GO2-89-072, Supply Sys Nuclear Plant 2 Annual Environ Operating Rept 1988
| ML17285A428 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Columbia  |
| Issue date: | 12/31/1988 |
| From: | Sorensen G WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| GO2-89-072, GO2-89-72, NUDOCS 8905030128 | |
| Download: ML17285A428 (57) | |
Text
t, gCCE~1VTED DI BU'11ON DEMONSTRATION SYSTEM REGULATOR NFORMATION DISTRIBUTION ~TEM (RIDS) p7, q/a(u/Pp
~ ACCESSION NBR:8905030128 DOC SEDATE: &~~
NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET g FACIL:50-397 WPPSS Nuclear Project, Unit 2, Washington Public Powe 05000397 AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION SORENSEN,G.C.
Washington Public Power Supply System RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION.
SUBJECT:
"Supply S
NITe9war Plant 2 Annual Environ Operating Rept 1988."
890426 tr.
DISTRIBUTION CODE:
IE2SD COPIES RECEIVED:LTR I ENCL I
SIZE:
0 TITLE: Environmental Monitoring Rept (per Tech Specs)
NOTES:
RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PDS LA SAMWORTHER INTERNAL: ACRS IRM TECH ADV NRR/DEST/ADE 8H NUDOCS-ABSTRACT RGN5 DRSS/RPB EXTERNAL EGStG S IMPSON g F NRC PDR COPIES LTTR ENCL 4
4 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 2
2 2
2 1
1 RECIPlENT ID CODE/NAME PD5 PD AEOD/DSP/TPAB NRR ROTHMANER N
PB 10 REG FILE 01 R
ILE 02 LPDR COPIES LTTR ENCL 1
1 1
1 1
1 2
2 1
1 1
1 1
1
'A D
5 NOZE 'LO ALL 'KIDS" R1XZPIBGS:
PLEBE HELP US 'lO REDOCE ~LSTEl 03ÃZACZ '?HE DOQJMERZ CONGKL DESK HXN Pl-37 (EXT. 20079)
KO EIZMHCAXB %Ã3R MNE PKK DIPGGSOTIQN LISTS FOR DOCUMEMZS YOU DQH'T NEED!
TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED:
LTTR 22 ENCL 22
t y.)
S WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM P.O. Box 968
~ 3000 George Washington Way
~ Richland, Washington 99352 April 26, 1989 G02-89-072 Docket No. 50-397 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn:
Document Control Desk Mail Station Pl-137 Washington, DC 20555
Dear Sirs:
Subject:
NUCLEAR PLANT NO.
2 ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT
Reference:
Facility Operating License NPF-21 Appendix B
Environmental Protection Plan Per Section 5.4.1 of the referenced
- EPP, please find attached the subject report for the 1988 calendar year.
Very truly yours, G.
C. Sorensen, Manager Regulatory Programs JPC/tlr
, Attachment cc:
Mr. C. J.
- Bosted, Resident NRC Inspector (901A)
Mr.
W. L. Fitch, EFSEC Mr. J.
B. Martin, Region V
NRC Mr. R.
B. Samworth, NRC
0 t
I r<
SUPPLY SYSTEM NUCLEAR PLANT NO.'2 ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT 1988 ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS DEPARTMENT WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM APRIL 1989 8905030128 881232 PDR ADQCK 0500039'7 R
Fzu
TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE Introduction Unreviewed Environmental Questions Cooling Tower Drift Studies.
Nonroutine Reports NPDES Permit-Related Reports
~
~
1
~
~
1
~
~
1
~
~
3
~
~
3
o
0, INTRODUCTION The WNP-2 Environmental Protection Plan (Appendix B to Operating License No. NPF-21) addresses the protection of nonradiological environmental values during plant operation.
Section 3.0 of the EPP requires that changes in plant design and operation be assessed for environmental impacts against the impacts which were projected by the NRC at. the time the plant was licensed.
Changes which involve an unreviewed environmental question (defined in the EPP) must be approved by the NRC.
Section 4.0 requires the reporting of events which may result in significant environmental impacts and also requires a soil and vegetation monitoring program to evaluate cooling tower drift impacts.
