View source for PY-CEI-NRR-1304, Suggests That Meeting Be Held on 910221 to Present Addl Info on FW Nozzle Weld Indications,To Accommodate Schedules of Technical Personnel Who Will Be Present to Address NRC Questions

{{Adams
| number = ML20067B220
| issue date = 02/01/1991
| title = Suggests That Meeting Be Held on 910221 to Present Addl Info on FW Nozzle Weld Indications,To Accommodate Schedules of Technical Personnel Who Will Be Present to Address NRC Questions
| author name = Lyster M
| author affiliation = CENTERIOR ENERGY
| addressee name = 
| addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
| docket = 05000440
| license number = 
| contact person = 
| document report number = PY-CEI-NRR-1304, TAC-79022, NUDOCS 9102080176
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE
| page count = 1
| project = TAC:79022
| stage = Meeting
}}

=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:n          4 GNTE PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT              Mall Address:
10 CENTER ROAD                        PO. BOX 97                                                            Michael D. Lyster PERRY, OHIO 44081                      PERRY, OHIO 44081 VICE PRESIDENT NUCLEAR (216) 259 3737 February-1, 1991 PY-CEI/NRR-1304 L U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Vashington, D. C.       20555 Perry Nuclear Power Plant Docket No. 50-440 Feedvater Nozzle Veld Indications (TAC No. 79022)
Centlement By {{letter dated|date=December 14, 1990|text=letter dated December 14, 1990}}, the NRC. staff noted that additional information on the feedvater nozzle veld indications identified a: PNPP was                                                    <
necessary in order for the staff to complete evaluations and determine acceptability of operation of PNPP for the duration of cycle 3. Therefore, the staf f requested more detailed justification for use of the crack growth .
rate assumptions utilized in the evaluation submitted by {{letter dated|date=November 26, 1990|text=letter dated November 26, 1990}} (PY-CEI/NRR-1264L), and asked that options for obtaining actual or representative crack growth data during the cycle be addressed. It was                                                          !
requested that this information be provided within 45 days of plant startup in Cycle 3.                                                                                                         ,
j It is proposed that a meeting be held on February 21, 1991 at 1:00 p.m. to present additional information on this subject. The February 21 date,                                                           I although beyond the requested 45 days, is proposed to accomodate schedules of                                                   j technical personnel who vill be present to address the staff's questions. .Ve                                                   '
also understand that a brief discussion on the feedvater nozzle Indications is on the agends for the February 7, 1991 Hanagement Meeting with the NRC.
If you have any questions, please feel free to call.                                                                            1 I
Sinterely,                                                                           l 1
Michael f . Lyster m&r w HDL BSFinje i
en:    USNRC Project Manager                                                                                                 '
USNRC Resident Office i
                    .USNRC Region III openug compones                                                                                                      i     <
                                                                                                                             ')
CiMiaN E!ectne mmattg                                                                                                   .
9102oso176 9to2ot              't r                                                               h),
070035                                 lDR ADOCXo5oogo 1}}