View source for SNRC-1269, Responds to 860430 Request for Response to FEMA post- Exercise Rept for Emergency Exercise on 860213.Response to FEMA Assessment,Appropriate Remedial Actions & Schedule for Implementation Encl

{{Adams
| number = ML20199G470
| issue date = 06/20/1986
| title = Responds to 860430 Request for Response to FEMA post- Exercise Rept for Emergency Exercise on 860213.Response to FEMA Assessment,Appropriate Remedial Actions & Schedule for Implementation Encl
| author name = Leonard J
| author affiliation = LONG ISLAND LIGHTING CO.
| addressee name = Denton H
| addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION (NRR)
| docket = 05000322
| license number = 
| contact person = 
| case reference number = CON-#386-400
| document report number = OL-5, SNRC-1269, NUDOCS 8606250249
| package number = ML20199G476
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC
| page count = 21
}}

=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:x se r wav::
g ,fE,g'O        _       j     LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY w        ;.o 4,,r _m    c.-.                   SHOREHAM NUCLEAR POWER STATION P.O. BOX 618. NORTH COUNTRY ROAD e WADING RIVER, N.Y.11792 JOHN D. LEON ARD. JR.
VICE PRESIDENT NUCLEAR OPERATIONS SNRC-1269 JUN 2 01986 Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Submittal of LILCO's Response to the FEMA Post Exercise Report For Shoreham Emergency Exercise of February 13, 1986 Shoreham Nuclear Power Station - Unit 1 Docket No. 50-322

==Dear Mr. Denton:==

On April 30, 1986 the NRC Region I forwarded to LILCO the FEMA Region II Post Exercise Assessment for the Shoreham Emergency Exercise held on February 13, 1986, along with a request for LILCO's response. This assessment identified five deficiencies and 38 Areas Requiring Corrective Action (ARCA). LILCO's response to the FEMA assessment, appropriate remedial actions, and a schedule for implementation are detailed in Enclosure 1.
LILCO believes that these actions, when complete, will enable the NRC to conclude, with reasonable assurance, that appropriate measures can be taken to protect the health and safety of the public living in the Shoreham vicinity in the event of a radiological emergency.
LILCO is issuing, under separate cover, Revision 7 of the SNPS Local Offsite Radiological Emergency Response Plan and Procedures to resolve those deficiencies identified by the FEMA exercise assessment requiring plan and/or procedure changes.
We ask that you cause a request to be made to FEMA, pursuant to the NRC-FEMA Memorandum of Understanding, for an expedited review of LILCO's response to the FEMA Exercise Assessment. To this end, we are forwarding under separate cover sixteen (16) copies directly to members of the RAC.
8606250249 860620                                                                                      } fg PDR     ADOCK 05000 22                                                                                    g F

SNRC-1269 Paga 2 Should you have any questions, please contact this office.
i
:f s D                      /       , .. se' y John D. Leonar Jr'
                ;         Vice President'- 'uclear Operation CAD:ck Enclosures r
cc: J. A. Berry                                                                                                                   [
R. Caruso/R. Lo c
f 4
s i
l l
\
l
   - . . _ . . _ _ , .       . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _- _.          . , . . . . ,_ __ _______ . _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ . _ .__ _ . . _ . . . _ _ _ .J

Fase 1 of 19 Tabla 3.1 ENCIA)SURE I                                                                Fase 1 (f 6 SHOREHAM MK1.E.AR POWER STAT 10M - SCICULE FC2 00RECTINC CIFICIENCIES OR AREAS RL@lRINC G4UtECTIVE ACT10M February 13, 1986 Exercise 12201.UC De f ic tenc y                                                                                                         Res.
or Area                                                                                                               Act.
Requiring                                                     Proposed                                         Resp. Comy.
Corrective                                                    Completion                                       Ad. or   or No.                                                                                   RAC Rec-       '^tton for Corrective Action          Action                            1180 Response (ACTION)       Date    FEMA Evaluettom of I. ERD Response      imed. lacamp 1                            J.10.k                                                   Delays in responding to the two (2) evacuation           D            1. Procedures have been reviewed and      5/26/M tapediment tree play sessages inserted at the                             revised to ensure information on IIRO EOC were caused by the f atture to inform                            tapedimente to promptly passed to the Evacuation Coordinator in a timely menner.                            all relevant personnel and a in addition there was a lack of Internal com-                             coordinated response toplemented.
aunication in response to these impediment pro-                           In addition, a Traffic Engineer blems. Pertinent information was not included                             has been added to the IZRO EOC on the 1045 and 1106 LERO Message Forme from the                          staff to eselst in evaluating Evacuation Route Coordinator to the Evacuation                            road tapedimente and developing Support Cmmunicator to the Evacuation Support                             alternate routing.
Comunicator for Route Spottera/ Road Crews re-garding the slaulated tapediment involving the                        2. The Traffic Guidance Table Top TT-6     5/26/66 gravet truck and fuel truck problems. As a re-                            has been modified to tacorporate the sult of thte lack of information, the tapediment                          changes to the procedures. Attachment problems were not analysed in a timely feehton                            1.
and incomplete eastyment wee dispatched to handle the gravel truck tapedtaent in the field.
Internal commetcatione procedures should be revieued and revised as necessary to ensure that information on tapedtaente is pr o ptly passed both up the chain of commend to the Evacuattest Coordinator and dounuard and laterally to all lead coordinatore under the Fvacuation Coordt-nator and their stafts. Additional training is needed to ensure that the procedures, dwther new or current, are preperly taplemented.
All coordinatore at the EOC, and those de intttate messages, must be trained to include all pertinent information on the 1150 message forme and to analyte the equipment requirements to clear impedimente.

