ENOC-08-00041, Fitness-for-Duty Program Performance Report for the Period January 2008 - June 2008

From kanterella
(Redirected from ML082390035)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Fitness-for-Duty Program Performance Report for the Period January 2008 - June 2008
ML082390035
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point, Pilgrim, Vermont Yankee, FitzPatrick  
Issue date: 08/22/2008
From: Mccann J
Entergy Nuclear Operations
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
ENOC-08-00041
Download: ML082390035 (25)


Text

  • Entergy Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

440 Hamilton Avenue White Plains, NY 106001 John F. McCann Director Nuclear Safety and Licensing August 22, 2008 ENOC-08-00041 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001

SUBJECT:

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant Docket No. 50-333 Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units No. 1, 2 and 3 Docket Nos.50-003, 50-247, and 50-286 Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Docket No. 50-293 Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Docket No. 50-271 Fitness-for-Duty Program Performance Report For the Period January 2008 - June 2008

Dear Sir or Madam:

This letter transmits the James A. FitzPatrick, Indian Point 1, Indian Point 2, Indian Point 3, Pilgrim, and Vermont Yankee Fitness-for-Duty Program performance reports for the period from January 2008 through June 2008 in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 26.71(d).

The FitzPatrick report is Attachment I; the combined Indian Point 1, 2, and 3 report is Attachment II; the Pilgrim report is Attachment Ill, and the Vermont Yankee report is Attachment IV.

/4c)2-

There are no new commitments made in this letter. If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Charlene Faison at 914-272-3378.

Very truly yours, hn Mceann Director, Nuclear Safety and Licensing Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

Attachments: As stated cc:

Mr. Samuel J. Collins Regional Administrator, Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406-1415 Mr. John Boska, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch I-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop O-8-C2 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Mr. James S. Kim, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch I-1 Division of Operator Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission M/S O-8C2 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Mr. Ted Smith, Project Manager Division of Waste Management and Environmental Protection Office of Federal and State Materials and Environmental Management Programs U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop T-7-E18 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Resident Inspector's Office Indian Point Unit 3 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P.O. Box 59 Buchanan, NY 10511-0059 Resident Inspector's Office Indian Point Unit 2 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P.O. Box 59 Buchanan, NY'10511-0059 Resident Inspector's Office James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P.O. Box 136 Lycoming, NY 13093-0136 Resident Inspector's Office Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 600 Rocky Hill Road Mail Stop 66 Plymouth, MA 02360 Resident Inspector's Office Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 320 Governor Hunt Road P.O. Box 157 Vernon, VT 05354 2

Mr. Paul Eddy NYS Department of Public Service 3 Empire State Plaza Albany, NY 12223 Mr. Paul D. Tonko President NYSERDA 17 Columbia Circle Albany, NY 12203 Mr. David O'Brien Commissioner Department of Public Service 112 State Street, Drawer 20 Montpelier, VT 05620-2601 3

ATTACHMENT I TO ENOC-08-00041 JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT FITNESS'FOR DUTY PROGRAM PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR JANUARY 2008 THROUGH JUNE 2008 (4 pages)

ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.

JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT DOCKET NO. 50-333 DPR-59

ATTACHMENT I TO ENOC-08-00041 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant Fitness-for-Duty Program Performance Report For the Period January through June 2008 INTRODUCTION 10 CFR 26.71(d) requires that nuclear power plant licensees periodically collect, compile and submit Fitness-for-Duty performance data. Specifically, this performance data must include:

1.

Random testing rate;

2.

Drugs tested for and cutoff levels, including results of tests using lower cutoff levels;

3.

Workforce population tested;

4.

Numbers of tests and results by population and type of test (i.e., pre-access, random, for-cause, etc.);

5.

Substances identified;

6.

Summary of management actions; and

7.

A list of events reported.

Fitness-for-Duty performance data for Entergy's James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant for the period January through June 2008 are provided below and in the attached tables.

Data on random testing rate, a summary of management actions, and a list of events reported (items 1, 6 and 7) are given below. Data for the remaining items (2, 3, 4 and 5) are given in the attached tables.

