Difference between revisions of "ML20071P056"

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 02:15, 23 May 2020

Review of Licensee Resolution of Outstanding Issues from NRC Equipment Environ Qualification SERs (F-11 & B-60), Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Unit 1, Technical Evaluation Rept
ML20071P056
Person / Time
Site: Calvert Cliffs Exelon icon.png
Issue date: 10/13/1982
From: Pandey S
FRANKLIN INSTITUTE
To: Le N
NRC
Shared Package
ML20071P060 List:
References
CON-NRC-03-79-118, CON-NRC-3-79-118
Download: ML20071P056 (650)


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:3 ,

                                                                                         ~~                             _

[ f i , e

    . ti'                          Na" Send Conof XA imPDE
 ,          ; .;                  L
,          .m.

4 TECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT - REVIEW OF LICENSEES' RESOLUTION OF OUTSTANDING ISSUES

 ;                                FROM NRC EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION y                      SAFETY EVALUATION REPORTS ('.2-11 and B-60)

D.I BALTIM0RE GAS AND ELECTRIC C0hPANY i.7 h

I CALVERT CLIFFS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 1 a

NRC DOCKET NO. 50-317 FRC PROJECT C5257 9. C N RC TAC NO. 42494 FRC ASSIGNMENT 13 l W t

              'd NRC CONTRACT NO. NRC-03-79-118                                  FRCTASK 487

( I lT Prepared by

  ,     ((,                      Franklin Research Center
. ; '*4                          20th and Race Streets 1 f. ,s .<

1 Philadelphia, PA 19103 FRC Group Leader:

 ,                                                                                                                           S. Pandey n.1 (g .r._                           Prepared for

(( Nuclear Regulatory Commission lfj,$ Washington, D.C. 20555 Lead NRC Engineer: N. B. Le 1,.. ?. P. Shemanski Ig;

             .                                                       October 13, 1982 Thl's report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States I ,(:g         p                  Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, or any of their s . /g"'                          employees, makes any warranty, expressed or impiled, or assumes any legal liability or l?'..                             responsibility for any third party's use, or the results of sucn use, of any information, appa-l;" ]                             ratus, product or process disclosed in this report, or represents that its use by such third p, y                              party would not infringe privately owned rights.

(iJ Reviewed by: Approved by:

   }.        ..'

c[a-f MN 'd y Group Leader Project Managgr, % 'J" 1#4v w/ 4 epa'rtrnent D rect iPlease Send Copy of XA to PDR

m. ;

b ik s 4 N\ k Franklin Research Center f:.h .;) y' ~^- A Division of The Franklin Institute The Bergerrun Frannhn Park.ay. PMa . Ps 19103 (215) 448- 100c q Q Q / o c2 J o p yg y . , ,. -. ..

                                                                            ;       3                      -
                                                                                                                          ,,- n                           ,

L vt i 4 TER-CS257-487 2 , CONTENTS Section Title Page L. s 1 INTRODUCTION . ,. . . . .

                                                                                             .       .    .   .      .   .    . 1-1.
                                                                                                                           ~

l.1 Purpose of the Evaluation . . . . . . . . 1-1 L 1.2 Scope of the Evaluation . . . . . . . . . 1-1 1.3 Generic Issue Background. . . . . . . . . 1-2 l.4 Specific Issue Background . . . . . . . . 1-10 2 NRC CRITERIA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION . . . . . 2-1

                .i J                         2.1   Criteria Provided by the NRC.                 .       .    .   .      .   .   .. 2-1
 '//.\U                                  2.2   Staff Positions and Supplemental Criteria                       .     .   .    . 2-1 g,

y.

 ' .?                                          2.2.1     Raquirements and Applicable Criteria .                      .   .    . 2-1 4,' :                                    2.2.2     Application of Requirements and Criteria to TMI Q.[{                                                 Lessons Learned Implementation Equipment                    .   .    . 2-3 9,*                                      2.2.3     Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification 2-4 i-                                                      Review      .     .    .    .       .       .    .   .      .   .    .

2.2.4 Clarification of Qualification Requirements . . 2-5 .E j~, ' 2.2.5 Additional Clarification of Qualification j :,,j Requirements . . . . . . . . . . 2-8 ! ;'J ' f .o 3 METHODOLOGY USED FOR THE EVALUATION . . . . . . . 3-1 9N

    '?:

3.1 In troduction. . . . . . . . . . . . 3-1 [/O. 9 s, 'i 3.2 Methodology . . . . . . .- . . . . 3-2 [ 'A ~ 3.3 NRC Qualification Categories.and Definitions. . . . 3-8 f. b;:,:l d 3.4 Implementation Guide for Fulfilling NRC Criteria. . . 3-12 f0 % 4 TECHNICAL EVALUATION . . . . . . . . . . . 4-1 q-4.1 Introduc tion. . . . . . . . . . . . 4-1

       /.                                4.2   Summary of the Evaluation             .       .       .    .    .     .   .    . 4-2
j. 4.3 Methodology Used by the Licensee. . . . . . . 4-14 Ql-f '

cS s 4.3.1 Completeness of Safety-Related Equipment List. . 4-16 il 4.3.2 Containment Spray System . . . . . . . 4-15

   .t      .                                   4.3.3     Environmental Service Conditions .                    .     .   .    . 4-13 4                                        4.3.4     Chemical Spray         .    .       .       .    .    .     .   .    . 4-17 g                                              4.3.5     Submergence       .    .    .       .       .    .    .     .   .    . 4-18 z'1 ,,                                          4.3.6     Aging and Qualified Life .                  .    .    .     .   .    . 4-19
 , y,                                    4.4   Equipment Environmental Qualification Evaluation.                         .    . 4-21 1                   I
  • iii
    ~. il
         ^

O N bd Franklin Research Center

         's,,                          A CMesen of The Fm hw f <.

W{ . - - - - - - -

c_.-__.,-- ~. =: -

                                                                                  --r u.v.w ;=::-            -   -       '

TER-C5237-487 O CONTENTS (Cont.) Section Title Page 5 CONCLUSIONS, . . . . . .' . . . . . . . 5-1 6 REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . '. . . 6-1 APPENDIX A - ENVIRONENTAL SERVICE CONDITIONS APPENDIX B - LISTING OF SAFETY-RELATED ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT APPENDIX C.- PLANT SAFETY-RELATED SYSTEMS AND DISPLAY INSTRUMENTATIO!] f APPENDIX D - REVIEW OF LICENSEE'S RESPONSE TO NRC EEQ l SER CONCERNING JUSTIFICATION FOR INTERIM OPERATION 1 APPENDIX E - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFOR!"ATION \ O i, 1 S a ( l 4 iv O UUUU Franidin Research Center A % e n. r= in.a,. l

      ;;r-_ a ;w va:+m m ww          .__-;-
                                                             -n    ,

( ,

                                                                                                                       ~.      . _ _ _ _ .

k TER-C5257-487 l l FOREWORD t', This Technical Evaluation Report was prepared by Franklin Research Center R

        ..> ,f,                       under a contract with the ,U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission (Office of Nuclear
             ; 2.,~

M Reactor Regulation, Division of Operating Reactors) for technical assistance m in support of NRC operating reac or licensing actions. The technical 2,. l7, . evaluation was conducted in accordance with criteria established by the NRC. 4

p n,

. 9; s ,,'

            ..iQ
r. W.
                ,O :

i- fiC .

; ' d. -.
        ' .+,   d':;'

L d I y,, .

           . +
q z:n M

N d.M

#h4,ij          ;' .

Nl.r_Y

                ~p lq
           ~. h,
j. i I Cf: .
             ': .a ig19           ~%.:M ie
. d., -

u, ,N

  • . ,J
           .' o.'t 1
                    ,y

[s'. r

   .           s*          \

N

   #Ni O                                                   v d00d Franklin Research Center
p' , , A cea.on w n. Fran.an m.ou.

l

                                             -, -- - 3, _ ,-                 - .
7. 7 g - , , _ , 1
                                                                                                                          =e -    !' 5 ; i l,;,~ 'j;    ' -
                 ~l'.

y

.s, a
                   .A TER-C5257-487
               -J ij:

l I IDENTIFICATION OF PROPRIETARY INFORMATION s, iet.

,.;f.;

Q Some of the information in this technical evaluation report was obtained j hy from manufacturers' proprietary test reporte. All proprietary test reports .,,[3, . are identified as such in'Section 6,. References, of this report. Checksheets

          '.18J1 in Section 4 containing proprietary information have been replaced with a
          .'3              :$       checksheet page stating that the proprietary information has been removed.

r,

           .03 ?.'

n :;

                    ;j
0-

[,......;y

n
;S:,
c. :

D, f fai e, ll l 9.11 TW, K@:,

 .n     '
  . 31; Dbb nk, H'::m@,1 w ..s.m y erp yin e .s q
     . c., np N
/ChS '.Q .

me? ng!; r,. . hU 4w.} ;ff. h{:M

; .) tr'
             . .~ , Q
             . .>[' . ,

-j>;&'y ' e w , t.cy . g.

'~

i .l l . . , vii

   .s - ; .
   ;'.(
    . :,; e 4

gd m Franklin Research Center

4. iic y? Ac % .rn.r - u.

ge t a~. N . . .. w - g t7 - ., , . , , ,

                                                                     ~      4 . --
                                                                                                  - . . , . .    ..w..., s . ,    ,<e.   .. g,p ,gy .

_ _ . ___ m__. . _ _ . - - - . . _ . . ~ _ _ _ - - e 9 g isJ TER-C5257-487

    -l            l
           .,                                                  1. INTRODUCTION
    ^:
         ?
  .i                1.1 PURPOSE OF THE EVALUATION
 , ; ',7 y.#                       The purpose of this report is to:             -

W E o evaluate licensees' resolutions of outstanding issues related to y.6 saf ety-related electrical equipment environmental qualification (EEQ)

 .g                                discussed in the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Safety Evaluation jl,"

Reports (SERs) in accordance with NRC criteria. The objective is to identify all cases where a licensee's response has not resolved the significant qualification issues. m

  ;pf                         o    evaluate licensees' qualification documentation of safety-related .
 ?$h                               electrical equipment located in harsh environments in accordance with
 ;;;#f                             criteria established by the NRC and to identify (1) equipment for 0%                                which qualification documentation is adequate, i.e., substantiates
 'gg                               that the equipment is capable of performing its specified design basis
 ,.d'                              safety function when it is exposed to a harsh environment and (2) p(:[p:

^ equipment for which qualification documentation is deficient, i.e., does not give reasonable assurance that the~ equipment is capable of performing its specified safety function. n;l o evaluate licensees' qualification documentation of safety-related L.@g electrical equipment located in harsh environments required for TMI ?% Lessons Learned Implementation. The objective is to evaluate /y [h qualification docunentation of equipment within the scope of IE Bulletin 79-01B, Supplement 3 (item 2) [7],* in accordance with 3h% criteria established by the NRC in a manner identical to the ovaluation of all other safety-related electrical equipment. lLV i:w

 .. m t?;W                 l.2       SCOPE OF THE EVALUATION 4 %,

C;m 9?$ The scope of this report is limited to the evaluation of environmental gmj,f qualification of electrical equipment that must function to mitigate the e

 ?:,'4ks            consequences of a loss of-coolant accident (LOCA) or high energy line break                                .

S<

j (BELB) and whose environment is adversely affected by that event.

Q ., iTs

',\,                *For References, see Section 6.             Note that reference numbers are not presented pf                    in sequential order.

Il l x n) din ReSearch Center ,l . - - - . - - . 4 -,

  -=                                       n                                                ~              c.                 m y ;, ,r, :y                                            ~

gr;, p~ ' .

      ..         .            .. a .~,-:.                  ".. _ _ _ .            - -. -. . . -- . a _ . m . . . w. . w = ., ..a TER-C5257-487 With respect to TMI Action Plan Implementation, the scope of this report is limited to those sections of NUREG-0737 [11] applicable to equipment having an installation implementation date of January 1,1981. Where applicable, a review is to be perf ormed on installed equipment with implementation dates after January 1, 1981 if adequately identified by the Licensee.

The NRC has determined that the evaluat' ion of environmental qualification of equipment items (1) located in plant areas whose environment is not adversely affected by the design basis event (DBE) (e.g., equipment located in

                   " mild" environments) or (2) required to achieve and maintain cold shutdown, is not to be included within the scope of this report. However, where the Licensee has identified these equipment items in the EEQ submittals to the NRC, these items have been listed in NRC evaluation Category III.b in this report (see Section 3 of this report for definition of NRC evaluation

'. categories) . l' Qualification aspects not included within the scope of this evaluation are: A o seismic and dynamic qualification

              ;          o equipment protection against natural phencmena if              ,         o    equipment operational service conditions (e.g., vibration, voltage, I                              and frequency deviations) o equipment located where it is subjected to the outdoor environment o    equipment protection against fire' hazards o equipment protection against missiles o equipment located in plant areas whose environment is not adversely affected by the design basis event
.                        o equipment required to achieve and maintain cold shutdown.

5 1.3 GENERIC ISSUE BACKGROUND Safety-related electrical equipment must be capable of perfoming design 4 safety functions under all normal, abnomal, and accident conditions. The purpose of equips'nt qualification is to provide , tangible evidence that equipment will operate on demand and to verify design performance, thereby c establishing assurance that the potential for common mode failure is minimized. 4 1-2

                        $$l Franklin Research Center i'i A tw.an on n. rr.n a mu.

1 i%: y g m

  • W ? W V 'C h y ,a f a - 'i''~^"*'*"N ' * *
                                                                               ',  ,      -~~'"':       m; ,  ""&W
       .(                         .. mn                     -r-        --                               - ax 2n::..~.    .aa.a.z:m   m
               ?
    ,N                              -

l l TER-C5257-487 l l

              ,                    Of particular concern is the assurance that equipment will remain operable during and following exposure to the harsh environmental conditions (i.e., temperature, pressure, humidity [ steam], chemical sprays, radiation,
   >y[.f and submergence) imposed as a result of a design basis accident. These harsh environments are generally defined by the limiting conditions resulting from u%
      /4                    the complete spectrum of postulated break sizes, break locations, and single
   .. a g                      failures consequent to a LOCA, main steam line break (MSLB) inside the reactor                              l
.y ; containment, or a HELB outside the reactor containment (such as a main steam
    ~#

or feedwater line break). In addition, depending on specific plant design

        )                  f eatures, other postulated HELE locations may be associated with:

Ch, o the chemical and volume control system (CVCS) letdown line 4 g o the steam supply piping to h ks the auxiliary feedwater (AFW) pump turbine the reactor core isolation cooling (kciC) pump turbine the high pressure core injection (HPCI) pump turbine , dp j - the isolation condenser i.w 1y o steam generator blowdown. 'd The NRC criteria for reviewing the safety of nuclear power generating l s,, l: - stations include the requirement that the qualification of safety-related 1

l. ,
                     - electrical equipment be substantiated by auditable documentation of the wl.

. fk hJ:@ program that establishes the ability of the equipment to function as specified in the station design. This report is restricted to a technical evaluation of Q.$ the equipment's ability to function in harsh environments resulting from DBEs.

   ;w
   .]                             Qualification criteria applied during the licensing of the older nuclear M                      power plants have been modified over the years, and specific industry i                           standards concerning qualification have been revised as the design of reactor 4AG                     systens has changed and as reFulatory and operating experience has

. .e ,f. A accumulated. Examples of such standards are IEEE Standards 279-71, 323-74, 2li[3 g4 a. 383-74, 317-76, 334-80, 381-77, 382-80, 535-79, 627-80, 649-80, and 650-79. Oh NRC NUREG documents 0413 and 0588 have been developed to address this topic. l [(k In particular, NUREG-0588 (published for co= ment in December 1979 and reissued

                .i       as ".evisica 1 in July 1981) for.nally presented the NRC staff positions TH                  regarding selected areas of environmental qualification of safety-related I

j j electrical equipment in the resolution of General Technical Activity A-24, r% l l17 ' w 1-3 iT! b. Frank!in Research Center iS, *o - em.Fr.nonv.au. M< n' Ll' --

                                          - m  c.. w :-, z-  --
                                                                              ' M   ;- -' I b  & ^~ *                            *
                                                                            %                              4
                                                                                                              '. ' [*h[? 
     .....~.s..o.          aw                           --a .a     : ~ n                (_-                               - - .

1 l l l TER-C5257-487

                " Qualification of Class IE Safety Related Equipment." The positions documented therein are applicable to plants that are or will be in the construction permit or operating license review process.

Although qualification standards and regulatory requirements have undergone considerable development, all of the currently operating nuclear power plants are re, quired to comply with 10CFR50, App?ndix A, General Design Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants, Section I, Criterien 4. This criterion dtates in part that " structures, systems and CCQponents important to safety shall be designed to accommodate the effects of and to be compatible with the environmental conditions associated with normal operation, maintenance, testing and postulated accidents, including loss-of-coolant accidents." Qualification requirements are also embodied in (1) 10CFR50 Appendix A, General Design Criteria 1, 2, and 23 and (2) 10CFR50 Appendix B, Quality f Assurance Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants and Fuel Reprocessing Plants, 7 Criteria III, " Design Control," and II, " Test Control." Thase requirements are applicable to safety-related equipment located outside as well as inside

,              containment.

The NRC staff has evaluated the licensees' equipment qualification programs by reviewing the qualification documentation of selected safety-related equipment as part of the operating license review for each plant. The NRC staff has also used a variety of methods to assure that these general requirements are met for electrical safety-related equipment. In the oldest plants, qualification was based on the fact that electrical components were of high industrial quality. Af ter 1971, qualification was judged on the basis of IEEE Std 323-71; however, no regulatory guide was issued adopting this standard. For plants whose SERs were issued af ter July 1,1974, the Cem=ission issued Regulatory Guide 1.89, which in most respects adopted the most recent standard, IEEE Std 323-74. s In November 1977, the Union of Concerned Scientists petitioned the NRC Cocmissioners to upgrade current standards for the environmental qualification

              'of safety-related~ electrical equipment in operating plants. Subsequently, the NRC staff instituted the Systematic Evaluation Program (SEP) to determine the degree to which the older operating nuclear power plants deviated from current 1-4 Ub Franklin Research Center A Dwe.on of The FrannAn resctue

.A W-y '

                  , ~ '.; ?         y       3 , g p     6.NW===      * ****"      -     -

4"- , .

                                                               -       . - . . .   .-- -        ~
                                                                                                          ~-- u : -                   ----r I

C, 4 d q; TER-C5257-487 j I licensing criteria. The subject of electrical equipment environmental

                ,            qualification (SEP Topic III-12) was -elected for accelerated evaluation as
                ;            part of this program.         Seismic qualification of equipment was to be addressed h
          ;.w                as a separate SEP topic. In December 1977, the NRC issued a generic letter to a,y ]                     all SEP plant licensees requesting that they initiate reviews to determine the Q.,.

adequacy of existing equipment qualification documentation. p Preliminary NRC review of licensee responses led to the preparation of a NUREC-0458, an interim NRC assessment of the environmental qualification of electrical equipment. This document concluded that "no significant safety

       -u A              deficiencies requiring immediate remedial actions were identified." However, Y,. .

It was recommended that additional effort should be devoted to examining the

       ,j                    installation and environmental qualification documentation of specific
 ,h]                         electrical equipment in all operating reactors.
.lm Wr .:

On May 31, 1978, the NRC Office of Inspection and Enforcement issued IE

  ;g;                        Circular 78-08, " Environmental Qualification of Safety-Related Electrical i

Equipment at Nuclear Power Plants," which required all licensees of operating lfl'l', I plants (except. those included in the SEP) to examine their installed (( 4 _ safety-related electrical equipment and ensure appropriate qualification w.e m.1, . documentation for equipment function under postulated accident conditions. ,NuC i2 Subsequently, on February 8,1973, the NRC Office of Inspection and Enforce-ment issued IE Bulletin 79-01, which was intended to raise the threshold of IE

  ' lj Circular 78-08 to the level of Bulletin,              i.e., action requiring a licensee i h..h #                    re spons e.       This Bulletin required a complete re-review of the environmental r'p]
            .              qualification of safety-related electrical equipment as described in IE C' d                      Circular 78-08.

[M

 ~,y    [I                             The review of the licensees' responses indicated certain deficiencies within p,{                       the scope of equipment addressed, definition of harsh environments, and adcquacy

[ of support documentation. It became apparent that generic criteria were needed

hh~ ..

for evaluating the electrical equipment environmental qualification for both SEP

 ~ c.,                     and non-SEP operating plants. Therefore, during the second half of 1979, the 5,9.) b                   Div1'sion of Operating Reacters (DOR) of the' NRC issued internally a document entitled " Guidelines for Evaluating Environmental Qualificatica of Class IE
 ]                   }     Electrical Equipment in Operating Reactors" [3]. (The document is hereafter 7.,

i$ & 1~5 '; W _up 3 dhrank!!n n o- n. n Rese_ arch Center '* Q .

         &o - , -               ,- _ ,                          -

s - --:,, _

                                                                                                                          ' ' *Y y M M % %R3
                                                                                                  . _ _ ' _ _ _; yT[q Y .
      . ...         ......-.u--.~.-----~.                          -
                                                                         ~ ~ . -                 .
                                                                                                         - -       ~ - -         '

TER-C5257-487 referred to as the " DOR Guidelines.") The document was prepared as a screening standard for reviewing all operating plants, including SEP plants. It was originally intended that the licensees evaluate their qualification documentation in accordance with the DOR Guidelines. However, initial NRC review of this documentation, which was compiled to support licensee submittals, revealed the need f or obtairing independent evaluations and for accelerating the qualifi-cation review program. , In October 1979, the NRC awarded Franklin Research Center a contract to provide assistance in the " Review and Evaluation of Licensing Actions for Operating Reactors," which included an assignment for review of equipment environmental qualification documentation under SEP Topic III-12. The assign-ment was to review equipment environmental qualification documentation and to present the results in the form of a Technical Evaluation Report for the 11 oldest plants (included in the SEP review). The plants included within the I assignment were the Palisades, Oyster Creek, Ginna, Haddam Neck, Yankee Rowe, Lacrosse, and Big Rock Point plants and Zion Station Units 1 and 2, Indian l Point Units 2 and 3, Millstone Unit 1, Dresden Unit 2, and San Onofre Unit 1. ~l (This assignment was completed in April 1981.) i On January 14, 1980, the NRC Office of Inspection and Enforcement issued the DOR Guidelines and IE Bulletin 79-01B, which expanded the scope of IE Bulletin 79-01 and requested additional infomation on environmental qualifica-tion of safety-related electrical equipment at operating facilities, excluding the 11 facilities undergoing the SEP review. This Bulletin cited the DOR Guidelines as the criteria to be used in evaluating the adequacy of the safety-related electrical equipment qualification. The scope of the review was expanded to include HELds (inside and outside containment) in addition to equipment aging and submergence. The NRC advised the licensees that the criteria contained in the DOR Guidelines would be used in its review of licensee submittals; NUREG-0588 would be used as a guide in cases where the DOR Guidelines do not provide sufficient detail. In early February 1980, the NRC decided that Indian Point Units 2 and 3 / and Zion Station Units 1 and 2 should be included within SEP Tepic III-12 for L the purpose of equipment environmental qualification review.

'                                                                        1-6
nkun Research Center
>l                              A Onas on of N Frarwen Irisottste fI
     &a       - ;;e..;.                            ;f                  } p +,e.                               W, -

n . - f, n.- - n - --- *n-7'} ~

                                                                                                                             . e
                                                 ~ . ~ ..                  _..   -. a .
                                                                                         ... 9                  .                     --

n :& [ ; ;w s

             ,1,                                               ,N                                                                                                                                  \

Q

          ,(                                                                              3                                TER-C5257-487
2 . \ s d I l,, On February 21, 1980, the NRC and representa'tives of the SEP Plant Owners l _ \
   ;5             d Group held an open meeting at NRC headquarters EC(discuss an accelerat;d reqev g                 b I               '
   ,e program in accordance with the D0R Cuide. lines-'-74presentatives of the ' Indian                                                                   - '
   ' p.;                    Point Units and Zion Station also attended this meeting.- The NRC foxmally (T-N                      issued to all licensees represented at the meeting the DOR Guidelines document which included n second document, " Guidelines for Identification of TliatC s.

r . u.4 - 3 ay Safety Equipment of SEP Operating Reactors for Vhich Environgental le r,g QualificationIsToBeAddressed"[3],togetherAUththerdq[catt1[atthex '

            ~.                                                                                                      -

s _

            "A              licensees review their plant systems and provide additior:1 equipmenc-environ- ;

mental qualification inf ormation to the NRC on an accelerated schedule. s For non-SEP pla ts, the NRC Office of Inspection and E'nforment formed a [A - pgm. task force including a principal reviewer in each region'and a task leader *-

9. s
  ;                                                                                                                                     . ~

r b,# f rom headq arters. The regional members wer* assidfti'd 'responsib11137 for the a_ _ T P

  }g.?                      technical review of the licensees' responses 'to 'IE Bulletin 79-CM.- and the 7
     ,M.          K         task leader was assigned responsibility for the oveh11 coordination of the s
          ,                 review effort with NRC staff to assure ovyrall ess'istency. The egional                                                                          3               \            '
                         ' reviewers held meetings with the licensies in their respective regions, which p ..

W

                                                                                                         .r i

resulted in staff positions being issued in a supplement to IE Bullecin 79-011 ',

     ). j                   dated February 29, 1980.                                              ,

1 g .~ -

  +yQ      t 3 In April 1980, the NRC organizational structure was modified And the                                                     .g b pj 2

Equipment Qualification Branch was formed within the new DiviN*on.of Engi- h %

                                                                                                                                                                                                 'N i[         ,
          ~, e neering . Hasponsibility for reviewing the status of equipmen't' qualification
                                                                                                                                                                                              ;.m y             for all plaats was\ assigned to this branch.                                                                                                       .s                    .

S. ' , -% [.g on May 23, 1380, the NRC issued Memorandum and Order CU-80'21 [8], , hl specifying that licensees and applicants aust meet the require 2ents set forth J

             .w                                         .
                                                                                                                                                                         ~ ,

Q,1 in the DOR Guidelines and NUREC-0588 regarding environmental qualification of

      %    A                safety-related electrical equipment in order to satisfy 10CFR50, Appendix A,                                            N O

General Design Criteria, Section I, Criterion 4. This Order also established 8 . u. that the SERs on this subject, to be prepared by the NRC staff, must be issuti [,W[ on February 1, 1981 and that all subsequent actions to be taken by licensees s 4

h. g.. 'to achieve full ccmpliance with the DOR Guidelines or NUREG-0588 must be W r completed no later t h n June 30, 1982. The Memorandum and Order 't stablished -

l l the DOR Guidelines a id NUREG-0588 as acceptable interpretations af the General 9 .

         .j %                                                                                                                                                                                      -

4 4 1-7 ' '

, 'eg, Uhh Franklin Research Center                                                                                                                                           '
          ,g                         A c m.on o m . rr.non m .                                                               ,
              ?                                                                                                                                                                                \

t, y 3- ~

                                                                                              , ,.         ..     :     y.          -c.,       ,.        -y , ' a '"f               e ;-

c -,

a 3 . .j. ~ ~ ..

                                                                     ;. ....-. = . - - .,.>.. .~ ,- - -           a w -a       ~ - =   - --

7

                                                \'                                                                       TER-C5257-487 Design Critena for an. interim period. Rulemaking was proposed for the purpose of establishing a permanent interpretation of the General Design Criteria.                     ,               s The staff held regional meetings with the licensees and interested parties du' ring the week of July 13, 1980. T'e                     h staff issued a second supplement to IE Bulletin 79-01B, a response' to significant questions raised during the public meetiggs, and .two Orders. The Order dated May 30, 1980 required the licensees t'o comply with the previously issued Commission Memorandum and Order of May 27,1980 (CLI-80-21). The above orders required the licensees to cceplete the tasks identified in IE Bulletin 79-01B no la' r than November'1,1980 to allow the staff to comply with the February 1,1981
                                         's
      ,                         date isused* ( ~ by the Commission Order. The responses to the questions were issued on'fet                    19, 1980; and the second and third supplements to IE Bulletin 79-                      ghlighting the staff positions affecting the licensees'

_. responses, were issued on September 29 and October 24, 1980, respectively. In October 1980,' EG&G Idaho, Inc., awarded Franklin Research Center a -

                                           ~
                       ;       contract to provide assiatance in the equipment environmental qualification

( 1

                           - review fot 13 of the plants whose licensees responded to IE Bulletin 79-013.

( '

                           - The assignment was to evaluate the licensees' equipment environmental qualifi-cation submittals'a6t to present the results in the form of a Technical Evaluatio(Report for eahh plant. The objective of this Technical Evaluation Report was to review the licensees' submittals to determine if safety-related
      ~s
                   ,           electrical equipment was 'raviewed for environmental qualification in L
  ,                            accordance with the DOR Guidelint:s and NUREC-0588 as required by IE Bulletin 79-013. The NRC was to perf orm an audit of the qualification documentation references as pgrt of its Safety Evaluation Program. If discrepancies were y                               found, t.he. 4tcit was to be extended. The plants included within this 4

assigyment were Nine Mile Point Unit 1, Millstone Unit 2, Salem Unit 1, Browns y, A ,' Ferly Unir.a 1, 2, and 3, Brunswick Units 1 and 2, Hatch Units 1 and 2, Dresden 4 g (, . Unit 3, and Quad Cities Units 1 and 2. (This assignment was completed in June 1981.) s Ini mid-1981, the NRC issued.3ERs on environmental qualification of

   'F
                             ' safe? related electrical equipment' to licensees of all operating plants.

t'

 ]    'A                 ,                                                                1-8
'i                                  y'W$ Trank!in Research Ceter 7                                       %  a, won er n. rr man m.an.

1-N {y3T@,'7W T%.y".~p .m.

                                                                     =y pupp       MT          -

i ve, 'Z , ;E" "'r ~ _st _ ._

, - _m -- _ . . _ _ w-- - _..m- . = - _. 7 TER-C5257-487 l I

        ,-            Where additional qualificatica information was required, the licensees were directed to respond to the NRC within 90 days of receipt of the SER.
          ,                 In May 1981, under the 110,ensing action assistance contract, NRC
        ,t ,

authorized Frank 11.1 Research Center to proceed with the review and evaltiation j of the environmectal qualificccf.on of safety-related electrical equipment "hc! located in harsh environmener, required for 'TKI Lessons Learned Implementation

       #              on 71 operating plants.
   ,m
    -e                      In July 1981, the NRC conducted extensive meetings with the nuclear j            industry to .tddress concerns and questions regarding qualification of safety-
     ,,{'             related equipment. In addition, the NRC provided licenseed with detailed j

information with respect to the format and expected content of the licensees'

4. .w , 90-day responses to the NRC SERs. Draft outlines of the following proposed programs were also presented to the industry: environmental qualification of
     ,M               equipment located in " mild" environments, seicnic and dynamic qualification, 3h

.- n; . and environmental qualification of mechanical equipment.

     ;q            g        On September 23, 1981, the NRC Commissioners consihred a petition i

j.s, .. (SECY-81-486) to extend the deadline for actions to be taken by licensees to <g % achieve environmental qualification of all safety-related equipment. On 9 September 30, 1981, the NRC Commissioners extended this deadline to the second q(e a refueling outage af ter March 31, 1982.

   - wh SM  9h                       In October 1981, the NRC' authorized Franklin Research Center to include within the scope of the existing EEQ assignnent (TMI Lessons Learned
m. f .. Implementation Equipment) the evaluation of licensees' resolutions of out-
     $..y u ..

M.$ standing issues related to equipment environmental qualification discussed in syl us ,k,M. . the NRC SERs in accordance with NRC criteria. The assignment was to review M,t the qualification documentation and to present the results in the form of a Technical Evaluation Report for 71 operating plants. (This report was devel- *

l. oped within the scope of this assig= ment.)
<      y-Fy                           On Jenuary 7,1982, the NRC Commissioners approved the issuance of the g..

yq proposed rule, "Enviror: antal Qualification of Electric Equipment for Nuclear QS Power Plants," f or public comment. The proposed rule was published in the

    ,n~

M Federal Register (Volume 47, No.13) dated January 20, 1982. d~ l 3, < 4 1~9 4'.# ~ NJ Frank!!n Research Center

    ;3';                      A om an am. rwon >.au.

l ['E j Y' .- _ 9 _, , p, . , .. ,. . - . . .

                                                                                     ,,ympgp o , ,. q: y ,;- = 3,a
             . - . . . .          - . . . . -    . -    -s.. .. - - -- .. -   -==-a  - --               -

TER-C5257-487 In February 1982, Proposed Revision 1 to Regulatory Guide 1.89,

           " Environmental Qualification of Electric Equipment for Nuclear Power Plants,"

was issued for public com=ent. This regulatory guide was issued to (1) reflect currant Ftc positions on equipment qualification and (2) provide guidelines for meeting the NRC Commissioners proposed rule on equipment qualification. . The final rule, " Environmental Qualification of Electric Equipment for ' Nuclear Power Plants," vas subsequently issued on April 16, 1982 by the NRC (to be published in the Federal Register) to clarify ar 3 strengthen the criteria for environnental qualification of electrical equipment. The final rule is to be incorporated into 10CFR50 as Section 50.49, "Envirocmental ,j Qualification of Electric Equipment for Nuclear Power Plants." The significant features of the rule are: f o Requalification of electrical equipment in accordance with the rule

 'I                          will not be required for equipment qualified or being qualified in accordance with the DOR Guidelines and IE Bulletin 79-013 or 1                           NUREG-0588, provided the qt alification program cocmenced wf thin 90 days af ter the effective d, :e of the rule.

o The requirement to qualify equipment needed to complete one path of achieving and maintaining a cold shutdown condition has been deleted. o A new section has been added, covering the qualification of equipment located in mild environments. o The Cor: mission de'adline for actions to be taken by licensees to achieve environmental qualification of all safety-related equipment is extended to the second refueling outage after March 31, 1982. On April 20, 1982, the NRC staff issued Generic Letter No. 82-09 [9] to all licensees, presenting the NRC's position and clarification of certain aspects of the environmental qualification requirements. p 1.4 SPECIFIC ISSUE BACKGROUND h On May 31, 19 78, the NRC Office of Inspection and Enforcement issued IE Circular 78-08, " Environmental Qualification of Safety-Related Electrical Equipment at Nuclear Power Plants," which required all licensees of operating plants to examine their installed safety-related electrical equipment and

                           .nkun_Resear_ch
                               ._             .C_ enter
    ~.== - -                                     - , n e a+ -                                             ,
                                                              . _ _ _ -     _ _ _ _   _n-         _ - - - -
                                                                                                                  -...~..- w n --          r . .w.w t

TER-C5257-487

            -l          l ensure appropriate qualification documentation for equipment function under postulated accident conditions.                    Subsequently, on February 8, 1979, the NRC i~

Office of Inspection and Enforcement issued IE Bulletin 79-01, which was intended to esise the threshold of IE Circular 78-08 to the level of Bulletin, I i.e., action requiring a licensee response. This Bulletin required a complete 9 re-review of the environ = ntal qualification of safety-related electrical

     ';                            equipment as described in IE Ci:cular 78-08.

On January 14, 1980, the NRC Office of Inspection and Enforcement issued the DOR Guidelines and IE Bulletin 79-OlB, which expanded the scope of IE Bulletin 79-01 and requested additional information on environmental qualification of safety-related electrical equipment at operating facilities.

  *]                             This Bulletin cited the DOR Guidelines as the criteria to be used in evaluating m                     the adequacy of the safety-related electrical equipment qualification.

r ; j( y, The NRC staff held regional meetings with the licensees and interested

  . vY J.               .,             parties during the week of July 13, 1980. The staff issued a second supplement to IE Bulletin 79-01B, a reeponse to significant questions raised
        ..y during the public meetings, and two orders. The Order dated May 30, 1980 required the licensees to comply with the previously issued Commission
      ]j,1                    Memorandum and Order of May 27, 1980 (CLI-80-21). The above orders required Il! ,

the licensees to complete the tasks identified in IE Bulletin 79-013 no later 6 M:* e than November 1, 1980 to allow the staff to. comply with the February 1, 1981 !{;-f: date imposed by the Commission Order. The responses to the questions were j, issued on February 29, 1980; and the second and third supplements to IE

f. 'vl Bulletin 79-013, highlighting the staff positions affecting the licensees'
  'i';M                        responses, were issued on September 29 and October 24, 1980, respectively.

M The NRC Office of Inspection and Enforcement perfomed (1) a preliminary 4' g evaluation of the Licensee's response, documented in a technical evaluation m - report (TER) and (2) an onsite verification inspection (October 27-29, 1980) 7, g of selected safety-related electical equipment. The condensate and feedwater O systems were insepcted at Unit 1, the compressed air system was inspected at Unit-2. The. inspection at both units verified proper installation of p :. ;

               ,             equipment, overall interface integrity, and manufacturer's nameplate data.

i The manufacturer's name and mc, del number from the na=eplate data were compared ' ; q; 4 1 11

        ;                               budd Frank!1n Research Center Ac    .e n. n = an m a s=-         ,,.         a     .,y               - m p           -

g 4p,....,w m ; w ,~ m i

     . . _ .           . _. . _ .. .. . . . - . ~ .  . . _     . ._ .a . a _       ^       --

TER-C5257-487 to infomation given in the Component Evaluation Work Sheets (CES) of the Licensee's report. The site inspection is documented for Ucits 1 and 2 in reports IE 50-317/80-20 and 318/80-18, respectively. No deficiencies were noted. On May 27, 1980 [1], Baltimore Gas and Electric Company provided the NRC with an equipment environmet.tal qualificatio'n submittal in response to IE Bulletin 79-013 for the Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Unit 1. On October 31, 1980 [2], Baltimore Gas and Electric submitted to the NRC further equipment environmental qualification infomation in response to IE Bulletin 79-01B. On February 3, 1981 [12], Baltimore Gas and Electric submitted to the NRC additional infomation in response to IE Bulletin 79-013. The NRC isstted a Safety Evaluation Report (SER) to Balcimore Gas and Electric on May 28, 1981 [13]. Requests for infomation [39, 44 41, 42, 43, 44]' were transmitted to the NRC by FRC to obtain qualification docu=entation referenced by the Licensee in its submittals, TMI Action Plan infomation, and correlations to NUREG-0737 [11]. I' l t By letters dated September 1, 1981 [14] and April 12, 1982 [35], , Baltimore Gas and Electric tranemitted to the NRC responses to the SER. l l In References 16,17,18, 36, 37, and 38, Baltimore Gas and Electric k responded to the FRC requests for additional infomation. ( ) I t I

                  #A                                      1-12 O

l UNEnklin Research Center 4

                         +.on a n. re %.

I i Me-= uw r.me ;_ - z - - _ .-

                                        . , .7 , ., . - _ , -; g          y        ,
                                                                               . _ 7 7m 7,g n_ _.y .

m..._ ..:.u. L I

     ~,                                                                                                 TER-C5257-487 l           l 1
2. NRC CRITERIA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

( 2.1 CRITERIA PROVIDED BY THE NRC The screening guideli,nes used to evaluate the electrical equipment environmental qualification program were: ! D: o DOR Guidelines, " Guidelines for Evaluating Environmental Qualification of Class lE Electrical Equipment in Operating Reactors," November 1979

              ;                         [3]

o NUREG-0588, Revision 1, " Interim Staff Position on Environmental Qualification of Safety-Related Electrical Equipment," July 1981 [10].

  ; L P.                           Other appropriate references used in the review of the licensees'
           .j                electrical equipment environmental qualification submittals are:
     , vf
  !Y   ..                          o IE Bulletin 79-013, " Environmental Qualification of Class lE j.F                                  Equipment," January 14, 1980; Supplemer.t No. 1, February 29, 1980; 1/                                    Supplement No. 2, September 29, 1980; and Supplement No. 3, October
{ I 24, 1980 [4, 5, 6, 7]

b .; o NUREG-0737, " Clarification of TMI Action Plan Requirements," November

              ?                        1980 [11]. This document is applicable for the selection of equipment 1;'                                 for the evaluation of the environmental qualification of
   -M                                  safety-related electrical equipment located in harsh environments
         .3                            required for TMI Lessons Learned Implementation. The scope of the review is limited to equipment associated with specific sections of
                 ~
 ,,,                                 NUREG-0737 which have an installation implementation date of January
 }X                                    1. 1981. Where applicable, a review is to be performed on installed l'y                                  equipment with implementation dates after January 1, 1981 if
  ! ~J '                               adequately identified by the licensee.

f.f ,i

 ,9 2.2   STAFF POSITIONS AND SUPPLEMENTAL CRITERIA U s::
   ,(         .

The NRC identified the following staff positions and supplemental j criteria to be used in conjunction with the referenced screening guidelines.

       .g 2.2.1    Requirements and Applicable Criteria
         .+'
            ;gq                    Items 3 and 17 of Supplement 2 to IE Bulletin 79-01B [6] describe the 4
  !';.)

, .. I l application of the DOR Guidelines and NUREG-0588 to operating reactors (ors),

   ,4i A                                         2-1
       . Y. .                     Ub Franklin Research Center

.; o y % a n.o.n a % h i=--

                                                                                                       ,y
                                                                                       ,.3 y . m S. j.7     -,   y n ,4 .,,

l t TER-C5257-487 near term operating license applicants (NTOLs), and construction permit applicants (cps). The qualification requirements and applicable criteria are stated as follows: [ Question 3]

                           " Define the requirements and applicable criteria for ors, NTOLs, and OLs. Specifically address the NIOLs whose CP SER is prior to July 1974 and after July *1974. Can a CP whose SER is prior to 1974 use the DOR guidelines?"

[NRC Answer to Question 3]

                           " Table 1 describes the application of each document. All operating reactors as of May 23,1980, will be evaluated against the DOR guidelines. In cases where the DOR guidelines do not provide sufficient detail, but NUREG-0588 Category II does, NUREG-0588 will be used.

TABLE 1 ,

,                                                             REQUIREMENTS ors,                                     OLs                                 cps CP SER                  CP SER DOR GUIDELINES       Before 7/1/74           After 7/1/74 i

USE NUREG-0588 NUREG-053' NUREG-0588 NUREG-0588 i AS NECESSARY (C M . 11) (CAT. I) (CAT. I) or

?

NEW RULE WHEN j IN EFFECT REPLACEMENT C'OMPONENTS USE NUREG-0588 (CAT. I) All plants licensed after May 23, 1980, shall conform to NUREG-0588. In accordance with Regulatory Guide 1.89, all such operating licenses for facilities whose construction permit SER is dated July 1, 1974 or later, are to be reviewed against IEEE Std. 323-1974. Thus, for these licensees, the operating license applicant is to qualify equipment to the Category I i, column in NUREG-0588. For operating licenses issued after May 23, 1980, 2 whose construction permit SER is dated before July 1,1974, the operating license applicant is to qualify equipment to at least Category II column .

.i                         of NUREG-0588; unless the licensee made commitment in the construction                                      l f                          permit record to use the 1974 standard, or unless the operating licensee                                    ]

application record indicates that the 1974 standard is to be used, in i such cases Column I of NUREG-0588 is to be used. While there are differences between the Category II column of NUREG-0588 ) and the DOR guidelines, the differences are in details and in the 2-2

;                          m bbnklin Research Center i
                                           *~
  • NSCG7%CLT.~*"~* - _ _g g,.

[? ~ ___ _ _ _.

                                                   -                                  -                                  n-n:

TER-C525 7-487

        'l           l optional part of the documents. The minimum requirements set forth by
               ,               these documents cre general and compatible. Thus, the minimum standards set by either of the two documents are equally applicable to ors and NIOLs."

(Question 17]

   . ,?.  -
'L ,,,s                       " Define the requirements for ' replacement parts.'                           Are they the same for
;                              ' spare' parts? Clear}y discuss the alternatives for existing inventories
..; 4 of parts / components. If equipment is ordered to meet IEEE Std. 323-1974

.e standard but lead time exceeds June 1982, can we use IEEE Std. 323-1971 .,,.,, qualified components in the interim?"

 .y,
 ;Y                    s       (NRC Answer to Question 17]

t "The requirements for ' replacement' and ' spare' parts are the same for j the purposes of ,omplying with the Commission order and memorandum. A After May 1980, all parts used to replace presently installed parts shall -f be qualified to Category I of NUREG-0588 'unless there are sound reasons a f.y to the contrary.' Nonavailability and/or the fact that the part to be AM used as a replacement is a spare part purchased prior to May 23, 1980, p and is in stock are among the factors to be considered in weighing .; 7 whether there are ' sound reasons to the contrary.' All replacement parts f3 shall as a minimum conform to the requirements described in the, answer to ]{ question 3. Justification for deviation from Category I of NUREG-0588 g shall be documented by the licensee and records shall be available for A .. NM audit, upon request by the NRC." 1:o

*i#:l M                       2.2.2    Application of Requirements and Criteria to TMI Lessons a.7 Learned Implementation Equipment The NRC requested an evaluation of the environmental qualification of c.y safety-related electrical equipment located in harsh environments required for EQ v ,-

TMI Lessons Learned Implementation in accordance with reiteria established by 4CE., w the NRC in a manner identical to the evaluation of all other safety-related Mi electrical equipment. Additionally, Item 21 of Supplement 2 to IE Bulletin M g 79-01B (6] states: M g "TMI Lessons Learned instrumentation will be considered in the February 1, jy 1981 SER. This equipment is subject to the same requirements as other 2y f safety-related electrical equipment. The guidance and requirements of 9r NUREG-0588 referenced daughter standards, and Reg Guides will be used by y the staff in assessing the adequacy of the qualification information."

   'JO                                                             ,

j$;y. Item 2 of Supplement 3 to IE Bulletin 79-013 [7] states: D." "IEB 79-01B required a 90 day response which was due in mid-April 1980. uq tl I Supplement 1 (Feb. 1980) informed licensees that equipment which was ll 2-3 3 G Franklin Research Center h.K 7.[

   .                              ^ cam.an er N rrwe,a wou.
 ' iN-           -
                                                     ,= yp 7 r            e ;- r'  i M>Jg 8
                                                                                                                          .I"* T k "U "' ~Yb

[ * ' f # ' ,~ ' I- E ' ' '[

n... ..- . - . ... ...- . . .-. _ ~ .. . - .- -~..n -

                                                                                                                  ,a      --

TER-C525 7-48 7

                  ' planned' to be installed as a result of lessons learned need not be addressed in that response. Some of this equipment has since been e               installed.              Supplement #2 (Q.5, Q.21) identified that the staff position was that equipment which is installed should be treated in a manner similar to all other safety-related electrical equipment and be addressed
  ;              in the November 1, 1980 submittal. This position represents no change in J

staff position regarding the scope of the review. However, since the staff position on this issue was unclear the following will apply:

                                                                                         ~
a. Qualification information for installed TMI Action Plan equipment must be submitted by February 1,1981.
b. Qualification information for future TMI Action Plan equipment (ref.

NUREG-0737, when issued), which requires NRC pre-implementation review, must be submitted with the pre-implementation review data.

c. Qualification information for TMI Action Plan equipment currently under NRC review should be submitted as soon as possible.
d. Qualification information for "MI Action Plan equipment not yet i installed which does not require pre-implementation review should be submitted to NRC for review by the implementation date."

2.2.3 Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review Supplement 2 of IE Bulletin 79-01B [6] permits deferment of the review of environmental qualification for all safety-related equipment items located in s plant areas where the equipment is not exposed to the direct effects of a high energy line break (BELB) or to nuclear radiation emanating from circulation of fluids.containing radioactive substances. Supplement, 3 of IE Bulletin 79-013.

   ,      [7] permits deferment of the review of environmental qualification for all equipment required to achieve and maintain the plant in a cold shutdown condition. Supplements 2 and 3 of 79-013 originally permitted deferment until after February 1,1981 of the qualification review of equipment located in a

?( mild environment or required to achieve and maintain the plant in a cold 7 shutdown condition. Since the issuance of Supplements 2 and 3, the NRC has h determined that the review of environmental qualification for this equipment is not within the scope of the present review program. O u J ) 2-4 Djj Franklin Research Center A DMs.on of The Frannan insoeute

 . v[--- Tv     .-    .mr.s=r,% y .,y,g.,               q J  ,9. % p yq7; q y g g r-m r.-Mg,-;j.7,g.        --7,...,g.,
                                                                                                 . ~ . .                s
                                .~. -;                            - . . -                      m _: : :a                         - w.;;.acw   r-- 2
            ^

TER-C525 7-487 l F 2.2.4 Clarification of Qualification Requirements 2.2.4.1 Service Conditions Inside Containment for a Loss-of-Coolant Accident (DOR Guidelines Section 4.1) For pressurized water reactors (PWRs), the DOR Guidelines state that the

      ,"                     containment temperature and pressure conditions as a function of time should be based on the most recent NRC-approved service conditions specified in the

{ Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) or other licensee documentation. In the

               ..,           specific case of pressure-suppression type containments, the following minimum high temperature conditions may be used: (1) boiling water reactor (BWR) drywells - 340*F for 6 hours and (2) PWR ice condenser lower compartments -

340*F for 3 hours. As stated in Supplement 2 to IE Bulletin 79-OlB [6], e "these values are a screening device, per the Guidelines, and can be used d.n

      ,n lieu of a plant-specific profile, provided that expected pressure and humidity
  ! .h; ,                    conditions as a function of time are accounted for."
        . ,e,,

, '!.l, Service conditions should bound those expected for coolant and steam line

    . y@.                    breaks inside containment with due consideration given to analytical
                           - uncertainties. The steam line break condition should include superheated

,7 conditions, the peak temperature, and subsequent temperature /pressurs profiles as functions of time. If containment spray is to be used, the impact of the

         .I[                 spray on required equipment should be assessed.
 }

l&{ , The adequacy of a plant-specific profile depends on the assumptions and

 %.x                 <       design considerations at the time the profiles were developed. The DOR
p. .
 , f%s                       Guidelines and N'JREG-0588 provide guidance and considerations required to M.'

JW determine if the calculated plant-specific temperature / pressure profiles

 . .1                        encompass the loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) and HELB accidents inside containment.
   . . k .N y

l[ 2.2.4.2 Submergence (D0k Guidelines Section 4.1, Subitem 3; and Seccion 4.3.2, Subitem 3) yn

  ,{."                                       Equipment submergence (inside or outside containm;nt) should be addressed d                          where the possibility exists that submergence of equipment may result from
  %(..;                      HELBs or other postulated occurrences.                                 Supplement 2 to IE Bulletin 79-01B [6]
   -t*                                                                                                     If the equipment satisfies the bl                      I provides the following additional criterion:

4y

   .;                                                                                            2-5 Q 'V'                                   .     .L. Frank lin Research Center Aemmaatn. % ,am        u.

W

                   %  }

r]'. %-

                                                                                '"g "F- T F      F 1' -' . E' '

Y,, ,yj [ e-

     .._w.               .~. a            +                .~ ....---.-. - .~ -    - - . -- . .            -            w-~=

l TER-C525 7-487 guidance and other requirements of the DOR Guidelines or NUREG-0588 for the j IOCA and HELB accidents, and the licensee demonstrates that its failure will not adversely affect any safety-related function or mislead the operator af ter submergence, the equipment can be considered exempt from the submergence portion of the qualification requirements.

                                                   ~

2.2.4.3 Simulated Service Conditions and Test Duration (DOR Guidelines Section 5.2.1) 'I The Guidelines require that the test chamber environment envelop the required service conditions for a time equal to the period from the initiation of the accident until the service conditions eturn to normal. Supplement 2 to IE Bulletin 79-OlB [6] provides the following additional criterion:

                        " Equipment designed to perform its safety related function within a short time into an event must be qualified for a. period of at least I hour in j;                      excess of the time assumed in the accident analysis. The staff has indicated that time is the most significant factor in ter=s of the margins required to provide an acceptable confidence level that                          a j

safety-related function will be completed. The 1-hour qualification y requirement is based on the acceptance of a type test for a single unit -1 - and the spectrum of accidents (small and large breaks) bounded by the 1 single test." I

!                 2.2.4.4     Test Sequence (DOR Guidelines Section 5.2.3)
;                       Supplement 2 to IE Bulletin 79-OlB [6] provides the following additional criteria:
                        " Sequential testing requirements are specified in NUREG-0588 and the D0R Guidelines. Licensees must follow the test requirements of the applicable document.
1. If the test has been completed without aging in sequence, justification for such a deviation must be submitted.
 ]

1

2. If testir.g of a given component has been scheduled but not initiated, the test sequence / program should be modified to include aging.

s

3. Test programs in progress shculd be evaluated regarding the ability to compty by incorporating aging in the proper sequence. These programs ~

would then fall in the first or second category." O nklin Research Center A Cmmon cd The Frannan lessa.te

*m=,      , - - ,-                                       -

3- -- ,

                                                                                                ,q py         n ;27,3    .3 . - -
                                                                                                                     ~

e TER-C525 7-487 2.2.4.5 Radiation (DOR Guidelines sections 4.1.2, 4.2.2, and 4.3.2. Subitem 2) Supplement 2 to IE Bulletin 79-013 [6] provides the following additional criteria: 4

       .h                    "Both the DOR Guidelines and NUREG-0588 are similar in that they provide s '~                    the methods for determining the radiation source term when considering
              . ,           MCA events inside containment (100% noSle gases /50% iodine /1%
               '-            particulates). These methods consider the radiation source term
               'o 4

resulting from an event which completely depressurizes the primary system and releases the source term inventory to the containment. NUREG-0578 provides the radiation source term to be used for determining the qualification doses for equipment in close proximity to recirculating

           '.,'              fluid systems inside and outside of containment as a result of WCA.

This method considers a LOCA event in which the primary system may not

        t                 depressurize and the source term inventory remains in the coolant.

m;

            \          -

NUREC-0588 also provides the radiation source term to be used for t D qualifying equipment following non-IDCA events both inside and outside f[ l' containment (10% nobl.e gases /10% iodine /0% particulates). Mi '.1 hen developing radiation source terms for equipment qualification, the j '. licensee must ensure consideration is given to those events which provide h 'I I the most bounding conditions. The following table summarizes these h ', , . considerations: M yy'. I i;I LOCA Non-LOCA HELB

  <; . ,4,.
    -#                     Outside Containment             NUREG-0578        NUREG-0588
    'W .

(100/50/1 (10/10/0 Ih :w I4 in RCS) [*] in RCS)- . t 35 Inside Containment Larger of c. 3 d, -

         %                                                 NUREG-0588        NUREG-0588 2$                                                   (100/50/1         (10/10/0 J:

7.Q. . in containment) in RCS) 1q

         ..b
,:1. ,

or

    ...r.                                                                                                               .
.N NUREG-0578 LM (100/50/1 E) y '.1, in RCS) f'N
~
       %.            *The numbers in parentheses represent % noble gases /% iodine /% particulates.

l.- RCS means reactor coolant system.

          -[

p. 7, { } 4e

1. -

4.,

                         &                                        2-7

,b,k.

       ,.4 d Franidin Research Center 4 cem. a m rr.e ex.u.

f ' , i. d ^ - u 4 ~.m . 2 --> Qm y y.g, ..(,33 pmy--=v-- . r ~ST ' ' ~ - ~ ' ' n ., f ~ V:x

           .._        ..,m._2~-._.~_--_                                     .- -      -

o 1 l I TER-C525 7-487 Gamma equivalents may be used when conr' '... 5 of the contibutions of beta exposure has been included in accordance witt. the guidance given in ; the DOR Guidelines and NUREG-0588. Cobalt 60 is one ?.:ceptable gamma l radiation source for environmental qualification of satety-related equipment. Cesium 137 may also be used." 2.2.5 Additional Clarification of Qualification Requirements The NRC has worked with a number of licensees, at their requests, to provide further clarification on environmental qualification requirements. On January 20, 1982, the NRC issued Generic Letter No. 82-09 [9] presenting staff positions on certain aspects of the qualification requirements. Generic Letter No. 82-09 states:

                         "1.       Operator Display Instrumentation                                        .

Q. Given the interrelated activities associated with display instrumentation (e.g., NUREG-0700, NUREG-0799, proposed Regulatory Guide 1.97 and Equipment Qualification efforts), what display instrumentation referenced in emergency operating procedures must be identified in licensee submittal to the NRC7 A. All display instrumentation referenced in th~e emergency procedures need not be identified. The NRC requires that licensees need only identify and have available qualification documentation on those operator display instruments which are safety-related (see Question 2). If licensees have previously supplied a listing of all display instrumentation referenced in emergency procedures, licensees may identify (such as by the use of an *) which of those instruments are s afe ty-relate d. The staff will defer review of' the basis for this' safety-related classification until other NRC activitiesl have been implemented. When these other activities are implemented, additional instruments presently not requiring qualification may require upgrading to a safety-related status and/or may require qualification. Licensaes will be required at that time to qualify

]                                  this instrumentation in accordance with the following criteria:

o For new or upgraded instrumentation with a required operation date prior to the equipment qualification deadline, qualification cust be accomplished by the equipment qualification deadline. 1 Such activities include preparation of new emergency procedures (NUREG-0799), control room design reviews (NUREG-0700), and upgrading of accident monitoring instrumentation (Reg. Guide 1.97 and NUREG-0737). 2-8 O LM Franidin Research Center a em om. F on wou. w

  • w erIP g% emuAp4mM , *9* *e%. ,- - $ ** 9 N y -- --w- ' ' - -- . , -h --

w

mm .s. .- - -- x - u- - - - aw- ' u.:.w = TER-C525 7-487 o For new or upgraded instrumentation with a required operation date

   ,                                               after the equipment qualification deadline, qualification must be accomplished prior to equipment operation and plant acceptance.

s 2. Safety-Related Equipment 4 Q. For Equipment Qualification purposes, what constitutes ay safety-related electrical equipment? !' A. The Commission, 'in CLI-80-21, required the environmental l + qualification of only safety-related " electrical equipment. lr Identification of the safety-related equipment installed at specific plants can be obtained from FSARs, Technical Specifications and

         ,-                                        other docketed correspondence setting forth NRC requirements or
         ,                                         licensee commitments. Identification of safety-related equipment installed in harsh environments at specific plants must be supplied l                                                   by the licensee. The necessity for upgrading nonsafety-related Y                                 system to safety-related status will be the subject of other NRC c                                  reviews.

7..j t- .; [y' I; s

3. Replacement Parts 3; Q. Please clarify the NRC requirements on replacement parts.

7 I_I I A. In CLI-80-21, the Commission stated that unless chere were sound reasons to the contrary, replacement equipment should be qualified ['d to the standards set forth in Category I of NUREG-0588. The ]kl t, f Commission's position was designed to promote the policy of upgrading the environmental qualification and reliability of p'y installed safety-related electrical equipment. To meet this overall p '? goal, licensees must institute internal policy practices consistent i, : , with the Commission's state.nent. ! V .4 ![', Situations may arise in which upgrading to NUREG-0588, Cate.gwy I of

ss, replacement equipment qualified to NUREG-0588, Category II or the
       ." ? <                                      DOR Guidelines will not be compatible with overall station safety
    , ( ,' l                                       and performance goals. Licensees must review such situations on a casa-by-case basis and determine that ' sound reasons to the M@0t'                                               contrary' do, in fact, exist which warrant the use of replacement
     !,,'                                          equipment (not necessarily in-kind) qualified to the DOR Guidelines

,[ :, or NUREG-0588, Category II. For equipment located in a harsh ! S environment, licensaes' procedures must provide for documentation i f'd. and substantiation of such determinations. . ;f l .- ,h' ' n s t 1: i 2-9 ay h,h, ,. , A Franklin Research Center .4 *[ A Dmseon of Th4 Fraren insamee i; , 'i

     "#~
                         ' - - '. , = ,           ,F"7--r                            s*p +
                                                                                                           ~

f -] . - r, s- 's " ' '

                                                                                                                                 ~7"'

7 -. ,D

         . .                            . . . _-,._:......               u...-- . .. _ _.._.       ,.. ___ ~          ..__ m ,- - -

TER-C525 7-487 Conditions which reflect sound reasons why qualification standards for replacement of equipment in a harsh environment need not be 9i upgraded to NUREG-0588, Category I include the following:

1. The licensee has replacement equipment in stock that meets the DOR Guidelines or NUREG-0588, Category II, and procurement actions regarding such replacement equipment had com=enced prior to May 23, 1980,
2. Replace' ment equipment qualified to the NUREG-0588, Category I standards does not exist.
3. Replacement equipment qualified to the NUREG-0588, Category I standards is not available to meet installation and operation schedules. Equipment qualified to the DOR Guidelines or NUREG-0588, Category II may be used for an interim period until Category I equipment is obtained and an outage of sufficient duration is available for replacement. Justification for use of the non-Category' I qualified replacement equipment beyond this interim period must be submitted to the NRC for approval prior to the end of the interim period and in sufficient time for reasonable NRC review.
4. Replacement equipment qualified to NUREG-0588, Category I standards would require significant plant modifications to

, accommodate its use. f

5. Operating perfor=ance and reliability data for the Category I equipment indicates poor overall equipment performance. For example, mean time to failure is significantly shorter for the Category :: replacement equipment.
6. The use of, replacement equipment qualified to NUREG-0588, Category I standards has a significant probability of creating human' factor problems that will negatively affect plant safety and performance, e.g., (1) knowledge, skills and ability of existing plant staff require significant upgrading to operate or maintain the specific Category I replacement equipment; (2) the use of equipment qualified to Category I standards creates a one-of-a-kind application; or (3) maintenance, surveillance or calibration activities are unnecessarily complex.
5. Submergence outside Containment Q. For equipment qualification purposes, what are the staff requirements concerning submergence of equipment cutside containment?

i 2-10 O M J' bu Franklin Research Center A om.oa om. n non m.au. ' '-<-e.,-- .c ve --c: c-e , env . - s+.=sa y m: 7,w-;- me n s - , 53 5 . , . > ,- , _ -.

ma w. . . . . u- " w - - - - a;.a -. - -

                                                                                                                  .-Y 1

3*- r TER-C525 7-487 l I A. The Staff requires that the' licensee submit documentation on the

;                                  qualification of safety-related equipment that could be submerged due to a high energy line break outside containment.
            }                6. Radiation
j. ' Q. Is the staff screening value of 4 x 107 rads applicable to all
          .                        operating reactors?                    ,
l f #< A. No. This screening value is applicable only to PWRs with dry type L -

containments. However, for PWRs with dry type containments, the

c. Licensee may choose to use plant specific analysis instead of the screening value. For plants with other containment types, the licensee must use plant specific analysis.

