View source for DCL-11-039, Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 & 2, Decommissioning Funding Report for 2010

{{Adams
| number = ML110900672
| issue date = 03/31/2011
| title = Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 & 2, Decommissioning Funding Report for 2010
| author name = Conway J T
| author affiliation = Pacific Gas &amp; Electric Co
| addressee name = 
| addressee affiliation = NRC/Document Control Desk, NRC/NRR
| docket = 05000275, 05000323
| license number = DPR-080, DPR-082
| contact person = 
| case reference number = DCL-11-039
| document type = Decommissioning Funding Plan DKTs 30, 40, 50, 70, Letter type:DCL
| page count = 193
}}

=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Pacific Gas and Electric Company March 31,2011 PG&E Letter DCL-11-039 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001 Docket No. 50-275, OL-DPR-80 Docket No. 50-323, OL-DPR-82 Diablo Canyon Units 1 and 2 John T. Conway Senior Vice President*
Energy Supply & Chief Nuclear Officer 10 CFR 50.75 77 Beale Street Mail Code B32 San Francisco, CA 94105 415.973.3336 Internal:
223.3336 Fax: 415.973.2313 Alternate Address Diablo Canyon Power Plant p. O. Box 56 Avila Beach, CA 93424 805.545.3333 Fax: 805.545.4884 Decommissioning Funding Report for Diablo Canyon Power Plant Units 1 and 2 Dear Commissioners and Staff: PG&E is submitting the decommissioning fund report for Diablo Canyon Power Plant (DCPP) Units 1 and 2, pursuant to the requirements of 10 CFR 50.75(f).
Diablo Canyon Units 1 and 2 At the end of calendar year 2010, the market value of the DCPP Units 1* (3411 MWt) and 2 (3411 MWt) decommissioning trust fund Market value was $807.5 million and $1,083.1 million respectively.
Based on the site-specific decommissioning cost estimate prepared by TLG Services, Inc., and adjusted per the Nuclear Decommissioning Cost Triennial Proceeding (NDCTP) Decision 10-07-047 from the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), PG&E is confident that the DCPP Units 1 and 2 decommissioning trust fund balance in 2024 and 2025 will meet the minimum NRC decommissioning amount of $580.3 million (2011 dollars) for each unit that was calculated pursuant to the requirements specified in 10 CFR 50.75(c).
Supporting Cost Estimates Based on site-specific cost estimates prepared by TLG Services, Inc. and the NDCTP Decision 10-07-047, PG&E has estimated that the decommissioning costs are approximately 
$583.9 million for DCPP Unit 1 and $546 million for Unit 2 in 2011 dollars. These costs do not include site restoration of the facilities 
($258.6 million) nor spent fuel management costs after shutdown of the Units ($637.4 million).
To assure that sufficient funds will be available for decommissioning, PG&E has established separate external sinking trust fund accounts for DCPP Units 1 and 2. A member of the STARS (Strategic Teaming and Resource Sharing) Alliance Callaway
* Comanche Peak
* Diablo Canyon
* Palo Verde. San Onofre
* South Texas Project
* Wolf Creek Document Co ntrol Desk March 31,2011 Page 2 Supporting Enclosures PG&E Letter DCL-11-039 Supporting documentation for this report i s included as E nclosure s 1 through 4. Enclosure 1 provides decommissioning funding status information in a format suggested by NEI and the NRC. Enclosure 2 provides inform at ion on the esca l ation of the required decommissioning funding amounts from 1986 dollars to 2011 dollars. As required by 10 CFR 50.75 (c)(2), and using NUREG 1577, " Standard Rev i ew P l an on Power Reactor Licensee F in anc i al Qua lific at ion s and Decomm i ss ioning Funding Assurance," Revision 1 and NUREG 1307, " Report on Waste Burial Charges," Revision 14, the information includes escalation factors for energy, labor, and waste burial costs. Enclosure 3 provides the TLG Services, Inc. decommissioning cost estimate report prepared in March 2009 for PG&E's DCPP Units 1 and 2. The TLG Services , Inc. cost est im ate has then been adjusted to reflect the costs in 2011 dollars per CPUC Decision 10-07-047.
The report provides cost est im ates for decommissioning of both nuclear and non-nuclear facilities, including the independent spent fuel storage in sta ll at ion (I SFSI). Enclosure 4 contains the TLG Serv ices, Inc. decommissioning cost estimate report prepared in March 2009 for PG&E's DCPP Units 1 & 2. The report provides cost estimates for the decommissioning of the nuclear, non-nuclear facilities, and spent fuel management including operation of the ISFSI. There are no Regulatory commitments in this letter. Shou ld you have any questions in regard to this document please feel free to call Mr. Bob Kapus at (707) 444-0810.
Sincere ly, St:-{ . J n T. Conway Senior Vice President 
-Energ /y and Chief Nuclear Officer Enclosures cc/enc: Elmo E. Collins, NRC Region IV James T. Pol i ckosk i, NRC Project Manager Alan B. Wang, NRC Project Manager INPO Diablo Distribution A member of the STARS (Strategic Teaming and Resource Shar in g) A lli ance Ca ll away
* Comanche Peak
* Diablo Canyon
* Palo Verde. San Onofre
* South Te x as Project
* Wolf Creek Enclosure 1 PG&E Letter DCL-11-039 NRC Decommissioning Funding Status Report Diablo Canyon Power Plant -Units 1 (3411 MWt) and 2 (3411 MWt)
Enclosure 1 PG&E Letter DCL-11-039 Page 1 of 3 NRC Decommissioning Funding Status Report Diablo Canyon Power Plant -Units 1 (3411 MWt) & 2 (3411 MWt) As provided in 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1), each power reactor licensee is required to report to the NRC on a calendar year basis, beginning on March 31, 1999, and every 2 years thereafter, on the status of it s decommissioning funding for each reactor or share of reactor it owns. 1. The minimum decommissioning fund est im ate , pursuant to 10 CFR 50.75 (b) and (C)1 Value in January 2011 do ll ars $ in Mill i ons Unit 1 $580.3 Unit 2 $580.3 2. The amount accumu lated at the end of the calendar year preceding the date of the report for i tems included in 10 CFR 50.75 (b) and (c). (Alternatively, the total amount accumulated at the end of the calendar year preced in g the date of the report can be reported here if the cover l etter transmitt i ng the report provides the total estimate and indicates what port i on of that est im ate is for it ems not in c lud ed in 10 CFR 50.7 5 (b) and (c)). Market Value (December 2010 dollars) Un it 1 $ 807.5 Unit 2 $1,083.1 3. A schedu l e of the annua l amounts remaining to be collected; for it ems in 10 CFR 50.75(b) and (c). (Alt e rn at ively, the annual amounts remaining to be collected can include it ems beyond those required in 10 CFR 50.75(b) a nd (c) if the cover letter transm itting the report provides a total cost est im ate and indicates what portion of that est im ate i s for it ems that are not includ ed in 10 CFR 50.75 (b) and (c)). (See item 6 of th i s enc l osure describ in g the co ll ect i on of add ition a l funds) Un i t 1 amount remaining 
($4.7 million for 3 years beginning 2010) Un it 2 amount remaining 
($4.4 million for 3 years beginn i ng 2 010) $14.2 $13.2 1
* T h e NRC formulas in sect ion 10 CFR 50.75 (c) includ e only those decommissioning costs in cur r ed by li censees to remove a facility or s it e safe ly from serv ice a nd reduce residual radioactivity to l eve l s that permit: (1) release of the property for unrestricted use and termination of the lic e n se; or (2) release of t h e property under restricted conditions a nd termination of the lic ense. T h e cost of dismantling or demo li s hin g nonradiological s y stems a nd structures i s not includ ed in t h e NRC decommissioning cost est im ates. The costs of managing and stor in g spent fuel on s it e until transfer to Department of Ene rgy are not in c lud ed in the cost formulas.
Enclosure 1 PG&E Letter DCL-11-039 Page 2 of 3 4. The assumptions used regarding escalation in decommissioning cost, rates of earnings on decommission i ng funds (anticipates that the portfolio of each trust will be gradually converted to a more conservative all income portfolio beginning in 2020 for Unit 1 and Unit 2), and rates of other factors used in funding projections; Esca l at i on in decomm i ssioning costs Rate of Return on Qualified Trust Unit 1 2010 Rate of Return on Qual i f i ed Trust Un i t 1 2011 Rate of Return on Qualified Trust Unit 1 2012 Rate of Return on Qualif i ed Trust Un it 1 2013 Rate of Return on Qua lifi ed Trust Unit 1 2014 Rate of Return on Qualified Trust Unit 1 2015 Rate of Return on Qual ifi ed Trust Unit 1 2016 Rate of Return on Qual ifi ed Trust Unit 1 2017 Rate of Return on Qualif i ed Trust Unit 1 2018 Rate of Return on Qual ifi ed Trust Unit 1 2019 Rate of Return on Qual ifi ed Trust Unit 1 2020 Rate of Return on Qua lifi ed Trust Unit 1 2021 Rate of Return on Qua lifi ed Trust Unit 1 2022 Rate of Return on Qua lifi ed Trust Unit 1 2023 Rate of Return on Qua lifi ed Trust Un it 1 2024 Rate of Return on Qua lifi ed Trust Unit 1 (Post 2025) Rate of Return on Qua lified Trust Unit 2 2010 Rate of Return on Qualified Trust Unit 2 2011 Rate of Return on Qualified Trust Unit 2 20 12 Rate of Return on Qua lifi ed Trust Unit 2 20 13 Rate of Return on Qua lifi ed Trust Unit 2 20 1 4 Rate of Return on Qua lifi ed Trust Unit 2 2015 Rate of Return on Qua lifi ed Trust Unit 2 2016 Rate of Return on Qual ifi ed Trust Un it 2 2017 Rate of Return on Qua lified Trust Unit 2 2018 Rate of Return on Qua lifi ed Trust Unit 2 2019 Rate of Return on Qual ifi ed Trust Unit 2 2020 Rate of Return on Qual ifi ed Trust Unit 2 2021 Rate of Return on Qual ifi ed Trust Un it 2 2022 Rate of Return on Qual ifi ed Trust Un it 2 2023 Rate of Return on Qua lifi ed Trust Un it 2 2024 Rate of Return on Qual ifi ed Trust Unit 2 (Post 2025) 5.01 percent 4.96 percent 4.92 percent 4.88 percent 4.85 percent 4.82 percent 4.80 percent 4.78 percent 4.77 percent 4.75 percent 4.37 percent 4.01 percent 3.67 percent 3.35 percent 3.05 percent 2.9 5 percent 5.01 percent 4.96 percent 4.91 percent 4.88 percent 4.85 percent 4.82 percent 4.80 percent 4.78 percent 4.77 percent 4.75 percent 4.37 percent 4.01 percent 3.67 percent 3.35 percent 3.05 percent 2.95 percent 5. Any contracts upon which the licensee is relying pursuant to 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1)(v).
NONE Enclosure 1 PG&E Letter DCL-11-039 Page 3 of 3 6. Any modifications to a licensee's current method providing financial assurance occurring s in ce the last subm itt ed report. NONE 7. Any material changes to trust agreements.
NONE 8. Ca lifornia Pub lic Utilities Comm i ss ion (CPUC) Subm itt a l in 2011 dollars in millions:
Tota l Unit 1 (Decommi ss ion 2024) Scope Excluded from NRC calculations Spent Fuel Management Tota l NRC Decommissioning Costs Tota l Unit 2 (Decommi ss ion 2025) Scope Excluded from NRC calculations Spent Fuel Management Total NRC Decommissioning Costs $ 857.5 $ 97.9 $ 175.7 $ 583.9 $1,168.9 $ 160.7 $ 461.7 $ 546.5 Enclosure 2 PG&E Letter DCL-11-039
* 2011 Decommissioning Estimate U1 (1 page)
* 2011 Decommissioning Estimate U2 (1 page)
* Composite Escalation (1 page)
* Development of B Component (1 page)
* Development of E Component (7 pages)
* Development of L Component (7 pages) 2011 Decommissioning Estimate U1 Nuclear Regulatory Commis s ion E stimate of Decommi s sion Costs for PWR DCPP Unit 1 in 2011 Jan 1986 Estimate DCPP PWR (millions) 
$105 E nclo s ure 2 PG&E Letter DCL-1 1-0 39 Escalated to 1999 $118.2 (Table 2.1 in NUREG 1307, Revision 10 , has no value for 1999 Burial) Escalated to 2000 (No Submittal Required)
E scalated to 2001 $333.8 ($396.7 in 2001 Submittal)
E scalated to 2002 (No Submittal Required)
E scalated to 2003 $347.5 ($404.8 in 2003 Submittal)
Escalated to 2004 (No Subm i ttal Required)
Escalated to 2005 $404.2 ($427.2 in 2005 Submitta l) Esca l ated to 2006 (N o Subm itt a l Requ ir ed) Esca l ated to 2007 $495.8 ($494.8 in 2007 Subm itt al) Esca l ated to 2008 (No Subm ittal Required) Esca lat ed to 2009 $54 1.4 Escalated to 2010 $560.7 (No Submitta l Requ ir ed) Escalated to 2011 $580.3 Jan 1986 based on 10 CFR 50.75 (c) Tab l e of minimum amounts BWR based on minimum 1, 200 MWt = ($104 + (.009xMWt))
million per unit J an 1 9 8 6 based on 10 CFR 50.75 (c) Table of min imu m amounts PWR Greater than or equal to 3400 MWt = $105 million per unit between 1200 MWt and 3400 MWt (for PWR l ess than 1200 MWt, use P=1200MWt $75+0.0088P) 2011 Decommissioning Est i mate U2 Nuc l ear Regu l atory Commiss i on E stimate of Decommiss i on Costs for PWR DCPP Un it 2 in 2011 Jan 1986 Est i mate DCPP PWR (milli ons) $105 E nclo s ure 2 PG&E Le tt e r DCL-11-039 Esca l ated to 1999 $118.2 (Tab l e 2.1 in NUREG 1307, Rev i s i on 10, has no value for 1999 Bur i a l) Esca l ated to 2000 (No Subm i tta l Required) Esca l ated to 2001 $333.8 ($396.7 i n 2001 Subm i tta l) Esca l ated to 2002 (No Subm it ta l Requ ir ed) Esca l ated to 2003 $347.5 ($404.8 in 2003 Subm itt a l) Esca l ated to 2004 (No Subm i tta l Requ i red) Esca l ated to 2005 $4 0 4.2 ($427.2 in 2 00 5 Subm itt a l) Esca l ated to 2006 (No Subm itt a l Requ ir ed) Esca l ated to 2 00 7 $495.8 ($494.8 in 2007 Subm itt a l) Esca l ated to 20 08 (No S ubmitt a l Required)
Esca l ated to 2009 $541.4 Esca l ated to 2 010 $560.7 (No Subm itt a l Req uir ed) Esca l ated to 2011 $580.3 Jan 1986 based on 10 CFR 50.75 (c) Tab l e of minimum amounts BWR based on minimum 1, 200 MWt = ($104 + (.009xMWt)) million per unit Jan 1986 based on 10 CFR 50.75 (c) Tab l e of minimum amounts PWR Greater than or equa l to 3400 MWt = $105 million per unit between 1200 MWt and 3400 MWt (for PWR l ess than 1200 MWt, use P=1200MWt $75+0.0088P)
Calculating Overall Esca l at i o n Rate PWR Ja n-86 J a n-99 Jan-OO Jan-01 Jan-0 2 J a n-03 Jan-04 Jan-05 J a n-06 J a n-0 7 Jan-0 8 Jan-09 L (L abor) 1.0000 1.5624 1.6370 0.93 65 0.9733 1.0 1 22 1.061 2 1.0958 2.0 724 2.1465 2.22 0 7 2.2639 E (Ene rg y) 1.0000 0.8 499 1.0 297 1.185 0 0.99 09 1.2 0 27 1.2164 1.4 656 1.8 306 1.7 950 2.3262 1.7850 B (Buria l) 1.0000 0.0000 10.8 03 9 10.9840 1 1.16 33 11.3430 13.0 733 1 3.395 1 13.7247 14.0626 15.0364 15.6922 (1) From NUREG 130 7, Revision 1 2, Report on Wast e Buria l Charges , Section 2 Summary , Page 3 ... where A, B, a nd C are the fractions of th e to ta l 198 6 do ll ar costs that are attributab l e to l abor (0.65), ener gy (0.13), and bur i al (0.2 2), r espec tiv e ly, and sum t o 1.0. (2) Jan-01 , J a n-0 3, Jan-0 5, a nd J a n-07 B (Bur i al) v a l ue in this tab l e see ca l cu l a ti o n not es i n Dev e l opme nt of B Component spreadsheet Composite Escalation PWR Combined Esca l ation Rate for: J a n-10 Jan-11 W e ight (1) Jan-86 Jan-99 J a n-D O J a n-01 2.2948 2.3216 0.65 1.0000 1.1 260 3.5748 3.1 793 2.0766 2.3063 0.1 3 16.2646 16.8999 0.22 J an-0 2 J a n-0 3 J a n-04 J a n-0 5 Jan-0 6 3.2174 3.3098 3.7241 3.8497 4.6044 Jan-0 7 J a n-08 4.7224 5.0538 Enclosure 2 PG&E Letter DCL-11-039 J an-09 J an-10 Jan-11 5.1559 5.3398 5.5268 Development of Burial Esca l ation Deve l oped from NUREG-1307 Revision 14 Development of B Component E nclo s ure 2 PG&E Le tt e r DCL-11-039 Tab l e 2.1 "VALUES OF B SUB-X AS A FUNCTION OF LLW BURIAL SITE , WASTE VENDOR, AND YEAR" (Summary for non-Atlantic Compact) Revised to Bx Va l ues for Gener i c LLW Disposa l Site (Assumed to be same as that prov i ded for the At l antic Compact) for lack of a better alternative at this time. PWR P W R Buria l Costs Res t a t e d to (South Carolina) 19 86 = 100 1986 1.678 1.0000 1987 1988 2.007 1.1961 1989 1990 1991 2.494 1.4863 1992 1993 11.408 6.7986 1994 11.873 7.0757 1995 12.824 7.6424 1996 12.771 7.6108 1997 15.852 9.4470 1998 15.886 9.4672 1999 0.0000 2000 18.129 10.8039 2001 0.0 0 00 2 0 02 18.732 11.1633 2003 19.034 11.3430 2004 21.937 13.0 733 20 0 5 22.477 13.3951 2006 23.030 13.7247 2007 23.597 14.0626 20 0 8 25.231 15.0364 20 0 9 26.332 15.6922 2 0 10 27.292 16.2646 2011 28.358 16.8999 Tab l e 2.1 Note ('c) From 7/1/95 through 6/30/2000 access was a ll owed for all states except North Caro li na. Effect i ve 7/1 1 2000 rates are based on w h et h er a waste generator is or is not a member of the Atlantic Compact. 2001 has no information in NUREG-1307 Revision 12. 2001 is an estimate that i s ca l cu l ated by app l ying the average percent change between 2000 and 2002 and adding to the 2000 base. 2003 has no information in NUREG-1307 Revision 12. 2003 is an estimate that i s ca l culated by app l ying the average percent change between 2002 and 2004 and adding to the 2002 base. 2005 has no information in NUREG-1307 Revision 12. 2005 is an estimate that i s ca l culated by app l ying the average percent change between 2004 and 2006 and adding to the 2004 base. 2007 has no i nformat i on in NUREG-1307 Revis i on 12. 2007 i s an estimate that is ca l cu l ated by applying the average percent change between 2004 and 2006 and adding to the 2006 base. 2009 has no information in NUREG-1307 Rev i sion 13. 2009 is an estimate that is ca l cu l ated by applying the average percent change between 2006 and 2008 and adding to the 2008 base. 2011 has no information in NUREG-1307 Revision 14. 2011 is an estimate that is ca l culated by apply i ng the average percent change between 2008 and 2010 and add i ng to the 2008 base.
Development of E Component Calcu l ation o f Energy Escalation Factor -Reference N U REG-1307 , Revision 14 , Sectopm 3.2 Using Regiona l Indices SERIES ID: WPU0573 Light Fuel Oils (as of 03/02/11) and WPU0543 Industrial E lectric Power (as of 03/02/11) REBA S ED TO 1986 = 100 PPI for Fuels & PPI for Light PPI for F u el s & PPI f or Ligh t Related Products Fuel Oils Related Products Fuel Oils (1982 = 1 00) (1982=100) 
(1986 = 100) (1986=100) (P) =Industrial Energy Power (F) = Light Fuel Oils (P) =Indu s trial Energy Power (F) = Light Fue l Oils PWR wt= 0.58 PWR wt = 0.42 Jan-86 114.2 82.0 1.0000 1.0000 Feb-86 115.0 62.4 1.0070 0.76 1 0 Mar-86 114.4 51.3 1.0 018 0.6256 Apr-86 11 3.7 4 9.8 0.9956 0.6073 M ay-86 114.1 47.0 0.999 1 0.5732 J un-86 11 5.3 44.7 1.0096 0.545 1 Jul-86 116.2 36.4 1.0175 0.4439 Aug-86 11 6.3 40.1 1.0184 0.4 890 Sep-86 116.3 46.3 1.0184 0.56 4 6 Oc t-86 11 3.0 43.1 0.9895 0.5256 N ov-86 11 2.7 43.5 0.9869 0.5305 Dec-86 11 2.3 45.6 0.9834 0.5561 Jan-87 110.3 51.4 0.9658 0.6268 Feb-87 109.8 53.1 0.9615 0.6 4 76 Mar-87 11 0.2 49.7 0.9650 0.6061 Apr-87 109.9 52.0 0.9623 0.63 41 May-87 111.8 53.3 0.9790 0.6500 Jun-8 7 11 3.9 55.1 0.9974 0.6720 Jul-87 11 6.2 56.3 1.0175 0.6866 Aug-8 7 11 5.7 59.4 1.0131 0.724 4 Sep-8 7 11 5.5 56.8 1.0114 0.6927 Oct-87 111.0 59.3 0.9720 0.7232 N ov-87 1 09.2 61.2 0.9562 0.7463 Dec-87 1 09.6 58.1 0.9597 0.7085 J a n-88 108.8 5 4.8 0.9527 0.6683 Feb-88 1 09.0 51.5 0.9545 0.6280 Mar-88 1 09.0 49.7 0.9545 0.606 1 Apr-88 109.1 53.3 0.9553 0.6500 May-88 108.9 54.3 0.9536 0.6622 Jun-88 117.2 50.6 1.0263 0.6 1 71 Jul-88 118.2 46.9 1.0350 0.5720 Aug-88 118.3 46.8 1.0359 0.5707 Sep-88 118.5 45.9 1.0377 0.5598 Oct-88 114.2 42.3 1.0000 0.5 1 59 N ov-88 1 09.2 4 7.2 0.9562 0.5756 Dec-88 110.5 50.6 0.9676 0.6171 Jan-89 11 2.0 5 4.9 0.9807 0.6695 Feb-89 112.0 5 4.0 0.9807 0.6585 M ar-89 112.3 57.3 0.9834 0.6988 Apr-89 112.4 61.5 0.9842 0.7500 M ay-89 11 3.6 57.5 0.9947 0.7012 Jun-89 119.8 53.3 1.0490 0.6500 Jul-89 12 2.2 52.7 1.0701 0.6427 Aug-89 1 22.4 53.5 1.0718 0.652 4 Sep-89 1 22.5 59.3 1.0727 0.7232 Energy Escalation Factor (E) f or PWR (Diablo Canyon) 1.0000 0.9037 0.84 38 0.8325 0.8202 0.8 145 0.77 66 0.796 1 0.8278 0.79 47 0.7952 0.8 039 0.8235 0.8 296 0.814 2 0.82 4 5 0.8 4 08 0.8607 0.8785 0.8919 0.8775 0.8675 0.8681 0.8542 0.8333 0.8174 0.8082 0.827 1 0.831 2 0.854 4 0.8405 0.84 05 0.8369 0.79 67 0.7964 0.8204 0.8 500 0.8454 0.8638 0.88 59 0.8715 0.88 14 0.8906 0.8957 0.9259 Enclosure 2 PG&E L e tt e r DCL-11-039 Page 1 of 7 Development of E Component Calculation of Energy Escalation Factor -Reference NUREG-1307 , Revision 14 , Sectopm 3.2 Using Regional Indices SERIES 10: WPU0573 Light Fuel Oils (a s of 03/02/11) and WPU0543 Industrial Electric Power (as of 03/02/11)
REBASED TO 1986 = 100 PPI for Fuels & PPI for Light PPI for Fuels & PPI for Light Related Products Fuel Oils Related Products Fuel Oils (1982 = 100) (1982=100) (1986 = 100) (1986=100) (P) =Industrial Energy Power (F) = Light Fuel Oils (P) =Industrial Energy Power (F) = Light Fuel Oils Oct-89 117.2 64.0 1.0263 0.7805 Nov-89 113.5 64.4 0.9939 0.7854 Dec-89 114.2 68.1 1.0000 0.8305 Jan-90 114.9 85.3 1.0061 1.0402 Feb-90 115.0 59.4 1.0070 0.7244 Mar-90 1 15.4 60.4 1.0105 0.7366 Apr-90 115.1 61.0 1.0079 0.7439 May-90 117.0 58.4 1.0245 0.7122 Jun-90 123.9 53.0 1.0849 0.6463 Jul-90 124.4 51.6 1.0893 0.6293 Aug-90 124.6 72.3 1.09 11 0.8817 Sep-90 125.0 87.3 1.0946 1.0646 Oct-90 121.2 104.8 1.06 13 1.2780 Nov-90 120.2 98.9 1.0525 1.2061 Dec-90 118.9 89.3 1.0412 1.0890 Jan-91 124.2 82.9 1.0 876 1.0110 Feb-91 124.3 74.3 1.0884 0.9061 Mar-9 1 124.3 61.6 1.0884 0.7512 Apr-91 124.7 60.0 1.0919 0.7317 May-91 128.2 59.6 1.1226 0.7268 Jun-9 1 132.6 57.6 1.1611 0.7024 Jul-9 1 134.5 58.1 1.1778 0.7085 Aug-91 133.8 62.1 1.1716 0.7573 Sep-9 1 133.8 65.4 1.1716 0.7976 Oct-9 1 128.3 67.6 1.1235 0.8244 Nov-91 123.1 71.0 1.0779 0.8659 Dec-9 1 125.1 62.2 1.0954 0.7585 Jan-92 125.9 54.4 1.1025 0.6634 Feb-92 125.3 57.3 1.0972 0.6988 Mar-92 125.8 56.0 1.1016 0.6829 Apr-9 2 124.8 59.0 1.0928 0.7195 May-92 128.5 62.1 1.1252 0.7573 Jun-92 134.8 65.4 1.1804 0.7976 Jul-92 135.6 64.6 1.1874 0.7878 Aug-9 2 135.1 63.3 1.1830 0.7720 Sep-92 135.9 65.6 1.1900 0.8000 Oct-92 131.2 68.2 1.1489 0.8317 Nov-92 125.5 64.2 1.0989 0.7829 Dec-92 126.7 59.4 1.1095 0.7244 Jan-9 3 127.1 59.0 1.1130 0.7195 Feb-93 126.4 60.4 1.1068 0.7366 Mar-9 3 126.7 63.2 1.1095 0.7707 Apr-93 126.8 62.4 1.1103 0.7610 May-93 127.5 62.6 1.1165 0.7634 Jun-93 136.9 60.8 1.1988 0.7415 Jul-93 137.1 57.0 1.2005 0.6951 Aug-93 137.2 54.4 1.2014 0.6634 Energy Escalation Factor (E) for PWR (Diablo Canyon) 0.9230 0.9063 0.9288 1.0205 0.8883 0.8955 0.8970 0.8933 0.9007 0.8961 1.0031 1.0820 1.1523 1.1170 1.0613 1.0554 1.0119 0.9468 0.9406 0.9564 0.9685 0.9807 0.9976 1.0145 0.9979 0.9889 0.9539 0.9181 0.9299 0.9257 0.9360 0.9707 1.0196 1.0196 1.0104 1.0262 1.0157 0.9662 0.9477 0.9477 0.9513 0.9672 0.9636 0.9682 1.0067 0.9883 0.9754 Enclosure 2 PG&E Letter DCL-11-039 Page 2 of 7 Development of E Compone nt Calculation of Energy Escalation Factor -Re f erence N UREG-1307 , Rev i s i on 14, Sectopm 3.2 Using Reg i onal I ndices S ERIES ID: WPU0573 Light Fuel Oils (as of 03/02/11) and WPU0543 Industrial Ele c tric Power (as of 03/02/1 1) REBASED TO 1986 = 100 PPI for Fuels & PP I for Ligh t PPI for Fuel s & PPI for Ligh t Related Products Fuel Oils Rel a ted Products Fuel Oi l s (1982 = 100) (1982=100) (1986 = 100) (1986=1 00) (P) =Industria l Energy Power (F) = Light Fue l Oils (P) =Industrial Energy Power (F) = L i gh t Fue l O il s Se p-93 1 37.6 59.3 1.2049 0.7232 Oc t-93 13 1.9 65.4 1.1550 0.7976 N o v-93 1 26.3 6 1.6 1.1060 0.75 1 2 Dec-93 1 26.0 5 1.4 1.1033 0.6268 Jan-9 4 1 26.2 5 1.5 1.1051 0.6280 Feb-9 4 1 25.9 57.5 1.1025 0.70 1 2 M ar-9 4 1 25.8 56.2 1.1016 0.685 4 Apr-9 4 1 25.4 5 4.7 1.0981 0.667 1 May-9 4 1 26.0 54.7 1.1033 0.6671 Jun-9 4 1 33.5 5 4.1 1.1690 0.6598 Ju l-9 4 1 3 4.5 56.3 1.1778 0.6866 Aug-9 4 1 3 4.5 57.5 1.1778 0.7012 Sep-9 4 1 3 4.9 57.7 1.1813 0.7037 Oc t-9 4 1 29.1 57.7 1.1305 0.7037 N ov-9 4 1 27.0 58.8 1.1121 0.7 1 7 1 Dec-9 4 1 27.4 54.7 1.1156 0.667 1 Ja n-95 1 27.6 54.7 1.1173 0.667 1 Feb-95 1 28.0 53.3 1.1208 0.6500 M ar-95 1 28.3 54.3 1.1235 0.6622 Apr-95 1 26.4 57.1 1.1068 0.6963 M a y-95 1 30.2 59.1 1.1 40 1 0.7207 Ju n-95 1 35.3 55.8 1.1848 0.6805 Jul-95 1 36.6 53.5 1.1 96 1 0.652 4 Aug-95 1 36.5 55.6 1.1953 0.6780 Sep-95 1 33.7 58.2 1.1 708 0.7098 Oc t-95 13 1.4 57.8 1.1 506 0.70 4 9 N ov-95 1 27.6 59.5 1.1173 0.7256 Dec-95 1 27.7 60.6 1.1182 0.7390 Ja n-96 1 27.9 62.6 1.1200 0.7634 Fe b-96 1 2 7.1 59.7 1.1130 0.7280 M ar-96 1 27.8 63.5 1.1191 0.774 4 Apr-96 1 29.1 74.7 1.1305 0.9 1 10 M ay-96 1 35.0 72.0 1.1821 0.8780 J u n-96 13 7.5 62.8 1.2040 0.7659 Ju l-96 1 36.0 6 4.3 1.1909 0.78 41 Aug-96 1 36.2 66.5 1.1926 0.81 1 0 Sep-96 1 36.2 73.4 1.1926 0.895 1 Oc t-96 1 3 1.2 79.7 1.1489 0.9720 N o v-9 6 1 27.1 76.5 1.1130 0.9329 Dec-96 1 2 7.7 76.1 1.1182 0.9280 J a n-9 7 1 28.3 73.7 1.1235 0.8988 Feb-9 7 1 28.1 72.3 1.1 217 0.88 1 7 M a r-9 7 1 2 8.2 65.2 1.1226 0.795 1 A p r-9 7 1 2 7.3 65.3 1.11 47 0.7 963 M a y-9 7 1 29.7 6 4.2 1.1357 0.7829 Ju n-9 7 1 35.1 60.8 1.1830 0.7 41 5 J ul-9 7 1 35.9 57.8 1.1900 0.70 4 9 Energy Escalat i on Fac t or (E) for PWR (D i ablo Can y on) 1.0026 1.0049 0.9570 0.903 2 0.9047 0.9339 0.926 8 0.917 1 0.920 1 0.955 1 0.97 1 5 0.9776 0.9807 0.95 1 2 0.9 4 62 0.9272 0.9282 0.923 1 0.929 7 0.93 44 0.96 4 0 0.9730 0.967 8 0.9780 0.977 1 0.963 4 0.9528 0.9590 0.9702 0.95 1 3 0.97 4 3 1.0383 1.05 44 1.0200 1.020 1 1.0323 1.0677 1.07 4 6 1.0373 1.0383 1.029 1 1.0209 0.985 1 0.98 1 0 0.987 6 0.9976 0.9863 E n c l os u re 2 PG&E L e tt er D C L-11-039 P age 3 of 7 Development of E Component Calculation of Energy Escalation Factor -Reference NUREG-1307, Revision 14, Sectopm 3.2 Using Regional Indices SERIES ID: WPU0573 Light Fuel Oils (as of 03/02/11) and WPU0543 Industrial Ele c tric Power (as of 03/02/11)
REBAS E D TO 1986 = 100 PPI for Fuels & PPI for Light PPI for Fuels & PPI for Light Related Products Fuel Oils Related Products Fuel Oils (1982 = 100) (1982=100) (1986 = 100) (1986=100) (P) =Industrial Energy Power (F) = Light Fuel Oils (P) =Industrial Energy Power (F) = Light Fuel Oils Aug-97 134.7 61.5 1.1795 0.7500 Sep-97 136.0 60.4 1.1909 0.7366 Oct-97 130.1 64.8 1.1392 0.7902 Nov-97 127.9 65.8 1.1200 0.8024 Dec-97 128.3 59.4 1.1235 0.7244 Jan-98 127.4 54.1 1.1156 0.6598 Feb-98 127.2 52.0 1.1138 0.6341 Mar-98 126.7 48.3 1.1095 0.5890 Apr-98 126.4 50.2 1.1068 0.6122 May-98 129.2 50.0 1.1313 0.6098 Jun-98 133.8 46.3 1.1716 0.5646 Jul-98 134.8 45.0 1.1804 0.5488 Aug-98 135.2 44.0 1.1839 0.5366 Sep-98 135.2 48.3 1.1839 0.5890 Oct-98 130.4 47.4 1.1419 0.5780 Nov-98 127.6 46.2 1.1173 0.5634 Dec-98 126.6 38.8 1.1086 0.4732 Jan-99 126.1 40.9 1.1042 0.4988 Feb-99 125.5 38.2 1.0989 0.4659 Mar-99 125.5 42.8 1.0989 0.5220 Apr-99 125.2 52.5 1.0963 0.6402 May-99 127.4 52.6 1.1156 0.6415 Jun-99 131.0 52.4 1.1471 0.6390 Jul-99 133.9 58.7 1.1725 0.7159 Aug-99 133.9 63 1.1725 0.7683 Sep-99 134.1 67.6 1.1743 0.8244 Oct-99 129.5 65.5 1.1340 0.7988 Nov-99 127.5 71.3 1.1165 0.8695 Dec-99 126.5 72.9 1.1077 0.8890 Jan-OO 126.8 75.3 1.1103 0.9183 Feb-OO 126.7 87.9 1.1095 1.0720 Mar-OO 126.7 89.7 1.1095 1.0939 Apr-OO 126.8 83.1 1.1103 1.0134 May-OO 128.6 82.9 1.1261 1.0110 Jun-OO 133.6 86.2 1.1699 1.0512 Jul-OO 136.2 88.7 1.1926 1.0817 Aug-OO 137.4 91.6 1.2032 1.1171 Sep-OO 137.8 110.1 1.2 0 67 1.3427 Oct-OO 134.1 108.6 1.1743 1.3244 Nov-OO 130.9 108.4 1.1462 1.3220 Dec-OO 132.7 100.6 1.1620 1.2268 Jan-01 136.4 96.1 1.1944 1.1720 Feb-01 136.4 91.6 1.1944 1.1171 Mar-01 136.5 83.1 1.1953 1.0134 Apr-0 1 135.1 86.2 1.1830 1.0512 May-01 136.2 94.2 1.1926 1.1488 Jun-01 148.4 90.2 1.2995 1.1000 Energy Es c alation Factor (E) for PWR (Diablo Canyon) 0.9991 1.0001 0.9927 0.9866 0.9559 0.9241 0.9124 0.8909 0.8991 0.9123 0.9167 0.9151 0.9120 0.9340 0.9051 0.8847 0.8417 0.8499 0.8330 0.8566 0.9048 0.9165 0.9337 0.9807 1.0027 1.0273 0.9932 1.0127 1.0159 1.0297 1.0937 1.1029 1.0696 1.0777 1.1200 1.1461 1.1670 1.2638 1.2373 1.2200 1.1892 1.1850 1.1619 1.1189 1.1277 1.1742 1.2157 Enclosure 2 PG&E Letter DCL-11-039 Page 4 of 7 Development of E Componen t Calculation of Energy Escalation Factor -Reference NUREG-1307, Revision 14 , S e c t o pm 3.2 Using Regional Indices SERIES 10: WPU0573 Light Fuel Oils (as of 03/02/11) and WPU 0 543 Indu s trial E le c tric P o wer (a s of 03/02/11)
REBAS E D TO 1986 = 100 PPI for Fuels & PPI for Light PP I for Fuels & PPI for Light Related Products Fuel Oils Related Pr o du c ts Fuel Oils (1982 = 100) (1982=100) (1986 = 100) (1986=100) (P) =Industrial Energy Power (F) = Light Fuel Oils (P) =Indu s trial E nergy Power (F) = Light Fuel Oils Ju l-0 1 149.5 81.3 1.3091 0.9915 Aug-01 148.9 83.2 1.3039 1.0146 Sep-0 1 148.2 93 1.2977 1.1341 Oct-0 1 143.8 76.8 1.2592 0.9366 Nov-0 1 137.3 70.5 1.2023 0.8598 Dec-0 1 136.9 56.6 1.1988 0.6902 Jan-02 136.3 58.3 1.1935 0.7110 Feb-02 135.4 59.6 1.1856 0.7268 Mar-02 135.7 69.1 1.1883 0.8427 Apr-02 135.4 76.4 1.1856 0.9317 May-02 137.9 75 1.2075 0.9146 Jun-02 143.6 71.4 1.2574 0.8707 Jul-02 144.9 75.5 1.2688 0.9207 Aug-02 145.0 77.9 1.2697 0.9500 Sep-02 145.8 89.5 1.2767 1.0915 Oct-02 140.0 95.1 1.2259 1.1598 Nov-02 139.5 82.8 1.2215 1.0098 Dec-02 139.6 84.6 1.2224 1.0317 Jan-03 140.3 95.7 1.2285 1.1671 Feb-03 140.6 120.4 1.2312 1.4683 Mar-03 143.3 128.9 1.2548 1.5720 Apr-03 144.3 98.3 1.2636 1.1988 May-03 145.1 85.5 1.2706 1.0427 Jun-03 148.3 87.2 1.2986 1.0634 Jul-03 151.6 90.1 1.3275 1.0988 Aug-03 151.3 94.1 1.3249 1.1476 Sep-03 152.0 88.2 1.3310 1.0756 Oct-03 147.4 97.8 1.2907 1.1927 Nov-03 142.7 93.0 1.2496 1.1341 Dec-03 142.9 95.8 1.2513 1.1683 Jan-0 4 143.1 106.8 1.2531 1.3024 Feb-04 143.1 100.8 1.2531 1.2293 Mar-04 143.1 107.8 1.2531 1.3146 Apr-04 143.1 115.2 1.2531 1.4049 May-04 144.2 116 1.2627 1.4146 Jun-04 152.4 111.5 1.3345 1.3598 Jul-04 152.2 119.3 1.3327 1.4549 Aug-0 4 154.0 131.1 1.3485 1.5988 Sep-04 154.0 136.8 1.3485 1.6683 Oct-04 145.8 161.7 1.2767 1.9720 Nov-04 144.9 153.6 1.2688 1.8732 Dec-0 4 146.2 133.8 1.2802 1.6317 Jan-05 148.9 138.5 1.3039 1.6890 Feb-05 148.0 146 1.2960 1.7805 Mar-05 148.1 169.4 1.2968 2.0659 Ap r-05 148.7 170.9 1.3 0 21 2.0841 May-05 151.1 165.3 1.3231 2.0159 Energy E s calation Factor (E) for PWR (Diablo Canyon) 1.1757 1.1824 1.2290 1.1237 1.0584 0.9852 0.9909 0.9929 1.0431 1.0790 1.0845 1.0950 1.1226 1.1354 1.1989 1.1981 1.1326 1.1423 1.2027 1.3308 1.3880 1.2364 1.1749 1.1 998 1.2314 1.2504 1.2237 1.2495 1.201 1 1.2164 1.2738 1.2 4 31 1.2789 1.3168 1.3265 1.3451 1.3840 1.4536 1.4828 1.5687 1.5227 1.4278 1.4656 1.4995 1.6198 1.6306 1.6141 Enc l osure 2 PG&E Letter DCL-11-039 Page 5 o f 7 Development of E Component Calculation of Energy Escalat i on Fac t or -Reference NUREG-1307, Revision 14, Sectopm 3.2 Using Regional Indices SERIES I D: WPU0573 Light Fuel Oils (as of 03/02/11) and WPU0543 Industrial Electric Power (as of 03/02/11) R E BA S ED TO 1986 = 100 PPI for Fue l s & PPI for Light PPI f o r Fuel s & PPI for Ligh t Related Products Fuel Oils Related Produ c ts Fue l Oils (1 982 = 1 00) (1 982=100) (1986 = 100) (1 986=100) (P) =Industrial Energy Power (F) = Light Fuel Oils (P) =Industrial Energy Power (F) = Light Fue l Oils Jun-05 1 59.7 180.6 1.3984 2.202 4 Jul-05 1 62.1 186.2 1.4 194 2.2707 Aug-05 1 62.5 1 9 4.5 1.4229 2.3720 Sep-05 162.8 209.9 1.4256 2.5598 Oc t-05 1 59.5 252.0 1.3967 3.0732 N ov-05 161.1 199.1 1.4107 2.4280 Dec-05 1 6 1.4 1 93.6 1.4133 2.3610 Jan-06 167.0 191.8 1.4623 2.3390 Feb-06 168.6 1 90.0 1.4764 2.3 1 7 1 M ar-06 167.4 199.2 1.4658 2.4 293 Apr-06 169.6 221.9 1.4851 2.7 06 1 M ay-06 170.8 231.4 1.49 5 6 2.8220 Jun-06 181.2 238.1 1.5867 2.9037 Jul-06 181.9 231.6 1.5928 2.82 44 Aug-06 18 0.2 24 1.4 1.5779 2.9 4 39 Se p-06 181.0 203.1 1.5849 2.47 68 Oct-06 171.2 198.1 1.4991 2.41 59 N ov-06 1 67.2 198.2 1.4641 2.4 1 71 Dec-06 167.8 200.4 1.4694 2.4439 J an-07 171.9 180.0 1.5053 2.19 5 1 Feb-07 17 5.7 1 9 1.5 1.5385 2.3 35 4 M ar-07 172.1 215.1 1.5070 2.6 232 Apr-07 173.1 231.8 1.5158 2.8268 M a y-07 179.2 225.3 1.5692 2.7 4 76 Jun-07 18 6.7 222.4 1.6349 2.7122 Jul-07 18 7.0 237.8 1.6 375 2.9000 Aug-07 187.6 225.5 1.6427 2.7500 Sep-07 1 88.4 238.9 1.6497 2.9 1 3 4 Oct-07 18 2.7 2 4 3.3 1.5998 2.9671 N ov-07 18 0.3 288.2 1.5788 3.5 146 Dec-07 18 0.0 266.7 1.5762 3.2524 Jan-08 181.9 273.8 1.5928 3.3 390 Feb-08 1 80.0 280.2 1.5762 3.4171 M ar-08 183.1 339.6 1.6033 4.141 5 Apr-08 185.2 352.5 1.6217 4.2988 M ay-08 18 9.5 38 4.9 1.6594 4.6939 Jun-08 1 91.9 41 0.5 1.6804 5.006 1 Jul-08 1 96.1 4 23.8 1.7172 5.1683 Aug-08 1 97.1 3 4 3.9 1.7259 4.1 939 Sep-08 1 95.9 335.1 1.715 4 4.0866 Oct-08 1 93.0 279.0 1.6900 3.4024 N ov-08 187.7 218.2 1.6436 2.66 1 0 Dec-0 8 188.3 1 63.0 1.6489 1.9878 Jan-09 1 90.3 1 59.8 1.6664 1.9488 Feb-09 1 90.3 14 5.6 1.6664 1.7756 M ar-09 187.6 1 36.8 1.6427 1.6683 Apr-09 186.9 1 59.9 1.6366 1.9500 Energy Escalation Factor (E) f or PWR (Diablo Canyon) 1.736 1 1.7770 1.8215 1.9019 2.1 008 1.8380 1.8113 1.8306 1.8295 1.87 05 1.9979 2.0527 2.1398 2.1 10 1 2.1 516 1.9595 1.8842 1.86 43 1.878 7 1.7950 1.87 32 1.9758 2.0664 2.06 41 2.0873 2.1677 2.1078 2.1805 2.1 741 2.39 19 2.2802 2.3262 2.34 9 4 2.6693 2.7461 2.9339 3.0772 3.1666 2.7625 2.7113 2.4092 2.0709 1.79 12 1.7850 1.7123 1.6535 1.7 682 Enclosure 2 P G&E L e tt er DCL-11-039 Page 6 of 7 Development of E Component Calculation of Energy Escalation Factor -Reference NUREG-1307, Revision 14, Sectopm 3.2 Using Regional Indices SERIES 10: WPU0573 Light Fuel Oils (as of 03/02/11) and WPU0543 Industrial Electric Power (as of 03/02/11)
REBASED TO 1986 = 100 PPI for Fuels & PPI for Light PPI for Fuels & PPI for Light Related Products Fuel Oils Related Produ c ts Fuel Oils (1982 = 100) (1982=100) 
(1986 = 100) (1986=100) (P) =Industrial Energy Power (F) = Light Fuel Oils (P) =Indu s trial Energy Power (F) = Light Fuel Oils May-09 190.5 158.6 1.6681 1.9341 Jun-09 193.3 183.7 1.6926 2.2402 Jul-09 196.2 165.2 1.7180 2.0146 Aug-09 194.7 196.1 1.7049 2.3915 Sep-09 194.9 186.6 1.7067 2.2756 Oct-09 189.9 193.3 1.6629 2.3573 Nov-09 186.0 207.8 1.6287 2.5341 Dec-09 186.0 197.5 1.6287 2.4085 Jan-10 186.3 220.7 1.6313 2.6915 Feb-10 186.1 200.2 1.6296 2.4415 Mar-10 189.0 217.0 1.6550 2.6463 Apr-10 188.8 231.5 1.6532 2.8232 May-10 192.0 226.0 1.6813 2.7561 Jun-10 197.8 212.4 1.7320 2.5902 Jul-10 199.8 209.3 1.7496 2.5524 Aug-10 200.8 221.4 1.7583 2.7000 Sep-10 200.0 220.0 1.7513 2.6829 Oct-10 194.7 236.0 1.7049 2.8780 Nov-10 192.9 245.5 1.6891 2.9939 Energy Escalation Factor (E) for PWR (Diablo Canyon) 1.7799 1.9226 1.8426 1.9933 1.9456 1.9545 2.0090 1.9562 2.0766 1.9706 2.0714 2.1446 2.1327 2.0925 2.0868 2.1538 2.1426 2.1976 2.237 1 Enclosure 2 PG&E Letter DCL-11-039 Page 7 of 7 De v e l opme nt o f L Co m po n e nt Enclosure 2 PG&E Letter DCL-11-039 Page 1 of 7 Calcu l ation of Labor Escalation Factor -Reference NUREG-1307, Revision 14, Section 3.1 Us i ng Regional Indices SERIES ID: CIU20100000002401 (as of 03/02/11) January 1986 adjusted to ref l ect NUREG 1307 Revision 14 Scaling Factor for West Labor (Page 7). Note 1: The Base Labor factor was reindexed in December 2005, at which time the index was reset to 100. Emp l oyment Cost Indust West Reg i on Labor Private Industry Escalation (1989 = 100) Factor Jan-86 89.8 1.00000 Feb-86 Mar-86 Apr-86 90.8 1.01114 May-86 Jun-86 Ju l-86 91.2 1.01559 Aug-86 Sep-86 Oct-86 91.6 1.02004 Nov-86 Dec-86 Jan-87 92.5 1.03007 Feb-87 Mar-87 Apr-87 92.6 1.03118 May-87 Jun-87 Ju l-87 93.7 1.04343 Aug-87 Sep-87 Oct-87 94.1 1.04788 Nov-87 Dec-87 Jan-88 95.4 1.06236 Feb-88 Mar-88 Apr-88 96.3 1.07238 May-88 Jun-88 Ju l-88 97 1.08018 Aug-88 Sep-88 Oct-88 97.7 1.08797 Nov-88 Dec-88 Jan-89 98.8 1.10022 Feb-89 Mar-89 Apr-89 100 1.11359 May-89 Jun-89 Ju l-89 101 1.12472 Aug-89 Sep-89 Development of L Com ponent Enc lo sure 2 PG&E Letter DCL-11-039 Page 2 of 7 Calculation of Labor Esca lation Facto r -Reference NUREG-1307, Revision 14, Sec tion 3.1 Using Regional Indices SERIES 10: CIU20100000002401 (a s of 03/02/11) January 1986 adjusted to reflect NUR EG 1307 Revision 14 Scaling Factor for West Labor (Page 7). Note 1: The Base Labor factor was reindexed in December 2005, at which time the index was res et to 100. E mployment Cost Indust West Reg i on Labor Private Industry Escalation (1989 = 100) Factor Oct-89 101.8 1.13363 Nov-89 Dec-89 Jan-90 103.3 1.15033 Feb-90 Mar-90 Apr-90 104.5 1.16370 May-90 Jun-90 Ju l-90 105.6 1.17595 Aug-90 Sep-90 Oct-90 106.3 1.18374 Nov-90 Dec-90 Jan-91 107.5 1.19710 Feb-9 1 Mar-91 Apr-91 108.9 1.21269 Ma y-91 Jun-91 Jul-91 110 1.22494 Aug-91 Sep-9 1 Oct-91 110.9 1.23497 Nov-91 Dec-91 Jan-92 111.9 1.24610 Feb-92 Mar-92 Apr-92 112.9 1.25724 May-92 Jun-92 Ju l-92 114.1 1.2 7060 Aug-92 Sep-92 Oct-92 114.9 1.27951 Nov-92 Dec-92 Jan-93 116.2 1.29399 Feb-93 Mar-93 Apr-93 116.4 1.2 9621 May-93 Jun-93 Development of L Com ponent Enclosure 2 PG&E Letter DCL-11-039 Page 3 of 7 Calcu l ation of Labor Esca lation Factor -Reference NUREG-1307, Revision 14, Section 3.1 Using Regional Indice s SERIES 10: CIU20100000002401 (as of 03/02/11)
January 1986 adjusted to reflect NUR EG 1307 Revis i on 14 Sca l ing Factor for West Labor (Page 7). Note 1: T he Base Labor factor wa s reindexed in December 2005, at which time the ind ex w as reset to 100. E mp l oyment Cost Indust West Region Labor Pr i vate Industry Esca l at i on (1989=100) Factor Jul-93 117.8 1.3 1180 Aug-93 Sep-93 Oct-93 118.1 1.31514 Nov-93 Dec-93 Jan-94 119.4 1.32962 Feb-94 Mar-94 Apr-94 120.5 1.34187 May-94 Jun-94 Ju l-94 121.3 1.35078 Aug-94 Sep-94 Oct-94 121.7 1.35523 Nov-94 Dec-94 Jan-95 122.6 1.36526 Feb-95 Mar-95 Apr-95 123.4 1.37416 May-95 Jun-95 Ju l-95 123.9 1.37973 Aug-95 Sep-95 Oct-95 125 1.39198 Nov-95 Dec-95 Jan-96 125.9 1.40200 Feb-96 Mar-96 Apr-96 127.3 1.41759 May-96 Jun-96 Ju l-96 128.3 1.42873 Aug-96 Sep-96 Oct-96 128.9 1.43541 Nov-96 Dec-96 Jan-97 130.3 1.45100 Feb-97 Mar-97 Development of L Component Enclosure 2 PG&E Letter DCL-11-039 Page 4 of 7 Calculation of Labor Esca lation Fac tor -Reference NUR EG-1307, Revision 14, Sec tion 3.1 Using Regional Indices SERIES ID: CIU20100000002401 (as of 03/02/11)
January 1986 adjusted to reflect NUREG 1307 Revision 14 Scaling Factor for We st Labor (Page 7). Note 1: The Base Labor factor was reindexed in December 2 005, at which time the ind ex was reset to 100. E mployment Cost Indust West Region Labor Pr i vate Industry Esca l ation (1989 = 100) Factor Apr-97 131.4 1.46325 May-97 Jun-97 Ju l-97 132.5 1.47550 Aug-97 Sep-97 Oct-97 133.4 1.48552 Nov-97 Dec-97 Jan-98 135.2 1.50557 Feb-98 Mar-98 Apr-98 136.6 1.52116 Ma y-98 Jun-98 Ju l-98 138.5 1.54232 Aug-98 Sep-98 Oct-98 140 1.55902 No v-98 Dec-98 Jan-99 140.3 1.56236 Feb-99 Mar-99 Apr-99 142.1 1.58241 May-99 Jun-99 Ju l-99 143.3 1.59577 Aug-99 Sep-99 Oct-99 144.7 1.61136 Nov-99 Dec-99 Jan-OO 147 1.63697 Feb-OO Mar-OO Apr-OO 148.8 1.65702 May-OO Jun-OO Jul-OO 150.8 1.67929 Aug-OO Sep-OO Oct-OO 151.8 1.6904 2 Nov-OO Dec-OO Development of L Component Enc l osure 2 PG&E Letter DCL-11-039 Page 5 of 7 Calculation of Labor Esca lation Factor -Reference NUR EG-1307, Revision 14, Sect ion 3.1 Using Regiona l Indices SERIES ID: CIU20100000002401 (as of 03/02/11) January 1986 adjusted to ref l ect NUREG 1307 Revision 14 Sca l ing Factor for We st Labor (Page 7). Note 1: The Base Labor factor wa s reindexed in December 2005, at which time the ind ex was reset to 100. Jan-01 Feb-01 Mar-01 Apr-01 May-01 Jun-01 Ju l-01 Aug-01 Sep-01 Oct-01 Nov-01 Dec-01 Jan-02 Feb-02 Feb-02 Mar-0 2 Apr-02 May-02 Jun-0 2 J u l-0 2 Aug-02 Sep-02 Oct-02 Nov-02 Dec-02 Jan-03 Feb-03 Mar-03 Apr-03 May-03 Jun-03 Ju l-03 Aug-03 Sep-03 Oct-03 Nov-03 Dec-03 Jan-04 Feb-04 Mar-04 Apr-04 May-04 Jun-04 Ju l-04 Aug-04 E mp l oyment Cost Indust West Reg i on Labor Private Industry Es calation (1989 = 100) Factor 84.1 0.93653 85 0.94655 85.9 0.95657 86.9 0.96771 87.4 0.97327 88.5 0.98552 89.1 0.99220 89.8 1.00000 90.9 1.01225 92 1.02450 93.2 1.03786 93.8 1.04454 95.3 1.06125 96.2 1.071 27 96.9 1.07906 Development of L Component E n c l os ur e 2 PG&E Le tt e r DC L-11-0 3 9 Page 6 of 7 Calculation of Labor E scalation Factor -Reference NUR E G-1307, Revi s ion 14 , Section 3.1 Using Reg i onal Indices S E RIE S 10: CIU20100000002401 (as of 03/02/11)
January 1986 a djusted to ref l ect NUR E G 1307 Revision 14 Scaling Factor for West Labor (Pag e 7). Note 1: The Ba s e Labor factor wa s r e indexed in December 200S, at which time the index was reset to 100. Emp l oyment Cost Indust West Region Labor Pr i vate Industry Escalation (1989 = 100) Factor Sep-04 Oct-04 97.4 1.08463 Nov-04 Dec-04 Jan-OS 98.4 1.09S77 Feb-OS Mar-OS Apr-OS 99.3 1.10S79 May-OS Jun-OS Ju l-OS 99.7 1.11024 Aug-OS Sep-OS Oct-OS (Note 1) 100 2.06000 Nov-OS Dec-OS Jan-06 100.6 2.07236 Feb-06 Mar-06 Apr-06 101.8 2.09708 May-06 Jun-06 Ju l-06 102.S 2.111S0 Aug-06 Sep-06 Oct-06 103 2.12180 Nov-06 Dec-06 Jan-07 104.2 2.146S2 Feb-O? Mar-O? Apr-O? 104.9 2.16094 May-07 Jun-07 Ju l-07 10S.7 2.17742 Aug-07 Sep-O? Oct-07 106.S 2.19390 Nov-O? Dec-07 Jan-08 107.8 2.22068 Feb-OB Mar-08 Apr-08 108.4 2.23304 May-08 Development of L Com ponent Enclosure 2 PG&E Letter DCL-11-039 Page 7 of 7 Calculation of Labor Esca lation Factor -Reference NUREG-1307, Revision 14, Sect ion 3.1 Using Regional Indices SERIES 10: CIU20100000002401 (as of 03/02/11) January 1986 adjusted to reflect NUREG 1307 Revision 14 Scaling Factor for West Labor (Page 7). Note 1: The Base Labor factor was reindexed in December 2005, at which tim e the ind ex was reset to 100. Emp l oyment Cost Indu st West Reg i on Labor Pr iv ate Industry Esca l at ion (1989 = 100) Factor Jun-08 Jul-08 109.3 2.25158 Aug-08 Sep-08 Oct-08 109.4 2.25364 Nov-08 Dec-08 Jan-09 109.9 2.26394 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 110.0 2.26600 May-09 Jun-09 Ju l-09 110.3 2.27218 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 110.6 2.27836 Nov-09 Dec-09 Jan-10 111.4 2.29484 Feb-10 Mar-10 Apr-10 111.7 2.30102 May-10 Jun-10 Jul-10 112.3 2.31338 Aug-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 112.5 2.31750 Nov-10 Dec-10 Jan-11 112.7 2.32162 Jan-11 i s an est imat e based on difference between July 2010 and October 2010 a nd adding to the October 2010 base.