rose d 08 av
.                                                                                                                                                                                                 Tabla 3.1 Page 2 of 6               ,
SIM*EHAM NUCLEAR POWER STITION - SCHirJLE FC3 CCRt'CTING DEFICIDeCIES OR AREAS RE.ql' IRING CISFICTIVE ACTION February 13, 19n6 Esercise IANO EOC (CONT'D)
DeiSctency                                                                                                                Rea, of Area                                                                                                                  Act.
Requiring                                                        Proposed                                         Resp. Comp.
Corrective                                                       Completion                                       Ad. or   or No.                                  RAC Recoseendation for Corrective Action              Action              LERO Response (ACTION)                      Date      FEMA Evaluation of LERO Response      ined. Incasp 1
2    F.1.s                          There wee aces confusion regarding the method         ARCA         The FAA will be tretected se port of              S/26/R6 for notifytag the Federal Aviation                                 the FYMA FRERP response. The plan Adntetstretten (FAA).                                              and training will be modtfled eccord-ingly as part of Rev. 7.
(1) The 1530 procedures should be reviewed and resteed as necessary to essere that a point of contact with the FAA has been deetsnated.
(2) The LERO EOC staf f should be trained in the appropriate procedures so that the FAA can be notified in a timely menner.
3   E.1,                           Stace there are no procedures for mottitcation        ARCA         The proc. will be modified in Rev. S              9/1/86 F.1.a                          of the long Island Battroad (LIRR) in the Plan,                    to include a phone cell to the LIRR.
the LIRA was not mottiled during the emerstee.                     LERO trotning will be modified accordingl 7.
(1) The LERO procedures should be resteed to establish a point of contact and a means for notifying the LIRR.
(2) The LERG EOC staf f should be trained in the revised procedures so that the LIRR con be nottiled in a timely menner.
4     1.10                           The dose assessment statue board in the accident      ARCA         The dose easessment board will be modt-           9/1/86 assessment area had to accammadate both DOE RAF                    fled to acccomodate data from both and LII 2 ftend monitoring data. There were not                    DOE-RAF teams and LilIO teams.
enough col mine on the board to beep the two (2) ocurces of data separated. LERO should enlaren the does aseesament status board to accomodate e clear separation between the data reports f rom the DOE RAP and LIIE0 field monitoring teams.
1

Fage 3 of 19 Tabla 3.1 Page 3 e.f 6 SHOREHAM NUCLEAR POWR ST* TION - SCHFi*.R.E FOR CDkkitTINC DEFICIDeCIES OR AkfAS REQUIRING CORRECT!vE ACTION February 13, 1986 Eserctoe 1180 EOC (CUNT'D)
Deftetency                                                                                                               Rea, or Area                                                                                                                Act.
Requiring                                                       Proposed                                        Resp. Cup.
Corrective                                                      Comptet1on                                      Ad. or    or RAC Recommendettoo for Correcttwe Actton              Actton              LERO Response (ACTION)                     Date      FEMA Evaluatton of LDO Response      Inad. lacamp 1.10,                  The downwind distance of the sample was incor-           ARCA      All material for trenealeaton                    9/1/M F.1.4                  rectly reported to 7,000 meters instead of 700                     of field date will be reviewed metere for one of the thyroid doses reported by                     to ensure 12R0 and DOE practtres a DOE-RAF field monitoring team. This error was                    are constatent. To be included caused by a deciaal point stoplaced during the                      in Rev. 8 convereton of the distance units and meant that the initial calculation of thyroid dose based on thte measurement wee 9000 mRam/hr. at 4.3 miles downwind (notead of 9,000 mRes/hr. at about 0.5 ottee downwind. About five (5) minutes elopeed before thle error wee found and corrected. All downwind distance from the f tend should be reported consistently la either elles or esters.
1.10                     During the reporting of the initial D(4 RAF               ARCA      LERO procedures will be reviewed                 9/1/M thyroid doses, only one field amasurement, the                     and a note added to ensure better 1400 mRS /hr measurement mode et about 1204 at                     coordination and accurate use of two (2) elles from the plant, wee available.                       field data. To be incorporated thte value was used at the LERG EOC to entre-                      in Rev. 3 potete doses et other distances. These entre-potated data were reported as actual measure-mente at other distances rather than as pro-jected data on the dose assessment status board.
It took two and one half (2.5) hours to iden-tify and correct thte error. 1230 reporting                                                                                                                                        i procedures should be reviewed to ensure proper coordinattan and proper reporting.

