View source for TXX-6803, Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-445/86-07 & 50-446/86-05.Corrective actions:38 Remaining Corrective Action Repts Closed Prior to Action Taken to Prevent Further Violations Will Be Examined

{{Adams
| number = ML20235R617
| issue date = 10/01/1987
| title = Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-445/86-07 & 50-446/86-05.Corrective actions:38 Remaining Corrective Action Repts Closed Prior to Action Taken to Prevent Further Violations Will Be Examined
| author name = Beck J, Counsil W
| author affiliation = TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC)
| addressee name = 
| addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION &amp; RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM)
| docket = 05000445, 05000446
| license number = 
| contact person = 
| document report number = TXX-6803, NUDOCS 8710080127
| title reference date = 09-11-1987
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC
| page count = 3
}}

=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:- _ _                                                              __
M FE Log .# TXX-6803 File # 10130 l
                                                           =         =.                       IR-86-07 YllELECTRIC IR-86 05 Ref- # 10CFR2.201                                             -i l
mmam c. counsu                                                                 October 1, 1987 Esecutive Vke President U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission                                                                                                         1 Attn:        Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555

==SUBJECT:==
COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION (CPSES)'
DOCKET NOS. 50-445 AND 50-446 REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING INSPECTION REPORT:      50-445/86-07 AND 50-446/86-05 Gentlemen:
                                                                                                                                                    )
Your {{letter dated|date=September 11, 1987|text=letter dated September 11, 1987}}, requested additional information on the                                                                j subject inspection report with respect to Notice of Violation (N0V) Item A                                                                   !
(445/8607-V-24), Notice of Deviation (N0D) Item E (445/8607-D-01) and Notice                                                                  1 of Deviation (N0D) Item I.3 (445/8607-D-11).
We hereby respond to the above items in the' attachment to this letter.
Very truly yours,                                               j M ' , 6, .
W. G. Counsil                                                    !
By: hc.) b/_
Jorn W. Beck Vice President, Nuclear Engineering RDD:tgj C- Mr. R. D. Martin, Region IV                                                                                                               i Resident Inspectors, CPSES (3)                                                                                             ,
gjooBo127a71oo3                                                                                                                               ;
g          ADOCM 05000445 f  l' 400 Nonh Olive Street ' LB 81   Dallas Texas 75201

         ' Attachment to'TXX-6803
       . -~0ctober 1, 1987
         -Page.1 of 2 RE0 VEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION NOTICE OF VIOLATION ITEM A (445/8607-V-24)
                           ...(W)ith respect to NOV Item A, the corrective steps taken'-
appear inadequate in light of the reason given for not performing a technical evaluation of_ all 48 closed Corrective Action Reports (CARS) to. assure that they have been properly-dispositioned.
Additionally, please inform us of actions taken to ascertain whether this problem exists -in CAR systems used by other groups,.
j                        such as Brown and Root."
RESPONSE TO ITEM A (445/8607-V-24)
In our original response to this Notice of Violation, we indicated that a review of 10 of the previously closed CARS had identified no additional inadequate justifications for closure. We believe:that this result is indicative of the- quality of actions.taken to address previously cicsed CARS, I          and properly addresses the concerns raised .in the violation.
To further demonstrate this, the 38 remaining CARS closed prior to the; action taken to prevent further violations will also be examined. The review has                   J been initiated, and'will verify the adequacy of each CAR's' disposition.                    I A similar review of the adequacy of the disposition of closed CARS which were issued by other organizations, such as Brown and Root, will also be performed.
The reviews are scheduled to be completed by October 30,.1987..
RE0 VEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ITEM E NOTICE OF DEVIATION (445/8607-D-01) l With respect to N0D Item E, please provide the basis for the. statement in your             i February 18, 1987, response (TXX-6222) indicating that the welding on the seismic arrestor brackets has been determined to be acceptable. Additionally,.
your response identified that your letter TXX-3657 would be supplemented to document why lack of, welding documentation does not constitute a significant               q condition: adverse to quality. TXX-3657 was supplemented by TXX-6526.      Please clarify the statements in supplement, TXX-6526, relative to control' of bracket materials and welding by the valve manufacturer.
l
___1_____ ____d

Attachment-to TXX-6803
     - October 1, 1987
  ,-   Page 2 of 2 RESPONSE TO ITEM E (445/8607-D-01) l Information concerning the acceptability of seismic arrestor bracket welds, acceptance criteria, and clarification of statements regarding the manufacturer's control of bracket materials and welding will be provided in our next update to SDAR CP-83-08. As stated in TXX-6526, we will review l
Fisher Control's Certificates of Conformance and will inspect the bracket attachment welds in accordance with the visual weld acceptance criteria (VWAC), and the weld sizes as depicted on the vendor's design drawings.
Although our next report is scheduled for issue by January 14, 1988, in view of your concern regarding this issue we will submit an updated response to the SDAR which will include the additional information no later than November 30, l      1987.
1 1
RE0 VEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION                    ,
NOTICE OF DEVIATION ITEM I.3 (445/8607-D-111 Please identify the actions taken in regard to N0D Item I.3 to avoid            i recurrence of further errors by the identified ERC inspector.
RESPONSE TO
,                                   ITEM I.3 (445/8607-D-11)
.      No actions were taken in regard to N00 Item I.3 to avoid recurrence of further l      errors by the identified ERC inspector. The ERC inspector, who incorrectly i      documented the "out" side caliper reading, had been terminated due to a reduction in force (May 2t, 1986) prior to this error being identified to TV Electric.
t
,}}