NRC Generic Letter 1980-97: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 15: Line 15:
| page count = 5
| page count = 5
}}
}}
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES VNUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIONREGION I631 PARK AVENUEt97.; /o KING OF PRUSSIA, PENNSYLVANIA 1906November 14, 1980Docket Nos. 50-0350-247 ,Consolidated Edison Company ofNew York, Inc. -ATTN: Mr. Peter Zarakas c o 2Vice President4 Irving PlaceNew York, New York 10003Gentlemen:The enclosed IE Bulletin 80-23, "Failures of Solenoid Valves Manufactured byValcor Engineering Corporation" is forwarded to you for action. No writtenresponse is required.In order to assist the NRC in evaluating the value/impact of each Bulletin onlicensees, it would be helpful if you would provide an estimate of the manpowerexpended in conduct of the review and preparation of the report(s) required bythe Bulletin. Please estimate separately the manpower associated with correctiveactions following identification of problems through the Bulletin.If you desire additional information regarding this matter; please contactthis office.Sincerely,o H. GrierDirectorEnclosures:1. IE Bulletin No. 80-232. List of Recently Issued IE Bulletins
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES V NUCLEAR REGULATORY  
COMMISSION
REGION I 631 PARK AVENUE t97.; /o KING OF PRUSSIA, PENNSYLVANIA  
1906 November 14, 1980 Docket Nos. 50-03 50-247 , Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. -ATTN: Mr. Peter Zarakas c o 2 Vice President 4 Irving Place New York, New York 10003 Gentlemen:
The enclosed IE Bulletin 80-23, "Failures of Solenoid Valves Manufactured by Valcor Engineering Corporation" is forwarded to you for action. No written response is required.In order to assist the NRC in evaluating the value/impact of each Bulletin on licensees, it would be helpful if you would provide an estimate of the manpower expended in conduct of the review and preparation of the report(s)  
required by the Bulletin.
 
Please estimate separately the manpower associated with corrective actions following identification of problems through the Bulletin.If you desire additional information regarding this matter; please contact this office.Sincerely, o H. Grier Director Enclosures:
1. IE Bulletin No. 80-23 2. List of Recently Issued IE Bulletins  


