05000259/LER-1980-068-01, /01T-0:on 800901,fire Protection Sys Insp Not Performed as Required by Tech Spec.Caused by Failure to Obtain Consultant Svcs within Specified Time Interval.Insp to Be Performed at Earliest Possible Date

/01T-0:on 800901,fire Protection Sys Insp Not Performed as Required by Tech Spec.Caused by Failure to Obtain Consultant Svcs within Specified Time Interval.Insp to Be Performed at Earliest Possible Date

ML19347A956
Person / Time
Site:	Browns Ferry
Issue date:	09/22/1980
From:	Calhoun J TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML19347A949	List: 05000259/LER-1980-068, Forwards LER 80-068/01T-0 05000259/LER-1980-068-01, /01T-0:on 800901,fire Protection Sys Insp Not Performed as Required by Tech Spec.Caused by Failure to Obtain Consultant Svcs within Specified Time Interval.Insp to Be Performed at Earliest Possible Date
References
LER-80-068-01T-01, LER-80-68-1T-1, NUDOCS 8009300567
Download: ML19347A956 (1)

LER-1980-068, /01T-0:on 800901,fire Protection Sys Insp Not Performed as Required by Tech Spec.Caused by Failure to Obtain Consultant Svcs within Specified Time Interval.Insp to Be Performed at Earliest Possible Date

Event date:
Report date:
2591980068R01 - NRC Website

text

_~

m uc*o..

6e

..uu6. u. u n o (7 77)

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT CcNractatocoI I

I 1

i i

l irtf ass mNr on Tves att nEavinEn iNPoamariom i

f oTTl l Al t.1 BI Rl Fl 1l@l 0 l 0 l - l 0 l 0 l 0 l 0 l 0 l - l 0 l 0 @l 4 l 1 l 1 l 1 l 1 l@l l

lg 8 y LICENset Coot t.

is Laccesse suaseim 20 2.

ucta st tves Jo 5 7 sA r ie CON' T 101:1 l'.3 LLJ@l 01 s 101010121 s l 91Gl o l 9 t o l i l a 10 Gl o l a 12121 a l o l@

f 8

80 66 DOcalT%unseta 80 tytNT Daf t 14

'S AtPORf DAf t 80 EVENT oEstairfioN Aa.o PaosAstE CONSEQUENCES h [TTT1 l Inspection of the fire protection systems by a qualified fire consultant was not 1

(b TTl l performed within the maximum 3-year interval as required by Technical Specification g

,,g j l 3.ll.E.2.

There was no resulting significant chain of e<e:nts and no danger to the l

I io,,,g health or sa'fety of the public. This event is coaunon to all three units. There o, ; have been ro previous similar becurrences.

i loI7Il 1

Illa ! I l

i g 9 4'-

s.sttu caust

cause

toue s.t.t CoOf Coot 50 scoot CoWONENT CCot sueCoot SUSCoot loisi l Al BJ O LA_J G LXJ @ I z I z I z I z I z I z 18 I z l@ LZ_l @

7 8

9 10 11 12 to

's is 20

$t out N fiat oCCVRRtNCE REPORT "t V '5 P N E n mO _IVENrvtan REPORf No.

Coot fvPt

%0.

@,a(y,q l8 l0 l l_l l 0l 6l 8l y

l 0l 1l g

g [0j

_v n

n 2

2.

>r 2.

n 20 2

22 EPO 'M,$'

o'A'Rr 5223

oua @I "Un?rn'

,o'.'"id.

'"A",L'J'

..fu*/f!OJr IXI@ixi@

L,zJ@

l Z'@

l i

I I

L.' J@

l Yl@

l zi@

12 l 919 1 9 1 a

s.

2 as v

.a 2

CAUSE DESCRIPTION AND CORHECTIVE ACTIONS h l i ; o i l The event was caused by a failure to obtain contracted consultant services within thej j

Q l required time it;terval. A contract for fire consultant services has baen awarded l

(and the inspection will be performed at the earliest possible date.

,,,7i

&I I

G.I

_j r

o

's'i aT cintastatus @

5'sEo'iiEv' oiscovany cascaintio= @

Powta l'I1 d @ l0l9l9[@l NA l

g gl Administrative Review l

42rivirv coltt%

".oot r o, Crivitv @ l Loe.1,0~ o,.tu t @

,u.it l i 1 1 L ZJ @o... t u.st. so 'd..@.oet.

LZJ l

N^

I N^

I t

o f,<,....,o, @

~. 0..

@L zj@l

...t I TR I 01 1 Ol NA I

6,nos tt mu',!,n onca. o~@A li b l l gIgraI Ol@l I

e 4

1 11 12 go toss OF oR oAMAGE To f actL*TV Q Tvrt US 5Caipflone v

i s l 41 1 zi@l NA i

~.t.2,v 8009300 i

N,cesEONty ttsyt u@t't SCptPT'om j

e' e

LNj l

NA O /

I lIlllll!!I lil}

-' a P

e 2 in es es go :

NAME OF PMEPARER PHONE:

e Tennessee Valley Authority Fona BF-17 Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant BF 15.2 1/10/79 LER SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION BFRO 259 / 8068 Technical Specification involved 3.ll.E.2 Reported Under Technical Specification

6. 7. 2.a (3)

Date of Occurrence 9/1/80 Time of Occurrence NA Unit 1.2.3 Identification and Description of Occurrence:

Inspection of the fire protection system by a qualified fire consultant was not performed within the 3-year interval as required by Tech. Spec 3.11.E.2.

Conditions ' Prior to Occurrence:

Unit 1 @ 99% steady state power.

Unit 2 @ 90~. steady state power.

Unit 3 @ 99% steady state power.

Action specVied in the Technical Specific.* tion Surveillance Requirements met due to inoperable equipment. Describe.

N/A 1

Apparent C ase of Occurrence:

Failure to negotiate contracts with outside consultants within the specifie.d time limit.

Analysis of Occurrence:

There was no damage to plant equipment. There was no activity release, no personnel exposure or injury and no danger to the health or safety of the public.

Corrective Action

A fire consultant services contract has been awarded and the inspectien s

~

will.be made at the earliest possible date.

Fanure Data:

N/A

• Retention :

eriod - Lifetime; Responsibility - Administrative Supervisor

• Revision:

oou