Table C-1 and Table C-2 Enc l osure 3 PG&E Letter DCL-11-039 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Unit 1 Decon Decommissioning Cost Estimate Table C-1 and Table C-2 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Unit 2 Decon Decommissioning Cost Estimate Note: Totals may not sum due to rounding Enclosure 3 PG&E Letter DCL-11-039 Page 1 of 9 T AB LE C-1 T AB L E C-2 DIABLO C ANY O N PO WE R PL AN T U N IT 1 DI AB LO CANY O N POWER PL AN T U N I T 1 DECO N DECOMMISSIO N I N G COST ESTI MA T E DECO N DECOM M IS S IO N I N G COST ESTI MA TE (Thou s and s of 200 8 Dollar s) (Thous a nd s of 2 011 Dollar s) ID Burial s ite Utl-,site LLKW D ec on R e moval Pa ck ag in g Tran s po rt P r oc ess in g Di s pos a l Other To t al Cla ss A Cla ss B Cla ss C GTCC o ff-S ite LLRW N umber A ctivit y De s cription Co s t Co s t Cost Co s t Cost Co s t Cost s Contingency Total Co s t s Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Decon Remo v e Pack ag in g Tran s port Proce ss in g Dispo s al Other Contin g enc y Total PERIOD 1a -Shutdown through Transition Period 1 a Direct Decommissioning Activities 1a.1.1 Prepare preliminary decommissioning cost 156 32 188 169 42 211 1a.1.2 Notification of Cessation of Operations 1a.1.3 Remove fuel & source material 1a.1.4 Notification of Permanent Defueling 1a.1.5 Deactivate p l ant systems & process waste 1a.1.6 Prepare and submit PSDAR 240 50 289 260 65 325 1a.1.7 Review plant dwgs & specs. 551 114 666 597 149 747 1a.1.8 Perform detailed rad survey 1a.1.9 Estimate by-product inventory 120 25 145 130 33 163 1a.1.10 End product description 120 25 145 130 33 163 1a.1.11 Detailed by-product inventory 156 32 188 169 42 211 1a.1.12 Define major work sequence 899 186 1,086 975 244 1,218 1a.1.13 Perform SER and EA 372 77 449 403 101 504 1a.1.14 Perform Site-Specific Cost Study 599 124 724 649 162 812 1a.1.15 Prepare/submit License Termination Plan 491 102 593 532 133 665 1a.1.16 Receive NRC approval of termination plan Activity Specifications 1a.1.17.1 Plant & temporary facilities 590 122 712 640 160 799 1a.1.17.2 Plant systems 500 104 603 542 136 678 1a.1.17.3 NSSS Decontamination Flush 60 12 72 65 16 81 1a.1.17.4 Reactor internals 851 176 1 , 028 922 231 1 , 153 1a.1.17.5 Reactor vessel 779 162 941 844 211 1 , 056 1a.1.17.6 Biological shield 6 0 12 72 65 16 81 1a.1.17.7 Steam generators 374 78 452 405 101 5 07 1a.1.17.8 Reinforced concrete 192 40 232 208 52 260 1a.1.17.9 Main Turbine 48 10 58 52 13 65 1a.1.17.10 Main Condensers 48 10 58 52 13 65 1a.1.17.11 P l ant structures 
& buildings 374 78 452 405 101 507 1a.1.17.12 Waste management 551 114 666 597 149 747 1a.1.17.13 Facility & site closeout 108 22 130 117 29 146 1a.1.17 Total 4 , 535 940 5,475 4,916 1 ,229 6,145 Planning & Site Preparations 1a.1.18 Prepare dismantling sequence 288 60 347 312 78 390 1a.1.19 Plant prep. & temp. svces 2 , 700 560 3,260 2,927 732 3,659 1a.1.20 Design water clean-up system 168 35 203 18 2 46 228 1a.1.21 Rigging/Cont.Cntr l Env lp s/too lin g/etc. 2 , 100 435 2 , 535 2,276 569 2,846 1a.1.22 Procure casks/liners 
& containers 147 31 178 159 40 199 1a.1 Sub total Period 1a Activity Costs 13 , 642 2,828 16,470 14 , 788 3 , 697 18,485 Period 1a Additional Costs 1a.2.1 S pent Fue l Pool Isolation 9,407 1,950 11 , 358 10 , 197 2,549 12,746 1a.2 Subtota l Period 1 a Activity Costs 9,407 1,950 11,358 10,197 2,549 12,746 Period 1a Collateral Costs 1a.3.1 S pent Fuel Cap i ta l and Transfer 836 173 1,009 906 227 1,133 1a.3 S ubto ta l Period 1 a Co llat e ral Costs 836 173 1,009 906 227 1,133 Period 1a Period-Dependent Costs 1a.4.1 Ins uran ce 1 , 195 165 1,360 1,295 324 1,619 1a.4.2 Property taxes 101 14 115 109 27 137 1a.4.3 Health physics suppl i es 486 168 654 527 132 659 1a.4.4 Heavy equipment rental 490 102 591 531 133 664 1a.4.5 Disposal of DAW generated 11 4 38 16 69 610 12 5 47 16 80 1a.4.6 P l ant energy budget 1,330 276 1,605 1,442 360 1 , 802 1a.4.7 NRC ISF S I Fees 159 159 172 43 2 1 5 1a.4.8 NCR Fees 706 98 803 765 191 957 1a.4.9 Emergency Planning Fees 1,258 174 1,432 1,364 341 1,705 1a.4.10 Spent Fuel Poo l O&M 735 152 887 797 199 996 1a.4.11 I SFS I -Operating Costs 118 24 142 128 32 160 1 a.4.12 Spent Fuel Storage/Capita l Equipment 1,594 330 1,925 1 , 728 432 2 , 160 1a.4.13 I SFSI -Fixed Costs 239 50 289 259 65 324 1a.4.14 Security Staff Cost 775 161 936 840 210 1,050 1a.4.15 Utility Staff Cost 26,403 5,473 31 , 876 28,621 7,155 35 , 776 1a.4 SUbtotal 1 a. Period-Dependent Costs 976 11 4 38 34,612 7,202 42 , 843 610 1,058 12 5 47 37,519 9,660 48 , 302 1a.0 TOTAL PERIOD 1a COST 976 11 4 38 58,497 12 , 153 71,680 610 1 , 058 12 5 47 63,411 16 , 133 80,666 Note: Totals may not sum due to rounding Enclosure 3 PG&E Letter DCL-11-039 Page 2 of 9 TABLE C-l TABLE C-2 DlABLO CANYON POWER PLANT U N IT 1 DlABLO CANYON POWER PL At'l T UNIT 1 DECON DECOMMISSlONING COST ESTIMATE DECON DECOMMISSIONING COST ESTIMATE (Thousands of 2008 Dollars) (Thou s ands of 2011 Dollar s) ID Burial site LLKW Decon Removal Packaging Tl'an s port Processing Di s posal Other Total Class A Cla ss B Class C GTCC Off-Site LLRW Number Activity Description Cost Cost Cost Co s t Co s t Cost Co s t s Contingency Total Cost s Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Decon Remove Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Contingenc y Total Period 1b -Decommissioning Preparations Period 1 b Direct Decommissioning Activit i es Detailed Work Procedures 1 b.1.1.1 Plant systems 567 118 685 615 154 768 1b.1.1.2 NSSS Decontamination Flush 120 25 145 130 33 16 3 1b.1.1.3 Reactor interna l s 300 62 362 325 81 407 1b.1.1A Remaining buildings 162 34 195 176 44 220 1b.1.1.5 CRD cooling assembly 120 25 145 130 33 163 1b.1.1.6 CRD housings & ICI tubes 120 25 145 130 33 163 1b.1.1.7 In core instrumentation 120 25 145 130 33 163 1b.1.1.8 Reactor vesse l 435 90 525 472 118 589 1b.1.1.9 Facility closeout 144 30 174 156 39 195 1b.1.1.10 Missi l e shields 54 11 65 59 15 73 1b.1.1.11 Biological shield 144 30 174 156 39 195 1b.1.1.12 Stea m generators 551 114 666 597 149 747 1b.1.1.13 Reinforced concrete 120 25 145 130 33 163 1b.1.1.1 4 Main Turbine 187 39 226 203 51 253 1b.1.1.15 Main Condenser 187 39 226 203 51 253 1b.1.1.16 Auxiliary building 327 68 395 354 89 443 1b.1.1.17 Reactor bui l ding 327 68 395 354 89 443 1b.1.1 Tota l 3,986 826 4,812 4,321 1,080 5,401 1b.1.2 Decon primary l oop 1,62 3 1 , 122 2,745 1,759 440 2 , 199 1b.1 Subtota l Period 1 b Activity Costs 1 ,623 3,986 1,948 7,557 1,759 4 , 321 1,520 7,600 Period 1 b Additional Costs 1b.2.1 Site Characterization 4,549 1 , 886 6,435 4,931 1,233 6,164 1b.2.2 Hazardous Waste Management 590 122 713 640 160 799 1b.2.3 Mixed Waste Management 912 189 1,101 989 247 1 , 236 1b.2 Subtota l Period 1 b Activity Costs 6,051 2 , 197 8,248 6 ,559 1 ,64 0 8,199 Per i od 1 b Co ll ateral Costs 1b.3.1 Decon equipment 935 194 1,129 1,014 253 1,267 1b.3.2 DOC staff relocation expenses 1,395 289 1,6 84 1,512 378 1 , 890 1b.3.3 Process liquid waste 64 188 786 6,988 2,648 10,674 400 2,403 69 204 976 8,681 2,483 12,4 14 1b.3A Sma ll tool a ll owance 2 0 3 2 1 3 1b.3.5 Pipe cutting eqU i pment 1,000 207 1 ,207 1 , 0 84 271 1,355 1b.3.6 De co n rig 1,400 290 1,690 1,518 379 1 ,897 1b.3.7 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer 496 103 599 538 134 672 1b.3 Subtotal Period 1 b Collateral Costs 2,399 1,002 188 786 6,988 1,891 3,73 1 16,986 400 2,403 2 , 601 1 , 0 86 2 04 976 8,681 2,050 3,899 19,497 Period 1 b Period-Dependent Costs 1b.4.1 Decon supp l ies 28 10 38 30 8 38 1 bA.2 Insurance 592 82 674 642 160 802 1b.4.3 Property ta xes 50 7 57 54 14 68 1 bAA Hea l th physics supp l ies 272 94 366 295 74 369 1bA.5 Heavy equipment ren tal 243 50 293 263 66 329 1 bA.6 Disposal of DAW generated 7 2 22 9 40 354 8 27 9 47 1 bA.7 Plant energy budget 1,319 273 1,592 1,430 357 1,787 1 bA.8 NRC ISFSI Fees 95 95 103 103 1 bA.9 NRC Fees 350 48 398 379 95 474 1b.4.10 Emergency P l anning Fees 369 51 420 400 100 500 1 bA.11 Spent Fue l Pool O&M 364 76 440 395 99 493 1bA.12 ISFSI Operating Costs 70 14 84 76 19 95 1 bA.13 Spent Fuel Storage/Capital Equipment 1,578 327 1 ,906 1,711 428 2,138 1 bA.14 I SFSI Fixed Costs 142 29 172 154 38 192 1b.4.15 Security Staff Cost 385 80 464 4 1 7 104 522 1 bA.16 DOC Staff Cost 5,260 1 , 090 6,350 5,702 1 ,425 7,127 1 bA.17 Utility Staff Cost 13,172 2 , 730 15 ,902 14,278 3,570 17,848 1 bA Subtotal Period 1 b Period-Dependent Costs 28 515 7 2 22 23 , 745 4 , 972 29,292 354 30 558 8 27 25,74 0 6,591 32,957 1b.0 TOTAL PERIOD 1 b COST 1,051 1 ,517 195 789 7,010 35,672 12,849 29,292 354 1 , 139 1 , 644 211 980 8,709 38,668 12,838 64,190 PERIOD 1 TOTALS 4 , 051 2,493 206 793 7,048 94,170 25 , 002 133,763 1,364 2,403 4 , 391 2,7 0 2 223 985 8,756 102,080 29,785 148,923 Note: Totals may not sum due to rounding ID N umber A ctivity De sc ription PER IO D 2a -Large Component Removal Period 2a Direct Decommissioning Activ iti es Nuclear Steam Supply System Removal 2a.1.1.1 Reactor Coolant Piping 2a.1.1.2 Pressur i zer Quench Tank 2a.1.1.3 Reactor Coo l an t Pump s & Motors 2a.1.1.4 Pressurizer 2a.1.1.5 S t ea m Generators 2a.1.1.6 2a.1.1.7 2a.1.1.8 2a.1.1.9 2a.1.1 Retired Steam Ge n e r ator U n its CRDMs lICl s/Service Structure Removal Reactor V esse l Int e rn a l s Reactor Vessel Totals Removal of Ma jo r Equipment 2a.1.2 Main Turbine/Generator 2a.1.3 Main Condensers Cascad i ng Cos t s from Clean Building Demolition 2a.1.4.1 Reac t or 2a.1.4.2 Containment Penetration Area 2a.1.4.3 Fuel Handling 2a.1.4 Totals Disposal of Pl a nt Systems 2a.1.5.1 Auxi li ary S t eam 2a.1.5.2 Auxiliary St eam (RCA) 2a.1.5.3 Condensate System 2a.1.5.4 Condensate S ystem (In s u lated) 2a.1.5.5 Containment Spray 2 a.1.5.6 Extraction Steam & H eate r Drip 2a.1.5.7 Feedwater System 2a.1.5.8 Feedwater System (Insulated) 2a.1.5.9 Feedwater System (RC A Insula ted) 2a.1.5.10 Feedwater System (RCA) 2a.1.5.11 Lube Oil Distribution 
& Pur ification 2a.1.5.12 Nitrogen & Hydr o g e n 2a.1.5.13 Nitrogen & Hydr o gen (In s ulated) 2a.1.5.14 Nitrogen & Hydr o gen (RCA Insulat ed) 2a.1.5.15 Nitrogen & Hyd ro g e n (RCA) 2a.1.5.16 Oily Water S e parat o r & TB Sump 2a.1.5.17 Sa lt water System 2a.1.5.18 Turbine St eam Supp l y 2a.1.5.19 Turbine Steam Supp ly (RCA) 2a.1.5.20 Turbin e and Generator 2a.1.5.2 1 Turbin e and Generator (In s ulat e d) 2a.1.5 Totals 2a.1.6 Scaffo lding in support of decommissioning 2a.1 Subtotal Period 2a Activity Costs Pe riod 2a Add ition a l Costs 2a.2.1 Re tir ed Reactor H ead 2a.2 Su b tota l Period 2a A ddi tio n a l Cos t s Period 2a Collateral Costs 2a.3.1 Process liquid waste 2a.3.2 Sma ll too l allowance 2a.3.3 2a.3 Spent Fuel Capita l and Transfer Su b total P e ri od 2a Co ll a t e ra l Co sts T AB LE C-l DIABLO CANY O N PO WE R PL ANT U N IT 1 D E CO N D E CO MM ISSIO NIN G COST ESTI MAT E (Thou s and s of 200 8 Dolla rs) D ec on Co s t 305 32 120 38 394 1 62 144 100 1 , 295 1 , 295 106 1 06 R e mov a l Co s t 287 29 101 59 3,846 92 2,231 4, 15 9 10,804 534 1 , 529 1 , 208 66 175 1 ,449 245 2 13 1 , 1 31 4 01 19 4 45 0 65 27 1 98 5 18 8 17 1 5 87 3 0 16 2 1 ,227 67 1 116 49 5 , 622 2,3 11 22 , 249 10 2 102 299 299 Pa c ka g in g Tran s por t Co s t Co s t 4 0 6 44 454 2 , 686 1,895 224 5, 070 1,598 1 2, 01 8 1 92 181 6 3 68 2 1 10 16 5 11 3 3 8 0 22 4 1 256 12 1 2,658 1 5 1 151 49 49 40 6 121 295 1 , 924 1 , 890 37 914 65 1 5 , 878 1 39 131 56 29 592 182 87 1 43 48 101 24 1 25 5 8 700 182 37 8 2 , 228 9 8 , 384 55 55 196 196 Pro cess in g Co s t 2 , 974 2 , 974 5 , 948 88 1 831 458 240 4,856 1,497 7 13 1,176 395 825 1 99 10 205 2 38 63 5,742 1,497 30 0 63 18,278 67 26,006 LLKW Di s po sa l Co s t 766 108 1,358 620 5 , 939 5,768 255 4,579 8 , 548 27,941 6 0 5 570 10 29 , 126 503 5 0 3 1 83 1 83 Othe r Co s t s 234 234 469 469 1 5 1 5 1 , 586 1 , 586 Tot a l Contingenc y 588 72 618 385 5,04 0 3 , 263 270 7,692 11,113 29,04 1 631 950 250 14 36 3 00 192 130 1,530 489 234 4 31 115 287 81 4 113 3 2 39 25 33 1,770 583 110 32 6,204 8 1 9 37,945 528 528 18 4 62 329 575 Total Co s t s 2, 0 27 254 2 , 360 1,852 22 , 803 15,790 1 , 0 4 0 20,864 26,404 93 , 394 2,981 4 , 1 93 1,458 79 212 1,749 958 616 8 , 176 2 , 590 1,237 2 , 216 628 1,495 405 21 533 20 1 9 169 126 195 9,519 2 , 954 567 152 32,587 3,227 138,131 1,355 1,355 718 361 1,915 2,994 Clas s A Cu , Feet 2, 1 4 1 329 5,388 2,460 23,568 22 , 887 3 , 881 1 ,753 6,416 68,822 2 , 301 2 , 170 37 73 , 330 2,0 0 2 2 , 0 0 2 725 725 Burial site Cla ss B Cu. Feet 845 2,379 3,224 3,224 Cla ss C GTCC Cu. Feet Cu. Feet 574 574 574 Decon 331 35 130 41 427 176 1 56 10 8 1,40 4 1,404 11 5 115 R e move 3 1 1 3 1 109 64 4 , 169 100 2,418 4,508 11 , 712 57 9 1,657 1,3 0 9 72 190 1, 57 1 266 231 1 ,226 435 210 488 70 294 106 5 204 1 8 1 5 94 3 3 1 76 1, 330 727 126 53 6,094 2,505 24 , 118 111 111 324 324 TABLE C-2 DI ABL O C ANY O N POWER PL AN T U N I T 1 DECO N DECO MM ISSIO N I N G COS T ESTI MA TE (Thou s and s of 2 011 Doll ars) Pack ag in g 43 7 48 492 2,9 1 2 2, 0 54 243 5,496 1,7 32 13,028 208 196 7 3 74 23 11 17 5 12 3 3 87 24 4 1 278 13 13 , 72 1 1 64 164 53 53 Tran s port 50 7 150 150 366 2 , 39 0 2 , 348 46 1 , 1 35 809 173 163 70 36 735 226 108 178 6 0 125 3 0 1 3 1 6 10 870 226 46 10 2,768 11 10,41 5 68 68 243 243 o ff-Site Proce ss in g 3,695 3,695 7,389 1,094 1 , 032 569 298 6, 0 33 1 ,86 0 886 1,461 491 1 , 025 247 12 255 2 47 78 7 , 133 1 , 860 373 78 22,707 83 32,307 LLR W Di s po s al 952 1 34 1 , 687 770 7,378 7 , 166 317 5 , 688 10 , 619 34 , 711 752 708 1 2 36,183 625 625 227 227 Other 254 254 508 5 0 8 1 6 1 6 1,719 1 , 719 Enc lo sure 3 PG&E letter Del 039 Page 3 of 9 Contingenc y 422 54 531 379 4,737 3,826 796 3,515 4,589 17,390 70 1 9 3 9 327 18 47 393 228 1 42 2, 01 7 6 36 304 536 15 7 364 97 5 1 23 5 o 2 37 3 0 44 2 , 355 709 137 36 7 , 962 656 29 , 664 246 246 160 81 430 671 Total 2 , 10 8 268 2 , 656 1 , 897 23 , 684 19,131 3 , 979 17,573 22, 947 86,950 3 , 507 4 , 696 1,637 89 237 1,963 1 , 138 710 10 , 0 85 3 , 1 79 1,519 2, 680 783 1,820 483 24 616 23 1 10 186 152 220 11 ,77 5 3,546 686 17 8 39,808 3 , 281 148,322 1 , 230 1 , 23 0 799 405 2 , 1 49 3 , 353 Note: Tota l s may not sum due to rounding ID Number Activity Descript i on Period 2a Pe rio d-Depe n de nt Costs 2a.4.1 Deco n su p p li es 2a.4.2 In s ur a n c e 2a.4.3 P r ope rt y taxes 2a.4.4 H ea l t h p h y s i cs s u p pli es 2a.4.5 H eav y eq u ipme n t r en t a l 2a.4.6 Di sp os a l of D AW g e n e r ated 2a.4.7 Pl ant e n ergy b u dget 2a.4.8 N RC I SFS I F ees 2a.4.9 2a.4.1 0 2a.4.11 2a.4.1 2 2a.4.1 3 2a.4.1 4 2a.4.1 5 2a.4.1 6 2a.4.17 2a.4 2a.0 NRC F ees E m e r ge n cy P l an nin g F ees Spe nt Fu e l P o o l O&M I SFS I O p e r a tin g Costs Spe nt F u e l St or a g e/Cap it a l Eq ui pme n t I SFS I F i xed Cos t s Secu rit y Sta ff Cost D OC S t aff C ost U ti lit y S t aff Cost Subtota l Period 2a Pe r iod-Depe nd ent Costs TOTA L PER I OD 2a COSTS PER I OD 2b -S i te Deco nt am i nat io n Period 2b Di r ect Deco m m i ss i on i ng Act i v i t i es D i sposa l of P l ant Systems 2b.1.1.1 C a pit a l Add iti o n s 85-2 0 02 (c l ea n) 2b.1.1.2 Cap i ta l Add iti o n s 85-2 0 02 (co nt am in ated) 2b.1.1.3 Ch emi ca l & Volum e Cont r ol 2 b.1.1.4 Ch em i c al & Volum e Cont r ol (In su l a t ed) 2b.1.1.5 Co m po n e nt C o o lin g W a t e r 2 b.1.1.6 C om p on e nt C o o ling W a t er (RCA) 2 b.1.1.7 Compr essed A ir 2b.1.1.8 Compres se d A ir (In s ula te d) 2b.1.1.9 Co m p r essed A ir (RCA In s ul ate d) 2 b.1.1.1 0 Co mpr e s s ed A ir RC A 2 b.1.1.1 1 Di ese l Engin e-Ge n era tor 2b.1.1.1 2 Di ese l E n g in e-G e n e r a t o r (I ns ul ated) 2 b.1.1.1 3 Electrical (C le a n) 2 b.1.1.1 4 El ec tric a l (C ontamin a t ed) 2b.1.1.1 5 E l ect ri ca l (D ec ontamin a t e d) 2b.1.1.1 6 Fir e Pr o t ec ti o n 2 b.1.1.1 7 Gase ous R a dwas t e 2 b.1.1.1 8 HV AC (Cl e an In s u late d) 2 b.1.1.1 9 HV AC (C l ea n) 2 b.1.1.2 0 HV AC (C ont am in a t e d I nsu l ate d) 2 b.1.1.2 1 HV AC (Co nt am i na t e d) 2 b.1.1.22 Li q ui d Ra d waste 2b.1.1.23 Liqui d R adwaste (In su l a t ed) 2 b.1.1.24 M ake-u p W a t e r 2 b.1.1.25 M ake-u p W a t e r (In s ul ate d) 2b.1.1.26 Make-up W ater (RCA In sulated) 2b.1.1.27 Make-u p W ate r (R C A) 2b.1.1.28 M i sce ll aneo u s Reac t or Co ol ant 2b.1.1.29 Nu clear Steam S u p ply Sa m p lin g 2b.1.1.3 0 Nuclear Steam S u pp ly Samp lin g (I nsu l ated) 2 b.1.1.31 Residua l H ea t Rem ov a l 2b.1.1.32 Safety Inj ec t ion 2b.1.1.33 Sa f e ty Inj ect i on (In s ul ate d) 2b.1.1.34 Sa f ety Inj ect i on (RCA I ns ul ated) 2b.1.1.35 Sa f e t y Inj ec tio n (RCA) 2b.1.1.36 Serv i ce Coo li ng Wate r 2b.1.1.37 Serv i ce Cool in g Water (RCA) 2b.1.1 Tota l s 2b.1.2 Scaffo l d in g in s u pport of decom m ission i ng Decontaminatio n of S i te Bui l dings 2 b.1.3.1 Reactor 2b.1.3.2 Cap i ta l Add i t i o n s 85-2004 2b.1.3.3 Co nt a i nme n t Pe n e t ra ti o n A r ea 2 b.1.3 Totals 2 b.1 Subtota l Period 2b Activity Costs TABLE C-l DIABLO CAt'NON POWER PLANT UNIT 1 DECON DECOMMISSIONING COST ESTIMATE (Thousand s of 2008 Dollar s) Decon Cost 91 91 1,492 7 25 26 5 478 56 17 275 1,817 1,524 27 266 1,817 3,634 Removal Cost 2, 0 49 3,735 5,784 28,433 1 55 353 948 3 4 1 1 66 478 1 48 5 22 4 1 3 1 52 10 1,8 0 9 49 1 3, 0 25 3 11 66 24 3 0 4 254 1 , 1 28 598 63 3 0 6 28 34 1 8 0 98 1 46 44 258 1 01 5 32 27 0 1 0 0 23 12,889 2,889 1,737 23 188 1,947 17,724 Packaging Transport Cost Cost 97 36 97 36 12,955 3 62 1 9 13 3 9 73 11 4 6 34 48 4 2 4 4 1 56 4 2 17 382 1 5 381 29 410 8 0 7 8,671 28 87 1 3 107 1 24 63 6 1 2 93 3 36 1 78 44 2 3 19 5 6 1 68 11 4 33 3 1,445 1 1 349 4 33 386 1,842 Uft'-!:)ite Processing Cost 26,006 234 475 4 0 876 10 1 99 5 0 5 5, 0 22 761 1 4 281 1,381 172 5 28 157 29 31 1 309 76 3 23 205 26 10 , 864 84 426 4 0 12 0 586 11,533 LLKW Disposal Cost 32 0 320 30, 1 3 1 573 1 6 1 35 28 3 0 183 44 0 36 31 35 8 589 31 2 1 7 151 2 , 349 1 2 3,703 3 394 4, 0 99 6,46 0 Other Costs 699 1 60 2, 0 04 302 1, 0 44 892 1, 1 65 224 6, 0 26 454 1 ,1 51 2 0 ,6 0 7 29,137 63,867 65,937 Total Contingency 31 97 22 708 774 1 3 1 4 1 5 144 1 23 242 46 1 , 249 94 239 4,272 6, 0 40 14,629 53,676 32 177 1,152 37 0 34 37 1 3 1 1 10 1 9 0 32 2 3 75 3 01 2,223 286 36 5 63 1 65 78 1 74 1 75 63 6 18 99 64 7 1 19 569 64 3 23 197 21 1 4 8,681 1 ,024 3,146 36 42 1 3,6 0 3 13,308 Total Costs 122 796 182 2,756 4,5 0 9 584 2,4 1 9 3 0 2 1,188 1 , 01 5 1,4 0 7 27 0 7 , 276 549 1,390 24,879 35,177 84,823 227,302 187 795 4, 0 23 1, 2 10 201 1,844 178 6 45 83 0 184 1 2 2, 1 84 1 ,404 10 ,955 1 ,46 0 1 5 1 29 367 772 3 , 6 84 2 , 521 241 369 34 84 458 25 0 292 73 2, 1 24 287 1 3 1 0 0 874 1 21 67 38,426 4, 0 34 11,265 1 33 1,450 12,848 55,308 Class A Cu. Feet 5, 1 58 5, 1 58 8 1 ,215 2,316 615 13 2 10 5 11 4 695 1,886 1 35 1 24 133 3 1 2,242 1 21 7 64 576 9,297 46 20,482 1 4 1 ,509 22, 00 5 31,348 Bur i al site Class B Cu. Feet 3,224 Class C GTCC Cu. Feet Cu. Feet 574 Decon 99 99 1,6 1 7 786 287 5 1 8 61 1 8 298 1,97 0 1,652 29 288 1 , 97 0 3 , 939 Remove 2,22 1 4 , 049 6,270 3 0 ,821 1 68 383 1 , 0 28 370 1 80 5 1 8 16 0 5 24 448 16 5 11 1 , 9 6 1 532 3,279 33 7 72 26 33 0 275 1,223 648 68 332 3 0 37 195 106 1 58 48 28 0 109 5 35 293 1 08 25 13,972 3,132 1,883 25 204 2 , 1 11 19 , 213 TABLE C-2 DIABLO CANYON POWER PLANT UNIT 1 DECON DECOMMISSIONING COST ESTIMATE (Thousands of 2011 Dollars) Packaging 1 05 1 05 14, 0 43 3 67 2 1 1 4 3 1 0 79 12 4 7 37 52 4 2 4 4 1 6 1 4 2 1 8 4 1 4 16 4 1 3 1 31 444 875 Transport 45 45 10 ,772 35 10 8 1 6 1 33 1 3 0 78 760 11 6 4 45 22 1 55 2 4 24 6 7 84 1 4 5 41 4 1,795 1 4 434 5 41 48 0 2,288 Off-Site Processing 32,3 0 7 29 1 5 90 50 1 ,088 1 2 247 627 6,239 945 17 349 1 ,7 1 6 2 1 4 6 35 195 36 39 1 384 94 4 29 255 32 1 3,496 1 04 529 50 149 728 1 4,327 LLRW Disposal 398 398 37,432 7 1 2 20 0 43 35 37 227 547 45 39 43 10 732 39 2 2 1 188 2,9 1 8 15 4,600 4 489 5,092 8,025 Other 758 173 2,172 327 1,132 967 1 ,263 243 6,532 492 1 , 248 22,338 31,585 69,232 71,476 Enclosure 3 PG&E L etter DCL-11-039 Page 4 of 9 Contingency 25 1 89 43 555 1,0 1 2 1 37 543 283 242 3 1 6 61 1 ,633 1 23 3 1 2 5,584 7,896 19,037 49,6 1 7 42 1 7 8 8 2 3 236 45 438 4 0 1 9 1 82 4 1 3 49 0 3 2 3 2 , 589 352 33 7 82 1 78 85 6 508 47 83 8 19 10 4 52 63 15 46 0 65 3 23 199 27 1 5 8,64 1 820 2,378 28 3 01 2,7 0 6 12,167 Total 123 947 2 1 7 2,776 5,061 684 2,7 1 5 327 1,4 1 5 1,2 0 9 1,579 3 0 4 8, 1 65 6 1 5 1,560 27,922 39,48 1 95, 1 85 248,086 21 0 889 4,1 1 3 1, 17 9 225 2,192 201 7 47 9 10 206 1 4 2,45 1 1,6 1 4 12,947 1,762 1 6 5 33 4 1 2 89 1 4,28 0 2,542 233 4 1 5 38 9 4 52 0 262 3 1 5 77 2,298 326 1 5 1 1 4 993 136 76 43,2 0 6 4, 10 1 11,889 1 42 1,5 0 4 13,530 60,835 Note: T otals may not sum due to rounding Enclos ure 3 PG&E L etter DCL-11-039 Page 5 of 9 TABLE C-l TABLE C-2 DIABLO CANYON POWER PLANT UNIT 1 DIABLO CANYON POWER PLANT UNIT 1 DECON DECOMMISSIONING COST ESTIMATE DECON DECOMMISSIONING COST ESTIMATE (Thousands of 2 00 8 Dollars) (Thou s ands of 2011 Do lla rs) ID Burial s i te On:...':lite LL1{W Decon Remova l Packa g ing Transport Process ing D i sposa l Other Total Class A Class B Class C GTCC Off-Site LLRW N umb er Act i v it y Description Cost Cost Cost Cost Cost Cost Cost s Contingency Tota l Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet C u. Feet Cu. Feet Decon Remove Packaging Trans p ort Proces s in g Disposal Other Cont in gency Total Period 2 b C ollateral Costs 2b.3.1 Process li quid waste 210 189 779 1 , 01 1 682 2, 873 2,821 228 205 968 1 ,256 664 3,32 0 2b.3.2 Sma ll to o l a ll owance 366 76 441 397 99 496 2b.3.3 Spent Fue l Capital and Transfer 898 186 1,08 4 973 243 1,217 2b.3 Subtot a l Per iod 2b Collateral Costs 210 366 189 779 1 , 011 8 98 944 4,399 2 ,8 21 228 397 205 968 1 ,2 56 97 3 1,007 5 , 033 Period 2 b Period-Dependent Costs 2b.4.1 Decon supplies 792 274 1,066 859 215 1 , 073 2b.4.2 I nsur a n ce 846 1 17 963 917 229 1 , 146 2b.4.3 Property ta x es 194 27 220 210 53 263 2b.4.4 Health physics supplies 2,360 815 3,176 2,558 640 3 , 198 2b.4.5 H eav y eq uipme n t rental 4,49 0 931 5,420 4 , 867 1,217 6 , 084 2b.4.6 Disposal of DAW generated 89 33 294 121 536 4,735 96 41 365 126 628 2b.4. 7 Plant energy budget 1 ,9 15 397 2,312 2, 076 519 2,595 2b.4.8 NRC I SFSI F ees 366 366 397 397 2b.4.9 NRC Fees 1,264 175 1,439 1 , 370 343 1 ,7 13 2b.4.10 Emergency P l anning Fe es 715 99 814 775 194 969 2b.4.11 Spent Fue l Transfer -Pool or I SFS I to DOE 918 190 1,108 995 249 1 ,244 2b.4.12 Spent Fuel Poo l O&M 1,411 293 1, 704 1 , 530 382 1,912 2b.4.13 Liquid Radwaste Processing EquipmentlSer1J 3 69 76 445 400 10 0 500 2b.4.14 ISFSI Operating Cost s 271 56 327 294 73 367 2b.4.15 Spent Fuel Storage/Capital Equipment 5,128 1 , 063 6,191 5,559 1,390 6,948 2b.4.1 6 ISFSI Fixed Costs 550 114 6 64 596 149 745 2b.4.17 Security Staff Cost 1, 3 94 289 1,683 1 , 511 378 1,889 2b.4.18 DOC Staff Cost 17,18 4 3 , 562 20,747 18 , 627 4,657 23,284 2b.4.19 Utility Staff Cost 25,221 5 , 228 30,450 27,3 40 6,835 34 ,17 4 2b.4 Subtot a l Period 2b Period-D e pendent Costs 792 6 ,8 50 89 33 294 57,747 1 3 ,827 79 , 632 4,735 859 7,425 9 6 41 365 62 , 598 17,846 89,230 2b.0 TOTAL PERIOD 2 b COSTS 4 , 636 24,940 1,086 2 , 654 11 , 53 3 7,765 58,645 28,079 139,339 38,904 5 , 0 25 27 , 0 35 1 , 177 3,297 14 , 327 9 ,646 63,571 31, 0 2 0 155 , 100 Period 2c -Wet Fuel Storage Period 2c Direct Decomm i ssioning Ac t ivities Period 2c C ollater al Costs 2c.3.1 Spent Fu e l Capital and Transfer 9,873 2,047 11 ,92 0 10 , 702 2 , 676 13 ,378 2c.3 Subtotal Period 2c Collateral Costs 9,873 2, 047 11 , 920 10 , 702 2 , 676 13 ,378 Period 2c Period-Dependent Costs 2c.4.1 In surance 3,474 480 3,954 3 , 766 941 4,7 07 2c.4.2 Property taxes 805 111 917 873 218 1 , 091 2c.4.3 Health physics supp li es 701 242 943 760 190 950 2c.4.4 D i sposal of DAW generated 15 6 49 20 90 797 16 7 61 21 106 2c.4.5 Plant energy budget 2,016 418 2,434 2 , 185 5 4 6 2,732 2 c.4.6 NRC I SFSI Fees 1,522 1 , 522 1 , 650 412 2,062 2c.4.7 NRC Fees 1,457 201 1 , 659 1 , 579 395 1 , 974 2c.4.8 Emergency Planning Fees 2,974 411 3 , 386 3,224 3 , 224 2c.4.9 Sp e nt Fuel Transf e r -Pool or ISFSI t o DOE 4,050 839 4 , 889 4,390 1 , 098 5,488 2c.4.10 Spent Fue l Pool O&M 5,868 1 ,2 16 7 , 084 6 , 361 1 , 590 7 , 951 2c.4.1 1 I SFSI Operat i ng Costs 1,125 233 1 , 359 1 ,220 305 1,524 2c.4.12 Spent Fuel Stor a g e/Capita l Equipment 44, 0 27 9,127 53 , 154 4 7 ,72 5 11,931 59,657 2c.4.13 I SFSI Fi xe d Costs 2,288 474 2 , 762 2,480 620 3,100 2c.4.1 4 Utility Staff Cost 6,990 1,449 8,439 7,577 1 ,894 9,471 2c.4 Subtota l Period 2c Peri o d-De pend e nt Cos t s 701 15 6 49 76,596 15,223 92 , 590 797 760 16 7 61 83, 0 3 0 20 , 969 104,84 3 2c.0 TOTAL PERIOD 2c COSTS 701 15 6 49 86,469 17,270 104 ,5 10 797 760 16 7 61 93 , 732 23,644 118,221 Note: Totals may not sum due to rounding ID N umber Activit y Description Period 2d -Decontamination F ollowing Wet Fue l St or age Period 2d Direct Decommi ss ioning Activ i ties 2 d.1.1 Remove Spent Fuel Racks Disposal of Plant Systems 2d.1.2.1 Electrical (Contam in ated) -FHB 2 d.1.2.2 Electrical (Decontaminated) 
-FHB 2d.1.2.3 Fire Protection (RC A) 2 d.1.2A HVAC (Contaminated) 
-FHB 2 d.1.2.5 Spent Fuel Pit Co oling 2 d.1.2.6 Spent Fu e l Pit Coo ling -FHB 2 d.1.2 Totals Decontamination of S ite Bu ildin gs 2d.1.3.1 Fuel Handlin g 2 d.1.3 Tot a l s 2d.1A Sca ffo l ding in support of decommissio ni ng 2 d.1 S ub tota l Perio d 2d A ctivity Costs Per i od 2 d Add itional Costs 2 d.2.1 Lic ense Terminat ion Survey Pl a nning 2 d.2 S ubtot a l Period 2d Additional Costs Period 2d Collateral Costs 2d.3.1 Process liquid waste 2d.3.2 Small tool allowance 2d.3.3 Decommissioning Equipment Disposition 2d.3 Subtotal Period 2d Collateral C os ts Period 2 d Period-Dependent Costs 2d A.1 Decon S uppli es 2dA.2 Insurance 2dA.3 Property t axe s 2dAA Health phy s ics supp li es 2dA.5 He avy Equipment Rental 2dA.6 Disposa l of DAW generated 2dA.7 Plant energy budget 2dA.8 NRC ISF S I Fe es 2dA.9 NRC Fees 2 dA.10 Emergency Planning Fees 2dA.11 Spe nt Fuel Transfer -Pool or SFS I to DOE 2dA.12 Liquid Radwaste P ro cessing EquipmenUServ 2dA.1 3 IS FS I Operating Costs 2dA.1 4 I SFS I F i xed Cost s 2dA.15 Security Staff Cost 2 dA.16 DOC S t aff Cost 2d.4.17 Utilit y St a ff Cost 2dA Subtotal Period 2d Period-Dependent Co sts 2 d.0 TOTAL PERIOD 2d CO S T PER I OD 2e -License Termination Period 2e Di r ect Decommis s i o nin g Acticities 2e.1.1 ORISE confirmatory s urvey 2e.1.2 Terminat e licen se 2e.1 Subtotal Pe ri od 2e Act i v it y Cos t s Period 2e Additional Costs 2e.2.1 License Termin a tion Survey 2e.2 S ubtotal 2e Addit i ona l Costs Period 2e Co ll ateral Costs 2e.3.1 DOC Staff re lo cation ex p e nse s 2e.3 S ub to tal 2e Collat era l Costs TABLE C-l DI AB LO C ANY O N POWER PL AN T U N IT 1 DECO N DECOMMISSIONI N G COST ESTI MA T E (Thou s and s of 200 8 Dollar s) Decon Cost 477 665 665 1 , 14 2 116 116 2 10 210 1,469 Remova l Cost 47 1 42 880 191 268 70 97 1 , 649 723 723 578 2,996 72 72 443 1 , 0 76 1 ,519 4,587 Packaging Transport Cost Cost 1 36 1 11 2 8 22 24 68 39 39 3 246 53 121 174 26 26 446 34 10 90 20 41 26 27 214 48 48 2 29 8 215 10 7 322 10 10 630 Uff-,site Process in g Cost 77 742 162 320 117 125 1,543 206 206 17 1,765 686 686 2,45 1 LLKW Di s po s al Co s t 656 5 36 221 237 499 5 10 5 10 2 1,668 200 99 299 87 87 2 , 05 4 Other Cost s 669 669 177 46 245 8 8 3 0 3 171 207 177 65 132 182 2 , 769 3 , 526 8 , 08 8 8 , 757 153 15 3 8 , 178 8 , 178 1,395 1,395 Tota l Contin g ency 598 69 478 10 4 181 13 3 15 0 1 , 11 6 944 944 2 0 5 2 , 862 277 277 201 15 215 43 2 73 24 6 15 3 223 36 51 42 24 43 37 1 3 27 38 574 731 2 , 0 95 5 , 666 63 63 3 , 390 3 , 390 289 289 Total Co s t s 1 ,948 305 2,202 478 8 54 588 66 0 5, 0 88 3 , 134 3 , 134 807 10 , 977 946 946 785 87 1 ,229 2,10 1 283 201 53 597 1 , 299 159 2 9 6 88 345 1 9 5 250 213 78 159 220 3 , 343 4,257 12,036 26 , 0 6 0 216 216 11,568 1 1,5 68 1,684 1,6 84 C l ass A Cu. Feet 2,496 20 138 841 903 1,902 1 ,96 5 1,965 9 6 , 372 794 378 1 , 172 1,400 1 ,40 0 8 , 944 Buria l s i te Class B Cu. Feet C l ass C GTCC Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Decon 517 721 721 1,238 126 1 26 228 228 1 ,592 Remove 51 15 4 954 2 07 291 76 105 1 ,788 784 784 627 3,248 78 78 48 0 1,166 1 ,647 4,972 TABLE C-2 DIABLO C ANY O N POWER PL AN T U N IT 1 DECO N DECOMMISSIONI N G COST ESTIM A TE (Thou s and s of 2011 Do ll ar s) Packaging 147 1 12 2 9 24 26 74 42 42 3 267 57 131 1 89 28 28 483 Tran s port 42 1 2 112 25 51 32 34 266 60 60 2 370 267 133 400 1 2 12 783 o ff-Site Proces s ing 96 922 2 01 398 1 45 155 1 , 917 256 256 21 2,193 852 852 3,045 LLRW Disposa l 815 6 45 275 294 620 634 634 2 , 0 72 248 12 3 371 108 108 2, 5 52 Other 725 725 192 50 266 95 328 185 224 1 92 70 143 19 7 3,002 3,822 8,767 9,493 166 166 8,865 8,865 1 , 512 1,512 Enclosure 3 PG&E L etter DCL-11-039 Page 6 of 9 Contingenc y 393 67 500 109 198 1 38 154 1 , 166 624 624 164 2 , 347 18 1 181 1 7 5 2 0 310 50 4 57 48 1 2 1 20 29 2 37 66 82 46 56 48 18 3 6 49 750 956 2,698 5 , 7 30 41 41 2,216 2,2 1 6 378 378 Total 1,966 337 2,499 544 99 0 690 768 5 ,83 0 3, 1 20 3, 120 82 0 11,7 34 906 906 873 98 1 , 549 2,520 285 24 0 62 600 1,458 1 86 332 95 41 1 23 2 280 240 88 17 9 247 3,752 4,778 13,48 8 28,650 2 07 2 07 11,081 11,081 1,890 1 ,89 0 Note: Totals may not sum due to rounding TABLE C-l DIABLO C ANY ON POWER PL AN T U N IT 1 DECO N DECOMMISSIO N I N G COST ESTI MA TE (Thousands of 2008 Dollar s) ID UtI-,sit e LLKW Decon Removal Packa g ing Tran s port Processin g Dispo s al Other Number Activity De s cription Cost Cost Co s t Co s t Cost Cost Co s t s Period 2e Period-Dependent Costs 2e.4.1 Insurance 290 2e.4.2 Property taxes 76 2e.4.3 Hea l th physics supplies 919 2e.4.4 Disposa l of DAW generated 6 2 20 2e.4.5 Plant ene r gy budget 200 2e.4.6 NRC ISFS I Fees 1 44 2e.4.7 NRC Fees 532 2e.4.8 Emergency Pla n ning Fees 281 2e.4.9 Spent Fuel Transfe r -Poo l or I SFS I to DOE 3 3 9 2e.4.10 I SFS I -Operat in g Costs 106 2e.4.11 I SFS I -Fixed Costs 216 2e.4.12 Sec u r i ty Staff Cost 298 2e.4.13 DOC Staff Cost 2,847 2e.4.14 Ut il ity Staff Cost 2,525 2e.4 Subtota l Period 2e Period-Dependent Costs 919 6 2 20 7 , 852 2e.0 TOTAL PER I OD 2e COST 919 6 2 20 17,578 PER I OD 2 TOTALS 7,597 59 , 580 14 , 508 11,963 39,990 40,020 237,386 PER I OD 3b Site Restoration Perod 3b Direct Decomm i ssioning Act i vities Dem ol itio n of Remain in g S i te Bui l di n gs 3b.l.l.l Reactor 6 , 873 3b.l.l.2 Cap i ta l Add i t i o n s 85-2004 273 3b.l.l.3 C o n t a in me n t Pe n e t ration Area 615 3b.l.l.4 Miscellane o us 26 3 b.l.l.5 Turbine 3,274 3b.l.l.6 Turbi n e Pedestal 1 , 212 3 b.l.1.7 Fuel H a n d lin g 1,689 3 b.l.l To t a l s 13 , 96 1 S it e C l oseo u t Act i vi ti es 3b.l.2 G r ade & la n dscape site 2,272 3 b.l.3 F ina l rep o rt to NRC 187 3b.l Subto t a l Pe ri od 3b Act i v i t y Costs 16,234 187 Pe ri od 3b A d ditiona l C o s t 3b.2.1 Co n crete Crush in g 464 3b.2.2 Cofferdam Co n struct i o n a n d Teardown 438 3b.2 Subtotal Pe ri od 3b Addit i ona l C o sts 90 1 Per i od 3b C ol la t era l Costs 3b.3.1 Small too l a ll owa n ce 187 3b.3 Subtotal 3b Collatera l Costs 187 Per i od 3b Period-Depende n t Costs 3b.4.1 In sura n ce 787 3b.4.2 Propert y taxes 207 3b.4.3 Heavy equipme n t rental 6,420 3bA.4 P l ant ene r gy budget 273 3b.4.5 NRC I SFSI Fees 391 3b.4.6 Emergency P l ann in g Fees 763 3bA.7 S p ent Fue l Tra n sfe r -Poo l or I SFS I to DOE 921 3b.4.8 I SFS I -Operat i ng Costs 289 3b.4.9 I SFS I -Fixed Costs 587 3b.4.10 Secur i ty Staff Cost 338 3bA.ll DOC Staff Cost 6,581 3bA.12 Ut il ity Staff Cost 1,713 3bA Subtota l Period 3b Period-Dependent Costs 6,420 12,849 3b.0 TOTAL PER I OD 3b COST 23,741 13 , 036 PER I OD 3c -Fue l Storage Operations
/Sh i pping Per i od 3c Direct Decomm i ss i oning Costs Period 3c P Collateral Costs 3c.3 Subtota l Per i od 3c Collatera l Costs Burial site Total Class A Class B Clas s C GTCC Contin g enc y To t al Co s t s Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Decon Remove 40 330 11 86 318 1 , 236 996 8 36 319 42 242 144 73 605 39 319 70 409 22 128 45 261 62 360 590 3,437 523 3, 0 48 1 , 842 10 , 642 319 996 5 , 585 24,110 319 996 110,277 521,321 130 , 180 3,224 574 8,235 64,585 1,425 8,298 7,450 57 330 296 127 742 667 5 31 28 679 3,952 3,549 251 1,463 1,3 1 4 35 0 2 ,0 39 1,83 1 2,894 16,856 15, 1 34 471 2 , 743 2,463 39 226 3,404 19,825 17,598 96 560 5 0 3 9 1 529 475 187 1,089 977 39 225 2 0 3 39 225 2 0 3 109 896 29 235 1,331 7,750 6,959 56 329 391 105 869 191 1,112 6 0 349 122 709 70 408 1,364 7,945 355 2 , 068 3,792 23, 0 61 6,959 7,422 44,199 25 , 735 TABLE C-2 DIABLO C ANY O N POWER PL AN T U N IT 1 DECO N DECOMMISSIO N I N G COST ESTI MA TE (Thou s and s of 2 011 Dollar s) Off-Site LLRW Packaging Transport Proces s in g Disposal 7 25 25 7 25 15 , 727 14 , 862 49,680 49,717 8 , 538 339 764 32 4,067 1,5 0 6 2,098 17,344 2,823 2 0 , 1 67 Other 314 82 217 156 577 305 367 115 234 323 3,086 2,737 8,512 19,055 257,326 203 203 853 224 296 424 827 998 313 636 366 7,134 1,857 13,928 14,131 Enclosure 3 PG&E Letter DCL-11-039 Page 7 of 9 Contingenc y Total 79 393 21 103 249 1 , 245 8 42 54 271 156 144 721 76 381 92 459 29 144 59 293 81 4 0 4 772 3,858 684 3,421 2,385 11,927 5,021 25,106 115 , 033 575 , 164 3 , 997 19,986 159 794 358 1,788 1 5 76 1,9 0 4 9,52 0 705 3,524 982 4,91 1 8,119 40,597 1,321 6,607 51 253 9,492 47,46 0 126 629 11 9 593 244 1,22 1 51 253 5 1 253 213 1 , 0 66 56 280 1,740 8,699 74 370 424 207 1, 0 34 250 1,248 78 392 159 795 92 458 1 , 783 8 , 917 464 2 , 321 5,222 26 , 109 9,967 49 , 833 Note: Totals may not sum due to rounding Enclosure 3 PG&E Letter DCL-11-039 Page 8 of 9 TABLE Col TABLE C-2 DIABLO C ANY ON POWER PL AN T U N IT 1 DI AB LO C ANY O N POWER PL AN T U N IT 1 DE C O N DECOMMISSIONI N G COST ESTIMATE DECO N DECOM M ISSIONI N G COST ESTI MA TE (Thou s and s of 2008 Dollar s) (Thou s and s of 2011 Dollar s) ID Burial site Uff..oite LLKW Decon Removal Packaging Transport Proces s ing Disposal Other Total Class A Class B Class C GTCC Off-Site LLRW N umber Activity De s cription Co s t Co s t Cost Cost Cost Cost Co s t s Contingency Total Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Decon Remove Packagin g Transport Processing Di s po s al Other Contin g enc y Total Period 3c Period-Dependent Costs 3c.4.1 I ns u rance 4,184 578 4 , 762 4 , 535 1 , 134 5 , 669 3c.4.2 Property taxes 1,098 152 1 , 250 1 , 190 298 1,488 3c.4.3 Pla nt e n ergy b u dget 3c.4.4 NRC ISFSI Fees 2,075 2 , 075 2 , 249 562 2 , 812 3c.4.5 Emergency P l a nni ng Fees 4,055 560 4 , 615 4 , 396 1,099 5,495 3c.4.6 Spent F u e l Tra n sfer -Poo l or ISFSI to DOE 4 , 865 1 , 0 09 5 , 874 5 , 274 1 , 318 6 , 592 3c.4.7 ISFSI -Operat i ng Costs 1,534 318 1,852 1 , 663 4 1 6 2 , 079 3c.4.8 I SFS I -Fixed Costs 3 , 119 647 3 , 766 3,381 845 4 , 226 3c.4.9 Secur i ty Staff Cost 20,852 4 , 323 25 ,1 74 22 , 6 0 4 5,65 1 28 , 254 3c.4.10 U ti l ity Staff Cost 5,130 1 , 0 64 6,194 5 , 561 1,390 6 , 951 3c.4 Subtota l Per i od 3c Period-Dependent Costs 46,913 8 , 65 0 55,562 5 0 , 854 12,713 63 , 567 3c.0 TOTAL PERIOD 3c COST 46,913 8 , 650 55,562 50,854 12,713 63 , 567 PER I OD 3d -GTCC s h ipp in g Period 3d D i rect Decommissioning Act i vities Nuclear Steam Supp l y System Remova l 3 d.1.1.1 V esse l & In te rn a l s G T CC D i sposa l 3 0 0 8,952 1 , 897 11,150 433 325 11,121 2,862 14,308 3 d.1.1 Tota l s 30 0 8,952 1,897 1 1 , 1 5 0 433 325 1 1 ,12 1 2,862 1 4,3 0 8 3d.1 Subtota l Per i od 3d Activity Costs 300 8,952 1 , 897 11 , 150 433 325 11,12 1 2 , 862 14 , 3 0 8 Period 3d P Co ll ate r a l C o sts 3d.3 SUbtota l Per i od 3d Co ll atera l Costs P e ri od 3d Pe ri od-Depe n de nt Cos t s 3 d.4.1 In s ur a n ce 1 5 2 17 1 6 4 2 0 3d.4.2 P ro p ert y taxe s 4 1 4 4 5 3d.4.3 Pl a nt e n e r gy bud get 3 d.4.4 N RC IS F SI F ees 7 7 8 8 3d.4.5 Em e rg e n cy P l a nnin g F ees 1 4 2 1 6 15 4 19 3 d.4.6 I S FSI -O p e r a tin g Co s t s 5 1 7 5 1 7 3 d.4.7 I SFS I-Fixe d Co s ts 1 1 2 1 3 12 3 15 3 d.4.8 Secu ri t y Staff C os t 73 1 5 8 9 79 2 0 9 9 3 d.4.9 Utili ty S t aff Co s t 18 4 22 20 5 24 3d.4 Sub to t a l P e ri od 3d P eriod-D ependent Cos t s 1 48 2 7 17 5 1 60 4 0 2 01 3d.0 TOTAL PER I O D 3d COST 3 0 0 8 , 952 1 48 1,924 11 , 325 325 11 , 1 21 1 60 2,9 0 2 14 , 5 0 8 PER I OD 3e -I SFS I Dec o ntaminat io n Pe ri o d 3e D ir ect Dec o m mi sS ionin g Act i v i t i es Per i od 3e Ad d itio n al C o sts 3e.2.1 I SFS I Li cense Terminat i on 1 , 059 4 100 387 789 678 3,016 6 , 239 1,148 4 124 481 855 653 3,266 3e.2 SUbto t a l Pe r i o d 3e Add i tiona l Costs 1, 0 59 4 1 00 387 789 678 3, 0 16 6 , 239 1,148 4 124 481 855 653 3,266 Per i od 3e Co ll a t eral Cos t s 3e.3.1 Sma ll too l a ll owance 1 4 3 17 1 5 4 19 3e.3 Subtotal 3e Co l lateral Cos t s 14 3 17 15 4 19 Per i od 3e Per i od-Depe n de n t Cos t s 3e.4.1 I nsu r a n ce 127 18 145 138 34 172 3e.4.2 P r o p erty t axes 33 5 38 36 9 45 3e.4.3 Heavy eq ui p m e n t r e n ta l 309 64 373 335 84 419 3e.4.4 P l ant e n ergy budget 3e.4.5 Security Staff Cost 172 36 207 186 47 233 3e.4.6 U ti li ty Staff Cost 129 27 156 140 35 175 3e.4 Su b to t a l Pe ri o d 3e Period-Depen d ent Costs 309 461 149 919 335 5 0 0 209 1,043 3e.0 TOTAL PERIOD 3e COST 1 , 383 4 100 387 1,250 829 3,953 6,239 1,499 4 1 24 481 1,355 866 4 , 329 PER I OD 3f -I SFS I S i te Restorat i on Per i od 3f D i rect Decomm i ssioning Act i vities Per i od 3f Add i tiona l Costs 3f.2.1 ISFS I Demolition and Site Restoration 562 24 121 707 609 26 159 794 3f.2 Subtota l Period 3f Additiona l Costs 562 24 12 1 707 609 26 1 59 794 Per i od 3f Co ll a t era l Costs 3f.3.1 Sma ll tool a ll owance 4 5 4 5 3f.3 Subtota l 3f Co ll ateral Costs 4 5 4 5 Note: T otals may not sum due to rounding Enc losu re 3 PG&E Letter DCL-11-039 Page 9 of 9 TABLE C-I TABLE C-2 DIABLO CANYON POWER PLANT UNIT 1 DIABLO CANYON POWER PLANT UNIT 1 DECON DECOMMISSIONING COST ESTIMATE DECON DECOMMISSIO N ING COST ESTIMATE (Thousands of 2008 Dollars) (Thousands of 2011 Dollar s) ID Burial site Off*,site LLKW Decon Removal Packaging Transpol*t Processing Disposal Other Total Class A Class B Class C GTCC Off-Site LLRW Number Activ it y Description Cost Cost Cost Cost Co s t Cost Co s ts Contingency Total Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Decon Remove Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Contingency Total Period 3f Period-Dependent Costs 3f.4.1 In surance 3f.4.2 Property taxes 17 2 19 18 5 23 3f.4.3 Heavy equipment rental 103 21 125 112 28 14 0 3f.4.4 Plant energy budget 3f.4.6 Security Staff Cost 86 18 104 93 23 117 3f.4.7 Utility Staff Cost 54 11 65 59 15 73 3f.4 Subtota l Period 3f Period-Dependent Costs 103 158 53 314 112 171 71 354 3f.O TOTAL PERIOD 3f COST 669 181 175 1 , 025 725 196 230 1,152 PERIOD 3 TOTALS 25 ,793 304 100 9 ,339 61,529 19 , 000 116 , 064 6,239 433 27,960 330 124 11,602 66,697 26,678 133,391 TOTAL COST TO DECOMMISS I ON 11,648 87 ,866 15 , 019 12 ,856 39,990 56,407 393,084 154 , 278 771 , 148 137,783 5,627 574 433 12,626 95,247 16,281 15 ,9 71 49,680 70,074 426,103 171,495 857,477 NOTE: Tota l s may not sum due to rounding Enc l osure 3 PG&E L etter DCL-1 1-039 TABLE C-l TABLE C-2 Page 1 of 9 DIABLO C ANY O N POWER PLA N T U N IT 2 DI AB LO CANY O N POWER P LAN T U N IT 2 DECO N DE C O MM ISSIO N I NG C OST ESTI MA TE DECO N DE C OMMISSIONING COST ESTIMATE (Thou sa nd s of 20 0 8 Do ll ar s) (Thou sa nd s of 2011 Dollar s) ID Burial site Un'-:Sit e LLl{W Decon Removal Packa g in g Transport Proce s sin g Di s po s a l Other Tota l Cla ss A C l ass B Clas s C GTCC Off-Site LLRW Number Act i v i ty Description Cost Co s t C o s t Cost Co s t Co s t Costs Contingency Tota l Cost s Cu. Feet Cu. Feet C u. Feet C u. Feet Decon R e move Packag in g Transport Proce ss ing Di s posal Othel' Cont in ge ncy Tota l PER I OD 1a -Sh utdown through Tra n s ition P e ri od 1 a Direct De c ommis s i o n i n g Act iviti es la.l.1 P r epa r e pr e liminary deco mmis s i oni ng cost 67 14 8 1 73 18 9 1 l a.l.2 No t i fi ca t i on of Cess a ti o n of Operations la.l.3 Remove fue l & sou r ce mat e rial l a.l.4 No t i fi ca tion of Permanent Def u e l ing la.l.5 Deactivat e pla nt systems & process waste l a.l.6 Prepar e and s u bm it P S D AR 10 3 22 124 112 28 1 4 0 la.l.7 Revi ew p l ant d wgs & specs. 236 5 0 286 256 64 320 la.l.8 Perform de t ai l ed rad s u rvey la.l.9 Estimate by-product i nventory 5 1 1 1 62 55 1 4 69 l a.l.l0 End product d esc ripti o n 51 1 1 62 55 14 69 la.l.11 Detailed by-product inv e nt ory 67 14 8 1 73 18 91 l a.l.12 Define maj o r wo r k sequence 384 81 466 417 104 52 1 la.l.1 3 Perform SER and EA 1 59 33 192 1 73 43 216 la.l.14 Perf o rm S i te-Specific Cost Study 256 54 310 278 70 348 la.1.15 Prepar e/submit Lic e n se Terminat io n P l a n 2 10 44 254 228 57 285 l a.l.16 Recei v e NRC approval of t e rmin a ti o n p l a n Ac tivity Spec ifi ca tion s la.l.17.1 Plant & t e m po r ary fac il ities 252 53 305 274 68 342 la.l.17.2 Plant systems 2 14 45 259 232 58 29 1 l a.l.17.3 NSSS Dec o ntamination Flu sh 26 5 3 1 28 7 35 l a.l.17.4 Reactor int e rn a l s 364 77 4 4 1 395 99 494 la.l.17.5 Reacto r vess e l 333 70 403 362 90 452 la.l.17.6 Biological s h ie ld 26 5 3 1 28 7 35 la.1.17.7 St e arn genera t o r s 1 6 0 34 194 174 43 2 1 7 l a.l.17.8 Reinforced co n c r ete 82 17 9 9 89 22 1 11 la.l.17.9 Mai n Turbine 2 1 4 2 5 2 3 6 29 la.1.17.10 Mai n Co nd e n sers 2 1 4 25 23 6 29 l a.l.17.1 1 Plant str u c ture s & buildings 160 34 194 174 43 2 17 la.l.17.12 Waste rnanage m ent 2 3 6 50 2 8 6 25 6 64 320 la.l.17.1 3 F a c i lity & s i t e c l o se out 46 10 56 50 12 62 la.l.17 Tota l 1,939 409 2,348 2 , 10 6 526 2 , 632 P l anning & Si te P r epa rations la.l.1 8 Pr epa r e d i s m a ntling seq u e nce 123 26 149 1 34 33 167 la.l.1 9 P lant prep. & t e m p. svces 2,70 0 569 3,269 2,932 733 3,666 la.l.2 0 D es ign water clean-up sys t e m 72 1 5 87 78 20 98 la.l.2 1 Rigging/Conl.Cntr l E nvlp sltoo ling/etc. 2,100 443 2, 543 2 , 28 1 570 2,85 1 l a.l.22 Procure casks/line r s & con t ai n e r s 63 13 76 68 17 86 la.l Subto t a l Period la Ac tivity Cos t s 8, 5 8 1 1 , 808 10,389 9,320 2,330 1 1 ,65 0 P eri od 1 a Additional C o s t s l a.2.1 Spen t Fu el Pool I so lati o n 6,272 1 , 322 7, 593 6,812 1,703 8,5 15 l a.2 Su b tota l P e ri o d 1 a Acti vity Cos ts 6, 272 1 , 322 7,593 6,8 12 1 ,703 8,515 Period 1 a Co ll ateral Costs la.3.1 Spen t Fu e l Cap it a l and Tr a n s f e r 1 , 64 9 348 1 ,997 1 , 79 1 448 2,239 l a.3 S ubtot a l P e ri o d 1 a Co ll a t e ral Costs 1 ,649 348 1 , 9 97 1 , 79 1 4 48 2,239 P er io d 1 a Period-D epe nd ent Costs l a.4.1 I n s ur a n ce 1 , 1 95 16 8 1,3 63 1 , 298 324 1 , 622 1 a.4.2 Property t axes 1 0 1 14 115 110 27 1 37 1 a.4.3 H e alth phy s i cs s u pp li es 457 1 6 1 618 496 124 620 1 a.4.4 Heavy equ i p m e nt r e ntal 490 10 3 5 9 1 532 1 33 665 la.4.5 D i sposa l of DAW gen e r ated 1 1 4 35 1 5 64 565 12 5 43 15 75 laA.6 P l a nt e nergy bud ge t 1 ,33 0 280 1 ,6 10 1,4 45 361 1 ,8 06 laA.7 NRC I S F S I F ees 1 9 1 191 207 52 259 laA.8 NCR Fees 471 66 537 512 1 28 639 l a.4.9 Emergency P l an n ing F ees 1 ,258 177 1,4 34 1,366 342 1, 70 8 l a.4.1 0 S p e nt F u e l P o ol O&M 735 1 55 890 798 200 998 laA.l1 I SFS I -Operat ing Costs 141 30 171 15 3 38 1 91 laA.12 Spent Fue l Storage/Capital Equipme nt 4 , 385 924 5,309 4 , 763 1,191 5,953 laA.13 I SFS I -Fi xe d Costs 286 60 347 311 78 388 laA.1 4 Security Staff Cost 10,231 2 , 1 56 12,3 88 11 , 11 2 2,778 13,89 0 1 a.4.1 5 Utility Staff Cos t 21,222 4,4 7 3 25,695 23, 049 5 , 762 28 ,81 2 l aA Subtota ll a. Pe riod-D e p endent Costs 947 11 4 35 4 1 , 545 8 , 782 5 1 ,324 565 1, 029 1 2 5 43 45,122 11,55 3 57, 7 64 l a.O TOTAL PERIOD la COST 947 11 4 35 58 , 0 47 1 2 , 259 7 1, 303 565 1 ,029 1 2 5 43 63 , 0 45 1 6 , 033 80, 1 6 7 NOTE: Tota l s may not sum due to rounding ID N umbel' Ac tivi ty D es crip t ion Per iod 1 b -De commi ss ioni ng Pre p arat i o n s Pe r i od 1 b D ir ect D eco mm i ss i o n i n g Acti viti es D e t a il ed W o rk P ro ce dur es 1 b.1.1.1 P l a n t sy s t e m s 1 b.1.1.2 N SSS D ec ontam i n at i on F l u s h 1 b.1.1.3 Reactor int e rn a l s 1 b.1.1.4 Re m a i ning b uildin gs 1 b.1.1.5 CR D coa lin g asse mb l y 1 b.1.1.6 CR D hou s ings & I C I t u b es 1 b.1.1. 7 I n c or e i n s trum e n ta t io n 1 b.l.l.8 Reac t or v esse l 1 b.l.l.9 F a cil i ty c l ose out 1 b.l.1.1 0 M i s s il e s hi e ld s 1 b.1.1.11 B i o l o g ica l s hi e l d 1 b.l.l.1 2 S t ea m gene r a t o r s 1 b.l.l.1 3 Re in fo r ce d c o n c r ete l b.l.l.1 4 Ma i nTu rb i ne 1 b.1.1.1 5 M a in Co n de n se r 1 b.1.1.16 A u x i li a ry b ui l d i ng 1 b.l.l.1 7 Reac t or b uil d i n g l b.1.1 T o t al 1 b.l.2 D eco n prim a ry l oop 1 b.1 S ubt o t a l Per i o d 1 b Ac tiv i ty Cos t s P e ri od 1 b Ad d i tion a l C o s t s 1 b.2.1 Sit e C h a ra c t e r i za tion 1 b.2.2 Ha z ard o u s Wa s t e Ma n age m e nt 1 b.2.3 M i x ed Wa s te Manag e m e nt 1 b.2 Subt o t a l P e r i od 1 b A c t i v i ty C o s t s P er i o d 1 b Co ll a t e r a l Cos t s 1 b.3.1 De c on e qu i pment 1 b.3.2 D OC s taff r e l o c a t i o n ex p e n ses 1 b.3.3 Pro cess li q ui d wa s t e 1 b.3.4 Small to o l allo wa n ce 1 b.3.5 Pipe cutt i ng equipm e nt 1 b.3.6 D e con rig 1 b.3.7 S p e nt Fu e l C a p it a l and T ra n s f e r 1 b.3 Subtot a l Peri od 1 b Co ll a t e r a l Co s t s P e r i od 1 b P e ri o d-D epe nd e nt Cos t s 1 b.4.1 D ec on sup p li es 1 b.4.2 I n s uran ce 1 b.4.3 Prop e rty ta xes 1 b.4.4 H ea lth phy s i cs s u pp l i es 1 b.4.5 H ea vy eq uipm e n t r e nt a l 1 b.4.6 D i s po s al of D A W ge n er at e d 1 b.4. 7 P l a nt e n e rg y b u d ge t 1 b.4.8 NR C I S F S I Fees 1 b.4.9 NR C F ees 1 b.4.1 0 E m erge n c y P l a nn i n g Fees 1 b.4.11 S p e nt Fu e l Po o l O&M 1 b.4.1 2 I S F S I Op e r ating Cos t s 1 b.4.1 3 S p ent F u e l S t o r age/Ca pital Equipm e nt 1 b.4.1 4 I SF SI Fi xe d Co st s 1 b.4.1 5 Sec urity S t a ff Cos t 1 b.4.1 6 DO C S t aff Cos t 1 b.4.1 7 Ut i lity S t a ff Cos t 1 b.4 Sub to t a l P e ri od 1 b P e ri o d-Depe nd e nt C o s t s 1b.0 TOT A L PER I OD lb COST P ER IOD 1 T O T A LS T ABLE C-l DI AB LO CANY O N PO WE R P LAN T U N IT 2 DE C O N DE C O MM I SS IO N I NG CO S T ESTI MA TE (Thou s and s of 200 8 Do ll ars) D e con C o s t 1,635 1 ,635 935 6 4 1,40 0 2 , 399 28 29 4,063 4 , 063 Remov a l Co s t 2 1 , 000 1 ,0 0 2 255 247 502 1 , 505 2 , 452 Un"'::;it e P ac k ag in g Tl'an s port Pr o c ess in g 1 90 7 9 1 1 9 0 79 1 6 2 6 2 1 96 794 2 0 6 798 L L.lt W Di s po s al Co s t 7 , 04 1 7 ,04 1 2 0 2 0 7 , 061 7 , 096 Oth e r Co s t s 243 5 1 1 28 69 5 1 5 1 5 1 1 86 62 23 62 236 51 8 0 8 0 14 0 1 4 0 1,704 1,704 1 , 9 4 5 5 9 0 9 1 2 3,447 1,395 5 04 1 ,89 9 602 51 1 ,341 96 237 3 7 5 3 70 71 1 , 9 1 9 144 5, 1 58 3,863 10 ,698 24,926 3 1 , 976 90, 0 23 Bur i a l s ite Tota l Cla ss A C la ss B C l ass C GTCC C ontin g ency Tota l C o s t s Cu. Fe e t C u. Fe e t Cu. Fe e t C u. Fe e t 51 11 27 1 5 11 11 11 39 1 3 5 1 3 50 11 17 1 7 29 29 359 1 , 1 48 1 ,5 0 8 82 0 1 24 1 9 2 1 , 1 36 197 294 2 , 711 o 2 11 2 9 5 10 6 3,8 1 5 1 0 8 5 7 90 5 2 8 283 33 5 3 78 1 5 4 0 4 30 1 , 087 8 1 4 2,255 5 , 3 0 4 11 , 763 24 , 022 294 62 155 84 62 62 62 225 74 28 74 286 62 97 97 1 69 1 69 2 , 063 2 ,7 83 4 , 847 2 , 765 71 5 1 , 104 4 , 583 1 , 1 32 1 , 689 10,79 6 3 1 ,2 11 1 , 6 95 6 1 0 17 , 1 3 7 39 68 7 58 345 299 3 7 1 ,623 96 27 1 427 448 86 2,324 1 75 6 , 245 4 , 677 1 2,953 3 0 ,790 57,35 6 1 28, 6 60 401 2 , 4 21 4 01 2,4 2 1 327 327 728 2,42 1 1 , 293 2,421 D e con 1 , 776 1 , 776 1 , 016 70 1 , 5 21 2 , 6 06 3 0 31 4 , 413 4,4 1 3 R e mo ve 2 1 , 0 86 1, 0 88 2 77 268 545 1 , 635 2 , 663 TAB LE C-2 DI AB LO CANY O N PO WE R P LANT U N IT 2 DE C O N DECO MM I S SIO N I NG C O S T E S TI MA T E (Thou sa nds o f 2011 Dollar s) P a ck ag in g Tran s port 2 06 983 206 983 7 2 7 2 1 3 98 6 224 99 1 Off-S i t e Proc ess in g LLR W Di s po s al 8, 7 47 8,7 47 2 5 25 8 , 772 8,8 1 5 Oth e r 264 55 1 39 7 5 55 55 55 202 67 25 67 256 55 87 87 1 52 152 1 , 851 1 ,851 2, 11 2 6 41 99 1 3 , 7 4 4 1 ,5 15 54 7 2 , 0 63 654 5 5 1 ,45 6 10 4 257 4 07 4 0 2 7 7 2 , 084 1 56 5,6 0 2 4, 1 96 11 ,619 27 , 072 34 , 729 97 , 774 Enclosure 3 PG&E L e t te r DC L-11-039 Page 2 of 9 C on t i ng enc y 66 1 4 35 1 9 1 4 1 4 1 4 5 1 17 6 17 64 1 4 22 22 38 38 463 444 9 0 7 528 1 6 0 2 4 8 9 3 6 254 3 79 2 , 5 01 1 272 3 8 0 137 3 , 923 1 63 1 4 6 9 67 8 364 64 10 2 10 0 1 9 52 1 39 1 ,4 01 1,0 49 2 , 9 0 5 6 , 92 1 12 , 687 28,72 0 To ta l 33 0 69 17 4 94 69 69 69 2 5 3 84 3 1 84 32 0 69 10 9 1 09 1 90 1 9 0 2,313 2,220 4,5 3 3 2,64 1 8 01 1 , 2 3 8 4 , 680 1 ,2 6 9 1 ,8 94 1 2 , 5 07 3 1 ,3 5 8 1 ,9 01 6 84 1 9 , 6 1 5 38 817 6 9 3 4 6 33 5 42 1 ,82 1 10 4 322 50 9 5 0 2 96 2,6 0 5 1 95 7, 00 3 5,245 1 4 , 5 24 34,603 63 , 435 1 43 , 60 0 NOTE: Totals may not sum due to rounding ID N umber Activity Description PERIOD 2a -Large Component Removal Period 2a Dir ect D ecom mi ss ioni ng Act ivi t i es Nuclear Stea m S up p ly System Removal 2a.l.l .1 Reactor Coolant Piping 2a.l.l.2 Pr essu riz e r Quench T ank 2a.l.l.3 Reactor Coolant Pum ps & Motors 2a.l.l.4 Pressurizer 2a.l.l.5 Steam Ge nerat o r s 2a.l.l.6 Retired Steam Generator Unit s 2a.l.l.7 CRDMslICls/Service S tru cture Removal 2a.l.l.8 Reactor Vess e l Int e rnals 2a.l.l.9 Reactor V esse l 2a.l.l Tota l s Re m ova l of Major Equipment 2a.l.2 Main Turbin e/Ge n e rat o r 2a.l.3 Main Condensers Cascad ing Costs from Clean Building Demolition 2a.l.4.1 R eacto r 2a.l.4.2 Au x iliary 2a.l.4.3 Containment Pen et r a ti o n A r ea 2a.l.4.4 Radwaste Storage 2a.l.4.5 Fuel H a ndlin g 2a.l.4 Tota l s Disposal of Plant Systems 2a.l.5.1 2a.l.5.2 2a.l.5.3 2a.l.5.4 2a.l.5.5 2a.l.5.6 2a.1.5.7 2a.l.5.8 2a.l.5.9 2a.l.5.10 2a.l.5.11 2a.l.5.12 2a.l.5.13 2a.l.5.14 2a.l.5.1 5 2a.l.5.16 2a.l.5.17 2a.l.5.18 2a.l.5.19 2a.l.5.20 2a.l.5.21 2a.l.5.22 2a.l.5.23 2a.l.5 2a.l.6 2a.l Auxi li ary Steam Au x ili a ry Steam (RCA) Building Service s (Non P owe r Block) Condensate Syst e m Condensate Sys t e m (Insu l ated) Containment Spray E x traction Steam & Heater Drip Feedwater System Feedwater Sys t em (Insulated)
