View source for NUREG-0133, Safety Evaluation Accepting Licensee Rev 3 to ODCM for Plant Through Temporary Change 4.Rev Meets Criteria of NUREG-0133 & Other Guidance. Guidance

{{Adams
| number = ML20248B843
| issue date = 06/05/1989
| title = Safety Evaluation Accepting Licensee Rev 3 to ODCM for Plant Through Temporary Change 4.Rev Meets Criteria of NUREG-0133 & Other Guidance. Guidance
| author name = 
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION (NRR)
| addressee name = 
| addressee affiliation = 
| docket = 05000440
| license number = 
| contact person = 
| case reference number = RTR-NUREG-0133, RTR-NUREG-133
| document report number = NUDOCS 8906090185
| package number = ML20246L261
| document type = SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT--LICENSING &amp; RELATED ISSUES, TEXT-SAFETY REPORT
| page count = 2
}}

=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:_ - _ _ _ _ _ - -
   ~
       $ :i     '
kh
       '             i                                       UNITED STATES j
l g                 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
              .L              j                           WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 j$
SAFETY EVALUATION.BY.THE.0FFICE.0F. NUCLEAR. REACTOR. REGULATION                              I I
                                                 '0FFSITE. DOSE CALCULATION. MANUAL                                            !
REVISION.3.THROUGH TCN 4                                                .d THE. CLEVELAND. ELECTRIC. ILLUMINATING. COMPANY,.ET.AL.                                l 1
                               ~
PERRY. NUCLEAR. POWER. PLANT,. UNIT.N0. 1 00CKET.NO. 50 440                                                   l

==1.0 INTRODUCTION==
By. {{letter dated|date=March 9, 1988|text=letter dated March 9,1988}} (P.eference (a')), the staff documented acceptance                 ,
                   ' with certain caveats) of Revision 2 of the Offsite' Dose Calculation Manual ODCM) for the Perry Nuclear Power Plant Unit No.'1 (Perry). With reference (b),
the licensee submitted a complete Revision 3 to the ODCM that also included                            <
T.CN-l'and 2. With' reference (c) the licensee provided a response to.the'NRC c6mments of reference (a) and stated that revised ODCM pages addressing these comments would be submitted with the next Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Report. With reference (d) the' licensee submitted pages of TCN-3 and                      ,
TCN-4-bringing the Perry ODCM up to date as of December 31, 1988. The purpose of this Safety Evaluation is to document acceptance of the ODCM for Perry
                   'through Revision 3, TCN-4.
2.0 EVALUATION The Revision 3 ODCM for Perry updated through TCN-4 has been reviewed for us
            -        in its entirety by our contractor, EG&G Idaho, Inc. Their discussion and comments are contained in their detailed letter evaluation SIM-53-89 accompany-ing reference (e) (attached).
Our contractor has' evaluated the licensee's submittals, references (b), (c),
and (d)'against each of the discrepancies and suggestions identified in reference (a). Our contractor included, in general, that the licensee's ODCM updated through TCN-4 to Revision 3 meets all of the criteria of NUREG-0133 and other NRC guidance. However, the contractor identified two areas for the licensee's further consideration.
The first involved the. licensee's response to Major Discrepancy (#2) of the contractor's Technical Evaluation Report (TER) enclosed with Reference (a).
1 The contractor suggests that the licensee. include in the ODCM values for the term flow rate, F, and should reference or justify the values for the mixing ratio, M .
p The second involved the licensee's response to Additional Discrepancy (#9) f rom the TER in Reference (a). It appears that a previous milk control location was deleted in TCN-3. The licensee should address the contractor's P

9
                                                 -2 comments on establishing a new milk control location and revise the ODCM, if necessary.

==3.0 CONCLUSION==

In all other respects, the staff agrees with the contractor that the method-ology used in the licensee's ODCM, Revision 3 updated through TCN-4, neets the b,     criteria of NUREG-0133 and other NRC guidance. Therefore, except as noted above, we conclude that the licensee's revision to the ODCM is acceptable.

==4.0 REFERENCES==

(a) {{letter dated|date=March 9, 1988|text=March 9, 1988 letter}} from T. G. Colburn, NRC, to A. Kaplan, CEIC.
(b) {{letter dated|date=August 30, 1988|text=August 30, 1988 letter}} from A. Kaplan, CEIC, to NRC Document Control Desk.                                                                                                                                                                ,
(c) {{letter dated|date=September 20, 1988|text=September 20, 1988 letter}} form A. Kaplan, CEIC, to NRC Document Control Desk.
(d) {{letter dated|date=March 1, 1989|text=March 1,1989 letter}} from A. Kaplan, CEIC, to NRC Document Control Desk.
(e) {{letter dated|date=April 26, 1989|text=April 26, 1989 letter}} from F. B. Simpson, INEL, to W. Meinke, NRC.
Attachment as stated                                       ,
Principal Contributors:      W. Meinke T. Colburn Dated: June 5,1989 i
f i
                                                                            - - _ ~ _ _ - . - - - . _ - - , - - - - - - . - . - - - - - - - . - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - _ - - - -}}