View source for NL-12-2271, SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 10 of 14

{{Adams
| number = ML12355A043
| issue date = 11/26/2012
| title = SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 10 of 14
| author name = Volodarsky D
| author affiliation = Southern Nuclear Operating Co, Inc
| addressee name = 
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR
| docket = 05000425
| license number = 
| contact person = 
| case reference number = NL-12-2271
| document report number = SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver 1.0
| document type = Report, Technical
| page count = 50
| project = 
| stage = Other
}}

=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Sheet 1 of 2 Status:(n N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. 2-,'              71 SO          Equip. Classu  --    ,-,    ...                 V     W)         Aov)_
Equipment Description       R.D.                ,              OIZAiL.      ,-C         t     f.*   b. 4A*t..tt Location: Bldg. F P46         Floor El. 200'       Room, Area             R AOL Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorate I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one         YO Ng of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?                   Y% NO UD N/AQ
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface                   YX NO UJO N/AD oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?            YO NO UO N/A$
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?                 YO NO UO N/AX (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
P40-T It       5o"/0 s~aAP4t....
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of                  YfNO UDI potentially adverse seismic conditions?
12Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
                                                         <C-3 >
PAGE 341 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                                  NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment IDNo.           ' Y-I IS0                Equip. Class.'... o   i VIV")
Equipment Description       9t.dk4' (Oalai   *         ,      ,      o d,*'.t V*t'tc._
Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?            YN NO] U        N/AD
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,      Y&#xfd;NE       Ur   N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adcquate flexibility to avoid damage?                    Y&#xfd;iN1 NU-       N/AD
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free           YX ND U-1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could            Y    'NE   1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by:                      Evalatedby.....) ~                                    ate    .   &.~(             c~&
                                                                                                              ..............
PAGE 342 of 433

A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS                                           0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 V.-
PAGE 343 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                                   NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of 2 Status: OJN U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment IDNo,      2-1-6H -902-0               Equip. Class12     ,'v/r14uM*1  1,,,          -         /-
Equipment Description           le-, 0,   94 Y       rf Ak" 3.        1-e. .*           .
Location: Bldg.      P4 . Floor El. 22&                    Room, Area          /, /02..
Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)               ,1'1.Mr      E r/". 0/.
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one        Y[] NX' of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?                   YE] NL] UE] N/AE
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface                  YE] NE] UC- N/AM oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near tie anchors?           YE] NE] UE] N/A-
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?                  YEI NE] UE] N/Am(
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
              /_ 1,Ale 1W04,'^,'z-re0 :t,.. 7-,eU t-t &--e 7-
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of                   Y5&#xfd;NEI UE]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Enter the equipment class name from.Appendix B; Classes of Equipment.
                                                          &#xfd;<C-3 >
PAGE 344 of 433

NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipmont]]DNo.         21-// 511        29-0 Equip. Class U  1-1rAV&'1P749v           -   e4As5l'y Equipment Description         /z0,      1)14,K p4 'wt 3           L-e/1     .-
Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?      YJ Nn UD N/AD
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YK NEI UI     N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?               YI( ND UD N/AD
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free       Yi    NDI UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?                         I\
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could        YA, ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
                            ,_3  2.                                     A(      Aa, Evaluatedby:.C.                                                  \4D                 ate:
A*lz ' t~VL  ioe P4,Qk
                                                         -< C.4 >
PAGE 345 of 433

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                   NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONOO
                                         ,I PAGE 346 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                                   NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 s#             U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. 2 T/1          ,         Equip. Class",
Equipment Description        car"4      . / /I'J                    k    flA4.eij      [a. a Location: Bldg. tCJT 00f5, Floor El.            1,-0/       Room, Area             A'_, b Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but tecommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorae
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one          YL" N[I of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?                    Y[EI NO UO NX/A
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface                    Y[9 N[C UU1 N/AC oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?             Y*NCE    UEC N/AD
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?                   YdNC UC N/AC (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of                   YV~NE] UD potentially adverse seismic conditions?
2 Enter the equipmcni class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
                                                         < C-3 >
PAGE 347 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                                 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.       2   LzT- k11 I -       Equip. Class" Equipment Descriptions        Sr Al I Le                    -les                            44 Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?           YX     q[VWUE] N/AQ IP.,vj /~y/A* "i,'dtr* to6erat ,'-', z~-LT-*-ji ( -.                      ,      //
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution syste        ceiling tiles and lighting, Y13"1'    0u U[3 N/Am and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
4'e-VjA.-      7 /M'k.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?                   YMNf-] UE- N/ACI
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free           YCI NIE&#xfd;U1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
fc117f&'.          7    AAc Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could            Y9?N-1 U'-
adversely affect the safety fimctions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Date:      e414      -
el"X7
                                                      &#xfd;<C-4 >
PAGE 348 of 433

OACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .010 PAGE 349 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                                   NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Starus:c9 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
EquipmentlDNo.        2l     5V 3004-            Equip. Class2 2    0 (0"fk)
                                                                                     /
EquipmentDescription        Mqan 5tfom Sond/ 1 Ad               - V*aIVQ Location: Bldg.      AfUb          Floor El. 01      Room, Area     __1___
Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one         YCE NI;(
of the 50% of SWEL.items requiring such verification)?
L;-P pjV Ivve.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?                    YE NEI ULE N/Akf
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface                    YO NO UC NiAV oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?            YO NE UE] N/Ao"
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plantdocumentation?                   YE NEI UE] N/Az" (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of                   Y&#xfd;(NE UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?
12Enter dhe equipment class utine from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment,
                                                          < C-3 >"
PAGE 350 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                               NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) 2 Equipment IDNo.         ___________-           Equip.Class    ,0 o0fk Equipment Description                                 .m Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?       Y& NEI U1     N/AEJ
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,   Yg NEI U-    N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?                 YO NO UO N/A,&#xfd;"
Y&#xfd;(NO" 1J[
10, Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could         YK No UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
AJON&
Evaluated by                               I lqq/%/   w   wk,
                                                        . W14                            Date:
                                                        < C-4A>
PAGE 351 of 433

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0 PAGE 352 of 433

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .040 PAGE 353 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                                 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of 2 Status: (DN U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.        Z - P-      3 C't,0      Equip. Class12                        f   -
Equipment Description                  drq*sr e* t&#xfd;tC77;-Z,,*                     m w: -L Location: Bldg.. -,4,"/           Floor El. 1         -"    Room, Area           i       /0,3 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anc horage
: i. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one        YE] N9 of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?                   Y9*5'1U1--     N/ACI
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface                  Y.NE] UC] N/AC" oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the. concrete near the anchors?          YE]NE    UO N/A[f
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?                 YI- N40 ULJ N/A/u'rj (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially advcrse seismic conditions?
Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes f Equipment,
                                                         <C-3>
PAGE 354 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                             NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.        2 -  Pr3 co-,          Equip. Class'u           /op Equipment Description         S4 I       P-/.
e-,d,/        -byV           7AJ h*.,..//*a' Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?      YU           f"U'N/AD]
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y0NDE        UD' N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?                Y          O E    N/AD YU-NOU
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions rJ0-J
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could        YF3-<0D adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by-    6J....        .) 7 I     "/                                       Date:    '      /
                                                        < C-4>
PAGE 355 of 433

*ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS S                                     SO NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 356 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                                 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of 2 Status: Y&(    U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment IDNo.                                 Equp. Class'2        040r)
EquipmentDescription         Ar                   q\Jq6vh-   &ql)-__
Location: Bldg.       Arib       Floor Fl.    ,.t5        Room, Area     _-,,_                     __.
Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL; The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgrcents and findings, Additional space is.provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e,, is the item one       YO Ni of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?                 YE NE UE N/Ag 3.. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface                 YE NE UE N/Aw oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?          YE NEI UE N/Ax
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?                YE NEI UE1 N/Aw (Note! This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of                 Y<NO UE3 poltently adverse peismi conditions?
                             "2Enter the equipmentccas&namne from Appendix B: Classes of Zquipm-nt.
                                                         < C-3 >
PAGE 357 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                            NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.           )     -30o
                                        -              Equip. CjasS120 0A4(1  k Equipment Description        A4Mds. 4 lkf   V4Itt       C S"
Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by neat-by equipment or structures?     Yrl N ' U0 N/AD Cko 4,d.
h15~kyC-~
1L         t(CA-              4,.&#xfd;          -O4         4 /Qf0            2+3
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,       NEI UD] N/A[]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?               YV NE     UD N/AD3
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free      YD N'     U0 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Rave you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could        Y    /N0 UI-0 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 55CE .2-W5 3004- RIK. A-0 WALA                        f~t5(W Evlae   '-      *J1                    44            v1AO Date:         1 z12-.
                                          $ -       44 ~p        ~~e%~e/                          gi0~
                                                         -<C-4 >-
PAGE 358 of 433

9ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                   NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION00 C
PAGE 359 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS           NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 360 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                                      NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:.5 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No,       2-     -K 53000)            Equip. Class 2/J_
Equipment Description       S6 1 P           50_*S      O *i(      Coi'fI*LLi(
Location: Bldg. A*x ,*"Oj          Floor El.    -1V450f Room, Area            ,   t   L Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but reconmmended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
rAnh2e                                                                                     30   [   "''*"
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
YNiNE] UEJ N/A-]
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface                     YE    NE] Ul N/AU oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?                  Y[] NO UO N/A'$,
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required,)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of                    Y     NEI UE]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?                                               /
2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of" Equpmenrt.
                                                           < C-3 >
PAGE 361 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                               NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
EquipmentIDNo.          Z-4         Ooo        Equip. Class' 2      -                          ..
                                                                                                      ...
                                                                                                        ...
                                                                                                          .
Equipment Description              . Pl I<6         tffS4,tf" A/RL/ C.OWf1,L4 Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?        Y&#xfd;NO U[] N/AUJ
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,        NEI U-    N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?                      NOj UO N/AD
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment fiee        Y4 NO U-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could         Y     ND U'.
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by:           e,- 7Iii2,&#xfd; .       Q      /   .. i--      Y   .&sect;(           Date:    *e.        t
                                                         < C-4 >
PAGE 362 of 433
* ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                      NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0
                                                         ~MI~
PAGE 363 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                                    NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:@ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.         2   TL.      t3.o        Equip. Class 2    "        --
                                                                                    ,-x       -        -x'  .  -
Equipment Description        C           t            IC_. Z        ,     A/C u-,'--    .'u..
Location: Bldg. Cc-                Floor'EL. 2,o-o" Room, Area                  -. 32S Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)                 .)                       ,
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one           YE N5:
of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?                    YM NE] UI-E N/AE]
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface                    YX NEI      UE N/AE]
oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?           Y1      NE] UE] N/AE]
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?                  YE] NE] UE] N/A4 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for                                      /
which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of                   '/r'   NE] UE]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?                                                 7-12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
                                                           <C-3 >
PAGE 364 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                             NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) 2                                    -  L     cX k%~
Equipment ID No.       2-vi,- C.Equip.
1 "5                 Class"     -
Equipment Description C.i, v o                A
                                                .*'/C. Z.-x               U,.t Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?       Y;   NE] Uli- N/AE]
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,  Yb' NEI UF] N/AE]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?                 _ t(         ,
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?              YV NE]'I Ul     N/AE]
10, Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for. and found no other seismic conditions that could           NE UE]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by:     k&#xfd;                                     /                        Date:______
                                                    ,~  'C                                    &#xfd;'//'_//z -e,&#xfd;Z_
                                                       <C-4 >
PAGE 365 of 433

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0 PAGE 366 of 433

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .04P PAGE 367 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                                   NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Stams: DfN U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.      12 -T15       -1133 Equip. Class"             11 (1      '6 4 WIL I
Equipment Description         C_  S. ();t r                  -FViA   o         r Location: Bldg. C*410io            FloorEl. 2t60--0      Room,Area        '5 4.S,$                      '1    'f(Z Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)                          9,/
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one        Y4NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?                   Y'N" U-         N/AOl
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface                    YA N1O UO N/AC1 oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?           Y     NE]I[TO N/A]
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?                 YKANnN     Un N/AC (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of                   -4NO UEI potentially adverse seismic conditions?
                             " Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment, PAGE 368 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                              NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.      _-___________           Equip. Class12 ...... l. r Fquipment Description          COCK'    c~kr km. Ven+ Fita Codmflkr
                                            ..................
Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?                    N/AC Y&#xfd;NO UO
: 8. Are ovethead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,   Y NC UE' N/A-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
* NFI UO N/AC
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free       Y,   No UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could              NO UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) t*J C-L Evaluated by:              ,   _.i..i--                                             Date:           Z-0  z.CCS 02    CI
                                     '-,*    XV/
qtf
                                                        <C-4 >'
PAGE 369 of 433

ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0            NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIO 9
                                                                                  .N PAGE 370 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                                  NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of 2 Status:0 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
EquipmentIDNo.       ;Z-T&#xfd;50'5-61                Equip. Class' 2       L(Ttfhja         .t,Amor)
Equipment Description        Di'SeJ 0          tbiUfi, I . -'rq;11tpr      &#xb6;:      C*Or- o*i'l[r Location: Bldg. 1'urd TOA Floor El.                        Room, Area         e"                        04,11 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)_
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each. of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one          YOI NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?                    Y4 NO UO] N/A-]
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface                    Y)gINI U-     N/AD oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?             Y     Nn U] N/AD
: 5. IS the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?                  YE NEI U-     N/A (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of                   Y) NEI Ul]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
12 Enter the equipment class nmne from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
                                                         < C-3 >
PAGE 371 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                             NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic. Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.             -      X' 5      Equip. Class"      (tr50r Equipment Description       D;,d Pl&v4,(       unA.I TdA Pr ran                        ,idrohr Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?        Y* N] UI] N/AE]
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y'    NCI UC] N/ACI and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?                YW NCI UC] N/AC]
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free       YVNn] UC]
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could        YV NCi UC]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Date:     C&#xfd;  5- 2LhZDl1..
                                                       < C-4 )
PAGE 372 of 433

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0
NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 373 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                                    NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:     N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. 2- TI6HY-P;                      Equip. Class-2    il (r4*!Tpkr,-_ SeiSO')
Equipment Description       N$(C4 Fo'0.J( (CAD         T'h      "- ratno         FA-CoFen   -wlvr Location: Bldg. Tvn1kdT"A FloorEl.. 0'                   Room, Area     @Nf(SLw '*t(r Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The. space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage                                                                                             ~7*    C~-~'~
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
Y*   Nn UE N/AE
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface NETEN!AE oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?           YNE UO N/AE
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?                 YE NE U-       N/TIE (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
YNO UO2
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
                             "2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
                                                           < C-3>
PAGE 374 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                               NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. D-T JIA -22,51            Equip. Class'..__.[Re*I  DM    At   5trLorS)
Equipment Description        ISW T"vitr 041gT                     I-   Trctn Pt- Fan   Con+rvoler Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?       1        N1 U0 N/A0 S. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y         NE U   N/A and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?                Y4 NEI UC- N/ACl
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free        YV NEI Ut of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could                NCI UC-]
adversely affect the safety functions of the.equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: _          -                                   S;                     Date:          .
1~                             ~7
                                               /
                                                       < C-4 >-
PAGE 375 of 433

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONRO4 PAGE 376 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                                   NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status - N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) 2 EquipmentID No.         -- TV-11 61 5,           Equip. Class' "-,A*a    1 tr-O/o'-          ,* 4    ' /a-.J 1'r-/J (-iv*l Equipment Description         A*JSt-' 1      5f.Yrijl            ':/Z       c,'        /' ) 4.2o.'TXl t. V.'
4 Location: Bldg.      LaGIt1O       Floor El. UO f-cl      Room, Area           739T Manufacturer, Model, Etc, (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one       YE]
of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?                  Y[     NE UD NIAJXjj
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface                   YE NE UE N!AX/
oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?          YE NE. UE N/Aj
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
YE NE UE
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of
                                                                                               /1-NEU potentially adverse seismic conditions?
                              "Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
                                                          <C-3 >
PAGE 377 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                                NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.         2-- T1/- /f? 7s-       Equip. Class" 1     6,1. S5 e Equipment Description           AIS.e-W      TO"F
                                                       &#xa3;S.JF,      AL c-,z4t ,&   cO,      ,,    6            ,4    V)*,V Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?         Y*   NO] U   .N/AD
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,    Y*1 NEI UO N/A]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?/
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
Y4$INEI UO N/Al]
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free        YIS NEI UE]
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions tI. Have you looked for and.bund no other seismic conditions that. could         IqA. NE] UE]
adversely affect tile safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
                          ~  ,.                  i2_
Evaluated by                                                                         Date:
2
                                                             -  V4 PAGE 378 of 433

