ML17285A428

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Supply Sys Nuclear Plant 2 Annual Environ Operating Rept 1988. W/890426 Ltr
ML17285A428
Person / Time
Site: Columbia Energy Northwest icon.png
Issue date: 12/31/1988
From: Sorensen G
WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
GO2-89-072, GO2-89-72, NUDOCS 8905030128
Download: ML17285A428 (57)


Text

t, gCCE~1VTED DI BU'11ON DEMONSTRATION SYSTEM REGULATOR NFORMATION DISTRIBUTION ~TEM (RIDS)

~

p7, ACCESSION NBR:8905030128 FACIL:50-397 WPPSS DOC SEDATE:

Nuclear Project,

&~~

q/a(u/Pp NOTARIZED: NO Unit 2, Washington Public Powe DOCKET g 05000397 AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION SORENSEN,G.C. Washington Public Power Supply System RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION.

SUBJECT:

"Supply S NITe9war Plant 2 Annual Environ Operating Rept 1988." 890426 tr.

DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE2SD COPIES RECEIVED:LTR I ENCL I SIZE: 0 TITLE: Environmental Monitoring Rept (per Tech Specs)

NOTES:

RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPlENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL PDS LA 4 4 PD5 PD 1 1 SAMWORTHER 1 1

'A INTERNAL: ACRS 1 1 AEOD/DSP/TPAB 1 1 IRM TECH ADV 1 1 NRR ROTHMANER 1 1 NRR/DEST/ADE 8H 1 1 N PB 10 2 2 D NUDOCS-ABSTRACT 1 1 REG FILE 01 1 1 RGN5 DRSS/RPB 2 2 R ILE 02 1 1 5 EXTERNAL EGStG S IMPSON g F 2 2 LPDR 1 1 NRC PDR 1 1 NOZE 'LO ALL 'KIDS" R1XZPIBGS:

PLEBE HELP US 'lO REDOCE ~LSTEl 03ÃZACZ '?HE DOQJMERZ CONGKL DESK HXN Pl-37 (EXT. 20079) KO EIZMHCAXB %Ã3R MNE PKK DIPGGSOTIQN LISTS FOR DOCUMEMZS YOU DQH'T NEED!

TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 22 ENCL 22

t y.)

S WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM P.O. Box 968 ~ 3000 George Washington Way ~ Richland, Washington 99352 April 26, 1989 G02-89-072 Docket No. 50-397 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Mail Station Pl-137 Washington, DC 20555

Dear Sirs:

Subject:

NUCLEAR PLANT NO. 2 ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT

Reference:

Facility Operating License NPF-21 Appendix B Environmental Protection Plan Per Section 5.4.1 of the referenced EPP, please find attached the subject report for the 1988 calendar year.

Very truly yours, G. C. Sorensen, Manager Regulatory Programs JPC/tlr

, Attachment cc: Mr. C. J. Bosted, Resident NRC Inspector (901A)

Mr. W. L. Fitch, EFSEC Mr. J. B. Martin, Region V NRC Mr. R. B. Samworth, NRC

t 0

I r<

SUPPLY SYSTEM NUCLEAR PLANT NO.'2 ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT 1988 ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS DEPARTMENT WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM APRIL 1989 8905030128 881232 PDR ADQCK 0500039'7 R Fzu

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE Introduction ~ ~ 1 Unreviewed Environmental Questions ~ ~ 1 Cooling Tower Drift Studies. ~ ~ 1 Nonroutine Reports ~ ~ 3 NPDES Permit-Related Reports ~ ~ 3

o

0,

. INTRODUCTION The WNP-2 Environmental Protection Plan (Appendix B to Operating License No. NPF-21) addresses the protection of nonradiological environmental values during plant operation. Section 3.0 of the EPP requires that changes in plant design and operation be assessed for environmental impacts against the impacts which were projected by the NRC at. the time the plant was licensed. Changes which involve an unreviewed environmental question (defined in the EPP) must be approved by the NRC. Section 4.0 requires the reporting of events which may result in significant environmental impacts and also requires a soil and vegetation monitoring program to evaluate cooling tower drift impacts. Section 5.0 addresses administrative matters and requires an annual report on several EPP conditions including the monitoring program. This

,Annual Environmental Operating Report is submitted per Section 5.4.1 of the EPP.