Section 5.0 addresses administrative matters and requires an annual report on several EPP conditions including the monitoring program.
This
,Annual Environmental Operating Report is submitted per Section 5.4.1 of the EPP.
UNREVIEWED ENVIRONMENTAL UESTIONS A proposed
- change, test, or experiment is deemed to involve an unreviewed environmental question if it concerns:
(1) a matter which may result in a significant increase in any adverse environmental impact previously evaluated in the environmental licensing documentation; or (2) a significant change in effluents or power level; or (3) a matter not previously evaluated in the environmental documentation which may have a significant environmental impact (EPP Section 3.1).
No design or operational
- changes, tests, or experiments in 1988 involved an unreviewed environmental question.
COOLING TOWER DRIFT STUDIES Section 4.2.1 of the EPP requires a monitoring program, of at least three years duration, to assess the effects of cooling tower drif.
As in previous years, soil and vegetation samples were collected in May at four grassland (G01-GO4) and five shrub (SO1-SO5) sites (see Figure 1) and analyzed for relevant chemistry parameters.
Analytical methods were described in the Environmental Operating Report for 1985.
Soil Chemistr Results The results of the 1988 soil chemistry analyses are provided in Table 1.
The results for 1980-1988 are displayed in Figures 2
through 19.
Results prior to 1985 are based on a single sample
at each location.
In 1985 and succeeding years results are the means of five samples collected at a station.
Soils at all sample sites range from sandy to sandy loam and contain a low percentage of clay.
Soil pH values in the years of operation (1984-1988) are generally lower than measurements during the period before operation (see Figure 2). It is difficult to attribute this to a cooling tower effect since the lower pH is observed at all locations, including Station S05, more than four (4) miles from the towers.
Soil conductivity (Figure 3) was generally within the range of previously observed values for the operational period except at Station G03 about 300 meters south of the cooling towers.
With the exception of Station G03, soil sulfate concentrations at all sites were in the range of values recorded for the immediately preceding years (Figure 4).
Although Station G03 showed a substantial increase in sulfate, the concentration (approx.
18 ug/g) was less than recorded in 1985 and preoperational years 1980 and 1981.
Calcium (Figure 5) was generally lower than measurements recorded in the preceding years of operation while magnesium (Figure 6) was slightly higher compared to the same period.
Sodium (Figure 7) and potassium (Figure 8) were the same or slightly elevated over the 1987 measurements at most stations.
Bicarbonate concentrations (Figure 9) in 1988 continued to be at levels generally higher than recorded during the preoperational period.
Chloride concentrations (Figure 10) were much lower than in previous years at all stations.
The chloride measurements at Station G03 do not trend with the conductivity results discussed above.
The results of soil metals analyses are shown in Figures 11 through 16.
No trends or abnormalities are evident in. the measured concentrations of copper,
Ve etation Chemistr Results C
The results of the 1988 vegetation chemical analyses are presented in Table 2.
Total copper and extractable sulfate and P~
tectorum are shown in Figures 17, 18, and 19.
Increases (as compared to all previous years) in extractable chloride were Bromus tectorum.
Other measurements were within ranges observed in previous years.
Soil and Ve etation Stud Summar 0i Although some stations show departure from means of historical data for some chemical parameters, no adverse trends or impacts are apparent from the five years of operational data.
Whereas the EPP requirement is three years of data supporting the no-
adverse-impact hypothesis, future annual environmental operating reports will not report on the results of soil and vegetation chemistry studies.
These studies will be continued,
- however, and the NRC will be informed of the observations through distribution of the annual nonradiological environmental monitoring report which is prepared for the State of Washington.
NONROUTINE REPORTS During 1988 there were no nonroutine reports required by Section 5.4.2 of the EPP nor were there any EPP noncompliances.
NPDES PERMIT-RELATED REPORTS Monthly discharge monitoring reports were submitted to the Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council (EFSEC) during 1988.
A summary of the data reported is shown j.n Tables 3 and 4.
There were no instances of noncompliance with the permit conditions during this period.