Page 4 of 19 Tabla 3.1 Page 4 of S SHCEMAN NUCLEA) FOWER STATION - SQtW1.E FG2 O*RICTING DEFICIENCIES OR AREAS REQUIRING CORRFITIVE ACTION February 13. 1986 Tsercles (190 EOC (GINT*D)
Dettelency                                                                                                            Res.
or Area                                                                                                              Act.
Sequ8 ring                                                 Proposed                                           Resp. Comp.
Corrective                                                 Completion                                        Ad. or    or No.        RAC Reccomendation for Correcttwo Action            Action                   LERO Response (ACTION)           Date      FEMA Evaluation of LARO Response       lead. Incomy
.7    1. l') Althoudi he later quoted the PAC correctly t#wn        ARCA          The Health Services Coordinator has      6/I9[06 asked to de se by a Federal evaluator, during a                      been provided with review metettal betefing held at the LERG EOC at about 1110, the                     on the use and meaning of the EPA Health Services Coordinator stestated the EPA                        PAC's.
PAC as being mandatory evacuation town the projected thyrote dose wee five (5) Ben. The Health Services Coordinator should review the EPA PAG guidance in order to avoid say poselble confuaten that could result due to eletaforma-tion given during briefings.
:8    E.6    Prior to the esercise, LII2 management made the      ARCA            The stren system will be activated as   N/A I            dectaton that the stren system would not be                          part of a pre pt nottitcation test, activated as part of the Febrt.ary 13, 1986                          prior to commercial operetten.
eserc ise. Activatten of the stren system should be octually tested in the futiere.
9   E.2    There use a delay of about forty-five (45)           ARCA           Procedures and training tdlll be         9/1/86 minutes between the 12hD EOC's first attempt                         revloed to allow fleatblitty in per-to have Route Spotter $1005 verify the fuel                          sonnel assignment. This will ensure truck tapediment and the dispatch of that                            that personnel are feediately dio-sporter fra the Port Jefferson Staging Area.                        patcLed for tapedlarnt vertitcation this delayed timely vertitcation of the                             or other evacuation entgency.
tapediment. Personnel need to be trained in the development of alternative approaches uhen delays are reasonably anticipated in the field vertffcatten of tapedtaente to evacuation. Development of alternatives should include commentation between, at a statain, the Evacuation Coordinator and the Evacuation Route Coordinator.
a

Fase 5 of 1)
Tatta 3.1 Page 5 ef 6 SHUREHAM NUaEAR POWER STATIC 3 - SQiEDLE.E FC3 CORRECTING DEFICIENCIES OR AREAS REQUIRING Q*RFCTIVE ACTION February 13, 1986 Enercise LERO EOC (CONT'D)
Defietency                                                                                                                    Res.
or Area                                                                                                                      Act.
Requiring                                                       Proposed                                              Reop. Crep.
Corrective                                                      Complet tor.                                        Ad. or     or No.                             BAC Reccomendation for Corrective Action                                   Action             LERO Response (ACTION)                      Date        FDIA Evaluation of LERO Response        ined. laccep 13           N/R                Only the Shoreham-Weding River School District                              ARCA        Schnote will be requested to parti-              N/A participated in the February 13, 1986 eneretee,                                         ctpate in future esercises.
Prior to the eserclee, L114D - .        t made the dectates that other school districts were not to be included la the esercise. In the future all schools must be included la all Federally evolusted esercises and drille.
11           E.3                Dostertry and tratetes have not been provided                              ARCA         LILCO to ready to abide by its                   N/A
,                  E.5.a              to the Rue Drivere used for school esecuation,                                          commitment to provide treintnn in baste principles of redtation and (1) Rus Detwere used for school evacuation                                              doetmetry use and to provide personal j                                           ehould be trained in the use of doeteeters.                                       doetmeters and KI tablets to all school bus drivers upon request.
1 (2) Adequate suppites of dostertry should be provided for Rue Drivers used for school evacuation.
12           J.10.3             Some of the Ambulette Drivers were not suare                               ARCA         Training of ambulance / subulette                9/1/86 of when to take their 51. Training on El                                                drivers te being scheduled and procedures should be given to the Ambulette                                             will be revised to provide Drivers.                                                                                 increased emphasis on dosin-
 ;                                                                                                                             etry and radiological pro-tective actions for emergency workers.
l s
l l
4

Page 6 of 19 Tabl3 3.1 Page 6 of 6 SHORENAM MUCLEAR PtMER ST; TIC 3 - SCHEI A E FC2 CORRECTING REFICIENCIFS OR AREAS DEQUIRING Cr*RFCTIVE ACTlun February 13. 1986 Esercise LABO EOC (CONT *D)
DeItctency                                                                                                              Dee, or Area                                                                                                                Act.
Requtrles                                                        Proposed                                       toep. Comp.
Corrective                                                      Completion                                      Ad. er   or pe.          RAC Recomeseadation for Corrective Action              Action              LERO Response (ACTlon)                      Data     PEMA Evaluation of LEM Desponse      laad. Inceny 13   J 10.3 Bue Drivere used for school evacuation have            ARCA          See 12h0 EOC ltem 11.                            p/A mot been treined in El policy and the use of El. Sufficient supplies of El are not evettable for school evacuaties Due Drivers.
(1) Due Drivere used for school evacuation should be tratmed la El policy and the use of El.
(2) Adequate supplies of El should be provided for See Prisere used for school evacuation.
14   E.4    Astutette Drivers were act all trained regardies       ARCA          See lino EOC lten 12.                            m/A edio can authortse doses to excese of and Wt to de la the event of espesure above the general put'tc PACa. Ambulette Drivere should be tralned an enceaalve espesure authertsation and applicable procedures.
15   E.4    See Drivere used for school evacuation have            ASCA          See LERO EOC ltem 11                             W/A mot been trained regarding seio can authertse esposure in encese of the general public PACS.
Due Drivere used for school evacuation should receive tratalog regarding idio can eurhertse esposure in escess of the general public PAGa.
4