Acceptable to the Staff for equipment qualification purposes are C radiation values developed as part of the plant licensing process provided that they are based on the TID 14844 source terms and are

          -.                       conservatively performed. In order to assure that the methodologies

[jp are appropriate, the Staff requests two component specific sample Si calculations (one for inside and one for outside containment), and a dj brief written description of each of the methodologies used, their (p' application and associated conservatisms. Such sample calculations and a statement by the licensee that the values of radiation exposure k] of components so derived are appropriate for environmental

'1                                 qualification of equipment will satisfy the Staff's concern on the
                                   ' Radiation Specification Valee' used during the qualification reviews.

{y*]L j,

7. Containment Service Conditions
  -( s h.

Q{.; Q. Must the Staff value (identified in the SERs) of Tgg7 for PWRs and T SAT j(k ,

                                          + 20*F for BWRs be used as the maximum in-containment temperature for the purpose of equipment qualification?
        ?

A. No. The Staff will accept the use of these values. However, an Q,, acceptable alternative to the NRC staff's temperature criterion used s 3 for the service conditions must base that service condition on the Ih E FSAR analysis or other NRC approved analysis, provided that the

  ' i                             specific analysis, or a summary of that analysis, together with reference to tha previous NRC acceptance of the analysis is submitted

(@y] by the licensee. In addition, some of the information in the associated safety evaluation may require clarification. j . , .j ~

8. . One Hour Minimum Openting Time
   ; c.

N Q. The Staff has previously indicated that certain exceptions to the one 4-hour minimun operating time rule are permitted. Can further clarification be provided?

            ?                                                     2-11 h7 y                       QUdJ Franklin Research Center g" u                              4t w wn.nuanwou.

I y - ~ . - g.,;.

     ,      . - . . .     . . . . . - . . - . ~ . .      . -         ,.~.-... - . = - -             -
                                                               %                                                                       1 i

i TER-C5257-487

                                                                                                                                       )

A. With' regard to plants subject to the qualification requirements of the DOR Guidelines or Category II of NUREG-0588, for those pieces of G, 1 equipment tested prior to May 23, 1980, the test data and analysis may be used to qualify the equipment to the required operating time , plus an appropriate margin. The one hour margin requirement need not i be applied. However, subsequent failures should be shown not to be , detrimental to plant safety. 1 The one hour time margin rule is not applicable to equipment whose safety func~ tion is perfor=ed prior to significant changes in the environment at the equipment location.

9. ging i Q. Must a qualified life be developed for all safety-related electrical equipnent located in harsh environments? i A. Section 7 of the DOR Guidelines and Section 4.2, Category II of NUREG-0588, do not require a qualified life to be established for all safety-related electrical equipment located in harsh environments. A qualified life, in accordance with the provisions in IEEE 323-1974, is required for equipment, including replacement parts, qualified to Category I of NUREG-0588 that is located in a harsh environment.

An acceptable method for addressing in-service degradation is through a preventive maintenance / surveillance program with equipment and component refurbishment and/or replacement based on known susceptibility ;o aging degradation, the results of inspections, or manufacturers recommendations. These elements of the program lead to an understanding on a device specific basis of the nature and extent of the increased stress levels encountered during Design Basis

                                         . Accidents and resultant degradation (if.any) which may. occur.
                                                       ~                                                         .

Arrhenius or o.ther appropriate accelerated aging methodologies may be used to establish replacement and refurbishment schedules if the ! component's design and materials application are sufficiently simple ; and the necess.try data are available to allow a meaningful applica- ! tion. .1 ' l In plants subject to the qualification requirements of either the DOR Guidelines or NUREG-0588 Category II, for equipment that has been 1 identified as being susceptible to significant degradation due to ' thermal and radiation aging, the schedule for inspection of and/or l replacement of the susceptible components in that equipment must be ! incorporated into the preventive maintenance and surveillance ; programs, and that information should be incorporated into the system I component evaluation worksheets (SCEWS). For other equipment, the .j aging colu=n in the SCEWS chauld be marked 'No Known' Susceptibility'." i 2-12 O l MbMU Frank lin Research Center 4 om a n. n wn ,,, z ,-- ; ; .;

           ~~
    ; .*F*       KY."~~-WQG,'.}.*V4', 2 PiJ.:ss:WM~'.~,
                                                                                  ^'
                                                                                , K ":-R
                                                                                             . }      ,
                                                                                                          ,         _y, -. . _ , , ,

o >

Q.

m, r-b TER-C525 7-487 l l

3. METHODOLOGY USED FOR THE EVALUATION

3.1 INTRODUCTION

5:

       . v.

eM ;! As discussed in Section 1.3 of this report, the NRC issued Safety e?-)

             -y            Evaluation Reports (SERs) on environmental qualification of safety-related
         ,   c.m equipment to licensees of all operating plants in mid-1981.

y-The SERs identified various equipment qualification deficiencies as indicated below: LEGEND: DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY

     '..?                    R - Radiation                                            M - Margin ll'Q&.                      T - Temperature                                          I - HELB Evaluation Outside i; y                      QT - Qualification Time                                            Containment Not Completed if (D                    RT - Required Time                                       QM - Qualification Method P - Pressure                                          RPN - Equipment Relocation or Replacement,
  -M@                        H - Humidity                                                     Adequate Schedule Not Provided 7'                          CS - Chemical Spray                                     EXN - Exempted Equipment Justification
 .d                   I      A - Material Aging Eval.tation,                                  Inadequate f:. , ,                              Replacement Scheaule, Ongoing                  SEN - Separate Effects Qualification j                 Equipment Surveillance                                    Justification Inadequate
       /L N                  S - Submergence                                        QI - Qualification Information Being B el                        (R) - Licensee has coc=ritted                                      Developed of                                to replace equipment                           RPS - Equipment Relocation or Replacement D$                                                                                             Schedule Provided
       %:..w%    ;

The SERs directed licensees to "either provide documentation of the missing g.;y.q: [Jgh qualification information which demonstrates that safety-related equipment meets the DOR Guidelines or NUREG-0588 requirements or commit to a corrective t A: f.P 7. , i action (re-qualification, replacement (etc.]) to establish qualification by m M.s M..jh June 30, 1982." Licensees were required to respond to the NRC within 90 days f %. 4 M- of receipt of the SER. Mb.C As stated in Section 1.1, the purpose of this repcet is (1) to evaluate $:4 4, licensees' resolucions of outstanding issues related to safety-related p electrical equipuent environmental qualification (EEQ) discussed in the NRC's v[p,l SERs in accordance witti NR'C criteria, and ~(2) t'o evaluate licensees' M 2' qualification documentation of safety-related electrical equipment, including

       .]             }

h, .J: As 3-1 @ h... NOU FranMn Research Center Q.Q:1 4 o==en s m Fran sn in.ma. % ,~ :s

                            --    .                           w _        . _ - _,,
                                                                                                                                ,c q g , - -,

[

_ _ . , _ . . . . _ _ . _ . . - . . . . .. . .. . <.um . . .A L..A ..k . s... ,- .._...s ,.. .. ".. '.*.

                                                                                                                        .   :.2 . .aa;, :
                                                                                                                                .         m~
    . 1 TER-C5257-487 TMI Lessons Learned Implementation equipment, located in harsh environ =ents in accordance with criteria established by the NRC (see Section 2 of this report). The methodology used to evaluate (1) the Licensee's response to the NRC SER and (2) the equipment environmental qualification is presented herein.

s 3.2 METHODOLOGY '

            .                  The Licensee, Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, provided a response to the SER and additional qualification information in its submittals [14, 35, 16, 17, 18, 36. 37, 38] to the NRC for Calvert Cliffs l'uclear Power Plant Unit 1.

The following bases provided by the NRC were used to determine the relative completeness of the Licensee's submittals: o Determine whether the Licensee provided specific responses to the SER Concerns. o Determine whether the Licensee proposed corrective actions and a 6 schedule for completion of the actions. W

  ,                            o   Determine whether the Licensee addressed the NRC's concern for margin g                                with respect to the containment environmental conditions.

4

 '(.                           o   Determine whether the Licensee revised the environmental parameters.

o Da.termine whether the Licensee's System Component Evaluation Work ( Sheets (SCEWS) were updated to correct deficiencies and add g supplemental information. o Determine whether the Licensee provided justifications for interim operation for all unqualified equipment. o Determine whether the Licensee addressed aging and incorporated the results into the equipment maintenance program.

     ,                         The extensive list of safety-related electrical equipment
  • in various locations of the plant identified by the Licensee was analyzed, and all identical equipment located within plant areas that are exposed to the same environmental service conditions was grouped togethar and designated an u

, e.

                       *In this report, the term " safety-related electrical equipment" refers to the equiysent defined by the two NRC Cuidelines referenced in Section 2.1.

3-2 ds NJ Franklin Research Center A ow v rr nun n, a,,, I i I

               .m. - , m                  _

_y -, , . . .

                                                                                                                                            ; c.,
                        .              ..     - - - .                                                  .. n 7
        /4 TER-C5257-487 l             I " equipment item." In this report, the term " equipment item" refers to a specific type of electrical equipment, designated by manufacturer and model, which is representative of all identical equipment in a plant area exposed to y                      the same anvironmental service conditions (e.g., Flow Transmitter, Fischer &

i,, Porter, Model 10B2496, located within containment). This analysis resulted in

            .p a reduced listing of equipment (equipment items) that formed the basis for the s               ,          review.
j. Appendix A contains the environmental service conditions for each location. Appendix B contains the tabulation of the equipment items, locations, function, plant identification numbers, required operating time, and applicable qualification documentation references. Appendix C lists the
a. ,

plant systems identified by the Licensee and the NRC as being essential to

 &.            ,            **E**Y*

g Each item in the list of safety-related electrical equipment items was

s. y y reviewed in relation to:

sy-6 o the Licensee's response to the SER concerns

 ,.I                  I V                                  o     technical information received from the Licensee as a result of f '.[.
    .      +

requests for additional information (Appendix E) , [,@ o technical data derived from the Licensee's submittal . a L' vf o NRC DOR Guidelines or NUREG-0588 Revision 1 criteria I:-::;c w . ,' M;l

    .                             o    the Licensee's definition of harsh service environments (Appendix A)

LL . [/l o documentation cited by the Licensee as evidence of qualification ! U p(f:j3 o applicable and available qualification documentation associated with 1M%., .< the overall equipment environmental qualification program ent

     $..                          o    the Licensee's analysis and/or justification of qualification e:o                                                                                                                      .

'M o Licensee proposed corrective action for qualification deficiencies A o the Licensee's equipment /part replacement schedules f, _ . . . V o the Licensee's technical arguments concerning the adequacy of 1 ,"ti ; equipment, based en system operational censiderations

      . )*f G~'                              o    the Licensee's rationale concerning exemption of equipment from qualification.
                      }

g - g 3-3 b Frank!!n Research Center A DMason of The Frannan :nson.te

      ,a.

7 y .m --

                                                                        .m   m. ,. .      -.:-. .e . -

77: air-vgmyrrevp

                                                         .          .w..:. . -. w        . J a ;. .. .._ .:               . u -- -

TER-C5257-487 Topics not within the scope of the evaluation are: o completeness of the Licensee's listing of safety-related equipment o acceptability of Licensee provided environmental service conditions. The NRC requested ca evaluation of the environmental qualification of safety-related electrical equipment located in harsh environments required for TMI Lessons Learned Implementation. The objective is to evaluate qualification documentation of equipment within the scope of IE Bulletin 79-013, Supplement 3 (item 2), in accordance with criteria established by the NRC (see Section 2 4. of this report) in a manner identical to the evaluation of all other safety-related electrical equipment. The scope of this review is limited to TMI Action Plan equipment associated with those sections of NUREG-0737 which have

   ~

an equipmen.i installation implementation date of January 1,1982 (sections are i identified below). Where applicable, a review was to be performed on installed equipment w# th implementation dates after January 1, 1981 if adequately identified by the licensee. II.B.3 (ALL/1-1-81) Post-Accident Sampling Capability of Reactor Coolant and Containment II.D.3 ( ALL/1-1-81) Direct Indication of Relief and Safety Valve Position II.E.1.2 (PWR/1-1-81) Auxiliary Feedwater System Automatic Initiation and Flow Indication II.E.3.1 (PWR/1-1-81) Emergency Power Supply for Pressurizer Heaters (Safety-Grade Interfaces) II.E.4.1 (ALL/7-1/dl) Dedicated Hydrogen Penetrations i II.E.4.2 (ALL/1-1-81) Containment Isolation Dependability I l II.F.2 (PWR/1-1-81) Instrumentation for Detection of Inadequate Core j Cooling II.G.1 (PWR/1-1-81) Emergency Power for Pressurizer Equipment ( Sa fe ty- $ Grade Interfaces) t g II.K.2.10 (PWR/B&W/ 7-1-81) Safety-Grade Anticipatory Reactor Trip h II.K.3.9 (PWR/W/1-1-81) PID Controller Modification (If Hardware Change r Involved) 3-4 O 4Ub'J Franklin Research Center A OMason of The Frannlm triscrute

                 ~ *V *** W                . - -

T,-, , ,- n ' ,,f%

                                                                                                        ' ' ~ ' ' ,"f f ^    'T

s, l

     $ 1-1 np                                                                                    TER-C525 7-487 II.K.3.12 (PWR/W/1-1-81) Anticipatory Reactor Trip upon Turbine Trip II.K.3.13 (PWR/GE/7-1-81) Separation of HPCI and RCIC Initiation Signals II.K.3.15 (BWR/GE/7-1-81) Prevention of Spurious Isolation of HPCI and C;.y RCIC Systems

[ en II.K.3.19 (BWR/GE/7-1-81) Interlock on Recirculation Pump Loop i, II.K.3.21 (BWR/GE/7-1-18) Restart of Core Spray and LPCI Systems (If p Hardware Chcnged Out) Y II.K.3.27 (BWR/GE/7-1-81) Provide Common Reference Level for Vessel Level

       -4                     Instrumentation (If Hardware Changed Out)

Licensees whose plants were included within the NRC Systematic Evaluation

    ,o. [.i          Program received a Technical Evaluation Report (TER) in addition to the SER.

16 The TER was based on a review of equipment environmental qualificacion I'j "

    ?

documentation associated with the Licensee's EEQ submittals. The qualification ll(yg deficiencies identified in the SER were derived from the TER. Plants included [3.4 within this program were the Palisades, Oyster Creek, Ginna, Haddam Neck, W Yankee Rowe, Lacrosse, and Big Rock Point plants and Zion Station Units 1 and 2, Indian Point Units 2 and 3, Millstone Unit 1, Dresden Unit 2, and San v i .. py ( Onofre Unit 1. For these plants, the evaluation presented herein is based on pyv (:.wff (1) the result of the initial TER, (2) the Licensee's response to the NRC SER

      ; ;. _       ' and the TER, and (3) the Licensee's updated EEQ submittal (s) .

di' c-v; TERs were also developed for.the following plants: Nine Mile Point Unit

.34
. ea t7, 1, Millstone Unit 2, Salem Unit 1, Browns Ferry Units 1, 2, and 3, Brunswick yg                    Units 1 and 2, Hatch Units 1 and 2, Dresden Unit 3, and Quad Cities Units 1
  ~ ,4               and 2. The objective of those TERs was to review the Licensee's submittals to determi:.e if safety-related electrical equipment was reviewed for environmental N[                    qualification by the Licensee in accordance with the DDR Guidelines and
~

M.p ..... NUREG-0588 as required by IE Bulletin 79-01B. For these 13 plants and all

i. other plants, excluding the 14 plants associated with the Systematic Evaluation jy Program, the evaluation presented herein is based solely on (1) the Licensee's gl response to the NRC SER and (2) the Licensee's revised EEQ submittal (s).
   -1 g                         Tnis technical evaluation was conducted to identify (1) whether the
,  ..'               Licensee provided an adequate response to the SER corcerns (and TER concerns, t

3; 3-5

h. , ,.

9 UUd Frank!in Research Center n .v - 't , K. {. , - -- _ ym- . . , = - . - - - -.

                                                                                      -7; .g;,,.,                , ,,ap 3 , ,. . ; , ,_ .
                             . . . , _                      ._               .  . - - + .   -
                                                                                                   . __::aw - :-

l TER-C5257-487 where applicable), (2) major deficiencies within the equipment qualification O program, and (3) whether the Licensee proposed adequate corrective actions. to resolve qualification deficiencies and provided a schedule for completion of the corrective actions. The TER was written primarily to address deviations from the NRC criteria and requirements. Technical data or test results that satisfy the qualification criteria are not discussed herein. The evaluation presented in Section 4 of this report includes completed equipment environmental qualification review checksheets (partially handwritten) which compile both the technical information recessary to conduct the review and the results of the evaluation. Parameters listed on these checksheets were derived from the appropriate NRC screening criteria. The evaluation of each equipment item includes several checksheet pages. Only those checksheet pages necessary to complete the evaluation for each equipment I item are included in this report. A complete listing of the checksheet pages is shown on the bottom of Checksheet la, reproduced here as Figure 3-1. The checksheets contain the following information: o Equipment item information'(see Figure 3-1), for example: Solenoid Valve Located in Turbine Building (Area #7) Automatic Switch Co. (ASCO) Model LB8300B61U Actuates Feedwater Control Valves (V-4269, V-4270) Licensee Reference 839 Required Operating Time: Short term (SI signal) TER Checkshee', No. 1 Reference 59, Section 4.5.2.6 Licensee Submittal: Page 9 [62]; Table 3, Page 1 [1]; SCEW l o Qualification deficiencies identified in the SER (see Figure 3-1) o Licensee's response to the SER j o Licensee's statements and rationale for qualification o Licensee's corrective action and replacement schedule o Evaluation of qualification including identification of all deficiencies i o Evaluation of system considerations presented by the Licensee as a q rationale for excluding, equipment.from qualification. The results of the evaluation are sne nrized on Checksheet 2 (Equipment Environmental Qualification Su= mary Form) for each equipment item. Checksheet nklin Research Center q A Chemn ed The FranaAn insaa.te 1__. _ _.- _ _ _ __ - j

TER-C5257-487 4!b Frariklin Research Center NRC Contract No. N RC-03-79-118 FRC Project No.C3257 Page A De af We beaWm inonnes FRC Assignment No.13 lq { } ann ne Rass Sews. PNa . Pa 19103 (219 4410W FRC Task No.

              >-                         EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _
             .m "s .\ '
            - .                           Equipment Item No. 1
               /fl                        Solenoid Valves Located in Turbine Building (Area $7)
  * *W" Automatic Switch Co. ( ASCO) Model LB8300861U Actuates Teedwater Control valves (V-4269, V-4270)

Licensee Reference 1611 Required Operating Time: Short term (SI signal) TER Checksheet No.1

               ,                          Reference 59, Section 4.5.2.6
            . - Q, Licensee Submittal: Page 9 [62]; Table 3. Page 1 (1]; FRC SCE*J 1 t

m

     ,-&         ~
            - ?J i       .T 1
 . ;-. $:q n, t !
  ; c.4      9, 6,'[c       -

l$ DESICIATION FOR CEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCI.ED ITD4(S) CNI.Y l (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) 3 ., \9.c: ':(M !Q R, T, gr, Er, P, 5, CS, A S. (R), M. I, 96, RPN, EDI, SEN, QI, RPS, None, i ,Yt) l P t,' Not stated, Not applicable ' h'h , ' '] !.ISTING CF APPt.ICABI.E CMB'KSHEETS:

      ;4, 's ag;p h-                                    Contents                                                                 Checksheet Pace No.

9m .

              ,k                           Epigment Itea                                                            la y(*

u y[e Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC S:lR lb

  'hY e, m Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms                      2

'Q 7 Licensee Response to NBC SER 3a, 3b, 3c, 3d 1 k' h System Consideration Review 4a, 4b, 4c, 44, 4e, 4f ' %;yv ,- Q 1,. Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Sa, 5b, Sc, 54, Se, Sf,

    - - -                                                                                                           59, 5b, Si, 5j
. .i d. x't          >

' q ?' Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 6a, 6b .

    ? :, <*;f                              Equipment Summary
  . :t; .

s* . ,w c# Maintenance and Replacement Scaedule Summary 7a, 7b, 7c b 'X.:,Q m ,

     ?r,i
  .n,.-

di Figure 3-1. Sample Checksheet Page la u

   ',                                                                                   " Equipment Item" 4                                                              3-7
  • dbj Franklin Research Center p'i; A ~,.an or ne vme.a n m.m, s
     "W                 --*M    -FWp
  • 4-4d g o- Im _eAhN eyygmYhT[gh, wghh"* * ~h*d$

_7 *yj "_; [ _

                                                                                                                                         ^
                                                                                             -  -~

i -, 2- , _ , , _- ' ' - - ;- _- 0 7 -

                                                                                                                     =.w .,_ae,._,       ,..-

i t b

}

TER-C5257-487 G h 2 specifically identifies any qualification deficiencies determined by the f evaluation and identifies the NRC qualification category to which the equipment item was assigned. A sample Checksheet 2 is presented in Figure 3-2. All information was reviewed for conformance to the NRC criteria referenced in Section 2 of this report. As requested by the NRC, all appli-9 cable and available, qualification documentation associated with the overall l Equipment Environ = ental Qualification (EEQ) program was used by the reviewers, whether referenced by the Licensee or not. Upon completion of the review for each equipment item, an overa'.1 evaluation of the component and a specific conclusion with respect to its qualification was developed. Based on the evaluation, each equipmenc item was I assigned to one of the generic qualification categories provided by the NRC. The NRC category descriptions are presented in Section 3.3 of this report. 3.3 NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORIES AND DEFINITIONS i I o NRC Category'I.a EQUIPMENT THAT SATISFIES ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE DOR GUIDELINES OR NUREG-0588, OR HAS ACCEPTABLE DEVIATIONS FROM THE DOR /NUREG CRITERIA This category includes equipment items which are fully acceptable on the basis that all applicable criteria defined in the DOR Guidelines or NUREG-0588 are (1) satisfied and the equipuent has been found to be qualified or (2) sufficient information has been presented to determine j that deviations from the criteria are acceptable or insignificant. o NRC Category I.b EQUIPMENT FOR WHICH DEVIATIONS FROM THE DOR GUIDELINES OR NUREG-0588 ARE JUDGED CONDITIONALLY ACCEPTABLE PROVIDED THAT SPECIFIC MODIFICATIONS ARE MADE g This category includes equipment items that do not satisfy one or more of the applicable criteria defined in the DOR Guidelines or NUREG-0588; however, the Licensee has stated that specific modifications will be made on or before a designated date. This equipment is considered by NRC to be i conditionally acceptable provided that the specific modifications are made by the Licensee. When the modifications are completed as proposed, the Licensee states that the equipment will satisfy all applicable NRC ~ (j. requirements. Examples'of specific modifications are '.1) replacement of l unqualified equipment with qualified equipment, (2) equipment hardware L !j g 3-8 '

'k                       MEnkHn Research Center y                                              A c% am. rwa m.ou.
.i '
       ,.__      x                                . - - - - , -             _-

_ . . . w- ,y ,7

             . .o t

i TER-C5257-487 g1 Frantn Rassarch Centa NRC Contract No. NRC43 79-118 FRC Prcjoct No.CW Page Aommaaw N h a la m e FRC AssignmentNo.13 2 20m .nd Ra e Seves. Na.. Ps. ItIC31215144& 10m FRC Task No. EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. .__ J ECUI? MENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATICN

SUMMARY

F03

        . .: 1 1y, DESIGNATICW:

1 [. , NRC RECUIRD8?dTS . X = OEFICTENq i; . ,

                #                      Documented Evidence of Qualification Mequate Adequate Sicilarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Establianed
       . . J.

Aging Cegradation Evaluated Mequately Qualified or Replacement Schedule Estaclished (If Requitec M Prograa . : ,sbed to Identify Aging Degradation

           .'                          Criteria yrding Aging Simulation satisfied (If Required)                                .

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposures

        ]J~'                                o Peak Temperature Mequate O Peat Pressure Mequate o Duration Mequate w                                   o Required Profile Enveloped Mequately o Steam Exposure (If Required). Mequate
 't"                                   Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied

,p 3 Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied

           #. f                      Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied
       ..i                             Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied yQ                                  Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies
  */                                       (If Any) Satisfied h,                                   Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied .

a criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied l? Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied

         ,j   ,

Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NURE3-0588, Cat. I) l;~.Y LESIGNATION: l .d NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY r 3W [$5 Equipment Qualified lI c I.a

       'i..'    ,

I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification , ( ;r-,C. II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established , l .; % II.b Equipment Not Qualified , II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requiremerts Except Qualified I.ife

((l
.@

j., or Replacement Schedule Justified

       . .Q                             III.a      Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.D      Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review ll3

' ' 'yg ?J IV Documentation nst Made Availacle lG ,w <

      .~
         .')

4 lI . , . ll ' 1 ,, , h, - gg l~g'

  ;y                                                             Figure 3-2.              Sample Checksheet Page 2 I                                                   " Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Form" T                     A                                                             3-9
      %                          WS!f Franklin Research Center 1- ,;N   . ..                            4 om a w N rem.
   =a
                    ~,_ . g ' . & , , ed% 4
                                               %,   , rw .      - M 2***444 e - '"'~ M           'O N~~4uW4   n"T Q -- (";     I
                                                                                                                                               ."a%%@h. '   ,      '-        -
                            ..n..._._          -

n - = = TER-C5257-487 modification, (3) equipment relocation abova submergence level, (4) relocation or shielding of equipment from radiation source, (5) verifica-tion of qualification by additional testing, (6) equipment relocation to a mild environment, and (7) qualification testing of equipment in progress, o NRC Category II.a EQUIPMENT FOR WHICH QUALIFICATION DOCUMENTATION IS IN: SUFFICIENT.TO ESTABLISH THAT THE EQUIPMENT IS OR IS NOT QUALIFIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE i DOR GUIDELINES OR NUREG-0588 . 1 The qualification of equipment items in this category, in accordance with the requirements of the DOR Guidelines or NUREG-0588, is significantly deficient or inconclusive based upon review of (1) the documentation provided by the Licensee or (2) applicable and available qualification documentation associated with the overall equipment environmental qualification program. The qualification documentation indicates signifi-cant deficiencies, which can be categorized as follows: (1) appropriate documentation reflecting qualification has not been cited and made available for review by the Licensee and there is no knowledge of applicable docu-

      . mentation; (2) the Licensee is awaiting qualification from the equipment vendor; or (3) the qualification documentation indicates significant deficiencies; however, where testing was conducted, no reported failures or
   ,        severe anomalies were observed which would unquestionably affect the 9

ability of the equipment to perform its design basis safety function (s). o NRC Category II.b EQUIPMENT THAT IS UNQUALIFIED This category includes equipment items whose qualification documenta-tion has been judged to be seriously deficient based upon review of (1) the documentation provided by the Licensee, or (2) applicable and availa'cle qualification documentation associated with the overall equipment environmental. qualification program. The qualification documentation I indi' cates serious deficiencies reported during testing; for example, severe l anomalies or failure of the test specimen, which could affect the ability l of the equipment to perform its safety function. NRC has requested I immediate written notification when an equipment item is placed in this category during the course of the review.

J o NRC Category II.c EQUIPMENT THAT SATISFIES ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE DOR GUIDELINES OR NUREG-0588 WITH THE EXCEPTION OF QUALIFIED LIFE This category includes equipment items that are acceptable on the basis that all applicable criteria defined in the DOR Guidelines or NUREG-0588 are satisfied with the exception of the qualified life criterion. The Licensee (1) has not evaluated qualified life or replacement schedule, (2) has .not adequately evaluated qualified life or replacement schedule, or (3) has not adequately intepreted qualified life in terms of calendar time.

[ Note: The component replacement schedule discussed in Section 7.0 of the 3-10 O N Franklin Research Center m a n.r m .aas,

                                                                       ~.y                 -

7

j l i., ! TER-C5257-487

 'l                      l       DOR Guidelines is, in effect, a qualified life. It is not essential to use
       ;7                        the term " qualified life," but the replacement schedule must be justified.]

o NRC Category III.a EQUIPMENT THAT IS EXEMPT FROM QUALIFICATION e C. This category includes equipment items that are exempt from

                                                                                        ~

qualification on the basis that (1) the equipment does not provide a safety 4 function (i.e., should not have been included in the equipment list submitted by the Licensee), or (2) the specific safety-related function cf

            ;?;

the equipment can be accomplished by some other designated equipment that is fully qualified and satisfies the single failure criterion. In addition, any failure of the exempt equipment must not misleed the operator or degrade the ability of qualified equipment to perform its required

* :R                            safety-related function.

o NRC Category III.b EQUIPMENT NOT IN THE SCOPE OF THE QUALIFICATION REVIEW This category includes equipment items addressed by the Licensee in the E. j , equipment environmental qualification submittals which are (1) required to achieve and maintain the plant in a cold shutdown condition or (2) located ["('.I

'% .                            in a mild environment. Supplement 2 of IE Bulletin 79-01B permits 4                       deferment of the review of environmental qualification for all safety-related equipment i6 ems located in plant areas where the equipment is not y];y                    }

exposed to the direct effects of a high energy line break (HELB) or to K. nuclear radiation emanating from circulation of fluids containing U. '.' radioactive substances. Supplement 3 of IE Bulletin 79-01B permits

      'M                       deferment of the review of environmental qualification for all equipment h                          required to achieve and maintain the plant in a cold shutdown condition.

$$ Eupplements 2 and 3 of IE Bulletin 79-01B originally permitted deferment M.% until af ter February 1,1981 of the qualification review of equipment j'Q located in a mild environment or, required.to achieve and maintain the plant , t,% in a cold shutdown condition. Since the issuance of Supplements 2 and 3, M the NRC has determined that the review of environmental qualification for k this equipment is not within the scope of this report. f o NRC Category IV EQUIPMENT FOR WHICH QUALIFICATION DOCUMENTATION HAS NOT BEEN MADE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW d K *' ' This category includes equipment items for which qualificacion documentation in accordance with the requirements of the DOR Guidelines s L;s or NUREG-0588 has been cited by the Licensee as evidence of qualifica-IIE tion; however, this documentation has not been made available for review. Therefore, a conclusion cannot be reached with respect to qualification of f [M k ... this equipment. V;jf . DM.!

' d N. r
@'                   i h
;ju l

3-11 4ff g M Franklin Research Center p:.w'.i a c m.an # m w a %

;..,q
                     ~
                           .n     mn     a      . , - -  -  -    ,- -
                                                                              ,,,m*m-y v v < .- " n % r":
                                                                                                                 ~ '   ~ ^ ~

j\ , -- - . . _ . . . ~

                                                                                 - :.;._ - -      -       ame -       1        ~
                                                                                                                                       ~'    '        ~
~ .,

s' > TER-C5257-487 3.4 IMPLEMENTATION GVIDE FOR FULFILLING NRC CRITERIA i The NRC has requested enat a detailed implementation guide for fulfilling NRC criteria be prepared as part of this assignment. The implementation guide will prest.nt a fully detailed discussion of the principal qualification criteri.4 presented in the DUR Guidelines and NUREG-0588. The primary emphasis l* will be to clarify tech =ical peints, eliminate possible misconceptions, and I' M early provi.ie definitive guidance to enable lic~ensees to understand and

        ,                resolve, in an expeditious manner, qualification deficiencies identified as a result of this TER. The implementation guide (TER-C5257-532) has been 1

prepared and issued to the NRC. The implementation guide is either appended to this TER or will be forwarded to the Licensee by the NRC under a separate letter. The Licensee is encouraged to review that document. i 0 1', f 'l l l I U I L1 l-t. l l l L I s a As 3-12 O W$ FrankEn Research Center A c% on m Fr.n.en m.ou. wwmgeo.__ _ - - e

                                                                                                                           - -_ g r-t

l c. y o TER-C5257-487 i -

            -l              l i        ..

J< j 4. TECHNICAL EVALUATION r e t- n

  ' . q                        

4.1 INTRODUCTION

  !i ,

The technical evaluation presented in this section represents the

     . , .I.                   equipment environmental qualification (EEQ) assessment for each equipment item y          listed in Appendix B in accordance with the methodology presented in Section 3
      , . -a,
                  , ~l         of this report. The evaluations were conducted to identify any major
                  ,            deficiencies within the Licensee's equipment qualification program and to y;                        detemine whether the Licensee (1) provided an adequate response to the SER E.'.yrI   .

concerns, (2) proposed adequate corrective actions to resolve qualification fjt i deficiencies, and (3) provided a schedule for completion of the corrective

    , A ,' .                   actions.

g, w

      . e. . .
     .5.N                               The evaluations are based on the available qualification documentation c.p{nl
     ',p*/

provided by the Licensee, complemented in several cases by other relevant

        'l ny                  ) technical information. The major qualification deficiencies that have been Ts2      ..

identified and the results of the evaluation are shown in the Equipment [s;.~9( Environmental Qualification Summary Foms (Tables 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, and 4-4) [$;'dj presented in Sectioa 4.2.

    ?O( ?
    ;,$.;i+:        *p;                 Observations concerning the Licensee'.s qualification methodology.
    ;Q.s .
    ~...

presented in response to the NRC SER are presented in Section 4.3. g 4 Technical evaluations of the enviren= ental qualification of the equipment jj[if[4 items are presented in Section 4.4.

    &<W
    }d'.a q,114.

N fhh dW hus; wg.y

          ,st            .4
            ,       G l *>,"o
e. . <
      ;q% f                                                *                                                                                                           )

s I g:;n

     'ii.

4-1 nklin Rese

      ,.a                                  ---_ arch C_ enter
      ),Ifhf a
                                                                                                                                            ;         y_

[_[_,

      . . . .          .: -- .. a . . . . . . . - . . - - . . . . . . . . . . . ~           _.__                                . __   . r TER-C5257-487 4.2 

SUMMARY

OF THE EVALUATION The following tabulations represent a smn=ary of the results of the equipment environmental qualification evaluation conducted in accordance with the methodology. presented in Section 3.

   ;                      Table 4-1 summarizes the number of equipment items assigned to each NRC qualification category as a result of the evaluation.

l Table 4-2 su=mari:es the nu=ber of equipment items found to have a specific qualification deficiency. I Table 4-3 aummarizes the number of equipment items for which the Licensee

  ]                has proposed a specific corrective action to rcsolve a qualification deficiency.

Table 4-4 consists of Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms [; for the equipment items, identifying (1) compliance with the qualification , requirements defined in Section 2, (2) the resultant NRC qualification fj category, and (3) the Licensee proposed corrective action. 11 E Ii 9

 ]                                                                                                                        /

l

.1 4
)

I 1 i f h 1 i N

    ;                                                                                                                                      1 q                                                                                                                                          l b

9 9

.I g
+

2 L l & 4-2 O h $bj Franklin Research Center a ce at m Fran.ein in.omi. 1s _,i* - 3. , __, ,. _ .. .~ u.

4 TER-C5257-487 k l 4 TABLE 4-1 NUMBER OF EQUIPMENT ITEMS IN EACH QUALIFICATION CATEGORY

              ..a
        ,. 3 n

. : .1 ., NRC NUMBER OF CATEGORY R:j i

      'W                    CATEGORY on                                                      DESCRIPTION EQUIP 1Et4T ITEMS up                                                                      ,

4 e Y I.A EQUIPMENT QUALIFIED---------------------------------------- 11 l7 C EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).: 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, L '.y:s 11, 12, 13, 60, 62 ) p . 3. . ,,, t'C I.B EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION PENDING MODIFICATION--------------- l~', 7 [ EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).: 10, 36, 39, 40, 41, 95, 96, 96 3 ' , s A} > . w II.A EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION NOT ESTABLIS'HED-------------------- 65

@Sf                                             ( EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).:                       1,  4,          6,      14, 15, 16, Cy;                                                    17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, t4y                                                    29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 37, 42, 43, 44, 45,
  1. 7d 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 52, 55, 58, 59, 61, 66, 67, L,3? 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84,
  ?. .,.
  .                                                   85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 97 1

&mA g II.B EQUIPMENT NOT QUALIFIED--------------------- --*----------- 0 M@C

f
  • WM K'j[

II.C EQUIPMENT SATISFIES ALL PEQUIREMENTS EXCEPT QUALIFIED LIFE OR MPLACEMENT SCHEDULE JUSTIFIED------~~~-- 1

        /

[ EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(3).: 38 3

  ~kl/
       ~,d V u

[A.d III.A EQUIPMENT EXEMPT FROM QUALIFICATION------------------------ 10

AC [ EQUIPMENT ITEM NOCS).: 51, 53, 54, 56, 57, 68,
.-d 69, 70, 71, 72 )
 ' L,E4i nv
 < : M, M[:22                        III.B EQUIPMENT NOT IN THE SCOPE OF THE REVIEW-------------------                                                            3 7$

s% ( EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).: 63, 64, 65 ) ,3;3

           ,, y V           IV
  .i:.ws.56                             D OCUMENTATION NOT M ADE AV AIL AB LE------------------~~--                                       - * --         0 i$.L
p i . v. ...-.-...

S"q, t. ; g TOTAL 97 ' n~.Sp' r ac=====================================================================a======== j,)y@

    ;. 7 '

!] x

                            )*

' "dt A 4-3 Y

                                      !!Obd Franklin Research Center C ;;p
  +..                                     e n a n. rr.mu w an.                                                                                                              ,
                                            .-..-_       .-_       - _ _ - %--- Am.r    - --- . ..     . - -       M
                                          ,        .-     ,,-o .-ar-- ,_7   2 (. m t~-ww         : m _ ~~_.      ,. ..g- %"Q 47.,T7,,;*;*@Trr **hqG'y' [,ijWie]wf.
%T%
                   . . = .                   - ..- . ..       .. . w.             w           _
=.-_. :. .a n TER-C5257-487 i

i TABLE 4-2 j QUALIFICATION DEFICIENCY TJMMARY J MUMBER OF ., DEFICIENT .s - EQUIP M.EN T j i NRC REQUIREMENT

              =====================================================================                                     =========   ITEMS
1. DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE OF QUALIFICATION ADEQUATE------------- 36 C EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).: 4, 10, 15, 21, 26, 27, 37, 40, 43, 44, 45, 47, 48, 50, 52, 55, 58, 59, 4

61, 66, 67, 73, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 82, 83, 85, 90, 91, 92, 94, 95, 96 3

2. ADEQUATE SIMILARITY BETWEEN EQUIPMENT AND TEST SPECIMEN ESTABLISHED--------------------------------- 34

( EQUIPMENT ITEM NGCS).: 14, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20,

   '                                         22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 73, 74, 77, 78, 90, 81, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 89, 93, 97 3
3. AGING DEGRADATION EVALUATED ADEQUATELY---------------~~--- 27 j)

( EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).: 1, 4, 6, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, i 29, 30, 31, 32, 30, 42, 46, 49f 88 1

4. QUALIFIED LIFE OR REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE ESTABLISHED (IF REQUIRED' ---------------------~~--------- 27

( EQUIPMENT ITEM . 1, 4, 6, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, ; '3, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, .6, 49, 88 )

5. PROGRAM E'STABLISHED TO _s.WIIF AGING DEGRADATION--------- 4

( EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).: 1, 4, 6, 42 3

6. CRITERIA REGARDING AGING SIMULATION (IF REQUIRED)---~~----------------------------------- 3

( EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).: 1, 4, 63

7. CRITERIA REGARDING TEMPERATURE / PRESSURE EXPOSURE:

A. - PEAK TEMPERATURE ADEQUATE----------------------- 3 ( EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).: 26, 27, 42 ] t B. - PEAK PRESSURE ADEQUATE ========------------------ 3 ( EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).: 26, 27, 42 ]

              ===============================================================================       .

s

                          -<C3bs                                         4-4 O

0000 Frank!!n Research Center A DMason of Th. Fe Mw [ . . . :.. _.,_ .. . t_ , ,- me e - , r'np p- ; , ,

                                                                         '~

VY ~~%

u '

      ' /f aJ J.
           > ] ?o j
            . . . e.
                   -a TER-C5257-487 l

1 o;,

   ,             s, h           s~j g..                                                                Table 4-2 (Cont. )

m

   -x <.$a                                                               QUALIFICATION DEFICIENCY SUllMARY u
     ..e
 < E'%                                                                                           '

NUMBER OF

M.

t I DEFIClENT

                ..g                                                                                                        E,0 UI P Y.Eh T         -
                %                                                             REQUIREMENT                                      ITE'45
          .M ce=====================NRC                                  =========================================================

sM n$' C. - DURATION ADEQUATE------------------------------- 1

      ' .,.],$
        .,                                                   ( EQUIPMENT ITEtt h0(S).:              42 ]

M -1 q f D. - REQUIRED PROFILE ENVELOPED ADEQUATELY----------- ( EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).: 26, 27 J 2~

' , . E. - STEAM EXPOSURE (IF REQUIRED) ADEQUATE----------- 3 (f7},e 7 ( EQUIPMENT ITEM NO(S).: 36, 39, 41 )

yfj 8 CRITERIA REGARDING SPRAY SATISFIED------------------------ 4 (I;

i . h.~ $

[ EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).: 42, 46, 49, 88 3 l

    ]
  ,f . %
                            }       9. CRITERIA REGARDING SUBMERGENCE SATISFIED------------------                                 0 1w                               10 CRITERIA REGARDING RADIATION SATISFIED--------------------                                     7 ID'@                                            [ EQ'JIPMENT ITEM N0(S) . :                  1,    6, 26, 27, 42, 46, I y.'U                                                49, 49 1
,;M
   ; '#7;                       11. CRITERIA REGARDING TEST SEQUENCE SATISFIED-----==---------                                    0
   . t.t
' ' #56                         12. CRITERIA'REGARDING TEST FAILURES OR SEVERE ANOMALIES
           @                                   (IF ANY) SATISFIED------------------------------------                             4 t.
        -@ci                                   ( EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).:                    36, 39, 41, 42 3 4    '*
   ,V d                         13. CRITERIA REGARDING FUNCTIONAL TESTING SATISFIED-----------                                    3
            ,$                                 ( EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).:                     1,    6, 88 ]

Ji%g ., 2 '

14. CRITERIA REGARDING INSTRUMENT ACCURACY SATISFIED---------- 0

,s .h EM 15. TEST DURATION MARGIN (1 HOUR + FUNCTION TIME) SATISFIED--- 0

  ~                             16. CRITERIA REGARDING MARGINS SATISFIED (NUREG-0588, CAT. 1)-                                    0 E88=============================================================================
     ; ??

h* ' d'

       ..,1
       .;u.e
 't :-

I n. 44 4 .w.m 4-5 h[k . . . 4 'e db Franklin Research Center A Ctetsen of The Frarwin insatute i!? . : n'?l,, r:W S *.-. " _ q roj=-i - ,, - .

                                                                                   ,_-  ,.-7,._,-   --
                                                                                                         '~~"~~W*         "VT                ^~^ *
                                                                                   ,_ g ;;, -          - :,, . _ a --

1 TER-C5257-487 ' O TABLE 4-3 LICENSEC CORRECTIVE ACTION

SUMMARY

NUMBER OF CURRECTIVE ACTION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ITEMS

       ============================================================: =================
1. EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT WITH QUALIFIED EQUIPMENT----------------- 6

( EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).: 39, ,40, 41, 52, 95, 96 3

2. EQUIPMENT MODIFICATION---------------------------- L----------- 0
3. EQUIPMENT RELOCATION ABOVE SUBMERGENCE LEVEL------------------- 0
4. RELOCATE OR SHIELD EQUIPMENT FROM RADIATION SOURCE------------- 0
5. VERIFY QUALIFICATION BY ADDITIONAL TESTING / ANALYSIS------------ 3

( EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).: 52, 74, 80 )

6. EQUIPMENT RELOCATION TO A MILD ENVIRONMENT--------------------- 0
7. QUALIFICATION TESTING OF EQUIPMENT IN PROGRESS----------------- 1

( EQUIPMENT ITEM .NOCS) : ,7,3 . ]

8. OTHER (FOR DETAILED DESCRIPTION SEE SPECIFIC EQUIPMENT ITEMS)== 41

( EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).: 10, 33, 40, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 55, 58, 59, 61, 66, 67, 68, 69, 71, 72, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 94, 97 ) SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION (S) HAS BEEN 4 PROVIDED (SEE SPECIFIC EQUIPMENT ITEM FOR COMPLETION DATE)------~~ 3 n ( EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).: 52, 95, 96 ) 1

      ====== =================================$=====================================*,

i O e __ _ .,__. c_ I 7K T w" __"'""'M , . . - .-

                                                                     - - ,' 7p wh3ys g                                            - h.7 2            -

s K O F l' K ' T ' M7a' . 2 --y

 ~^                    ll,&T     ;G}i ' %.N$h:Qy{ f'~yhhfy$ hhQfff}g{&&,.                                                                           ~ &jQ& :Wy&h&ylf}l}4y QQf{hif &}"
     *i              1 f                                                                                                                                            c
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            ',} g
     .g                                              .

I f

       ' I.

I i Table 4-4 5 EUUIPMENT EhTISONNENTAL QUALIFICATION SUMMART FORN g ...s...ee.s...e.s...e...e.......... .........ae.s. d 7 eses.se.....se.e....s.......see...semessa.a.. easee..e.e.. men Y! $ $ FSC E0ulPNENT ITEN kUNoERS 8 11 p- emessassomassomosenessnesasseemsessessemeesssssemesses.sossee M> a5 loottocaloontoo4too5tooslooflocolooelolotelliotalotaleteloist seassuessa ammensesseensamossessammenesamossessnesse.assamassmemaneesessenessenemonesensasseesseemassenesessenemmenessassessesseeseos dl p

                           . <e           i NBC RECHIPEMENTS                                     (DESIGNATION 8 I = DEFICIENCT)                                         i       I     I       $      8       8       8      I      l      5       8     I      I       I       I     I
                           $qtu           l ..--=======.-==.                                    =======.---=-========_==-====                                           8       I     I       I      I       l       8      8      l      l       l     8      8       8       8     8 J..l f ;

h3 7 8 I

8. DOCUMENTED EVIDE81CE OF OHALITICATION ADEQU A TE-~~=-===~~ a
2. ADEQUATE SINILARITY BETNEEN EQUIPMENT AND TtST SPECINEN ESTABLI5MtD====== = ====================== = ======8 1

8 8 8 8

                                                                                                                                                                                              $I l 8

8 8 8 l 8 8 l 8 8 l 8 8 3 8 8

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          $I I 8

{ I l I i I I B l II g l I I 8 I I h Il I 3. AGING DEGRADATION EVALUATED ADFOUAftLY - =* - ~ = = = = = ~ -=8 I II I I I I I I I II II I

         'ill l              $

g 1 4. 00ALIFIED LIFE DR REPLACEk4NT SCHEDULE ESTAMLISHFD (IF REQUIBFD) - - ==== - == - - - ~ ~ ==========8 I I I I I I l I .I I 8 8 8 8 8 I l l 8 $ $ J i I I 4 8I I II $ $ I I I I t iI II l

           ; [                            l   S. PhDGRAN F57 ARI.15NED TO IDENTIFV AGIlfG DEGR AD ATION-~======4                                                           I I        i       iI I           IIi           8      4       8       8. I       I       I       I     I ts                                   8    6. CpITERIA prcARDING AGING SIMULATION SATISFIED (IF sEQUlaEDI - ===8                                                        I 3       8       8I              8I I          I      I       I       3    8       8       8             8 l-                   !

4 al Y. CHITFEIA REGARDING TEMPERATURE / PRES &URE EIPO3URE: I l 8 8 8 8 y l A. - PEAK TEMPERATURE ADE0UATE= = = ~ ~ == = = ====== = =l i I I l 8 I i 8 8 8 I 8 I 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 3 8 4 8 c $ p. - et.'s PRES 5UpE ADE0uATE==--=============================4 I t i I I i 8 8 ) i I I & I I n' ) C . - PU R A T i n N A D E 0 U A T E -= == =-= == === =============-===== 8 8 8 3 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 I D. = REQUIBFD PROFILE EhWEl.0 PED ADEQUATELT == - - = = ~ -=4 I l l I i l l

  'f 8     8       8 l

8 l 8 l 3 l 8 E. - STEAP EXPOSURE (IF RE03 IRED) ADE00 ATE =-============ = =4 8 8 8' s I I 3 8 8 8 8 I o. CRITealA RFGARDING SPRAT sATI6F8ED=================-====-========l 8 8 I I t 8 8 I I I I I I I i 9. CRITFRIA RFGARnING $UBNERGENCE 5ATI6FIED== = =d - ~ ~ ~ == = =8 1 1 8 8 3 8 8 l l 8 8 8 l l 8 Ji p i 10 CRITERIA REGARDING RADIAfloh SATI3FIED== ~ ~ == = = = = =-= ~ ==l 3I i I 8 ) I I I I I t t 4 8 8 8

  . .S l                            g    i 11. CHITFhtA REGARDING TEST SEQUENCE 34TISFIED - = === - ===== - ===8                                                               8     8       8      8       8       l      l      l      8       8     8      I       I       i     1
 .J '                              q     l 12. CRITERIA DECARDING TEST FAILUDES OR SEVERE ANOMALIES                                                                    l       l     l       l      3       3       8      8      8      8       8     8      8       8       l     l 4             (IF A1T) $AT!5FIED================================-==========8                                                          l     l       8      8       8       8      I      l      t       l     I      t       i       I     !
 )).0 I 13. CRITERIA REGARDING FUNCTIONAI, TESTING SATISFILD============== - =1 I l                                                               8       8      8       8I l           l      8      8       8     8      8       8       8     8 S

I $4. CHITERIA REGARDING INSTRUMENT ACCURACT SATI5FIED=================8 $ 8 8 8 8 l l 8 8 8, 4 4 8 8 i t 15. ft.5T DUR ATION NARGIN (I HOUR 9 FUNCTION TIME) 3ATISFIED======= = l l 8 l l 8 l t i i i l I I I 8

   'i ,d                                 $ 16. CRITERIA RFGARDING NARGINS SATI5FIED (NUpfG=oSGo, CAT. 1 ) ====~ l                                                             !     I       l       8       8       8      l     l       8      8     8       8       8      8      8
         ,;,                            easmsmaassasummasemasamaassasssassemeensassessammasesessasseessemamenomassmenesmemeneesemesessnessessammeenseemasosammessasssessesse
  ;M                                     l NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORT                           (DESIGNATION 8                e CAfEGORT)                              8      8     1       8       8       I       I     4      8       8      8     I       I       i      I      i q:                                1 == - ====--=========.--====                         ============. ..===========I                                            g      g     g       i       i       g       g     g      g       g      l     l       t       i      I      g p                               ! I.A         FoulPMENT 0UALIFIFD=====-====================================8                                                         l I1I3                838             gI II 1I l                  8IgI III                     l      3 j+                              1     I.B      E0 HIP 4ENT QUALIFICATION PENDING mpDIFICAT10N======*- ~ =====l                                                        4     8       8       8       8       I     i      l       i I 3        l       l      l       8      8 fa                            i II.A        EpulPPFMT GUALIFIEATION NOT ESTABLI5NED======================l I (                                                           l       iI $            83$           I      I       I      l     l       8      8I II l II.B     FoutPwEg7 NOT                                                                                                                                       I 3                                   0UALIFIED==-========================.====-=-===8                                                  8     8       8      8               i      8      i       8      8     8      i       t       8     8
    .          j                        i II.C' touIP4FHT 5AfaSFIES ALL SEQUIREMENTS EICEPT                                                                            l      8     l       l       8       8       l     1      l       l      l     8       8      8       1     1

, y ' 8 QUALIFIED LIFE OR DEPLACEPfht SEHEDHLE JUSTIFIED a = = = = =8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 i l 8 III.A EQUIPPFNT FIEMPT FRON 00ALIFICATION==========================3 l t 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 I i 8 8 l l l l 8 III.D EQUIP #ENT Nuf IN THE SCDPE OF THE REVIEN== = === = ========~l I l l l I I I I I I t I l l j 4 ' I IV DOCHPENTATInN NOT MAbE AVAILABLE== = ~ ~ ~ == = === ~=====l 8 8 4 8 8 8 3 3 l l 8 8 8 8 8 8 l Q seassessmasasessassmassanssuessensmessenassenessessessassssemassassammaasseeenesasseess a-meemmessenessassessmesseesnessmeneassessee Q t Cum CTIvr ACTIuN sFECIFIED (DESIGNATION: I e ACTION sPrCIFIED) l I I $ $ 8 I I I I l 8 l l l 1 E # , Ly' I =====-========-============ ===-========---==---=======-===-===l 8 8 4 3 8 8 8 3 5 8 I 3 l in ! .m i 1. EQUIP 4 NT REPLACFMENT WITil OUALIFIED EQUIPNENT=- - - - - === - =1 8 8 8 8 8 I i l 8 I I I I $ 8 N I 'M 98 i 2. FeUIPaFhi N0DIFICATION-===== = ================ - -== = == = ====l 8 I. EOHTPMEnf PELOCATION ASuvE THE $UBPE9GFNCE LEVEL-- - - - ~ ~ ==l 8 8 8 l 8 l l l l l t 8 i 8 3 4 8 I 8 I 8 { 8 { 8 l 8 4 8 8 da W l 4. RFIACATE nR SHILI.D toulPHENT FDDn D ADI ATION 500RCE====== = = ===8 8 l l 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 4 b I 5. Vt. RIFT onAI.IFICATInN 1T ADDITIDEAL TESTING / ANALYSIS - = = = ===~ 1 1 3 l l l 8 8 l' 8 l l 8 8 l l M l 6. EuulP"Fh7 del.UCATION TO A MILD ENVIRONMENT = - ========= ===== - 8 l l 8 l 8, 8 8 8 8 8 { l ! l I , 1 8 7. QUALIFICATION TESTING nr FOUIPnENT IN PROGRt'53======~-==== = ===l I I I l l l 8

     .y                                 I e. nTHFR (===stt SPrCtrIC EOUIP=ENT ITEp IF CHECarD===}=- - - - = ~ 5                                                               8     I       I      !       !       !      l 3

t 3

I !

3 8 8 I 8 i 8 8 8 4 I

                                                                                                                        ~
       'n                                                                                                                                                             l                            I       I       I I     3       8                             I      I      I       I     I      8       8      8      8 3 &CHthuLt FOR COMPLETInr OF CnRRFCTIvr ACTION (3) HAS BEEN PROVIDED - l                                                              I l       8      8       8       8      8      8      8       8     8      8       8      8      8 l ,                                      samassassa s s a m a s s a mm a s s aa e as se s s s s ss a m m a s s a s s u a s s s m a na s s aa e s s a s s e s s n e s s e s s a m m am a a s s e ss a n s s u e s s a m e s m as e m a a n o as s a mm a m a s s es s ne s s are mam a n i

pl l

  • e i ql ,

t l l4 l l

w

                            % 1. '       --
         }                                                                                                                                                                                                                   '

( I

                .                                                                                                                                                                                                             i.

b Table 4-4 (Cont. ) lt E5b FOUIPMFNT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SUMMART FORM r=a

                                                                                             ..ss.a.....s........es.es...s.s...s......... a.s..                                                                                .
                  ,D a                                                                                                          ..........e...e..........s.. ...s....s.e..ss.......s..es.....

( a ! FRC EQUIPRENT ITEN NURSERS l gl 2E assessesammeessansamassenesseeeesesenessassammessnessassemene

          ,       g5 30161017301080393020402t3022802380248025802610273020803980808 a

l # 30

                  **                *****************************************************************samenesseenmasonessessamensamenesesessnesosassesessesessa.sessene e 1                     8 NRC REQUIRFNFWT5                          (DESIGNATION: Ie DEFICIENCT)                    !     l   l       l     t    l    l          l            l       l g            -  ,

8 ======...======= ============...============== l l 8 i i I 8 8 8 8 8 s J1 8 4 $ l 8 l l 3 1 8 l [ fR y

                                     $       1. DOCHNfhTED EVIDENCE Or OHALIFICATION ADEQUATE ====================8 t 2, ADEQUATE SIMILAMITT SETNFEN EQUIPMENT AND 8   8   8   8     8I 4      8      l   l      l III l       8   l   l
  • t t t t t t t t l t I t J.

q' g{[ 8- TEST SPECInEN F3?ASLI3NED========================================$ I II lI 8I II I t 3 -l i II l 3 8I II l I II l I II II l 1 3. AGIhG DEGRADATION EVALUATED ADLOUATEL1===========================8 I II$I l 3 II II 3I II $I l I l I II tI l Il I l ha() 4 4. QUALIFIED LIFE OR RFPLACFMENT SCHEDULE 4 l l l l 8 l l l l 8 8 8 8 8 8 3 E ST A B L I SH FD I 1 F R E0 U I R E D I == ===== == == == ==== == = *=== ==== ==== ======== l I l I lI II II IIIIII II IIII lI l 3 l Ii I l

               '                     8      5. PROGaAM ESTABLISHED TO IDEhTIff AGING DEGRADAfl0R================8                      8   8   l   1     8    l    4      8   8      8    8    8   8   I   t
L' l 6. CRITFRIA RFGARDING AGING SIMULATION SATISFIED (IF REQUIh4D)======8 I l l l t I I l '
'.y;f                                l       7. CRIT 3:RI A RECANDING TFMPERATUNE/ PRESSURE EIPOSURES                            l 8

8 8 l 4 l 8 l 8 l 8 l 8 l l l 8 8 8 8 8 7

  '4.                                l                  4 = Pt.AK TEMPERATURE ADL00 ATE *======*===--***==============l                !   l   4   l     8    l    l      1   8      l I $I l      l   8   8 s                                l                   n. = PEAA PNES$ uke ADEuuATE=========*=======================l                4    4   8   l     1    4    8     8    8      l III (       l   l   1 8                  C. = DURATION ADroUATE==-===r=========-=====================l                  l       l                          l   I      t    I    !   l   t   t

, 't' I c. = REQUINED PR0 RILE ENVELOPFD ADEQUATELT==================8 4 4 8 8 4 l 8 4 8 8 8 l t 'l I II l- 3 I I sj l k. = sTTAn EXPDSURE (IT EFOUIRED) ADEQUATE==================8 l 8 8 8 8 8 l t l 8 8 l t i 8

8. OptTEgIA RECtk91NG SPRAT SATISFIED **======*======================l
    ^  ',I                          4 I 9. CRITEkIA RfCAkb2NG SUBNERGENCE 5ATI5FIEL=========================t l

t l t l I l l t 3 t l t l t 8 l 8 l 8 l 8 L t t t t I t t 43 8 10. CsITEnIA RFGARDING kADIATION 3ATTLflLD===========================l t I i 8 l l l l l l I 1I I t t l g l Il. CHI 1ERIA RFCANDING TEST SEQUENCE SATI5FIED=======================l l 1 8 8 l l 8 I l l 8 l 1 ! l , -. I d' OD $ l2. CRITFPIA REGABDING TEST FAILuhE3 OR SEVERE ANOMALIES 8 8 8 l 8 l 1 l l 3 3 8 8 8 8 8 [ (IF ant) SATISFIED ===========================================4 8 3 3 8 l l l l l 3 3 8 l 3 i l "

             }                      t 13. CRITLRIA REGARDING FUNCTinkAL TESTING SAT l8FIED==================l                         l   8   1   8     8    8    8      l   l      3    l    l   l   4   8 l
              ,                     l 14. ChlTERIA REGAkDING INSTRUMENT ACCupACT SATISFIED =================8                         8   l   l   8    8     8    8      8   8      I    8    l   8   l   8
             ;                      l 45. TFST DuMATION MARGIN (I HOUR + FUhCTION TIME) SAfl8FIED==========l                         l    l       l 8        l     l    3     8    8      3    3    l  8    l   l
            ,                       8 86. CFift1IA RFGARDING MARGINS SATISFIED (NUREG=0588 CAT 1)========8                           8   8    8   l    l     l               8     8     8    I  I    t   t

.y

              '                    a s s a s sa m m a s s au s se sse m a ss e ss s ss s ss s ss e s a m m a s s o m a s s u m e s s a m m es se n e s sam a s sen es s en es m as s e s se s s e s l NRC OUALIFICATION CATEGORT                (DF3IGNATION I e CATEGORTl                      8    !    l   3   l     l    l    l     l    l      t    I    t  l    I
         ,i                         i ===========-======---=====                ===================--======                     t     I   t   i   I     I    I    (     l    I      i    t    I   i   l l

l l 5.A EQUIPNFNT 0uALIFILD==========================================$ l 3 4 4 4 8 8 8 l 8 l l l 3 3

         ,!                         1       1.8       E4DIPpFNT GUALIFICATIUN PENDING MODIFICAT10N*================t                 l    l   l   l    l     l    8     l    l      l    t    l  l   $   $

t 'II.A EQUIPMEh? OUALIFICATION NOT E3fA*LISHED======================8 I lIII l I II $I3I l I II II ( I l I $I II 3I l l II.k EQUIP 8ENT NUT 0UALIFIED======================================l l 8 l 4 l 3 3 4 l l l 8 l 1 l t[ , I it.C L4ulPPEh? SATISFIES ALL NfoulpEMENTS E3 CEPT 4 8 8 4 t I !