==CONTACT==
==CONTACT==
: D. L. Caphton(215-337-5266)cc w/encls:L. 0. Brooks, Project Manager, IP NuclearW. Monti, Manager -Nuclear Power Generation DepartmentM. Shatkouski, Plant ManagerJ. M. Makepeace, Director, Technical EngineeringW. D. Hamlin, Assistant to Resident ManagerJ. D. Block, Esquire, Executive Vice President -AdministrationJoyce P. Davis, EsquireBrent L. Brandenburg, Assistant General Counsel8012040 'OGC ,c)  
: D. L. Caphton (215-337-5266)
SSINS No.: 6820Accession No.:8008220257IEB 80-23UNITED STATESNUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIONOFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENTWASHINGTON, D.C. 20555November 14, 1980IE Bulletin No. 80-23:FAILURES OF SOLENOID VALVES MANUFACTURED BY VALCORENGINEERING CORPORATIONIntroduction:Valcor Engineering Corporation (Valcor) has submitted 10 CFR Part 21 Reportsaddressing failures of Valcor solenoid valves used at nuclear power facilities.These failures have occurred at nuclear facilities owned by Duke Power Companyand Omaha Public Power District, and are purportedly limited to solenoidvalves having part numbers (P/N's) V70900-21-1 and V70900-21-3.The information presented in this bulletin is intended to shed light on thedefective solenoid valves so that appropriate actions can be taken to circum-vent the degradation of any safety-related system using such solenoid valves.DISCUSSION:The specific Valcor solenoid valves addressed herein were purportedly designedas Class IE components. However, in light of the reported failures, it appearsthat neither the design nor the qualification tests were adequate for Class IEservice. Valcor has attributed the failures to a latent defect in the magnetwire. Valcor believes that this defect manifests itself when the solenoidvalves are continuously energized at elevated temperatures by an incompata-bility between the magnet wire's polyvinyl varnish coating and the wire'spolyimide insulation which causes a dielectric breakdown leading to turn-to-turn shorts within the coil.Valcor states that the above incompatability is limited to solenoid valveshaving P/N's V70900-21-1 and V70900-21-3, and that all customers affected bythe aforementioned defect have been notified. A listing of Valcor customersso notified and valves purchased follows.tCUSTOMFRP-0- NO.VALVE P/NOTYAnchor-DarlingAnchor-DarlingCesare Bonetti (Italy)Duke Power CompanyDuke (Mill Power)Duke Power CompanyRalph HillerMill PowerOmaha Public Power Dist.Stone and WebsterCopes VulcanP-827N6631535/79E95188-11C-97733E97822-11HA-187-0E52462-7343472LOOO #43911,553V70900-21-1,-3V70900-21-1V70900-21-3V70900-21-3V70900-21-1,-3V70900-21-3V70900-21-3V70900-21-1,-3V70900-21-3V70900-21-3V70900-21-1246101003357014201984TAL 610  
cc w/encls: L. 0. Brooks, Project Manager, IP Nuclear W. Monti, Manager -Nuclear Power Generation Department M. Shatkouski, Plant Manager J. M. Makepeace, Director, Technical Engineering W. D. Hamlin, Assistant to Resident Manager J. D. Block, Esquire, Executive Vice President  
IEB 80-23November 14, 1980Pages 2 of 3Valcor's corrective actions include making arrangements for replacing existingcoils with a newly designed coil using a 997 silicone varnish coating insteadof the polyvinyl varnish. Sample coils of the new design are scheduled toundergo qualification tests. We do not know the particulars of these tests,but Valcor has scheduled the first phase of these tests for completion byNovember 15, 1980, and has identified the second phase as an on-going agingtest.Fort Calhoun has replaced twelve of its original solenoid valves with Valcortype V70900-21-3 valves, ten of which are located inside containment and twooutside. This substitution was made because the original solenoid valves didnot meet the requirements of IE Bulletin No. 79-01. However, subsequent tothe replacement, Fort Calhoun has experienced five failures of these Valcorsolenoid valves. Each failure involved a solenoid valve located inside contain-ment and designed for operation in the normally energized mode. These twofactors (i.e., continuously energized mode of operation and a somewhat elevatedtemperature inside containment) tend to support Valcor's contention regardingthe failure mechanism.ACTIONS TO BE TAKEN BY HOLDER OF OPERATING LICENSES:1. Determine whether Valcor solenoid valves having P/N's V70900-21-1 or -3are used to perform any safety-related function at your facility.If so, identify the safety-related systems using these solenoidvalves, the total number of such solenoid valves used, and evaluateacceptability of continued operation with potentially defective solenoidvalves. A report of the results of the evaluation of continued operationshall be submitted within ten (10) days of the date of this bulletin andshould include factors such as (a) operator's ability to promptly identifya failing or failed solenoid valve, (b) effect of solenoid valve failureson safety-related systems and subsequent operator actions required, and(c) possible degradation of the power supply serving a failed solenoidvalve and the effects on other components served by said power supply.If no such solenoid valves are used, you need only submit a negativedeclaration to this effect within thirty (30) days of the date of thisbulletin and you need not respond to the remaining items.2. Licensees of operating plants using the aforementioned solenoid valves insafety-related applications shall periodically test the coils forpotential turn-to-turn shorts in a manner that will not violate any LCOor cause any undesirable transient. The tests should account for coilresistance chfnges due to temperature effects attributed to the environ-ment and to I R losses in the coil to provide accurate indications ofchanges in resistance due to turn-to-turn shorts.These tests are to be initiated within ten (10) days of the date of thisbulletin. The following schedule is recommended until the units arereplaced with qualified units:(a) Daily for solenoid valves operated in a normally energized mode;(b) Weekly for solenoid valves operated in a normally deenergized mode.
-Administration Joyce P. Davis, Esquire Brent L. Brandenburg, Assistant General Counsel 8012040 'OGC ,c)  
SSINS No.: 6820 Accession No.: 8008220257 IEB 80-23 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY  
COMMISSION
OFFICE OF INSPECTION  
AND ENFORCEMENT
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555 November 14, 1980 IE Bulletin No. 80-23: FAILURES OF SOLENOID VALVES MANUFACTURED  
BY VALCOR ENGINEERING
CORPORATION
Introduction:
Valcor Engineering Corporation (Valcor) has submitted  
10 CFR Part 21 Reports addressing failures of Valcor solenoid valves used at nuclear power facilities.
 
