GNRO-2015/00044, Report Pursuant to 10 CFR 71.95 (a)(3) and (B) of Two Potential Instances of Noncompliance with Certificate of Compliance No. 9168/B(U)-96 for the 8-120B/002-8 Cask
| ML15208A495 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Grand Gulf, 07109168 |
| Issue date: | 07/27/2015 |
| From: | Nadeau J Entergy Operations |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards |
| References | |
| GNRO-2015/00044 | |
| Download: ML15208A495 (8) | |
Text
Q
~Entergy GNRO-2015/00044 July 27,2015 u.s. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn:
Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001 Entergy Operations, Inc.
P. O. Box 756 Port Gibson, MS 39150 James Nadeau Manager, Regulatory Assurance Grand Gulf Nuclear Station Tel. (601) 437-2103
SUBJECT:
REFERENCE:
Dear Sir or Madam:
Report Pursuant to 10 CFR 71.95 (a)(3) and (b) of two potential instances of noncompliance with Certificate of Compliance No. 9168/B(U)-96 for the 8-120B/002-8 Cask Grand Gulf Nuclear Station, Unit 1 Docket No. 50-416 License No. NPF-29 1.
Energy Solutions Letter ES-CD-O-2015-002 - 10 CFR 71.95 Report on the 8-120B Cask Entergy Operations, Inc. (Entergy) hereby submits this report pursuant to Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 71.95(a)(3) and (b) regarding two potential instances in which the conditions of approval in Certificate of Compliance (CoC) for the 8-120B/002-8 Cask CoC No.
9168/B(U)-96 may not have been met when making shipments from Grand Gulf Nuclear Station (GGNS). The potential instances of noncompliance with the CoC occurred on October 27,2014 and November 10,2014.
Energy Solutions notified Entergy of their concerns associated with the CoC on June 24, 2015.
Entergy immediately investigated its shipment history to determine if the shipping package in question had been used by GGNS to ship radioactive materials. Two instances were identified. of this letter provides a detailed list of the CoC noncompliance instances. This attachment includes the shipment numbers, shipment dates, material shipped, and the final destination of each shipment.
Energy Solutions, in Reference 1, documented the as-built discrepancy and determined that the package was not adversely affected by the identified discrepancy. Further, their evaluation determined that the discrepancy did not represent a public health and safety concern. The bases for the conclusions were documented in Attachment to Energy Solutions Letter ES-CD-O-2015-002.
To prevent recurrence Entergy will work with its vendor to ensure all future shipments are made with a shipping package that is in full compliance with its associated CoCo
GNRO-2014/00044 Page 2 of 2 This letter contains no new commitments. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact James Nadeau at 601-437-2103.
IN/ram
Attachment:
Details on Certificate of Compliance Potential Violations cc:
u.s. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Mr. A. Wang, NRR/DORL Mail Stop OWFN/8 G14 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2378 NRC Senior Resident Inspector Grand Gulf Nuclear Station Port Gibson, MS 39150 u.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Director, Division of Spent Fuel Storage and Transportation, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, Washington, DC 20555-00001
- u. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Marc L. Dapas (w/2)
Regional Administrator, Region IV 1600 East Lamar Boulevard Arlington, TX 76011-4511
GNRO-2015/00044 bee:
OUTLOOK MAIL:
DISTRIBUTION IS ALL ELECTRONIC Brumfield N. T.
(RB-R&PI)
Busick R. D.
(GG-OPS)
Chase M.L.
(Acting - W3-R&PI)
Clark J. A.
(RB-RA)
Coutu T.
(GG-R&PI)
Ford B. S.
(ECH-NS&L)
Fallacara V.
(GG-GMPO)
Meaders E.A.
(GG-TRNG)
OTHER - Licensing Files LRS_DOCS (GNRI or GNRO)
GGN CENTRAL FILE (1 )
GGN PLANT LICENSING GGN\\RBS SRC ALL LER's ALL RESPONSE TO VIOLATIONS James D. E.
(ANO-R&PI)
Ellis D. R.
(Acting - GG-EP)
McCann J. F.
(WP-VP)
Mulligan K. J.
(GG-VP)
Jarrell J. P.
(W3-RA)
Pyle S.L.
(ANO-RA)
Nadeau J. J.
(GG-RA)
Milly M.
(GG-MAINT)
Wiles D.P (GG-ENG)
Attachment to GNRO-2015/00044 Details on Certificate of Compliance Potential Violations
Attachment GNRO-2014/00044 Page 1 of 1 Grand Gulf Nuclear Generating Station Potential Instances of Certificate of Noncompliance Shipment Number Shipment Date Material Shipped 2014-1009 10/27/2014 RWCU-A resin 2014-1102 11/10/2014 RWCU-A resin Both of these shipments went to the Energy Solutions processing facility in Oak Ridge, TN. The proper shipping name was, "Radioactive Material, Type B(U) package, 7, Fissile Excepted, RQ-radionuclides." Both shipments were received by the vendor without incident.
