ML19207B300

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
LER 79-043/01T-1 on 790628:radwaste Sump Discharge Piping Between Drywell Penetrations & Second Containment Isolation Valves Was Not Supported Per Seismic Class I Requirements. Caused by Design Error.Supports Redesigned & Installed
ML19207B300
Person / Time
Site: Hatch Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 08/17/1979
From: Coggin C
GEORGIA POWER CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML19207B296 List:
References
LER-79-043-01T, NUDOCS 7908240362
Download: ML19207B300 (3)


Text

Update Report, Frevious kepcYt Date

, ' cor..TnoL ctccx- l 1 i l l l l@ (PLEASE PRINT O*t TYPE ALL REQUIHED INFonMATION, 7-3-79 i 6 Ic 1

[ GI vm..m AIE Cm II IH ll l@l010 l0 l 010101010 la lo 10 ml@l 4 l m111111 Il@i i ig

. > i. , m. = . m .. .  :. m.m TY,s o ,,  ; ..

'. 'T loit 3$77c's I X i@l 0 15 10 10 10 13 12 11 !@l 016121817191@l0i811171719l@

EVE'#T OE3:3 PT:ON A 0PACCA 40 E':C E S ot: I While reviewino oice suoport desicn for concrete anchor bolt surveillance purcoses, itl o i a i 1 was detemined that the rtdwaste sumo discharce pipino between the drywell penetra- I _

o Ia i i tions (X-18, X-19) and the second containment isolation '/alves (G11-F004, F020) was l' fo s I not supported per seismic Class I requirements. Thiswascontrarytothecriteriaof-l o is 1 FSAR Section 1.6.7.1. The reactor was in the refuelino mode when this deficiency was 1 -

oIi i discovered. This was not a repetitive occurrence. l Ol4 l l S Y S T ! '.' CAUSE CAu;! CO? . VALVE CO2E C002 SU?C ci CO'.tPC'J t J T C O D E SUSCODE GUBCOOE o i ?i LM I ^ !8 I B l@ I A l@ l sIJ i VI P I 01 R I T l@ l B l@ l Z l @

7 d 'A Il it 32 >8 38 20

_, S E C'.'E N T14 L OCCURAENCE REFCny R E V I S I C '.

3 aa s eiNT v E ail REPCRT NO. CCCE TYP5 . O.

@ ]*.q* l7I9' L ;l l!

23 l01413l 24 ;6 l/l 1011 l 1l l-! l 11 2:  :: 23 ;J 30 31 32 A C T ' S "J Ft 'Tu a ! EsrECT 5-ut077 PJ ATT ACH? ? t N T NPAC4 PAWF COeyp g g.j p g ., g .4 7 T A *. C ?. AC T ; 0'J O'4 Pla;a r ' tc r.ca

. wouns 22, s S?.it TTED FCR

  • t hUS. SUPPLliM M A ?a l,2 4 0 7., R C R O

, 43 43 42 43 44 47 CAUSE CE 03saTIC'. AND COR tCCTIVE ACTIONS ,

Iii i The cause nf this event was desian error The Unit 1 oinina specification did not I

!i t .1 i specify this pipe as seismic Class I. After evaluatina th3 oicing sucoorts as then I i i, I presently installed, it was determined that this pioing was not adeauately supported  ;

i i: I for the postulated seismic event. The piping supports were redesigned and installed l lii: I to meet seismic Class I recuirements. (continued)  !

7 3 3 80 F A:tu ' .

a.* r ru cp C F STAie, S PO /.E 4 07-daSTATUS DISC O\r E H Y DISCOVERY OESCRsPTIO!J i tI H @ l010l 0 l@l

- I fyA l l45D l@! Notification from A/E l I #

g eh,., . 3.{.,, il 44 4G 63 li' A*.'GU?47 OF ACTivi f Y "ELEas" (0:~5L LOC ATION OF RE LE ASF i Ij [_ ZJ M i 7! 9 ,! N/A l l N/A l 7 J * .' 44 4, go P t *'

  • y:':E u i trC nr 1 i

n cucn .c M i i 1 -i l0101Ojci<'hgl IUA l

' ' 3 So n .w . d' .

. . e c

. .a. i,,w ~n ;

i i 1 0' 0' OC.I N/A -

l 1

1 tI 33

.: m ._ ,, , ,c s "

_,u- O '7 9 0 8 2 4 0'3Q l' ] [_Zj .

M/A l

' > SJ

_. _ _ ' , , , , .;{ nnc usc cutv ,

l' ,

[_:U ., ' N/A l lIIIIII i iiii!]

o u so :

C . 1. Coni n . Sr t. Pl + Enc Sew" ,..,-. 912-267-7781  ;

P00RORGINE T

Cause Description and Corrective Actions (continued) -

This design' deficiency was resolved durir: the current refueling outage, under the enncrete expansion anchor surve llance and testing program.

i O

e

/

e e

e f

  1. ,r ; ! 'y u -

3,

flARRATIVE

SUMMARY

- (LER #50-321/1979-043)

While perforcing concrete expansion anchor surveillance evaluation for Unit 1, it wa- determined that the drywell radwaste sump discharge piping between the drywell penetrations and the second isolation valves was not supported per '

seismic Class I requiremer.ts. This was contrary to the criteria of FSAR sec-tion 1.6.7.1, and was reported under Technical Specifications 6.9.1.8.i. The reactor was in the refueling mode when this deficiency was discovered.

~

~ '

The cause of this event was design error. The Unit 1 piping specification did not specify the subject pipe as seismic Class I. It was determined that the then existing piping was not adequately supported for the postulated seis-mic event. '

This piping was analyzed and supported seismically. Implementation was accom-plished during the current refueling outage ynder the concrete expansion anch-or surveillance and testing program. ,

The similar Unit 2 piping is installed as seismic Class I.

4 7 g ',) - t Ju V1