These failures have occurred at nuclear facilities owned by Duke Power Company and Omaha Public Power District, and are purportedly limited to solenoid valves having part numbers (P/N's) V70900-21-1 and V70900-21-3.
 
The information presented in this bulletin is intended to shed light on the defective solenoid valves so that appropriate actions can be taken to circum-vent the degradation of any safety-related system using such solenoid valves.DISCUSSION:
The specific Valcor solenoid valves addressed herein were purportedly designed as Class IE components.
 
However, in light of the reported failures, it appears that neither the design nor the qualification tests were adequate for Class IE service. Valcor has attributed the failures to a latent defect in the magnet wire. Valcor believes that this defect manifests itself when the solenoid valves are continuously energized at elevated temperatures by an incompata- bility between the magnet wire's polyvinyl varnish coating and the wire's polyimide insulation which causes a dielectric breakdown leading to turn-to-turn shorts within the coil.Valcor states that the above incompatability is limited to solenoid valves having P/N's V70900-21-1 and V70900-21-3, and that all customers affected by the aforementioned defect have been notified.
 
A listing of Valcor customers so notified and valves purchased follows.tCUSTOMFR P-0- NO.VALVE P/N OTY Anchor-Darling Anchor-Darling Cesare Bonetti (Italy)Duke Power Company Duke (Mill Power)Duke Power Company Ralph Hiller Mill Power Omaha Public Power Dist.Stone and Webster Copes Vulcan P-827 N663 1535/79 E95188-11 C-97733 E97822-11 HA-187-0 E52462-73 43472 LOOO #43 911,553 V70900-21-1,-3 V70900-21-1 V70900-21-3 V70900-21-3 V70900-21-1,-3 V70900-21-3 V70900-21-3 V70900-21-1,-3 V70900-21-3 V70900-21-3 V70900-21-1
24 6 10 100 335 70 14 20 19 8 4 TAL 610  
IEB 80-23 November 14, 1980 Pages 2 of 3 Valcor's corrective actions include making arrangements for replacing existing coils with a newly designed coil using a 997 silicone varnish coating instead of the polyvinyl varnish. Sample coils of the new design are scheduled to undergo qualification tests. We do not know the particulars of these tests, but Valcor has scheduled the first phase of these tests for completion by November 15, 1980, and has identified the second phase as an on-going aging test.Fort Calhoun has replaced twelve of its original solenoid valves with Valcor type V70900-21-3 valves, ten of which are located inside containment and two outside. This substitution was made because the original solenoid valves did not meet the requirements of IE Bulletin No. 79-01. However, subsequent to the replacement, Fort Calhoun has experienced five failures of these Valcor solenoid valves. Each failure involved a solenoid valve located inside contain-ment and designed for operation in the normally energized mode. These two factors (i.e., continuously energized mode of operation and a somewhat elevated temperature inside containment)  
tend to support Valcor's contention regarding the failure mechanism.
 
