View source for DD-25-02, OEDO-24-00011 - Directors Decision Regarding Decommissioning Trust Fund Misuse for Palisades Nuclear Plant

{{Adams
| number = ML25199A096
| issue date = 08/14/2025
| title = OEDO-24-00011 - Directors Decision Regarding Decommissioning Trust Fund Misuse for Palisades Nuclear Plant
| author name = Groom J
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR
| addressee name = 
| addressee affiliation = Beyond Nuclear, Don't Waste Michigan, Michigan Safe Energy Future
| docket = 05000255
| license number = DPR-020
| contact person = 
| case reference number = EPID L-2023-CRS-0008, 2.206, DD-25-02, OEDO-24-00011
| package number = ML25199A053
| document type = 2.206 Director Decision
| page count = 1
| project = EPID:L-2023-CRS-0008
| stage = Other
}}

=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:DD-25-02 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION Jeremy Groom, Acting Deputy Director In the Matter of 
) Docket No. 50-255 
) 
) 
)
Holtec Palisades, LLC and Holtec 
) License No. DPR-20 Decommissioning International, LLC 
) 
)
Palisades Nuclear Plant 
)
DIRECTORS DECISION UNDER 10 CFR 2.206 I.
Introduction On September 28, 2023, Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC (Holtec), on behalf of Holtec Palisades, LLC, submitted a request to exempt the Palisades Nuclear Plant (Palisades) from certain requirements in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 50.82, Termination of license (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML23271A140). By {{letter dated|date=December 5, 2023|text=letter dated December 5, 2023}}, and in response to Holtecs exemption request, Beyond Nuclear, Michigan Safe Energy Future, and Dont Waste Michigan (the petitioner) filed a petition to intervene and a request for hearing on that exemption request (ML23339A192). On December 18, 2023, the Commission denied the request for hearing and referred Contention 2 of the petition, which asserted Holtecs misuse of decommissioning funds, to the enforcement process under 10 CFR 2.206, Requests for action under this subpart (ML23352A325).
The underlying concern in Contention 2 of the December 5, 2023, request is that Holtec has misused the decommissioning trust fund (DTF) to keep Palisades in a status to restart the reactor, rather than to decommission the plant. The petitioner cited 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8) regarding appropriate uses of the DTF. Specifically, the petitioner asserted the following:
: 1.
Holtec expended $44 million from the Palisades DTF from June 28 to December 31, 2022.
: 2.
Holtec continued improper utilization of the Palisades DTF from December 31, 2022, to the present.
The staff of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) assembled a Petition Review Board (PRB) in accordance with Management Directive (MD) 8.11, Review Process for 10 CFR 2.206 Petitions, dated March 1, 2019, and its associated Directive Handbook 8.11, section III, dated March 1, 2019 (ML18296A043). On February 29, 2024 (ML24061A014), the petition manager informed the petitioner that the PRBs initial assessment was to not accept the petition for review. The PRBs position was that the petition did not meet the MD 8.11 criteria for acceptance under 10 CFR 2.206 because the issues raised regarding Holtecs use of the Palisades DTF in 2022 had already been addressed through the NRCs inspection and enforcement process.
In August and November 2023 (ML23276B452 and ML24045A147, respectively), the NRC completed inspections that addressed, in part, the use of the Palisades DTF. As a result of these inspections, the NRC identified several instances, totaling just over $57,000, of the licensee using the Palisades DTF to pay for activities not considered legitimate decommissioning expenses under the definition in 10 CFR 50.2, Definitions.
The NRC confirmed that the unauthorized reimbursements from the Palisades DTF resulted from inadvertent oversights or inattention to detail, or both, in the coding associated with the billing for various projects and community donations. The licensee has implemented several process revisions to address order coding modification issues and errors, as well as training to eliminate these issues from future DTF expenditures. The licensee also reimbursed the unauthorized expenses to the Palisades DTF. On February 20, 2024 (ML24045A147), the NRC issued Holtec a Severity Level IV noncited violation to address the illegitimate use of decommissioning funds at Palisades stemming from the staffs findings during the November 2023 inspection.
