View source for Information Notice 2003-01, Failure of a Boiling Water Reactor Target Rock Main Steam Safety/Relief Valve

{{Adams
| number = ML030140543
| issue date = 01/15/2003
| title = Failure of a Boiling Water Reactor Target Rock Main Steam Safety/Relief Valve
| author name = Beckner W
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DRIP/RORP
| addressee name = 
| addressee affiliation = 
| docket = 
| license number = 
| contact person = Billings, Danny, NRR/OES/ROR, 415-1175
| case reference number = TAC M6480
| document report number = IN-03-001
| document type = NRC Information Notice
| page count = 8
}}
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATESNUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIONOFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATIONWASHINGTON, DC 20555-0001January 15, 2003NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 2003-01:FAILURE OF A BOILING WATER REACTORTARGET ROCK MAIN STEAM SAFETY/RELIEF

VALVE

==Addressees==
All holders of operating licenses or construction permits for nuclear power reactors, exceptthose that have permanently ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been

permanently removed from the reactor.

==Purpose==
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice to alertaddressees to a recent failure of a main steam safety/relief valve on a boiling water reactor

(BWR).  The NRC anticipates that recipients will review the information for applicability to their

facilities and consider taking appropriate actions.  However, suggestions contained in this

information notice are not NRC requirements; therefore, no specific action or written response

is required.

==Description of Circumstances==
In April 2002, following a Unit 1 refueling outage at the Hatch Nuclear Plant, the safety/reliefvalve (S/RV) in the 1J location began leaking.  In an effort to stop the assumed pilot valve

leakage, the licensee cycled the S/RV at rated pressure and temperature.  The valve failed to

fully open and then failed to reseat.  The licensee continued the startup to allow identification of

potential balance-of-plant leakage.  During the balance-of-plant startup, the associated S/RVvacuum breaker failed due to repeated cycling

, resulting in high unidentified drywell leakage. The plant was shut down when the leakage exceeded the technical specification allowableleakage (reference LER 50-321/2002-002).   The S/RVs installed in Unit 1 are Target Rock two-stage S/RVs.  The main stage valve internals(shown in attached Figure 1) are assembled by screwing the main piston onto the main stem so

that the piston moves inside the guide, installing a locking tab washer, and installing the stem

nut against the washer's locking tab.  The piston is torqued to 100 ft-lbs, the stem nut is torqued

to 50 ft-lbs, and the locking tab is bent to capture the stem nut.  During the S/RV inspection

after the April 2002 shutdown, the failed valve was found to have a .003-inch clearance

between the main disc and its seat.  When the valve was disassembled, the stem nut and the piston were found to be loose.  The stem nut was removed by hand and the piston was alsounthreaded by hand from the stem.  However, the threads on the stem were severely damaged.

The piston was unthreaded by working it up to the good threads under the stem nut and

threading it onto this portion of the stem.  The inside of the guide was heavily grooved and was

also worn by the piston edge wearing on the guide.  The piston was visibly cocked on the valve

stem.  In an earlier event in 1999, the licensee had a different S/RV fail on the test stand.  This failureoccurred during the fourth valve actuation when the stem nut fell off the stem and jammed in

the preload spring coils.  The resulting uneven force caused the piston to cock in the guide.

The stem nut had lost torque and came unscrewed from the stem threads in spite of the locking

tab.  Following this failure, the licensee instituted a program to check the torque on both the

stem nut and the piston.  The licensee found in most cases, both the stem nut and the piston

had lost torque.Following the failure of the 1J S/RV, the licensee closely examined three valves which had beenremoved during the April 2002 refueling outage.  The stem nuts and pistons of all three valves

had lost torque, the stems of two of the valves showed significant wear on the valve threads, and one valve exhibited some thread wear.  All three valves showed signs of damage on the

stem shoulder, which is designed to contact the piston.  In October 2002, the licensee removed

three additional S/RVs from Unit 1 for testing, disassembly, and inspection.  All three valves

successfully stroked with steam pressure but when disassembled and inspected, were found to

have lost torque on both the stem nut and the piston.  Two valves had fairly good threads and

the final valve (1F) had significant thread damage and a visibly cocked piston.  All three valve

