View source for PY-CEI-NRR-0814, Responds to Generic Ltr 88-02, Isap Ii. Util Decided Not to Participate in Isap Ii,But Intends to Support Objectives Described in Generic Ltr by Other Means

{{Adams
| number = ML20147H203
| issue date = 02/26/1988
| title = Responds to Generic Ltr 88-02, Isap Ii. Util Decided Not to Participate in Isap Ii,But Intends to Support Objectives Described in Generic Ltr by Other Means
| author name = Kaplan A
| author affiliation = CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO.
| addressee name = Miraglia F
| addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION (NRR)
| docket = 05000440
| license number = 
| contact person = 
| document report number = GL-88-02, GL-88-2, PY-CEI-NRR-0814, PY-CEI-NRR-814, NUDOCS 8803080417
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC
| page count = 2
}}

=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:(
26 g     -
THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMIN ATING COMPANY P.O  DOX 97 s  PER AY. OHtO 44081  m  TELEPHONE (216) 259-3737   e  ADDR ESS - 10 CENTER ROAO Serving The Best Location in the Nation PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT
{    AI Kaplan                                           Februa ry 26, 1988 vice eResioem                                       PY-CEI/NRR-0814 L NUCLEAR GROUP F
Mr. Frank J. Miraglia Associate Director for Projects U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 Perry Nuclear Power Plant Docket No. 50-440 Integrated Safety Assessment Program II (ISAP II) (Generic Letter 88-02)

==Dear Mr. Miraglia:==

Thank you f or the opportunity to participate in the Integrated Saf ety Assessment Program II (ISAP II) described in your generic letter 88-02.              We agree with the stated objectives of ranking licensing and generic issues according to plant-specific safety importance and implementation consistent with each utility's available resources.
However, the ISAP II program is based on performance of a plant-specifit Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA), and Cleveland Electric has no immediate plans to perform such a PRA. In addition, the existing interactive process for resolving Perry-specific licensing issues has been adequate. Regarding generic issues, Cleveland Electric has actively supported the definition and cost-effective resolution of generic safety issues through industry owner's groups established for that purpose and, more recently, NUMARC. The successful resolution of truly generic issues requires this broad-based consensus.
CEI has therefore decided against ISAP II participation, at the present time, with the full intention of supporting the objectives described in generic letter 38-02 by other means.       Our response to this letter's questionnaire is accordingly attached.
Please call if you have any questions.
Very truly y urs, J
Al Kaplan Vice President Nucicar Group AK: cab Enclosure gh p
cc: Document Control De sk T. Colburn K. Connaughton l
l 8803080417 880226 PDR    ADOCK 05000440 P                 PDR
: j. .
           .c u:*
Integrated Safety Assessment Prerram (ISAF) II Response Format to Generic Letter 88-0?
Facility Name:     Perry Nuclear Power Plant
  /                   Utility:     Cleve' land Electric Illuminating Company (CEI)
Individual Contact Name:       E. M. Buzzelli           Phone Number: (216) 259-3737 X-5606 An expression of interest will not be considered a conmitment te particip6te on the part of the utility.
: 1. Would you be interested in participating in ISAP II? If so, in whist time frame?
CEI is not oresently in.erested in participating in ISAP II.
: 2. Do you believe that an industry /NRC seminar consisting ;f a brief discussicn by NRC followed by a question and answer period would be beneficial prior to making a decision?
CEI would not oppose discussions of additional information at any time.
: 3. Would you be interesteo in a one-on-one meeting with the f:PC to discuss your particular facility or facilities?
No,.our frequent opportunities to meet with the NRC nroiect nsnar,er and other staff are considered sufficient to (!) interoret and naintain com9.iance with 1
our operating 1.icense, and (2) address 1.icensin.g and generic .nsues aris NUMARC and Owners Groups as sopropriate.
: 4. If you remain urdecided regarding participation, what additieral inferaation do you need in order to make a decision?
: 5. Do you have any potential concerns obout participating in !UP II?
CEI supports the ohiective, however, it is not our present intent to oerform a plant-specific PRA in order to complete our Individual Plant Examination.
l                          Therefore, the banefit of performing a PRA in order to narticinate in ISAP II i
is not apoarent.
: 6. Do you have any suggestier.s for progr6n improver'ents or charces?
l                          CEI will provide such recomnendations through industry organizations l                          established for this purpose: NUMARC and the BWR 09ners Group.
(
                                                          .-.}}