  • t t 3 8 8 8 8 8 l OHALIFIED LIFE OR REPLACEkEh? SCHEDULE JUSTIFIED =============3 5 8 8 8 8 8 8 3 l l l t 1 i l l III.A E0HIPMENT FIEMPT FROM 0UALIFICATION==========================8 l 8 l l 3 3 l l 8 8 l l l l l t III.s EnutrerNT NOT IN THE SCOPE OF THE DEVIEWa====================$ $ l l t l l l l j l l l l l IV DOCUPFNTATION NOT NADE AVAILAbLE=============================l 8 8 hh massamasam l l l l l 4 l l pg
, ;j 1.

masassanssoasassammasassassamassammasassessammeensesenemasessassesoammesseessaseseemsessen esessesslsamal mass I l essa lsses i I CONNECTIVF ACTION SPECIFIFn (DESIGNAflDNg Ie ACTION SPECIFIED) 8 8 8 l l 8 8 l l 8 8 8 l l t 8 F1 ,,, i =========================== =================================== l l , j l I l l , l 8 8 8 8 8 l pa

             !                     8        1. EuulretNT RLPLACLMFNT NITH QUALIFIFD 3.0UIPMENT===================l                   l   8   l   l     l    l    l      8   l      l    8    1   l   l   l     (n i                      t        2. EcuIPMt'NT MODIFICATIDM.==========================================8                       l                                                                                   )

3 3, l l l l l l =4

        .!                         $        ). EaulPdENT RLLOCAfl0N A80VE THE SUBPERGENCE LEVEL=================l                  l   l   l 8

l 3 l 4 4 l 3 l 3 l l l f

         'l                                                                                                                                                 8           1               8                                    P 8                    8 t 4. StLHCATE OP SHIELD EQUIPMENT FROM RADIATION $nURCE===============t                           t   8   4   (     [    t    (      l   t      t    $        4 3       8   8 8 5 VER'tY OUALIFICATION DT ADDITIONAL TFSTING/ANALV538.=============$                                l   l   l          l    l                                             00 g

l 6. EQU I P 'E97 RELHC A T I ON T O A M I LD E N V I RON M E N T ========== ============= 8 8 8 8 l 3 l l ( l 8 %4 1 l { ! I I I i *

  }          -

l T. CHALIFICATION TESTING OF EQUIPMENT IN PRnGRES$===================3 l l l l 3 8 l 8 8 l 8 l l 8 8 8 3 4 l 8 l 8 8 l l .8. OTHER (==,5EE SPFCIFIC EQUIPPENT ITEN IF CHECKED =.=)=============l t l l l l l I l A ',- I 1 3 8 8 8 l l 5 8 8 l l 8 I l ! I l 8 l l 8 l j j 3CHEDULE FOR Co#Pl.ETIDM Dr CORRFCTIVE ACTIDN(3) HA5 BFEN PROVIDED===8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 I 8 8 a mea s sa a s s s a a n s a s s es. sa m e s s ma s s a m a s s s m a sa s e m ese m a s s a m a sa m a m m a ssa e m a a s se s so a s s e s s e sese a s sl e e I e G G

h _ : 1 f, Table 4-4 (cont. ) _ EQUIPMENT ENVIRDNNENTAL QUALIFICATIDN SUMMART FORN

     .f        . a                                                                 ..................................................

1 ygE ............................................................. FRC EQUIPMENT ITEN mun8ER3 3 3 .i..............................................s.............

     ,1            E                                                                                                      3038103210331034803510368031
                           ...................................................................................................883880398040104ll0421043104488458
ga . . ....................... ...
)

e dU sa l WRC REcutREMFMTS m......-=.=== == (DESIGNATIONS I . DEFICIENCT)

                                                                          ====..-===.=.==..=..=.--.....

{ l l 8 8 8 8 8 1 I I l 8 8 8 8

    .j                      $                                                                                             1     g   l     3    8     8   l     3     g   i         g               I
    )
                 %R         1 t
1. DuCUNINTfD EVIDENCE Or oUAI.IFICAT nN ADEQUATE---=======-==..-----I
2. ADEOUAIE AIMILARITT BETWEEN EQUIPnth7 ANO
                                                                                                                                !   3     l    l     8   : I I       l   8I I i

3 1 II lI 8I I 3 , 4 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 % 8 j [Q 5 t TEST SPECIMEN ESTABLISHED - ~ -== = = = = = = = =~ - ~ ~ ==8 I II II $I 8I $

3. AGING pf. GRADATION EVALUATED ADE0UATELT*=***=*-====***========-===4 I II I l 8 8 I I l 8 8 8 l I gh 8 I I I I II I i 8 8I $ 8 8 8 3 4. QU ALIFIt'D LIFE OR REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE I ( l l I I l 8 8 8 8 l l l 3 3 i

ha 1 EST AnLI SHID (I F REQUI R ED )---~~~~=====-***~ 5 I II I 4 8. I 8 4I l l l l I $ 8 8 8. E I 5. PROGRAN ESTABLISHLD TO IDENTIFT AGING DEGRADATION======.=========8 1 3 l l l l l 8 3 $ 8Ii 4 8 8 I 8 6. CRIFEkIA RFGARDING AGING SIMULATIO1 SATI5FIFD (IF REQUIRED)===-==8

1. CptfEMIA REGARDING TEMPERATURE / PRESSURE EXPO 3UREI 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 l* I 3 I 3 l 8 I 3 3 4 8 8 8 i ! 4 8 8 8 8 8 8 I 4
  • PLAR TEMPERATURE ADt00 ATE =======*====*=**===*====*=====8 8 8 8 8 4 I I I 1 I II i 8 8 8 l R. = PEAK PRESJUkE ADE00 ATE ===========*============*========4 8 8 l l 8 8 $ 5 8 8 II I i j j
        ,                   I                C.   -

DURATION ADFOUATE----- ===-=======--====---==-======..=1 8 8 8 I I I I I I i !I I I i 1

 <T,          .            8                 D. = REoutRED PRDFILE ENVELOPED ADEQUATELT - == = = = ==. ~ t                     i   I     I    I     i   $     5     8   $    8    $     $    $

. j j E. = STEAN EIPOSURE (IT REQUIR(D) ADEQUATE ==*==============8 I i iI $

                                                                                                                                                                                                  $   8 3'      -

8 8 $ $I 3 $I I $ $ 8 8 8 8. rRITIRIA RFGANDING srRAr sATIsrIED=-- - -= ~ ~ ~ ~ -= = ~ - ~ $ 8 8 3 3 3 $ 8 8 8 I II I I i 1 1 3 8 9..CRIIERIA arGARDING supMEaGENCE SAfl5FIED - === = = ~ - - -======8 8 I I I I I I I l 8 .8 8 8 8 8

  • n[

2 l 8 lo. ch!TERIA RFGARDING BADIAtloN sATIsrIED== ~ = ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ = - =.8 l l 8 8 8 8 3 3 3 8 8I i 8 8 8 , p I S t . CNITINI A REGANDING TEST SEQUEECE S ATISFIED=~~===========l I l l l l l I 1 I 12. CRITERIA RFGANDING TEST FAILUNES OR SEVERE ANOMALIES 8 I I 8 I 3 8 8 8 8 l 4 g 8 I I I I I $ 8 8 8 $ 8 8

        )            t.O   I                (IF ANT) 5 A T I S F I I D-= = = = = = = -~ =--= = = ~ ~ ~ = = = == = = = 8       8    8     8    8     8I I      I     II I     l 3 8I I        I   I    I
    ~g                     t 83. CRITERIA HFGARDING FUNCTIONAL TFSTIkG SATISFIED = = ~ -= ~ ~ ====8                            l   l     l    l                                              l 8   8     8     8   3    3    3     8        l    8 g                i 14. CRITERIA RFCARDING IN4780 MENT ACCURACT SATI5FIED=-**=============l                           l   8     8    8     8   8     8     8   8    8    8     8    8   i    l
              !            I 15. Test puhATION MARGIN (I HOUR e FUNCTION TIME) S A TI5FIEDa===~l                              l   I     I     i    l   3     8     3    3  *I    I      I    i   I    )

i i 16 1)=====..=8 1

              -                                                                                                               8                    8   3     3     3    $    l   8      8    I   I
                           .... .C98198I4 RFGARDING MARGIh3 SATI5FIED (NUREG.0500, CAT...........................................................................8...8...8............................................i r   ,            8 NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORT                  (DEdIGNATION8 I . CATEGORT)                     3    3   $     8     8    8   8     8     3    1    4   8      8    l   8    l L                3 -----= --====----========                   --====--==-============----                     1    I   I     I     8    l-  I     I     I    I    l   l      8    ;   8    8
             !             ! I.A           E OU I P4 E N T G U A 8. I F I E D - = = ~~ == == = === = ======-== == 8           8   8     $     5    8   8     8     8   8    3    3      5   8    8    8
        '(    l            l I.B           FOUIPMENT GUALIFICATION PihDING NODIFICATION== = = ===== ~ l                       8   8     8     8    8I I      I     II II II I           I   I    I    l i            i II.A          foulPMFNT GUALIFICATIDh NOT ESTABLISHED---=====- -===========l 3 8I 8III l I I                              l I!        $   8    8    8I lI II 1I I
  • d '

8 13.9 EOH I PM EN T NOT 00 A LI F I ED===~-= ==--~~~~~===-==.. I i l l 8 8 8 3 3 8 8 3 i B l 8

              ;            4     II.C      Enu!PMENT SATI5FIES ALL REQUIREMENTS EXCEPT                                  8     3   3     3    8     3   3     8     8   I    i    t     i    i   4    e
    ^j                     l OHALIFIED LIFE OR REPLACEMFWT SCHEDULE JU37IFIED - -=== = === 4                    8   8     8    8     3   I     II i      !    l    8     8    I   I    I I III.A fGUIPMrdT EXEMPT FHO. QUALIFICATION ====-
    ' .h
    .j I III.B E nulPMINT NOT IN THE SCOPE OF THE RFWIEW-===============l
                                                                                                     =============-==8        8 l

8 l 8 l 8 l 8 l 8 8 8 8 8 8 I I l I l l l l l 3 l 5 i 8 g l IV N O T M A D E A V A I L A B LE -~ ~--===== == ======= = = =

  • l l l $ 4 8 8 8 1 3 l I tg
  • 9 .....a...

l 00CnMuTATION..............................................................................................................l....l.......8 ACTION SPFCIFIED so

    . ,a                   , CUWRECTIVF                                  (DEstGNATION9 I . ACTION $PECIFIED) 1                8   l     l    l     l   l     l     $   $    $    5     l    l   l    l       8
                              ...-===....-====..=_=======

1 8

                                                                         .--==___==-..... == _.-_==_==...... I
8. EoHIP*FNT REPLACEnFN1 NITH QU ALI F I FD t 0GIPMENT*===~~~~== 8 I

8 i 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 l 8

                                                                                                                                                                   ,   8    I 8I II II i l     8 i

8 I I I a go A t i

2. E nu t r n E N T N 0 D I F I C A T i nr:-=.= =--- ~ .= ~--=--=----~.-== =-==-==.... ! l 3 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 : l l 8 8 Ln .

B 3. EculPdEuf REL0c473nt. AnovE THE sungEpcFrCE LEVEL- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -==l l l l l 8 8 8 8 $ 8 8 8 8 8 8 y r

4. Rf LOC ATE OR SHIT'I.D EQUIPMENT f pOM RADIATION $0HRCL- - ===========4 1

I 5. Yt4 fry OHALIFICATION BV ADDITION AL TESTING /AN ALYSIS=-=======l 8 8 8 8 4 8 l 8 8 8 8 l I l l l l 8 l 8 8 l l l 8 l 4 8 4 3 h CD I I 6 IuulPME.47 RELOCATION 10 A MILD ENVIROh4ENT*== = ====- ~ == = ===8 8 8 3 3 l l l 8 l l l 3 8 l l 9 i { e I 7. QUALIFICATION TESTIkG OF FOUIPMEh? IN PROGR135 - ===== ~ -=======8 8 I I I l 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 B l 8 9. nTHER (. 5EE SPECIFIC EQUIPMENT ITEM IF CHFCNED )= = ==---===-8 3 1I 4 .t l l 8I l 8I 8I II II I g 4, I 8 8 I I I I $ 8 I I I I I 8 8 8 8 4 I scaEpuLt rnp (nnPLETinN OF CORAFCTIVE ACTIUN(S) HAS ttFEM PROVIDED===l l y

                           ...................a.......a..ma................s...........a.....aa.......................8...8.......................a............

8 8 8 8 3 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 m

       .:    i                                                                                                                                                                                                          k
             .                                                                                                                                                                                                          9 4  .

L l ' s

y__ _a. _ .* _. _ __ - _ - - = - _ __ _ w a,_ _ .- i h J' jii

        ?

Table 4-4 (Cont. ) g

             !!        m                                                                EoulPeE>T ENvlR0 b fAL ouALIrtCATION suanART r0Rn                                                                                             '
                  ,    :;g                                                              ..................................................

1*

             .l      > =q                                                                                                  .............................................w........a......
             ,f
             .6 p,

a rpe Eou PnENT ITEN NunoEps i ; SE? 1o46:o4T o4:3049:050105:1052 05I oselesslessiostlesalo5s

as ..................................................................s.............................................................toso .... ,'
                  }.

f Jg 8 .NRC REcugpEuENTS

                                       .....=..-=...-.

(DiaIGNATION: I . DEFICIENCT)

                                                                              ---=..-= ~-.=.---- --==.. ...

i t I I I a a 8 e 8 8 a I , I 8 I a I 4 I i !

                 '                                                                                                                                                                                   8
    .                              i    1. coCuat=TED EVIDENCE Cr OUAB.IrtCATION A D E o u A T E------~=-- --.-- g                  I II :          eI 3       : I          :      I                   I     I l a j                 -,

t 2. AofoWAfr sINIt.ARITT sETutEN toUIPmEu? AND : I t

I e I e a a :
                 ,                          Test SPECIMEN ES T A e Li s N E D--  .-~ ~------=-.-= ~~- 3                          :     :     :                                   : *I                :     :     :      :                i i

g@n 3. ACING DEGRADATInN EVALUATED ADE UATELY-.===- --.============. ===8 I I I 8I 8 8 3 8 8 8 8 3 3 4 4 8 8 8 o 8 4..OuALIr:Eu LtrE uR REPLACEnrNT sCNEcutE : 8 8 : 3 : : : : : : : e a

                 ?
                     $3            :        r$7AnLishrD car aroulRID)==-. ------=.-=.===-------=. -----..--- 3 I                       :        I          :   :     :                 a     a       e           I      a i     y           I   S. PHOGRAM ESTARt.ISHED TO IDENTIrf AGING DEGRADATION ======-===--===.8                   3     3     8      8      3   3     3      l    8     8     l       l     8     l      l l                  l   6. CRITENIA REGARDING AGING SINULATION SATISFIED (IF REQUIRED)=*---I                      I     i     !      i                                        I       I     I     I i    1. CHIffRIA                                                                                                         !,3 8     3      5    8     3                                I I                                        REGARDING TEMPERATURE / PRES $uRE EEPbsURE3                             3     3     3      8      8                t    t     t     t       t    t      t      t t

A. - PEAA TFhrERAtuRE ADiouATE-- ~ b - - ----==----. - ~ ~-- 3I I I I i 8 I I I I I i 1 3 5

n. - PEAA PREssuRr ADEcuATE-===-==--------==..----......=--.3 3 3 3 3 3 : 3 3 : 8 3 3 C. - DURATION ADE0UATE= -==-.-========--*==========-=..==*-=8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 i l ! 8 3 1 8 D. - REQUIRED FROFILE ENVELOPED ADEQUATELT..===----========.8 8 l t i I 4 3 l 8 I I I t i 3 !

I L. - STEAN ESPOSURE (IF REQUIRED) ADEQUATE--==---=========-el ! l t l l t t t I i e..CEITENIA REGARDING $ PRAT 3ATISFIED========**============--..=====8 I I 8 I I I l 3 l 3I I l 8 3 l 3 8 l 8 I 3 3 8 9. CNITFNIA REGARhlNG SUbMERCENCE 341ISFIED-===-===-==-- .......-.=-4 g 3 g g { g g l g g g g g g g [d . D I 10. CHITERIA REGARDING RADIATION 84TISFIED*----===-*=====-.=.=-======8 I $ 5 8I i l ! 3 4 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 g e 1 St. CNITFRIA REGARDING TEST SEQUENCE 34TISFIED- - .- ~ .== ~ - -=== 8 I I I i d *

                           )      I 12. CRITERIA REGARDING TEST FAILURIS OR SEVERE ANOMALIE3 I              (IF ANT) 34TISFIED===..====-====== ~ ==-==-=.........-===..-..I l

8 l 8 3 8 I 8 l 8 8 3 4 3 3 l l 8 8 8 l 4 l 3 3 3 j j o

  • 3 3 3 3 3 3 8 I j l 3 8 3 l l i 13. CRITERIA REGAhDING FUNCTIONAL TESTING $4TISFIED==--. .--== ==.==.8 8 ( l 3 4 3 3 1 l t t I l 8 l
                ,                 i 14 CNIffkIA REGARDING INSTRUMENT ACCURACT SATISFIED-=.-.============8                        8     8     8      8     3   3     3      I    I     i     8       3     8     8      l                 j i

lg I 15 TtST DuMATION mAeGIN (I HOUR e FUNCTION TIME) 3ATI3FIED==========l 3 3 3 3 3 l 3 l l 8 3 l 3 3 8 8 16 CalT I

                                  ...as.....FRIA                                                              8)==.-= ~ l       i            $     8      8   8     8      8                        i     !
                                                                                                                                                                       ,.......I....I....I...s.......8....l
               ;.                                RFGanotNG MARGIN 3 34TI5FiF0 (NUREG=0580. CAT.ss.s............s........z..s........s.....s.......................e...................s.

9 8 MkC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY g ...--....--==-.-.=..--.... (DESIGNATION 8 I . CATEGORT) 8 8 4 8 4 8 8 8 8 8 3 I I I l l

  ,4            ,
                                                                              ==---.........--==--.......                  g    g     g      g     g      g   g     g      g    g     g     g       g     g     g      g
    .4 g                       3.A       F4UIPMENT 0U4LIFIED-=== ~====- - - - - - - -===.-==..-.-=.3                    3     3      l     3      3   3     3      {    g     l     l       l     8     3I g g                  i    I.b       soulPME147 00ALIFICATIuN PEmbthG N00!FICATION=---==-====-====-$                      l                   l   l     l      l                l I    15.4 8           3      g l     l             3     8     8      g E00tPMFa7 QUALIFICATION h07 E5fABLISHED====--=====-===---=.==l I I I II                      II II 4         8II          I    II I       I        II II I            I
               ,                  8    II.P      foutP5FNT h0T 0uRLIFIED============-=====- k===========..====3                 3     8     l      3     l    8    3      3     3    3     3       3     l      8     g i    II.C      EnUIPNENT SATISFIES ALL REOUIHEMENTS EXCFPT                              l     l l                                                                                                   3     3      3     3   3     3      3     8    3     8       3     3     l      l l                                 GUAl.BrIED LIFE OR REPLACEMENT 3CHtDULE JU57tFIED= ~ -====-==.8                                                                                               l 3    ill.A toulP,Euf EAENPT r 04 ou1LIr CATION ==-.==--.==-------===-----:

8 8 8 8 8 3 3 8 8 8 8 8 8 l

                                  !                                                                                             :     :           i      iI        : I : I :         : I       I               :      3 e
               ,                 a     III.B 90UIPMENT IV                     NOT IN INE SCOPE OF THE REVIEN.- - ----===.---==--=t poCuMLNTATION NOT MADE 3     I     l     l      8   8     3      8    3     3     3       3     3     l      3        g AVAILABLE==-==============---.....--==8 s...ssa....s.as.u.a..sa..a.s...s.s.a.ssa.a......as.s.ame.                                                        t          3     g ass.a..m....s.a..e.4.s..g ..................aa.a...m.s...s.ame.s.a.s..s......a i            3                3    3     3     3       3     3     3      g        t4 I CupRFCTIVE ACTION SPECIFIED                                                                                                                                                                PO (DESIGNATION: I . ACTION SPECIFIED)         l     l           l                             l    l
                                     --.... -- -==...=====- -.-               ...-=---............=...----.-..--. g             g 8

g g 3 g 3 g g g g g 5 g 4 g 3 g I g t g t g g, ( l t a. routroraf REPLACEMErlT NITH uuALIFIED Fou!PkENT - ======= = == ~ .8 i 8 3 3 3 8 8I I I I N I 2. EnulP4EkT =0ntFICATInu== ~ -.= ~ ...= - ---- ~ = ...--. ..... ~ . 3 3 3 3 3 3 g g g 3 3 l 3 3 8 3 I 3 vi 8 3. roulegrNT Rt. LOCATION ABOVE THE supMERGENCE LEVEL.-=========== ~ .8 $ N g 3 g g 3 g g i i t t t 3 3 3 8 8

4. Ri.LnCATE OR SHIELD FOUIPPENT FROM RADIATION 500RCE.-= = == ~ ~ =l
5. VERIrl ount.tFICATION ST ADDITgoNAL TFSTING/ANALV63 d = = ~ ~ ~ =8 8 l

8 8 8 8 3 8 3 I 3 II l g l i l I l i l i t i l I l i 3 8 h Cn

      *        ,                 5 I 6 EQUIP' TENT #ELnCaf ton 10 A MILD ENVIRoumENT.- - --..- .=.. ~ ..--~ l                    3     3     g      g      g   g     g      g    g     g     g       3     g     g      g        y T. QUAllrICATION TESTING OF EQUIPMENT IN PHOGRE55.------....-----.-=3                   3     l     l      l      l   l     3      3    3     3     3       8     3     3      3 5     9. nTHEN ( ~.3EE sPFCIFIC EquirnENT ITEN IF CHECEED - )====== -- ~ =l I $I 3I 3I 3I l                                 8     l      l    8I 3                l Il I l 5

l 3 l 8 8 8 8 8 I I i t i I 8 8 8 8 8 SCHFI'ULE FHR CHMPLETInn OF COPRt'CT8VE ACTION (3) HAS BEFN PROV!DED--l l t i i t tI l 8 3 3 3 3 3 3

                                 .s.zasa.as. ass.sa. ass.na..saa.ma.s.s.sanass..ss.assa.s...sas..               4as......masa....ssen...sa...e.i...ee.ne.ame...m.s....s.......s......

3 A b O 9 9

my; mm - + ny -;;m ymyym ' 2. - . kl [ b' .

                                                                                                                                                                                      ,' $           f' ~         'h        '

L : ( - - G O Table 4-4 (Cont. )

                    ,    c-                                                                    EOUIPMENT ENVIRONnENTAL QUALIFICATION SunNART FDam
     ,N i                =
                         ==-
                                                                                               .........a........................................

p >m -

                                                                                                                               ......a......................................................
        i 23n                                                                                                                            FRC EQU3PNENT ITEN NUNRERS

[

     -r yb                                                                                                       ............................................................8 8
                  '-                                                                                                           306810628063l064306S1066
   .-                 a. s            .........a...s.........a.a..............................aa..................................a..806780681069107080?l80723073801480758 Q3               I Whc RF0HINENEMTS                            (DESIGNATION I e DFFICIENCT)              l     l  8   8    4       3     $       $      $   $      l       l  l      l   l   8
   'e.                g@

i ================ ========== _ === = =_ ....==== l l 8 8 l 3 8 8 l l 1 4 8 3 3 3 qj l 3. DoctInt NTFD EVIDENCE OF QUALIFICATION ADEQUATE = = ~ - *=== = ~ t I I l 8 l 8I II I i 8 8 l 8I l 8I $ 3 4 2. ALEQUATE SI1tLARITY BFTWELE EQUIPNENT AND l 3 8 8 l l l I I I {

   ,         'e                        I        TEST SPICIntu E3?ASLI5NED========================================l                   l  8   l    l 8

l 8 8 1 I 4 l 8 l 8 l I II l l l { g:r l 3. AGING DECRADAfl0N E V ALU ATED ADEQU A TELT ======~-~~ l ! ! $ I i l l l 4 l l l l 8 8

     -l-              ga               4   4. uq4LIFIFD LIFE OR REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE                                           1     8  8   l    l       l     3       8      8   8     8                  l   l
      ;!.             wR               l        rsTABLISHFD ( I F R E0 U I R ED ) =-===== === ==== == === ========= = === 8          l  8   8    8       8     3       3     3    3     8 8

8 8 8 8 l 8 8 g j 4 3

5. PROGNAM L3?ARLISMED TD IDENTIlf AGING DEGRADATION - - - - - el 8 8 l l 8 8 8 i .3 ,
  • 8 8 8 8 I i q l 6. CPIIENIA REGARDING AGING SIMULATION 3ATI$FIED (1F REQUISED)= = =8 8 8 8 l 8 8 l l l l 4 8 l 8 4 j M ,

I T. ChlTrdIA DrGARDING TEMPERATURE / PRESSURE EIPOSUREs 8 8 8 8 l l l l 8 3 3 8 l l { l nl' t A. - PEAK TENPLRATURE ADE0dATE==============================8 8 8 8 8 8 8 l l 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 I i l S. = PEAA PRES $URE ADEQUATE =================================4 l { $ 8 3 3 3 8 i B 3 l 3 l 8 j i c. - DuRAftnN ADEQUATE = == - = = === = ================ ===l l 8 8 8 8 l l 8 l l l 4 { l I i I n. = REQUIRFo PRorILE ENVELnPED ADE00ATELT==================l l 8 8 8 8 3 I I I I l t l l l_

     ,                                8                  E. = STEAN EXPDSURE (IF kEOUIRED) ADLQUATE==================l              8   3   8    8      3      3       8     8    l     [       t   t     l    l   l l e..csITrRIA REGARDING SPRAT SATISF1ED**======*======================8                       l   l   8    8      8      l       3     3    I     I       g   l     l   8    8 I    9. CRITERIA R EG ARDING SUDNERGENCE S 4TI SFIFD--======-~~ l                             l   I   I    i      3      l       l     l    8     8       8   l     8   8    8 p      i 10. CSITIRIA REGARDING RADIATION 8 A T I SFI ED=--===~===~J~~ l                             8   I   l    4      8      I       i     4    8     8       8   I     I   I    3 g     i St. CHITLRIA RrGARDING TF3T SEQUENCE SATISFIED - = = = = = === = 9 - =&-                    !   I  j    $       $      8       l     4    8     8       3   3     8   8    8 q
p. I 12. CRITERIA RFGARDIMC TEST FAILuhE3 OR SEVERE ANOMALIES I l 8 3 l l 8 8 8 8 l l t l 3 3 pa I (Ir ANT) sATIsr1ED===========================================l l 4 4 l l g i 4 I $ g i l 5 8 i 13. CRITENIA REGAnntNG FHNCTIONAL TESTING 5ATISFIED==================8 8 8 l l l 8 l l 3 3 3 3 8 8 3 5 34. CRifERIA W2GARh!MG INSTHUMENT ACCURACT 5ATISFIED=================8 8 8 8 l 8 i l I i 8 l 8 8 8 3 8 15. Tes? DuSATIoM MARGIff (I HOUR + FUhCTION TIF7) SATISFIED = = ~ ~ l i I B l l l l l 8 8 3 3 3 3 3 8 16. CRITERIA PEGARDING PARGIh5 SATI5FIED (NUREG='580. CAT. 8)== ~ - 3 8 8 8 l l l l 3 8 8 8 3 3 l naassassan ssasassamassoassammaassamassassassessassa assanamme.nasmesoamme.e.samosamesesse.nese ssessee.a.amammeam.4 sa.assene..some. eses
                                      ! NRC OUALIFICATION CATEGORY                   (DESIGNAff0N8 I = CATEGORT)              8     8   8  8    8       8     3       4     8    8      l      l   3      8   8    4 I

8 ========================== I 8.A

                                                                                     ===========================              g 9 4 H I P M r n ? 0 U 4 L I F I ED-==~~ ~ ~= == == = ==== =-==== = ==--= g g

iI $ i l l 1 l 3 g 8 g 8 g l g l g l g 8 i 3 l 3 l 3 l 1

         '      j                     l I.B          EoulPMrNT GUALIFICATION PI.NDING MODIFICATION ============== ~ 8               l   l  l    8       8     8       l     l    l      8      l   8     8    8   8 l II.A         EQUIP =ENT GUALIFICATION NOT ESTA8LISHED======================8 I l                l  6    8       8III l              8    8     8       8   8Il I II l l                     t II.B         EQUIPMENT NOT GUALIFIED====== - - - ~ = = = = - ~ === = =8                     8  8   l    8       8     l       8     8    3     3       3   8     3    l   3
       ;        j                     i    II.C      F4 DIP'8ENT SATI5FIES ALL Rt'0UIREMFMTS EXCEPT                           l *8     8   8   'l       l     l       l     8    8     4       8   l     l    l   8 l              CH A LIFII:D LIFE OR RLPLACEMEllT SCHEDULE JUSTIFIED ====== = = =l             8   8  8    8       8     8       l     l    8     8       l   8          l   l l

l' 8 III.A 14HIPHEh? FXFhPT FRON OUALIFICATION===== - - - ====== - ===l i III.m 1.0 HIP:tFh7 hn? IN THE SCOPE OF THE REVIEN======== = = = = = ==8 l l l 8 8 g l 3 l I l 3 g3 g3 l 4 3 8 g t ly 8 8I lI lI i ! I I l 3 3 3 8 8 8 g esassassss DHCHNENTATION NOT MADE AVAILABLE- - ====== = = == - ~ = ~ 5 l l l 8 l l t 8 8 l l 8 l l bl 1 assasemmaassmaa.asassesanssesass.aa. seamssessassamassssaaesasemmasse.ses. mans.ne.8 ssess.se.sossessammesmas.a..e...asse.ame pd

         ;                            3 CORNECTIVF ACTION SPECIFIED                  (DF5IGNATIO . I a RCTION SPECIFIED) 1          I  I   l    l      3      3       1     8          l       l   l     l   8    3 I

8 =================_==_====

                                                                                     =================================== 1 i 4. EQUIPMLNT REPLACEMENT WITH OUALIF3ED E0ulPNENT= = = = = = = = l 8

8 l I l 8 8 l 3 8 8 8

                                                                                                                                                                                 ,8 8

8 8 l l l l a Pa i 2. EculP: LENT PODIFICAfl0N==== = =============== = ======== = =======l 4 l l l 8 l l 8 l 3 l 8 8 l l u 8

3. EQUIPMLNT RELOCATION AbOVE THE $UB4ERGENCF LEvtL======= - = ~ - 4 4 l l l 8 l l $ $ 5 I I $ l i N #

t 4. REspCATE OP $HIELD ECHIPMENT tRUM RADIATION 30URCE==== - ===== ~ 5 l 8 8 I I I I 3 l l l 8 8 8 3 [, J B 5 vtRIFT ouar.IrICATION RT ADDITIONAL TESTING /ANALISIS= = = ==== ~ $ $ 3 8 3 3 8 8 8 8 8 3 3 l I I 8 co

       ?        '

8 6. ECHIPMENT RELOCATION fn A PILD tNVII:0gmENT - - ===== = == - - =l l 3 8 l l 8 4 l l 3 3 l l %l l l T. QUALIFICATION TESTIfG OF EQUIPMEkT IN PROGRESS-== = == = = ~ ~l 4 8 4 8 8 8 I i l l 8 l l I l l 8 l f 8 R. OTHER (===St E SPECIFIC I QUIPNt.NT ITf M If CHt:CEED _ )==== = ======l I i ! l l l 1 3I l I 3I $ 8I 3I i l i l I i ! I I I I .I I l l l 8 l l I l l 8 f l l SCHflHl.E FDN COMPLETInn UF rapFECTIVE ACTION (5) HAS RFEN PPOVIDED - R I ! 3 l l 3 3 8 l l l l l i a s s a s s a sa s a ma s s a.am m a s s a s s e s sa s sa s sa.sa a s s s a n s sa.s e a s s a s s a s s a s s a m a s s a s se s s o a s.e s es s.e s s a s s a . a ss a s s as s a{ l 4

           ,                        9 7                                                                                                                                                                                                                               I 4.d
      .t l

m_ _ _ _ _ . _

                                                                                - - ~ -          .- _                 m          ,     m                    -

_ _ = ~ L i, Table 4-4 (Cont. ) '

c--

EontP>ENT rNVIRuNee>TAL QuALIF CAtsua SUNNAuf Fonn 4 g .................................................. ; - c.n

                 >n [

3 ............................................................. . 3 i FRC EQUIPMENT ITEN kHMBFRS $ E ............................................................. .

           -     as                                                                                                                           80761017301880198080
                                ...........................................................................................40011082108380848085308610814080100930908 I NRC Rt0ujRE.F1TS                                                                                                                             ............................a...........

l N, . (DFSIGNAftpus I . DEFICIENCTI I I t t t I 3

=.... -.--.-... l l i L l I l l 8. I l 3. DOCuPFMTED EVIDE4CE OF QUALIFICATION ADLOUATE ~ ~ * ~ ----= ~ ~.at
l : 8 8 : : l 3 3 : : : : : !.
                     @                                                                                                                          I l I $I$I I 3           1 2 ArFPUATE SIMILARITT SETktfp EQUIPMENT AND                                                                                                I      lI l I 4         8I $          l    8      l      l I l           I.

3 8 { t t I l 8 8 8 at l l i Tes? SPECI"LN EST48bl5HkDa== ~ * - - ~ e* ~ ~ a = ==== = ~ === 3t 8I II I II 4I l 8I tI $I i I 1I l 3 3 3 l [

--........---=-=-------.---------------.3 l

i l 1 1 8 1 1 I I I l I I l 4 I l @ l S. PppCR44 FSTABLI5NED TO 3DENTIff AGIDG DEGRADATION.- ~ ===== ~ .*4 8 : I : : I ( l i L l l 1 L t I l l l l l 6. CNgTt.NIA REGARDING AGING sinut,ATION SATISFIED (IF REuulRED)= = ~ l l l l l l 5 7. CRIfikIA NFCARDING TLliPERATURE/ PRE 358fRE EIPDSURE 8 8 1 l l l l 8 8 3 3 l . l l 3 8 8 l l l l l 8 8 8 4 3 l l A. = PEAR TFMPFRATURE ADEQUATE--==*---*=*---*----=======*--*l I l i. i a n. . PEAK PRE 55uRE ADFOuATE-.. ---------------.------ ..=---I 8 8 8 8 8 1 3 8 8 3 l l 8 i i ! I 8 I I l 4 l 8 I l 3 3 5 C. - DURATION ADEQUATE ============--========*--==--*=====--=l t t i 1 p. = REQUIRED PROFILE ENVELOPED ADEOU4TFLV======-.==....=-..! l i i 8 8 1 5 I i 1 1 1 3

                                                                                                                                                   $     $       $    $      1      8     l     8     l       l    3    l      l      l      3 F. - STEAN EXPn5URE (IF RTOUIRFD) ADEQUATE =-==-== -=-=- -== 3                                     4    3       3    $      $      $     $     $     3       l    3    3      3      3 1     8. CFITENIA REGARntuG SPEAT 3ATISFIED===*======***.==-=====*======-*4                                                                         I     l 3

'y 4 8 8 1 1 8 l 8 8 8I l 8 8 3 9. CRITFRIA RFGANngNG SHEMERGENCE $ATI5FITD==== ~ = = ===== = = ===8 l l t t t l p 8 8 8 8 8 3 l l 3

                                ! to. CRITrRIA R EGauDI NG R A DI AT ION S A TISF IFD~--~=~~~~~~ 3                                                 $     $    =l      l      l      8     l     l    3       l     l    3      I      l      l g

ra 8 ll. OkI1E'IA RFG4knlNG TF57 SEQUEhCE SATI5FIED -- -- ~ ~ - - - - -.{ t g 3 L 8 g j l 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 t 12. CRITERIA #FGARDING TEST FAILURES OR SEVERE ANOMALIES I l l 8 l l I i l l ' mg l PJ l (IF A!8 7 ) 5 4 T t 3 F I FD--~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~-~~~~=~--=~ 4 l l

                                                                                                                                                                                    .                             3     3      8      3      4 8                  8      l      l     l     t    i       I    I     I      i   *I        3 a                           3 13. CRITtRIA afGANDING FUNCTIONAL Tr8 TING SATI5FIED = =- - - ~ ~ ---I                                            8     4       8    8      1      3     8     8    8       8    3    33 3          3       3 g

8 I4. CRITERIA kEGARDING INSTRUMFNT ACCURACT 6ATISFIED====-=--====.=---l l l 8 3 8 8 8 3 3 3, l l 3 3 3 l 3 85 TEST DURATION MARGIta (t NOUR + FUNCTION TIME) SATISFIED - == -fa-l l 16 CPIT 8 8 l l 8 8 8 8 8 3 3 3 l 3 l i .... .....EMIA l)=== =l REGARDING MARGINS 5ATISFIED (NUREG-0588, CAT................................................... 1 4 4 4.................................................3...3 ................ a 8 4 5 L l 8 8 8 3 3 i NkC QUALIFICATION CATECORY (DESIGNATION: I . CATEGORT) l l y' t 3---~.-------==--------- ------=---=------- ~ ~ --- 8 8 8 8 8 8 3 3 3 3 l l l 3 3 3 $ 8 i i : 3 I.A E n u l P g F N T O U A L I r I En- .-~..~.--.--~~.-~~--.~- 3 g 3 g i t t 1 3 3 8 3 3 8 I .B . toulP4F.af 40ALIFICATIch PINDING MODIFICATION - ~ --- - ---.-l l l I l 3 3 l 3 l 3 l 3 l 3 g 3 g

 '!                            I     II.A      F4DIPnFNT QUALIFICATION NOT ESTABLISHED ==

8 8 8 3 l l l y

         ,                     i     II.B      FoulPnFui NOT QUALIFIED....-.-.... - ~==~5=                          .- ~ m --=
                                                                                                                             ... ~~ ~  ~ --I I gII gII II
                                                                                                                                     -..-.3                     g II g

IIII g 3 3Il I $I l 33I 3I II 3 I -3 g 3 g 3 3 3 3 3 g g i II.C EQUIPPENT SATISFIES ALL REQUIREMENT 5 EICEPT l 8 8 l 8 l l l l 3 8 3 3 3 l l l j t OHALIfIED LIFE OR REPLACEMFNT 3CHEDULE JUSTIFIED--~~~==...I 4 l l l l 4 3 3 l l 3 3 3 3 8 III.A t0UIPMFNT FIEMPI IRON 00ALIFICATION=== = = ====~- ======= ==l l i L $ $ $ $ g l g l g l 1 g gy III.h 44ulPPFNT NOT IN THE SCOPE OF TIfE REVIEN - ~ ~ ~ ~ = ~ ~ j i ! I 4 4 8 3 l l 1 t 3 3 3 j NOT MADE AVAILABLE .~=====-~===============3 3 3 3 a ,

                                               .....................................................................3...3...3....l...t...........................8....g
                              ..........DOCHMENTATION                                                                                             3                                      l     l    3       l    l    3                     l     %,

p 8 C0h6fCTIVE ACTION SPECIFIf D .... , l i ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (DESIGNATION: I = ACTION SPECIFIED) 4 1 1 4 4 L l i l 3 3 8 3 3 3 3 O i ----------- - - - ----- --.---~ =- 3 l l u j i t. Feutrarn? RI.PLACFnENT w!TH OUA1.IFIfD EQUIPnFNT - - - -== = == ~ 8 3 3 l l 3 $ g l l I I I I I l l

2. [0 U I P M E h ? N ap I F I C A T I 0r:----- ..... ---...~.....-.....--.......=, {1 l
                                                                                                                                                      ,I l       l    l I

I t 3 i 1 3 8 3 3 l g 8 l l g l j $ sa

3. EcutFaE%T ret,0CAfton AmofE TNF SusMtRCFHCF LEVEL == ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~l l 3 3 8 4 ALLOCATE OR S'IIELD EQUIPMENT FROM RADIATION 300BCE+.....----===..I 3 8 l' 3 3 l

l l l l . g l l g g g l' l l S. UtRIFT GUALIFICAtled SV ADDITIpuAL TESTING /ANALTSIS- ~ *== ~ *=--I

                                                                                                                                                 $     3       8    8      8                  3    3       g     l    l      8      g      3      #   g-
                                                                                                                                                'l     4            8I $                           l       l                        l             00
        ,                     l      6. EuulPHP 14 7 RELOCATInz TO A M It.p 3 mV IRnkmFNT....~~..........~                                 g     {     g 3

g

                                                                                                                                                                                  $     $     $                  3    3      g             3 N

n l i i 3 g g g g g g g g g {, I. OUALIFICATIUM TESTitG pr EQUIIMFNT IN PN0GRE55 -= ~ ~ --= ==----l l l l l l q l 0. OTHLN ( 3 3 3 3 8 8 e 3 3 3

.s                            8 5EE SPFCIFIC EOUIPMENT ITEN IF CHECKED.-.) ~ ~ ~ - ~ 3 3 8 I l I II l                                               tI 3I gIII l I $Il 3 l I l I gig l     8     I       i    l      1      l     t     I    I       l                 I      I      I l 3CHE Dill.t rnp romPLETIpra CF CURRECTIVE ACTION (3) HAS bEFN PROV                                               i     l            l      l      l                j 8    8 8                        3     l            g
                              .....................................s...........................IDFD...I......s........................................................l...3                                      8    3      8 s                            e                                                                                                      e                                                                                                           G
                                                                                                              +

r_ -: - -

._-+7-- -~~= ; --

T ma--p.ne}2parwn=4,: C M jf ~ 3,-GKQ; WQxo: p GF: : .= - 3,ly L

                                                                                                                                                                            }            ,

11 mJ Table 4-4 (Cont. ) cer EndIPutNT ENulRcEnLNTAL QUALIFICATION SUNNARV FDBN E]$ c1 essa-easosasssessenessmeneascassoasemmassessessaan If J

            > "p km
                   ]6                                                                                             essenessessenessessessessemessesseneesmerosesseemesespeeeeeme F       EQUIPMENT ITEN NupBERS                   l s

g _g; .i.......ee.e....s.RC ....es..sm............es............ ...... A E3. ... l. 28..li. 4i.. io.4 ..T. . messessenessessessassassassassemasonesasessesessessnessamessessessmeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeemesensassessessasseammeensessesessemeessessesses fffu m i NRC RFOUlkEMENTS I ===-===-======== (DESIGNATIOWs I a DEFICIENCT)

                                                                  =============================

l l I i l l 8 l l l 8 l l l 8 8 8 8 4C 8. DocuprNTED EVIDENCE OF QUALIFICATION ADEQUATE ====================8 I l I l l I iI 1I3 3 l ,( 13 l 2. ADEGUATE SIMILARITT SETNEEN FOUIPMENT AND I 8 8 8 8 i j t I

    '       } :T         4         TEST SPECIMEN ESTA8LISHLD===============,=========================l                         l    $I $        8       l     { I $                                l 3 ()         i   3. AGING DEGRADATION EVALUATED ADf00ATEl.T===========================l                            l    t     I    (       t      t     i                              I

{a i 4. QUALIFIFD LIFE On NFPLACFPENT SCHEDULE l l 3 3 $ 3 3 l

 *          *d           l         ESTAhl.13Hr0 (IF RE4UIRED)========================================l                         l     l     l    l       l 3

g g g

              @          l   5. PROGRAN ESTARLISHED TD IDENTIFT AGING DEGRADATIUN================l                             l    l      l    8      3      l     3        ,,                    j 3    6. CRITERIA prGARDING AGING SIMULATinN SATISFIED (IF REQUIRED)======8                             l    l     l    l       8      8    8                              8 1    T. CRITFsIA REGedDING TEPPERATURL/ PRE 55URE EIPO3UREg                               l            l    3     3    3       3      3    3                              3 A.
  • PEAK TEMPERATURE ADE0uATE=========================-====4 8 8 8 8 8 8 I l l M. = PEAK FRES$URE ADEQUATE =================================l l l l 3 3 l l {

t C. - DuRATIor ADE0UATE=======T==============================l l l l 3 3 3 3 l l D. = REQUIRED PROFILE ENVELOPED ADL0UATELf==================l l 3 l l 3 3 3 3 l E. - STEAN EIP05 uke (IF REQUIRED) ADE00ATF==================l 3 3 l l 3 l 3 l

'.'Jl                   I S. CHITERIA REGARDING $PRAI SATI3FIED=============-=================l                                l    l     l    $       l      l    l                              3 J                l 9 CHITERIA #EGARDING SUBMLRGENCE 3ATISFIED=========================4                                      l     l    l              I    I                              I I                 I   I... CRITERIA NEGARDING RADIATION 34TISFIED*==========================8 3

l l l t 4 l I l f 3 l 8 18. CRITERIA REGARDING TEST SEQUFNCE 3&TISFIED=======================8 8 8 l l 8 l t l { pa l 82, CRITERIA REGARDING TEST FAILURES OR $EVERE ANUMALIE3 3 3 4 3 4 3 3 I I ( La 3 (IF ANT) SATISFIED ===========================================8 8 8 3 l l l 8 8 7{ l 33. CRITFRIA REGARDING FUNCTIONAL TFSTING SATISFIED ==================4 8 8 8 8 3 4 l l

      ;                 I 14. CPITERIA RFGARDING INSTRUMENT ACCURACT 3ATISFIED=================l                              l     l     l                        l 3        3     3                  ,                 t 3J                       l Ib. TEST DURATION NARGIN (I HuuR + FUpCTION TIME) 8ATISFIED==========l                              l     3     l    l       3     3     l                              l t 16 CRITERIA EFGARDING MARGINS 3ATISFIED (NURIG=0580, CAT. 3)===*====l                               l    8      8   8       8      l     l
. [f                    m e s soa s s a s sa s a s s o as s m aa s e m asa m a s e s s m a s s m e e n s eass a s s o m a s sa s s ess m ee s s e e m s s am m e mmen es s u em m e n es s a s s s
   '{                   l NHC OHALIFICATION CATEGORY              (DESIGNATIONB I e CATEGDRI)                    4            l     l     l   4        l     l     l                              l
      ;                 i ==========================              ===========================                    ,            8    :          l        l          :                               l

,4 4 1.A FGHIPMFNT 0UALIFIED==========================================8 8 8 8 8 8 l l l

       ,                3    I.a       EculPMFNT GUALIFICATION PEkDING NDDIFICATI0N=================l                         {    l      {   jI 3I3              l                              l l II.A         FOUIPMENT CUALIFICATION NOT ESTABLISHED======================l I l I l I                          l I {        3      33 l                                 1
     -t                 i II.a         Eoii:PMrNT No? 0uALIrIED===============-================-=====                         l    :          :       l      l    g l II.C                                                                                                                                                                   l t                                E0n!PMFNT SATISFIES ALL RLOUIREMEhTS EXCEPT                               I            l    l     3    3       3      l    l                              3 i                 1 00ALIFILD LIFE OR REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE JU$73FIED=============l                         l                              l
,j                      i III.A LiulPPENT EXEMPT FRCM 0UALIFICATION==========================8                                l 3

l 3 8 8 8 8 8 8 3 t 3 l l III.D LoulParNT Nuf IN THE SCOPE DF THE REVIEN=====================l I l l l l 8 IV DOCUMENTATION NOT MADE AVAILABLF=============================l 8 8 l gj osassassas a s s e s e s s e s s a m a s a s s es s e m ass a m m a s a s s a ss s am m a ls s l l l l 8 8

   .4
     /                                                                                                                                   e ss os s s e s s e s s oa s sess e m a s s u e ss ese s s e s a m mpd g e.as ss am ae m I CORNFCTIvr ACTION 3PECIFIED             IbESIGNATIONg Ia ACTIDN SPECIFIED) l                        8    l     8    8       l      l    l                              t           C1 I ================-==========             ===============-==-================ 3                       l          I    l       3      l    l                                          La 3

I 8. E0utPMEhr REPLs0EMEh? NITH OUALIFtFD EQUIPMENT ===================4 l 2. Eou!PMEa7 MnnlFICATI0N=============-=============================l 8 3 3 3 l l I 3Il 3 3 l l l 3 (f

   -i                   8    3. EOUIPNFNT RELP2ATIDtt ABOVE THE AUh8ERGENCE LEVfL*================l                                l     l            g      l 3           %4 l
    }j                  l 4. RFLOCATE OR ShlELD EQUIPMLMT FROM RADIATION 300RCE===============l 3

l l l 8 8 l 3 3 3 3 l & i 5 VERIFT ODALIFICATIGH BY ADDITIONAL TE87ENG/ ANALYSIS =============l 3 8 l l 3 3 3 3 00 i J

                        ! 6 E0u!P1FPT RELOCATInh TO A MILD ENVIR0hMENT======================={                                l    {     l    i       I     l     8                              8
                                                                                                                                                                                                             'J B    7. 00ALIFICATIUM TrSTIhG DF FOUIPMLnT IN PROGRFS5===================l                            l    8     l    3       l     l     l                              l 1                  3    8. OTHER (===MEF SPFCIFIC EQUIPMLNT ITEN IF CHICRED= )=============l I II j                                 gI l e 3           gI l                                 l I                                                                                        l            1                                                                  l
       ]k               l s                               or CoRNFCTIVE ACTION (s) HAs sEEN PkDvIDED===l
                        ....fass.s...s......ma.......sa...........................s........es.....es......

t uLE FnR COMPLETION l 8 l 8 3 8 l I 8 8 I l 8 l c sos.....a......e......se....as..e.....e... ....s.se..l n

' l_

e4

                         . . - -            .x    , .   ..       . + - . - . 2 .. .~ u-                        .: w .-          . n o

i TER-C5257-487 9 4 4.3 METHODOLOGY USED BY THE LICENSEE Ihis section includes observations concerning the Licensee's qualification methodology presented in the response [14] to the NRC SER. 4.3.1 Completeness of Safetv-Related Equipment List 4 1 a Section 3.1 of,the NRC SER [13} identified the following concern: i 'Tisplay instrumentation which provides information for the reactor operators to aid them in the safe handling of the plant was not specifically identified by the licensee. A complete list of all display instrumentation mentioned in the LOCA and RELB emergency procedures must be provided. Equipment qualification information in the form of su= mary sheets should be provided for all components of the display instrumen-tation exposed to hcrsh environments. Instrumentation which is not considered to be safety related but which is mentioned in the emergency procedure should appear on the list. For these instruments, (1) justification should be provided for not considering the instrument

l. '

safety related and (2) assurance should be provided that its subsequent failure will not mislead the operator or adversely affect the mitigation

   ?

of the consequences of the accident. The environmental qualification of I post-accident sampling and monitoring and radiation monitoring equipment is closely.related to the review of the TMI Lessons-Learned modifications and will be perfor=ed in conjunction with that review. l The licensee identified 227 items of equipment which were assessed by the t staff. Because Units 1 and 2 are nearly identical, the review can be performed as one. Differences in the units will be identified by a parenthetical expression, with the applicable unit number enclosed." L

 ),

j In response to this concern, the Licensee stated (14):

                                "A list of all display instrumentation mentioned in the LOCA and HELB k                             procedures is provided in Attachment 1. This attachment lists the 1                             system, equipment component, and component number in alphanumeric jl                               sequence for Calvert Cliffs Emergency Operating Procedure-5, Loss of g                                Reactor Coolant and Calvert Cliffs Emergency Operating Procedure-6, Steam j                              Generator Tube Rupture. The instruments used for the Main Steam Line Rupture are the same as those for E0P-5. These instruments are located
)'

within a mild environment, i.e. , one where the environment will not change under any postulated accident conditions." h_ . It is concluded that the Licensee has provided a satisfactory response to 'I the NRC concern.

s O
  .                           t e __ .__ _ _

A y---~~ ~y~- ,3__ ~

                                                 ^^^---

Z,= - - - ( 3,4. ' * ' ~

                                                                                      - . G ys=y"ff._;f av * -

[' - - -

d TER-C5257-487 d I 4.3.2 Containment Spray S/ stem Section 3.2 of the NRC SER [13] identified the following concern:

                                 "On this basis, the staff has assumed, unless otherwise noted, that the analysis for developing the environmental envelopes for Calvert Cliffs 7                   Units 1 and 2, relative to the temperature, pressure, and the containment "W'd   ;                    spray caustics, has been performed in accordance with the requirements stated above. The staff has revie*wed the qualification documentation to

('7 ensure that the qualification specifications envelope the conditions established by the licensee. During this review, the staff assumed that 3 for plants designed and equipped with an automatic containment spray

         /                      system which satisfies the single-failure criterion, the main-steam-line-break (MSLB) environmental conditions are enveloped by the large-break-LOCA environmental conditions. The staf f assumed, and requires the licensee to verify, that the containment spray system is not subjected to
             ]                  a disabling single-conponent failure and therefore satisfies the
           '.                   requirements of Section 4.2.1 of the DOR guidelines.                        -
          .;Q my y                   Equipment submergence has also been addressed where the possibility
                 '?             exists that flooding of equipment may result from HELBs."

d].p z,; In response to this concer ,, the Licensee stated (14]: lhy "No credit is taken for the containst.ut spray system in our LOCA and MSLB a 1 p{ ' } analyses which are discussed in Section 14.15 of our FSAR." hi _ . j - Q:.a It is concluded that the Licensee has provided a satisfactory response to

  1. n .

j;Z the NRC concern. ',sts. ,, .&,, l x,y I J.t M

             ';           4.3.3    Environmental Service Conditions t' Na,c.g f .' t                     4.3.3.1    Temperature, Pressure, and Humidity Conditions Inside Containment

$jf I ::# Section 3.3 of the NRC SER [13] identified the folicwing concern: j,y.0b] !. "The licensee has provided the results of accident analysis as follows:

            ;4 Max Temo (*F)       Max Press (psig)         Humidity (%)

gw QM lOCA HSLB 276 269 50 44.5 100 100 sr Ql$

       'W                       The staf f has concluded that the minimum temperature profile for Q                  equipment qualification purposes should include a margin to account for t                             high-than-average temperatures.in the. upper regions of the containment
h. 4., that can exist due to stratification, especially following 'a postulated
  # 9y, '                       MSLB. Use of the steam saturation temperature corresponding to the total building pressure (partial pressure of steam plus partial pressure of

$a.>l t-4-15

  '"S.:                       O 23 1                   03J Franklin Research Center
       . s&; .                      Ao % atn.n a m n u.

3 l s p a +,,--, ,.. m _ % % m, ,.- # - .-c-..- - . -mm

     .   .. a     u. . w. ;         w. -              . . . r . . s. 2 - ~.w.           .u....-%          .-~.a.  --

TER-C5257-487 air) versus time will provide an acceptable margin for either a postulated LOCA or MSLB, whichever is controlling, as to potential adverse environmental effects on equipment. He licensee's specified temperature (service' condition) of 276*F does not satisfy the above requirement. A saturation temperature corresponding to the peak profile (296*F peak temperature at 50 psig) should be used instead. The licensee should update his equipment su= mary tables to reflect this change. If there is any equipment that does not meet the staff position,' the licensee must provide either justification that the equipment will perform its intended function under the specifie.d conditions ~or propose corrective action." The Licensee responded to the NRC concern as follows [14]:

                      "We have developed a containment temperature profile which incorporates the 296*F saturation temperature corresponding to the peak pressure defined in our FSAR. We are presently re-assessing the qualification of components subjected to this higher temperature in a manner consistent with DOR Guidelines and NUREG 0588. This effort will be completed by December 31, 1981. This new containment time temperature profile is included as attachment 2."

It appears that the Licensee has not resolved the NRC concern. Since the Licensee is responsible for identifying the environments, the parameters identified by the Licensee have been used in the evaluations contained in this Technical Evaluation Report. These parameters are reproduced in Appendix A. 4.3.3.2 Temperature, Pressure, and Humidity Conditions Outside Containment

  <                   Section 3.4 of the NRC SER [13] stated the following:
                      "The licenase has provided the temperature., pressure, humidity and
applicable environment associated with an HELB outside containment. The following areas outside containment have been addressed

(1) ECCC pump room (A119) (2) Containment recirculation pipe tunnel (Al22) (3) West penetration room (A221) (4) Piping area (A224 and M28) (5) Radiation exhaust ventilation equipment rocm (A225) (6) East penetration room (A227) (7) Main steam piping penetration ( A315) (8) East piping penetration room (A316) (9) Spent fuel filter room.(A328) The staf f has verified that the parameters identified by the licensee for the MSLB are acceptable."

  • nidin Research Center A DMaen of The Frankan insanaa
 . _ . m. n __ __ - m, , m wm,,                   ., , e sn -- _r --:- _   , - - -
                                                                                                   ,     _-   py         .
                                                              ..   - _ - . _ ~ . _ _ -

___ ____.m, d* m - l l

     &;                                                                                                                         l
p

(; ! TER-C5257-487 i l j I l 4.3.3.3 Nuclear Radiation Dose (Inside and Outside Containment) 3ection 3.8 of the NRC SER [13] identified the following concern: i :,,h "The licensee has provided values for the radiation levels postulated to Z@ exist following a LOCA. The application and methodology employed to J ;$ determine these values were presented to the licensee as part of the NRC i?.i>J staff criteria contained ir the DOR guidelines, in NUREG-0588, and in the ;

' 'T                     guidance provided in'IEB-79-013, Supple' ment 2. Therefore, for this Q      

review, the staff has assumed that, unless otherwise noted, the values provided have been determined in accordance with the prescribed

 '"3R                    criteria. The staff revieu determined that the values to which equipment was qualified enveloped the requirements identified by the licensee.
. ,.f.1 7                   The value required by the licensee inside containment is an integrated
       ?l                dose of 1 x 108 rads. This value envelopes the DOR guideline requirements and is therefore acceptable.

M.Q A required value outside containment of greater than 104 rads has been used by the licensee to specify limiting radiation levels within the' ECCS 7'Q pump room of the auxiliary building. _ais value does not appear to

%.y                      consider the radiation levels influenced by the source term methodology
     .',7                associated with post-LOCA recirculation fluid lines. The licensee must o r                      correct this along with the associated equipment summary sheets.                   He
             }-          licensee stated that this review is in progress and will be completed by N]                -

February 1, 1981, and the results submitted to the staff."

   .g          -

In response to this concern, the Licensee stated {l4]: [Uht1.Y h

                         "A discussion of the source term methodology associated with post-LOCA recirculation fluid lines is provided in Attachment 4.             This also i$                    includes a listing of the equipment doses. The summary sheets have been updated incorporating the calculated doses. The reasses'sment and Q'M[t

(* y ,y Q re-evaluation of the qualification of components subjected to these doses will be completed by early 1982."

$GJ                      It is concluded that the Licensee has provided a satisfactory response to WP
.t                 the NRC concern.
J 9Q p
~,

y gg 4.3.4 Chemical Soray j

?M                                                                                                                              \

u pi- Section 3.6 of the NRC SER [13] identified the following concern:

%w                                                                                                                              l I
                         "The licensee's FSAR value for the chemical concentration is 1700 ppm

'y@N M ry boric acid solution; the exact volume percent used by the vendor for I

;                        qualification testing is being verified by the licensee. Therefore, for the purpose of this review, the effects of chemical spray will be
$g%    ?                 considered unresolved. The staff will review the licensee's response
g ,

when it is submitted and discuss the resolution in a supplemental report."

>6 y4 4-17 9h                       b Franklin Research Center Acm ame r an l

4g % >,,~.._ - . - -

                                          ,,,,.,7       %,_-      ~ , - - -
                                                                                       ,    .~,     ,
                                                                                                               .m         ,.. ,
                                                                                                           -~          ~
          . , _ _ _ . -                               . _ . _ . - .               - -            L                        .1.E _     E ui     ,.r..a -

TE R-C5257-487 a In response to this concern, the Licensee stated [14]:

                                         "The chemical concentration for boric seid solution is being evaluated on the basis of ppm and percent solution by weight. We have received infor. nation concerning post LOCA chemistry that recently increases the safety injection tank concentrations to 280 ppm.                     This is presently being re-evaluated by Bechtel Corporation with scheduled completion by mid-Oc tobe r. "

It is concluded that the Licensee has provided a satisfactory response to the NRC concern. l 4.3.5 Submergence Section 3.5 of the NRC SER [13] identified the following concern:

                                        "The maximum submergence levels have been established and assessed by the e                                        licensee. Unless otherwise noted, the staff assumed for this review that
't                                       the methodology employed by the licensee is in accordat.ce with the appropriate criteria as established by Commission Memorandum and Order f'                                     CLI-80-21.

W ] The licensee's value for maximum submergence is 16. f t 4 in. below this level has been identified by the licensee, along with the Equipment

                        .               proposed corrective action. The licensee identified five safety-related
 ?                                      electrical components for Unit 1 and seven for Unit 2 as having the f                                        potential for becoming submerged after a postulated event. As a corrective action, the licensee proposes replacing these components; in some cases, the licensee is considering relocation of the components.

The licensee has replaced the components in Unit 1 and has stated that j the components in Unit 2.will be replaced before startup from the cur ent i outage. Based on its review of the licensee's submittal, the staff 3 concurs with the proposed resolution. f In one instance, the licensee stated that the component in question--a h solenoid valve in Unit 2- performs its function in less than 7 seconds, y fails closed, and is not required to operate after a LOCA. In this case, j the licensee should provide an assessment of the failure modes associated 4 with the submergence of the solenoid valve. The licensee should also d provide assurance that the subsequent failure of this component will not f adversely affect any other safety functions or mislead an operator. 3 Additionally, the licensee should discuss operating t*me, across the spectrum of events, in relation to the time of submergence. If the y/ results of the licensee's assessment are acceptable, then the solenoid )} valve may be exempt from the submergence parameter of qualification. 0,. 3 + 4-18 A .*! bEnklin Research Center A QMson of The Frandn insatute .? wem.kwmW ~e-S**b=~w __ , .&,;-~- -g p, v

                                                                                                   ,-7'. '
                                                                                                                ,        y ' ,   w   ~, ,
  • g

w. f D.

   ; ( ,. .

TER-C5257-487

     . '. .e
        ',l    l It is not clear from the information submitted that submergence of safety-related electrical equipment outside of containment was 91               addressed. The licensee should address this area more specifically in
          .              the 90-day response end upgrade the CES as appropriste."
       .Ba In response to this concern, the Licenses stated (14):

N. .

    ;. 'y
    &                    "We have relocated all of the subject components on both Units 1 and 2 ta 7IE                    an elevation above the calculated submergence level with the exception of
i. l solenoid valve 2SV506. An assessment of the failure modes associated
    )."                  with the submergence of this valve is provided in Attachment 3.         The i        s.,              failure modes analysis shows that the subsequent failure of 2SV506 will
  ;W                     not adversely affect any other safety function or r.1: lead an operator.