ACTIONS TO BE TAKEN BY HOLDER OF OPERATING  
LICENSES: 1. Determine whether Valcor solenoid valves having P/N's V70900-21-1 or -3 are used to perform any safety-related function at your facility.If so, identify the safety-related systems using these solenoid valves, the total number of such solenoid valves used, and evaluate acceptability of continued operation with potentially defective solenoid valves. A report of the results of the evaluation of continued operation shall be submitted within ten (10) days of the date of this bulletin and should include factors such as (a) operator's ability to promptly identify a failing or failed solenoid valve, (b) effect of solenoid valve failures on safety-related systems and subsequent operator actions required, and (c) possible degradation of the power supply serving a failed solenoid valve and the effects on other components served by said power supply.If no such solenoid valves are used, you need only submit a negative declaration to this effect within thirty (30) days of the date of this bulletin and you need not respond to the remaining items.2. Licensees of operating plants using the aforementioned solenoid valves in safety-related applications shall periodically test the coils for potential turn-to-turn shorts in a manner that will not violate any LCO or cause any undesirable transient.
 
The tests should account for coil resistance chfnges due to temperature effects attributed to the environ-ment and to I R losses in the coil to provide accurate indications of changes in resistance due to turn-to-turn shorts.These tests are to be initiated within ten (10) days of the date of this bulletin.
 
The following schedule is recommended until the units are replaced with qualified units: (a) Daily for solenoid valves operated in a normally energized mode;(b) Weekly for solenoid valves operated in a normally deenergized mode.
 
IEB 80-23 November 14, 1980 Pages 3 of 3 Whenever the tests indicate that ten percent or more of the coil turns have been shorted, said solenoid valve, or its coil, shall be replaced with a new unit.3. Licensees of operating plants shall submit a report within forty-five
(45) days of the date of this bulletin describing their longer term corrective action plan and the date by whidh the corrective actions will be implemented.
 
As a minimum, the longer term corrective measures should include the replacement of the coils with fully qualified coils.New solenoid valve assemblies (i.e., a repaired unit with a replacement coil or a completely new unit) shall be demonstrated to be qualified for its safety-related application per the applicable requirements of IEEE 323-1974, IEEE 344-1975, IEEE 382-1972 and IE Bulletin No. 79-O1B and supplements thereto.ACTIONS TO BE TAKEN BY HOLDERS OF CONSTRUCTION
PERMITS: 1. Determine whether Valcor solenoid valves having P/N's V70900-21-1 or -3 are to be used to perform safety-related functions at your facility.If so, a report addressing this matter shall be submitted by the earlier of the two following dates: (a) within ninety (90) days of the date of this bulletin; (b) two weeks prior to the date by which you expect to receive an operating License.The above report should indicate your plans to replace said valves prior to commencing operation, if this is the case. Otherwise, if you propose to commence operation prior to replacing said valves, the report should indicate the safety-related systems where such valves are to be used, and should include an evaluation of the acceptability of operating with potentially defective valves. This evaluation should address factors such as your proposed test plan, operator's ability to promptly identify a failing or failed valve, effect of solenoid valve failure on safety-related systems and subsequent operator actions required, and the preventive measures you plan to implement to circumvent the effects of failures of these valves.If no such valves are to be used in your facility, submit a negative declaration to this effect within forty-five
(45) days of the date of this bulletin but prior to the date by which you expect to receive an operating license.The above requested reports shall be submitted to the director of the appropriate NRC region within time stipulated for each item in the this bulletin.


