NRC 2011-0024, Submittal of 2010 Fitness for Duty Performance Data
| ML110590429 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Point Beach  |
| Issue date: | 02/25/2011 |
| From: | Jim Costedio Point Beach |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NRC 2011-0024 | |
| Download: ML110590429 (5) | |
Text
February 25,201 1 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units I and 2 Dockets 50-266 and 50-301 License Nos. DPR-24 and DPR-27 201 0 Fitness for Dutv Performance Data NRC 201 I
-0024 10 CFR 26.41 7 10 CFR 26.717 In accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 26.41 7 and 26.71 7 enclosed is the 201 0 Fitness-For-Duty (FFD) Program Performance Data for Point Beach Nuclear Plant.
This letter contains no new Regulatory Commitments and no revisions to existing Regulatory Commitments.
Very truly yours, NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC James Costedio Licensing Manager I
Enclosure cc:
Administrator, Region Ill, USNRC Project Manager, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, USNRC Resident Inspector, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, USNRC NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC, 6610 Nuclear Road, Two Rivers, WI 54241
FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM PERFORMANCE DATA NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC 201 0 Company Annual Reporting Period Point Beach Nuclear Plant Location Donald C. Popp (920) 755-7756 Contact Name Phone Number Cutoffs: ScreenIConfirmation (nglml) & Alcohol (% BAC)
X 10 CFR 26 Levels identified in Sections 26.1 03 and 26.1 63 I
During the reporting period of 2010, NextEra Energy Resources (NextEra) Point Beach Nuclear Plant (PBNP) conducted 2,214 drug and alcohol tests in accordance with 10 CFR Part 26. Random test rates are as follows:
Testing Results Average number with Unescorted Access Total: I560 Categories Follow-Up For Cause -
Observed Behavior For Cause -
Post Event Pre-Access Random Total Point Beach Nuclear Plant 54.2%
11 Contractor Personnel 879 POOLS Page 1 of 4 Tested 56 3
7 1235 454 1755 Licensee Employees 681 Reporting Period 2010 Positive 0
0 0
2 I
3 Tested 24 1
4 38 392 459 Positive 0
1 0
0 1
2
BREAKDOWN OF CONFIRMED POSITIVE TESTS Management Actions For the reporting period of 201 0, five (5) workers were denied nuclear access after testing positive for drugs or alcohol. By test type, one (1) for cause - observed behavior test was positive, two (2) pre-access tests were positive, and two (2) random tests were positive.
5 1 For Cause - Observed Behavior Positive Test One (1) Licensee employee tested positive for alcohol. This individual was denied access. After completion of a treatment program, the individual was screened as an Initial Screening and was granted unescorted access to Point Beach Nuclear Plant (PBNP).
Alcohol 2
1 3
Pre-Access Positive Test Refusal to Test 0
0 0
Amphe-tamines 0
0 0
Point Beach Licensee Employees Contractors Total One (1) Initial contractor employee tested positive for marijuana, and one (1) initial contractor employee tested positive for alcohol. Both individuals were denied access to PBNP.
Phency-clidine 0
0 0
Cocaine 0
0 0
Marijuana 0
2 2
Random Positive Test Opiates 0
0 0
One (1) contractor employee tested positive for marijuana, and one (1) licensee employee tested positive for alcohol. Both individuals were denied access to PBNP.
Additional Comments
- 1. There were no subversion attempts during the 2010 reporting period.
- 2. For the 2010 reporting period, all blind specimens submitted to PBNP's HHS-certified laboratory yielded expected results.
Reportable Events Point Beach Nuclear Plant had one (I) reportable event as defined in 10 CFR Part 26.719 during this reporting period. On June 29,2010, at 1355 (EST) a 24-hour FFD event report (EN 46053) was made to the NRC in accordance with 10 CFR 26.719(b)(Z)(ii).
Page 2 of 4
Facilitv Name 1 Pdiiik B e ~ h ZUUY
Faciliw Name Report Period I
I I
I I
I I Point Beach v
l2010 v
Summary of Corrective Actions - 26.203(e)(2) 1 Analysis of Waiver Assessment Data:
During 2010, there were a total of 28 waivers utilized that documented 51 deviations. Twenty-six waivers were for inclement weather (a blizzard). There were two (2) waivers utilized for one (1) maintenance individual following a Unit 2 reactor trip to perform required emergent electrical system troubleshooting.
Analysis of Fatigue Assessment Data:
There were a total of 14 fatigue assessments performed during 2010. Thirteen (13) of the assessments were "for cause" following a minor injury to an individual and one (1) assessment was performed for an individual who selfdeclared fatigue.
==
Conclusions:==
During 2010, there were a total of 28 waivers utilized that documented 51 deviations. Twenty-six (26) waivers were for inclement weather (a blizzard). There were two (2) waivers utilized for one maintenance individuaif following a Unit 2 reactor trip to perform required emergent electrical troubleshooting. Face-to-face assessments were performed for all individuals who required a waiver.
Summary of Status of Corrective Actions:
None I
Distribution of Waiver for Individuals in Each Category - 26.203(e)(l)(iii)
I Performing security duties as described in 26.4(a)(5) 24 24 individuals.
. P Number of Employees Number of Waivers 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11-20 More than 20 Performing health physics or chemistry duties as described in 26.4(a)(2) 0 Issued Waivers 0perat5g or on-site directing of the operations of systems, as described in 26.4(a)(I )
1 duties Of a fire brigade member as described in 26.4(a)(3)
- 0 Total Number of Employees Issued Waivers Most Waivers Provided to a Single Individual Performing maintenance or onsite directing of maintenance as described in 26.4(a)(4) 1 1
0 under fire brigade column. Do 2
2 not double count these
'Note: Formd~~duals performng the fire brigade duteies, please count them only 1
0