View source for NL-13-1236, SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver. 2.0, Vogtle Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic. Part 6 of 14

{{Adams
| number = ML13211A261
| issue date = 07/25/2013
| title = SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver. 2.0, Vogtle Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic. Part 6 of 14
| author name = 
| author affiliation = Southern Co, Southern Nuclear Operating Co, Inc
| addressee name = 
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR
| docket = 05000425
| license number = 
| contact person = 
| case reference number = NL-13-1236
| document report number = SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver 2.0
| document type = Report, Technical
| page count = 57
| project = 
| stage = Other
}}

=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Sheet 1 of 2 Status:N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. 2'-24o3          -74T   00. Equip. Class"2             /,4A//(    -   ez6L4$   2/
Equipment Description         z9/'.:,'-         Pu 4 71     0/f    D0,4y        7-,q ,,<i Location: Bldg.        9 r'7        Floor El. ZZO "        Room, Area         &?el&#xfd; A/i2o Manufacturer. Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)                                'T<-7 ?/,/ 1,.
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one          YN NC of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?                     YP    NC UC N/AC
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface                     YX NCI UC N/AC-]
oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?             Y* N-     UC N/AX U' 64.be~o covvSer~od To                                                Rk'f77~
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?                   YPQ NC UC N/AC (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
A/      __
_           __-                                   o7A 00:          ' 14R. 2.0 7/ r//7,6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of         YJX NCI   UC potentially adverse seismic conditions?
                                 "  Enter the equipmcnt class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
                                                                < C-3 >
PAGE 243 of 433

NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment [D No.      2- 04o9-         - .O;:?Equip. Class"    7"A,4-K       -     C4A, &#xa3; Z z/
Equipment Description        P1I9E el54     F'/e'       O/f-      - 4 11)0          7,,4
                                                                                       '    /k Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?          Y/ NEI UCI N/Al]
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,    Y;9 N] UEC N/AC and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?                 Y0   N i]U0 N/AC
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free        YJNO NCU of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could          Y;K No U0 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
NVO AlE Evaluated by:                           7767-04 v          1`01P/fRS                 Date:   t5,2 Z~-Frn-k
                                                       < C-4>
PAGE 244 of 433

AACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                               9 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2 I1 I
PAGE 245 of 433

qACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS
            &deg;                             I Uro__       _
NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 20 PAGE 246 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                                    NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: c) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment IDNo.                        A-d' 6;    Equip. Class"          *,       e           , -. ,W V *t,-
Equipment Description       AJ $CT -           LCvJ*hA          )5c       /)C'V' Location: Bldg. /*) . (. T         Floor El.      06        Room, Area          9  40C2 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)                 r.s 4                C-Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one        YO NUj of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
                                                                                                      /
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?                   Y[I NO UO N/A-
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface                    Y*/NO UD N/AD oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?           Y@/?ND UM N/AD
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?                 YO NEI UD N/A,//
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of                   YLVND UM potentially adverse seismic conditions?
12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment,
                                                           <KC-3 >
PAGE 247 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                               NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
EquipmentIDNo.         a2-C -J446             Equip. Class' 2 7-      T   .- .. C.6    i       vlN Equipment Description          IV5 CT       13 t               I*oJIA c       A1*
I Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?        YIN-    UD N/AD
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YM//N" U" N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?                 YWNO- Ur N/AD
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free        Y06/ND UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could         YMS'Nn U" adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
N/i.       p_     V<
Evaluated by:      F              Y"                                                 Date:
                                                                                                   "" '   &#xfd;C" 4 C4 >
PAGE 248 of 433

ARACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0
NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 249 of 433

ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                    NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 20 or A
PAGE 250 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                                  NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
EquipmentlD No.       2 -'-S         -'0 6/      Equip. Class'2                        fXe Equipment Description       kIa A       N'M/    A     FiQ      Th I-LA,-Z-X.z,0J       V-44'VL:
Location: Bldg.       A 0,        Floor El. I I    '-3     Room, Area                D /13 1
Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)                   54,4 TOA/
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchoraize
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one        YDE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?                   YK NE UE- N/AE
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface                   Yto'NE U-   N/A0 oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visiblc cracks in the concrete near the anchors?           Y1NE1   UE- NIAE
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?                 YE: NEI UEr N/Ak (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
S,7           y
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of                 YVrNED U0 potentially adverse seismic conditions?
12Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
                                                          < C-3*>
PAGE 251 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                               NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.       2 - Fr5- o              Equip. Class'_                    (01, Equipment Description        RAI',    iPOAVA T    ,o2        to /AevijAZ.o      V.-Lt/I Interaction Effects
: 7. Are sofi targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?          YY*N'    UQ N/AD
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y   NO UF] N/AQ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?                  Y   NEI U-    N/A-
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free         YW"N-   U-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could          '"NO     U'-
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
                                 .I W..      WI    mA Evaluated by:                                                                        Date:      . L l 29 7~oI?
                                                       < C-4 >
PAGE 252 of 433

4ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                     NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2P A
                                        -(205) 0 PAGE 253 of 433

*ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 20 PAGE 254 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                            NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: O N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. 4 - Psj-lt   -t         5        Equip. Class"2 I2- In4taoue.,.          (a.cis Equipment Description "LJ,,ht                        StlJ,.,
St.rh      Cpft4r.l,I     rdhw, Location: Bldg. C      4rgl       Floor El. 190L-0"          Room, Area        IL&.PO p Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one        YE NX of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?                   Yg NEI    UE N/AO
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface                   Y[J NEI UE N/AFE oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?            YUQ NE UE N/AE[
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?                  YE NE UE N/As (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of                   YW NEI UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?
12Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
                                                          -( C-3 )&#xfd; PAGE 255 OF 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                     NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
EquipmentlDNo. 2--F5L-I2.05                   Equip. Class"2   19- 7ns*um#^a          n.ni EquipmentDescription        E,.lv..Iock   Flo,. Sk.mih    CoA4taiJ     fu;lcii, Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?       YIN NEI UE- N/AC
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,  YEN NEI UC] N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?               YfM NOI UtC N/A
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free       YI N[I- UM of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could        Y[O NCI   UC-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) okN.Vj 0401 :              ;.oec            o-1q-53-10y 4"or                                     5      LC.
No~e 02.: Thi5       -tvC     w,,ot#a*4                          n   Sp*,~r5ZazJui                   ~...
Evaluated by:                                  S"s. S/e/..--   P"        1#. 2,     Date:   6/_______ _3
(   ,I /
                                                       < C-4 0 PAGE 256 OF 433

AACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION V PAGE 257 of 433

*ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.1110 PAGE 258 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                                     NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:. N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.        2-- FiT- O/3p              Equip. Class12 _                           f &#xfd;    -[&#xfd;'5 &#xfd;/";Wl ell ( 94k TPnlimnmpnt f"pe~erintinn            Cc?      4       PIoi~J Location: Bldg. 4        X          FloorEl. I4J"" Room, Area                             4. C Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)                       13."Iy" Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one          YE] N/
of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?                     Y6 NE     UE] N/AE]
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface                     Y-j-       U-- N/AE]
oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?             Y*N-E] UE] N/AE]
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?                    YE] NE] UE] N/ADY (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of                    Y~ 4E]-NE UE]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
                                                            < C-3 )
PAGE 259 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                              NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.         Z - FT-- I6P          Equip. Class' 2 I  Y    /l        f     X. ( kr Equipment Descrintion           C-CP     '4       -O Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?       YONCUIOU       N/A[C
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y    NEj U-     N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?               Y[*N-    U['] N/A-
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free       Yg`NUEC of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could         Y    NC UEI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
         *&#xfd;5 - -- Wq2         l      u4dt (IA rofZ ,*            C Evaluated           by                                              Date: C'5/'/f J/      2
                                                       < C-4>
PAGE 260 of 433

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2 ItinU ". t PAGE 261 of 433

9 A!ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONID 2,0 PAGE 262 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                                     NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 2 Status:D N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.         2-       T     O 1
* Equip. Class12 _                         a(       1145TR41MC-Afr R-44jtS)
Eouinment Description                 r-HP, A F-&#xfd;01'j Location: Bldg.     ,=U4           FloorEl.     /12 -       Room, Area             RlD    11.3 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one          Y&#xfd;'NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?                    YX'NE UE- N/AE-
: 3. Is the anchorage frec of corrosion that is more than mild surface                    Y4dNEI UI- N/AE]
oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?             YVJNO U-       N/A-
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?                  YiNEI      U0 N/A[
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
CYS -DPMRO17 jv&#xfd;Lo Cx 5-IP P O)9J VI r.3.o
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of                   Y/&#xfd;`NEI U13 potentially adverse seismic conditions?
12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
                                                           < C-3 >
PAGE 263 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                              NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.        2-' FT - 0/o6       $ Equip. Class 12_
Equipment Description             4/-h& A- raeko Interaction Effects 1
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?       Y'     N[" U0 N/AC-
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,  Y* NO UC N/ACl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?                &#xa5;* NC:] U'I N/AC-
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free        Y('N[- UC of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Otber Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could         Y    NCI   U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by:    _  #V                                     Ik, l'. 1                Date:               0L2-.
                                                      -< C-4 >-
PAGE 264 of 433

AACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION P PAGE 265 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS           NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 266 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                                  NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.       2-FT-       -     L        quip. Class" Equipment Description                5i P /I F.10,,
Location: Bldg.      kJ,_)       Floor El. j      3o     Roo. m, Area            /A- //.        /
Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)               &    0Aa.o'A,-/"l        4  d,,41."
                                                                                                        //
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one        YE] N211 of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?                 YX NE UE3 N/AE
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface                  Y% NEI UE- N/AE oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?          Y5   NE- UE- N/AE-
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?                YEI NEI      UE- N/A["/
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
NoT      /AS, -5o7.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of                 YX4 NEIUE]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
                                                                                            ,#7        t, I.EL,,                  fT'P"/*  AT      T"/"7 "Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
                                                         < C-3 >,
PAGE 267 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                              NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.                    o &
2 - F'7"- 0/Q          Equip. Class 12 Equipment Description                Sift0    '4Lrtto Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Y    NEI UD N/AD
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,  YK NDI   UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?                YK NDI U[] N/AD
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free       Y;* ND UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could        YX ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by:      ,Fritnk Ytic rl~/                                                Date:        bL/y-91   /
lzW1P         V~~:-y                A~"          ~   (
PAGE 268 of 433

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0                                     O0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 269 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                                  NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: (b     ,U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. FT- 1T                   Equip. Class1-          ( Zrwj      &   lZ*-i~ts)
Equipment Description          .(.W F io0 TTrcsN4+-t1        -    rC*'veX A Location: Bldg.      A'0K          Floor El. 19_"      Room, Area        ______
Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one        YK'N' of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?                  Y 'NEI       UC1 N/A-1
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface                  Y&#xfd;'ND U0 N/AC oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?           YWN-        U0 N/A-
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?                Y4NEI UEJ N/A--
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
CK ppyP M027 s ,er.         9.0           1,6,,l~(kol To0     I, MG 9, vtr, 3.O                   30YVM Lac',4
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of                 YK NEIUC potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
                                                         < C-3 >
PAGE 270 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                             NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic-Walkdown Checklist (SWCj .
12 Equipment ID No.             FT- I37          Equip.Class Equipment Description         (l(. FIoy Trant      ,1r, - T        ,i tA Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by neoby equipmentor structures?          YWNC     UC] N/AC]
            . Areov             eq C i
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,   Y   NCI UC] N/AC and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?                YA/N"] UC] N/AC]
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free       Y    NO] UC of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could        yA NC    U"]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
      -FOIL   A.     &W',*WjA-t5-Yg CW    1r)5 '--0if'-01qoA.
Evaluated by        "/&#xfd;'                    /M'A'j W1,111        (%got\             Date:  '        -1 a~74       i-'O/~o~~9,q$Ay
                                                       < C-4 >
PAGE 271 of 433

4ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.lq PAGE 272 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS           NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 273 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                                     NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: ON U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
EquipmentIDNo.         *-    'T-SV                  Equip. Class' 2   19   (L,$ste,           /0k(d5)
Eauioment     Descriotion    A"J(X FI 1NOW     J o 'O 5,6e            Go
                                                                             . I - FNovir4onas(/r Location: Bldg.       AI]X          Floor El. 119"        Room, Area      P 10Z Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)                 ?WtMdIt+A Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchoraue I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one          Y1INc of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?                     Y4NEI       U0] N/AE-
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface                     4    NEI U(( N/AE3 oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?             4     NE[1 UII N/AI]
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?                   YEI NEI UE[ N/A (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
k0AI' V 5O' so         > ,l .
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of                    YNE] UE3 potentially adverse seismic conditions?
12Enter tlhe equipment viass name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
                                                             < C-3 >
PAGE 274 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                              NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.               K-    5"5-       Equip. Class' Equipment Description           /Ak/b r-WF    0    1v  5Ih4,1 Gen. L -. Fl*tv. Tirmahre   "
Interaction Effects
: 7. Are
: 8.       soft targetsqimndsrbtotyses Aresovehaf        free from impact by nearby equipment eln or ie structures?
n ihig       YK NEI U[:] N/AD
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,   YV NDI UD' N/ADl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?                YV NDI UD' N/AD
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free       Y4 ND:] UD]
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could        YJ NDI UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
NO    COYA"jf Evaluated by:4~                1~I1Ak~~ik~~'                                        Date:    &#xfd;3 &#xfd;.oij
                                                        &#xfd;<C-4 >"
PAGE 275 of 433

