View source for TXX-4569, Deficiency Rept SDAR-199 Re Unsatisfactory Reinsp by Technical Review Team.Significant Insp Being Conducted to Ensure Equipment Will Perform Intended Safety Function.One Inspector Terminated

{{Adams
| number = ML20132G845
| issue date = 09/26/1985
| title = Deficiency Rept SDAR-199 Re Unsatisfactory Reinsp by Technical Review Team.Significant Insp Being Conducted to Ensure Equipment Will Perform Intended Safety Function.One Inspector Terminated
| author name = Counsil W
| author affiliation = TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC)
| addressee name = Hunnter D, Hunter D
| addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION &amp; ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
| docket = 05000445, 05000446
| license number = 
| contact person = 
| document report number = SDAR-199, TXX-4569, NUDOCS 8510010639
| document type = DEFICIENCY REPORTS (PER 10CFR50.55E &amp; PART 21), TEXT-SAFETY REPORT
| page count = 1
}}

=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING COMPANY SKYW AY TOWER . 400 NORTH OLIVE NTREET, L.R. 8 5 . D ARJ AM, TEX AN TSRO S WILLIAM G COUNSIL                                                                   September 26, 1985 TXX-4569 Mr. D. R. Hunter, Chief Reactor Project Branch 2 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Inspection and Enforcement 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 100                                           Docket Nos.:            50-445 Arlington, TX 76012                                                                               50-446 COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION QUALIFICATION / CERTIFICATION OF INSPECTORS QA FILE: CP-85-37, SDAR-199 FILE N0.: 10110

==Dear Mr. Hunter:==

In accordance with 10CFR50.55e, we have concluded that the deficiencies discovered during reinspection efforts of T.R.T Issues 1.a.2 and 1.a.3 constitute a reportable condition.                       To ensure that the equipment involved will satisfactorily perform its intended safety functions we are conducting a significant reinspection of the work performed by the original inspectors.                In addition, one inspector has been terminated partly because of falsification of inspection records.
Supporting documentation is available at the CPSES site.for your Inspector's review.
Very truly yours,           ,
                                                                                       /l, &l 4 (1&2 W. G. Counsil
          .WGC/bil Attachment cc: NRC Region IV - (o + 1 copy)
Director, Inspection & Enforcement (15 copies)
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555
                                                                                                              @ B O W,fl p.3
                                                                                                           !              '' ; l 8510010639 850926                                                                                \     SEP271985        I PDR      ADOCK 05000445                                                                                                  ;
S                       PDR                                                                   ,
j
                                                                                                                           .jl I
,p/,                               .         . _ . _ - - . _ .
qqt P         Ij t
0}}