UNREVIEWED ENVIRONMENTAL UESTIONS A proposed change, test, or experiment is deemed to involve an unreviewed environmental question if it concerns: (1) a matter which may result in a significant increase in any adverse environmental impact previously evaluated in the environmental licensing documentation; or (2) a significant change in effluents or power level; or (3) a matter not previously evaluated in the environmental documentation which may have a significant environmental impact (EPP Section 3.1). No design or operational changes, tests, or experiments in 1988 involved an unreviewed environmental question.

COOLING TOWER DRIFT STUDIES Section 4.2.1 of the EPP requires a monitoring program, of at least three years duration, to assess the effects of cooling tower drif . As in previous years, soil and vegetation samples were collected in May at four grassland (G01-GO4) and five shrub (SO1-SO5) sites (see Figure 1) and analyzed for relevant chemistry parameters. Analytical methods were described in the Environmental Operating Report for 1985.

Soil Chemistr Results The results of the 1988 soil chemistry analyses are provided in Table 1. The results for 1980-1988 are displayed in Figures 2 through 19. Results prior to 1985 are based on a single sample

at each location. In 1985 and succeeding years results are the of five samples collected at a station. Soils at all

. means sample sites range from sandy to sandy loam and contain a low percentage of clay. Soil pH values in the years of operation (1984-1988) are generally lower than measurements during the period before operation (see Figure 2). It is difficult to attribute this to a cooling tower effect since the lower pH is observed at all locations, including Station S05, more than four (4) miles from the towers. Soil conductivity (Figure 3) was generally within the range of previously observed values for the operational period except at Station G03 about 300 meters south of the cooling towers. With the exception of Station G03, soil sulfate concentrations at all sites were in the range of values recorded for the immediately preceding years (Figure 4).

Although Station G03 showed a substantial increase in sulfate, the concentration (approx. 18 ug/g) was less than recorded in 1985 and preoperational years 1980 and 1981.

Calcium (Figure 5) was generally lower than measurements recorded in the preceding years of operation while magnesium (Figure 6) was slightly higher compared to the same period. Sodium (Figure

7) and potassium (Figure 8) were the same or slightly elevated over the 1987 measurements at most stations. Bicarbonate concentrations (Figure 9) in 1988 continued to be at levels generally higher than recorded during the preoperational period.

Chloride concentrations (Figure 10) were much lower than in previous years at all stations. The chloride measurements at Station G03 do not trend with the conductivity results discussed above.

The results of soil metals analyses are shown in Figures 11 through 16. No trends or abnormalities are evident in. the measured concentrations of copper, lead, cadmium, chromium, nickel, and zinc.

Ve etation Chemistr Results C

The results of the 1988 vegetation chemical analyses are presented in Table 2. Total copper and extractable sulfate and P~

tectorum are shown in Figures 17, 18, and 19. Increases (as compared to all previous years) in extractable chloride were Bromus tectorum. Other measurements were within ranges observed in previous years.

Soil and Ve etation Stud Summar Although some stations show departure from means of historical data for some chemical parameters, no adverse trends or impacts are apparent from the five years of operational data. Whereas 0 the EPP requirement is three years of data supporting the no-i

adverse-impact hypothesis, future annual environmental operating reports will not report on the results of soil and vegetation chemistry studies. These studies will be continued, however, and the NRC will be informed of the observations through distribution of the annual nonradiological environmental monitoring report which is prepared for the State of Washington.

NONROUTINE REPORTS During 1988 there were no nonroutine reports required by Section 5.4.2 of the EPP nor were there any EPP noncompliances.

NPDES PERMIT-RELATED REPORTS Monthly discharge monitoring reports were submitted to the Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council (EFSEC) during 1988. A summary of the data reported is shown j.n Tables 3 and 4. There were no instances of noncompliance with the permit conditions during this period.

