View source for NL-15-0802, J.M. Farley, E.I. Hatch, Vogtle - Annual Non-Radioactive Environmental Operating Reports for 2014

{{Adams
| number = ML15120A604
| issue date = 04/30/2015
| title = J.M. Farley, E.I. Hatch, Vogtle - Annual Non-Radioactive Environmental Operating Reports for 2014
| author name = Pierce C R
| author affiliation = Southern Nuclear Operating Co, Inc
| addressee name = 
| addressee affiliation = NRC/Document Control Desk, NRC/NRR
| docket = 05000321, 05000348, 05000364, 05000366, 05000424, 05000425
| license number = 
| contact person = 
| case reference number = NL-15-0802
| document type = Annual Operating Report
| page count = 10
}}

=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Charles R. Pierce Regulatory Affairs Director A PR 3 0 2015 Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. 40 Inverness Center Parkway Post Office Box 1295 Birmingham, AL 35201 Tel 205.992.7872 Fax 205.992.7601 Docket Nos.: 50-321 50-348 50-424 50-366 50-364 50-425 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555-0001 SOUTHERN A COMPANY NL-15-0802 Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant; Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant; Vogtle Electric Generating Plant Annual Non-Radioactive Environmental Operating Reports for 2014 Ladies and Gentlemen:
In accordance with subsection 5.4.1 of the referenced plants' Environmental Protection Plans (appendix B to the operating licenses), Southern Nuclear Operating Company hereby submits the Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Reports for 2014. This letter contains no NRC commitments.
If you have any questions, please contact Ken McElroy at (205) 992-7369.
Respectfully submitted, C.Jf *C. R. Pierce Regulatory Affairs Director CRP/JLS Attachments: 
: 1. Hatch Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2014 2. Farley Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2014 3. Vogtle Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2014 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NL-15-0802 Page 2 cc: Southern Nuclear Operating Company Mr. S. E. Kuczynski, Chairman, President 
& CEO Mr. D. G. Bost, Executive Vice President 
& Chief Nuclear Officer Ms. C. A. Gayheart, Vice President 
-Farley Mr. D. R. Vineyard, Vice President-Hatch Mr. D. R. Madison, Vice President-Fleet Operations Mr. B. K. Taber, Vice President-Vogtle 1 & 2 Mr. M. D. Meier, Vice President-Regulatory Affairs Mr. B. J. Adams, Vice President-Engineering Ms. B. L. Taylor, Regulatory Affairs Manager-Farley Mr. G. L. Johnson, Regulatory Affairs Manager-Hatch Mr. G. W. Gunn, Regulatory Affairs Manager-Vogtle 1 & 2 RType: Farley=CFA04.054; Hatch=CHA02.004; Vogtle=CVC7000 U.S. Nuclear Regulatorv Commission Mr. V. M. McCree, Regional Administrator Mr. S. A. Williams, NRR Project Manager-Farley Mr. D. H. Hardage, Senior Resident Inspector-Hatch Mr. L. M. Cain, Senior Resident Inspector-Vogtle 1 & 2 Mr. P. K. Niebaum, Senior Resident Inspector-Farley Mr. R.E. Martin, NRR Project Manager-Hatch, Vogtle 1 & 2 Alabama Department of Public Health Dr. D. E. Williamson, State Health Officer State of Georgia Mr. J. H. Turner, Director-Environmental Protection Division Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant; Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant; Vogtle Electric Generating Plant Annual Non-Radioactive Environmental Operating Reports for 2014 Attachment 1 Hatch Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2014 Attachment 1 Page 1 of2 Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Reports for 2014 EDWIN I. HATCH NUCLEAR PLANT-UNITS 1 AND 2 I. Introduction This report is submitted in accordance with Subsection 5.4.1 of the Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant Environmental Protection Plan , Appendix B to Facility Operating Licenses DPR-57 and NPF-5. This report describes implementation of the Environmental Protection Plan for the calendar year 2014. II. Reporting Requirements A. Summaries and Analyses of Results of Environmental Protection Activities Required by Subsection 4.2 of the Environmental Protection Plan (EPP) for the Reporting Period 1. Aquatic Monitoring -Liquid effluent monitoring was performed in accordance with the State of Georgia National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit GA0004120; there was no additional requirement for aquatic monitoring during the year. 2. Terrestrial Monitoring -Terrestrial monitoring is not required. 3. Maintenance of Transmission Line Corridors -There is no reporting requirement associated with this condition. B. Comparisons of the Year's Monitoring Activities with Preoperational Studies, Operational Controls, and Previous Nonradiological Environmental Monitoring Reports These comparisons were not required because no nonradiological environmental monitoring programs were conducted during the reporting period beyond those performed in accordance with NPDES Permit No. GA0004120.