~Entergy NUCLEAR QUALITY RELATED EN-Ll-106 I
REV. 13 MANAGEMENT MANUAL INFORMATIONAL USE NRC Correspondence ATTACHMENT 9.4 NRC SUBMITTAL REVIEW Sheet 2 of 2 Does this letter require any document changes (e.g., procedures, DBDs, FSAR, TS Bases, Yes 0
etc.), if approved? If "yes," indicate in Section III an action for the responsible No
~
department to determine the affected documents. (The Correspondence Preparer may indicate the specific documents requiring revision, if known or may initiate an action for review.)
Does this letter contain information certified accurate? If "yes," identify the information Yes 0
and document certification in an attachment. (Attachment 9.5 must be used.)
No
~
Section III Actions and CommitmentsSection IV Final Document Si noff for Submittal Due Date Responsible Dept.
James Nadeau Richard A. Meister Taylor Coles 40 Responsible Department Head Final Submittal Review (optional)
Correspondence Preparer Required Actions Note: Actions needed upon approval should be captured in the a
ro riate action trackin s stem EN-LI-106 REV 13
~Entergy NUCLEAR QUALITY RELATED EN-Ll-106 I
REV. 13 MANAGEMENT MANUAL INFORMATIONAL USE NRC Correspondence ATTACHMENT 9.4 NRC SUBMITTAL REVIEW Sheet 1 of 2
.*****./*,*i...,.Acti()I1\\*,*..***.****,.*....***, *.
(cqncurrence,.Gerti!ic:;~tion,etc.).' :, ' :
S*~~~*~.i~~.~..;*..**..*****.*.
'(sign,ll"lter<?ffic:e m~mo;e-mail,or teleconi)
Joseph Long Radiation Protection Certification See attached Form 9.5 Paul Stokes Radiation Protection Certification See attached Form 9.5 Roy Miller Radiation Protection Concu rrence COMMENTS' S
d C
II Section orrespon ence creemng Does this letter contain commitments? If "yes," identify the commitments with due Yes D
dates in the submittal and in Section III. When fleet letters contain commitments, a No
~
PCRS LO (e.g., LO-LAR, LO-WT) should be initiated with a CA assigned to each applicable site to enter the commitments into the site's commitment management system.
Does this letter contain any information or analyses of new safety issues performed at NRC Yes D
request or to satisfy a regulatory requirement? If "yes," reflect requirement to update the No
~
UFSAR in Section III.
EN-LI-106 REV 13
-".-Entergy NUCLEAR QUALITY RELATED EN-Ll-106 I
REV. 13 MANAGEMENT MANUAL INFORMATIONAL USE NRC Correspondence AnACHMENT 9.5 Sheet 1 of 1 Letter Number: I GNRO-2015-00044 CERTIFICATION REFERENCE FORM
Subject:
Report Pursuant to 10 CFR 71.95 (a)(3) and (b) of two potential instances of noncom Iiance with Certificate of Com Iiance No. 9168 for the 8-1208 Cask Department Rad Protection Certifiable Statement(s): Use one of the following methods to identify certifiable statements in the table below:
1 Identify location in submittal (e.g., page 3, para 2, sentence 1) OR, 2
Paste in the exact words of the statement(s) OR, 3
State "see attachment" and attach a copy of the correspondence with the certifiable statements indicated (e.g., by redlining, highlighting, or underlinjng, etc.).
Each statement or section of information being certified should be uniquely numbered to correspond with the supporting documentation listed below.
Objective Evidence or Basis of Peer Review: List the supporting documents in the table below and attach a copy of the documents OR give basis of peer review. Large documents need not be attached.
Certifiable Statement(s)
Objective Evidence or Basis of Peer Review Letter GNRO-2015/00044 (cover letter and Energy Solutions Letter ES-CD-O-2015-002 attachment 1)
CR-GGN-2015-03869 Individual certifying the statement(s): Certification may be documented using e-mail, telecom, "sign off" sheet, or inter-office memorandum. The form of documentation should specifically identify the information being certified.
?
Ie-3*
Rad Protection
L---""9'-.::o....-~~=r-_____:;l,...:::...-...,....'__-I'r--
Department Peer Review: Prior to signing for certification, determine if a Peer Review is required per section 5.4[2](c). Indicate "N/A" if not required..
Paul Stokes~d:-
EN-LI-106 REV 13