.4

TABLE 1 SOIL CHEMISTRY AT tfINE SAMPLE LOCATIOf'/S, HAY 1988 Gol G02 G03 G04 Sal 502 503 504 505 pH ( 1:2 soil"water ) 6. 92 6. 99 6 71 6.78 6 86 7.20 6.7? 6. 75 6. 99 Conductivity (1: 2 soil-water) microsieaens/cm 35. 3 36 6 125. 6 21.2 23 ? 61.4 43. 8 49 9 4a.s 5ulfate ug/gm 0. 40 3. 54 18. 56 0. 84 1. 44 3.72 3. 82 4. 06 4. 26 Chloride ug/gm 1. 20 l. 44 2. 48 0. 48 0. 96 1.44 1. 84 2.40 1 28 Copper ug/gm 12. 04 12. 90 11 08 9 97 10 55 9.50 12. 32 14. 04 9. 74 Lead ug/gm 4. 59 4.27 3 73 3. 08 3. 50 2.21 2. 60 3. 65 2. 29 Cadmium ug/gm 0 OBQO 0.064 0 064 0. 063 0.069 0.039 a.o85 0. 088 0. 070 Chromium ug/gm 12 00 11.90 9 48 8. 97 4 77 4.69 6.47 B. 46 7. 08 Nickel ug/gm 1,1.93 10.02 8. 64 7.78 12. 96 12.98 10.83 13. 34 9. 67 Zinc ug/gm 48. 72 50.56 47 18 45 31 47 79 28.12 47.D4 48. 51 44. 54 5odium / 0. 109 0.150 0. 108 0. 111 a.os4 0. 03D 0.089 0. 067 0. 081 Potassium Ca 1 c i um'.

/ 0. 272 0. 274 0.192 0. 154 0. 175 0. 110 0.210 0. 201

a. 24
0. 155
0. 23
0. 23 0. 23 0. 24 0. 23 0 22 0. 30 D.24 Bicart>onate (meq /HC03/gm) 0 0014 0.0023 0.0018 0.0009 0 0009 0.0035 O.DD22 0.0016 0.0025 t1agnesium / 0. 53 0 57 0. 47 0. 44 0.52 0.43 0.48 0.49 0 45

o

. TABLE 2 VEGETATION CHEMISTRY AT NINE SAMPLE LOCATIONS, MAY l988 SITR POSh BRTE SIhL PHLO POTE hRTR Copper (ug/gn) GCI 4.25 6.00 6.75 6.15 G02 3.45 5.80 6.00 4.45 G03 4.80 4.60 4.85 6.50 G04 4.35 4.80 - 4.?0 4.90 SOI 4.25 4.95 4.40 4.85 S02 5.40 - 3.75 5.75 5.40 S03 3.85 5.10 - 4.65 10.95 S04 5.80 5.05 4.50 25 '0 S05 3.95 4.40 4.15 16.55 Kxtractable Su}fate (X) GDI 0.019 0.018 0.115 0.01S G02 0.019 0.019 0 '03 0.018 G03 O.OIS 0.115 0;020 0.021 GD4 0.020 0.086 0.018 0.021 SOI 0.018 0.018 0.121 0.018 S02 0.021 - 0.018 0.021 0.018 S03 0.020 0.019 - 0.020 - 0.024 S04 0.021 0.086 0.020 - 0.022 S05 0.018 0.017 - - C.018 0.024

":xtractable Cbioriue (X) GOI 0.27 0.28 0.54 0.12 G02 0.25 0.30 0.90 0.14 G03 0.26 0.64 0.16 0.12 G04 0.17 0.49 O. ID O. Il SOI 0.19 0.27 0.50 C.CS S02 0.17 - 0.10 0.12 0.75 S03 0.27 0.14 - O.OS - 0.50 S04 0.23 0.57 0.13 - 1.38 S05 0.22 0.21 - - 0.14 0.84

  • POSA = Pea ~sandbar ii BRTE = Bromus tectorum A

PHLO = Phlox longifolia

= Purshia tritentata i PUTR ARTR = Artemisia tridentata

o 0

TABLE 3 WNP-2 LOW VOLUME WASTE DISCHARGES 1988 DAYS FLOW OIL & GREASE SUSP. SOLIDS MONTH of (gallons x 1000) (lbs/day) (lbs/day)