An additional section not required by 10 CFR 26 is included in this report; The additional section summarizes events related to the FitzPatrick Fitness-for-Duty Program and lessons learned.

At JAF, Entergy considers all contractors to be short-term contractors for the purposes of the Fitness-for-Duty Program. For this reason, the attached tables show "zeros" for data associated with long-term contractors.

RANDOM TESTING RATE For this period, 28.77% of the workforce were tested randomly.

SUMMARY

OF MANAGEMENT ACTIONS Entergy used the definition of "Management Actions" implicit in 10 CFR 26.27

("Management actions and sanctions to be imposed") to determine the content of this section.

1

ATTACHMENT I TO ENOC-08-00041 Pre-Access Testing A total of 87 pre-access tests (25-employees, 62-contractors) were administered. All tests were negative.

Random Testing A total of 239 random tests (203-employees, 36-contractors) were administered. One employee tested positive for marijuana. A mandatory EAP referral was completed with a minimal 14-day suspension. The employee returned to work after signing a reentry agreement and was placed in the follow up program for 3 years. All other tests were negative. All contractor Random tests were negative.

For Cause Testing There were no For Cause Tests performed this period.

Follow Up Testing There were 19 follow up tests (17-employees and 2 contractors) administered during this reporting period. All test results were negative.

Other This category includes tests repeated because the results of the specimen were negative but the specimen was determined by the laboratory to have either a low specific gravity or a low concentration of creatinine. There were 9 atypical tests (8 employees and 1 contractor).

All repeat observed test results were negative. There were 3 Department of Transportation (DOT) tests performed (which had a lower alcohol cutoff level at 0.02% BAC). 2 of the DOT tests were Random and 1 was a Follow-up test. The test results were negative.

Events Reported None Lessons Learned and Program Events There were no program events identified during this period at JAF. A fleet condition report (CR-HQN-2008-00728) was generated to share the event and lessons learned from not meeting the blind sample requirements at two other licensee plants.

2

Attachment I TO ENOC-08-00041 Fitness For Duty Program Semi-Annual Performance Data Report - Personnel Subject to 10CFR26 Section I - Company Data Company:

Entergy - JAF Six-Month Period: 01/01/2008 to 06/30/2008 Location:

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant PO Box 110 Drugs Tested For Screen/Confirmation (nq/mi)

Lycoming, NY 13093 Marijuana 100/15 Marijuana 50/15 (N/A for JAF)

Contact:

Debra J. Caltabiano Cocaine 300/150 Opiates 300/300 Access/FFD Coordinator Amphetamines 1000/500 Phencyclidine 25/25 Alcohol (%BAC) 0.04% BAC Phone:

(315) 349-6412 Random Testing Rate: NLT 50% per annum.

Section II - Testing Results Licensee Employee Long-Term Contractor Short-Term Contractor Total Avg. Workforce 113'..716:97....

Y 2,:

0I

,F.

[':. s!144*.,l 3.8 i ":,.

Category Tested Positive Refused Tested Positive Refused Tested Positive Refused Tested Positive Refused Follow-Up' 17 0

0 0

0 0

2 0

0 19 0

0 Observed Behavior 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0, 0

0 0

0 Other 11 0

0 0

0 0

1 0

0 12 0

0 Post Accident 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 Pre-Access 25 0

0 0

0 0

62 0

0 87 0

0 Random 203 1

0 0

0 0

36 0

0

239, 1

0 Total 256 1

0 0

0 0

101 0

0 357 1

0 Section III - Breakdown of Confirmed Positive Tests for Specific Substances Alcohol Ampheta-Cocaine Marijuana Marijuana Opiates Phenycli-FFD Refused Total mines 50 100 dine Violation Licensee Employee 0

0 0

0 1

0 0

0 0

1 Short-Term Contractor 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 Total 0

0 0

0 1

0 0

0 0

1 Note: Any discrepancies in the totals in this section versusSection II indicate that one or more tests detected multiple drugs. Refer to Section IV for the declaration of these tests and their corresponding drugs.