' C Possible submergence of equipment outside the cont cInment is heing re-evaluated by Bechtel Corporation with completion expected Ly J;p mid-October." It is concluded that the Licensee has provided a satisfactory response to

. 4 the NRC concern.

k!w

.a..
 . OI$t Mo              4.3.6    Aging and Oualified Life 73

\ %s

  ,T 1 ' -G Section 3.7 of the NRC SER (13] identified the following concern:

U l

  ,'62A "The DOR Guidelines, section 7, does not require a qualified life to be established for all safety related electrical equipment, however the following actions are required:

(p pg 1. Detailed comparison of existing equipment to the materials identified in Appendix C of the DOR guidelines. The first supplement to M'Sh l IEB-79-01B requires the licensees to utilize the table and .t.dentify M any additional materials as a result of their effort. . iw

2. Establish an ongoing program to review surveillance and maintenance OM a records to identify potential age related degradations.
  ?)5 yLg                     3. Establish component maintenance and replace =cnt schedules which bei                          iaclude considerations of aging characteristics of the installed Syd                          components.
 'n$j    A:,

The licensee identified a number of equipment items for which a specified . g qualified life was established (for examples, 5 years, 15 years, or 40 Ad years). In its assessment of these submittals, the staff did not review

 %74/                    the adequacy of the methodology nor the basis used to arrive at these W                     values; the staff has assumed that the established values are based on 3M                     state-of-the-art technology and are acceptable.

3;&. gew

 ?.Y n

ni 4-19 nklin Res w .; ~~.earch ~ Center

g. . r.. . g.; , _ ,- - . , , , . _ . , . .- ,. _,
                                                                                          .p.;my - 7. ,,,
       . . . . a. . - - n. :: . ---- c ; . . a _._ a .                                    , - - ..                                                           .         -
                                                                                                                                                                         . c:. < .          .,-:-       - , . _., _ . ,

l { TER-C5257-487 For this review, ho.ever, the staff requires that the licensee submit supplemental information to verify and identify the degree of conformance to the above requirements. The response should include all the equipment identified as required to maintain functional operability in harsh environments. Le licensee indicated that this phase of the response is outstanding and that the review is in progress. The staf f will review the licensee's response when it is submitted and discu'ss its evaluation in a supplemental report." In rasponse to this concern, the Licensee stated [14]:

                                                  "We are not making a detailed comparison of the existir.g equipment and the materials identified in Appendix C of the DOR Guidelines. We have been using data obcained from Wyle Laboratories for evaluation of age sensitive materials.                             Our previous letter, Reference (d) described this effort and completion date.

A program to review surveillance and maintenance records to identify potential age related degradations will be implemented by June, 1982." It is concluded that the Licensee has provided a satisfactory response to y the NRC concern. 4 4 - k, 1

 .a 1

l 4-20 O A bd Franklin Research Center Ao m em<r wnmu, 4 W- pi p--= g- W .- '

                                                            .            .m , %.M W4Z--' ;;i " J# %-su                                                                             g ':      _-__    .; 7 ;-- -         ,

___ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ . . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ w. 1 ~ - __a

p.

             *c l

l TER-C5257-487 4.4 EQUIPMENT EINIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION EVALUATION

                                            'Ihe evaluation presented in this section of the report includes, for each equipment item, completed equipment environmental qualificction review e
                   .l,           checksheets (partially handwritten) which present both the technical
. c ..

J information necessary to conduct the review and the results of the evaluation, eh' .

~c -.
                        -4
                ) .-

s}f

     , i..
           ;W M
        ,      '1;
     ,, . :t.e,
     'i ;
         *9
      ,S's, ;i
     .wp
      . ;.u QIr 2.
        >q                 }

e.'

      .~.

l.^ :@~

    . y :c4
     ; 4v;
     ,"*4'y.',

(&. - 4'th

     .ilh
    '$5 c..G.  ..,

m j kb

    , :3:;
    . J:L; kS7) s,%

d:V Y]p

    ; f.1F Y?{k i ; .;

tN.jJ I,iq [ '?..N t st; fc,k'1 p,. g -

    ,t: :p .-

[l l sn

    .a.,,_     .
     '4j                                  4                                                  4-21 W,
                                           !!000 Fran} din Research Center A om.on er rh. Franen sou,
       . ,? a. I j
                                                                                                               ~        ~        '

M-es.- 9 4 [4. i' h&A.w3 -

                                                  , - > . ,.,&sw - , . 4 _ y.   . m -- -Je . ,Ee M w,,,e   -
                                                                                                                 -,. g-        .        ,___

w_ ..- - -u _ _ - - -

                                                                                                                          --mu           . ,,.vm       - --   -

N

  • ~
   ) .

( I s b,- t f ! Ji ......................................... I I s.- I EQUIPMEb7 ENVIRONMFMTAL ODALIFICAflDN i l' d S EC i EQUIPMEh? ITEN CilECBINLET JMOEI I l CALVEN CLIFF $ $ l

         ,    D y )[

os

                                                                                                           ......................T...................
  • 7 6

E-b FPC [ EU I l l.M ' p0,. rDFIPnND NT MAhDFACTURER PODEL lauNat.R N, . LOCATIDE g 'j g I Spl E*' HIP V48 VF ASCO WPNTX9320&2tV CONTAINNENT, (C230) g3T 2 sul.p4nID VALVE ASCO 2c6)RS)RVU CONTAINNENT,.(C230) y e I: ) TriFunIn VALVE set.ErnID VALVE ASCn Rfs)20Al75V CONTAthmENT, (C230) > ln ASCO 4 HTe)20 ECCS PunP ROOM, (Alls)

                't               5       5pl.t r0l0 v ALVF.                                       ASCO                              2061815RVU                   EAST PIPING PENETRATION ROON, (All6      l
              * ?.               6       Snt.EtJOID VALVE                                         ASCO                              NPHTIO)20A2tv               CONTAINpFNT, (C230)
                @                7* sns.t10!D VAI.VF                                              ASCO                              NPS320A387V                  MAIN STEAN PIPING PENETRATION, (All sne.ErnID VALVF                                          A5CO '                                                                                                  [

t WP8320Al87V EAST PSPING PEhETRATION ROON, (4316 ; 9 snl.fNnlU VALVE ASCO 2063815RVU EAST PIPING PENETRATION BonN, (4386 t to - SOLEtenID VALVE TFLFDT3tE 218106202525) PIPING ARFA (A224) j ll spLLwnID VALVE ASCO l WFtll6E)5V EAST PIPING PENETRATION BOON, (All6 F l 12 ShitHnIP VAI.VF ASCO NPS320A195V CONTAINmFNT (C230) 'j I)- 5DLEPOIP VALVF ASCO WPS)l6ESSV CONTAINnENT (C230) 34 t'nfuMITED VALVE ACTUATOR I.I M I TnROUE SMh00 EAST PENETRATION ROON, (A321) ' l 15 taffeRIZED W AI.VE ACTU ATOR PRATT TN2000) EAST PIPING PfMETRATION BuoN, (All6 l 16 ~ t'Olp*Izan V4LVE ACTUATOR LIFITOROUE $NB00 EAST PIPING PENETRATION ROON, (AlI6

   .'g p        87         tiornRIZED WALVE ACTUATOR                               LIMITONOUE                         SMB00                       EAST PtNErmATION BDON, (A227) po1PRIZtn VALVE ACTuATUR                                LIMITnRout j           N g       te 19         M010'tIZFD J AS.VE ACTU ATna                            t.I M I TOR OH E SMB00 SM82 EAST PIPING PENETRATION B00N, (All6 MAIN STE4N PIPING PENETPATION, (All lI            N        2P         Muf0RIZFn VALVE ACTUAinR                                LIpITOROUE                         $4R2                        MAIN $ TEAM PIPING PENETHATION, (til y                        21         Pol 0NITED VALVE ACTUATOR                                                                  Sahl                        ECOS Pt3MP RonN, (A189) j' s

22 25 Putn9IZED V4LVE ACTUAina MpfW4I2fD VALVE ACTHAfoR LIMITnRotsr LIMITnROUL I.IMITopouE

                                                                                                                                    $NB2                        CONTAINnEh? REC.!BCULATION PIPE TUNN      [

smR00 EAST PENETRATION B00N, (A227)

 ')
  • 24 25 retnpI2LD VALVE ACTU4TDd Ful0Ri2ED V4LVE ACTilATOR 8.IMITOR00L SM82 EAST PFNETRATION 900N, (A227) ,
 ~

LIMI1DR00E $NB0 tCCS PU.P RDon, (Alle) '

 ,f                           26 - Puf0pl1LD VALVE ACTUATOst                                     I. I M IT ON QUL                   SMBf SIZFS 00, )            CONTAINNENT, (C230) i                       27        l'n l uu l1F D VALVE ACTUATOR n4TipHIFFD VALVE ACTUAfhp l.IMITpBOUE                        SMM)                        CONTAINMEhT, (C2)G)
         '                    28                                                                I.IFITnkout                         5#H00                       FCCS PUMP ROOM, (Alle)                    r 29        Fof0FIZED                            vat,VE ACTt'ATnR   I.IhlinR00E                         SMn00                       ECCS PUMP B004, (Allec                    ^

In e ntuk tZt h V ALVE ACTUATOR LIFIITOROUE SMB00 CONTAINMENT llECIRCULA)'*1 PIPE TUNN

            ,                 It        heGepI7ED V ALVr ACTU Aink                              1.j MITnN ')UE                      SNh2                        EAST Pt'NETRATION ROON, gm l4                                                                                                                                                                                       )

32 t14TUNITED VALVE ACTUATOR LIMITokOtte $4h2 CONTAINNENT RECIRCULATION DAPE TUNN

      'I
                              )) FIA T H A NSP ITT t:R                                          FI5CHtR AND PORTrp
  • l#H2495(6) EAST PIPING PENffRATInN ROON, (All6 34 FLon I N 4'13'4 I T TL R I I500tF N AhD PORTIR 10H2495(6)

PIPING Apt 4, (4224) { '] 35 16 tLHW Th A*lS!'I TTE ft I.t vil. TH AH'4ITTER F R SCisEH AhD PUR1ER 80H249h(6) NF57 ptnETRATION RDOM, (A228) h } i FISCHFP AhD Putt 1ER 8)D24955PAAPCB CONTAINMENT, (C230)

1. IT l h t tSue t' I % IC4 Tom SICPA 9222(3) AUEILIARY FEFDNATTR PUNP ROOM, (T60 y e i

j! 36 PristuMF Thar13NITTIR Fl h CilFit AND PnRTFR SAFP3000 SERIF 3 MAIN STLAM PIPING PENFTPATION, (All O 1 19 PktS5HHF TR A;isnIT TFP i FISCHt'R APD PORTER 50EP1000 SIMitj3 CONTAINMFNT, (C230)

  • 40 P T** l'nSennuMT 104ARH CONTAINNFNT, (C230) l 41 rkPSSHPI TRANSHITTER FI SClif f AND PORTER SAEPle00 5 FRIES CONTAIPmFNT, (C230) y
       ,e                    4J         I LP CTPIC AL Pt rit Tk 4TlHN                           AMrHtNnh                            20503) j                  I)        FI.t CTielf NOTop                                       s;t rF N AL ELE CTRIC              SAMII852480R CONTAIN9FNT, (C230)

FCCS PUNP BOnM, (Alle) g j 44 It.tCTPIC HnTOR ptLIAserF flFCTkIC Pl4G40bNfV FCC3 PHmP 9004, (Alt 9) 45 I I.D CTF IC MnTOP (;ti.LR Al. I LFCTftle 55881052C34 FCC$ PUMP RDOM, (Alt 9) 46 ilFLTP.C FinTHp 1.

   .; l                      47         t'I.f rTN IC l'ofun 1:ti,IperF ELfrTRIC AI.I.35 FMALrt k$

X)23727AIAN 988. FH5ngo05 CDNT4ImmFbf, (C230) tCCS PCMP 9004, (Allt) p J. 4N l't.t rit Ir MTn8e a;t i t l At. l'LI CTP IC %FNilp52r)4 G CCS PHrP HDeeM, (Alt 9) s

   ,d                        49         El t s1t IC Pt'ITOP                                     re t.I st.rF FI f rTHIC            X l2 9 )S6 A f* A h                                                    #

Cob 7 A I N w f N,T, (r2)G)

 }q
       ~

q

e - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - -

e O I

1 5 <

                                                                                                                                                                                   < *                          ?                           ' N 4'#* *- f.
                    /;.                                                                                          .                                            . e                                   -                            -

h.i N Y Y Y

                                                               -                             "                        Y                                U U'M k 2 T b. b "                        ' "                  -

i g . I m .........................................

                   '~

C l EnH I P > t'la f Ef;VINue.MFNTAL OHA'lFICATIHN 8 1 F0titPNFNT ITEM CHtCK5 HEFT INDEI i

                > "Tl                                                                                l                       cal. VENT CLIFFS               3 g                                                                                 .........................................

n ' sL E ,.p C

           '    N             ITEM Wo.       Con                                               PAPHFACTHPER                               tinDFL NUP.nta                          LOCATION N@           sma....sa.FneFh?   .a s s e .as.sa.m.m.sa.m a s..as e e.m.ea m.m.a ss sa a nw..s mos a.sa s.n e s s.s e.s..m.s a m a s sa ma s s e s.s m os e .a s .a m a s s a mes s o a s s e ss e mas e s s a m m e 3             50      FltCTRIC POTnn                                    JnHNsnN Contynl.3                          MPlaCA)                                 ECCS PUNP ROON, (Allt) 51      hA"14TInn Dr.TFCTOR                                be sit PCHousF.                           et21196                                 CopTAthNENT, (C230)

(tr() 52 53 P ADI Afinie Morl!Tnia hAbl4 TION (ETECTCR NFSTjNCHOUSE RFUTFR-STOFES 1168 M2827 CONTAINMENT, (C230) CONTAINNENT, (C230?

         &      ga3             54       A*PLitILP                                         CEf80RAL ATPMIC                           PA6A                                    CONTAthMENT, (C230)
                  @             55      9t.tC1PIC PFATEN                                   kFSTINLHOUSE                              EHN5                                    CONTAINNENT, (C230) 56 'tttCTHICAL CnNNECTOR                                   FlhCs                                     EN5905                                  CUNTAtWMFNT, (C230) 1                     57     .60tCYpffAL CONNFCTDR                               ITT CANNON                                 37417                                  CONTAINPFNT, (C230) 3 58 . TEMPIf88L hLOCK                                       PARATHnN                                   1600 SERIES                            CONTAINNENT, (C230) i                     59'     TLNe tt. Al. BLnCN                                 ht37INGHOUSE                              542247                                  CONTAINMENT, (C230) 60'     1IPtfilAL PLnCK                                    NFIDHutt.FR                               SAR                                     NAIN STEAN PIPING PFNETRATION, (All 61      f t.NrH N AL Bl.OCK                                OWCHANAN                                  Sil2                                    CONTAINNENT, (C230) d                        e.2     f t
  • M t h a t. PLucil N E I DHHl.(.F R SAF CONTAthMENT, (C230)
      .A                        63      f t *HINab RLOCil                                  linf Fli AN                               Fbt48                                   CONTAINMENT, (C230) k                      64      ftFPINAL PLnCK                                     liOFFNAN                                  i4424                                   CONTAINMENT, (C230)
        '{              p  -    65      TFt>fDAL PLOCK                                     FIELD                                     kD                                      CONTAlNNENT, (C230) 3              l      66       ftMPtNAL LHC                                      AMP                                        34000 SERIES                           CONTAINNENT, (C230)

A" N 67 ft N* ltt AL l.uc THOMAS AND BLTTS 53000 SERIES CONTAINNENT, (C230) W 6e

  • Ft.tCTHICAt. CONNF.CTOR PI'mptX 39028 CONTAINPENT, (C230)
    I                         69      El.ECTRIC Al. CONr8ECTOR                           A N PflFNDL                               923201004                               CONTAINMENT, (C230) 19                                                                                                                                                                                                                 l'
'9   .                                 .FLtCTRICAL CONNFCTOM                               A PPHCff 0L                                A0576A                                 CONTAINMENT, (C230)
' 'q                            18      6LEr.ItsCAl,CONprCT3R                              ADFHENOL                                  27975                                   CONTAlbMENT, (C130)                                                   6 72      if.*CTHICal. CONNECTOR                             AF PesLn0L                                53800                                   CONTAINMENT, (C230)                                                   !

W

                                ". 4    F t.r'C'P IC Al. C A P LE                          ANAcennA NIDE AND CASLE                   l'PR/CPE                                CONTAINMt.NT, (C230)
   "q                           74      f f.*-CTit I C Al. C A R LE                       CD&MO WIRE AfD CABLE                       ILPE/NEOPDFNE                           CONTAINMENT, (C230) 75      ft.tCTHICAL CABLE                                 CDFpo NipE App CABLE                       Sil.ICUhE SHSpts/ASSESTOS BR,           CONTAlpMENT, (C230)                                                   '

76 tLt(TPICAl. CABLE CorTIPFWTAL WikE SILIC0kE puppFR/ASRESTOS BR, CONTAINhENT, (C230) 7T FttC1NICAL CARLI: hD&1DN It.3HLATED NIDE II.PE/ILPE CONTAINMENT, (C230) 70 f tACTklCAl. CAhLF D Af rHD N POLYMEN AND ILPE/II,PE CONTAINpFNT, (C230) i M 19 ELDCTWICAL CARLE isATCHEM C0ARIAL/XLP CONTAINMENT, (C230) J to PLDCTRICAl. CARLF CONTINENTAL. MlpF XLPE/Pvc CONTAINMFNT, (C230) .

          ,                     On      FIPLTHICAL CARLF                                  00109:1T1                                  EPR/DROLOM                              CUNTAINMFNT, (C230)                                                  i j                      82 . f l.*T114 ICAl. CARLE                                ROCFPF5TDS                                 SII.ICONE NuBurp/A5BESTUS sp,           CohTAINPtNT, (C230)
       .j                       83      f.f.tCTplC Al. CADE.F                             PDCEbF5703                                 XI.PE/Nt0PetnE                          CONTA3kNFNT, (C230) 04      Ft.trFNICAI rAPLF                                 RDSTON If3HLATFD WlpE                                                                                                                                   l
                                                                                                                                   .TunuSTRITE = HVPALHN/HTPALON             CONTAlkwENT, (C230)                                      '

65 DL*CTNICAL CA4LF HPSTON.lHSHLATkD NIpt* aILICpt.E pH88ER (EnUIVILINT)/M CONTAINWFNT, ((2301 86 fl.PCYNINL CAnLF POSTLsN Jh5PLAft'0 NIDE XLPE/HTP CONTAIMMEHF, ((230) f n ({, #7 tlDCfr..:*. CAetF FFBITE HTE/Fa CONTAlnwENT, (( 2 3 0 ) s.n l l 98 i s.D Cth f C Al. CAPLF DIECPhACH HATFIELD SILICOFE RHph8H/ASRESTUS 69, CON T A [ k N F_N T , (( 2 30 ) N ' t 99 I I.* CTwir AI. CAHLE AH Afru'O A MINT' AND CABLE FPS /HYPALpq CONTAlhPENT, (C230) U ' j 90 ll.DCTRICAL rAnl.E Lt.ht R Al. FLEC1pIC SILICobt WHl. PEN / ASBESTOS BR, CONTAINNFNT, (C230) i . 98 ft.tCTPirAL CAPLF O kiTF HTIL/HTFS CONTAINMFNT, (C236) .

        ,                       92      II.rCThlfAL PARLE                                 TIhFS WIDE Arp CANLE                       PVC                                     CONTAINMF807, 80230)                                       CO 93      PLtCTPICAL CAmt.E                                 CD/TINtNTAL %l86                           SILICONE kPPRER/CLA55 BR,               CONTAINMFNT, (C230)                                        N 94 - f l.t CTR tr HnTom                                   CF.at '143. Fl.D CTklC                     FJF                                     EAST PIPlWG PFNETRATION B00N, (A316 95      f.fsl.t 's.t h V ALVE                             lik ACa e.a                                10222                                   WEST PENETRAff.DN B00M, (A223) 96      MHtMHID VALTE                                     I.n A r nre .                              80222                                   CONTAINNFNT, (C230)
        .g,                     97      i t.t ( TH Ir a g. C A gg,E                       Ct ps. rgsE Ato rAhl.E                     stLICOPE WHP6FN/ASPFSTHS Pp.            CONTAINMENT, (C230) o 1
          .j                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      i e

j 1 'i i _. ~

w4W5 44W -'-e ' #s eWeb MeaW eImeN M eh4 h 'M ~

                                                                                                                   ^ hwww            &   .

he hh hv.aM. O t e e . 4 i i i !

 'I                                                                                                                                                                     l l

h A I O Se i , e

,i
                                  " ~"
        '*
  • I ' ) 44" [ T T ,,W
                                                                                                'dV{'

d% -7d"',t/' 7"~ -~ d ) ," ,"T',"'- -. , _- --;--- -- --- -- ,- .

u. . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _m_. . _ . ' _ . . L_
                                                                                                                         ... _ ..,_g.-. w gm                                                          NRC Contrict No. NRC-03-79-118
          ,7m MU Fr nklin Rrs:ar:h Canta                                 FRC Project No. C5257                           Pagg A Dnnsion olThe Frankhn insatute                       FRC Assignment No.13                             ja 2tnh and Race Stresti Phda . Pa 19101 (215) +18104     FRC Task No.        4M EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. /

EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 1

            ,       SOLENOID VALVE LOCATED IN CONTAINMENT (C230)
   , ,              ASCO MODEL WPHTX8320A21V REQUIRED OPERATING TIME:                  1 HOUR

[- TER CHECKSHEET NO. 1

 . ;, . i     -

LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 4026, 28, 27 .)

      .~,           FUNCTION (PLANT ID): RCP ,BLEE') 0FF ISOLATION 1CV506 (1SV506)
       ..           LICENSEE SUBMITTAL:              SCFW(S) [1, 12):           10 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): LETDOWN LINE ISOLATION 1CV516 & 1Cv515 (ISV516, ISV515)

Lm LICENSEE SUBMIITAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12): 9, 8

           '..      FUNCTION (PLANT ID): CONTAINMENT SPRAY HEADER ISOLATION 1CV4150 & ICV 4151
                !                                       (ISV4150, ISV4151)

LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12]: 181, 182 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): SI TANK VENTS (ISV623, ISV613, ISV643, ISv633) j) LI7.NSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12): 225, 222, 231, 228 TS q;! I 'hj 61

 &w    ' b.x
' 1%.

l,i l k u.. 12 h1 U DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY: r.

" Nm e

(See Section 3 of this TER fer Legend) f 9(3 4 R, T, QT, P, H, CS, (R), M, I, VM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, 3 1 ?,p,:

;om,  7;.-           Not stated, Not applicable
 .                   LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:
; .l .y ff                   Contents                                                                        Checksheet Page No.

[j,p. 4 pg% Equipment Item la hh

$ : ?k Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER                                    lb jy Q                 Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms                             2 u

Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 25, 2c, 2J

       ];            System Consideration Review                                                   90    4L,    4%,  4J, 4e, 4f Equipment Environmental Qualification. Review                                -52,   5b, Sc, 5d, !c, Sf, fgh    g.                                                                                             Sg, Sh, Si,      J-
   ,;       v if                   Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation                                  -6u,  CL-j:1               l  Equipment Summary n

([" Maintenance anc Replacement Schedule Summary -L , L, Tc

 ,. 9 ..
      . , +;

A-*-- -

                                                                      --y,   .- _ ,.,

r ,

  -   ..   ..u~.~~.....--.-.:a.                                    _-. -- . .w. a. .                                    a s                                                      NRC C:ntr:ct N 3. NRC-03-79-118 6[J U   Franklin Rssearch Canur                              FRC Pr:Jset N3. CS237                   Paga A Dmsson oi Ths Fr:nkhn !nsntura                     FRC Assignment No 13                     lb 2thh and Race Struts. Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 448-lM   FRC Task No. 487/400 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. T SUb. MARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SKR - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:
         .X    Tne Licensee (has/ -                   =) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or'will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions. X The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

          .X  The Licensee (t=ss/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not ceen fully established.

Justification for interim operation (has/has not! been provided by the Licensee for tnis equipment item. Corrective action specified t./ the Licensee: 7 Equipment replacement with qualified equipment ( Equipment modification l Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a niild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( ) The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a' basis for justification for interim operation. The Licensee (nas/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective l action .) The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIFW

         - CIRCLED ITEM C4LY:                (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modification III.a Exempt hQualification Not Established III.b Not'in Scope l II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available o, O' l l 1 l Lyty . ,q- m ;9. w g - + w -_ 7-+ ____7e ___ . _ _

      'G:

N RC Contr'ct N 3. N RC-03-73-14 4UO0hr:nk!!n R:se rch Canta

    ~

FRC Pr: ject N2. C5257 Paga A Dmson of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No. J3 2 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 46'l /488 _ { h EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM

  . T,; .
         -#1                                                                                                           DESIGNATION:

X = DEFICIENCY

               /       NRC REQUIREMENTS Documented Evidence of Qudlification Adequate
"{    .g q             Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established j             Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately                                                                     X Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)                                           M
              <        Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation                                                          X
         .e            Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)                                                X
        @              Criteria Regarding Ternperature/ Pressure Exposure:

pJ o Peak Temperature Adequate

       , {, ,                o Peak Pressure Adequate
         ^]   .

o Duration Adequate H o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately

 ' j.? -

o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate

  ,g' Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied
  *g,                  Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisflud
     '.                Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied                                                                     X
   ,[.dj               Criteria Regarding Test Seque'nce Satisfied

[] j;3

                    }

Criterra Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied

*-     ,               Criteria Regarding Func.tional Testing Satisfied                                                           X j,[                 Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied A%                Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margir.s Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)
 #Q         y p:,'.A ps
  .T M                                                                                                                   DESIGNATION:

% NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGCRY X = CATEGORY Mi

.P,M p             I.a          Equipment Qualified f                     I.b          Equipment Qualification Pending Modification y ;'

Q II.a II.b Equipment Qualification Not Established Equipment Not Qualified X Q . gj II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified g III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification fd, III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qual'fication Review Q. IV Documentation Not Made Available 2.y i hs.+ .m. . . w. ,y . m NA q,e

    *.[.' .       [

l

  • w, , e ,-. ,.. ;;
                                                                                ._7**~                                                _,

p7~ n.,, .. ,- .- 4

                                 .                     w..,,.~.            -                         ...
                       - ._. - - , . . ~ , :_a
                                                                                                                                        =--.-.

NRC C:ntr;ct No. NRC-03-79-118 NNrenklir. R:sstreh Csntre FRC Pro);ct N3. CS257 P:Q3 A oms.on of The Franidin Insntute FRC Assignment No.]3 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phda., Pa. 19103 (21$3 448.t000 FRCTask No. 407I488 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEV/ OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.1 LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER 1 1 la

                                         'e qualificatics test re;crt referenced in the ee=.q;e.
                                                                                                             ~.

cut spe:ifies a descastrated life of 4.4 years.

    ,                                3. Issuedletterlated[/22/a1sc:steE=zieering;o,requesti:6 additi::al verifi:atics cf ma eria's f r the listet. scie :id valves.     '4e er;ect to receive the necessa y Micr=sti:n sei anticipate reschtion 17 th e:d of this year.

14 An assess =e=s cf the faihre sedes assceisted with this cevi:e is f:u:1 it. Attach:ect 3. 1 i i l' l' 1 i ') .I

    .,                                                                                                                                                1 1

1 1,

'f' .t s

4 e L l l e t, F.

                                                                                                                                               ]

T . - - - p . .

                                   . . ,n..;, - n n ..

v- y.c

         . i .V
           '..             /gLOIl ranklin R search Cantir NRC C:ntrIct No. NRC-03-79-118 Pige FRC Pr: Ject No. C5257
                                     . D. von of hs Frankhn institut.                              FRC Assignm:nt N313                                     5f
             ,;                     ?dth and Race Streers. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000         FRC Task No. 48 7 f488
                       \
                         "QUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.1
           ~T NOTES:
    .n                          L P                              2.7 c           O 2.8 om                         o, A m,                .c e           ASCO
.s M s - - - -
                                                                                                                                       -s M %4,                            F' m h ew cm n .,O m r,. emin w .'wp A
 -m on03 A, C g & t e a . ,, n m , od # m
                                                                                                                    ,                                 g
         ,7> no_r               "

w h

           >d '                                         O
   ,.o       .

m l # h e o .- T".h o h ake_b. JLs3 AS t.O f'

     . .. 1 JLn_e Jum_nAAE2                             ch                A,FM Hch S

o: u, d c- 2.00 Iwr-d. d b u u _.eJ L _h. ou crtdALc, o a o 6 RnO e t h T A .P M C um.e._,

.::S                                                                                  %                     0
'. l.f;I (wsa /C% . J22,                                          ASCO h vu.D e 27*

9a cr % h? .-f

                                                                                                                                              " It appears hat the weakest link in the coil is the lead wire connection to the
   ..Y @ agnet wire. Different lead wire is used depending on the class of

.y-N oil. I e S cordingly, based on the type of lead wire utilized in our coils, 3d'4. Class A coils can be irradiated to 50 m'illion rads, Class 3 and tg): lass F coils can be irradiated to 100 million rads, and Class P.

          ,.           :: oils can be irradiated to 200 million rads and still be service.ble,                                                                     ,         ;

w m a a u _ u c&_ 'M@bh@@$

'5 5

a.df3 l

                           . a ns.curdn._O Ja M,
.':yy 4,p         :
      /:7           1 7l.' M.,;
          ~.
,.%..L,h
   . 2.T

.j;;. % E. Y

 .R -

m .; 7,9 t 'e. a.**{. p 3

t. . 9
  ' [

U.:I'.y

  'Nk VC N
  ' '. .  *-W*YY.

W T*$ n _ _-. _

                                                  ,   y  ,__,ry,            -
                                                                                             7 '
                                                                                                                  ~~l        ' ' ' " ' ',

g 'aI *

  • s . : _u.:a.a. " ' -

__ : i --

                                                                                   -               m      wa- --          - =. a - ~ x~- -   *
.s A-                                                                NRC C:ntrrct No. N RC-03-79-118 000       nklin Research Centtr                                 FRC Proj:ct No. CS237                          PIgo A Dwision of The Franklin Inst:rute                       FRC Assignment No.J3                            5g 20th ar.d Race Streets. PMa . Pa 191'J3 (2151448-1000     FRC Task No. 48~l /486 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. i NOTES:
R-% A w 402.Co am m M c#,
                                                                                                             '            b

!i W oonQmA o. M anA m DMALA Q [ Om , . ' DSC.O am ( Ma o

    .I o                ener %             WPHTx 832.o A2.1N M w pHT83006(o1Y F) M NAtACO                M th (nurtono MS. G L3 M EA -740).

a g . - ca a ww (310' F ; Co5 969 , coTo bom_ c3 ac. e c - i - C SOIukio On D .Yb p; N't%O.At_A , h cLat- d 9 b .i au A .m M (0 O h o h m i s i u AM, u a u

c-h n e Da O A u>sm o i

t Thenad , &, &m &$&

 ..               crt--     w^                                  eto O M $2L                                          M J-%am9hmM                                                            o          A       A ek (t e.. A A n6 An ar~a n M
                .c. m    m h -y n e t 1,                                      .omum r

A D bN I m s CLmk. } \ s. O

              , = - -              --~p              , gn;yy            .y     , . , ;p m3 ; ~ ~ . -
                                                                                                                                   .,:. n- -
                                                                                                                         - _ _ _ _ . . ~
                  -l
  • A NRC C;ntrict No. NRC-03-79-118 dh!, Franklin R search Csntrr FRC Project No. CS257 P ga
                    ;                     A Divmon of Ths Frtnkhn Institut                         FRC Assignmant Na.13
           ? ,,                                                                                                                                       lc 2thh and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103(215)448 ttm       FRC Task No.       477 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAll.CICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. E d                  I I'I EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2

{A SOLENOID VALVE LOCATED IN CONTAINMENT (C230) ASCO MODEL 2063813RVU r

  , ger;                          REQUIRED OPERATING TIME:                    1 HOUR
          !                       TER CHECKSHEET NO. 2
 .        D[?..I                  LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 712 f .',3                             FUNCTION (PLANT ID):                 CHEQK VALVE LEAKACE DRAIN TO RWT (ISV618, ISV628, j . j.7.)                                                             ISV638, ISV648)
 ; :y;l-                          LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12): 210, 211, 212, 213                                                    *
       .. Qf
        , ,7y
     ;7
       .w                                                                                                                                .
             .r.

3& 3-J 4 n.'

             -y f..y)hk
 'b     u-u 3*Ahf,&

' 3;p .f

       .,b.

c l

    ?g5                         _ DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) eg.n

        - *g                       R, T, QT, RT,         P, H, h                S,     (R), M,    I , QM , RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None,
       .t-
f/g,p / Not stated, Ncit applicable
     .. hy y :1,
     ~ *U I                        LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

h, $ G .S.7.,.f' Contents Checksheet Page No. V %.-

 .$, W               .

Equipment Item la N ,j Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb

         '.: G.

c.g *? Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2

  • f% Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 2b, L , L'- --

' o.*WQ r.j System Consideration Review '. ; , !b,

                                                                                                                                       ,  4-,  eu, 42
  , 0.                             Equipment Environmental Qualification Review
 %y                                                                                                                    Sa, Sb, Sc, 5d, Se, 5f, 5;, SP, Si, Sj U M,y.2            .'
     ;jn 'y a) Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation                                                           -50,    5 5 --
 , ,]                       g     Equipment Summary Q]/g                             Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary                                         -'s , L,      N ff. R
 >: p:,

n

              ,L-
                  'h _                .,
                                           ]L._ _ aC 7                     4,                  py, s _ ,        - n
                                                                                                                      ~
                                                                                                                     ~p,7 .gT LAW ryyg;,gy ;. -m
          . .      ~ _ ..,- ~-......~ w w-.                              --              ~~~~~-w-                  ~~ M 4                                                                NRC C::ntrzet No. NRC-03-79-118
        '                      d) Franklin Riseirch Cent:r                                     FRC Project No. C5257                      P:go A DMsion of Tha Frankhn Insnruti 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103 (215) 448 t000 FRC Assignment No. }3                      lb FRC Task No. 487/486 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2-i

SUMMARY

OF LICEMSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - CNLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: i E 1 Tne Licensee (ha s/' - - - J provided a response to the SER concerns.

  \

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/o*r will function when exposed to the applicable DBE

   ,,                               environmental service conditions.

M The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

   's The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment. item. { Corrective action specified by the Licensee: Equipment replacement with qualified equipment

   ]                                             Equipment modification
   'j Equipment relocation above submergence level
   )                                             Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source

( Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) L Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( ) The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. 1 The Licensee (nas/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action

                                                                                                                                    ..)

L..

)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC OUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW h - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) .1 hI.b Qualified Modification II.c Qualified Life Deficiency III.a Exempt g II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope e II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available gsw *- e ** J ik ,

A NRC C:ntr:ct No. N RC-03-79-118

                  $.      Obrinklin Risexrch Ccnt:r                                              FRC Project N3. C5257 P gE A DMsson of The Franklin Insnture
                  ^

FRC Assignment No.1[ 2 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRCTask No. 48'l 489 q l EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2.

            ,.                                 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION 

SUMMARY

FORM

         'i DESIGNATION:

(l.W NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY

         . b-j.
                ,'.)    Documented Evidence of Quhlification Adequate Adequate Siailarity Eetween Equipment and Test Specimen Established                      '

Aging Degradation Eraluated Adequately ,,M . Qualified Life or r.eplacement Schedule Established (If Required) ,",, Program Establist ad to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regard Ang Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) l Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: 7 o Peak Temperature Adequate

                   -          o Peak Pressure Adequate
       .y                     o Duration Adequate
      .q g.,                  o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate
 . Ml fit I                      Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied 49[               Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied
     /r.@               Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied
  • Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied
q. . Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies

, ? (If Any) Satisfied , .Q3 Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied t Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied ky,JM Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied j.g' 1 3. i . Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) n , V,' DESIGNATION: M ' NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY

      . , y/
      'Y  -

I.a Equipment Qualified X l ' .E ? I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established h@,hfM II.b Equipment Not Qualified w v.i g II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified ff III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification

         ' .d            III.D       Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review h

w.< . IV Documentation Not Made Available k j<t

       ;,b                                *
         ..' f;
         . J 'y i
         .L -

m [ ,$ d ' , a M,, v-- , y 7. c- + - : =-- . . .,, ,m ,, , a w ...,_p g ,.,. - 7 q _, , , _3 _ , , , 4,, . ;g -

                                                                                                                                               ~ _ _ .         -
                                                                                                                                -- =; 3 u.---
                      -                                                              NRC C;ntrzet No. NRC-03-79-118 000! Franklin Rss5:rch Csntr                                     FRC Pr; ject N0. C3257                              Pac 2 A Olvisen of The Frankhn Inst:ture                                                           3 FRC        Assignment                                3a 20th and Race Streets. Phi!a.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000      FRC Task           No. 487 /No.)M8 j             EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2-LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER v

i

1. S e qualificatic test repert refere:ced ir. the ec:; uter ;;ist-out ;ecifies a de:castratei life of .' .'4 years.,

j s 2 2. S e RfA simulatic test c: ducted by MOO 1.:1 ded a c'- d aal s; ray censisting of 3000 ;;: 3cre as teri: acid. S e -av' o

          '                                                                                                    ur.

c :centratics of hori: scii i e:ted g into the ec tai,.:ta.t dur.:3

e ;ostulated accident is ex;ected to be 2500 ;;:.

1 .1 9 e b

    .J s

I, - L i , i . l I 1

                                                                                                                                                   )
-i 9
    \

F 1;< 1 r

 ,c
 ' f. i i.

O

  ;l-
                                                . ;ym .                - - .y:g 7,,,

_ .,,, . gw..y

                                                                                                         . ; cg e  .
                                                                                                                       ,7 m e f ,               -'

j

                         .v....,,_                  . _ .
                                                                               -____-__--__n..._-__..--_

i[

         , ~;_                                                                               NRC C::ntrzct N 9. NRC-03-79-118
                    %               A' Frtnklin Rxs: arch Crntir
                                    !!!ll[                                                   FRC Pr: Ject N3. CS257             P;g3
         . . :y,                         A Dmsson of The Frankhn Insurute                 .

FRC Assignment No.13 5 4 IK :p 2rnn and Race Streets Phda . Pa 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 4D fNI { EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 4

               . h. ',

4 a is .J. t J

                     .S.i
        *I.d p.;

Checksheets IA M N have been removed due to the

 - .j.,Q                           proprietary r.ature of information contained therein.

q1; <

        * ;;.i
          ,   f r f;
               .L.; 4
                    '. R 3:n
             .x,
                 ' 2, '

1 l 9

           ..,s..U :'
          %N L. $.

i; /,'.

          + m?
        /. .;.it J.         .,

s . ' .3 N. N, , *, h

        $l:S&

y,e -

t1 Q.l 1...r-
!.ea'
           .I'l.
               . . .Y>
    ' , ;l dc-J':?ll               s J'.

? < I',I.; e.

        $ ' * .'_k, .

Aih?: t; l l.,b,, s./ I'i @; e:. e -M lmtyA'e' b

' i h.1'A p'My!4 f .:, ,. g

.', kI N!

                  .e
    .ty%
      '. ~/ b gh T.M ,5) c.i.e
                   'l

, . 3, % .}.

                .; ,. i     ,.

,e q < *r ..

            ~ ' i.g.-

.N N l d',x ; ,' . i: $.-l n (y3':z -M n .t:t , E ,' g - _ -_ . _.m. , __-%g,g

                          . - - _                    _     .        . ~     -

JLH Zl # NRC C;ntr:ct No. NRC-03-79-118

       . h.M                 dbh3  rink!in Resnrch Csntir                                    FRC Projzct No. C5257                             Piga F.                            A Dusim of Th2 Fr:nkhn Instituts                           FRC Assignment No.13                                lc
    , :p

[, [j 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Fa 19103 (215) 44E lin.J FRC Task No. W7 N d I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 3 , [' EQUIPMENT ITEM No. 3 4 SOLENOID VALVE LOCATED IN CONTAINMENT (C230)

              ;.         ASCO MODEL NF8320A175V s'                   REQUIRED OPERATING TIME:                       1 HOUR
        $J               TER CHECKSHEET NO. 3 Qjg                  LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 712 N iu                FUNCTION (PLANT ID): RECJRCULATION RETURN LINE DRAIN (ISV661)
        +3               LICENSEE SUBMITTAL:                  SCEW(S) [1, 12]: 219 Y          FUN'CTION (PLANT ID):                   SI TANK FILL & DRAIN (ISV621, ISV611, ISV641, ISV631)
    .4                   LICENSEE SUBMITTAL:                  SCEW(S) [1, 12}: 223, 220, 229, 226 y

n, - ,

         . u;
        .( 'O 2d iie b ,'t
             ~:.

Git

  ,w$bh
       ^X6
(g$.:

I l.N DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

  !gg                      (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT, RT, P, H, h S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable 9 17 s LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHFCKSHEETS: jh ,jl

 ;y g                     Contents                                                                              Checksheet Page No.

M Equipment Item la

    'A.N      4'
  ;f(                     Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER                                           lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms                                   2
   'e
 ?;g@.'                   Licensee Response to NRC SER                                                           3a, C, L, % -

r . .- yn System Consideration Review -;;, 'b, , M, 40, if d> j f,~. Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 52, Sb, St M 50, E f , -- S I. Sg, Sh, Si, Sj

    ..it i:W:

fp Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation R, CL fr.] ) Equipment Summary

    <w k9 Maintenance and Replacement Senedule Summary                                          7:,_ ,L , 7 c a ,& h " '

e s-:nras .-s n-wemm=cenevrouwwayy, -g e7 , - ,vm -.m .,77 3 pr - eny rgrg g-{ , -

d) 4x NRC C;ntr ct Na. NRC-03-79-118 [ MJ Franklin R:setrch Cent:r FRC Przject No. C5257 P:g2 A Dtus.on of The Frinkhn Institut:3 FRC Assignment 13 lb 2cth and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. M"I No./488 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 3 1 SUAMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: l N Tne Licensee (ha s/E - - H provided a response to the SER concerns. i The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or' will function when exposed to the applicable DBE j environmental service conditions. The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item. Corrective action specified by the Licensee: I Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level

  ,                                                   Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source

]y Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment l' Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( ) The Licensee has provided other information for, this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. The Licensee (nas/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .) The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY 9ASED ON REVIEW

                            - CIRCLED ITE.M ONLY:                       (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency

                          .I.D           Modification                                                     III a Exempt i

II.a Qualification Not Esta0lished III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available i e, 1

                .y--          ~..               ,        ,$~M . y y'.              "~]M,             ~C       (~ kMk 6           p s f ^- -

pQt v. a E'T' - 4

A NRC C;ntract N 2. NRC-03-79-118 00bhrinklin Resench Cant;r FRC Project N3.CS257 Paga A Dr.:sion of The Franklin Insnture FRC Assignment No. }3 2 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 44810C0 FRCTask No. 4O/48O EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 3 9

     ,,-                                            EQUIPMENT' ENVIRON *4 ENTAL QUALIFICATION 

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION: g,7 NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established

              .g           Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately 2

e Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) o Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation

       ',"                 Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)
         , ,. j,           Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

y o Peak Temperature Adequate J, o Peak Pressure Adequate -

          ./; i                   o Duration Adequate
     ;j,Y                         o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately
        .,                        o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate p          Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied

$M iN Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied [f.; Criteria Regarding Radiation Satistied ,

 .A                         Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Rd                      I    Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies d  .x                         (If Any) Satisfied l

!?%

   %                        Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied 4:'fh                        Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied
         ?y Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)
      ;n6,.
       , f.

U DESIGNATION: NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY m. 2.' I.a Equipment Qualified X h ,..y I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification

           ,, $             II.a          Equipment Qualification Not Established M                    II.b          Equipment Not Qualified

' $, II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life (/ or Replacement Schedule Justified g III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification W III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of thu Qualification Review

        ?                   IV            Documentation Not Made Available Cf bg                                                       M.1                   Ma m, o e 0 um_h,
       ,a s

f 3 L, . < -~ --n

                                        ,-=p =;=n9y _ m . .n m --                                                          ,,,,        _w _
          , - z.          -
                                  . ._s . w :               m.                   -

a., . . - . . - _ = u, _a.. - o

    ,                          A                                                                             NRC Crntr et N2. NRC-03-79-118 U001J Funk!!n Rrsench Cxnt;r                                         -

FRC Project Nr. CS257 Paga A Dtvlsr a of The Frar kan Inst:tute FRC Assignment No.13 3a l

    ,]                                     20th and etace Streets. Phifa.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000          FRCTask No. 48 7/46P)                      .       i EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 3 i                                                                                LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER l
                                                                                                                                                               \

l 1 j Q

1. "'he q alificatic test repcrt refere:cei 1: the ce=puter ;rist- I cut specifies a de= castrated life of L.4 years.

t

2. "'he LOCA eisuittic: test cc: ducted by AS:0 ir.cinded s ehemie.2 sprey consistics of 3000 ;;: Scrc as deri'c acid. -'he - . ve---

ccacentrstics of beric acid igeeted ir. o the ec tai.=e t d;rteg the postulated accide:t is expected to te 2 h0 ;;:. l l a 1 l 6 O 1 1

  ! .M;
                 ~. r---.   -    - - - - -
                                                                                               , ,. g
                               #,_x                                                              NRC Contr:ct No. NRC-03-79-118
             -.                 LdlFr$nklin Rsse:rch Cent r                                      FRC Pr; ject No. C5257                                       Pzg2 A Dnnsion of Th2 Frtnkhn institut                      FRC Assignmnnt No.13 20th and Race Streets Phila . Pa 19101(215) 443 1000                                 H '7                             lc FRC Task No.

i EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUlPMENT ITEM NO. Y l l EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 4 SOLENOID VALVE LOCATED IN THE ECCS PUMP ROOM (All8) ASCO MODEL HT8320

 ,,         -n-              REQUIRED OPERATING TIME:                          1 HOUR
              ,             TER CHECKSHEET NO. 4 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 28 FUNCTION (PLANT ID):                         SHUTDOWN HX 12 DISCHARGE 1CV3830 (ISV3830)

LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) (1, 12): 45 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): SHUTDOWN HX 11 DISCHARGE 1CV3828 (ISV3828) LICENSEE SU3MITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12]: 44

    .- 5
 ' -l
       .3 Ur.1
c. 3,
1.

[l I 3. ),, DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY: ~. 2 y .- u , (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) I,f.h v ~ ,. R, T, h P, H, CS, S, (R), M, 1, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None,

    , ;r-

[ Not stated, Not applicable

 ,5 - ,                       LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

s V2 i ;V Contents Checksheet Page No.

. r. ,
       ~
       ;                      Equipment Item                                                                                la

,_g n- Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 -

  )if                         Licensee Response to NRC SER                                                                  3a, ;L, L, %
  , pl                        System Consideration Review                                                                   -12 , -I b , tc, 13,    10,     !f-Equipment Environmental Qualification Review                                                 -;e, ;b, _ 50, 5d, S c ,- S f ,

e }Q ;g , L, 31, ;j-4.:;c N! ' Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation i , ;b-Equipment. Summary {';t] } C, , - y Maintenance anc Replacement Schedule Summary 7a, 7a, Tw

 /f4 e:)

.'f t f q 4

       ,}  ,
    .-:        ~

F'D k #_ $ M.414' ' P S

  • N*D ., ,YTY f - $Y '*^ W " ' "
                                                                                                             '"73 g ' gW +   P      '"['7g"           -
           .. ~      -.-a.- .an                        --- -                -   -- u.   . .   ~r-            Lw-w- -               --'

NRC Cintrret N2. NRC-03-79-118 Y8 s A[krrnklin Rsserrch Ccnt:r FRC Pr j tct Ns. C5257 P:ga A Division of Th2 Frrnklin Insr:rur FRC Assignrnent No.13 lb 20th and Race Stree,ts. Phila.. Pa 19103 (215) 448 1

  • FRC Task No. 487[480 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 4 j

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: X Tne Licensee (has/'W) provided a response to the SER concerns. ( The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditio~ns. ' The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. The Licensee (has/hasnot ) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item. Corrective action specified by the Licensee: Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification

 ;                                    Equipment relocation above submergen'ce level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source

_ Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( ) The Licensee has provided other information for.this equipment item that can be ccnstrued as a basis for justification for interim operation. i The Licensee (nas/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective

{ action .)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. , DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC OUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

                 - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY:                    (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency Ib Modification III.a Exempt h Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

   , n m -- m p sny m g ,<, p - --                             --                  ,-       -  <
                                                                                                   .n - . p e 5 y z.  - ' 5 r rr

a

N 4

0 NRC C;ntr ct No. NRC-03-79-118 4'000J Frrnklin R:setrch Center FRC Pr ];ct No. C5257 P;g3 A Dnnsion of The Franklin Institute 20th and Race Streers. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448. loco FRC Assignment No.[13FRC Task No. AO2408

                                                                                                             ~

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIE'N OF EQUlPMENT ITEM NO. 4 6 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATIOt;

SUMMARY

FORM 1 DESIGNATION: f

  'l-                 NRC REQUIREMENTS                                                                               X = DEFICIENCY m

s.a M Documented Evidence of Qudlification Adequate N

       .-y-           Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established                                                       -
        ;g            Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately                                                                           .X Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)                                                 X j[.            Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation                                                                %
  'M'                 Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)                                                       X
          .           Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

w- o Peak Temperature Adequate fU o Peak Pres.sure Adequate

  .;U                       o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately
   'K r,"

o Steam Exposure (If Required) Arlequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied M Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomal'ies jl,

<3 Y l

(If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied

   . Yf               Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied
     ,[               Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied y).]             Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

M

     'M .
  }D                                                                                                                          DESIGNATION:

1.hf$ NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY

  . VW I.a          Equipment Qualified
  , ]                  I.b          Equipment Qualificaticn Pending Modificatf or X

y}y II.a II.b Equipment Qualification Not Established Equipment Not Qualified

,     Jf;              II.c         Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life
p. or Replacement Schedule Justified 3 Jg III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification .

[1r) III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review }{U IV Documentation Not Made Available _ 1: j [.1 ,.,'?'.' . C;j),L M? iy'

\.

I h[,$y c.a 1 *; - r- -c,r . . . 7+j * ~ 5. .., e ; q7 a . ,,j ,7. . - p ,, ,

                                                                -m

4 NRC Cantract No. NRC-03-79-118 P g2 U00i) Funklin Rtse rch Cintr FRC Pr: Ject No. C5257 A Otvision of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13 30 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRCTask No._46~} / 4N EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 4 LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER

6. These components are within the scope of, our present assessnent/

en luatica activity. Ccmpletion of the activity with subsequent action plan is not anticipated until the end of this year or first

                                  -quarter of next.

e t I t t ii I! e

    ~

u =,- - . WF ,*~,~, , , -=TT ::--~ = * ~ :;;.r~. , , -uggyip,;, ; ,,3 . , _,

                   ^
                              #s                                                                   NRC C:ntr:ct No. NRC-03-79-118 LO0hranklin RIsstreh Csntir                                         FRC Project ND. C5257                                     Pag 2 D, uen of The Frankhn institute                          FRC Assignment No.13                                       5f f
                                      '. Jth and Race Streets. Pruta. Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000      FRC Task No. 467 !Mk 4             EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 4 NOTES:
                . 1
                                    ~R.Am e 27n~O E.8                                               onm        o., n_ , m se e ASCO a                m T-A,                             w M ~ ~ L ,.                                  e n % m ' a A m weJ~
                                                                         **                   c                 .               o            m
                                     "                              <vA m,.o ma.-o c_ta. 7 m a -
a n cI d i n m 2 o .. T.Ar -

_O_h. Ed 8U AS C.O 4.. w .kan, :rmu%c wk,FM H en k

          .                   u ic- 2.0 D                    me-d. h_

o

                                                                                                               -behr.          oa cidate-

_On0MAeuu a o

 ,       d.
I TAP h TLEM Am m o e . 0,, Asto a m_ot - 27:

k.7 a s - r3 . -

                                                                                                                                    #'      It appears N $::
        >2               that the weakest link in the coil is the lead wire connection to ths magnet wire.                      Different lead wire is used depending on the class of
         'q             gcoil.
         ;g              Accordingly, based on the type of lead wire utilized in our coils, A-[ftl,                   Class A coils can be irradiated to 50 million rads, Class 3 and lCM                       Class F coils can be irradiated to 100 million rads, and Class F.

?,jjjj coils can be irradiated tc 200 million rads and still be servicab1$. wa CNQ

'T,19 i f(ch f
4. TLC M h o b fL t_lM
.m .

s D O_ 9_ t D , 'i$.,&.- % l ly yy ***k 4 ,F y;y:: . ' xny .

 - ;f.?
        '.Ep

' .:::w;

     , :, 1 ew d:747
   ! .~ ' . p

' ' -lb Oh.Y., O\ % a

   ,M                3, w --c.% ---,..+c.w.. y 7-i,,p p
                                                                           's=:& W 9 , m T+Q,;W'M'd'"' e N " " N -- W P *'7
                                                 .---_m                                                       . 2.._.,__         ,

A NRC Contr:ct Nc. NRC-03-79-118 1 i id) Franklin R serrch Cent:r FRC Project No. C5257 Paga A Divesson of The Frankhn Insnture FRC Assignment No.13 lc j 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103(215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 48'7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 6 EQUIPMENT ITEM No. 5 SOLENOID VALVE LOCATED IN THE EAST PIPING PENETRATION ROOM (A316) ASCO MODEL 2063815RVU REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 HOUR TER CHECKSHEET No. 5 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 712 3 FUNCTION (PLANT ID),: CONTAINMENT COOLER 13 SUPPLY 1Cvl589 (ISV1589) i LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12): 43 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): CONTAINMENT COOLER 11 SUPPLY 1CV1581 (ISV1581) i LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12): 42 I FUNCTION (PLANT ID): CONTAINMENT COOLING COIL 13 DISCHARGE ICV 1590 (ISV1590) i LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12]: 41

)

FUNCTION (PLANT ID): CONTAINMENT COOLING COIL 11 DISCHARGE 1CV1582 (ISV1382) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12]: 40 DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITD4(S) ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) hhh CS, S, (R), M, I, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: Contents Checksheet Page No. Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 l Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, Ob, ::, 2d-System Consideration Review --! : , Ib, !c, *d, !c, if I Equipment Environmental Qualification Review -50, Eb, Sc, 5A Ea Sf, 53 , :.., :1, j Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation Ca, CL Equipment Summary Maintenance ano Replacement Schedule Summary 4e; 7t, 7; j

             -e                   s..          ,
                                                   .y 7;r g             we - r m =rna y = ,-          -gn , c 7,y   ;,a,--        fz

_ __ _ . . _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ - m ._ __

        '.             4                                                                NRC C:ntr ct No. NRC-03-79-118
                        !iOblJ Frtnklin Reserrch Czntir                                 FRC Pr:j;ct N3. C3237                            Paga T                     A Diwsion of The Frankhn Insnrute                                                 3                          lb i                   20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 443-1000      FRC    Assignment FRC Task    No. 4 O No.
                                                                                                              / }480 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. I

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

      ?

Tne Licensee (has/'_ .- _M provided a response to the SER concerns.

      .4.. -

m,A The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is d qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE

         +:.                environmental service conditions.
    .m                  y
    $                  /\ The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no
          ':                outstanding qualification deficiencies.

[ The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment

  • 6 item whose qualification has not been fully established.

n

     -j]f                           .7ustification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

hlMW

Corrective action specified by the Licensee M4 q, .

[h Equipment replacement with qualified equipment lM' Equipment modification - jf k Equipment relocation above submergence level l .. A V Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) (g;.y , Equipment relocation to a mild environment 19 % Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( ) j?d h.gl The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item p We that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. sp w .a, The Licensee (nas/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed Q@; corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective MN; action .)

*Q
,h                         The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification
.f/V.                      and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

PI,D , M DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

                      - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
r. r w M hI.bQualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency
  .i                         Modification                                               'III.a Exempt
   %                  II.a Qualification Not Established                                 III.b Not in Scope IS,N                  II.b Not Qualified                                                 IV     Documentation       Not Available s)'". ,-

U t

+
       , 'J
    )     GI
  ***** *T{
  • N f( 7~
                                                                                " ' ' ~      ~          ~
                                                                                                          T    '2  V
      .-     _m_~,_.._-_.-_.___   .                             . . - _ _ _ _ . _                                        s,,_....m._,_         o...    -

A NRC C:ntrc.ct Nr. NRC-03-79-118 ll00hnnklin Rrse:rch Center Pag 2 FRC Pr: Ject N . CS257 A Divmon of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignmeni No.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215)4",8 1000 FRCTask No. 4O~7 /40 b EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. T EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION: NRC REQUIRE'4ENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence'of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) I

                     ~ Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperacure/ Pressure Exposure: o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied r e iteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied

                      . Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION: NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified X I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified , _ III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentai; ion Not Made Available

                       .g              y                              M rner. E ,                    OMaA QNrtOn M .

I

 't i

j k --- . ._..: %. mur: gepnqv- ;, _ - _ %% y

i i.

                                                    %.                                                       NRC C:ntract N3. NRC-03-79-118
                     %                         s"lL' UUl   Frs.nklin Rtse:rch Center                             FRCPr: Ject No.C5257                             Paga A Division of The FranWin Instirure
               'y)j                                  10th and Race Streets, Phda.. Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000   FRC Assignment No[.13FRCTask No. 98'I3a488 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. I 4                                                             LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER i
       . - y;,                  ,
             ~;.                                            6. Sese cc pccents are vi**'a *'a sec;e of c= pnsect assess:ent/

My evalutics activity. cc=;ietics of the activity vi-h se se p e:-

                   *j                                            actics plas is not antici;ated '.:stil the est of
  • tis year er firn
q. tarter of next. <
                      <a W.                          l
               .4r A<
               ..Y A

n

                          ?_
        , a,,.4g. 8      .a k
                         - ,M p

j.y fC i,, .6

              ..;9        J s

. .i ffl 1 0 .^ I 4. ~ . 1-M. o% 9

                , f,

.i;.em M{! s.,-f' l

                   */d ,

l ,- y, _ ;bq

         . yr i ? ;*, -Q i        $. :

t . $D

      - etm
      ...va   .Y.

g 9. w. q. ,.y r .\ , I '"4 g

 . a. e:

1 'ik

 - e :+ 4
         \ '

k,Q' T' c ,, i m,

            .I
             -1                          f 6..c ..
                  . k ,'
               -4:

s s ,' 4 . , . %d -

                  ..*TR                     7 gn         *.~S ~N f Y"?

_ , ,..,e - , . - , yy :'"' _ g*

                                                                                                                                                        . .,-_~w---   ~ - -~~a-
                         ~

r 4 r, ff [

_ . . . . -. . _ . - -. - . . - . .; . . - - - . . - ~; . = .- ~.w- - ~ - - - - - gA NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 I UCEf Fr'a~nklin Rsstarch C ntrr FRC Project No. C3237 Pig 3 A Dwison c f The Frinkhn instituti FRC Assignment No.13 20th and Race Streets. Phita . Pa 1910'l(215) 44d-ItW) Ia ! FRC Task No. 'ff'l l EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. b ; i EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 6 SOLEN 0 D VALVE LOCATED IN CONTAINMENT (C230) ASCO MODEL WPHTX8320A21V REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 9 HOURS TER CHECKSHEET NO. 6 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 4026, 28, 27 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): PURGE AIR SAMPLE ISOLATION 1CV5291 (ISV5291) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL:' SCEW(S) [1, 12]: 250 FUNCTION (PLANT E): DOUSING FILTER SUPPLY HEADER 1CV4159 (ISV4159) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12): 38 FUNCTION (PLANT D): DOUSING FILTER SU? PLY HEADER ICV 4160 (ISV4160) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12): 39 i FUNCTION (PLANT D ): PRESSURIZER 11 VAPOR ISOLATION ICV 5465 (ISV5465) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12]: 180 FUNCTION (PLANT D): PRESSURIZER 11 LIQUID ISOLATION ICV 5466 (ISV5466) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12]: 179 FUNCTION (PLANT D): RC HOT LEG SAMPLE ISOLATION 1CV5467 (ISV5467) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCE'l(S) [1, 12 ) : 178 , O

 ;                     DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for I4.gend) R, T, (TV, P, H, CS, (R) , M, I , QM , RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None,

                       'Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS :

Contents Checksheet Page No. Equipment Item la C Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb L Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3 a , -S-b , 2c, 2d 1 System Consideration Review - -! c , It, !c, td. ?c, !! - j Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 5;, 5b, Sc, 5d, 5;, :f,

                                                                                                              -53 , Oh, 21, ;j Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation                                            -Ec, 55 Equipment Summary Maintenance anct Replacement Schedule Summary                                             7c, 7b, 77 8       _  .-h-. w       *-e-         e,      4-        ,         .r  e,me b     ., .           ,       7 - ._               _3_

o - [ . I. l 4Ubrznklin Rrs:rrch C:nt:r NRC Crntr:ct Ns. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Pr:j;:ct No. C5257 Paga

              'I A DMston of The Frankhn Inst:tute                       FRC Assignment No.J3
     '                                                                                                                                          lb 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 191'G (2:9 4481cc0     FRC Task No. 487 /M8 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIE'N OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. b

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEC RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: mm

  }.h,.                   [ Tne Licensee (has/t W provided a response to the SER concerns.
 %9Q
   <4         4                    The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is M                         qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE W                          environmental service conditions.
   ,-t jQ-                     X The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no y                                outstanding qualification deficiencies.
   .      .a -

[' M The Licensee (.has/has not) Proposed a corrective action for this equipment 9 item whose qualification has not been fully established.

  ;9 Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the
 . @Y;h ;

Licensee for this equipment item.

