View source for 10 CFR 72.102, Geological and Seismological Characteristics for Applications Before October 16, 2003 and Applications for Other Than Dry Cask Modes of Storage

[[name::Geological and seismological characteristics for applications before October 16, 2003 and applications for other than dry cask modes of storage]]
{{lin|l1=a|(a)|txt=}}{{lin|l1=a|l2=1|txt=(a)(1) East of the Rocky Mountain Front (east of approximately 104&deg; west longitude), except in areas of known seismic activity including but not limited to the regions around New Madrid, MO, Charleston, SC, and Attica, NY, sites will be acceptable if the results from onsite foundation and geological investigation, literature review, and regional geological reconnaissance show no unstable geological characteristics, soil stability problems, or potential for vibratory ground motion at the site in excess of an appropriate response spectrum anchored at 0.2 g.}}
{{lin|l1=a|l2=2|txt=(2) For those sites that have been evaluated under paragraph (a)(1) of this section that are east of the Rocky Mountain Front, and that are not in areas of known seismic activity, a standardized design earthquake (DE) described by an appropriate response spectrum anchored at 0.25 g may be used. Alternatively, a site-specific DE may be determined by using the criteria and level of investigations required by appendix A of part 100 of this chapter.}}
{{lin|l1=b|txt=(b) West of the Rocky Mountain Front (west of approximately 104&deg; west longitude), and in other areas of known potential seismic activity, seismicity will be evaluated by the techniques of appendix A of part 100 of this chapter. Sites that lie within the range of strong near-field ground motion from historical earthquakes on large capable faults should be avoided.}}
{{lin|l1=c|txt=(c) Sites other than bedrock sites must be evaluated for their liquefaction potential or other soil instability due to vibratory ground motion.}}
{{lin|l1=d|txt=(d) Site-specific investigations and laboratory analyses must show that soil conditions are adequate for the proposed foundation loading.}}
{{lin|l1=e|txt=(e) In an evaluation of alternative sites, those which require a minimum of engineered provisions to correct site deficiencies are preferred. Sites with unstable geologic characteristics should be avoided.}}
{{lin|l1=f|txt=(f) The design earthquake (DE) for use in the design of structures must be determined as follows:}}
{{lin|l1=f|l2=1|txt=(1) For sites that have been evaluated under the criteria of appendix A of 10 CFR part 100, the DE must be equivalent to the safe shutdown earthquake (SSE) for a nuclear power plant.}}
{{lin|l1=f|l2=2|txt=(2) Regardless of the results of the investigations anywhere in the continental U.S., the DE must have a value for the horizontal ground motion of no less than 0.10 g with the appropriate response spectrum.}}
==[[Federal Register]]==
[{{FR|2003|54159|{{FR|68|54159|68 FR 54159}}, Sep. 16, 2003}}]


==External Links==
[[URL::http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/cfr/part072/part072-0102.html|NRC website [[CFR::10 CFR 72#|10 CFR 72]].102]]

{{CFR-Nav}}