3

Attachment I TO ENOC-08-00041 Section IV - Breakdown of Tests With Multiple Detected Drugs Alcohol Ampheta-Cocaine Marijuana Marijuana Opiates Phencycli-FFD Refused mines 50 100 dine Violation None Section V - Blind Testing Results Q1 13.07%

Q2 12.25%

Period 12.61 %

Section VI - Random Testing Results For Period 28.77 %

4

ATTACHMENT II TO ENOC-08-00041 INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNITS NO. 1, 2, and 3 FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR JANUARY 2008 THROUGH JUNE 2008 (5 pages)

ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.

INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NO. 1 DOCKET NO.50-003 DPR-5 INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NO. 2 DOCKET NO. 50-247 DPR-26 INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NO. 3 DOCKET NO. 50-286 DPR-64

ATTACHMENT II TO ENOC-08-00041 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

Indian Point Energy Center Units No. 1, 2, 3 Fitness-For-Duty Program Performance Report For the Period of January through June 2008 INTRODUCTION 10 CFR 26.71 (d) requires that nuclear power plant licensees periodically collect, compile and submit Fitness-For-Duty performance data. Specifically, this performance data must include:

1.

Random testing rate;

2.

Drugs tested for and cutoff levels, including results of tests using lower cutoff levels and tests for other drugs;

3.

Workforce population tested;

4.

Numbers of tests and results by population and type of test (i.e., pre-access, random, for-cause, etc.);

5.

Substances identified;

6.

Summary of management actibns; and

7.

A list of events reported.

Fitness-For-Duty performance data for the Entergy's Indian Point Energy Center for the period from January through June 2008 are provided below and in the attached tables. The random testing rate, a summary of management actions, and a list of events reported (items 1, 6, and 7) are given below. Data for the remaining items (2, 3, 4 and 5) are given in the attached tables.

An additional section not required by 10 CFR 26 is included in this report. The additional section summarizes events related to the Indian Point Energy Center Fitness-For-Duty program and lessons learned.

At IPEC, Entergy considers all contractors to be short-term for the purposes of the Fitness-For-Duty program. For this reason, the attached tables show "zeros" for data associated with long-term contractors.

RANDOM TESTING RATE For this period, 25.17% of the workforce was tested randomly.

1

ATTACHMENT II TO ENOC-08-00041

SUMMARY

OF MANAGEMENT ACTIONS Entergy used the definition of "Management Actions" implicit in 10 CFR 26.27

("Management actions and sanctions to be imposed") to determine the content of this section.

Pre-Access Testinq A total of seven hundred and thirteen (713) pre-access tests were performed (75 employees and 638 contractors).

One employee tested positive for cocaine. Mandatory EAP referral and a fourteen-day suspension were initiated. The individual abandoned his job duties and was terminated.

Nine (9) contractor tests were positive; 4 for cocaine, 4 for marijuana (all four samples tested at >50ng/ml and 3 of the four samples tested at >100ng/ml). All individuals were denied access to the site for three years. One (1) individual tested positive for alcohol. Individual was denied access to the site for one year.

Random Testing A total of four-hundred and four (404) random tests were performed (319-employees and 85-contractors).

One employee tested positive for cocaine. Mandatory EAP referral and a fourteen-day suspension were initiated. Employee was placed in follow-up testing program for 3 years upon returning to work.

One contractor tested positive for alcohol. The individual was a supervisor and a 24-hour notification was made to NRC. Individual was denied access to the site for one year.

One contractor tested positive for marijuana at >50ng/ml and >100ng/ml. The individual was denied access to the site for three years.

For-Cause Testing A total of eleven (11) for-cause tests were performed. Eight tests were for observed behavior (4 employees and 4 contractors). Three tests were for post accident (3 contractors).

All for-cause tests for contractors were negative.

One employee tested positive for cocaine on an observed behavior test. Mandatory EAP referral and a fourteen-day suspension were initiated. Employee was placed in follow-up testing program for 3 years upon returning to work.