DSCHG Total Ave Max Ave Max Ave Max ZAN 182.5 13.0 28.7 0.15 0.83 4.86 27.70 FEB 14 181.3 13.0 30.3 0.24 1.89 3.69 17.98 12 132.6 11.1 19.4 0.05 0.14 2.16 15.35 APR 213.0 14.2 27.5 0.11 0.58 4.52 32.08 MAY 90.5 11.3 24.4 0.05 0.16 3.13 13.50 JUN 61.2 10.2 14.5 0.06 0.11 0.34 0.89 JUL 10 96.7 9.7 26.0 0 '6 0 '9 0.45 1.07 AUG 13 149.2 11.5 21.7 0.08 0.28 3.72 19.50 SEP 131.8 12.0 15.0 0.05 0.06 2.45 12.15 OCT 143.2 13.0 25.8 0.15 1.05 3.49 18.95 NOV 16 190.1 11.9 19.5 0.08 0.37 4.74 23.79 DEC 14 170.6 12.2 15.3 0.30 2.15 1.76 11.61 Permit Limit 20.0 40.0 2.50 7.00 5.00 34.00

  • Neutralization Tank releases to recirculating cooling water.

s 0,

. TABLE 4 WNP-2 COOLING WATER BLOWDOWN DISCHARGES 1988 Days pH TRC Discharge Volume Month Dschgng High Low (mg/1) (millions ofgallons)

Total Ave* Max*

Jan 27 8.3 7.9 <0.1 37.19 1.38 5.55 Feb 13 8.3 7.6 <0.1 20.94 1.61 2.37 Mar 26 8.2 6.7 <0.1 44.02 1.69 4.97 Apr 30 8.3 7.5 <0. 1 40.39 1.35 1.79 May 8.2 7.3 <0. 1 9.20 0.66 1.37 Jun 27 8.5 7.2 <0.1 31.10 1.15 3.73 Jul 31 8.5 7.8 <0.1 71.04 2.29 4.67 Aug 29 8.4 7.8 <F 1 36.08 1.24 2.49 Sep 29 8.3 7.4 <0.1 49.08 1.69 6 '1 Oct 30 8.3 7.9 <0.1 42.10 1.40 2.22 Nov 30 8.5 7.9 <0. 1 33.88 1.13 2.00 Dec 24 8.5 7 9 <0.1 24.28 1.01 1.73 Permit Limit 9.0 6.5 F 1 5.00 9.40

    • Average daily discharge during month.

Maximum daily discharge during month.

e

I i<< ~ -H

~ 0 ~ aa 0 ctoe+Nl a 0 oaaapeae OIr krkr aeaeaaeep y) .i'=

)

usa *4 I

I) I

,! Illlhl!- ill

~ ~

I ~

<<I I Ooi Il 0 I

or or uaire a)a aaae 0<< ~

I I 'rk

~

I

<<jta !t 'A ~ul Ni

+Zo

)<<i~ 0 0~ ~ I ~

~ 0)

~

Olk ~

a 'o I

I Or reikkr I

~ pea as 00 0 00<<I krak 0 aee lI ~

or ~<<

~

gpJ 0 or rkk41111 0000 0 La IX ~ Ill0 $0 Qp pg 0

~ >> <<lk I ~ Qi

'E .". IOA01114 ~

I ~7 I Crore ~ 111 ~

oark ok~

IOi

\ ~g+Q',4 4

ro Ir~ I d

<a<< I

'4 f ~

~

~

ri II I ~

o r. <<kkokr 0 ~ r k O 1 ~4 r ~.

orkrr << ~ ap

~I I<<ear

~<<I~ gI I

I~<<I

~

Oi I

ae OJ I

rr 0 0 0 0orasI11k<<101

~

a ae Iaaa ll1'lge tp r 000000 lljso rig)

/,. r li

., ~ ) +~ljj k .' N j 'k lk,kh F g 9

I

/ q ro go

.o4"<<,~

+coo. v

~

l'l/

V <<Ikek n

kk I

kkr

,0 ikr k

~ grkk FIGURE 1. SOIL 5 VEGETATION CHEMISTRY SAMPLE LOCATIONS

Q.O LEGEND Preoperational Period 1980 6.5 1981 1982 6.0 1 983 7.0 6.5 6.0 GO1 GO2 GO3 GO4 SO1 SO2 SO3 SO+ SO5 STATION Q.O LEGEND Operational Period 1 984 5.5 1985 1988 6.0 1 987 1 988

