View source for 3F0899-20, Forwards six-month fitness-for-duty Program Performance Data for Period 990101-990630,IAW 10CFR26.71

{{Adams
| number = ML20211H014
| issue date = 08/26/1999
| title = Forwards six-month fitness-for-duty Program Performance Data for Period 990101-990630,IAW 10CFR26.71
| author name = Grazio R
| author affiliation = FLORIDA POWER CORP.
| addressee name = 
| addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
| docket = 05000302
| license number = 
| contact person = 
| document report number = 3F0899-20, NUDOCS 9909010102
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE
| page count = 6
}}

=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:.
Flrrida Power 2.2?A."
NeNt dd No.DPR 72 August 26,1999 3F0899-20 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001

==Subject:==
10 CFR 26, Fitness-for-Duty Program Performance Data (Six-Month Report)
(
l 1

==Dear Sir:==
l Florida Power Corporation (FPC) hereby submits the six-month Fitness-for-Duty program performance data for the period January 1,1999, through June 30, 1999, in accordance with                              ;
10 CFR 26.71(d).
If you have any questions regarding this submittal, please contact Mr. Sid Powell, Manager,                            j
                                                                                                                                  ~
Nuclear Licensing at (352) 563-4883.
Sincerely,                                                                                                              l l
         ,      W         yY Robert E. Grazio I
Director                                                                                                         '
Nuclear Site & Business Support REG /twc Attachment
                                                                                                                              'Y}
xc:     Regional Administrator, Region II Senior Resident Inspector
(\,hD         l NRR Project Manager
                        ^
99095101O2990826 PDR    ADOCK 05C003 2 R
CRYSTAL RIVER ENERGY COMPLEX: 15760 W. Power Line Street
* Crystal River, Florida 34428-6708 + (352)795-6486           j A Florida Progress Company

i l        kI.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission                                                                     Attachment
!J      3F0899-20                                                                                                Page 2 of 6 p         FOOTNOTES
: 1. Margaret L'. Moore, MD, retired as the Medical Director of St. Anthony's Occupational Health Center of St. Petersburg, FL as of January 29,1999.- She was replaced by C.L. Bilgi, MD. Dr. Bilgi is l                responsible for a group of Medical Review Officers (MROs), all of whom may function as' FPC's MRO.
Drs. Moore,'J. Giovinco-Barbas, and Robert Shefsky were available to provide MRO services for l                Crystal River Unit 3 during the report period January 1,1999 through June 30,1999.
: 2. Four (4) FPC pre-access test results were positive for marijuana. All were denied access and denied employment.
L 3.      Eleven (11) contractor pre-access test results were confirmed positive: nine (9) for marijuana, one for.
alcohol, and one for cocaine. All were denied access and denied employment.
: 4. On January 19,1999, a permanent licensee employer, was suspected of being under the influence of I
alcohol and tested "For-Cause." Two (2) alcohol breath tests and a drug test were administered with negative results.
On March 19,1999, a permanent licensee employee was suspected of being under the influence of alcohol and tested "For-Cause." Two (2) alcohol breath tests were administered with positive results. A drug test was administered with negative results. The employee's access was terminated unfavorably.
Based on an evaluation by the MRO, the employee's access was restored on May 19,1999, and a follow-up testing program was established.
On April 21,1999 FPC was informed by another licensee that a contractor seeking access to their facility, who was under FPC's FFD Program, was suspected of being under the influence of alcohol.
L                Two (2) alcohol breath tests were administered with positive results. A drug test was administered with negative results. The individual will be subject to a follow-up testing program upon his return.
5,     On January 29,1999, a permanent licensee employee tested positive for opiates (codeine) and morphine during random testing. This individual had a valid doctor's prescription for the substances in question and based upon review by the MRO, the tests were determined to be negative. No additional action was taken.
On Febrary 26,1999, a permanent licensee employee tested positive for opiates (codeine) during random testing. The individual had a valid doctor's prescription for the substance in question and based on review by the MRO, the test was determined to be negative. No additional action was taken.
On March 8,1999, a permanent licensee employee tested positive for marijuana during random testing.
The employee was discharged and access was revoked.
       . 6.      On March 19,1999, a contractor tested positive for marijuana during random testing. The individual was discharged and access was revoked.
NGTES:
A. Since July 1,1991, Florida Power Corporation performed all pre-access testing of Contractors except
               - during periods between February 28,1994 and December 31,1997. During this time, B&W Nuclear
: Technologies (now Framatome Technologies) performed pre-access testing for B&W/Framatome personnel under the Fitness for Duty Program as approved by Florida Power Corporation, l
: h. _
     .b.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission                                                                    Attachment 3F0899-20                                                                                              Page 3 of 6 NOTES (Cont''d)
B. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Certified Laboratories utilized by FPC follow the DHHS mandatory guidelines for drug testing programs as published in the Federal Register, June 9, 1994 (59 FR 29908). In accordance with these guidelines, specimens testing positive in the initial screen l'          for methamphetamines must contain a concentration equal to or greater than 200 nymL of the metabolite
;           amphetamine in the confirmatory test. If this criterion is not met, the specimen is reported to FPC as         !
negative for methamphetamine.
l
                                                                                                                         )
l l