2

ATTACHMENT II TO ENOC-08-00041 Follow-Up Testing A total of thirty six (36) follow-up (11-employee and 25-contractor) tests were performed.

All follow-up tests for employees and contractors were negative.

Other This category includes tests repeated because the results of the specimen were negative but the specimen was determined by the laboratory to have either a low specific gravity or a low concentration of creatinine. A total of eight (8) tests were performed (5 employees and 3 contractors).

One contractor tested positive for marijuana at >50ng/ml. Individual was denied access to the site for three years.

Events Reported There was a 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> FFD notification made to the NRC for a contractor supervisor who tested positive for alcohol during a random test. Individual was denied access to site for one year.

Lessons Learned and Program Events.

There were no program events identified during this period at IPEC. A fleet condition report (CR-HQN-2008-00728) was generated to share the event and lessons learned from not meeting the blind sample requirements at two other licensee plants.

3

Attachment II TO ENOC-08-00041 Fitness For Duty Program Semi-Annual Performance Data Report-Personnel Subject to 10CFR26 Section I - Company Data Company:

Indian Point Energy Center (IPEC)

Six-Month Period: 01/01/2008 to 06/30/2008 Location:

Indian Point Energy Center Drugs Tested For Screen/Confirmation (nq/ml) 450 Broadway, Suite 3 Buchanan, NY 10511 Marijuana 100/15 Marijuana 50/15

Contact:

Sharon Quinn Cocaine 300/150 Opiates 300/300 Senior Security Coordinator Amphetamines 1000/500 Phencyclidine 25/25 Alcohol (%BAC) 0.04% BAC Phone:

(914) 788-2193 Random Testing Rate: NLT 50% per annum.

Section II - Testing Results Licensee Employee Long-Term Contractor Short-Term Contractor Total Avg. Workforce

4. 1.6229'_ ý7..

.0 4

":1".

'.: 1605.27,.

Category Tested Positive Refused Tested Positive Refused Tested Positive Refused Tested Positive Refused Follow-Up 11 0

0 0

0 0

25 0

0 36 0

0 Observed Behavior 4

1 0

0 0

0 4

0 0

8 1

0 Post Accident 0

0 0

0 0

0 3

0 0

3 0

0 Other

.5 0

0 0

0 0

3 1

0 8

1 0

Pre-Access 75 1

0 0

0 0

638 9

0 713 10 0

Random 319 1

0 0

0 0

85 2

0 404 3

0 Total 414 3

0 0

0 0

758 12 0

1172 15, 0

Section III - Breakdown of Confirmed Positive Tests for. Specific Substances Alcohol Ampheta-Cocaine Marijuana Marijuana Opiates Phenycli-FFD Refused Total mines 50 100 dine Violation Licensee Employee 0

0 3

0 0

0 0

0 0

3 Long-Term Contractor 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 Short-Term Contractor 2

0 4

6 4

0 0

0 0

16 Total 2

0 7

6 4

0 0

0 0

19 Note: Discrepancies in the totals in this section versusSection II indicate that one or more tests detected multiple drugs. Refer to Section IV for the declaration of these tests and their corresponding drugs.

4

Attachment II to ENOC-08-00041 Section IV - Breakdown of Tests With Multiple Detected Drugs Alcohol Ampheta-Cocaine Marijuana Marijuana mines 50 100 Opiates Phenycli-FFD Refused dine Violation 4

Short-Term ContractorsSection V - Blind Testing Results Q1 10.78%

Q2 11.63%

Period 11.09 %

Section VI - Random Testing Results 0

0 0

4 4

0 0

0 0

For Period 25.17%

5

ATTACHMENT III TO ENOC-08-00041 PILGRIM NUCLEAR POWER STATION FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR JANUARY 2008 THROUGH JUNE 2008 (4 pages)

ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.

PILGRIM NUCLEAR POWER STATION DOCKET NO. 50-293 DPR-35

ATTACHMENT III TO ENOC-08-00041 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Fitness-For-Duty Program Performance Report For the Period January through June 2008 INTRODUCTION 10 CFR 26.71(d) requires that nuclear power plant licensees periodically collect, compile, and submit Fitness-For-Duty performance data. Specifically, this performance data must include:

1.