.4
TABLE 1
SOIL CHEMISTRY AT tfINE SAMPLE LOCATIOf'/S, HAY 1988 Gol G02 G03 G04 Sal 502 503 504 505 pH ( 1:2 soil"water )
- 6. 92
- 6. 99 6 71 6.78 6 86 7.20 6.7?
- 6. 75
- 6. 99 Conductivity (1: 2 soil-water) microsieaens/cm 5ulfate ug/gm Chloride ug/gm Copper ug/gm Lead ug/gm Cadmium ug/gm Chromium ug/gm Nickel ug/gm Zinc ug/gm 5odium /
Ca 1 cium'.
Bicart>onate (meq /HC03/gm) t1agnesium /
- 35. 3
- 0. 40
- 1. 20
- 12. 04
- 4. 59 0
OBQO 12 00 1,1.93
- 48. 72
- 0. 109
- 0. 272
- 0. 23 0 0014
- 0. 53 36 6
- 3. 54
- l. 44
- 12. 90 4.27 0.064 11.90 10.02 50.56 0.150
- 0. 274
- 0. 23 0.0023 0 57 125. 6
- 18. 56
- 2. 48 11 08 3 73 0 064 9 48
- 8. 64 47 18
- 0. 108 0.192
- 0. 24 0.0018
- 0. 47 21.2
- 0. 84
- 0. 48 9 97
- 3. 08
- 0. 063
- 8. 97 7.78 45 31
- 0. 111
- 0. 154
- 0. 23 0.0009
- 0. 44 23 ?
- 1. 44
- 0. 96 10 55
- 3. 50 0.069 4 77
- 12. 96 47 79 a.os4
- 0. 175 0 22 0 0009 0.52 61.4 3.72 1.44 9.50 2.21 0.039 4.69 12.98 28.12
- 0. 03D
- 0. 110
- 0. 30 0.0035 0.43
- 43. 8
- 3. 82
- 1. 84
- 12. 32
- 2. 60 a.o85 6.47 10.83 47.D4 0.089 0.210 D.24 O.DD22 0.48 49 9
- 4. 06 2.40
- 14. 04
- 3. 65
- 0. 088 B. 46
- 13. 34
- 48. 51
- 0. 067
- 0. 201
- a. 24 0.0016 0.49 4a.s
- 4. 26 1 28
- 9. 74
- 2. 29
- 0. 070
- 7. 08
- 9. 67
- 44. 54
- 0. 081
- 0. 155
- 0. 23 0.0025 0 45
o
TABLE 2 VEGETATION CHEMISTRY AT NINE SAMPLE LOCATIONS, MAY l988 SITR POSh BRTE SIhL PHLO POTE hRTR Copper (ug/gn)
GCI G02 G03 G04 SOI S02 S03 S04 S05 4.25 6.00 6.75 6.15 3.45 5.80 6.00 4.45 4.80 4.60 4.85 4.35 4.80 4.?0 4.25 4.95 4.40 4.85 5.40 3.75 3.85 5.10 4.65 5.80 5.05 4.50 3.95 4.40 6.50 4.90 5.75 5.40 10.95 25'0 4.15 16.55 Kxtractable Su}fate (X)
GDI G02 G03 GD4 SOI S02 S03 S04 S05 0.019 0.018 0.115 0.01S 0.019 0.019 0 '03 0.018 O.OIS 0.115 0;020 0.021 0.020 0.086 0.018 0.021 0.018 0.018 0.121 0.018 0.021 0.018 0.021 0.018 0.020 0.019 0.020 0.024 0.021 0.086 0.020 0.022 0.018 0.017 C.018 0.024
":xtractable Cbioriue (X)
GOI G02 G03 G04 SOI S02 S03 S04 S05 0.27 0.28 0.54 0.12 0.25 0.30 0.90 0.14 0.26 0.64 0.16 0.12 0.17 0.49 O. ID O. Il 0.19 0.27 0.50 C.CS 0.17 0.10 0.12 0.75 0.27 0.14 O.OS 0.50 0.23 0.57 0.13 1.38 0.22 0.21 0.14 0.84 i
- POSA
=
Pea
~sandbar ii BRTE
= Bromus tectorum A
PHLO = Phlox longifolia PUTR = Purshia tritentata ARTR = Artemisia tridentata
o 0
TABLE 3 WNP-2 LOW VOLUME WASTE DISCHARGES 1988 MONTH ZAN FEB APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC DAYS of DSCHG 14 12 10 13 16 14 FLOW (gallons x 1000)
Total Ave Max 182.5 13.0 28.7 181.3 13.0 30.3 132.6 11.1 19.4 213.0 14.2 27.5 90.5 11.3 24.4 61.2 10.2 14.5 96.7 9.7 26.0 149.2 11.5 21.7 131.8 12.0 15.0 143.2 13.0 25.8 190.1 11.9 19.5 170.6 12.2 15.3 OIL & GREASE (lbs/day)
Ave Max 0.15 0.83 0.24 1.89 0.05 0.14 0.11 0.58 0.05 0.16 0.06 0.11 0'6 0'9 0.08 0.28 0.05 0.06 0.15 1.05 0.08 0.37 0.30 2.15 SUSP.