On February 29, 2024, the petition manager offered the petitioner an opportunity to address the PRB in a public meeting (ML24061A014), which subsequently took place on April 10, 2024. The transcript of that meeting (ML24114A016) is publicly available in ADAMS and is considered a supplement to the petition.
During the April 10, 2024, public meeting, the petitioner discussed DTF expenditures of 
$120 million noted in the 2023 Decommissioning Funding Status Report for Palisades, which was submitted to the NRC on March 29, 2024 (ML24089A117). The petitioner also raised concerns about whether the $120 million was properly used for decommissioning expenditures in accordance with NRC requirements and guidance.
Following the April 10, 2024, public meeting, the PRB met to consider what had been presented during the session. The PRB found that the issues regarding use of the Palisades DTF in 2022 have been thoroughly addressed through the NRCs inspection and enforcement process, as noted above. Therefore, the PRB did not accept those issues into the 10 CFR 2.206 process. The concerns the petitioner raised at the public meeting regarding the recently submitted 2023 expenditure report for Palisades involved new information that the NRC had not yet fully considered. Therefore, in accordance with MD 8.11, section III.C, the PRB accepted that portion of the petitioners concern into the 10 CFR 2.206 process for further review.
On July 2, 2024, the NRC issued an acknowledgement letter (ML24137A014) informing the petitioner that the concerns raised in the petition, as supplemented, now meet the MD 8.11 criteria for acceptance.
Publicly available documents created or received at the NRC are accessible electronically through ADAMS in the NRCs library at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.
Persons who do not have access to ADAMS, who encounter problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS, or who want to inspect publicly available documents at the NRCs Public Document Room at 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852, should contact the NRCs Public Document Room reference staff by telephone at 1-800-397-4209 or 301-415-4737, or by email at pdr.resource@nrc.gov.
Petitioners Concern:
The petitioner asserts that Holtec misused the DTF to keep Palisades in a status to restart the reactor as opposed to decommissioning the plant. Specifically, as described in the April 10, 2024, public meeting transcript, the petitioner alleged that Holtec withdrew $120 million from the Palisades DTF, as noted in Holtecs 2023 Decommissioning Funding Status Report, and raised concerns about whether the $120 million was properly used for decommissioning expenditures in accordance with the current NRC requirements and guidance.
II.
Discussion Regulatory Requirements The NRC has a comprehensive, regulation-based framework that provides oversight of licensee DTFs. The regulation at 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(i) specifies that licensees may use DTFs if the following three criteria are met:
(A)
The withdrawals are for expenses for legitimate decommissioning activities consistent with the definition of decommissioning in &sect; 50.2; (B)
The expenditure would not reduce the value of the decommissioning trust below an amount necessary to place and maintain the reactor in a safe storage condition if unforeseen conditions or expenses arise; and (C)
The withdrawals would not inhibit the ability of the licensee to complete funding of any shortfalls in the decommissioning trust needed to ensure the availability of funds to ultimately release the site and terminate the license.
Decommission is defined in 10 CFR 50.2 as to remove a facility or site safely from service and reduce residual radioactivity to a level that permits (1) Release of the property for the unrestricted use and termination of the license; or (2) Release of the property under restricted conditions and termination of the license.
Furthermore, as outlined in Regulatory Guide 1.184, Revision 1, Decommissioning of Nuclear Power Reactors, issued October 2013 (ML13144A840), which licensees may follow as a method of compliance with decommissioning requirements, the licensees ability to use the trust funds set aside for decommissioning depends on reaching certain milestones in the decommissioning process. The limitation on the accessibility of the decommissioning funds is designed to ensure that sufficient trust funds are always available to place the facility in a safe, stable condition that ultimately leads to decommissioning and license termination. Further information regarding the Palisades specific decommissioning plans and cost estimates can be found in the Post Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report [PSDAR] including Site-Specific Decommissioning Cost Estimate [DCE] for Palisades Nuclear Plant, dated December 23, 2020 (ML20358A232), as supplemented by {{letter dated|date=March 1, 2023|text=letter dated March 1, 2023}} (ML23060A039), which the NRC reviewed and approved by {{letter dated|date=May 2, 2023|text=letter dated May 2, 2023}} (ML23087A036).