Random testing rate; 2

Drugs tested for and cutoff levels, including results of tests using lower cutoff levels and tests for other drugs; 3

Workforce population tested;

4.

Numbers of tests and results by population and type of test (i.e. pre-access, random, for cause, etc.);

5.

Substances Identified;

6.

Summary of management actions; and

7.

A list of events reported.

Fitness-For-Duty performance data for the Entergy's Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant for the period from January through June 2008 are provided below and in the attached tables. The random testing rate, a summary of management actions, and a list of events reported (Items 1, 6, and 7) are given below. Data for the remaining Items (2, 3, 4 and 5) are given in the attached tables.

An additional section not required by 10CFR26 is included in this report. The additional section summarizes events related to Pilgrim Station's Fitness-For-Duty program and lessons learned.

At Pilgrim, Entergy considers all contractors to be short-term contractors for the purposes of the Fitness-for-Duty Program.

RANDOM TEST RATE During this period, 28.07% of the workforce was tested randomly.

SUMMARY

OF MANAGEMENT ACTIONS Entergy used the definition of "Management Actions" implicit in 10 CFR 26.27

("Management actions and sanctions to be imposed") to determine the content of this section.

Pre-Access Testinq During this period, a total of 130 pre-access tests were administered. The breakdown is 80 licensee employees and 50 short-term contractors. One short-term contractor test result was 1

ATTACHMENT III TO ENOC-08-00041 positive for cocaine and his access has been denied to all Entergy plants for a minimum of 3 years.

Random Testing A total of two hundred-sixteen (216) random tests were performed. Two hundred-six (206) were licensee employees and ten (10) were short term contractors. All test results were negative.

For Cause Testing A total of 4 for-cause tests were performed (3 observed behavior and 1 post accident).

One observed behavior test was for a short term contractor who was terminated for inattentiveness to duties. The test result was negative. The other two tests were for an Entergy employee who was initially tested negative but was referred to Employee Assistance Program (EAP) for personal issues. While at the EAP office, it was thought that he had the smell of alcohol in his breath and FFD personnel escorted him back to the site for another test. Both test results were negative. The individual is now in the Employee Assistance Program.

One for-cause test for an Entergy employee was performed as the result of a minor car accident in the parking lot. The test result was negative and no further action was taken.

Follow-up Testing A total of 8 follow-up tests were performed during this period. Seven were Entergy employees and one was a short term contractor. All test results were negative.

Other This category includes tests repeated because the results of the specimen were negative, but the specimen was determined by the laboratory to have either a low specific gravity or a low concentration of creatinine. A total of six (6) tests (5 employees, 1 contractor) in this category were performed. All results were negative.

Events Reported There were no events during this time period that required reporting to the NRC. No performance indicators were identified during this period.

Lessons Learned and Program Events During the first quarter of 2008, Pilgrim Station did not meet the 10% blind sample submittal as required (although the combined average for the first and second quarter was over 10%). A condition report (CR-PNP-2008-023.86) was generated. Corrective actions and follow-up actions to prevent future recurrence have been implemented. A fleet condition report (CR-HQN-2008-00728) was generated to share the event and lessons learned with other Entergy fleet sites./

2

Attachment III TO ENOC-08-00041 Fitness For Duty Program Semi-Annual Performance Data Report-Personnel Subject to 10CFR26 Section I - Company Data Company:

Entergy - Pilgrim Station Six-Month Period: 01/01/2008 to 06/30/2008 Location:

Entergy - Pilgrim Station Drugs Tested For Screen/Confirmation (no/ml 600 Rocky Hill Road Plymouth, MA 02360 Marijuana 100/15 Marijuana 50/15

Contact:

Diane Wilson Cocaine 300/150 Opiates 300/300 Security Coordinator Amphetamines 1000/500 Phencyclidine 25/25 Alcohol (%BAC) 0.04% BAC Phone:

(508) 830-8256 Random Testing Rate: NLT 50% per annum.