4.$ -

Corrective action specified by the Licensee: ..n:- CTf Equipment replacement with qualified equipment K. Equipment modification [.,,I I Equipment. relocation above submergence level ]{,g Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) m.m[, i Equipment relocation to a mild environment 4 Qualification testing of equipment in progress b Other ( ) [$ The Licensee has provided other infermation for this. equipment item

  ?Q

. M -J that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. lh# '}%;f l The Licensee (nas/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective l p;.

l. action .)

jf.l

 < %y                             The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification j;{                              and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.                                                                       ,

< v. e ' NEi DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW i l '. . - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) g[y 4 I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency

  , .fr                   I.b        Modificat. ion                                         III.a Exempt
             !}          h Qualification Not Established                                    III.b Not in Scope

!p II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available % I N4.v

c. .

l t'5% (am&p, -- - - ~m- mm ~~ , n

                                                                                            . - - - - - - ~                       __
     - s u u:.a m ,                 ~                    _.                     _    _
                                                                                                                      ~

A NRC ContrJct Na. NRC-03-79-118 P go i illlbrank!!n Research Center FRC Project No. CS257 A own of The FananInsmute 3 2 20th and Race Sneers. Phda.. Pa. 19103(215)448 1000 FRC Assignment FRCTask No. 40/No.)488 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. b EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SL7EARY FORM DESIGNATION: NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence cf Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately X Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) X ' Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation X Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) X Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposures o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately a o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied 5 Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied )( Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied X l Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied l Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied - Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) i DESIGNATION: j NRC CUALIFICATION CATECORY X = CATEGORY i ) I.a Equipment Qualified 5 I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification ) II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established X ,\ II.b Equipment Not Qualified

 .            II.c         Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified

$ III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review j IV Documentation Not Made Available n l O i , s i

                                                  ~

y , , ,_ _

NRC Contract N3. NRC-03-79-118 S' *if Ullbanklin R:tsenen Ccnt;r FRC Project N3. C5257 P;g3 A Division of The Frankhn !nstitute 3 FRC Assignment 30 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103 (2151 448-1000 FRCTaskNo. 487 No.

                                                                                                                          /      )488
                           - I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. b i

ih I

z I LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER
           $                    1
           ~
   .;,lQ; .                              sv USS , sv4%o :

q_4 t

           '/'                                   3 Issued letter dated 22/81 to Tate F.=gineering Co. requesting I . ,- j                                               additional verificatics of r,aterials for the listed soleccid valves. We az;ect ta receive the cecessary infor=atica and r',                                                    anticipate resolution by the end of this year.

, if

   ', 3 p, p.;                          SV 54GS, SV54GG ,5%7 :

S

Mt i $

l

                             )

13 nese selecoid valves have been relocated on both f.inits 1 and

   . 4c                                               2 to an elevatice stove the esic'.tiatei subnergence level.
        ;y i

{

             'm
      &              c SV S2.H ;

l'h'g [ ; I,j

                        ,"p!
             -m

' N 1. Se qualification test re;crt referenced in the cc=; uter print-

       ',![]
          ,,                                         out s;ecifies a de:nonstrated life of 1.k years.

6

  • v.

. -llW rw

       .,-1'
  • i mS w

Q !I' 3 ' fiU k;?? 0b . 1, v a$.q.- p y. -

  • Dy ca
               ^

s'%' 3'h ,

                             )
         =

g p w, ws.

          ,2<-

gi

   .w                                N'{**"W%WX TMWMN--n .,-                              ,y.

7%**"'* 1 ~ b 7 "M -- <

                                                                                                                             ~                - ~
                                                                                                                                   ~ r~ ~ - - '   * ,       v.   ,'g' -- y'y

m . _ __ _ r

                #A                                                          NRC Contre:ct N;. NRC-03-79118 2Enklin Rssrarch Cant:r                                    FRC Pr: Ject No. C5257                              PigJ A Dus.on of Tha Fr; nun Insntut2                       FRC Assignm;;nt No.13                                lc 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103:215) 448 1000  FRC Task No.        489 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EOuiPMENT ITEM NO. 7 EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 7 SOLENOID VALVE LOCATED IN THE MAIN STEAM PIPING PENETRATION (A315)

ASCO MODEL NP8320A187V REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 9 HOURS TER CHECKSHEET NO. 7 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 712 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): PURGE AIR SAMPLE ISOLATION 1CV5292 (ISV5292) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL:' SCEW(S) [1, 12): 251 'I 9 DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITDi(S) ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) h RT, P, H, CS,hf. (R) , M, I, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not' stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICA3LE CHECKSHEETS : Contents Checksheet Page No. Equipment Item la i Spi..ary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 2b, k, 2J System Consideration Review *:, Ib, !, -13 , !;, Of Equipment Environmental Qualification Review -5 , 5b, ~:, 50, 5;, 5fr

                                                                                                -5g, Sh, Si, Sj Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation                                   -5,    CL-Equipment Summary Maintenance anc Replacement Schedule Summary                                     Ta,   7.,    k-
                                                                                                                     .-g g,--
      . . _   .7   u. - ,, -          m;_ --- _          .--..,-_%.--...                               :  .,    .-
                  . _ . _ .          - .     . - . . ~ ~                                -
                                                                                          --        -      -         -     -      -          -    ~ - - -

1 4 4 NRC C:ntrIct No. NRC-03-79-118 q ULUU Frznklin Restarch Csnest FRC Proj:ct No. C3257 P:g2

               ..                   A Dnnsson of The Franan Insnrure                       FRC Astignment No.13                         lb 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103 f215) 448-1000  FRC Task No. _48;Y4 80 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 7

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - CNLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: 1 N Tne Licensee (has/N) provided a response to the SER concerns. The Licensee (has/has pot) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE

          - e. ;

environmental service conditions. M The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

            ,'                     The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item wnose qualification has not been fully established,
p. a s- Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the
 !7                                       Licensee for tnis equipment item.
 '        .4
   +*

Corrective action specified by the Licensee: t-i .- e f't '.. < v_- Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification [ .- l l Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source I'Mg Verify qualification by additional (testing /analys.is) 4 - Equipment relocation to a mild environment

       -2                                       Qualification testing of equipment in progress
     '7    a                                    other (                                                                              )

3 .t The Licensee has provided other information .for this equipment item

      "$                                  that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim i                                operation.
   ?!
 &.1
   .g fj The Licensee (nas/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action.                 (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective 1.0                                  action                                                                                  .)
    .e p;

gr The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification

           ;                       and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.
     .(/                      DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC CUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

[h - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) f._ N% hI.DQualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency Modification III'.a Exempt Y II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope h II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available l l 4.- 9s I le f

        ,; 1
                           ,,..a-                    .u              , = , ~
                                                              .                            .    ,----a--
                                                                                                             - ---,mm.     , . .+    - qw                 -

v ~ . . . - ~ . . _.- . . . . - - . - . .

                                                                                             .  ~ . - . - .                          - _..x . --a. -    w-4s du Fr:nklin R:serrch Centr NRC C:ntrzet N3. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Pr; ject No. C5257                              Pag 3 A Dwe of The Frankhn Insttute 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000           FRC Assignment No/.13FRC Task No. 487248 8 EQUIPMENT ENV'RONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION W MARY FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate

                       .o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation , Satisfied
  ;               Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied i               Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied
  ;               Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied s I                 Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied
,,                Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied                                                     ,

Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

                                                                                                                              ' DESIGNATION:

NRC OUALIFICATION CATEGORY ' ~ X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified , N I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Est.sblished s II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Raquirkcents Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified ' s III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification . - , III.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Quslification Review _ s-

.                  IV          Documentation Not Made Available '                              '4       N              ~                                 }

D

                                                                                                    '         '                                               h g

Sm - h m e. 2. g b i c o w W a ~. t 4 g

,                                                                                                            s
                                                                                                                                     )                           l y                                                                                       .

f --

                                 . ~ ~ .m . ,                       .g        .

mgyg I

                               - , . <               _ _ . . . . ~ _ _ _ _ .      ._ _ -..- ._._._-       . ~ _ .       - . . _ _ _      . . . _ . . . .                 , _ . . _ _ . . . - . . . . _ -

J 4 NRC C:ntr:ct No. NRC-03-79-118 k Frrnklin Rrsnrch Csntir FRCPr lectM L3257 Pags A Dwmon of The Frankhn Insnture FRC Assignment No.13 3a 20th and Race Streets. PMa.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-10M FRC Task No. 46'7 /486

                .(, m                EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUlPMENT ITEM NO. 7 s

N .. /

                           ~
         .#                        #                                            LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER 1'

Msl f.

.i d
               .y . ,

k? ' '

6. "hese ecsposents are ytthis tt? scope of o'e ,9 stent assess:e::/

evaluatics activity. Cc:71e:Dn of the anivny with su':seque::

                 .      I .!                        actica plaa is co: assici;a:et us:i1 :te c e of :..3 y,g of f, yn
                                                  - qu w.e: of : ext.
               .. w o f . .* i
i. .% 4
            /* ,

v p

                        'i                                                                                                                                                     4

( 4 ej,1 h,*

            'J U                  g US i'c n

1, ,/'2d6$", , A -I s ,s 1 I. f m e"/h. . J:4

        ~

, . ._ m I { }y**.$'d ,', :.5 k i? * ;'-;[9

w. .
     , ,, ??.. J
      ),N
     ' w j -Qk.[

u,y,

s. I
             .//j 3

. I'3%y 1 T,

       ?;i.3

}5*: #p

 % f.g,,            c, L .%h 9 g.u il Y.,   aq.                                                                                                                                                                                         .

e-%

          . < .s'
 .t s.t  .'s ,Q'.

k[kh L I;

. , cn. -

_W,

      '.a
      \$ s y
y. ; ., < .

i w 7 'P. ' . w w m ww w '---~R- . . . . . _ Y_ _ . . '" -r..-,v _ i

          ,, s                                                                 NRC C:ntract No. NRC-03-79-118 E Franklin Rrsearch Csnter                                             FRC Pr: Ject N 2. CS257                                               Pag 3 A Dewsion of Ths Frrnkhn instituu 20th and Race Streets. Phi!a . Pa 19103 (215) 448 IINx)           FRC            Assignm'                   int46  ND.1g'7               lc FRC Task                 No.

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. T EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 8 SOLEN 0ID VALVE LOCATED IN THE EAST PIPING PENETRATION ROOM (A316) ASCO MODEL NP8320A187V REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 EOUR TER CHECKSHEET NO. 8 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 712 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): STEAM GENERATOR 12 BLOWDOWN ISOLATION 1CV4012 (ISV4012) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL:' SCEW(S) [1, 12): 120 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): STEAM GENERATOR 12 BLOWDOWN ISOLATION 1CV4013 (ISV4013) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12): 121 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): STEAM CENERATOR 11 BLOWDOWN ISOLATION ICV 4011 (ISV4011) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12): 114 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): STEAM GENERATOR 11 BLOWDOWN ISOLATION 1CV4010 (ISV4010) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12): 113 E' {

}

l DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) I i hh S, (R), M, I, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable

  • 1 LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

1 l Contents Checksheet Page No, l i Equipment Item la f Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb l Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2

 ;     Licensee Response to NRC SER                                                                                           3a, 25, k, 2 d-I                                                                                                                                                            i j     System Consideration Review                                                                                           -k, 4b, 4w, 40, 4w, 42 -

l Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 52, 55, Sc, 53, 50, 5f, _sg mk mi mj , Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation -h , C b - j Equipment Summary i Maintenance ana Replacement Schedule Summary -7 m , 7 , 7c - l l u %

              -                             ~#.                        '

__~ -. -m : t

g _3_ NRC Crntr:ct No. N RC-03-79-118 d02 Frankhn Resurch C:nur FRC Project No. CS257 Pm_ g 2 [ A Dmsen of The Frankhn instru:e FRC Assignment No.

           '#                                                                                                                                        lb 2Cth and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 448.imo     FRCTask No. Adl - M3 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUlPMENT ITEM NO. O

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: M Tne Licensee (has/k - m) provided a response to the SER concerns. The Licensee (has/has pot) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions. X The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

               ,',                      The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.
         'I Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for tnis equipment item.

(;.g Corrective action specified by the Licensee: . f.y Equipment replacement with qualified equipment 1: Equipment modification l Equipment relocation above submergence level q# Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Mr. ? Other ( ) p The. Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item 1" . that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim

            !l operation.
  -$                                           The Licensee (nas/has not) provided a schedule for the pecposed l 'g}.                                          corre.tive action.

action (Schedule for accomplishing the cc,rrective

                                                                                                                                            .)

{fy The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification l f l-P. and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

  ; ,ij'                     DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
              ;              - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY:                       (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) h1.bQualified     Modification II.c Qualified Life Deficiency
           ,                                                                                       III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established                                    III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified                                                    IV       Documentation Not Available
1. I l I l 1 i
              '1
                                        -                 _            = : - . a ... ,,        :c.= m - - - .=;         -.mm--               z.      . p,   ~
          .                   m.                ...            ___.m.      . _ _ _ _ _ _ . .    . _ . _ _            _ _ _m A                                                               NRC C:ntr ct N2. NRC-03-79-118                        l UNJ Frrnklin R search Crnter                                  FRC Project No. C5257                          P cJ A Otvision of The Franklin !nsntute                       FRC Assignment No. }3                            2 20th and Race Streets. Phila. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000    FRC Task No. 48~l /488                                f EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION fiEVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 6 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION 

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION: NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Pagarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Ragarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied _ Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Fuaction Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) DESIGNATION: NRC GUALIFICATICN CATEGORY X v CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified M I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified ii III.a Equipment ExeJpt Fror. Qualification III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available } Sr g & L -.2.&ca-sD M . ? e

    - = = =                                         =                  =-                    -_                                .
                   .~ , _ . .                                                                         .                   -
                                                                                                                                              .            ... . . . . . ~ - ,                 ..,~ .

O NRC C ntract No. NRC-03-79-118 4'ljbb)Franklin Research Csnter FRC Pr: Ject N2. C5257 Pac ~' w A Divison of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.}3 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103 (215J 44810M FRCTask No. A8'l/ 408 { ) EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 8 LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER i T

6. "tese :::pc:ents are v. hi _,,,j

_ g jl evahatics aesivi 7* C :Pietic: the ee of the pe of e,y 777,,,=3 activt vi-1 s4se,,,e,,kb Miic Pl ac 14 cet antici;ated 'm-1; -3 eg of .3, y ,,

                                                                 --4%9er of next.

4L t

 ~.1 ld Y
  ,       g         .
            .A 3       0
          ?.>
           , f-               'N
         .f t                      .

Ad"..

                  %       1 p
        " *:tl
  -                     4
         . e ' .G i
    ?         ,~l
      .-          ,a y AY N n<   -

Me s..

  *       ';1
     .'h q
               -.(

~ I. i 9 m "r

- - . = - --

Mv_. ._ Y e g , -"- " - 7e ,._

                                 ~
       .                                          n.              . . . . . _ .  .---..~-..a....                            - . m. .n . :-_. ~

4x NRC C;ntrzet N2. NRC-03-79-118 d%nklin Research Center FRC Pr; ject No. C3257 PJg7 A Dmsion of Ths Frankhn Institut2 FRC Assignm:nt Na.13 lc 20th ar.d Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103 (2:5) 44 S 1000 FRC Task No. 4R7

                                                                                                                                                       ^

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 9 EQUIPMENT ITEM No. 9 SOLENOID VALVE LCCATED IN THE EAST PIPING PENETRATION ROOM (A316) ASCO MODEL 2063815RVU REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 18 SECONDS TER CHECKSHEET NO. 9 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 712 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): COMPONENT COOLING TO RCP ISOLATION ICV 3332 (ISV3832) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL:' SCEW(S) [1, 12): 36

   '     FUNCTION (PLANT ID): COMPONENT COOLING FROM RCP ISOLATION ICV 3833 (ISV3833)

LICENSEE SU3MITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12): 37 i O DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY (See Section 3 of this TER for Le<3end)

             @                             CS,          S,     (R) , M,         I,                  EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No. Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 j Licensee Response to NRC SER 3 1, b, ;c, 2d I System Consideration Review I;, ;b, ;, 4, a, 4f Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Sa, Eb, :, :d, :;, :fr 9,3 Sh, 5i, SP Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation C., Cb - Equipment Summary Maintenance anc Replacement Senedule Summary 7a, 7-, Tv l w_ . - . . ~ . _ . _ - - - - - - , . . . . -

                                . . . . . . -            . . . . . -                 .-                          --       -.               - -- ~ ~- -                        -- --
             .' -                   da                                                                         NRC C;ntrcet N3. NRC-03-79-118 NJ Frz.nkhn Resrarch Csntre                                              FRC ProjIct N3. CS257                                             Paga A Dmsson of The Franun Inst:ru:e
                 '                                                                                             FRC Assignrnent No. }3                                              lh 20th and Race Streets Phu . Pa 19103 (215) 448-Ilm              FRCTask No. A9~i /400 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 9

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPT.ICABLE: M Tne Licensee (ha s/W) provided a response to the SER concerns.

         *,      ,                          The Licensee (has/has 13 qualified and/or will ,not)          function   specifically when exposed   statedtothat  the the       equipment applicable        DBE is
                .,q                           environmental service conditions.
     - 'b                         N The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no c)                                                                                       <.

outstanding qualification deficiencies.

             ,_                               The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item wnose qualification has not been fully established.                                                                      ~

_4 f.g Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the y ,q Licensee for tnis equipment item.

       *M' y; '                                              Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

Y Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification, "

     ,,                                                     Equipment relocation above submergence level                                                                         .
   ,            ..,                                         Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source
   '; ff                                                    Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)
             .f              _                              Eqtipment relocation to a mild environment
        ,73                                                 Qualification testing of equipment in progress pd       ;.o Other (                                                                                                            )

y,y The Licensee has provided.other information for this equipment item

         "(   ,

that can be construed as a basis ter justification for interim operation.

 ,[,i                                                Tne Licensee (nas/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed ry                                               corrective action.                    (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective
 < :-), ,                                            action                                                                                                            .)

9h , . P, ., ' The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification t,,% M and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

    .6,D djY        "                    DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
                                 - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY:                        (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) hI.bQualified    Modification II.c Qualified Life Deficiency III.a Exempt p-                        II.a Qualification Not Established                                           III.b Not in Sccpe

, II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available I i, ~ , 4y.

                     , ,   ,e-a                  '5 T "? ?w          w m  --  ,e e.e-   n  e-  e =O%wp g eF>tm       9"
                                                                                                                             'f}K  **M*^2**      *"A NWY'~~    ' * ' " " 
             ..                           .                   ...~a        -    :.-.a.~...               -- n --.      -       -
                                                                                                                                  ~
.f I d          A                                                                  NRC CIntrait N 2. NRC-03-79-118                     i UOONnMin R:se:rch C:ntir                                           FRC Przject N .C5257                         Paga A Dwison of The Frankhn Insntute                           FRC Assignment No. J3                         2     .

20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRCTaskNo. 48 l/489 f EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 9 h EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNAIION:

          'NRC RECUIREMENTS                                                                                  X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence'of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence. Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied , Criteria Fagarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied

       -   Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) 4 DESIGNATION:

NRC CUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified N I I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification i II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified ; i III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.c Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review f IV Documentation Not Made Available , f sn w < w .2. g n M w % n . 0 rl 1

                 ~'
                                                ,. ,_ y.:mn.,.               ,_X_'~":.---,-_u_"-~",.,,,                      _ :4
                          #A                                                        NRC C:ntract No. NRC-03-79-118
  • Enk desearch C:nttr FRC Pr$ct N 3. CS257 P ga A ciws.on of T'e Franan Institute FRC Assignment No.13 24th and Race Streets Phda . Pa 19101(215) 445 !ajo la FRC Task No. LL f(1 q EQUlr 7,iENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. /0 EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 10
            .            SOLENOID VALVE LOCATED IN THE PIPING AREA ( A224)
                     . TELEDYNE MODEL 2111062025253
     , f                 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: NOT STATED TER CHECKSHEET NO. 10
        ..N          '

LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): STEAM GENERATOR 12 MSIV (ISV4052, ISV4049, ISV4048, ISV4053, ISV4047) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12}: 122 THROUGH 126 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): STEAM GENERATOR II MSIV ICV 4043 (ISV4043, ISV4044,

                 ,                                           ISV4045, ISV4042, ISV4046)
                   ,     LICENSEE SUBMITTAL:              SCEW(S) [1, 12]: 115 THROUGH 119 1
          .?: }
         .a
     .;+,       .

7 ;(n lrf

   .fv      ._ i l3.4 wf q.

g,i d i] [

h. ..
        ' 4; c , .4                 DESIGNATION FOR OF?ICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:
   , y f-                 (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) t : s't.<

hh P, CS, S, (R), M, I, 'M , RPN, EXN, SEN, Ql, RPS, None, jOS '

  )]{                     Not stated, Not applicable k,                       LISTING OF APE LICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

I.. 'T:' t.- , Ig Contents Checksheet Pace No. _~ N rw hg.; Equipment Item la j ,s;> Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb bh 1 $12 Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2

, c--i l Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, c, :c, %

r p f i[' System Consideration Review h, 'b, 'c, '3,

                                                                                                                              .       *f-Equipment Environmental Qualification Review                                 So, },,{c, {d,         k,     :f,
                                                                                                       -,, . . . . .., n -

4. t Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation --S c , ic -

1. j k Equipment Summary

'I2:>

  ;; ,~                   Maintenance anc Replacement Senedule Summary                                 h , 7L, 7c 4

If Ln._ _ ._. _ , ,.___ __ _ __._ _ -

_ , . - . .:a . ..-- - ..-- - - - - - - 4 NRC C:ntr ct Nc. NRC-03-79-118 00i!U Franklin Rrs: arch Center FRC Pr;j:ct No. C5257 P g '; l A Dmsson of Ths Frinklin Insnrut FRC Assignment No.13 . l lb l 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 44810m FRC Task No. 467/468 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. D J SUAMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: J Tne Licensee (has/~ - - -5) provided a response to the SER concerns. The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or' will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions. The Licensee has presented information whien shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

                   ,X The Licensee (has/E x:) proposed a corrective actior. for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully establishe3.

1 Justification for interim operation (hasW) been provided by the Licensee for tnis equipment item.

.{                      X Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

f Equipment replacement with qualified equipment l Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in pecgress

                                .X  Other ( O btsn. Eve Oei- i n rorrnsh\ on er- t eolate..

t

                                                                                                                                      }

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that cari be construed as a basis for justif'i cation for interim operation. X The Licensee (ms/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accompli-hing the corrective action .)

  ,                    The Licensee states that the equipment ites does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

                  - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY:                 (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) i             I.a    cualified                                               II.c Qualified Life Deficiency Q Modification                                                 III.a Exempt-II.a Qualification Not Established                             III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified                                             IV      Documentation Not Available O

i l

 <--=.=.a-
                                   = .- -               :-, . .:.=.,qw.,.,-         :-p ..;.-.+,-       ,
= =3 -- m ~ ~ ~ --

6 >-

                            # 4                                                           NRC C:ntr:ct NO. NRC-03-79-118

{Jh) Frtnklin Rrse:rch Centr FRC Pr; ject N D. CS257 P:ga A Dwision of The Franklin Insnture FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Ps. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 467/4 PJ B EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.10_ 4 EQUIPMENT EtNIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

         .;;                NRC REQUIREMENTS                                                                                   X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qu'alification Adequate                                                                  X Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)
                     .      Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Sdtisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate L Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied I Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied

l.l l Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies 1 (If Any) Satisfied 13 Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied b Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied
                      )     Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)
     '&         t i                                                                                                                            DESIGNATION:

NRC CUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY

.u .;
          .r
    ', ,3 [                 I.a           Equipment Qualified f                I.b           Equipment Qualification Pending Modification                                                     X Q                      II.a II.b Equipment Qualification Not Established Equipment Not Qualified
  ?.Wi l '$                         II.c          Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life l iQ                         III.a or Replacement Schedule Justified T.5                            Equipn. 7t Exedipt From Qualification fM,ji                     III.D         Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review
 ,h[                         TV           Documentation Not Made Available 1.@
         .e
        ,af' l j.

M I e

 .5
~

ny-w m m y.rangrey y-- - .-

                                                                           . ~ . . . - - .           -
                                                                                                          .......-- - .. -           .~___n.             .;

NRC C:ntract NO. NRC-03-79-118 4]U') Ut Frank!!n Research Csnter FRC Pr: Ject No. CS257 P_g9 A Division of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.J3 3a 20th and Race' Streets. Ph.'a , Pa. 19103 (215) 44810co FRC Task No. . 487/488 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.10 LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER

6. nese ce=pene ts are withi: the see;e cf cur present a.sess:ent/

evaluatic: activity. ce=pletic: of the activity with st seque:t actie: plan is not artici;atei unti?. the e:1 of this year ' firs *. 1 M uirter Cf ceX*..

  • 4
   ?

q e I O S

 }

N.X = ,2 = - ~' ~.. .;,,=.~~ ~ . ~ ~T- - . , . - :~: L-;q~;;T;;_~~~ 7

                                                                                                                             ... ~~~~-'T M w =A "-=v.-v=   = -

i

                                                       -. _. . _ _ . . . . _        - _ _ _ _ . ~ _ . . . _

A # NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118

               ,        dEnk!in Resee.rch Cent:r                                             FRC Pn:J;ct NO. C5257                            Paga
                ,           A Div sion of The Frankhn Inst.tute                              FRC Assignment No.13                              la 20th and Race Streets PMa . Pa 19101 (215) 448-1000              FRC Task No.         4M

{ EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICA7I ON REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. II EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 11 l'; SOLENOID VALVE LOCATED IN THE EAST PIPING PENETRATION ROOM (A316) ASCO MODEL NP8316E35V

         '" ]          REQUIRED OPERATING TIME:                         9 HOURS TER CHECKSHEET NO.11 3 ,,'j        LICENSEE REFERENCE (S):                      712 y

FUNCTION (PLANT ID): CONTAINMENT PURGE ISOUATION ICV 1413 (ISV1413) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12}: 249 9 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): CONTAINMENT PURCE ISOLATION !::V1411 (ISV1411) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12): 247

        .y
   &f 3f sy:

5

   /
  , , ;L 1,.f -'

}.- _ l% hy 1

         , ,9          DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

y (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

         ?%            R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, A, S,                          (R), M,       I, VM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, Nene,
        . .g Not stated, Not applicable WQ LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS :

' "i? r 3

      . 3. .

i;% Contents Checksheet Page No. u.vp 1 's C v 1 : - @. Equipment Item la ,

w

. $'s - Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 kM.~ vy }{-),] Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, Ob, 0;, L

         .jj           System Consideration Review                                                              4a, ab,-4c, L,         4c, 4 f-ky                      Equipment Environmental Qualification Review                                             S a , -- 5 b , Sc, Id, 5;,  if,-

4 's Sg, SP Si. Sj

4

) Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation Se, -: b ~ g

 ,.,.                  Equipment Summary
        ' 1;<
         ;A
'. 
c.j Maintenance anc Replacement Schedule Summary Ta, To d r
            *1
                .em.-       _ _ - -     w,ap opme=%- ;_                   3p_    ,-
                                                                                  ,;             - _ . , = -                   -
    ... -_                                                 .m<                                                                     --
                                                                            . - . - . _    . . . - _ _ _ . _ . - m.____

NRC CIntract N3. NRC-03-79-118 gMU Franklin Res 1rch C4ntir FRC Pr:joct Aa. C5257 P g? A Dnnsson of Th2 Franklin Insnrun FRC A3signrnent No. t3 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 448-10c0 FRC Task No. 48'I.j408 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. Il

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES 'IO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: N Tne Licensee (ha sL=- - - 1) provided a response to the SER concerns. The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or' will function when exposed to the applicable DBE e environmental service conditions. 1 The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item. Cc'rrective action specified by the Licensee: l Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( ) Tne Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. The Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .) The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION E7ALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

            - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY:                  (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) d          h1.0Qualified Modification II.c Qualified Life Deficiency III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established                            III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified                                           IV             Locumentation Nct Available i

1 2 1

  • f Y ,.,_ -
           =. = =. w. . ,===r= ;; =.,===.==~,:::ww . -= . ..=. -wnnpp=-                                                  --      -

NRC C:ntract N e. NRC-03-79-118 C[hj Ull 'ranklin Reserrch Cent:r FRC Pr:J ct N O. CS257 Paga A Dw m of The Frank!m It'stitute 2 20th and Race S:rms. Phda.. Pa 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC FRC Assignrnent Task No. 48'i No/.13 488 I I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. II

               ,                               EQUIPMENT EtNIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION 

SUMMARY

FORM

    ;,                                                                                                                                  DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY

              ><         Documented Evidence of Qu'alification Adequate i      Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Cegradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degra<'ation

            ~

Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

              ,                o Peak Temperature Adequate
             ',                o Peak Pressure Adequate
     . .; -                    o Duration Adequate
     -f                        o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately 4h                        o Steam Exposu: ) (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied
  ']                     Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied
            /'

Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied h.O i I Criteria Regarding Test ?ailures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied [',

f. .,3 Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied
            $            Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy SatisTied

{1.tl; Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied , [,l,y Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) 3G?; Y'd DESIGNATION: ! . .M NRC OUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY ' l {.,Ph I.a Equipment Qualified X @g I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification j*19 II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established

 'M                      II.o         Equipment Not Qualified e[c, II.c        Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified
.n                        III.a       Equipment Exempt From Qualification 7((                        III.o       Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review
, , -[,{                  IV          Documentation Not Made Available M

pa S- h -. z. g che , e a ,, .y

   . .o.; ,
     'au
    . h . *(

[ m

                                                                                                                        ..c ,.             --m    ,_.m.          ,m-,,_
              ,% m       -.., w _;..,_     .
                                               #,g .,.- sw.w y_,_..w-                               -            .-                 .
   = . n._            _                                      _   .&                , . :_   , .. -   ~..&.  . . _ . _ _
       &                                                            NRC C:ntract NO. NRC-03-79-118 dJU Franklin Research Ctntu                                 FRC Project N3. C5257                       P:ge A Dwision of The Frankhn Insnrute FRC  Assignment       No.13[4 8 R            3a 20th and Race Streets. Phda. Pa. 19103(215) 448-1000    FRC Task No. 4 87 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M m

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER

1. *he q"a' * *icati:= test re;crt refere::ed in the cc ; uter print-ct.: t;ccifies s de=ctstrated life of ... years.
2. "he 'JOA si:dati:= tea cendu:ted by A300 ir.:12ded a che=1:a1 s;rty ::::is-i-4 Of 2000 ;. Icre: as t:ri': acid. Se-a--..

c:::ectrs, tics of teric acid i:Je:ted 1.tc the centai =e .: duri:3 tre ;ostulated e.::ident is ex;e:ted to be 2h0 ;;:. O t 9 _=. =_.- ,_.

g;_x NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118

             'g                          L!.Snklin Resurch Center                                               FRC Project No. C5257                                                 P g3 1                   A Dvs,on of The Frank!;n Insntute                                  FRC Assignment No.13                                                   lc l-                  ".                        20th and Race Streets Ph :a . Pa 19103 (215) 444-1000              FRC Task No.                  487 q                    g  EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M
  !                                  EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 12 SOLENOID VALVE LOCATED IN CONTAINMENT (C230)
               ..                    ASCO MODEL NP8320A195V l                                     REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 9 HOURS 1

IE TER CHECKSHEET NO. 12

Tj ~

LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 712

  ,           4 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): CONTAINMENT INSTRUMENT AIR HEADER 1CV2085 (ISV2083)

LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12}: 12

             ;1 S:
  ?. ;.-
     .      k:

i: 1-1 .' *' ~

  ,h                            I
  !c
               ;                      DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:
          ,12, (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT, RT, P, H, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, ,y c l',.j Not stated, Not applicable l ;Y

     ._ ((,.'    .

LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: l ', 5, Contents Checksheet Pace No. [ .i Equipment Item la 6-Summary of Licensee Responses ta .he NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2

  .a.
  '                                   Licensee Response to NRC SER                                                                         3a,-:b, 2c            2d-
                    ,,                System Consideration Review                                                                        - -!   , !b,   10,      Id,         :, 4f i

Equipment Environmental Qualification Review -52, 55, "c M. 50, 5f,- l' f; Sg, Sh, Si, 5j

  !                                   Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementaticn                                                        -h, Cb p                                      Equipment Summary
. Maintenance anc Replacement Senedule Sumary b , T b , --r T
    -W=**'s              T* . e ~~m
                                    + + -3 wqysgo M me h eg y r- cm , -*       sw-  -g-ee-=~-----             ~77 - , e
  • w-w r> .=%, . -.4 7 ' + e e -=*erv . , I' 4e - - - sy - - ' #wh
    - - - - - - .- _                                    _.. ~ _..._._ _ . ~ -- .-_ - .--. _ ... ~ -. - ._ _

cs l.bU Franklin Research Csnter NRC CIntr ct Nr. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Prij;ct N 3. CS2J7 P:g; A Dnnsion of Th2 Frtnki:n Inst:tuti FRC / ssignment N7.)3 lb 20th and Race Streets Phda., Pa 19103 (215) 443 1000 FRCTask No. 46I/400 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIE'N OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.12-SUAMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: 1 Tne Licensee ~ (has/ic; in) provided a response to the SER concerns. The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or'will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions. 1 The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. The Licensee (has/has not) proposad a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. Justification for Interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for tnis equipment item. Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

  ~

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( ) , Tne Licensee, has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. The Licensee (nas/has not) prvvided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective 1 action .) 1 The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification ar ./o: should be exempted from environmental qualification.

'i                    DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW I
                      - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY:                    (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) h Qualified                                                     II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b    Modification                                           III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established                             III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified                                             IV     Documentation Not Available i                                                                                                                               e

_.._ _._- _ 2 - , .,_ _ _ . _ . W.,. _ 77- ~.~'.1 _ , gH,% ._ C ~ ,7

                                 ..    -                     . . . -- .      --.        . - ~ - -   _ . ._              .__ ... .             -- . . - . ...                   -

A NRC ContrCct N2. NRC-03-79-118 dbnklin Rrserrch Csntir FRC Project N2. C5257 P:g2 A Dwisxan of The Franan Ir:vue 13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 44810m FRC Assignrnent FAC Task No. _40 No[486 { ( EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM N EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION: NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate I Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately

         ' '         Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: , o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied

      -sh            Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied y
    !4               Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied

((9 Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies i. t r.' , (If Any) Satisfied 1.% Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied s ., '1{ Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied

        '?.          Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied
    '((              Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)
;* i.i. N j N/,$

jf ,f] DESIGNATION: X'= CATEGORY Q$ NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY N., I.a Equipment Qualified M r .[ I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification 7" II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established Gpd II.o Equipment Not Qualified l Ri2 II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life 3i.3 or Replacement Schedule Justified tJ ,[ III.a Equipment Exe:np*. From Qualification

          'f          III.D        Equipment Not in tne Scope of the Qualification Review g                    IV           Documentation Not Made Available
     .;C
c. +
                                                                                                                                                       ^   M, Me g

b > V u

    ---                    'y

_ 9 __. Wet Mr. ww- y euev M7 h p *-O=-p. -

  • e em .e-7 -

y A yw.,.g,g pq

                          . . - ~ . ~
                                                .a-..               . .:a.w        .- - -. - n , ,. ,              .        ...   ; w ,     4v c.-   . . . . . . . .     -m O                                            l l

l NRC C ntract N3. NRC-03-79-118 l 000 Franklin assurch cdnter FRC PrrJr.ct N S. C5257 Pcg2 ; A Diwson of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Ta:sk No. _ MY.13MR i EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.12 LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER i 1. Se qualification test repon referenced in the ce=; uter print. cut a;ecifies a de=cestrated life of !..'4 years.

2. ~he iT.A si=ulatien test ec ducted by A300 inc12ded a che=icaf.

s; ray censisting of 3000 ;;= Scres as teri: aci!. Se - = v d - .,= con =ectratic: of toric acid i:Jected into the c:: air.=ent duri:g the ;ostuisted acciient is expected to te 2 Mc ;;=. i 6 4 4 l

  .j s

e r %- i i l a i i1

          .- . ~ . ~ , -             -.    --
                                                               - .a .-_.  :
m. - - p=m--- , ' -*y " _ _ _
                                                                                                                                        ,,.C       gg_y-- ~ ,

l

                                                                     . . . . . . . .   ..n  --. ..     .z     . ..._:.         - . - . . - . -      . . ..    .

gs NRC C;ntract No. NRC-03-79-118

                         . 35nkhn Resarch Centir                                      FRC Prclect NO. CS257                                    Pag;
            *[               A Dw.sion of The Frsnkhn instituri lc 29th and Pace Streers. Phi!a Pa 19101(215# 448 1000      FRCTask FRC  Assignment No.      4No.1p9 n
             ]         EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. /5 EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 13
        >              SOLEN 0ID VALVE LOCATED IN CONTAINMENT (C230) g         ASCO MODEL NP8316E35V REQUIRED OPERATING TIME:                  9 HOURS

, Z TER CHECKSHEET NO. 13 . . ,i/M LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 712

        . ,            FUNCTION (PLANT ID):                  CONTAINMENT FURGE ISOLATION 1CV1412 (ISV1412)

LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12]: 248

           ?           FUNCTION (PLANT ID): CONTAINMENT PURGE ISOLATION 1CV1410 (ISV1410)
           ;.          LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12): 246

,' ;, A . ;

   'yQ) .

W,:.;

       .1;;' '
          $b b

^

   .s         .)

rs;

   ,!?
     -)

, fg 5 DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

    .[N)

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) j R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R), M, I, VM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, fg.;J

         .4
  ,Jj ht    state         Not applicable

$'.- LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECRSHEETS: i 7!

   '. [

e t, Contents Checksheet Page No. e,? J

 ].                     Equipment Item                                                                     la 7           Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER                                       lb
   *Y                   Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms                                2 s          Licensee Response to NRC SER                                                      04,       b, Ja, 22 System Consideration Review                                                       --4 a , 4L,  L., 4J, 4e, 4f-Equipment Environmental Qualification Review                                      -5u,    CL, :c, Id, 5e, Lfr "3,

Ch, Zi, Sj -

   .?'
        ;/ m            Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation                                       6e, L
          /

equipment Summary

        , 'y ./

Maintenance anc Replacement Schedule Summary 74, 7;, 7;

 ._ ,3w --,,.                 ..,.#          .         . - ~               -...x=--_                    . r. w= - . -       <.  - -      -ar=-war     - --- -
                                                                                                                    . , . =n.ns:        1..

4 NRC C:ntr ct Na. NRC-03-79-118 I UOOL Fr:nklin R:sench C:ntu FRC Pr: Ject N . C5257 Pag 2 A DMsion of Th3 Frtnkhn insn ut2 FRC Assignment No.j3 lb l 20th and Race Streets Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 448-10M FRC Task No. 407/489 l EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. O SUAMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS AP2 APPLICABLE: X Tne Licensee (has/C) provided a response to the SER concerns. The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions. N The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. 3 _ Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the

   ,                                    Licensee for this equipment item.
    ,.                                  Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

t

    ,;                                        Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification

( Equipment relocation above submergence level Y Relocate or shield equipment fror's radiation scurce t Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

   ,                                          Equipment relocation to a mild environment

{ Qualification testing of equipment in progress r Other ( ) l The Licensee has provided oth ?r information ~ for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. I The Licensee (nas/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action f

                                                                                                                              .)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification h . and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. l DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC CUALIFICATION E'7ALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

                           - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY:                 (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) n hI.bQualified Modification II.c Qualified Life Ceficiency III.a Exempt y                         II.a Qualification Not Established                         III b Not in Scope i!                          II.b Not Qualified                                         IV     Documentaticn    Not Available X.                                                                                                                                           G t

e I 1

            ;; -g :.yw-me-~~--                                   a       .,                        - -    -

y; . w w . .m - t -a <

                                                              . ..     . . .       .-,  . . . .   . - :--. . . - -    - . .   . . . .                . _ .a. - w NRC C:ntr ct Nr. NRC-03-79-118
           - d.             4'000J Franklin Reseirch Canta                                     FRC Pr2 ject Nr. C5257                                P:g3 i            A Divmon of The Franklin Institute                                                 3                              2 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 44810m      FRC   Assignment FRC Task     No. 48'7/No.)489 I        I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL OUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. O EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SLNMARY FORM DESIGNATION:
         ;. 4l              NRC REQUIREMENTS                                                                                 X = DEFICIENCY
                 .          Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)
                -[          Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)
             ,.             Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate y o Duration Adequate j o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate l4:( 7t

          "'                Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Ih         '

Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies j ' '; 4 (If Any) Satisfied

 '(.-                       Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Sati;fiad Criteria Regaring Instrument Accuracy Satisfied l.G Q .'V Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) l

. 'fd DESIGNATION: NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY 'N I.a Equipment Qualified X

       %                     I.b II.a Equipment Qualification Pending Modification Equipment Qualification Not Established
           .x W                  II.D         Equipment Not Qualified

[ ^. 4 II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life W ' or Replacement Schedule Justified M III.a Equipment Exeinpt Frcm Qualification y{ III.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review

   ]$
    ' n ,*)

IV Documentation Not Made Available 3 s~ - u zp%# . m f.. wt f

              , b iW/
          .*f. h 3
    ,,. % y==# w.cre-                          =    ---r: a .. -.,....;r.-=                     . _
                                                                                                              <     -_.y._..  .u              ..

_ _ ..- - - - - - ...- _ - _ . -.w.----- ge r NRC CTntrret No. N RC-03-79<118 2' ) Frankhn Research Centir FRC Project N2. 05257 Pag 3 A Dus.on of Tha Frinkhn instatut2 FRC Assignm;nt Nr.13 lc I 2'hh and Race Streets. Phda. Pa 191'JH215) 443-10ix) FRC Task No. 4f9 l l EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. /Y-

                                                                                                                                                 )

EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 14 MOTORIZED VALVE ACTUATOR LOCATED IN THE EAST PENETRATION ROOM (A227) LIMITORQUE MODEL SMB00 i REQUIRED OPEPATING TIME: 8 HOURS TER CHECKSHEET NO. 14 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 1064 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): MANUAL HPSI TO LOOP 113 1MOV626 (IMOV626) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL:' SCEW(S) [1, 12): 199 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): MANUAL HPSI TO LOOP llA 1MOV616 (IMOV616) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12]: 198 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): HPSI TO LOOP 113 1MOV627 (IMOV627) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12]: 197

I, O

p DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R, T, P, H, CS S, (R) , h I, VM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable l LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS : l J Content.s Checksheet Pace No.

y Equipment Item la l Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb l

l; Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 i Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 1b, L, T System Consideration Review -!;, Ob, ic, td, te, ;f Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 50, 5b, 5c, 53, 5, 5f,

 .i                                                                                                      5g, Sh, 51, L Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation                                        L, 6L Equipment Summary i,                    Ma intenance anc Replace.nent Schedule Summary                                      7.,       7;, 7c-1 a

9

                *e. p            4,*9 9.
  • w W-*-* -pg e-
  • 9 em -
  • __m, _, ,. __m gg _ . _ _ . _ ..,p. _

1* - gN NRC C:ntr:ct NT. NRC-03-79-118 bi nklin Rrs; arch Ccnt:r FRC Pr ject NO. C52J7 P g3 A De.:sion of The Fran:chn Insnrut FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets PMa . Pa 19103 (21h 4481000 FRC Task No. 48N4@ EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M i SUAMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: i X Tne Licensee (has/L 1) provided a response to the SER concerns. X The Licensee (6'has ,not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE

  .                 i environmental service conditions.
               . .                 M The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no a                        outstanding qualification deficiencies.

The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment

                .                      item whose qualification has not been fully established.

Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the f' Licensee for this equipment item.

      ,1 Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification

  .]                        l                             Equipment relocation above submergence level l,            ,                                            Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source j;

Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

                   ,          .:                          Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress j,                                                       Other (                                                                                    )
  .           4 The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment . item
         }g                                    that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.
      ,'                                       The Licensee (nas/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed
    ,                                          corrective action.                (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective
        ; '                                    action                                                                                          .)

y< l ,.4 The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification

   - : ,;                              and/or chould be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

                                 - CIRCLi'D ITEM ONLY:                     (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) g.f                             I.a    Qualified                                                .II.c          Qualified Life Deficiency l '. ,             ,              I.b    Modification                                              III.a Exempt Q a Qualification Not Established)                                  III.b Not in Scope i

II.o Not Qua11ried IV Documentation Not Available

 ~ ;{

t a 2 1

                                                              .n ,-   .,,-n       .- .__
                                                                                                                                        ;;p m.-          -

_ . . . _...>. - ... ., . .. _ . .-.... . _ - .~. . .. _ m .. . .... ~ . ._.. - _ ~ .m cr Q' . lj007r:nklin Rese:rch Ccnt;r NRC Contract N . NRC-03 79-118 Pag 3 J FRC Project NO. C5257 A Dimion of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.17 2 20th and Race Srreets. Phita.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 49Y /4% EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. I4-EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION: NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence;of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established X Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately X Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) % Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate

 !               Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied I              Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied l               Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied                                                  .

Criteria Pagarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat., I) DESIGNATICN: NRC CUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established X II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exeinpt From Qualification III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available f See Evch clion on 9o 3e E -7.

~i O
 ~              .                                                                              -                    -
Wq*v.m er ;y ~-.w w- - m . v. - - - . -

m _ _ _ . ,_

                      - _                        . . . .      ..                               . . . - - . . . . . -        -   ..-n-..-----~.-_

k

                                          #                                                               NRC C:ntr:ct N2. NRC-03 79-118 LUT Frankim R:scrch Centr                                        FRC Project N:. C5257                     Pag 3 6                                           A oiv,sion of The Frankt.n institure                        FRC Assignment No.13                       3a 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000      FRC Task No. 4F)? /@@

{ EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. I4 I LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER

          *1                                                                                                         '

4

5. L1=iterque has 'i f:r=ec us that a ge:erts report vill te availatie vti:1 iiettifias its =en-= eta 111: =aterials used vitti thei:-
                                                                 .%'/'s a:1 =cre directly ;revides bases f=r c:rrelati; to existi=g qualificati:n test re;cris. We v11.1 receive ce;1es cf this re;crt j                                 vhe issued act ar.ticipata resolutics cf the cutstandi:g ite.=4 by, the end of this year.                              .

4 1

            , 1.
       ;- .?.
            < 's:

s y *8 I l . ! . I O I ..* p. g

            .k -

9 ,7+' h ' n.r.:.;

ll . o. .<

4

              -a.

i,.yt , a , a [.': bPp sy[n Q f ... C. ;,5 t y . . . 5 . . Ii'ls* 4 d

            ^
 '77 W. ' , y

[ t

                \                !

p'A.s .' t

                 ?          i
            .'?

k

                                       -% . 7 " 7.7" 7" T " ' 4 ' *.' .7J , O" '7            ,                  , p-a.7         _ ,              ,.       , _ _
   ..- ... _ ~ .._ _ _ _ _ _. _ _                                                                                  _ _ _ -                               _ - _ .                   -

1 4g_ q NRC Contrset Hb. N RC-03-79-118 bJIFrank!!n R:surch Center FRC ProWct Ho, C5257 3 , Pag]

  • A cive of N Franklin Insoture FRC Assi;nment No.13 f 1 ~8 ~ '

20m and Race Streets. PMa.. Pa. 19103 (215) 4481M FRCTask No._4M i4 PR t ECUIPMENT ENVIRONM5?4TAL QUAllFICATION REVIE4# OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M i ' , NOTES: "X" DE'!OTES APPROPRIATE "0IES N 1. The Liceosee has not provided documentation from the manufacturer which establishes similarity between the installs 6 equipment and the te'st sbecimen in the referenced ducument(37. ( ucTE A) s.

                                                                                                     ..                                             i X
2. The Licensee has not identifies the-class of the insulation system used for clig motor in the rotorized valve actuator.

X 3. The Licensee has not identified whether or not this motorized valve actuator incorporates a motor-brake assembly. X 4. The Licensee has not identifiediche class of the insulation system used for the motor-brake assembly (if applicable) . X 5. The Licensee has not identified the motor manufacturer for this motori:ed viive actuator. [ X 6. The Licensee has not identifiec' the manufacture sofs the . motor-brake assembly (if spy 11 cable) . . b 7. The Licensee has not identificd the tyje of current.used in j the motorized va]ve actuator. ' f b 8. The Licensee has not identified the type of current used in . j the moter-brake asrembly V.if applicable). , X

9. The Licens'ee hcs not esta~clished a qualified life estimate '

for this motorized valve actuator based on technically justifiable methods and conservative assu=ptiens.

10. The Licensee has stated that the only harsh paras ter ~

that this motorized valve actuator is exposed to is radiation.

11. Since radiation is stated to be the only harsh parameter did considering the extensive raciscion tes:ing of the mot:Us used in this type of motorized valve actuator, the spect? O d radiation dose of is considered to be of sufficiently 1cw value as to not aftbet this equip =ent - , i item. Th!.7-equipment item is considered qualified !ce this parameter. '
12. The Licensee has committed to replace this equipse :t item.

The Licensee has stated the following: i U , ' ' ! h " g([ F

                                                                                                        % --       N                                    -

y

           . ,7                  . . _ _ . - .               .._.._._m
                                                                                            ..           . _ . . _ . .       ..._._m_____m                                        -

7- ___ A NRC C:ntr:ct N:. NRC-03-79-118 Udb Tranklin Rssearch Cant:r - FRC Pr: ject No. CS2J7 P;g2 A Dtvmon of The Frankhn institute FRC Assignment No.13 5g

                                ~ 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000                     FRC Task No.              46Yf489
                 ;m
          .(            ) ECUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.14
                 . .j NOTES:

M % 'A A l_ <1 AM2 1 S E2 D 23, ,) s w L le,o

                                                                                                                                 /

M a.

                                                    ' qwis u                       '?d s                                   pf w)1 &                          osnf-
     ~ ;-

y n)A b i 1/L ras-n m,$ % m<- _ m slo 141 AAA inis2b W _. 1

                          ).                         bxes k                                    wseAtAAc W4$sjuk
          ~
          ..                                        wsh%kh                                            hat mn2s. " '7k;fl J                                                  LA wx,2                                                             a 'i,                a-a
  #                     c h

a,L2 ss -

                                                                                                                                 % ,26xAs l                           _

l Jt,At & j M_Y d & N hr $i La dwd

c. s
                                                                                            /

w _ L'iJ

         ,,i ,

m ms-,mhd / L_1-s . ' ') . An_ W S-l2-90 n) /0 -/ 0 -[r0 da f ie1 um o /W wik lst QU mudar. ult L i Aam i$1A l; % cs-uld au,<A % dws i. O Am A sAlatit na,k& +3 # d

 .{....

9 l*

       ,.                ~g po s . .- . , .                                            . sw **m_tt,,.
                                                                            -t--                      - -..+-
                                                                                                                         * ' *C'9 'bf '_ W } Q f f*e~~eWnW 5 M E'"

_ m W~4'Y 'S* T W"'"M

_ _ . . . . _ . .__ .........<.2.._.~_-._m._. . . _ _ _ . _ - _ _ . - - - ~ _ . _ 9 NRC C:ntr ct Nn. NRC-03-79-118 A]UEnklin U Rtseach Cent r FRC Project Nr. C5?.57 PJ g J A Dwaon of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets Pbla.. Pa 19103(215) 443 1000 FRC Task No. N ~/ EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMEN'TAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. EQUIPMENT ITEM No. 15 ' MOTORIZED VALVE ACTUATOR LOCATED IN THE EAST PIPING PENETRATION RCOM (A316) PRATT MODEL TN20003 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 9 HOURS TER CHECKSHEET NO. 15 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID),: H2 PURGE ISOLATION 1M0'V6902 (IMOV6902) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) (1, 12]: 259 O DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITDi(S) ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend R, RT, P, H, CS, S, (R), M, I, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: Contents Checksheet Pace No. Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a , :.. , :., ad System Consideration Review in, *

                                                                                                                     -l   , *,      '^      

Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Sa, B, -, 55, "2 Sf, 59, Eh, :_, :, , Installei TMI Lessons Learned Implementation Ga, - Equipment Summary ~i j 4 Maintenance ano Replacement Schedule Summary % , %W 1 , ,.m.. , ,.. . . .. . , ,c, . ,. y g., ,, ..n.;, .,.. ,% ; - . . . - . - - - -

                                                                                                                           ~

_ __ ys-R -_

__ - _ -. _ _ _ -. .---.--w --: -- O

               ~

NRC C ntrict N3. NRC-03-79-118 lb

                             #4[Tr"$nklin              Rssearch Centxr                                FRC PrIJ:ct No. CS257                              P:g3 A os. mon of The Frannhn inst.rute FRCTask Assignment          No.13       [499           lb 29th and Race Streets. Phita . Pa 191031215) 44810m               FRC      No.       48-7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _L5 H

SUMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: X Tne Licensee (ha s/_ _ _) provided a response to the SER concerns.

       ,, q                  X The Licensee (~/has ,not) specifically stated that the equipment is
            -a                    qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

J 't The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. X The Licensee (=:s/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

        .y                           5 Justification for interim operation (t=sy/" has ::=Z) been provided by t'he Licensee for tnis equipment item.
e , Corrective action specified by the Licensee:
               ,                                 Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification jl                 I                          Equipment celocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) l'                       .,

Equipment relocation to a mild environment

   ,- .g                                         Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other (                                                                                               )

l '. .', The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item ( that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim I). . . - operation. !: o l,.* The Licensee (nas/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed ib . corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective M, . m action y .)

                                  .he Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification Ji ' . 1                           and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

4p 5 ir- DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC CSALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED CN REVIEW

                           - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY:                    (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

E I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency

   'f                      I.b      Modification                                                      III.a Exempt

,f' i QI.aQualificationNot Established [ III .b Not in Scope II.c Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available b h 1^

      ...-w--                   _

e- me .im ewm - ~ ' * * " " * - - - -- _y ._m. ,.

 . . . . ..~..-.~,.~-_.- ~ _- - -.--                    -

A NRC C:ntr;ct N2. NRC-03-79-118 l 000l} Fr:nklin R: search Ctntr FRC Proj:ct N r. CS257 PagJ A DMsen of The Frankhn Insttute FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa. 19103 (215)448 1000 FRC Task No. 48'E/488 l ECUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW CF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. IS EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION: NRC REQUIREMENTg X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence'of Qualification Adequate N Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately X Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) M Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulatica Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Tast Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NURIG-0528, Cat. I) DESIGNATION: NRC QUALIFICATION CATECORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established X II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available See ~ev h Nioe cs, Py 5 1i. O p ,a. + - - n -

                     'i
                                   -                  . - _ .. . - . n                           u ~-.         . a .x.   - . . . < -         --.w.c   w      . .. ~ -

L 4~ NRC C ntt:ct No. NRC-03-79-118 P ga

                    '3               Ob0 Frank!in Research Csnter                                      FRC Project No. C5257 c-                 A Demon of The Frank!m Institure                           FRC Assignment No.13                          30 48N4M 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa. 19103 (215) 448-l @      FRC Task No.

{ } EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _l,5. 3 LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER 4ej r t '3 c d 5 Limitorque has 1:fer=ed us that a generic report vill te available vtich ide:tifies the ac=-cetalli: =aterials used withis their

                                                             .v4V's as? =cra d'~~'y ;:=svides bases for correlatic to existi:4
             '-. . ,                                         qualifi:stics test reports. *4e v11.1 receive ce;ies of this re;en vae: issued asi antici; ate resclu.i:= cf the cutstariing item.s
  • A* f by, the end of this yes.r. .
         *)?,

L

                - .q
                 ,           a O

1 ') 6

        ' f.a 1
            ...1
      .,$     $S l
   ' ~l .ft;        i:
            .1)4
        *1       ..l'*

del i

    ~ sil:i%n    T ';

as g4 4. ,. r I s tw. Si, ,@h- .-

   .,.<g,-
   !      -s a

L.- 'n4

 -I                 6%" \
            , F.,9
             ' A t.]

4 J g.~.*' 7:.,, t [ I S'l ' ' .f f 2;$ 1 _ n* ]h I.Md ?i,A: I - Q&j i ,n.y l ', :'4' 1 l 8;3ff:, 5i

k. y 0

( ye l l '

                       .Ii i                           i s

l e q r

           %3 i ,

l '#.F 9 l

         -tv l     *n . f. -

1 ;r, ., k.11x i c

                                  -e==em=..-       -m      .. e w g.a.nech        _ ,,              .
                                                                                                                                   -  ,'PM--           -- --
   .- ~   .-.w          , - . - - . - .          - . - .-                                                                 -                     --

NRC Contract N;. N RC-03-79-118 l UObranklin R: search C:nter FRC Project N2. C5257 P .g3 A Cimon el The Franklin insature FRC Asaignment No.13 5f 20th and Race Streers. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1MO FRC Task No. 46N4PJ3 EQUlFMENT ENVIRCNMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _L5 i NOTES: "X" DENOTES APPROPRIATE NOTES X 1. rhe t1censee has not provided docu=entation from the manufacturer which establishes o .h h c.a. Won. [soES A,G) J 2. The Licensee has not identified the class of the insulation system used for the motor in the motorized valve actuator. X 3. The Licensee has not identified whether or not this motorized valve actuator incorporates a motor-brake assembly. X 4. The Licensee has not identified the class of the insulation system used for the motor-brake assembly (if applicable). X 5. The Licensee has not identified the motor manufacturer for this motorized valve actuator. K 6. The Licensee has not identified the manufacturer of the motor-brake assembly (if applicable). X 7. The Licensee has not identified the type of current used in the =otorized valve actuator. N 8. The Licensee has not identified the type of current used in the motor-brake assembly (if applicable). N 9. The Licensee has not established a qualified life estimate for this motori:ed valve actuator based on technically justifiable methods and conservative assumptions.

10. The Licensee has stated that the only harsh parameter that this motori:ed' valve actuator is exposed to is r'adiation.
11. Since radiation is stated to be the only harsh parameter and considering the extensive radiation testing of the motors used in this type of meterized valve actuator, the specified radiation dose of is considered to be of sufficiently low value as to not affect this equipment item. This equipment item is considered qualified for this parameter.
12. The Licensee has cc=mitted to replace this equipuent item.

The Licensee has stated the folleving: 1 O " w-wnw -e w%,e.un~ M, m m e==em = y __ _ , , _ , _, we- - - --

                                                                 ...-.e..            --   . - . . . .    . . , . .....              ,

AA NRC Ccntract No. N RC-03-79-118 I

                     ~

bhffFrinklin Research Centn FRC Project No. C5257 P:g2 A Dimsson of The Frankhn insnrute FRC Assignment No.13 5g 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. -48Y- /4BB

                ]

[ ) EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _15. A_/

   ,                           NOTES:

A- ^ 23 L C_ bf) /1 1 t-st $ h 423nr /_ A/

 .i             .i                       LiaX1                                          e           e            n ,, $ a 0h A e f b .

M as of a~ w % u a-MEdlnnd - fA - . Y b Y. lY k] 8s nb/a ), M l 4

                                           &-xd                           + m s-u, io - 'n ~:a
           's                              NabA                            oj9              6% & mL sh
       ?                                Jdfx --                                  J n jn~1t/ s sna>ar
   *I
TL:s Etlu mn La '7h Lhza/ sAs aa a w lA GJs oAditi-u.J && .

.t11

                                                                                          /                                                       '

L/. AA /1/MA) ( W hN }

                                      '1h am_                                            4 '7L                     se7l'aA L

%li Mu dc s As, L's 'J

)            -

_ w.

                                                                                                                                    ]
   .'L           ,
                .1 l.J lt       'j,

.,*i a-i m (

       .l                I l n.

4 1 l _ , y .1 , .. _ _ _ -.

        .       .        ..        w a .- .          .     ..         . - .. .- _ ,. _ n -                 u. m _ - - ~ - - -                 -

g__w NRC C;ntr:ct N 2. NRC-03-79-118

                    !((Enklin R:s=rch Canter                                         FRC Pr; ject No. C5257                           P:g J A Diwsion of Thi Frtnkhn Institute                           FRC Assignm:nt ND.13                               lc 20th and Race Sireets. Ph,!a . Pa 19101 (215,448-1M FRC Task No.          4U
                                                                                                                                            ^

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. Il# EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 16 MOTORIZED VALVE ACTUATOR LOCATED IN THE EAST PIPING PENETRATION ROOM (A316) LIMITORQUE MODEL SMB00 i REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 9 HOURS TER CHECKSHEET NO. 16 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 706, 662, 26 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): H2 PURGE ISOLATION 1MOV6903 (IMOV6903) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL:' SCEW(S) [1, 12): 260 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): H2 PURGE ISOLATION 1MOV6901 (IMOV6901) LICENSEE SUBMIT'"AL: SCEW(S) [1, 12): 258 a

   ]
  )

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

  ]

R, T, hh P, H, CS, S, (R), M, I, VM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: Contents Checksheet Pace No. Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, :b, L , :--d System Consideration Review %, 4L, 4-, 4d, -: , 4f-Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 5, 55, Ic,.If, 5: 1 Sf, Sg,Oh, ;;, 5; Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation fr i Equipment Summary Maintenance anc Replacement Senedule Sum. mary h,~b, 7r

     .n- . ; ,_ .- . _ _ ,. _ ,, y g              . _
                                                              .6       %.                 p y ,7 ; _ y.

m {CG'~ T"~

                                   ... ._.         . _ . . . - . _ . . -                - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - -                                ~-

NRC CIntrzct N::. NRC-03-79-118 4xbb Franklin Rtsearch Centxt FRC Proj;ct Nr. CS257 PCg? A De sion oi The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 2')th and Race Streets Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 448-!W lb FRC Task No. _48't /448 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _!.S2

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

                   .e
                  ,                      M Tne Licensee (has/:                         ) provided a response to the SER concerns.
  ,       'g,
                       ,                M The Licensee (2=s/has , not) specifically stated that the equipment is a

qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service :onditions. N The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

                  .C Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.
                    ..                             Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification

l l Equipment relocation above submergence level 1 Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source j.,'
 ~ ^                                                      Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment s a Qualification testing of equipment in progress

              .q                                          Other (                                                                                            )

h~ Tne Licensee has provided other information for this. equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim

          ;* -                                     operation.

L. 1 The Licensee (nas/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed f corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective

  ~, ,                                             action                                                                                           .)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. i3

         - 9 DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
   ~ *C                               - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY:                 (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) i .T ,j t
 ! '                                  I.a    Qualified                                                       II.c Qualified Life Deficiency W                       I.b    Modification                                                    III.a Exempt
 }.                                tir,a      3 m!..,
                                                             = 1 - ' - -        --
  • III.b Not in Scope II.b Not qualified IV Documentation Not Available r '
                            ./

C 1 6 1 y; 4 M M qwTh(-ergpN f p _ y _

                                                                                                                             --W 7
                                                                                                                                                 =v as   g T'*--,  ~. .'-,
                . . . _ ,    ;_..      _ _.___._~. - _ .                    ..-_e          - - _ < -   2  -_         m._.                c    --

4xUNU Franklin Resurch Csnter NRC Contrcct N 2. NRC-03-73-118 FRC Project Nr. C5257 P;pJ A DMson of The FrarAlin Institute FRC Assignrnent No.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 44810m FRC Task No. 48Y/48A EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. Ib i i EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION: NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence'of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established X Aging Cegradation Evaluated Adequately Y

        ,                    Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)                                          X Program Established to Identify Aging Degradaticn Criteria Regarding Aging Simul. tion Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature /Fressure Exposure: o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequate y o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequt..a Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied i Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied f

     ;                       Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied
     ;                       Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies
 '!                               (If Any) Satisfied
 .f                          Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied
 ;[                          Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied                                                        _

u Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisf ec Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) q t i

 'l

DESIGNATICN: NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Mcdification

.} II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established X II.b Equipment Not Qualified p }!'

