View source for BECO-95-125, Comment Supporting Pr 10CFR60,72,73 & 75 Re Safeguards for Spent Nuclear Fuel

{{Adams
| number = ML20095G594
| issue date = 12/14/1995
| title = Comment Supporting Pr 10CFR60,72,73 & 75 Re Safeguards for Spent Nuclear Fuel
| author name = Boulette E
| author affiliation = BOSTON EDISON CO.
| addressee name = 
| addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
| docket = 05000293
| license number = 
| contact person = 
| case reference number = FRN-60FR42079, RULE-PR-60, RULE-PR-72, RULE-PR-73, RULE-PR-75
| document report number = 60FR42079-00020, 60FR42079-20, BECO-95-125, NUDOCS 9512210112
| document type = LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS &amp; ORDERS &amp; PLEADINGS, PUBLIC COMMENTS ON PROPOSED RULES &amp; PETITIONS FOR
| page count = 1
}}

=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:_ _ _                     .    ._       ..     ..        __ _.. .             _ _ _ _ _ . _ _
g                                                00CKETED US!!RC l
Boston Edlinen Pdgrrn Nuclear Power Staten Rocky Hdi Road                               '95 EC 19 P2 ;51 Plymouth Massachusetts 02360 0FF;r: c, M.
DOCK: #
E. T. Boulette. PhD                                                                                                      I
- Senior Vice President - Nuclear December 14,~1995                       )
BECo Ltr. #95425                        i l
Secretary                                                               DOCKET NUMBER nn                               !
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission                                      PROPOSED RULE rR cn ,n wM                      l Washington, DC 20555                                                                  gpgpcg                           '
Docket No. 50-293 License No. DPR-35 Proposed Rule - Safeauards for Spent Nuclear Fuel 60FR42079 Although Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station is not currently an independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) or Monitored Retrievable Storage (MRS) facility, Boston Edison Company endorses the comments submitted by the Nuclear Energy Institute                                         i dated November 13, 1995, regarding the proposed rule on Safeguards for Spent                                           {
Nuclear Fuel or High Level Radioactive Waste. The proposed regulations are not                                         l commensurate with any potential threat to the public health and safety; therefore,                                     ;
applying protected area design basis threat and Part 73 safeguards criteria to an ISFSI would result in an excessive level of protection. We, therefore, concur with the NEl proposal to equate the regulatory burden commensurate with the safety significance.
L4l.L E. T. Boulette, PhD MTURap95/Prfuel cc:       Mr. R. Eaton, Project Manager Division of Reactor Projects - l/11 Mail Stop: 14D1 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1 White Flint North 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region I 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 Senior Resident inspector Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station 9512210112 951214 PDR      PR 60 60FR42079                PDR                                                                                       so
__ ..}}