Section II - Testing Results Licensee Employee Long-Term Contractor Short-Term Contractor Total Avg. W orkforce 7

0,

.. 0 T0>

i KKi

.97"26.,

,769.. 56 Category Tested Positive Refused Tested Positive Refused Tested Positive Refused Tested Positive Refused Follow-Up 7

0 0

0 0

0 1

0 0

8 0

0 Observed Behavior 2

0 0

0 0

0 1

0 0

3 0

0 Post Accident 1

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

1 0

0 Other 5

0 0

0 0

0 1

0 0

6 0

0 Pre-Access 80 0

0 0

0 0

50 1

0 130 1

0 Random 206 0

0 0

0 0

10 0

0 216 0

0 Total 301 0

.0 0

0 0

63 1

0 364 1

0 Section III - Breakdown of Confirmed Positive Tests for Specific Substances Alcohol Ampheta-Cocaine Marijuana Marijuana Opiates Phenycli-FFD Refused Total mines 50 100 dine Violation Licensee Employee 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 Long-Term Contractor 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 Short-Term Contractor 0

0 1

0 0

0 0

0 0

1 Total 0

0 1

0 0

0 0

0 0

1 Note: Discrepancies in the totals in this section versusSection II indicate that one or more tests detected multiple drugs. Refer to Section IV for the declaration of these tests and their corresponding drugs.

3

Attachment III to ENOC-08-00041 Section IV - Breakdown of Tests With Multiple Detected Drugs Alcohol Ampheta-Cocaine Marijuana Marijuana mines 50 100 Opiates Phenycli-FFD Refused dine Violation None Section V - Blind Testing Results Q1 9.82%

Q2 12.44%

Period 11.26 %

Section VI - Random Testing Results For Period 28.07 %

4

ATTACHMENT IV TO ENOC-08-00041 VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER STATION FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR JANUARY 2008 THROUGH JUNE 2008 (5 pages)

ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.

Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Docket No. 50-271 DPR-28

Attachment IV to ENOC-08-00041 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

Vermont Yankee Fitness-For-Duty Program Performance Report For the Period of January through June 2008 INTRODUCTION 10 CFR 26.71 (d) requires that nuclear power plant licensees periodically collect, compile and submit Fitness-For-Duty performance data. Specifically, this performance data must include:

1.

Random testing rate;

2.

Drugs tested for and cutoff levels, including results of tests using lower cutoff levels and tests for other drugs;

3.

Workforce population tested;

4.

Numbers of tests and results by population and type of test (i.e., pre-access, random, for-cause, etc.);

5.

Substances identified;

6.

Summary of management actions; and

7.

A list of events reported.

Fitness-For-Duty performance data for Entergy's Vermont Yankee for the period from January through June 2008 are provided below and in the attached tables. The random testing rate, a summary of management actions, and a list of events reported (items 1, 6, and 7) are given below. Data for the remaining items (2, 3, 4 and 5) are given in the attached tables.

An additional section not required by 10CFR26 is included in this report. The additional section summarizes events related to Vermont Yankee's Fitness-For-Duty program and lessons learned.

At Vermont Yankee, Entergy considers Wackenhut Security contractors to be long-term and all other contractors to be short-term for the purposes of the Fitness-For-Duty program.

RANDOM TESTING RATE For this period, 27.32% of the workforce was tested randomly.

SUMMARY

OF MANAGEMENT ACTIONS Entergy used the definition of "Management Actions" implicit in 10 CFR 26.27

("Management actions and sanctions to be imposed") to determine the content of this section.

1

Attachment IV to ENOC-08-00041 Pre-Access Testing A total of one-hundred-fifty-seven (157) pre-access tests were performed during this period:

Seventy-Four (74) employees; nine (9) long-term contractors and seventy-four (74) short-term contractors.

Two short-term contractor test results were positive; both were for marijuana > 100ng/ml.

Both were denied access for a minimum of three years.

All other tests under this category were negative.