Page 7 et 1)
Tabla 3.4 Page 1 c.f 2 se0RENAM NUCIIAR POWE.R STATION - 50tEDt4.E FC2 CCMCTING DEFICIENCIES
 ;                                                                                     OR ARLAS RFOUIRING a*RECTIVE ACTION l                                                                                          February 13, 1986 Laeretse j                                                                                              EparrurY MEWS CENTER l                                                                          DeiIctency                                                                                                                                       Res.
or Area                                                                                                                                         Act.
Requiring                                                     Proposed                                               Resp.                      Comp.
Corrective                                                    Completten                                             Ad. or                            or No.        RAC Recomendation for Corrective ActSan                       Acttom        LERO Response (ACTION)                         Date      FEMA Evaluettan of LERD Resposee            Inad.                  Incomp 1   C.4.b  Insuf fletent copying capabillttee at the                     D            Copying machines in the ENC are being          8/1/P6 ENC resulted la delays in the distributton                                  evaluated for upgrada and replacement of inforestion. These delays affected the                                   se necessary.
f ollowing two (2) areas:
l In order to espedite diesemination of         6/19/86 e Hard copies of Eb5 messages were not                                      inf ormation, procedures have been provided to the medte in a timely menner.                                resteed. Essential emergency infor-i                                                                                           astion will be put in sum ary form and e Reor control personnel were not able to                                   etsultaneously transmitted via computer answer queettone received from the public                                to the ENC and all rumor control locatione, because they were not given accurate up-to-date status reporte.
IIRO should make provietone for rettable and rapid equipment to reproduce, in hard copy, all appropriate messages for distributton to the ENC staff.
2   J lo.b Mape and displays in the medte besefins rose                  ARCA         The suggested additional dis-                  9/1/s6 were taeuffletent. The following eleplaye                                  plays and status boards will should be posted in as ares saatly vietble to                              be provided to the ENC.
reporteres o An EP2 map e tch tracks protective acttano and pi ne pochway, o A status beard uhtch provides ECLa and their times of declarettan.

             . _ -               ~-    =~      . . - _      - _ . .         .,_ -.                                    -                                     .                                                                _ - . .
Page 8 of 19 Tabla 3.4 Peer 2 of 2 i
SHOREHAM NUCLEAR POWER STATION = SCHEDULE F(* CURRECTING DEFICIfMCIES OR ABFAS REqulRlhG CuMRECTIVE ACTION tebruary 13, 1986 Emercise Ele:MCFJeCY NfWS CENTER (CONT'D)
Deftctency                                                                                                                      Res.
or Area                                                                                                                  Act.
Requirtog                                                 Froposed                                     Resp.             Comp.
Corrective                                                       Completion                                   Ad. or                    or No. RAC Recommendetton for Correcttwo Actton                  Action             LERO Response (ACTION)                Date      PEMA Evaluetten of 1280 Response  ined.         Incesp
!3     g/R Some hard coptes of ESS messages that were                ARCA              The emergency press releases, e tch   9/1/86 provided to the press contained estravous                                   do not conteln deleted metertel, will
 ;         information (clearly marked for deletten)                                   be posted in the ENC.
that should have been omitted to avoid poestble confusion. Nord coptes of ERS messages posted in the RNC for use by the press should contata only that information dich wee broadcast to the public.
i l

_.                     -   _ . . . _ _   .     . . _                               . _ _ . _   __, _ ___                _         ._   . _ _ .        m. . __                _          ..
Pese 9 atf 19 Tabla 3.5 Pese 1 cf 1 SHOREHAM IfDCLEAR POWFR STf. TION - SCHEDULE PGt QRRECTIteC DEFICIENCIES OR AREAS REqu1RiteG CORRECTIVE ACTION February 13, 1986 Emeretse FORT JEFFERSON STACING AREA Dettelency                                                                                                                   Rom.
or Area                                                                                                                     Act.
Requirins                                                    Proposed                                             Resp. Comp.
Corrective                                                   Completion                                          Ad. or       or leo.        RAC Recommendetton for Corrective Action                Action         LERO Response (ACTION)                       Date         FEMA Evaluation of LERO Response       ined. Incomp 1    E.3.e, One (1) aus Driver neslected to read hte DRD            ARCA      Training materials will be revised               9/1/86 E.3.b  at any time during the seventy-five (75)                          to provide additional nephasis on minutes tw use wortt : g in the EFZ. Att Bus                      radiation and dosimetry.
Drivere should be trained to read their DRDs                                                                                 ,
every fifteen (15) minutes as described in 1280 Procedures.
4 k
s
(
                                    *              ,[
s.,
k, '
s 4
s                                                                                                                          9 6
6 s
i t