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .00 PAGE 379 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                                   NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0
                                                                                                      /      Sheet 1 of 2 Status:O N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.       2--TV       1,0"5'        Equip. Class' 2         oqqr)
Equipment Description       P6' O0                   r,'_
                                                             *'Ma1      -            6 Location: Bldg.      PG           Floor El. .Z2.0'I        Room, Area       P-103 , Nfar     P,,  i 93 coluts 1- 1' Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one       YO      X of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?                  YJ NO UC N/AC
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface                   YWNNO UOI N/ACl oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?           Y&#xfd;NC UC N/AC
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?                 YC NC UC N/AVi%
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
                                                                                                     /
YI*' NC uC
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B; Classes of Equipment.
                                                          < C-3 >
PAGE 380 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                               NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
EquipmentlDNo.          &#xfd;       ij2-cJ&#xfd;5-       Equip. Class"2 &#xfd; (0.444r)
Equipment Description         P0&       0 L's:a i4rf          44.*  -          13 Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?        Y     ND UCD N/AD
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y       ND UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?                YII/ND U[      N/AD
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free       YEi/NV    UE3 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could         YnVN-I U13 adverscly affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
                                                            /Voa(f Evaluated by:.                                                                      Date:
P4R~rr~< C-4Q              1 >
PAGE 381 of 433

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                       NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .00 OUTSIDE AIR INTAKE FO 13 PAGE 382 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                                   NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of 2 Status:@M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
EquipmentIDNo.        2-Ty- (tI47                Equip. Class"2 "e,.pe.i42ge*          5
                                                                                               *-'ra -     -. ar; I?
Equipment Description            /'OA 4)    ~f-f POA rtl-i/ 1 1 Location: Bldg. 6OW"I0L            Floor El. Z&',,          Room, Area             3o Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)              Tp1ose,       (*.,lro [s Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one       YE- Nol of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
Y      - UI-- N/AE-
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface                   YX NO UrJ N/All oxidation?
Y* NEI- UO- N/All
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concretenear the anchors?
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?                YO NE UE N/Ak (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of                  YXNEI UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?
12Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
                                                          < C-3 >
PAGE 383 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                         NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. 2- T'         -  I- 75        Equip. Class"2        -e.-7 -a           ,e-,   -   Cf/C.~.r H/
Equipment Description        CQJt(/ EA4V-      FA g    "l"VI- I (:'7 Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?      Y$kN[" U-' N/AUl
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yt     NE    UC N/AC and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?               y     NC- UI-     N/AC
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free      YVNEI       UC]
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could       YX1 NC UC-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) po    ! . cJ7                                     $v Evaluated by:                                    A-i       /jAK05      Dove-k-     Date:      Si4.-        zo(z
                                                                                                 &#xfd;Ilq617-
                                                         &#xfd;<C-4 >
PAGE 384 of 433

A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS     0                                      0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 385 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                                 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: ON      U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.         -- 120V-PN-001            Equip. Class"     *",t", ?-p1-C/"ss "
Equipment Description          (on*,'p*ya.              Pu.M   A Location: Bldg.      I4 IJX(.        FloorEl. I  *"3" Room, Area          _1905_
Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)                GoY, O{S Punfrp, TJ- c.
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Ybi" NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?                     Yo' NEI UII N/AC-
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface                      Y"NI- UC1 N/AC]
oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?              YC'NC- U-     N/AC
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?                    YOND UC- N/AC1 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
2.4((oA-i9oZ-OoOO(o                &Vc. 10.0.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of                     Yf NEI UC]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
                                                         <C-3 >
PAGE 386 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                             NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
EquipmentlDNo.         Z- IZv' -P6-o           Equip. Class'2 -/rt."/,/,A.,A       -         5 I/eq; Equipment Description       c...  "A~A*'T i           P"r      Am? A Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?        9NOUlD N/AD
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y     NDI U     N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?               Ykf NEI UD N/AD
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free       YXNDE UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could              ND UD]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?                       ,\
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
No C(t01tAYJ5, A
Evaluated by:                        -      f1~t*      ,j    pJlnt$0               Date:   &#xfd;/.q I/lot)
                                                      < C-4 >
PAGE 387 of 433

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                      NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .04P 2-1206.P6-001_M01 PAGE 388 of 433

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS           NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 389 of 433
* ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0           NO. SNCVO61-RPT-02, VERSION .
PAGE 390 of 433}}