Random Testing A total of two-hundred-twenty-two (222) random tests were performed during this period:

One-hundred-fifty-five (155) employees; twenty-eight (28) long-term contractors and thirty-nine (39) short-term contractors.

All tests under this category were negative.

For-Cause Testing A total of eight (8) for-cause tests were performed during this period.

Four (4) licensee employees, two (2) long-term contractors, and one (1) short-term contractor for observed behavior. One (1) long-term contractor for post accident.

One (1) licensee employee for-cause observed behavior tested positive for alcohol by back extrapolation. A mandatory EAP referral was completed with a minimal 14-day suspension.

Employee was returned to work after signing a re-entry agreement and was placed in the follow-up program for three years. All other tests were negative.

Follow-Up Testing A total of twenty-two (22) follow-up tests were performed during this period: Thirteen (13) employees, four (4) long-term contractor and five (5) short-term contractors were tested.

All tests under this category were negative.

Other This category includes tests repeated because the results of the specimen were negative but the specimen was determined by the laboratory to have either a low specific gravity or a low concentration of creatinine.

A total of four (4) tests were performed during this period. Two (2) licensee employees, one (1) long-term contractor, one (1) short-term contractor All tests Under this category were negative.

2

Attachment IV to ENOC-08-00041 Events Reported There were no reportable events during this period. No performance indicators were identified during this period.

Lessons Learned and Program Events.

During the 1st quarter, VY did not meet the 10% blind sample submittal as required (although the combined average rate for the 1 st and 2 nd quarter was over the 10%). A condition report (CR-VTY-2008-03015) was generated. Corrective actions and follow-up actions to prevent future recurrence have been implemented. A fleet condition report (CR-HQN-2008-00728) was generated to share the event and lessons learned with other Entergy fleet sites.

3

Attachment IV TO ENOC-08-00041 Fitness For Duty Program Semi-Annual Performance Data Report-Personnel Subject to 10CFR26 Section I - Company Data Company:

Entergy - Vermont Yankee Location:

Governor Hunt Road PO Box 157 Vernon, VT 05354

Contact:

Tina Emery-Howe Senior Security Coordinator Phone:

(802) 258-5804 Six-Month Period: 01/01/2008 to 06/30/2008 Section II - Testing Results Licensee Employee Long-Term Contractor Short-Term Contractor Total Avg. Workforce

_519:51 10:.i8.26,

~

8.3827~,,

Category Tested Positive Refused Tested Positive Refused Tested Positive Refused Tested Positive Refused Follow-Up 13 0

0 4

0 0

5 0

0 22 0

0 Observed Behavior 4

1 0

2 0

0 1

0 0

7 1

0 Post Accident 0

0 0

1

0.

0 0

0 0

1 0

0 Other 2

0 0

1

0.

0 1

0 0

4 0

0 Pre-Access 74 0

0 9

0 0

74 2

0 157 2

0 Randorm 15n 0

28 n

0 39o 0

0 22 n

Total 248 1

0 45 0

0.

120 2

0 413 3

0 Section III - Breakdown of Confirmed Positive Tests for Specific Substances Alcohol Ampheta-Cocaine Marijuana Marijuana Opiates Phenycli-FFD Refused Total mines 50 100 dine Violation Licensee Employee 1

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

1 Long-Term Contractor 0

0 0

0 0

. 0 0

0 0

0 Short-Term Contractor 0

0 0

0

-2 0

0 0

0 2

Total 1

0 0

0 2

0 0

0 0

3 Note: Discrepancies in the totals in this section versusSection II indicate that one or more tests detected multiple drugs. Refer to Section IV for the declaration of these tests and their corresponding drugs.

4

Attachment IV to ENOC-08-00041 Section IV - Breakdown of Tests With Multiple Detected Drugs Alcohol Ampheta-Cocaine Marijuana Marijuana Opiates Phenycli-FFD Refused mines 50 100 dine Violation None Section V - Blind Testing Results Q1 6.63%

Q2 14.29%

Period 10.65 %

Section VI - Random Testing Results For Period 27.32 %

5