9                                                                                   0 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 276 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS           NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 277 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                                     NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:&    N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.           2   FV 06 10             Equip. Class 2 Equipment Description                  Kk?~ P'~OW A                 /1i4,lcA        oi0   le Location: Bldg.        ,     V-kQFloorEl. /L-9I1; Room, Area                         OE-C P.s Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)                         .
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one           Y[] NV of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?                     YEI NE] UE] N/Ao
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface                     YE] NEI UE N/AO oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?             YEI NEI   UE] N/A2         "//
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?                   YE] NEI    UE] N/Am&#xfd;-&#xfd; (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of                    Y     NE] UF potentially adverse seismic conditions?
                              '2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
                                                            <C-3 >
PAGE 278 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                             NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.          I- r-V a   10:       Equip. Class'                      3-Pniuinmen t fl,'egcrrntinn         It/tg. P    4P  A      A4tjr-fC/*     H', 1.."
P-11inment Descrintion Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?        YZINEIU0 N/AO
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y ffN &#xfd;U EIN/AE3 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
YDN0  ON/E
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could       Y2['    ]  IUE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
S~~~O      /ar-~eq4                              h2 Evaluated by:        ~     ~     4   p          % {j/                              Date:   0,     1- t7 01 f      /
                                                      < C-4 >-
PAGE 279 of 433

AACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONV PAGE 280 of 433

4ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 281 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                                   NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 2 Status: ()  N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.       2-RV- OIqO               Equip.Class'__
Equipment Description       Ccf, A      SGft*      Gn, k chaQ;ng Soeho,'j of Va.vt Location: Bldg. PI)(         FloorEl.. IqS        Room,Area        RA'W03 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)                                A',d c Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one       YE] NW of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?                  YE] NE] UE] N/AE:T&#xfd;
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface                  YE] NE] UE] N/A         <"
oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?           YE] NEI UE] N/AD"*
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?                YE] NEI UE]
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of                       4 YO-E    UE]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Enter the equipmenl class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
                                                         <C-3>
PAGE 282 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                           NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.         .2    liv-0 t9O P      Equip. Class'2" Equipment Description -CC-P           A-   Scfe~f     G(V-oi    506~f0;j, Ofp  \oVaC.
Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?          YZ"N-       UO N/AC
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[&#xfd;NEI UC N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?                   YO/N[ UE- N/AC
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free          Y/N            rU-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could            YO/NC UC1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Oo~~~p        ('%Loo.51w      ivn rlwf weta     (e5elv[A            m~omjrv+ o&#xfd; 4 15CGIWI~ L7' or&#xfd;O foa-a,     S6zc concf1.
5e       2-H4V-315"2 4rc &%-C.
Date:   -et-i/7 4   /2.
1 Evaluated by:
PAGE 283 of 433

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                         NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONV S
* p~4 , ~
S PAGE 284 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                                    NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:@ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.      2-4V '-/2 'i'S" Equip. Class 1 2                                 0          "p&#xfd;e~"
Equipment Description               Pu* A           eF-hi
                                                            ,Aj L 1       i26*t-*-'
Location: Bldg4-/            --re-_Floor El. 2-141       Room, Area          _/ 02...
Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)                  L       ,
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one          Y['] N*d of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
I              C a-f-
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?                    YEr  NEI UE] N/A93'
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface                     YO NO UE N/AIF' oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?            YE NE UIE N/Ag'
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?                  YE NE UE N/Az/
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of                    Y[/N-    UM potentially adverse seismic conditions?
2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equiipment.
                                                          < C-3 >
PAGE 285 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                              NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. 2- I14V - / ?-Oc S'" Equip. Class' 2
0                     AL Equipment Description 11-T)           &T        kiaj e      p&.*-V                 e-Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?            Y*I]UD' N/AD Yj"/ND UD N/AD
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Y[2"NO U- N/AD
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free        Y[!R/NO U-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions i1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could         Y    D/N[-
U"i adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
                                           , IV-o V
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)       4&
Evaluated by:.                           Clyjc.      -&#xfd;       F-,k                  Date:  of/Ll,/4 PAGE 286 of 433

4ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.ll&#xfd; PAGE 287 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                                   NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Status.:    N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.       2- tAV"*,U27 G             Equip. Class 2     O(*fO4ft)
Equipment Description        G- &#xfd;        " Orz-&#xfd;-t=..           _       'x-y     oac- rx*,j\ &#xfd;- O Location: Bldg.      SU. 3         FloorEl.      27-.'      RoomArea          (Z (z S Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one         YO N*,K of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?                  A     NE    U'    N/A"
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface                 .       NO UE N/AA oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?             YE NE UE-- N/Aj
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?                  YO NEI UO N/AX (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of                    It   NE UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?
2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
                                                            < C-3 >
PAGE 288 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                             NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
EquipmentIDNo.             -      -    7        Equip. Class'   0(0 ,kr)
Equipment Description           "         o       _          Ac    Z'*L-(    G*C-      M  *      )
Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?      Y     NEI UFI N/AE
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,  Y     NEI Ul" N/AlI and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?          X
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?                Y     NO" Ul- N/AO
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free      I*    NO- UO-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could             NO] U[]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?                   Y&#xfd; Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
                                                        < C-4 >
PAGE 289 of 433

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONq2 PAGE 290 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                                  NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:@ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.       2- I+V 1300SA              Equip. Class02    7 Equipment Description                     5V 8y&#xfd;az KWo.4               V-5G I Location: Bldg.      AVX          Floor El. __-0_   1      Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one       YO N&#xfd; of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?                  Y-   NEI   U-   N/Ax
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface                  YO NEI U[- N/A; oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?          YO NEI U-       N/Ar
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?                YO NO UC N/Av (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of                  YVN-       UC potentially adverse seismic conditions?
L19-       UMED VtAl ,
12Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
                                                          < C-3 >
PAGE 291 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                            NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Waikdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ED No.        2-  N+V-  13005-A      Equip. Classu Equipment Description        L4'hOG(  (515V     &#xfd;yms '40 Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?      Y[) NEI UQ N/AM
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yq NLE U-     N/AQl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?              Ye NE    U-   N/A-
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free      YodND U-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could        Y!VNEI LT adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
N~ONE.
Evaluated by:                                      r~,"16~ irki                    Date:  ,   3'!201 913 /Zo/Z
                                                         < C-4 >
PAGE 292 of 433

AACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 200 PAGE 293 of 433

ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 PAGE 294 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                                    NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: Y (N, U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
EquipmentIDNo.        *          /T(q6
                                       -              Equip. Classt l2     (    (Ml        1"*-J4/-W                     i /.
Equipment Description         4Fv     t/ r,79 S6-7 Location: Bldg. 4&"-SAeCV           Floor El.  (qf_____f   Room, Area              <A"/.
Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)               /AA(_, ]mf/O //,/A1LAAJg,-
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one                  7 YO Nrix of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?                    YE NEI UF     N/A
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface                     YE- NE UE- N/Ae oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete nea- the anchors?             YO NE UE N/1A
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?                   YO NE U[:E N/Az (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of                   Y% NFE U-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
12Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
                                                         < C-3 >-
PAGE 295 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                              NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
EquipmentIDNo.          2-      -It-1(-q1 1       Equip. CIassU   ;(Mb,       /-  4 ,hJ*'AJ                   O,-/,J -
Equipment Description          6 FY l/ F-OA" S(' I Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?       YO NX UOI N/AD c~c...wo.*,.*       1.*-*       ,,-,4-,.  * .>".                    (':A0 5-ozqq3),
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,   Y     N-   Uti-   N/AD-and masonry block waUs not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?                YI)(N-     U[ N/A-
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free        V&sect;NO U' of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could        Y&#xfd; ND Ut'l adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
            -*- _-I14 -1/- 5z-  Z7 Evaluated by:                             KC                     e                 Date:      '5           2x
                                                       < C4 >"
PAGE 296 of 433

9 AAACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIOR PAGE 297 of 433

A ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 20 PAGE 298 of 433

9 ARACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                 NO. SNCVO61-RPT-02, VERSION PAGE 299 of 433}}