~ 7+5 7.0 5.5 5.0 GO1 GO2 GO3 GO+ SO1 SO2 SO3 SO+ SO5 STATION FIGURE 2. SOIL pH, 1980-1988

~ 4 s

200 LEGEND Preoperational Per iod 160 1980 1981 160 1982 1 983 Ch R D a ao 60 20 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 STATION 200 LEGEND Operational Period 160 1 984 1 985 100 1 988 1 987 120 1988 Z

DD CL ao 20 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 STATION FIGURE 3. SOE L CONDUCTI VI TY, 1 980-1 988

i 200 LEGEND Preoperational Period 150 1980 1981

. 1eo 1982 1 983 I 120 gg 100 R3 60 eo 20 GO1 GO2 GO3 GO4 SO1 SO2 SO3 SO4 SOS STATION LEGEND Operational Period 1 984 1 985 50 1988 1 987 20 g 1 988 10 GO1 GO2 GO3 GO4 SO1 SO2 SO3 SO4 SOS STATION FIGURE 4. SOIL SULFATE, 1980-1988

,7dO LEGEND Preoperation

~ 575 1980 1981

~ 500 1 982

.d2d 1983 I .460 o575 I mao

~ 225

~ 150

.075 G01 G02 G03 "GO+ S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 STATION

,750 LEGEND Operational Period

~ 575 1 984 1 985 AOO 1 986

.525 1 98T A50 1988 80- .575 I .mO

~ 225

~ 150

.075 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 STATION FIGURE 5. SOIL CALCIUII (wt 'A), 1980-1988

e

,60 LEGEND Preoperational Period, i72 1981 1982

. .eh

.Oe 1983 I5 Ao g

I .e2 o2h

+1d ode GO1 GO2 GO3 GO4 SO1 SO2 SO3 SO4 SO5 STATION

~ 60 LEGEND Operational Period

~ 72 1984 1985

~ dh 1988

.ee 1 987 Ae 1988 g

B5 5 AO I .m o2h

~ 1e

~ Oe GO1 GO2 GO3 GO4 SO1 SO2 SO3 SO4 SO5 STATION FIGURE 6. SOiL MAGNESIUM (wt /), 1981-1988

s I

I i

,20 Preoperational Period

~ 1b 1980 1981

~ 1d 1 982

~ 14 1 983

,12 g

ga +..10 f5 Oy I 20b

.Od

.04

~ 02 C01 602 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 STATION

~ 20 LEGEND

~ 1d Operational Period 1984 1 985

~ 1d 1986

~ 14 1 987 II ,'I 2 1988 22 .10 Rh I .Od

.Od

.04

~ 02 G01 G02 GO3 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 SO5 STATION FIGURE 7 ~ SO IL SOOIU I (Ult %) 1 980 1 988

<<50 LEG ENO Preoperational Period 1980 1981 1982 35

~

1 983

<<15

<<10

~ 05 GO1 GO2 GO3 GO4 SO1 SO2 SO3 SO4 SO5 STATION

<<50 Operational Period 1984 1985 1986 1987 ss 1988 g

g~5 .ss fgI .~0

~ 15

<<10

.05 GO1 GO2 GO3 GO4 SO1 SO2 SO3 SO4 SO5 STATION FIGURE 8 ~ SOIL POTASSIUM (Nt %) 1 980-1 988

LEGEND Pr eoperational Per iod 1980 1981 1982 1983 X

LLI 16 10 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02'03 S04 S05 STATION LEGEND Operational Period 1984 1985 1986 1 987 1988 X

10 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 STATION FIGURE 9, SOIL BICARBONATE, 1980-1988

20 LEGEND Preoperational Period 1 980 1981 1d 1 982 1983 I

w cn 12 5

G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 SOS STATION 20 LEGEND Operational Period 1d 1 984 1 985 1d 1986 1 987 g 12 1 988 W Cn mgC9 10 Q

CD M O d G01 GO2 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 STATION FIGURE 10. SOIL CHLORIDE, 1980-1988