C. Assessment of the Observed Impacts of Plant Operation on the Environment There were no significant adverse environmental impacts associated with plant operation during the year. D. EPP Noncompliance and Corrective Actions There were no EPP noncompliances during the year.
Attachment 1 Page 2 of2 Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Reports for 2014 E. Changes in Station Design or Operation, Tests, or Experiments Made in Accordance with EPP Subsection 3.1 Which Involved a Potentially Significant Unreviewed Environmental Question There were no changes in station design or operation, tests, or experiments which involved a potentially significant, unreviewed environmental question.
F. Nonroutine Reports Submitted in Accordance with EPP Section 5.4.2 There were no nonroutine reports submitted during the year.
Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant; Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant; Vogtle Electric Generating Plant Annual Non-Radioactive Environmental Operating Reports for 2014 Attachment 2 Farley Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2014 Attachment 2 Page 1 of 1 Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Reports for 2014 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT-UNITS 1 AND 2 I. Introduction In accordance with Subsection 5.4.1 of the Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant Environmental Protection Plan, Appendix B to Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-2 and NPF-8, this report is submitted summarizing implementation of the Environmental Protection Plan for calendar year 2014. II. Reporting Requirements A. Summaries and Analyses of Results of Environmental Protection Activities Required by Subsection 4.2 of the Environmental Protection Plan (EPP) for the Reporting Period 1. Aerial Remote Sensing -Aerial Remote Sensing is no longer required. 
: 2. Herbicide Application -There is no reporting requirement associated with this condition. 
: 3. Land Management-There is no reporting requirement associated with thi s condition.
B. Comparison of the Year's Monitoring Activities with Preoperational Studies, Operational Controls, and Previous Non-Radiological Monitoring Reports These comparisons were not required because no nonradiological environmental monitoring programs were conducted during the reporting period beyond those performed in accordance with NPDES Permit No. AL0024619.
C. Assessment of the Observed Impacts of Plant Operation on the Environment There were no significant adverse environmental impacts associated with plant operation during the year. D. EPP Noncompliance and Corrective Actions There were no EPP noncompliances during the year. E. Changes in Station Design or Operation, Tests, or Experiments Made in Accordance with EPP Section 3.1 Which Involved a Potentially Significant Unreviewed Environmental Question There were no changes in station design or operation, tests, or experiments which involved a potentially significant, unreviewed environmental question.
F. Nonroutine Reports Submitted in Accordance with EPP Section 5.4.2 There were no nonroutine reports submitted during the year.
Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant; Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant; Vogtle Electric Generating Plant Annual Non-Radioactive Environmental Operating Reports for 2014 Attachment 3 Vogtle Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2014 Attachment 3 Page 1 of 2 Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Reports for 2014 VOGTLE ELECTRIC GENERATING PLANT -UNITS 1 AND 2 I. Introduction In accordance with Subsection 5.4.1 of the Vogtle Electric Generating Plant (VEGP) Environmental Protection Plan (Nonradiological), Appendix B to Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-68 and NPF-81, this report is submitted describing implementation of the Environmental Protection Plan for the calendar year 2014. II. Reporting Requirements A. Summaries and Analyses of Results of Environmental Protection Activities Required by Subsection 4.2 of the Environmental Protection Plan (EPP) for the Reporting Period 1. Aquatic Monitoring 
-Liquid effluent monitoring was performed in accordance with State of Georgia National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit GA0026786; there was no additional requirement for aquatic monitoring during the year. 2. Terrestrial Monitoring -Terrestrial monitoring is not required. 
: 3. Maintenance of Transmission Line Corridors-There is no reporting requirement associated with this condition. 
: 4. Noise Monitoring -There were no complaints reported regarding noise along the VEGP-related, high-voltage transmission lines. B. Comparison of the Year's Monitoring Activities with Preoperational Studies, Operational Controls, and Previous Monitoring Reports These programs were not required because no nonradiological environmental monitoring programs were conducted during the reporting period beyond those performed in accordance with NPDES Permit No. GA0026786 referenced in Section A above. C. Assessment of the Observed Impacts of Plant Operation on the Environment There were no significant adverse environmental impacts associated with plant operation during the year. D. EPP Noncompliance and Corrective Actions There were no EPP noncompliances during the year.
Attachment 3 Page 2 of 2 Annual Non-Radiological Environmental Operating Reports for 2014 E. Changes in Station Design or Operation, Tests, or Experiments Made in Accordance with EPP Subsection 3.1 Which Involved a Potentially Significant Unreviewed Environmental Question There were no changes in station design or operation, tests, or experiments which involved a potentially significant, unreviewed environmental question.
F. Nonroutine Reports Submitted in Accordance with EPP Section 5.4.2 There were no nonroutine reports submitted during the year.}}