View source for CLI-94-03, Forwards Decision CLI-94-03 in Response to Formal Petition Re Decommissioning Activities at Plant.Commission Ruled That Component Removal Program Does Not Involve Any Activities Requiring Adjudicatory Hearing & Denies Request

{{Adams
| number = ML20149E097
| issue date = 03/31/1994
| title = Forwards Decision CLI-94-03 in Response to Formal Petition Re Decommissioning Activities at Plant.Commission Ruled That Component Removal Program Does Not Involve Any Activities Requiring Adjudicatory Hearing & Denies Request
| author name = Hoyle J
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
| addressee name = Katz F
| addressee affiliation = CITIZENS AWARENESS NETWORK
| docket = 05000029
| license number = 
| contact person = 
| document report number = CLI-94-03, CLI-94-3, NUDOCS 9405260221
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
| page count = 1
}}

=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:.                            .
1     -
j',r-~s'o,  ,,
UNITED STATES j       !\       *
                    ,,,,    *g             NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION d         ;,
* E                    WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555 s
           %, V    - ' /s / !                      March 31, 1994
                 ++***
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY r
Mr. Frederick Katz Citizens Awareness Network Box 83.
Shelbourne Falls, Massachusetts 01370

==Dear Sir:==

On March 8,         1994, Secretary Chilk informed you that the -            -
Commission has received your letter of December ~13,                 1993, which renewed your request for an adjudicatory hearing regarding the decommissioning activities at the Yankee Nuclear Power Station
(" Yankee NPS"). He also informed you that the Commission was reviewing a formal petition seeking hearings regarding decommissioning activities at Yankee NPS, and that the Commission would respond to your letter of December 13, 1993, as soon as a decision had been inaued in response to that petition.
The Comminaion has now issued a decision in response to that petition.
As you can see from that decision, a copy of which is enclosed for your review, the Commission has ruled that the Component Removal Program ("CRP") at Yankee NPS does not involve any activity Therefore,           that requires the offer of an adjudicatory hearing.
the Commission has denied your renewed request for an adjudicatory hearing regarding the CRP.for the reasons stated in the attached order and in the Commionion's letters to you dated November 18,          1993 and January 4, 1994.
Thin        letter constitutes the Commission's final response to your letter of December 13, 1993.
Sincerely, Jo n C. Ho le
{p'sistantSecretaryoftheCommission Enclosure                                                  O CLI-94-03 (3/18/94) cc:         Thomas Dignan, Esq.                                  g j$4 i
                                                                                               .I 9405260221 940331                                               .pb .* /NN PDR-
    'd g u d         ADOCK 05000029 PDR                                   *
                                                                                      /IN jg uu}}