IEB 80-23November 14, 1980Pages 3 of 3Whenever the tests indicate that ten percent or more of the coil turnshave been shorted, said solenoid valve, or its coil, shall be replacedwith a new unit.3. Licensees of operating plants shall submit a report within forty-five(45) days of the date of this bulletin describing their longer termcorrective action plan and the date by whidh the corrective actionswill be implemented. As a minimum, the longer term corrective measuresshould include the replacement of the coils with fully qualified coils.New solenoid valve assemblies (i.e., a repaired unit with a replacementcoil or a completely new unit) shall be demonstrated to be qualified forits safety-related application per the applicable requirements ofIEEE 323-1974, IEEE 344-1975, IEEE 382-1972 and IE Bulletin No. 79-O1Band supplements thereto.ACTIONS TO BE TAKEN BY HOLDERS OF CONSTRUCTION PERMITS:1. Determine whether Valcor solenoid valves having P/N's V70900-21-1 or -3are to be used to perform safety-related functions at your facility.If so, a report addressing this matter shall be submitted by the earlierof the two following dates: (a) within ninety (90) days of the dateof this bulletin; (b) two weeks prior to the date by which you expectto receive an operating License.The above report should indicate your plans to replace said valvesprior to commencing operation, if this is the case. Otherwise, if youpropose to commence operation prior to replacing said valves, the reportshould indicate the safety-related systems where such valves are to be used,and should include an evaluation of the acceptability of operating withpotentially defective valves. This evaluation should address factorssuch as your proposed test plan, operator's ability to promptly identifya failing or failed valve, effect of solenoid valve failure on safety-relatedsystems and subsequent operator actions required, and the preventivemeasures you plan to implement to circumvent the effects of failuresof these valves.If no such valves are to be used in your facility, submit a negativedeclaration to this effect within forty-five (45) days of the date ofthis bulletin but prior to the date by which you expect to receive anoperating license.The above requested reports shall be submitted to the director of theappropriate NRC region within time stipulated for each item in the thisbulletin. A copy of each report shall be forwarded to the Director, Divisionof Resident and Regional Reactor Inspection, Office of Inspection and Enforcement,United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D. C. 20555.Approved by GAO, B180225(R0072); clearance expires November 30, 1980. Approvalwas given under a blanket clearance specifically for identified generic problems.
A copy of each report shall be forwarded to the Director, Division of Resident and Regional Reactor Inspection, Office of Inspection and Enforcement, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D. C. 20555.Approved by GAO, B180225(R0072);  
clearance expires November 30, 1980. Approval was given under a blanket clearance specifically for identified generic problems.


IE Bulletin No. 80-23November 14, 1980Enclosure 2RECENTLY ISSUEDIE BULLETINSBulletinNo.SubjectAutomation Industries,Model 200-520-008 Sealed-Source ConnectorsDate Issued9/12/80Issued ToAll holders of aradiography license80-2280-21Valve Yokes Supplied byMalcolm Foundry Company,11/6/80Inc.All holders of apower reactorOL or CPRevision 1to 79-26Revision 1to 80-19Boron Loss fromBWR Control BladesFailures of Mercury-Wetted Matrix Relays inReactor ProtectiveSystems of OperatingNuclear Power PlantsDesigned by CombustionEngineering8/29/808/15/80All holdersof a BWR powerreactor OLAll holders of apower reactorOL or CP80-2080-1980-18Failures of WestinghouseType W-2 Spring Return toNeutral Control SwitchesFailures of Mercury-Wetted Matrix Relays inReactor Protective Systemsof Operating Nuclear PowerPlants Designed by CombustionEngineeringMaintenance of AdequateMinimum Flow ThruCentrifugal Charging PumpsFollowing Secondary Side HighEnergy Line Rupture7/31/807/31/807/24/80All holders of apower reactor OLor CPAll holders of apower reactor OLor CPAll holders of aPWR power reactorOL or CPSupplement 3to 80-17Supplement 2to 80-17Supplement 1to 80-17Failure of Control Rodsto Insert During aScram at a BWRFailure of Control Rodsto Insert During a Scramat a BWRFailure of Control Rodsto Insert During a Scramat a BWR8/22/807/22/807/18/80All holders of aBWR power reactorOL or CPAll holders of aBWR power reactor OLAll holders of a BWRpower reactorOL or CP  
IE Bulletin No. 80-23 November 14, 1980 Enclosure
}}
2 RECENTLY ISSUED IE BULLETINS Bulletin No.Subject Automation Industries, Model 200-520-008 Sealed-Source Connectors Date Issued 9/12/80 Issued To All holders of a radiography license 80-22 80-21 Valve Yokes Supplied by Malcolm Foundry Company, 11/6/80 Inc.All holders of a power reactor OL or CP Revision 1 to 79-26 Revision 1 to 80-19 Boron Loss from BWR Control Blades Failures of Mercury-Wetted Matrix Relays in Reactor Protective Systems of Operating Nuclear Power Plants Designed by Combustion Engineering
8/29/80 8/15/80 All holders of a BWR power reactor OL All holders of a power reactor OL or CP 80-20 80-19 80-18 Failures of Westinghouse Type W-2 Spring Return to Neutral Control Switches Failures of Mercury-Wetted Matrix Relays in Reactor Protective Systems of Operating Nuclear Power Plants Designed by Combustion Engineering Maintenance of Adequate Minimum Flow Thru Centrifugal Charging Pumps Following Secondary Side High Energy Line Rupture 7/31/80 7/31/80 7/24/80 All holders of a power reactor OL or CP All holders of a power reactor OL or CP All holders of a PWR power reactor OL or CP Supplement
3 to 80-17 Supplement
2 to 80-17 Supplement
1 to 80-17 Failure of Control Rods to Insert During a Scram at a BWR Failure of Control Rods to Insert During a Scram at a BWR Failure of Control Rods to Insert During a Scram at a BWR 8/22/80 7/22/80 7/18/80 All holders of a BWR power reactor OL or CP All holders of a BWR power reactor OL All holders of a BWR power reactor OL or CP}}