Feedwater Sy s t e m (RCA In s ulated) Feedwater System (RCA) NSSS Sampling NSSS Sampling (In s ul a t e d) Nitrog e n & Hydrog e n Nitrogen & Hydrogen (Insu l ated) Nitrogen & Hydrog e n (RCA In sulated) Nitrog e n & Hydrogen (RCA) Oily Wat e r Separator 
& TB Sump Saltwater System Turbin e Steam S upply Turb i ne Steam Supply (RCA) Turb i ne and Generator Turb i ne and G ene rator (Insu l ated) Total s Scaffo lding in s upp o rt of decommiss i o ning Subtotal Period 2a Act i vity Costs P eriod 2a Add iti onal Costs 2a.2.1 Ret ir ed Reactor H ea d 2a.2 Subtotal Period 2a Addit i onal Costs Period 2a Co llateral Costs 2a.3.1 Process l iquid was t e 2a.3.2 Small tool a ll owance 2a.3.3 Spe nt Fu e l Ca p i tal and Tr a n sfer 2a.3 S ubtotal Period 2a Co ll ateral Costs TABLE C-l DIABLO CANYON POWER PLANT UNIT 2 DECON DECOMMISSIONING COST ESTIMATE (Thousands of 2008 Dollal's)
Decon Cost 3 0 5 32 12 0 38 394 162 1 34 100 1,285 1, 285 107 107 Removal Packaging Transport Process in g Cost Cost Cost Cost 287 29 101 59 3,846 92 2, 19 8 4,126 10 , 73 9 532 1,529 1 , 208 652 66 82 175 2 , 18 3 128 109 6 1 ,031 388 183 391 9 3 137 93 4 128 3 8 1 6 1 4 8 1 24 15 3 1 ,240 685 119 44 5 , 099 4,344 24,426 102 10 2 318 3 1 8 40 6 44 454 2 , 686 1 ,89 5 224 5, 018 1,56 2 11,930 19 1 181 3 2 62 21 10 16 13 1 3 4 81 23 4 1 245 26 1 2,573 151 151 49 49 40 6 121 295 1 , 924 1 , 890 37 870 651 5 , 835 13 8 131 31 14 546 181 84 137 11 2 24 1 3 4 5 714 191 39 7 2, 0 93 1 9 8,2 16 55 55 1 98 198 2,9 74 2 , 974 5,948 879 831 252 118 4,477 1,481 688 1 , 126 9 19 197 10 8 2 34 41 5,855 1, 567 3 18 58 17,151 14 9 24,958 LLl{W Disposal Cost 766 108 1 ,358 620 5,939 5,768 255 4,516 8,548 27,878 603 570 43 5 48 22 29,122 503 503 1 84 1 84 Other Costs 229 229 459 459 15 1 5 1 , 160 1 , 160 Buria l site Total Class A Class B Class C GTCC Cont in gency Tota l Costs Cu. Feet C u. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet 598 73 628 391 5 , 124 3 , 317 27 5 7,700 11 , 250 29 , 356 640 966 255 1 37 14 17 37 460 10 5 67 1 1,429 490 228 406 252 29 80 4 63 15 3 2 37 18 32 1 , 83 1 614 11 8 29 5 , 854 1 , 572 38 , 848 537 537 18 9 67 244 500 2, 03 6 255 2,371 1,859 22,887 15,844 1,044 20,667 26,467 93,430 2,983 4,208 1,462 790 80 99 2 1 2 2,643 5 1 9 310 7 7,545 2 ,56 1 1,19 2 2,076 1 ,3 8 9 16 6 396 20 251 5 9 20 157 89 18 6 9,721 3 , 07 9 598 14 0 30,489 6, 1 32 1 39,887 1,363 1,363 727 385 1,4 0 4 2,516 2,141 329 5,388 2,46 0 23,568 22,887 3, 881 1,5 02 6,416 68 , 572 2 , 294 2,170 164 20 185 82 73,303 2, 002 2 , 00 2 731 731 845 2,379 3,224 3,224 574 574 574 Decon 331 35 1 30 41 428 176 1 46 109 1 ,396 1,3 9 6 116 11 6 Remove 312 31 110 64 4, 177 100 2,387 4,481 11 , 664 578 1,6 6 1 1, 3 1 2 708 72 89 1 9 0 2,371 139 118 7 1,120 421 199 425 101 149 10 1 4 139 41 17 1 4 88 26 1 66 1 ,34 7 744 129 48 5,538 4,718 26,529 111 111 345 345 TABLE C-2 DIABLO CANYON POWER PLANT UNIT 2 DECON DECOMMISSIONING COST ESTIMATE (Thou s ands of 2011 Do ll ars) Packaging 43 7 48 493 2,9 1 7 2, 058 243 5,450 1,6 96 12,957 207 197 3 2 67 23 11 17 14 1 3 4 1 88 25 4 1 266 28 13 ,656 164 164 53 53 Transport 50 7 150 366 2,390 2,348 46 1,08 1 809 7 ,2 49 171 16 3 39 17 678 225 104 170 139 30 1 4 5 6 887 237 48 9 2,6 00 24 10 ,2 0 7 68 68 246 246 Off-Site Processing 3,695 3,695 7 ,3 89 1 ,092 1 , 032 313 147 5,562 1,840 855 1 , 3 99 1, 142 245 12 10 2 42 51 7 , 274 1 ,94 7 395 72 21,307 1 85 31 , 00 5 LLRW Disposa l 952 1 34 1 ,687 770 7,378 7 , 166 317 5 , 610 10 , 619 34 , 633 749 708 53 6 60 27 36, 178 625 625 229 229 Other 249 249 499 499 16 1 6 1 ,260 1 ,260 E nclosure 3 PG&E Letter DCL-11-039 Page 3 of 9 Cont in ge nc y 422 54 531 434 5,246 3,817 220 3,73 1 4,49 1 1 8,946 699 940 328 177 18 22 48 593 12 3 71 2 1,857 62 7 292 503 3 4 9 37 95 5 53 1 2 4 o 2 34 21 42 2,399 738 14 4 32 7 ,443 1 ,246 29,867 246 246 16 1 86 3 15 5 62 Tota l 2,110 268 2,656 2,169 26,23 1 19,08 3 1 , 102 1 8,653 22,454 9 4,73 2 3,497 4,7 01 1 , 64 0 88 5 90 111 238 2 ,9 64 617 3 56 8 9,284 3,136 1,461 2,514 1 , 745 187 474 23 263 61 22 1 9 169 105 208 11,994 3, 6 9 1 721 162 37,213 6,228 149 , 3 36 1 ,23 0 1 , 230 805 432 1,575 2 , 812 NOTE: Totals may not sum due to rounding ID N umber Activity Description Period 2a Period-Dependent Costs 2a.4.1 Decon supplies 2a.4.2 In su r ance 2a.4.3 Property taxes 2a.4.4 Health physi cs supplies 2a.4.5 Heavy equ ip ment rental 2a.4.6 Disposal of DAW generated 2a.4.7 Plant e nergy budget 2a.4.8 NRC ISFSI Fees 2a.4.9 2a.4.10 2a.4.11 2a.4.12 2a.4.13 2a.4.14 2a.4.15 2a.4.16 2a.4.17 2a.4.18 2a.4 2a.0 NRC Fees Emergency P l ann in g Fees Spent Fue l Transfer -Poo l or I SFS I to DOE Spent Fuel Pool O&M I SFS I Operating Costs Spent Fue l Storage/Capital Equipment I SFS I F i xed Costs Security Staff Cost DOC Staff Cost Utility Staff Cost Subtotal Period 2a Period-Dependent Costs TOTAL PERIOD 2a COSTS PER I OD 2b -Site Decontamination Period 2b Di r ect Decommiss i oning Act i vities Disposal of Plant Systems 2b.1.1.1 2b.1.1.2 2b.1.1.3 2b.1.1.4 2b.1.1.5 2b.1.1.6 2b.1.1.7 2b.1.1.8 2b.1.1.9 2b.1.1.10 2b.1.1.11 2b.1.1.1 2 2b.1.1.1 3 2b.1.1.14 2b.1.1.15 2b.1.1.16 2b.1.1.17 2b.1.1.18 2b.1.1.19 2b.1.1.2 0 2b.1.1.21 2b.1.1.22 2b.1.1.23 2b.1.1.24 2b.1.1.25 2b.1.1.26 2b.1.1.27 2b.1.1.28 2b.1.1.29 2b.1.1.30 2b.1.1.3 1 2b.1.1.32 2b.1.1.33 2b.1.1.34 2b.1.1.35 2b.1.1.36 2b.1.1.37 2b.1.1.38 2b.1.1.39 2b.1.1.40 2b.1.1 2b.1.2 Capita l Additions 85-2002 (clean) Capital Additions 85-2002 (contaminated) Chemical & Volume Control Chemical & Volume Control (Insulated) Componen t Coo lin g Water Component Cooling Water (RCA) Compressed Air Compressed Air (In s u lated) Comp r essed Air (RCA In sulated) Compressed Ai r RCA D iese l Engine-Generator Di ese l Eng i ne-Generator (Insulated)
El ect ri ca l (Clean) Electrical (Contaminated)
Electri ca l (RCA) Fire Protect i on Gaseous Radwaste HVAC (Clean Insulated) HVAC (C l ean) HVAC (Contam in ated In su l ated) HVAC (Contaminated)
Liquid Radwaste L iqu i d Radwaste (In su l ated) Lub e O il Di s tribution 
& Purific a tion Make-up Water Make-up Wate r (Insulated)
Make-up Water (RCA Insulated) Make-up Water (RCA) Mechanica l Department Equipment M i sce ll aneous Reactor Coolant Nu c l ear Steam Supply Samp lin g Nuclear S t eam Supply Samp lin g (In s ula ted) Residu a l Heat Removal Safety Inj ection Safety Inj ection (Insulat e d) Safety Inj ection (RCA I nsulated)
Safety Inj ection (RCA) Service Cooling Water Service Coo lin g Water (RCA) Sewer System Expansion To ta l s Scaffo l d i ng i n support of decommissioning Decontaminat i on of Site Buildings 2b.1.3.1 Reactor 2b.1.3.2 A u x ili ary 2b.1.3.3 Capita l Additions 85-2004 2b.1.3.4 Containment Penetration A r ea 2b.1.3.5 Radwaste Storage 2b.1.3 Tota l s TABLE C-l DIABLO CANYON POWER PLANT UNIT 2 DECON DECOMMISSIONING COST ESTIMATE (Thousands of 2008 Dollars) Decon Cost 89 89 1,481 670 241 298 24 17 265 1,514 1,524 1,080 345 266 7 3,222 Removal Cost 2,113 3,658 5,771 30,617 382 38 0 815 315 161 462 100 5 23 411 116 3 2,645 279 1,691 293 102 34 356 191 849 345 32 211 208 20 25 126 1 101 16 7 236 98 4 30 250 118 29 40 11,507 5,430 1,737 657 150 188 56 2,788 Packaging Transport Cost Cost 104 39 104 39 12 , 877 9 55 17 13 3 5 30 10 5 4 22 30 2 5 4 1 55 4 2 17 298 33 38 1 11 2 24 29 12 558 8,508 38 75 12 107 1 26 30 256 91 9 25 125 31 1 42 3 17 5 1 67 11 4 33 4 1 , 015 24 349 106 21 33 10 519 Processing Cost 24,958 287 403 39 877 11 212 243 2,103 750 61 197 970 142 2 342 24 138 30 3 1 305 76 3 23 203 35 7,479 186 426 232 30 120 8 816 LLKW Disposal Cost 342 342 30,151 58 498 147 17 34 17 124 274 1 8 31 7 3 583 31 2 17 150 2,009 27 3,703 1,592 345 394 173 6,206 Other Costs 685 157 1 ,962 296 700 876 352 1,141 219 4,531 445 13 ,382 20,180 29,194 74 , 121 75,755 Total Contingency 31 96 22 742 771 14 3 414 98 123 74 241 46 955 94 2,820 4,253 6 , 15 3 17,076 56,961 80 224 1,040 345 34 372 2 1 1 11 195 24 1 557 162 1,095 282 63 7 75 120 576 467 35 156 44 4 15 77 67 9 4 560 64 3 22 193 25 18 8 7,055 1,966 3,198 1 ,636 430 428 91 5 , 782 Total Costs 120 781 179 2,856 4,428 628 2,376 296 798 1,000 427 1,382 265 5,486 539 16,202 24,433 35,347 97 , 542 24 1 ,3 09 462 995 3,555 1,115 195 1,831 122 6 46 847 141 3 3,203 735 5,176 1,426 273 4 1 431 554 2,665 1 ,588 115 755 251 24 67 361 1 256 36 15 2 , 071 284 12 97 845 142 87 49 30,878 7,665 11,317 5,416 1,345 1,457 356 19 ,89 1 Burial site Class A Class B Class C GTCC Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet 5,524 5,524 81,561 224 2,029 561 63 132 64 474 1 ,25 1 67 124 26 11 2 , 219 121 7 63 571 8,010 102 20,482 6,098 1,320 1,509 660 30,069 3,224 574 Decon 97 97 1 ,609 728 262 324 26 18 288 1,644 1,655 1 , 173 375 289 8 3,499 Remove 2,295 3,973 6,268 33,253 415 413 885 342 175 502 10 9 5 25 446 1 26 3 2 , 873 303 1,837 318 111 37 387 207 922 375 35 229 226 22 27 137 1 110 17 8 256 106 4 33 272 128 31 43 12,498 5,898 1,887 714 163 204 61 3,028 TABLE C-2 DIABLO CANYON POWER PLANT UNIT 2 DECON DECOMMISSIONING COST ESTIMATE (Thousands of 2011 Dollars) Packaging 113 113 13 ,986 10 60 18 14 3 5 33 11 5 4 24 33 2 5 4 1 6 0 4 2 18 324 36 414 122 26 31 13 606 Tran s pol*t 48 48 10 ,569 47 93 15 133 1 32 37 318 113 11 31 155 39 1 52 4 21 6 1 83 14 5 41 1,261 30 434 132 26 41 1 2 645 Off-Site Processing 31,005 357 50 1 48 1 , 089 14 263 302 2,613 932 76 245 1,205 176 2 425 30 171 37 4 1 379 94 4 29 252 43 9,291 231 529 288 37 149 10 1 , 014 LLRW Disposal 425 425 37,457 72 619 183 21 42 21 154 340 22 39 9 4 724 39 2 21 18 6 2,496 34 4,600 1,978 429 489 215 7,710 Othel' 744 171 2,131 321 760 951 382 1,23 9 238 4,921 483 14,534 21,917 3 1 ,7 0 8 80,503 82,278 Enclosure 3 PG&E Letter DCL-11-039 Page 4 of 9 Contingency 24 186 43 574 993 147 533 190 238 96 310 59 1 ,230 121 3,634 5,479 7,927 21 , 863 52 , 539 104 225 721 217 44 435 27 1 10 186 31 1 718 1 67 1,200 343 61 9 97 127 615 322 22 178 56 5 15 83 o 54 8 3 448 64 3 22 192 32 20 11 6,878 1,557 2,380 1,101 264 301 80 4,125 Total 1 2 1 930 213 2 , 869 4 , 966 733 2,664 321 950 1,189 478 1,5 49 297 6,151 604 18,168 27,397 39,635 109,317 262,695 519 1 , 1 23 3,606 1,085 219 2,173 1 36 7 50 932 157 4 3,591 836 6,000 1,717 307 46 483 636 3,075 1,608 111 890 282 27 76 414 1 268 40 16 2,238 322 13 112 962 1 60 101 54 34 , 392 7,785 11 , 898 5,507 1,320 1,505 398 20,627 NOTE: Totals may not sum due to rounding Enclosure 3 PG&E Letter DCL-11-039 T AB LE C-l T AB LE C-2 Page 5 of 9 DI ABL O CANY O N POWER P LAN T U N IT 2 DI AB LO CANY O N POWER P LAN T U N IT 2 D E CO N D EC O MM I SS IO N I N G COST ESTl MA T E DECO N DECO MM ISSIO N I N G CO S T E S TI MA TE (Thou s and s of 2 008 Dollat's) (Thous a nd s of 20 11 Dollar s) ID Burial s ite LLltW Decon Removal P a cka g in g Tran s port Proc ess in g Di s posal Oth e t' Total C la ss A Cla ss B Cla ss C GTCC o ff-Site LLR W N umb e r Ac t i vit y D e scription C o s t C o s t C o s t C o st C o s t C o s t C o sts C ontin g enc y To t al C ost s C u. Feet C u. Feet Cu. F eet C u. Feet Decon R e mov e Packa g in g Tran s port Proce ss in g Di s po s al Other C ontingenc y To ta l 2b.l Subtotal Period 2b Activity Costs 4 , 736 19,725 888 1,558 8,480 8 , 242 14,803 58,434 38 , 181 5 , 144 21,423 964 1.936 10,535 10 , 239 1 2 ,560 62,801 Period 2b Co ll ateral Costs 2b.3.1 Process liquid waste 224 185 758 956 679 2 ,803 2 , 749 24 3 201 942 1,188 643 3 , 217 2b.3.2 Small t ool allowance 400 84 485 434 109 543 2b.3.3 Spe nt Fue l Capital and Transfer 576 121 697 626 156 782 2b.3 Sub tot a l P e ri od 2b Co ll atera l C o sts 224 400 185 758 956 576 885 3,984 2 , 749 243 434 201 942 1 , 188 626 908 4 , 542 Per io d 2b Period-D e p e ndent Costs 2b.4.1 Decon supp l i es 1,457 512 1 , 969 1,582 396 1,978 2b.4.2 In surance 857 120 978 931 233 1 , 163 2b.4.3 Property taxes 196 28 224 213 53 266 2b.4.4 Health physics supplies 2 , 600 9 13 3 , 513 2 , 824 706 3,530 2b.4.5 Heavy equipment rental 4 , 547 958 5 , 506 4,938 1 , 235 6 , 173 2b.4.6 Disposa l of DAW gene r ated 101 38 333 139 610 5 , 365 110 47 414 143 713 2b.4.7 Plant energy budget 1,940 409 2 , 349 2,107 527 2,634 2b.4.8 NRC I SFS I Fees 371 371 403 403 2b.4.9 NRC Fees 877 123 1,000 953 238 1,191 2b.4.10 Emergency Planning Fe e s 724 10 2 826 786 197 983 2b.4.11 Spent Fuel Transfer -Poo l or ISF S I to DOE 1 , 232 260 1,492 1 , 338 335 1 , 673 2b.4.12 Spent Fuel Pool O&M 1,429 301 1 , 730 1,552 388 1,940 2b.4.13 Liquid Radwaste Processing EquipmenUSer.
374 7 9 452 406 102 508 2b.4.14 I SFS I Operating Costs 274 58 332 298 74 372 2b.4.15 Spent Fuel Storage/Capital Equ i pment 9 , 137 1 , 926 11,063 9 , 924 2,481 12,405 2b.4.16 ISFSI Fixed Costs 557 117 675 605 151 756 2b.4.17 Securi t y S t aff Cost 16,757 3,532 20 , 289 18 , 200 4 ,550 22,750 2b.4.18 DOC Staff Cos t 24 , 325 5 , 127 29,452 26 , 419 6 , 605 33,024 2b.4.19 Util ity Staff Cost 35,045 7,386 42,431 38,062 9 , 5 1 6 47 , 578 2b.4 Subtota l Period 2b Period,Dependent Costs 1,457 7 , 147 101 38 333 94 , 096 22 , 088 125,260 5,365 1 , 582 7,762 110 47 4 1 4 102,198 28 , 02 8 1 40, 1 4 1 2 b.0 TOTAL PERIOD 2b COSTS 6,4 18 27 , 273 1,174 2,353 8,480 9 , 532 94 , 672 37,776 187,678 46,294 6,97 1 29,621 1 ,275 2,923 10 , 535 11, 842 10 2,823 41,497 207,487 Period 2c -Wet Fue l S torage Period 2c Direct Decomm i ssio n i ng Activit i es Period 2c Co llat e r a l Costs 2c.3.1 Spen t Fuel Capital and T ransf er 98 , 000 2,065 11,865 10 6 , 438 26,609 1 33,047 2c.3 Su btotal Period 2c Collatera l Costs 98 , 000 2,065 11,865 106,43 8 26 , 609 1 33 , 047 Per i od 2c Period-D ependen t Costs 2c.4.1 I nsu r a n ce 3 , 1 6 1 444 3,605 3,433 858 4,291 2c.4.2 Property ta xes 723 102 825 78 5 196 982 2c.4.3 H ea l th physics supp li es 809 284 1,093 879 22 0 1 , 098 2c.4.4 Di sposa l o f DAW genera t ed 19 62 26 113 996 2 1 9. 77 27 13 3 2c.4.5 Plant e n e r gy budget 1 , 908 4 0 2 2 , 310 2 , 072 51 8 2,590 2c.4.6 NRC I SFS I Fees 1 , 367 1,367 1 , 485 371 1,856 2c.4.7 NRC Fees 1 , 224 172 1 , 395 1 , 329 332 1,662 2c.4.8 Emergen c y P l an ni ng Fees 2 , 671 3 75 3, 0 47 2,9 01 2 , 90 1 2c.4.9 Spent F u e l Transfer -Poo l or ISFS I t o DOE 3 , 383 713 4 , 0 96 3,674 919 4,593 2c.4.10 Spent Fue l Poo l O&M 5 , 270 1 , 111 6 , 380 5 , 724 1,431 7,155 2c.4.11 I SFS I Ope ra ting Costs 1, 011 213 1,224 1 ,098 275 1,373 2c.4.12 Spent Fue l Storage/Ca p i ta l Equipment 38 , 381 8 , 0 89 46 , 470 4 1 ,686 10,4 2 1 52,107 2c.4.1 3 I SFS I F i xed Costs 2 , 0 55 433 2,488 2,232 558 2,790 2c.4.1 4 Secur i ty Staff Cost 52,323 11 ,027 63 , 350 56,828 1 4,2 07 71, 03 5 2c.4.15 U t i lity Staff Cost 38,639 8 , 143 46,782 4 1 ,966 10,491 52,457 2c.4 Subtota l Period 2c Period-Dependent Costs 809 19 62 152 , 115 3 1 , 534 184 , 545 996 879 21 9 77 165 , 212 41 , 549 207,746 2c.O TOTAL PERIOD 2c COSTS 809 19 62 1 61 , 915 33,599 1 9 6,411 996 879 21 9 77 175 , 85 6 44 , 210 221,051 NOTE: Totals may not sum due to rounding ID TABLE C-l DIABLO CANYON POWER PLANT UNIT 2 DECON DECOMMISSIONING COST ESTIMATE (Thousands of 2008 Dollars) Decon Un:.:::iite Removal Packaging Transport Processing Number Activity Description Cost Period 2d -Decontam in ation Following Wet Fuel Storage Period 2d Direct Decomm i ssioning Activities 2d.l.l Remove Spent Fuel Racks Disposal of Plant Systems 2d.l.2.1 Electrical (Contaminated) 
-FHB 2d.l.2.2 Electrical (Decontam in ated) -FHB 2d.l.2.3 Fire Protect io n (RCA) 2d.l.2.4 HVAC (Contaminated) 
-FHB 2d.l.2.5 Spent Fuel P it Coo lin g 2d.l.2.6 Spent Fuel P it Coo lin g -FHB 2d.l.2 Totals Decontamination of Site Bu il dings 2d.l.3.1 Fuel Handling 2d.l.3 Totals 2d.l.4 Scaffo ldin g in support of decommissioning 2d.l Subtota l Period 2d Activ i ty Costs Per i od 2d Add iti ona l Costs 2d.2.1 License Term in at i on Survey Planning 2d.2 Subtota l Period 2d Additional Costs Period 2d Collateral Costs 2d.3.1 Process liquid waste 2d.3.2 Sma ll tool al lo wance 2d.3.3 Decommissioning Equipment Disposition 2d.3 Subtota l Pe rio d 2d Col l atera l Costs Period 2d Period-Dependent Costs 2d.4.1 Decon Supplies 2d.4.2 Insurance 2d.4.3 P rop erty taxes 2d.4.4 Health p hysi cs s u ppl i es 2 d.4.5 Heavy Equ ipm en t Rental 2d.4.6 Disposal of DAW generated 2d.4.7 P l ant energy b udg et 2d.4.8 NRC ISFSI Fees 2d.4.9 NRC Fees 2d.4.10 Emergency Planning Fees 2d.4.11 Spent Fuel Tr ansfer -Pool or S FSI to DOE 2d.4.12 Liquid Radwaste Processing EquipmenUSef\
2d.4.13 ISF SI Operating Costs 2d.4.14 I SFSI Fixed Costs 2d.4.15 Sec urit y Staff Cost 2d.4.16 DOC Staff Cost 2d.4.17 Utility Staff Cost 2d.4 Subtotal Period 2d Period-Dependent Costs 2d.0 TOTAL PER IOD 2d COST PERIOD 2e -License Termination Period 2e Direct Decommi ss ioning Act i cities 2e.l.l aRISE confirmatory survey 2e.l.2 Terminate l icense 2e.l Subtotal Period 2e Activ it y Cos t s Period 2e Additiona l Costs 2e.2.1 Li cense Termination Survey 2e.2 Sub t otal 2e Addit i o n a l Costs Period 2e Co ll atera l Costs 2e.3.1 DOC Staff re loca tion expenses 2e.3 Subtotal 2e Co ll atera l Costs 477 665 665 1,142 116 116 2 10 210 1,468 Cost Cost Cost Cost 47 86 521 203 190 72 98 1 , 169 723 723 1,086 3,024 68 68 445 1,076 1 ,52 1 4,614 136 6 3 4 22 24 60 39 39 7 242 53 121 174 35 35 451 34 6 53 27 27 26 28 166 48 48 5 253 215 107 322 13 13 588 45 434 222 212 119 12 9 1,162 206 206 37 1,404 686 686 2,090 LLltW Disposal Cost 656 3 17 222 238 480 510 510 1,652 2 00 99 299 115 115 2,066 Other Costs 669 669 177 46 245 88 207 171 207 177 65 132 2,143 3,93 1 6,066 13,655 14,324 153 153 11,808 11 ,8 08 1,395 1,395 Burial s ite Total Class A Class B C la ss C GTCC Cont in gency Total Costs Cu. Feet C u. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet 608 42 287 124 124 137 154 868 959 959 393 2,828 282 282 204 14 219 438 74 25 7 1 56 227 48 52 29 24 44 37 14 28 452 828 1,278 3,322 6,870 64 64 4 ,977 4,977 294 294 1,958 183 1 ,3 01 579 573 597 671 3,905 3,150 3,150 1 ,533 10,546 951 951 787 83 1,232 2,102 284 202 53 602 1 ,3 03 212 296 88 237 196 25 1 214 79 1 60 2,594 4,759 7,344 18,873 32,471 217 217 16,785 16,785 1,689 1,689 2,496 12 65 844 907 1,828 1,965 1,965 20 6,310 793 378 1 ,171 1,862 1,862 9,342 Decon 518 722 722 1,240 126 126 228 228 1,594 Remove 51 93 566 220 2 06 78 106 1,270 785 785 1,180 3,284 74 74 483 1,169 1 , 652 5 , 011 TABLE C-2 DIABLO CANYON POWER PLANT UNIT 2 DECON DECOMMISSIONING COST ESTIMATE (Thousands of 2011 Dollat*s)
Packaging 148 1 7 3 4 24 26 65 42 42 263 58 131 1 89 38 38 490 Transport 42 7 66 34 34 32 35 206 60 60 6 314 267 133 400 16 16 730 Off-Site Process in g 56 539 276 263 148 160 1,444 256 256 46 1,744 852 852 2,596 LLRW Disposal 815 4 21 276 296 596 634 634 2,052 248 123 371 143 143 2,567 Other 727 727 1 92 50 266 96 225 186 225 192 71 143 2,328 4 , 269 6,588 14,831 15,557 166 166 12,825 12,825 1,515 1,515 Enc l osure 3 PG&E Letter DCL-11-039 Page 6 of 9 Cont in gency 394 40 294 133 132 140 156 895 625 625 311 2,225 182 182 175 18 310 503 57 48 12 121 292 49 67 56 46 56 48 1 8 36 582 1 , 067 1,647 4,227 7,137 42 42 3,206 3,206 379 379 Total 1,968 202 1,472 666 661 698 779 4,476 3,124 3,124 1 ,557 11,123 908 908 874 92 1 ,549 2,516 285 240 62 604 1,461 246 333 96 281 232 281 240 88 179 2,909 5 ,3 37 8,235 21,135 35,683 208 208 16 , 031 1 6,031 1 , 894 1,894 NOTE: Totals may not sum due to rounding Enclosure 3 PG&E Lett er DCL-11-0 39 TABLE C-l TABLE C-2 Page 7 o f 9 DIABLO CANYON POWER PLANT UNIT 2 DIABLO CANYON POWER PLANT UNIT 2 DECON DECOMMISSIONING COST ESTIMATE DECON DECOMMISSIONING COST ESTIMATE (Thou s ands of 2008 Dollar s) (Thou s and s of 2011 Dollat*s) ID B urial s it e UU-I:Site LLtlW Decon Removal Packag in g Trans pol't Processing Disposal Other Total C l ass A C la ss B C l ass C GTCC o ff-Site LLRW Number Activity Description Cost Cost Cost Co s t Cost Cost Cost s Cont in gency Tota l Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Decon Remove Packag in g Tran s port Processing Disposal Other Conti n gen c y Tota l Period 2e Pe ri od-Dependent Costs 2e.4.1 Insurance 29 0 4 1 330 315 79 394 2e.4.2 Property t axes 76 11 87 83 21 103 2e.4.3 Hea l th phys i cs supplies 1,242 436 1,679 1,349 337 1,686 2e.4.4 D i sposa l of DAW generated 22 9 40 355 8 27 9 47 2e.4.5 P l ant energy budg e t 200 42 243 217 54 272 2e.4.6 NRC I S FS I Fee s 144 144 1 56 156 2e.4.7 NRC Fees 355 50 405 3 86 96 482 2 e.4.8 Em e rgen c y Pl a nning Fees 281 39 320 305 76 381 2e.4.9 Spent Fuel Transfer -Pool or I S FSI to DOE 339 71 410 368 92 46 0 2e.4.10 I SFS I -Operating Co s ts 106 22 129 115 29 144 2e.4.11 I SFS I -Fi xe d Costs 216 45 261 235 59 293 2e.4.1 2 Secur i ty S taff Cost 3,433 723 4 , 1 56 3,729 932 4,661 2e.4.13 DOC Staff Cost 4 , 840 1 , 020 5 , 861 5,257 1 ,31 4 6,571 2 e.4.14 Ut il ity Staff Cost 5 , 631 1,187 6 , 817 6,116 1 ,529 7 ,645 2e.4 Subtota l Period 2e P e ri od-Dependent Costs 1 ,242 7 2 22 15,910 3,698 2 0 , 881 355 1 ,349 8 2 27 1 7 ,2 8 0 4,667 23 , 333 2 e.0 TOT A L PER I OD 2e COS T 1 ,242 20 29,265 9,033 39 , 572 355 1 , 349 8 25 31,785 8,292 41,461 PER I OD 2 TOTALS 9 , 367 64 , 556 1 4,528 11,458 35 , 529 4 1 ,833 375,931 144 , 239 697,441 13 8,548 3,224 574 10, 173 70,1 14 1 5 , 779 14 , 234 44,138 5 1 , 969 408 , 299 153 , 677 768 , 383 PER I OD 3b S i te Restorat i on P erod 3b Direct D eco mmis s i o nin g Activ i ti es Demo li t i on of Rema i n i ng S i te Build i ngs 3b.l.l.l R eac tor 6 , 873 1,4 49 8 , 322 7,465 1 ,866 9,331 3b.l.l.2 Adm i nistration 96 0 202 1 , 163 1 , 043 261 1 ,3 0 3 3b.l.l.3 Au x i l iary 5,977 1 ,2 60 7,237 6,492 1,623 8,115 3b.l.l.4 Cap i ta l Add i t i ons 85-2004 3,915 825 4 , 740 4,252 1,063 5,315 3b.l.1.5 Chem i ca l Sto r age 4 1 5 4 1 5 3b.l.l.6 Ch l o ri nation 8 2 10 9 2 11 3b.l.1.7 C ir c ul ating Water Tun n e l s 1 ,0 08 213 1,22 1 1,095 274 1,368 3b.l.l.8 Co l d Machin e Shop 357 75 433 388 97 485 3b.l.l.9 Commu ni cat i o n 4 5 4 1 5 3b.l.1.10 Co n densate Po li sh i ngfTechn i cal Support 763 161 923 829 207 1,036 3b.l.l.l l Co n ta in ment P e n et r ati o n A r ea 6 15 130 745 668 167 835 3b.l.l.12 D isc h a r ge St r uctu r e 854 1 80 1, 0 34 928 232 1 , 159 3b.l.l.13 Fabrication Shop 10 7 23 1 3 0 116 29 145 3b.l.1.1 4 Fi r e P u mp House 5 1 5 5 1 7 3b.l.1.1 5 H aza r do u s Was t e Storage Fa c i lity 35 42 38 10 48 3b.l.1.16 I ntake S t ructu r e 4,868 1 ,026 5,893 5,287 1,322 6,609 3b.l.1.17 Mai n tenance Shop 330 69 399 358 90 448 3b.l.l.1 8 Misce ll aneous Structures 57 12 69 62 15 77 3b.l.1.19 NPO Permane n t War e hous e 1 ,2 2 1 257 1 ,478 1 ,326 332 1 ,658 3b.l.1.2 0 Po n ds 2 2 2 1 3 3b.l.1.21 Portab l e Fire Pum p & Fuel Cart 1 1 1 0 1 3b.l.l.22 Pret r eatment 9 2 11 10 2 12 3b.l.l.23 Radwaste Storage 1 ,5 95 336 1,931 1,732 433 2,165 3b.l.1.24 Radw aste Storage Facility (A ddit i o na l) 42 9 51 46 1 1 57 3b.l.l.25 Rotor Warehou se 742 156 898 806 201 1 , 007 3b.l.l.26 Security 3 0 3 64 366 329 82 411 3b.l.1.27 Security Bui l d i ngs (Additiona l) 4 6 10 56 50 1 2 62 3b.l.1.28 Simulator 370 78 448 402 100 502 3b.l.1.29 Steam Generator Sto ra ge Facility 82 1 17 3 994 892 223 1, 1 15 3b.l.l.30 Telephone Term i n a l 2 1 3 2 1 3 3b.l.1.31 Tu r bi n e 4,940 1,041 5,981 5,365 1 ,3 4 1 6,707 3b.l.1.32 Turbine Pedestal 1 , 212 255 1,467 1 , 316 329 1 ,6 45 3b.l.l.33 V e hicle Maintenance 30 6 37 33 8 41 3b.l.l.3 4 Waste Water Ho l ding & Treatment Facility 20 4 24 22 5 27 3b.l.135 Fue l Ha n d l i n g 1 ,689 356 2,045 1 ,834 459 2,293 3b.l.l Tota l s 39 ,784 8,384 48, 1 68 43,209 10 ,802 54, 01 2 S i te C l os eo ut A c t i viti es 3b.l.2 R e move Rubb l e 1,470 310 1 , 779 1,5 9 7 399 1 , 996 3b.l.3 Grade & landscape s it e 2 , 272 479 2 , 7 5 1 2,468 617 3,085 3b.l.4 F i na l report to NRC 8 0 17 97 87 22 109 3b.l Subtota l Pe ri o d 3 b Ac t ivi ty Costs 43,526 80 9,190 52,795 47,2 74 87 1 1 , 840 59 , 201 P er iod 3 b A dd i t i onal Cost 3b.2.1 C o ncrete C ru s hin g 8,46 7 7 1 , 7 86 10 , 26 1 9 , 1 96 9 2 , 301 11 , 506 3 b.2.2 Breakwater Demolition 
& Remova l 33,893 11 , 9 0 5 45,798 36 , 811 9 , 203 46 , 014 3b.2.3 Coffe r dam Construct i on and T ea rdo w n 438 92 530 476 119 595 3b.2 Subtota l Per i od 3 b Ad d i tional Costs 42, 79 8 7 1 3 , 78 3 56,589 46,483 9 1 1 , 62 3 58 , 115 Period 3b Co ll atera l Cos t s 3b.3.1 Sma ll too l a ll owanc e 797 16 8 965 866 2 16 1 , 0 82 3 b.3 Subtota l 3b Collateral Costs 797 16 8 965 866 216 1 , 08 2 NOTE: Totals may not sum due to rounding Enclosure 3 PG&E Letter DCL-11-039 TABLE C-l TABLE C-2 Page 8 of 9 DIABLO CANYON POWER PLANT UNIT 2 DIABLO CANYON POWER PLANT UNIT 2 DECO N DECOMMISSIONING COST ESTIMATE DECON DECOMMISSIONING COST ESTIMATE (Thou s ands of 2008 Dollars) (Thou sa nd s of 2011 Dollars) ID Burial site Ull-ljite LLltW Decon Remova l Packaging Tran s port Processing Di s posal Other Total Class A Class B Cla ss C GTCC Off-Site LLRW Number Activity Description Cost Cost Cost Cost Cost Cost Costs Contingency Total Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Decon Remove Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Contingency Tota l Period 3b Period-Dependent Costs 3b.4.1 I nsurance 787 111 898 855 214 1,068 3b.4.2 Property taxes 207 29 236 225 56 281 3b.4.3 Heavy equ ip ment r e ntal 6,420 1,353 7 , 772 6,973 1,743 8,716 3b.4.4 Plant energy budget 273 57 330 297 74 371 3b.4.5 NRC I SFS I Fees 391 391 425 425 3b.4.6 Emerge nc y Planning Fees 763 10 7 870 829 207 1 , 036 3b.4.7 Spent F u e l Transfer -Pool or ISFS I to DOE 921 1 94 1,115 1,000 250 1 ,25 0 3b.4.8 I SFS I -O p e r ati n g Costs 289 61 350 314 78 392 3b.4.9 I SFS I -Fi xe d Costs 587 1 24 711 638 159 797 3b.4.1 0 Security Staff Cost 9,337 1,968 11,305 10 , 141 2,535 12,676 3b.4.11 DOC Staff Cost 12 ,6 16 2,659 15 , 275 1 3,702 3,426 17,128 3b.4.12 Utility Staff Cost 7,795 1,643 9,438 8,466 2, 1 17 10,583 3b.4 Subtotal Pe riod 3b Period-Dependent Costs 6,420 33,965 8,305 48,690 6,973 36,889 10 ,966 54,828 3b.0 TOTAL PER I OD 3b COST 93,541 7 34,045 31,447 159,040 101,595 9 36,976 34,645 17 3,225 PERIOD 3c -Fue l Storage Operations
/Shipp ing Period 3c Direct Decommissioning Activities Period 3c I Co ll ateral Cos t s 3c.3 Subtota l Period 3c Collateral Costs Period 3c Period-Dependent Costs 3c.4.1 I nsurance 4,184 588 4,772 4,544 1 , 136 5,680 3c.4.2 Property t axes 1,098 154 1 ,252 1 , 193 298 1 ,49 1 3c.4.3 Plant e nergy budget 3c.4.4 NRC I S F S I Fees 2,075 2, 07 5 2,254 563 2,8 1 7 3c.4.5 Emergency P l a nning Fees 4, 0 55 570 4,625 4,404 1,101 5,5 0 5 3c.4.6 Spent Fu e l Tr ans f er -Pool or I SFS I t o DOE 4,865 1, 0 25 5 , 891 5,284 1,321 6 ,6 0 5 3c.4.7 I S FSI -O p e r ating Costs 1,534 323 1 ,857 1 ,66 6 417 2,083 3c.4.8 I SFS I -Fixed Costs 3,119 657 3,777 3,388 847 4,234 3c.4.9 Security S t aff Cost 20,852 4,394 25,246 22,647 5,662 28,3 0 9 3c.4.10 Util i ty Staff Cost 5,13 0 1,081 6,2 1 2 5 ,572 1,393 6,965 3c.4 Su b to t a l Period 3c Period-Depende n t Costs 46,913 8, 7 94 55,706 50,952 12 , 738 63,690 3c.0 TOT A L PER I OD 3c COST 46,913 8,794 55,706 5 0 ,952 12,738 63,690 PERIOD 3d -GTCC shipping P e r i od 3d Dir ec t Deco mmi ss i on i ng Act iviti es Nuclear Steam Supply Syste m Removal 3d.1.1.1 V esse l & Int erna l s GTCC D isposa l 300 8,952 1,929 11 , 1 81 433 326 11,1 2 1 2,862 14 , 309 3 d.1.1 Totals 3 00 8,952 1,929 11 ,18 1 433 326 11 , 121 2,862 14,3 0 9 3d.1 Su btot a l Period 3d Ac t ivi t y Costs 300 8,952 1,929 11 , 1 8 1 433 326 11,121 2 ,8 62 14 ,3 09 Period 3d I Co llat era l Costs 3d.3 Subto t a l Period 3d Collatera l Costs Period 3d Per i od-Dependent Costs 3 d.4.1 In su r ance 15 2 17 16 4 20 3d.4.2 Property ta xes 4 4 5 3d.4.3 Plant ene r gy budget 3 d.4.4 NRC I SFS I Fees 7 8 8 3d.4.5 Emergency Planning Fe es 14 2 16 15 4 19 3d.4.6 I SFS I -Ope r at in g Costs 5 1 7 5 1 7 3d.4.7 I SFS I -Fixed Costs 11 2 13 12 3 1 5 3d.4.8 Security S t aff Cost 73 15 89 79 20 99 3d.4.9 Uti l ity Staff C o st 1 8 4 22 20 5 24 3d.4 Subtota l Per io d 3d Period-Dependent Costs 148 27 17 5 161 40 201 3d.0 TOTAL PERIOD 3d COST 300 8,952 148 1,956 11 ,357 326 11,121 161 2,902 1 4,510 NOTE: Totals may not sum due to rounding Enc l osure 3 PG&E letter Del 039 TABLE C-1 TABLE C-2 Page 9 of 9 DIABLO CANYON POWER PLANT UNIT 2 DIABLO CANYON POWER PLANT UNIT 2 DECON DECOMMISSIONING COST ESTIMATE DECON DECOMMISSIONING COST ESTIMATE (Thousands of 2 008 Do ll ars) (Thousand s of 2011 Dollars) ID Burial site Utt"-tiite LLltW Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Class A Class B Class C GTCC Off-Site LLRW Number Activity Description Cost Cost Cost Cost Cost Cost Costs Contingency Total Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Decon Remove Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Contingency Total PER IO D 3e -I SFS I Dec on tam in at ion Period 3e Direct Decommissioning Activities Period 3e Add iti ona l Costs 3e.2.1 ISFSI Li ce n se T er min a tion 1,059 4 100 387 789 689 3,028 6,239 1.150 4 124 481 857 654 3,27 1 3e.2 S ubt o t a l Peri o d 3e A dd i tiona l Costs 1 ,059 4 100 387 789 689 3,028 6,239 1,150 4 124 48 1 857 654 3,271 P e r i od 3e Co ll atera l Costs 3e.3.1 S ma ll tool a ll owance 14 17 1 5 4 19 3e.3 S ubt o t a l 3e Co ll ate r a l Costs 14 17 1 5 4 19 Per i od 3e Period-Dependent Cos t s 3e.4.1 In surance 127 18 145 1 38 34 172 3e.4.2 Property t axes 33 38 36 9 45 3e.4.3 He a vy equipment r e nta l 3 0 9 65 375 336 84 420 3e.4.4 P l ant energy budget 3e.4.5 Sec urit y Staff Cos t 172 36 2 07 187 47 234 3e.4.6 Utility S t aff Cost 129 27 156 140 35 175 3e.4 Subtota l Period 3e Period-Depen dent Costs 309 46 1 151 922 336 501 209 1,045 3e.0 TOTAL PER I OD 3e COST 1 ,383 4 100 387 1,250 843 3,967 6,239 1 ,5 02 4 124 48 1 1 ,358 867 4,336 PERIOD 3f -I SFS I Site Restoration Period 3 f Direct Decommissioning Activities Period 3f A d d i t ion a l Costs 3f.2.1 ISF S I D em o li t ion and S it e Resto ration 562 24 123 709 6 10 26 159 796 3 f.2 S ubt o ta l Period 3 f Add i tiona l Costs 562 24 12 3 70 9 610 26 15 9 796 P e riod 3 f Co ll a t e ral Costs 3f.3.1 Sma ll too l allo wa nce 4 5 4 3f.3 S ubt o t a l 3 f Col l a t e ral Costs 4 5 4 Period 3f P e riod-D e p en d e nt Costs 3r.4.1 I nsurance 3r.4.2 Property ta xes 17 2 19 18 5 23 3f.4.3 H eavy equipme n t r e nta l 10 3 22 12 5 112 28 140 3f.4.4 P l ant energy bud get 3f.4.6 Secu r ity Staff Cos t 86 18 105 93 23 117 3f.4.7 Utility Staff Cos t 54 11 66 59 15 7 3 3 f.4 S u btota l Period 3 f Period-Dependent Costs 10 3 15 8 54 314 112 172 71 354 3f.0 TOTA L P ER I OD 3f COST 669 181 17 8 1,028 727 1 97 231 1 , 154 PER I OD 3 TOTALS 95 , 592 304 10 7 9,339 82,537 43,2 1 7 23 1,0 97 6,239 433 103,822 330 133 11 , 60 2 89,643 51,383 256 ,91 4 TOTAL COST TO DECOMM I SS I ON 1 3,430 162,600 1 5,Q38 1 2,363 35,529 58,267 548,492 211,479 1 ,057, 1 98 14 6,080 5 , 645 574 433 14,586 176 , 600 16,333 15,359 44,138 72,385 595,717 233,779 1,168,897 Enclosure 4 PG&E Letter DCL-11-039 Decommissioning Cost Analysis for the Diablo Canyon Power Plant (TLG Services, Inc.)
Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 DECOMMISSIONING COST ANALYSIS for the DIABLO CANYON POWER PLANT prepared for Pacific Gas and Electric Company prepared by TLG Services, Inc. Bridgewater, Connecticut March 2009 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decolnlnissioning Cost Analysis Project Manager , Proj ect Engineer' Technical Manager Quality Assurance Manager TLG Services, Inc. APPROVALS Docutnent POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Page ii of xvii Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis SECTION TABLE OF CONTENTS Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Page iii of xvii PAGE EXECUTIVE 

==SUMMARY==
 ..................................................................................
vii-xvii 1. INTRODUCTION 
.....................................................................................................
1-1 1.1 Objectives of Study ...........................................................................................
1-1 1.2 Site Description 
.................................................................................................
1-1 1.3 Regulatory Guidance ........................................................................................
1-2 1.3.1 Nuclear Waste Policy Act ......................................................................
1-4 1.3.2 Low-Level Radioactive Waste Acts ......................................................
1-5 1.3.3 Radiological Criteria for License Termination 
....................................
1-7 2. DECOMMISSIONING ALTERNATIVES 
..............................................................
2-1 2.1 DECON ..............................................................................................................
2-2 2.1.1 Period 1 -Preparations 
.........................................................................
2-2 2.1.2 Period 2 -Decommissioning Operations 
..............................................
2-4 2.1.3 Period 3 -Site Restoration 
....................................................................
2-7 2.1.4 ISFSI Operations and Decommissioning 
............................................
2-8 2.2 SAFSTOR ..........................................................................................................
2-9 2.2.1 Period 1 -Preparations 
.......................................................................
2-10 2.2.2 Period 2 -Dormancy ............................................................................
2-11 2.2.3 Periods 3 and 4 -Delayed Decommissioning 
.....................................
2-12 2.2.4 Period 5 -Site Restoration 
..................................................................
2-13 3. COST ESTIMATE .....................................................................................................
3-1 3.1 Basis of Estimate ..............................................................................................
3-1 3.2 Methodology 
......................................................................................................
3-1 3.3 Impact of Decommissioning Multiple Reactor Units .....................................
3-3 3.4 Financial Components of the Cost Model .......................................................
3-4 3.4.1 Contingency 
...........................................................................................
3-4 3.4.2 Financial Risk ........................................................................................
3-6 3.5 Site-Specific Considerations 
.............................................................................
3-7 3.5.1 Spent Fuel Management 
.......................................................................
3-8 3.5.2 Reactor Vessel and Internal Components 
.........................................
3-10 3.5.3 Primary System Components 
.............................................................
3-11 3.5.4 Retired Components 
............................................................................
3-13 3.5.5 Main Turbine and Condenser 
.............................................................
3-13 3.5.6 Transportation Methods .....................................................................
3-13 3.5.7 Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal .............................................
3-14 3.5.8 Site Conditions Following Decommissioning 
....................................
3-15 TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis SECTION TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)
Document POl-l 604-003, Rev. 0 Page iv of xvii PAGE 3.6 Assumptions 
....................................................................................................
3-16 3.6.1 Estimating Basis .................................................................................
3-16 3.6.2 Labor Costs ..........................................................................................
3-16 3.6.3 Design Conditions 
................................................................................
3-17 3.6.4 General .................................................................................................
3-17 3.7 Cost Estimate Summary ...............................................................................
3-20 4. SCHEDULE ESTIMATE ........................................................................................
4-1 4.1 Schedule Estimate Assumptions 
.....................................................................
4-1 4.2 Project Schedule ................................................................................................
4-2 5. RADIOACTIVE WASTES ........................................................................................
5-1 6. RESULTS .................................................................................................................
6-1 7. REFERENCES 
..........................................................................................................
7-1 TABLES DECON Cost Summary, Decommissioning Cost Elements ...........................
xvi SAFSTOR Cost Summary, Decommissioning Cost Elements ......................
xvii 3.1a Unit 1, DECON Alternative, Schedule of Total Annual Expenditures 
....... 3-22 3.1b Unit 2, DECON Alternative, Schedule of Total Annual Expenditures 
....... 3-23 3.2a Unit 1, SAFSTOR Alternative, Schedule of Total Annual Expenditures 
.... 3-24 3.2b Unit 2, SAFSTOR Alternative, Schedule of Total Annual Expenditures 
.... 3-26 5.1 Unit 1 DECON Alternative, Decommissioning Waste Summary ..................
5-3 5.2 Unit 2 DECON Alternative, Decommissioning Waste Summary ..................
5-4 5.3 Unit 1 SAFSTOR Alternative, Decommissioning Waste Summary ..............
5-5 5.4 Unit 2 SAFSTOR Alternative, Decommissioning Waste Summary ..............
5-6 6.1 Unit 1 DECON Alternative, Decommissioning Cost Elements .....................
6-4 6.2 Unit 2 DECON Alternative, Decommissioning Cost Elements .....................
6-5 6.3 Unit 1 SAFSTOR Alternative, Decommissioning Cost Elements ..................
6-6 6.4 Unit 2 SAFSTOR Alternative, Decommissioning Cost Elements ..................
6-7 TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis SECTION TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)
FIGURES Document POl-l 604-003, Rev. 0 Page v of xvii PAGE 4.1 Activity Schedule ..............................................................................................
4-3 4.2 Decommissioning Timeline, DECON ..............................................................
4-7 4.3 Decommissioning Timeline, SAFSTOR ..........................................................
4-8 APPENDICES A. Unit Cost Factor Development 
.............................................................................
A-I B. Unit Cost Factor Listing ......................................................................................
B-1 C. Detailed Cost Analysis, DECON ..........................................................................
C-l D. Detailed Cost Analysis, SAFSTOR ......................................................................
D-l TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis No. REVISION LOG Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Page vi of xvii I1te1TI Keason for Revision o 03-27-09 Original Issue TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis EXECUTIVE 

==SUMMARY==
Document POla1604-003, Rev. 0 Page vii of xvii This report presents estimates of the cost to decommission the Diablo Canyon Power Plant (Diablo Canyon) for the selected decommissioning scenarios following the scheduled cessation of plant operations.
The analysis relies upon site-specific, technical information from an evaluation prepared in 2005,[1] updated to reflect current assumptions pertaining to the disposition of the nuclear plant and relevant industry experience in undertaking such projects.
The current estimates are designed to provide Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), with sufficient information to assess the plant owners' financial obligations, as they pertain to the eventual decommissioning of the nuclear plant. The primary goal of the decommissioning is the removal and disposal of the contaminated systems and structures so that the plant's operating licenses can be terminated.
The analysis recognizes that spent fuel will be stored at the site in the plant's storage pools and in an independent spent fuel storage installation (ISFSI) until such time that it can be transferred to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) federal repository.
Consequently, the estimates also include those costs to manage and subsequently decommission these interim storage facilities.
The currently projected cost to decommission the station, assuming the DECON alternative, is estimated at $1,828.3 million, as reported in 2008 dollars. An estimate for the SAFSTOR alternative is also provided.
The estimates are based on numerous fundamental assumptions, including regulatory requirements, project contingencies, low-level radioactive waste disposal practices, high-level radioactive waste management options, and site restoration requirements.
The estimates incorporate a minimum cooling period of approximately 12 years for the spent fuel that resides in the storage pools when operations cease.l 2] In both scenarios that were analyzed, any residual fuel remaining in the pools after the 12-year period is relocated to the ISFSI to await transfer to a DOE facility.
The estimates also include the dismantling of site structures and non-essential facilities and the limited restoration of the site. "Decommissioning Cost Analysis for the Diablo Canyon Power Plant," Document No. POl-1513-004, Rev. 0, TLG Services, Inc., June 2005 2 The current Part 72 ISFSI license does not allow dry cask storage of spent fuel with burnups above 45,000 MWD/metric ton. It is assumed that PG&E can amend the Part 72 license to store the higher burnup fuel, but that as a condition of the amendment it will require longer decay times (12 years) before storing the spent fuel in the casks. TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Alternatives and Regulations Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Page viii of xvii The ultimate objective of the decommissioning process is to reduce the inventory of contaminated and activated material so that the license can be terminated.
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or Commission) provided initial decommissioning requirements in its rule adopted on June 27, 1988)3] In this rule, the NRC set forth financial criteria for decommissioning licensed nuclear power facilities.
The regulations addressed planning needs, timing, funding methods, and environmental review requirements for decommissioning.
The rule also defined three decommissioning alternatives as being acceptable to the NRC: DECON, SAFSTOR, and ENTOMB. DECON is defined as "the alternative in which the equipment, structures, and portions of a facility and site containing radioactive contaminants are removed or decontaminated to a level that permits the property to be released for unrestricted use shortly after cessation of operations. 
"[4] SAFSTOR is defined as "the alternative in which the nuclear facility is placed and maintained in a condition that allows the nuclear facility to be safely stored and subsequently decontaminated (deferred decontamination) to levels that permit release for unrestricted use."[5] Decommissioning is to be completed within 60 years, although longer time periods will be considered when necessary to protect public health and safety. ENTOMB is defined as "the alternative in which radioactive contaminants are encased in a structurally long-lived material, such as concrete; the entombed structure is appropriately maintained and continued surveillance is carried out until the radioactive material decays to a level permitting unrestricted release of the property."[6]
As with the SAFSTOR alternative, decommissioning is currently required to be completed within 60 years. The 60-year restriction has limited the practicality for the ENTOMB alternative at commercial reactors that generate significant amounts of long-lived radioactive material.
In 1997, the Commission directed its staff 3 U.s. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Parts 30, 40, 50, 51,70 and 72 "General Requirements for Decommissioning Nuclear Facilities," Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Federal Register Volume 53, Number 123 (p 24018 et seq.), June 27, 1988 4 Ibid. Page FR24022, Column 3 5 Ibid. 6 Ibid. Page FR24023, Column 2 TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Page ix of xvii to re-evaluate this alternative and identify the technical requirements and regulatory actions that would be necessary for entombment to become a viable option. The resulting evaluation provided several recommendations, however, rule making has been deferred pending the completion of additional research studies, for example, on engineered barriers.
In 1996, the NRC published reVISIons to the general requirements for decommissioning nuclear power plants to clarify ambiguities and codify procedures and terminology as a means of enhancing efficiency and uniformity in the decommissioning processJ7]
The amendments allow for greater public participation and better define the transition process from operations to decommissioning.
Regulatory Guide 1.184, issued in July 2000, further described the methods and procedures acceptable to the NRC staff for implementing the requirements of the 1996 revised rule relating to the initial activities and major phases of the decommissioning process. The costs and schedules presented in this analysis follow the general guidance and processes described in the amended regulations.
The format and content of the estimates is also consistent with the recommendations of Regulatory Guide 1.202, issued in February 2005.&#xa3;8] Decommissioning Scenarios Two decommissioning scenarios are evaluated for the two nuclear units. The scenarios selected are representative of alternatives available to the owner and are defined as follows: DECON: The operating licenses for Units 1 and 2 currently expire in November 2024 and August 2025, respectively.
The first scenario assumes that decommissioning activities at the two units are sequenced and integrated so as to minimize the total duration of the physical dismantling processes.
Any residual spent fuel is transferred to the ISFSI to facilitate decontamination and dismantling activities within the fuel handling building.
Spent fuel storage operations continue at the site until the transfer of the fuel to the DOE IS complete, assumed to be in the year 2051. SAFSTOR: The units are placed into safe-storage in the second scenario.
Spent fuel remaining in the spent fuel storage pools after a minimum cooling period of 12 years is transferred to the ISFSI for interim storage. The length of 7 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Parts 2,50, and 51, "Decommissioning of Nuclear Power Reactors," Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Federal Register Volume 61, (p 39278 et seq.), July 29, 1996 8 "Standard Format and Content of Decommissioning Cost Estimates for Nuclear Power Reactors," Regulatory Guide 1.202, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, February 2005 TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Page x of xvii SAFSTOR dormancy is established to schedule the beginning of Unit 1 decommissioning activities with the final spent fuel shipment from the ISFSI. As with the DECON scenario, decommissioning activities at the two units are sequenced and integrated so as to minimize the total duration of the physical dismantling processes.
Methodology The methodology used to develop the estimates described within this document follows the basic approach originally presented in the cost estimating guidelines[9]
developed by the Atomic Industrial Forum (now Nuclear Energy Institute).
This reference describes a unit factor method for determining decommissioning activity costs. The unit factors used in this analysis incorporates site-specific costs and the latest available information on worker productivity in decommissioning.
The estimates also reflect lessons learned from TLG's involvement in the Shippingport Station decommissioning, completed in 1989, and the decommissioning of the Cintichem reactor, hot cells and associated facilities, completed in 1997. In addition, the planning and engineering for the Pathfinder, Shoreham, Rancho Seco, Trojan, Yankee Rowe, Big Rock Point, Maine Yankee, Humboldt Bay-3, Connecticut Yankee and San Onofre-1 nuclear units have provided additional insight into the process, the regulatory aspects, and technical challenges of decommissioning commercial nuclear units. An activity duration critical path is used to determine the total decommissioning program schedule.
The schedule is relied upon in calculating the carrying costs, which include program management, administration, field engineering, equipment rental, and support services, such as quality control and security.
Contingency Consistent with cost estimating practice, contingencies are applied to the decontamination and dismantling costs developed as "specific provision for unforeseeable elements of cost within the defined project scope, particularly important where previous experience relating estimates and actual costs has shown that unforeseeable events which will increase costs are likely to occur." [10] The cost elements in the estimates are based on ideal conditions; therefore, the types of unforeseeable events that are almost certain to occur in decommissioning, based on industry experience, are addressed through a percentage contingency applied on a 9 T.S. LaGuardia et al., "Guidelines for Producing Commercial Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Estimates," AIFINESP-036, May 1986 10 Project and Cost Engineers' Handbook, Second Edition, American Association of Cost Engineers, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, New York, p. 239. TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document POl-l 604-003, Rev. 0 Page xi of xvii line-item basis. This contingency factor is a nearly universal element in all large-scale construction and demolition projects.
