ND-21-0628, Vogtie Electric Generating Plant Unit 3 - ITAAC Closure Notification on Completion of ITAAC 2.5.01.04 (Index Number 519)

From kanterella
(Redirected from ML21183A258)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Vogtie Electric Generating Plant Unit 3 - ITAAC Closure Notification on Completion of ITAAC 2.5.01.04 (Index Number 519)
ML21183A258
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 07/02/2021
From: Yox M
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
ND-21-0628
Download: ML21183A258 (7)


Text

Michael J. Yox 7825 River Road Sk. Southern Nuclear Regulatory Affairs Director Waynesboro, GA 30830 706-848-6459 tei Vogtie 3 & 4 JUL 0 2 2021 Docket No.: 52-025 ND-21-0628 10 CFR 52.99(c)(1)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001 Southern Nuclear Operating Company Vogtie Electric Generating Plant Unit 3 ITAAC Closure Notification on Completion of ITAAC 2.5.01.04 [Index Number 5191 Ladies and Gentlemen:

In accordance with 10 CFR 52.99(c)(1), the purpose of this letter is to notify the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) of the completion of Vogtie Electric Generating Plant(VEGP)

Unit 3 Inspections, Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria (ITAAC) Item 2.5.01.04 [Index Number 519]. This ITAAC verifies the Diverse Actuation System hardware and any software was developed using a planned design process which provides for specific design documentation and reviews during the design life cycle stages. The closure process for this ITAAC is based on the guidance described in NEI 08-01, "Industry Guideline for the ITAAC Closure Process under 10 CFR Part 52," which was endorsed by the NRC in Regulatory Guide 1.215.

This letter contains no new NRC regulatory commitments. Southern Nuclear Operating Company(SNC) requests NRC staff confirmation of this determination and publication of the required notice in the Federal Register per 10 CFR 52.99.

If there are any questions, please contact Kelli Roberts at 706-848-6991.

Respectfully submitted.

Michael J. Yox Regulatory Affairs Director Vogtie 3 & 4

Enclosure:

Vogtie Electric Generating Plant(VEGP) Unit 3 Completion of 2.5.01.04 [Index Number 519]

MJY/RAS/sfr

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ND-21-0628 Page 2 of 3 To:

Southern Nuclear Operating Company/ Georgia Power Company Mr. Peter P. Sena III Mr. D. L. McKinney Mr. M. D. Meier Mr. G. Chick Mr. S. Stimac Mr. P. Martino Mr. M. J. Vox Mr. A. S. Parton Ms. K. A. Roberts Mr. C. T. Defnall Mr. C. E. Morrow Mr. J. M. Fisher Mr. R. L. Belike Mr. S. Leighty Ms. A. C. Chamberlain Mr. J. C. Haswell Document Services RTYPE: VND.LI.L06 File AR.01.02.06 cc:

Nuclear Reoulatorv Commission Ms. M. Bailey Mr. M. King Mr. G. Bowman Ms. A. Veil M C. P. Patel M G. J. Khouri M C. J. Even M B. J. Kemker Ms. N. C. Coovert M . C. Welch M . J. Gaslevic M . O. Lopez-Santiago M . G. Armstrong M . M. Webb M . T. Fredette M . C. Santos M . B. Davis M . J. Vasquez M . J. Eargle M . E. Davidson M . T. Fanelli Ms. K. McCurry M . J. Parent M . B. Griman

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ND-21-0628 Page 3 of 3 Qqlethorpe Power Corporation Mr. R. B. Brinkman Mr. E. Rasmussen Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia Mr. J. E. Fuller Mr. 8. M. Jackson Dalton Utilities Mr. T. Bundros Westinahouse Electric Company. LLC Dr. L. OrianI Mr. D. C. Durham Mr. M. M. Corletti Mr. Z. 8. Harper Mr. J. L. Coward Other Mr. 8. W. Kline, Bechtel Power Corporation Ms. L. Matis, Tetra Tech NUS, Inc.

Dr. W. R. Jacobs, Jr., Ph.D., GDS Associates, Inc.

Mr. 8. Roetger, Georgia Public Service Commission Mr. R. L. Trokey, Georgia Public Service Commission Mr. K. C. Greene, Troutman Sanders Mr. 8. Blanton, Baich Bingham

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ND-21-0628 Enclosure Page 1 of 4 Southern Nuclear Operating Company ND-21-0628 Enclosure Vogtle Electric Generating Plant(VEGP) Unit 3 Completion of 2.5.01.04[Index Number 519]

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ND-21-0628 Enclosure Page 2 of 4 ITAAC Statement Design Commitment

4. The DAS hardware and any software are developed using a planned design process which provides for specific design documentation and reviews during the following life cycle stages:

a) Development phase for hardware and any software b) System test phase c) installation phase The planned design process also provides for the use of commercial off-the-shelf hardware and software.

