View source for 05000400/FIN-2007402-02

{{finding
| title = Administration of NRC Required Annual Plant Access, Radiation Worker and Respiratory Protection Training Testing.
| docket = 05000400
| inspection report = IR 05000400/2007402
| finding integer = 02
| quarter = 2007Q2
| IR section = 4OA3
| finding type = AV
| significance = 
| cornerstone = Physical Protection
| violation of = None
| identified by = NRC
| Inspection procedure = IP 71153
| Inspector = J Munday, I Hall
| CCA = N/A for ROP
| INPO aspect = 
| description = The inspector identified an AV for three contract security supervisors providing answers to security officers while administering annual computer based re-qualification test (Plant Access, Radiation Worker and Respiratory Protection Training). The finding was contrary to the Progress Energy Nuclear Generation Group (Shearon Harris) Standard Procedure TRN-NGGC-0010, Plant Access, Radiation Worker and Respiratory Protection Training, as required by Technical Specification 6.8.1.a and Regulatory Guide 1.33. The inspector determined that the licensees failure to properly supervise the conduct of NRC required annual re-qualification testing is a performance deficiency because the licensee is expected to comply with the Progress Energy Nuclear Generation Group (Shearon Harris) Standard Procedure TRN-NGGC-0010, Plant Access, Radiation Worker and Respiratory Protection Training. As a result, it cannot be concluded with any degree of certainty that security officers adequately achieved minimum scores which is the criterion used to demonstrate an acceptable understanding of plant access and radiation worker procedures. The inspector determined that the finding is greater than minor because it affects the Physical Security Program Objective to prevent radiological sabotage and affects the Cornerstone Attributes for implementation of licensees Protective Strategy and Contingency Response and was reasonably within the licensees ability to correct by ensuring that security officers were being properly tested. The finding was evaluated under the NRCs Enforcement Policy using the traditional enforcement process because the finding involved willfulness and potentially impeded the NRC regulatory process. Additionally, the finding is being considered for escalated enforcement, due to the willful aspects.  
}}