Page 10 af 19 Tab u 3.6 Page 1 af 6 SINEHAM NUCLEAR PUWER STATIC;l - SchEMfLE FC;l CofMCTIM DEFICIEJeCIES OR AREAS DEQUIRING CORRFCflVE ACTION Feoruary 13, 1986 Faercise FATCHoQJE STACING AREA Dettelency                                                                                                                  Rea, or Area                                                                                                                    Act.
Requiring                                                     Proposed                                              Deep. Comp.
Corrective                                                    Completten                                           Ad. or    or No.        RAC Rechetton for Corrective Action                 Action        LERO Response (ACTION)                         Date      FEMA Evaluation of 12RO Response           Inad. Incoup 1   J.9,   Sua detwere were not dispatched until two (2)       D             There is no requirement to dispatch           N /A J.10 3 hours af ter receipt of the Site Area Emergency                   bus drivers within two hours of a ECL declaration.                                                  Site Area Emergency. The dispatch of bus drivers wee within the times (1) An additional area should be established                      detailed in the LERO plan. See for the distributton of dostmetry to                        analyste of dispatch, Attachment 2.
reduce Bus Driver procesetog time.
(2) Additional trained staff should be pro-vided to the Bus Dispatcher to assist him in deploying over three hundred (300) drivers and Transfer Fotat Coordinatore uho are deployed from the Patchogue Stastog Area.
2   N/R    OFIF 4.7.1 specifies that the only personnel        ARCA          0FIF 4.7.1 will be revised in Rev. 8          9/1/86 entrance to to be the Meta Entrance on the                        to indicate actual flow of personnel.
Conklin Avenue side of the building. The entrance actually used for this purpose wee the one on the north side of the building (Nein Street). Stace the systes actually used seems to be superior to the Flan due to reduced congestion, OFIF 4.7.1 should be revised to indicate that personnel are to enter the Patchogue Staging Area through the Mete Street entrance to the building.

  . _ _ .                                                                m_ .     ._ -               ___
Page 11 af 19 Tabla 3.6 Prge 2 sf 6 SHOREHAM N1 CLEAR POWER STATIC 3 - SCHEDULE FCil G ECTING DEFICIENCIES OR AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION February 13, 1966 Esercise PATCH 000E STACING AREA (CONT'D)
Deftetency                                                                                                              tea.
or Area                                                                                                                Act.
Requiring                                                      Proposed                                         Resp. Comp.
Corrective                                                     Completion                                      Ad. or    or No. RAC Recommendation for Corrective Action              Action           LERO Response (ACTION)                       Date      PEMA Evaluation of LERO Response     ined. Incoup I         3   N/R LERO personnel entered the upper floor                ARCA             UPIP 4.7.1 Rev. 8 will be revised to        9/1/86 repeatedly to use telephones for emargency                             indicate that upoteiro phones may be nottitcation. This practice is explicitly                              uttltsed, prohibited by OPir 4.7.1 (page 38, item 03).
Either OPIP 4.7.1 should be revised to re-flect the actual practice of using tele-phones on the second floor of the Patchogue Staging Area butiding, or more telephones should be provided on the first floor for LERO personnel to perform their emergency nottitcations.
4   N/R The south door was not locked for security as         ARCA             Vertf tration that doors shceld be          9/1/86 specified in OPIP 4.7.1. All doors required to                      checked by the SAC will be indicated be locked by the Plan should be vertfled as                            in Rev. 8.
actually locked by the Staging Area Coordinator or a designee.
5   N/R Unauthortred entrance to the staging area could       ARCA             This area of buildtog entry is being        9/1/g6 be achte n d throegh the open fire escape on the                       reviewed. A guard will be posted at second floor of the east side of the butiding.                         the designated location until the The fire escape on the second floor of the east                        f actitty review to completed, side of the building should be designated as a guard post in the Plan an individual should be assigned to Staff this guard poet.