Inspections/Tests/Analvses Inspection will be performed of the process used to design the hardware and any software.

Acceptance Criteria A report exists and concludes that the process defines the organizational responsibilities, activities, and configuration management controls for the following:

a) Documentation and review of hardware and any software.

b) Performance of tests and the documentation of test results during the system test phase.

c) Performance of tests and inspections during the installation phase.

The process also defines requirements for the use of commercial off-the-shelf hardware and software.

ITAAC Determination Basis An inspection was performed to verify that the Diverse Actuation System (DAS) hardware and software were developed using a planned design process which provides for specific design documentation and reviews during the following life cycle stages: Development phase for hardware and any software, system test phase, and Installation phase. The planned design process also provided for the use of commercial off-the-shelf hardware and software.

DAS was developed using defined processes, activities, and organizational responsibilities per APP-DAS-GEH-001 (Reference 1). The defined processes were further incorporated into the vendor's processes and procedures that include the software and hardware development life cycle (i.e., development phase, hardware and software requirements, design, manufacturing, factory testing, and delivery).

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ND-21-0628 Enclosure Page 3 of 4 An inspection of the vendor's processes and procedures used to develop and test the hardware and software was performed, and It was concluded that the processes define the organizational responsibilities, activities, and configuration management controls for documentation and review of hardware and any software, performance of tests and the documentation of test results during the system test phase, and requirements for the use of commercial off-the-shelf hardware and software. Technical report APP-GW-GLR-623,"AP1000 Design Certification ITAAC 2.5.01.04: Diverse Actuation System Design Process Technical Report"(Reference 2) documents the results of the Inspection and Includes references to vendor processes and procedures that define each of the Acceptance Criteria.

An Inspection of processes used for the performance of tests and Inspections during the Installation phase was performed. The results of this Inspection are documented In SV3-DAS-ITR-800519(Reference 3). DAS cabinets were Installed and Inspected In accordance with 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3301,"Electrical Equipment Installation"(Reference 4). The DAS Is designed using the Advanced Logic System (ALS) platform. The platform Is based on Field Programmable Gate Array(FPGA)technology that does not utilize software-based controls and does not require software loading on site. Software Installation for the DAS service unit Is per SV3-GW-GCW-0125(Reference 5). Post-Installation tests are performed per the component test procedure B-GEN-ITPCI-002(Reference 6) after completion of the system energization.

The results of the above DAS Inspections conclude that the processes define the organizational responsibilities, activities, and configuration management controls for documentation and review of hardware and any software; performance of tests and the documentation of test results during the system test phase; performance of tests and Inspections during the Installation phase; and requirements for the use of commercial off-the-shelf hardware and software.

References 1 through 6 are available for NRC Inspection as part of the Unit 3 ITAAC 2.5.01.04 Completion Package (Reference 7).

ITAAC Finding Review In accordance with plant procedures for ITAAC completion. Southern Nuclear Operating Company(SNC) performed a review of all findings pertaining to the subject ITAAC and associated corrective actions. This review found there are no relevant ITAAC findings associated with this ITAAC. The ITAAC completion review Is documented In the ITAAC Completion Package 2.5.01.04(Reference 7)and Is available for NRC review.

ITAAC Completion Statement Based on the above Information, SNC hereby notifies the NRC that ITAAC 2.5.01.04 was performed for VEGP Unit 3 and that the prescribed acceptance criteria were met.

Systems, structures, and components verified as part of this ITAAC are being maintained In their as-designed, ITAAC compliant condition In accordance with approved plant programs and procedures.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ND-21-0628 Enclosure Page 4 of 4 References(available for NRC inspection)

1. APP-DAS-GEH-001, Revision 1,"AP1000 Diverse Actuation System Design Process"
2. APP-GW-GLR-623, Revision 1,"AP1000 Design Certification ITAAC 2.5.01.04: Diverse Actuation System Design Process Technical Report"
3. SV3-DAS-iTR-800519, Revision 0,"Diverse Actuation System Design Process Summary Report: installation Phase"
4. 26139-000-4MP-T81C-N3301, Revision 5,"Electrical Equipment installation"
5. SV3-GW-GCW-0125, Revision 0,"AP1000 Vogtie Unit 3 Diverse Actuation System (DAS)

ASU PC Update and Application Ver 1.11 installation"

6. B-GEN-iTPCi-002, Revision 3,"Diverse Actuation System (DAS) Cabinets"
7. 2.5.01.04-U3-CP-Rev0, ITAAC Completion Package