It should be noted that contingency, as used in this analysis, is based on a preliminary technical position [11] to reflect the California Public Utilities Commission's desire for owners to conservatively establish an appropriate contingency factor for inclusion in the decommissioning revenue requirements.
Contingency funds are expected to be fully expended throughout the program. As such, inclusion of contingency is necessary to provide assurance that sufficient funding will be available to accomplish the intended tasks. Low -Level Radioactive Waste Disposal The contaminated and activated material generated in the decontamination and dismantling of a commercial nuclear reactor is classified as low-level (radioactive) waste, although not all of the material is suitable for "shallow-land" disposaL [12] With the passage of the "Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Act" in 1980, [13] and its Amendments of 1985, [14] the states became ultimately responsible for the disposition of low-level radioactive waste (LLRW) generated within their own borders. Until recently, there were two facilities available to PG&E for the disposal of low-level radioactive waste generated by Diablo Canyon. As of July 1, 2008, however, the facility in Barnwell, South Carolina was closed to generators outside the Atlantic Compact (comprised of the states of Connecticut, New Jersey and South Carolina).
This leaves the facility in Clive, Utah, operated by EnergySolutions, as the only available destination for low-level radioactive waste requiring controlled disposaL For the purpose of this analysis, the EnergySolutions' facility is used as the disposal site for the majority of the radioactive waste (Class A). There are no currently operating disposal facilities available to PG&E that have a license to dispose of the more highly radioactive waste (Classes B and C), for example, generated in the dismantling of the reactor vesseL As such, waste disposal costs and waste transportation distances must be estimated.
The disposal cost and transportation distance for low -level radioactive waste is based on a study sponsored by PG&E and Southern California Edison Company, "Establishing an Appropriate Disposal Rate for 11 "Technical Position Paper for Establishing an Appropriate Contingency Factor for Inclusion in the Decommissioning Revenue Requirements", Study Number: DECON-POS-H002, Revision A, Status: Preliminary (provided by PG&E). 12 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 61, "Licensing Requirements for Land Disposal of Radioactive Waste" 13 "Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Act of 1980," Public Law 96-573, 1980. 14 "Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1985," Public Law 99-240, 1986. TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Page xii of xvii Low Level Radioactive Waste During Decommissioning." [15] The study was done to reflect the California Public Utilities Commission's desire for these owners to conservatively estimate their nuclear decommissioning LLRW disposal rates. The dismantling of the components residing closest to the reactor core generates radioactive waste considered unsuitable for shallow-land disposal (i.e., low-level radioactive waste with concentrations of radionuclides that exceed the limits established by the NRC for Class C radioactive waste (GTCC>>. The Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1985 assigned the federal government the responsibility for the disposal of this material.
The Act also stated that the beneficiaries of the activities resulting in the generation of such radioactive waste bear all reasonable costs of disposing of such waste. However, to date, the federal government has not identified a cost for disposing of GTCC or a schedule for acceptance.
As such, the GTCC radioactive waste has been packaged and disposed of as high-level waste, at a cost equivalent to that envisioned for the spent fuel. For purposes of this study, GTCC is packaged in the same type of canister used for spent fuel. The GTCC material is either stored with the spent fuel at the ISFSI or shipped directly to a DOE facility as it is generated (depending upon the timing of the decommissioning and whether the spent fuel has been removed from the site prior to the start of decommissioning).
A significant portion of the waste material generated during decommissioning may only be potentially contaminated by radioactive materials.
This waste can be analyzed on site or shipped off site to licensed facilities for further analysis, for processing and/or for conditioning/recovery.
Reduction in the volume of low-level radioactive waste requiring disposal in a licensed low -level radioactive waste disposal facility can be accomplished through a variety of methods, including analyses and surveys or decontamination to eliminate the portion of waste that does not require disposal as radioactive waste, compaction, incineration or metal melt. The estimates for Diablo Canyon reflect the savings from waste recovery/volume reduction.
High-Level Radioactive Waste Management Congress passed the "Nuclear Waste Policy Act" [16] (NWPA) in 1982, assigning the federal government's long-standing responsibility for disposal of the spent nuclear fuel created by the commercial nuclear generating plants to the DOE. The NWP A provided that DOE would enter into contracts with utilities in which DOE would promise to take the utilities' spent fuel and high-level radioactive waste and utilities would pay 15 "Establishing an Appropriate Disposal Rate for Low Level Radioactive Waste During Decommissioning", Robert A Snyder NEWEX, Revision 0, July 2008 (provided by PG&E). 16 "Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 and Amendments," DOE's Office of Civilian Radioactive 1982 TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Page xiii of xvii the cost of the disposition services for that material.
The NWP A, along with the individual contracts with the utilities, specified that the DOE was to begin accepting spent fuel by January 31, 1998. Since the original legislation, the DOE has announced several delays in the program schedule.
By January 1998, the DOE had failed to accept any spent fuel or high level waste, as required by the NWP A and utility contracts.
Delays continue and, as a result, generators have initiated legal action against the DOE in an attempt to obtain compensation for DOE's breach of contract.
Operation of DOE's yet-to-be constructed repository is contingent upon the review and approval of the facility's license application by the NRC and the successful resolution of pending litigation.
The DOE submitted its license application to the NRC on June 3, 2008, seeking authorization to construct the repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. Assuming a timely review and adequate funding, the DOE expects that receipt of fuel could begin as early as 2020. [17] It is generally necessary that spent fuel be cooled and stored for a minimum period at the generating site prior to transfer.
As such, the NRC requires that licensees establish a program to manage and provide funding for the management of all irradiated fuel at the reactor site until title of the fuel is transferred to the Secretary of Energy, pursuant to 10 CFR Part 50.54(bb)J18]
This funding requirement is fulfilled through inclusion of certain cost elements in the decommissioning estimates, for example, associated with the isolation and continued operation of the spent fuel pools and the ISFSI. The DOE's generator allocation/receipt schedules are based upon the oldest fuel receiving the highest priority.
For purposes of this analysis, acceptance of commercial spent fuel by the DOE is expected to begin in 2020. The first assemblies removed from the Diablo Canyon site are assumed to be in 2028. With an estimated, maximum rate of transfer of 3,000 metric tons of uranium (MTU)/year, completion of the removal of fuel from the site is projected to be in the year 2051 . . Consequently, costs are included within the estimates for the long-term caretaking of the spent fuel at the Diablo Canyon site until the year 2051. An ISFSI, which is independently licensed and operated, will remain operational after the cessation of plant operations.
For the DECON and SAFSTOR scenarios, the facility is expanded to accommodate the inventory of spent fuel residing in the plant's storage pools at the conclusion of the required cooling period. Once emptied, 17 DOE-RW-0604, "Project Decision Schedule", U.s. DOE Offfice of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, January 2009". 18 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 50, "Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities," Subpart 54 (bb), "Conditions of Licenses." TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document P01 5 1604-003, Rev. 0 Page xiv of xvii the spent fuel pool facilities can be either decontaminated and dismantled or prepared for long-term storage. Site Restoration The efficient removal of the contaminated materials at the site may result in damage to many of the site structures.
Blasting, coring, drilling, and the other decontamination activities will substantially damage power block structures, potentially weakening the footings and structural supports.
Prompt dismantling of site structures (once the facilities are decontaminated) is clearly the most appropriate and cost-effective option. It is unreasonable to anticipate that these structures would be repaired and preserved after the radiological contamination is removed. The cost to dismantle site structures with a work force already mobilized on site is more efficient than if the process is deferred.
Site facilities quickly degrade without maintenance, adding additional expense and creating potential hazards to the public and the demolition work force. Consequently, this study assumes that site structures are removed to a nominal depth of three feet below the local grade level wherever possible.
The site is then to be graded and stabilized.
Summary The costs to decommission Diablo Canyon assumes the removal of all contaminated and activated plant components and structural materials such that the owner may then have unrestricted use of the site with no further requirements for an operating license. Low-level radioactive waste, other than GTCC waste, is sent to a commercial processor for treatment/conditioning or to a controlled disposal facility.
Decommissioning is accomplished within the 60-year period required by current NRC regulations.
In the interim, the spent fuel remains in storage at the site until such time that the transfer to a DOE facility is complete.
Once emptied, the storage facilities are also decommissioned.
Both the DECON and SAFSTOR scenarIOS are described in Section 2. The assumptions are presented in Section 3, along with schedules of annual expenditures.
The major cost contributors are identified in Section 6, with detailed activity costs, waste volumes, and associated manpower requirements delineated in Appendices C and D. The major cost components are also identified in the cost summary provided at the end of this section. The cost elements in the estimates are assigned to one of three subcategories:
NRC License Termination, Spent Fuel Management, and Site Restoration.
The subcategory "NRC License Termination" is used to accumulate costs that are consistent with "decommissioning" as defined by the NRC in its financial assurance regulations (i.e., TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Page xv of xvii 10 CFR Part 50.75). The cost reported for this subcategory is generally sufficient to terminate the unit's operating license, recognizing that there may be some additional cost impact from spent fuel management.
The "Spent Fuel Management" subcategory contains costs associated with the containerization and transfer of spent fuel from the wet storage pools to a DOE transport cask, as well as the transfer of the fuel in storage at the ISFSI to the DOE. Costs are included for the operation of the storage pools and the management of the ISFSI until such time that the transfer is complete. "Site Restoration" is used to capture costs associated with the dismantling and demolition of buildings and facilities demonstrated to be free from contamination.
This includes structures never exposed to radioactive materials, as well as those facilities that have been decontaminated to appropriate levels. Structures are removed to a depth of three feet and backfilled to conform to local grade. It should be noted that the costs assigned to these subcategories are allocations.
Delegation of cost elements is for the purposes of comparison (e.g., with NRC financial guidelines) or to permit specific financial treatment (e.g., ARO determinations).
In reality, there can be considerable interaction between the activities in the three subcategories.
For example, an owner may decide to remove non-contaminated structures early in the project to improve access to highly contaminated facilities or plant components.
In these instances, the non-contaminated removal costs could be reassigned from Site Restoration to an NRC License Termination support activity.
However, in general, the allocations represent a reasonable accounting of those costs that can be expected to be incurred for the specific subcomponents of the total estimated program cost, if executed as described.
As noted within this document, the estimates were developed and costs are presented in 2008 dollars. As such, the estimates do not reflect the escalation of costs (due to inflationary and market forces) over the remaining operating life of the plant or during the decommissioning period. TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document POl-l 604-003, Rev. 0 Page xvi of xvii Total [2] DECON COST 

==SUMMARY==
DECOMMISSIONING COST ELEMENTS (thousands of 2008 dollars) Unit 2 [1] Includes engineering and security costs [2] Columns may not add due to rounding TLG Services, Inc. Total Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document POl-l 604-003, Rev. 0 Page xvii of xvii SAFSTOR COST 

==SUMMARY==
DECOMMISSIONING COST ELEMENTS (thousands of 2008 dollars) Cost Element Total Decontamination 36,1
__
___ , __
____
__ c __ '-f __ ,, __
__ t_, __
___
___
__ " ___
__
__ '4 ___
__
__
2 27,787 7,
__ _
__
738_",
__ __ 52,327 C'
__
__ "c, ___ , __
__
__
__
__ __ ___ 20,915 c ___ c 22,518_ _c __
__ """ __
_____
__ , __ ,, ___ ___
___
4, 169
___ __ __
_____ ll, 738 11, 980 Cost Element License Termination __
__
__ ** 
..... * . te Restoration tal [2] [1] Includes engineering and security costs [2] Columns may not add due to rounding TLG Services, Inc. 1,916,567 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis 1. INTRODUCTION Document P01-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 1, Page 1 of 8 This report presents estimates of the costs to decommission the Diablo Canyon Power Plant, (Diablo Canyon) following a scheduled cessation of plant operations.
The analysis relies upon site-specific, technical information from an earlier evaluation prepared in 2005,[1]*
updated to reflect current assumptions pertaining to the disposition of the nuclear plant and relevant industry experience in undertaking such projects.
The current estimates are designed to provide Pacific Gas and Electric Company (pG&E) with sufficient information to assess the plant owners' financial obligations, as they pertain to the eventual decommissioning of the nuclear station. It is not a detailed engineering document, but a financial analysis prepared in advance of the detailed engineering that will be required to carry out the decommissioning.
1.1 OBJECTIVES OF STUDY The objectives of this study are to prepare comprehensive estimates of the costs to decommission Diablo Canyon, to provide a sequence or schedule for the associated activities, and to develop waste stream projections from the decontamination and dismantling activities.
For the purposes of this study, the shutdown dates were taken as 40 years after receiving full power-operating licenses, or 2 November 2024 for Unit 1, and 26 August 2025 for Unit 2. 1.2 SITE DESCRIPTION Diablo Canyon is located on the central California coast in San Luis Obispo County, approximately 12 miles west southwest of the City of San Luis Obispo. The plant, comprised of two nuclear units, is located on a 750-acre site adjacent to the Pacific Ocean, roughly equidistant from San Francisco and Los Angeles. The Nuclear Steam Supply System (NSSS) consists of a pressurized water reactor and a four-loop Reactor Coolant System. The systems were supplied by the Westinghouse Electric Corporation.
Units 1 and 2 each have a current license rating of 3411 MWt, with corresponding estimated ultimate net electrical outputs 1131 and 1156 megawatts (electric), respectively, with the reactors at rated power. The Reactor Coolant System is comprised of the reactor vessel and four heat transfer loops, each containing a vertical U-tube type steam generator, and a single-stage centrifugal reactor coolant pump. In addition, the system includes
* References provided in Section 7 of the document TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 1, Page 2 of 8 an electrically heated pressurizer, a pressurizer relief tank, and interconnected piping. The system is housed within a "containment structure," a seismic Category I reinforced-concrete dry structure.
It consists of an upright cylinder topped with a hemispherical dome, supported on a reinforced concrete foundation mat, which is keyed into the bedrock. A welded steel liner plate anchored to the inside face of the containment serves as a leak -tight membrane.
The liner on top of the foundation mat is protected by a two-foot thick concrete fill mat, which supports the containment internals and forms the floor of the containment.
The lower portion of the containment cylindrical wall has additional embedded wide flange steel beams between elevations 88 ft. 2 in. and 108 ft. 2 in. (mean sea level). Heat produced in the reactor is converted to electrical energy by the Steam and Power Conversion Systems. A turbine-generator system converts the thermal energy of steam produced in the steam generators into mechanical shaft power and then into electrical energy. The plant's turbine-generators are each tandem compound, four element units. They consist of one high-pressure double-flow and three low-pressure double-flow elements driving a coupled generator at 1800 rpm. The turbines are operated in a closed feedwater cycle that condenses the steam; the heated feedwater is returned to the steam generators.
Heat rejected in the main condensers is removed by the Circulating Water System (CWS). The circulating water system provides the heat sink required for removal of waste heat in the power plant's thermal cycle. The system has the principal function of removing heat by absorbing this energy in the main condenser.
Condenser circulating water is water from the Pacific Ocean. Each unit is served by two circulating water pumps at the intake structure.
From this structure seawater is pumped through two circulating water conduits to the condenser inlet water boxes. The water is returned to the ocean at Diablo Cove through an outfall at the water's edge. 1.3 REGULATORY GUIDANCE The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or Commission) provided initial decommissioning requirements in its rule "General Requirements for Decommissioning Nuclear Facilities," issued in June 1988)2] This rule -set forth financial criteria for decommissioning licensed nuclear power facilities.
The regulation addressed decommissioning planning needs, timing, funding methods, and environmental review requirements.
The intent of the rule was to ensure that decommissioning would be accomplished in a safe and timely manner and that adequate funds would be available for this purpose. Subsequent to the rule, the NRC issued Regulatory Guide 1.159, "Assuring the TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document P01-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 1, Page 3 of 8 Availability of Funds for Decommissioning Nuclear Reactors,"[3]
which provided additional guidance to the licensees of nuclear facilities on the financial methods acceptable to the NRC staff for complying with the requirements of the rule. The regulatory guide addressed the funding requirements and provided guidance on the content and form of the financial assurance mechanisms indicated in the rule. The rule defined three decommissioning alternatives as being acceptable to the NRC: DECON, SAFSTOR, and ENTOMB. The DECON alternative assumes that any contaminated or activated portion of the plant's systems, structures and facilities are removed or decontaminated to levels that permit the site to be released for unrestricted use shortly after the cessation of plant operations.
The rule also placed limits on the time allowed to complete the decommissioning process. For SAFSTOR, the process is restricted in overall duration to 60 years, unless it can be shown that a longer duration is necessary to protect public health and safety. The guidelines for ENTOMB are similar, providing the NRC with both sufficient leverage and flexibility to ensure that these deferred options are only used in situations where it is reasonable and consistent with the definition of decommissioning.
At the conclusion of a 60-year dormancy period (or longer for ENTOMB if the NRC approves such a case), the site would still require significant remediation to meet the unrestricted release limits for license termination.
The ENTOMB alternative has not been viewed as a viable option for power reactors due to the significant time required to isolate the long-lived radionuclides for decay to permissible levels. However, with rule making permitting the controlled release of a site,[4] the NRC has re-evaluated this alternative.
The resulting feasibility study, based upon an assessment by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, concluded that the method did have conditional merit for some, if not most reactors.
However, the staff also found that additional rule making would be needed before this option could be treated as a generic alternative.
The NRC had considered rulemaking to alter the 60-year time for completing decommissioning and to clarify the use of engineered barriers for reactor entombmentsJ5]
However, the NRC's staff has recommended that rulemaking be deferred, based upon several factors, e.g., no licensee has committed to pursuing the entombment option, the unresolved issues associated with the disposition of greater-than-Class C material (GTCC), and the NRC's current priorities, at least until after the additional research studies are complete.
The Commission concurred with the staffs recommendation.
In 1996, the NRC published reVISIons to the general requirements for decommissioning nuclear power plantsJ6]
When the decommissioning TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 1, Page 4 of 8 regulations were adopted in 1988, it was assumed that the majority of licensees would decommission at the end of the facility's operating licensed life. Since that time, several licensees permanently and prematurely ceased operations.
Exemptions from certain operating requirements were required once the reactor was defueled to facilitate the decommissioning.
Each case was handled individually, without clearly defined generic requirements.
The NRC amended the decommissioning regulations in 1996 to clarify ambiguities and codify procedures and terminology as a means of enhancing efficiency and uniformity in the decommissioning process. The amendments allow for greater public participation and better define the transition process from operations to decommissioning.
Under the revised regulations, licensees will submit written certification to the NRC within 30 days after the decision to cease operations.
Certification will also be required once the fuel is permanently removed from the reactor vessel. Submittal of these notices will entitle the licensee to a fee reduction and eliminate the obligation to follow certain requirements needed only during operation of the reactor. Within two years of submitting notice of permanent cessation of operations, the licensee is required to submit a Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report (PSDAR) to the NRC. The PSDAR describes the planned decommissioning activities, the associated sequence and schedule, and an estimate of expected costs. Prior to completing decommissioning, the licensee is required to submit an application to the NRC to terminate the license, wh,ich will include a license termination plan (LTP). 1.3.1 Nuclear Waste Policy Act Congress passed the "Nuclear Waste Policy Act" [7] (NWPA) in 1982, assigning the federal government's long-standing responsibility for disposal of the spent nuclear fuel created by the commercial nuclear generating plants to the DOE. The NWPA provided that DOE would enter into contracts with utilities in which DOE would promise to take the utilities' spent fuel and high-level radioactive waste and utilities would pay the cost of the disposition services for that material.
The NWP A, along with the individual contracts with the utilities, specified that the DOE was to begin accepting spent fuel by January 31, 1998. Since the original legislation, the DOE has announced several delays in the program schedule.
By January 1998, the DOE had failed to accept any spent fuel or high level waste, as required by the NWP A and utility contracts.
Delays continue and, as a result, generators have initiated legal action against the DOE in an attempt to obtain compensation for DOE's breach of contract.
TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 1, Page 5 of 8 Operation of DOE's yet-to-be constructed repository is contingent upon the review and approval of the facility's license application by the NRC and the successful resolution of pending litigation.
The DOE submitted its license application to the NRC on June 3, 2008, seeking authorization to construct the repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. Assuming a timely review and adequate funding, the DOE expects that receipt of fuel could begin as early as 2020. [8] I t is generally necessary that spent fuel be actively cooled and stored for a minimum period at the generating site prior to transfer.
As such, the NRC requires that licensees establish a program to manage and provide funding for the management of all irradiated fuel at the reactor site until title of the fuel is transferred to the Secretary of Energy, pursuant to 10 CFR Part 50.54(bb). 
[9] This funding requirement is fulfilled through inclusion of certain cost elements in the decommissioning estimate, for example, associated with the isolation and continued operation of the spent fuel pools and ISFSI. DOE's contracts with utilities order the acceptance of spent fuel from utilities based upon the oldest fuel receiving the highest priority.
For purposes of this analysis, acceptance of commercial spent fuel by the DOE is expected to begin in 2020 (in accordance with DOE's latest published schedule).
The first assemblies removed from the Diablo Canyon site are assumed to be in 2028. With an estimated maximum rate of transfer of 3,000 metric tons of uranium (MTU)/year from the commercial generators, completion of the removal of fuel from the Diablo Canyon site is projected to be in the year 2051. Consequently, costs are included within the estimates for the long-term caretaking of the spent fuel at the Diablo Canyon site until the year 2051. An ISFSI, which is independently licensed and operated, will remain operational after the cessation of plant operations.
For the DECON and SAFSTOR scenarios, the facility is expanded to accommodate the inventory of spent fuel residing in the plant's storage pools at the conclusion of the required cooling period. Once emptied, the spent fuel pool facilities can be either decontaminated and dismantled or prepared for long-term storage. 1.3.2 Low-Level Radioactive Waste Acts The contaminated and activated material generated in the decontamination and dismantling of a commercial nuclear reactor is classified as low-level (radioactive) waste, [10] although not all of the TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document P01-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 1, Page 6 of 8 material is suitable for "shallow-land" disposaL With the passage of the "Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Act" in 1980, [11] and its Amendments of 1985, [12] the states became ultimately responsible for the disposition of low-level radioactive waste generated within their own borders. Until recently, there were two facilities available to PG&E for the disposal of low-level radioactive waste generated by Diablo Canyon. As of July 1, 2008, however, the facility in Barnwell, South Carolina was closed to generators outside the Atlantic Compact (comprised of the states of Connecticut, New Jersey and South Carolina).
This leaves the facility in Clive, Utah, operated by EnergySolutions, as the only available destination for low-level radioactive waste requiring controlled disposaL For the purpose of this analysis, the EnergySolutions' facility is used as the disposal site for the majority of the radioactive waste (Class A). There are no currently operating disposal facilities available to PG&E that have a license to dispose of the more highly radioactive waste (Classes B and C), for example, generated in the dismantling of the reactor vesseL As such, waste disposal costs must be estimated.
The disposal cost for low-level radioactive waste is based on a study sponsored by PG&E and Southern California Edison Company, "Establishing an Appropriate Disposal Rate for Low Level Radioactive Waste During Decommissioning." [13] The study was done to reflect the California Public Utilities Commission's desire for these owners to conservatively estimate their nuclear decommissioning LLRW disposal rates. The dismantling of the components residing closest to the reactor core generates radioactive waste considered unsuitable for shallow-land disposal (i.e., low-level radioactive waste with concentrations of radionuclides that exceed the limits established by the NRC for Class C radioactive waste (GTCC>>. The Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1985 assigned the federal government the responsibility for the disposal of this materiaL The Act also stated that the beneficiaries of the activities resulting in the generation of such radioactive waste bear all reasonable costs of disposing of such waste. However, to date, the federal government has not identified a cost for disposing of GTCC or a schedule for acceptance.
As such, the GTCC radioactive waste has been packaged and disposed of as high-level waste, at a cost equivalent to that envisioned for the spent fueL TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document P01-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 1, Page 7 of 8 For purposes of this study, GTCC is packaged in the same type of canister used for spent fuel. The GTCCmaterial is either stored with the spent fuel or shipped directly to a DOE facility as it is generated (depending upon the timing of the decommissioning and whether the spent fuel has been removed from the site prior to the start of decommissioning) . A significant portion of the waste material generated during decommissioning may only be potentially contaminated by radioactive materials.
This waste can be analyzed on site or shipped off site to licensed facilities for further analysis, for processing and/or for conditioning/recovery.
Reduction in the volume of low-level radioactive waste requiring disposal in a licensed low-level radioactive waste disposal facility can be accomplished through a variety of methods, including analyses and surveys or decontamination to eliminate the portion of waste that does not require disposal as radioactive waste, compaction, incineration or metal melt. The estimates for Diablo Canyon reflect the savings from waste recovery/volume reduction.
1.3.3 Radiological Criteria for License Termination In 1997, the NRC published Subpart E, "Radiological Criteria for License Termination," [14] amending 10 CFR Part 20. This subpart provides radiological criteria for releasing a facility for unrestricted use. The regulation states that the site can be released for unrestricted use if radioactivity levels are such that the average member of a critical group would not receive a Total Effective Dose Equivalent (TEDE) in excess of 25 millirem per year, and provided that residual radioactivity has been reduced to levels that are As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA). The decommissioning estimates assume that the Diablo Canyon site will be remediated to a residual level consistent with the NRC-prescribed level. It should be noted that the NRC and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) differ on the amount of residual radioactivity considered acceptable in site remediation.
The EPA has two limits that apply to radioactive materials.
An EPA limit of 15 millirem per year is derived from criteria established by the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA or Superfund). 
[15] An additional and separate limit of 4 millirem per year, as defined in 40 CFR &sect;141.16, is applied to drinking water. [16] TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document P01-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 1, Page 8 of 8 On October 9, 2002, the NRC signed an agreement with the EPA on the radiological decommissioning and decontamination of NRC-licensed sites. The Memorandum of Understanding (MOD) [17] provides that EPA will defer exercise of authority under CERCLA for the majority of facilities decommissioned under NRC authority.
The MOD also includes provisions for NRC and EPA consultation for certain sites when, at the time of license termination, (1) groundwater contamination exceeds EPA-permitted levels; (2) NRC contemplates restricted release of the site; and/or (3) residual radioactive soil concentrations exceed levels defined in the MOD. The MOD does not impose any new requirements on NRC licensees and should reduce the involvement of the EPA with NRC licensees who are decommissioning.
Most sites are expected to meet the NRC criteria for unrestricted use, and the NRC believes that only a few sites will have groundwater or soil contamination in excess of the levels specified in the MOD that trigger consultation with the EPA. However, if there are other hazardous materials on the site, the EPA may be involved in the cleanup. As such, the possibility of dual regulation remains for certain licensees.
The present study does not include any costs for this occurrence.
TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document P01-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 2, Page 1 of 13 2. DECOMMISSIONING ALTERNATIVES Detailed cost estimates were developed to decommission the Diablo Canyon nuclear plant for the following approved decommissioning alternatives:
DECON and SAFSTOR. Although the alternatives differ with respect to technique, process, cost, and schedule, they attain the same result: the ultimate release of the site for unrestricted use. Two decommissioning scenarios were evaluated for the two nuclear units. The scenarios selected are representative of alternatives available to the owner and are defined as follows: DECON: Units 1 and 2 are currently expected to cease operations in November 2024 and August 2025, respectively.
Spent fuel remaining in the spent fuel storage pools after a minimum cooling period of 12 years is transferred to the ISFSI for interim storage. This scenario assumes that decommissioning activities at the two units are sequenced and integrated so as to minimize the total duration of the physical dismantling processes.
Any residual spent fuel is transferred to the ISFSI so as to facilitate decontamination and dismantling activities within the fuel handing building.
Spent fuel storage operations continue at the site until the transfer of the fuel to the DOE is complete, assumed to be in the year 2051. SAFSTOR: The units are placed into safe-storage in this scenario.
The start of field decommissioning is deferred to the end of the fuel storage period. Spent fuel remaining in the spent fuel storage pools after a minimum cooling period of 12 years is transferred to the ISFSI for interim storage. As with the DECON scenario, decommissioning activities at the two units are sequenced and integrated so as to minimize the total duration of the physical dismantling processes.
Spent fuel storage operations continue at the site until the transfer of the fuel to the DOE is complete, assumed to be in the year 2051. The following sections describe the basic activities associated with each alternative.
Although detailed procedures for each activity identified are not provided, and the actual sequence of work may vary, the activity descriptions provide a basis not only for estimating but also for the expected scope of work, i.e., engineering and planning at the time of decommissioning.
The conceptual approach that the NRC has described in its regulations divides decommissioning into three phases. The initial phase commences with the effective date of permanent cessation of operations and involves the transition of both plant and licensee from reactor operations (i.e., power production) to facility de-activation and closure. During the first phase, notification is to be provided to the NRC TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document POI-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 2, Page 2 of 13 certifying the permanent cessation of operations and the removal of fuel from the reactor vesseL The licensee is then prohibited from reactor operation.
The second phase encompasses activities during the storage period or during major decommissioning activities, or a combination of the two. The third phase pertains to the activities involved in license termination.
The decommissioning estimates developed for Diablo Canyon are also divided into phases or periods; however, demarcation of the phases is based upon major milestones within the project or significant changes in the projected expenditures.
2.1 DECON The DECON alternative, as defined by the NRC, is "the alternative in which the equipment, structures, and portions of a facility and site containing radioactive contaminants are removed or decontaminated to a level that permits the property to be released for unrestricted use shortly after cessation of operations." This study does not address the cost to dispose of the spent fuel residing at the site; such costs are funded through a surcharge on electrical generation.
However, the study does estimate the costs incurred with the interim on-site storage of the fuel pending shipment by the DOE to an off-site disposal facility.
2.1.1 Period 1 -Preparations In anticipation of the cessation of plant operations, detailed preparations are undertaken to provide a smooth transition from plant operations to site decommissioning.
Through implementation of a staffing transition plan, the organization required to manage the intended decommissioning activities is assembled from available plant staff and outside resources.
Preparations include the planning for permanent de fueling of the reactor, revision of technical specifications applicable to the operating conditions and requirements, a characterization of the facility and major components, and the development of the PSDAR. Engineering and Planning The PSDAR, required within two years of the notice to cease operations, provides a description of the licensee's planned decommissioning activities, a timetable, and the associated financial requirements of the intended decommissioning program. Upon receipt of the PSDAR, the NRC will make the document available to the public for comment in a local hearing to be held in the vicinity of the reactor site. Ninety days TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document POI-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 2, Page 3 of 13 following submittal and NRC receipt of the PSDAR, the licensee may begin to perform major decommissioning activities under a modified 10 CFR &sect;50.59 procedure, i.e., without specific NRC approvaL Major activities are defined as any activity that results in permanent removal of major radioactive components, permanently modifies the structure of the containment, or results in dismantling components (for shipment) containing GTCC, as defined by 10 CFR &sect;61. Major components are further defined as comprising the reactor vessel and internals, large bore reactor coolant system piping, and other large components that are radioactive.
The NRC includes the following additional criteria for use of the &sect;50.59 process in decommissioning.
The proposed activity must not: foreclose release of the site for possible unrestricted use, significantly increase decommissioning costs, cause any significant environmental impact, or violate the terms of the licensee's existing license. Existing operational technical specifications are reviewed and modified to reflect plant conditions and the safety concerns associated with permanent cessation of operations.
The environmental impact associated with the planned decommissioning activities is also considered.
Typically, a licensee will not be allowed to proceed if the consequences of a particular decommissioning activity are greater than that bounded by previously evaluated environmental assessments or impact statements.
In this instance, the licensee would have to submit a license amendment for the specific activity and update the environmental report. The decommissioning program outlined in the PSDAR will be designed to accomplish the required tasks within the ALARA guidelines (as defined in 10 CFR &sect;20) for protection of personnel from exposure to radiation hazards. It will also address the continued protection of the health and safety of the public and the environment during the dismantling activity.
Consequently, with the development of the PSDAR, activity specifications, cost-benefit and safety analyses, work packages and procedures, would be assembled to support the proposed decontamination and dismantling activities.
TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Site Preparations Document P01-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 2, Page 4 of 13 Following final plant shutdown, and in preparation for actual decommissioning activities, the following activities are initiated:
Characterization of the site and surrounding environs.
This includes radiation surveys of work areas, major components (including the reactor vessel and its internals), internal piping, and primary shield cores. Isolation of the spent fuel storage pools and fuel handling systems, such that decommissioning operations can commence on the balance of the plant. The pools will remain operational for approximately twelve years following the cessation of operations before the inventory resident at shutdown can be transferred to the DOE. Specification of transport and disposal requirements for activated materials and/or hazardous materials, including shielding and waste stabilization.
Development of procedures for occupational exposure control, control and release of liquid and gaseous effluent, processing of radwaste (including dry-active waste, resins, filter media, metallic and metallic components generated in decommissioning), site security and emergency programs, and industrial safety. 2.1.2 Period 2 -Decommissioning Operations This period includes the wet spent fuel storage and physical decommissioning activities associated with the removal and disposal of contaminated and activated components and structures, including the successful termination of the 10 CFR &sect;50 operating license. Significant decommissioning activities in this phase include: Operations, maintenance, and security associated with storing of spent fuel in the spent fuel storage pools. Transferring spent fuel from the storage pools to the ISFSI. Construction of temporary facilities and/or modification of existing facilities to support dismantling activities.
This may include a centralized processing area to facilitate equipment removal and component preparations for off-site disposaL Reconfiguration and modification of site structures and facilities as needed to support decommissioning operations.
This may include the TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document P01-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 2, Page 5 of 13 upgrading of roads (on-and off-site) to facilitate hauling and transport.
Modifications may be required to the containment structure to facilitate access of large/heavy equipment.
Modifications may also be required to the refueling area of the building to support the segmentation of the reactor vessel internals and component extraction.
Design and fabrication of temporary and permanent shielding to support removal and transportation activities, construction of contamination control envelopes, and the procurement of specialty tooling. Procurement (lease or purchase) of shipping canisters, cask liners, and industrial packages for the disposition of low-level radioactive waste. Decontamination of components and piping systems as required to control (minimize) worker exposure.
Removal of piping and components no longer essential to support decommissioning operations.
Removal of control rod drive housings and the head service structure from the reactor vessel head. Segmentation of the vessel closure head. Removal and segmentation of the upper internals assemblies.
Segmentation will maximize the loading of the shielded transport casks, i.e., by weight and activity.
The operations are conducted under water using remotely operated tooling and contamination controls.
Disassembly and segmentation of the remaining reactor internals, including the core shroud and lower core support assembly.
Some material is expected to exceed Class C disposal requirements.
As such, the segments will be packaged in modified fuel storage canisters for geologic disposal.
Segmentation of the reactor vessel. A shielded platform is installed for segmentation as cutting operations are performed in-air using remotely operated equipment within a contamination control envelope.
The water level is maintained just below the cut to minimize the working area dose rates. Segments are transferred air to containers that are stored under water, for example, in an isolated area of the refueling canal. Removal of the activated portions of the concrete biological shield and accessible contaminated concrete surfaces.
If dictated by the steam TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 2, Page 6 of 13 generator and pressurizer removal scenarios, those portions of the associated cubicles necessary for access and component extraction are removed. Removal of the steam generators and pressurizer for material recovery and controlled disposaL The generators will be moved to an on-site processing center, the steam domes removed and the internal components segregated for recycling.
The lower shell and tube bundle will be packaged for direct disposaL These components can serve as their own burial containers provided that all penetrations are properly sealed and the internal contaminants are stabilized, e.g., with grout. Steel shielding will be added, as necessary, to those external areas of the package to meet transportation limits and regulations.
The pressurizer is disposed of intact. At least two years prior to the anticipated date of license termination, an LTP is required.
Submitted as a supplement to the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) or its equivalent, the plan must include: a site characterization, description of the remaining dismantling activities, plans for site remediation, procedures for the final radiation survey, designation of the end use of the site, an updated cost estimate to complete the decommissioning, and any associated environmental concerns.
The NRC will notice the receipt of the plan, make the plan available for public comment, and schedule a local hearing. LTP approval will be subject to any conditions and limitations as deemed appropriate by the Commission.
The licensee may then commence with the final remediation of site facilities and services, including:
Removal of remaining plant systems and associated components as they become nonessential to the decommissioning program or worker health and safety (e.g., waste collection and treatment systems, electrical power and ventilation systems).
Removal of the steel liners from refueling canal, disposing of the activated and contaminated sections as radioactive waste. Removal of any activated/
contaminated concrete.
Surveys of the decontaminated areas of the containment structure.
Remediation and removal of the contaminated equipment and material from the auxiliary building and any other contaminated*
facility.
Radiation and contamination controls will be utilized until residual levels indicate that the structures and equipment can be released for unrestricted access and conventional demolition.
This activity may necessitate the dismantling and disposition of most of TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 2, Page 7 of 13 the systems and components (both clean and contaminated) located within these buildings.
This activity facilitates surface decontamination and subsequent verification surveys required prior to obtaining release for demolition.
Routing of material removed in the decontamination and dismantling to a central processing area. Material certified to be free of contamination is released for unrestricted disposition, e.g., as scrap, recycle, or general disposaL Contaminated material is characterized and segregated for additional off-site processing (disassembly, chemical cleaning, volume reduction, and waste treatment), and/or packaged for controlled disposal at a low-level radioactive waste disposal facility.
Incorporated into the LTP is the Final Survey Plan. This plan identifies the radiological surveys to be performed once the decontamination activities are completed and is developed using the guidance provided in the "Multi-Agency Radiation Survey and Site Investigation Manual (MARSSIM)."[18]
This document incorporates the statistical approaches to survey design and data interpretation used by the EPA. It also identifies state-of-the-art, commercially available instrumentation and procedures for conducting radiological surveys. Use of this guidance ensures that the surveys are conducted in a manner that provides a high degree of confidence that applicable NRC criteria are satisfied.
Once the survey is complete, the results are provided to the NRC in a format that can be verified.
The NRC then reviews and evaluates the information, performs an independent confirmation of radiological site conditions, and makes a determination on final termination of the license. The NRC will terminate the operating licenses if it determines that site remediation has been performed in accordance with the LTP, and that the terminal radiation survey and associated documentation demonstrate that the facility is suitable for release. 2.1.3 Period 3 -Site Restoration Following completion of decommissioning operations, site restoration activities will begin. Efficient removal of the contaminated materials and verification that residual radionuclide concentrations are below the NRC limits will result in substantial damage to many of the structures.
Although performed in a controlled, safe manner, blasting, coring, drilling, scarification (surface removal), and the other decontamination activities will substantially degrade power block structures including the reactor and auxiliary buildings.
Under certain circumstances, TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document POI-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 2, Page 8 of 13 verifying that subsurface radionuclide concentrations meet NRC site release requirements will require removal of grade slabs and lower floors, potentially weakening footings and structural supports.
This removal activity will be necessary for those facilities and plant areas where historical records, when available, indicate the potential for radionuclides having been present in the soil, where system failures have been recorded, or where it is required to confirm that subsurface process and drain lines were not breached over the operating life of the station. Prompt dismantling of site structures is clearly the most appropriate and cost-effective option. It is unreasonable to anticipate that these structures would be repaired and preserved after the radiological contamination is removed. The cost to dismantle site structures with a work force already mobilized on site is more efficient than if the process were deferred.
Site facilities quickly degrade without maintenance, adding additional expense and creating potential hazards to the public as well as to future workers. Abandonment creates a breeding ground for vermin infestation as well as other biological hazards. This cost study presumes that non-essential structures and site facilities are dismantled as a continuation of the decommissioning activity.
Foundations and exterior walls are removed to a nominal depth of three feet below grade. The three-foot depth allows for the placement of gravel for drainage, as well as topsoil, so that vegetation can be established for erosion control. Site areas affected by the dismantling activities are restored and the plant area graded as required to prevent ponding and inhibit the refloating of subsurface materials.
Non-contaminated concrete rubble produced by demolition activities is processed to remove reinforcing steel and miscellaneous embedments.
The processed material is then used on site to backfill foundation voids. Excess non-contaminated materials are trucked to an off-site area for disposal as construction debris. 2.1.4 ISFSI Operations and Decommissioning The ISFSI will continue to operate under a separate and independent license (10 CFR &sect;72) following the termination of the &sect;50 operating licenses.
Assuming the DOE starts accepting fuel from the industry in 2020, transfer of spent fuel from Diablo Canyon is anticipated to begin in 2028, and continue through the year 2051. TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document POI-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 2, Page 9 of 13 At the conclusion of the spent fuel transfer process, the ISFSI will be decommissioned.
The Commission will terminate the &sect;72 license when it determines that the remediation of the ISFSI has been performed in accordance with an ISFSI license termination plan and that the final radiation survey and associated documentation demonstrate that the facility is suitable for release. Once the requirements are satisfied, the NRC can terminate the license for the ISFSI. The ISFSI is based upon the currently licensed facility that uses purpose canisters and concrete overpacks for pad storage. For purposes of this cost analysis, it is assumed that once the inner canisters containing the spent fuel assemblies have been removed, any required decontamination performed on the storage overpack (some minor activation is assumed), and the license for the facility terminated, the concrete overpacks can be dismantled using conventional techniques for the demolition of reinforced concrete.
The concrete storage pad is then removed and the area regraded.
2.2 SAFSTOR The NRC defines SAFSTOR as "the alternative in which the nuclear facility is placed and maintained in a condition that allows the nuclear facility to be safely stored and subsequently decontaminated (deferred decontamination) to levels that permit release for unrestricted use." The facility is left intact (during the dormancy period), with structures maintained in a sound condition.
Systems that are not required to support the spent fuel pools or site surveillance and security are drained, de-energized, and secured. Minimal cleaning/removal of loose contamination and/or fixation and sealing of remaining contamination is performed.
Access to contaminated areas IS secured to provide controlled access for inspection and maintenance.
The engineering and planning requirements for physical dismantling activities are similar to those for the DECON alternative.
Site preparations for physical dismantling are also similar to those for the DECON alternative, with the exception of certain activities, such as spent fuel pool operations and maintenance, and chemical decontamination of primary systems. Decommissioning operations are assumed to begin once the transfer of the spent fuel to the DOE is completed.
TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis 2.2.1 Period 1 -Preparations Document P01-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 2, Page 10 of 13 Preparations for long-term storage include the planning for permanent defueling of the reactor, revision of technical specifications appropriate to the operating conditions and requirements, a characterization of the facility and major components, and the development of the PSDAR. The process of placing the plant in safe-storage includes, but is not limited to, the following activities:
Isolating of the spent fuel storage services and fuel handling systems so that safe-storage operations may commence on the balance of the plant. This activity may be carried out by plant personnel in accordance with existing operating technical specifications.
Activities are scheduled around the fuel handling systems to the greatest extent possible.
Transferring of the spent fuel from the storage pools to the DOE, following the minimum required cooling period in the spent fuel pools. Draining and de-energizing of the non-contaminated systems not required to support continued site operations or maintenance.
Disposing of contaminated filter elements and resin beds not required for processing wastes from layup activities for future operations.
Draining of the reactor vessel, with the internals left in place and the vessel head secured. Draining and de-energizing non-essential, contaminated systems with decontamination as required for future maintenance and inspection.
Preparing and alarm systems whose continued use is required; de-energizing portions of fire protection, electric power, and HVAC systems whose continued use is not required.
Cleaning of the loose surface contamination from building access pathways.
Performing an interim radiation survey of plant, posting warning signs where appropriate.
Erecting physical barriers and/or securing all access to radioactive or contaminated areas, except as required for inspection and maintenance.
TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document P01-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 2, Page 11 of 13 Installing security and surveillance monitoring equipment and relocating security fence around secured structures, as required.
2.2.2 Period 2 -Dormancy The second phase identified by the NRC in its rule addresses licensed activities during a storage period and is applicable to the dormancy phases of the deferred decommissioning alternatives.
Dormancy activities include a 24-hour security force, preventive and corrective maintenance on security systems, area lighting, general building maintenance, heating and ventilation of buildings, routine radiological inspections of contaminated structures, maintenance of structural integrity, and a site environmental and radiation monitoring program. Resident maintenance personnel perform equipment maintenance, inspection . activities, routine services to maintain safe conditions, adequate lighting, heating, and ventilation, and periodic preventive maintenance on essential site services.
An environmental surveillance program is carried out during the dormancy period to ensure that releases of radioactive material to the environment are prevented and/or detected and controlled.
Appropriate emergency procedures are established and initiated for potential releases that exceed prescribed limits. The environmental surveillance program constitutes an abbreviated version of the program in effect during normal plant operations.
Security during the dormancy period is conducted primarily to prevent unauthorized entry and to protect the public from the consequences of its own actions. The security fence, sensors, alarms, and other surveillance equipment provide security.
Fire and radiation alarms are also monitored and maintained.
Consistent with the DECON scenario, the spent fuel storage pools are emptied within approximately 12 years of the cessation of operations.
The transfer of the spent fuel to the DOE continues throughout the dormancy period until completed in 2051. Once emptied, the ISFSI is secured for storage and decommissioned along with the power block structures in Period 4. After an optional period of storage (such that license termination is accomplished within 60 years of final shutdown), it is required that the licensee submit an application to terminate the license, along with an LTP (described in Section 2.1.2), thereby initiating the third phase. TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis 2.2.3 Periods 3 and 4 -Delayed Decommissioning Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 2, Page 12 of 13 Prior to the commencement of decommissioning operations, preparations are undertaken to reactivate site services and prepare for decommissioning.
Preparations include engineering and planning, a detailed site characterization, and the assembly of a decommissioning management organization.
Final planning for activities and the writing of activity specifications and detailed procedures are also initiated at this time. Much of the work in developing a termination plan is relevant to the development of the detailed engineering plans and procedures.
The activities associated with this phase and the follow-on decontamination and dismantling processes are detailed in Sections 2.1.1 and 2.1.2. The primary difference between the sequences anticipated for the DECON and this deferred scenario is the absence, in the latter, of any constraint on the availability of the fuel storage facilities for decommissioning.
Variations in the length of the dormancy period are expected to have little effect upon the quantities of radioactive wastes generated from system and structure removal operations.
Given the levels of radioactivity and spectrum of radionuclides expected from forty years of plant operation, no plant process system identified as being contaminated upon final shutdown will become releasable due to the decay period alone, i.e., there is no significant reduction in the waste generated from the decommissioning activities.
However, due to the lower activity levels, a greater percentage of the waste volume can be designated for off-site processing and recovery.
The delay in decommissioning also yields lower working area radiation levels. As such, the estimate for this delayed scenario incorporates reduced ALARA controls for the SAFSTOR's lower occupational exposure potential.
Although the initial radiation levels due to 60CO will decrease during the dormancy period, the internal components of the reactor vessel will still exhibit sufficiently high radiation dose rates to require remote sectioning under water due to the presence of long-lived radionuclides such as 94Nb, 59Ni, and 63Ni. Therefore, the dismantling procedures described for the DECON alternative would still be employed during this scenario.
Portions of the biological shield will still be radioactive due to the presence of activated trace elements with long half-lives (152Eu and 154Eu). Decontamination will require controlled removal and TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 2, Page 13 of 13 disposal.
It is assumed that radioactive corrosion products on inner surfaces of piping and components will not have decayed to levels that will permit unrestricted use or allow conventional removal. These systems and components will be surveyed as they are removed and disposed of in accordance with the existing radioactive release criteria.
2.2.4 Period 5 -Site Restoration Following completion of decommissioning operations, site-restoration activities can begin. Dismantling, as a continuation of the decommissioning process, is clearly the most appropriate and effective option, as described in Section 2.1.3. The basis for the dismantling cost in this scenario is consistent with that described for DECON, presuming the removal of structures and site facilities to a nominal depth of three feet below grade and the limited restoration of the site. TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis 3. COST ESTIMATE Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 1 of 27 The cost estimates prepared for decommissioning Diablo Canyon consider the unique features of the site, including the NSSS, power generation systems, support services, site buildings, and ancillary facilities.
The basis of the estimates, including the sources of information relied upon, the estimating methodology 
: employed, specific considerations, and other pertinent assumptions, is described in this section. 3.1 BASIS OF ESTIMATE The estimates were developed using the site-specific, technical information from the 2005 analysis.
This information was reviewed for the current analysis and updated as deemed appropriate.
The site-specific considerations and assumptions used in the previous evaluation were also revisited.
Modifications were incorporated where new information was available or experience from ongoing decommissioning programs provided viable alternatives or improved processes.
3.2 METHODOLOGY The methodology used to develop the estimates follows the basic approach originally presented in the AIF/NESP-036 study report, "Guidelines for Producing Commercial Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Estimates,"[19]
and the DOE "Decommissioning Handbook."[20]
These documents present a unit factor method for estimating decommissioning activity costs, which simplifies the estimating calculations.
Unit factors for concrete removal ($/cubic yard), steel removal ($/ton), and cutting costs ($/inch) are developed using local labor rates. The activity-dependent costs are estimated with the item quantities (cubic yards and tons), developed from plant drawings and inventory documents.
Removal rates and material costs for the conventional disposition of components and structures rely upon information available in the industry publication, "Building Construction Cost Data," published by R.S. Means. [21] The unit factor method provides a demonstrable basis for establishing reliable cost estimates.
The detail provided in the unit factors, including activity duration, labor costs (by craft), and equipment and consumable costs, ensures that essential elements have not been omitted. Appendix A presents the detailed development of a typical unit factor. Appendix B provides the values contained within one set of factors developed for this analysis.
TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 2 of 27 This analysis reflects lessons learned from TLG's involvement in the Shippingport Station Decommissioning Project, completed in 1989, as well as the decommissioning of the Cintichem reactor, hot cells, and associated facilities, completed in 1997. In addition, the planning and engineering for the Pathfinder, Shoreham, Rancho Seco, Trojan, Yankee Rowe, Big Rock Point, Maine Yankee, Humboldt Bay-3, Oyster Creek, Connecticut Yankee, and San Onofre-1 nuclear units have provided additional insight into the process, the regulatory aspects, and the technical challenges of decommissioning commercial nuclear units. Work Difficulty Factors TLG has historically applied work difficulty adjustment factors (WDFs) to account for the inefficiencies in working in a power plant environment.
WDFs are assigned to each unique set of unit factors, commensurate with the inefficiencies associated with working in confined, hazardous environments.
The ranges used for the WDFs are as follows: Access Factor Respiratory Protection Factor Radiation/ALARA Factor Protective Clothing Factor Work Break Factor 10% to 20% 10% to 50% 10% to 37% 10% to 30% 8.33% The factors and their associated range of values were developed in conjunction with the AIF/NESP-036 study. The application of the factors is discussed in more detail in that publication.
Scheduling Program Durations The unit factors, adjusted by the WDFs as described above, are applied against the inventory of materials to be removed in the radiologically controlled areas. The resulting man-hours, or crew-hours, are used in the development of the decommissioning program schedule, using resource loading and event sequencing considerations.
The scheduling of conventional removal and dismantling activities is based upon productivity information available from the "Building Construction Cost Data" publication.
An activity duration critical path is used to determine the total decommissioning program schedule.
The schedule is relied upon in calculating the carrying costs, which include program management, administration, field TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 3 of 27 engineering, equipment rental, and support services such as quality control and security.
This systematic approach for assembling decommissioning estimates ensures a high degree of confidence in the reliability of the resulting costs. 3.3 IMPACT OF DECOMMISSIONING MULTIPLE REACTOR UNITS In estimating the near simultaneous decommissioning of two co-located reactor units there can be opportunities to achieve economies of scale, by sharing costs between units, and coordinating the sequence of work activities.
There will also be schedule constraints, particularly where there are requirements for specialty equipment and staff, or practical limitations on when final status surveys can take place. For purposes of the estimate, Units 1 and 2 are assumed to be essentially identical.
Common facilities have been assigned to Unit 2. A summary of the principal impacts are listed below. The sequence of work generally follows the principal that the work is done at Unit 1 first, followed by similar work at Unit 2. This permits the experience gained at Unit 1 to be applied by the workforce at the second unit. It should be noted however, that the estimate does not consider productivity improvements at the second unit, since there is little documented experience with decommissioning two units simultaneously.
The work associated with developing activity specifications and procedures can be considered essentially identical between the two units, therefore the second unit costs are assumed to be a fraction of the first unit ('" 43%). Segmenting the reactor vessel and internals will require the use of special equipment.
The decommissioning project will be scheduled such that Unit 2's reactor internals and vessel are segmented immediately after the activities at Unit 1 have been completed.
Some program management and support costs, particularly costs associated with the more senior positions, can be avoided with two reactors undergoing decommissioning simultaneously.
As a result, the estimate is based on a "lead" unit that includes these senior positions, and a "second" unit that excludes these positions.
The designation as lead is based on the unit undertaking the most complex tasks (for instance vessel segmentation) or performing tasks for the first time. The final radiological survey schedule is also affected by a two-unit decommissioning schedule.
It would be considered impractical to try to complete the final status survey of Unit 1, while Unit 2 still has ongoing radiological remediation work and waste handling in process. As such, the transfer of the spent fuel from the storage pools and subsequent TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document POl-l 604-003, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 4 of 27 decontamination of the spent fuel pool areas is coordinated so as to synchronize the final status survey for the station. The final demolition of buildings at Units 1 and 2 are considered to take place concurrently.
This is considered a reasonable assumption since access to the buildings is considered good at the station. Unit 1, as the first unit to enter decommissioning, incurs the majority of site characterization costs. Shared systems and common structures are generally assigned to Unit 2. Station costs such as emergency response fees, regulatory agency fees, corporate overhead, and insurance are generally allocated on an equal basis between the two units. 3.4 FINANCIAL COMPONENTS OF THE COST MODEL TLG's proprietary decommissioning cost model, DECCER, produces a number of distinct cost elements.
These direct expenditures, however, do not comprise the total cost to accomplish the project goal, i.e., license termination and site restoration.
Inherent in any cost estimate that does not rely on historical data is the inability to specify the precise source of costs imposed by factors such as tool breakage, accidents, illnesses, weather delays, and labor stoppages.
In the DECCER cost model, contingency fulfills this role. Contingency is added to each line item to account for costs that are difficult or impossible to develop analytically.
Such costs are historically inevitable over the duration of a job of this magnitude; therefore, this cost analysis includes funds to cover these types of expenses.
3.4.1 Contingency The activity-and period-dependent costs are combined to develop the total decommissioning cost. A contingency is then applied on a line-item basis, using one or more of the contingency types listed in the AIF/NESP-036 study. "Contingencies" are defined in the American Association of Cost Engineers "Project and Cost Engineers' Handbook" [22] as "specific provision for unforeseeable elements of cost within the defined project scope; particularly important where previous experience relating estimates and actual costs has shown that unforeseeable events which will increase costs are likely to occur." The cost elements in this analysis are based upon ideal conditions and maximum efficiency; therefore, consistent with industry practice, TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document POl*1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 5 of 27 contingency is included.
In the AIF/NESP-036 study, the types of unforeseeable events that are likely to occur in decommissioning are discussed and guidelines are provided for percentage contingency in each category.
It should be noted that contingency, as used in this analysis, includes contingency based on a preliminary technical position[23]
to reflect the California Public Utilities Commission's desire for owners to conservatively establish an appropriate contingency factor for inclusion in the decommissioning revenue requirements.
Contingency Based on AIF Guidelines As stated in the AIF study contingency funds are an integral part of the total cost to complete the decommissioning process. Exclusion of this component puts at risk a successful completion of the intended tasks and, potentially, subsequent related activities.
For this study, TLG examined the major activity-related problems (decontamination, segmentation, equipment handling, packaging, transport, and waste disposal) that necessitate a contingency.
Individual activity contingencies ranged from 10% to 75%, depending on the degree of difficulty judged to be appropriate from TLG's actual decommissioning experience.
The contingency values used in this study are as follows: Decontamination Contaminated Component Removal Contaminated Component Packaging Contaminated Component Transport Low -Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Reactor Segmentation NSSS Component Removal Reactor Waste Packaging Reactor Waste Transport Reactor Vessel Component Disposal GTCC Disposal Non-Radioactive Component Removal Heavy Equipment and Tooling Supplies Engineering Energy Characterization and Termination Surveys Construction TLG Services, Inc. 50% 25% 10% 15% 25% 75% 25% 25% 25% 50% 15% 15% 15% 25% 15% 15% 30% 15%
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Taxes and Fees Insurance Staffing Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 6 of 27 10% 10% 15% The contingency values are applied to the appropriate components of the estimates on a line item basis. The composite contingency value (excluding additional contingency described in the Preliminary Technical Position) for the DECON alternative is approximately 17.9%. The value for the SAFSTOR alternative is approximately 17.5%. Contingency Based on Preliminary Technical Position In addition to the contingency based on the AIF guidelines additional contingency was added to reflect the California Public Utilities Commission desire for owners to conservatively establish an appropriate contingency factor for inclusion in the decommissioning revenue requirements.
Based on the previously referenced technical position, additional contingency was added to reflect an overall project contingency of 25% (both scenarios), This contingency was incorporated on a line item basis, with each line item receiving a pro-rated share of the increase.
3.4.2 Financial Risk In addition to the routine uncertainties addressed by contingency, another cost element that is sometimes necessary to consider when bounding decommissioning costs relates to uncertainty, or risk. Examples can include changes in work scope, pricing, job performance, and other variations that could conceivably, but not necessarily, occur. Consideration is sometimes necessary to generate a level of confidence in the estimate, within a range of probabilities.
TLG considers these types of costs under the broad term "financial risk." Included within the category of financial risk are: Transition activities and costs: ancillary expenses associated with eliminating 50% to 80% of the site labor force shortly after the cessation of plant operations, added cost for worker separation packages throughout the decommissioning program, national or company-mandated retraining, and retention incentives for key personneL Delays in approval of the decommissioning plan due to intervention, public participation in local community meetings, legal challenges, and national and local hearings.
TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 7 of 27 Changes in the project work scope from the baseline estimate, involving the discovery of unexpected levels of contaminants, contamination in places not previously expected, contaminated soil previously undiscovered (either radioactive or hazardous material contamination), variations in plant inventory or configuration not indicated by the as-built drawings.
Regulatory changes, for example, affecting worker health and safety, site release criteria, waste transportation, and disposal.
Policy decisions altering national commitments (e.g., in the ability to accommodate certain waste forms for disposition), or in the timetable for such, for example, the start and rate of acceptance of spent fuel by the DOE. Pricing changes for basic inputs such as labor, energy, materials, and disposal.
Items subject to widespread price competition (such as materials) may not show significant variation; however, others such as waste disposal could exhibit large pricing uncertainties, particularly in markets where limited access to services is available.
It has been TLG'sexperience that the results of a risk analysis, when compared with the base case estimate for decommissioning, indicate that the chances of the base decommissioning estimate's being too high is a low probability, and the chances that the estimate is too low is a higher probability.
This is mostly due to the pricing uncertainty for level radioactive waste burial, and to a lesser extent due to schedule increases from changes in plant conditions and to pricing variations in the cost of labor (both craft and staff). This cost study, however, does not add any additional costs to the estimate for financial risk, since there is insufficient historical data from which to project future liabilities.
Consequently, the areas of uncertainty or risk are revisited periodically and addressed through repeated revisions or updates of the base estimates.
3.5 SITE-SPECIFIC CONSIDERATIONS There are a number of site-specific considerations that affect the method for dismantling and removal of equipment from the site and the degree of restoration required.
The cost impact of the considerations identified below is included in this cost study. TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis 3.5.1 Spent Fuel Management Document POl-1604;.003, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 8 of 27 The cost to dispose of spent fuel generated from plant operations is not reflected within the estimates to decommission the Diablo Canyon site. Ultimate disposition of the spent fuel is within the province of the DOE's Waste Management System, as defined by the NWPA. As such, the disposal cost is financed by a 1 mill/kWhr surcharge paid into the DOE's waste fund during operations.
However, the NRC requires licensees to establish a program to manage and provide funding for the management of all irradiated fuel at the reactors until title of the fuel is transferred to the Secretary of Energy. This funding requirement is fulfilled through inclusion of certain high-level waste cost elements within the estimate, as described below. The total inventory of assemblies that will require handling during decommissioning is based upon the following assumptions.
The DOE's generator allocation/receipt schedules are based upon the oldest fuel receiving the highest priority.
For purposes of this analysis, acceptance of commercial spent fuel by the DOE is expected to begin in 2020. The first assemblies removed from the Diablo Canyon site are assumed to be in 2028. With an estimated, maximum rate of transfer of 3,000 metric tons of uranium (MTU)/year, [24] completion of the removal of fuel from the site is projected to be in the year 2051. Consequently, costs are included within the estimates for the long-term caretaking of the spent fuel at the Diablo Canyon site until the year 2051. The estimates incorporate a minimum cooling period of approximately 12 years for the spent fuel that resides in the storage pools when operations cease. The current Part 72 ISFSI license does not allow dry cask storage of spent fuel with burnups above 45,000 MWD/metric ton. It is assumed that PG&E can amend the Part 72 license to store the higher burnup fuel, but that as a condition of the amendment it will require longer decay times (12 years) before storing the spent fuel in the casks. In both scenarios that were analyzed, any residual fuel remaining in the pool after the 12-year period is relocated to the ISFSI to await transfer to a DOE facility.
Operation and maintenance costs for the storage facilities are included within the estimates and address the cost for staffing the facilities, as well as security, insurance, and licensing fees. The estimates include the costs to purchase, load, and transfer the fuel storage canisters.
Costs are also provided for the final disposition of the facilities once the transfer is complete.
TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Canister Design Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 9 of 27 A multi-purpose storage canister (HOLTEC HI-STORM 100 system), with a 32-fuel assemblies capacity, is assumed for future cask acquisitions.
A unit cost of approximately 
$1,000,000 is used for pricing the internal multi-purpose canister (MPC) and concrete overpack.
The DOE is assumed to provide the MPC for fuel transferred directly from the pools to the DOE at no cost to the owner. Canister Loading and Transfer An average cost of approximately 
$220,000 per canister is used for the labor and consumables to load/transport the spent fuel from the pools to the ISFSI pad, based upon Diablo Canyon operating experience.
An average cost of approximately 
$200,000 per canister is used to estimate the cost to transfer the fuel from the spent fuel pools to the DOE. For estimating purposes, 50% of the pool to DOE cost is used to estimate the cost to transfer the fuel from the ISFSI to the DOE. Operations and Maintenance Annual costs (excluding labor) of approximately 
$1,500,000 and $430,000 are used for operation and maintenance of the spent fuel pools and the ISFSI, respectively.
ISFSI Decommissioning Design Considerations A HI-STORM multi-purpose (storage and transport) dry shielded storage canister with a vertical, reinforced concrete storage overpack is used as a basis for the cost analyses.
Approximately 50% of the overpacks are assumed to have some level of neutron-induced activation as a result of the long-term storage of the fuel, i.e., to levels exceeding free-release limits. Approximately 10% of the concrete and steel is assumed to be removed from the overpacks for controlled disposal.
The cost to dispose of this material, as well as the demolition of the ISFSI facility, is included in the estimates.
GTCC The dismantling of the reactor internals generates radioactive waste considered unsuitable for shallow land disposal (i.e., low-level radioactive waste with concentrations of radionuclides that exceed the limits established by the NRC for Class C radioactive waste (GTCC)). TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 10 of27 The Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1985 assigned the federal government the responsibility for the disposal of this material.
The Act also stated that the beneficiaries of the activities resulting in the generation of such radioactive waste bear all reasonable costs of disposing of such waste. Although there are strong arguments that GTCC waste is covered by the spent fuel contact with DOE and the fees being paid pursuant to that contract, DOE has taken the position that GTCC waste is not covered by that contract or its fees and that utilities, including PG&E, will have to pay an additional fee for the disposal of their GTCC waste. However, to date, the federal government has not identified a cost for disposing of GTCC or a schedule for acceptance.
As such, the GTCC radioactive waste has been packaged and disposed of as high-level waste, at a cost equivalent to that envisioned for the spent fuel. For purposes of this study, GTCC is packaged in the same type of canister used to store spent fuel. Disposal costs are based upon a cost equivalent to that envisioned for the spent fuel. It is not anticipated that the DOE would accept this waste prior to completing the transfer of spent fuel. Therefore, until such time the DOE is ready to accept GTCC waste, it is reasonable to assume that this material would remain in storage with the spent fuel in the ISFSI at the Diablo Canyon site (for the DECON alternative).
In the SAFSTOR scenario, the GTCC material is shipped directly to a DOE facility as it is generated since the fuel has been removed from the site prior to the start of decommissioning and the ISFSI deactivated.
3.5.2 Reactor Vessel and Internal Components The reactor pressure vessel and internal components are segmented for disposal in shielded, reusable transportation casks. Segmentation is performed in the refueling canal, where a turntable and remote cutter are installed.
The vessel is segmented in place, using a mast-mounted cutter supported off the lower head and directed from a shielded work platform installed overhead in the reactor cavity. Transportation cask specifications and transportation regulations dictate the segmentation and packaging methodology.