  ~   .
    .                                            9 1
a f6 t
                                                          )
s e
r o    ~
l e
v h    4                                          l e
t c
a eg      5                                   T t
t    a                                           o AP                                               t u
                  -                                         c e
i v
t
_                     4 i
c r
t
_                                                           s e
r
_                                                           e r
o m
s 3                                   'y  i wg n
u c
e ht 2
n o
d e
c a
h s
_                                                           e 1
i v
t
_                                                         i s
o p
d e
l                                     m r
at S  s s  e 0           0      0 i
f n
E f uT e                                   n c
C Rt o N                                     O A                                     R
_                   T l o
M S                                     f B h o     2           1      3          o U   c                                   i kn l
S A C
I u
n F     -                               l I
C   ye c
ni    0           0      0 a
n o
E   ed i
t P
i hi                               : d S P lc                             nd wa R                                  o/
h e l
O   we s                          s v s    e F A n     0           0      0     al f S   r3ima                         t sf o
T At i                            l ut   u S                                  s ec E                                  r s T   s                            d' rC E  t e
0           0      0 oR c
V I
i a
p                              eN r
e T
I O                               toh   t S                                it     t O                                lp a P   e                              s e  v n                              yi   t D i a     0           1      1 l
l i a s n
opo n       E   c o          o i
s s
M C                                ge a r R                                d e i                                          i m       I e w m       F   a 3            7 r t o       N   n                              a    a a                              s h C         O   u                        5 n s t
y r       C j i
r a
1 ml   t o       F                                  u u  s l
t a       O M       2           3          loe c tr u
g'                                         es e       N                                he R         W                                T (t r
a       O             s  ms r  mrs e 0     D             e  r o    r o l
eey   et    et c2 u -     K          e s    T- a c
T-c a       :
N99       A          nl o ep    gt r  t   r l S
E r t     a ho on E                nn              T S.
8 0    R         lxmE   ooC  SC     T t
o O
U 3F l
B                                N

l.
l=
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Conunission                                                           Attachment l       3F0899-20                                                                                      Page 5 of 6 i
10 CFR 26.71(d) DATA In accordance with 10 CFR 26.71(d), collect and compile fitness-for-duty program performance data on a standard form and submit to the NRC. The data for each site (corporate and other support stafflocations combined) must include the following:
: 1. Random Test Rate = Total Tested = 241 + % = 337 x 100 = 25.9%
for 6 months           Totalin Pool = 890+ 413 = 1303 (NOTE: Random testing rate is 2 50% per year.)                                                        ;
actual: {25.9% X 2 = 51.8%}
: 2. Drugs tested for and cutofflevels.                                 See Table on Page 1 of 5
: 3. Workforce population tested.                                       See Table on Page 1 of 5
: 4.    . Number of tests and results by population                        See Table on Page 1 of 5 e Process stage                                                    Lab & confirmatory screening
* Type of test                                                     See Table on Page 1 of 5          i
: 5. Substances identified.                                             See Footnotes on Page 2 of 5
: 6. Number of temporary suspensions or other                           N/A administrative actions taken based on                                                                !
on-site presumptive positives for marijuana (THC) and for cocaine.

i 1
1 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission                                                               Attachment 3F0899-20                                                                                        Page 6 of 6

==SUMMARY==
OF MANAGEMENT ACTIONS INITIATIVES TAKEN:                 Changes were made to the processes associated with specimen collection during this report period to provide additional means of detecting attempts to use dilutants, specimen substitutes, and adulterants. If the temperature of any urine sample falls outside the range of 93 F - 98 F, an observed collection was taken if an oral temperature was not taken, or did not confirm the urine temperature,                                                                                                  i LESSONS LEARNED:                   N/A EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATION:
During this six-month period, FPC tested 727 employees including contractors (random, pre-access, and for-cause). Nineteen (19) positive results were identified (2.6%).
PROGRAM WEAKNESS:
See Audit Summary Section CORRECTIVE ACTIONS:
See Audit Summary Section AUDIT 

==SUMMARY==
In accordance with 10 CFR 26.80, Florida Power Corporation (FPC) conducted an annual Fitness-for-Duty audit. This requirement was satisfied during an integrated audit of Security Access Authorization, and Fitness-for Duty (FFD) programs that was conducted from April 5,1999 through May 10, 1999.               ;
With respect to the FFD program, the audit resulted in no findings related to FPC's implementation of the    i program; however, seven findings were identified as part of the concurrent audit of the FFD testing          j laboratory, SmithKline Beecham Laboraty, located in Leesburg, FL. The findings affected ancillary parts      ;
of the FFD program and had minimal impact on the analyses of the FFD specimens for FPC.
S'UMMARY LISTING OF EVENTS REPORTED No events occurred; none reported.
l}}