stems showed varying degrees of damage in the shoulder area.The licensee believes the loss of torque and damage of the valve internals can be attributed tothe manufacturing tolerances of the valve stem and piston and to the lengthy service time

without adequate inspection and maintenance.  The valve is designed so the valve stem screws

into the piston.  The stem has a shoulder that seats against the piston shoulder.  For the valves

that show little to no thread damage, the stem apparently seats properly against the piston and

most of the valve actuation force is carried by the stem and piston shoulders.  For the valves

with thread damage, the licensee believes that the end of the lead thread of the piston contacts

the fillet that is machined into the shoulder of the valve stem.  As shown in Figure 1, when this

occurs, the shoulder of the stem does not properly seat against the shoulder of the piston.

Thread damage starts with the first actuation on the test stand, resulting in a loss of torque.

Over time, vibration from normal plant operations causes fretting and wear of the valve stem

shoulder and threads.  The piston rocks in the guide and wears grooves where the piston rings

contact the guide.  Eventually the piston could significantly cock on the stem and wedge in the

guide during valve actuation, which would prevent proper opening or closing of the valve.  The

licensee has not been able to determine the time in operation required to damage a valve to the

point of failure.  The licensee believes the failed 1J valve and the damaged 1F valve were in

service for approximately 20 years without maintenance.  The licensee is currently removing

several S/RVs during each plant outage to ensure that all installed S/RVs are inspected and

maintained at least every 6 years.  There are 11 S/RVs installed in each unit. DiscussionAs the result of the 1J valve failure, the licensee performed a root cause analysis following theevent and contracted an independent engineering firm to perform a separate root cause

analysis.  The licensee believes that the failure of the S/RV is related to the manufacturing

tolerances of the valve stem and piston assembly and to the lengthy service time without

adequate inspection and maintenance.  The independent root cause analysis determined that

the lead thread of the piston was contacting the fillet of the shoulder, preventing shoulder-to- shoulder contact.  Since the piston was not adequately attached to the stem, operational

vibration and valve actuation caused thread damage and eventual valve failure.  The valve

vendor (Curtiss Wright Flow Control Corporation) has developed changes to the inspection and

refurbishment procedures to ensure proper shoulder-to-shoulder contact during valve

assembly.  The BWR vendor (GE Nuclear Energy) is issuing a Service Information Letter (SIL)
to address the degradation found in the Hatch S/RVs.The above-described circumstances emphasize the importance of periodic inspection of S/RVmain stage components to identify deficiencies and necessary corrective actions.  All Target

Rock two-stage and three-stage S/RVs have similarly designed main stage components.

Currently 11 BWR plants in the U.S. have two-stage S/RVs, and 11 BWR plants have three- stage S/RVs.The above described problems found in the main stages of Target Rock S/RVs are not relatedto the problems found previously in the pilot stages of the S/RVs that were discussed in

Regulatory Issue Summary 2000-12, "Resolution of Generic Safety Issue B-55.

" This information notice requires no specific action or written response.  If you have anyquestions about the information in this notice, please contact one of the technical contacts

listed below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager./RA/William D. Beckner, Program Director

===Operating Reactor Improvements Program===
Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs

Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationTechnical Contacts:Norman Garrett, Region IICharles G. Hammer, NRR(912) 367-9881(301) 415-2791 Email:  nxg@nrc.govEmail: cgh@nrc.govDanny Billings, NRR(301) 415-1175 Email: deb1@nrc.govAttachments:1.  Figure 1 - Target Rock Safety/Relief Valve2.  List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices As the result of the 1J valve failure, the licensee performed a root cause analysis following theevent and contracted an independent engineering firm to perform a separate root cause

analysis.  The licensee believes that the failure of the S/RV is related to the manufacturing

tolerances of the valve stem and piston assembly and to the lengthy service time without

adequate inspection and maintenance.  The independent root cause analysis determined that

the lead thread of the piston was contacting the fillet of the shoulder, preventing shoulder-to- shoulder contact.  Since the piston was not adequately attached to the stem, operational

vibration and valve actuation caused thread damage and eventual valve failure.  The valve

vendor (Curtiss Wright Flow Control Corporation) has developed changes to the inspection and

refurbishment procedures to ensure proper shoulder-to-shoulder contact during valve

assembly.  The BWR vendor (GE Nuclear Energy) is issuing a Service Information Letter (SIL)
to address the degradation found in the Hatch S/RVs.The above-described circumstances emphasize the importance of periodic inspection of S/RVmain stage components to identify deficiencies and necessary corrective actions.  All Target

Rock two-stage and three-stage S/RVs have similarly designed main stage components.