SOLIDS (lbs/day)
Ave Max 4.86 27.70 3.69 17.98 2.16 15.35 4.52 32.08 3.13 13.50 0.34 0.89 0.45 1.07 3.72 19.50 2.45 12.15 3.49 18.95 4.74 23.79 1.76 11.61 Permit Limit 20.0 40.0 2.50 7.00 5.00 34.00
- Neutralization Tank releases to recirculating cooling water.
s
0, TABLE 4 WNP-2 COOLING WATER BLOWDOWN DISCHARGES 1988 Month Jan Feb Mar Days Dschgng 27 13 26 pH High Low 8.3 7.9 8.3 7.6 8.2 6.7 TRC (mg/1)
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1 Discharge Volume (millions ofgallons)
Total Ave*
Max*
37.19 1.38 5.55 20.94 1.61 2.37 44.02 1.69 4.97 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Permit Limit 30 27 31 29 29 30 30 24 8.3 7.5 8.2 7.3 8.5 7.2 8.5 7.8 8.4 7.8 8.3 7.4 8.3 7.9 8.5 7.9 8.5 7
9 9.0 6.5
<0. 1
<0. 1
<0.1
<0.1
<F 1
<0.1
<0.1
<0. 1
<0.1 F 1 40.39 1.35 1.79 9.20 0.66 1.37 31.10 1.15 3.73 71.04 2.29 4.67 36.08 1.24 2.49 49.08 1.69 6'1 42.10 1.40 2.22 33.88 1.13 2.00 24.28 1.01 1.73 5.00 9.40 Average daily discharge during month.
- Maximum daily discharge during month.
e
Il 0
~ 0 ~ aa I
I 0ctoe+Nla 0 or OIrkrkr oaaapeae aeaeaaeep or uaire a)a aaae
)<<i~
~ $
0<< ~
I 0 I 0 ~
~
~I
~
I
<<I I
~
~
~ I
'rk~
I y).i'= )
,!Illlhl!-
<<jta !t 'A Olk i<<
usa
~ Ooi ulNi
+Zo
~ -H
- 4 I I)ill
~ 0)
~>>
<<lk a
~gpJ
~pea as 00 or 0
4 ro
'E
~7 I Crore I
IOi Q',4
\\ ~g+
0 00<<I or rkk41111 0000 0 I
~
IOA01114
~
'o krak
~ <<La
~ 111 ~
I Or reikkr
~
0aee lI Ir~ I d
I I
IX Qi I
~
Ill0$0 Qp pg 0
~ ~
<a
~
oark ok~
<< I ri f
~
'4 ~ ~
II orkrr
~I gI
~
~<<I~ I~<<I I
~
I 0 000 as a ae or 11k<<101 Iaaa k O I<<ear Oi ae I
or. <<kkokr 0
1
~4 r
OJ
~ r
~.
<< ~
I rr ll1'lge ap tpr 000000 lljso rig)
/
.o4"<<,~
+coo. v
/,. r li., ~ )
lk,kh F Iq
- V <<Ikek/
+
k N
j
'k g ~ljj 9
ro go n
~l'l ikr kk I
kkr
,0 k
~grkk FIGURE 1.