II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life !- or Replacement Schedule Justified

       ,                      III.a        Equipment Exempt From Qualification

'/ III.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available i 1

                                                                                                     ?

9 e s4. L see ad ab cm

     )

D

            .-~        f.~ - q._              A ?7 _ . _ _ _        gy         j_,,_,,--_,

_ _ , q- p,.,g

                                                                         .~-...:.:.       ..                         - ___        .;_._-

6 NRC Contr ct N3. NRC-03-79-118 PigJ

           ,z                   Ull branklin Rzstsrch Centir                              FRC Project No. CS257 A Dnnsion of The Frankhn Inst:tute                    FRC Assignment No.13                            3a 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-IMO FRC Task No. 49? /4AR

{ } EQUlPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. E2

                 ,                                                       LICENSEE RESPOMSE TO NRC SER i
              ,.                                      5  Ti=1terque has inf:r:ed us ths; a ge:eric re; ort vill be available 3-                                        veich lientifies the ace-: eta.111: =aterials usei within their
CV's a:1 =cr* -- 'y ;.mvides bases f:: : rrein i:= to existing qualift:stice test reper s. '4e vd -aa='ve : ;ies of this re;c n
          , , - ,                                        vr.en issued asi a. ticipate reschties cf the outsta.iing i e:s
                .,                                       ty,the end cf this yesr.                       .
           .j .
     =i.

J

         ,5
          .X.
  ,    ,t/                g
           \               /

x ,,' , 's I u e J # d

  ;F-a k.

c., t 1

     . g r. I 6

t' _[" .- 1*

            }f T a
      '* l e C

t i .

     ..t,'.

i 1 '< l ., l a

    .m l _            %

1 \- 1' . l u

                                                                                                                         - p           -       -
                                                                                                                                                 ,-- -3

[ 7.--- , _ r-

7~.- - . - . . . .- . - . . . - . . - . . . - - - - - . _ _ w~.-. .

                                                                                                                                              ---m l

l 400NJ ranklin R2se;rch C ntr NRC Contract NJ. N RC-03-79-118 FRC Project Nr. C5257 Pago A Divmon cl The f rankhn Insnture 3 5f 20th and Rue Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-tmo FRC Assignrnent FRC Task No. 48 ? No.)468

                                                                                                          /

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. & NOTES: "X" DENOTES APPROPRIATE NOTES X 1. The ticensee has not provided docu=entation from the '

              ~

manufacturer which establishes similarity between the installed equipment and the test specimen in the referenced document (s). (t00T~e A) N 2. The-Licensee has not identified the class of the insulation system used for the motor in the motorized valve actuator. N 3. The Licensee has not identified whether or not this motorized valve actuator incorporates a motor-brake assembly. X 4. The Licensee has not identified the class of the insulation system used for the moter-brake asse=bly (if applicable) . N. 5. The Licensee has not identified the motor manufacturer for this motori=ed valve actuator. N 6. The Licensee has not identified the manufacturer of the motor-brake assembly (if applicable) . N 7. The Licensee has not identified the type of current used in j the motorized valve actuator. l I N 8. The Licensee has not identified the type of current used in the motor-brake assembly (if applicable) . X 9. The Licensee has not established a qualified life estimate for this motori=ed valve actuator based on technically justifiable methods and conservative assumptions.

10. The Licensee has stated that the only harsh parameter that this motorized valve actuator is exposed to is radiati'on.
11. Since radiation is stated to be the only harsh parameter and considering the extensive radiation testing of the motors used in this type of motori=ed valve actuator, the specified radiation drsse of is considered to be of sufficiently 1cw value as to not affect this equipment item. This equipment item is considered qualified for this parameter.
12. The Licensee has coc:mitted to replace this equipment item.

The Licensee has stated the follcwing: 1 4 1, I i G i !.

                                                                                                                       , ,4, _ _

y -- . - - ,

     ..-ww,_           , =wesse;-Wup+w .em,p
                                               ==* y 99evamme. .        ,-          Nmy M            p * ,     - , . -                   ,      -
                       -        . . , . . - - _ . ~ ~ . , - ~ . - - . - .          .~.                         _ --      _       _ . . _ . -.-
              '             6 7                                                         NRC Crntract N2. NRC-03-79-118 Paga
                   ,         U30J ranklin Research Cent:r                               FRC Project No. C5257 1          A ciws.on of The Frank:in insnrute                      FRC Assignment No.13                   5g 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 448-1 2 FRCTask No._4B'F /469

{ l EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. .L4a NOTES: n A.& kAA G4 A>LOJ7Dn & s Yksu l

                  .b                     wbl                              .

m-nJn2_u - . / lww % /

             ,                                  s      ). W A f./s'f           lA M / A    lU
           ~f                             A MMT                             71 Y&b Mad <                                     b SWd (see P9 3a)                                  v A i E$ A M nAsu n~C oAA                                             AsA ad               W e b l< M 43 A                             Aibhu % urb i b v                         n.)                             <w         nux' A

d I e s .;,; <

V, l

1 [ ls' i1

 ,          'J 5:

1 , , ' .%

    ,\d) 33 i (

l

         ';y co
 . c.

l d I ef i -

     ,  I'!?,.'

s 1

                                                                                #        r   .M                            '

ym -, ,

                                                                                                                     $ =
     . . - . .,    ,   --      .         .     . .         .,.       - . - ~ n . ~ -. ... . ~ .... -          umn                    -e gA                                                           NRC CIntrEct N;. NRC-03-79-118                             i
  ,               f!%nkhn Research Csntir                                     FRC Przject N ?. CS257                           P c')

A Dusion of Th2 Frrnklin institars FRC Assignm:;nt Nr.13 3.!th and Pace Struts. Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 44$10ix) 489 lc FRC Task No. EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. /7 EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 17 MOTORIZED VALVE ACTUATOR LOCATED IN THE EAST PENETRATION ROOM (A227) LIMITORQUE MODEL SMB00 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 HOUR TER CHECKSHEET NO. 17 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 706, 662, 26 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): CONTAINMENT ISOLATION (IMOV6579) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: ' SCEW(S) [1, 12]: 151 O d DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONTY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R, T, RT, P, H, s S, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: Contents Checksheet Pace No. l Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Surmary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, 0;, Od-System Consideration Review 4a, '. b , 1;, Id, 's , 4: Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 5a, Eb, Sc, :l, 3e r Sf, Sg, Sh, 51, Sj-Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 4e, CD - Equipment Summary Ma intenance ano Replacement senedule Summary _7 ?. 7b, 7; i l if _ . - _ _ _ _ _ -_. . _ _,-.,,.,,__-.--.,.. .,. . ._m. .

                                                                                                          ._,       ..              ..y l

4

            #                  QA                                                                 NRC C:ntr;ct N;. NRC-03-79-118 Pig 3
                               !b!! Frrnklin Resurch Centr                                        FRC Pr; ject N3. C5257 A D ..s.on of Thi Fr:nkhn Instituts                         FRC Assignm:nt Nr.13                    lb 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215)448 1000       FRC Task No. 48 } /498 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. I 7

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: X Tne Licensee (has/E _) provided a response to the SER concerns. N X The Licensee ft:c=/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will* function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions. L M The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

          ,                                   Justification for interim operation (has/nas not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.
{ Corrective action specified by the Licensee

hi Equipment replacement with qualified equipment

p. Equipment modification
        .{               [                          Equipment celocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source
                   ,                                verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment 4 Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( i ,-O ) 1 The Licensee has provi,ded other information for this equipment item 1 that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. 4 ' ; l' The Licensee (nas/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for acccmplishing the corrective m action .) 0

        ' [.}                       The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should ce exempted from environmental qualification.

1-DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC GUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

h - CIRCLED ITEM ONLYr (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency Ib Modification III.a Exempt

,       ;,                 I ti.a qualificatien Not Esraelisnedl                                  III.b Not in Scope l                   II.b Not Qualified                                                   IV      Documentation Not Available l

ed

  ,                  = -    g-  e  ,g.w,ng m gem y- .***   em       * * ' T OM             -   --
                                                                                                         #[ ' '               y
        ~ . .:_ m _ _ , .          . _ . _ .          . .        . _ _ _ _ _ _ _   ~ . . _ _ . _ _ -                     - _ wu. _,

4 NRC C:ntr"ct N 2. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project N2.CS257 Pag 3 0000 Frinklin R:surch Csnt:r A DMsion of The Frankhn Insttrute 3 2 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 443 1000 FRC Assignment FRCTask No. 4BN No.)4EA EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENT L QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. I7-EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FOPJ4 DESIGNATION: j NRC REQUIRE *4ENTS X = DEFICIENCY j Documented Evidenceiof Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established % Aging Degradat:.on Evaluated Adequately X f

   ;          Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)                                             X l          Program Estab .ished to Identify Aging Degradation l

Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Sdtisfied (If Required)

   ~

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate , o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Pagarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied L" Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied

l. Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION: [ NRC CUALIFICATICN CATEGORY X = CATEGORY l i I.a Equipment Qualified ! I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification

  ;             II.a           Equipment Qualification Not Established                                                     X l                II.D           Equipment Not Qualified II.c           Equipment Satisfies All Require.nents Except. Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a          Equipment Exetapt From Qualification III.D          Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review                                        _

j IV Gocumentaticn Not Fade Available (I 1 l See. E vcJ wm>,o o c he,s 64. e

c
                    - - _                                            _ =                             _. _ ,7
                                                                                                                                                                        - ~ ~

8 1, ( 400 branklin Resnrch Csnttr NRC Csntract N2. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 P._9 9 A o~,ston ci The Frank!in Institute FRCTask Assignment 30 No. 4 0 No.13[488 7-mh .nd Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103(21 9 448 1000 FRC { EQUlFMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW Or: EQUlFMENT ITEM NO.17 LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SCR 1 _ ' ij 3' *iaitCT14e ha5 infer *d 'a tha* a Eep"m *-r

                                                                =
                                                                                                                          **    .0-..,,,           ava~# ' ah'
                                                                                                                                                            ** e w .i, ' da ' ** e s w-<  -- - ----.       *.*.e n==- e: g;;g '. st a. 4 Cs...s
                                                                                       .                               ..            e e.4.v .w gget.

4--_w'* q M07's and =cre di-'a.' -, 4 4 s CO W ati:: *o existing qCficati:= tesh h '

  • 9 , j

3

l. f i * #*ECP" t' vhe: issued and antici ate "esa"...c c. . e cu:3 geging g.,=3 by,theendof$3137,,j, s

e.

              ':.p
                  .,p I

s I' e'*e

        .*g
  • e ,

... ;,h, <. l ., . J % 04, l '., # d

                  . .L. ,

t . I

  • I .;*w, *
     <'. kQa         t-J'. a v ,
     ' >*5 N.e .

y nw 'I } ' *. l

                 .s
 ' p:p;

',I :: J 1 .vj i*s < s + . v 'a s Y -,; . ' ,;

    % k                     1
        ?

4 d' d % 1 i- y

                    .k
              ... Lf "%
                ./.                4
                                    )

),\s 1 . k .' ~ _,

                          -+7 y ww++ p.am. - -           _        _

7,_ , _ _

                                                                                                                                                                                    .g  T.
        =...2n....                      .~.         ..        - :_....-.           . w= a   .-w..u       .w c.c ~ ~   w u ~ .   .- u _._w 4                                                                   NRC Contract Nr. NRC-03-79-118 Pag 3 ldJI Franklin Research Center                                      FRC Project No. C5257 A oweos The Franan insnrute                                  FRC Assignment No.1p                      5f 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000       FRC Task No. 487/463                  i i

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. IT - s .. NOTES: "5t"DENOTESAPPROPRIATENOTES N 1. The Licensee has not provided documentation from the manufacturer which establishes similarity between the inst'lled a equipment and the test specimen in the referenced document (s). ( See, gdhe A) X 2 .' The Licensee has not identified the class of the insulation system used for the motor in the motorized valve actuator. K 3. The Licensee has not identified whether or not this motorized valve actuator incorporates a motor-brake assembly. X 4. The Licenaee has not identified the class of the insulstion system used for the motor-brake assembly (if applicable) . X 5. The Licensee has not identified the motor manufacturer for this motorized valve actuator. X 6. The Licensee has not identified the manufacturer of the motor-brake assembly (if applicable) .

  ~

X 7. The Li:ensee has not identified the type of current used in j the motorized valve actuator. N 8. The Licensee has not identified the type of current used in the motor-brake asse=bly (if applicable) . X 9. The Licensee has not established a qualified life estimate

                                      .        for this motorized valve actuator based on technically justifiable methods and conservative assu=ptions.
10. The Licensee has stated that the only harsh parameter that this motorized valve actuator is~ exposed to is radiation.
11. Since radiation is stated to be the only harsh parameter and considering the extensive radiation testing of the motors used in this type of motorized valve actuator, the specified radiation dose of is considered to be of sufficiently low value as to not affect this equipment item. This equipment item is considered qualified for this j parameter.

_ _ 12. The Licensee has ce=mitted to replace this equipment ites. The Licensee has stated the following.- O 1 i

 )w 4,.,. a ~ , a=. . -                  - - . m .n + + ;,..m                      a.,
                                                                                 ~
                                                                                             ..-pnny,;nm - wusv2== , W.pg       '
                                                                                                                                           ... gg
                                                                                                                                                ~-

A NRC C:ntrc.ct N c. N RC-03-79-118 d$nklin Resarrch Centir FRC Pr: Ject N3. CS257 P:g] d A Dmsion of The Franan Inst:tute 5g 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 449 1000 FRC Assignment FRC Task No. 48} No.13[490-l EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUI'PMENT ITEM NO. IT NOTES:

     ~

A. % dL,m hs sh mmAm Nj wbl A s, M

       . .                                    heont
                                                                    %         y ~/L Z~um
                                                                                                 ~~zJA
                                                                                                                      ,.                      u A AAA.4 f'                    . 2        ob s w ujb                       A AAA                   k SE(2            fs<-e 09. . ?<t                                 am]) 21,2/h2 Ynsd nAw, n                            N;LM                                Lu J                         k A u;,b                      -

6 4. A M JAA

               ,,                                                                                            m -.
                                                                                  - ji         t I

3, s

            ..s
           ?$,

15'.

 .' . O
 - Ef-m j $1
             ?'

k.4 I w if e t!. , h i i 4 *.,

p r
 ,           s.
 ; a j .

y N pa we $ Q_ Sg e.e m_ ~ '. Y

  • 4
  • H ? 1 '

o ,

                                                                                                                                                               -j-T'
       . - . _ - . - _ _ ~ - -                                          .

g_n__ NRC Contr:ct NO. NRC-03-79-118 LUd Franklin Resurch C:nter FRC Pr! Ject Ns. C5257 P__ ga, A Dmsion of Th3 Fr nklin insuuo FRC Assignm';nt N2.13 lc 20ih and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103(215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4i7

                                                                                                                                        ^

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. I f EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 18 MOTORIZED VALVE ACTUATOR LOCATED IN THE EAST PIPING PENETRATION ROOM (A316) LIMITORQUE MODEL SM300 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 HOUR TER CHECKSHEET NO. 18 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 662 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): INSTRUMENT AIR CONTAINMENT ISOLATION (IMOV2080) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL:' SCEW(S) [1, 12}: 13 DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R, T, QT, RT, P,hCS,hS, (R), M, I, VM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not' applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: ,. Contents Checksheet Page No. l Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 2b, :;, 3d - System Consideration Review -4 , -I b , I, if, M -i f _ l Equipment Environmental Qualification Review -5a, b, Ic, 53, Ec, Sf, 59, ES, ;i, 5j-Installed TMI Lessens Learned Implementaticn is, Ob Equipment Summary Ma intenance ano Replacement Senedule Summary "' a , 7a, 7 ; -- 1 I c.. . .c: 2,. _ , _ _ . _ . , m mm,.,. w ;;.--r m,4

NRC Crntract Nr. NRC-03-79-118 4,00 1 Frrnkhn R:surch Cint:r FRC Pr; ject N;. CS257 . P g; A Dr. mon of N Fenkhn Iristitue FRC Assignrnent No.1 Ib 24th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 443 1000 FRC Task No. 48? 439 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.18 StM24ARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: w X Tne Licensee (has/' - ^) provided a response to the SER concerns.

   ~~

X The Licensee (t:sr/has ,not) specifically stated that the equipment is

                   !          qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental servi'ce conditions.
              /
                           The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualif. cation deficiencies.

The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item wnose qualification has not been fully established.

            ,a Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

W- Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

       . ; {,.
         ;y                                Equipment replacement with qualified equipment
 '~

Equipment modification j l Equipment relocation above submergence level }y Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source

         ,g,                               verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Q "' Equipment relocation to a mild environment j '. U Qualification testing of equipment in progress

 ',t..E
  • Other ( )
     .g
      !No                            The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item
 ,d'                                 that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim h%                                  operation.

q j The Licensee (nas/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed [y f corrective action. action (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective

                                                                                                                      .)

Q.i ;

b. .he Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification
 'Y and/or should ce exempted from environmental qualification.

].Og DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

                ~
                        - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY:                  (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) 9.-

f ': '

 +

I.a I.b Qualified Modification II.c Qualified Life Deficiency III.a Exe pt l,f L II.a Qualification Not Establisned} III.b Not in Scope i II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Nc Available 31 I l' L a e- ,

   ,          . .r-m- r-/ tap.;,v :.vw.w ?*pany ~. F'.~s(%7WWWS.ppp M C.W 9W*'.W;%{j ;h -                           7E^<J        Nr   ,;M

A NRC Contract Nr. NRC-03-79-118 ! UllNr:.nklin R:se:rch C:nter FRC Project N r. C5257 P:0J A DMuon of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13 2 - 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-10m FRC Task No. 487/488 I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. /? EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION: NRC REQUIREMENTS X = OEFICIENCY Documented Evidence'of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established X Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately X Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) X Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied . Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied . Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins 3atisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) DESIGNATION: NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established Y II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available See E mlucS on on 9qe 5-9. O

            =__m _                                                                            __ sm=
                                     ~

NRC C;ntr:ct N O. NRC-03-79-118 F

                       ~'

Ud"~ Franklin Research Center FRC Pr;j;ct Nr. CS257 P-Q9 A owiston of The Franun Insntura FRC Assignment No.13 3o d 20th and Race Streets. P5da . Pa 19103 (215) 448 two FRC Task No. 487 / MR l'

                     \yli EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.18 LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER
                         'I                      5    L1:1 torque has ist:r:ed us that a Ee:eric report vill be available 1

which identifies the non-=etalli: =aterials used withis their

                     -     4
                                                      .~. s and =cre direc*17 pm-tides bases f r correlatics to existing qual- icatics tes report s. We viZ receive copies of -his re;cr-ve      .ssued a:d a:*icipate resciuti = cf the cuts:s.:di:g it.m
             <                                        b7. the e d of this year.                                          .

a l l t e

           ~ *h,
!.y.. -
                  )

b

        , :y"::

,4* -V. We , 't M[

   ' . g#     - .

, , ' M, , ,3 7

   ? %l

, 4 . 5#"

     ~ y,                                                                                                                                                                          l
           .g
  • l
l.
  • IL 1

1 f

        ,f %
      . e l
   'I                         k
        %4 I+,
- Q ._f '
     - a ,3 l '
                      ,+ = cwg.=n* ;::". . -r T,ip ,; p . , . .. . 'pr ,m*mv.

T c.7_ q -.g.3. g;, 2 g r,-. [

      .. .          a-  - . . - . - . . - - . .                   .  .x -        - - ~ =_.--                               -

NRC Contr ct Nr. NRC-03-79-118 4'dU Franklin Research Center FRC Project N::.C5257 Pag: A Dimon of The FrankLn Insetute FRC Assignment No.13 5f 20th and Race Strurs. PNa . Pa.1910h215) 448 ICM FRC Task No. 487d88 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. lO_ NOTES: "X" DENGTES APPROPRIATE NOTES X 1. The Licensea has not provided documentation from the manufacturer which establishes similarity between the installed equipment and the test specimen in the referenced

 ' ,i                                           document (s). (MOTE A)

N 2. The Licensee has not identified the class of the insulation system used for the motor in the motorized valve actuator. N 3. The Licensee has not identified whether or not this motorised valve actuator incorporates a motor-brake assembly. X 4. The Licensee has not identified the class of the insulation system used for the motor-brake assembly (if applicable). i I X 5. The Licensee has not identified the motor manufacturer for this motorized valve actuator. X 6. The Licensee has not identified the manufacturer of the h motor-brake assembly (if applicable). X 7. The Licensee has not identified the type of current used in T the motorized valve actuator. X 8. The T.icensee has not identified the type of current used in L the motor-brake asse=bly (if applicable). h 9. The Licensee has not established a qualified life estim:ce for this motorized valve actuator based on technically justifiable =ethods and conservative assumptions.

  )                               10.           The Licensee has stated that the only harsh para =eter that this motorized valve actuator is exposed to is radiation.
11. Since radiation is stated to be the only harsh parameter and considering the extensive radiation testing of the motors used in this type of motorized valve actuator, the specified l radiation dose of is considered to be of sufficiently low value as to not affect this equipment item. This equipment ite= is considered qualified for this
l parameter.

lI 12. The Licensee has co=mitted to replace this equip =ent item. The Licensee has stated the folleving: b

  }

j O l l l 'i k <.a...;. ..- T '":. . - , , . .-z...._ _ , g

                                                                                              - _ , _        - + y_ m _ 3 . ,_ _
                               . .             ..----.......,..-a.~-_n-                                                      ~ .--._. u       -.a..-.
        . 4. . . -
                                   ~                                                          NRC Crntrce: NO. NRC-03-79-118 000L Frcnk!!n Res: arch Center                                   FRC Pr;j'.ct N a. C5257                   Pag 2 A Divis on of The Franklin Insnture                      FRC Assignment No.13                       5g 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa. 19103 (215) 44810m    FRC Task No.      49% /M3

( ~ J EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. A NOTES: A 6 W1As% - M_A_. \- wdt %L n,,AAir ,. .

                                                                                                                    /n'in, 'n ,o J/WbW / )                 l4) bs -         bl W / M )           $
           'z                             nuukr.                      %              dmus swm> "4 YL                /
Sell (see ,so. . u 9a- -) om k/ n M A % d YNJ.AY DM A / .-*'7 A M M fx1 -

i a/$ /id b D se h ! nM NA

           -                                vjW                Awd
i

, .. / ' y [, L t :, y.. n

           ,L' j .. ,i .'

3 .* , , d e;" s. gv

          ,"         e

(

    ,i$
  . ji f+

)..

e. ,
        -l. , ;
      -l                 I 4       g q e7       ._    .
           . . .          .                    ..                . a . .:. . . . .      ._             .
                                                                                                                    ._ a.;n-      --         -

4.x NRC CIntract N . NRC-03-79-118 i,!!WJ5nkun Rssearch Centir FRC Pr:j:ct N2. CS257 P:03 A Dmsson of Th2 Frwkhn Inst, tuts FRC Assignment No.13 Ia 20th and Race 5:reets. P5da . Pa 19103 (215) 44$1000 FRC Task No. 4M EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.' M EQUIPMENT ITEM No. 19 MOTORIZED VALVE ACTUATOR LOCATED IN THE MAIN STEAM PIPING PENETRATION (A315) LIMITORQUE MODEL SMB2 4 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: NOT STATED i TER CHECKSHEET NO. 19 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 706 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): STEAM GENERATOR 12 FEEDWATER ISOLATION IMOV4517 (IMOV4517) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12]: 15 t I i i O DESIGNATICN FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) 1 R, T, h P, H, CS,hS, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated', Not applic'able LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: Contents Checksheet Page No. Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, 26, 30 System Consideration Review !;, 4L, 4c, 4w, 4e, 4: Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Sc, ;b,-Sc, 53, :., Sf, , 52, Sh, 5i, :j l i Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 5;, - a Equipment Summary Maintenance anc Replacement Senedule Summary 4, % , 77 i 4

  ,, , ...       ..--..%              . , - ,          .      , m    , r y - a, E. - , ) %    . ., . e  ,      . , . ,   __ ,-        _

r e y_

                                                                  - - ~ =                                               -=

r~---- -

                              /g                                                           NRC C:ntract N 3. NRC-03-79-118 d) Franklin Rsseweh Centre                                  FRC Pr$ct N3. C5257                      Pag 2 A Dr..sion of The Franan Inst:rute                     FRC Assignment No.13                      ib 1               Oh5 and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000  FRC Task No. 48Y Mb EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUlPMENT ITEM NO. l9

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: 4 X Tne Licensee (hasf- - - -) provided a response to the SER concerns.

  , ', ;'j, Y The Licensee (- /has ,not) specifically stated that the equipment is i.

qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions. [ The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment

              ,                    item whose qualification has not been fully established.

c Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Q3' Licensee for this equipment item. u 8 I,C;, Corrective action specified by the Licensee: 4. n W.?,a ,

             ?                                    Equipment replacement with qualified equipment
     =.

4 Equipment modification I Equipment relocation above submergence level l 1 i, Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) N Equipment relocation to a mild environment

 } 'j
 ,m                                               Qualification testing of equipment in progress
 ,   ' ;                                          Other (                                                                         )
     .+
 - I                                                                                               ~

Tne Licensee has provided other .information for this equipment' item

             ?                            that can be ^onstrued as a basis for justification for interim

[ operation.

 ." Y f]{                                      The Licensee (nas/has not) provided a schedule for the propcsed p;                                         corrective action.                (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective tj_ , ,                                  action                                                                               .)
$; .;q f,.4                                ihe Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification
 ..t p ,p
     .       i                    and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

h,5

        .-+;                 DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
        ?                  - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
  . ;Y.  ,.
 ,                           I.a Qualified                                                 II.c Qualified Life Deficiency il1                         I.b Modification                                              III.a Exempt C ."'-                    I li.a eu,! t ' t c,ri na Nn* En*3clished)                       III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified                                            IV    Documentation Not Available 1

I i / (hx 3

  ,'                    t l'                .1 Q 4 yg. +== r m = y yey w w - ~ - -
                    ,c..
                                                                                                                           . - .        .~ --
    .                                                   ,..            . .            - w      / . u.k.w ~ au-.
                                                     %                                           !? ',-                        l d'7                                          i NRC CIntr ct N3. NRC-03-79438 FRC Project No. CS257 ..                       Piga 00bJ tanklin Resea:ch Cen.er A Dus on of The Frankhn Insnture     ~.                                                                  2 2cth and Race Streets. PMa.. Ps. 19103 (215) 448 saco    FRC FRC Task Assignment N o. . 48$ No.13(4N'I-EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT lY3M NC. R                                                        l l

l

                                                      ~N                          ,

7 EQUIPMENT Etr/IRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SUM'4ARY FORM , r . DESIGhT!ON: NRC REQUIRE *4EN"'S X = DEFICIENCY, Dor.umentedEvidence*ofCualificationAdequatb - Adequate Similarity Between Equipmer.t and Test Specimen Established X ' Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Y* , Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) k j~ Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation .' l Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If RequiMd) s Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: , o Peak Temperature Adequate , o Peak Pressure 1.dequate o Duration Adeq': ate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied N _ Criteria Regarding Submergend Satisfied ~ Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequance Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied

  • Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DldIGNATION: NRC CUALIFICATION CATEOGRF X_s CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualifidd I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification __ II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established K_ II.b Equipmeitt Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exe.npt From Qualification III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available a S ee E vchb e e on bE b 9-4 O l 1- _ . .. - _ .

                                                                                                                 . . ~ . . . - - -         . _ _ .. .       . _ _

NRC C::ntrcct NO. NRC-03-79-118 ljb ihrtn! din Ris::rch Center FRC Prrject N;. C3257 Page

                                         - A Divmon of The Frankhn insneure                              FRC Assignment No.13                            3a 20th and Race Streets. Phila , Pa 19103 (215) 448 10 @

FRC Task No. 42>Y /4@ { } EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. l 1 s LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER C

          .;                                          5. Tir.itorque has ist:r=ed us that a se: erie report vill te available vtich 11entifies the o:-metallic :sterials used withis their lc,7's and mort direct 1Y 7:":vides bases f:r correlati :*. to existi 4 qualificati:: test reports. Ve vill re:eive ce;ies of this re;c whe: is sued. ami a:Si:1; ate resciutics of the cutstandi:4 ite:s A

ty, the end of this year.

  • P o- ,
 *)

l..* 14 Rb a s.

   $ [k<              .

l. 4

.{        *.

S

 +

1 u , j' ) . 4

                .S et l

l., 1 l j %A'i 9 3 4 V l r . .i l' % 1 ,,Y ( ' s . ;, a g .1 g '% 2

                \N 4 .

1

 ,     .m KJ p"e h'M GK;TFe'                                P'.M *   ** - ~i~" "                

_ .. .. - - . _ . . . . _ _ . _ . ~ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ . _ _ _ _ _ . . _ . . _ _ _ , _ _ - ._ _- 4 NRC Contract N;. NRC-03-79-118 000) Frank!!n Research Center I FRC Project No. C5257 P ce A Divmon of The Frankhn Insnture FRC Assignment No.33 5f

'Crn and Race Streets. PMa.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 Icco FRC Task No. 437 / 4A A EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. N NOTES: "X" DENOTES APPROPRIATE NOTES i

X 1. The Licensee has not provided documentation from the manufacturer which establishes similarity between the installed equipment and the test specimen in the referenced document (s). X 2. The Licensee has not identified the class of the insulation system used for the motor in the motorized valve actuator. E 3. The Licensee has not identified whether or not this motorized valve actuator incorporates a motor-brake assembly. X 4. The Licensee has not identified the class of the insulation system used for the motor-brake assembly (if applicable) . X s. The ticensee has not iaentifiea che =ocor manufacturer for this motorized valve actuator. M 6. The Licensee has not identified the manufacturer of the motor-brake assembly (if applicable) . M

   ~ ~
7. The Licensee has not identified the type of current used in the motorized valve actuator.
8. The Licensee has not identified the type of current used in the motor-brake assembly (if applicable).

_.' N 9. The Licensee has not establishad a qualified life estimate for this motorized valve actuator based on technically justifiable methods and conservative assu=ptions. l'O. The Licansee has stated that the only harsh parameter that this motorized valve actuator is exposed to'is radiation.

11. Since radiatien is stated to be the only harsh parameter and considering the extensive radiation testing of the motors used in this type of motorized valve actuator, the specified radiation dose of is considered to be of sufficiently law value as to not affect this equipment item. This equipment item is considered qualified for this parameter.
12. The Licensee has co=mitted to replace this equipment item.

The Licensee has stated the following: 1 O

                            --                                                  _ = -                                                -     -

a [ # NRC C:ntrzet Na. NRC-03-79-118

            ~

2 nk!in Res: arch Centu FRC Project No. C5257 P:gJ A Dvsion of The Franun inst:tute FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 1910H215) 441Itxx) FRC Task No. 477

           .q h EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ! TEM NO.2 P

EQUIPMENT I. N NO. 20 MOTORIZED VAL X ACTUATOR LOCATED IN THE MAIN STEAM PIPING PENETRATION (.4315) LIMITORQUE MOD. .SMB2

           '(

REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 8 HOURS

    - ~                    TER CHECKSHEET No. 20 1/N                    LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 706 1     FUNCTION (PLANT ID): STEAM GENERATOR 11 FEEDWATER ISOLATION 1MOV4516 (IMOV4516) 3 LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12):                       14 t.
              .y cuc
       %.             u
         ; 7..-
           -p x., '

bbk nQ ( i,0 , . . . ,l l 5

   /.< ;$1
 'v.y
      *~'                     DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIEC BY HE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

l? . (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R, T, h P, H, CS, S, (R), M, I , VM , RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None,

         ; ,, c l ;']                 Not stated, Not applicable

\ ;-' Q J.)- LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: 3.. 'k Contents Checksheet Pace No. I , . .: m

   'g ..' N I * ;2                         Equipment Item                                                                la
  - ,X N.Q                            Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER                                  lb q ~p -
 -- /q.                       Equipment Environmental Qualificatica Summary Fcrms                           2
             ^g .
       *k                     Licensee Response to NRC SER                                                  3a,-5b, -        ,  L System Consideration Review                                                    12,  *b,
                                                                                                                  .     *0,
                                                                                                                         .       4,  4w,   4f s
      '7. '                   Equipment Environmental qualification Review                                  50, 5 b ,- 5 :, 52, 5:, 5f,
 . .,Q["                                                                                                    :g, 55, Ei, 5j
     . .-q Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation                                  50, 5b

{, Equipment Summary c l n ' Maintenance anc Replacement Senedule Summary 's, 'b, : Egjj m a

        . - .?
         ,. 4., p 3. ,::; .r .-            -    w--x sw-- -       , ,, - . cm,y -m:- p           t=;w, : ,;...wy .g, - ,

ass ., qas 4~~ .=p3;; - - -

                                                                                                                           . . _ .       ..           .  . _       ., u.w w Qx b b)ranklin Research Centir NRC C ntr ct NO. NRC-03-79-118 Pag]

FRC Pr: Ject N2. CS257 A C . s,on of Tha Frrnkhn Institut2 FRC Assignm;nt Nr.:.13 lb 20th and Race Senets. Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 4M /4FA EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2.0

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: M Tne Licensee (has/E-) provided a response to the SER concerns. X The Licensee iWhas not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/of will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environc. ental service conditions.

                                                                                                                                       ~

Y The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. The Licensee (has/has 'not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item. Corrective action specified by the Licensee: Equipment replacement with qualified equipment } Equipment modification Eqaipment relocation above submergence level g) .lelocate or shield equipment frem radiation source j verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( ) The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed' as a basis for justification for interim operation. The Licensee (nas/nas not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .) The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. OR9TGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC OUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

                               - CIRCLED ITEM CNLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Eeficiency I.b Modification III.a Exempt 1 11.a cualifia tion Not Establishedl III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Net Available O j m e- - - - , , , , - . . . . m., , .en w . m. . . m 4 . . . . . . . . p.h . ....,o m .nr N __ , ,,

l P A NRC C:ntract No. NRC-03-79-118

            '                                                                                                                                                    P g2 00bhifnklin Rrsearch Centtr                               FRC PrJject NO. CS257 A Dms.on of The Frankhn!nstaute                      FRC Assignment No.13                                                       2
                      ,             20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa. 19103 (215) 4481mo FRC Task No.                 487/48A
            .I             l EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIE'N OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 7_O J
                    ,                               EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION 

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION: NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY

a. ,
                    '                                                   4 Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established                                                           X Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately                                                                                        X Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)                                                             X Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria hegarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: o Peak Temperature Adequate

                 ;                  o Peak Pressure Adequate
                -C                  o Durat' ion Adequate e, LE         .

o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate 7; Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied

   . .                        Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied                                                                                            ,
              '1 Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied d              l    Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies m                (If Any) Satisfied t

Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied

  • Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied
   , f                        Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied

'i. ,;' .[ Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

   !N 6                                                                                                                                  DESIGNATION:
       ' w4 ]P:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I' I.a Equipment Qualified

                ;              I.b         Equipment        Qualification Pending Modification 3.'                             II.a        Equipment        Qualification Not Established                                                                  k' N. .                         II.b        Equipment        Not Qualified
          'i                   II.c        Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Lite id                                          or Replacement Schedule Justified W                         III.a       Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.o       Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review

[f IV Documentation Not Made Available

       ,1 3                                                   See E vcJucdon on                                     %e 5f                          .

a i sy' i i

r. , ,, ,

l l A_ NRC C:ntrIct No. NRC-03-79-118 Paga 0009rsnk!in Ressarch Cantir FRC ProJ:ct No. C3257 A Owis.on el The Frankun Institute FRC Assignment No.17 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 4481c00 FRC Task No. 464/46R EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.1O 1 LICENSEE RESPONSE ':0 NRC SER 5 Li=itorque tu i=fer=ed us that a generi report vill te anizadie which identifies the ccr.-cetallic =aterials used within their

                                          .W/'s and =cre dire:tly ;revides tases f:r correlati:: to existi:4 qualificatics test re;cris.             'Je vill receive ec;1es of this re;e-when issued art ar.tici; ate resolu-ics of tt: 2: standing ite=s by, the end of this yes.r.                               .

1 i 4 (1 s 4 i _i lf i F I I4 I .ei _ . - _ , - - fwg . .>.,....,-n . .

                                               ,.,.e,,-,       - w n m-
                                                                                   -,-.~--,--.~~--~~~~r~~~~-~~~-~~v,,

m . , ,,

6000)hranklin Research Center N RC Contract NO. N RC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page

                  ,,               A Divmon of The Frankim Insotute                       FRC Asaignrnent No.17                             Sf 20th and Race Streets. PN!a . Pa 19103 (215) 448 moo   FRCTask No. 487 /48A EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF FQUIPMENT ITEM NO.19 NOTES:                                     "X"    DENOTES APPROPRIATE NOTES
1. The Licensee has not provided documentation from the manufacturer which establishes similarity between the installed equipment and the test specimen in the referenced document (s).
            ,l                              2. The Licensee has not identified the class cf the insulation system used for the motor in the motorized valve actuator.

N 3. The Licensee has not identified whether or not this =otorized valve actuator incorporates a motor-brake assembly. N 4. The Licensee has not identified the class of the insulation 3 system used for the motor-brake assembly (if applicable) .

     ; :[                          N        5. The Licensee has not identified the motor =anufacturer fer this motorized valve actuator.

I.;:.a."

          .l'l,;.                  N        6. The Licensee has not identified the manufacturer of the
 , -J4:
    ,                                             motor-brake assembly (if applicable) .
 ;e                                v

.-[ ,f , A, 7. The Licensee has not identified the type of current used in the moterized valve' actuator. N: , N 8. The Licensee has not identified the type of current used in 1.J.: the motor-brake assembly (if applicable). v . si u A 9. The Licensee has not established a qualified life estimate C:j[ for this motorized valve actuator based on technically

   .,       g                                     justifiable methods and conservative assu=ptions.

l' 10. The Licensee has stated that the only harsh parameter

 ;                                                that this motorized valve actuator is exposed to is radiation.

4

         %                                11. Since radiation is stated to be the culy harsh parameter and
 '%                                               considering the extensive radiation testing of the moters

('$ used in this type of motorized valve actuator, the specified

  . . js                                          radiation dose of                               is considered to be of

-!'W sufficiently 1cv value as to not affect this equipment 3 item. This equipment item is considered qualified for this

, parameter.

( j 12. The Licensee has cecmitted to replace this equipment item.

        .n                                        The Licensee has stated the folicwing:

Q t b. v t 3,

           .t. . g f,O I                   4 i
 +, = -                 w e s = w n_ n       __-.           _,_                         .             , , _ , , . . _ _, ,               _
             #p1 Franklin Rssearch Cent:r NRC C:ntr: ct No. NRC-03-79-118 PagJ.

FRC ProJ: t N3. C5257 A Dmsion of The FrankLn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 lc 2'un and Race Streets Phila . Pa 19101(215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. W '7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUlPMENT ITEM NO. .j - EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 21 MOTORIZED VALVE ACTUATOR LOCATED IN THE ECCS PUMP ROOM (A119) LIMITORQUE MODEL SMB1 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME? 1 HOUR TER CHECKSHEET NO. 21 g LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED

.J          FUNCTION (PLANT ID); MANUAL HPSI HEADER ISOLATION 1MOV656 (IMOV656)

I LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12]: 218 ' l. I s i i e DESIG1ATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R, T, RT, P, H, CS, S, (R), M, 1, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, tiot applicabl'e LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: Contents Checksheet Page No. Equipment Item la

 ,           Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER                                        lb Equipment Environmental Qualificatica Summary Forms                                 2
 ,           Licensee Response to NRC SER                                                        3a, :b, :, :d System Consideration Review                                                          la,      'b,       ::, '     42, 4f -
 'l                                                                                                                          ,

Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 5c, Ib, Sc, 55, 5, 5f, 8 , O'., 21, 0; Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation =: a , w. Equipment Summary I Maintenance anc Replacement Schedule Summary 7., 7;, 7c

    . _.             ==       ._ _ ..             . . . .        . ..                .= . _ . _ -                - .       _        . . . ~ -

A NRC CIntract NO. NRC-03-79-118 Ubranklin Rxse rch Centir FRC Pr: Ject N 2. CS257 Pag 3 A Dr.: son of The Frankhn institute FRC Assignment No.1p lb 29th and Race Streets. PN!a . Pa 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRCTask No. W /488 EQUlFMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2I

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: 4

             .             X Tne Licensee (has/L._ c.x) provided a response to the SER concerns.
          ~S               X The Licensee r/has ,not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

X The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. The Licensee (nas/nas not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

         ,,                             Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item, hq                                   Corrective action specified by the Licensee:
            +

,r l: Equipment replacement with qualified equipment

                                               -quipment mcdification i                                               Equipment relocation above submergence level j,                                              Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

A . Equipment relocation to a mild environment

        ,'                                     Qualification testing of equipment in progress g,;.                                   Other (                                                                                               )

Nd I' The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim

    ' ;, ,)                            operation.

1 t:

 ..                                     .he Licensee (nas/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed j'                                    corrective action.                 (Schedule for acccmplishing the corrective M} . I-                               action                                                                                                  .)
 " $i
           '~

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. r,t '[k DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW 'N., ikl - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) w'-%

               ;          I.a      Qualified                                                  II.c Qualified Life Deficiency
     ,9i                  I.b      Modification                                              III.a Exempt
   -T                  III.a Oualification Not Estaclisnec[                                  III.b Not in Scope j     ,

II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available l I I __ v . m.wr - m .

                 .                    =.                     . . .
                                                                                 .. . n:.         . . - - . . . . .   .---..--.a 1..                                                 o 4-h                                                                 NRC Contrret N O. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. CS257                                                                                  P :g2 000J ranklin Research Center A Deusen of The Franklin Insrirute                                                                                                                                         2 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000       FRC   Assignment FRCTask     No. 46f   No.1:)489)
                                                                                                                 /                                                                                       _

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2.1 _ EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FOR*4 DESIGNATION: NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documenteu Evidence *of Qualification Adequate X Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established

    ,               Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately                                                                                                               X Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)                                                                                       X Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation                                                                                                                                  f Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate t o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation , Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies { (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied

                  Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) 5 DESIGNATION:

NRC CUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified l! I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification

- II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established X li II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life
 -                               or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a       Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.D       Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV          Documentation Not Made Available See Evah+ ion                                         om       Pye. M O

i l lH 9..s w m p m m...,.. , m.n . -1 w. w .,.m w m m, l

O 6-lj0 Jhrenklin Research Cantrr NRC C ntrict N3. NRC-03 79-118 Paga FRC Pr: Ject N3. C5257 A DNesion of The Franklin !nsnture FRC 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 44810m FRC Assignment No.13[4T 8 Task No. 487 { l L EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. AL 1 l L LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER

             -d                                         5    L1=itorque has infer =ed us that a ge:eric re;crt vi n te avsilable which ide tifies the nen-metalli: _sterials used withis their MC7's asi =cre direc*:17 ;:"JYideS he.ses f0r COr elf.tiO: tC existing qualificatics test re;crts. '.'e vi.1.1 receive ce;tes cf this re;or.

vae: issued a.:1 antici;ata resolu-ics cf the cutsta:11:g iters by. the e d of this year. . s.< 4 *.*J '+ l r i .. [.a, I e.. C j' d >

                 # 1 l

l -. t'

% l
~

hG a I I.

             =

!6

  ,~,'j I , ~ .'

kt, (s 4

                  ~

j, 1 & h 4 .E ' I F s b

          ?

g 4 ~ s' *I 4

                                  -9 *8e            NM-                                        , -                ,,
                                                                                                                                  --7 b
                                                                                                            ~ ..... ~ _ . . - - -. -                                .   . _    ,

d' N RC Contract N 2. NRC-03-79-118 Page l b N)ranklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 A Divmon of The Franklin Inst:rute FRC Assignment No.13 5f ; 20th and Race Streers. PMa . Pa. 19103(215) 4 81c00 FRC Task No. 487/408 !_ EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2 l , NOTES: "X" DENOTES APPROPRIATE NOTES

   !                                          N         1. The Licensee has not provided documentation from the manufacturer which establishes                                               S n o r-    hs.s 4                                                            M l tcensee, yo4 ded %e,guo                                       li fico e,ngoc      enhb et A sq cAed on 'T%e c.o m po n e = t @ ee.4.

N 2. The Licensee has not identified the class of the insulation syste= used for the motor in the motorized valve actuator. N 3. The Licensee has not identified whether or not this motorized valve actuator incorporates a motor-brake assembly. [ 4. The Licensee has not identified the class of the insulation system used for the motor-brake assembly (if applicable). X 5. The Licensee has not identified the motor =anufacturer for this motorized valve actuator. f X 6. The Licensee has not identified the manufacturer of the motor-brake assembly (if applicable) . .f X. 7. The Licensee has not identified the type of current used in ([ the tiotorized valve actuator. I N 8. The Licensee has not identified the type of current used in

  ,                                                            the motor-brake assembly (if applicable).

I -

                      ;                      N          9. The Licensee has not established a qualified life estimate for this motorized valve actuator based on technically

~~ justifiable methods and conservative assumptions.

   ,                                                   10. The Licensee has stated that the only harsh parameter                                         .

that this motorized valve actuator is exposed to is radiation.

11. Since radiation is stated to be the only harsh parameter and considering the extensive radiation testing of the motors
j. used in this type of motorized valve actuator, the specified radiation dose of is considered to be of
}'s                                                            sufficiently low value as to not affect this equipment item. This equipment item is considered qualified for this parameter.
i 12. The Licensee has committed to replace this equipment item.

The Licensee has stated the following: 'l O ;

  's e= *P e'u'* * * *w f*a peg = 9 = 3 - **me      .      _p   ;           w
  • m- **
  • h=w ste-* = ww - e - *e =we .,

[=MM- ,

Ms NRC Contact N2. NRC-03-79-118 2!.Enklin Research Center FRC Prcject N3. C5257 Paga

k. A Dmsion of Tbs Frank!in Insntute FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 443 1000 FRC Task No. N7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 22 MOTORIZED VALVE ACTUATOR LOCATED IN CONTAINMENT RECIRCULATION PIPE TUNI;EL (A122)
    ' ),' .           LIMITORQUE MODEL SM32
#,. 7 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 9 HOURS
   .A                 TER CHECKSHEET NO. 22 m              LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 706                                            -

FUNCTION (PLANT ID): CONTAINMENT SUMP DISCHARGE (1MOV4145)

                    LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12}: 215 4

4 l

    .a :

P

       .g W

O'S H!

3l ,

e I;l l

 . :.1  '
          .'gl l ' .p;   .

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY: l[d (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

  ;40
               $       R, T,                    P,     B, CS,          S,    (R), M,   I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None,

'n .

  ]:]                   Not stated, Not applicable

' s<, .b M& LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS :

W /,)

M,.sC Contents Checksheet Pace No. c .~

 .y;f Equipment Item                                                                      la
  -f[

_ a Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb

;E
   'gs                 Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms                                 2
 ;;40 h6w Licensee Response to NRC SER                                                        3 a , -5 ': , 5c, 55-hy.                     System Consideration Review                                                         Mv ,        k,     *c, h, C A. w;;
 - fg. 'q              Equipment Environmental Qualification Review                                       .5 '   *b,   52, 5d, Sc, Sf,
            .y                                                                                             C~; , 5b, 5i, 5; p%             '

Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation A' 55 q _'d l Equipment Summary R. .,3 ~- Maintenance anc Replacement Senedule Summary '2, 'b, 2 gh.i

                                                               ,=..<~..   .

_,c.y, ~ . - - - - - ,-

                                                                  .:. :.        .      ~-     a .. . .-  .,          .-.._..--a NRC C:ntr:ct N r. NRC-03-79-118 4.-UNJ ranklin Rssstrch Centr                              FRC Prrject N3. C5257                          P ga A Da sen ciThiFrankhn Institure                                                                        lb 29th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 448-tmo  FRC FRC Assignment      No.1)488 Task No. 467/

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 22

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: 1 Tne Licensee (has/b- -1 provided a response to the SER concerns. X The Licensee (t::ms/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions. The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item. Corrective Action specified by the Licensee: Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiacion source verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( __ __ ) The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment . item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. The Licensee (nas/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .) The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON RE7IEW ] - CIRCLED ITEM CNLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

)                 I.a   Qualified                                              II.c Qualified Life Deficiency j                  I.b   Modification                                           III.a Exempt QI.a Qua11tication Not Fnt rlich                              III.b Nct in Scope II.b Not Qualified                                           IV       Documentation Not Avrilable 1

l 1

   -. .- .. . . ~    ws., . . , .w== . - s-v . .                                  = ..
                                                                                          ===w          . - -    - - + = = = = =  - -
            ..         &                                                                NRC C:ntr ct Nr. NRC-03-79-118 bOOJ Franklin Research Center                                                                                          P__g FRC Pr$ct NO. C5257
               ,             A Dnnsen of The Franklin Instuute                          FRC Assignment No.13                                     2 20th and Race Streers. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-10M      FRC Task No. 4B~f/4C8 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _?.l.

i

                -                             EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION 

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

              ,        NRC REQUIREMENTS                                                                                 X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qu'lification      a                   Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established                                                 X
         . , ,         Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately                                                                              X Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)                                                    X Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)
                ~

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: o Peak Temperature Adequate

        '*'                  o Peak Pressure Adequate 1               o Duration Adequate S r.                  o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately 1                o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied
.} Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied 6

j' Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied ,{

  • Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied
 !.                    Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies "t                     (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied

( {" ] Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied l .i Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I; e Q'

     '.                                                                                                                         DESIGNATION:

Y NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY

    .llG     ';
.d.                    I.a          Equipment Qualified yy                  I.b         Equipme.,t Qualification Pending Modification X

gy II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established y,,l II.b Equipment Not Qualified I 9: II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life ldi or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification [%j(j 4 III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review i.,s h IV Documentation Not Made Available

]f_k
 +,

I .}

 ;b  .

l m ,

                                         .            . . , .    .,a.        .    . . , . . . . . .

NRC Contr:ct N . NRC-03-79-118 00banklin Research Centr FRC Pr: ject NO. C5257 Pag 3 A Divisen of The Franklin Insnture FRC Assignment No.11 3a 2im and Race Streets. Phca.. Pa. 19103 (215) 443 1000 FRC Task No. 467/48I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. Z'2-LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER

5. '1=itorque has infor=ed us that a ge=eric re;crt vill be available l vtich iientifies the nec-metallic aterials used within their
                                     .v3/'s and more directly ;revides bases f:r correla-1:n to existing qualification test repcrts. *'e      . vill receive copies of this re;crt vae: israed ar.1 sati:1;ata resch.ics cf the cutstanding i e.:s by, the end of this year.                                         .

a O 1 l. l' 1 II l I l I

1 O

l: 1

                ,  1--4 ,_.-. , w ,z               _
                                                                 ;,        --. __              :- C Te---- -       .
                                                                                                                       -- m    - -

4dJ h NRC Contract N;. NRC-03-79-118 ranklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Pag] A Dimn of The Frankan Instrure FRC Assignment No.13 5f 7 2Crt ar d Re:e Sneets. Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 48Y/ 489

           )             I     EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 22-N
          .4         l
                  .4 NOTES:                                        "X"  DENOTES APPROPRIATE NOTES
           .d                         X         1. The Licensee has not provided documentation from the manufacturer which establishes similarity between.the.                   .

installed equipment and the test specimen in the referenced document (s). X 2 .' The Licensee has not identified the class of the insulation system used for the motor in the motorized valve actuator. X I 3. The Licensee has not identified whether or not this motorized valve actuator incorporates a motor-brake asse=bly. X 4. The Licensee has not identified the class of the insulation

       '  t -                                        system used for the motor-brake assembly (if applicable).

N X 5. The Licensee has not identified the motor manufacturer for this motorized valve actuator. 4 gy) X 6. The Licensee has not identified the manufacturer of the

    .y,                                               motor-brake assembly (if applicable) .

8e X 7. The Licensee has not identified the type of current used in the motorized valve actuator. 4 X 8. The Licensee has not identified the type of current used in i'yg the motor-brake assembly (if applicable).

        $jl                           X,        9. The Licensee has not established a qualified life estimate t                                                for this motori:ed valve actuator based on technically

{j,.j,4 t justifiable methods and conservative assumptions.

 .Q *f Dyj                                         10. The Licensee has stated that the only harsh parametar l
]q that this =ocorized valve actuator is exposed to is radiation.

, ny [g _

11. Since radiation is stated to be the only harsh paraneter and l '%

considering the extensive radiation testing of the motors f ;/f used in this type of motorized valve actuator, the specified ' 2.M. radiation dose of is considered to be of

 ;'iM                                                 sufficiently low value as to not affect this equipment I'}                                             item.       This equipment item is considered qualified for this

, ur: M parameter. ..- @ 12. The Licensee has committed to replace this equipment item. 4.T The Licensee has stated the following: bl hp::, ,w I-pp

    .va
   .iGf l_!g
      )                I s.
        .y I       ~r.      .
             ~
  ~
                           - _       _,              me                  _, _           _          .-w_        _ -. -         ,     - ~ -. --.
     .                                                       .      - - . =   -
2. .. .....a.. . . . . . . . . . -u NRC C :ntri.ct N3. NRC-03-79-118
        # g-b Franklin R as: arch Centzr                                FRC PrJject N 2. C5257                                     P:g3 A Dien of The Franun institute                            FRC Assignment No.13                                          lc 2Cth and Race Streers Phila . Pa 19101(215) 44010u0       FRC Task No.        4 ff'7                                                 .

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 23 EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 23 MOTORIZED VALVE ACTUATOR LOCATED IN THE EAST PENETRATION ROOM (A227) LIMITORQUE MODEL SM300 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 8 HOURS TER C11ECKSHEET No. 23 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 1064 FUNCTION (PLANT ID); HPSI TO LOOP 11A iMOV617 (IMOV617) LICENSEE SU3MITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12): 196 9

                                                                                                            ~

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R, T, P,H,CS,hS, (R), M, I, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: Contents Checksheet Page No. Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 L Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3;. , L , 3d-System Consideration Review '2 -! b , tc, '2, lu, 4f-(L Equipment Environmental Qualification Review -b, L, 2, 50, kr 5f, 59, G, Ji, % Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation -5 a , Ob-q Equipment Summary r Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary h , 7b, ' ' ' l a

6. ~7.,.-,-. .

6,,. ,- , ,--.7G ~.- e ,7 .,-- - -- - m , G b'4

_ . _ _ . _ ..a.._.. . _+: - . _ _ . .._....m.--~.

                        #g                                                                    NRC Crntrcet Nr. NRC-03-79-118 l       dJ Frink!!n Rnench Csntre                                            FRC Pr: Ject Nr. CS257                               PJg3 a                A Den of The Frankhn fast:rute FRC Task Assignment                                   lb
Uth and Race Streets Phi:a . Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC No. 48'i-No.13[489
               ~-I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 7_3

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

               ,             Tne Licensee (has/x =                        ) provided a response to the SER concerns.

Y The Licensee (L/nas ,not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will fur.etion when exposed to the applicable DBE vavironmental service conditions. s N The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action"for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for tnis equipment item. Corrective action specified by the Licensee: t '. U P Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification 3 Equipment relocation above submergence level E U. Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

   ./                                       Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress
      ,                                     Other (                                                                                              )

'f , The Licensee has provided other information for this equipmene item 1 ;;f that can be construed as a basis for. justification for interim &,, \ operation. l. The Licensee (nas/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for acccmplishing the corrective

A action
g. . .)

R r, The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. DESIGNATIOS OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

                      - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY:                     (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
<3 '

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency j I.b Modification _ III.a Exempt FII.a Qualification Not Established} ' III.b Not in Scope

         .j.m II.b Not Qualified                                                      IV          Documentation Not Available

(

  • k k

)

  *
  • W , N -p WW9* Wye 3 .. . Meis* ****N**=* vp wmMN e eWw MN g 4 *M _ .N'-

7

   - - - - .                                               - . .      .         .....:..      u.   .   . . a: . .. _          . - ~ .

As NRCC:1.ntrcet NO. NRC-03-79-118 00hnnklin Rtsearch Ccnter FRC Project Nr. C5257 Pag 3 A Dwmon of The Franklin Institure FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 l % 0 FRC Task No. 40'+ /46B EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 23 ECUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FOR'1 DESIGNATION: NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence'of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established X Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately X Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) X Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) DESIGNATION: NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established __ X II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available a 6C VA R (M On ye b . O e _ ~ _ . _ - , _ _ _ . ,

_ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _. ,. _ .~ . _w _ o

                                                                                                                                          . _ _ _ . . . . _ . ~   q   ,

1 l

                             ,      4                                                                 NRC C:ntr:ct N2. NRC-03-79-118 Page I

Ubu Franklin Rtsearch Csnter FRC Pr: Ject NO. C3257 ) A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13 3a l 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 448-10m FRC Task No. 487/488 ) l a { } EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. U ' 1 1, . l l' l p LICENSEE RESPOriSE TO NRC SER 't l 1, i V d 5 Li=itorque has info =ed us that a ge:eri' re;cri vill te available which ide:tifies the non-: eta.111e _ateriais used vitti: their MCV's a:1 =cre directly ;m rides bases for cor ela .10: to existi:4 qualificati:: test reports. Ve vill receive ec;ies of this re;cr: l vhen iss'.ed a.cd anti:1; ate res lutic: of the outstandi:g ite.:s

          -12                                                   by, the end of this yes.r.                        .
                          /

e4 q.,

              ,-    ,4
   }                     .d r

4 ., c v .) ,

   .                                                                                                                                  9

. .L' ' l . ' L.k l _fh O. E l ', - p S' ; .

    . - r:V E .

s h a'1 I!>t,.tev3 :s

y' ;:..
                 .,e
            .NJj s                 7

'9. 1 c ..'_ ,* J 1 . .; A; .: E1 w 4 { -r [.

  ,.-                 -a s

sI 4 L i. '- I % J -);

         - * .I '

_l I m:, w

              \-

3! .g,

              <g.
                    .' d m..,.                           , , ,          _ , _ we r                _               - ~ ee .y--    . ,               -- --      ' '            - -
                                                                    .     ..  . . . n.           .:    ,a    s;;;..:. .; -- -- a --

4d b)ranklin Research Center NRC Contract Nr. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No.C5257 P gJ A Dwson of The FranWin tr. secure 5f 20th and Race S reets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 4481c00 FRC Assignment FRC Task No. 487/ No.13,489 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 23 NOTES: "X" DENOTES APPROPRIATE NOTES N 1. The Licensee has not provided documentation from the manufacturer which establishes similarity between the instilled equipment and the test specimen in the referenced I document (s). (. MOTE A)

                        %         2 .' The Licensee has not identified the class of the insulation system used for the motor in the motorized valve actuator.

X 3. The Licensee has not identified whether or not this motorized valve actuator incorporates a motor-brake assembly. N 4. The Licensee has not identified the class of the insulation system used for the motor-brake assembly (if applicable) . X 5. The Licensee has not identified the motor manufacturer for this motorized valve actuator.

6. The Licensee has not identified the manufacturer of the motor-brake assembly (if applicable) .

I X 7. The Licensee has not identified the type of current used in the motorized valve actuator *.

8. The Licensee has not identified the type of current used in the motor-brake asse=bly (if applicable).

N 9. The Licensee has not established a qualified life estimate for this motorized valve actuator based on technically j justifiable methods and conservative assu=ptions.

10. The Licensee has stated that the only harsh para =eter ,
                                                        ~

that this motorized valve actuator is exposed to is radiation. ('

11. Since radiation is stated to be the only harsh parameter and considering the extensive radiation testing of the motors used in this type of motorized valve actuator, the specified L radiation dose of is considered to be of g sufficiently low value as to not affect this equipment item. This equipment item is considered qualified for this parameter.

O p 12. The Licensee has co=mitted to replace this equipment item. d The Licensee has stated the following:

!                                                                                                                           O 3

l 1 1 , _'__._,.g. - . _ . _ . _ . _ _ , . . . . , , . , _ , , _ ,. . l

                                                                                                                                                  ~

m 1

                /i "l

g NRC Cantr ct No. NRC-03-79-118 d Pag 3

                                    /)b Franklin Research Center W21                                                            FRC Project N2. C5257 4                         A Dmwn of The Frankhn Instaure                         FRC Assignment No.13                 5g 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 44810m    FRC Task No. 4G+/489; EQUIPMENi ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 23 ll l,                                    230TES :
                                             .                          /ACdA(                       0                       /,
                ;                                  aarl               L k s,s                      do M              K-n -so        d I                                                    to -to - s o ,.              'x}Aw             -

W LLl% i h.W 4. Au h s. A 2 /A.s E &, f

                                                                                                                ,A_

n N1 $&_ in sh N baX~ % i l^ MceAwk ul-a o Ast lef & AlaAuw A f ua Lt Ykos a d

          ?                                      Aw&                         -

4 J s - _wr i 9 ,,.a; . . . . 5' 1 ,, ~ .. .:fc . 1;':y l'M.

 , ~: ~~;
  ,n. .
 . 9. ., q .
      ,!f.y
          "'a 6 ,
s. '.l:h $

l D ' ' "; e 2:- ' } } ..C iQ W', > lis: p@ ..+. I : w .. o e

t,"

l :!;il ,b

n
  • ca
                                                                                       .  '.         o                             -

_._ .. a

                         #-                                                          NRC C;ntract No. NRC-03-79-118 U   Frankhn Reserrch C:ntir                                FRC Project N3. C52J7                             P 02 A Diw4on of The Frankhn Institute                      FRC Assignment No.13                               lc 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 4481rmo   FRC Task No.      4 8'7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUlPMENT ITEM NO. M EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 24 MOTORIZED VALVE ACTUATOR LOCATED IN THE EAST PENETRATION ROOM (A227)

LIMITORQUE MODEL SMB2 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 9 HOURS TER CHECKSHEET NO. 24 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 706 FUNCTION (PLANT ID); LPSI TO LOOP 11A iMOV615 (IMOV615) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12): 206 e l

 !                      DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) , R, T, P, H, CS S (R), M, I , QM , RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICALLE CHECT SHEETS: Contents Checkcheet Page No. Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, Tc, 2c, : 2 -- l System Consideration Review -12 , '. b , Ic, M, !:, *f - Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Sc, 5b, 5c, 5, 5: 7 Sf, Eg,'EP, 5i, If 8 Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation -02, L Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Scnedule Summary L , 70, 7; w - - ---- . 1 -

                      ?

p) NRC C2ntract Na. NRC-03 79-118 dfFrtnkhn Rrserrch Csntir FRC Pr: Ject N 3. C5257 P _. g ] A Da. von of Th FrsnMn insttruis FRC Assignment No.1 lb 20th and Race Streers Phita . Pa 19103 (215) 448 Imo FRC Task No. 467 /:a498 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 24

              'h ,

SUAMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: a b Tne Licensee (has/M . 2) provided a response to the SER concerns.