On December 13, 2021, the NRC granted Holtec an exemption (ML21286A294 and ML21286A506) from the requirements of 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(i)(A) to allow the use of a portion of the funds from the Palisades DTF for spent fuel management and site restoration activities at Palisades, in accordance with Holtecs PSDAR and DCE.
Reported Decommissioning Expenditures for Palisades As described in the NRCs letter to the petitioner dated July 2, 2024, the agency limited the scope of the 10 CFR 2.206 petition to a review of the new information presented during the April 10, 2024, public meeting and the independent validation that the expenses claimed against the Palisades DTF, not previously reviewed by the NRC, were legitimate decommissioning expenses as opposed to expenses related to the Palisades restart initiative. During the April 10, 2024, public meeting, the petitioner referenced $120 million of decommissioning expenditures, which can be found in enclosure 4 to Holtecs 2023 Decommissioning Funding Status Report. In table 1 of enclosure 4 of that report, Holtec characterized its Palisades decommissioning expenses for 2022 and 2023 as summarized in table 1.
Table 1 Summary of Holtecs Decommissioning Expenses at Palisades Since License Transfer Holtec Decommissioning Expenditures10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(v)(A) Since License Transfer Year License Termination Spent Fuel Management Site Restoration Total1 2022 
$38M 
$6M 
$0M 
$44M 2023 
$43M 
$56M 
$0M 
$99M Total Spent to Date 
$81M 
$62M 
$0M 
$143M2 1
Columns may not add up due to rounding.
2 
$120M of incurred costs have not been reimbursed as of December 31, 2023.
Note: M = million.
Holtecs report shows that a total of $143 million of Palisades decommissioning-related expenses were accounted for, with $44 million in expenses for 2022 and an additional 
$99 million in expenses for 2023. Notably, footnote 2 to table 1 clarifies that Holtec has only withdrawn $23 million of the $143 million of expenses from the Palisades DTF, and the 
$120 million of expenses had not been reimbursed as of December 31, 2023. Table 2 of enclosure 4 explains that Holtec intends to withdraw the $120 million of reimbursable funds from the DTF during the years 2040 and 2041 ($60 million is expected to be withdrawn each of these years). This approach ensures that sufficient money remains in the DTF to complete decommissioning and is consistent with the regulations in 10 CFR 50.82 and guidance provided in Regulatory Guide 1.184.
The NRC staff reviewed Holtecs decommissioning expenses during various routine inspections at Palisades and independently found that there have been several instances of misallocation of DTF funds, as described in the next section of this letter. The staff has taken appropriate action on these instances under its normal inspection and enforcement processes.
However, as discussed below, the staff has determined that these misallocations are outside the scope of the petition because they were not related to Palisades restart-specific initiatives.
NRC Inspection Activities The NRC staff performs routine inspections at Palisades, as required by the Decommissioning Power Reactor Inspection Program. Specifically, the NRC inspection activities at Palisades included review of Holtecs decommissioning expenditures, in accordance with NRC Inspection Procedure 71801, Decommissioning Performance and Status Reviews at Permanently Shutdown Reactors, dated January 1, 2021 (ML20240A293). Table 2 lists the NRC staffs inspection activities, their respective inspection reports, and their associated findings. The timeframe of the selected inspection reports below covers inspections for which the NRC staff reviewed Palisades 2023 DTF expenses and withdrawals.
Table 2 List of NRC Staff Inspection Reports for Palisades Covering Calendar Year 2023 Inspection Report No.
Document Date Document ADAMS Accession No.