SOIL 5 VEGETATION CHEMISTRY SAMPLE LOCATIONS
Q.O 6.5 6.0 Preoperational Period LEGEND 1980 1981 1982 1 983 7.0 6.5 6.0 Q.O GO1 GO2 GO3 GO4 SO1 SO2 SO3 SO+
SO5 STATION LEGEND 5.5 6.0 Operational Period 1 984 1985 1988 1 987 1 988
~ 7+5 7.0 5.5 5.0 GO1 GO2 GO3 GO+
SO1 SO2 SO3 SO+
SO5 STATION FIGURE 2.
SOIL pH, 1980-1988
~ 4 s
200 160 160 Preoperational Per iod LEGEND 1980 1981 1982 1 983 ChR D ao a
60 20 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 STATION 200 160 100 120 Operational Period LEGEND 1 984 1 985 1 988 1 987 1988 Z D D CL ao 20 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 STATION FIGURE 3.
SOE L CONDUCTIVITY, 1 980-1 988
i
200 150 1eo I 120 gg 100 R3 60 Preoperational Period LEGEND 1980 1981 1982 1 983 eo 20 50 g
20 GO1 GO2 GO3 GO4 SO1 SO2 SO3 SO4 SOS STATION Operational Period LEGEND 1 984 1 985 1988 1 987 1 988 10 GO1 GO2 GO3 GO4 SO1 SO2 SO3 SO4 SOS STATION FIGURE 4.
SOIL SULFATE, 1980-1988
,7dO
~575
~500
.d2d Preoperation LEGEND 1980 1981 1 982 1983 I
.460 o575 I mao
~225
~150
.075
,750
~575 AOO
.525 A50 80-
.575 I.mO G01 G02 G03 "GO+
S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 STATION Operational Period LEGEND 1 984 1 985 1 986 1 98T 1988
~225
~150
.075 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 STATION FIGURE 5.
SOIL CALCIUII (wt 'A), 1980-1988
e
,60 i72
.eh
.Oe Preoperational
- Period, LEGEND 1981 1982 1983 I
Ao 5
g I.e2 o2h
+1d ode
~60
~72
~dh
.ee g Ae 5B5 AO I.m GO1 GO2 GO3 GO4 SO1 SO2 SO3 SO4 SO5 STATION Operational Period LEGEND 1984 1985 1988 1 987 1988 o2h
~1e
~Oe GO1 GO2 GO3 GO4 SO1 SO2 SO3 SO4 SO5 STATION FIGURE 6.
SOiL MAGNESIUM (wt /), 1981-1988
s I
I i
,20
~1b
~1d
~14 Preoperational Period 1980 1981 1 982 1 983 g
,12 g f5 a +..10 OyI 20b
.Od
.04
~02
~20
~1d
~1d
~14 I
,'I 2 22I.10 RhI.Od C01 602 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 STATION Operational Period LEGEND 1984 1 985 1986 1 987 1988
.Od
.04
~02 G01 G02 GO3 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 SO5 STATION FIGURE 7 ~
SO I L SOOIU I (Ult %)
1 980 1 988
<<50
~35 Preoperational Period LEGENO 1980 1981 1982 1 983
<<15
<<10
~05
<<50 g
ss 5
g~
.ss fgI.~0 GO1 GO2 GO3 GO4 SO1 SO2 SO3 SO4 SO5 STATION Operational Period 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988
~15
<<10
.05 GO1 GO2 GO3 GO4 SO1 SO2 SO3 SO4 SO5 STATION FIGURE 8 ~
SOIL POTASSIUM (Nt
%)
1 980-1 988
Pr eoperational Per iod LEGEND 1980 1981 1982 1983 X
LLI 16 10 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02'03 S04 S05 STATION Operational Period LEGEND 1984 1985 1986 1 987 1988 X
10 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 STATION FIGURE 9, SOIL BICARBONATE, 1980-1988
20 1d I
12 w cn 5
Preoperational Period LEGEND 1 980 1981 1 982 1983 20 1d 1d g 12 W Cn mg 10 Q
C9 CD M O
d G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 SOS STATION Operational Period LEGEND 1 984 1 985 1986 1 987 1 988 G01 GO2 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 STATION FIGURE 10.