Page 12 of 19 Tabla 3.6 Page 3 af 6 SHOCEHAN CJCLEAR PUWER STATION - SQ1EI/JLE FC2 CC;RECTING DEFICIENCILS OR AkEAS REQUIRING O*ktCTIVE ACTION February 13, 1986 Enercise PATCHOW E STACING AREA (CONT'D)
Deftetency                                                                                                                   peo.
or Area                                                                                                                     Act.
Requiring                                                      Proposed                                          Deep.      Comp.
Corrective                                                     C mpletton                                       Ad. or              or No.        RAC Reccamendation for Correcttwe Actton               Actton       LERO Response (ACTION)                           Date      FENA Evaluation of LEAD Beepanse      ined. Incomp 6   J.9,   A Bus Ortver took tuo (2) hours and ten (10)           D            LERO's investigation of the                     s/1/e6 J.10.g minutes to proceed from the staging area to                         Problem revealed that during                                                        i the trenefer point. Another driver went to                          past drills bus drivers have the wrong transfer potat, and his utstake was                       repeatedly volunteered to go not recosntred by the Transfer Point Coordt-                        to the same transfer points notor. Yet another driver stomed a se pent of                      and bus yards. Thus, they had an eestsned evacuation route,                                      not become f amiliar with the other possible locations.
(1) Bue Drivere .or general popuistion evacu-                      LILCO will run " road rallles" atton reates should receive training to                      to have the bus drivers f amil-
                             .esure their ability to follow directions                     farize themselves with other given to them ao they can (a) follow routes                  bus yards and transf er points.
from the staging area to bus garages and                     in the future, emergency pre-then to transfer potate and (b) follow an                    paredness training will force eastened bus route.                                          the use of dif f erent transfer points and bus yards. The (2) OPIP 3.6.4, Attachment 2 (Pasee 13-14)                         Transf er Point Coordinator and Attachment 1 (Pages 10-12) should be                     Procedure will indicate that rewteed to req > ire, respectively, the Bus                  bus dispatch forms are to be Driver to present, and the Transfer Point                     checked upon driver's arrival, Coordinator to verify, each Bus Driver's                      in Rev. 7.
copy of the Bus / van Dispatching Form (OPIP 3.6.4, Attachment 2. Page 62) to esaure that the Bus Driver has arrived at the proper transfer point.

Page 13 af 19 Tabis 3.6 l                                                                                                                                                                                   Page 4 cf 6
                                                                          $HC"JHAM NUC1.EAlt MlWER STATION - SCHEITJLE FC3 CCi'RECTING DEFICIENCIES OR AREAS RFQUIRINC C0kRECTIVE ACTION February 13, 1966 Laercise PATCH 0 CUE STACINC AREA (CONT'D)
Deficiency                                                                                                                Res.
or Area                                                                                                                  Act.
Requiring                                                        Proposed                                       Resp. Comp.
Corrective                                                       Cmpletion                                      Ad. or          or No.        RAC Recommendation for Correcttwe Actton              Action         I.ERO Response (ACTION)                          Date     PEMA Evaluation of LERO Response     Inad. Incomp 7   J.9,   Traf fic Cutdes do not have complete or correct       ARCA           The Traffic Cutde Procedure util be             9/1/86 J.10.g information on the appropriate deettnation for                       modtlled in Rev. 8 evacueee. All Traffic Culdes should be trained to advise motorists with questions to tune to the t.BS station (WALE-FM) for the latest information on all matters related to the emergency, including the location of the Receptics Center.
8   J.10.k Appropriate personnel and equtgesent were not         ARCA          Af ter road creus are dispatched to              N/A dispatched to clear the multiple vehicle                             their field positions they accident etmulated as an impediment to                               comicate via radio utth the EOC.
evacuation. The appropriate personnet at                            the taad Traffic Culdes at the Staging the Patchogue Stastag Aree should be trained                        Area do nor decide uhtch trucks are to to request more taformation f rom the IIRO                          be dispatched to a particular impedt-EOC town tapedimente to evacuation are indicated.                   eent.
9   J.10.d Instructions for the driver of the nontnett-          ARCA          The Transfer Point Coordinators'                9/1/Il6 tutionalised mobility-impaired bus to proceed                       training material will be to the Reception Center were not properly                           modified to ensure they relay tronomitted to the Bue Driver at the trockhaven                     instructions from the 1AC's to National Laboratory Transfer Point. Trenefer                        the bus drivers.
Point Coordinatore should be trained to follou instructions forthcoming from the staging area regarding directione that are to be given to special population evacuation route Rue Drivers, atace they are trained to return to the transfer point for instructions as spectiled in the tERO Plan.

Fece 16 of 19 T% la 3.6 Page 5 ef 6 SHC;EHAM NUCLEAR FOWER STATIC 3 - SCllEDUI.E FC3 CCLRECT1*T: DEFICIENCIES OR ARFAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION February 13, 1966 Emercise FAlCH00UE STAGING AREA (CONT'D)
Deftetency                                                                                                                  Res.
or Area                                                                                                                    Act.
Requiring                                                         Proposed                                          Resp. Comp.
j                                                                 Corrective                                                        Completion                                       Ad. or    or leo.        RAC Recommendation for Corrective Action              Action       LERO Response (ACTION)                              Date      FEMA Evaluation of I.ERO Response     ined. Incomp 10   J 10.d Residences of some non-institutionaltsed              ARCA         The maps used to find homes in the                 9/1/86 mobility-tapatred persons were dif ficult to                       EFZ will be reviewed for clarity.
find. Drivers deetsnated to pick up non-tastitutionalized mobility-impaired evacueen at their residences should be provided with more detailed espe and clearer descriptions of pickup pointe.
11   J.9,   it took forty (40) minutes from receipt of a LERO ARCA            Rev. 8 will be revised to                          9/1/86 J.10.g request to dispatch a Bus Driver to stem 1ste the                 indicate an an additlonal evacuation of forty (40) ochool children. The                     LERO Staff person will assist Sue Dispatcher at the Patchogue Staging Area                      the Special Pop lations Bus should be provided with trained staff support so                  Dispatcher, that Bus Drivers can be dispatched in a more timely manner.
12   E.3,   The Fetchogue Staging Area Bus Dispatcher made        ARCA         All personnel going into the field                 9/1/06 E.6    repeated statements with a bullhorn etch                           receive a doelmetry briefing d en emphaatsed only that general population evacu-                     they are issued their dostmetry.
atton Route Bus Drivers were to call in if a                       The lead Traffic Guides and Bus I             reading of 3.5 wee reached on their DRD; he did                    Dispatchers training will be not give the units associated with the 3.5                         modified to emphasize the number not mention the use of the 0-200 mRes                        need to be more precise DRD etch is supposed to trigger the first                          with their information.
call-in at a remains at or above 200 mRes. The verbal instructione given to the general popu-lation evacuattom route Bus Drivere by the Fatchogue Bus Dispatcher over the bullhorn should be more precise to emphastre the proper use of both doetmeters and the careful reading of esposure control instructions for emergency workers.