 #      [f '

3' X The Licensee (Whas ,not) specifically stated that tne equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

    #c[                   1 The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no
                .f             outstanding qualification deficiencies.

[3, ; The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item wnose qualification has not been fully established. a.; Juacification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item. Corrective action specified by the Licensee: A M,( Equipment replacement with qualified equipment

         -l * '                             Equipment modification
      ,                                     Equipment celocation above submergence level
    ,n . ,                                  Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source 09                                      Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)
 'f                     _

Equipment relocation to a mild environment

           '{   ,

Qualification testing of equipment in progress

j. Other ( )

m;p 2 ^ -T The Licensee has' provided other information for this equipment item 1 1'f _. that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim 'YA operation.

      ;w. p .

p,y The Licensee (nas/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective 'cK^g;; action .) ! 4% 'S The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification

    . ifhj                     and/or should be exe.npted from environmental qualification.

19l

   ,, ;j.                 DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC OUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW MM(
my
                          - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

J ,- I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency l , ;;[,' I.b Modifi a tion III.a Exempt l- [ D I.a Qualification Not Established)' III.b Not in Scope [M II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available l . 'l

~;.

T cy w e= .ne# SSW m,4-s.4+ w-- - _ o minee' . ._m ___ y _, _ l

       . . _ . . . - . . _ . . .                                     . .. . . . . _           . _ . .     .z_-    : _ ; .. _ .     .  .w .        , a ,._ a =  i l

Ar NRC Contr:ct N;. NRC-03-79-118 Pag 3 dNnklin R: search C:ract FRC Project Nr. C5257 A Divmon of The Franklin insnture FRC Assignment No.1]I 2 20th and Race Streets. P5da.. Pa.19103 (215) 4481000 FRC Task No. 46Y/488 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2 4 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONiENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM

                                                              -                                                           DESIGNATION:

NRC PEQUIREMENTS X

  • DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence *of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established X Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately X QualU ied Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) X Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied ,, Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) DESIGNATION: f 4 NRC QUALIFICATICN CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established X II.b Equipment Not Qualified h ' II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available a j See. E vCA Won om

                                                                                                            %e M.

1 t 9 i y- . =. - . , - , _ . _

4~ . NRC Contr ct N2. NRC-03-79-118 b) Franklin Resmch C:ntr FRC Project N3. CS257 Pag 3 i A owision of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.19 3a

            ,.                           20th and Race Streets. Phita . Pa 19103 (215) 443 1000   FRCTask No. 48I f 4 6A

( } EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 24 l LICENSEE RESPONSE 'to NRC SER

                  *i
                <J v,
1
           ' .u                                      5    limitorque tas infor=ed us that a generie re;cre vi" to available vuich identifies the non-=etallic =aterials used within thei
                                                          .vt.,7's and =cre directly pr-svides bases for c=rrelatic: to existics
                   ,                                      qualifi:stice test reports. **.e vill receive ce;1es of this re;crt vne issued and arti:i; ate resciuti:s =f the Outs *acii:4 ite:2 s                                                  by,the end of this year.
  • r#
           %             l 4

a

          'y )
       - i's
           ,~ *
                  ,1
               .k

(. f ( q ja s .x

     . . #'$.a- )

q

       .               I
       -t..

NV

   +
               ?

N.

       *
  • as b

l ,$ i . ,. l , e , n ~ r ni

     . M.
 ,   s7( i
 , , . 4. l          ,

7

 <       t t-          j .-
     .h n     A t

I d 1.' < ?.

 .     ,s Is                 4
                              ,.,. mpg,,,___                                         w          y                -

g.'e -

                                                                                                                                 .m.- - --- '

_ . . . . - u. .... _ . ~...-..~--; -. m .+ . u..~ . . . a . ~ . c - ..--,.-,...:-_a 6~!j0 U Franklin Research Center NRC Contract N O. NRC-03-79-118 Page FRC Project No. C5257 A Dimion of The Franian insature FRC Assignment No.13 5f 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa. 19103 (215) 448- 000 FRC Task No. 483/488 - EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REYlEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 24 _ tiOTES: "X" DENOTES APPROPRIATE NOTES N, 1. The Licensee has not provided documentation from the manufacturer which establishes similarity between the inst 211ed equipment and the test specimen in the referenced . document (s). X 2. The. Licensee has not identified the class of the insulation system used for the motor in the motorized valve actuator.

                          %         3. The Licensee has not identified whether or not this motorized valve actuator incorporates a motor-brake assembly.

K 4. The Licensee has not identified the class of the insulation system used for the motor-brake asse=bly (.if applicable) . X 5. The Licensee has not identified the meter manufacturer for this motorized valve actuator. N 6. The Licensee has not identified the manufacturer of,the motor-brake assembly (if applicable) .

                           %        7. The Licensee has not identified the type of current used 'in the motorized valve actuator.

N 8. The Licensee has not identified the type of current used in the motor-brake assembly (if applicable) . _ M 9. The Licensee has not established a qualified life estt:: ate for this motorized valve actuator based on technically justifiable methods and conservative assu=ptions.

10. The Licensee has stated that the only harsh parameter that this motorized valve ^ actuator is exposed to is radiation.

l 11. Since radiation is stated to be riie only harsh parameter and l considering the extensive radiation testing of the =ctars used in this type of motorized valve actuator, the specified radiation dose of is considered to be of sufficiently low value as to not affect this equipment , item. This equipment item is considered qualified for this g parameter. L

;                                12. The Licensee has co==itted to replace this equipment nen .

The Licensee has stated the following:

i 1

a 1 g A

                                                                                                                                     ~

h __ .. .- _ ,_ --.- ,7-,,-,,# .js 9 :3' j

g,2_w NRC Contrret N3. N RC-03-79-118 LUU!. fira ~anklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 PagS A Dmsaon of The Frcnkhn Institute 20th and Race Streets Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 44 & l000 FRC Assignment No.13 ja FRC Task No. 9 R '7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2# 7,. EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 25 MOTORIZED VALVE ACTUATOR LOCATED IN THE ECCS PUMP ROOM ( A118) g LIMITORQUE MODEL SMB0 y' REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: NOT STATED p TER CHECKSHEET NO. 25 i .,6 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 1620

 ' ct .                           FUNCTION (PLANT ID): HPSI HEADER ISOLATION VALVE (IMOV654)

LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12]: 191

       -g
        ~,$i
  • 1) g-
   '}. %
        -Gl
          '5,  .
              ,)

l ??, i

  - .Q;       .

3 DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

  ,['                               (See Section 3 of this TER fcr Legend)
     .s.:

I R, T, P, H, CS, S, (R), M, I, UM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, 0, Not stated, Not applicable

   ~ &;

LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

      -%.?
  ,; ;,                             Conten.s                                                                                                   Checksheet Pace No.
 ',' K                              Equipment Item                                                                                             la
 .;v
              ~'

Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb [., 4 ;,1 Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2

  <[                                Licensee Response to NEC SER                                                                               3a,-2b, Oc, 2i
 ,k.                                System Consideration Review                                                                                 'c,     4b, 4;, 4u, 4c, 4f
                 ^

Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 5c, , :c, 52, 5, Sf, i '- , 59, 5h, Li, s Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation -6 2, -: b - Equipment Summary T8

              }                     Maintenance ana Replacement Senedule Summary                                                               7.,     'b,      7;
  ' 42
  • e sp- e me-+= e w 1.mpee ey == M y mm teg e ** - M*n6 WP*^-**'"948%- T.- j
..a . . :a . -. .. ..~ .u- .a - .u.~ - . . m:. - .. . :- x.c x v. u .. a w
                     #     3                                                         NRC Contrict Nc. NRC-03-79-118 dhrinklin Research C4nttr                                      FRC Pr Ject N 2. C5257                      P gJ A D<..sion of Th Fr:nkhn Ins::tui.                        FRC Assignment No.13 20tri and Race Streets. Phila . e   i,103 (215) 4481000                                                lb FRC Task No. 48 F / 4frf EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 25 SUAMARY OF , LICENSEE RESTONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

A Tne Licensee (has/h- ..u 3 provided a response to the SER concerns. M The Licensee (m /has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/of will function when exposed to the applica~ le o DBE environmental service conditions. N The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. ~ Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item. Corrective action specified by the Licensee: Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification j Equipment relocation above submergence level i Relocate or shield equipment from radiaLion source ^j Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

 !                                      Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other (                                                                                )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. _ The Licensee (nas/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed } 1. corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action

                                                                                                                           .)

d The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. 1 DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC OUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

                    - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY:                     (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modification III.a Exempt ll EII.a Qualificu, tion not i:.s tac 11sned ] III.b Not in Scope j II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available - O

                ,.m ,. ~ - .

[__,. ~,-.n-.-

                                                                 - , , . , . , -   ~.- -                   -    -. . =n+ w-ww             -

4 A NRC C e ntr ct N O. NRC-03-79-118 0003 Frrnklin Rrserrch Crntir FRC Pr! ject Ns. C5257 P s? A Dwmon of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignrnent No.19 2 20th and Rue Streets. Phile.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 46+ / 4 93 I I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 26 3 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SU'4 MARY FORM DESIGNATION:

            ,              NRC REQUIREMENTS                                                                            X = DEFICIENCY
 .o
  • DocuL. anted Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established X
  .g. ,                    Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately                                                                   X

( Qualified Life or Replacer ent Schedule Established (If Required) % Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: 42, o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate

    ~. -                         o Duration Adequate 5, .                          o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately jh                             o Steam Exposure (If' Required) Adequate C                        Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied d                        Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied

,k . Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied i f, Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied i}{ l Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied ' ?(d'gj Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied g Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied

  ?                        Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied N).p                     Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)
  .u-2;.,l b                                                                                                                         DESIGNATION:

NRC CUALIFICATION CATEGCRY X = CATEGORY r: .,w ...

    . '!                   I.a          Equipment Qualified
  ;TA                       I.b         Equipment Qualification Pending Modification 9f,                        II.a        Equipment Qualification Not Established                                                      N

[j?M II.b Equipment Not Qualified

Q;' II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life d or Replacement Schedule Justified M III.a Equipment Exec +t From Qualification f? III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review h, .[f IV Documentation Not Made Available 4 ~$,

g See EcA W on %p sf. 9 l lR. a ,, , s

 ;r,
         . . . . . _ , i..... =         .-.-...a..                   ..  .-. -.-             -....-...:..-~.-_:.....-_z.._.-                        .-

4 NRC C;ntrc.ct No. NRC-03-79-118 UNIFranklin Research Crntir FRC Pr: Ject No. C5257 Pag 2 A Division of The Frankhn Instrure FRC Assignment No.13 30 20th and Raca Streets. Phita.. Pa. 19103 (215) 44S.1000 FRC Task No. 467748F EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 25 LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER 5 L1:1:crque has infor=ed us that a generic report vill te available vtich *,ientities the sc -cetdli: naterials used withis their W."s and =cre directly ;:-:vides bases f:r correlati:r. to existing q.alifi:stic test re;cr:s. *'e. vill receive c:;ies cf this re; . . when issued and anti:ipate resciutics of the c :stariing ite=s by,the end of this yes.r. . l

                                                                                                                                    ~

e 4 I l l t t I ll l1 l4 d J. l4 41

 -1
  • _.- -e -. -- . _ . _
                                                                                                                    ._           .m            .
                    "[          g  * ',             9

6 NRC Contract N e. N RC-?3-79-118 Page dd7ranklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 A Diws on of The Franklin Insnrure 5f Zrh and Race S:reers. Phda . Pa. 19103 (215) 4431c00 FRC Assignment FRC Task No. 4M/ No.13,488 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2.5

   ,                     NOTES:                                     "X"      DENOTES APPROPRIATE NOTES 1, j                     N        1. The Licensee has not provided documentation from the manufacturer which establishes similarity between the installed equipment and the test specimen in the referenced document (s) . @ ort A)

N 2 .' The Licensee has not identified the class of the insulation system used for the motor in the =otorized valve actuator. E 3. The Licensee has not identified whether or not this motorized valve actuator incorporates a motor-brake assembly. X 4. The Licensee has not identified the class of the insulation system used for the motor-brake assembly (if applicable). I,[ N 5. The Licensee has not identified the motor manufacturer for

           ,.                                    this motori:ed valve actuator.

..' < X. 6. The Licensee has not identified the manufacturer of the motor-brake assembly (if applicable) . hp N. 7. The Licensee has not identified the type of current used in the motorized valve actuator.

                     }

j;. X 8. The Licensee has not identified the type of current used in the motor-brake assembly (if applicable). l.'",.7.

;cN ,                           K        9. The Licensee has not established a qualified life estimate W                                        for this motorized valve actuator based on technically
,ec.                                            justifiable methods and conservative assu=ptions.
       . 0.:,

[~ ;.t; 10. The Licensee has stated that the only harsh parameter y$ that this =otorized valve actuator is exposed to is radiation. g' ,e

       -j4                             11.      Since radiation is stated to be the only harsh para =eter and
                   ,                            considering the extensive radiation testing of the =otors
     ?'~                                       used in this type of motorized valve actuator, the specified J;                                               radiation dose of                              is considered to be of
f. sufficiently low value as to not affect this equip =ent ites. This equipment ites is considered qualified for this parameter.

o ,, 12. The Licensee has ce=mitted to replace this equipment item. d.b 2 The Licensee has stated the following: FD ' / t ryg U 4 y v g h

 ,            o

{i

            ._;.___._m,.....c..__.w___,..mm....                             ..2,_-...          r
                                                                                                       . e w e.._u       ,a     .n  . s. ;.m A                                                            NRC C;ntract N2. NRC-03-79-118 lldgFranklin Research Csntu                                  FRC Prriject No. C5257                          Pc_g2 A omis on of The Frankhn Institure                                                                       5g 20th and Race Screets Phda . Pa 19103(215)448-1000      FRCTask FRC  Assignment No. 48No.13[468't
         ;                   EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 25 l                      NOTES:
4. 'L dinii L oEA wnia A m N l dL%ns 62 W 5 .< 2ak- m n d hnt~lnd br- Lh<r n&v A
       ,                                Linwxu                         G              sbM &d W Ouw
       ;                               - +,                       sxa n                                      au -1A A2 % %msf

(; a J$s o,$ W' a241MAYd h Al4MfkC i

                                        /

p ' 1\ p i Id l1 l Li I 1 ya t H a

,i

'i

    't 1

e o u -Q,.- yg. ~,7,~~-

                                      -.m W ,; ,           ,   6.        -             ---4 s-  -*ve**m Cr g - - - x           ,

ge NRC Crntrict No. NRC-03-79-118 S.J Frankhn Resear:h Centrr FRC Prrj ct No. C5257 P_g s A Dus.on of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 la 29th and Race Streets Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 44+ 1000 FAC Task No. N '7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. h EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 26 MOTORIZED VALVE ACTUATOR LOCATED IN CONTAINMENT (C230) i LIMITORQUE MODEL SMB; SIZES 00, 3 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 9 HOURS TER CHECKSHEET NO. 26 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 706, 662

          ,          FUNCTION (PLANT ID):                SI IANK llA ISOLATION 1MOV614 (IMOV614)

LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12]: 221 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): SI TANK llB ISOLATION IMOV624 (IMOV624) is LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12): 224 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): H2 PURGE ISOLATION 1MOV6900 (1MOV6900) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12): 257 b q

%                i 1 (:                                                                                                                 ,

l..'. It ;

\.

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

   ,                  (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, P, H, CS, S, (R), M, I, h RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None,

     %                     g 2

Not stated, Not applicable This defi C.i e ncy br- 1MdV C0900 #nI]

  ; ...,l ',          LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS :
.O e Contents Checksheet Page No.
               .i
   .'.i 6                   Equipment Item                                                                la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER                                  lb
  %5r
    .i.,

Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 ( Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a,-3b, 3c, d

        ,'<           System Consideratior Review                                                  --! ,  -t h . 10, Id, Oc, 4f-Equipment Environmental Qualification Review                                 52, 5b, :;, :d, :c, Sf, -

4 Sg , -55, Si, SP Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation U, -: b -

  'l l  Equipment Summary Maintenance ana Replacement senedule summary                                 7.,    7;, 7;
    .a -
              .)

7 ,

                                                                                                                                     ._, ,,s -
         .:-.-.-... ..w.a w.                          ~ a w a.                        a-              -
                                                                                                                  -+
                                                                                                                                 = i g. 7                       a           _ :

d' NRC CIntr:ct Nr. NRC-03-79-118 P;g2 dbranklin Rss arch Centrr FRC PrIject Nr. CO257 A Dmsion of Ths Frankhn insnrut2 FRC Assignm;nt No.13 lb 20th and Race Streers. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 448. moo FRC Task No. 487/48A EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2/o

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: X Tne Licensee (has/E- - -; provided a response to the S2R concerns. Y The Licensee (h=s/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions. The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item. Corrective action specified by the Licensee: Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment i Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( )

The Licensee has provided other information for .this equipment item j that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

The Licensee (nas/has not) providt:d a schedule for the proposed , corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action ,

                                                                                                                                               .)

'l

   ]                         The Licensee states th.it the equipment item does not require qualification j                        and/or should oe exempted from environmental qualification.
  ,                    DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATICN EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
                       - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY:                         (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) 1

-{ I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modification III.a Exempt

  }

III.a Qualification Not Est'M i * % II.b Not Qualified III.b Not in Scope IV Documentation Not Available 4

    & 96M                       eew    wy we.gige.y p
    < +- . - , . .,* ewe..p,,.~. m'e w. , - - . , y,rw .  , , . ,
                                                                               -=
                                                                                  . . ~ . - - - - ~ ~ ~ -

W*****

                                                                                                                                                                  ~

4lb) Franklin Research Center NRC C:ntr:ct Na. NRC-03-73-118 FRC Project No. C5257 P::g 3 A Dmsion of The Frankhn Institure FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race Streers. Phda.. Pa. 19103(215 448-1000 FRC Task No. 467/492 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 26

         ,'                                   EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION 

SUMMARY

FORM

             -                                                                                                   DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate X Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established X Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately X Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) i Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: o Peak Temperature Adequate X o Peak Pressure Adequate i o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately X

    .       'N               o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate
          ; [,'      Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied
              .;     Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied ii '               Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied                                                                          %

Criteria Pagarding Test Sequence Satisfied l Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies

 ,,;                       (If Any) Satisfied
  ,i                 Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied
         'h          Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied
 , 77 Criteria Regarding Margins Sat Lsfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) fM,, >          '
      ,,- U
  ' y; J
      .                                                                                                                 DESIGNATION:
   /"i               NRC QUALIFICATION CATECORY                                                                         X = CATEGORY
 'sy
 - y,i               I.a            Equipment              Qualified I.b           Equipment              Qualification Pending Modification
 ,'                   II.a          Equipment              Qualification Not Established                                             Y_ __

[g/ .$:y II.b Equipment Not Qualified

 ; gf                 II.c          Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life C(T:                               or Replacement Schedule Justified ig                  III.a         Equipment Exempt From Qualification h.%:*                III.D IV Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualificaticn Review Documentation Not Made Available
 !Y)
  .w
 @                                          See E vC h % o r PSe. 54.

b S.;q =. w l

                       *"N            -
                                             , - , - - - -    _, "W            __ __  y, % e           ,g,   .q       _     __
      . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..            .        .. =. a a s. ~          .-- w. - . . _.- - -                                               - a ~.-

4 NRC C ntract No. NRC-03-79-118 NJ nklin Research Csntir FRC Pr; ject N3. C5257 Pzg2 3 A DMsion ol The Fran'an institute FRC Assignment No.13 3a 20th and Race Streets. PMa.. Pa. '.9103 (215) 443-10m FRC Task No. 487/488 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. No LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER 5 ;=i=1terque has inter =ed us that a generi: ae;cre vill be available v'.

                                                         . ich ide:tifies the ne:-=etalli: sater'tals used within their M07's'as? =cre directly prevides bases f:r ::r elati: to existing qualift:sti:: test re;cres. Ve vill receive copies of this re;er-when issued ami anti 1;ste resciutics of the cutstanding ite=3 by,the end of this year.                             .
 'Y l

r l O l l l li O 'j g ==e ,a*% - ma.-'=a-+w.ap per ya m -weep

                                                                                                                -e-~-e-     - * - - - - - -
                                                                                                                                                    ***m, y,* e
                                               ..,_                          r_7,.7...   ,7yyaw -re!.-ow +--                                      m t,                     ,

n-- -

                                       -__              . _ , . - . - -                          --,_n                    -
                                                                                                                                   ~-       w -                  =z~-

i 4- N RC C; ntrict N s. NRC-03-79-118 0007)ranklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Diwsion of The Franan Inst:ture FRC Assignment No.13 5f 2Crn and Race Streets. Phda . Pa. 19103 1215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 487 /4U EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2.f4 tiOTES : "X" DENOTES APPROPRIATE NOTES X 1. The Licensee has not provided documentation from the manufacturer which establishes similarity between the

            '.'                                      installed equipment and the test specimen an the referenced document (s). (cote 4)
                  "]                 h         2 .' The Licensee has not identified the class of the insulation system used for the motor in the motorized valve actuator.

N 3. The Licensee has not identified whether or not this motorized valve actuator incorporates a motor-brake assembly. h 4 The Licensee has not identified the class of the insulation-

          ..                                         system used for the motor-brake assembly (if applicable) .

X, 5. The Licensee has not identified the motor manufacturer for

              .e                                     this motorized valve actuator.

X 6. The Licensee has not identified the manufacturer of the m- motor-brake assembly (if applicable). N 7. The Licensee has not identified the type of current ~ used in

 ;l ,

l the motorized valve actuator.

 .,-                                  N        8. The Licensee has not identified the type of current used in f-i ,- w the motor-brake asse=bly (if applicable).

X s 1 9. The Licensee has not established a qualified life estimate c.%!j for this motorized valve actuator based on technically

          %                                          justifiable methods and conservative assumptions.

Q

          &                                   10. The. Licensee has stated that the only harsh parameter

, ,q . ? that this motorized valve actuator is exposed to is radiation. l ,. i.: .~ N 11. Since radiation is stated to be the only harsh parameter and M considering the extensive radiation testing of the motors Ifl used in this type of motorized valve actuator, the specified

 ;QZ                                                 radiation dose of                                     is considered to be of i glM.;                                              sufficiently low value as to not affect this equipment

_d item. This equipment item is considered qualified for this f.D u parameter. ,w[ jy _

12. The Licensee has com=1tted to replace this equipment item.

jyp The Licensee has stated the following: M h .

                ~

I l

          ,gD i*

\ x. l.* . I- *(, 'N , i * ( ., a d I' L , _.. __ _ l - --

                    .....   ..       .        .,...;                 . - . . - .; . u.           c .. c.s . - .~ a;. . c a , . - .. . ,.: _. ~ a s
                                                                                                                  .                                        . - a---

NRC C:nt.-:ct Na. NRC-03-79-118 4(!0bh) ranklin Resexrch Cint r FRC Pr:J:::t N::. C5257 P:g9 A Division of The Franidin Instrute FRC Assignment No.13 5g 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Ps 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. APS/4AA EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. f.Is NOTES: AAf aA 22A 0 R*JJ~ wR daKs w/nL _ ' AsjkA a,-, Gn idxbu % A 161 1As a % sLt -o_ '

                                       '4,6k6R,1d 4

udd,s 42,~,s w n a nuw2,a % % nA L % AL>f

                                       &Awik                                  &JAAf (sc&) blns, m&~ n a s as u J poa at % - A R:                                                     A; trAAdd %

4JM s axALiisLa snwna AA,k d wa. '% A O e & L>n 2 AtLbo %21 0 nn aanJLA ,L AE % on wA nwAn a. mu 4 hL %* mA & seo 1 l-I O 'S - ' ~

                                                                                                                                        ." ~ ~ -
                                          ......-,,,.,e.,
                             ,, ...                                 ,.p.         .,y--  _ _ , ,
                                                                                                        ,w y y=,.7ryw m =<      --
                                                                                                                                                        --       w-

, _ ,- _ ~ - m.~ %a - - - - < -, L _..; C gs NRC C::ntr.ict No. NRC-03-79-118 L2%nkLn Resiarch Center FRC Project No. C5257 P g2 A Dmsion of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 Ia 20th and Race Streets Phila Pa 19!U3 (215) 44&l000 FRC Task No. Y 8 '7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M EQUIPMENT ITEM No. 27 MOTORIZED VALVE ACTUATOR LOCATED IN CONTAINMENT (C230) LIMITORQUE MODEL SMB3 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 9 HOURS

, TER CHECKSHEET NO. 27
   ~ ' ' '

LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 706, 662 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): SI TANK 12A ISOLATION 1MOV634 (IMOV634)

  ~

LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12]: 227 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): SI TANK 123 ISOLATION 1MOV644 (IMOV644)

          -               LICENSEE SUBMITTAL:                SCEW(S) [1, 12]: 230
V
3.

nc.N

  <        <1

('F ,' 8. 4 p / DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITDi(S) ONLY:

  ., 4,                     (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
 . ,? : '
        ,                  R, T,                     P, H, CS,          S,   (P), M, I,      RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, 1
 ! '..q/.

Not stated, Not applicable jh LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

      . f,
  ,,                       Contents                                                                          Checksheet Pace No.
c'iff. Equipment Item la i s t v-

'y;. Summary of Licensee Responses to tne NRC SER lb

               '1          Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms                               2
  .V'
          ""               Licensee Response to NRC SER                                                      3a,    -c,   20, 3d-
                ,          System Consideration Review                                                     - -! : , Ib,   10,   ". d ,   : ,   *f
        -.                - Equipment Environmental Qualification Review                                     5 c , ' '; , 5,    55, !c7 Sf,
               ,,                                                                                            5g,    I'.,
                                                                                                                      .-  :i, 5j m  -

1 Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 30, -: : -

 ,,l  '

I Equipment Summary _ Ma intenance anc Replacement Senedule Summary 7c, 70, 7 ;- W D *

                                   *** ' W MW UM 9
  • _W_ - .

g . .N- g- -M[ q, ---w r c

           .                .                 . . .             . . .         . . . . . . . . ~ . . . - - . - _ . -              .

Q,,s NRC Contr:ct N 2. NRC-03-79-118 LifJ Fr:nklin Rese:rch Cantir FRC Project N .CS257 P g3 A Du.on el Th s Frtnkhn !nst: rut:1 FRC Assignrn:nt N?.14 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 4481c00 FRC Task No. 48Y /48R EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 77 I I SUAMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLIGABLE: Tne Licensee (has/;- -e ) provided a response to the SER concerns. J % The Licensee (h=s/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions. The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualitication has not been fully established. Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item. i Corrective action specified by the Licensee: l Equipment replacement with qualified equipment j Equipment modification

;                                                       Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( ) The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. The Licensee (nas/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action . ) A he Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC OUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

                              - CIRCLED ITF.M ONLY:                      (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) a J                              I.a         Qualified                                                   II.c Qualified Life Deficiency L                             I.b         Modification                                                III.a Exempt M.                          LII.a vuattrication Not Estaclisned \                                      III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified                                                      IV    Documentation Not Available t
s. ..--n- - - - ~ ~ s- ~ .. n -,
                                                                                                                                    -- ~~-- - - .

e' T N-M* *1 't -*.'9#:3 % 'P . Ff #M.- M $- W

                                                                                             ,                           -we g-y

A NRC Contr:ct N r. NRC-03-79-118 UlEbanklin Research Center FRC Project NO. C5257 P QJ A Dmion of The Franklin Institute 2 20th and Race Streets. Phda. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-10C0 FRC Assignment FRC Task No. 48Y No.13[488 I I EQUlPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. N

         , ,                                 EQUIPMENT E!NIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION 

SUMMARY

FORM

            ;r                                                                                                            DESIGNATION:

h NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY

             .i       Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate                                                                          M Adequate Similarity Eetween Equipment and Test Specimen Established                                                    Y Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately                                                                                 X N        Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)                                                       '/

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

              'i      Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:
             >              o Peak Temperature Adequate                                                                                     'd
     ,}'                    o Peak Pressure Adequate                                                                                        X dj'                        o Duration Adequate
  ..:4,                     o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately                                                                          X o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate
     }.$              Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied
'$gj
   .                  Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied X

,fwp Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied

     $                Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied F                 h   Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies i k.d. . .                 (If Any) Satisfied
  ,kb                 Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied y! [t.'.I.-            Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied

-1' Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

     . c,y
.' yQ
  • X
, %"                                                                                                                          DESIGNATION:
'r'  .
                      -NP   CUALIFICATICN CATEGORY                                                                            X = CATEGORY e

I.a Equipment Qualified

       .2.i            I.b         Equipment Qualification Pending Modification
'33                    II.a        Equipment Qualification Not Established                                                                   M 65%                 II.b        Equipment Not Qualified Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life
' hil                  II.c or Replacement Schedule Justified ll))

2 III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification h'S III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review D'.(] 7.:. ; IV Documentation Not Made Available a 1q (( Nk hN b . t'e

     ,s ,      ',
        ,h
  ~w*                         e4              .,.r      ,             - -, y*,"y' yy, 4'"   ,

7 4,=,, , , ,

x..... ! . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . - . . ...~.._.-- _ _ - -- NRC C ntr:ct NO. NRC-03 79-118 Ollh~ Franklin Raseirch Cent:r FRC Przject N3. C5257 P:g3 A Division of The Franktn Institute FRC Assignment No.19 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215)448 1000 FRC Task No. 4BT/48A EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. f.1 LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER j 5. li=iterque has infer =ed us that a generic report vill te availatie which identifies the nc:-metallic caterials used vithis their y.0V's a:1 =cre directly ;n vides bases fer ccrrelatic: to existig qualificatics test repcrts. e . vill receive ce;ies of this re;ert when issued and antici;ste reselutics of the outstanding ites.: ty,the end cf this year. . i' u e u e k lt O !1 - - .~~ *. - ----v ~~- -- . n,. r. ., m n a . "" , , *W '

               % "'1Nm.       * * .   =, ,    e .e e9 q. q ,     ,,

r

     <4         .

4UNJ7tanklin Research Center NRC Contrcct N r. NRC-05-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Pag 3 A Divisen of The Frankhn Insntute FRC Assignment No.13 5f 20 n and Race screets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 4877488 I I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. E i o

      ./, j                    NOTES:                                       "X"   DENOTES APPROPRIATE NOTES
        ;v   ,
       .F N           1. The Licensee has not provided documentation from the
       '[1     ,                                     manufacturer which establishes similarity between the installed ' equipment and the test specimen in the referenced R

o document (s). (cote Ar)

                      ,              X          2 .- The Licensee has no't' identified the class of the insulation
           .y                                        system used for the motor in the motorized valve actuator.

C h 3. The Licensee has not identified whether or not this motorized valve actuator incorporates a motor-brake assembly.

       'N                           N'          4.

a The Licensee has not identified the class of the insulation ~ N system used for the motor-brake assembly (.if applicable) .

5. The Licensee has not identified the motor manufacturer for
    (    .                                          this moto'rized valve actuator.
 /g ih                              N           6. The Licensee has not identified the manufacturer of the motor-brake assembly (if applicable) .

I' / N 7. The Licensee has not identified the type of current used in j] g the motorized valve actuator. NL, N 8. The Licensee has not identified the type of current used in [,(y j the motor-brake assembly (if applicable). N 9. The Licensee has not established a qualified life estimate for this motorized valve actuator based on technically N@WNa justifiable methods and conservative assumptions. , erfy 10. .The Licensee has stated that the only harsh parameter M, aca that this motorized valve actuator is exposed to is radiation.

  ' rW                                      11.      Since radiation is stated to be the only harsh parameter and considering the extensive radiation testing of the motors
Eg ; used in this type of motorized valve actuator, the specified G39 radiation dose of is considered to be of ldp sufficiently low value as to not affect this equipment item. This equipment item is considered qualified for this
f. 7 m parameter.

g> r ' J,

12. The Licensee has co=nitted to replace this equipment item.
,A ei The Licensee has stated the following

1 l(Yf p'.';

   \
   -L              9
   =
                 =,=+.e.**       ew        ,-w-tw--  --v pg     ya= = , ' ,   ,og *=       y+ + , are *1P. -'=*3  9  . - _       ,    ._p.,   ..

f- p j,,--WP - *** t . _- _ -

        . .         ... .: . . . . . . . .                ...-....n..----                                                     c  -u.....   .-.m NRC Contr:ct Nr. NRC-03-79-118 A)Nnklin O!                 RIserrch Ccnt:r                                  FRC Project N3. CS257                      Pcg3 A Division of The Franklin Inst:ruie                         FRC Assignment No.13                        5g 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000      FRC Task No.       48? /488)

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. U NOTES: A. L 21A O O Af C/AA2x1A2.borsh'st nuYA ~2C., % ns wGA m, N1eAAM

                                        & A n:                                           hisnn ha ',;AsRt c2+AAnuntLu.a-                                                                              11.a An1 m %                                             luIxd sobraTAN! A     '

nLnanr. aA asAsk a- nnuanr &

                                             <     O ra te's S u % E s nx n d #

L As n. 60sAb s t (sfEd a n A Mn ~jes s sh i .;uax u 1h ' An d " , zenas. L 0 i A/01ersih w1: 8 L/ dst sxim1 AAM doaa 4b L L h Ad h 1 Asas %LC- n.: sal L. ' mu EA m a % .u m e) n e>Abuk.< n i% aAd ^71l %d anAAA snsi .?A t 0 ~3 =i e y e 4

                --o                                            .        _
                                                                                                  -            ne          ~.

_ w. me . - - -, . , , .

g. . .,,-,7.,,
                                                                                                                 ,        y-      7      .

gh NRC Contrict No. NRC-03-79-118 lbf Frankhn Research Cen:er FRC Prij';ct N::. CO257 Pag? A Dus.on of Ths Funun Institut2 FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and P. ace Streets Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 448-10ix) FRC Task No. W #7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 28 MOTORIZED VALVE ACTUATOR LOCATED IN THE ECCS PUMP ROOM ( A118) LIMITORQUE MODEL SMB00 4*' 9 HOURS REQUIRED OPERATING TIME:

          .. ;              TER CHECKSHEET NO. 28 w               LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED
       ,S                  FUNCTION (PLANT ID): CS 4 SI PUMPS RECIRCULATION (IMOV659)
               'li          LICENSEE SUBMITTAL:                   SCEW(S) [1, 12]:            216
        '"                 FUNCTION (PLMIT ID):                      CS & SI PUMPS RECIRCULATION (IMOV660)
        ,q;!               LICENSEE SUBMITTAL:                    SCEW(S) [1, 12]:            217
      .,.i 1

1

              '.:v           ~~
        ./d,p
        .pi'
      ' k'h ll                      I
      ..?,>

w Wi DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY: j 7/ (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R, T, P, H, CS,hS, (R), M, I, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, w. p Not stated, Not applicable l u ' ??? lfj'{ LISTING OF APPLICABLE Ci!ECKSHEETS: i{ , ,. g . Contents Checksheet Page No. l

., * ,, a yij Equipment Item la
           -v 1

' '" Summary of Licensee Fesponses to the NRC SER lb

            . :a
       . .Yi                 Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms                                     2
      ;(?
    . ,;!j ;                 Licensee Response to NRC SER                                                            3a, 1b, 30, 25-
         '$                  System Consideration Review                                                              *2    -I b , -10 , id,   IO,   if-
          ,.                 Equipment Environmental Qualification Refiew                                            !2, ;b,      5, 5d, 50, 5f,
         .;g                                                                                                         5g , e , i i , 5 ; --

s ~, Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation fa, :L

 .                           Equipment Summarj l-'

Ma intenance and Replacement Schedule Suniary ~2, 'b, 'c-1 E .' ... . . u . - .. _ .__.. =;p, , - +.g , , , . ,__ . _ ,gn , , _;w

                                                                                                                                                      .- - - -,..a w
      . . . .                   ..                  .-         - .. -.                    ~ . -     --      ~ . , - ~ . . .._a.-                . a., n
                 /A                                                                  NRC C:ntract N a. NRC-03-79-118 NJ FrrnkSn Rrseach Cintu                                           FRC Pr; ject NO. C5257                                 P:g;                     j A Dr.: son of Tha Fr: nun Insntura                              FRC Assignm:nt N2.13                                    lb                      l 20th and Race Strevis. Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000           FRC Task No.        48N486
                                                                                                                                                          ^

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 28 SUA.%RY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: I Tne Licensee (has/u= . J provided a response to the SER concerns. b The Licensee (t:sa/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE 3 environmental service conditions. N The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no I outstanding qualification deficiencies. The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item wnose qualification has not been fully established. Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item. 4 Corrective action specified by the Licensee: Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification

,                                  Equipment relccation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source

[ Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment i Qualification testing of equipment in progress other ( ) The Licensee has provided other information for this uguipment item that'can be construed as a basis for justification for interim

                                                                                                       ~

operation. The Licensee (nas/has not) provided a schedule for the propcsed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .) The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempt.ed from envircnmental qualification. DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATICN EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

    ;           - CIPCLED ITEM CNLY:                 (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) 9 I.a   Qualified                                                       II.c Quelified Life Deficier.cy 1,              I.b   Modification                                                    III.a Exempt.
.]            l II.a Quatil tcation Not Establisnedl                                  III.b Not in Scope j           II.b Not Qualified                                                    IV        Documentation Not Available O

k _y ml. - ,,m - . . - v e. e - ,

                                                                       -wn e.m:: w n = =-  e -*- , - . ,  - -
                                                                                                                  -.                          r
                                                                                                                                                 = - ; m -- r y
                                                                                                                        ,        :. . m .a

_ _ _..___ _.___.= _ _ _ _ ._

           .-                                                                                                                  e o

As NRC C:ntrcct N a. N RC-03-79-118 - P:g2 00d?ranklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 A onnsion of The Franklin Inst rute 2 20th and Race Streers. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Assignment FRC Task No. 48Y No.13[489 I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _23 4

            .,.,                                        EQUIPMENT E!NIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION 

SUMMARY

FORM V DESIGNATION: X = DEFICIENCY NRC REQUIREMENTS

                                                                                                             ~

Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate e Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established K Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately X q Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) X

      ;%                         Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate 7 o Duration Adequate by o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately 3- l o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate

               .s                Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied
     -jlh/                       Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied
           ;g:                   Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied l                      Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied                                                                  ,

p '[,l I Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies a (If Any) Satisfied 9 Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied JG Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied V Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied _ Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

  ,','.:q,*

DESIGNATION: NRC CUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY

     ?]l.:.
        ~
  .%                             I.a          Equipment Qualified Equipment Qualification Pending Modification Q

jg I.b II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established K_ g II.b Equipment Not Qualified

i Jj II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life h " III.a or Replacement Schedule Justified Equipment Exe
npt From Qualification Mi III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review
  1. j IV Documentation Not Made Available

, 'rj ,

       ' {.

See b vct hch th on f- . 6

.p. ' .,l                  p
 'e h
 - -. W.; .: Aq,M*                           .~p.br'" T='L '
  • s z' y 4 - - - -s=y y- y yh N**===*. _,, 4
        . _ - . . . .               .    ...u                  -...:       - . . . .         . .   .._..........c..a,....._-                -
                              ~

NRC C::ntr::.ct N3. NRC-03-79-118 U!)'branklin Res:Irch Cent:r FRC Pr: Ject N3. C5257 Pag 2 A OMsion of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13 3a

 ,1 20th and Race Streets. Phi a.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000        FRC Task No.      4-89/489 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 28 LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER 5     11=itorque has 1:f:r:ei us that a ge:erf: re;cr vi n te availatie vich lientifies the sc:-=etalli: :steria.ls used within their
      ,                                         MC7's ami =cre directly ;:=3vides bases fer c:relatics to existing q4alificatic test re;cris.              ".'e vill receive ec;ies cf this re;;rt when issued aci anti:1; ate resciutic: cf the cutstandi s 1 e.:.s by,the e=1 cf this yes:.                                  .

I 1 I O I

                           -,                    _ , =
          .._...-._.,.,.g-                         . _ . . . _ . _ .      ..._,.-_,,-....%.                          ,in        - , s ..g ,._, , -

4 h NRC Contret Nr. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page dJ rank!!n Research Center A Dtwn of ne Franan insnrute FRC Assignment No.13 5f

                 .               20th and Race Streets. P5da.. Pa.19103 (215) 448.tmo FRC Task No. 487/488
          .l             I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2A NOTES:                                    "X"   DENOTES APPROPRIATE NOTES li
  ,                              N        1. The Licensee has not provided documentation from the l,                                            manufaccurer which establishes                           ua.l's b'ca-IIfx. , CrooTe A,B) 7 g                     X       2c The Licensee has not identified the class of the insulation
              '-                                system used for the motor in the motorized valve actuator.

X 3. The ticensee hae not identified whether or not this =otor1=ed valve actuator incorporates a motor-brake assembly. A X 4. The Licensee has not identified the class of the insulation b)' system used for the motor-brake assembly (if applicable). E X 5. The Licensee has not identified the motor manufacturer for

  ,;g                                           this motorized valve actuator.

%g k 6. The Licensee has not identified the =anufacturer of the motor-brake assembly (if applicable) . q I 7. The Licensee has not identified the type of current used in the motorized valve actuator.

                       }

);[]. . M 8. The Licensee has not identified the type of current used in l'.y the motor-brake assembly (if applicable).

         ,q                               9. The Licensee has not established a qualified life estimate
     ' 14                                       for this motorized valve' actuator based on technically

< C.q justifiable =ethods and conservative assumptions. ,gt 10. The Licensee has stated that the only harsh parameter j , 3,< that this motorized valve actuator is exposed to is radiation. pfD 11. Since radiation is stated to be the only harsh parameter and t*C considering the extensive radiation testing of the motors

                 ,                              used in this type of materized valve actuator, the specified

(% l;MN

       ,                                        radiation dose of                                  is considered to be of sufficiently low value as to act affect this equipment ldW                                              item. This equipment item is considered qualified for this

' ',) ,[g parameter. 't2, .j ~ 12. The Licensee has counitted to replace this equipment item.

, y,.;                                          The Licensee has stated the follcwing:

p,l

  .{'

1: s :;; .!? sp q % 'f4

   .. f -

M{ m i

                      }

e 'O

 .s
                     ?                                   *,    M?,Tf f*                **"*~*~*"'P                     "" ' # N r m yq7      } * *
   . ..     ..-.. .         a             . .        -1a. - . ~ -                            . . . . . . . .       - e A                                                                         NRC Contract Nr. NRC-0.1-79-118 00b       nklin Rssurch Cent.tr                                          FRC Project No. C5257                                         P:gT; A Division of Tha Frtnkhn insntuts                                 FRC Assignment No.13                                           5g 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 4481c00              FRC Task No.            48Y/488 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 26 NOTES:

6 Y WAJM U2 4 dLKs mAu] N ,,ev,n h> ' as,te~ a LO s ~ R a

                                   % muiadha                                                                       smw                WL U

bddA .

                                                                                 -s                 Ad iAs            '

V x,n s n w aar V $ _) ) 4 Mbt &4 MO Vd) d4 " M6 VG)dd sulut un /6L A 76 6 f4 6(o 2.;. bd - DiL2, luu, hm u M ud

            =                                                                               d R

1 l I

 --e*
  • a. + - o y + mee, v -.meee.y
                                                 ,m7            9    s     , _ ,   --- etww eev                . -      ,        . -   . , , _ , , . . - -,

g NRC ContrJct No. NRC-03-79-118 UU!pL Frrnklin Rzsstreh Cent:r Pag 2

         ~*                                                                          FRC Pr: Ject No. CS257 A Dusacn of Ths Frtnkhn instituo                       FRC Assignment No.13                                           lc 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000  FRC Task No.          4M EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 29 EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 29 MOTORIZED VALVE ACTUATOR LOCATED IN THE ECCS PUMP ROOM (A119)
         . . ..        LIMITORQUE MODEL SMB00 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME:                    9 HOURS TER CHECKSHEET NO. 29
   ,                   LICENSEE REFERENCE (S):                  1064
              \        FUNCTION (PLANT ID): HPSJ HEADER CROSS-CONNECT VALVE ( A119) (1MOV655)

LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12]: 190 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): HPSI HEADER CROSS-CONNECT VALVE (IMOV653)

          ~      4     LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12):                         189 im f:[N s
 ; .y '
 ,Y :-
         .               DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) [ . .',) c

 :.fr; R, T, h P, B, CS, h S, (R), M, I, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None,
                                                                                                                                                                ~

Not stated, Not applicable f.. )

           .m
      , .},4             LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:
  'N
   *(.                   Contents                                                                           Checksheet Pace No.

r.

 'P e-             Equipment Item                                                                       la l'-Q                      Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER yj                                                                                                          lb

' Up Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2

  ~w.

j:<y, Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, Yb, Oc, :i System Consideration Review --! ; , 4L, 4c, 40, 4u, 4:

  .E                     Equipment Environmental Qualification Review                                      -5 0 , 5b, ~c, ~2, 52, 5f,
   ;          e 59, Oh, Si, 5j-
 ..I-           '

Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 50, 05 f{ } Equipment Summary

         .,              Maintenance anc Replacement Scnedule Summary                                       7a, 7b, 70 k'
    .** f t g **r**'w f [A 5 'T~r         Ww* + y      +t_ ;-   Swj--&5 ' <          ~ ~ ' ~ -    ~~~"A- 05. ,          " ~+ m ' - " * - ~
                                                                                                                                                -   ?'   wY5 A%

[ __m _ _ . _

                                                .. . ~ .. : a a.. , ._ : . .. .    .:a .              :.-..w..-..__.,a.                               ~ ;. ,. n NRC Contract N:;. NRC-03-79-118 A[jhrrnklin d             Rrstarch Cent:r                                FRC Project No. C5257                                       Pig 3 A Dr..sion al Th2 Fr ;n!Jin !nsntuu                      FRC Assignm:nt N;.13 -                                       lb 2Cth and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103(215)448 tmo      FRC Task No. 487/488 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 29

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: Y Tne Licensee (has/L., .m) provided a response to the SER concerns. N The Licensee (bes/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions. ~ The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item. Corrective action specified by the Licensee: -) Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( ) The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis fer justification for interim operation. The Licensee (nas/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .) The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

                  - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY:                  (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)                                                               !

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I,b Modification III.a Exempt , L11. a Oua i i r i cation Not Estaclisned) III.b Not in Scope I II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available D,

            .h                        L.,.-       e.        .,        - - - - . w e wp* Terr **e-  W      e =** 5 t *
  • 1 * "M f --
                                                                                                                                           'Aee," 7      7

J 4bJ 7 NRC C:ntrzct N . NRC-03-79-118 P g3 h ranklin Research Center FRC Project N2. CS257 4 A Dwmon of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13,408 2 20th and hace Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4M/ d EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 29

M.

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM e DESIGNATION:

, /y.)                   NRC REQUIREMENTS                                                                              X = DEFICIENCY
                                                                                              ~
        ~!l,                                                         <

tm Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate

      ' U                Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established                                                  X m              Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately                                                                               %
) j.                     Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)                                                     %

s < Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

n. Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate

   .%                          o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate GN h^-y                        o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate
 .M.y                    Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Q.3                     Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied jj                 Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied
-J                 l     Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied

'M I Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies

) t-                         (If Any) Satisfied

, ,)t/p Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied C.d Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied y.g% Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) {'k E*d DESIGNATION: [h NRC CUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY If%

 .vQ                                  Equipment Qualified

- t I.a iGS I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Mcdification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established X

}d15ffQ
 !                        II.b        Equipment Not Qualified M                          II.c        Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Lif e W{                                     or Replacement Schedule Justified Ok k                      III.a III.D Equipment Exempt From Qualification Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review
  'y
   -                      IV          Documentation Not Made Available
 'g  -

' N,l r: G (D,,, \/ MA tOA CA 6 - an l rQ

' ,'kR a

! 4.?;mqw wv w wmn,_,, cgm ~~--mm w #~w. v- _u --

a... .....n ~ ~ i .. n . .- ... .-. u. . ..u. . ~

t. 1 NRC Contr:ct No. NRC-03-79-118 UObrinkhn Riserrch Center FRC Project No. C5257 Pag 3-A cimon of The Franan Insntute FRC Assignrr.ani No.13 30 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa 19103 (215) 44810c0 FRC Task No. er37/4ea EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 29-i 4

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC 5!.R i 4 5 L1=iterrae has infor=ed *as that a generi reacri vill te available which idestifies the sc -zeta. *ic =rrer* als Asei vithis their MOV's aci =cre directly ;:-: rides taen.fre ecrreittic: to existi:4 Taalificatics test re;crts. 'Je vill rece1~s ce; es cf this re;cn whe: israed and s.:ticipate resci';-ics of the eatsta..di:g items ' ty. the e:d of

  • tis year. .

ii e '( l l 4 4 9 t 1 1

 'k '

l I t i I o l' p 7 10. The Licensee has stated that the only harsh parameter . 4. Ni! " that this motori:ed valve actuator is exposed to is radiation.

  'S                                                11. Since radiation is stated to be the only harsh parameter and r,'g                                                    considering the extensive radiation testing of the =otors
  !M                                                      used in this type of motorized valve actuator, the specified radiation dose of                                   is considered to be of (Q;
  • ie.

sufficiently low value as to not affect this equipment

 ;th                                                      item. This equipment item is considered qualified for this g                                                       parameter.

Yb 12. The Licensee has committed to replace this equip =ent item. Q ,a; The Licensee has stated the follcwing:

       .i
,,j '.

2 e ., ) e

+
  ~           .

Fe e 2

                                     ~
                         ,ws - ,,r , y eM --     7--ee   . . ~ . . . -

m~E r -===re w e v- th * = ~ - * = --** wm *-a'*6 Mb **- MfE -** Me [ ]

r -- . -- - x---- - - - - - - - --->---.,s=------ n NRC C:ntract NO. NRC-03-79118 gw$nkhn R JF Resesrch Cent:r FRC Project NO. C5257 Pag 3 A Diwsion of Tha Fr: nun Insntuts FRC Assignment No.13 5g 3)th and Race S*reets. Phh Pa 19103(215)448 Imo FRC Task No. 487/488 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 29 tiOTES:

                                      -            9       s &           A2lA-        ke2] 6JY                    $b-1A$ dad 2f YW2_

w 1 N L S % ,1_ wdOA m , jd} Aid ars d,1~au 'TL LLO6rAU)a deav D - + w ww W

                                        +6shia'    /         _

ml A n ~ ~ ihe .An . p . wuur

  !                                                                                                                                            9 e.

i l i l a n i 9

                                  **=r=.                                                                   ,e_
9. _.., _. . . _ . _ . . _ . . _ . . _ . . _ _ , , _ , _ . . ,

___.__m --

g;2_ NRC C;ntract N 5. N RC-03-79-118

                               !,C,2 Fr:n! din R: search Center                                                                                P:g]

FR C Pr: Ject N 3. C5257 A oui.on of The Frankbn Insnrue FRC Assignment No.13 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103(215; 444 1000 lc FRC Task No. IM '7

                .1 ~'

( s EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICAT!ON REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 30 N_/ EQUIPMENT ITEM No. 30 MOTORIZED VALVE ACTUATOR LOCATED IN CONTAINMENT RECIRCULATION PIPE TUNNEL (A122) LIMITORQUE MODEL SMB00 1 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 9 HOURS q TER CHECKSHEET No. 30 i LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 706, 2876 - FUNCTION (PLANT ID): CONTAINMENT NORMAL SUMP MAKEUP WATER RETURN ISOLATION (IMOV5463) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12): 265 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): CONTAINMENT NORMAL SUMP MAKEUP WATER RETURN ISOLATION (IMOV5462)

          ,                 LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12}: 264 1
   ~

( . {.N e ?!Y ,

           %l d-              I
        ,s-Y,                      DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

lM (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) D R, T, RT, P, H, CS, S, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, e.

       '{.e                                                                       (R), M, llj                           Not stated, Not applicable 1: Q l ' L. J                      LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

b?

 ,        .g                 Contents                                                                           Checksheet Page No.

\. ,0 j.% Equipment Item la

      .,m

. gf. Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb

o. Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 j Q, Licensee Response to NRC SER 3 a , -3 5, Jr. 3d-
  • '.n" . , System Consideration Review *, 1b, I;, 40, 4;, 42 -

9'. Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Lb-56, Sc, 5d, 5;, 5f, f' .~a Sg,-5h, Si, ;;

     ,                       Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation                                        Se, CL

(.* Equipment Summary

  , E :-                     Maintenance ano Replacement Senedule Summary                                       t , 7b, 7;
j. -

4- . )w. , ,, m . w i..v - - , - ~ - - _ . ,

                                                                                            ..   .- - y ,w .w w . .- ,.. -, ,; _ , . -          y - ~pw m
                   ,.                                                _ . . . _      ._. . . _ .                  ._       . _ . m _. _ _ . _ _ m                         ._

w l

  '                                                                                                        NRC Contract N r. NRC-03-79-118                                         l
                            /[lWa'n!

din R:s; arch C:nt:r FRC Project No. C5257 P g3 l l A o s.wn of Ths Fr:n'n.: n inuaun FRC Assignment No.13 lb i 2:ah and Race Stree's. Phda.. Pa 19103(215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 487/427 A - I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.JO SUMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES 'IO THE NRC SER - CHLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: X Tne Licensee (has/b- ._a provided a response to the SER concerns. t 1 The Licensee (br/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE 2 environmental service conditions. l X The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the [ Licensee for tnis equipment item.

 'l H                                         Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

4

)                                               Equipment replacement with qualified equipment j                                              Equipment modification ~                                                                                          *
 ]                                              Equipment relocation above submergence level
'1 R6 locate or shield equipment from radiation source

( Verify qualitication by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress J Other ( )

 ,                                        The Licensee has provided other information for.this equipment item i

that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. i I The Licensee (nas/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed f corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .) c The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. DE3IGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW q - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) { I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency

                          .I.b    Modification                                                              III.a Exempt 1II.a Qualif tcation Not Estaclisnedj                                              III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified                                                               IV          Documentation Not Available r<
     - . .. . . Y E~ , M -. 1 .       . . - - - .--. + 2-e s.-- wroE - -- d ~~e y- + =          - * * - - * * * * * '
  • P,--- ,7 - " ' ' '. ** ? * , ' ' p
                          /g                                                                 NRC C:ntract N O. N RC-03-79-118 bdJ Fr:nklin R:seIrch C:nt:r FRC Pr:Joct Nr. C0257                               Pag]

A Dim.on oi The Frankhn inst tute FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race Streers. Phda . Pa. 19103 (215) 44810m FRC Task No. 487 /dd8 I I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAt. QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. SO EQUIPMENT E!NIRON:4 ENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FOP 14

          - i                                                                                                                DESIGNATION:

A. NRC REQUIRFJ4ENTS X = DEFICIENCY

             .a           Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established                                            X Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately                                                                         Y
            .i            Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)                                                'l Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation
                 !        Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: . o Peak Temperature Adequate

             >                     o Peak Pressure Adequate
    , . . ,                        o Duration Adequate r j,p                            o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately is                           o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate T j.i                   criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied
  ,I                      Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied

][, Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied N Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied g [ ) Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies i f (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied ,[]) ' b;.f. Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied

E Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied
    ,M                    Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) hp
    '7,/                                                                                                                        DESIGNATION:
  • Y' , NRC OUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY i

c ;. .

'"Q                       I.a              Equipment Qualified Equipment Qualification Pending Modification
  .~J                      I.b il d   .

II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established X '$) II.b Equipment Not Qualified

h. II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life
   */j$                                    or Replacement Schedule Justified y;,                    III.a           '

ipment Exempt From Qualification g, III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review { g,;, IV Documentation Not Made Available m +s e .k , MI M VC MC f on On p . 1x i

    '9 m     %
  • y b h[< '

y Ul[. I"i"W I. M M F9'W"* 9 '

                                                                     '1 M,y
                                                                              - - - -*         pyg            y --
         .... -. . .            , . --.          . . . . . . . . . ....:.= -- -. - - ~ --                            ..c-               -
                                                                                                                                                   ..         -- v s                                                              NRC C:ntr:ct N O. NRC-03-70-118 Ob Franklin R:sc rch Ccnt:r                                       FRC Pr: Ject N2. C5257                                          Pag 3 A Dwision of The Frankhn institute                            FRC Assignment No.1J                                            '3a 20th and Race Stree's. Phdt. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000         FRC Task No. MY /4f28__

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFiOATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 3 LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER

5. !i=itorque has 1:for=ed us that a se:eri: re; rt vill te availatie vai:h, identifies the ::n- eta- =atefials usei withi: their MCV's asi ::re directly ;rovides bases f:r ::rrela-i:: to existing qus11fi:sti:: test re;crts. *4e vill receive ::;ies of this re; r.

ve.e: issued and a :1:1; ate resciuti:: cf the cutstanding items ty, the e:d of this yes.r. . O 1 e d . n O t

  1. 4

_my e. . -%

      .~    -=6.....---      .r w - up me-.,.g w . ye e. g ., wg.e e .ww-y,.       - . m*                       . yese* =w ,
                                                                                                                                        .y . , 7.. _ ,.p _.

gyp.~e .

                ~

A~ NRC Contract Nr. NRC-03-79-118

                              !.N     nklin Research Center                               FRC Project No. C5257           Page A cimion of The FranMin Institute                                           13           5f
              .                   20th and Race Streers. Phda.. Pa 19103 f 215) 44810@    FRC  Assignrnent FRC Task    No. 48 No.Nl88 I         I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 20.

F tiOTES: "X" DENOTES APPROPRIATE NOTES l g h 1. The Licensee has not provided documentation from the

      .J."

manufacturer which establishes similarity between the installed equipment and the test specimen in the referenced document (s). ( NOTE A) Y 2. The Licensee has not identified the class of the insulatica

                    .                             system used for the motor in the motorized valve actuator.
           '~

f 3. The Licensee has not identified whether or not this motorized

                     ,                            valve actuator incorporates a motor-brake assembly.
            /                     /k       4. The Licensee has not identified the class of the insulation t                                    system used for the motor-brake assembly (if applicable).
5. The Licensee has not identified the motor manufacturer for 41 this motorized valve actuator.

.Y N 6. The Licensee has not identified the manufacturer of the motor-brake assembly (if applicable). N. n$1 , y

     ,f                           A        7. The Licensee has not identified the type of current used in
       .Gr,,                      X        s.

the motorized valve actuator, The ticensee has noe ideneified the type of currene used in the motor-brake assembly (if applicable). f.g

l. lb
 . -e fi       9. The Licensee has not established a qualified life estimate for this motorized valve actuator based on technically

[9h

    .         X.

justifiable =ethods and conservative assumptions. c7p 10. The Licensee has stated that the only harsh parameter );, that this motorized valve actuator is exposed to is radiation.

   ,. F-
11. Since radiation is stated to be the only harsh para =eter and i '/ .. considering the extensive radiation testing of the motors
    ..$                                           used in this type of motorized valve actuator, the specified
g radiation dose of is considered to be of
  .g                                              sufficiently low value as to not affect this equipment
  .</                                             item.      This equipment item is considered qualified for this
~ .g;..

d@M parameter. Pp1 12. The Licensee has committed to replace this equipment item. igi The Licensee has stated the following: W m . Q2 iG Skj l n+

                  .i e-a

_ ... . . am:% ,.__.--#% % r w j , c ,7,

              . . . . _ . - . - . _ _ , . . _ _ _ _ .           . . -...,~ . . _ . _ .. _ ___.                  ... . .
                                                                                                                                                  -              - - . ~ . ,

1 l A- NRC Contrcct Nc. NRC-03-79-118 l 00bNnklin Rsssarch Cant:r FRC Pr; ject No. CS257 P:g3 l A Division of The Frank:in insuute FRC Assignment No.13 5g i 20th and Race Streets. Phita . Pa 19103 (215) 448 lcm FRC Task No.387- /4-8 8 l l EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 30 - j 1 NOTES: A . % , L L e e ,. m h.s c&d e<-7/2 sesn<di-w1

   ;                                    avM L ki                                                A A.                     Su, n2rldad M h2                               bcAueer Ne                                     db-Ab)
                                        & s4Acf wwf ju m x W
                                         ,Aaha kSw i

O o, 6 b ./x-aime i L i 1 i d m. 1 i I i .d d l S l 4 ~

          . __ m _.--_-- _. g. ,.                             _                _.,,..,....,._____c._

nm -wnw - - -- -

                                                                                                                         . ~ . . . .      w: .. --      . .,    .

w m l g__N NRC C:ntr:ct N2. NRC-03-79118 l 2 Frankhn Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 P:ge

           '?                       A Dus.on of The Franan Insmute                            FRC Assignment No.13                                   la 2Gth and Race 5 reets Phila Pa 1910H215) 44%IM            FRC Task No.        NU

{ } EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTA', QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQU!PME.*JT ITEM NO. U EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 31 MOTORIZED VALVE ACTUATOR LOCATED IN THE EAST PENETRATION ROOM (A227) [, LIMITORQUE MODEL SMB2 d REQUIRED OPER/. TING TIME: 9 F.0URS

5. . TER CHECKSHEET No. 31
         N .               LICENSEE REFERENCE (S):               706
            ',h              FUNCTION (PLANT ID): LPSI TO LOOP 1131MOV625 (IMOV625)
      , 3;;                  LICENSEE SUBMITTAL:              SCEW(S) [1, 12):               207
           *J ,

a T.