Currently 11 BWR plants in the U.S. have two-stage S/RVs, and 11 BWR plants have three- stage S/RVs.The above described problems found in the main stages of Target Rock S/RVs are not relatedto the problems found previously in the pilot stages of the S/RVs that were discussed in

Regulatory Issue Summary 2000-12, "Resolution of Generic Safety Issue B-55.

" This information notice requires no specific action or written response.  If you have anyquestions about the information in this notice, please contact one of the technical contacts

listed below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager./RA/William D. Beckner, Program Director

===Operating Reactor Improvements Program===
Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs

Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationTechnical Contacts:Norman Garrett, Region IICharles G. Hammer, NRR(912) 367-9881(301) 415-2791 Email:  nxg@nrc.govEmail: cgh@nrc.govDanny Billings, NRR(301) 415-1175 Email: deb1@nrc.govAttachments:1.  Figure 1 - Target Rock Safety/Relief Valve2.  List of Recently Issued NRC Information NoticesDISTRIBUTION

:ADAMS

IN File

ADAMS ACCESSION NUMBER: ML030140543 DOCUMENT NAME: G:\RORP\OES\Staff Folders\Info\Hatch SRV\Billings\Hatch SRV\Hatch SRV

IN.rev2.wpdOFFICEOES:RORP:DRIPTech EditorEMEB:DEEMEB:DENAMEDBillingsPKleeneBRBonserCGHammer DATE12/12/200212/04/200201/09/200312/18/2002OFFICERegion IIRegion IISC:OES:RORP:DRIPPD:RORP:DRIPNAMENPGarrettBRBonserTReisWDBeckner

DATE12/20/2002      /        /200201/13/200301/15/2003OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

Attachment 1 ______________________________________________________________________________________OL = Operating License

CP = Construction PermitAttachment 2 LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUEDNRC INFORMATION NOTICES

_____________________________________________________________________________________InformationDate of

===Notice No.         SubjectIssuanceIssued to===
_____________________________________________________________________________________2002-35Changes to 10 CFR Parts 71and 72 Quality Assurance

Programs12/20/2002All holders of 10 CFR Part 71quality assurance program

approvals and all 10 CFR Part 72 licensees and certificate holders.2002-34Failure of Safety-RelatedCircuit Breaker External

===Auxiliary Switches at Columbia===
Generating Station11/25/2002All holders of operating licensesor construction permits for

nuclear power reactors.2002-33Notification of PermanentInjunction Against Neutron

===Products Incorporated of===
Dickerson, Maryland11/21/2002All teletherapy and radiationprocessing licensees. 2002-29(Errata)Recent Design Problems in Safety Functions of Pneumatic

Systems11/06/2002All holders of operating licensesor construction permits for

nuclear power reactors.2002-32Electromigration onSemiconductor Integrated

Circuits10/31/2002All holders of operating licensesfor nuclear power reactors except

those who have ceased

operations and have certified that

fuel has been permanently

removed from the reactor vessel.2002-31Potentially Defective UF

6Cylinder Valves (1-inch)10/31/2002All licensees authorized topossess and use source material

and/or special nuclear material for

the heating, emptying, filling, or

shipping of uranium hexafluoride

(UF 6) in 30- and 48-inch cylinders.2002-30Control and Surveillance ofPortable Gauges During Field

Operations10/30/2002All NRC licensees authorized topossess, use, transport, and store

portable gauges.Note:NRC generic communications may be received in electronic format shortly after they areissued by subscribing to the NRC listserver as follows:To subscribe send an e-mail to <listproc@nrc.gov >, no subject, and the followingcommand in the message portion:subscribe gc-nrr firstname lastname}}

{{Information notice-Nav}}