Page 15 of 19 Tabl:3 3.6 Page 6 af 6 SHOREHAM Mty'12AR PUWFR STATIC 3 - SCllEDt2.E FCQ (T2.RECTING DFFICIENCIES OR AREAS RHpilRING C(*RFCTIVE ACTION February 13, 1986 Esercise PATOKGIE STACING AREA (CDKPD)
Deiiciency                                                                                                                  Res.
or Area                                                                                                                    Act.
Requiring                                                          Proposed                                         Resp. Comp.
Corrective                                                         Completion                                      Ad. or    or No.                       RAC Recommendation for Corrective Action             Action        LERO Response (ACT10M)                              Date      FEMA Evaluation of 1220 Response     inad. Incomp 13        E . 3. s .      One general population evacuation route Rue Driver ARCA            Training material will be                          9/1/e6 E.3.h           read DRDs only tulce et the instructions et the                    modified to emphasize the Transfer Potat Coordinator and another read his                    importance of reading the DRDs only won it use conventent. General popu-                     DRD and other aspects of KI letton evacuation route Rue Drivere shculd be                      and d0simetry.
trained to reed their dostmetere opptratmetely every itf teen (15) etnutes when they are inside the 10-stle EPZ, stopping the bus te do so if necessary.
14        E.3.e,          Traf fic Culdes at two (2) TCro did not know dose    ARCA          See Patchogue S.A. Ites 13                         9/1/06 E.3.b           outhertsetion limite. Train tt'e Traf fic Culdes ao that they know the dose authorisation llatte.
15        J.10.e,         The Route Alerting Driver observed belteved he       ARCA          See Patchogue S.A. Itse 13. Route                  N/A J.10.f          would receive El authertastion in an ERS sessage.                  Alert Drivere consume their El This to inconstetent with OPIP 3.3.4, Attachment                   tablet den they hear a General 1, item 89 Route Alert Drivere should be                           Emergency declared on the radio, trataed to know that &l authortaatton to to be                    See OPIP 3.3.4, Attactosent 1, seemed to them by their supervisor as spectfted                   Step 9.
to the 1230 Plan.
16        E.4             Traffic Cutdea at two (2) TCro did not fully         ARCA          See Patchogue S.A. Item 13                         N/A understand that the chate of command for excese esposure authertsetton stves the Lead Traffic Cutde authority to authorise ascese exposure by radio, and some Traffic Cutdee indicated that they might queetton the authority of the Lead Traffic Guide to teaue the authorisation for escoes exposure All Traf fic Cutdee should be trained to know that the Lead Traffic Cutde con authorise esposure in eacess of the generet populetten Pace by redto.
l

Page 16 of 19 Tabla 3.7 Page 1 af 2 SHCCEllAM NUCLEAR IMadER STATIC 3 - SQiEDUL.E FC3 CORRFCTING DEFICIENCIES OR AREAS DE@lRING C(BRECTIVE ACTION February 11, 1986 Eseretse RIVERHEAD STALENG AREA Deficiency                                                                                                                 Bas.
or Area                                                                                                                  Act.
Requiring                                                        Proposed                                         Beep. Comp.
Corrective                                                        Completion                                       Ad. or   or No.             BAC Reccamendation for Correcttwo Action               Action          LERO Response (ACTION)                          Date      FEMA Evolustion of LERO Beepense      Inad. Incosy 1       N/R     elle the status board wee updated periodically,        ARCA            Training material will be                      9/1/86 the time wee not always included een new                              modified to ensure S.A.
taformation wee posted. Personnel should be                            personnel put times on tratned to record the time that updated                                 latest information.
tuformation to posted on the status board.
2       J.10.)  The time between deployment of Traf fic Guides         D               Traffic Cutdes will be pre equipped            5/26/86 from the staging area and their arrival at                               for tamediate dispatch for the 2 TCro was escessive, taking between fif ty (50)                         elle EPZ. An odottional person and seventy (70) minutest approntestely thirty                         will be essigned to acetat with etnutes was opent in line at the staging area                           equipment distributton, receiving iteld kits and procedures. A more expedittaua means of dispatching the Traf fic Cutdes from the staging stem to the field should be developed.
3       E       The access road at the Brookhaven Subetstion           ARCA             Brookhaven Subatetton T.F. to LIII0           N/A Transfer Fotnt wee narrow and curving and could                         property and la cleared regularly be impassable in inclement weather. Considera-                          by LIIIO plows. This factitty, tion should be given to relocating the Brookhaven                      e tch to at a central and convenient Subetetton Tremefer Potat to e different location.                       location, was not a probles e en used during the drill on 1/30/86 tamedtetely folloutes a snow stors.
4        s.3 b  One (1) of the drivers for the general popula-         ARCA                                                           9/1/86 tion evacuation bus routes dispatched f rom the                        Training material will be Riverhead Stestas Area did not reed his DRDe                          modified to emphasize the every infteen (15) stoutes as etsted in orIP                             importance of reading the 3.9.1. Due Drivere for the general population                          DRD and other aspects of KI bue routes shoeld be given adottlanal tratatng                         and dosimetry.
to read their low and mid-range DRDe every fifteen (15) etnotes.
m..   . . _ .                                               _

