View source for NRC-2011-0237, Comment (8) of Brian Sepalak on Behalf of Beaver Valley Power Station Supporting Regional Utility Group I Comments on Draft NUREG-1022, Revision 3, Event Reporting Guidelines: 10 CFR 50.72 and 50.73.

{{Adams
| number = ML11353A409
| issue date = 12/12/2011
| title = Comment (8) of Brian Sepalak on Behalf of Beaver Valley Power Station Supporting Regional Utility Group I Comments on Draft NUREG-1022, Revision 3, Event Reporting Guidelines: 10 CFR 50.72 and 50.73.
| author name = Sepalak B
| author affiliation = Region 1 Utility Group (RUG1)
| addressee name = Bladey C
| addressee affiliation = NRC/ADM/DAS/RDEB
| docket = 05000334
| license number = 
| contact person = 
| case reference number = 76FR63565 00008, NRC-2011-0237
| document report number = NUREG-1022 R3
| document type = General FR Notice Comment Letter type:NRC
| page count = 2
}}

=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:FLI--%,.-.      IIC',TjI"
                                                .           S RUG I REGION I UTILIY GROUP
                                           >?
                                           ~     ~        4LSO December 12, 2011 Ms. Cindy K. Bladey             _   .-      -.
Chief, Rules, Announcements and Directives BrancrhJ U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

==Subject:==
Regional Utility Group I Comments on Draft NUREG-1022, Revision 3, "Event Reporting Guidelines: 10 CFR 50.72 and 50.73." (Federal Register dated October 13, 2011; 76 FR 63565; Docket ID NRC-2011-0237)

==Dear Ms. Bladey:==

The Regional Utility Group for NRC Region I (RUG I) appreciates the opportunity to provide comments on draft NUREG-1 022, Revision 3, "Event Reporting Guidelines: 10 CFR 50.72 and 50.73."
RUG I members endorse the comments provided to the NRC in a letter titled, "NEI Comments on Draft NUREG-1022, Revision 3, 'Event Reporting Guidelines: 10 CFR 50.72 and 50.73,"
dated December 6, 2011. In particular, RUG I members want to emphasize that elements of the proposed changes to the NUREG are substantive changes that are well beyond the staff's intended purpose of providing guidance clarification, and as such have not received adequate regulatory analysis.
The RUG I members support the NEI request to further discuss the NRC's proposed resolution of industry comments prior to the final issuance of NUREG-1 022, Revision 3.
Please contact me at sepelakb@firstenergycorp.com or 724-682-4282 should you have any questions.
Sincerely, Brian Sepalak Beaver Valley Power Station Chair, Regional Utility Group I cc:     Mr. Frederick D. Brown, NRR/DIRS, NRC Mr. Aron Lewin, NRR/DIRS/IRIB, NRC Mr. Tim J. Kobetz, NRR/DIRS/IRIB, NRC NRC Document Control Desk B
A~ i/'

Page 1 of 1 As of: December 14, 2011 Received: December 12, 2011 PUBLICTracking     PUBLICSUBMISIONStatus: P'enctlng__Fost                           No. 80f0dff Comments Due: December 12, 2011 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2011-0237 Event Reporting Guidelines Comment On: NRC-2011-0237-0001 Event Reporting Guidelines Document: NRC-2011-0237-DRAFT-0006 Comment on FR Doc # 2011-26419 Submitter Information Name: Mark Reidmeyer Address:
Certrec Corporation 4150 International Plaza, Suite 820 Fort Worth, TX, 76109 Submitter's Representative: Brian Sepalak Organization: RUG I Government Agency Type: Federal Government Agency: NRC General Comment This letter is submitted on behalf of the RUG I By Certrec Corporation. Certrec provides administrative suppoert to the RUG I organization.
Attachments RUG I NUREG 1022 Comments https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/componentlcontentstreamer?objectld=090000648Of8Odf...          12/14/2011}}