Intact disposal of reactor vessel shells has been successfully demonstrated at several of the sites currently being decommissioned.
Access to navigable waterways has allowed these large packages to be transported to the Barnwell disposal site with minimal overland travel. Intact disposal of the reactor vessel and internal components can TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 11 of27 provide savings in cost and worker exposure by eliminating the complex segmentation requirements, isolation of the GTCC material, and transport/storage of the resulting waste packages.
Portland General Electric (PGE) was able to dispose of the Trojan reactor as an intact package (including the internals).
However, its location on the Columbia River simplified the transportation analysis since: the reactor package could be secured to the transport vehicle for the entire journey, i.e., the package was not lifted during transport, there were no man-made or natural terrain features between the plant site and the disposal location that could produce a large drop, and transport speeds were very low, limited by the overland transport vehicle and the river barge. As a member of the Northwest Compact, PGE had a site available for disposal of the package -the US Ecology facility in Washington State. The characteristics of this arid site proved favorable in demonstrating compliance with land disposal regulations.
It is not known whether this option will be available when the Diablo Canyon plant ceases operation.
Future viability of this option will depend upon the ultimate location of the disposal site, as well as the disposal site licensee's ability to accept highly radioactive packages and effectively isolate them from the environment.
Consequently, the study assumes the reactor vessel will require segmentation, as a bounding condition.
With lower levels of activation, the vessel shell can be packaged more efficiently than the curie-limited internal components.
This will allow the use of more conventional waste packages rather than shielded casks for transport (although some shielded casks are still required).
3.5.3 Primary System Components In the DECON scenario, the reactor coolant system components are assumed to be decontaminated using chemical agents prior to the start of dismantling operations.
This type of decontamination can be expected to have a significant ALARA impact, since in this scenario the removal work is done within the first few years of shutdown.
A decontamination factor (average reduction) of 10 is assumed for the process. Disposal of the decontamination solution effluent is included within the estimates TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 12 of 27 as a "process liquid waste" charge. In the SAFSTOR scenario, radionuclide decay is expected to provide the same benefit and, therefore, a chemical decontamination is not included.
The following discussion deals with the removal and disposition of the steam generators, but the techniques involved are also applicable to other large components, such as heat exchangers, component coolers, and the pressurizer.
The steam generators' size and weight, as well as their location within the reactor building, will ultimately determine the removal strategy.
A trolley crane is set up for the removal of the generators.
It can also be used to move portions of the steam generator cubicle walls and floor slabs from the reactor building to a location where they can be decontaminated and transported to the material handling area. Interferences within the work area, such as grating, piping, and other components are removed to create sufficient laydown space for processing these large components.
The generators are rigged for removal, disconnected from the surrounding piping and supports, and maneuvered into the open area where they are lowered onto a dolly. Each generator is rotated into the horizontal position for extraction from the containment and placed onto a multi-wheeled vehicle for transport to an on-site processing and storage area. The generators are disassembled on-site with the steam domes and lightly contaminated subassemblies designated for off-site recycling.
The more highly contaminated lower shell and tube bundle are packaged for direct disposal.
The interior volume is filled with low-density cellular concrete for stabilization of the internal contamination.
Disposal costs are based upon the displaced volume of the units. Each component is then loaded onto a rail car for transport to the disposal facility.
Reactor coolant piping is cut from the reactor vessel once the water level in the vessel (used for personnel shielding during dismantling and cutting operations in and around the vessel) is dropped below the nozzle zone. The piping is boxed and transported by shielded van. The reactor coolant pumps and motors are lifted out intact, packaged, and transported for processing and/or disposal.
TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis 3.5.4 Retired Components Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 13 of 27 Both Diablo Canyon units are expected to replace their original sets of steam generators prior to final shutdown; these retired sets will be stored on site within a concrete protective structure.
The cost for transportation and disposal of these retired sets of steam generators has been included in this analysis.
3.5.5 Main Turbine and Condenser The main turbine is dismantled uSIng conventional maintenance procedures.
The turbine rotors and shafts are removed to a laydown area. The lower turbine casings are removed from their anchors by controlled demolition.
The main condensers are also disassembled and moved to a laydown area. Material is then prepared for transportation to an off-site recycling facility where it is surveyed and designated for either decontamination or volume! reduction, conventional disposal, or controlled disposal.
Components are packaged and readied for transport in accordance with the intended disposition.
3.5.6 Transportation Methods Contaminated piping, components, and structural material other than the highly activated reactor vessel and internal components will qualify as LSA-I, II or III or Surface Contaminated Object, SCO-I or II, as described in Title 49)25] The contaminated material will be packaged in Industrial Packages (IP-1, IP-2, or IP-3, as defined in subpart 173.411) for transport unless demonstrated to qualify as their own shipping containers.
The reactor vessel and internal components are expected to be transported in accordance with Part 71, as Type B. It is conceivable that the reactor, due to its limited specific activity, could qualify as LSA II or III. However, the high radiation levels on the outer surface would require that additional shielding be incorporated within the packaging so as to attenuate the dose to levels acceptable for transport.
Transport of the highly activated metal, produced in the segmentation of the reactor vessel and internal components, will be by shielded truck cask. Cask shipments may exceed 95,000 pounds, including vessel segment(s), supplementary shielding, cask tie-downs, and trailer. The maximum level of activity per shipment assumed permissible was based upon the license limits of the available shielded transport casks. The segmentation scheme for the vessel and internal segments is designed to meet these limits. TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document P01-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 14 of27 The transport of large intact components (e.g., large heat exchangers and other oversized components) will be by a combination of truck, rail, and/or multi-wheeled transporter.
Transportation costs for Class A low-level radioactive waste are based upon the mileage to the EnergySolutions facility in Clive, Utah. Transportation costs for Class Band C waste are based upon the mileage to Andrews County, Texas. Transportation costs for off-site waste processing are based upon the mileage to Memphis, Tennessee.
Truck transport costs are estimated using published tariffs from State Motor Transit. [26] 3.5.7 Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal To the greatest extent practical, metallic material generated in the decontamination and dismantling processes is processed to reduce the total cost of controlled disposal.
Material meeting the regulatory and/or site release criterion, is released as scrap, requiring no further cost consideration.
Conditioning (preparing the material to meet the waste acceptance criteria of the disposal site) and recovery of the waste stream is performed off site at a licensed processing center. Any material leaving the site is subject to a survey and release charge, at a minimum. Based on TLG's experience, rates were assumed for off..:site processing as well as survey and release. The mass of radioactive waste generated during the various decommissioning activities at the site is shown on a line-item basis in the detailed Appendices C and D, and summarized in Section 5. The quantified waste summaries shown in these tables are consistent with 10 CFR Part 61 classifications.
Commercially available steel containers are presumed to be used for the disposal of piping, small components, and concrete.
Larger components can serve as their own containers, with proper closure of all openings, access ways, and penetrations.
The volumes are calculated based on the exterior package dimensions for containerized material or a specific calculation for components serving as their own waste containers.
The more highly activated reactor components will be shipped in reusable, shielded truck casks with disposable liners. In calculating disposal costs, the burial fees are applied against the liner volume, as well as the special handling requirements of the payload. Packaging efficiencies are lower for the highly activated materials (greater than TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 15 of27 Type A quantity waste), where high concentrations of gamma-emitting radionuclides limit the capacity of the shipping canisters.
For the purpose of this analysis, the EnergySolutions' facility is used as the disposal site for the majority of the radioactive waste (Class A). This waste was disposed of at a rate of $62 per cubic foot for "Bulk" waste, and a rate of $252 per cubic foot for "General" waste. These rates include State of Utah taxes and Southwest Compact fees. There are no currently operating disposal facilities available to PG&E that have a license to dispose of the more highly radioactive waste (Classes B and C), for example, generated in the dismantling of the reactor vessel. As such, waste disposal costs were estimated.
The cost for disposal for Class B and C waste was $2,916 per cubic foot. This rate includes Southwest Compact fees. These disposal costs for low-level radioactive waste are based on a study sponsored by PG&E and Southern California Edison Company, "Establishing an Appropriate Disposal Rate for Low Level Radioactive Waste During Decommissioning."[13]
The study was done to reflect the California Public Utilities Commission's desire for these owners to conservatively estimate their nuclear decommissioning LLRW disposal rates. 3.5.8 Site Conditions Following Decommissioning The NRC will terminate (or amend) the site license if it determines that site remediation has been performed in accordance with the license termination plan, and that the terminal radiation survey and associated documentation demonstrate that the facility is suitable for release. The NRC's involvement in the decommissioning process will end at this point. Local building codes and state environmental regulations will dictate the next step in the decommissioning process, as well as the owner's own future plans for the site. All structures will be removed except for the switchyard.
The switchyard is required for grid operations.
Structures to be removed include but are not limited to the reactor buildings, auxiliary building, turbine buildings, intake and discharge structures, and steam generator storage facility.
The structures that are expected to require decontamination or radiological remediation are the reactor buildings, auxiliary building, and radwaste storage building.
TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document P01-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 16 of 27 The estimates presented herein include the dismantling of the major structures to a nominal depth of three feet below grade, backfilling and the collapsing of below grade voids, and general terra-forming such that the site upon which the power block and supplemental structures are located is transformed into a "grassy plain." The estimate does not assume the remediation of any significant volume of contaminated soil. This assumption may be affected by continued plant operations and/or future regulatory actions, such as the development of site-specific release criteria.
3.6 ASSUMPTIONS The following are the major assumptions made In the development of the estimates for decommissioning the site. 3.6.1 Estimating Basis The study follows the principles of ALARA through the use of work duration adjustment factors. These factors address the impact of activities such as radiological protection instruction, mock-up training, and the use of respiratory protection and protective clothing.
The factors lengthen a task's duration, increasing costs and lengthening the overall schedule.
ALARA planning is considered in the costs for engineering and planning, and in the development of activity specifications and detailed procedures.
Changes to worker exposure limits may impact the decommissioning cost and project schedule.
3.6.2 Labor Costs The craft labor required to decontaminate and dismantle the nuclear plant is acquired through standard site contracting practices.
The current cost of labor at the site is used as an estimating basis. The owner will provide radiological health and safety, quality assurance and overall site administration during the decommissioning and demolition phases. Contract personnel will provide engineering services, e.g., for preparing the activity specifications, work procedures, activation, and structural analyses, under the direction of PG&E. Personnel costs are based upon average salary information provided by PG&E. Overhead costs are included for site and corporate support, reduced commensurate with the staffing of the project. TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 17 of27 Security, while reduced from operating levels, is maintained throughout the decommissioning for access control, material control, and to safeguard the spent fueL 3.6.3 Design Conditions Any fuel cladding failure that occurred during the lifetime of the plant is assumed to have released fission products at sufficiently low levels that the buildup of quantities of long-lived isotopes (e.g., 137CS, 90S r , or transuranics) has been prevented from reaching levels exceeding those that permit the major NSSS components to be shipped under current transportation regulations and disposal requirements.
The curie contents of the vessel and internals at final shutdown are derived from those listed in NUREG/CR-34 7 4J27] Actual estimates are derived from the curie/gram values contained therein and adjusted for the different mass of the Diablo Canyon components, projected operating life, and different periods of decay. Additional short-lived isotopes were derived from CR-0130[28]
and CR-0672,[29]
and benchmarked to the lived values from CR-347 4. The control elements are disposed of along with the spent fuel, i.e., there is no additional cost provided for their disposal.
Activation of the containment building structure is confined to the biological shield. More extensive activation (at very low levels) of the interior structures within containment has been detected at several reactors and the owners have elected to dispose of the affected material at a controlled facility rather than reuse the material as fill on site or send it to a landfilL The ultimate disposition of the material removed from the containment building will depend upon the site release criteria selected, as well as the designated end use for the site. 3.6.4 General Transition Activities Existing warehouses are cleared of non-essential material and remain for use by PG&E and its subcontractors.
The plant's operating staff performs the following activities at no additional cost or credit to the project during the transition period: TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document P01-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 18 of27 Drain and collect fuel oils, lubricating oils, and transformer oils for recycle and/or sale. Drain and collect acids, caustics, and other chemical stores for recycle and/or sale. Process operating waste inventories, i.e., the estimates do not address the disposition of any legacy wastes; the disposal of operating wastes during this initial period is not considered a decommissioning expense. Secondary Side Systems Selected secondary side systems are assumed to be contaminated, and will require radiological controls during dismantling, and off-site waste processing.
Systems assumed to be affected include: Auxiliary Steam Condensate Extraction Steam and Heater Drip Lube Oil Distribution and Purification Turbine Steam Supply Turbine and Generator Main Condensers Main Turbine/Generator Contaminated Surfaces Contaminated concrete surfaces in the reactor buildings, fuel handling areas, containment penetration areas, radwaste storage building and auxiliary building will require decontamination by scabbling (removal of concrete surfaces to a depth of one-half inch), or a drill and spall technique (removal of concrete surfaces to a depth of two inches). Electrical Switchyard The existing electrical switchyard will remain after decommissioning in support of the utility's electrical transmission and distribution system. Scrap and Salvage The existing plant equipment is considered obsolete and suitable for scrap as deadweight quantities only. PG&E will make economically TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document P01-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 19 0(27 reasonable efforts to salvage equipment following final plant shutdown.
However, dismantling techniques assumed by TLG for equipment in this analysis are not consistent with removal techniques required for salvage (resale) of equipment.
Experience has indicated that some buyers wanted equipment stripped down to very specific requirements before they would consider purchase.
This required expensive rework after the equipment had been removed from its installed location.
Since placing a salvage value on this machinery and equipment would be speculative, and the value would be small in comparison to the overall decommissioning expenses, this analysis does not attempt to quantify the value that an owner may realize based upon those efforts. It is assumed, for purposes of this analysis, that any value received from the sale of scrap generated in the dismantling process would be more than offset by the on-site processing costs. The dismantling techniques assumed in the decommissioning estimates do not include the additional cost for size reduction and preparation to meet "furnace ready" conditions.
For example, the recovery of copper from electrical cabling may require the removal and disposition of any contaminated insulation, an added expense. With a volatile market, the potential profit margin in scrap recovery is highly speculative, regardless of the ability to free release this materiaL This assumption is an implicit recognition of scrap value in the disposal of clean metallic waste at no additional cost to the project. Furniture, tools, mobile equipment such as forklifts, trucks, bulldozers, and other property is removed at no cost or credit to the decommissioning project. Disposition may include relocation to other facilities.
Spare parts are also made available for alternative use. Energy For estimating purposes, the plant is assumed to be de-energized, with the exception of those facilities associated with spent fuel storage. Replacement power costs are used to calculate the cost of energy consumed during decommissioning for tooling, lighting, ventilation, and essential services.
Insurance Costs for continuing coverage (nuclear liability and property insurance) following cessation of plant operations and during decommissioning are included and based upon current operating premiums.
Reductions in TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document POl-1604 G 003, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 20 of 27 premiums, throughout the decommissioning process, are based upon the guidance and the limits for coverage defined in the NRC's proposed rulemaking "Financial Protection Requirements for Permanently Shutdown Nuclear Power Reactors." [30] The NRC's financial protection requirements are based on varIOUS reactor (and spent fuel) configurations.
Taxes Property taxes are included for all decommissioning periods. Site Modifications The perimeter fence and in-plant security barriers will be moved, as appropriate, to conform to the Site Security Plan in force during the various stages of the project. 3.7 COST ESTIMATE 

==SUMMARY==
Schedules of expenditures are provided in Tables 3.1 and 3.2. The tables delineate the cost contributors by year of expenditures as well as cost contributor (e.g., labor, materials, and waste disposal).
Additional tables in Appendices C and D provide detailed costs elements.
The cost elements are also assigned to one of three subcategories: "License Termination," "Spent Fuel Management," and "Site Restoration." The subcategory "License Termination" is used to accumulate costs that are consistent with "decommissioning" as defined by the NRC in its financial assurance regulations (i.e., 10 CFR &sect;50.75). The cost reported for this subcategory is generally sufficient to terminate the plant's operating license, recognizing that there may be some additional cost impact from spent fuel management.
The "Spent Fuel Management" subcategory contains costs associated with the containerization and transfer of spent fuel from the pools to the DOE and the transfer of casks from the ISFSI to the DOE. Costs are also included for the operations of the pools and management of the ISFSI until such time that the transfer of all fuel from this facility to an off-site location (e.g., geologic repository) is complete. "Site Restoration" is used to capture costs associated with the dismantling and demolition of buildings and facilities demonstrated to be free from contamination.
This includes structures never exposed to radioactive TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document P01-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 21 of 27 materials, as well as those facilities that have been decontaminated to appropriate levels. Structures are removed to a depth of three feet and backfilled to conform to local grade. As discussed in Section 3.4.1, it is not anticipated that the DOE will accept the GTCC waste prior to completing the transfer of spent fuel. Therefore, the cost of GTCC disposal is shown in the final year of ISFSI operation (for the DECON alternative).
While designated for disposal at the geologic repository along with the spent fuel, GTCC waste is still classified as low-level radioactive waste and, as such, included as a "License Termination" expense. Decommissioning costs are reported in 2008 dollars. Costs are not inflated, escalated, or discounted over the period of expenditure (or projected lifetime of the plant), The schedules are based upon the detailed activity costs reported in Appendices C and D, along with the time line presented in Section 4. TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis TABLE 3.1a DECON ALTERNATIVE Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 22 of 27 SCHEDULE OF TOTAL ANNUAL EXPENDITURES, UNIT 1 (thousands, 2008 dollars) Year 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050 2051 2052 PG&E Labor 5,240 31,907 25,455 21,656 15,898 13,422 1,057 1,057 1,060 1,057 1,057 1,057 1,060 2,560 5,485 1,101 1,012 603 569 569 570 569 569 569 570 569 569 569 220 TLG Services, Inc. Equipment 
& Contractor Materials Labor Burial 426 2,808 8 4,829 19,265 I 3,169 19,743 33,361 38,606 20,478 34,008 45,390 9,071 24,740 12,725 7,763 20,678 10,605 1,239 373 8 1,239 373 8 1,243 374 I 8 1,239 373 8 1,239 373 8 1,239 373 I 8 1,243 374 8 2,521 4,083 I 2,289 3,510 22,055 t 3,466 8,431 9,927 1 8,664 9,559 &deg; 663 2,866 I &deg; &deg; 2,312 &deg; &deg; 2,312 &deg; &deg; 2,319 &deg; &deg; 2,312 &deg; &deg; 2,312 I &deg; &deg; 2,312 &deg; &deg; 2,319 I &deg; &deg; 2,312 I &deg; &deg; 2,312 &deg; 349 2,315 4 1,457 1,466 1 516 96,587 210,569 I 116,839 Other Total 3,301 I 11,783 ! 21,306 I 80,477 20,127 I 137,292 15,945 137,476 10,316 I 72,750 I 10,308 I 62,776 I I I 10,408 13,086 10,408 13,086 I 10,437 13,122 10,408 13,086 10,408 I 13,086 I 10,408 I 13,086 I I 10,437 I 13,122 9,623 I 21,077 I I 4,296 I 38,813 I 2,4221 21,882 2,393 21,627 2,235 6,366 I 2,222 5,103 I 2,222 ! 5,103 2,228 I 5,117 I 2,222 5,103 2,222 I 5,103 2,222 I 5,103 2,228 5,117 I 2,222 5,103 2,222 5,103 13,014 1 16,251 I 1,287 I 4,945 209,499 771,148 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis TABLE 3.1h DECON ALTERNATIVE Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 23 of 27 SCHEDULE OF TOTAL ANNUAL EXPENDITURES, UNIT 2 (thousands, 2008 dollars) Year 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 --2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050 2051 2052 PG&E Labor 9,011 25,695 23,205 22,538 21,813 16,451 6,522 6,540 6,522 6,522 6,522 6,540 8,254 10,960 4,739 4,618 880 571 571 572 571 571 571 572 571 571 570 220 1193,262 TLG Services, Inc. I Equipment 
& Contractor Materials Labor 1,157 7,959 7,762 26,170 21,815 43,514 19,284 43,905 10,551 I 39,706 7,340 29,024 1,396 9,246 1,400 9,271 1,396 9,246 1,396 9,246 1,396 9,246 1,400 9,271 2,774 12,749 4,123 35,182 32,960 36,726 34,005 36,793 2,602 4,956 0 I 2,319 0 2,319 0 2,325 0 2,319 0 2,319 0 2,319 0 2,325 0 2,319 0 2,319 349 2,322 1,461 1,472 154,566 396,886 Burial Other Total 17 6,861 I 25,005 I 6,668 19,904 I 86,198 I 44,172 16,257 I 148,963 37,978 14,646 138,350 I 11,900 I 12,513 I 96,482 I 7,731 I 11,705 i 72,250 12 10,208 i 27,383 12 10,236 27,458 I 12 I 10,208 27,383 12 10,208 27,383 I 12 10,208 27,383 I 12 I 10,236 I 27,458 2,132 9,398 I 35,307 3,229 I 4,018 57,511 I 1 2,424 I 76,850 I 0 2,402 I 77,819 0 2,240 I 10,677 I I 0 I 2,227 I 5,116 I 0 2,227 I 5,116 0 2,233 5,130 0 2,227 I 5,116 I 0 2,227 5,116 0 I 2,227 5,116 0 2,233 5,130 0 2,227 5,116 I 0 I 2,227 5,116 4 13,050 16,296 518 1,290 I 4,962 114,419 I 198,066 1,057,198 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis TABLE 3.2a SAFSTOR ALTERNATIVE Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 24 of 27 SCHEDULE OF TOTAL ANNUAL EXPENDITURES, UNIT 1 (thousands, 2008 dollars) Year 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050 2051 2052 2053 2054 2055 2056 PG&E Labor 5,259 30,958 9,269 1,114 1,118 1,114 1,114 1,114 1,118 1,114 1,114 1,114 1,118 589 588 588 589 588 588 588 589 588 588 588 589 588 588 1,377 19,859 19,369 18,116 13,128 10,885 TLG Services, Inc. Equipment 
& Contractor Materials Labor 352 1,131 4,209 8,474 3,677 3,298 1,348 351 1,351 352 1,348 351 1,348 351 1,348 351 1,351 352 1,348 351 1,348 351 1,348 351 1,351 352 295 2 293 1 293 1 293 1 293 1 293 1 293 1 293 1 293 1 293 1 293 1 293 1 293 1 293 1 353 869 1,950 21,842 14,251 35,855 19,367 33,742 8,946 24,128 7,302 19,633 Burial Other Total 8 1,443 I 8,192 326 9,132 I I 53,099 671 24,008 I 40,923 31 10,012 12,857 I 31 I 10,039 I 12,892 I I 31 10,012 I 12,857 31 10,012 12,857 31 10,012 12,857 I 31 I 10,039 I 12,892 I 31 10,012 I 12,857 31 10,012 i 12,857 ! I 31 I 10,012 I 12,857 I I 31 I 10,039 12,892 i 31 2,644 3,561 31 I 2,624 I 3,536 --I I i 31 2,624 ! 3,536 31 2,631 3,545 : 31 2,624 3,536 31 2,624 3,536 31 2,624 3,536 31 2,631 3,545 31 2,624 3,536 31 I 2,624 3,536 31 2,624 i 3,536 31 2,631 3,545 I 31 I 2,624 3,536 31 2,624 3,536 32 2,616 5,246 I 44 I 2,726 46,420 28,584 14,007 112,066 46,649 16,313 134,188 I 12,817 5,269 64,289 10,431 4,349 52,600 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis TABLE 3.2a (continued)
SAFSTOR ALTERNATIVE Document POl-1604 a 003, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 25 of 27 SCHEDULE OF TOTAL ANNUAL EXPENDITURES, UNIT 1 (thousands, 2008 dollars) Year 2057 2058 2059 2060 PG&E Labor 1,474 2,900 1,013 677 1153,673 TLG Services, Inc. Equipment 
& Contractor Materials Labor Burial 335 3,053 12 4,447 17,762 22 8,889 9,674 0 5,942 6,467 0 97,609 189,456 1 100,344 Other Total I 481 I 5,353 I 1,033 I 26,164 I 290 I 19,866 I 194 I 13,280 218,830 759,912 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis TABLE 3.2h SAFSTOR ALTERNATIVE Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 26 of 27 SCHEDULE OF TOTAL ANNUAL EXPENDITURES, UNIT 2 (thousands, 2008 dollars) Year 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 --2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050 2051 2052 2053 2054 2055 2056 2057 PG&E Labor 11,261 32,110 10,473 6,569 6,552 6,552 6,552 6,569 6,552 6,552 6,552 6,569 5,824 2,591 2,591 2,598 2,591 2,591 2,591 2,598 2,591 2,591 2,591 2,598 2,591 2,591 2,508 2,516 14,922 18,130 19,728 18,988 17,524 TLG Services, Inc. Equipment 
& Contractor Materials Labor 1,014 5,491 \ 7,428 20,954 2,042 10,517 1,323 9,229 1,319 9,204 1,319 9,204 1,319 9,204 1,323 9,229 1,319 9,204 1,319 9,204 1,319 9,204 1,323 9,229 1,134 8,370 308 4,662 308
* 4,662 309 4,674 308 4,662 308 4,662 308 4,662 309 4,674 308 4,662 308 4,662 308 4,662 309 4,674 308 4,662 308 4,662 307 4,470 489 1,382 2,305 11,448 16,601 31,370 19,645 37,211 10,267 33,375 9,174 33,462 Burial Other Total 18 4,215 i 21,999 I 728 I 15,858 I i i 77,079 336 I 15,904 1 39,272 35 9,739 I 26,895 35 9,712 26,821 35 I 9,712 26,821 35 9,712 26,821 35 9,739 26,895 I 35 I 9,712 26,821 35 9,712 26,821 35 9,712 26,821 I 35 I 9,739 26,895 34 8,408 23,770 32 2,606 10,199 1 2,606 10,199 I 32 I 2,613 10,227 32 2,606 10,199 32 2,606 10,199 32 I 2,606 10,199 I I 32 2,613 10,227 32 2,606 10,199 I 32 2,606 10:199 I 32 2,606 10,199 32 2,613 10,227 32 2,606 I 10,199 I 32 I 2,606 1 10,199 32 2,536 9,854 33 1,101 I 5,520 I 41 I 2,785 I 31,502 33,107 13,418 I 112,627 41,953 I 14,797 133,334 I 10,869 I 4,704 78,203 9,390 4,226 73,775 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis TABLE 3.2h (continued)
SAFSTOR ALTERNATIVE Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 27 of 27 SCHEDULE OF TOTAL ANNUAL EXPENDITURES, UNIT 2 (thousands, 2008 dollars) Year 2058 2059 2060 PG&E Labor 6,494 3,370 2,253 TLG Services, Inc. Equipment 
& Contractor Materials Labor 14,496 34,206 34,316 33,548 22,940 22,427 Burial Other Total I 24 I 872 I 56,092 I 0 I 296 I 71,530 I I 0 I 198 I 47,817 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis 4. SCHEDULE ESTIMATE Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 4, Page 1 of 8 The schedules for the decommissioning scenarios considered in this study follow the sequences presented in the AIF/NESP-036 study, with minor changes to reflect recent experience and site-specific constraints.
In addition, the scheduling has been revised to reflect the spent fuel management plan described in Section 3.5.1. A schedule or sequence of activities for the DECON alternative from shutdown ISFSI site restoration is presented in Figure 4.1. The scheduling sequence is based on the fuel being removed from the spent fuel pools within twelve years. The key activities listed in the schedule do not reflect a one-to-one correspondence with those activities in the cost tables, but reflect dividing some activities for clarity and combining others for convenience.
The schedule was prepared using the "Microsoft Project Professional 2003" computer software. 
[31] 4.1 SCHEDULE ESTIMATE ASSUMPTIONS The schedule reflects the results of a precedence network developed for the site decommissioning activities, i.e., a PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique)
Software Package. The work activity durations used in the precedence network reflect the actual man-hour estimates from the cost table, adjusted by stretching certain activities over their slack range and shifting the start and end dates of others. The following assumptions were made in the development of the decommissioning schedule:
The spent fuel pools are isolated until such time that all spent fuel has been discharged from the spent fuel pools to the DOE. Decontamination and dismantling of the storage pools is initiated once the transfer of spent fuel is complete (DECON option). All work (except vessel and internals removal) is performed during an 8-hour workday, 5 days per week, with no overtime.
There are eleven paid holidays per year. Reactor and internals removal activities are performed by using separate crews for different activities working on different shifts, with a corresponding backshift charge for the second shift. Multiple crews work parallel activities to the maximum extent possible, consistent with optimum efficiency, adequate access for cutting, removal and laydown space, and with the stringent safety measures necessary during demolition of heavy components and structures.
TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 4, Page 2 of 8 For plant systems removal, the systems with the longest removal durations in areas on the critical path are considered to determine the duration of the activity.
4.2 PROJECT SCHEDULE The period-dependent costs presented in the detailed cost tables are based upon the durations developed in the schedules for decommissioning.
Durations are established between several milestones in each project period; these durations are used to establish a critical path for the entire project. In turn, the critical path duration for each period is used as the basis for determining the dependent costs. A second critical path is shown for the spent fuel storage period, which determines the release of the fuel pool areas for final decontamination.
Project timelines are for the DECON and SAFSTOR scenarios are provided in Figures 4.2 and 4.3 with milestone dates based on the 2024 and 2025 shutdown dates for Units 1 and 2, respectively.
The fuel pools are emptied approximately twelve years after shutdown, while ISFSI operations continue until the DOE can complete the transfer of assemblies to its geologic repository.
Deferred decommissioning in the SAFSTOR scenarios is assumed to commence so that the physical dismantling takes place immediately after all spent fuel has been removed from the site. TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis FIGURE 4.1 ACTIVITY SCHEDULE Doc u ment POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 4, Page 3 of 8 Task Name YIIY21Y31Y41Y51Y61Y71yslY9 YIOYllY12Y13Y14 Diablo Canyon Unit 1 & 2 schedule Shutdown Unit 1 -November 2 , 2024 Period la Unit 1 -Shutdown through transition Certificate of penn anent c essation of operations submitted Fuel storage pool operations Dry fuel storage operations Reco nfi gure plan t Prepare activity specifications Perform site characterization PSDAR s ubmitted -Wri-tten certificate o f removal offuei submitted Site specific decommissioning cos t estimate submitted DOC staff mobilized .., Period Ib Unit 1 -Decommissioning preparations Fuel storage pool operations Reco nfigur e pla nt (continue d) .-Dry fuel storage operations Prepare detailed work procedures DeconNSSS Isolate spent fuel pool Period 2a Unit 1 -Large component removal F ue l po o l Dry fue l storage opera t ions --Pr e p ara t ion for reactor ves s e l removal Reactor vessei & Remai nin g larg e NSSS componen ts di spos it i on Non-essential systems Main Main condenser License termination plan submi tted * *' p' ,".
* Period 2b Unit 1 -Decontamination (wet fuel) Fuel storage pool operations i Dry fuel storage operations TLG Services, Inc. r Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 4, Page 4 of 8 FIGURE 4.1 (continued)
ACTIVITY SCHEDULE I I I I I I I I I Task Name Remove s ys t e m s not s upporting wet fue l s torage Decon buildings not supporting wet fuel storage License termination plan app roved for Period 2c Unit 1 and:Dry Fuel Storage Un i t 1 Fuel S t o re d Wet . . . -Un i t 1 F uel Stored D ry 2 Operat i on s Shutdown Unit 2 -August 26, 2025 Period la Unit 2 -Shutdown through transition cessation of submitted Fuel storage pool operations Dry fu e l s t or a g e oper a tion s Prepare activity specifications Perform site characterization PSDAR submitted Si te specific decommissioning cost estimate submitted DOC staff mobilized "
Ib Unit " 2 -
F u e l s t orage poo-l operatioru Reconfig u r e pl ant (con t i nued) Dry fuel sto r a g e op e ration s Prepare d e tailed wor k procedure s Dec o nNSS S Isolate spen t fue l poo l 2a Uclt 2 -Large component removal F ue l s to r ag e poo l op e rations -.--. . D ry fue l sto r age ope r a t ion s reactor r emo v al React o r ve s se l & i nt e rnals ... .-'" '" Remainin g l ar g e N S SS componen t s di s position TLG Services, Inc. YIIY2IY3IY4IY5IY6-rY7 TY81Y9 YIOYllY12Y13Y14 
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , I .1 -I .! 0 1 .! _I O! 0 1 'n r$ ; i I i I i I.;
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis ITaskName Non-,:,ssennal systems Main condenser P e ri o d 2b Unit 2 -Decontaminati o n (w e t fu e l) Fue l s to r;:;.ge po:>l ope ra tions I I I I Re m ove systems n o t su pporting Vlet fuel st o rag e t er min atio n p l an S:pp r o ved Fu el pool a v ailab l e fo r decommissio
-ni n g Period 2c Unit 2 Wet Fuel Storag e Unit 2Wet Fuel Storage Document POla1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 4, Page 5 of 8 FIGURE 4.1 (continued)
ACTIVITY SCHEDULE IY41Y51Y61Y71Y81Y9 . Mf<<M! _I ; i !Jr di a! i i ; i ....
j i i. i i..J i ! i; ; i i i i i I I I I Period 2d Unit 1 &: 2 -Decontamination following wet fuel storage I : ' I i!! ; I I I I I I I I I I Dry fuel op erati ons Decon w e t fue l storage area Period 2e Unit 1 & 2 -Plant license termination Dry fuP.! storage c.perations F inal Site Survey NRC r eview & approval Par t 50 lice n se t erminated Peri o d 3b Unit 1 & 2 -Site restorati o n Dry fuel storage opera t i o ns Buildir,g demolitions , b ackfill and landscapi ng Period 3c -Unit 1 & 2 Fu e l Storage Operations/Shipping .till Spent F ue l Off Sit e (oct ual D ecembe r 2051) Peri o d 3d -Unit 1 & 2 GTCC shipping End mCC s hipmen t (actuai end of 2051) Period 3e -ISFSI Decontamination End Decontamination end of April 2052) Period 3f -ISFSI Site Restoration End Restoration (actual end of Jun e 2052) TLG Services, Inc. rn 1 m i I t ! r&'!M 4 I I
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 4, Page 6 of 8 FIGURE 4.1 (continued)
ACTIVITY SCHEDULE LEGEND Legend: 1. Red text and/or shaded scheduling bars indicate critical path activities 
: 2. Shaded scheduling bars associated with major decommissioning periods, e.g., Period la, indicate overall duration of that period 3. Blue text and/or diamond symbols indicate major milestones 
: 4. Due to limitations within Microsoft PROJECT, dates beyond 2049 can not be printed. Those activities that continue past 2049 have the end date noted in the Task Name. TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 4, Page 7 of 8 Unit 1 FIGURE 4.2 DECOMMISSIONING TIMELINE DECON (not to scale) (Shutdown November 2, 2024) Pool and ISFSI Operations ISFSI Operations Period 2 Period 3 Period 1 Transition and Preparations Decommissioning Site Restoration ISFSIOperations ISFSI D&D 11 /2024 OS/2026 Unit 2 01/2039 Storage Pools Empty Unit 1 -01 /2037 Unit 2 -10 / 2037 01/2041 12/2051 06/2052 (Shutdown August 26, 2025) Period 1 Transition and Preparations 08/2025 02/2027 TLG Services, Inc. Period 2 Decommissioning Period 3 Site Restoration ISFSI Operations ISFSI D&D 01/2039 01/2041 12/2051 06/2052 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 4, Page 8 of 8 Unit 1 FIGURE 4.3 DECOMMISSIONING TIMELINE SAFSTOR (not to scale) (Shutdown November 2, 2024) Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 Period 4 Transition and Delayed Period 5 Site Prep arations Dormancy Preparations Decommissioning Restoration 11 /2024 Unit 2 OS/2026 12/2051 Unit 1 Pool Empty 01/2037 Dry Spent Fuel Storage ISFSI Empty 12/2051 06/2053 (Shutdown August 26, 2025) Period 2 Period 3 08/2058 09/2060 Period 4 Period 5 Site Period 1 Transition and Preparations Dormancy Delayed Preparations Decommissioning Restoration 08/2025 02/2027 TLG Services, Inc. 11 / 2052 Unit 2 Pool Empty 10/2037 OS/2054 08/2058 09/2060 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 5, Page 1 of 6 5. RADIOACTIVE WASTES The objectives of the decommissioning process are the removal of all radioactive material from the site that would restrict its future use and the termination of the NRC license. This currently requires the remediation of all radioactive material at the site in excess of applicable legal limits. Under the Atomic Energy Act,[32] the NRC is responsible for protecting the public from sources of ionizing radiation.
Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations delineates the production, utilization, and disposal of radioactive materials and processes.
In particular, Part 71 defines radioactive material as it pertains to transportation and Part 61 specifies its disposition.
Most of the materials being transported for controlled burial are categorized as Low Specific Activity (LSA) or Surface Contaminated Object (SCO) materials containing Type A quantities, as defined in 49 CFR Parts 173-178. Shipping containers are required to be Industrial Packages (IP-l, IP-2 or IP-3, as defined in 10 CFR &sect; 173.411).
For this study, commercially available steel containers are presumed to be used for the disposal of piping, small components, and concrete.
Larger components can serve as their own containers, with proper closure of all openings, access ways, and penetrations.
The volumes of radioactive waste generated during the various decommissioning activities at the site are shown on a line-item basis in Appendices C and D, and summarized in Tables 5.1 and 5.2. The quantified waste volume summaries shown in these tables are consistent with Part 61 classifications.
The volumes are calculated based on the exterior dimensions for containerized material and on the displaced volume of components serving as their own waste containers.
The reactor vessel and internals are categorized as large quantity shipments and, accordingly, will be shipped in reusable, shielded truck casks with disposable liners. In calculating disposal costs, the burial fees are applied against the liner volume, as well as the special handling requirements of the payload. Packaging efficiencies are lower for the highly activated materials (greater than Type A quantity waste), where high concentrations of gamma-emitting radionuclides limit the capacity of the shipping canisters.
No process system containing/handling radioactive substances at shutdown is presumed to meet material release criteria by decay alone (i.e., systems radioactive at shutdown will still be radioactive over the time period during which the decommissioning is accomplished, due to the presence of long-lived radionuclides).
While the dose rates decrease with time, radionuclides such as 137CS will still control the disposition requirements.
TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document Rev. 0 Section 5, Page 2 of 6 The waste material produced in the decontamination and dismantling of the nuclear plants is primarily generated during Period 2 of DECON and Period 4 of SAFSTOR. Material that is considered potentially contaminated when removed from the radiological controlled area is sent to processing facilities in Tennessee for conditioning and disposal.
Heavily contaminated components and activated materials are routed for controlled disposal.
The disposal volumes reported in the tables reflect the savings resulting from reprocessing and recycling.
For the purpose of this analysis, the EnergySolutions' facility is used as the disposal site for the majority of the radioactive waste (Class A). This waste was disposed of at a rate of $62 per cubic foot for "Bulk" waste, and a rate of $252 per cubic foot for "General" waste. These rates include State of Utah taxes and Southwest Compact fees. There are no currently operating disposal facilities available to PG&E that have a license to dispose of the more highly radioactive waste (Classes B and C), for example, generated in the dismantling of the reactor vessel. As such, waste disposal costs and waste transportation distances were estimated.
For purposes of estimating the Class Band C waste transportation cost it was assumed that this waste was shipped to Andrews County, Texas. The cost for disposal for Class Band C waste was $2,916 per cubic foot. This rate includes Southwest Compact fees. These disposal costs for low-level radioactive waste are based on a study sponsored by PG&E and Southern California Edison Company. The study was done to reflect the California Public Utilities Commission's desire for these owners to conservatively estimate their nuclear decommissioning LLRW disposal rates. TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis TABLE 5.1 Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 5, Page 3 of 6 UNIT 1 DECON ALTERNATIVE DECOMMISSIONING WASTE 

==SUMMARY==
Waste r Solutions A Estimate [2] B Estimate [2] C GTCC 433 85,510 12,868,966 
[1] Waste is classified according to the requirements as delineated in Title 10 CFR, Part 61.55 [2] Costs for disposal of Class Band C waste was based on the following study: "Establishing an Appropriate Disposal Rate for Low Level Radioactive Waste During Decommissioning", Robert A Snyder NEWEX, Revision 0, July 2008 [3] Columns may not add due to rounding.
TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 5, Page 4 of 6 Waste TABLE 5.2 UNIT 2 DECON ALTERNATIVE DECOMMISSIONING WASTE 

==SUMMARY==
Cost Basis A Estimate [2] Estimate [2] 574 Spent Fuel 732
__
__ --f---____ 1 _____ 4_3 __ 3 ___ ____
Recycling Vendors A 13,879,480 153,210,831 
[1] Waste is classified according to the requirements as delineated in Title 10 CFR, Part 61.55 [2] Costs for disposal of Class Band C waste was based on the following study: "Establishing an Appropriate Disposal Rate for Low Level Radioactive Waste During Decommissioning", Robert A Snyder NEWEX, Revision 0, July 2008 [3] Columns may not add due to rounding.
TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document POl-l 604-003, Rev. 0 Section 5, Page 5 of 6 Waste disposal)
Waste TABLE 5.3 UNIT 1 SAFSTOR ALTERNATIVE DECOMMISSIONING WASTE 

==SUMMARY==
Estimate [2] B Estimate [2] c 584 433 167 68,960 85510 11,208,799 
[1] Waste is classified according to the requirements as delineated in Title 10 CFR, Part 61.55 [2] Costs for disposal of Class Band C waste was based on the following study: "Establishing an Appropriate Disposal Rate for Low Level Radioactive Waste During Decommissioning", Robert A Snyder NEWEX, Revision 0, July 2008 [3] Columns may not add due to rounding.
TLG Services, Inc; Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 5, Page 6 of 6 Waste TABLE 5.4 UNIT 2 SAFSTOR ALTERNATIVE DECOMMISSIONING WASTE 

==SUMMARY==
Cost Basis Class A Estimate [2] B 167 Estimate [2] C 584 68,960 433 Recycling Vendors A [1] Waste is classified according to the requirements as delineated in Title 10 CFR, Part 61.55 [2] Costs for disposal of Class Band C waste was based on the following study: "Establishing an Appropriate Disposal Rate for Low Level Radioactive Waste During Decommissioning", Robert A Snyder NEWEX, Revision 0, July 2008 [3] Columns may not add due to rounding.
TLG Services, Inc. 10 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis 6. RESULTS Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 6, Page 1 of 7 The analysis to estimate the costs to decommission Diablo Canyon relied upon the site-specific, technical information developed for a previous analysis prepared in 2005. While not an engineering study, the estimates provide PG&E with sufficient information to assess their financial obligations, as they pertain to the eventual decommissioning of the nuclear station. The estimates described in this report are based on numerous fundamental assumptions, including regulatory requirements, project contingencies, low-level radioactive waste disposal practices, high-level radioactive waste management options, and site restoration requirements.
The decommissioning scenarios assume continued operation of the station's spent fuel pools for a minimum of twelve years following the cessation of operations for continued cooling of the assemblies.
The cost projected to promptly decommission (DECON) Diablo Canyon is estimated to be $1,828.3 million. The majority of this cost (approximately 68.2%) is associated with the physical decontamination and dismantling of the nuclear plant so that the operating license can be terminated.
Another 20.9% is associated with the management, interim storage, and eventual transfer of the spent fueL The remaining 10.9% is for the demolition of the designated structures and limited restoration of the site. The cost projected for deferred decommissioning (SAFSTOR) is estimated to be $1,916.6 million. The majority of this cost (approximately 55.7%) is associated with placing the plant in storage, ongoing caretaking of the plant during dormancy, and the eventual physical decontamination and dismantling of the nuclear plant so that the operating license can be terminated.
Another 34.0% is associated with the management, interim storage, and eventual transfer of the spent fueL The remaining 10.3% is for the demolition of the designated structures and limited restoration of the site. The primary cost contributors, identified in Tables 6.1 thru 6.4, are either related or associated with the management and disposition of the radioactive waste. Program management is the largest single contributor to the overall cost. The magnitude of the expense is a function of both the size of the organization required to manage the decommissioning, as well as the duration of the program. The size and composition of the management organization varies with the decommissioning phase and associated site activities.
However, once the operating licenses are terminated, the staff is substantially reduced for the conventional demolition and restoration of the site, and the long-term care of the spent fuel (for the DECON alternative).
TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document POla1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 6, Page 2 of 7 As described in this report, the spent fuel pools will remain operational for a minimum of twelve years following the cessation of operations.
The pools will be isolated and an independent spent fuel island created. This will allow decommissioning operations to proceed in and around the pool areas. Over the twelve-year period, the spent fuel will be packaged into multi-purpose canisters for transfer to the ISFSI. Spent fuel will also be in storage at the ISFSI (from operations).
This inventory will be transferred to the DOE after the pools are emptied. The cost for waste disposal includes only those costs associated with the controlled disposition of the low-level radioactive waste generated from decontamination and dismantling activities, including plant equipment and components, structural material, filters, resins and dry-active waste. As described in Section 5, disposition of the majority of the low-level radioactive material requiring controlled disposal is at the EnergySolutions' facility.
Highly activated components, requiring additional isolation from the environment (GTCC), are packaged for geologic disposal.
The cost of geologic disposal is based upon a cost equivalent for spent fuel. A significant portion of the metallic waste is designated for additional processing and treatment at an off-site facility.
Processing reduces the volume of material requiring controlled disposal through such techniques and processes as survey and sorting, decontamination, and volume reduction.
The material that cannot be unconditionally released is packaged for controlled disposal at one of the currently operating facilities.
The cost identified in the summary tables for processing is inclusive, incorporating the ultimate disposition of the material.
Decontamination and removal costs reflect the labor-intensive nature of the decommissioning process, as well as the management controls required to ensure a safe and successful program. Non-radiological demolition is a natural extension of the decommissioning process. The methods employed in decontamination and dismantling are generally destructive and indiscriminate in inflicting collateral damage. With a work force mobilized to support decommissioning operations, radiological demolition can be an integrated activity and a logical expansion of the work being performed in the process of terminating the operating license. Prompt demolition reduces future liabilities and can be more cost effective than deferral, due to the deterioration of the facilities (and therefore the working conditions) with time. The reported cost for transport includes the tariffs and surcharges associated with moving large components and/or overweight shielded casks overland, as well as the general expense, e.g., labor and fuel, of transporting material to the destinations TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 6, Page 3 of 7 identified in this report. For purposes of this analysis, material is primarily moved overland by truck. Decontamination is used to reduce the plant's radiation fields and minimize worker exposure.
Slightly contaminated material or material located within a contaminated area is sent to an off-site processing center, i.e., this analysis does not assume that contaminated plant components and equipment can be decontaminated for uncontrolled release in-situ. Centralized processing centers have proven to be a more economical means of handling the large volumes of material produced in the dismantling of a nuclear plant. License termination survey costs are associated with the labor intensive and complex activity of verifying that contamination has been removed from the site to the levels specified by the regulating agency. This process involves a systematic survey of all remaining plant surface areas and surrounding environs, sampling, isotopic analysis, and documentation of the findings.
The status of any plant components and materials not removed in the decommissioning process will also require confirmation and will add to the expense of surveying the facilities alone. The remaining costs include allocations for heavy equipment and temporary services, as well as for other expenses such as regulatory fees and the premiums for nuclear insurance.
While site operating costs are greatly reduced following the final cessation of plant operations, certain administrative functions do need to be maintained either at a basic functional or regulatory level. TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis TABLE 6.1 Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 6, Page 4 of 7 UNIT 1 DECON ALTERNATIVE DECOMMISSIONING COST ELEMENTS (thousands of 2008 dollars) 1 48,280 6.3
__
11,358 1.5 145,29 771,148 t Element 'cense Termination 104 Total [2] [1] Includes engineering and security costs [2] Columns may not add due to rounding TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 6, Page 5 of 7 TABLE 6.2 UNIT 2 DECON ALTERNATIVE DECOMMISSIONING COST ELEMENTS (thousands of 2008 dollars) Cost Element p 2.0 20.2 1.8 1. 8.0 4.1 2.0 0.3 0.6
__ 78 9
__ ,",,, __ __ ,,,_,, ______
__ 1 ______
___
__ __ 
[1] Includes engineering and security costs [2] Columns may not add due to rounding TLG Services, Inc. 100.0 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document POl-l 604-003, Rev. 0 Section 6, Page 6 of 7 TABLE 6.3 UNIT 1 SAFSTOR ALTERNATIVE DECOMMISSIONING COST ELEMENTS (thousands of 2008 dollars) Cost Element Decontamination Total [2] Cost Element Site Restoration 
[1] Includes engineering and security costs [2] Columns may not add due to rounding TLG Services, Inc. Total 759,912 100.0 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis TABLE 6.4 Document POl g 1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 6, Page 7 of 7 UNIT 2 SAFSTOR ALTERNATIVE DECOMMISSIONING COST ELEMENTS (thousands of 2008 dollars) Site Restoration Total [2] [1] Includes engineering and security costs [2] Columns may not add due to rounding TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis 7. REFERENCES Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 7, Page 1 of 3 1. "Decommissioning Cost Analysis for the Diablo Canyon Power Plant," Document No. POl-1513-004, Rev. 1, TLG Services, Inc., August 2005 2. U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Parts 30, 40, 50, 51, 70 and 72, "General Requirements for Decommissioning Nuclear Facilities," Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Federal Register Volume 53, Number 123 (p 24018 et seq.), June 27, 1988 3. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Regulatory Guide 1.159, "Assuring the Availability of Funds for Decommissioning Nuclear Reactors," October 2003 4. U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 20, Subpart E, "Radiological Criteria for License Termination" 5. U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Parts 20 and 50, "Entombment Options for Power Reactors," Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Federal Register Volume 66, Number 200, October 16, 2001 6. U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Parts 2, 50 and 51, "Decommissioning of Nuclear Power Reactors," Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Federal Register Volume 61 (p 39278 et seq.), July 29, 1996 7. "Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 and Amendments," U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, 1982 8. DOEIRW-0604, "Project Decision Schedule," U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, January 2009 9. U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 50, "Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities," Subpart 54 (bb), "Conditions of Licenses" 10. U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 61.55, "Waste classification" 11. "Low Level Radioactive Waste Policy Act," Public Law 96-573, 1980 12. "Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1985," Public Law 99-240, 1986 TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis 7. REFERENCES (continued)
Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 7, Page 2 of 3 13. "Establishing an Appropriate Disposal Rate for Low Level Radioactive Waste During Decommissioning", Robert A Snyder NEWEX, Revision 0, July 2008 14. U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 20, Subpart E, "Radiological Criteria for License Termination," Federal Register, Volume 62, Number 139 (p 39058 et seq.), July 21, 1997 15. "Establishment of Cleanup Levels for CERCLA Sites with Radioactive Contamination," EPA Memorandum OSWER No. 9200.4-18, August 22, 1997. 16. U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 141.16, "Maximum contaminant levels for beta particle and photon radioactivity from man-made radionuclides in community water systems" 17. "Memorandum of Understanding Between the Environmental Protection Agency and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission:
Consultation and Finality on Decommissioning and Decontamination of Contaminated Sites," OSWER 9295.8-06a, October 9, 2002 18. "Multi-Agency Radiation Survey and Site Investigation Manual (MARSSIM)," NUREG-1575, Rev. 1, EPA 402-R-97-016, Rev. 1, August 2000 19. T.S. LaGuardia et aI., "Guidelines for Producing Commercial Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Estimates," AIFINESP-036, May 1986 20. W.J. Manion and T.S. LaGuardia, "Decommissioning Handbook," U.S. Department of Energy, DOEIEV/10128-1, November 1980 21. "Building Construction Cost Data 2008," Robert Snow Means Company, Inc., Kingston, Massachusetts 
: 22. Project and Cost Engineers' Handbook, Second Edition, p. 239, American Association of Cost Engineers, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, New York, 1984 TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis 7. REFERENCES (continued)
Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Section 7, Page 3 of 3 23. "Technical Position Paper for Establishing an Appropriate Contingency Factor for Inclusion in the Decommissioning Revenue Requirements", Study Number: DECON-POS-H002, Revision A, Status: Preliminary (provided by PG&E) 24. DOEIRW-0351, "Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System Waste Acceptance System Requirements Document", Revision 5, May 31,2007 25. U.S. Department of Transportation, Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations, "Transportation," Parts 173 through 178, 2007 26. Tri-State Motor Transit Company, published tariffs, Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC), Docket No. MC-427719 Rules Tariff, March 2004, Radioactive Materials Tariff, January 2008 27. J.C. Evans et al., "Long-Lived Activation Products in Reactor Materials" NUREG/CR-34 7 4, Pacific Northwest Laboratory for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
August 1984 28. R.I. Smith, G.J. Konzek, W.E. Kennedy, Jr., "Technology, Safety and Costs of Decommissioning a Reference Pressurized Water Reactor Power Station," NUREG/CR-0130 and addenda, Pacific Northwest Laboratory for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
June 1978 29. H.D. Oak, et al., "Technology, Safety and Costs of Decommissioning a Reference Boiling Water Reactor Power Station," NUREG/CR-0672 and addenda, Pacific Northwest Laboratory for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
June 1980 30. "Financial Protection Requirements for Permanently Shutdown Nuclear Power Reactors," 10 CFR Parts 50 and 140, Federal Register Notice, Vol. 62, No. 210, October 30, 1997 31. "Microsoft Project Professional 2003," Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, W A. 32. "Atomic Energy Act of 1954," (68 Stat. 919) TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis APPENDIX A Document POl-l 604-003, Rev. 0 Appendix A, Page 1 of 4 UNIT COST FACTOR DEVELOPMENT TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Appendix A, Page 2 of 4 APPENDIX A UNIT COST FACTOR DEVELOPMENT Example: Unit Factor for Removal of Contaminated Heat Exchanger 
< 3,000 lbs. 1. SCOPE Heat exchangers weighing < 3,000 lbs. will be removed in one piece using a crane or small hoist. They will be disconnected from the inlet and outlet piping. The heat exchanger will be sent to the waste processing area. 2. CALCULATIONS Act Activity ID Description Activity Duration (minutes) a Remove insulation b Mount pipe cutters c Install contamination controls d Disconnect inlet and outlet lines e Cap openings f Rig for removal g Unbolt from mounts h Remove contamination controls 1 Remove, wrap, send to waste processing area Totals (Activity/Critical)
Duration adjustment(s): 
+ Respiratory protection adjustment (50% of critical duration) 
+ RadiationlALARA adjustment (37% of critical duration)
Adjusted work duration + Protective clothing adjustment (30% of adjusted duration)
Productive work duration + Work break adjustment (8.33 % of productive duration)
Total work duration (minutes) 
*** Total duration = 11.217 hr *** 60 60 20 60 20 30 30 15 355
* alpha designators indicate activities that can be performed in parallel TLG Services, Inc. Critical Duration (minutes) 
* (b) 60 (b) 60 (d) 30 30 15 255 128 95 478 143 621 673 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis APPENDIX A (continued) 
: 3. LABOR REQUIRED Crew Laborers Craftsmen Foreman General Foreman Fire Watch Health Physics Technician Total Labor Cost Number 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.25 0.05 1.00 Duration (hours) 11.217 11.217 11.217 11.217 11.217 11.217 4. EQUIPMENT 
& CONSUMABLES COSTS Equipment Costs ConsumableslMaterials Costs -Blotting paper 50 @ $0.58 sq ft {I} -Plastic sheets/bags 50 @ $0. 18/sq ft {2} -Gas torch consumables 1 @ $10.521hr x 1 hr {3} Subtotal cost of equipment and materials Overhead & profit on equipment and materials 
@ 17.25 % Total costs, equipment 
& material TOTAL COST: Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Appendix A, Page 3 of 4 Rate ($/hr) $48.88 $59.39 $62.93 $65.78 $48.88 $53.75 Cost $1,644.86 
$1,332.36 
$705.89 $184.46 $27.41 $602.91 $4,497.89 none $29.00 $9.00 $10.52 $48.52 $8.37 $56.89 Removal of contaminated heat exchanger 
<3000 pounds: $4,554.78 Total labor cost: Total equipment/material costs: Total craft labor man-hours required per unit: TLG Services, Inc. $4,497.89 
$56.89 81.88 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis 5. NOTES AND REFERENCES Document POl-l 604-003, Rev. 0 Appendix A, Page 4 of 4 Work difficulty factors were developed in conjunction with the Atomic Industrial Forum's (now NEI) program to standardize nuclear decommissioning cost estimates and are delineated in Volume 1, Chapter 5 of the "Guidelines for Producing Commercial Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Estimates," AIFINESP-036, May 1986. References for equipment 
& consumables costs: 1. McMaster-Carr, Item 7193T88, Spill Control 2. R.S. Means (2008) Division 01 56, Section 13.60-0200, page 20 3. R.S. Means (2008) Division 01 54 33, Section 40-6360, Reference-l0 Material and consumable costs were adjusted using the regional indices for San Luis Obispo, California.
TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis APPENDIXB Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Appendix B, Page 1 of7 UNIT COST FACTOR LISTING (DECON: Power Block Structures Only) TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Appendix B, Page 2 of7 U nit Cost Factor APPENDIXB UNIT COST FACTOR LISTING (Power Block Structures Only) Removal of clean instrument and sampling tubing, $/linear foot Removal of clean pipe 0.25 to 2 inches diameter, $/linear foot Removal of clean pipe >2 to 4 inches diameter, $/linear foot Removal of clean pipe >4 to 8 inches diameter, $/linear foot Removal of clean pipe >8 to 14 inches diameter, $/linear foot Removal of clean pipe> 14 to 20 inches diameter, $/linear foot Removal of clean pipe >20 to 36 inches diameter, $/linear foot Removal of clean pipe >36 inches diameter, $/linear foot Removal of clean valve >2 to 4 inches Removal of clean valve >4 to 8 inches Removal of clean valve >8 to 14 inches Removal of clean valve> 14 to 20 inches Removal of clean valve >20 to 36 inches Removal of clean valve >36 inches Removal of clean pipe hanger for small bore piping Removal of clean pipe hanger for large bore piping Removal of clean pump, <300 pound Removal of clean pump, 300-1000 pound Removal of clean pump, 1000-10,000 pound Removal of clean pump, > 10,000 pound Removal of clean pump motor, 300-1000 pound Removal of clean pump motor, 1000-10,000 pound Removal of clean pump motor, >10,000 pound Removal of clean heat exchanger 
<3000 pound Removal of clean heat exchanger 
>3000 pound Removal of clean feedwater heater/deaerator Removal of clean moisture separator/reheater Removal of clean tank, <300 gallons Removal of clean tank, 300-3000 gallon Removal of clean tank, >3000 gallons, $/square foot surface area TLG Services, Inc. Cost/Unit($)
0.53 5.65 7.99 15.37 29.88 38.77 57.06 67.83 102.44 153.66 298.82 387.72 570.65 678.35 33.90 124.18 257.65 711.04 2,828.75 5,465.31 299.03 1,177.97 2,650.42 1,516.92 3,810.98 10,757.59 22,135.40 331.59 1,048.60 8.70 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Appendix B, Page 3 of 7 Unit Cost Factor APPENDIXB UNIT COST FACTOR LISTING (Power Block Structures Only) Removal of clean electrical equipment, <300 pound Removal of clean electrical equipment, 300-1000 pound Removal of clean electrical equipment, 1000-10,000 pound Removal of clean electrical equipment, > 10,000 pound Removal of clean electrical transformer 
< 30 tons Removal of clean electrical transformer>
30 tons Removal of clean standby diesel generator, <100 kW Removal of clean standby diesel generator, 100 kW to 1 MW Removal of clean standby diesel generator, > 1 MW Removal of clean electrical cable tray, $/linear foot Removal of clean electrical conduit, $/linear foot Removal of clean mechanical equipment, <300 pound Removal of clean mechanical equipment, 300-1000 pound Removal of clean mechanical equipment, 1000-10,000 pound Removal of clean mechanical equipment, >10,000 pound Removal of clean HVAC equipment, <300 pound Removal of clean HV AC equipment, 300-1000 pound Removal of clean HVAC equipment, 1000-10,000 pound Removal of clean HVAC equipment, > 10,000 pound Removal of clean HV AC ductwork, $/pound Removal of contaminated instrument and sampling tubing, $/linear foot Removal of contaminated pipe 0.25 to 2 inches diameter, $/linear foot Removal of contaminated pipe >2 to 4 inches diameter, $/linear foot Removal of contaminated pipe >4 to 8 inches diameter, $/linear foot Removal of contaminated pipe >8 to 14 inches diameter, $/linear foot Removal of contaminated pipe> 14 to 20 inches diameter, $/linear foot Removal of contaminated pipe >20 to 36 inches diameter, $/linear foot Removal of contaminated pipe >36 inches diameter, $/linear foot Removal of contaminated valve >2 to 4 inches Removal of contaminated valve >4 to 8 inches TLG Services, Inc. CostlU nit( $) 141.13 486.82 973.67 2,308.13 1,602.97 4,616.28 1,637.30 3,654.56 7,565.66 13.16 5.74 141.13 486.82 973.67 2,308.13 141.13 486.82 973.67 2,308.13 0.56 1.64 22.13 38.42 60.30 119.72 144.08 200.04 236.75 466.22 558.77 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Appendix B, Page 4 of7 U nit Cost Factor APPENDIXB UNIT COST FACTOR LISTING (Power Block Structures Only) Removal of contaminated valve >8 to 14 inches Removal of contaminated valve> 14 to 20 inches Removal of contaminated valve >20 to 36 inches Removal of contaminated valve >36 inches Removal of contaminated pipe hanger for small bore piping Removal of contaminated pipe hanger for large bore piping Removal of contaminated pump, <300 pound Removal of contaminated pump, 300-1000 pound Removal of contaminated pump, 1000-10,000 pound Removal of contaminated pump, > 10,000 pound Removal of contaminated pump motor, 300-1000 pound Removal of contaminated pump motor, 1000-10,000 pound Removal of contaminated pump motor, > 10,000 pound Removal of contaminated heat exchanger 
<3000 pound Removal of contaminated heat exchanger 
>3000 pound Removal of contaminated tank, <300 gallons Removal of contaminated tank, >300 gallons, $/square foot Removal of contaminated electrical equipment, <300 pound Removal of contaminated electrical equipment, 300-1000 pound Removal of contaminated electrical equipment, 1000-10,000 pound Removal of contaminated electrical equipment, > 10,000 pound Removal of contaminated electrical cable tray, $/linear foot Removal of contaminated electrical conduit, $Ilinear foot Removal of contaminated mechanical equipment, <300 pound Removal of contaminated mechanical equipment, 300-1000 pound Removal of contaminated mechanical equipment, 1000-10,000 pound Removal of contaminated mechanical equipment, >10,000 pound Removal of contaminated HV AC equipment, <300 pound Removal of contaminated HV AC equipment, 300-1000 pound Removal of contaminated HV AC equipment, 1000-10,000 pound TLG Services, Inc. Cost/Unit($)
1,152.68 1,466.63 1,955.83 2,322.96 114.31 379.89 994.26 2,289.60 7,519.81 18,316.19 967.26 3,053.97 6,856.50 4,554.78 13,175.19 1,651.42 32.24 773.83 1,860.19 3,581.23 6,982.38 37.36 17.17 861.55 2,056.73 3,953.19 6,982.38 861.55 2,056.73 3,953.19 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document POl-l 604-003, Rev. 0 Appendix B, Page 5 of7 APPENDIXB UNIT COST FACTOR LISTING (Power Block Structures Only) Unit Cost Factor Cost/Unit($)
Removal of contaminated HV AC equipment, > 10,000 pound Removal of contaminated HV AC ductwork, $/pound Removal/plasma arc cut of contaminated thin metal components, $/linear in. Additional decontamination of surface by washing, $/square foot Additional decontamination of surfaces by hydrolasing, $/square foot Decontamination rig hook up and flush, $1 250 foot length Chemical flush of components/systems, $/gallon Removal of clean standard reinforced concrete, $/cubic yard Removal of grade slab concrete, $/cubic yard Removal of clean concrete floors, $/cubic yard Removal of sections of clean concrete floors, $/cubic yard Removal of clean heavily rein concrete wl#9 rebar, $/cubic yard Removal of contaminated heavily rein concrete w/#9 rebar, $/cubic yard Removal of clean heavily rein concrete wl#18 rebar, $/cubic yard Removal of contaminated heavily rein concrete w/#18 rebar, $/cubic yard Removal heavily rein concrete wl#18 rebar & steel embedments, $/cubic yard Removal of below -grade suspended floors, $/cubic yard Removal of clean monolithic concrete structures, $/cubic yard Removal of contaminated monolithic concrete structures, $/cubic yard Removal of clean foundation concrete, $/cubic yard Removal of contaminated foundation concrete, $/cubic yard Explosive demolition of bulk concrete, $/cubic yard Removal of clean hollow masonry block wall, $/cubic yard Removal of contaminated hollow masonry block wall, $/cubic yard Removal of clean solid masonry block wall, $/cubic yard Removal of contaminated solid masonry block wall, $/cubic yard Backfill ofbelow-graqe voids, $/cubic yard Removal of subterranean tunnels/voids, $/linear foot Placement of concrete for below-grade voids, $/cubic yard Excavation of clean material, $/cubic yard TLG Services, Inc. 6,982.38 2.29 4.11 8.60 36.12 7,312.90 16.76 145.04 193.82 379.84 1,123.28 254.39 2,251.67 321.60 2,980.61 491.72 379.84 958.59 2,250.19 752.34 2,096.28 32.43 108.56 357.95 108.56 357.95 28.42 122.09 154.57 3.06 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Appendix B, Page 6 of 7 Unit Cost Factor APPENDIXB UNIT COST FACTOR LISTING (Power Block Structures Only) Excavation of contaminated material, $/cubic yard Removal of clean concrete rubble (tipping fee included), $/cubic yard Removal of contaminated concrete rubble, $/cubic yard Removal of building by volume, $/cubic foot Removal of clean building metal siding, $/square foot Removal of contaminated building metal siding, $/square foot Removal of standard asphalt roofing, $/square foot Removal of transite panels, $/square foot Scarifying contaminated concrete surfaces (drill & spall), $/square foot Scabbling contaminated concrete floors, $/square foot Scabbling contaminated concrete walls, $/square foot Scabbling contaminated ceilings, $/square foot Scabbling structural steel, $/square foot Removal of clean overhead crane/monorail 
< 10 ton capacity Removal of contaminated overhead crane/monorail 
< 10 ton capacity Removal of clean overhead crane/monorail>
10-50 ton capacity Removal of contaminated overhead crane/monorail>
10-50 ton capacity Removal of polar crane> 50 ton capacity Removal of gantry crane> 50 ton capacity Removal of structural steel, $/pound Removal of clean steel floor grating, $/square foot Removal of contaminated steel floor grating, $/square foot Removal of clean free standing steel liner, $/square foot Removal of contaminated free standing steel liner, $/square foot Removal of clean concrete-anchored steel liner, $/square foot Removal of contaminated concrete-anchored steel liner, $/square foot Placement of scaffolding in clean areas, $/square foot Placement of scaffolding in contaminated areas, $/square foot Landscaping with topsoil, $/acre Cost of CPC B-88 LSA box & preparation for use TLG Services, Inc. Cost/U nit( $) 42.67 24.58 26.80 0.32 1.27 4.40 2.47 2.33 15.00 8.77 22.75 77.64 7.26 673.87 1,906.00 1,617.31 4,573.64 6,744.05 28,851.72 0.23 4.69 13.68 13.05 37.73 6.52 43.96 17.73 29.17 26,058.01 1,931.00 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Appendix B, Page 7of7 U nit Cost Factor APPENDIXB UNIT COST FACTOR LISTING (Power Block Structures Only) Cost of CPC B-25 LSA box & preparation for use Cost of CPC B-12V 12 gauge LSA box & preparation for use Cost of CPC B-144 LSA box & preparation for use Cost ofLSA drum & preparation for use Cost of cask liner for CNSI 8 120A cask (resins) Decontamination of surfaces with vacuuming, $/square foot TLG Services, Inc. Cost/U nit($) 1,702.11 1,666.89 10,158.75 161.97 8,060.01 0.75 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis APPENDIXC Document POl-l 604-003, Rev. 0 Appendix C, Page 1 of 24 DETAILED COST ANALYSIS DECON TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Activity Index Activitv Description PERIOD 1a -Shutdown through Transition Period 1 a Direct Decommissioning Activities 1a.1.1 Prepare preliminary decommissioning cost 1a.1.2 Notification of Cessation of Operations 1a.1.3 Remove fuel & source material 1a.1.4 Notification of Permanent Defueling 1a.1.5 Deactivate plant systems & process waste 1a.1.6 Prepare and submit PSDAR 1a.1.7 Review plant dwgs & specs. 1a.1.8 Perform detailed rad survey 1a.1.9 Estimate by-product inventory 1a.1.10 End product description 1a.1.11 Detailed by-product inventory 1a.1.12 Define major work sequence 1a.1.13 Perform SER and EA 1a.1.14 Perform Site-Specific Cost Study 1a.1.15 Prepare/submit License Termination Plan 1a.1.16 Receive NRC approval of termination plan Activity Specifications 1a.1.17.1 Plant & temporary faciltties 1a.1.17.2 Plant systems 1a.1.17.3 NSSS Decontamination Flush 1a.1.17.4 Reactor internals 1a,1.17.5 Reactor vessel 1a.1.17.6 Biologicalshield 1 a.1.17. 7 Steam generators 1a.1.17.8 Reinforced concrete 1a.1.17.9 Main Turbine 1a.1.17.10 Main Condensers 1 a.1.17.11 Plant structures 
& buildings 1a.1.17.12 Waste management 1a.1.17.13 Facility & site closeout 1a.1.17 Total Planning & Site Preparations 1a.1.18 Prepare dismantling sequence 1a.1.19 Plant prep. & temp. svces 1a.1.20 Design water clean-up system 1a.1.21 Rigging/Cont.
