IR 05000288/1992002

From kanterella
(Redirected from ML20127F320)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Insp Rept 50-288/92-02 on 921103-05 & 24.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Reactor Operations Program,Including Reactor Operations,Health Physics, Emergency Planning & Preparedness & Transportation
ML20127F320
Person / Time
Site: Reed College
Issue date: 12/21/1992
From: Pate R, Qualls P
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To:
Shared Package
ML20127F316 List:
References
50-288-92-02, 50-288-92-2, NUDOCS 9301200202
Download: ML20127F320 (4)


Text

- - - _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

!

.

U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION Y Report N /92-02 Docket N License N R-112 Licensee: Reed College 3203 S.E. Woodstock Boulevard Portland, Oregon 97202 Facility Name: Reed Reactor Facility Inspection at: Portland, Oregon Inspection Date: November 3-5, and November 24, 1992 Inspectors:

b$ Thlk@

Difeligned

. EQiialls Reactor Inspector

'

/ / / E Approved by:

E W t" . i e. C 'ef l Dile Signed Safeguards, Emergency Preparedness and Non-power Reactor Branch Summary:

Areas In1pected: Routine announced inspection by a region based inspector of the reactor operations program; including reactor operations, health physics, emergency planning and preparedness, transportation activities, and exit interview, inspection procedures 30703, 40750, and B6740 were use Reiglin In the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identifie The licensee program is fully capable of meeting their safety objective .

G PDR

-_ _

. DETAILS 1. PERSONS CONTACTED The below listed persons were contacted during the course of the inspectio * D. Dennett, Vice President / Provost

  • M. Pollock, Reactor Director
  • P. Terdal, Associate Reactor Director M. Parrott, Health Physicist
  • Attended exit meeting on November 3,199 . Class II Research and Test Reactor Operations (40750)

The inspectors reviewed the operations, health physics, emergency preparedness, and qualification training for the TRIGA reactor. The items reviewed are discussed in the following subparagraphs, Organization The inspectors reviewed the licensee's organization and found that the licensee's organization was consistent with the description of the organization described in Section I of their Technical Specifications (TS).

b, Loos and Records The inspectors reviewed selected operating logs and maintenance records for 1991 through October 1992. The inspectors noted that the records and logs were up to date with adequate information included to aroperly document facility operations. The inspectors also noted taat problems were clearly identified and documented in the logs and that the maintenance logs left a clear reviewable record of problems identified and of maintenance accomplishe Procedures Theinspectorsverifiedthattheoperat8rresponsibilitiesare clearly defined in licensee procedures. The procedures also establish review requirements for procedural changes. The inspectors reviewed operating procedures and verified that they were technically adequate and met TS requirements. The inspectors verified that the operators were using the current approved procedures, Re_qqalification Trainino The inspector reviewed selected licensed operator requalification records, t.icensee records indicated that all'requalification l

l

- --- - . - . . - -

.

. 2 requirements were being tracked and completed as required by their approved requalification pla Surveillance The inspectors reviewed selected surveillance records for the facility, including power monitoring instrumentation and fuel element inspection records. No cases of missed surveillance requirements were identified. The procedures reviewed appeared to adequately meet TS requirements Experiments The inspectors reviewed the licensee's experiment records. All early experiments had been properly reviewed and approved by facility management and the Reactor Operations Comittee (ROC).

There have been no new experiments during this inspection interva Egattor Operations Comittee The inspectors reviewed the ROC meeting minutes and audit resort The meetings appeared to be at a depth that indicated that tie ROC was very involved in reactor activities. The meetings were held as required by TS with a very good attendance record by comittee members. The inspector noted that the ROC had a well documented and comprehensive audit record. The audits were conducted as required by T }{ealth. Physics The inspectors reviewed the health physics practices at the

! facility. The radiation areas were clearly marked. Survey

records were reviewed by the inspectors and verified by conducting a confirmatory survey. The surveys were conducted at the required frequency. The inspectors verified that all survey

,

'

instrumentation observed was in calibration. The inspector conducted a confirmatory survey and verified that proper radiological posting was in place. The. inspector reviewed exposure records for 1991 and 1992 and verified that no significant personnel exposure had occurred. The inspectors noted that the low exposures received by the facility staff was indicative of an effective ALARA program. The licensee recorded one occasion when unexpected TLD readings were. received. The source of the radiation was traced to the relocating of the safe containing radioactive sources near the storage rack for employee TLD Emeroency Preparedness The inspectors verified through records review that drills were being conducted in accordance with licensee emergency plan

i l

l

.

'

. 3  :

requirements. The inspectors reviewed the licensee's emergency I plan and associated emergency procedures. The procedures l adequately implemented t1e plan requirements. The inspectors also L inspected the licensee's emergency kits and spot checked selected items with an inventory list. No deficiencies were identified with the emergency kits. The inspector discussed fire response time with mem>ers of the Portland Fire Department. Response time was on the order of a few minutes. The inspector observed walkthrough training of the fire crew by the facility staf f.gcility Tour The inspectors toured the reactor facility including the supporting mechanical, electrical, and venttiation rooms. All areas were well maintained and facility housekeeping was in orde Instrumentation was in calibration, emergency response equipment was available.and maintained, and no fire or personnel hazards were identifie Observed Facility Operations The inspectors observed reactor operation during facility training and the completion of a shutdown checklist. In all cases the facility staff performed the activity in a competent professional manner, proper procedures and checklists were used, and the activities accomplished safely and expeditiousl No violations or deviations were identifie . Transportation Activities (86740)

The inspectors verified through discussions with facility personnel that all shi?ments of radioactive materials are accomplished by the facility using tie State of Oregon license. The transfer to the. state license occurs prior to any materials leaving the facility. The inspector reviewed the transfer documents. They were generally in good order and no deficiencies were identifie No violations or deviations were identified. ,. {xit Meetina l The inspectors met with the licensee staff on November 3,1992. The

! items Itsted in this report were discussed at that time. The licensee did not identify as proprietary any of the materials provided to or reviewed by the inspector during'the inspectio :