_.      _     _ _ . . _         _.                                   _ _ . _ . . __ _                      __.              _ _ _ . . . _ _ _ _ _ _ .           _ _ _ _ _ _ .            . . . . .   ..  ._____m                   _. . . -
Page 17 of 19 Tabla 3.7 Page 2 of 2 SHOREHAM NUCLEiB POWER STATION - SOIEDtt.E FOR CORRECTING DEFICIDeCIES OR AREAS RE@llRING CORRECTIVE ACTION February 13, 1986 Esercise RIVt.RHEAD STACl>C AREA (Cont'd)
DefIetency                                                                                                                                      Res.
or Area                                                                                                                                        Act.
Requiring                                                                Proposed                                                    Resp. Comp.
Corrective                                                               Completion                                                  Ad. or      or No.                  RAC Rec a mendation for Corrective Action                  Action       LERO Response (ACTION)                                     Cate                FEMA Evaluation of IJRO Response       Inad. Incomp
 ;5       E.3.h            Tuo (2) of the eight (R) Tratfic Cutdes did not            ARCA         See Riverhead S.A. Item 4                                 R/A fully understand the difference betueen low and mid-range DRDs. Traffte Guides should be given additional training in the use of low and mid-range DRDs.
6   J.11.3           One (1) Rue Delver stmulated the ingestion of              ARCA         See Riverhead S.A. Ites 4                                 N/A his El tablet prematurely, prior to being assigned en evacuation route. Rua Drivere should be given additional training in pro-cedures for tagrating EI.
J l

Page le of 19 Tabla 3.9 Fese 1 et 1 TABLE 3.9 SHOREHAM hilQ. EAR PUWFR STATION = SCHEDULE ICR CORsECTING DEFICitNCIES OR AREAS DE411 RING O* RECTI %E ACTION February 13, 1986 Esercise RECEPTION CENTFR Deiiefency                                                                                                               Res.
or Area                                                                                                                 Act.
Requiring                                                       Proposed                                        Resp. Comp.
Corrective                                                     Cmpletion                                        Ad. or     or No.                    RAC Reccomendetton for Correcttve Actton            Ac t ton       LERO Response (ACTION)                          Date     FEMA Evoluetten of LIBO Response      ined. Incsump 1   J.12               On severet occeetene, personnet radiolo$tcal        ARCA           Training material will be                      9/3/e6 j
monitortns took approntestely four (4) to                           modifted to emphasize the need five (5) stoutes per individuet, etch to                            to accomplish monitoring with-constderetty tenser then the ninety (90)                            in 90 seconds.
seconde specif ted in the IJR0 Procedures.
All monitoring personnel assigned to the
* Reception Center eh mid be treined to sonster individuele within ninety (90) seconde as prescribed in the 1280 Procedures.
4

Page 1) (I 19 Tab 13 3.10 Page 1 af 1 SIKSEHAM NUCLEAR POWER STATION - SCHEDULE FC3 CORRECTING DEFICIENCILS OR AREAS RE(511 RING C(*kiCTION ACTION February 13. 1986 Esercise Omt,kt.CATE CARE CENTER $
Deiic tency                                                                                                            Rea, or Area                                                                                                              Act.
Requiring                                                    Proposed                                         Resp. Comp.
Corrective                                                    Completion                                       Ad. or   or No.          RAC Raccamendation for Correcttwe Action                    Action        LERO Response (ACTION)                        Date      PEMA Evaluation of LERO Response      Inad. Incomp 1   J.10.h   Neither of the two (2) congregate care f actittles ARCA                   The Red Cross has the responstbtlity         N/A activated for the February 13, 1966 esercise are                          for estatsining a tiet of congregate identified in the latest oubalaston of the IJRO                           care centers. Since the list la revised Flan. The Flan should be revised to include all                           periodically (as particular centers be-f acitttles intended for use as shelter f actittles                       come unavailable or as new ones are added),
during a radiological emergency at SMFS. These                            it unuld be inappropriate to include the facilities should be included in the list                                 list in the 1180 Flan. Instead, Appendia B
;                attached to LERO's letter of agreement with the                           to the plan will be revised to contain a American Red Crose.                                                       new letter of agreement with the Red Crose which will atste that the Red Cross will metatain an up-to-date list of congregate care centers and that the list will be made available to the appropriate federal speactes on request.
_}}