View source for CNS-16-077, Expedited Seismic Evaluation Process Closeout, Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendations 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident

{{Adams
| number = ML16347A013
| issue date = 12/08/2016
| title = Expedited Seismic Evaluation Process Closeout, Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendations 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident
| author name = Simril T
| author affiliation = Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC
| addressee name = 
| addressee affiliation = NRC/Document Control Desk, NRC/NRR
| docket = 05000413, 05000414
| license number = NPF-035, NPF-052
| contact person = 
| case reference number = CNS-16-077
| document type = Letter type:CNS, Response to Request for Additional Information (RAI)
| page count = 3
| project = 
| stage = Response to RAI
}}

=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:TomSimr.il Vice :P,r.esident Catawba :l'iluclear:Statiom Duke Ener,gy CN01MP I 4800 Concord Road York, SC 29.745
                                                                                        .o.: 803.7c01.334.Q f: ,803.701.322j tom.simril@duke"enerogy.,com 10 CFR 50.54(f)
CNS-16-077 December 8, 2016 Attention: Document Control Desk U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555-0001 Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (Duke Energy)
Catawba Nuclear Station (CNS), Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-413 and 50-414 Renewed License Nos. NPF-35 and NPF-52

==Subject:==
Catawba Nuclear Station Expedited Seismic Evaluation Process (ESEP) Closeout, Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendations 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident

==References:==
: 1. NRC Letter, Request for Information Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendations 2.1, 2.3, and 9.3, of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident, dated March 12, 2012 (ADAMS Accession No. ML12053A340)
: 2. NEI Letter, Proposed Path Forward for NTTF Recommendation 2.1: Seismic Reevaluations, dated April 9, 2013 (ADAMS Accession No. ML13101A379)
: 3. NRC Letter, Electric Power Research Institute Final Draft Report XXXXXX, "Seismic Evaluation Guidance: Augmented Approach for the Resolution of Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1: Seismic", as an Acceptable Alternative to the March 12, 2012, Information Request for Seismic Reevaluations, dated May 7, 2013 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML13106A331)
: 4. Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) Final Report 3002000704, Seismic Evaluation Guidance, Augmented Approach for the Resolution of Fukushima Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1: Seismic, dated May 2013
: 5. Duke Energy Letter, Errata Letter for 10 CFR 50.54(f) Submittal of Expedited Seismic Evaluation Process (ESEP) Report, Revision 2, dated November 5, 2015 (ADAMS Accession No. ML15317A013)

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission December 8, 2016 Page 2 On March 12, 2012, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRG) issued Reference 1 to all power reactor licensees and holders of construction permits in active or deferred status. Enclosure 1 of Reference 1 requested each addressee located in the Central and Eastern United States (CEUS) to submit a Seismic Hazard Evaluation and Screening Report within 1.5 years from the date of Reference 1.
The Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) submitted Reference 2 requesting NRC agreement to delay submittal of the CEUS Seismic Hazard Evaluation and Screening, as well as endorsement of the guidance. The delay and industry guidance was endorsed by the NRC in a letter dated May 7, 2013 (Reference 3).
In accordance with the NRG endorsed guidance of the final EPRI Seismic Evaluation Guidance Report 3002000704, dated May 2013 (Reference 4), the ESEP Report for Catawba was provided by a letter dated November 5, 2015 (Reference 5). Pursuant to Action #4 as listed in Table 8-1 of Section 8.4 of Reference 5, all required seismic walkdowns, evaluations, and modifications for Catawba Units 1 and 2 identified in the ESEP report have been completed. No additional changes have been made to the enclosure in the Reference 5 letter.
There are no regulatory commitments associated with this letter.
Should you have any questions regarding this submittal, please contact Sherry Andrews at 803-701-3424.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on December 8, 2016.
Sincerely, Tom Simril Site' Vice President, Catawba Nuclear Station

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission December 8, 2016 Page 3 xc:
C. Haney, Regional Administrator U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree Center Avenue NE, Suite 1200 Atlanta, GA 30303-1257 P.J. Bamford, Senior Project Manager U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission One White Flint North, Mailstop 13 F15 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738 Michael D. Orenak, Project Manager U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission One White Flint North, Mailstop 0-8G9A 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738 J.D. Austin U.S. NRC Senior Resident Catawba Nuclear Station Justin Folkwein American Nuclear Insurers 95 Glastonbury Blvd., Suite 300 Glastonbury, CT 06033-4453}}