View source for RS-16-236, Fifth Six-Month Status Report for Phases 1 and 2 Overall Integrated Plan in Response to June 6, 2013 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Hardened Containment Vents Capable Operation Under Severe.

{{Adams
| number = ML16349A033
| issue date = 12/14/2016
| title = Fifth Six-Month Status Report for Phases 1 and 2 Overall Integrated Plan in Response to June 6, 2013 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Hardened Containment Vents Capable Operation Under Severe.
| author name = Helker D
| author affiliation = Exelon Generation Co, LLC
| addressee name = 
| addressee affiliation = NRC/Document Control Desk, NRC/NRR
| docket = 05000220, 05000410
| license number = DPR-063, NPF-069
| contact person = 
| case reference number = EA-13-109, RS-16-236
| document type = Letter type:RS, Status Report
| page count = 48
| project = 
| stage = Other
}}

=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Exelon Generation , .
Order No. EA-13-109 RS-16-236 December 14, 2016 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001 Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-63 and DPR-69 NRG Docket Nos. 50-220 and 50-410

==Subject:==
Fifth Six-Month Status Report For Phases 1 and 2 Overall Integrated Plan in Response to June 6, 2013 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Hardened Containment Vents Capable of Operation Under Severe Accident Conditions (Order Number EA-13-109)

==References:==
: 1. NRG Order Number EA-13-109, "Issuance of Order to Modify Licenses with Regard to Reliable Hardened Containment Vents Capable of Operation Under Severe Accident Conditions," dated June 6, 2013
: 2. NRG Interim Staff Guidance JLD-ISG-2013-02, "Compliance with Order EA-13-109, Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Hardened Containment Vents Capable of Operation under Severe Accident Conditions", Revision 0, dated November 14, 2013
: 3. NRG Interim Staff Guidance JLD-ISG-2015-01, "Compliance with Phase 2 Order EA-13-109, Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Hardened Containment Vents Capable of Operation under Severe Accident Conditions", Revision 0, dated April 2015
: 4. NEI 13-02, "Industry Guidance for Compliance With Order EA-13-109, BWR Mark I & II Reliable Hardened Containment Vents Capable of Operation Under Severe Accident Conditions", Revision 1, dated April 2015
: 5. Exelon Generation Company, LLC's Answer to June 6, 2013, Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Hardened Containment Vents Capable of Operation Under Severe Accident Conditions (Order Number EA-13-109), dated June 26, 2013
: 6. Exelon Generation Company, LLC Phase 1 Overall Integrated Plan in Response to June 6, 2013 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Hardened Containment Vents Capable of Operation Under Severe Accident Conditions (Order Number EA-13-109), dated June 27, 2014
: 7. Exelon Generation Company, LLC First Six-Month Status Report Phase 1 Overall Integrated Plan in Response to June 6, 2013 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Hardened Containment Vents Capable of Operation Under Severe Accident Conditions (Order Number EA-13-109), dated December 17, 2014 (FLL-14-035)
: 8. Exelon Generation Company, LLC Second Six-Month Status Report Phase 1 Overall Integrated Plan in Response to June 6, 2013 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Hardened Containment Vents Capable of Operation Under Severe Accident Conditions (Order Number EA-13-109), dated June 30, 2015 (RS-15-153)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Integrated Plan Report to EA-13-109 December 14, 2016 Page 2
: 9. Exelon Generation Company, LLC Phase 1 (Updated) and Phase 2 Overall Integrated Plan in Response to June 6, 2013 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Hardened Containment Vents Capable of Operation Under Severe Accident Conditions (Order Number EA-13-109), dated December 15, 2015 (RS-15-302)
: 10. Exelon Generation Company, LLC Fourth Six-Month Status Report For Phases 1 and 2 Overall Integrated Plan in Response to June 6, 2013 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Hardened Containment Vents Capable of Operation Under Severe Accident Conditions (Order Number EA-13-109), dated June 30, 2016 (RS-16-111)
: 11. NRC letter to Exelon Generation Company, LLC, Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 1 -
Interim Staff Evaluation Relating to Overall Integrated Plan in Response to Phase 1 of Order EA-13-109 (Severe Accident Capable Hardened Vents) (TAC No. MF4481), dated March 26, 2015
: 12. NRC letter to Exelon Generation Company, LLC, Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 2 -
Interim Staff Evaluation Relating to Overall Integrated Plan in Response to Phase 1 of Order EA-13-109 (Severe Accident Capable Hardened Vents) (TAC No. MF4482), dated February 11, 2015
: 13. NRC letter to Exelon Generation Company, LLC, Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 1 -
Interim Staff Evaluation Relating to Overall Integrated Plan in Response to Phase 2 of Order EA-13-109 (Severe Accident Capable Hardened Vents) (TAC No. MF4481), dated August 30, 2016
: 14. NRC letter to Exelon Generation Company, LLC, Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 2 -
Interim Staff Evaluation Relating to Overall Integrated Plan in Response to Phase 2 of Order EA-13-109 (Severe Accident Capable Hardened Vents) (TAC No. MF4482), dated August 25, 2016 On June 6, 2013, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission ("NRC" or "Commission") issued an Order (Reference 1) to Exelon Generation Company, LLC (EGC). Reference 1 was immediately effective and directs EGC to require their BWRs with Mark I and Mark II containments to take certain actions to ensure that these facilities have a hardened containment vent system (HCVS) to remove decay heat from the containment, and maintain control of containment pressure within acceptable limits following events that result in loss of active containment heat removal capability while maintaining the capability to operate under severe accident (SA) conditions resulting from an Extended Loss of AC Power (ELAP). Specific requirements are outlined in Attachment 2 of Reference 1.
Reference 1 required submission of an Overall Integrated Plan (OIP) by June 30, 2014 for Phase 1 of the Order, and an OIP by December 31, 2015 for Phase 2 of the Order. The interim staff guidance (References 2 and 3) provide direction regarding the content of the OIP for Phase 1 and Phase 2. Reference 3 endorses industry guidance document NEI 13-02, Revision 1 (Reference 4) with clarifications and exceptions identified in References 2 and 3. Reference 5 provided the EGC initial response regarding reliable hardened containment vents capable of operation under severe accident conditions. Reference 6 provided the Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2, Phase 1 OIP pursuant to Section IV, Condition D.1 of Reference 1.
References 7 and 8 provided the first and second six-month status reports pursuant to Section IV, Condition D.3 of Reference 1 for Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station. Reference 9 provided the Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2, Phase 1 updated and Phase 2 OIP pursuant to Section

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Integrated Plan Report to EA-13-109 December 14, 2016 Page 3 IV, Conditions D.2 and D.3 of Reference 1. Reference 1O provided the fourth six-month status reports pursuant to Section IV, Condition D.3 of Reference 1 for Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station.
The purpose of this letter is to provide the fifth six-month update reports for Phases 1 and 2, pursuant to Section IV, Condition D.3 of Reference 1, that delineates progress made in implementing the requirements of Reference 1 for Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2.
The enclosed reports provide an update of milestone accomplishments since the last status report, including any changes to the compliance method, schedule, or need for relief and the basis, if any. The enclosed reports also address the NRC Interim Staff Evaluation open items contained in References 11, 12, 13, and 14.
This letter contains no new regulatory commitments. If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact David P. Helker at 610-765-5525.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on the 141h day of December 2016.
Respectfully submitted, David P. Helker Manager - Licensing & Regulatory Affairs Exelon Generation Company, LLC

==Enclosures:==
: 1. Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 1 Fifth Six-Month Status Report for Phases 1 and 2 Implementation of Order EA-13-109, Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Hardened Containment Vents Capable of Operation Under Severe Accident Conditions
: 2. Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 2 Fifth Six-Month Status Report for Phases 1 and 2 Implementation of Order EA-13-109, Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Hardened Containment Vents Capable of Operation Under Severe Accident Conditions cc:   Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation NRC Regional Administrator - Region I NRC Senior Resident Inspector - Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station NRC Project Manager, NRA - Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Mr. Raj Auluck, NRR/JLD/TSD/JCBB, NRC Mr. Brian E. Lee, NRR/JLD/JCBB, NRC Mr. Jason C. Paige, NRR/JLD/JOMB, NRC

Enclosure 1 Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 1 Fifth Six-Month Status Report for Phases 1 and 2 Implementation of Order EA-13-109, Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Hardened Containment Vents Capable of Operation Under Severe Accident Conditions (19 pages)

Enclosure 1 Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 1 Fifth Six-Month Status Report for Phases 1 and 2 Implementation of Order EA-13-109, "Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Hardened Containment Vents Capable of Operation Under Severe Accident Conditions" 1 Introduction Nine Mile Point Unit 1 developed an Overall Integrated Plan (Reference 1 in Section 8), documenting the installation of a Hardened Containment Vent System (HCVS) that provides a reliable hardened venting capability for pre-core damage and under severe accident conditions, including those involving a breach of the reactor vessel by molten core debris, in response to Reference 2. This six month status report updates the milestone accomplishments based on the combined Phases 1 and 2 Overall Integrated Plan dated December 15, 2015 (Reference 7) and last updated on June 30, 2016 (Reference 9).
Nine Mile Point Unit 1 developed an updated and combined Phases 1 and 2 Overall Integrated Plan (Reference 7 in Section 8), documenting:
: 1. The installation of a Hardened Containment Vent System (HCVS) that provides a reliable hardened venting capability for pre-core damage and under severe accident conditions, including those involving a breach of the reactor vessel by molten core debris, in response to Reference 2.
: 2. An alternative venting strategy that makes it unlikely that a drywall vent is needed to protect the containment from overpressure related failure under severe accident conditions, including those that involve a breach of the reactor vessel by molten core debris, in response to Reference 2 This enclosure provides an update of milestone accomplishments since submittal of the combined Phases 1 and 2 Overall Integrated Plan and the last six month update, including any changes to the compliance method, schedule, or need for relief/relaxation and the basis, if any.
2   Milestone Accomplishments The following milestone(s) have been completed since the last six-month update was submitted under Reference 9, and are current as of December 2, 2016.
* Fifth Six-Month Update (complete with this submittal)
Page 1 of 19

Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 1 Fifth Six-Month Status Report for Implementation of HCVS Phases 1 and 2 3 Milestone Schedule Status The following provides an update to the Part 5 Milestone Schedule of the Overall Integrated Plan. It provides the activity status of each item, and whether the expected completion date has changed. The dates are planning dates subject to change as design and implementation details are developed. The revised Design Engineering Complete date shown below does not impact the order implementation date.
NMP1 - Phase 1 Specific Milestone Schedule Target Activity Milestone                      Completion                        Comments Status Date Hold preliminary/conceptual design               November Complete meeting                                             2013 Submit Overall Integrated Implementation         June 2014     Complete Plan Submit 6 Month Status Report                     December      Complete 2014 Submit 6 Month Status Report                     June 2015     Complete Submit 6 Month Status Report                     December      Complete     Simultaneous with 2015                   Phase 2 OIP Submit Combined Phase 1 & 2 Six-Month            June 2016     Complete Status Report Design Engineering Complete                      J!:!ly 29~0   Started      Design Package issued February January 2016 and revised 2017 pkg . issued June 2016 to capture lessons learned from NMP2. Additional Design Package changes in progress.
Submit Combined Phase 1 & 2 Six-Month            December      Complete Status Report                                        2016      with this submittal Maintenance and Operation Procedure               February     Started Changes Developed, Training Complete                 2017 Implementation Outage                            April 2017    Not Started Procedure Changes Active, Walk-Through           April 2017    Not Started Demonstration/Functional Test Submit Completion Report                         June 2019     Not Started Page 2 of 19

Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 1 Fifth Six-Month Status Report for Implementation of HCVS Phases 1 and 2 NMP1 - Phase 2 Specific Milestone Schedule Target Activity Milestone                        Completion                 Comments Status Date Submit Overall Integrated Implementation             December   Complete Simultaneous with Plan                                                    2015              Phase 1 Updated OIP Hold preliminary/conceptual design meeting           June 2015  Complete Submit 6 Month Status Report                         June 2016  Complete Submit 6 Month Status Report                         December   Complete 2016    with this submittal Submit 6 Month Status Report                         June 2017  Not Started Submit 6 Month Status Report                         December   Not 2017    Started Submit 6 Month Status Report                         June 2018  Not Started Submit 6 Month Status Report                         December   Not 2018    Started Design Engineering Complete                          April 2018 Not Started Maintenance and Operation Procedure                   February  Not Changes Developed , Training Complete                   2019    Started Implementation Outage                                April 2019 Not Started Procedure Changes Active, Walk-Through               April 2019 Not Demonstration/Functional Test                                   Started Submit Completion Report                             June 2019  Not Started 4  Changes to Compliance Method There are no changes to the compliance method as documented in the combined Phases 1 and 2 Overall Integrated Plan (Reference 7).
5  Need for Relief/Relaxation and Basis for the Relief/Relaxation Nine Mile Point Unit 1 expects to comply with the order implementation date and no relief/relaxation is required at this time.
Page 3 of 19

Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 1 Fifth Six-Month Status Report for Implementation of HCVS Phases 1 and 2 6 Open Items from Combined Phases 1 and 2 Overall Integrated Plan and Interim Staff Evaluations The following tables provide a summary of the open items documented in Attachment 7 of the combined Phases 1 and 2 Overall Integrated Plan, the Reference 6 Interim Staff Evaluation (ISE) for Phase 1 and the Reference 10 ISE for Phase 2, and the status of each item.
Open Phase 1 Open Items from OIP                            Status Item
: 1. Perform final sizing evaluation for       Deleted (closed to ISE open item HCVS batteries and battery charger        number 7 below) and include in FLEX DG loading calculation.
: 2. Perform final vent capacity calculation   Deleted (closed to ISE open item for the Torus HCVS piping confirming      number 2 below) 1 % minimum capacity.
: 3. Perform final sizing evaluation for       Deleted (closed to ISE open item pneumatic Nitrogen (N2) supply.           number 8 below)
: 4. Perform confirmatory environmental        Deleted (closed to ISE open  item condition evaluation for the Turbine      numbers 6 and 11 below)
Building in the vicinity of the Remote Operating Station (ROS) and HCVS dedicated pneumatic supply and batteries.
: 5. State which approach or combination Deleted (closed to ISE open        item of approaches the plant determines is number 3 below) necessary to address the control of combustible gases downstream of the HCVS control valve.
: 6. Complete evaluation for                   Deleted (closed to ISE open  item environmental/seismic qualification of numbers 9 and 11 below)
HCVS components.
: 7. Complete evaluation for                    Deleted (closed to ISE open item environmental conditions and confirm number 6 below) the travel path accessibility.
: 8. Perform radiological evaluation for        Started Phase 1 vent line impact on ERO response actions.
Page 4 of 19

Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 1 Fifth Six-Month Status Report for Implementation of HCVS Phases 1 and 2 Phase 1 Interim Open Staff Evaluation                        Description Item                                                                         Status (ISE) Open Items 1       Make available       Seismic Design of HCVS stack                  Complete for NRC staff The HCVS vent piping system has been audit the seismic evaluated to Seismic Category I and tornado requirements in pipe stress calculations missile final S22.4-201.1 P002 and S22.4-201.13P003 design criteria for consistent with the plant's seismic design the HCVS stack.
basis to comply with NEI 13-02, Section 5.2 seismic design guidance. Per NRC Letter, May 9, 2014 "

==Subject:==
Screening and Prioritization Results Regarding Information Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 50.54(f) Regarding Seismic Hazard Re-Evaluations for Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident", the NRC concluded that NMP1 "screened out" of performing the seismic risk evaluation as part of the HCVS seismic analysis. Therefore, use of current licensing basis and design basis seismic information (i.e., response spectra) is considered acceptable for the BOB analysis of the HCVS piping system at NMP1. The above referenced pipe stress calculations are available for NRC review in the ePortal.
Missile Protection of the HCVS stack NEI 13-02, Section 5.1.1 .6 requires that missile impacts are to be considered for portions of the HCVS. The Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) issued a white paper HCVS-WP-04, endorsed by the NRC, which provides a risk-informed approach to evaluate the threat posed to exposed portions of the HCVS by wind-borne missiles.
The white paper concludes that the HCVS is unlikely to be damaged in a manner that prevents containment venting by wind-generated missiles coincident with an ELAP or LUHS, for plants that are enveloped by the assumptions in the white paper.
Page 5 of 19

Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 1 Fifth Six-Month Status Report for Implementation of HCVS Phases 1 and 2 Phase 1 Interim Open Staff Evaluation                         Description Item                                                                           Status (ISE) Open Items A NMP1 specific missile evaluation is documented in the Engineering Change Package (ECP) consistent with HCVS-WP-
: 04. The conclusion of the evaluation is that NMP1 meets all of the tornado missile assumptions identified in HCVS-WP-004 and as such, supplementary protection is not required for the HCVS piping and components. The ECP missile evaluation is available in the ePortal for NRC review.
2       Make available        The HCVS is sized to provide sufficient        Complete for NRC staff         venting capacity to prevent a long-term audit analyses        overpressure failure of the containment by demonstrating         keeping the containment pressure below the that HCVS has         containment design pressure and the primary the capacity to       containment pressure limit. The HCVS has vent the              been demonstrated by calculation 822.4-steam/energy          201.13F004 to have the capacity to vent the equivalent of one     steam/energy equivalent of 1 percent of percent of            licensed/rated thermal power. The calculation licensed/rated        indicates that a vent capacity of thermal power         approximately 68,300 lbm/hour of saturated (unless a lower       steam at the primary containment design value is justified),  pressure is required. The results of this and that the          calculation show that the capacity of the suppression pool      HCVS exceeds this value.
and the HCVS The suppression pool thermal capacity must together are able be sufficient to absorb the decay heat to absorb and generated during at least the first 3 hours reject decay heat, following reactor shutdown. The total decay such that heat available to the suppression pool for the following a first 3 hours following reactor shutdown, reactor shutdown when starting at 102% reactor thermal power, from full power is 2.91 OE8 BTU; and the suppression pool containment           thermal capacity, i.e., its capacity to absorb pressure is energy, is 6.299E8 BTU. Therefore, there is restored and then sufficient suppression pool capacity to absorb maintained below the decay heat during the first 3 hours the primary following reactor shutdown, and the EA          containment 109, Attachment 2, Requirement 1.21 and design pressure NEI 13-02, Section 4.1.1 are satisfied.
and the primary The calculations supportinQ the above Page 6 of 19

Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 1 Fifth Six-Month Status Report for Implementation of HCVS Phases 1 and 2 Phase 1 Interim Open Staff Evaluation                        Description                   Status Item (ISE) Open Items containment          response are available for NRG review in the pressure limit.      ePortal.
3       Provide a            As discussed in the December 2015 OIP          Complete description of the   submittal, the NMP1 design will use an Argon final design of the  purge system to prevent the possibility of HCVS to address      hydrogen detonation and deflagration. The hydrogen             argon purge system design is illustrated on detonation and       Piping and Instrumentation Drawing C-def lag ration . 18014-C, Sht. 7, and is available for NRG review in the ePortal. The argon purge system was sized in calculation S22.4-201.13F001 which is on the ePortal.
4       Make available       At NMP1 , the primary operating station for    Complete for N RC staff       HCVS operation is located in the Auxiliary audit                Control Room. A HCVS remote operating documentation        station (ROS) is located in the turbine that demonstrates building . The location was evaluated for adequate             habitability and accessibility during a severe communication        accident. Onsite communications will be between the          performed using either the installed sound remote HCVS          powered headset system or the 450 MHz operation             radios in the talk around mode, or a locations and        combination thereof. A sound powered phone HCVS decision       jack is available near the ROS to makers during        communicate with the rest of the plant.
ELAP and severe Offsite communications will utilize fixed accident satellite phones in the Control Room and conditions.
Technical Support Center (TSC) . Both locations also have portable satellite phones staged.
Communications protocol for beyond design basis events are documented in CC-NM-118 and procedure N1-0P-51 and are available for NRG review in the ePortal.
These communication methods are consistent with FLEX communication practices at NMP1 and have been previously reviewed by the staff as documented in a communications safety assessment regarding NTTF Rec 9.3 Communications for Page 7 of 19

Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 1 Fifth Six-Month Status Report for Implementation of HCVS Phases 1 and 2 Phase 1 Interim Open Staff Evaluation                        Description Item                                                                          Status (ISE) Open Items NMP (ML13100A236).
5       Provide a            P&IDs C18014C, Sheets 1 and 7 are              Complete description of the available to the NRC for review on the strategies for       ePortal. The P&IDs combined with the hydrogen control     following system description provides a that minimizes the summary of the system design intended to potential for        minimize the potential for hydrogen gas hydrogen gas         migration and ingress into the reactor migration and        building or other buildings:
ingress into the The new HCVS wetwell pipe has a dedicated reactor building or HCVS flowpath from the wetwell penetration other buildings.
PCIVs to the outside with no interconnected downstream piping. The HCVS discharges the effluent to a release point above main plant structures. The new HCVS vent interfaces with lines 201.1-20-LT (upstream of PCIVs IV-201-16 and IV-201-17) and 201.1-3-LT (upstream of PCIV IV-201 .2-33 and IV-201.2-06) of the Containment System.
Line 201.1-20-LT is utilized for supplying nitrogen to the torus through isolation valves IV-201-16 and IV-201-17 during primary containment inerting. Similarly, the containment purge fan takes suction through this flow path when de-inerting containment.
IV-201-16 and IV-201-17 are normally closed and automatically close upon receipt of a containment isolation signal from the Reactor Protection System or a high radiation signal from the Off-Gas System monitors.
Line 201.1-3-LT provides nitrogen makeup to the torus through isolation valves IV-201.2-33 and IV-201.2-06 during normal operation. IV-201.2-33 and IV-201.2-06 are normally closed and automatically close upon receipt of a containment isolation signal from the Reactor Protection System or a loss of motive air supply.
The new HCVS vent will be normally isolated from the Containment System by two new normally closed PCIVs (IV-201.13-74 and IV-Page 8 of 19

Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 1 Fifth Six-Month Status Report for Implementation of HCVS Phases 1 and 2 Phase 1 Interim Open Staff Evaluation                        Description Item                                                                          Status (ISE) Open Items 201.13-71) and will not impact the operation of these interfacing systems. The new HCVS piping is designed as an independent, isolable branch off of Line 201.1-20-LT.
There are no branch lines downstream of the HCVS vent piping PCIVs (IV-201.13-71 and IV-201.13-74), which interface with existing plant systems and there is no potential for cross flow from the HCVS, thereby meeting the requirements of NEI 13-02, Section 1.2.3.
Therefore, valves IV-201.2-33, IV-201.2-06, IV-201-16 and IV-201-17 are not considered boundary valves. These valves are exposed to the containment atmosphere, as a result of the original plant design, independent of the addition of HCVS.
6       Make available       An assessment of Operator access to HCVS Complete for NRC staff        equipment was performed and documented audit an             in the Design Consideration Section (DCS) of evaluation of        Engineering Change Package ECP         temperature and      000086 which has been loaded on the radiological        ePortal. The assessment evaluated the conditions to        temperature and radiological conditions of all ensure that          areas that will be needed to be accessed by operating            plant Operators in order to initiate and personnel can       operate the HCVS during a beyond design safely access and    basis event. The assessment provides the operate controls     expected temperature and radiological and support          conditions in each area documented in equipment.          tabular form in the DCS. The assessment concludes that during the 7 days of sustained operation during a beyond design basis event the predicted environmental and radiological conditions will be acceptable for the operators to gain access to areas required for HCVS operation in the primary and remote operating stations.
7       Make available      The new battery selected is a sixty (60) cell   Complete for NRC staff        GNB battery with the battery cells connected audit the final      in series to create 125VDC nominal voltage.
sizing evaluation    The battery is a Valve Regulated Lead Acid forHCVS              (VRLA) type rated for 104 ampere-hours.
Page 9 of 19

Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 1 Fifth Six-Month Status Report for Implementation of HCVS Phases 1 and 2 Phase 1 Interim Open Staff Evaluation                       Description Item                                                                         Status (ISE) Open Items batteries/battery   The battery is selected in accordance with charger including   IEEE-485. The Battery Sizing Requirements incorporation into  indicates that based on 1.5 ampere loading FLEX DG loading     requirements for 24 hours duty period, a calculation.        minimum of a sixty (60) cell, 55 ampere-hours battery is required to bound the required battery duty cycle and end-of-cycle battery terminal voltage requirements. The selected battery capacity of 104 ampere-hours is more than the minimum required 55 ampere-hours battery capacity. Therefore, the selected battery is adequate.
The battery charger is rated for 130 volts nominal DC output voltage, 10 amperes nominal DC output current, 120 volts AC input voltage and a current limit adjustment range of 50% - 120%.
The HCVS loads may also be powered via 125 voe battery board 12 which is downstream of the station battery charger 12 (DC side). The FLEX DG sizing calc.
600VACDGES-FLEX-BDB was already sized to accommodate the station battery charger 12 full load rating (AC side). Additionally, the HCVS loads will be powered by FLEX portable power sources at T=:: 24 hours when the station battery would have been fully charged and load shedding would have been completed during ELAP. Therefore, there will be no impact on the FLEX DG loading calculation 600VACDGES-FLEX-BDB. A minor revision to the FLEX portable battery charger equipment sizing calculation 125VDCSCES-FLEX-BDB was completed to address the addition of the HCVS loads. The calculation concluded that the HCVS panel load addition of 1.5 amperes DC is negligible and still within the 400 ampere rating of the portable battery charger BC-BOB.
The battery/battery charger sizing requirements evaluation and the minor revision to calculation 125VDCSCES-FLEX-Page 10 of 19

Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 1 Fifth Six-Month Status Report for Implementation of HCVS Phases 1 and 2 Phase 1 Interim Open Staff Evaluation                       Description Item                                                                          Status (ISE) Open Items BOB are in the ePortal for NRC review.
8       Make available      As discussed in the December 2015 OIP           Complete for NRC staff       submittal, the NMP1 design will use a audit               nitrogen bottle station to supply motive force documentation of to the HCVS isolation valves. The bottle the HCVS            station will be located in a readily accessible nitrogen            protected area in the turbine building. The pneumatic system nitrogen supply system design is illustrated design including    on Piping and Instrumentation Drawing C-sizing and          18014-C, Sht. 7, and is available for NRC location.           review in the ePortal.
A calculation was completed to determine the required pneumatic supply storage volume and supply pressure required to operate the HCVS isolation valves (IV-201.13-71 and IV-201.13-74) for 24 hours following a loss of normal pneumatic supplies during an ELAP.
Calculation S22.4-201.13M002 is available for NRC review in the ePortal.
9       Make available                                                      Started for NRC staff audit documentation of a seismic qualification evaluation of HCVS components.
10      Make available      Description of Existing Instrumentation:        Complete for NRC staff In the Phases 1 and 2 combined HCVS OIP, audit descriptions Part 2: Key Venting Parameters section, both of all drywell pressure, torus pressure and torus instrumentation level are listed as key parameters. Other Part and controls 2 OIP sections only list drywell pressure and (existing and torus pool level as key parameters. In Part 3 planned) of the OIP, drywall pressure and suppression necessary to pool level are stated as the key parameters implement this for SAWM operations. The following order including discussion has been revised since the June qualification 2016 six-month update to clarify what key methods.
parameters are used for HCVS initiation and Page 11 of 19

Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 1 Fifth Six-Month Status Report for Implementation of HCVS Phases 1 and 2 Phase 1 Interim Open Staff Evaluation                     Description Item                                                                       Status (ISE) Open Items cycling for Phases 1 and 2.
Existing control room indications for wetwell (suppression chamber) pressure and suppression pool (primary containment) water level are used for HCVS venting operation. Operation of the HCVS will be based on guidance in the EOPs and SAPs and will follow the primary containment pressure limit (PCPL) curves contained in these procedures. The PCPL curves use suppression chamber pressure vs. primary containment water level parameters to determine when to vent containment.
Therefore, containment wetwell pressure indication is preferred to determine the need ,
timing and effectiveness of the venting operation following a BOBEE, in order to ensure that containment pressure does not exceed the PCPL.
Existing control room indication for wetwell pressure, shown on Pl-201.2-595A (Channel
: 12) and Pl-201 .2-594A (Channel 11 ), will be used for this purpose. These indicators receive pressure signals from pressure transmitters PT-201.2-595 and PT-201 .2-594, respectively. These pressure transmitters sense the torus pressure from a penetration at the top of the torus and therefore will not be impacted by high water levels.
Orywell pressure instrumentation may also be referenced during the event. Containment pressure is displayed on indicator Pl-201.2-483A (Channel 12) and Pl-201.2-484A (Channel 11 ). These indicators receive pressure signals from pressure transmitters PT-201.2-483 and PT-201.2-484, respectively. Wetwell level indication is needed to determine that the wetwell vent path is preserved. Wetwell level is displayed on indicator Ll-201 .2-5950 (Channel 12) and Ll-201.2-594C (Channel 11 ). Ll-201.2-5950 Page 12 of 19

Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 1 Fifth Six-Month Status Report for Implementation of HCVS Phases 1 and 2 Phase 1 Interim Open Staff Evaluation                      Description Item                                                                     Status (ISE) Open Items receives signals from PT-201.2-595 and PT-201.2-596 while Ll-201.2-594C receives signals from PT-201.2-594 and PT-201.2-680. As indicated in the OIP, LI 58-05A (LT 58-05) can also be used to monitor torus level and Pl 201.2-106A (PT 201.2-106) can also be used to monitor drywell pressure.
The pressure and level indicators and related transmitters are all Safety Related, Regulatory Guide 1.97 compliant components. Channel 12 is the FLEX diesel power backed loop, and Channel 11 can be powered as an alternate strategy.
Description of New Instrumentation:
The l&C scope for the HCVS is to display the following and to control the SOVs associated with the new primary containment isolation valves.
* HCVS Isolation Valve Position Indication (POS)
* Temperature and Radiation of the HCVS Pipe (POS)
* Radiation of the HCVS Pipe (ROS)
* HCVS Purge System Supply Pressure (POS and ROS)
* HCVS Battery Voltage (ROS)
The ROS panel serves as the main power distribution for all l&C components and will contain local indicators to display HCVS battery voltage, radiation, and purge gas supply pressure. The POS panel provides all other indication except HCVS battery voltage and allows for the control of the HCVS SOVs via key lock switches.
A detailed description of new I &C components including qualification methods is included in the Engineering Change Package and is available on the ePortal for Page 13 of 19

Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 1 Fifth Six-Month Status Report for Implementation of HCVS Phases 1 and 2 Phase 1 Interim Open Staff Evaluation                      Description Item                                                                      Status (ISE) Open Items NRC review.
11       Make available                                                 Started for NRC staff audit the descriptions of local conditions (temperature, radiation and humidity) anticipated during ELAP and severe accident for the components (valves, instrumentation, sensors, transmitters, indicators, electronics, control devices, etc.) required for HCVS venting including confirmation that the components are capable of performing their functions during ELAP and severe accident conditions.
Phase 2 OIP and ISE Open Items Open Phase 2 OIP Open Item Description                  Status Item 1     Perform radiological evaluation to determine the SAWA flow     Started control point location.
Open Phase 2 Interim Staff Evaluation (ISE) Open Item Description     Status Item Licensee to confirm through analysis the temperature and 1                                                                    Started radiological conditions to ensure that operating personnel can Page 14 of 19

Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 1 Fifth Six-Month Status Report for Implementation of HCVS Phases 1 and 2 safely access and operate controls and support equipment (ISE Section 3.3.2.1 )
Licensee to evaluate the SAWA equipment and controls, as well as ingress and egress paths for the expected severe accident 2                                                                         Not Started conditions (temperature, humidity, radiation) for the sustained operating period (ISE Section 3.3.2.3).
Licensee to demonstrate how instrumentation and equipment being used for SAWA and supporting equipment is capable to 3                                                                         Not Started perform for the sustained operating period under the expected temperature and radioloqical conditions (ISE Section 3.3.2.3).
Licensee to demonstrate that containment failure as a result of 4     overpressure can be prevented without a drywell vent during         Not Started severe accident conditions (I SE Section 3.3.3).
Licensee to demonstrate how the plant is bounded by the reference plant analysis that shows the SAWM strategy is 5                                                                         Not Started successful in making it unlikely that a drywall vent is needed (ISE Section 3.3.3.1 ).
Licensee to demonstrate that there is adequate communication 6     between the MCR and the operator at the FLEX manual valve           Not Started during severe accident conditions (ISE Section 3.3.3.4).
Licensee to demonstrate the SAWM flow instrumentation 7     qualification for the expected environmental conditions (ISE        Not Started Section 3.3.3.4).
Page 15 of 19

Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 1 Fifth Six-Month Status Report for Implementation of HCVS Phases 1 and 2 7     Interim Staff Evaluation (ISE) Impacts As described above in the response to the ISE Open Item 10, the existing containment instrumentation credited has been changed to credit torus pressure indication in lieu of drywell pressure indication, although drywell pressure indication will also be available.
Secondly, in the Reference 10 HCVS Phase 2 ISE, sections 3.1.2 and 3.3.2.1, the NRC staff makes reference to HCVS power supplies based on information provided in the Reference 7 combined Phases 1 and 2 OIP. Changes to the HCVS power supply design described in the OIP have been made in the final design that necessitates a revision to the OIP discussion. Below is a revision to each OIP section impacted which shows the changes made to the HCVS power supply summaries.
OIP Page 11 of 64, third bullet under the time constraint discussion:
24 hours, connect back-up power. The HCVS battery is calculated to last a minimum of 24 hours. The HCVS components will be able to be re-powered directly from the 125V DC Battery Board #12 which will be re-powered from a portable diesel generator (DG) put in place for FLEX. The DG will be staged and placed in service within 8 hours (Reference 1) and therefore will be available prior to being required. In the event that the DG is not available, a local 120 VAC connection will allow a small portable generator staged outside of the turbine building to be connected to the HCVS battery charger to provide power.
OIP Page 14 of 64, under "Power and Pneumatic Supply Sources":
All electrical power required for operation of HCVS components will be provided by a dedicated HCVS battery charger and battery. The HCVS battery has a minimum capacity capable of providing power to the HCVS loads for 24 hours without recharging.
A final confirmatory evaluation has been completed as part of the detailed design process. The HCVS battery charger provided requires a 120 V AC supply. This will be fed by a 120/240 V AC rated lighting panel during normal plant operation. After the initial 24-hour period, the system can be aligned to 125 V DC Battery Board 12, which will be re-powered by a diesel generator as part of the FLEX response. In addition, a connection point that utilizes standard 120 VAC electrical connections will be provided for a portable generator for sustained operation of the HCVS.
OIP Page 21 of 64,    4th paragraph under Greater than 24 Hour Coping Detail:
The HCVS battery and battery charger will also be installed in the Turbine Building ROS area. The HCVS battery has a capacity sufficient for 24-hour operation. The normal power supply to the HCVS controls and instruments will be provided by a 120/240 V AC rated lighting panel via the HCVS battery charger. The #12 Station Battery Bus, which in turn is re-powered by a 600 VAC portable diesel generator connected to the # 12 Station Battery Charger as part of the FLEX response, can be aligned to the HCVS loads after the dedicated HCVS battery has completely discharged. A design change to install the portable diesel generator external connection points to this bus has been completed in support of EA-12-049 (Reference 1). In the event that power is not restored to the bus, a local 120 V AC connection to the HCVS battery charger will allow the HCVS battery charger to receive power from a small portable generator. Actions to Page 16 of 19

Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 1 Fifth Six-Month Status Report for Implementation of HCVS Phases 1 and 2 replenish the electrical supply include refueling the DG or connecting and refueling a small portable generator.
OIP Page 26 of 64, 3rd bullet under general description of venting actions using portable equipment:
Establishing temporary power to repower the battery charger. Option 1 is to connect the FLEX DG to Station Battery Charger #12, which provides power to Station Battery Bus
#12 that in turn powers the HCVS components. Option 1 would be completed as part of the FLEX response strategy and occurs to the south and inside the NMP Turbine Building. Option 2, to be taken if the FLEX DG cannot be connected to the Station Battery Charger #12, is to connect a small portable generator to the HCVS battery charger. Option 2 would be taken locally at the HCVS ROS Area. Either of these actions will also require the generators to be refueled. A one line diagram of the electrical system to be installed is included in sketch 1A.
OIP Sketch 1A: This sketch is out-of-date. The attached ECP-13-000086-MU-039 F45940C-002 provides an updated electrical layout of the HCVS.
8    References The following references support the updates to the combined Phases 1 and 2 Overall Integrated Plan described in this enclosure.
: 1. Nine Mile Point Unit 1's Overall Integrated Plan in Response to June 6, 2013 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Hardened Containment Vents Capable of Operation Under Severe Accident Conditions (Order Number EA-13-109)," dated June 27, 2014.
: 2. NRC Order Number EA-13-109, "Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Hardened Containment Vents Capable of Operation Under Severe Accident Conditions" dated June 6, 2013.
: 3. NEI 13-02, "Industry Guidance for Compliance with NRC Order EA-13-109, 'To Modify Licenses with Regard to Reliable Hardened Containment Vents Capable of Operation Under Severe Accident Conditions," Revision 1, dated April 2015.
: 4. NRC Interim Staff Guidance JLD-ISG-2013-02, "Compliance with Order EA-13-109, Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Hardened Containment Vents Capable of Operation Under Severe Accident Conditions," Revision 0, dated November 2013 (Accession No. ML133048836).
: 5. NRC Endorsement of industry "Hardened Containment Venting System (HCVS)
Phase 1 Overall Integrated Plan Template (EA-13-109) Rev O" (Accession No. ML14128A219).
: 6. NRC Interim Staff Evaluation "Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 1 - Interim Staff Evaluation Relating to Overall Integrated Plan in Response to Phase 1 of the Order EA-13-109 (Severe Accident Capable Hardened Vents (TAC NO. MF4481)", dated March 26, 2015.
: 7. Nine Mile Point Unit 1's Combined Phases 1 and 2 Overall Integrated Plan in Response to June 6, 2013 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Page 17 of 19

Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 1 Fifth Six-Month Status Report for Implementation of HCVS Phases 1 and 2 Reliable Hardened Containment Vents Capable of Operation Under Severe Accident Conditions (Order Number EA-13-109)," dated December 15, 2015.
: 8. NRC Interim Staff Guidance JLD-ISG-2015-01, "Compliance with Phase 2 of Order EA-13-109, Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Hardened Containment Vents Capable of Operation Under Severe Accident Conditions,"
Revision 0, dated April 2015 (Accession No. ML15104A118).
: 9. Nine Mile Point's Fourth Six-Month Status Report Update for Phases 1 and 2 Overall Integrated Plan in Response to "June 6, 2013 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Hardened Containment Vents Capable of Operation Under Severe Accident Conditions (Order Number EA-13-109)," dated June 30, 2016.
: 10. NRC Interim Staff Evaluation "Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 1 - Interim Staff Evaluation Relating to Overall Integrated Plan in Response to Phase 2 of the Order EA-13-109 (Severe Accident Capable Hardened Vents (TAC NO. MF4481)", dated August 30, 2016.
Page 18 of 19

Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 1 Fifth  Six~Month          Status Report for Implementation of HCVS Phases 1 and 2 Sketch 1A: Electrical Layout of System - HCVS LIGHTING PANEL    LP106 CKT. *16 l---~     MANUAL                         BKR-CHCVS>B  )
f TRANSFER SWITCH                          10A HOS-HCVS-PG PLUG FOR MDN-201.13-200 PORTABLE GENERATOR OUTLET-HCVS-PG 125VDC CHARGER 125VOC BATTERY
                                                  . I BC-HCVS BOARD *12, CUB Cl2                   125VDC CFLEX POWER>                    BATTERY SEE DWG.Cl9B39C-002                 BAT-HCVS
                                                                  '-'""''&deg;"
BKR-<HCVS)3    )               BKR-CHCVS>2   )
15A                            10A SEE   NOTE  2 125VDC BUS PNL-HCVS BKR-<HCVS>4                  BKR-<HCVS>7                      BKR-<HCVSJ5                  BKR - <HCVS>6
            )        IA                  )        LA                       )       LA                   )        2A HCVS                                                       Vl-201.13-80                 125VOC/24VOC RT-20l.13-79A VALVE                                                                                      CONVERTER HCVS RAD I AT !ON CONTROL                                                                                    PWRS-<1S90> L MONITOR SEE OWG.F45940C-00L NOiES:
I. NJT USED.
: 2. EREAKER IS KEPT OPEN DURING PLANT NORMAL OPERATION AND CLOSED ONLY IF REQUIRED CURING A BEYOND DESIGN BASIS EXTERNAL EVE'lT(BDBEE>.
Page 19 of 19

Enclosure 2 Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 2 Fifth Six-Month Status Report for Phases 1 and 2 Implementation of Order EA-13-109, Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Hardened Containment Vents Capable of Operation Under Severe Accident Conditions (24 pages)

Enclosure 2 Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 2 Fifth Six-Month Status Report for Phases 1 and 2 Implementation of Order EA-13-109, "Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Hardened Containment Vents Capable of Operation Under Severe Accident Conditions" 1 Introduction Nine Mile Point Unit 2 developed an Overall Integrated Plan (Reference 1 in Section 8), documenting the installation of a Hardened Containment Vent System (HCVS) that provides a reliable hardened venting capability for pre-core damage and under severe accident conditions, including those involving a breach of the reactor vessel by molten core debris, in response to Reference 2. This six month status report updates the milestone accomplishments based on the combined Phases 1 and 2 Overall Integrated Plan dated December 15, 2015 (Reference 7) and last updated on June 30, 2016 (Reference 10).
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 developed an updated and combined Phases 1 and 2 Overall Integrated Plan (Reference 7 in Section 8), documenting:
: 1. The installation of a Hardened Containment Vent System (HCVS) that provides a reliable hardened venting capability for pre-core damage and under severe accident conditions, including those involving a breach of the reactor vessel by molten core debris, in response to Reference 2.
: 2. An alternative venting strategy that makes it unlikely that a drywall vent is needed to protect the containment from overpressure related failure under severe accident conditions, including those that involve a breach of the reactor vessel by molten core debris, in response to Reference 2 This enclosure provides an update of milestone accomplishments since submittal of the combined Phases 1 and 2 Overall Integrated Plan and the last six month update, including any changes to the compliance method, schedule, or need for relief/relaxation and the basis, if any.
2  Milestone Accomplishments The following milestone(s) have been completed since the last six-month update was submitted under Reference 10, and are current as of December 2, 2016.
* Fifth Six-Month Update (complete with this submittal)
Page 1 of 24

Enclosure 2 Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 2 Fifth Six-Month Status Report for Implementation of HCVS Phases 1 and 2 3  Milestone Schedule Status The following provides an update to the Part 5 Milestone Schedule of the Overall Integrated Plan. It provides the activity status of each item, and whether the expected completion date has changed. The dates are planning dates subject to change as design and implementation details are developed.
NMP2 - Phase 1 Specific Milestone Schedule Target Activity        Comments Milestone                       Completion Status Date Hold preliminary/conceptual design meeting          November Complete 2013 Submit Overall Integrated Implementation           June 2014     Complete Plan Submit 6 Month Status Report                        December     Complete 2014 Design Engineering Complete                        March 2015    Complete Submit 6 Month Status Report                       June 2015      Complete Operations Procedure Changes Developed              December      Complete 2015 Submit 6 Month Status Report                        December      Complete Simultaneous with 2015                 Phase 2 OIP Training Complete                                    February     Complete 2016 NMP2 Implementation Outage                          April 2016    Complete Procedure Changes Active                            April 2016    Complete Walk Through Demonstration/Functional Test          April 2016    Complete Submit Fourth 6-Month Status Report                 June 2016     Complete Submit Completion Report                            June 2018     Not Started Page 2 of 24

Enclosure 2 Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 2 Fifth Six-Month Status Report for Implementation of HCVS Phases 1 and 2 NMP2 - Phase 2 Specific Milestone Schedule Target Activity     Comments Milestone                     Completion Status Date Submit Overall Integrated Implementation         December     Complete Plan                                                2015 Hold preliminary/conceptual design meeting        January     Complete 2016 Submit 6 Month Status Report                     June 2016    Complete Submit 6 Month Status Report                     December     Complete 2016      with this submittal Design Engineering On-site/Complete                August     Not       Changed from 2017      Started   March 2017 Submit 6 Month Status Report                     June 2017    Not Started Operations Procedure Changes Developed           December     Not 2017      Started Site Specific Maintenance Procedure              December     Not Developed                                           2017      Started Submit 6 Month Status Report                     December     Not 2017      Started Training Complete                                 February    Not 2018      Started Implementation Outage                            April 2018   Not Started Procedure Changes Active                         April 2018   Not Started Walk Through Demonstration/Functional Test       April 2018   Not Started Submit Completion Report                         June 2018    Not Started 4   Changes to Compliance Method There are no changes to the compliance method as documented in the combined Phases 1 and 2 Overall Integrated Plan (Reference 7).
Page 3 of 24

Enclosure 2 Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 2 Fifth Six-Month Status Report for Implementation of HCVS Phases 1 and 2 5 Need for Relief/Relaxation and Basis for the Relief/Relaxation Nine Mile Point Unit 2 complied with the Phase 1 order implementation date and expects to comply with the Phase 2 order implementation date and no relief/relaxation is required at this time.
6 Open Items from Combined Phases 1 and 2 Overall Integrated Plan and Interim Staff Evaluations The following tables provide a summary of the open items documented in the combined Phases 1 and 2 Overall Integrated Plan, the Reference 6 Interim Staff Evaluation (ISE) for Phase 1, and the Reference 11 ISE for Phase 2 and the status of each item.
* Phase 1 Open Items from OIP                          Status OIP Phase 1 Open Item No. 1                Deleted (closed to ISE open item number 8 below)
OIP Phase 1 Open Item No. 2                Deleted (closed to ISE open item number 3 below)
OIP Phase 1 Open Item No. 3                Deleted (closed to ISE open item number 9 below)
OIP Phase 1 Open Item No. 4                Deleted (closed to ISE open item number 2 below)
OIP Phase 1 Open Item No. 5                Deleted (closed to ISE open item number 4 below)
OIP Phase 1 Open Item No. 6                Deleted (closed to ISE open item numbers 10 and 12 below)
OIP Phase 1 Open Item No. 7                Deleted (closed to ISE open item number 7 below)
OIP Phase 1 Open Item No. 8                 Deleted (closed to ISE open item number 7 below)
OIP Phase 1 Open Item No. 9                Submitted for closure in Reference 10 ISE Phase 1 Open Items                            Status ISE Phase 1 Open Item No. 1                 Submitted for closure in Reference 10 ISE Phase 1 Open Item No. 2                 Submitted for Closure in Reference 7 Page 4 of 24

Enclosure 2 Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 2 Fifth Six-Month Status Report for Implementation of HCVS Phases 1 and 2 ISE Phase 1 Open Item No. 3            Submitted for closure in Reference 10 ISE Phase 1 Open Item No. 4            Submitted for Closure in Reference 7 ISE Phase 1 Open Item No. 5            Submitted for closure in Reference 10 ISE Phase 1 Open Item No. 6            Submitted for Closure in Reference 7 ISE Phase 1 Open Item No. 7            Submitted for closure in Reference 10 ISE Phase 1 Open Item No. 8            Submitted for closure in Reference 10 ISE Phase 1 Open Item No. 9            Submitted for Closure in Reference 7 ISE Phase 1 Open Item No. 10           Submitted for closure in Reference 10 ISE Phase 1 Open Item No. 11           Submitted for closure in Reference 10 and updated with this update as provided in table below.
ISE Phase 1 Open Item No. 12           Submitted for closure in Reference 10 ISE Phase 1 Open Item No. 13           Submitted for closure in Reference 10 OIP Phase 2 Open Items                              Status OIP Phase 2 Open Item No. 1            Started ISE Phase 2 Open Items                              Status ISE Phase 2 Open Item No. 1           Started ISE Phase 2 Open Item No. 2            Not Started ISE Phase 2 Open Item No. 3            Not Started ISE Phase 2 Open Item No. 4            Not Started The table below documents the completion of the final remaining open items as listed above. As stated above, EGC provides the response for the following items and considers them to be complete for Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 2.
Page 5 of 24