{{GL-Nav}}
{{GL-Nav}}

Revision as of 11:49, 31 August 2018

NRC Generic Letter 1980-097: Transmittal of IE Bulletin 1980-023: Failures of Solenoid Valves Manufactured by Valcor Engineering Corp
ML031350466
Person / Time
Issue date: 11/14/1980
From: Grier B H
NRC Region 1
To:
References
BL-80-023 GL-80-097, NUDOCS 8012040066
Download: ML031350466 (5)


UNITED STATES V NUCLEAR REGULATORY

COMMISSION

REGION I 631 PARK AVENUE t97.; /o KING OF PRUSSIA, PENNSYLVANIA

1906 November 14, 1980 Docket Nos. 50-03 50-247 , Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. -ATTN: Mr. Peter Zarakas c o 2 Vice President 4 Irving Place New York, New York 10003 Gentlemen:

The enclosed IE Bulletin 80-23, "Failures of Solenoid Valves Manufactured by Valcor Engineering Corporation" is forwarded to you for action. No written response is required.In order to assist the NRC in evaluating the value/impact of each Bulletin on licensees, it would be helpful if you would provide an estimate of the manpower expended in conduct of the review and preparation of the report(s)

required by the Bulletin.

Please estimate separately the manpower associated with corrective actions following identification of problems through the Bulletin.If you desire additional information regarding this matter; please contact this office.Sincerely, o H. Grier Director Enclosures:

1. IE Bulletin No. 80-23 2. List of Recently Issued IE Bulletins

CONTACT

D. L. Caphton (215-337-5266)

cc w/encls: L. 0. Brooks, Project Manager, IP Nuclear W. Monti, Manager -Nuclear Power Generation Department M. Shatkouski, Plant Manager J. M. Makepeace, Director, Technical Engineering W. D. Hamlin, Assistant to Resident Manager J. D. Block, Esquire, Executive Vice President

-Administration Joyce P. Davis, Esquire Brent L. Brandenburg, Assistant General Counsel 8012040 'OGC ,c)

SSINS No.: 6820 Accession No.: 8008220257 IEB 80-23 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY

COMMISSION

OFFICE OF INSPECTION

AND ENFORCEMENT

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555 November 14, 1980 IE Bulletin No. 80-23: FAILURES OF SOLENOID VALVES MANUFACTURED

BY VALCOR ENGINEERING

CORPORATION

Introduction:

Valcor Engineering Corporation (Valcor) has submitted

10 CFR Part 21 Reports addressing failures of Valcor solenoid valves used at nuclear power facilities.

These failures have occurred at nuclear facilities owned by Duke Power Company and Omaha Public Power District, and are purportedly limited to solenoid valves having part numbers (P/N's) V70900-21-1 and V70900-21-3.

The information presented in this bulletin is intended to shed light on the defective solenoid valves so that appropriate actions can be taken to circum-vent the degradation of any safety-related system using such solenoid valves.DISCUSSION:

The specific Valcor solenoid valves addressed herein were purportedly designed as Class IE components.