Cntrl Envlpsltooling/etc.
1a,1.22 Procure caskslliners 
& containers 1a.1 Subtotal Period 1 a Activity Costs Period 1 a Addttional Costs 1a.2.1 Spent Fuel Pool Isolation 1a.2 Subtotal Period 1 a Additional Costs Period 1 a Collateral Costs 1a.3.1 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer 1a,3 Subtotal Period 1 a Collateral Costs Period 1 a Period-Dependent Costs 1a.4.1 Insurance 1a.4.2 Property taxes TLG Services, Inc. Decon Cost Removal Cost Packaging Costs Transport Costs Table C-I Diablo Canyon Unit 1 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2008 Dollars) Off-Site LLRW Processing Disposal Costs Costs Other Costs 156 240 551 120 120 156 899 372 599 491 590 500 60 851 779 60 374 192 48 48 374 551 108 4,535 288 2,700 168 2,100 147 13,642 9,407 9,407 836 836 1,195 101 Total Continaenc 32 50 114 25 25 32 186 77 124 102 122 104 12 176 162 12 78 40 10 10 78 114 22 940 60 560 35 435 31 2,828 1,950 1,950 173 173 165 14 Total Costs 188 a n/a a 289 666 a 145 145 188 1,086 449 724 593 712 603 72 1,028 941 72 452 232 58 58 452 666 130 5,475 347 3,260 203 2,535 178 16,470 11,358 11,358 1,009 1,009 1,360 115 NRC Lic. Term. Costs 188 289 666 145 145 188 1,086 449 724 593 641 543 72 1,028 941 72 452 116 226 666 65 4,821 347 3,260 203 2,535 178 15,816 11,358 11,358 1,360 115 Spent Fuel Management Costs 1,009 1,009 Site Restoration Costs 71 60 116 58 58 226 65 654 654 Document POI-I604-003, Rev. 0 Appendix C, Page 2 of24 Processed Burial Volumes Burial/ Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Cu. Feet Cu. Feel Cu. Feel Cu. Feet Cu. Feel WI., Lbs. Utility and Craft Contractor Manhours Manhours 1,300 2,000 4,600 1,000 1,000 1,300 7,500 3,100 5,000 4,096 4,920 4,167 500 7,100 6,500 500 3,120 1,600 400 400 3,120 4,600 900 37,827 2,400 1,400 1,230 73,753 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Activity Index Descrietion Period 1 a Period.Dependent Costs (continUed) 1a.4.3 Health physics supplies 1a.4.4 Heavy equipment rental 1a.4.5 Disposal of DAW generated 1a.4.6 Plant energy budget 1a.4.7 NRC ISFSI Fees 1 a.4. 8 NRC Fees 1a.4.9 Emergency Planning Fees 1a.4.10 Spent Fuel Pool O&M 1a,4.11 ISFSI -Operating Costs 1a.4.12 Spent Fuel Storage/Capital Equipment 1a.4.13 ISFSI
* Fixed Costs 1a.4.14 Security Staff Cost 1a.4.15 Utility Staff Cost 1a4 Subtotal Period 1 a Period-Dependent Costs 1a.0 TOTAL PERIOD 1 a COST PERIOD 1 b -Decommissioning Preparations Period 1 b Direct Decommissioning Activities Detailed Work Procedures 1b.1.1.1 Plant systems 1b.1.1.2 NSSS Decontamination Flush 1b.1.1.3 Reactor internals 1b.1.1.4 Remaining buildings 1b.1.1.5 CRD cooling assembly 1b.1.1.6 CRD housings & ICI tubes 1b.1.1.7 Incore instrumentation 1b.1.1.8 Reactor vessel 1b.1.1.9 Facility closeout 1 b.1.1.1 0 Missile shields 1 b.1.1.11 Biological shield 1 b.1.1.12 Steam generators 1b.1.1.13 Reinforced concrete 1 b.1.1.14 Main Turbine 1b.1.1.15 Main Condensers 1b.1.1.16 Auxiliary building 1b.1.1.17 Reactor building 1b.1.1 Total 1b.1.2 Decon primary loop 1b.1 Subtotal Period 1 b Activity Costs Period 1 b Additional Costs 1b.2.1 Site Characterization 1b.2.2 Hazardous Waste Management 1b.2.3 Mixed Waste Management 1b.2 Subtotal Period 1 b Additional Costs Period 1 b Collateral Costs 1b.3.1 Decon equipment 1b.3.2 DOC staff relocation expenses 1b.3.3 Process liquid waste 1b.3.4 Small tool allowance TLG Services, Inc. Decon Removal Packaging Transport Cost Cost Costs Costs 486 490 11 976 11 976 11 1.623 1,623 935 64 188 786 Table C-I Diablo Canyon Unit 1 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2008 Dollars) Off-Site LLRW NRC Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lie. Term. Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs 168 654 654 102 591 591 38 16 69 69 1,330 276 1,605 1,605 159 159 706 98 803 803 1.258 174 1,432 735 152 887 118 24 142 1,594 330 1,925 239 50 289 775 161 936 936 26,403 5,473 31,876 31,876 38 34,612 7,202 42,843 38,009 38 58,497 12,153 71.680 65,183 567 118 685 617 120 25 145 145 300 62 362 362 162 34 195 49 120 25 145 145 120 25 145 145 120 25 145 145 435 90 525 525 144 30 174 87 54 11 65 65 144 30 174 174 551 114 666 666 120 25 145 72 187 39 226 187 39 226 327 68 395 356 327 68 395 356 3,986 826 4,812 3,907 1,122 2,745 2,745 3,986 1,948 7,557 6,652 4,549 1,886 6,435 6,435 590 122 713 713 912 189 1,101 1,101 6,051 2,197 8,248 8,248 194 1,129 1,129 1,395 289 1,684 1,684 6,988 2,648 10.674 10,674 0 3 3 Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet 610 159 1,432 887 142 1,925 289 4,834 610 5,842 654 610 69 147 87 72 226 226 40 40 905 905 400 2,403 GTCC Document POl*1604*003, Rev. 0 Appendix C, Page 3 of24 Burial/ Utility and Processed Craft Contractor Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs. Manhours Manhours 12,190 22 12,264 423,400 12,190 22 435,664 12,190 22 509,417 4,733 1,000 2,500 1,350 1,000 1,000 1,000 3,630 1,200 450 1,200 4,600 1,000 1,560 1,560 2,730 2,730 33,243 1,067 1,067 33,243 25,000 9,412 25,000 9,412 290,742 547 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Activity Index Description Period 1 b Collateral Costs (continued) 1b.3.5 Pipe cutting equipment 1b.3.6 Decon rig 1b.3.7 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer 1b.3 Subtotal Period 1 b Collateral Costs Period 1 b Period-Dependent Costs 1bA.1 Decon supplies 1bA.2 Insurance 1bA.3 Property taxes 1bAA Health physics supplies 1bA.5 Heavy eqUipment rental 1bA.6 Disposal of DAW generated 1bA.7 Plant energy budget 1bA.8 NRC ISFSI Fees 1bA.9 NRC Fees 1bA.10 Emergency Planning Fees 1b.4.11 Spent Fuel Pool O&M 1b.4.12 ISFSI -Operating Costs 1bA.13 Spent Fuel Storage/Capttal Equipment 1b.4.14 ISFSI -Fixed Costs 1b.4.15 Security Staff Cost 1bA.16 DOC Staff Cost 1b.4.17 Utility Staff Cost 1b.4 Subtotal Period 1 b Period-Dependent Costs 1b.0 TOTAL PERIOD 1 b COST PERIOD 1 TOTALS PERIOD 2a -Large Component Removal Period 2a Direct Decommissioning Activities Nuclear Steam Supply System Removal 2a.1.1.1 Reactor Coolant Piping 2a.1.1.2 Pressurizer Quench Tank 2a.1.1.3 Reactor Coolant Pumps & Motors 2a.1.1.4 Pressurizer 2a.1.1.5 Steam Generators 2a.1.1.6 Retired Steam Generator Units 2a.1.1.7 CRDMslICls/Service Structure Removal 2a.1.1.8 Reactor Vessel Internals 2a.1.1.9 Reactor Vessel 2a.1.1 Totals Removal of Major Equipment 2a.1.2 Main Turbine/Generator 2a.1.3 Main Condensers Cascading Costs from Clean Building Demolition 2a.1.4.1 'Reactor 2a.1.4.2 Containment Penetration Area 2a.1.4.3 Fuel Handling 2a.1.4 Totals TLG Services, Inc. Decon Removal Packaging Transport Cost Cost Costs Costs 1,000 1,400 2,399 1,002 188 786 28 272 243 28 515 4,051 1,517 195 789 4,051 2,493 206 793 305 287 40 40 32 29 6 6 120 101 44 121 38 59 454 295 394 3,846 2,686 1,924 1,895 1,890 162 92 224 37 144 2,231 5.D70 914 100 4,159 1,598 651 1,295 10,804 12,018 5,878 534 192 139 1,529 181 131 1,208 66 175 1,449 Table C-I Diablo Canyon Unit 1 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2008 Dollars) Off-Site LLRW NRC Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term. Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs 207 1,207 1,207 290 1,690 1,690 496 103 599 6,988 1,891 3,731 16,986 16,388 10 38 38 592 82 674 674 50 7 57 57 94 366 366 50 293 293 22 9 40 40 1.319 273 1,592 1,592 95 95 350 48 398 398 369 51 420 364 76 440 70 14 84 1,578 327 1,906 142 29 172 385 80 464 464 5,260 1,090 6,350 6,350 13,172 2,730 15,902 15,902 22 23,745 4,972 29,292 26,176 7,010 35,672 12,849 62,083 57.464 7,048 94.170 25,002 133,763 122.647 766 588 2,027 2,027 108 72 254 254 1,358 618 2,360 2,360 620 385 1,852 1,852 2,974 5,939 5,040 22,803 22,803 2,974 5,768 3,263 15,790 15,790 255 270 1,040 1,040 4,579 234 7,692 20,864 20,864 8,548 234 11,113 26,404 26,404 5,948 27,941 469 29,041 93,394 93,394 881 605 631 2,981 2,981 831 570 950 4,193 4,193 250 1,458 1,458 14 79 79 36 212 212 300 1,749 1,749 Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet 599 599 400 2,403 354 95 420 440 84 1,906 172 3,116 354 3,714 905 755 2,403 9,557 1,559 1,364 2.403 2,141 329 5,388 2,460 37,344 23,568 37,344 22,887 3,881 1,753 845 574 6,416 2,379 74,688 68,822 3,224 574 7,712 2,301 7,274 2,170 GTCC Document POI-I604-003, Rev. 0 Appendix C, Page 4 of24 Burial I Utility and Processed Craft Contractor Cu. Feet Wt..Lbs. Manhours Manhours 290,742 547 7,084 13 6,082 63,091 210,994 7,084 13 280,167 297,826 26,626 322,822 310,016 26.648 832,239 258,908 10.138 36,557 1,073 871,200 4,152 269,821 2.282 3,353,901 23,234 1.750 3,128,906 10,800 1,125 86,025 4.285 359,588 28,500 1,272 964,382 28,500 1,272 9,329,287 112,963 5,419 551,290 9,450 520,010 27.028 13,127 704 1,746 15,578 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Activity Index Descrietion Disposal of Plant Systems 2a.1.5.1 Auxiliary Steam 2a.1.5.2 Auxiliary Steam (RCA) 2a.1.5.3 Condensate System 2a.1.5.4 Condensate System (Insulated) 2a.1.5.5 Containment Spray 2a.1.5.6 Extraction Steam & Heater Drip 2a.1.5.7 Feedwater System 2a.1.5.8 Feedwater System (Insulated) 2a.1.5.9 Feedwater System (RCA Insulated) 2a.1.5.10 Feedwater System (RCA) 2a.1.5.11 Lube Oil Distribution 
& Purification 2a.1.5.12 Nitrogen & Hydrogen 2a.1.5.13 Nitrogen & Hydrogen (Insulated) 2a.1.5.14 Nitrogen & Hydrogen (RCA Insulated) 2a.1.5.15 Nitrogen & Hydrogen (RCA) 2a.1.5.16 Oily Water Separator 
& TB Sump 2a.1.5.17 Saltwater System 2a.1.5.18 Turbine Steam Supply 2a.1.5.19 Turbine Steam Supply (RCA) 2a.1.5.20 Turbine and Generator 2a.1.5.21 Turbine and Generator (Insulated) 2a.1.5 Totals 2a.1.6 Scaffolding in support of decommissioning 2a.1 Subtotal Period 2a Activity Costs Period 2a Additional Costs 2a.2.1 Retired Reactor Head 2a.2 Subtotal Period 2a Additional Costs Period 2a Collateral Costs 2a.3.1 Process liquid waste 2a.3.2 Small tool allowance 2a.3.3 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer 2a.3 Subtotal Period 2a Collateral Costs Period 2a Period-Dependent Costs 2a.4.1 Decon supplies 2a.4.2 Insurance 2a.4.3 Property taxes 2a.4.4 Health physics supplies 2a.4.5 Heavy equipment rental 2a.4.6 Disposal of DAW generated 2a.4.7 Plant energy budget 2a.4.8 NRC ISFSI Fees 2a.4.9 NRC Fees 2a.4.10 Emergency Planning Fees 2a.4.11 Spent Fuel Pool O&M 2a.4.12 ISFSI -Operating Costs 2a.4.13 Spent Fuel Storage/Capital Equipment 2a.4.14 ISFSI -Fixed Costs 2a.4.15 Security Staff Cost 2a.4.16 DOC Staff Cost 2a.4.17 Utility Staff Cost 2a.4 Subtotal Period 2a Period-Dependent Costs TLG Services, Inc. Decon Removal Packaging Transport Cost Cost Costs Costs 245 6 56 213 3 29 1,131 68 592 401 21 182 194 10 87 450 16 143 65 5 48 271 11 101 98 3 24 5 0 1 188 3 25 17 1 5 87 30 162 1,227 80 700 671 22 182 116 4 37 49 1 8 5,622 256 2,228 2,311 12 1.295 22,249 12,658 8,384 102 151 55 102 151 55 106 49 196 299 106 299 49 196 91 2,049 3,735 97 36 91 5,784 97 36 Table C-I Diablo Canyon Unit 1 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of2008 Dollars) Off-Site LLRW NRC Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term. Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs 458 192 958 958 240 130 616 616 4,856 1,530 8,176 8,176 1,497 489 2,590 2,590 713 234 1,237 1,237 1,176 431 2,216 2,216 395 115 628 628 825 287 1,495 1,495 199 81 405 405 10 4 21 21 205 113 533 533 3 20 0 1 2 2 9 9 38 39 169 169 63 25 126 126 33 195 5,742 1,770 9,519 9,519 1,497 583 2,954 2,954 300 110 567 567 63 32 152 152 18,278 6.204 32.587 32,371 67 10 819 3,227 3,227 26,006 29,126 469 37,945 138,131 137.915 503 15 528 1,355 1,355 503 15 528 1,355 1,355 183 184 718 718 62 361 325 1,586 329 1,915 183 1,586 575 2,994 1,043 31 122 122 699 97 796 796 160 22 182 164 708 2,756 2,756 774 4,509 4,509 320 131 584 584 2,004 415 2,419 2.419 302 302 1,044 144 1,188 1,188 892 123 1,015 1,165 242 1,407 224 46 270 6,026 1,249 7,276 454 94 549 1,151 239 1,390 1,390 20,607 4,272 24,879 24,879 29,137 6,040 35,177 35,177 320 63,867 14,629 84,823 73,986 Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet 4,445 2,330 47,076 14,512 6,908 11,399 3,829 7,995 1,926 101 1,986 20 1 20 371 607 195 55,669 14,508 2,909 607 216 177,198 586 37 216 267,458 73,330 3,224 574 2,002 2,002 725 36 1,915 1,915 36 725 18 5,158 302 1,015 1,407 270 7,276 549 10,819 18 5,158 GTCC Cu. Feet Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Appendix C, Page 50f24 Burial I Utility and Processed Craft Contractor Wt, Lbs. Manhours Manhours 180,494 4,001 94,627 3,528 1,911,765 18,771 589,348 6,833 280,525 3,329 462,924 7,441 155,509 1,130 324,669 4,542 78,223 1,693 4,117 81 80,661 3,052 315 17 793 75 15,060 1,433 24,649 464 2,926 2,260,765 20,590 589,194 11,474 118,127 1,947 24,645 777 7,196,094 94,419 29,669 18,689 17,626,350 278,128 5,419 211,020 2,100 84 211,020 2,100 84 43,508 141 43,508 141 103,157 188 18,197 251.451 460,189 103,157 188 729,838 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Activity Index Activi!.t Descri(;!tion 2a.0 TOTAL PERIOD 2a COST PERIOD 2b -Site Decontamination Period 2b Direct Decommissioning Activities Disposal of Plant Systems 2b.1.1.1 Capital Additions 85-2002 (clean) 2b.1.1.2 Capital Additions 85-2002 (contaminated) 2b.1.1.3 Chemical & Volume Control 2b.1.1.4 Chemical & Volume Control (Insulated) 2b.1.1.5 Component Cooling Water 2b.1.1.6 Component Cooling Water (RCA) 2b.1.1.7 Compressed Air 2b.1.1.8 Compressed Air (Insulated) 2b.1.1.9 Compressed Air (RCA Insulated) 2b.1.1.10 Compressed Air (RCA) 2b.1.1.11 Diesel Engine-Generator 2b.1.1.12 Diesel Engine-Generator (Insulated) 2b.1.1.13 Electrical (Clean) 2b.1.1.14 Electrical (Contaminated) 2b.1.1.15 Electrical (Decontaminated) 2b.1.1.16 Fire Protection 2b.1.1.17 Gaseous Radwaste 2b.1.1.18 HVAC (Clean Insulated) 2b.1.1.19 HVAC(Clean) 2b.1.1.20 HVAC (Contaminated Insulated) 2b.1.1.21 HVAC (Contaminated) 2b.1.1.22 Liquid Radwaste 2b.1.1.23 Liquid Radwaste (Insulated) 2b.1.1.24 Make-up Water 2b.1.1.25 Make-up Water (Insulated) 2b.1.1.26 Make-up Water (RCA Insulated) 2b.1.1.27 Make-up Water (RCA) 2b.1.1.28 Miscellaneous Reactor Coolant 2b.1.1.29 Nuclear Steam Supply Sampling 2b.1.1.30 Nuclear Steam Supply Sampling (Insulated 2b.1.1.31 Residual Heat Removal 2b.1.1.32 Safety Injection 2b.1.1.33 Safety Injection (Insulated) 2b.1.1.34 Safety Injection (RCA Insulated) 2b.1.1.35 Safety Injection (RCA) 2b.1.1.36 Service Cooling Water 2b.1.1.37 Service Cooling Water (RCA) 2b.1.1 Totals 2b.1.2 Scaffolding in support of decommissioning Decontamination of Site Buildings 2b.1.3.1 "Reactor 2b.1.3.2 Capital Additions 85-2004 2b.1.3.3 Containment Penetration Area 2b.1.3 Totals 2b.1 Subtotal Period 2b Activity Costs TLG Services, Inc. Decon Cost 1,492 725 265 478 56 17 275 1.817 1,524 27 266 1.817 3,634 Removal Packaging Transport Cost Costs Costs 28,433 12,955 8,671 155 353 3 28 948 62 87 341 19 13 166 478 13 107 148 5 22 1 413 24 152 10 1,809 491 9 63 3,025 73 612 311 11 93 66 4 3 24 304 254 6 36 1,128 34 178 598 48 44 63 4 2 306 28 34 0 3 180 2 19 98 4 5 146 4 6 44 1 1 258 56 68 101 4 11 5 0 0 32 2 4 270 17 33 100 23 0 3 12.889 382 1,445 2,889 15 11 1,737 381 349 23 1 4 188 29 33 1,947 410 386 17.724 807 1,842 Table C-I Diablo Canyon Unit 1 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2008 Dollars) Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic.Term.
Management Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs 26,006 30,131 65.937 53,676 227,302 214,298 12,734 32 187 234 177 795 795 475 573 1,152 4,023 4,023 40 161 370 1,210 1,210 34 201 876 371 1,844 1,844 31 178 1 6 10 10 45 45 199 190 830 830 32 184 2 12 375 2,184 505 35 301 1,404 1,404 5,022 2,223 10.955 10.955 761 286 1,460 1,460 14 28 36 151 151 5 29 63 367 281 30 165 772 772 1,381 183 781 3,684 3,684 172 440 741 2,521 2,521 5 36 75 241 241 63 369 6 34 28 18 84 84 157 99 458 458 29 31 64 250 250 31 35 71 292 292 1 8 19 73 73 309 589 569 2,124 2,124 76 31 64 287 287 3 2 3 13 13 23 17 23 100 100 205 151 197 874 874 21 121 26 14 67 67 10,864 2,349 8.681 38,426 34,556 84 12 1,024 4,034 4,034 426 3,703 3,146 11,265 11,265 40 3 36 133 133 120 394 421 1,450 1,450 586 4,099 3,603 12,848 12.848 11,533 6,460 13,308 55,308 51,438 Site Processed Restoration Volume Class A Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet 271 267,458 81,215 187 2,266 4,609 2,316 383 615 201 8,495 178 6 102 1,932 184 12 2,184 4,898 132 48,689 7,373 131 105 29 367 2,728 114 13,391 695 1.667 1.886 46 135 369 34 269 1,522 283 124 299 133 10 31 2,999 2,242 736 121 25 7 221 64 1,989 576 121 253 3,871 105,317 9.297 733 46 4,128 20,482 386 14 1,164 1,509 5,678 22,005 3.871 111.728 31,348 --Burial Volumes Class B Class C GTCC Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet 3.224 574 Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Appendix C, Page 6of24 Burial I Utility and Processed Craft Contractor Wt.,Lbs. Manhours Manhours 17,984,030 280,557 735,341 2,830 92,043 6,160 380,777 26,732 70,078 10,196 3,078 344,999 8,025 2,744 98 4,130 380 78,476 6,959 2,760 178 32,770 210,603 8,543 1,977,300 51,247 299,432 5,298 14,631 1,089 475 5.804 120,927 4,027 605,518 18,115 216,389 18,104 13,869 1,993 5,614 521 10,909 564 61,817 2,969 21,970 1,932 23,955 2,684 3,177 816 320,783 5,703 40,322 1,773 1,628 82 14,653 537 131.878 4,462 1.856 10,286 384 5,070,550 247,503 37,087 23,361 2,076,526 53,197 16,586 839 180,273 7,367 2,273,384 61,403 7,381,021 332.267 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Activity Index Descrietion Period 2b Collateral Costs 2b.3.1 Process liquid waste 2b.3.2 Small tool allowance 2b.3.3 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer 2b.3 Subtotal Period 2b Collateral Costs Period 2b Period*Dependent Costs 2b.4.1 Decon supplies 2b.4.2 Insurance 2b.4.3 Property taxes 2b.4.4 Health physics supplies 2b.4.5 Heavy eqUipment rental 2b.4.6 Disposal of DAW generated 2b.4.7 Plant energy budget 2b.4.8 NRC ISFSI Fees 2bo4.9 NRC Fees 2b.4.10 Emergency Planning Fees 2b.4.11 Spent Fuel Transfer*
Pool or ISFSI to DOE 2bo4.12 Spent Fuel Pool O&M 2bo4.13 Liquid Radwaste Processing Equipment/Services 2bo4.14 ISFSI
* Operating Costs 2b.4.15 Spent Fuel Storage/Capital Equipment 2bo4.16 ISFSI
* Fixed Costs 2b.4.17 Security Staff Cost 2b.4.18 DOC Staff Cost 2bo4.19 Utility Staff Cost 2b.4 Subtotal Period 2b Period*Dependent Costs 2b.0 TOTAL PERIOD 2b COST PERIOD 2c
* Wet Fuel Storage Period 2c Direct Decommissioning Activities Period 2c Collateral Costs 2c.3.1 Spent Fuel and Transfer 2c.3 Subtotal Period 2c Collateral Costs Period 2c Period.Dependent Costs 2c.4.1 Insurance 2c.4.2 Property taxes 2c.4.3 Health physics supplies 2c.4.4 Disposal of DAW generated 2c.4.5 Plant energy budget 2c.4.6 NRC ISFSI Fees 2c.4.7 NRC Fees 2c.4.8 Emergency Planning Fees 2c.4.9 Spent Fuel Transfer*
Pool or ISFSI to DOE 2c.4.10 Spent Fuel Pool O&M 2c.4.11 ISFSI
* Operating Costs 2c.4.12 Spent Fuel Equipment 2c.4.13 ISFSI
* Fixed Costs 2c.4.14 Utility Staff Cost 2co4 Subtotal Period 2c Period*Dependent Costs 2c.0 TOTAL PERIOD 2c COST TLG Services, Inc. Decon Removal Packaging Transport Cost Cost Costs Costs 210 189 779 366 210 366 189 779 792 2,360 4,490 89 33 792 6,850 89 33 4,636 24,940 1,086 2,654 701 15 701 15 701 15 Table C-I Diablo Canyon Unit 1 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2008 Dollars) Off-Site LLRW NRC Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term. Costs Costs Costs Continlilenc:c:
Costs Costs 1,011 682 2,873 2,873 76 441 441 898 186 1,084 1,011 898 944 4,399 3,314 274 1,066 1,066 846 117 963 963 194 27 220 220 815 3,176 3,176 931 5,420 5,420 294 121 536 536 1,915 397 2,312 2,312 366 366 1,264 175 1,439 1,439 715 99 814 918 190 1,108 1,411 293 1,704 369 76 445 445 271 56 327 5,128 1,063 6,191 550 114 664 1,394 289 1,683 1,683 17,184 3,562 20,747 20,747 25,221 5,228 30.450 30,450 294 57,747 13.827 79,632 68.458 11,533 7,765 58,645 28,079 139,339 123.210 9,873 2,047 11.920 9,873 2,047 11,920 3,474 480 3,954 3,954 805 111 917 917 242 943 943 49 20 90 90 2,016 418 2,434 2,434 1,522 1,522 1,457 201 1,659 1,659 2,974 411 3,386 4,050 839 4,889 5,868 1,216 7,084 1,125 233 1,359 44,027 9,127 53,154 2,288 474 2,762 6,990 1,449 8,439 8,439 49 76,596 15,223 92,590 18,435 49 86,469 17,270 104,510 18,435 Spent Fuel Site Processed Management Restoration Volume Class A Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet 2,821 1,084 1,084 2,821 4,735 366 814 1,108 1,704 327 6,191 664 11,174 4,735 12,258 3,871 111,728 38,904 11,920 11,920 797 1,522 3,386 4,889 7,084 1,359 53,154 2,762 74,155 797 86,075 797 Burial Volumes Class B Class C GTCC Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Document POl*1604*003, Rev. 0 Appendix C, Page 7of24 Burial/ Utility and Processed Craft Contractor Wt.,Lbs. Manhours Manhours 240,731 550 240,731 550 94,697 172 22,031 216,309 402,574 94,697 172 640,914 7,716,449 332,989 640,914 15,949 29 118,932 15,949 29 118,932 15,949 29 118,932 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Activity Index PERIOD 2d -Decontamination Following Wet Fuel Storage Period 2d Direct Decommissioning 2d.1.1 Remove spent fuel racks Disposal of Plant Systems 2d.1.2.1 Electrical (Contaminated) 
-FHB 2d.1.2.2 Electrical (Decontaminated) 
-FHB 2d.1.2.3 Fire Protection (RCA) 2d.1.24 HVAC (Contaminated) 
-FHB 2d.1.2.5 Spent Fuel Pit Cooling 2d.1.2.6 Spent Fuel Pit Cooling -FHB 2d.1.2 Totals Decontamination of Site Buildings 2d.1.3.1 Fuel Handling 2d.1.3 Totals 2d.1,4 Scaffolding in support of decommissioning 2d.1 Subtotal Period 2d Activity Costs Period 2d Additional Costs 2d.2.1 License Termination Survey Planning 2d.2 Subtotal Period 2d Additional Costs Period 2d Collateral Costs 2d.3.1 Process liquid waste 2d.3.2 Small tool allowance 2d.3.3 Decommissioning Equipment Disposition 2d.3 Subtotal Period 2d Collateral Costs Period 2d Period-Dependent Costs 2d.4.1 Decon supplies 2d.4.2 Insurance 2d.4.3 Property taxes 2d.4.4 Health physics supplies 2d.4.5 Heavy equipment rental 2d.4.6 Disposal of DAW generated 2d.4.7 Plant energy budget 2d.4.8 NRC ISFSI Fees 2d.4.9 NRC Fees 2d.4.10 Emergency Planning Fees 2d.4.11 Spent Fuel Transfer -Pool or ISFSI to DOE 2d.4.12 Liquid Radwaste Processing EquipmenUServices 2d.4.13 ISFSI -Operating Costs 2d.4.14 ISFSI -Fixed Costs 2d.4.15 Security Staff Cost 2d.4.16 DOC Staff Cost 2d.4.17 Utility Staff Cost 2d.4 Subtotal Period 2d Period-Dependent Costs 2d.0 TOTAL PERIOD 2d COST TLG Services, Inc. Decon Removal Packaging Transport Cost Cost Costs Costs 477 47 136 34 142 1 10 880 11 90 191 2 20 268 8 41 70 22 26 97 24 27 1,649 68 214 665 723 39 48 665 723 39 48 578 1.142 2.996 246 298 116 53 215 72 121 107 116 72 174 322 210 443 1,076 26 10 210 1,519 26 10 1,469 4,587 446 630 Table C-I Diablo Canyon Unit 1 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2008 Dollars) Off-Site LLRW NRC Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lie. Term. Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs 656 598 1,948 1,948 77 5. 69 305 305 742 478 2,202 2,202 162 104 478 478 320 36 181 854 854 117 221 133 588 588 125 237 150 660 660 1,543 499 1,116 5,088 5,088 206 510 944 3,134 3,134 206 510 944 3,134 3,134 17 205 807 807 1,765 1,668 2,862 10,977 10,977 669 277 946 946 669 277 946 946 200 201 785 785 15 87 87 686 99 215 1,229 1,229 686 299 432 2,101 2,101 73 283 283 177 24 201 201 46 6 53 53 153 597 597 223 1,299 1,299 87 36 159 159 245 51 296 296 88 88 303 42 345 345 171 24 195 207 43 250 177 37 213 213 65 13 78 132 27 159 182 38 220 220 2,769 574 3,343 3,343 3,526 731 4,257 4,257 87 8,088 2,095 12,036 11,265 2,451 2,054 8,757 5,666 26,060 25,290 spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet 2,496 746 20 7.198 1,570 3,102 138 1,130 841 1,209 903 14,955 1,902 1,996 1,965 1,996 1,965 147 17,097 6.372 794 6,000 378 6,000 1.172 1,400 88 195 250 78 159 770 1,400 770 23,097 8,944 GTCC Document POI-I604-003, Rev. 0 Appendix C, Page 8 of24 Burial! Utility and Processed Craft Contractor Cu. Feet Wt.,Lbs. Manhours Manhours 221,587 962 32,098 2,475 292,312 14,847 63,760 3,139 138.203 4,294 120,463 1,270 129,199 1,737 776,035 27,761 253,465 23,531 253,465 23,531 7,417 4,672 1,258,505 56,927 6,240 6,240 47,648 155 303,548 88 351,197 243 28,006 51 2,880 35,040 58,080 28,006 51 96,000 1,637,707 57.221 102,240 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Activity Index Activill:
Descrietion PERIOD 2e -License Termination Period 2e Direct Decommissioning Activrties 2e.1.1 ORISE confirmatory survey 2e.1.2 Terminate license 2e.1 Subtotal Period 2e Activity Costs Period 2e Additional Costs 2e.2.1 License Termination Survey 2e.2 Subtotal Period 2e Additional Costs Period 2e Collateral Costs 2e.3.1 DOC staff relocation expenses 2e.3 Subtotal Period 2e Collateral Costs Period 2e Period-Dependent Costs 2e.4.1 Insurance 2e.4.2 Property taxes 2e.4.3 Health physics supplies 2e.4.4 Disposal of DAW generated 2e.4.5 Plant energy budget 2e.4.6 NRC ISFSI Fees 2e.4.7 NRC Fees 2e.4.8 Emergency Planning Fees 2e.4.9 Spent Fuel Transfer -Pool or ISFSI to DOE 2e.4.10 ISFSI -Operating Costs 2e.4.11 ISFSI -Fixed Costs 2e.4.12 Securrty Staff Cost 2e.4.13 DOC Staff Cost 2e.4.14 Utility Staff Cost 2e.4 Subtotal Period 2e Period-Dependent Costs 2e.0 TOTAL PERIOD 2e COST PERIOD 2 TOTALS PERIOD 3b -Site Restoration Period 3b Direct Decommissioning Activities Demolition of Remaining Site Buildings 3b.1.1.1 'Reactor 3b.1.1.2 Caprtal Additions 85-2004 3b.1.1.3 Containment Penetration Area 3b.1.1.4 Miscellaneous 3b.1.1.5 Turbine 3b.1.1.6 Turbine Pedestal 3b.1.1.7 Fuel Handling 3b.1.1 Totals Site Closeout Activrties 3b.1.2 Grade & landscape site 3b.1.3 Final report to NRC 3b.1 Subtotal Period 3b Activity Costs TLG Services, Inc. Decon Removal Packaging Transport Cost Cost Costs Costs 919 919 919 7,597 59,580 14,508 11,963 6.873 273 615 26 3,274 1,212 1,689 13.961 2,272 16,234 Table C-I Diablo Canyon Unit 1 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2008 Dollars) Off-Site LLRW NRC Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lie. Term. Costs Costs Costs Contin2enc:t:
Costs Costs 153 63 216 216 a 153 63 216 216 8,178 3,390 11,568 11,568 8,178 3,390 11,568 11,568 1,395 289 1,684 1,684 1.395 289 1,684 1,684 290 40 330 330 76 11 86 86 318 1,236 1,236 20 8 36 36 200 42 242 242 144 144 532 73 605 605 281 39 319 339 70 409 106 22 128 216 45 261 298 62 360 360 2,847 590 3,437 3,437 2,525 523 3,048 3,048 20 7,852 1,842 10,642 9,381 20 17,578 5,585 24.110 22,849 39,990 40,020 237,386 110,277 521,321 404,082 1,425 8,298 57 330 127 742 5 31 679 3,952 251 1,463 350 2,039 2,894 16,856 471 2,743 187 39 226 226 187 3.404 19,825 226 Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet 319 144 319 409 128 261 1,261 319 1,261 319 113.098 4.141 402,284 130,180 3,224 574 8,298 330 742 31 3,952 1.463 2,039 16,856 2,743 19,599 GTCC Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Appendix C, Page 90f24 Burial I Utility and Processed Craft Contractor Cu. Feet Wt, Lbs. Manhours Manhours 142,829 3,120 142,829 3,120 6,371 12 4,714 36,143 39,286 6,371 12 80,143 6,371 142,841 83,263 27,360,510 813,637 1,680,690 74,901 3,572 6.563 249 38,602 11,300 16,750 151,936 4,587 1,560 156,523 1,560 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Activity Index Activi!l:
Period 3b Costs 3b.2.1 Concrete Crushing 3b.2.2 Cofferdam Construction and Teardown 3b.2 Subtotal Period 3b Additional Costs Period 3b Collateral Costs 3b.3.1 Small tool allowance 3b.3 Subtotal Period 3b Collateral Costs Period 3b Period.Dependent Costs 3bA.1 Insurance 3bA.2 Property taxes 3bA.3 Heavy eqUipment rental 3bAA Plant energy budget 3bA.5 NRC ISFSI Fees 3bA.6 Emergency Planning Fees 3b.4.7 Spent Fuel Transfer*
Pool or ISFSI to DOE 3bA.8 ISFSI
* Operating Costs 3bA.9 ISFSI -Fixed Costs 3bA.10 Security Staff Cost 3bA.11 DOC Staff Cost 3b.4.12 Utility Staff Cost 3b.4 Subtotal Period 3b Period*Dependent Costs 3b.0 TOTAL PERIOD 3b COST PERIOD 3c -Fuel Storage Operations/Shipping Period 3c Direct Decommissioning Activities Period 3c Collateral Costs 3c.3 Subtotal Period 3c Collateral Costs Period 3c Period*Dependent Costs 3c,4.1 Insurance 3cA.2 Property taxes 3cA,3 Plant energy budget 3c,4.4 NRC ISFSI Fees 3cA.5 Emergency Planning Fees 3cA.6 Spent Fuel Transfer -Pool or ISFSI to DOE 3cA.7 ISFSI -Operating Costs 3cA.8 ISFSI -Fixed Costs 3cA.9 Staff Cost 3cA.10 Utility Staff Cost 3cA Subtotal Period 3c Period.Dependent Costs 3c.0 TOTAL PERIOD 3c COST PERIOD 3d -GTCC shipping Period 3d Direct Decommissioning Activities Nuclear Steam Supply System Removal 3d.1.1.1 Vessel & Internals GTCC Disposal 3d.1.1 Totals 3d.1 Subtotal Period 3d Activity Costs TLG Services, Inc. Decon Removal Packaging Transport Cost Cost Costs Costs 464 438 901 187 187 6,420 6,420 23,741 300 300 300 Table C-I Diablo Canyon Unit 1 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2008 Dollars) Off-Site LLRW NRC Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term. Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs 96 560 91 529 187 1,089 39 225 39 225 787 109 896 207 29 235 1,331 7,750 273 56 329 391 391 763 105 869 921 191 1,112 289 60 349 587 122 709 338 70 408 6,581 1,364 7,945 1,713 355 2,068 12,849 3.792 23,061 13,036 7,422 44,199 226 4,184 578 4,762 1,098 152 1,250 2,075 2,075 4,055 560 4,615 4,865 1,009 5,874 1,534 318 1,852 3,119 647 3,766 20,852 4,323 25,174 5,130 1,064 6,194 46,913 8,650 55,562 46,913 8.650 55,562 8,952 1,897 11,150 11,150 8,952 1,897 11,150 11,150 8,952 1,897 11,150 11,150 Spent Fuel Site Processed Management Restoration Volume Class A Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet 560 529 1,089 225 225 896 235 7,750 329 391 869 1,112 349 709 408 7,945 1,158 910 5,718 17,342 5,718 38,255 4,762 1,250 2,075 4,615 5,874 1,852 3,766 25,174 6,194 55,562 55,562 Burial Volumes Class B Class C GTCC Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet 433 433 433 Document POI*I604*003, Rev. 0 Appendix C, Page 10 of24 Burial/ Utility and Processed Craft Contractor Wt., Lbs. Manhours Manhours 2,063 4,004 6,067 5,343 81.211 27,783 114,337 162,590 115,897 306,566 76,755 383,321 383,321 85,510 85,510 85.510 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Activity Index DescriE!tion Period 3d Collateral Costs 3d.3 SUbtotal Period 3d Collateral Costs Period 3d Period-Dependent Costs 3do4.1 Insurance 3do4.2 Property taxes 3do4.3 Plant energy budget 3do404 NRC ISFSI Fees 3do4.5 Emergency Planning Fees 3do4.6 ISFSI -Operating Costs 3do4.7 ISFSI -Fixed Costs 3do4.8 Staff Cost 3do4.9 Utility Staff Cost 3do4 Subtotal Period 3d Period-Dependent Costs 3d.0 TOTAL PERIOD 3d COST PERIOD 3e -ISFSI Decontamination Period 3e Direct Decommissioning Activities Period 3e Additional Costs 3e.2.1 ISFSI License Termination 3e.2 Subtotal Period 3e Additional Costs Period 3e Collateral Costs 3e.3.1 Small tool allowance 3e.3 Subtotal Period 3e Collateral Costs Period 3e Period-Dependent Costs 3eo4.1 Insurance 3eo4.2 Property taxes 3eo4.3 Heavy equipment rental 3eo404 Plant energy budget 3eo4.5 Security Staff Cost 3e.4.6 Utility Staff Cost 3eo4 Subtotal Period 3e Period-Dependent Costs 3e.0 TOTAL PERIOD 3e COST PERIOD 31 *ISFSI Site Restoration Period 31 Direct Decommissioning Activities Period 31 Additional Costs 31.2.1 ISFSI Demolition and Site Restoration 31.2 Subtotal Period 31 Additional Costs Period 31 Collateral Costs 31.3.1 Small tool allowance 31.3 Subtotal Period 31 Collateral Costs Period 31 Period-Dependent Costs 31.4.1 Insurance 3104.2 Property taxes 3104.3 Heavy equipment rental 3104.4 Plant energy budget TLG Services, Inc. Decon Removal Packaging Transport Cost Cost Costs Costs 300 1,059 100 1,059 100 14 14 309 309 1,383 100 562 562 103 Table C-I Diablo Canyon Unit 1 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2008 Dollars) Off-Site LLRW NRC Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lie. Term. Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs 15 17 4 4 7 7 14 2 16 5 1 7 11 2 13 73 15 89 18 4 22 148 27 175 8,952 148 1,924 11,325 11,150 387 789 678 3,016 387 789 678 3,016 17 17 127 18 145 33 5 38 64 373 172 36 207 129 27 156 461 149 919 387 1,250 829 3,953 24 121 707 24 121 707 17 2 19 21 125 spent Fuel Site Processed Management Restoration Volume Class A Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet 17 4 7 16 7 13 89 22 175 175 3,016 6,239 3,016 6,239 17 17 145 38 373 207 156 919 3,953 6,239 707 707 19 125 Burial Volumes Class B Class C GTCC Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet 433 Document POI-I604-003, Rev. 0 Appendix C, Page 11 of24 Burial I Utility and Processed Craft Contractor Wt, Lbs. Manhours Manhours 1,080 270 1,350 85,510 1,350 748,943 15,356 1,280 748,943 15,356 1,280 2,510 1,901 4,411 748,943 15,356 5,691 3,446 80 3,446 80 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Activity Index Activitv Description Period 31 Period-Dependent Costs (continued) 31.4.5 Security Staff Cost 31.4.6 Utility Staff Cost 31.4 Subtotal Period 31 Period-Dependent Costs 31.0 TOTAL PERIOD 31 COST PERIOD 3 TOTALS TOTAL COST TO DECOMMISSION Decon Cost 11,648 OTAl COST TO DECOMMISSION WITH 25.01% CONTINGENCY:
OTAl NRC LICENSE TERMINATION COST IS 69.78% OR: rPENT FUEL MANAGEMENT COST IS 24.52% OR:
DEMOLITION COST IS 5.7% OR: Removal Cost 103 669 25,793 87,866 OTAl lOW-LEVEl RADIOACTIVE WASTE VOLUME BURIED (EXCLUDING GTCC): OTAl GREATER THAN CLASS C RADWASTE VOLUME GENERATED:
OTAl SCRAP METAL REMOVED: OTAl CRAFT LABOR REQUIREMENTS:
End Notes: n/a -indicates that this activity not charged as decommissioning expense. a -indicates that this activity performed by decommissioning staff. 0-indicates that this value is less than 0.5 but is non-zero.
a cell containing" -" indicates a zero value TLG Services, Inc. Packaging Costs 304 15,019 Table C-I Diablo Canyon Unit 1 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2008 Dollars) Transport Costs Off-Site llRW Processing Disposal Costs Costs Other Costs 86 54 158 181 100 9,339 61,529 12,856 39,990 56.407 393,084 $771,148 thousands of 2008 dollars $538,104 thousands of 2008 dollars $189,088 thousands of 2008 dollars $43,956 thousands of 2008 dollars 143,984 Cubic Feet 433 Cubic Feet 47,992 Tons 1,021,677 Man-hours Total Continaenc 18 11 53 175 19,000 154,278 Total Costs 104 65 314 1,025 116,064 771,148 NRC Lic.Term.
Costs 11,375 538,104 Spent Fuel Management Costs 104 65 314 1,025 66,434 189,088 Document POI-1604-003, Rev. 0 Appendix C, Page 12 of24 Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial I Utility and Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet WI., lbs. Manhours Manhours 1,265 784 2,050 3,446 2,130 38,255 6,239 433 834,453 181,392 508,389 43,956 402,284 137,783 5,627 574 433 28,504,980 1,021,677 3,021,318 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Activity Index Activitv DescriDtion PERIOD 1a -Shutdown through Transition Period 1 a Direct Decommissioning Activities 1 a.l.1 Prepare preliminary decommissioning cost 1 a.l.2 Notification of Cessation of Operations 1 a.1.3 Remove fuel & source material la.l.4 la.l.5 la.l.6 la.l.7 la.l.8 1a.l.9 1a.l.l0 1a.l.ll la.l.12 la.l.13 1a.1.14 1a.l.15 la.l.16 Notification of Permanent Detueling Deactivate plant systems & process waste Prepare and submit PSDAR Review plant dwgs & specs. Perform detailed rad survey Estimate by-product inventory End product description Detailed by-product inventory Define major work sequence Perform SER and EA Perform Site-Specific Cost Study Prepare/submit License Termination Plan Receive NRC approval of termination plan Activity Specifications 1 a.l.17.1 Plant & temporary facilrties la.l.17.2 Plant systems 1 a.l.17.3 NSSS Decontamination Flush la.l.17.4 Reactorinternals 1a.l.17.5 Reactor vessel 1a.l.17.6 Biological shield 1a.l.17.7 Steam generators la.l.17.8 Reinforced concrete 1a.1.17.9 Main Turbine 1a.1.17.10 Main Condensers 1 a.l.17.11 Plant structures 
& buildings la.l.17.12Waste management la.1.17.13 Facility & site closeout la.1.17 Total Planning & Site Preparations 1 a.l.18 Prepare dismantling sequence 1 a.l.19 Plant prep. & temp. svces 1 a.l.20 Design water clean-up system la.1.21 Rigging/Cont.
Cntrl Envlpsltooling/etc.