Enclosure 2 Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 2 Fifth Six-Month Status Report for Implementation of HCVS Phases 1 and 2 Phase 1 Open Items Item                             Description                      Status OIP Phase 1 Open     Radiological Calculation H21C-114 has been           Complete Item No. 9           completed to provide assurance that personnel can Perform              safely operate the NMP2 HCVS and respond to radiological         required ERO response actions during severe evaluation for       accident conditions. Calculation was performed Phase 1 vent line    using NRG endorsed HCVS-WP-02 and HCVS-impact on ERO        FAQ-12 methodologies.
response actions.
Calculation H21 C-114 has been posted in ePortal for NRC's review.
Page 6 of 24

Enclosure 2 Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 2 Fifth Six-Month Status Report for Implementation of HCVS Phases 1 and 2 Item                               Description                    Status ISE Phase 1 Open      Seismic Design of the outdoor HCVS stack             Complete Item No. 1 The HCVS piping contains ASME Class 2, 3 and Make available for    ANSI B31 .1 piping. The entire HCVS system has N RC staff audit the  been evaluated to Seismic Category I requirements seismic and           in pipe stress calculation AX-515B consistent with tornado missile       the plants seismic design basis to comply with NEI final design criteria 13-02, Section 5.2 seismic design guidance. Per for the HCVS stack. NRC Letter, May 9, 2014 "

==Subject:==
Screening and Prioritization Results Regarding Information Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 50.54(f) Regarding Seismic Hazard Re-Evaluations for Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident", the NRC concluded that NMP2 "screened out" of performing the seismic risk evaluation as part of the Containment Purge System (CPS) I HCVS seismic analysis. Therefore, the more severe seismic load case (2xSSE) is not required as part of the BOB analysis of the CPS/HCVS system. Pipe stress calculation AX-515B is available in the ePortal for NRC review.
Missile Protection of the outdoor HCVS stack NEI 13-02, Section 5.1.1 .6 requires that missile impacts are to be considered for portions of the HCVS. The Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) issued a white paper HCVS-WP-04, endorsed by the NRC, which provides a risk-informed approach to evaluate the threat posed to exposed portions of the HCVS by wind-borne missiles. The white paper concludes that the HCVS is unlikely to be damaged in a manner that prevents containment venting by wind-generated missiles coincident with an ELAP or LUHS, for plants that are enveloped by the assumptions in the white paper.
A NMP2 specific missile evaluation is documented in the Engineering Change Package (ECP) consistent with HCVS-WP-04. The conclusion of the evaluation is that NMP2 meets all of the tornado missile assumptions identified in HCVS-WP-04 and as such ,
supplementary protection is not required for the HCVS piping and components. The ECP missile Page 7 of 24

Enclosure 2 Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 2 Fifth Six-Month Status Report for Implementation of HCVS Phases 1 and 2 Item                              Description                        Status evaluation is available in the eportal for NRC review.
ISE Phase 1 Open     The December 2015 OIP update contains a more           Complete Item No. 2           detailed description of the seismic adequacy of the ROS location.
Make available for NRC staff review documentation of a determination of seismic adequacy for the ROS location in the Reactor Building Track Bay.
ISE Phase 1 Open     The HCVS was designed to have the capacity to          Complete Item No. 3           vent the steam equivalent of a decay heat rate of 1%
of the rated thermal power at a pressure equivalent Make available for to the lessor of containment design pressure or the NRC staff audit PCPL consistent with NEI 13-02 Section 4.1.1.1 analyses guidance. The design pressure was used which is demonstrating that 45 psig at NMP2. This is equivalent to a flow rate of HCVS has the approximately 148,600 lbm/hr. The current design capacity to vent the has been evaluated considering pipe diameter, steam/energy length, and geometry as well as vendor provided equivalent of one valve Cv's, and the losses associated with a burst (1) percent of rupture disc. Calculation A 10.1-A-050 concludes licensed/rated that the design provides margin to the minimum thermal power required flow rate. Calculation A 10.1-A-050 is (unless a lower available for NRC review in the ePortal.
value is justified) and that the Additionally, MAAP 4.0.6 analyses in Calculation N2-suppression pool 2014-004 were performed to investigate the and the HCVS response of the NMP2 containment venting using together are able to the new HCVS vent parameters and the use of RPV absorb and reject alternate injection with assumed RCIC failure at 240 decay heat, such
                      &deg;F in the suppression pool. The objective of the that following a analysis was to understand the overall accident reactor shutdown response signature and key containment (wetwell from full power and drywell) thermal-hydraulic behavior. The MAAP containment analyses demonstrate that the suppression pool and pressure is the HCVS together are able to absorb and reject restored and then decay heat, such that following a reactor shutdown maintained below from full power containment pressure is restored and the primary then maintained below the primary containment Page 8 of 24

Enclosure 2 Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 2 Fifth Six-Month Status Report for Implementation of HCVS Phases 1 and 2 Item                             Description                     Status containment design  design pressure and the primary containment pressure and the    pressure limit. Calculation N2-2014-004 is available primary             for NRC review in the ePortal.
containment pressure limit.
Page 9 of 24

Enclosure 2 Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 2 Fifth Six-Month Status Report for Implementation of HCVS Phases 1 and 2 Item                                Description                         Status ISE Phase 1 Open      As required by EA-13-109, Section 1.2.11, the             Complete Item No. 4            HCVS design will include an Argon purge system Provide a             that will be connected just downstream of the HCVS isolation valve. It will be designed to prevent description of the final design of the   hydrogen detonation downstream of that valve.
HCVS to address       However, the Argon purge system is required to be used only if the ELAP progresses to severe accident hydrogen detonation and        conditions which result in the creation of hydrogen.
def lag ration.       The Argon purge system will have a switch for the control valve in the MCR to allow opening the purge for the designated time, but it will also allow for local operation in the ROS in case of a DC power or control circuit failure. The installed capacity for the Argon purge system will be sized for 6 purges within the first 24 hours of the ELAP. Evaluation N2-MISC-003, "MAAP Analysis to Support SAWA Strategy" shows that in a severe accident, NMP2 would not be expected to exceed 6 vent cycles in the first 24-hour period. The design allows for Argon bottle replacement for continued operation past 24 hours. The argon system was sized in calculation A 10.1-P-053 which has been loaded on the ePortal.
The Argon purge system can also be used to breach the rupture disc. The MCR panel will include an indication of vent line pressure upstream of the disc to show when the disc has burst due to the increased Argon pressure.
Page 10 of 24

Enclosure 2 Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 2 Fifth Six-Month Status Report for Implementation of HCVS Phases 1 and 2 Item                                  Description                  Status ISE Phase 1 Open     At NMP2, the primary operating station for HCVS      Complete Item No. 5           operation is located in the MCR. A HCVS remote Make available for   operating station (ROS) is located in the RB Track NRC staff audit      Bay. The location was ~valuated for habitability and documentation that   accessibility during a severe accident. Onsite demonstrates         communications will be performed using either the adequate             installed sound powered headset system or the 450 communication        MHz radios in the talk around mode, or a between the          combination thereof. A sound powered phone jack is remote HCVS          available near the ROS to communicate with the rest operation locations  of the plant.
and HCVS decision makers during        Offsite communications will utilize fixed satellite ELAP and severe      phones in the Control Room and Technical Support accident conditions. Center (TSC). Both locations also have portable satellite phones staged.
Communications protocol for beyond design basis events are documented in CC-NM-118 and procedure N2-0P-76 which are available for NRC review in the ePortal.
These communication methods are consistent with FLEX communication practices at NMP2 and have been previously reviewed by the staff as documented in a communications safety assessment regarding NTTF Rec 9.3 Communications for NMP (ML13100A236).
P!:lru:=! 11 of ?LI.

Enclosure 2 Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 2 Fifth Six-Month Status Report for Implementation of HCVS Phases 1 and 2 Item                              Description                   Status ISE Phase 1 Open     The December 2015 OIP update contains a more       Complete Item No. 6           detailed description of how the design addresses Provide a            hydrogen detonation and deflagration. Refer to the description of the   discussion subtitled "Unintended Cross Flow of strategies for       Vented Fluids" on page 16 of 66 in the December hydrogen control     2015 OIP for details as to how hydrogen gas that minimizes the   migration and ingress into the reactor building or potential for        other buildings is minimized.
hydrogen gas migration and ingress into the reactor building or other buildings.
P::\no 1? nf ~Ll

Enclosure 2 Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 2 Fifth Six-Month Status Report for Implementation of HCVS Phases 1 and 2 Item                              Description                        Status ISE Phase 1 Open     Temperature Evaluation:                                 Complete Item No. 7 Make available for   Accessing HCVS equipment, following an external N RC staff audit an  event that results in an ELAP, will subject the evaluation of        operator to prevailing area temperatures. The temperature and      majority of the operator travel path from the MGR to radiological         the ROS is outdoors. Therefore, the travel path conditions to        does not pose any habitability concerns, with respect ensure that          to temperature. The MGR and ROS are expected to operating            remain habitable, with respect to temperature, during personnel can        the event. During the ELAP, as with the station safely access and    blackout, normal ventilation systems are inoperable operate controls     and non-vital equipment is not contributing to the and support          area heat load. Therefore, area temperatures in the equipment.           MGR will be higher than that for normal operation and likely more in line with that for station blackout.
The expected peak area temperature for the MGR is 100 &deg;F. This is based on Calculation ES-198 which predicts the control room heat-up following a station blackout. The calculation assumes doors to the control room will be open. Procedural directions is provided in Station Blackout/ELAP procedure N2-SOP-01 to block open control room doors for additional cooling when normal ventilation is lost.
The area temperature for the ROS in the Track Bay is not expected to undergo any appreciable change as a result of the event. There is no vital equipment in the area that would be operating, adding to the heat load, and the space has a 20' vertical height, which will moderate the area temperature.
Additionally, the Track Bay door to the outside can be opened to moderate the temperature, if needed.
Radiological Evaluation:
The radiological dose Calculation H21C-114 is described in detail under the response to OIP Phase 1, Open Item No. 9 above.
In accordance with the definition of sustained operations in NEI 13-02, the integrated radiation dose due to HCVS operation over a 7-day period Page 13 of 24