However, in light of the reported failures, it appears that neither the design nor the qualification tests were adequate for Class IE service. Valcor has attributed the failures to a latent defect in the magnet wire. Valcor believes that this defect manifests itself when the solenoid valves are continuously energized at elevated temperatures by an incompata- bility between the magnet wire's polyvinyl varnish coating and the wire's polyimide insulation which causes a dielectric breakdown leading to turn-to-turn shorts within the coil.Valcor states that the above incompatability is limited to solenoid valves having P/N's V70900-21-1 and V70900-21-3, and that all customers affected by the aforementioned defect have been notified.

A listing of Valcor customers so notified and valves purchased follows.tCUSTOMFR P-0- NO.VALVE P/N OTY Anchor-Darling Anchor-Darling Cesare Bonetti (Italy)Duke Power Company Duke (Mill Power)Duke Power Company Ralph Hiller Mill Power Omaha Public Power Dist.Stone and Webster Copes Vulcan P-827 N663 1535/79 E95188-11 C-97733 E97822-11 HA-187-0 E52462-73 43472 LOOO #43 911,553 V70900-21-1,-3 V70900-21-1 V70900-21-3 V70900-21-3 V70900-21-1,-3 V70900-21-3 V70900-21-3 V70900-21-1,-3 V70900-21-3 V70900-21-3 V70900-21-1

24 6 10 100 335 70 14 20 19 8 4 TAL 610

IEB 80-23 November 14, 1980 Pages 2 of 3 Valcor's corrective actions include making arrangements for replacing existing coils with a newly designed coil using a 997 silicone varnish coating instead of the polyvinyl varnish. Sample coils of the new design are scheduled to undergo qualification tests. We do not know the particulars of these tests, but Valcor has scheduled the first phase of these tests for completion by November 15, 1980, and has identified the second phase as an on-going aging test.Fort Calhoun has replaced twelve of its original solenoid valves with Valcor type V70900-21-3 valves, ten of which are located inside containment and two outside. This substitution was made because the original solenoid valves did not meet the requirements of IE Bulletin No. 79-01. However, subsequent to the replacement, Fort Calhoun has experienced five failures of these Valcor solenoid valves. Each failure involved a solenoid valve located inside contain-ment and designed for operation in the normally energized mode. These two factors (i.e., continuously energized mode of operation and a somewhat elevated temperature inside containment)

tend to support Valcor's contention regarding the failure mechanism.

ACTIONS TO BE TAKEN BY HOLDER OF OPERATING

LICENSES: 1. Determine whether Valcor solenoid valves having P/N's V70900-21-1 or -3 are used to perform any safety-related function at your facility.If so, identify the safety-related systems using these solenoid valves, the total number of such solenoid valves used, and evaluate acceptability of continued operation with potentially defective solenoid valves. A report of the results of the evaluation of continued operation shall be submitted within ten (10) days of the date of this bulletin and should include factors such as (a) operator's ability to promptly identify a failing or failed solenoid valve, (b) effect of solenoid valve failures on safety-related systems and subsequent operator actions required, and (c) possible degradation of the power supply serving a failed solenoid valve and the effects on other components served by said power supply.If no such solenoid valves are used, you need only submit a negative declaration to this effect within thirty (30) days of the date of this bulletin and you need not respond to the remaining items.2. Licensees of operating plants using the aforementioned solenoid valves in safety-related applications shall periodically test the coils for potential turn-to-turn shorts in a manner that will not violate any LCO or cause any undesirable transient.

The tests should account for coil resistance chfnges due to temperature effects attributed to the environ-ment and to I R losses in the coil to provide accurate indications of changes in resistance due to turn-to-turn shorts.These tests are to be initiated within ten (10) days of the date of this bulletin.

The following schedule is recommended until the units are replaced with qualified units: (a) Daily for solenoid valves operated in a normally energized mode;(b) Weekly for solenoid valves operated in a normally deenergized mode.

