NRC-98-0022, Forwards semi-annual FFD Rept for Period from Jul-Dec 1997
| ML20203G792 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 02/26/1998 |
| From: | Gipson D DETROIT EDISON CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| CON-NRC-98-0022, CON-NRC-98-22 NUDOCS 9803030067 | |
| Download: ML20203G792 (5) | |
Text
_
Douglas IL Gipson i
'enior Vice l'rnl# lent, Nut Irar Gener ation l'ortni 2 6tH North lhxir lla) Nrutntt. Mi< hir.in 441M Tel :ll31%R201 rat 313 W. 4172 Detroit Edison 10CFR26.71(d)
February 26,1998 NRC 98 0022 4
1 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Coi.:.ol Desk Washington. D. C. 20555
Reference:
Fenn12-NRC Docket No. 50 341 NRC License No. NPF-43
Subject:
Semi Annual Fitness for Duty Report in accordance with 10CFR26.71(d). enclosed is the Semi-Annual Fitness for Duty (FFD)
Report for Fermi 2 for the report period from July 1.1997 to December 31,1997.
If there are any questions regarding this report, please contact Mr. Joseph 11. Korte, Director - Nuclear Security, at (734) 586 1095.
1 l
Sincerely, l
Enclosure Ch)' /
ee: A. B. Beach B. L Burgess O. A. Ilarris M. J. Jordan A. J. Kugler G. L Pirtle Region 111
- o U U 'J 'J 9903030067 990226
'll,, l{' h. .lli
' l{lfll
.fi PDR ADOCK 05000341 R
PDR e.
wrE Enero company L
, Enclosure to NitC 48 0022 Page1of4 Fitness for Duty Program Performance Data Personnel Subject to 10CFR26 THE DETROIT EDISON COMPANY December 31,1997 company 6 Wnth (.nden0 FERMI 2 Location JOSEPH H. KORTE (734) 586-1095 contact Name Phone Onclude area code)
Cutoffs: Gereen/ Confirmation (ng/ml)
EAppendix A to 10CFR26 Marijuana
/
Amphetamines
/
/
Cocaine
/
Phencyclidine
/
/
Opiates
/
Alcohol (% BAC)
/
Long-Term Short-Term Testing Results Licensee Contractor Contractor Employees Personnel Personnel 7,verage Number with Unescoded Access 948 0
429 Categories Tested Positive Tested Positive Tested Positive Pre Access 93 1
0 0
254 2
For Post accident 0
0 0
0 0
0 Cause Observed behavior 4
0 0
0 10 0
Random 229 0
0 0
113 0
Follow up 8
0 0
0 4
0 Other 0
0 0
0 0
0 Total 334 1
0 0
381 2
ll l
l i
1 A
3 5
4 3
secna 2
t s
b u
S I
c if l
ic l
e at s s e p
uT 0
0 0
0 f
S e o Rt ro f
lo s
h t
o 0
0 0
0 s
c l
e A
T e
v ye i
c n t
nid 0
0 0
0 i
ei s
hl o
P c P
d
- s e e e
h n pi 0
0 0
0 m
mm m
r At a ifno se C
ta 0
0 0
0 i
f p
o O
n e
w ia 0
0 0
0 n
o c
d o
k C
ae a
r n
B ua 0
2 3
j 1
ira 1\\
s s
r r
o o
s t
t e
c c
e a
a r
r y
t t
2 o
n n
o o
o2 lp C
C 0
4 m
te0 f E
m m
r r
r u8 o e
e e
s9 2 e
T T-s o -Ce n
g-t l
l r
cR g e
n o
a n
a c
t o
h o
ENP iL L
S T
lll l!
, Enclosure to NRC.98-0023 Page 3 of 4 SECTION 3 FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM PERFORMANCE DATA
- 1) The Fermi 2 annual testing rate in the Random Test Program for 1997 was 55% (average pool size was 1722, total tested was 946).
- 2) Detroit Edison does not have an on-site testing facility but transports specimens to a laboratory certified by the Department ofllealth and lluman Services.
REPORTS M ADE UNDER 10CFR26.73 There were no reports made under 10CFR26.73.
TESTING RESULTF.
There were three individuals who tested positive for the six month period ending December 31, 1997. The positive tests were categorized as follmvs:
Pre Access Testine A total of three individuals tested positive. One 1.icensee employee tested positive for marijuana. Two contract employees tested positive for marijuna. All of the individuals were denied access. The licensee employce was referred to the Employee Assistance Progra:n (EAP).
For Cause Testine There were no positive tests in this category during this six month period.
Random Tesiine There were no positive tests in this category during this six month period.
Follow-Un Testine There were no positive tests in this category during this six month period.
I
, Enclosure to N'RC t>8-0022 Page 4 of 4
SUMMARY
OF MANAGliMl!NT ACTIONS There were no appeals acceived during this six month period.
There was one Condition Assessment Resolution Document (CARD) written identifying 10CFR26 Program deficiencies during this six month period.
CARD 9710577 documents that then."as a lack of chain of custody in the disposal of split specimens. Inadequate program design was ihntified as the probable cause.
.