View source for BECO-84-203, Application for Amend to License DPR-35,consisting of Proposed Change 84-14 to Modify Tech Spec Primary Containment Oxygen Concentration to Conform W/ Recommendations of Generic Ltr 84-09

{{Adams
| number = ML20101B248
| issue date = 12/06/1984
| title = Application for Amend to License DPR-35,consisting of Proposed Change 84-14 to Modify Tech Spec Primary Containment Oxygen Concentration to Conform W/ Recommendations of Generic Ltr 84-09
| author name = Harrington W
| author affiliation = BOSTON EDISON CO.
| addressee name = Vassallo D
| addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION (NRR)
| docket = 05000293
| license number = 
| contact person = 
| document report number = BECO-84-203, GL-84-09, GL-84-9, NUDOCS 8412200213
| package number = ML20101B251
| document type = OPERATING LICENSES-APPLIATION TO AMEND-RENEW EXISTING, TEXT-LICENSE APPLICATIONS &amp; PERMITS
| page count = 3
| project = 
| stage = Request
}}

=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:'
  ;AA*
ED5 TON EDISDN COMPANY 800 50VLsTON STREET 50mTON, MAseACHusETTs 02199 WILLIAM D. HARRINGTON December 6,1984
       *$".L'"" ""'""'                                                         BEco 84-203~
Proposed Change ,
Mr. Domenic B. Vassallo, Chief                                    84-14
            -Operating Reactors Branch #2 Division of Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation l            U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 License DPR-35 Docket 50-293 Primary Containment Oxvaen Concentration Technical Specification Changes i

==Dear Sir:==

4 Pursuant .to the provisions of 10CFR50.90, the Boston Edison Company hereby proposes the attached modifications to Appendix A of Operating License No.
DPR-35. These proposed modifications have been provided to conform with the recommendations of Criteria one (1) of Generic Letter No. BA-09 which was issued May 8, 1984.
Submittal of this first of three criteria of the Generic Letter will enable us to respond to the additional requisites which we feel will obviate the need for hydrogen recombiners at Pilgrim Station.
L                                                                     Very truly yours, ERM/ns Attachment 3 signed originals and 40 copies l            Commonwealth of Massachusetts)
County of Suffolk                 )
l Then personally appeared before me W. D. Harrington, who, being duly sworn, did state that he is Senior Vice President - Nuclear of the Boston Edison Company, the applicant herein, and that he is duly authorized to execute and l            file the submittal contained herein in the name and on behalf of the Boston
:            Edison Company and that the statements in said submittal are true to the best l            of his knowledge and belief.
                                       ~
My Commission expires: /uut. 20,/99/                              44AI d            w l)
No1(ary Putflfc' g\
                                           ~
8412200213 841206 PDR ADOCK 05000293 P                  PDR 1

Proposed Amendments to Technical Specifications Primary Containment Oxvaen Concentration A. Narrative On May 8,- 1984, NRC issued Generic Letter 84-09 which concluded that
,                          recombiner capability is not required in BWR plants with Mark I
!                         containment for which notices on the construction permits were published before November 5,1970, if certain criteria were met. The criteria enumerated were as follows: 1) The plant has. Technical Specifications (limiting conditions for operation) requiring that the containment atmosphere be less than four percent oxygen when the containment is required to be inerted, and 2) The plant has only nitrogen or recycled containment atmosphere for use in all pneumatic control systems within containment, and 3) There are no potential sources of oxygen in containment other than that resulting from radiolysis of the reactor coolant.                                                                                                    '
B.-   Reason for Chance The present Technical Specification for Pilgrim Station provides an oxygen -
concentration level of less than 5% oxygen by volume in containment during reactor power operation within LCO boundaries.
In order to respond to the Generic Letter, the LCO for this Technical Specification must be changed to less than 4% oxygen by volume. The plent has no problem meeting this criteria-since the normal operating containment oxygen concentration levels are less than 4% by volume.
C. Safety Considerations These changes do not present an unreviewed safety question as defined in
:                         10CFR50.59. They have been reviewed and approved by the Operations Review Committee and reviewed by the Nuclear Safety Review and Audit Committee.
4 D. Sionificant Hazards Consideration The NRC has provided guidance concerning the application of standards for determining whether license amendments involve significant hazards considerations by providing certain examples-(48FR14870). The chcoge of
:                         the Technical Specification LCO to limit even further the oxygen 4
concentration level in primary ~ containment is a.n example of an amendment which is considered not likely to involve a significant hazards consideration, and provides, "(ii) a change that constitutes an additional limitation, restriction, or control not presently included in the Technical. Specifications: for example, a more stringent oxygen concentration level in containment, which in the main conforms to the Standard Technical Specification example, and negates the possibility of
,.                        hydrogen combustion ~ or detonation under conditions of excess hydrogen."
The BWR containment for Mark I plants is provided with an inerted i
atmosphere.         The only source of oxygen generation during a LOCA is due to radiolysis. The amount of oxygen generated during this event is minimal.
i

Therefore, since the volume of oxygen is maintained below 4%, the possibility of r hydrogen combustion event is precluded.
E. ' Schedule of Chance This amendment will be effective upon receipt of approval f rom NRC.
F. ADDlication Fee Pursuant to 10CFR170.12, Boston Edison classifies this change as a Class III amendment. Boston Edisor, identified this change as one covered by check #87853 submitted under separate cover inclusively with two past submittal fees and refei;enced in our November ll,1984 letter to Ms. Reba M. Diggs, Facilities Program Coordinator, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
                                            }}