Findings Related to DTF 05000255/2023002 July 19, 2023 ML23200A142 None 05000255/2023003 October 4, 2023 ML23276B452 Unresolved Item (URI) 05000255/2023003-01 05000255/2023004 February 20, 2024 ML24045A147 Severity Level IV noncited violation 05000255/2024004 February 14, 2025 ML25041A225 Severity Level IV noncited violation URI 05000255/2024004-01 As previously described in the NRCs letter to the petitioner dated July 2, 2024, Holtecs use of the DTF up to October 2023 had already been reviewed by the NRCs routine inspection and enforcement processes, which independently identified several instances in which Holtec used the Palisades DTF for nondecommissioning activities, totaling just over $57,000. The staff described these issues in detail in Inspection Report Nos. 05000255/2023003, dated October 4, 2023 (ML23276B452), and 05000255/2023004, dated February 20, 2024 (ML24045A147), resulting in the NRC issuing a Severity Level IV noncited violation for Palisades.
As of the April 10, 2024, public meeting, the NRC staff had not yet completed a review of Holtecs 2023 Decommissioning Funding Status Report and inspection of Palisades DTF use for October through December 2023, and therefore the petition was held in abeyance until these processes could be completed. The NRC concluded its annual financial assurance report review for Holtecs 2023 Decommissioning Funding Status Report in a memorandum dated September 18, 2024 (ML24240A169). This review concluded that the licensee continued to satisfy the decommissioning funding assurance requirements of 10 CFR 50.82. In November 2024, the NRC conducted its routine DTF inspection at Palisades, which is documented in Inspection Report No. 05000255/2024004, dated February 14, 2025 (ML25041A225). This inspection concluded that no withdrawals from the DTF were made from October 1 through December 31, 2023, which is the timeframe encompassed by the petitioners concern that had not already been reviewed when the staff accepted the petition. However, the inspection report does document several withdrawals made in 2024 that were not for legitimate decommissioning activities, which constituted a violation of NRC requirements. This review did not identify any withdrawals from the DTF for restart-specific activities; however, the inspectors opened an unresolved item to address questions related to use of the DTF for routine site maintenance costs because the inspection identified that the licensee continued to use the DTF for these expenditures in 2024. The NRC will address these issues through its normal inspection and enforcement processes; because they do not concern withdrawals for restart-specific activities, they are beyond the scope of this 10 CFR 2.206 petition.
III.
Conclusion In summary, the NRC has a comprehensive, regulation-based framework that provides for oversight of a licensees use of the DTF. The NRC staff reviewed Holtecs 2023 Decommissioning Funding Status Report for Palisades, in addition to Holtecs 2023 decommissioning expenditures, and found that the NRCs inspection and enforcement process independently identified instances of DTF misuse for which the agency issued applicable violations as required by regulations. The sole unresolved item from the staffs inspections related to misuse of the DTF during the relevant timeframe does not relate to restart-specific activities. Therefore, based on the NRCs continuous oversight of Holtecs use of the Palisades DTF, no further action is necessary at this time to address the petitioners concern.
As a result of the NRC staffs evaluation of the petitioners concerns, the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation has denied the petitioners request to take enforcement action concerning Holtecs use of the Palisades DTF. The PRB concludes that the issues raised regarding Holtecs use of the Palisades DTF in 2023 have already been addressed through the NRCs inspection and enforcement process, that violations related to these inspection findings have already been cited, and that there is no indication that withdrawals from the DTF were for restart-specific activities. Therefore, there is insufficient basis on which to take further enforcement-related action against Holtec, and the petitioners request is denied.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.206(c), a copy of this directors decision will be filed with the Secretary of the Commission for Commission review. As provided for by this regulation, the decision will constitute the final action of the Commission 25 days after the date of the decision unless the Commission, on its own motion, institutes a review of the decision within that time.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 14th day of August 2025.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Jeremy Groom, Acting Deputy Director, Reactor Safety Programs and Corporate Support Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 

==Attachment:==
Petitioner Comments on Proposed Directors Decision and NRC Response JEREMY GROOM Digitally signed by JEREMY GROOM Date: 2025.08.14 08:54:00 -04'00'

ATTACHMENT PETITIONERS COMMENTS ON PROPOSED DIRECTORS DECISION AND NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION RESPONSE By {{letter dated|date=July 2, 2025|text=letter dated July 2, 2025}} (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML25183A399), the petitioner provided comments (ML25097A165) to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) on the proposed directors decision regarding Holtec Decommissioning International, LLCs (Holtecs), misuse of decommissioning funds, to the enforcement process under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.206, Requests for action under this subpart, regarding Palisades Nuclear Plant.