IEB 80-23 November 14, 1980 Pages 3 of 3 Whenever the tests indicate that ten percent or more of the coil turns have been shorted, said solenoid valve, or its coil, shall be replaced with a new unit.3. Licensees of operating plants shall submit a report within forty-five

(45) days of the date of this bulletin describing their longer term corrective action plan and the date by whidh the corrective actions will be implemented.

As a minimum, the longer term corrective measures should include the replacement of the coils with fully qualified coils.New solenoid valve assemblies (i.e., a repaired unit with a replacement coil or a completely new unit) shall be demonstrated to be qualified for its safety-related application per the applicable requirements of IEEE 323-1974, IEEE 344-1975, IEEE 382-1972 and IE Bulletin No. 79-O1B and supplements thereto.ACTIONS TO BE TAKEN BY HOLDERS OF CONSTRUCTION

PERMITS: 1. Determine whether Valcor solenoid valves having P/N's V70900-21-1 or -3 are to be used to perform safety-related functions at your facility.If so, a report addressing this matter shall be submitted by the earlier of the two following dates: (a) within ninety (90) days of the date of this bulletin; (b) two weeks prior to the date by which you expect to receive an operating License.The above report should indicate your plans to replace said valves prior to commencing operation, if this is the case. Otherwise, if you propose to commence operation prior to replacing said valves, the report should indicate the safety-related systems where such valves are to be used, and should include an evaluation of the acceptability of operating with potentially defective valves. This evaluation should address factors such as your proposed test plan, operator's ability to promptly identify a failing or failed valve, effect of solenoid valve failure on safety-related systems and subsequent operator actions required, and the preventive measures you plan to implement to circumvent the effects of failures of these valves.If no such valves are to be used in your facility, submit a negative declaration to this effect within forty-five

(45) days of the date of this bulletin but prior to the date by which you expect to receive an operating license.The above requested reports shall be submitted to the director of the appropriate NRC region within time stipulated for each item in the this bulletin.

A copy of each report shall be forwarded to the Director, Division of Resident and Regional Reactor Inspection, Office of Inspection and Enforcement, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D. C. 20555.Approved by GAO, B180225(R0072);

clearance expires November 30, 1980. Approval was given under a blanket clearance specifically for identified generic problems.

IE Bulletin No. 80-23 November 14, 1980 Enclosure

2 RECENTLY ISSUED IE BULLETINS Bulletin No.Subject Automation Industries, Model 200-520-008 Sealed-Source Connectors Date Issued 9/12/80 Issued To All holders of a radiography license 80-22 80-21 Valve Yokes Supplied by Malcolm Foundry Company, 11/6/80 Inc.All holders of a power reactor OL or CP Revision 1 to 79-26 Revision 1 to 80-19 Boron Loss from BWR Control Blades Failures of Mercury-Wetted Matrix Relays in Reactor Protective Systems of Operating Nuclear Power Plants Designed by Combustion Engineering

8/29/80 8/15/80 All holders of a BWR power reactor OL All holders of a power reactor OL or CP 80-20 80-19 80-18 Failures of Westinghouse Type W-2 Spring Return to Neutral Control Switches Failures of Mercury-Wetted Matrix Relays in Reactor Protective Systems of Operating Nuclear Power Plants Designed by Combustion Engineering Maintenance of Adequate Minimum Flow Thru Centrifugal Charging Pumps Following Secondary Side High Energy Line Rupture 7/31/80 7/31/80 7/24/80 All holders of a power reactor OL or CP All holders of a power reactor OL or CP All holders of a PWR power reactor OL or CP Supplement

3 to 80-17 Supplement

2 to 80-17 Supplement

1 to 80-17 Failure of Control Rods to Insert During a Scram at a BWR Failure of Control Rods to Insert During a Scram at a BWR Failure of Control Rods to Insert During a Scram at a BWR 8/22/80 7/22/80 7/18/80 All holders of a BWR power reactor OL or CP All holders of a BWR power reactor OL All holders of a BWR power reactor OL or CP

Template:GL-Nav