SOIL CHLORIDE, 1980-1988
15.0 1 5.5 15.0 15.5 o I 12.0
~g ED 5
10.5 Preoperational Period LEGEND 1980 1981 1 982 1 983 Q.o 7.5 e.o 1510 1 e.b 15.0 15.5 11 I 120 8 co 5
1O.5 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 STATION Operational Period LEGEND 1 984 1985 1986 1 987 1988 Q.o 7,5 e.o G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 STATION FIGURE 11.
SOIL COPPER, 1980-1988
Preoperational Period LEGEND 1980 1981 1982 1983 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 SOS STATION Operational Period LEGEND 1984 1985 1986 1 987 1988 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 STATION FIGURE 12.
SOIL LEAD, 1980-1988
-~
~
+40 i72
.4+
.de g
.48 RI AO go CK CJ o52 Preoperational Period LEGEND 1980 1981 1982 1 983
~24
~14
+04
,40 072
.e+
.ed g
.48 Hg AO 83
~42 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 502 S03 S04 S05 STATION Operational Period LEGEND 1984 1 985 1988 1 987 1988
~24
~14
.04 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 STATION FIGURE 13.
SOIL CAO<IIUti, 1980-1 988
-S
~
22.0 1 Ql5 1725 15A I 12 2 Q
11.0 Rg O O 5.5 Preoperational Per iod LEGEND 1980 1981 1982 1983 b.b 2.2 22.0 1 Q.b 17.5 15.4 I 12.2 B~~
Q 11.0
~ C5 cD CD oo 5.5 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 SOS STATION Operational Period LEGEND 1984 1 985 1986 1 987 1988 b.b 2.2 G01 G02 Q03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 STATION FIGURE 14.
SOIL CHROMIUC~I, 1980-1984
"r
~ 0
2d.0 23.+
20.5 18.2 I 1d.d Cd.d CDRo 10.4 Preoperational Period LEGEND 1980 1981 1982 1 983 7.d 5.2 Zdd 2d.0 25.+
20.5
,1 d.2 g
ld.d g g 1d.d C3 ~
M Q 1 0+4 GO1 GO2 603 GO4 SO1 SO2 SO3 SO4 SO5 STATION Operational Period LEGEND 1984 1985 1986 1 987 1988 7.8 8.2 2.d GO1 GO2 GO3 GO4 SO1 SO2 SO3 SO4 SO5 STATION FIGURE 15.
SOI L NICKEL, 1 980-1 988
~ ~
O.
Preoperational Period LEGEND 1980 1981 1982 1983 5 do 30 20 70 dd 60 dd g dd G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 STATION Operational Period LEGEND 1984 1 985 1986 1 987 1988 2d 20 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 STATION FIGURE 16.
SOIL ZINC, 1980-19SS
~ a
10 Ig d
d Poa
~sandbar ii LEGEND 1980 1981 1982 1 983 1984 1985 1986 198T 1988 20 hm"
~~g 1d G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 STATION Bromus tectorum LEGEND 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 198T 1988 G01.
G02 G03 GO+
S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 STATION FIGURE 17.
COPPER IN VEGETATION, 1980-1988
.0
~20
~15
~15
-.05
.05 Poa
~sandbar ii LEGEND 1980 1981 1982 1 983 1984 1985 1988 1987 1988
.04
.02
~3dO G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 STATlON LEGEND
<<315
<<250
<<245
.210 C
R
~17d Bromus tectorum 1980 1981 1982 1 983 1984 1985 1988
<<10d 1987 1988
.070
.035 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 STATION FIGURE 18.
SULFATE IN VEGETATION, 1980-1988
0(
, ~
.50
~55 W
cR
.50 95 e25
~15 Pea
~sandbar ii LEGEND 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 10
.05
~40
.54
.+2 LajI A4 8
.50 5
.2g 15 GO1 GO2 GO3 GO+
So 1 SO2 SO3 SO+
SO5 STATION Bromus tectorum LEGEND 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1 985 1986 1 987 1988 e12 e04 GO1 GO2 GO3 GO@
SOl SO2 SO3 SO4 SOS STATION I~
FIGURE 19.
CHLORIOE EN YEGETATION, 1980-1988