The petitioners comments do not alter the NRC staffs conclusions in the proposed directors decision and therefore do not require modification to the final directors decision. This attachment provides the petitioners comments on the proposed directors decision and the NRCs responses to the comments.
The petitioners comments are summarized below.
Comment 1:
Notably, 18 CFR &sect; 35.32(a)(6) warrants that (6) Absent the express authorization of the Commission, no part of the assets of the Fund may be used for, or diverted to, any purpose other than to fund the costs of decommissioning the nuclear power plant to which the Fund relates, and to pay administrative costs and other incidental expenses, including taxes, of the Fund.
That is, decommissioning funds must be spent on decommissioning. The proposed decision provides no discussion of how it is that expenditures for spent fuel management, costs indisputably incurred during the period following June 2022 during which Holtec actively sought and obtained federal and state assistance commitments for the restart of Palisades, can be deemed costs of decommissioning.
NRC Response to Comment 1:
The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) is a codification of the general and permanent rules published in the Federal Register by the Executive departments and agencies of the Federal Government. The CFR is divided into 50 titles that represent broad areas subject to Federal regulation. Each title is divided into chapters, which usually bear the name of the issuing agency. Title 18, Conservation of Power and Water Resources, is composed of two volumes. The first volume, containing parts 1-399, of which you reference 18 CFR Part 35, Filing of Rate Schedules and Tariffs, includes all current regulations codified under this title by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, U.S. Department of Energy.
The regulation in 18 CFR 1.101, Definitions, defines Commission as the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, as referenced within 18 CFR. Therefore, the regulation that you cited (18 CFR 35.32(a)(6)) is outside the NRCs jurisdiction. However, the NRC has a similar regulation at 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(i)) which states, in part, the following:
Decommissioning trust funds may be used by licensees if (A) The withdrawals are for expenses for legitimate decommissioning activities consistent with the definition of decommissioning in [10 CFR] 50.2.
The regulation in 10 CFR 50.2, Definitions, defines Decommission as to remove a facility or site safely from service and reduce residual radioactivity to a level that permits (1) Release of the property for unrestricted use and termination of the license; or (2) Release of the property under restricted conditions and termination of the license.
Furthermore, on December 13, 2021, the NRC granted Holtec an exemption (ML21286A294, ML21286A506) from the requirements of 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(i)(A) to allow the use of a portion of the funds from the Palisades Decommissioning Trust Fund (DTF) for spent fuel management and site restoration activities at Palisades.
These points were previously detailed in the proposed directors decision section titled Regulatory Requirements.
Comment 2:
The Petitioners original question still remains unanswered: How could Holtec legitimately spend $143,000,000 from the decommissioning trust fund when Holtec admits that it has never engaged in any decommissioning activity?
NRC Response to Comment 2:
As described in the proposed directors decision section titled NRC Inspection Activities, the NRC staff reviewed Holtecs use of the DTF and verified the expenses incurred.
The staff also independently identified several instances in which Holtec used the Palisades DTF for nondecommissioning activities and took appropriate enforcement action for these findings. Notably, in NRC Inspection Report No. 05000255/2024004 (ML25041A225), the NRC staff issued Unresolved Item (URI) 05000255/2024004-01, which seeks to clarify at what point a decommissioning plant undergoing a restart initiative should transition away from using the DTF for otherwise legitimate expenditures. This URI is still under review and is being dispositioned through the NRCs inspection and enforcement process.
In conclusion, the Petition Review Board has determined that the petitioners comments did not provide any relevant additional information or support for the petition that was not previously considered. Thus, the comments did not change the conclusion of the proposed directors decision. The final directors decision denies the petitioners request for enforcement action. The NRC appreciates the petitioners comments and thanks the petitioner for raising concerns in the interest of protecting public health and safety.}}