15.0 LEGEND Preoperational Period 1980 1 5.5 1981 15.0 1 982 1 983 15.5 o

~g ED I 12.0 5

10.5 Q.o 7.5 e.o G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 STATION 1510 LEGEND Operational Period 1 984 1 e.b 1985 15.0 1986 1 987 15.5 1988 8I 11 120 co 5

1O.5 Q.o 7,5 e.o G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 STATION FIGURE 11. SOIL COPPER, 1980-1988

LEGEND Preoperational Period 1980 1981 1982 1983 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 SOS STATION LEGEND Operational Period 1984 1985 1986 1 987 1988 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 STATION FIGURE 12. SOIL LEAD, 1980-1988

- ~

+40 LEGEND Preoperational Period i72 1980 1981

.4+

1982

~ .de 1 983 g .48 RI go AO CK CJ o52

~ 24

~ 14

+04 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 502 S03 S04 S05 STATION

,40 LEGEND Operational Period 072 1984 1 985

.e+

1988

.ed 1 987 g .48 1988 Hg AO 83

~ 42

~ 24

~ 14

.04 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 STATION FIGURE 13. SOIL CAO<IIUti, 1980-1 988

-S 22.0 LEGEND Preoperational Per iod 1 Ql5 1980 1981 1725 1982

~ 15A 1983 I 12 2 Q 11.0 Rg OO 5.5 b.b 2.2 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 SOS STATION 22.0 LEGEND Operational Period 1 Q.b 1984 1 985 17.5 1986 15.4 1 987 I 12.2 1988 B~~

Q 11.0

~ C5 cD CD oo 5.5 b.b 2.2 G01 G02 Q03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 STATION FIGURE 14. SOIL CHROMIUC~I, 1980-1984

"r

~ 0

2d.0 LEGEND Preoperational Period 23.+ 1980 .,

1981 20.5 1982 18.2 1 983 I 1d.d Cd.d CD Ro 10.4 7.d 5.2 Zdd GO1 GO2 603 GO4 SO1 SO2 SO3 SO4 SO5 STATION 2d.0 LEGEND Operational Period 25.+ 1984 1985 20.5 1986

,1 d.2 1 987 g ld.d 1988 gC3 g 1d.d M~

Q 1 0+4 7.8 8.2 2.d GO1 GO2 GO3 GO4 SO1 SO2 SO3 SO4 SO5 STATION FIGURE 15. SOI L NI CKEL, 1 980-1 988

~ ~

O.

LEGEND Preoperational Period 1980 1981 1982 1983 do 5

30 20 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 STATION 70 LEGEND Operational Period dd 1984 1 985 60 1986 dd 1 987 g dd 1988 2d 20 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 STATION FIGURE 16. SOIL ZINC, 1980-19SS

~ a

10 LEGEND Poa ~sandbar ii 1980 1981 1982 1 983 Ig d 1984 1985 d

1986 198T 1988 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 STATION 20 LEGEND Bromus tectorum 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 hm" 1985

~~g 1d 1986 198T 1988 G01. G02 G03 GO+ S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 STATION FIGURE 17. COPPER IN VEGETATION, 1980-1988

.0

~ 20 LEGEND

~ 15 Poa ~sandbar ii 1980 1981

~ 15 1982 1 983 1984 1985 1988

- .05 1987

.05 1988

.04

.02 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 STATlON

~ 3dO LEGEND

<<315 Bromus tectorum 1980 1981

<<250 1982

<<245 1 983

.210 1984 C

R 17d 1985

~

1988 1987

<<10d 1988

.070

.035 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 STATION FIGURE 18. SULFATE IN VEGETATION, 1980-1988

0(

, ~

.50 LEGEND Pea ~sandbar ii 1980 1981

. W

~ 55 1982 1983

.50 1984 cR 9

5 e25 1985 1986 1987

~ 15 1988 10

.05 GO1 GO2 GO3 GO+ So 1 SO2 SO3 SO+ SO5 STATION

~ 40 LEGEND Bromus tectorum

.54 1980 1981 1982

.+2 1983 I8 Laj A4 1984

.50 1 985 1986 5 .2g 1 987 15 1988 e12 e04 GO1 GO2 GO3 GO@ SOl SO2 SO3 SO4 SOS STATION FIGURE 19. CHLORIOE EN YEGETATION, 1980-1988 I

~