Enclosure 2 Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 2 Fifth Six-Month Status Report for Implementation of HCVS Phases 1 and 2 Item                               Description                    Status was determined in Calculation H21 C-114. The 7-day dose determined in the calculation due to HCVS operation is a conservative maximum integrated radiation dose over a 7-day period with ELAP and fuel failure starting at reactor shutdown. For the sources considered and the methodology used in the calculation, the timing of HCVS vent operation or cycling of the vent will not create higher doses at personnel habitability and equipment locations (i.e.,
maximum doses determined in the calculation bound operational considerations for HCVS vent operation).
The operator travel path is designed to minimize the dose to the operator from shine off of the HCVS vent pipe on the west side of the Reactor Building. The dose rates along the majority of the path are heavily shielded from the HCVS vent pipe and would not be significant(< 1 mR/hr) . The dose rate between the Control Building and the Maintenance Building could be significant (several R/hr). However, the exposure to this dose rate would be for a few seconds and the accumulated dose would not be significant.
Peak maximum dose rates and 7-day total integrated dose have been calculated for the POS and the ROS in Calculation H21C-114. The radiation dose to personnel occupying defined habitability locations, resulting from HCVS operation are below the 5 rem acceptance criteria as shown below:
MCR: 7-day Total Integrated Dose= 4.1 rem ROS: 7-day Total Integrated Dose< 1 rem Therefore, during the 7 days of sustained operation for BDBEE, the predicted environmental and radiological conditions will be acceptable for the operators to gain access to areas required for HCVS operation in the MCR and ROS. The above referenced calculations are available in the ePortal for NRC review.
Page 14 of 24

Enclosure 2 Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 2 Fifth Six-Month Status Report for Implementation of HCVS Phases 1 and 2 Item                              Description                         Status ISE Phase 1 Open      Batteries/Battery Charger Sizing:                       Complete Item No. 8 Make available for    The new battery selected is a sixty (60) cell GNB NRG staff audit the   battery, with the battery cells connected in series to final sizing          create 125VDC nominal voltage. The battery is a evaluation for        Valve Regulated Lead Acid (VRLA) type rated for HCVS                  104 ampere-hours. The battery is selected in batteries/battery     accordance to IEEE-485. The Battery Sizing charger including     Requirements indicates that based on 2.3 ampere incorporation into    loading requirements for 24 hours duty period, a FLEX DG loading       minimum of a sixty (60) cell, 90.3 ampere-hours calculation.          battery is required to bound the required battery duty cycle and end-of-cycle battery terminal voltage requirements. The selected battery capacity of 104 ampere-hours is more than the minimum required 90.3 ampere-hours battery capacity. Therefore, the selected battery is adequate.
The battery charger is rated for 130 volts nominal DC output voltage, 10 amperes nominal DC output current, 120 volts AC input voltage and a current limit adjustment range of 50% - 120%. The battery/battery charger sizing requirements evaluation is available in the ePortal for NRG review.
Incorporation into FLEX DG Loading Calculation:
Following a BOBE, the battery charger is expected to draw a maximum load of 2.9 kVA. This load will be credited in the NMP2 FLEX Portable Diesel Generator Calculation EC-206 which was revised to reflect the load addition of the battery charger. The additional load added is still within the capability of the NMP2 FLEX Diesel Generator and therefore, this change is acceptable. Calculation EC-206 is available in the ePortal for NRG review.
Page 15 of 24

Enclosure 2 Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 2 Fifth Six-Month Status Report for Implementation of HCVS Phases 1 and 2 Item                             Description                     Status ISE Phase 1 Open     P&ID 061-D outlines the functional design of the    Complete Item No. 9           pneumatic system. Calculation A 10.1-P-051 Make available for   determines the required amount of Nitrogen needed NRC staff audit      for the required number of vent cycles in a 24-hour documentation of     period.
the HCVS nitrogen    The P&ID and calculation are loaded on the ePortal.
pneumatic system design including sizing and location.
Page 16 of 24

Enclosure 2 Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 2 Fifth Six-Month Status Report for Implementation of HCVS Phases 1 and 2 Item                               Description                         Status ISE Phase 1 Open     New components related to HCVS operation are            Complete Item No. 10          required to be designed to operate following a seismic event. Most equipment came qualified or Make available for evaluated by the vendor. However, some equipment NRG staff audit was purchased as commercial grade (non-safety documentation of a related) and was shake tested in order to prove the seismic components' ability to withstand a bounding seismic qualification event.
evaluation of HCVS components.
Qualification/evaluation documentation provided by the vendor, or test results from shake tests were compiled into a single report for HCVS dedicated equipment (Ref. VENRPT-15-000013) with the exception of separate seismic design reports for the PCIVs and HCVS pressure control valve 2CPS-AOV134. These reports are available in the ePortal for NRG review.
ISE Phase 1 Open     Existing Instrumentation:                               Complete Item No. 11                                                                  and In the Phases 1 and 2 combined HCVS OIP, Part 2:        Revised in Make available for Key Venting Parameters section, both drywell            this NRG staff audit pressure and suppression chamber pressure and          December descriptions of all suppression pool level are listed as key parameters. 2016 instrumentation and Other Part 2 OIP sections only list drywell pressure    Update controls (existing and suppression pool level as key parameters. In and planned)
Part 3 of the OIP, drywell pressure and suppression necessary to pool level are stated as the key parameters for implement this SAWM operations. The following discussion has order including been revised since the June 2016 six-month update qualification to clarify what key parameters are used for HCVS methods.
initiation and cycling for Phases 1 and 2.
Existing control room indications for wetwell (suppression chamber) pressure and suppression pool (primary containment) water level are used for HCVS venting operation. Operation of the HCVS will be based on guidance in the EOPs and SAPs and will follow the primary containment pressure limit (PCPL) curves contained in these procedures. The PCPL curves use suppression chamber pressure vs.
primary containment water level parameters to determine when to vent containment. Therefore, containment wetwell pressure indication is preferred Page 17 of 24

Enclosure 2 Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 2 Fifth Six-Month Status Report for Implementation of HCVS Phases 1 and 2 Item                                Description                     Status to determine the need, timing and effectiveness of the venting operation following a BDBEE, in order to ensure that containment pressure does not exceed the PCPL. Existing control room indication for wetwell pressure, shown on 2CMS*Pl7A (Division 1) and 2CMS*PR7B (Division 2), will be used for this purpose. These indicators receive pressure signals from pressure transmitters 2CMS*PT7A and 2CMS*PT7B, respectively. These pressure transmitters sense the wetwell pressure from penetrations Z-337-1 and Z-338-1, both located at elevation 224'-0".
Drywell pressure instrumentation may also be referenced during the event. Existing control room indication for drywell pressure, shown on 2CMS*Pl2A (Division 1) and 2CMS*PR2B (Division 2), will be used for this purpose. These indicators receive pressure signals from pressure transmitters 2CMS*PT2A and 2CMS*PT2B, respectively.
Wetwell level indication is needed to determine that the wetwell vent path is preserved. Wetwell level is displayed on indicator 2CMS*Ll9A (Division 1) and 2CMS*LR9B (Division 2). These indicators receive level signals from level transmitters 2CMS*LT9A and 2CMS*LT9B, respectively. Both of the instruments interface with the suppression pool at low and high elevation of 192' and 217' and can therefore monitor between those elevations. The inlet to the HCVS vent pipe is at elevation 227'. Therefore, water level will have to be maintained below 217' in order to ensure that the vent inlet does not get covered with water.
The pressure and level indicators and related transmitters are all Safety Related, Regulatory Guide 1.97 compliant components (Ref. NMP2-RG197-01 ).
They are also environmentally qualified for accident conditions (Ref. 2EQDP-XMTR001 ). Division 1 is the FLEX diesel power backed loop, and Division 2 can be powered as an alternate strategy.
Additionally, containment pressure and/or wetwell level can be obtained from a Transmation 1045 (or Page 18 of 24

Enclosure 2 Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 2 Fifth Six-Month Status Report for Implementation of HCVS Phases 1 and 2 Item                              Description                      Status similar loop calibrator) at the associated transmitter or Relay Room panel. NMP2 procedure N2-SOP-78A, EOP Key Parameter - Alternate Instrumentation, provides direction on how to obtain readings from transmitters using this hand-held test equipment.
The FLEX Phase 2 primary strategy is to provide power using a FLEX generator to Division 1 600 VAC unit substation to maintain instrumentation power supply and the back-up is Division 2.
Depending on availability, either loop may be used for containment pressure and wetwell level determination.
New HCVS Instrumentation and Controls:
The l&C scope for the HCVS is to display the following and to control the SOVs associated with the new primary containment isolation valves from new control room panel 2CEC-PNL801 located in the Main Control Room. The SOVs are controlled via key-lock control switches.
* HCVS Isolation Valve Position Indication
* Temperature, Pressure and Radiation of the HCVS Pipe
* HCVS Purge System Supply Pressure (Local indication only)
* HCVS Battery Voltage New track bay control panel 2CPS-PNL 100 serves as the main power distribution for all l&C components.
A detailed description of existing and new I &C components including qualification methods is included in the Engineering Change Package and is available on the ePortal for NRC review.
Page 19 of 24