la.1.22 Procure casksniners 
& containers 1 a.1 Subtotal Period 1 a Activity Costs Period 1 a Additional Costs 1 a.2.1 Spent Fuel Pool Isolation 1 a.2 Subtotal Period 1 a Additional Costs Period 1 a Collateral Costs la.3.1 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer 1 a.3 Subtotal Period 1 a Collateral Costs Period 1 a Period-Dependent Costs 1a.4.1 Insurance 1 a.4.2 Property taxes la.4.3 Health physics supplies 1a.4.4 Heavy equipment rental TLG Services, Inc. Decon Cost Removal Cost 457 490 Packaging Costs Transport Costs Table C-2 Diablo Canyon Unit 2 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2008 Dollars) Off-5ite LLRW Processing Disposal Costs Costs Other Costs 67 103 236 51 51 67 384 159 256 210 252 214 26 364 333 26 160 82 21 21 160 236 46 1,939 123 2,700 72 2,100 63 8,581 6,272 6,272 1,649 1,649 1,195 101 Total Continuenc 14 22 50 11 11 14 81 33 54 44 53 45 5 77 70 5 34 17 4 4 34 50 10 409 26 569 15 443 13 1,808 1,322 1,322 348 348 168 14 161 103 NRC Total Lic. Term. Costs Costs 81 81 a n/a a 124 124 286 286 a 62 62 62 62 81 81 466 466 192 192 310 310 254 254 305 275 259 233 31 31 441 441 403 403 31 31 194 194 99 50 25 25 194 97 286 286 56 28 2,348 2,067 149 149 3,269 3,269 87 87 2,543 2,543 76 76 10,389 10,109 7,593 7,593 7,593 7,593 1,997 1,997 1,363 1,363 115 115 618 618 593 593 Spent Fuel Management Costs 1,997 1,997 Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Appendix C, Page 13 of24 Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial I Utility and Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs. Manhours Manhours 31 26 50 25 25 97 28 280 280 556 855 1.967 428 428 556 3,207 1,326 2,138 1.751 2.104 1.782 214 3,036 2,779 214 1,334 684 171 171 1,334 1,967 385 16,175 1,026 599 526 31.537 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Activity Index Activi!l:
Period 1 a Period*Dependent Costs (continued) la.4.5 Disposal of DAW generated la.4.6 Plant energy budget la.4.7 NRC ISFSI Fees laA.8 NRC Fees la.4.9 Emergency Planning Fees la.4.10 Spent Fuel Pool O&M la.4.11 ISFSI
* Operating Costs la.4.12 Spent Fuel StoragelCapital Equipment la.4.13 ISFSI
* Fixed Costs la.4.14 Securtty Staff Cost la.4.15 Utility Staff Cost la.4 Subtotal Period 1 a Period*Dependent Costs la.O TOTAL PERIOD la COST PERIOD 1 b -Decommissioning Preparations Period 1 b Direct Decommissioning Activities Detailed Work Procedures lb.l.1.1 Plant systems lb.l.1.2 NSSS Decontamination Flush lb.l.l.3 Reactor internals lb.l.1.4 Remaining buildings lb.l.1.5 CRD cooling assembly lb.l.1.6 CRD housings & ICI tubes lb.l.1.7 Incore instrumentation lb.l.1.8 Reactor vessel lb.l.l.9 Faciltty closeout lb.l.l.l0 Missile shields 1 b.l.1.11 Biological shield lb.l.1.12 Steam generators lb.l.1.13 Reinforced concrete lb.l.1.14 Main Turbine lb.l.l.15 Main Condensers lb.l.l.16 Auxiliary building lb.l.l.17 Reactorbuilding lb.l.l Total lb.l.2 Decon primary loop lb.l Subtotal Period 1 b Activity Costs Period 1 b Addttional Costs lb.2.1 Stte Characterization lb.2.2 Hazardous Waste Management lb.2.3 Mixed Waste Management lb.2 Subtotal Period 1 b Additional Costs Period 1 b Collateral Costs lb.3.1 Decon equipment lb.3.2 DOC staff relocation expenses lb.3.3 Process liquid waste lb.3.4 Small tool allowance lb.3.5 Pipe cutting equipment lb.3.6 Decon rig lb.3.7 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer lb.3 Subtotal Period 1 b Collateral Costs TLG Services, Inc. Decon Removal Packaging Transport Cost Cost Costs Costs 11 947 11 947 11 1,635 1,635 935 64 190 791 1,000 1,400 2,399 1.002 190 791 Table C-2 Diablo Canyon Unit 2 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2008 Dollars) Off-Site LLRW NRC Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term. Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs 35 15 64 64 1,330 280 1,610 1.610 191 191 471 66 537 537 1,258 177 1,434 735 155 890 141 30 171 4,385 924 5,309 286 60 347 10,231 2,156 12,388 12,388 21.222 4,473 25,695 25,695 35 41.545 8,782 51,324 42,982 35 58.047 12.259 71,303 60,684 243 51 294 264 51 11 62 62 128 27 155 155 69 15 84 21 51 11 62 62 51 11 62 62 51 11 62 62 186 39 225 225 62 13 74 37 23 5 28 28 62 13 74 74 236 50 286 286 51 11 62 31 80 17 97 80 17 97 140 29 169 153 140 29 169 153 1,704 359 2,063 1.675 1,148 2,783 2,783 1,704 1,508 4,847 4,459 1,945 820 2,765 2,765 590 124 715 715 912 192 1,104 1,104 3,447 1.136 4,583 4,583 197 1,132 1,132 1,395 294 1,689 1,689 7,041 2,711 10,796 10,796 0 3 3 211 1,211 1,211 295 1,695 1,695 504 106 610 7,041 1,899 3.815 17,137 16,526 Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet 565 191 1,434 890 171 5,309 347 8.341 565 10,338 280 565 29 63 37 31 97 97 17 17 388 388 401 2,421 610 610 401 2,421 GTCC Cu. Feet Document POl.1604-003, Rev. 0 Appendix C, Page 14 0(24 Burial I Utility and Processed Craft Contractor Wt*ILbs. Manhours Manhours 11,299 21 157,471 346,229 11,299 21 503,700 11,299 21 535,237 2,024 428 1,069 577 428 428 428 1,552 513 192 513 1,967 428 667 667 1,167 1,167 14,215 1.067 1.067 14,215 10,690 4.024 10,690 4,024 292,773 550 292,773 550 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Activity Index Descrietion Period 1 b Period*Dependent Costs 1b.4.1 Decon supplies 1b.4.2 Insurance 1b.4.3 Property taxes 1b.4.4 Health physics supplies 1b.4.5 Heavy equipment rental 1b.4.6 Disposal of DAW generated 1b.4.7 Plant energy budget 1b.4.8 NRC ISFSI Fees 1b.4.9 NRC Fees 1b.4.10 Emergency Planning Fees 1b.4.11 Spent Fuel Pool O&M 1b.4.12 ISFSI
* Operating Costs 1b.4.13 Spent Fuel Storage/Capital Equipment 1b.4.14 ISFSI
* Fixed Costs 1b.4.15 Security Staff Cost 1b.4.16 DOC Staff Cost 1b.4.17 Staff Cost 1b.4 Subtotal Period 1 b Period.Dependent Costs 1b.0 TOTAL PERIOD 1 b COST PERIOD 1 TOTALS PERIOD 2a -Large Component Removal Period 2a Direct Decommissioning Activities Nuclear Steam Supply System Removal 2a.1.1.1 Reactor Coolant Piping 2a.1.1.2 Pressurizer Quench Tank 2a.1.1.3 Reactor Coolant Pumps & Motors 2a.1.1.4 Pressurizer 2a.1.1.5 Steam Generators 2a.1.1.6 Retired Steam Generator Units 2a.1.1.7 CRDMs/ICls/Service Structure Removal 2a.1.1.8 Reactor Vessellntemals 2a.1.1.9 Reactor Vessel 2a.1.1 Totals Removal of Major Equipment 2a.1.2 Main Turbine/Generator 2a.1.3 Main Condensers Cascading Costs from Clean Building Demolition 2a.1.4.1 "Reactor 2a.1.4.2 Auxiliary 2a.1.4.3 Containment Penetration Area 2a.1.4.4 Radwaste Storage 2a.1.4.5 Fuel Handling 2a.1.4 Totals Disposal of Plant Systems 2a.1.5.1 Auxiliary Steam 2a.1.5.2 Auxiliary Steam (RCA) 2a.1.5.3 Building Services (Non*Power Block) 2a.1.5.4 Condensate System 2a.1.5.5 Condensate System (Insulated)
TLG Services, Inc. Decon Removal Packaging Transport Cost Cost Costs Costs 29 255 247 29 502 4,063 1.505 196 794 4,063 2,452 206 798 305 287 40 40 32 29 6 6 120 101 44 121 38 59 454 295 394 3,846 2,686 1,924 1,895 1,890 162 92 224 37 134 2,198 5,018 870 100 4,126 1,562 651 1,285 10,739 11,930 5,835 532 191 138 1,529 181 131 1,208 652 66 82 175 2,183 128 31 109 14 6 1,031 62 546 388 21 181 Table C-2 Diablo Canyon Unit 2 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2008 Dollars) Off-Site LLRW NRC Processing Disposal other Total Total Lic. Term. Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs 10 39 39 602 85 687 687 51 7 58 58 90 345 345 52 299 299 20 8 37 37 1,341 283 1,623 1,623 96 96 237 33 271 271 375 53 427 370 78 448 71 15 86 1,919 404 2,324 144 30 175 5,158 1,087 6,245 6,245 3,863 814 4,677 4,677 10,698 2,255 12,953 12,953 20 24,926 5,304 30,790 27,234 7,061 31,976 11,763 57,356 52,802 7,096 90,023 24,022 128.660 113,486 766 598 2,036 2,036 108 73 255 255 1,358 628 2,371 2,371 620 391 1,859 1,859 2,974 5,939 5,124 22,887 22,887 2,974 5,768 3,317 15,844 15,844 255 275 1,044 1,044 4,516 229 7,700 20,667 20,667 8,548 229 11,250 26,467 26,467 5.948 27,878 459 29,356 93,430 93,430 879 603 640 2,983 2.983 831 570 966 4,208 4,208 255 1,462 1,462 137 790 790 14 80 80 17 99 99 37 212 212 460 2,643 2,643 252 105 519 519 118 67 310 310 1 7 4,477 1,429 7,545 7,545 1,481 490 2,561 2,561 Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet 327 96 427 448 86 2,324 175 3,556 327 4,167 388 728 2,421 14,505 669 1,293 2,421 2,141 329 5,388 2,460 37,344 23,568 37,344 22,887 3,881 1,502 845 574 6,416 2,379 74,688 68,572 3,224 574 7,691 2,294 7.274 2,170 2,440 1,146 43,400 14,362 GTCC Cu. Feet Document POl.1604*003, Rev. 0 Appendix C, Page 15 of24 Burial I Utility and Processed Craft Contractor Wt.,Lbs. Manhours Manhours 6.541 12 79,383 47,314 174,537 6.541 12 301,234 299,314 12,319 319,473 310,613 12,339 854,710 258,908 10,138 36,557 1.073 871,200 4,152 269,821 2,282 3.353,901 23,234 1,750 3,128,906 10,800 1,125 86,025 4,285 352,188 27,833 1,245 964,382 27,833 1,245 9,321,887 111,630 5,366 549,788 9,425 520,010 27,028 13,127 7,054 704 918 1,746 23,550 99,082 2,123 46,536 1,820 106 1,762,487 17,105 583,235 6,634 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Activity Index Descrietion Period 2a Disposal of Plant Systems (continued) 2a.1.5.6 Containment Spray 2a.1.5.7 Extraction Steam & Heater Drip 2a.1.5.8 F eedwater System 2a.1.5.9 Feedwater System (Insulated) 2a.1.5.10 Feedwater System (RCA Insulated) 2a.1.5.11 Feedwater System (RCA) 2a.1.5.12 NSSS Sampling 2a.1.5.13 NSSS Sampling (Insulated) 2a.1.5.14 Nitrogen & Hydrogen 2a.1.5.15 Nitrogen & Hydrogen (Insulated) 2a.1.5.16 Nitrogen & Hydrogen (RCA Insulated) 2a.1.5.17 Nitrogen & Hydrogen (RCA) 2a.1.5.18 Oily Water Separator 
& TB Sump 2a.1.5.19 Saltwater System 2a.1.5.20 Turbine Steam Supply 2a.1.5,21 Turbine Steam Supply (RCA) 2a.1.5.22 Turbine and Generator 2a.1.5.23 Turbine and Generator (Insulated) 2a.1.5 Totals 2a.1.6 Scaffolding in support of decommissioning 2a.1 Subtotal Period 2a Activity Costs Period 2a Additional Costs 2a.2.1 Retired Reactor Head 2a.2 Subtotal Period 2a Additional Costs Period 2a Collateral Costs 2a.3.1 Process liquid waste 2a.3.2 Small tool allowance 2a.3.3 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer 2a.3 Subtotal Period 2a Collateral Costs Period 2a Period.Dependent Costs 2a,4.1 Decon supplies 2a.4.2 Insurance 2a.4.3 Property taxes 2a.4.4 Health physics supplies 2a.4.5 Heavy equipment rental 2a.4.6 Disposal of DAW generated 2a.4.7 Plant energy budget 2a.4.8 NRC ISFSI Fees 2a.4.9 NRC Fees 2a.4.10 Emergency Planning Fees 2a.4.11 Spent Fuel Transfer*
Pool or ISFSI to DOE 2a.4.12 Spent Fuel Pool O&M 2a.4.13 ISFSI-Operating Costs 2a.4.14 Spent Fuel StoragelCapital Equipment 2a.4,15 ISFSI-Fixed Costs 2a.4.16 Security Staff Cost 2a.4.17 DOC Staff Cost 2a.4.18 Utility Staff Cost 2a.4 Subtotal Period 2a Period-Dependent Costs 2a.0 TOTAL PERIOD 2a COST TLG Services, Inc. Decon Removal Packaging Transport Cost Cost Costs Costs 183 10 84 391 16 137 93 13 112 137 93 24 4 128 38 16 1 4 81 24 153 1,240 81 714 685 23 191 119 4 39 44 1 7 5,099 245 2,093 4,344 26 19 1,285 24,426 12,573 8,216 102 151 55 102 151 55 107 49 198 318 107 318 49 198 89 2,113 3,658 104 39 89 5,771 104 39 1,481 30,617 12,877 8,508 Table C-2 Diablo Canyon Unit 2 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2008 Dollars) OffoSite LLRW NRC Processing Disposal other Total Total Lic. Term. Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs 688 228 1,192 1,192 1,126 406 2,076 2,076 919 252 1,389 1,389 29 166 197 80 396 396 10 4 20 20 8 43 63 251 251 5 15 59 59 3 20 0 1 2 2 8 8 34 37 157 157 41 18 89 89 32 186 5,855 1,831 9,721 9,721 1,567 614 3,079 3,079 318 118 598 598 58 29 140 140 17,151 48 5,854 30,489 30,110 149 22 1,572 6,132 6,132 24,958 29,122 459 38,848 139,887 139,507 503 15 537 1,363 1,363 503 15 537 1,363 1,363 184 189 727 727 67 385 346 1,160 244 1,404 184 1,160 500 2,516 1,074 31 120 120 685 96 781 781 157 22 179 161 742 2,856 2,856 771 4,428 4,428 342 143 628 628 1,962 414 2,376 2,376 296 296 700 98 798 798 876 123 1,000 352 74 427 1,141 241 1,382 219 46 265 4,531 955 5,486 445 94 539 13,382 2,820 16,202 16,202 20,180 4,253 24,433 24,433 29,194 6,153 35,347 35,347 342 74,121 17,076 97,542 88,131 24,958 30,151 75,755 56,961 241,309 230,074 Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet 6,667 10,916 8,906 166 1,907 100 81 164 20 20 1 17 330 402 186 56,760 15,189 3,082 565 380 166,269 185 1,300 82 380 257,222 73,303 3,224 574 2,002 2,002 731 38 1,404 1,404 38 731 18 5,524 296 1,000 427 1,382 265 5,486 539 9,394 18 5,524 10,798 436 257,222 81,561 3,224 574 GTCC Cu. Feet Document P01.1604-003, Rev. 0 Appendix C, Page 16 of24 Buriall Utility and Processed Craft Contractor Wt., Lbs. Manhours Manhours 270,737 3,135 443,294 6,490 361,684 1,645 2,547 77,448 1,601 4,076 76 17,884 2,398 1,787 711 309 16 705 72 13,400 1,362 16,329 394 2,779 2,305,038 20,783 616,829 11,698 125,162 2,001 22,940 696 6,768,654 86,499 65,745 37,341 17,226,080 295,473 5,366 211,020 2,100 84 211,020 2,100 84 43,889 143 43,889 143 110,482 201 204,930 246,240 458,460 110,482 201 909,630 17,591,480 297,917 915,080 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Activity Index Descrietion PERIOD 2b -Site Decontamination Period 2b Direc! Decommissioning Activities Disposal of Plant Systems 2b.1.1.1 Capital Additions 85-2002 (Clean) 2b.1.1.2 Capital Additions 85-2002 (contaminated) 2b.1.1.3 Chemical & Volume Control 2b.1.1.4 Chemical & Volume Control (Insulated) 2b.1.1.5 Component Cooling Water 2b.1.1.6 Component Cooling Water (RCA) 2b.1.1.7 Compressed Air 2b.1.1.8 Compressed Air (Insulated) 2b.1.1.9 Compressed Air (RCA Insulated) 2b.1.1.10 Compressed Air (RCA) 2b.1.1.11 Diesel Engine-Generator 2b.1.1.12 Diesel Engine-Generator (Insulated) 2b.1.1.13 Electrical (Clean) 2b.1.1.14 Electrical (Contaminated) 2b.1.1.15 Electrical (RCA) 2b.1.1.16 Fire Protection 2b.1.1.17 Gaseous Radwaste 2b.1.1.18 HVAC (Clean Insulated) 2b.1.1.19 HVAC (Clean) 2b.1.1.20 HVAC (Contaminated Insulated) 2b.1.1.21 HVAC (Contaminated) 2b.1.1.22 Liquid Radwaste 2b.l.l.23 Liquid Radwaste (Insulated) 2b.1.1.24 Lube Oil Distribution 
& Purification 2b,1.1.25 Make-up Water 2b.l.l.26 Make-up Water (Insulated) 2b.1.1.27 Make-up Water (RCA Insulated) 2b.1.1.28 Make-up Water (RCA) 2b.1.1.29 Mechanical Department EqUipment 2b.1.1.30 Miscellaneous Reactor Coolant 2b.l.l.31 Nuclear Steam Supply Sampling 2b.l.1.32 Nuclear Steam Supply Sampling (Insulated 2b.1.1.33 Residual Heat Removal 2b.1.1.34 Safety Injection 2b.1.1.35 Safety Injection (Insulated) 2b.1,1.36 Safety Injection (RCA Insulated) 2b.1.1.37 Safety Injection (RCA) 2b.1.1.38 Service Cooling Water 2b.l.l.39 Service Cooling Water (RCA) 2b.1.1.40 Sewer System Expansion 2b.l.1 Totals 2b.1.2 Scaffolding in support of decommissioning Decontamination of Site Buildings 2b.1.3.1 *Reactor 2b.1.3.2 Auxiliary 2b.1.3.3 Capital Additions 85-2004 2b.l.3.4 Containment Penetration Area 2b.1.3.5 Radwaste Storage 2b.1.3 Totals 2b.l Subtotal Period 2b Activity Costs TLG Services, Inc. Decon Cost 670 241 298 24 17 265 1,514 1,524 1,080 345 266 7 3,222 4,736 Removal Packaging Transport Cost Costs Costs 382 380 9 38 815 55 75 315 17 12 161 462 13 107 100 5 23 1 411 26 116 3 2,645 279 30 1,691 30 256 293 10 91 102 5 9 34 356 191 4 25 849 22 125 345 30 31 32 1 211 42 208 20 25 126 17 1 101 5 16 1 7 0 0 236 55 67 98 4 11 4 0 30 2 250 17 33 118 29 40 11,507 298 1,015 5,430 33 24 1,737 381 349 657 112 106 150 24 21 188 29 33 56 12 10 2,788 558 519 19,725 888 1,558 Table C-2 Diablo Canyon Unit 2 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2008 Dollars) Off-5ite LLRW NRC spent Fuel Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term. Management Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs 80 462 287 58 224 995 995 403 498 1,040 3,555 3,555 39 147 345 1,115 1,115 34 195 877 372 1,831 1,831 21 122 1 6 11 11 46 46 212 195 847 847 24 141 1 3 557 3,203 243 17 162 735 735 2,103 1,095 5,176 5,176 750 282 1.426 1,426 61 34 63 273 273 7 41 75 431 197 17 120 554 554 970 124 576 2,665 2,665 142 274 467 1,588 1,588 2 18 35 115 115 342 156 755 755 44 251 4 24 24 15 67 67 138 77 361 361 0 1 30 31 67 256 256 3 7 9 36 36 1 3 4 15 15 305 583 560 2,071 2,071 76 31 64 284 284 3 2 3 12 12 23 17 22 97 97 203 150 193 845 845 25 142 35 18 87 87 8 49 7,479 2,009 7,055 30,878 25,806 186 27 1,966 7,665 7,665 426 3,703 3,198 11,317 11,317 232 1,592 1,636 5,416 5,416 30 345 430 1,345 1,345 120 394 428 1,457 1,457 8 173 91 356 356 816 6,206 5,782 19,891 19,891 8.480 8,242 14,803 58,434 53,362 Site Processed Restoration Volume Class A Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet 462 2,779 224 3,909 2,029 375 561 195 8,505 122 6 108 2,055 141 3 3,203 2,355 63 20,389 7,268 587 132 41 431 1,912 64 9,399 474 1.380 1,251 23 67 3,315 251 24 237 1,340 288 124 25 26 11 11 2,957 2,219 734 121 24 7 219 63 1,971 571 142 342 49 5,072 72,506 8,010 1,624 102 4,128 20,482 2,251 6,098 288 1,320 1,164 1,509 75 660 7,907 30,069 5,072 82,037 38,181 Burial Volumes Class B Class C GTCC Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Document POl*1604-003, Rev. 0 Appendix C, Page 17 of24 Burial/ Utility and Processed Craft Contractor Wt..Lbs. Manhours Manhours 7,035 132,341 6.462 326,881 23,723 64,973 9,341 2,984 345,395 7,753 1,881 99 4,393 387 83,461 6,991 2,089 48 47,918 101,246 4,850 828,008 28,569 295,145 4,992 35,376 1,724 662 6,878 83,372 3,019 423,748 13,623 148,480 10,972 6,908 948 134,627 3,487 3,794 376 9,606 423 54,432 2,103 19 22,203 1,982 3,299 257 1.414 110 317,012 5,170 40,197 1,726 1,614 70 14,529 498 130,758 4,112 2,186 13,881 478 746 3,623,296 220,481 82,182 46,676 2,076,526 53,198 629,318 28,216 128,360 8,143 180,273 7,367 61,324 884 3,075,801 97,808 6,781,279 364,965 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Aualysis Activity Index Descrietion Period 2b Collateral Costs 2b.3.1 Process liquid waste 2b.3.2 Small tool allowance 2b.3.3 Spent Fuel and Transfer 2b.3 Subtotal Period 2b Collateral Costs Period 2b Period.Dependent Costs 2b.4.1 Decon supplies 2b.4.2 Insurance 2b.4.3 Property taxes 2bA.4 Health physics supplies 2b.4,5 Heavy equipment rental 2bA.6 Disposal of DAW generated 2b.4.7 Plant energy budget 2b.4.8 NRC ISFSI Fees 2bA.9 NRC Fees 2bA.l0 Emergency Planning Fees 2bA.ll Spent Fuel Transfer*
Pool or ISFSI to DOE 2bA.12 Spent Fuel Pool O&M 2b.4.13 Liquid Radwaste Processing Equipment/Services 2b.4.14 ISFSI
* Operating Costs 2b.4.15 Spent Fuel StoragelCapital EqUipment 2b.4.16 ISFSI* Fixed Costs 2bA.17 Security Staff Cost 2b.4.18 DOC Staff Cost 2b.4.19 Utility Staff Cost 2bA Subtotal Period 2b Period*Dependent Costs 2b.0 TOTAL PERIOD 2b COST PERIOD 2c
* Wet Fuel Storage Period 2c Direct Decommissioning Activities Period 2c Collateral Costs 2c.3.1 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer 2c.3 Subtotal Period 2c Collateral Costs Period 2c Period.Dependent Costs 2cA.l Insurance 2c.4.2 Property taxes 2c.4.3 Health physics supplies 2c.4A Disposal of DAW generated 2c.4.5 Plant energy budget 2cA.6 NRC ISFSI Fees 2c.4.7 NRC Fees 2cA.8 Emergency Planning Fees 2c.4.9 Spent Fuel Transfer*
Pool or ISFSI to DOE 2c.4.10 Spent Fuel Pool O&M 2c.4.11 ISFSI* Operating Costs 2c.4.12 Spent Fuel Storage/Capital Equipment 2c.4.13 ISFSI
* Fixed Costs 2c.4.14 Security Staff Cost 2c.4.15 Utility Staff Cost 2cA Subtotal Period 2c Period*Dependent Costs 2c.0 TOTAL PERIOD 2c COST TLG Services, Inc. Decon Removal Packaging Transport Cost Cost Costs Costs 224 185 758 400 224 400 185 758 1,457 2,600 4,547 101 38 1,457 7,147 101 38 6,418 27,273 1,174 2,353 809 19 809 19 809 19 Table C-2 Diablo Canyon Unit 2 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2008 Dollars) Off-Site LLRW NRC Processing Disposal other Total Total Lic. Term. Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs 956 679 2,803 2,803 84 485 485 576 121 697 956 576 885 3,984 3,287 512 1,969 1,969 857 120 978 978 196 28 224 224 913 3,513 3,513 958 5,506 5,506 333 139 610 610 1,940 409 2,349 2,349 371 371 877 123 1,000 1,000 724 102 826 1,232 260 1,492 1,429 301 1,730 374 79 452 452 274 58 332 9,137 1,926 11,063 557 117 675 16,757 3,532 20,289 20,289 24,325 5,127 29,452 29,452 35,045 7,386 42,431 42,431 333 94,096 22,088 125,260 108,771 8,480 9,532 94,672 37,776 187,678 165,421 9,800 2,065 11,865 9,800 2,065 11,865 3,161 444 3,605 3,605 723 102 825 825 284 1,093 1,093 62 26 113 113 1,908 402 2,310 2,310 1,367 1,367 1,224 172 1,395 1,395 2,671 375 3,047 3,383 713 4,096 5,270 1,111 6,380 1,011 213 1,224 38,381 8,089 46,470 2,055 433 2,488 52,323 11,027 63,350 63,350 38,639 8,143 46,782 46,782 62 152,115 31,534 184,545 119,474 62 161,915 33,599 196,411 119,474 Spent Fuel Site Processed Management Restoration Volume Class A Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet 2,749 697 697 2,749 5,365 371 826 1,492 1,730 332 11,063 675 16,489 5,365 17,186 5,072 82,037 46,294 11,865 11,865 996 1,367 3,047 4,096 6,380 1,224 46,470 2,488 65,072 996 76,937 996 Burial Volumes Class B Class C GTCC Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Document POl.1604-003, Rev. 0 Appendix C, Page 18 of24 Burial I Utility and Processed Craft Contractor Wt., Lbs. Manhours Manhours 227,668 536 227,668 536 107,294 195 256,614 296,171 549,743 107,294 195 1,102,529 7,116,241 365,696 1,102,529 19,915 36 796,620 590,920 19,915 36 1,387,540 19,915 36 1,387,540 Diablo Canyon Power Plaut Decommissionillg Cost Analysis Activity Index Descrietion PERIOD 2d -Decontamination Following Wet Fuel Storage Period 2d Direct Decommissioning Activities 2d.1.1 Remove spent fuel racks Disposal of Plant Systems 2d.1.2.1 Electrical (Contaminated) 
-FHB 2d.1.2.2 Electrical (RCA)-FHB 2d.1.2.3 Fire Protection (RCA) 2d.1.2.4 HVAC (Contaminated) 
-FHB 2d.1.2.5 Spent Fuel Pit Cooling 2d.1.2.6 Spent Fuel Pit Cooling -FHB 2d.1.2 Totals Decontamination of Site Buildings 2d.1.3.1 Fuel Handling 2d.1.3 Totals 2d.1.4 Scaffolding in support of decommissioning 2d.1 Subtotal Period 2d Activity Costs Period 2d Additional Costs 2d.2,1 License Termination Survey Planning 2d,2 Subtotal Period 2d Additional Costs Period 2d Collateral Costs 2d.3.1 Process liquid waste 2d.3.2 Small tool allowance 2d.3.3 Decommissioning Equipment Disposition 2d.3 Subtotal Period 2d Collateral Costs Period 2d Period-Dependent Costs 2d.4.1 Decon supplies 2d.4.2 Insurance 2do4.3 Property taxes 2do404 Health physics supplies 2do4.5 Heavy eqUipment rental 2do4.6 Disposal of DAW generated 2do4.7 Plant energy budget 2do4.8 NRC ISFSI Fees 2do4.9 NRC Fees 2d.4.10 Emergency Planning Fees 2d.4.11 Spent Fuel Transfer -Pool or ISFSI to DOE 2do4,12 Liquid Radwaste Processing Equipment/Services 2d.4.13 ISFSI -Operating Costs 2d.4.14 ISFSI -Fixed Costs 2d.4.15 Staff Cost 2d.4.16 DOC Staff Cost 2d.4.17 Utility Staff Cost 2d.4 Subtotal Period 2d Period-Dependent Costs 2d.0 TOTAL PERIOD 2d COST TLG Services, Inc. Decon Removal Packaging Transport Cost Cost Costs Costs 477 47 136 34 86 6 521 53 203 27 190 4 27 72 22 26 98 24 28 1,169 60 166 665 723 39 48 665 723 39 48 1,086 1,142 3,024 242 253 116 53 215 68 121 107 116 68 174 322 210 445 1,076 35 13 210 1,521 35 13 1,468 4,614 451 588 Table C-2 Diablo Canyon Unit 2 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2008 Dollars) Off-Site LLRW NRC Processing Disposal other Total Total Lic. Term. Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs 656 608 1,958 1,958 45 42 183 183 434 287 1,301 1,301 222 124 579 579 212 17 124 573 573 119 222 137 597 597 129 238 154 671 671 1,162 480 868 3,905 3,905 206 510 959 3,150 3,150 206 510 959 3,150 3,150 37 393 1,533 1,533 1,404 1,652 2,828 10,546 10,546 669 282 951 951 669 282 951 951 200 204 787 787 14 83 83 686 99 219 1,232 1,232 686 299 438 2,102 2,102 74 284 284 177 25 202 202 46 7 53 53 156 602 602 227 1,303 1,303 115 48 212 212 245 52 296 296 88 88 207 29 237 237 171 24 196 207 44 251 177 37 214 214 65 14 79 132 28 160 2,143 452 2,594 2,594 3,931 828 4,759 4,759 6,066 1,278 7,344 7,344 115 13,655 3,322 18,873 18,100 2,090 2,066 14,324 6,870 320471 31,699 Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet 2,496 440 12 4,211 2,153 2,055 65 1,156 844 1,246 907 11,260 1,828 1,996 1,965 1,996 1,965 325 20 13,581 6,310 793 6,000 378 6,000 1,171 1,862 88 196 251 79 160 772 1,862 772 19,581 9,342 GTCC Cu. Feet Document POI-1604-003, Rev. 0 Appendix C, Page 19 0124 Burial! Utility and Processed Craft Contractor Wt., Lbs. Manhours Manhours 221,587 962 18,915 1,488 171,029 8,801 87,426 3,365 89,234 3,027 121,824 1,291 131,056 1,753 619,483 19,725 253,465 23,531 253,465 23,531 16,436 9,335 1,110,972 53,554 6,240 6,240 47,568 155 303,548 88 351,117 243 37,235 68 31,920 48,000 91,680 37,235 68 171,600 1,499,323 53,865 177,840 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Activity Index PERIOD 2e -License Termination Period 2e Direct Decommissioning Activities 2e.1.1 ORISE confirmatory survey 2e.1.2 Terminate license 2e.1 Subtotal Period 2e Activity Costs Period 2e Additional Costs 2e.2.1 License Termination Survey 2e.2 Subtotal Period 2e Additional Costs Period 2e Collateral Costs 2e.3.1 DOC staff relocation expenses 2e.3 Subtotal Period 2e Collateral Costs Period 2e Period-Dependent Costs 2e.4,1 Insurance 2e.4.2 Property taxes 2e.4.3 Health physics supplies 2e.4.4 Disposal of DAW generated 2e.4.5 Plant energy budget 2e.4.6 NRC ISFSI Fees 2e.4.7 NRC Fees 2e.4.8 Emergency Planning Fees 2e.4.9 Spent Fuel Transfer -Pool or ISFSI to DOE 2e.4.10 ISFSI -Operating Costs 2e.4.11 ISFSI-Fixed Costs 2e.4.12 Security Staff Cost 2e.4.13 DOC Staff Cost 2e.4.14 Utility Staff Cost 2e.4 Subtotal Period 2e Period-Dependent Costs 2e.0 TOTAL PERIOD 2e COST PERIOD 2 TOTALS PERIOD 3b -Site Restoration Period 3b Direct Decommissioning Activities Demoldion of Remaining Sde Buildings 3b.1.1.1 *Reactor 3b.1.1.2 Administration 3b.1.1.3 Auxiliary 3b.1.1.4 Capital Additions 85-2004 3b.1.1.5 Chemical Storage 3b.1.1,6 Chlorination 3b.1.1.7 Circulating Water Tunnels 3b.1.1.8 Cold Machine Shop 3b.1.1.9 Communication 3b, 1.1.1 0 Condensate PolishingfTechnical Support 3b.1.1.11 Containment Penetration Area 3b,1.1.12 Discharge Structure 3b.1.1.13 Fabrication Shop 3b.1.1.14 Fire Pump House 3b.1.1.15 Hazardous Waste Storage Facility 3b.1.1.16 Intake Structure 3b.1.1.17 Maintenance Shop TLG Services, Inc. Decon Removal Packaging Transport Cost Cost Costs Costs 1,242 1,242 1,242 9,367 64,556 14,528 11,458 6,873 960 5,977 3,915 4 8 1,008 357 4 763 615 854 107 5 35 4,868 330 Table C-2 Diablo Canyon Unit 2 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2008 Dollars) Off-5ite LLRW NRC Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term. Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs 153 64 217 217 a 153 64 217 217 11,808 4,977 16,785 16,785 11,808 4,977 16,785 16,785 1,395 294 1,689 1,689 1,395 294 1,689 1,689 290 41 330 330 76 11 87 87 436 1,679 1,679 22 9 40 40 200 42 243 243 144 144 355 50 405 405 281 39 320 339 71 410 106 22 129 216 45 261 3,433 723 4,156 4,156 4,840 1,020 5,860 5,860 5,631 1,187 6,817 6,817 22 15,910 3,698 20,881 19,617 22 29,265 9,033 39,572 38,308 35,529 41,833 375,931 144,239 697,441 584,976 1,449 8,322 202 1,163 1,260 7,237 825 4,740 1 5 2 10 213 1,221 75 433 1 5 161 923 130 745 180 1,034 23 130 5 42 1,026 5,893 69 399 Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet 355 144 320 410 129 261 1,264 355 1,264 355 106,957 5,508 358,841 138,548 3,224 574 8,322 1,163 7,237 4,740 5 10 1,221 433 5 923 745 1,034 130 5 42 5,893 399 GTCC Cu. Feet Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Appendix C, Page 20 0{24 Buriall Utility and Processed Craft Contractor Wt ** Lbs. Manhours Manhours 209,457 3,120 209,457 3,120 7,097 13 51,071 57,357 80,929 7,097 13 189,357 7,097 209,470 192,477 26,234,050 926,984 3,775,465 74,901 10,358 64,471 47,403 46 99 12,071 3,785 44 9,300 6,565 8,317 1,223 55 430 46,364 3,444 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Activity Index Activi!l:
Period 3b Demolition of Remaining Site Buildings (continued) 3b.1.1.18 Miscellaneous Structures 3b.1.1.19 NPO Permanent Warehouse 3b.1.1.20 Ponds 3b.1.1.21 Portable Fire Pump & Fuel Cart 3b.1.1.22 Pretreatment 3b.1.1.23 Radwaste Storage 3b.1.1.24 Radwaste Storage Facilfty (Additional) 3b.1.1.25 Rotor Warehouse 3b.1.1.26 Security 3b.1.1.27 Security Buildings (additional) 3b.1.1.28 Simulator 3b.1.1.29 Steam Generator Storage Facility 3b.1.1.30 Telephone Terminal 3b.1.1.31 Turbine 3b.1.1.32 Turbine Pedestal 3b.1.1.33 Vehicle Maintenance 3b.1.1.34 Waste Water Holding & Treatment Facility 3b.1.1.35 Fuel Handling 3b.1.1 Totals Sfte Closeout Activities 3b.1.2 Remove Rubble 3b.1.3 Grade & landscape site 3b.1A Final report to NRC 3b.1 Subtotal Period 3b Activity Costs Period 3b Additional Costs 3b.2.1 Concrete Crushing 3b.2.2 Breakwater Demolition and Removal 3b.2.3 Cofferdam Construction and Teardown 3b.2 Subtotal Period 3b Additional Costs Period 3b Collateral Costs 3b.3.1 Small tool allowance 3b.3 Subtotal Period 3b Collateral Costs Period 3b Period*Dependent Costs 3bA.1 Insurance 3bA.2 Property taxes 3bA,3 Heavy equipment rental 3bAA Plant energy budget 3bA.5 NRC ISFSI Fees 3bA.6 Emergency Planning Fees 3b.4.7 Spent Fuel Transfer -Pool or ISFSI to DOE 3bA.8 ISFSI -Operating Costs 3bA.9 ISFSI -Fixed Costs 3b.4.10 Securfty Staff Cost 3b.4.11 DOC Staff Cost 3bA.12 Utility Staff Cost 3b.4 Subtotal Period 3b Period-Dependent Costs 3b.0 TOTAL PERIOD 3b COST TLG Services, Inc. Decon Removal Packaging Transport Cost Cost Costs Costs 57 1,221 2 1 9 1,595 42 742 303 46 370 821 2 4,940 1,212 30 20 1,689 39,784 1,470 2,272 43,526 8,467 33,893 438 42,798 797 797 6,420 6,420 93,541 Table C-2 Diablo Canyon Unit 2 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2008 Dollars) Off-Site LLRW NRC Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term. Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs 12 69 257 1,478 0 2 0 1 2 11 336 1,931 9 51 156 898 64 366 10 56 78 448 173 994 1 3 1,041 5,981 255 1,467 6 37 4 24 356 2,045 8,384 48,168 310 1,779 479 2,751 80 17 97 97 80 9,190 52,795 97 1,786 10,261 11,905 45,798 92 530 13,783 56,589 168 965 168 965 787 111 898 207 29 236 1,353 7,772 273 57 330 391 391 763 107 870 921 194 1,115 289 61 350 587 124 711 9,337 1,968 11,305 12,616 2,659 15,275 7,795 1,643 9,438 33,965 8,305 48,690 34,045 31,447 159,040 97 Spent Fuel Site Processed Management Restoration Volume Class A Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet 69 1,478 2 1 11 1,931 51 898 366 56 448 994 3 5,981 1,467 37 24 2,045 48,168 1,779 2,751 52,699 10,261 45,798 530 56,589 965 965 898 236 7,772 330 391 870 1,115 350 711 4,748 6,557 15,275 1,133 8,305 10,451 38,239 10,451 148,492 Burial Volumes Class B Class C GTCC Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Document P01*1604*003, Rev. 0 Appendix C, Page 21 0(24 Buriall Utility and Processed Craft Contractor Wt., Lbs. Manhours Manhours 673 14,093 24 14 108 17,854 662 9,938 3,944 722 4,191 8,888 28 57,743 11,300 367 238 16,750 436,410 8,191 4,587 667 449,187 667 37,686 128,379 46,649 4,004 170,069 46,649 138,914 145,326 116,474 400,714 619,256 448,030 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Activity Index Descrietion PERIOD 3c -Fuel Storage Operations/Shipping Period 3c Direct Decommissioning Activities Period 3c Collateral Costs 3c.3 Subtotal Period 3c Collateral Costs Period 3c Period-Dependent Costs 3c.4.1 Insurance 3c.4.2 Property taxes 3c.4.3 Plant energy budget 3c.4.4 NRC ISFSI Fees 3c.4.5 Emergency Planning Fees 3c.4.6 Spent Fuel Transfer -Pool or ISFSI to DOE 3c.4.7 ISFSI -Operating Costs 3c.4.8 ISFSI -Fixed Costs 3c.4.9 Securtty Staff Cost 3c.4.10 Utility Staff Cost 3co4 Subtotal Period 3c Period-Dependent Costs 3c.0 TOTAL PERIOD 3c COST PERIOD 3d -GTCC shipping Period 3d Direct Decommissioning Activities Nuclear Steam Supply System Removal 3d.1.1.1 Vessel & Internals GTCC Disposal 3d.1.1 Totals 3d.1 Subtotal Period 3d Activity Costs Period 3d Collateral Costs 3d.3 Subtotal Period 3d Collateral Costs Period 3d Period-Dependent Costs 3do4.1 Insurance 3d.4.2 Property taxes 3d.4.3 Plant energy budget 3d.4.4 NRC ISFSI Fees 3do4.5 Emergency Planning Fees 3d.4.6 ISFSI -Operating Costs 3do4.7 ISFSI -Fixed Costs 3d.4.8 Securtty Staff Cost 3do4.9 Utility Staff Cost 3d.4 Subtotal Period 3d Period-Dependent Costs 3d.0 TOTAL PERIOD 3d COST PERIOD 3e -ISFSI Decontamination Period 3e Direct Decommissioning Activities Period 3e Addttional Costs 3e.2,1 ISFSI License Termination 3e.2 Subtotal Period 3e Additional Costs TLG Services, Inc. Decon Removal Packaging Transport Cost Cost Costs Costs 300 300 300 300 1,059 100 1,059 100 Table C-2 Diablo Canyon Unit 2 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2008 Dollars) OltoSite LLRW NRC Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term. Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs 4,184 588 4,772 1,098 154 1,252 2,075 2,075 4,055 570 4,625 4,865 1,025 5,891 1,534 323 1,857 3,119 657 3,777 20,852 4,394 25,246 5,130 1,081 6,212 46,913 8.794 55,706 46.913 8.794 55,706 8,952 1,929 11,181 11,181 8,952 1,929 11,181 11,181 8,952 1,929 11,181 11,181 15 17 4 14 2 16 5 1 7 11 2 13 73 15 89 18 4 22 148 27 175 8,952 148 1,956 11,357 11,181 387 789 689 3,028 387 789 689 3,028 Spent Fuel Site Processed Management Restoration Volume Class A Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet 4,772 1,252 2,075 4,625 5,891 1,857 3,777 25,246 6,212 55,706 55.706 17 4 16 7 13 89 22 175 175 3,028 6,239 3,028 6,239 Burial Volumes Class B Class C GTCC Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet 433 433 433 433 Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Appendix C, Page 22 of24 Burial! Utility and Processed Craft Contractor Wt., Lbs. Manhours Manhours 306,566 76,755 383,321 383,321 85,510 85,510 85,510 1.080 270 1,350 85,510 1,350 748,943 15,356 1,280 748,943 15,356 1,280 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Activity Index Period 3e Collateral Costs 3e.3.1 Small tool allowance 3e.3 Subtotal Period 3e Collateral Costs Period 3e Period-Dependent Costs 3e.4.1 Insurance 3e.4.2 Property taxes 3e.4.3 Heavy equipment rental 3e.4.4 Plant energy budget 3e.4.5 Security Staff Cost 3e.4.6 Utilfty Staff Cost 3e.4 Subtotal Period 3e Period-Dependent Costs 3e.0 TOTAL PERIOD 3e COST PERIOD 31 -ISFSI Site Restoration Period 3f Direct Decommissioning Activfties Period 3f Additional Costs 3f.2.1 ISFSI Demolttion and Site Restoration 3f.2 Subtotal Period 3f Additional Costs Period 3f Collateral Costs 3f.3.1 Small tool allowance 3f.3 Subtotal Period 3f Collateral Costs Period 3f Period-Dependent Costs 3f.4.1 Insurance 31.4.2 Property taxes 3f.4.3 Heavy equipment rental 3f.4.4 Plant energy budget 3f.4.5 Security Staff Cost 3f.4.6 Utility Staff Cost 3f.4 Subtotal Period 3f Period-Dependent Costs 31.0 TOTAL PERIOD 3f COST PERIOD 3 TOTALS TLG Services, Inc. Decon Removal Packaging Transport Cost Cost Costs Costs 14 14 309 309 1,383 100 562 562 103 103 669 95,592 304 107 Table C-2 Diablo Canyon Unit 2 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2008 Dollars) Off-Site LLRW NRC Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term. Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs 17 17 127 18 145 33 5 38 65 375 172 36 208 129 27 156 461 151 922 387 1,250 843 3,967 24 123 709 24 123 709 17 2 19 22 125 86 18 105 54 11 66 158 54 314 181 178 1,028 9,339 82,537 43,217 231,097 11,278 Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet 17 17 145 38 375 208 156 922 3,967 6,239 709 709 19 125 105 66 314 1,028 71,327 148,492 6,239 GTCC Cu. Feet 433 Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Appendix C, Page 23 of24 Burial I Utility and Processed Craft Contractor Wt., Lbs. Manhours Manhours 2,510 1,901 4,411 748,943 15,356 5,691 3.446 80 3.446 80 1,265 784 2,050 3,446 2,130 834,453 638,058 840,522 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Activity Index Activity Description Decon Cost Removal Cost TOTAL COST TO DECOMMISSION 13,430 162,600 OTAL COST TO DECOMMISSION WITH 25.01% CONTINGENCY:
OTAL NRC LICENSE TERMINATION COST IS 67.13% OR: fPENT FUEL MANAGEMENT COST IS 18.24% OR:
DEMOLITION COST IS 14.63% OR: fOTAL LOW*LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE VOLUME BURIED (EXCLUDING GTCC):
GREATER THAN CLASS C RADWASTE VOLUME GENERATED:
OTAL SCRAP METAL REMOVED: OTAL CRAFT LABOR REQUIREMENTS:
End Notes: n/a* indicates that this activity not charged as decommissioning expense, a
* indicates that this performed by decommissioning staff, o
* indicates that this value is less than 0,5 but is non*zero, a cell containing" * " indicates a zero value TLG Services, Inc. Packaging Costs 15,038 Table C-2 Diablo Canyon Unit 2 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2008 Dollars) Transport Costs 12,363 Off-Site LLRW Processing Disposal Costs Costs Other Costs 35,529 58,267 548,492 $1,057,198 thousands of 2008 dollars $709,740 thousands of 2008 dollars $192,789 thousands of 2008 dollars $154,668 thousands of 2008 dollars 152,299 Cubic Feet 433 Cubic Feet 76,605 Tons 1,577 ,382 Man-hours Total ContinQenc NRC Total Lic. Term. Costs Costs 211,479 1,057,198 709,740 Spent Fuel Management Costs 192,789 Document P01.1604-003, Rev. 0 Appendix C, Page 24 0(24 Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial I Utility and Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs. Manhours Manhours 154,668 358,841 146,080 5,645 574 433 27,379,120 1,577,382 5,470,697 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis APPENDIXD Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Appendix D, Page 1 of 26 DETAILED COST ANALYSIS SAFSTOR TLG Services, Inc.
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Activity Index PERIOD 1 a -Shutdown through Transition Period 1 a Direct Decommissioning Activities 1a.1.1 SAFSTOR site characterization survey 1a.1.2 Prepare preliminary decommissioning cost 1a.1,3 Notification of Cessation of Operations 1a.1.4 Remove fuel & source material 1a.1.5 Notification of Permanent Defueling 1a.1.6 Deactivate plant systems & process waste 1a.1.7 Prepare and submit PSDAR 1a.1.8 Review plant dwgs & specs. 1a.1.9 Perform detailed rad survey 1a.1.10 Estimate by-product inventory 1a.1.11 End product description 1a.1.12 Detailed by-product inventory 1a.1.13 Define major work sequence 1a.1,14 Perform SER and EA 1a.1.15 Perform Site-Specific Cost Study Activity Specifications 1 a.1.16.1 Prepare plant and facilities for SAFSTOR 1a.1.16.2 Plant systems 1a.1.16.3 Plant structures and buildings 1a.1.16.4 Waste management 1a,1.16.5 Facility and site dormancy 1a.1.16 Total Detailed Work Procedures 1a.1.17.1 Plant systems 1a.1.17.2 Facility closeout & dormancy 1a.1.17 Total 1a.1.18 Procure vacuum drying system 1a.1.19 Drain/de-energize non-con!.
systems 1a.1.20 Drain & dry NSSS 1a.1.21 Drain/de-energize contaminated systems 1a.1.22 Decon/secure contaminated systems 1a.1 Subtotal Period 1 a Activity Costs Period 1 a Collateral Costs 1a.3.1 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer 1a.3 Subtotal Period 1 a Collateral Costs Period 1 a Period-Dependent Costs 1a.4,1 Insurance 1a.4.2 Property taxes 1a.4.3 Health physics supplies 1a.4.4 Heavy equipment rental 1a.4.5 Disposal of DAW generated 1a.4.6 Plant energy budget 1a.4.7 NRC ISFSI Fees 1a.4.8 NRC Fees 1a.4.9 Emergency Planning Fees 1a.4.10 Spent Fuel Pool O&M 1a.4.11 ISFSI -Operating Costs TLG Services, Inc. Decon Removal Packaging Transport Cost Cost Costs Costs 486 490 11 Table D-I Diablo Canyon Unit 1 SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2008 Dollars) Off-Site LLRW NRC Processing Disposal Other Total Total Llc. Term. Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs 414 175 589 589 156 33 189 189 a n/a a 240 51 291 291 156 33 189 189 a 120 25 145 145 120 25 145 145 180 38 218 218 120 25 145 145 372 79 450 450 599 127 726 726 590 125 715 715 500 106 605 605 374 79 453 453 240 51 291 291 240 51 291 291 1,943 411 2,354 2,354 142 30 172 172 144 30 174 174 286 60 346 346 12 15 15 a 4,717 1,086 5,802 5,802 836 177 1,012 836 177 1,012 1,195 169 1,363 1,363 101 14 115 115 171 658 658 104 593 593 38 16 69 69 1,330 281 1,611 1,611 159 159 706 100 805 805 1,258 177 1,435 735 155 890 141 30 171 Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet 1,012 1,012 610 159 1.435 890 171 GTCC Document POI-I604-003, Rev. 0 Appendix D, Page 2 of24 Burial I Utility and Processed Craft Contractor Cu. Feet Wl, Lbs. Manhours Manhours 1,300 2,000 1,300 1,000 1,000 1,500 1,000 3,100 5,000 4,920 4,167 3,120 2,000 2,000 16,207 1,183 1,200 2,383 100 35,890 12,190 22 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Activity Index Descrietion Period 1a Period-Dependent Costs (continued) 1a.4.12 Spent Fuel Storage/Capital Equipment 1a.4.13 ISFSI -Fixed Costs 1a.4.14 Security Staff Cost 1a.4.15 Utility Staff Cost 1a.4 Subtotal Period 1 a Period-Dependent Costs 1a.0 TOTAL PERIOD 1a COST PERIOD 1 b -SAFSTOR Limited DECON Activities Period 1 b Direct Decommissioning Activities Decontamination of Site Buildings 1b.1,1.1 *Reactor 1b.1.1.2 Containment Penetration Area 1b.1.1.3 Fuel Handling 1b.1.1 Totals 1b.1 Subtotal Period 1 b Activity Costs Period 1b Collateral Costs 1b.3.1 Decon eqUipment 1b.3.2 Process liquid waste 1b,3.3 Small tool allowance 1b.3.4 Spent Fuel and Transfer 1b.3 Subtotal Period 1 b Collateral Costs Period 1 b Period-Dependent Costs 1b.4.1 Decon supplies 1b.4.2 Insurance 1b.4.3 Property taxes 1b.4.4 Health physics supplies 1b.4.5 Heavy equipment rental 1b.4.6 Disposal of DAW generated 1b.4.7 Plant energy budget 1b.4.8 NRC ISFSI Fees 1b.4.9 NRC Fees 1b.4.10 Emergency Planning Fees 1b.4.11 Spent Fuel Pool O&M 1b.4.12 ISFSI -Operating Costs 1b.4.13 Spent Fuel Storage/Capital Equipment 1b.4.14 ISFSI -Fixed Costs 1b.4.15 Security Staff Cost 1b.4.16 UtilHy Staff Cost 1b.4 Subtotal Period 1 b Period-Dependent Costs 1b.0 TOTAL PERIOD 1 b COST PERIOD 1 c -Preparations for SAFSTOR Dormancy Period 1c Direct Decommissioning Activities 1c.1.1 Prepare support eqUipment for storage 1c.1.2 Install containment pressure equal. lines 1c.1.3 Interim survey prior to dormancy 1c.1.4 Secure building accesses TLG Services, Inc. Decon Removal Packaging Transport Cost Cost Costs Costs 976 11 976 11 1,501 250 639 2,389 2,389 935 165 75 304 46 1,100 46 75 304 850 303 123 10 850 426 10 4,339 473 86 307 431 42 Table D-I Diablo Canyon Unit 1 SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2008 Dollars) Off-Site LLRW NRC Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term. Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs 1.594 337 1,932 239 51 290 775 164 939 939 26,403 5,587 31,990 31,990 38 34,635 7,357 43,021 38,145 38 40,187 8,620 49,836 43,947 1,059 2,559 2,251 176 426 374 451 1,089 958 1,685 4,074 3,583 1,685 4,074 3,583 198 1,133 1,133 286 292 1,122 1,122 10 56 56 252 53 305 286 252 553 2,617 2,311 300 1,149 1,149 301 42 344 344 25 4 29 29 107 410 410 26 150 150 34 14 63 63 335 71 406 406 48 48 178 25 203 203 187 26 214 185 39 224 36 8 43 648 137 785 72 15 87 195 41 237 237 5,349 1,132 6,481 6,481 34 7,561 1,988 10,874 9,472 321 7,813 4,226 17,564 15,366 91 522 522 9 50 50 733 310 1,043 1,043 Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet 1,932 290 4,877 610 5,889 610 308 51 131 491 491 1,122 305 305 1,122 556 48 214 224 43 785 87 1,402 556 1,707 491 1,678 GTCC Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Appendix D, Page 3 of24 Burial I Utility and Processed Craft Contractor Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs. Manhours Manhours 12,264 423,400 12,190 22 435,664 12,190 22 471,554 26,109 4,381 10,962 41,452 41.452 67,311 219 67,311 219 11,126 20 3,091 87,269 11,126 20 90,360 78,437 41,691 90,360 3,000 700 12,834 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Activity Index Activi!l::
Descrietion Period 1c Direct Decommissioning Activities (continued) 1c.1.5 Prepare & submit interim report 1c.1 Subtotal Period 1 c Activity Costs Period 1c Costs 1c.2,1 Spent Fuel Pool Isolation 1c.2.2 Hazardous Waste Management 1c.2.3 Mixed Waste Management 1c.2 Subtotal Period 1 c Additional Costs Period 1c Collateral Costs 1c.3.1 Process liquid waste 1c.3.2 Small tool allowance 1c.3.3 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer 1c.3 Subtotal Period 1 c Collateral Costs Period 1 c Period-Dependent Costs 1 c.4. 1 Insurance 1c,4.2 Property taxes 1co4.3 Health physics supplies 1co404 Heavy equipment rental 1co4.5 Disposal of DAW generated 1co4.6 Plant energy budget 1co4.7 NRC ISFSI Fees 1c.4.8 NRC Fees 1c.4.9 Emergency Planning Fees 1co4.10 Spent Fuel Pool O&M 1co4.11 ISFSI -Operating Costs 1co4.12 Spent Fuel Storage/Caprtal Equipment 1co4.13 ISFSI -Fixed Costs 1co4.14 Security Staff Cost 1co4.15 Utility Staff Cost 1c.4 Subtotal Period 1 c Period-Dependent Costs 1c.0 TOTAL PERIOD 1 c COST PERIOD 1 TOTALS Decon Cost 208 208 208 4,546 PERIOD 2a -SAFSTOR Dormancy with Wet Spent Fuel Storage Period 2a Direct Decommissioning Activities 2a.1.1 Quarterly Inspection 2a.1.2 Semi-annual environmental survey 2a.1.3 Prepare reports 2a,104 Bituminous roof replacement 2a.1.5 Maintenance supplies 2a.1 Subtotal Period 2a Activity Costs Period 2a Collateral Costs 2a.3.1 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer 2a.3 Subtotal Period 2a Collateral Costs Period 2a Period-Dependent Costs 2a.4.1 Insurance 2a.4.2 Property taxes 2ao4.3 Health physics supplies TLG Services, Inc. Removal Packaging Transport Cost Costs Costs 472 95 383 95 383 187 119 307 784 98 384 2,232 195 695 940 Table D-I Diablo Canyon Unit 1 SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2008 Dollars) Off-Site LLRW NRC Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term. Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs 70 15 85 85 803 425 1.700 1,700 9,407 1,991 11,398 11,398 590 125 715 715 912 193 1,104 1,104 10,909 2,309 13,218 13,218 361 368 1,414 1,414 1 5 5 244 52 295 361 244 421 1,715 1,420 291 41 332 332 25 3 28 28 66 253 253 25 145 145 4 16 16 324 69 393 393 46 46 172 24 196 196 181 26 207 179 38 217 34 7 42 930 197 1,127 70 15 85 189 40 229 229 5,175 1,095 6,270 6,270 7,617 1,650 9,586 7,862 369 19,573 4,804 26,219 24.200 728 67,573 17,650 93,620 83,513 1,342 473 1,816 1,342 473 1,816 12,357 2,615 14,973 12,357 2,615 14,973 4,707 664 5,371 1,077 152 1,229 331 1,271 Spent Fuel Site Processed Management Restoration Volume Class A Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet 1,415 295 295 1,415 138 46 207 217 42 1,127 85 1,724 138 2,019 1,552 9,616 491 3,840 1,816 1,816 14,973 14,973 5,371 1,229 1,271 Burial Volumes Class B Class C Cu. Feet Cu. Feet GTCC Document POI-I604-003, Rev. 0 Appendix D, Page 4 of24 Burial I Utility and Processed Craft Contractor Cu. Feet Wt ** Lbs. Manhours Manhours 583 16,534 583 84,876 276 84,876 276 2,755 2,990 84,423 2,755 87,413 87,631 16,815 87,997 178,258 58,528 649,910 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Activity Index Descrietion Period 2a Period-Dependent Costs (continued) 2a.4.4 Disposal of DAW generated 2a.4.5 Plant energy budget 2a.4.6 NRC ISFSI Fees 2a.4.7 NRC Fees 2a.4.8 Emergency Planning Fees 2a.4.9 Spent Fuel Transfer -Pool or ISFSI to DOE 2a.4.10 Spent Fuel Pool O&M 2ao4.11 ISFSI -Operating Costs 2a.4.12 Spent Fuel Storage/Capital Equipment 2a.4.13 ISFSI -Fixed Costs 2a.4.14 Utility Staff Cost 2a.4 Subtotal Period 2a Period-Dependent Costs 2a.0 TOTAL PERIOD 2a COST Decon Cost PERIOD 2b -SAFSTOR Dormancy with Dry Spent Fuel Storage Period 2b Direct Decommissioning Activities 2b.1.1 Quarterly Inspection 2b.1.2 Semi-annual environmental survey 2b.1.3 Prepare reports 2b.1.4 Bituminous roof replacement 2b.1.5 Maintenance supplies 2b.1 Subtotal Period 2b Activity Costs Period 2b Period-Dependent Costs 2bo4.1 Insurance 2bo4.2 Property taxes 2bo4.3 Health physics supplies 2bo404 Disposal of DAW generated 2bo4.5 Plant energy budget 2b.4.6 NRC ISFSI Fees 2b.4.7 NRC Fees 2b.4.8 Emergency Planning Fees 2bo4.9 Spent Fuel Transfer -Pool or ISFSI to DOE 2b.4.10 ISFSI -Operating Costs 2bo4.11 ISFSI -Fixed Costs 2b.4.12 Utilrty Staff Cost 2bo4 Subtotal Period 2b Period-Dependent Costs 2b.0 TOTAL PERIOD 2b COST PERIOD 2 TOTALS PERIOD 3a -Reactivate Site Following SAFSTOR Dormancy Period 3a Direct Decommissioning Activities 3a.1.1 Prepare preliminary decommissioning cost 3a.1.2 Review plant dwgs & specs. 3a.1.3 Perform detailed rad survey 3a.104 End product description 3a.1.5 Detailed by-product inventory 3a.1.6 Define major work sequence 3a.1.7 Perform SER and EA 3a.1.8 Perform Site-Specific Cost Study 3a.1.9 Prepare/submrt License Termination Plan TLG Services, Inc. Removal Packaging Transport Cost Costs Costs 75 28 940 75 28 940 75 28 1.276 104 39 1.276 104 39 1,276 104 39 2,216 179 67 Table D-l Diablo Canyon Unit 1 SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2008 Dollars) Off-Site LLRW NRC Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term. Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs 248 104 455 2,840 601 3,441 2,035 2,035 2,152 304 2,456 4,278 604 4,882 4,601 974 5,575 7,846 1,660 9,507 1,505 318 1,823 55,181 11,678 66,859 3,060 647 3.707 9,823 2,079 11,902 248 99,105 20,116 120,513 248 112,805 23,205 137,301 1,881 663 2,544 1,881 663 2,544 5,750 811 6.562 1,509 213 1.722 450 1,726 343 144 630 1,990 421 2,411 2,852 2,852 3,015 425 3,441 5,573 786 6,360 6.699 1,418 8,116 2,108 446 2,555 4,287 907 5,194 7,259 1,536 8,795 343 41,043 7,558 50.364 343 42,924 8,222 52,909 591 155,730 31,427 190,210 156 33 189 189 551 117 668 668 a 120 25 145 145 156 33 189 189 899 190 1,089 1,089 372 79 450 450 599 127 726 726 491 104 595 595 Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet 455 3,994 3,441 2,035 2,456 4,882 5,575 9,507 1,823 66.859 3.707 11,902 120,513 3,994 137,301 3,994 2,544 2,544 6,562 1,722 1,726 630 5.534 2,411 2,852 3,441 6,360 8,116 2,555 5,194 8,795 50.364 5.534 52,909 5,534 190,210 9,529 GTCC Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Appendix D, Page 50f24 Burial/ Utility and Processed Craft Contractor Cu. Feet WI.. Lbs. Manhours Manhours 79,890 146 167,057 79,890 146 167,057 79,890 146 167,057 110,682 202 124,846 110.682 202 124,846 110,682 202 124,846 190,572 347 291,903 1,300 4,600 1,000 1,300 7,500 3,100 5,000 4,096 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Activity Index Activi!l:
Descrietion Period 3a Direct Decommissioning Activities (continued) 3a.1.10 Receive NRC approval of termination plan Activity Specifications 3a.1.11.1 Re-activate plant & temporary facilities 3a.1.11,2 Plant systems 3a.1.11.3 Reactor internals 3a.1,11.4 Reactor vessel 3a.1.11.5 Biological shield 3a.1.11.6 Steam generators 3a.1.11.7 Reinforced concrete 3a.1.11.8 Main Turbine 3a.1.11.9 Main Condensers 3a.1.11.10 Plant structures 
& buildings 3a.1.11.11 Waste management 3a.1.11.12 F aciltly & site closeout 3a,1.11 Total Planning & Site Preparations 3a.1.12 Prepare dismantling sequence 3a.1.13 Plant prep. & temp. svces 3a.1.14 Design water clean-up system 3a.1.15 Rigging/Cont.
Cntrl Envlpsltooling/etc.
3a.1.16 Procure casks/liners 
& containers 3a.1 Subtotal Period 3a Activtly Costs Period 3a Period-Dependent Costs 3a.4.1 Insurance 3a.4.2 Property taxes 3a.4.3 Health physics supplies 3a.4.4 Heavy equipment rental 3a.4.5 Disposal of DAW generated 3a.4.6 Plant energy budget 3a.4.7 NRC Fees 3a.4.8 Security Staff Cost 3a.4.9 Utility Staff Cost 3a.4 Subtotal Period 3a Period-Dependent Costs 3a.0 TOTAL PERIOD 3a COST PERIOD 3b -Decommissioning Preparations Period 3b Direct Decommissioning Activities Detailed Work Procedures 3b,1.1.1 Plant systems 3b.1.1.2 Reactor internals 3b.1.1.3 Remaining buildings 3b.1.1.4 CRD cooling assembly 3b.1.1.5 CRD housings & ICI tubes 3b.1.1.6 Incore instrumentation 3b.1.1.7 Reactor vessel 3b.1.1.8 Facility closeout 3b.1.1.9 Missile shields 3b.1.1.10 Biological Shield 3b.1.1.11 Steam generators TLG Services, Inc. Decon Removal Packaging Transport Cost Cost Costs Costs 425 490 10 915 10 915 10 Table D-l Diablo Canyon Unit 1 SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2008 Dollars) Off-Site LLRW NRC Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term. Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs 884 187 1,071 964 500 106 605 545 851 180 1,031 1,031 779 165 944 944 60 13 73 73 374 79 453 453 192 41 232 116 48 10 58 48 10 58 374 79 453 227 551 117 668 668 108 23 131 65 4,769 1,009 5,778 5,086 288 61 349 349 2,700 571 3,271 3,271 168 36 203 203 2,100 444 2,544 2,544 147 31 179 179 13,516 2,860 16,377 15,685 367 52 419 419 101 14 115 115 150 575 575 104 593 593 32 13 59 59 1,330 281 1,611 1,611 249 35 284 284 4,391 929 5,321 5,321 16,345 3.459 19,805 19,805 32 22,784 5,038 28,781 28,781 32 36,300 7,898 45,158 44,466 567 120 688 619 300 63 363 363 162 34 196 49 120 25 145 145 120 25 145 145 120 25 145 145 435 92 527 527 144 30 174 87 54 11 65 65 144 30 174 174 551 117 668 668 Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet 107 61 116 58 58 227 65 692 692 514 514 692 514 69 147 87 GTCC Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Appendix D, Page 6 of24 Burial/ Utility and Processed Craft Contractor Cu. Feet Wt ** Lbs. Manhours Manhours 7,370 4,167 7,100 6,500 500 3,120 1,600 400 400 3,120 4,600 900 39,777 2,400 1.400 1,230 72,703 10,287 19 65,179 258,629 10,287 19 323,807 10,287 19 396,510 4,733 2,500 1,350 1,000 1,000 1,000 3,630 1,200 450 1,200 4,600 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Activity Index Activi!.l:
Descrietion Period 3b Detailed Work Procedures (continued) 3b.1.1.12 Reinforced concrete 3b.1.1.13 Main Turbine 3b.1.1.14 Main Condensers 3b.1.1.15 Auxiliary building 3b.1.1.16 Reactor building 3b.1.1 Total 3b.1 Subtotal Period 3b Activity Costs Period 3b Additional Costs 3b.2.1 Site Characterization 3b.2 Subtotal Period 3b Additional Costs Period 3b Collateral Costs 3b.3.1 Decon equipment 3b.3.2 DOC staff relocation expenses 3b.3.3 Pipe cutting equipment 3b.3 Subtotal Period 3b Collateral Costs Period 3b Period-Dependent Costs 3bo4.1 Decon supplies 3bo4.2 Insurance 3bo4.3 Property taxes 3bo4.4 HeaHh physics supplies 3bo4.5 Heavy equipment rental 3bo4.6 Disposal of DAW generated 3bo4.7 Plant energy budget 3b.4.8 NRC Fees 3b.4.9 Security Staff Cost 3b.4.10 DOC Staff Cost 3b.4.11 Utility Staff Cost 3bA Subtotal Period 3b Period-Dependent Costs 3b.O TOTAL PERIOD 3b COST PERIOD 3 TOTALS PERIOD 4a -Large Component Removal Period 4a Direct Decommissioning Activities Nuclear Steam Supply System Removal 4a.1.1.1 Reactor Coolant Piping 4a.1.1.2 Pressurizer Quench Tank 4a.1.1.3 Reactor Coolant Pumps & Motors 4a.1.1.4 Pressurizer 4a.1.1.5 Steam Generators 4a.1.1.6 Retired Steam Generator Units 4a.1.1.7 CRDMslICls/Service Structure Removal 4a.1.1.8 Reactor Vessel Internals 4a.1,1.9 Vessel & Internals GTCC Disposal 4a.1.1.10 Reactor Vessel 4a.1.1 Totals TLG Services, Inc. Decon Removal Packaging Transport Cost Cost Costs Costs 935 1,000 935 1,000 29 235 246 29 480 964 1,480 964 2,395 15 66 259 40 32 7 26 6 5 26 101 44 121 8 59 454 295 85 3,846 1,858 1,886 1,858 1,886 35 90 221 29 60 1,983 3,746 496 86 3,911 1,315 633 372 10,275 9,543 5.383 Table D-l Diablo Canyon Unit 1 SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2008 Dollars) Off-Site LLRW NRC Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term. Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs 120 25 145 73 187 40 227 187 40 227 327 69 397 357 327 69 397 357 3,866 818 4,684 3,776 3,866 818 4,684 3,776 4,549 1,925 6,474 6,474 4,549 1,925 6,474 6,474 198 1,133 1,133 1,395 295 1,690 1,690 212 1,212 1,212 1,395 705 4,035 4,035 10 39 39 221 31 252 252 51 7 58 58 83 318 318 52 297 297 18 8 33 33 667 141 808 808 125 18 142 142 2,202 466 2,668 2,668 4,892 1,035 5,927 5,927 8,195 1,734 9,929 9,929 18 16,351 3,585 20,471 200471 18 26,161 7,033 35,664 34,756 50 62,461 14,931 80,822 79,222 60 690 406 1,554 1,554 9 97 52 203 203 1.358 564 2,213 2,213 620 372 1,809 1,809 2,974 5,768 4,741 21.158 21,158 2,974 5,768 3,325 15,811 15,811 39 202 173 789 789 3,476 197 6,131 16,089 16,089 8,952 1,895 10,847 10,847 8,565 197 10,969 25,675 25,675 6.057 35,495 394 28,629 96,147 96,147 Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet 73 227 227 40 40 908 908 292 292 908 292 1,600 806 214 1,927 33 296 5,388 2,460 37,344 22,887 37,344 22,887 419 3,362 2,693 376 584 6,481 2,379 75,354 68,381 2,754 584 Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Appendix D, Page 70[24 Burial I Utility and GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs. Manhours Manhours 1,000 1,560 1,560 2,730 2,730 32,243 32,243 25,000 9,412 25,000 9,412 5.834 11 32,679 58,560 129,669 5,834 11 220,907 5,834 25,011 262,562 16,121 25,029 659,072 256,781 5,614 36,557 596 871,200 3,760 269,821 1,782 3,128,906 20,508 1,125 3,128,906 10,800 1,125 83,603 2,134 360,613 23,417 1,069 433 85,510 964,972 23,417 1,069 433 9,186,868 92,028 4,387 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Activity Index Activi!}:
Descrietion Removal of Major Equipment 4a.1.2 Main Turbine/Generator 4a.1.3 Main Condensers Cascading Costs from Clean Building Demolition 4a.1.4.1 'Reactor 4a.1.4.2 Containment Penetration Area 4a.1.4.3 Fuel Handling 4a.1.4 Totals Disposal of Plant Systems 4a.1.5.1 Auxiliary Steam 4a.1.5.2 Auxiliary Steam (RCA) 4a.1.5.3 Condensate System 4a.1.5.4 Condensate System (Insulated) 4a.1.5.5 Containment Spray 4a.1.5.6 Extraction Steam & Heater Drip 4a.1.5.7 Feedwater System 4a.1.5.8 Feedwater System (Insulated) 4a.1.5.9 Feedwater System (RCA Insulated) 4a.1.5.10 Feedwater System (RCA) 4a.1.5.11 Lube Oil Distribution 
& Purification 4a.1.5.12 Nitrogen & Hydrogen 4a.1.5.13 Nitrogen & Hydrogen (Insulated) 4a.1.5.14 Nitrogen & Hydrogen (RCA Insulated) 4a.1.5.15 Nitrogen & Hydrogen (RCA) 4a.1.5.16 Oily Water Separator 
& TB Sump 4a.1.5.17 Saltwater System 4a.1.5.18 Turbine Steam Supply 4a.1.5.19 Turbine Steam Supply (RCA) 4a.1.5.20 Turbine and Generator 4a.1.5.21 Turbine and Generator (Insulated) 4a.1.5 Totals 4a.1.6 Scaffolding in support of decommissioning 4a.1 Subtotal Period 4a Costs Period 4a Additional Costs 4a.2.1 Retired Reactor Head 4a.2 Subtotal Period 4a Additional Costs Period 4a Collateral Costs 4a.3.1 Process liquid waste 4a.3.2 Small tool allowance 4a.3 Subtotal Period 4a Collateral Costs Period 4a Period-Dependent Costs 4a.4.1 Decon supplies 4a.4.2 Insurance 4a.4.3 Property taxes 4a.4.4 Health physics supplies 4a.4.5 Heavy eqUipment rental 4a.4.6 Disposal of DAW generated 4a.4.7 Plant energy budget 4a.4.8 NRC Fees 4a.4.9 Liquid Radwaste Processing Equipment/Services TLG Services, Inc. Decon Removal Packaging Transport Cost Cost Costs Costs 471 153 113 1,370 145 107 1,208 66 175 1,449 245 6 56 213 3 29 1,131 68 592 401 21 182 194 10 87 450 16 143 65 5 48 271 11 101 98 3 24 5 0 1 188 3 25 17 1 5 87 30 162 1,227 80 700 671 22 182 116 4 37 49 1 8 5,622 256 2,228 2,236 12 372 21,423 10,109 7,839 102 151 55 102 151 55 56 27 110 263 56 263 27 110 80 1,805 3,277 83 31 Table D-I Diablo Canyon Unit 1 SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2008 Dollars) Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Processing Disposal other Total Total Lic. Term. Management Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs 928 408 2,073 2,073 875 711 3,208 3,208 256 1,463 1,463 14 80 80 37 212 212 307 1,755 1,755 458 196 962 962 240 133 619 619 4,856 1,561 8,208 8,208 1,497 500 2,601 2,601 713 239 1,242 1,242 1,176 440 2.225 2,225 395 117 631 631 825 293 1,501 1,501 199 82 407 407 10 4 21 21 205 115 536 536 4 20 0 1 2 2 9 9 38 40 170 170 63 25 126 126 34 196 5,742 1,807 9,556 9,556 1,497 595 2,966 2,966 300 113 569 569 63 32 152 152 18,278 6,333 32,717 32,500 67 10 810 3,143 3,143 26,205 35,504 394 37,198 139,044 138,827 503 15 539 1,366 1,366 503 15 539 1,366 1,366 103 103 399 399 56 318 286 103 158 717 685 28 108 108 613 87 700 700 140 20 160 144 637 2,441 2,441 693 3,970 3,970 272 114 499 499 1,758 372 2,130 2,130 916 129 1,045 1,045 535 113 648 648 Site Processed Burial Volumes Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet 8,118 7,657 4,445 2,330 47,076 14,512 6,908 11,399 3,829 7,995 1,926 101 1,986 20 1 20 371 607 196 55,669 14,508 2,909 607 217 177,198 586 39 217 268,913 68,420 2,754 584 2,002 2,002 405 32 32 405 16 4,386 Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Appendix D, Page 8 of24 Burial/ Utility and GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Cu. Feet Wt.,Lbs. Manhours Manhours 365,301 8,335 344,574 24,147 13,127 704 1,746 15,578 180,494 4,001 94,627 3,528 1,911,765 18,771 589,348 6,833 280,525 3,329 462,924 7,441 155,509 1,130 324,669 4,542 78,223 1,693 4.117 81 80,661 3,052 315 17 793 75 15,060 1,433 24,649 464 2,926 2,260,765 20,590 589,194 11,474 118,127 1,947 24,645 777 7,196,094 94,419 29,687 17,211 433 17,122,520 251,718 4,387 211,020 2,100 84 211,020 2,100 84 24,289 79 24,289 79 87.730 160 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Activity Index Descrietion Period 4a Period-Dependent Costs (continued) 4a.4.10 Security Staff Cost 4a.4.11 DOC Staff Cost 4a.4.12 Utility Staff Cost 4a.4 Subtotal Period 4a Period-Dependent Costs 4a.0 TOTAL PERIOD 4a COST PERIOD 4b -Site Decontamination Period 4b Direct Decommissioning Activities 4b.1.1 Remove spent fuel racks Disposal of Plant Systems 4b.1.2.1 Additions 85-2002 (clean) 4b.1.2.2 Additions 85-2002 (contaminated) 4b.1.2.3 Chemical & Volume Control 4b.1.2.4 Chemical & Volume Control (Insulated) 4b.1.2.5 Component Cooling Water 4b.1.2.6 Component Cooling Water (RCA) 4b.1.2.7 Compressed Air 4b.1.2.8 Compressed Air (Insulated) 4b.1.2.9 Compressed Nr (RCA Insulated) 4b.1.2.10 Compressed Air (RCA) 4b.1.2.11 Diesel Engine-Generator 4b.1.2.12 Diesel Engine-Generator (Insulated) 4b.1,2.13 Electrical (Clean) 4b.1.2.14 Electrical (Contaminated) 4b.1.2.15 Electrical (Contaminated)-
FHB 4b.1.2.16 Electrical (Decontaminated) 4b.1.2.17 Electrical (Decontaminated) 
-FHB 4b.1.2.18 Fire Protection 4b.1.2.19 Fire Protection (RCA) 4b.1.2.20 Gaseous Radwaste 4b.1.2.21 HVAC (Clean Insulated) 4b.1.2.22 HVAC (Clean) 4b.1.2.23 HVAC (Contaminated Insulated) 4b.1.2.24 HVAC (Contaminated) 4b.1.2.25 HVAC (Contaminated) 
-FHB 4b.1.2.26 Liquid Radwaste 4b.1.2.27 Liquid Radwaste (Insulated) 4b.1.2.28 Make-up Water 4b.1.2.29 Make-up Water (Insulated) 4b.1.2.30 Make-up Water (RCA Insulated) 4b.1.2.31 Make-up Water (RCA) 4b.1.2.32 Miscellaneous Reactor Coolant 4b.1.2.33 Nuclear Steam Supply Sampling 4b.1.2.34 Nuclear Steam Supply Sampling (Insulated 4b.1.2.35 Residual Heat Removal 4b.1.2.36 Safety Injection 4b.1.2.37 Safety Injection (Insulated) 4b,1.2.38 Safety Injection (RCA Insulated) 4b.1.2.39 Safety Injection (RCA) 4b.1.2.40 Service Cooling Water 4b.1.2.41 Service Cooling Water (RCA) 4b.1,2.42 Spent Fuel Pit Cooling 4b.1.2.43 Spent Fuel Pit Cooling -FHB TLG Services, Inc. Decon Removal Packaging Transport Cost Cost Costs Costs 80 5,082 83 31 508 26,869 10,370 8,034 432 47 136 34 155 310 3 28 851 46 97 308 16 15 166 478 13 107 148 5 22 1 413 24 152 10 1.809 442 7 65 128 1 10 3.025 73 612 880 11 90 311 11 93 191 2 20 60 0 4 24 304 229 4 37 1,018 21 185 242 5 42 538 38 49 56 4 3 306 28 34 3 180 19 87 3 6 131 1 7 40 0 1 231 26 84 90 1 12 4 0 0 32 1 4 270 5 39 100 23 0 3 63 8 32 86 10 34 Table D-I Diablo Canyon Unit 1 SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of2008 Dollars) Off-Site LLRW NRC Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lie. Term. Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs 4,367 924 5,291 5,291 16,057 3,398 19,456 19,456 21,827 4,619 26,446 26,446 272 46,214 11,134 62,894 62,878 26,205 36,382 46,623 49,029 204,021 203,756 659 580 1.888 1,888 33 187 234 165 741 741 646 351 588 2,579 2,579 65 129 173 705 705 35 202 876 378 1,852 1,852 31 179 1 6 10 10 45 45 199 194 834 834 32 184 2 12 383 2,192 532 283 1,329 1,329 81 65 285 285 5,022 2,269 11,001 11,001 742 488 2,212 2,212 761 292 1,466 1,466 162 106 481 481 34 30 129 129 5 29 64 368 304 154 729 729 1,521 723 3,469 3,469 348 169 806 806 268 316 374 1,584 1,584 8 31 34 136 136 65 371 6 34 28 19 84 84 157 101 460 460 38 19 47 200 200 57 60 256 256 7 16 63 63 595 214 304 1,454 1,454 99 56 259 259 4 2 11 11 36 20 93 93 320 172 807 807 21 121 26 14 67 67 238 61 102 505 505 251 72 117 570 570 spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet 16 4,386 265 268,913 75,213 2,754 584 2,621 187 2,266 6,267 1,420 627 513 202 8,495 179 6 102 1,932 184 12 2,192 5,155 786 48,689 7,198 7,373 1,570 332 29 368 2,950 14,745 3,370 2,599 1,347 78 124 371 34 269 1,522 371 77 556 70 5,773 853 963 38 345 3,107 121 253 2,311 242 2,433 284 Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Appendix D, Page 9 of24 Burial I Utility and GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Cu. Feet WI., Lbs. Manhours Manhours 64,821 198,294 349,794 87,730 160 612,909 433 17,445,560 254,056 617,381 222,759 962 2,830 92,043 5,363 373,180 14,546 68,999 5,086 3,078 344,999 8,025 2,744 98 4,130 380 78,476 6,959 2,760 178 32,770 209,365 7,636 31,909 2,213 1,977,300 51,247 292,312 14,847 299,432 5,298 63,760 3,139 13,495 965 475 5,804 119,809 3,471 598,821 15,667 136,839 3,710 212,279 9,155 13,753 928 5,614 521 10,909 564 61,817 2,969 21,534 1,558 22,561 2,405 2,836 735 306,888 4,053 39,122 1,570 1,558 72 14,018 533 126,161 4,433 1,856 10,286 384 114,445 1,103 122,976 1,513 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Activity Index Descrietion Period 4b Disposal of Plant Systems (continued) 4b.1.2 Totals 4b.1.3 Scaffolding in support of decommissioning Decontamination of Site Buildings 4b. 1.4. 1 'Reactor 4b.1.4.2 Capital Additions 85-2004 4b.1.4.3 Containment Penetration Area 4b.1.4A Fuel Handling 4b.1.4 Totals 4b.1 Subtotal Period 4b Activity Costs Period 4b Additional Costs 4b.2.1 ISFSI License Termination 4b.2.2 License Termination Survey Planning 4b.2 Subtotal Period 4b Additional Costs Period 4b Collateral Costs 4b.3.1 Process liquid waste 4b.3.2 Small tool allowance 4b.3.3 Decommissioning Equipment Disposition 4b.3 Subtotal Period 4b Collateral Costs Period 4b Period-Dependent Costs 4b.4.1 Decon supplies 4bA.2 Insurance 4bA.3 Property taxes 4b.4.4 Health physics supplies 4bA.5 Heavy eqUipment rental 4bA.6 Disposal of DAW generated 4bA.7 Plant energy budget 4bA.8 NRC Fees 4bA.9 Liquid Radwaste Processing Equipment/Services 4bA.10 Security Staff Cost 4bA.11 DOC Staff Cost 4bA.12 Utility Staff Cost 4bA Subtotal Period 4b Period-Dependent Costs 4b.0 TOTAL PERIOD 4b COST PERIOD 4d -Delay before License Termination Period 4d Period-Dependent Costs 4d.4.1 Insurance 4d.4.2 Property taxes 4dA.3 Health physics supplies 4d.4.4 Disposal of DAW generated 4d.4.5 Plant energy budget 4dA.6 NRC Fees 4d.4.7 Utility Staff Cost 4d.4 Subtotal Period 4d Period-Dependent Costs 4d.0 TOTAL PERIOD 4d COST TLG Services, Inc. Decon Removal Packaging Transport Cost Cost Costs Costs 13,980 316 1,728 3,354 18 13 1,371 1,504 345 341 24 20 1 4 237 140 23 28 593 597 31 42 2,225 2,261 401 415 2,657 19,642 871 2,190 1,059 100 1,059 100 127 62 250 397 121 107 127 397 183 357 948 2,446 4,592 94 35 948 7,038 94 35 3,731 28,136 1,152 2,682 92 92 92 Table D-l Diablo Canyon Unit 1 SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2008 Dollars) Off-Site LLRW NRC Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term. Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs 13,672 1,193 8,203 39,094 35,209 101 15 1,215 4,714 4,714 426 1,365 2,190 7,541 7,541 40 3 34 126 126 120 299 357 1,204 1,204 206 388 823 2,680 2,680 792 2,055 3,404 11,552 11,552 14,564 3,922 13,402 57,248 53,363 387 783 690 3,022 669 283 952 952 387 1,451 973 3,974 952 236 234 909 909 84 481 481 686 100 220 1,234 1,234 686 335 538 2,624 2,624 334 1,282 1,282 866 122 988 988 198 28 226 226 863 3,309 3,309 972 5,564 5,564 309 130 567 567 1,959 415 2,374 2,374 1,293 182 1,475 1,475 755 160 914 914 1,426 302 1,728 1,728 15,043 3,183 18,226 18,226 21,285 4,504 25,789 25,789 309 42,824 11,195 62,442 62,442 15,250 4,953 44,275 26,108 126,288 119,381 106 15 121 121 33 125 125 3 12 12 192 27 220 220 934 198 1,131 1,131 1,232 275 1,609 1,609 1,232 275 1,609 1,609 Spent Fuel Site Processed Management Restoration Volume Class A Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet 3,885 132,547 4,861 880 58 4,128 17,997 386 14 1,164 1,197 1,996 1,566 7,674 20,775 3,885 141,101 28,315 3,022 6,237 3,022 6,237 924 6,000 397 6,000 1,320 4,981 4,981 3,022 3,885 147,101 40,854 105 105 105 Burial Volumes Class B Class C Cu. Feet Cu. Feet GTCC Document POI-1604-003, Rev. 0 Appendix D, Page 10 of24 Burial I Utility and Processed Craft Contractor Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs. Manhours Manhours 5,786,013 239,260 44,530 25,817 1,944,651 46,746 16,586 744 148,244 6,147 212,259 20,239 2,321,740 73,876 8,375,042 339,915 748,923 15,272 1,280 6,240 748,923 15,272 7,520 55,419 180 303,726 88 359,145 268 99,624 181 22,534 192,566 344,160 99,624 181 559,260 9,582,733 355,637 566,780 2,103 15,400 2,103 15,400 2,103 15,400 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Activity Index ActiVi!l:
Descrietion PERIOD 4e -License Termination Period 4e Direct Decommissioning Activities 4e.1.1 ORISE confirmatory survey 4e.1.2 Terminate license 4e.1 Subtotal Period 4e Activity Costs Period 4e Additional Costs 4e.2.1 License Termination Survey 4e.2 Subtotal Period 4e Additional Costs Period 4e Collateral Costs 4e.3.1 DOC staff relocation expenses 4e.3 SUbtotal Period 4e Collateral Costs Period 4e Period-Dependent Costs 4e.4.1 Insurance 4e.4.2 Property taxes 4e.4.3 Heatth physics supplies 4e.4.4 Disposal of DAW generated 4e.4.5 Plant energy budget 4e.4.6 NRC Fees 4e.4.7 Security Staff Cost 4e.4.8 DOC Staff Cost 4e.4.9 Utility Staff Cost 4e.4 Subtotal Period 4e Period-Dependent Costs 4e.0 TOTAL PERIOD 4e COST PERIOD 4 TOTALS PERIOD 5b -Site Restoration Period 5b Direct Decommissioning Activities Demolition of Remaining Site Buildings 5b.1.1.1 'Reactor 5b.1.1.2 Capital Addrtions 85-2004 5b.1.1.3 Containment Penetration Area 5b.1.1.4 Miscellaneous 5b.1.1.5 Turbine 5b.1.1.6 Turbine Pedestal 5b.1.1.7 Fuel Handling 5b.1.1 Totals Site Closeout Activities 5b.1.2 Grade & landscape srte 5b.1.3 Final report to NRC 5b.1 Subtotal Period 5b Activrty Costs Period 5b Additional Costs 5b.2.1 Concrete Crushing 5b.2.2 ISFSI Demolition and Srte Restoration 5b.2.3 Cofferdam Construction and Teardown 5b.2 Subtotal Period 5b Additional Costs TLG Services, Inc. Decon Removal Packaging Transport Cost Cost Costs Costs 919 919 919 4,239 56,016 11,530 10,719 6,873 273 615 26 3,274 1,212 1,689 13,961 2,272 16.234 464 545 438 1,447 Table D-I Diablo Canyon Unit 1 SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2008 Dollars) Off-Site LLRW NRC Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic.Term.
Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs 153 65 218 218 a 153 65 218 218 8,178 3,461 11,639 11,639 8,178 3,461 11,639 11,639 1,395 295 1,690 1,690 1,395 295 1,690 1,690 76 11 87 87 324 1,243 1,243 20 8 36 36 200 42 243 243 532 75 607 607 298 63 361 361 2,847 602 3,449 3,449 2,525 534 3,059 3,059 20 6,478 1,660 9,085 9,085 20 16,203 5,482 22,632 22,632 41,455 41,362 108,334 80.894 354,549 347,378 1,455 8,328 58 331 130 745 5 31 693 3,966 256 1,468 357 2,046 2,955 16,916 481 2.753 187 40 227 227 187 3,475 19.896 227 98 562 24 120 690 93 530 24 311 1,782 Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet 319 319 319 3,022 4,150 416,013 116,491 2,754 584 8,328 331 745 31 3,966 1,468 2,046 16,916 2,753 19,669 562 690 530 690 1,093 Document POI-I604-003, Rev. 0 Appendix D, Page 11 of24 Burial I Utility and GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Cu. Feet Wt. Lbs. Manhours Manhours 142,829 3,120 142,829 3,120 6,371 12 4,714 36,143 39,286 6,371 12 80,143 6,371 142,841 83,263 433 27,036,770 752,537 1,282,823 74,901 3,572 6,563 249 38,602 11,300 16,750 151,936 4,587 1,560 156,523 1.560 2,063 3,349 80 4,004 9,416 80 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Activity Index Period 5b Collateral Costs Activitv Description 5b.3.1 Small tool allowance 5b.3 Subtotal Period 5b Collateral Costs Period 5b Period-Dependent Costs 5b.4.1 Insurance 5b,4.2 Property taxes 5bA.3 Heavy equipment rental 5bAA Plant energy budget 5bA.5 Security Staff Cost 5bA.6 DOC Staff Cost 5bA.7 Utility Staff Cost 5bA Subtotal Period 5b Period-Dependent Costs 5b.0 TOTAL PERIOD 5b COST PERIOD 5 TOTALS TOTAL COST TO DECOMMISSION Decon Cost 9,749 OTAl COST TO DECOMMISSION WITH 25% CONTINGENCY:
OTAl NRC LICENSE TERMINATION COST IS 67.16% OR: FPENT FUEL MANAGEMENT COST IS 26.78% OR:
DEMOLITION COST IS 6.06% OR: Removal Cost 190 190 6,420 6,420 24,290 24,290 87,150 OTAl LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE VOLUME BURIED (EXCLUDING GTCC): OTAl GREATER THAN CLASS C RADWASTE VOLUME GENERATED:
OTAl SCRAP METAL REMOVED: OTAl CRAFT LABOR REQUIREMENTS:
End Notes: nla -indicates that this activity not charged as decommissioning expense. a -indicates that this activity performed by decommissioning staff. 0-indicates that this value is less than 0.5 but is non-zero.
a cell containing" -" indicates a zero value TLG Services, Inc. Packaging Costs 11,919 Table D-I Diablo Canyon Unit 1 SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2008 Dollars) Transport Costs Off-Site LLRW Processing Disposal Costs Costs Other Costs 207 273 338 6,581 1,713 9,111 9,322 9.322 11,487 41,455 42,730 403,420 $759,912 thousands of 2008 dollars $510,340 thousands of 2008 dollars $203,537 thousands of 2008 dollars $46,035 thousands of 2008 dollars 134,004 Cubic Feet 433 Cubic Feet 48,060 Tons 1,002,381 Man-hours Total Continqenc 40 40 29 1,359 58 72 1,393 362 3,272 7,099 7,099 152,002 Total Costs 231 231 236 7.778 330 410 7,974 2,075 18,803 40,711 40,711 759,912 NRC Lic. Term. Costs 227 227 510,340 Spent Fuel Management Costs 690 690 203,537 Document POI-1604-003, Rev. 0 Appendix D, Page 12 of24 Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial I Utility and Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt, Lbs. Manhours Manhours 231 231 236 7,778 330 410 7,974 2,075 18,803 39,795 39,795 46,035 416,013 130,665 2,754 584 165,939 165.939 5,343 81,211 27,783 114,337 115,977 115,977 433 27,421,720 1,002,381 2,999,686 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Activity Index Descrietion PERIOD 1a -Shutdown through Transition Period 1 a Direct Decommissioning 1a.1.1 SAFSTOR characterization sUNey 1a.1.2 Prepare preliminary decommissioning cost 1a.1.3 Notification 01 Cessation 01 Operations 1a.1.4 Remove fuel & source material 1a.1.5 Notification of Permanent Delueling 1a.1.6 Deactivate plant systems & process waste 1a.1.7 Prepare and submit PSDAR 1a.1.8 Review plant dwgs & specs. 1a.1.9 Perform detailed rad sUNey 1a.1.10 Estimate by-product inventory 1a.1.11 End product description 1a.1.12 Detailed by-product inventory 1a.1.13 Define major work sequence 1a.1.14 Perform SER and EA 1a.1.15 Perform Site-Specific Cost Study Activity Specifications 1a.1.16.1 Prepare plant and lacilities lor SAFSTOR 1a.1.16.2 Plant systems 1a.1.16.3 Plant structures and buildings 1 a.1.16.4 Waste management 1a.1.16.5 Facility and sfte dormancy 1a.1.16 Total Detailed Work Procedures 1a.1.17.1 Plant systems 1a.1.17.2 Facility closeout & dormancy 1a.1.17 Total 1a.1.18 Procure vacuum drying system 1a.1.19 Drain/de-energize non-cont.
systems 1a.1.20 Drain & dry NSSS 1a.1.21 Drain/de-energize contaminated systems 1a.1.22 Decon/secure contaminated systems 1a.1 Subtotal Period 1 a Activity Costs Period 1 a Collateral Costs 1a.3.1 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer 1a.3 Subtotal Period 1 a Collateral Costs Period 1 a Period-Dependent Costs 1a.4.1 Insurance 1a.4.2 Property taxes 1a.4.3 Health physics supplies 1a.4.4 Heavy equipment rental 1a.4.5 Disposal of DAW generated 1a.4.6 Plant energy budget 1a.4.7 NRC ISFSI Fees 1a.4.8 NRC Fees 1a.4.9 Emergency Planning Fees 1a.4.10 Spent Fuel Pool O&M 1a.4.11 ISFSI -Operating Costs 1a.4.12 Spent Fuel Storage/Capital Equipment 1a.4.13 ISFSI -Fixed Costs TLG Services, Inc. Deco" Removal Packaging Transport Cost Cost Costs Costs 486 490 11 Table D-2 Diablo Canyon Unit 2 SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2008 Dollars) Off-Site LLRW NRC Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term. Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs 414 179 593 593 67 14 81 81 a nla a 103 22 125 125 67 14 81 81 a 51 11 62 62 51 11 62 62 77 17 94 94 51 11 62 62 159 34 193 193 256 55 312 312 252 55 307 307 214 46 260 260 160 35 195 195 103 22 125 125 103 22 125 125 831 180 1,010 1.010 61 13 74 74 62 13 75 75 122 26 149 149 a 2,254 577 2,830 2,830 1,649 357 2,006 1,649 357 2,006 1,195 172 1,367 1,367 101 15 115 115 175 661 661 106 596 596 38 16 70 70 1,330 287 1,617 1,617 191 191 471 68 539 539 1,258 181 1,439 735 159 894 141 30 171 4,385 948 5,333 286 62 348 Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet 2,006 2,006 610 191 1,439 894 171 5,333 348 GTCC Cu. Feet Document POI-1604-003, Rev. 0 Appendix D, Page 13 0(24 Burial/ Utility and Processed Craft Contractor Wt ** Lbs. Manhours Manhours 556 855 556 428 428 641 428 1,326 2,138 2,104 1,782 1,334 855 855 6.930 506 513 1,019 43 15,347 12,190 22 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Activity Index Period 1a Period-Dependent Costs (continued) 1a.4.14 Security Staff Cost 1a.4.15 Utility Staff Cost 1a.4 Subtotal Period 1 a Period-Dependent Costs 1a.0 TOTAL PERIOD 1a COST PERIOD 1 b -SAFSTOR Limited DECON Activities Period 1 b Direct Decommissioning Activities Decontamination of Site Buildings 1b.1.1.1 "'Reactor lb.1.1.2 Auxiliary 1b.1.1.3 Capital Additions 85-2004 lb.1.1.4 Containment Penetration Area 1b.1.1.5 Fuel Handling 1b.1.1 Totals 1b.1 Subtotal Period 1 b Activity Costs Period 1 b Collateral Costs 1b.3.1 Decon equipment 1b.3.2 Process liquid waste 1b.3.3 Small tool allowance 1b.3.4 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer lb.3 Subtotal Period 1 b Collateral Costs Period 1 b Period-Dependent Costs lb.4.1 Decon supplies 1b.4.2 Insurance lb.4.3 Property taxes 1b.4.4 Heatth physics supplies lb.4.5 Heavy equipment rental 1b.4.6 Disposal of DAW generated 1b.4.7 Plant energy budget 1b.4.8 NRC ISFSI Fees 1b.4.9 NRC Fees 1b.4.10 Emergency Planning Fees 1b.4.11 Spent Fuel Pool O&M 1b.4.12 ISFSI-Operating Costs 1b.4.13 Spent Fuel StoragelCapital Equipment 1b.4.14 ISFSI -Fixed Costs 1b.4.15 Security Staff Cost 1b.4.16 Utility Staff Cost 1b.4 Subtotal Period 1 b Period-Dependent Costs 1b.0 TOTAL PERIOD 1b COST PERIOD 1c -Preparations for SAFSTOR Dormancy Period 1 c Direct Decommissioning Activities 1c.1.1 Prepare support equipment for storage 1c.1.2 Install containment pressure equal. lines 1c.1.3 Interim survey prior to dormancy 1c.1.4 Secure building accesses 1c.1.5 Prepare & submit interim report TLG Services, Inc. Decon Removal Packaging Transport Cost Cost Costs Costs 976 11 976 11 1,501 1,010 296 226 575 3,608 3,608 935 180 82 331 69 1,115 69 82 331 1,467 406 123 16 1,467 529 16 6,189 599 99 337 431 42 Table D-2 Diablo Canyon Unit 2 SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2008 Dollars) Off-Site LLRW NRC Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic.Term.
Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs 10,231 2,212 12,443 12,443 26,403 5,707 32,110 32,110 38 46,726 10,139 57,894 49,518 38 50,629 11,072 62,730 52.348 1,081 2,582 2,251 728 1,738 1,516 213 509 444 163 388 339 414 989 863 2,599 6,207 5,411 2,599 6,207 5,411 202 1,137 1.137 312 325 1,230 1,230 15 84 84 252 54 307 312 252 597 2,758 2,452 529 1,996 1,996 301 43 345 345 25 4 29 29 146 552 552 27 150 150 54 23 100 100 335 72 408 408 48 48 119 17 136 136 187 27 214 185 40 225 36 8 43 962 208 1,170 72 16 88 2,579 557 3,136 3,136 6,655 1,439 8,093 8,093 54 11,504 3,156 16,733 14,945 366 11,756 6,352 25,698 22,807 93 524 524 9 51 51 733 317 1,050 1,050 a 30 36 36 Spent Fuel Site Processed Management Restoration Volume Class A Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet 8,376 610 10,382 610 331 223 65 50 127 796 796 1,223 307 307 1,223 874 48 214 225 43 1,170 88 1,788 874 2,095 796 2,097 Burial Volumes Class B Class C GTCC Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Appendix D, Page 14 of24 Burial! Utility and Processed Craft Contractor Wt., Lbs. Manhours Manhours 157,471 423,400 12,190 22 580,871 12,190 22 596.218 26,111 17,740 5,109 3.917 9,816 62,693 62,693 73,380 238 73,380 238 17,477 32 39,691 106,720 17,477 32 146,411 90,856 62,963 146,411 3,000 700 12.834 249 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Activity Index Aclivi!X 1c.1 Subtotal Period 1 c Activity Costs Period 1 c Costs 1c.2.1 Spent Fuel Pool Isolation 1c.2.2 Hazardous Waste Management 1c.2.3 Mixed Waste Management 1c.2 Subtotal Period 1 c Additional Costs Period 1c Collateral Costs 1c.3.1 Process liquid waste 1c.3.2 Small tool allowance 1c.3.3 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer 1c.3 Subtotal Period 1 c Collateral Costs Period 1 c Period-Dependent Costs 1c.4.1 Insurance 1c.4.2 Property taxes 1c.4.3 Health physics supplies 1c.4.4 Heavy equipment rental 1c.4.5 Disposal of DAW generated 1c.4.6 Plant energy budget 1c.4.7 NRC ISFSI Fees 1c.4.8 NRC Fees 1c.4.9 Emergency Planning Fees 1c.4.10 Spent Fuel Pool O&M 1c.4.11 ISFSI -Operating Costs 1c.4.12 Spent Fuel Equipment 1c.4.13 ISFSI* Fixed Costs 1c.4.14 Security Staff Cost 1c.4.15 Utility Staff Cost 1c.4 Subtotal Period 1 c Period-Dependent Costs 1c.0 TOTAL PERIOD 1c COST PERIOD 1 TOTALS Decon Cost 208 208 208 6,397 PERIOD 2a
* SAFSTOR Dormancy with Wet Spent Fuel Storage Period 2a Direct Decommissioning 2a.1.1 Quarterly Inspection 2a.1.2 Semi-annual environmental survey 2a.1.3 Prepare reports 2a.1.4 Bituminous roof replacement 2a.1.5 Maintenance supplies 2a.1 Subtotal Period 2a Activity Costs Period 2a Collateral Costs 2a.3.1 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer 2a.3 Subtotal Period 2a Collateral Costs Period 2a Period-Dependent Costs 2a.4.1 Insurance 2a.4.2 Property taxes 2a.4.3 Health physics supplies 2a.4.4 Disposal of DAW generated 2a.4.5 Plant energy budget 2a.4.6 NRC ISFSI Fees 2a.4.7 NRC Fees TLG Services, Inc. Removal Packaging Transport Cost Costs Costs 472 95 383 95 383 198 123 322 799 98 384 2,373 208 725 1,204 83 31 Table D-2 Diablo Canyon Unit 2 SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2008 Dollars) Off-Site LLRW NRC Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term. Costs Costs Costs Contin2encx Costs Costs 763 425 1,661 1,661 6,272 1,356 7,627 7,627 590 128 718 718 912 197 1,109 1,109 7,773 1,680 9,454 9.454 361 376 1,422 1.422 1 5 5 252 54 307 361 252 431 1,734 1,428 301 43 345 345 25 4 29 29 71 270 270 27 150 150 10 4 18 18 335 72 408 408 48 48 119 17 136 136 187 27 214 185 40 225 36 8 43 957 207 1,164 72 16 88 2,579 557 3,136 3,136 6,655 1,439 8,093 8,093 10 11,500 2,532 14,367 12,584 370 20,288 5,069 27,216 25.126 774 82,673 22,493 115,644 100,282 a 36 44 1,341 483 1,825 1,378 491 1,869 11,535 2,494 14,029 11,535 2,494 14,029 4,703 678 5,381 1,076 155 1,231 434 1,637 273 117 504 2,838 613 3,452 2,034 2,034 1,907 275 2,182 Spent Fuel Site Processed Management Restoration Volume Class A Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet 1.414 307 307 1,414 154 48 214 225 43 1.164 88 1,783 154 2,090 1,568 14,566 796 4,274 44 1,825 1,869 14,029 14,029 5,381 1,231 1,637 504 4,403 3,452 2,034 2,182 Burial Volumes Class B Class C GTCC Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Document POI-1604-003, Rev. 0 Appendix D, Page 150(24 Buriall Utility and Processed Craft Contractor Wt., Lbs. Manhours Manhours 16,534 249 84,861 276 84,861 276 3.073 39,691 106,720 3.073 146.411 87,933 16,815 146,661 190,980 79.801 889,290 88,054 160 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Activity Index Period 2a Period*Dependent Costs (continued) 2a.4.8 Emergency Planning Fees 2a.4.9 Spent Fuel Transfer*
Pool or ISFSI to DOE 2a.4.10 Spent Fuel Pool O&M 2a.4.11 ISFSI
* Operating Costs 2a.4.12 Spent Fuel Storage/Caprtal Equipment 2a.4.13 ISFSI* Fixed Costs 2a.4.14 Security Staff Cost 2a.4.15 Utility Staff Cost 2a.4 Subtotal Period 2a Period*Dependent Costs 2a.0 TOTAL PERIOD 2a COST Decon Cost PERIOD 2b
* SAFSTOR Dormancy with Dry Spent Fuel Storage Period 2b Direct Decommissioning Activrties 2b.l.l Quarterty Inspection 2b.l.2 Semi-annual environmental survey 2b.l.3 Prepare reports 2b.l.4 Bituminous roof replacement 2b.l.5 Maintenance supplies 2b.l Subtotal Period 2b Activity Costs Period 2b Period.Dependent Costs 2b.4.1 Insurance 2b.4.2 Property taxes 2b.4.3 Health physics supplies 2b.4.4 Disposal of DAW generated 2b.4.5 Plant energy budget 2b.4.6 NRC ISFSI Fees 2bA.7 NRC Fees 2b.4.8 Emergency Planning Fees 2b.4.9 Spent Fuel Transfer*
Pool or ISFSI to DOE 2b.4.10 ISFSI
* Operating Costs 2b.4.11 ISFSI
* Fixed Costs 2b.4.12 Security Staff Cost 2b.4.13 Utility Staff Cost 2b.4 Subtotal Period 2b Period*Dependent Costs 2b.0 TOTAL PERIOD 2b COST PERIOD 2c
* SAFSTOR Dormancy without Spent Fuel Storage Period 2c Direct Decommissioning Activities 2c.l.1 Quarterly Inspection 2c.l.2 Semi-annual environmental survey 2c.l.3 Prepare reports 2c.l.4 Brtuminous roof replacement 2c.l.5 Maintenance supplies 2c.l Subtotal Period 2c Activity Costs Period 2c Period*Dependent Costs 2c.4.1 Insurance 2c.4.2 Property taxes 2c.4.3 Health physics supplies 2c.4.4 Disposal of DAW generated 2c.4.5 Plant energy budget 2c.4.6 NRC Fees 2c.4.7 Utility Staff Cost TLG Services, Inc. Removal Packaging Transport Cost Costs Costs 1,204 83 31 1,204 83 31 1.339 102 38 1,339 102 38 1,339 102 38 78 Table D-2 Diablo Canyon Unit 2 SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2008 Dollars) Off-Site LLRW NRC Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lie. Term. Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs 4,275 616 4,891 4,967 1,074 6,041 7,840 1,695 9,535 1,504 325 1,829 52,049 11,251 63,301 3,057 661 3,718 77,844 16,827 94,672 57,486 12,427 69,913 273 221,582 47,148 270,320 273 234,495 50,133 286,218 a 48 10 59 1,779 641 2,420 1,827 651 2,478 5,438 784 6,221 1,427 206 1,633 482 1,821 337 144 622 1,882 407 2,288 2,697 2,697 2,529 364 2,893 5,270 760 6,030 6,333 1,369 7,702 1,994 431 2,425 4,054 876 4,930 54,202 11,717 65,918 30,143 6,516 36,659 337 115,968 24,056 141,839 337 117.795 24.707 144.318 a 3 1 4 114 41 156 156 117 42 159 159 334 48 382 382 92 13 105 105 28 106 106 21 9 38 38 121 26 147 147 155 22 178 178 441 95 537 537 Spent Fuel Site Processed Management Restoration Volume Class A Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet 4,891 6,041 9,535 1,829 63,301 3,718 94,672 69,913 270,320 4,403 286.218 4,403 59 2,420 2,478 6,221 1,633 1,821 622 5,438 2,288 2,697 2,893 6,030 7,702 2,425 4,930 65,918 36,659 141,839 5,438 144,318 5,438 336 Burial Volumes Class B Class C GTCC Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Document P01.1604-003, Rev. 0 Appendix D, Page 16 of24 Buriall Utility and Processed Craft Contractor Wt.,Lbs. Manhours Manhours 1,185,193 879,157 88,054 160 2,064,350 88.054 160 2,064,350 108,754 198 796,886 472,229 108,754 198 1,269,114 108,754 198 1,269,114 6,728 12 7,589 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Activity Index Descrietion 2c.4 Subtotal Period 2c Period-Dependent Costs 2c.0 TOTAL PERIOD 2c COST PERIOD 2 TOTALS PERIOD 3a -Reactivate Site Following SAFSTOR Dormancy Period 3a Direct Decommissioning Activities 3a.1.1 Prepare preliminary decommissioning cost 3a.1.2 Review plant dwgs & specs. 3a.1.3 Perform detailed rad survey 3a.1.4 End product description 3a.1.5 Detailed by-product inventory 3a.1.6 Define major work sequence 3a.1.7 Perform SER and EA 3a.1.8 Perform Site-Specific Cost Study 3a.1.9 Prepare/submit License Termination Plan 3a.1.10 Receive NRC approval of termination plan Activity Specifications 3a.1.11.1 Re-activate plant & temporary facilities 3a.1.11.2 Plant systems 3a.1.11.3 Reactor intemals 3a.1.11.4 Reactor vessel 3a.1.11.5 Biological shield 3a.1.11.6 Steam generators 3a.1.11.7 Reinforced concrete 3a.1.11.8 Main Turbine 3a.1.11.9 Main Condensers 3a.1.11.10 Plant structures 
& buildings 3a.1.11.11 Waste management 3a.1.11.12 Facility & site closeout 3a.1.11 Total Planning & Site Preparations 3a.1.12 Prepare dismantling sequence 3a.1.13 Plant prep. & temp. svces 3a.1.14 Design water clean-up system 3a.1.15 Rigging/Cont.
Cntrl Envlps/tooling/etc.
3a.1.16 Procure casks/liners 
& containers 3a.1 Subtotal Period 3a Activity Costs Period 3a Period-Dependent Costs 3a.4.1 Insurance 3a.4.2 Property taxes 3a.4.3 Health physics supplies 3a.4.4 Heavy equipment rental 3a.4.5 Disposal of DAW generated 3a.4.6 Plant energy budget 3a.4.7 NRC Fees 3a.4.8 Security Staff Cost 3a.4.9 Utility Staff Cost 3a.4 Subtotal Period 3a Period-Dependent Costs 3a.0 TOTAL PERIOD 3a COST TLG Services, Inc. Decon Removal Packaging Transport Cost Cost Costs Costs 78 78 2,620 191 71 403 490 893 893 Table D-2 Diablo Canyon Unit 2 SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2008 Dollars) Off-Site LLRW NRC Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term. Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs 21 1,143 242 1,492 1,492 21 1,261 284 1,652 1,652 631 353,550 75,124 432,188 1,652 67 14 81 81 236 51 287 287 a 51 11 62 62 67 14 81 81 384 83 468 468 159 34 193 193 256 55 312 312 210 45 255 255 378 82 459 414 214 46 260 234 364 79 443 443 333 72 405 405 26 6 31 31 160 35 195 195 82 18 100 50 21 4 25 21 4 25 160 35 195 97 236 51 287 287 46 10 56 28 2,039 441 2,480 2,183 123 27 150 150 2,700 584 3,284 3,284 72 16 87 87 2,100 454 2,554 2,554 63 14 77 77 8,527 1,843 10,370 10,073 367 53 420 420 101 15 115 115 145 548 548 106 596 596 30 13 55 55 1,330 287 1,617 1,617 214 31 245 245 396 86 482 482 12,270 2,652 14,922 14,922 30 14,678 3,388 19,001 19,001 30 23,205 5,231 29,371 29,074 Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet 336 336 430,536 10,177 46 26 50 25 25 97 28 297 297 481 481 297 481 GTCC Cu. Feet Document POl-1604-003, Rev_ 0 Appendix D, Page 17 of24 Burial/ Utility and Processed Craft Contractor Wt., Lbs. Manhours Manhours 6,728 12 7,589 6,728 12 7,589 203,536 371 3.341,053 556 1,967 428 556 3,207 1,326 2,138 1,751 3,151 1,782 3,036 2,779 214 1,334 684 171 171 1,334 1,967 385 17,009 1,026 599 526 31.088 9,613 18 6,257 200,229 9.613 18 206,486 9,613 18 237,573 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Activity Index Descrietion PERIOD 3b -Decommissioning Preparations Period 3b Direct Decommissioning Activities Detailed Work Procedures 3b.l.l.l Plant systems 3b.l.l.2 Reactor internals 3b.l.l.3 Remaining buildings 3b.l.l.4 CRD cooling assembly 3b.l.l.5 CRD housings & ICI tubes 3b.l.l.6 Incore instrumentation 3b.l.l.7 Reactor vessel 3b.l.l.8 Facility closeout 3b.l.l.9 Missile shields 3b.l.l.l0 Biological shield 3b.l.l.ll Steam generators 3b.l.l.12 Reinforced concrete 3b.l.l.13 Main Turbine 3b.l.l.14 Main Condensers 3b.l.l.15 Auxiliary building 3b.l.l.16 Reactor building 3b.l.l Total 3b.l Subtotal Period 3b Activrty Costs Period 3b Additional Costs 3b.2.1 Site Characterization 3b.2 Subtotal Period 3b Additional Costs Period 3b Collateral Costs 3b.3.1 Decon equipment 3b.3.2 DOC staff relocation expenses 3b.3.3 Pipe cutting equipment 3b.3 Subtotal Period 3b Collateral Costs Period 3b Period-Dependent Costs 3b.4.1 Decon supplies 3b.4.2 Insurance 3b.4.3 Property taxes 3b.4.4 Health physics supplies 3b.4.5 Heavy equipment rental 3b.4.6 Disposal of DAW generated 3b.4.7 Plant energy budget 3b.4.8 NRC Fees 3b.4.9 Security Staff Cost 3b.4.10 DOC Staff Cost 3b.4.11 Utility Staff Cost 3b.4 Subtotal Period 3b Period-Dependent Costs 3b.0 TOTAL PERIOD 3b COST PERIOD 3 TOTALS TLG Services, Inc. Decon Removal Packaging Transport Cost Cost Costs Costs 935 1,000 935 1,000 29 218 246 29 464 964 1,464 964 2,356 14 Table D-2 Diablo Canyon Unit 2 SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2008 Dollars) Off-Site LLRW NRC Processing Disposal other Total Total Lic. Term. Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs 243 52 295 266 128 28 156 156 69 15 84 21 51 11 62 62 51 11 62 62 51 11 62 62 186 40 226 226 62 13 75 37 23 5 28 28 62 13 75 75 236 51 287 287 51 11 62 31 80 17 97 80 17 97 140 30 170 153 140 30 170 153 1,653 357 2.010 1.620 1,653 357 2,010 1.620 1,945 841 2,786 2,786 1,945 841 2,786 2,786 202 1,137 1,137 1,395 302 1,697 1,697 216 1,216 1,216 1,395 720 4,050 4,050 10 39 39 221 32 253 253 51 7 58 58 79 297 297 53 299 299 16 7 30 30 667 144 811 811 107 15 123 123 199 43 241 241 3,458 747 4,205 4,205 6,152 1,330 7,482 7,482 16 10,854 2,468 13,837 13,837 16 15,847 4,386 22,684 22,294 46 39,052 9,617 52,055 51,368 Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet 30 63 37 31 97 97 17 17 390 390 266 266 390 266 687 746 GTCC Cu. Feet Document POI-1604-003, Rev. 0 Appendix D, Page 18 of24 Buriall Utility and Processed Craft Contractor Wt..Lbs. Manhours Manhours 2,024 1,069 577 428 428 428 1.552 513 192 513 1,967 428 667 667 1,167 1,167 13,787 13,787 10.690 4,024 10,690 4,024 5.315 10 3,137 42,874 100,389 5,315 10 146,400 5,315 10,700 164,211 14,927 10,717 401,785 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Activity Index Descrietion PERIOD 4a -Large Component Removal Period 4a Direct Decommissioning Activijies Nuclear Steam Supply System Removal 4a.1.1.1 Reactor Coolant Piping 4a.1.1.2 Pressurizer Quench Tank 4a.1.1.3 Reactor Coolant Pumps & Motors 4a.1.1.4 Pressurizer 4a.1.1.5 Steam Generators 4a.1.1.6 Retired Steam Generator Units 4a,1.1,7 CRDMsIICls/Service Structure Removal 4a,1.1,8 Reactor Vessel Internals 4a,1.1,9 Vessel & Intemals GTCC Disposal 4a.1.1.10 Reactor Vessel 4a.1.1 Totals Removal of Major Equipment 4a,1.2 Main Turbine/Generator 4a,1.3 Main Condensers Cascading Costs from Clean Building Demolition 4a.1.4.1 *Reactor 4a,1.4.2 Auxiliary 4a.1.4.3 Containment Penetration Area 4a.1.4.4 Radwaste Storage 4a.1.4.5 Fuel Handling 4a,1.4 Totals Disposal of Plant Systems 4a.1.5.1 Auxiliary Steam 4a.1.5.2 Auxiliary Steam (RCA) 4a.1.5.3 Condensate System 4a.1.5.4 Condensate System (Insulated) 4a.1.5.5 Containment Spray 4a,1,5.6 Extraction Steam & Heater Drip 4a.1,5.7 Feedwater System 4a,1,5.8 Feedwater System (InSUlated) 4a.1,5.9 Feedwater System (RCA Insulated) 4a.1.5.10 Feedwater System (RCA) 4a.1,5.11 NSSS Sampling 4a.1.5.12 NSSS Sampling (Insulated) 4a.1,5.13 Nitrogen & Hydrogen 4a.1.5.14 Nitrogen & Hydrogen (Insulated) 4a.1.5.15 Nitrogen & Hydrogen (RCA Insulated) 4a.1.5.16 Nitrogen & Hydrogen (RCA) 4a.1.5.17 Oily Water Separator 
& TB Sump 4a.1.5.18 Saltwater System 4a.1.5.19 Turbine Steam Supply 4a.1.5.20 Turbine Steam Supply (RCA) 4a.1,5.21 Turbine and Generator 4a.1.5.22 Turbine and Generator (Insulated) 4a.1.5 Totals 4a.1.6 Scaffolding in support of decommissioning 4a.1 Subtotal Period 4a Activity Costs TLG Services, Inc. Decon Removal Packaging Transport Cost Cost Costs Costs 66 259 40 32 7 26 6 5 26 101 44 121 8 59 454 295 85 3.846 1,858 1,886 1,858 1,886 35 90 221 29 78 2,023 3,805 563 86 3,952 1,361 633 390 10,357 9,648 5,449 470 153 113 1,370 145 107 1,208 652 66 82 175 2.183 128 3 31 109 2 14 1,031 62 546 388 21 181 183 10 84 391 16 137 93 13 112 137 93 24 4 115 34 16 1 4 81 24 153 1,240 81 714 685 23 191 119 4 39 44 1 7 5,075 245 2,093 4,178 26 19 390 23,632 10,217 7,781 Table D-2 Diablo Canyon Unit 2 SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2008 Dollars) Olt-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Processing Disposal other Total Total Lic. Term. Management Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs 60 690 415 1,562 1,562 9 97 53 204 204 1.358 576 2,225 2.225 620 380 1,817 1,817 2,974 5,768 4,843 21,260 21,260 2,974 5,768 3,396 15,882 15,882 39 202 177 792 792 3,362 203 6,284 16,319 16,319 8,952 1,935 10,887 10,887 8,565 203 11,266 26,065 26,065 6.057 35,381 406 29,326 97,015 97,015 925 416 2,077 2,077 875 727 3,223 3,223 261 1.469 1,469 141 793 793 14 80 80 18 99 99 38 213 213 472 2,655 2,655 252 108 522 522 118 68 312 312 4,477 1,466 7,582 7,582 1,481 502 2,573 2,573 688 234 1,198 1,198 1,126 416 2,086 2,086 919 258 1,395 1,395 30 167 197 82 398 398 10 4 20 20 15 34 58 230 230 5 14 54 54 4 20 0 1 2 2 8 8 34 38 158 158 41 19 89 89 33 186 5,855 1,878 9,768 9,768 1,567 630 3,095 3,095 318 121 601 601 58 30 140 140 17,158 40 5,995 30,606 30,231 149 22 1,553 5,946 5,946 25,164 35,442 406 38,489 141,521 141,147 Site Processed Burial Volumes Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet 214 1,927 33 296 5,388 2,460 37,344 22,887 37,344 22,887 419 3,362 2,241 376 584 6,481 2,379 75,354 67,929 2,754 584 8,096 7,657 2,440 1,146 43,400 14,362 6,667 10,916 8,906 167 1,907 100 148 137 21 20 17 330 402 186 56,760 15,189 3,082 565 375 166,336 158 1,300 86 375 258,742 68,173 2,754 584 GTCC Cu. Feet 433 433 433 Document P01-1604-003, Rev. 0 Appendix D, Page 19 0(24 Buriall Utility and Processed Craft Contractor Wt., Lbs. Manhours Manhours 256,781 5.614 36.557 596 871,200 3.760 269,821 1,782 3,128,906 20,508 1,125 3,128,906 10,800 1,125 83.603 2,134 351,463 24,250 1,102 85,510 964,972 24,250 1,102 9,177,718 93,695 4,454 364,306 8,312 344,574 24,147 13,127 7,054 704 918 1,746 23,550 99,082 2,123 46,536 1,820 1,762,487 17,105 583,235 6,634 270,737 3,135 443,294 6,490 361,684 1,645 2,547 77,448 1,601 4,076 76 17,622 2.155 1,798 643 309 16 705 72 13,400 1,362 16,329 394 2.779 2,305,038 20.783 616,829 11,698 125,162 2,001 22,940 696 6,768,403 86,082 65,784 34,066 16,720,780 269,852 4,454 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioni 
** g Cost Analysis Activity Index Activi!l:
Descrietion Period 4a Additional Costs 4a.2.1 Retired Reactor Head 4a.2 Subtotal Period 4a Costs Period 4a Collateral Costs 4a.3.1 Process liquid waste 4a.3.2 Small tool allowance 4a.3 Subtotal Period 4a Collateral Costs Period 4a Period-Dependent Costs 4a.4.1 Decon supplies 4a.4.2 Insurance 4a.4.3 Property taxes 4a.4.4 Heatth physics supplies 4a.4.5 Heavy equipment rental 4a.4.6 Disposal of DAW generated 4a.4.7 Plant energy budget 4a.4.8 NRC Fees 4a.4.9 Liquid Radwaste Processing Equipment/Services 4a.4.10 Security Staff Cost 4a.4.11 DOC Staff Cost 4a.4.12 Utility Staff Cost 4a.4 Subtotal Period 4a Period-Dependent Costs 4a.0 TOTAL PERIOD 4a COST PERIOD 4b -Site Decontamination Period 4b Direct Decommissioning Activities 4b.1.1 Remove spent fuel racks Disposal of Plant Systems 4b.1.2.1 Building Services (Non-Power Block) 4b.1.2.2 Capital Additions 85-2002 (Clean) 4b.1.2.3 Capital Additions 85-2002 (contaminated) 4b.1.2.4 Chemical & Volume Control 4b.1.2.5 Chemical & Volume Control (Insulated) 4b.1.2.6 Component Cooling Water 4b.1.2.7 Component Cooling Water (RCA) 4b.1.2.8 Compressed Air 4b.1.2.9 Compressed Air (Insulated) 4b.1.2.10 Compressed Air (RCA Insulated) 4b.1.2.11 Compressed Air (RCA) 4b.1.2.12 Diesel Engine-Generator 4b.1.2.13 Diesel Engine-Generator (Insulated) 4b.1.2.14 Electrical (Clean) 4b,1.2.15 Electrical (Contaminated) 4b.1.2.16 Electrical (Contaminated) 
-FHB 4b,1,2.17 Electrical (RCA) 4b.1.2.18 Electrical (RCA)-FHB 4b.1.2.19 Fire Protection 4b.1.2.20 Fire Protection (RCA) 4b.1.2.21 Gaseous Radwaste 4b.1.2.22 HVAC (Clean Insulated) 4b.1.2.23 HVAC (Clean) 4b.1.2.24 HVAC (Contaminated Insulated) 4b.1.2.25 HVAC (Contaminated) 4b.1.2.26 HVAC (Contaminated) 
-FHB 4b.1.2.27 Liquid Radwaste TLG Services, Inc. Decon Removal Packaging Transport Cost Cost Costs Costs 102 151 55 102 151 55 57 28 111 283 57 283 28 111 79 1,888 3,258 89 33 79 5,146 89 33 526 29,163 10,485 7,981 432 47 136 34 382 338 5 40 731 40 83 283 15 14 161 462 13 107 100 5 23 1 411 26 116 3 2,645 251 31 77 6 1,691 30 256 521 6 53 293 10 91 203 3 27 92 1 11 34 356 172 3 26 766 15 130 171 3 27 310 22 36 Table D-2 Diablo Canyon Unit 2 SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2008 Dollars) Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term. Management Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs 503 15 550 1,377 1,377 503 15 550 1,377 1,377 105 106 406 406 61 344 309 105 168 750 716 29 108 108 610 88 698 698 140 20 160 144 680 2,568 2,568 704 3,962 3,962 294 126 543 543 1,748 378 2,126 2,126 624 90 713 713 532 115 646 646 6,076 1,313 7,389 7,389 16,188 3,499 19,688 19,688 22,742 4,916 27,658 27,658 294 48,658 11,958 66,258 66,242 25,164 36,344 49,080 51,165 209,907 209,482 659 592 1,901 1,901 1 83 464 331 202 916 916 547 312 518 2,230 2,230 62 117 163 653 653 35 196 877 381 1,840 1,840 22 122 1 6 11 11 46 46 212 200 852 852 25 141 1 3 572 3,217 256 153 694 694 48 39 171 171 2,103 1,124 5,204 5,204 434 294 1,309 1,309 750 289 1,433 1,433 222 127 583 583 86 54 244 244 7 41 77 433 210 113 524 524 1,065 536 2,512 2,512 225 117 544 544 218 175 233 995 995 Site Processed Burial Volumes Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet 2,002 2,002 410 34 34 410 16 4,747 16 4,747 425 258,742 75,332 2,754 584 2,621 7 464 3,206 5,298 1,263 604 464 196 8,505 122 6 108 2,055 141 3 3,217 2,478 463 20,389 4,211 7,268 2,153 837 41 433 2,038 10,324 2,182 2,117 787 GTCC Cu. Feet 433 Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Appendix D, Page 20 of 24 Burial I Utility and Processed Craft Contractor Wt..Lbs. Manhours Manhours 211,020 2,100 84 211,020 2,100 84 24,593 80 24,593 80 94,947 173 90,179 199,114 360,714 94,947 173 650,007 17,051,340 272,204 654,545 222,759 962 107 7,035 130,192 5,628 320,521 12,471 63,950 4,681 2,984 345,395 7,753 1,881 99 4,393 387 83,461 6,991 2,089 48 47,918 100,651 4,336 18,804 1,330 828,008 28,569 171,029 8,801 295,145 4,992 87,426 3,365 34,009 1,529 662 6,878 82,759 2,603 419,267 11,785 88,616 2,617 145,111 5,344 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissionillg Cost Analysis Activity Index Activill;:
Descrietion Period 4b Disposal of Plant Systems (continued) 4b.l.2.28 Liquid Radwaste (Insulated) 4b.l.2.29 Lube Oil Distribution 
& Purification 4b.l.2.30 Make-up Water 4b.l.2.31 Make-up Water (Insulated) 4b.l.2.32 Make-up Water (RCA Insulated) 4b.l.2.33 Make-up Water (RCA) 4b.l.2.34 Mechanical Department Equipment 4b.l.2.35 Miscellaneous Reactor Coolant 4b.l.2.36 Nuclear Steam Supply Sampling 4b.l.2.37 Nuclear Steam Supply Sampling (Insulated 4b.l.2.38 Residual Heat Removal 4b.l.2.39 Safety Injection 4b.l.2AO Safety Injection (Insulated) 4b.l.2Al Safety Injection (RCA Insulated) 4b.l.2A2 Safety Injection (RCA) 4b.l.2A3 Service Cooling Water 4b.l.2A4 Service Cooling Water (RCA) 4b.l.2A5 Sewer System Expansion 4b.l.2A6 Spent Fuel Pit Cooling 4b.l.2A7 Spent Fuel Pit Cooling -FHB 4b.l.2 Totals 4b.1.3 Scaffolding in support of decommissioning Decontamination of Site Buildings 4b.1A.l *Reactor 4b.1A.2 Auxiliary 4b.1A.3 Capital Additions 85-2004 4b.1AA Containment Penetration Area 4b.l.4.5 Radwaste Storage 4b.1A.6 Fuel Handling 4b.1A Totals 4b.l Subtotal Period 4b Activity Costs Period 4b Additional Costs 4b.2.1 ISFSI License Termination 4b.2.2 License Termination Survey Planning 4b.2 Subtotal Period 4b Additional Costs Period 4b Collateral Costs 4b.3.1 Process liquid waste 4b.3.2 Small tool allowance 4b.3.3 Decommissioning Equipment Disposition 4b.3 Subtotal Period 4b Collateral Costs Period 4b Period-Dependent Costs 4bA.l Decon supplies 4bA.2 Insurance 4bA.3 PropertY taxes 4bAA Health physics supplies 4bA.5 Heavy equipment rental 4bA.6 Disposal of DAW generated 4bA.7 Plant energy budget 4bA.8 NRC Fees 4bA.9 Liquid Radwaste Processing Equipment/Services 4bA.l0 Security Staff Cost 4bA.ll DOC Staff Cost TLG Services, Inc. Decon Removal Packaging Transport Cost Cost Costs Costs 29 1 211 42 208 20 25 3 126 17 1 89 14 0 6 0 0 211 25 83 88 1 12 4 0 0 30 4 250 39 118 29 40 64 33 87 10 35 12,253 237 1,244 6,267 39 29 1,371 1,504 345 341 961 474 89 87 307 105 19 17 237 140 23 28 5 39 9 8 593 597 31 42 3,473 2,860 518 521 3,905 21,427 931 1,828 1,059 100 1,059 100 134 66 264 426 121 107 134 426 187 371 1,574 2,725 4,951 103 38 Table D-2 Diablo Canyon Unit 2 SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2008 Dollars) Off-Site LLRW NRC Processing Disposal other Total Total Lic.Term.
Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs 15 17 69 69 342 160 759 759 45 253 4 25 24 15 68 68 138 79 363 363 0 1 39 19 49 205 205 8 30 30 3 13 13 591 209 300 1,419 1,419 99 56 256 256 4 2 10 10 35 19 90 90 318 168 779 779 25 143 35 19 88 88 9 49 241 62 106 514 514 255 72 122 581 581 9,795 981 6,584 31,094 25,992 223 32 2,329 8,919 8.919 426 1,365 2,237 7,588 7,588 232 1,204 1,379 4,428 4,428 30 261 366 1,103 1,103 120 299 364 1,212 1,212 8 130 69 268 268 206 388 840 2,698 2,698 1,021 3,647 5,255 17,297 17,297 11,039 5,320 14,761 59,211 54,109 387 783 705 3,037 669 289 958 958 387 1,451 994 3,995 958 249 253 965 965 92 518 518 686 100 225 1,239 1,239 686 349 570 2,723 2,723 567 2,141 2,141 933 135 1,068 1,068 214 31 244 244 982 3,706 3,706 1,070 6,021 6,021 339 145 625 625 2,112 457 2,569 2,569 954 138 1,092 1,092 814 176 990 990 9,300 2,010 11,310 11,310 24,151 5,221 29,371 29,371 Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet 40 61 3,315 253 25 237 1,340 377 77 74 32 5,726 831 960 38 342 3,081 143 342 49 2,339 245 2,474 287 5,101 94,955 4,015 1,949 129 4,128 17,997 2,251 4,824 288 1,Q42 1,164 1,197 75 521 1,996 1,566 9,903 27,146 5,101 106,807 33,911 3,037 6,237 3,037 6,237 976 6,000 397 6,000 1,373 5,461 GTCC Cu. Feet Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 AppendixD, Page 21 of24 Burial I Utility and Processed Craft Contractor Wt., Lbs. Manhours Manhours 6.847 481 134,627 3,487 3,794 376 9.606 423 54,432 2,103 19 21,764 1,602 3,017 227 1,293 97 303,129 3,705 39,005 1.530 1,545 62 13,901 495 125,112 4,084 2,186 13.881 478 746 115,793 1,123 124,819 1,529 4,187,504 211,427 98.676 51.099 1,944,618 46,746 498,290 23,409 99,807 6,779 148,207 6,147 47,028 616 212,259 20.239 2,950,208 103,935 7,459,147 367,424 748,923 15,272 1,280 6,240 748,923 15,272 7,520 58,549 190 303,726 88 362,275 278 109,214 199 138,036 295.949 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Activity Index Activi!X Period 4b Period.Dependent Costs (continued) 4b.4.12 Utility Staff Cost 4b.4 Subtotal Period 4b Period.Dependent Costs 4b.0 TOTAL PERIOD 4b COST PERIOD 4e -License Termination Period 4e Direct Decommissioning Activities 4e.l.l ORISE confirmatory survey 4e.l.2 Terminate license 4e.l Subtotal Period 4e Activity Costs Period 4e AdMional Costs 4e.2.1 License Termination Survey 4e.2 Subtotal Period 4e Additional Costs Period 4e Collateral Costs 4e.3.1 DOC staff relocation expenses 4e.3 Subtotal Period 4e Collateral Costs Period 4e Period-Dependent Costs 4e.4.1 Insurance 4e.4.2 Property taxes 4e.4.3 physics supplies 4e.4.4 Disposal of DAW generated 4e.4.5 Plant energy budget 4e.4.6 NRC Fees 4e.4.7 Security Staff Cost 4e.4.8 DOC Staff Cost 4e.4.9 Utility Staff Cost 4e,4 Subtotal Period 4e Period*Dependent Costs 4e.0 TOTAL PERIOD 4e COST PERIOD 4 TOTALS PERIOD Sb -Site Restoration Period 5b Direct Decommissioning Demolition of Remaining Site Buildings 5b.l.l.l *Reactor 5b.l.l.2 Administration 5b.l.l.3 Auxiliary 5b.l.l.4 Capital Additions 85*2004 5b.l.l.5 Chemical Storage 5b.l.l.6 Chlorination 5b.l.l.7 Circulating Water Tunnels 5b.l.l.8 Cold Machine Shop 5b.l.l.9 Communication 5b.l.l.l0 Condensate PolishingiT echnical Support 5b.l.l.ll Containment Penetration Area 5b.l.l.12 Discharge Structure 5b.l.l.13 Fabrication Shop 5b.l.l.14 Fire Pump House 5b.l.l.15 Hazardous Waste Storage Facility 5b.1.1.16 Intake Structure 5b.1.1.17 Maintenance Shop TLG Services, Inc. Decon Removal Packaging Transport Cost Cost Costs Costs 1,574 7,676 103 38 5,613 30,587 1,224 2,338 1,240 1,240 1,240 6,139 60,990 11,716 10,321 6,873 960 5,977 3,915 4 8 1,008 357 4 763 615 854 107 5 35 4.868 330 Table D-2 Diablo Canyon Unit 2 SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2008 Dollars) Off-Site LLRW NRC Processing Disposal other Total Total Lic.Term.
Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs 32,975 7,128 40,103 40,103 339 71,452 18,058 99,239 99,239 11,725 6,394 72,904 34,383 165,167 157,029 153 66 219 219 a 153 66 219 219 11,808 5,105 16,913 16,913 11,808 5,105 16,913 16,913 1,395 302 1,697 1,697 1,395 302 1,697 1,697 76 11 87 87 447 1,687 1,687 22 9 40 40 200 43 244 244 355 51 406 406 1,306 282 1,589 1,589 4,840 1,046 5,887 5,887 5,213 1,127 6,340 6,340 22 11,991 3,017 16,279 16,279 22 25,347 8,490 35,107 35,107 36,889 42,759 147,330 94,038 410,181 401,618 1,486 8,359 208 1,168 1,292 7,269 846 4,761 1 5 2 10 218 1,226 77 435 1 5 165 927 133 748 185 1,039 23 131 5 42 1,052 5,920 71 401 Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet 5,461 3,037 5,101 112,807 46,982 351 351 351 3,037 5,526 371.549 122,665 2,754 584 8,359 1,168 7,269 4,761 5 10 1,226 435 5 927 748 1,039 131 5 42 5,920 401 GTCC Cu. Feet 433 Document POl*1604.003, Rev. 0 Appendix D, Page 220(24 Buriall Utility and Processed Craft Contractor Wt., Lbs. Manhours Manhours 521,223 109,214 199 955,207 8,679,558 383,173 962,727 209,457 3,120 209,457 3,120 7,025 13 18,857 57,357 74,643 7,025 13 150,857 7,025 209,470 153,977 25,737,920 864,847 1,771,249 74,901 10,358 64,471 47,403 46 99 12,071 3,785 44 9,300 6,565 8,317 1,223 55 430 46,364 3,444 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysis Activity Index Descrietion Period 5b Demolition of Remaining Buildings (continued) 5b.l.l.18 Miscellaneous Structures 5b.l.l.19 NPO Permanent Warehouse 5b.l.l.20 Ponds 5b.l.l.21 Portable Fire Pump & Fuel Cart 5b.l.1.22 Pretreatment 5b.l.l.23 Radwaste Storage 5b.l.1.24 Radwaste Storage Facility (Additional) 5b.l.l.25 Rotor Warehouse 5b.l.l.26 Security 5b.l.l.27 Security Buildings (Additional) 5b.l.l.28 Simulator 5b.l.1.29 Steam Generator Storage 5b.l.l.30 Telephone Terminal 5b.l.l.31 Turbine 5b.1.1.32 Turbine Pedestal 5b.l.l.33 Vehicle Maintenance 5b.l.l.34 Waste Water Holding & Treatment Facility 5b.l.l.35 Fuel Handling 5b.l.1 Totals Closeout Activities 5b.l.2 Remove Rubble 5b.l.3 Grade & landscape site 5b.l.4 Final report to NRC 5b.l Subtotal Period 5b Activity Costs Period 5b Additional Costs 5b.2.1 Concrete Crushing 5b.2.2 ISFSI Demolition and Site Restoration 5b.2.3 Breakwater Demolition and Removal 5b.2.4 Cofferdam Construction and T eardown 5b.2 Subtotal Period 5b Additional Costs Period 5b Collateral Costs 5b.3.1 Small tool allowance 5b.3 Subtotal Period 5b Collateral Costs Period 5b Period-Dependent Costs 5b.4.1 Insurance 5b.4.2 Property taxes 5bA.3 Heavy equipment rental 5b.4.4 Plant energy budget 5bA.5 Security Staff Cost 5b.4.6 DOC Staff Cost 5bA.7 Utility Staff Cost 5bA Subtotal Period 5b Period-Dependent Costs 5b.0 TOTAL PERIOD 5b COST PERIOD 5 TOTALS TLG Services, Inc. Decon Removal Packaging Cost Cost Costs 57 1,221 2 1 9 1,595 42 742 303 46 370 821 2 4,940 1,212 30 20 1,689 39,784 1,470 2,272 43,526 8,467 545 33,893 438 43,344 801 801 6,420 6,420 94,090 94,090 Table D-2 Diablo Canyon Unit 2 SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2008 Dollars) Off-Site LLRW NRC Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term. Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs 12 69 264 1,484 0 2 0 1 2 11 345 1,940 9 52 160 902 65 368 10 56 80 450 177 998 1 3 1,068 6,007 262 1,474 37 25 365 2,054 8,600 48,384 318 1,787 491 2,763 80 17 97 97 80 9,426 53,032 97 1,832 10,307 24 123 692 12,211 46,104 95 532 24 14,261 57,636 173 974 173 974 207 30 236 1,388 7,807 273 59 331 3,553 768 4,321 12,616 2,727 15,343 5,679 1,228 6,906 22,327 6,199 34,945 22,430 30,059 146,587 97 22,430 30,059 146,587 97 Spent Fuel Site Processed Management Restoration Volume Class A Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet 69 1,484 2 1 11 1,940 52 902 368 56 450 998 3 6,007 1,474 37 25 2,054 48,384 1,787 2,763 52,934 10,307 692 46,104 532 692 56,944 974 974 236 7,807 331 4,321 15,343 6,906 34,945 692 145,797 692 145,797 Burial Volumes Class B Class C GTCC Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Document POl-1604-003, Rev. 0 Appendix D, Page 23 of24 Burial! Utility and Processed Craft Contractor Wt.,Lbs. Manhours Manhours 673 14,093 24 14 108 17,854 662 9,938 3,944 722 4,191 8,888 28 57,743 11,300 367 238 16,750 436,410 8,191 4,587 667 449,187 667 37,686 3,349 80 128,379 46,649 4,004 173,418 46.729 51,291 145,326 83,349 279,966 622,605 327.362 622,605 327,362 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Analysi.s Activity Index Activitv Description Decon Cost Removal Cost TOTAL COST TO DECOMMISSION 13,500 162,429 OTAl COST TO DECOMMISSION WITH 25% CONTINGENCY:
OTAl NRC liCENSE TERMINATION COST IS 47.98% OR: FPENT FUEL MANAGEMENT COST IS 38.8% OR:
DEMOLITION COST IS 13.21% OR: OTAl lOW-lEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE VOLUME BURIED (EXCLUDING GTCC): OTAl GREATER THAN CLASS C RADWASTE VOLUME GENERATED:
OTAl SCRAP METAL REMOVED:
CRAFT LABOR REQUIREMENTS:
End Notes: nla -indicates that this activity not charged as decommissioning expense. a -indicates that this activity performed by decommissioning staff. 0-indicates that this value is less than 0.5 but is non-Zero.
a cell containing" -" indicates a zero value TLG Services, Inc. Packaging Costs 12,129 Table D-2 Diablo Canyon Unit 2 SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2008 Dollars) Transport Costs 11,130 Off-5ite llRW Processing Disposal Costs Costs Other Costs 36.889 44,211 645,036 $1,156,654 thousands of 2008 dollars $555,017 thousands of 2008 dollars $448,831 thousands of 2008 dollars $152,806 thousands of 2008 dollars 141,201 Cubic Feet 433 Cubic Feet 76,674 Tons 1,578,341 Man-hours Total ContinQenc NRC Total Lic. Term. Costs Costs 231,331 1,156,654 555,017 Spent Fuel Management Costs 448,831 Document POl-1604-003, Rev_ 0 Appendix D, Page 24 of 24 Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial I Utility and Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt., lbs. Manhours Manhours 152,806 371,549 137,862 2,754 584 433 26,147,370 1,578,341 6,730,738}}