Enclosure 2 Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 2 Fifth Six-Month Status Report for Implementation of HCVS Phases 1 and 2 Item                              Description                      Status ISE Phase 1 Open     The HCVS is located in Primary Containment,           Complete Item No.12           Secondary Containment, the Reactor Building Track Bay, the Control Room, and outside the Reactor Make available for Building. Environmental conditions and impacts are NRG staff audit the evaluated in detail in the Engineering Change description of local Package (ECP). The ECP includes a listing of the conditions components in each area along with the (temperature, corresponding environmental conditions including radiation, and temperature, radiation and humidity. The ECP also humidity) includes a detailed listing of environmental anticipated during qualification requirements. The complete listing and ELAP and severe information from the ECP is available on the ePortal accident for the for NRG review.
components (valves, On November 17, 2016 a teleconference between instrumentation, Exelon and the NRG was held to review NMP2
: sensors, transmitters,        Phase 1 closure of open items. In this call NMP clarified that consistent with NEI 13-02 Appendix C indicators, section C.8.1, no further environmental qualification electronics, control of existing containment parameter monitoring devices, etc.)
instrumentation is required if the instrumentation is required for HCVS already RG 1.97 qualified.
venting including confirmation that the components are capable of performing their functions during ELAP and severe accident conditions.
Page 20 of 24

Enclosure 2 Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 2 Fifth Six-Month Status Report for Implementation of HCVS Phases 1 and 2 Item                               Description                        Status ISE Phase 1 Open      The existing containment isolation valves               Complete Item No. 13           2CPS* AOV109 and 2CPS* AOV111 were replaced with new valves. Additionally, an HCVS containment Make available for pressure control valve (2CPS-AOV134) located NRG staff audit downstream of the containment isolation valves was documentation of added to control vent flow after the containment an evaluation isolation valves are opened during a BDBEE.
verifying the existing Actuator capability and margin calculations were containment performed using the Sargent & Lundy AirBase isolation valves software program for the three AOVs. The relied upon for the calculations are intended to confirm that the AOVs HCVS, will open can open under the maximum expected differential under the pressure (MEDP) during BDBEE and severe maximum expected accident wetwell venting.
differential pressure during BDBEE and Under an ELAP or for severe accident wetwell severe accident venting the subject valves are closed and without wetwell venting.
their normal supply of air power. Prior to exceeding the primary containment pressure limit (PCPL),
Operators open the valves remotely using the dedicated HCVS batteries and nitrogen bottles. The MEDP is determined based on assuming the maximum upstream pressure is equal to the PCPL of 45 psig and by conservatively using a downstream pressure equal to vacuum pressure
(-14. 7 psig) since exhausting steam may condense in the HCVS line, creating a negative pressure. Thus the MEDP used in the calculations is 59.7 psid.
Calculation A 10.1-P-047 for 2CPS*AOV109/111 shows actuator torque required vs. actuator torque available margins for the closed to full open stroke in the range of 49% to 189%. Calculation A 10.1-P-052 for 2CPS-AOV134 shows margins from the closed to full open stroke in the range of 78% to 233%. The calculations demonstrate positive margin in the opening direction. The calculations are available in the ePortal for NRG review.
Page 21 of 24

Enclosure 2 Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 2 Fifth Six-Month Status Report for Implementation of HCVS Phases 1 and 2 Phase 2 OIP Open Items Item                                  Description                         Status OIP Phase 2 Open        Perform radiological evaluation to determine            Started Item No.1               feasibility of reactor building actions.
ISE Phase 2 Open        Licensee to provide the site-specific MAAP              Started Item No. 1              evaluation that establishes the initial SAWA flow rate (ISE Section 3.3.2.2)
ISE Phase 2 Open        Licensee to demonstrate that containment failure as     Not Started Item No. 2              a result of overpressure can be prevented without a drywell vent during severe accident conditions (ISE Section 3.3.3).
ISE Phase 2 Open        Licensee to demonstrate that there is adequate          Not Started Item No. 3              communication between the MCR and the operator at the FLEX manual valve during severe accident conditions (ISE Section 3.3.3.4).
ISE Phase 2 Open        Licensee to demonstrate the SAWM flow                   Not Started Item No. 4              instrumentation qualification for the expected environmental conditions (ISE Section 3.3.3.4).
7    Interim Staff Evaluation Impacts There are no potential impacts to the Interim Staff Evaluation(s) identified at this time. However, as revised in the response to ISi Open Item 11 above the existing containment instrumentation credited has been changed. Additionally, clarifications to various electrical discussions in the Reference 7 combined OIP are provided as follows:
Page 11 of 66, fourth bullet under the time constraint discussion 24 Hours, Connect back-up power to HCVS battery charger. The HCVS battery is calculated to last a minimum of 24 hours (ISE Open Item #8). The HCVS battery charger will be able to be re-powered either from the 600V AC bus permanently connected to the HCVS battery charger (via a 600 - 120/240 V AC step-down distribution transformer) that will be re-powered from a portable diesel generator (DG) put in place for FLEX or locally (Reactor Building Track Bay) from a small portable generator. The DG will be staged and placed in service within 8 hours (Reference 1) and therefore will be available prior to being required. In the event that the DG is not available, a local connection will allow a small portable generator to be connected to the HCVS battery charger to provide power. Connection of a small portable generator is achievable within 24 hours.
Page 14 of 66, under "Power and Pneumatic Supply Sources" All electrical power required for operation of HCVS components will be provided by a dedicated HCVS battery charger and battery. The HCVS battery has a minimum Page 22 of 24

Enclosure 2 Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 2 Fifth Six-Month Status Report for Implementation of HCVS Phases 1 and 2 capacity capable of providing power to the HCVS loads for 24 hours without recharging. An evaluation has been completed as part of the detailed design process (ISE Open Item #8). The HCVS battery charger provided requires a 120 VAC supply. This will be supplied by a 600 VAC bus (via a 600 - 120/240 VAC step-down distribution transformer) that will be re-powered by a portable diesel generator as part of the FLEX response. In addition, a connection point that utilizes standard 120 VAC electrical connections will be provided locally for a portable generator for sustained operation of the HCVS.
Page 21 of 66, 4th paragraph under Greater than 24 Hour Coping Detail The HCVS battery and battery charger will also be installed in the Reactor Building Track Bay. The HCVS battery has a capacity sufficient for 24-hour operation. The normal power supply to the HCVS battery charger will be provided from a 600 V AC bus (via a 600 - 120/240 VAC step-down distribution transformer) that will be re-powered by a portable diesel generator as part of the FLEX response. A design change to install the portable diesel generator external connection points to this bus has been completed in support of EA-12-049 (Reference 1). In the event that power is not restored to the bus, a local 120 V AC connection will allow the HCVS battery charger to receive power from a small portable generator. Actions to replenish the electrical supply include refueling the DG or connecting and refueling a small portable generator.
Page 26 of 66, 5th paragraph under general description of venting actions support functions The HCVS battery and battery charger will also be installed in the Reactor Building Track Bay. The HCVS battery has a capacity sufficient for 24-hour operation. The normal power source for the HCVS battery charger is a 120/240 V AC rated distribution panel which is fed by a 600 V AC bus (via a 600 - 120/240 VAC step-down distribution transformer) that will be re-powered by a portable diesel generator as part of the FLEX response. A design change to install the portable diesel generator external connection points to this bus has been completed in support of EA-12-049 (Reference 1). In the event that power is not restored to the 600 V AC bus, a local 120 V AC connection to the HCVS battery charger will allow the HCVS battery charger to receive power from a small portable generator. Actions to replenish the electrical supply include refueling the DG or connecting and refueling a small portable generator.
8 References The following references support the updates to the combined Phases 1 and 2 Overall Integrated Plan described in this enclosure.
: 1. Nine Mile Point Unit 2's Overall Integrated Plan in Response to June 6, 2013 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Hardened Containment Vents Capable of Operation Under Severe Accident Conditions (Order Number EA-13-109)," dated June 27, 2014.
Page 23 of 24

Enclosure 2 Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 2 Fifth Six-Month Status Report for Implementation of HCVS Phases 1 and 2
: 2. NRC Order Number EA-13-109, "Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Hardened Containment Vents Capable of Operation Under Severe Accident Conditions" dated June 6, 2013.
: 3. NEI 13-02, "Industry Guidance for Compliance with NRC Order EA-13-109, 'To Modify Licenses with Regard to Reliable Hardened Containment Vents Capable of Operation Under Severe Accident Conditions," Revision 1, dated April 2015.
: 4. NRC Interim Staff Guidance JLD-ISG-2013-02, "Compliance with Order EA     109, Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Hardened Containment Vents Capable of Operation Under Severe Accident Conditions," Revision 0, dated November 2013 (Accession No. ML13304B836).
: 5. NRC Endorsement of industry "Hardened Containment Venting System (HCVS)
Phase 1 Overall Integrated Plan Template (EA-13-109) Rev O" (Accession No. ML14128A219).
: 6. NRC Interim Staff Evaluation "Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 2 - Interim Staff Evaluation Relating to Overall Integrated Plan in Response to Phase 1 of the Order EA-13-109 (Severe Accident Capable Hardened Vents (TAC NO.
MF4482)", dated February 11, 2015.
: 7. Nine Mile Point Unit 1's Combined Phase 1 and 2 Overall Integrated Plan in Response to "June 6, 2013 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Hardened Containment Vents Capable of Operation Under Severe Accident Conditions (Order Number EA-13-109)," dated December 15, 2015.
: 8. NRC Interim Staff Guidance JLD-ISG-2015-01, "Compliance with Phase 2 of Order EA-13-109, Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Hardened Containment Vents Capable of Operation Under Severe Accident Conditions,"
Revision 0, dated April 2015 (Accession No. ML15104A118).
: 9. Letter from M.G. Korsnick (GENG) to Document Control Desk (NRC), Overall Integrated Plan for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events, dated February 28, 2013.
: 10. Nine Mile Point's Fourth Six-Month Status Report Update for Phases 1 and 2 Overall Integrated Plan in Response to "June 6, 2013 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Hardened Containment Vents Capable of Operation Under Severe Accident Conditions (Order Number EA      109)," dated June 30, 2016.
: 11. NRC Interim Staff Evaluation "Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 2 - Interim Staff Evaluation Relating to Overall Integrated Plan in Response to Phase 2 of the Order EA-13-109 (Severe Accident Capable Hardened Vents (TAC NO.
MF4482)", dated August 25, 2016.
Page 24 of 24}}