     'Iwt,
    '. .S                      -
2,1 ;
          . .i

':.,5)i

v
  !M, .
      'A ll
    .!k 3k,                      DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:
     '.j dj
         -                    (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
     .!n .
    -}                        R, T, h RT,           P,   H, CS, h S,         (R), M,       I, VM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None,
       -. p.

[

    -h c Not stated, Not applicable ff;                       LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:
 .gG

[Ib Content.s Checksheet Page No. ' i, .* 3

    ;                         Equipment Item                                                                      la
     #wd.                     Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER                                        lb jf s?J,3                    Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms                                 2 4:

l'j;j Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a,-3b,-3c, 2 d --

 . W. ;                       System Consideration Review                                                         4a, 4, 4c, 4d,            *c,
                                                                                                                                            . i f-M d,                   Equipment Environmental Qualification Review                                       -5 ; , 5b, Sc, 2d, Sc, 5f, 5g, :;., ;;,          ;-

y/yy[-; ( Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation Gm, C ., [1 Equipment Summary

    ,.h j                      Maintenance anc Replacement Senedule Su==ary                                       -7 ; , Ts,- 7c -

Q,t e'-

             *a
                                                                                                             , ,,                    ._w
                 .              . . . .             y__.             6._, .     ._-        -

l

              &                                                             NRC Contr:ct Nr. NRC-03-79-118 Edhnklin Rese;rch C:ntir                                     FRC Pr: ject NO. C5257                                Paga A D.usson of The Frankhn Inst:rute FRCTask Assignment                                     lb 2Gth and Race Streets. Phd4 . Pa 19103 (2:5) 448-1000 FRC       No. 48Y No.13[d%

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 3I 1 SUAMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLIC N Tne Licenree (has/L. . 4 provided a response to the SER concerns. N The Licensee (bir/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions. X The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment-item. Corrective action specified by the Licensee: a Equipment replacement with qualified equipment i Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level

  ]                             Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source
.q                              Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) i:                             Equipment relocation to a mild environment I

Qualification testing of equipment in progress [ e, Other ( ) 1 T::e Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. The Licensee (nas/nas not) provided a schedule for the proposed ) corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective l action

                                                                                                                         .)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should oe exempted frcs environmental qualification. DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

           - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY:                  (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency-I.b Modification III.a Exempt

        ]ii.a Oua ntici m m n uci:cae 1          II.b Not Qualillea                                     ]       III.b Not in Scope IV       Documentation Not Available J

L ( _ _ 7 :..--.m--

                                                            - ,         -    ,       7 -r~"        " ~ ~ " "                ~~~

Q' LOOJh ranklin Research Center NRC Contr:ct NO. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Pag 2 A Dmson cf The Frankhn Institute 2 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (2156 448-1000 FRC Assignment FRC Task No. 4P;4 No.13[488 l EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUlPMENT ITEM NO. 31 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION: NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established X Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately X Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) A

        ..               Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: o Peak Temperature Adequate o . Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate r' o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately i o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate

    '[                   Criteria Pagarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied m,.,
    "i            '

Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied jg i( , Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies h# C (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied i.' Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

    ?)
   .s
   , .                                                                                                                           DESIGNATION:

g .. NRC QUALIFICATICN CATEGORY X = CATEGORY p s I.a Equipment Qualified

c;. 3
 ^

I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established X. O,* II.b Equipment Not Qualified liI IsD II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification

 ,e                       III.D        Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review h                        IV           Documentation Not Made Available iV l - .

g 1

        . /
                  /

i : i ,.

       +6
                 - my v.m:m wrm .,--:_. . . . . am:.r. w;;. gwrg.,mg gu                                                           - - _m m. 3x,__.
                                                                                                                                          --           ----.---b
. . . . . . ~ . . ~ . . . - . - - - - . . . - - . ~ . - - - - - - .

3 1

                  ;_.                                                               NRC C:ntract Nc. NRC-03-79-118 UI)0i Franklin Rsseirch C:nt:r                                       FRC Pr: Ject N o. C5257                                                           Pag]

4 A Dnnsion olThe Frankhn insnture FRC Assignment No.13 3a f 4 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103(215) 448 1 2 FRC Task No. 48 ? /488 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. .:3.1. 1 LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER

5. :.1=itor se has ist:rmed us that a generic're; ort vill te available vuich identifies the non-metalli: :sterials used withis their MOY's a. 4 : ore directly ;r evides bases for c:rrelati:= to existi:4 qualifi:stien test reports. *'e . vill re:eive ::;tes of this re;;rt vnen issued est anticipate resolu*.i = cf the outstanding items by, *.he end of this year. .

4 1 1 O \. l 1

i i .A i '.

O J q s t ..,

~,-,._..-,,_
                                 ..,,_,-.,mm._.-_             ,
                                                                                                                          . _ _ _ - - - _ -f . . -u.
                                                                                                                                                                             - 7. _ _ _ _ _ _

4 NRC Contract N 2. NRC-03 73-118

              .                  Ulluu Frank!!n Research Center                               FRC Project No. C5257                  Page A Dhnson of The Franan Inseture                        FRC Assignment No.14                    Sf "th acd Race Sweets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 4481mo    FRC Task No. 461/468 l          l EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. <3 3
                .               tKYfES:                                       "k" DENOTES APPROPRIATE NOTES h                           X        1. The Licensee has not provided documentation from the manufacturer which establishes s1=ilarity between the
                   ,                                     installed equipment and the test specimen in the referenced

(( ,

              . . ,                                      document (s). (.u oTu A)
           '&                           X        2 .' The Licensee has not identified the class of the insulation
    - i'                                                 system used for the motor in the motorized valve actuator.

X 3. The Licensee has not identified whether or not this motorized valve actuator incorporates a motor-brake asse=bly. [ N 4. The Licensee has not identified the class of the insulation

    !_             ..                                    s7 stem used for the motor-brake assembly (if applicable) .
          . 3.                      X        5. The Licensee has not identified the motor.=anufacturer for this motorized valve actuator.

! @q ?} X 6. The ticensee has noe ideneified the manufacturer of the (Q motor-brake asse=bly (if applicable). X

                 ~

l ,-

7. The Licensee has not identified the type of current used in the motorized valve actuator.

N 8. The Licenses has not identified the type of current used in Q the motor-brake assembly (if applicable) . lh M 9. The Licensee has not established a qualified life estimate g for this motorized valve actuator based on technically

  . 7,g justifiable =ethods and conservative assumptions.

l 9.).J.i 10. The' Licensee has stated that t'.e only harsh para =eter ,@ .i .b that this =ocorized valve actuator is exposed to is radiation. ? ,'g? 11. Since radiation is stated to be the only harsh parameter and considering the extensive radiation testing of the =otors VM used in this type of motorized valve actuator, the specified +Y' radiation dose of is considered to be of (.M sufficiently low valua as to not affect this equipment 4 y,( item. This equipment item is considered qualified for this v.% parameter.

         ,4
' i N 12. The Licensee has c W tted to replace this equipment item.

The Licensee has stated the following: h'[: r. 1 : ~ . ,- t

                                                                                                 ~~~~~'~~~'~_______,,_.,,
u. -., _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ . - - - - - - - .

A. The Licensee has cited correspondence with L1=itorque that [} H.'. - 1 =ay establish similarity between the installed and tested equip =ent; however, this information was not subsitted for

t;l I review, L

a

            'J  t
    .                   _ . ,_                 .n           -

y , , g, -- a - --

        .                             .-                      k     -...: .                ., .       ..            . ..                      --

A~ NRC Contract N 2. NRC-03-79-118 M! fir'ankiin Rrsearch Csntir FRC Prrject N3. C5257 P 02 A DMsan of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phda , Pa 191031215) 443 1000 FRC Task No. 487 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. E EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 32 MOTORIZED VALVE ACTUATOR LOCATED IN CONTAINMENT RECIRCULATION PIPE TUNNEL (A122) LIMITORQUE MODEL SMB2 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 9 HOURS TER CHECKSHEET NO. 32 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 706 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): CONTAINMENT SUMP DISCHARCE (IMOV4144) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12]: 214 E f. l' t l' k DESIGNATICN FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITD4(S) ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) . i s R, T, P, H, CS, S, (R) , M, I , QM , RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING CF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS,: 9 Contents Checksheet Pace No. Equipment Item la " Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 ,j Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a,-25, 2c, ? ? -- System Consideration Review -! : , -I b , te, td, te, if- [ ( Equipment Environmental Qualification Review - 50, 51, Sc, 55, 5 ;, 5f, , l h , Sh, 5i, Sj l Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation -Sa, 5t- < Equipment Summary l Maintenance and Replacement Senedule Summary 7;, TL, 7-- l

                . ,.. .,.l a; Q .m .,,j' _                 _. , a .. m - ,,

I , : . .- . _7 . . . - _ , . . . . . . . _ , , _J,...,. . - . . . , _ i

                                     #w                                                                      NRC Contr:ct NT. NRC-03-79-118 NElbranklin RIsurch Centrr                                            FRC Pr$ct N::. CS257                   P:g3 a or. mon of Thz Frinklin Insertut                                                  13 FRC  Assignment                        lb 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 448 tmo         FRC Task No. 48 No. N489
         '^

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 32.

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: E

             ,                        N Tne Licensee (has/:- -- S provided a response to the SER concerns.

j The Licensee N/has ,not) specifically stated that the equipment is G qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE vl environmental service conditions. I'

             .-                       X The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no
          ~{                                   outstanding qualification deficiencies.

The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

           ., i Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the
         ]'                                              Licensee for this equipment item.

O Corrective action specified by the Licensee: Eqaipment replacement with qualified equipment 1 . Equipment modification p Equipment relocation above submergence level 1 , Relocate or shield equipment from radiatien source

         .1                                                    Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

[' ' Equipment relocation to a mild environment l' Qualification testing of equipment in progress

       -E -

Other ( ) The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim

          ,                                              operation.

84 g . . ej [ The Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective

  ,                                                      action                                                                              .)

i. N, The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification

q. and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.
             ,'                    DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
                                   - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY:                              (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
           '.                      I.a          Qualified                                                    II.c qualified Life Deficiency j *
            ,                      I.b          Modification                                                 III.a Exempt l  '

LII.aQualificationNotEstablishh III.b Not in Scope II.D Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

 ,' . l                      l
      " % s'
 %_.amap =              e- _w *Wwee ga ww epMew e r g r+    ,+   N we n ,W_erde tNp*         F     - - _ , q g          ""Y"   3 -'             -

F

                        --                          .     .~..__...~_w                  _ .

4~ NRC CIntract N2, NRC-03-79-118 llhJ Funklin R:serreh C:nt:r FRC Project N3.C5257 Pag 0 A ouuon of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phita.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 Imo FRC Task No. 46 7/# 8 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 32-

  )

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FOlui DESIGNATION: NRC REQUIREMEN*S X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence <of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established X Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately X. Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) X. Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: o Peak Temperature Adec;uate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied [ Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

                                           -                                                                     DESIGNATION:

NRC CUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established _ X. II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Quclified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available k I k GG E Va. LA L Ch O V\ & . i? O j l i---. . . . , . _~- A.,___,. _

                                                       .     ,           m_-._--~~--              ._-   . ,.     . .      ;;-a     .
                                                                                                  -.         .=_.       ...- -         . . . --__ . .- . _ ... - -           ,

l l NRC Ccntr:ct N2. NRC-03-79-118 l UObrenk!1n Risetrch C:ntt FRC Prcject N2. C5257 Pag 3 A oms.on of The Frankhn insutute FRC Assignment No.13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19:03 (215) 44810m FRC Task No. 487/482 { } EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICAT!ON REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 32. LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER

                ,4                                                 5  I1=1terque has infor=ed us that a gener1= report vill te availatie vnich identifies the ccc-ceta*a =aterials used withis their
                                                                      .v4Y's and =cre directly ;.mvides bases f r correlati:= to existing qualificatic: test repcrts. 'Je vill receite ::;tes of this re; rt
                  -                                                   when issued and antici; ate reschti:n of tre outsta.a.di:4 ite=s by,the end of this year.                           .

J.' j. t

       ) '.

a.. f q l f.

  ' ' A ./#

s ,I;

  • l k*l <
    .c()j 0,;
< .'s .

1

           .4
    % T              F
           %g4
           ![.

I a$ e a rs h h . . v, . .

                 ~T 3           .
a. -s g? ..
 '}c.

4 i

f a* ,
   - g             .<

b m . 6 %s- 44e $% MV . em. ,p gw q y g g . 9 %g g..ga w_p pie,gm 9.g e 9

                      .                                                             m ,_        x. .e   a   %.     ....___a.----              ---
                                                    .                                        NRC Contract N r. NRC-03-79-118 6'J00)7' tanklin Research Center                                    FRC Project No. C5257                          Pag 3 A Dim.cn onha FranW '.nstruta                               FRC Assignrnent No.13                           Sf     I 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 4484c00       FRC Task No. 4O>T/488 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 32.

tiOTES: "X" DENOTES APPROPRIATE NOTES _N 1. The. Licensee has not provided documentation from the manufacturer which establishes similarity between the instdlied equipment and the test specimen in the referenced

     ,                                              document (s). (.OoTE A)

N 2. The-Licensee has not identified the class of the insulation system used for the motor in the motorized valve actuator. K 3. The Licensee has not identified whether or not this motorized valve actuator incorporates a motor-brake assembly. X 4. The Liceesee has not identified the class of the insulation system used for the motor-brake assembly (if applicable). E 5. The Licensee has not identified the motor manufacturer for thic motorized valve actuator. X. 6. The Licensee has not identified the manufacturer of the motor-brake assembly (if app,licable). T ~ 7. The Licensee has not identified the type of turrent used in the =otorized valve actuator. __ N 8. The Licensee has not identified the type of current used in the motor-brake asse=bly (if applicable). N 9. The Licensee has not established a qualified life estimate for this motorized valve actuator based on technically justifiable =ethods and conservative assumptions.

10. The Licensee has stated that the only harsh parameter i that this motorized valve actuator is exposed to is radiation.'
11. Since radiation is stated to be the only harsh parameter and considering the extensive radiation testing of the motors used in this type of motorized valve actuator, the specified radiation dese of . is considered to be of sufficiently low v'alue as to not affect this equipment item. This equipment item is considered qualified for this parameter.
12. The Licensee has cecmitted to replace this equipment item.

The Licensee has stated the following: > e L l l

 '%mb,~,,-
       .        , - - ,  . ,,.,,;.. ,  ,....n    ,._-, y_       ,, , , , , , , , ,    ,,,,.,           ,p. pwp pgT, gw .- .,*3.7C'JJ.:,;',~f;45W

o C NRC Contr:ct N3. NRC-03-79-118 l

                             /[,g.L0b Franklin R1 search Cent 2r                         FRC Przject Ns. C5257                                  P:g]

D. mon of The FranklaInstitute FRC Asalgnmentpo.14

                                   ;)h and Race Streets Phila . Pa 19103 (2151448-1c00 5G FRC Task No. V87 / Yk'

[ EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 3 2_-- YJ NOTES:

    '              ~

h.%Ma Iss b wnuemki

                                                                                         %4 ml anAAA
i aM L%,n
    ;                   ~

a u M 'L n % d m jAA nd JAt ua- A A m W, Amk ~ $A! s ~s

                                                                                                /        a aJ rmf1L/

AA suunr-0

                .r
    )          #   f.j
          .,            '~%
              /

N _, ' f +, ,

      ,            .I u                        >

Y

              .n:.

c a i , 7 I l l .i.',- i T j'. l

             ,?Q_
              <y ,

3; l1 .?k

 -f ",

i q .. , tf.5 l .

    , ~ -} :

r![

      --A~A--c-                      ..e-        ., . A , % ,. 4,,, _ . ...._ _ . . a 74 _- m_. ..        , _ .m n g, . , _ , , _ - . . . . ,
                                                                                                                                                . ., ,;__,7,. -
        . . _ , . . _ .                                                           .          m.m-   - u . . _ .u _ .

_ u.....,_.m - - . . , . . _ . . 4a d$, J Franklin R search Crnter NRC C ntract N3. NRC-03-79-118 FRCPr jectN2.C5257 Pag] A Dmsson of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No 13 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phita.. Pa 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 8'7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 33 EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 33 FLOW TRANSMITTER LOCATED IN THE EAST PIPING PENETRATION ROOM (A316) FISCHER AND PORTER MODEL 10B2495 (6) REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 9 HOURS TER CHECKSHEET NO. 33 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 646, 1782 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): FLOW TRANSMITTER (lFT6901) LICENSEE SUB.MITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12]: 256 4 4 d 1 O b DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY: l[ (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R, T, P, H, CS, S, (R) , M, I, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, ll Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: Contents Checksheet Page No. 1 Equipment Item } la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a,-2b, 20, 2d - } System Consideration Review -! : , Ib, ;;, Id, LW Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 5c, 5b, 50, 5d, 5:,,5f, 59, Sh, Si, Ej - Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation -s e , Cb Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary -7; , 7b, 7c: h

                       . _ _        . . . n .. ,.              :-            ..   ;=,7~    7 ;=^ : 5pp+wy .                          ' wi:              -

p

 -i A                                                             NRC C:ntr:ct Nr. NRC-03-79-118 dbnklin Rese:rch Csntr                                       FRC Pr; ject Nr. CS257                      PJg3 A Dmsson of Thi Fr:nkhn Inst: tut 2                       FRC Assignment No.13                         lb 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Fa 19103 (215) 448 1000     FRC Task No.      4 P'7 / IM EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 33
  '                   I SU.otARY OF L7 0.':NSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

s I Tne Licensee (has/'* " e t) provided a response to the SER concerns. O ~. (j V The Licensee tvee/has ,not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions. The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment

                  ,,             item whose qualification has not been fully established, kg                               g Justification for interim operation (has/hac not) been provided by the
 ;                                     Licensee for tnis equipment item.
              'N                  & Corrective action specified by the Licensee:
  ., T7
             ":(                             Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification

[, Equipment relocation above submergence level

~;g                                          Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source i g',                                       verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)
   ,yj                   _.                  Equipment relocation to a mild environment ay3                                         Qualification testing of equipment in progress 2g                              X Other (               '-
                                                              - -       jM                                                           )
       .a.:
   . [7                                The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item f .p.;.                               that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim f.4                              operation.
  ,Y *f.

1 Qg h The Licensee feet;41as not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective i' action .) ?.w, l.h. r3 The Licensee states that the equipment ites does not require qualification l

 .6$                            and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

g5.) , DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC OUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

                           - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY:                  (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) i              I.a    Qualified                                                II.c Qualified Life Deficiency
     '.g                   I.b    Modification                                       _

III.a Exempt J-

    ~                   l_II.a Qualificar W Not Established I                              III.b Not in Scope g               II.b Not Qualified                                              IV     Documentation Not Available i
      ~p 6            ,

i," },_ mm, m . .. _ . - _ . , _ .

                                                                                                                                    ~             m
       -... _ .- _ - .- . -. - -- -.        ..-.c    ..       .     ..--;.-..-..a.~a....           .. - _ ... .. - .           _ . -

1 A NRC Contrcct NO. N RC-03-79-118 Pag 3 00br:nklin R:se:rch C:nter FRC Project Nr.CS257 A Divmon of The Frankhn Insttrute 2 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103(215) 448 1 2 0 FRC Assignment FRC Task No. (/P7No.13[YfI EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllF! CATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. J 3 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION: NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence < of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established ' 1 Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation

Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposures o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied _ Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument An uracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

                                                                                   .                                       DESIGNATION:

NRC'OUALIFICATION CATECORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established X 1 II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available l 9 l

                                                                                                                                        "'* M F.,b, ' .

[ _, d - . M -..-. ,-.. , , ___-c., __

                                                                                             ;7,   __
                                                                                                         .--q..
                                                                . .                . .=_ _____ --. _ _. . _ - _ _         _ . . . . _ __             . . _ - . _ _ - - -

1 A NRC Contr:ct NO. NRC-03-79-118 00bbranklin Res: arch C:nt:r FRC Pr: Ject NO. C5257 Pago A Dwision ol The Fradlin institute FRC Assignment No.13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phita . Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRCTaskNo. 4P 7NfI l EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 3 3 LICENSEE RESPONSE 'IO NRC SER 3 . m 9 4

6. nese ec= pone =ts a.re withis the sec;e of cur present assess =ect/
               'l                                          evaluatics activity. 'Cc=;1etics of the activity with subsequent action pla.m is not anticipated until the end of this year or first quarter of ce2*..
                     .j a
a. 1 3 4
         ,e s

e bl 1 ," N . ~; 9

)

F, 4 , d f e b . a .'

         ? ',Y
     ., ' 't

?. 'y'.~ '.. ; e.

    ,e. .
th y ;'?.:
        ,W          g m
       }.e I

s 2$

                        -      Y%

l 9 k h 1 7

                     , q:ww w 9 -_ . . . rn -- . - - :                              ~-.          .
                                                                                                    ,~m=                   --         -- - - ---       "-   ~v==~
          - - - - . . . . . . . .                   .,                                                 . . . . .s             :....~.u...    .~......-..;.n._

1

                     /%                                                                          NRC Contract N . NRC-03-79-118 L0hNn! din R:sench Ccnt:r                                                 FRC Project N2. C5257                                  P:g2, o, mon of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignrnent No.13 f                                5f
                           .Jth and Race Streets Phila.. Pa 19103 (215) 448 1000                 FRC Task No.            4/f7/ N I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M NOTES:
                                                                                   < T C d ts )

A be n sv v

                                                                              - ECUI P'.f t f4 T-~~; - ~~ * --

C L S C.. I P f I Q ta c v. r w .r. a a euvatw IF1322

                                                                 ~ ~ ~ - CQ'PU 4 1 FLO<rXhrw e
r. .s a s u u a t .-

FISCHER PURIER P a? l topsdF.4

                                                                              ~ lM2495CO si M                 F- L P & ;t. n s t -s-t do s V                                     -                          -

A JW% M M

           ~

i g' s

                          & Jn
   }                            fv & N.C:}$/$~ b ' O A J M                                                                 -

H & rw 1 o v / s

9. D.:S C R *. 3. ~ T. ..". ^v .:..~25. __

4 4 + i'

 .)

The test was initiated . ith three els:trc..ic forca 5:iar. a tr ,.s- 'i i i

                      =itter units, consistin5 cf (i) an osci'.ia:cr-amplifier .:dule, (2' .                                                            -
 ,                     detecter coil asse:bly, and (2) a force :::cr. These transmitters arc                                                            _

used en pressure :ransmitter ':dels iC32."30, 502.010:0, 2r.C00 and

l. 50ERi;00. ,Tc Ocnserve spa:e, the ::::uring elements were nct inciu:. . .

I and the cccpenents of ea:r. :es unit wree es::ved frc their enciestres. The three units were ::unted e:;ua'.ly s;;:ed en an 11-1/2 ir.. diare:e. 1' alumi..;; case .:: ate. . .i I

                                                                ,.$M NW T                                                                           .      .   - - -

a" MgGP g e +* N M3P***.N .- T- *

                                                                                                                  ,--,-g;       -
                                                                                                                                    -w-    ,          .

I As NRC Contr:ct N o. NRC-03-79-118 L0bhrankhn Research Cent:r FRC Pr; ject N3. CJ237 P:ga A Dimen of ne Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 5g 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 448-1MO FRCTask No. VP7/VM { } EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M NOTES:

                                                                                    ,sC sQnf <                ~
     '.',.'                            ,.A_            M4          -

C

                                                                                        ,                          .W                       W

( V 0 O f. j a-4 s_ r9 I.u

                .?

f 9' r 4..

 .l.' ; ,,  ,
               *1 i
          ,4 .'

3 m t l s' . .

           .'t 3

5 e v4

          ?C s        1i?

6

                                   -,-w-   . - _ , . -                 ,      .- ,,     , _ , ,y     -._
                                                                                                               ,,,[""*"*,      **** , ,
                                                                                                                                         --   ~~.we--

7 n e

_...e _ .~.. _ . . . . . - . - _ . ~ . . - ,...as....~.m,....m_-~

                # 4                                                               NRC Contract N:. N RC-03-79-118 i;bJ' Frankhn R: search Cent:r                                                                                    P qJ FRC Pr: Ject N3. C5257 A Demn of Tha FranMn institute                            FRC Assignment No.13                              lc 20th and Rue Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 443 1000     FRC Task No.             48'7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. D EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 34 FLOW TP.ANSMITTER LOCATED IN THE PIPING AREA ( A224)

FISCHER AND PORTER MODEL 10B2495 (6) REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 9 HOURS TER CHECKSHEET No. 34 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 646, 1782 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): LPSI FLOW TO IDOP 11B (1FT322) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12): 201 FUNCTION (PLANT D): HPSI FLOW TO LOOP llB (1FT321) - LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) (1, 12): 186 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): HPSI FLOW TO LOOP 11A (1FT311) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) (1, 12): 185 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): LPSI FLOW TO LOOP 11A (1FT312) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW( S ) [1, 12): 200 l DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, hot stateh Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS : Contents Checksheet Page No. Equipment Item la . Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licenree Response to NRC SER 20, Ibr Sc, 50 System Consideration Review 4;, ,;, 4., 40, 4u, 'f-Equipment Environmental Qualification Review -5a, SL, 'c, 5d, 5:, Efr 5,3 5h, Si, Ej - Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 50, S h-I Equipment Summary 1 Maintenance anc Replacement Schedule Summary *:, 'b, ' c-I i - 1 m.. e mm,,p

m

                   '         #3Li$h)rankhn Rese:rch Center NRC Contr:ct N D. NRC-03-79-118 Pag 3 FRC Pr: Ject N2. C5257
s. Dr.:sson of Thi Fr:n%n test-ruo FRC Assignment Nq.13 lb 29th and Race Streets. Phla . Pa 19103 (215) 448 tmo FRC Task No. U.h7/ N Y' EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. N 0

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES 'IO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

               ?                     Tne Licensee (has/has not) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has ,not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE im environmental service conditions. I' 1 The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

         .                          The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equip =ent 4

item wnose qualification has not been fully established. Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the

    ];                                      Licensee for this equipment item.

em Op Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

      ' I.5 s;;Q                                         Equipment replacement with qualified equipment
       .                                          Equipment modification

, .l } Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source i, ,. ) " Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) t . - - Equipment relocation to a mild environment JE Qualification testing of equipment in progress g a Other ( ) hb Tne Licensee has provided other.information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim

  ,: (?                                     operation.

l d The Licensee (nas/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed ' d corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .) h.D 1 i f:.d The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification

  }-y                               and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

F.bj i i pe.? DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC OUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW \ 7,

                            - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY:                     (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

'[YlJ; I.c Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modification III.a Exempt l; 'D[ [ II.a Qualification Not Established] III.b Not in Scope

    .f                       11.0 Not Qualified                                                     IV        Documentation Not Available a                  l

> v ti) cjt

t. _ p u-v --,....,-a. u . , - marw=="sw w== & f '#w' S~
                              --. n ~. _                                        . . , . .            m      ~~      ,-.&-   --
          . -.         -.    ...-..-.w.:-                           .      - -.      ..    ,       .            +    ,   a ... . z : :. x   . . . a :x. . w.,

3 4000U Fr:nklin Riscarch Centa NRC Contract N 7. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project Nr. C5257 P g3 ) A DMson of The Franklin Institute FPCTask A'ssignment No.13,(/# F 2 20th and Race Streets. Phita.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC No. #M/ - l EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 34 t-EQUIPMENT E!NIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FOR.M DESIGNATION: NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence *of Qualification Adequate i Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established ' T Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedu.1.e Established (If Required) Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate

    ,                            o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately
    ;                            o Steam Exposure (If Requir'ed) Adequate f                           Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied k                       Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied j                      Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Lij                         Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied E                           Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied
                 - - . Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margin:: Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)
t DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY o I.a Equipment Qualified l l I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification

        >                   II.a        Equipment         Qualification Not Established                                                Y                         l II.b        Equipment         Not Qualil 'i         -

% II.c Equipment Satisf f a i a P.equirements Except. Qualified Life 3 or Replacemer- & 2 Justified

 )                          III.a       Equipment Ex au, . ?t                     M lification                                                                   l
 ![                         III.D       Equipment Not in th Mcpe of the Qualificaticn Review                                                                     l

{ IV Documentation Sot Made Available kp. N #

                                                                                                     /h            N                              ,

l O P-3-- , -.

.- ,w , .~ ~ . . . _

m.. p m _,.gpyc ;=-

O 1 ,, a NRC C ntt ct N2. NRC-03-79-118 W !. Franklin Rastarch Center FRC Pr: Ject N 2. CS257 Page A Dms.on of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 lc 2Cth and Race Streets. Phde . Pa 191031215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 4 f""7 l E' UIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. T EQUIPMENT ITEM No. 35 FLOW TRANSMITTER LOCATEC IN THE WEST PENETRATION ROOM ( A221) FISCHER AND PORTER MODEL 10B2495 (6) REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 9 HOURS TER CRECKSHEET NO. 35

 ;- LICEt...JE REFERENCE (S): 646, 1782 FUNCTION (PLANT D): LPSI FLOW TO LOOP 12A (1FT332)

LICENSEE SUBMIITAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12): 202 FUNCTION (PLANT D): HPSI FLOW TO LOOP 12A (1FT331) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12]: 187 FUNCTION (PLANT D): HPSI FLOW TO IDOP 123 (lFT341) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12]: 188 FUNCTION (PLANT D): LPSI FLOW TO LOOP 123 (lFT342) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12): 203 s-

q. _.,
                        \
       .*/

J

m. ./

L N1 DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY: J

       . ,;                   (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None,. htstated fict applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS : Content: Checksheet Pace No. Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb

 )[J          =

Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 2c, :e, Ow, 3d i:

'i          ~                System Consideration Review                                                        -!;,     Ib, ';, II, !;, if
          ~ 

Equipment Environmental Qualificaticn Review Sc, 5b, :- ; , :d, L, Zr

               ;                                                                                               -5;, 5h, 51, 57
        .                     Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation                                      4: , 5b-Equipment Summary
k. ,

I. Maintenance anc Replacement Senedule Summary 7 ._ , ,1, 7 ; -- l i

         . .'2 q.:.1 = m ~ -~;.            :.                     - r~ - : ~ ~ ., ,             ;=-....,,;. .-          _ -- 7~gm    z--,,1.;n 4as- ---

(...--..., , . . . . . . ~ - - . . . . - : s -

                                                                                                                 ...---. . m.-- _.. a.i          ,

J 1 A NRC Contr:ct N3. NRC-03-79-118 0009 Franklin Rm:rch Center FRC Project NO. CS257 P:g2 , A Dmson cf Th Fr:nuin Inst 2ruo FRC Assignm:nt Nr.13,M,, P~ lb l 20th and Rse Streers. Phda-. Pa 19103 (215) 4481mo FRC Task No. W "'7 / l i EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.Il _ j - SUAMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: Tne Licensee (has/has not) provided a response to the SER concerns. The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions. 1 The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the i Licensee for this equipment- item. Corrective action specified by the Licensee: 4, Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification i Equipment relocation above submergence level h Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source ly Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

 '9                                          Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other (                                                                               )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item 4 that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. The Licensee (nas/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective

      ,                                action                                                                                   .)

d The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification j and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. I j DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

   ]                   - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY:                  (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) q I.a      Qualified                                              II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.h      Modification                                           III.a. Exempt

{ lII.a Oualification Not Estaclished J III.b Not in Scope

                                                                                  -~

l, II.b Not Qualified Documentation Not Available e IV i 4 i r D N

   's             - -            -- --

_ a., _._ _ _ .--- -

                                                                                                                                         , y.v ,

w.. ;.w -

                                                                                                                        ~ m     ..wa                          iw 1
                    +

4UOhJ Franklin Research Center NRC Contr:ct N 2. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No.C5257 Page A Otwson of The Franklin Inst:tute 2 20th and Race Streets. Phi:a.. Pa. 19103(215) 448-1 % 0 FRC Assignment No.13[N FRC Task No. M_M EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M v EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

       /O                 NRC REQUIREMENTS                                                                                      X = DEFICIENCY
 '                     I                                                    *                              .

Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established K Aging Degradation Evaluared Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement 3chedule Established (If Required) Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposura: o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate ,i. o Duration Adequate I' o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately [ " , o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate 1 t Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied

p. p y Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied
     .[

' .N,e. Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies [. j (If Any) Satisfied l

           .e d            Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied
 =r(3                      Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied
           ,,)             Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied 7                      Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) e ,q
i - DESIGNATION
    ,,                      NRC QUALIFICATION CA"'EGORY                                                                               X = CATEGORY l

ha L j ;j I.a I.b Equipment Qualified Equipment Qualification Pending Modification I g II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established X II.b Equipment Not Qualified j'y] II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life

       ,          J                              or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a                Equipment Exempt From Qualification M                  III.D                Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review t ,'.

IV Documentation Not Made Available i -

         ~
    '""" N P              '                                              -=         -
                                                                                             ,.g .,g, g y-   %,, . .j ,            ,g,       ., ,, ,      ,. ,

L

   ..~..-....-:w,..                                        .
                                                 - . ~ . . . . . .                - -      . . ~ -                        _             -._.c_. - .
                     &                                                                 NRC C':ntract N 2. N RC-03-79-118 20 Frtnklin Research Csnter                                      FRCPrIjectNa CS257                               P g]

A Division of Thi Fr:nklin Inst:tura FRC Assignment No.13 la 20th and Race Streets. Phi la . Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. W '7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. & EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 36 LEVEL TRANSMITTER LOCATED IN CONTAINMENT (C230) FISCHER AND PORTER MODEL 13D2495KBAABC3 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 8 HOURS k TER CHECKSHEET NO. 36 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 646, 1782 FUNCTION (PLANT ID); STEAM CENERATOR 12 LEVEL (1LT1121, ILT1106, ILT1123D, ILT1123C, ILTil23B, ILT1123A) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12): 22 THROUGH 27 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): STEAM GENERATOR 11 LEVEL (lLT1111, ILT1105, ILT1113D, ILT1113C, ILT1113B, ILT1113A) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12): 16 THROUGH 21

O E

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITD4(S) ONLY: N (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) T, P, H, S, (R), M, I, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not state'd , Not applicable

                                                                   ~

LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: Contents Checksheet Page No, i Equipment Item la j u Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb s Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 95, 3c, 2 d-System Consideration Review ta, !b, !c, il, h, if Equipment Environmental Qualification Review , 5n 5b, - "A ^ 5f, 5 9, Eh, Si, Sj Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation -5;, 6b - Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary "' c , 7. , Tc l Q _,_ _ _m.. =-- r w -=m ; n =, = = m---- 7 - n=m-+ . - 7 .

                    *b 6dijhJ ranklin Rzsetrch Center                                        NRC Contrcct N O. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Pr$ct N3. C5257                                    P g]

A D:.. .sion d Th2 Frtnkhn Instituti FRC Assignm;nt No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. W7/W EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. J G SUAMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES 'IO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: M Tne Licensee (has/h:2 '

                                                                              ..ct -provi ded a response to the SER concerns.

V The

                                    ,,nu 484ma Licensee (has/M n ynt) specifically stated that the equipment A m'e'N will function when expoced to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

[ , The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

                    =i' 1 The Licensee (has/" - ~ ) proposed a corrective action for tnis equipment i

item whose qualification has not been fully established. [ Justification for interim operation (has/L e -) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

            @.                      [ Corrective action specified by the Licensee:
             ;m X Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Y ,,                                               Equipment modification l             [                         Equipment relocation above submergence level

,. , Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) g - Equipment relocation to a mild environment U ~ Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( ) C ' m The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment. item

          ,'p                                 that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim
  .         'J'                              operation.

,i ., 1 i q ; }n The Licensee (nas/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed { j; y corrective action. action (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective

                                                                                                                                                      .)
  'N.

l * ~' The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification

and/or *.,hould be exempted from environmental qualification.

i; hb DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY SASED ON REVIEW

  ;-- 1                       - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY:                   (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) j'..'                          I.a g                                      Qualified _                                                    II.c Qualified Life Deficiency
 * -                        T I.b     Modification]                                                  III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II b Not Qualified                                                     IV       Documentation Not Available I

'; f 4 i S

            %y-                                     -~*w y                       +..       ,,*-           g    e- g =  'E
                                                                      =

7 [==. e e, . _ . . W "T" *"*'"1-" -

                                                                                                                                                   ~~
                                                                                                                                   * %8
           . ...        - ,,                 .~.     . .        ,. .                 .               .. . .        . . , . - . -             .        . ..      , ,. . . . , .
      - .-       n .         . . - ~ . -                  . -    - . .               . ... - - - . -                             - - , _ -                     . . .

A NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 ll00hranklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Pcga A Divmon of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13 a 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 4/F'1// N 2 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM , j DESIGNATION: l 1 NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY

'.                     Documented Evidencei of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established
                                                                                                                                           ^

Aging Cegradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: o Peak Temperature Adequate

  ;                            o , Peak Pressure Adequate g                               o Duration Adequate                                                                                                                             _
o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate X__

Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied (( Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied [ Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied 0 Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies o (If Any) Satisfied Y Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied j.; Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) i W DESIGNATION: l NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification X

.                       II.a                     Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b                     Equipment Not Qualified II.c                     Equipment Satisfles All Requirements Except. Qualified Life i                                             or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a                    Equipment Exegipt From Qualification III.o                    Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV                       Documentation Not Made Available I

d'

                                                                                                              ~~~x=.;=
  • xy:--+Wrw+ 7yy*m-;epp.w nw"= - - - -
              ~                       ~

NRC Con +".ct N 2. NRC-0.'b79-118

                                 !]llbranklin Rxsearch Csnttr                                  FRC Prrject N2. C5257                                       Pag 2 A Divmon of The Franklin Institure                      FRC Assignment No.1                                           3a 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 4t8-10m   FRC Task No.        W7 YW l            EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. l(s LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER
       ?
10. We had ;reviously ec=r.itted *o replacing these trass=i*ters
        .E   '.                                              and have crdered 3arten trass=itters f:r inside centain:ent 5

and Rese=trast fc= cutside ecstai=2:* a;;11:stic s. elivery is anticipatei is sufficie:c ti=e for installatics d= ing

                     ' i                                        our next scheduled refueling outages; L*:1 1 Cycle 6 as: Unit 2 Cycle 5      ne 3 artes q-* * * *icasics test ;r:grs= is s-*""' a' fer ec=;1stics and issd:ce of fissi re;crts ty :Tove=ber, 1951.

Se utility spcascred Rose = cunt prC6rss is scheduled for cc=pletion by May, 1982. As addi*ic a1 stree =c ths vill i te =ecessary for our evaluatic / assess:e: asi subsequent accepta=ce of the qualificatics of these de'ri:es. Sese vill be qualified to the Category I require =ents. n'

                 ,Yl e

a(I l

         '4 5
      -'k i '

t 'le

              . A I        g.              i
     " .~i
          *(=

4 4> b- ',)'

           #d
  ..p.

e.* [ n

      ..~f/f:
               ,9
        ;? e Mjs

,ee* 'e b

       *,U l           .          .

v.. . i': e .

  ?t~~g l: 'N
        ..1.

_i,

         ..g-k, d
             -e t                   'f

'3,sN 1*

  *      'g..     ' '

9

 -)
              . a' I 4..
     . w            ,

l

         -y,a I            r>
~ *% .
                              =

9- - - , . .,,-....*e.-- -. g -- . w .% 4.., _-_~' ~ ~ e . y . 4' w g , ng , .9g t l

w. .. a = ~ i-~~-a-~~ ~ -- --
                                                                                                                                 -'      "'~

l l 1 Q- NRC Contract N3. NRC-03-79-118 l L0b ranklin Reserreh Cent:r FRC Project Ns. C5257 Pcg 2 s D, con of The Frankhn Institute l FRC Assignment No.13 5f

                               *tth and Race Streets. Phita.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-tmo FRC Task No. Vf"7/YPT                             I I

I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 3 6 NOTES: Qualification for steam-high temperature and pressure exposure , has not been established. It appears that ,t.a.o y.St.-doa4 established that the test chamber time-depen ent temperature / pressure profile exceeded the postulated accident profile for 2.75 hcurs. However, the test tira duration did not t envelop the required accident profile, - More importantly, it is clear from tacM 9157 that the same . Fischer & porter transmitter failed the environmental test after 6 minutes. Clearly this equipment fails to satisfy the NRC criteria,which requires that short-term safety-functions must be qualified fer a period of at least 1 hour in excess of required operating time. FRC notes that in 4,4/LTf77[ Westinghouse has responded to NRC questicas relative to ropsco/ WCA?-915 7) . Westincheuse has - stated that Fischer & Porter transmitter tvee 1032496 are adequatelv eualified for short-term crotective functions; - g however, the NRC has noted that these transmitters are no lencer acceotable for HEL3 acclications. In additien, Westincheuse - [ stated that Fise'.er & Porter transmitters tyres 1082496,

',                                   5CEP1041, and 5GEF10 31, are acolicable for ncn-HEL3 acclications.                                -

F 0 1: 9 i

)

4 d I l' i O

                           ..        y
                                               -WFrr 7             2
                                                                     . tc: ,y*                                         -

2

                              .i

4 NRC CIntrict N3. NRC-03-7911a UUikFranklin Rsse:rch Center FRC Prrject N a. C5.257 Paga A Division of The Franklin Institure FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 44& lcm FRC Task No. S'87 1 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.N EQUIPMENT ITEM No. 37 PRESSURE INDICATOR LOCATED IN THE AUXILIARY FEEDWATER PUMP ROCM (T603) SIGMA MODEL 9222(3) REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 8 HOURS 9 TER CHECKSHEET No. 37

      -        LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): STEAM GENERATOR 12 OUTLET PRESSURE (lPI4009)

LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12]: 137 [ FUNCTION (PLANT ID): STEAM GENERATOR 11 OUTLET PRESSURE (IFI3992) LICENSEE LUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12): 135 a

     .x.
      ?
       .i t Tjl
     , .o s.,

j [ ,-4

      ..- K y         DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:
      ;g          (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
n l + -I.1 R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R) , M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None,

' z ' .y Y hotstated,/Not applicable i, LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: l *, l Contents Checksheet Page No. j'] Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb j Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 22, 2b, 20, :i

                                                                                                          *                         *5
           ,     System Consideration Review                                                      4           ,  '. 0 , *d, 9

Equipment Environmental Qualification Review "c, : '. , Ce, Zi

c. c -. ""

ch e4 :p 1-l.

      ;'          Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation                                    a ,    C, s
Equipment Sumary i

l ~1

             '                                                                                                  ~
    -            Maintenanca and Replacement Schedule Sumary                                      Co, 7t,           ;
    ._ .... . - ,.. e - m ,                                       ,_  _ _ .
                                                                            -._..w         _ _ymm _ .                     m    y% .

l

_ . , .. . . . ' . - ~ .-. .L.-~.. ~ ~ ~ - - : - -a - - - NRC C ntract Ng. NRC-03-79-118 A((ranklin dY Rese:rch C;ntr PcgJ FRC Pr: Ject No. C5257 A Dmson of The Frankhn Inst:rute FRC Assignment Ng.13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. l/r ~7NM EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.d 7

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES 'IO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: Tne Licensee (has/has not) provided a response to the SER concerns. The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions. The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. 1The Licensee 1%u/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided o'y the Licensee for this equipment-item. Corrective action specified by the Licensee: Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source _ Verify qualification by addi tional (testing / analysis) , Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( ) ' The Licensee has provided other information for .this equipment item that can be d:onstrued as a basis for justification for interim operation. The Licensee (nas/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for acccmplishing the corrective action .) The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

             - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY:                   (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modi *4c eine III.a Exempt l II. Qualification Not Established ] III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available O c _ . - , - n ,. -

       /

A NRC CIntrzct Nr. NRC-03-79-118 Ullbranklin Research Center FRC Project No. CS257 P:g3 e A Divmon of The FranWin Insnture FRC Assignment N9 13 j 2 20th and Race Streets. Ph.la.. Pa. 19103 (215) 443-1000 FRC Task No. Yr }/ VM I I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. d 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM

     ~.,

i !,' DESIGNATION:

 ,; h* _'            NRC REQUIREMENTS                                                                                           X = DEFICIENCY
>i .

Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Y '

  ' S'               Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established
     -7              Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately
    -                Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: C' o Peak Temperature Adequate Q. o Peak Pressure Adequate AC o Duration Adequate [#f o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately h'[ o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate K'j Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied eh Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied W(fN Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies ' ' , ' ,^' 'j (If Any) Satisfied 174 Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied ' 7 ') Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied

         .           Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied

[$h b,t., h Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) Of , I DESIGNATION: M;c NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY u I.a Equipment Qualified

  'a r                I.b         Equipment Qualification Pending Modificat:.cn 4,Je                 II.a        Equipment Qualification Not Established                                                                    K

' (. , II.b Equipment Not Qualified

  ,'/ 9               II.c        Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Lifs
   ..(                III.a or Replacement Schedule Justified Equipment Exempt From Qualification
  }f                  III.D       Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualifier. tion Review
%-f

[ ', IV Documentation Not Made Available r r-af M I . s

               ^ * -             ,W,                9     1    [ Y *". ((N         7
                                                                                            *Q *[ , , , , , - _

w, ** ,e ,

_ _.. ._, .__.-.-._.-A-.a~- =---.---- - - - - 4--

                     ,a                                                              NRC C;ntrcit Nr. NRC-03-79-118.

ML Franklin Riseirch Cint:r FRC Pr jec.Nr.C5257 P g3 A Diwsion of The Frank!:n Instaute FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103 (215) 44d.1000 FRC Task No. 421 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M EQUIPMENT ITEM No. 38 PRESSURE TRANSMITTER LOCATED IN THE MAIN STEAM PIPING PENETRATION (A315) FISCHER AND PORTER MODEL 50EP1000 SERIES REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 8 HOURS TER CHECKSHEET NO. 38 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 646, 1782 FUNCTION (PLANT ID),: STEAM GENERATOR 12 OUTLET PRESSURE (IPT4008) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12): 138 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): STEAM GENERA ~IOR 11 OUTLET PRESSURE (IPT3991) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12]: 136 DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R, T, CT, RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R) , M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None,, hot state'd) Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS : i Contents Checksheet Page No. Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3-c , 25, 2c, 2d j System Consideration Review I;, ab, 4;, 4d, !;, If-Equipment Environmental Qualification Review -S e , LL, k, 04, :s, ;f, Og, Ch, :i, Sj - Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation -h.

  • Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 7;, 7b, 7c
}.

l 1

                               ,%                  .. ... .... . pq ;                                                     + M W N #       r-     1
                                                                                    ,m.        . 7 ;ytys,m py -                                -

r" 4UbJ r:nklin Rise:rch Ccntir NRC C:ntr:ct NL NRC-03-79-118 FRC PrIject NL CS257 Pag] A Dn,rsion of Tha Frtnkhn instituti FRC Assignment 13 lb

                 ,             29th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103 (215) 448 1000   FRC Task No. Vf No.Y$/M EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. I StMMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

m ; Tne Licensee (has/has not) provided a response to the SER concerns. a" .~

      ,[                      The Licensee (has/has ,not) specifically stated that the equipment is
           !q                 qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE
    .o                        environmental service conditions.

N The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no

    .T.a                      outstanding qualification deficiencies.
          ]                   The* Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment It                      item whose qualification has not been fully established.

m uQ Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the ny Licensee for this equipment ites. 1 N V:n MV Corrective action specified by the Licensee: In9 l'@" -e Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification i{ l Equipment relocation abovs submergence level jht Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source l' Y Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) [g3 ,. Eqaipment relocation to a mild environment li% Qualification testing of equipment in progress 9c Other ( )

 @hH

[#ff The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item W ' that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim l operation.

    ' M[

The Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed

  .cjh                               corrective action.                  (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective 1-.g t.

W action .)

       -y

' '?( The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification j ., , and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. 7 -[

  • DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW ll - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

, 4 I.a Qualified lII.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modification III.a Exempt p;.'H ), II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope t i

           't           II.1 Not Qualified                                             IV    Documentation Not Available psWeemhag f e"W"O*e                ' _ _,     w   N   '*  --'*O~

m T- 'l

  • i
                                                .. . a. ,= w ~ . - -                                       z ,a          ;-- - - - - - - - - - -
   .. -.               .-            -                                           -.~p_.-~.                          . _                             -

6- NRC Contract N 2. NRC-03-79-118 Pag 2 UObrinkiin Rrse1rch Csnter FRC Project N . C5257 A DMs:on of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 10 @ FRC Task No. W~lNI EQUlFMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF ECUlFMENT ITEM NO.J2' EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION: NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence"of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied l Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied ~ i Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied j

;           Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied

{ Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) ] DESIGNATION: NRC CUALIFICATICN CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified I. II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified X III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review _ IV Documentation Not Made Available __

  • f

^ ug n g~ s ' ' .= n F W > @& LA xa~

                                    .. + .= g ._.~.- g , _ _                                              .,            , , , _ . ,

ga N RC Contr:ct N3. N RC-03-79-118 ld') Frsnklin R2 search Center FRC Project No. C5257 Fag] A Diwsion ol The Franklin institute FRC Assignment No.13 [a 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 4 s '7 [] EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EOU!PMENT ITEM NO. D

                \vl EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 39 PRESSURE TRANSMITTER LOCATED IN CONTAINMENT (C230)

FISCHER AND PORTER MODEL SCEP1000 SERIES REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 9 HOURS TER CHECKSHEET No. 39

         /                      LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 646, 1782 FUNCTION (PLANT ID):                   PRESSURIZER 11 PRESSURE (lPT103-1)

LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12]: 173 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): PRESSURIZER 11 PRESSURE (1PT103) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12): 172 a i.

 .      v. s I.N I

g /

 ; u.                            DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITD4(S) ONLY:
 ,                               (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) f .'                 R, T,                    P, H,                    S,         (R), M, I,                 EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, 4                      ,

Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: q l - Contents Checksheet Pace No. 1 h- / [ Equipment Item la j s d Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb l I

 ,                               Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms                                           2

,j f..

   ' -L.[. ..

Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a,-2b, k , O f. l, } System Consideration Review -k, 4L, 4w, 40, eu, of Equipment Environmental Qualification Review E, 5

                                                                                                                                    ,b,      50, 5d, 5;, 02,
g
.,.,

l f' -5g, 5S ** "j

      . 0 Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation                                                  h,   Ob-j                   l  Equipment Summary Maintenance anc Replacement Senedule Summary                                                 -7 ; , %, Tc 4

e gg h ee - -e *. .==a +=ews-e-p.v.e %ep* mysep*e ye'w ey **y**% ', M T " *F58* 7 _7

     . - . - .         ..       .       ~.:.          .    ..,_.:....w..-.a._.._,-                              m-            - - - -

4' NRC C:ntr::ct NO. NRC-03-79-118 UNU Frinklin Rssurch Cantr FRC Project N;. C5257 PagJ A DMswan of Ths Fr:nklin insntuu FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phi!a.. Pa 19103 (215) 44810co FRC Task No. </f'7/V8 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUlPMENT ITEM NO. d 7

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: X Tne Licensee (has/E . 4 provided a response to the SER concerns. The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions. The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. X The Licensee (has/'-- --) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

                           >L Justification for interim operation (has/hr W been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

k Corrective action specified by the Licensee: [ Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) ,j Equipment celocation to a mild er./ironment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( ) The Licensee has provided other infctmation for this equipment item , that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation, j The Licensee (nee /has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for acccmplishing the corrective action .) lj The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. I DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW l - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency

          ,      [ I.c    Modification )                                        III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established                           III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified                                           IV    Documentation Not Available 9

o l1-.

               - = = . - -                              ,..,.-n.m.                 _ m m y                         pg . , ,

t A - NRC Contract Nr. NRC-03-79-118 000hranklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 P ga A Divmon of The Fran'alin Insnture FRC Assignment No.13f 2

       , . ;;t   i 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 44Mooo      FRC Task No. 1-f M / NE
          ./   g
  ,      k)  v     EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 8'I EQUIP:iENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION 

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION: (.5 NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY r , Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established

  • Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately
          .,        Qualified Life or Replacemenc Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation

         ~^

Criteric. Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposures

      -e                  o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate
  ' . , _N                o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately                                                        .

T o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate M j T,N Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied i 2 Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied 'j[!E Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied M Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied I Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied N Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied

~ 2j($              Criteria Regarding Instrumer.t Accuracy Satisfied l-         ,         Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied i . . .*~          Crite;;ia Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

I ~ 'M! Is i f.N h.; N: NRC OUALIFICATION CATEGORY DESIGNATION: X = CATEGORY

m'}

1: , A ' I 'dj I.a Equipment Qualified Equipment Qualification Pending Modification Y QNg I.b II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established A.y II.b Equipment Not Qualified fyl II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life

.3 or Replacement Schedule Justified

)b:c

i III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification Equipment Not in the Scope o2 the Qualification Review
l.[ III.b

' } ,i . 4 IV Documentation Not Made Available ] sll L, jw YN hs -<pc SY 3S fx o m 64 ) yu }.m p =~ == w = y==..= w =., ,. _g - 7 .y ,- ;

       ..._.-       a-               . . . . ~                ..                --                     u       .--

NRC Contract N?. NRC-03-79-118 l}0 ihr:nWin Ruerrch Ccntir FRC Prolect N3. C5257 P:g3 A OWon of The Frankhn Instttute FRC Assignment No.13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phila. Pa. 19103 (215H48-10co FRC Task No. MP'7NU EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW CF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 3 7 LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER

10. b'e had previously causaitted to replacing these trans=itters and have crdered 3artc= trsas=itters for inside centainment and Rosemount ton outside centaic:nent a;;11catices. Celivery is anticipatei in s'.tfficie:t ti=e for isstailation during car next scheduled refaeling cutages; Unit 1 Cycle 6 and Unit 2 Cycle 5 ne 3arten qualificatics tes progras is seseduled for com;1etics and isatince of fisal re;crts by 3cvester,1961.

The utility s;casored Rose:nou=t prcgrsa is acceduled for completion by May, 1942. An additional three =ccths vill be necessary for our evaluation /assescent and subsequent acceptacce of the qualification of these devices. These vill be qualified to the Catescry I requirements. l I O g

 .i
  .I.!

>l l l i. I, i 44 3 4 e ,d

  )

I

                                          - ,.,                                    . ,... _ c.m,-              g ,. ,                . . , ,
                                                                                                               '~
                                      ... ._..._..                     .___ .x              ma                                 -=                          _.
          ;.             g l                                                             NRC Contrict N 3. N RC-03-79-118 d!. Frinklin R: starch Cent:r                             FRC Project NO. C5257                                   Pag 3 7                       A Dmson of The Franklin Institute                    FRC Assignment No.13                                     lc
y\

20th and Race Streets Phda . Pa 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 4M l s ,

                        ) EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 4 0 w
t EQUIPMENT ITEM 30. 40 RTD LOCATED IN CONTAINMENT (C230)

ROSEMOUNT MODEL 104ABH m REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: NOT STATED

        ,i                 TER CHECKSHEET No. 40
          i,'
            .              LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): REAdTOR COOLANT TEMPERATURE (lTE112CD, ITE112CC, 9                                                     1TE112CB, ITE122CB, 1TE122CD, 1TE122CC, 1TE122CA,
         ,_.                                                    1TE122HD, ITE122HC, ITE122HB, ITE122HA, ITEll2CA,
              ^                                                 ITEll2HD, ITEll2HC, 1TEll2HB, 1TEll2HA)
q LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12): 156 THROUGH 171 1,
       ./, ;

(

  .,t.

ll l; (l. ,' ' ' , l{P j.d I 4.t

     . s;
  • W' .

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITD4(S) ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) T, RT, P, H, S, (R), I, GM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None,

  . .y SE;*k Not stated, Not applicable
   ;a;
   %.                       LIST mG OF APPLICABLE CSECKSHEETS:

O, 4; "

       .p i.742                        Contents                                                                        Checksheet Pace No.
 ?.M

, w, - / , Q, * , ') Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb

   .#cA
 .!,;; 1 7                  Equipment Environmantal Qualification Summary Forms                              2 pi'                      Licensee Response to NRC SER                                                     3a,-5b, 2:, %

System Consideration Review -le, Ib, 4c, 4d, 42, 4f . ' 4' Equipment Environmental Qual'ification Review -5 2 , 5b, 5c, 53, Sc, 5 f ,- l w eu er u t .. l Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation :5 e , GL Equipment Summary \, ,.- hj Maintenance anc Replacement Senedule Summary 72, 7b, 70-h[G-1

                                                                        ,     . - - ,     - ,. ,    y ,- ,

c ,- -- ., y u ,-

      - . s . -  w . . ~ .c . . , .     .a       . - . - .-.. . . .         .-    .-           ~.        -
                                                                                                                             , _ u. +

4 NRC Contract N a NRC-03-79-118 Pcga bJ Franklin R:seirch Canur FRC Prelect NL CS257 A DMsen of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment lb 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 487No[.13 486 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 40

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

 .                M Tne Licensee (has/hommame-) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically s'tated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions. The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. X The Licensee (has/i ., proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

                        .X Justification for interim operation (has/hms=mn) been provided by the t                           Licensee for this equipment item.

i X Corrective acticn specified by the Licensee: X Equipment replacement with qualified equipment ] Equipment modification

  ,                                 Equipment relocation above submergence level l

Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( ) The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim 1 operation. M The Licensee (nasfe) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for acccmplishing the corrective j i action NEXT S C.H E.O ULE.D ouT AG E. .)' f The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification i and/or shculd be exempted from environmental qualification. a f DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATICN EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

                 - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (Sae Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

{ 4

  )              I.a     Qualified                                                II.c Qualified Life Deficiency Q Modification                                                    III.a' Exempt
    ,            II.a Qualification Not Established                               III.b Not in Scope j              II.b Not Qualified                                              IV       Ibcumentation Not Available i

I a .w ;= ~ - - - . . . . . , .

                                                                        , -w, .m..   .--ye                     .u,                  w--
.sI ', g y

l A NRC Crntr:ct Nr. NRC-03-79-118 lj0Nrank!In Research Center FRC Project No. CS257 P;g3 A D6mmn of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. J3 2 i / \ 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 443 1000 FRCTask No. 46 I/486 (yj EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 40 r EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM

                .i DESIGNATION:
          ,.[               NRC REQUIREMENTS                                                                                  X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate                                                                 M Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately
                                                                                                                 ^

y d' Qualified Life or Repl'. cement Schedule Established (If Required) Program Estiablished to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) ' Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

                 .                o Peak Temperature Adequate 4

o Peak Pressure Adequate

f. . o Duration Adequate

[ o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately

        ~

o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate M( Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied

M
    .N$                     Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied i h ']

Il. J Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria 3egarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies i Mk/ (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied l I Q[.[? I* cf Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied ' I:k Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) 1- ': ,..

 -4 W, l ..44                                                                                                                        DESIGNATION:

1 [.,-[d NRC CUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY 7

    ;@xj                    I.a           Equipment Qualified Equipment Qualification Pending Modification                                                    X 7h f, 5
        .                    I.b II.a         Equipment Qualification Not Established
Q;. ; II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Lif e

' , ,,,' 3? or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification

    %" [                                  Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review
      ?                      III.D h[/

w IV Documentation Not Made Available

       + '
    . r;7 JTJ
 .N i - , .s
n
 '4 p.

l . W**W* p -*e k = Neb - ge, -.; . p.,Ib P ' ~ ~ w wEU $N*w *. ',L

 .-       .w.           .a.=w            .- -                      -   -
                                                                                                  ,.a .      -       .
          #~                                                             NRC Contract N2. NRC-03-79-118 Ub      nk!In Rtserrch Csnter                                 FRC Project NO. CS257                  P g3 A ous.on of The Franklin Inseitute                        FRC Assignment Nq.13                    3a 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 4481c00    FRC Task No. 487/486 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QU ALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 90                                        h LICENbij RESPONSE TO NRC SER
6. Sese c:=pe=ects are vittis the scope of car prese:t assess =ent/

evaluatics a:*ivity. 0 :pletica cf the actirity with subsequent actica plan is =ct anticipatet until the e:1 cf this yes. cr first.

                               --quar.er of next.

The. Lian.see.'s SC.E.W M e.sdes, h k Olis equi pmend wi11 be_ ce.pis.c.c.J ducin3 Me. " n.ex+ sc.hedvkd o utt3e.'- O f Y I O 1 a:=a.wgy _ . _ .,-.n . , . , . ... - , ._ .. , . .

\ I

                            # 4                                                              NRC C:ntrIct Nc. NRC-03-79-118 L0bJ' Franklin Restsrch Csnter                                 FRC Pr; ject No. CS257                                       Pagg A Dw.sion of The Frankhn !nsnrute                         FRC Assignment No.13                                          lc 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 448 1000     FRC Task No.        4E7 q           EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 4 I EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 41 PRESSURE TRANSMITTER LOCATED IN CONTAINMENT (C230) w          FISCHER AND PORTER MODEL 50EP1000 SERIES REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 8 HOURS
    -<                     TER CHECKSHEET NO. 41
          *,               LICENSEE REFERENCE (S):                     646, 1782 d            FUNCTION (PLANT ID):                      PRESSURIZER 11 PRESSURE (lPT102A, B, C, D)

LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12}: 174, 175, 176, 177 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): STEAM CENERATOR 11 PRESSURE (lPT1013A, B, C, D) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12): 127, 128, 129, 130

              ,,           7 UNCTION (PLANT ID): STEAM GENERATOR 12 PRESSURE (IPT1023A, B, C, D)

LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12): 131, 132, 133, 134 4

  ,               1
          .h <

7i

          ../
    - i,I
        '.Q d
     ' dl  '
                ;           DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITD4 (S) ONLY (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, P, H, S, (R), M, I, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None,

    .b Not stated, Not applicable r.

LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: t Contents Checksheet Page No. Equipment Item la n(m j.3. , Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb

.( Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 J .- ,

Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, 2 ; , ;-d-k System Consideration Review !:, ib, 'c, *3,

                                                                                                                                            .;,        'f
 , ( ,'

Equ'pment Environmental Qualification Review 9 %, Sc, Id, b, %, Eg, 5h, Si, L

  .                           Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation                                       60, 5b Equipment Sumary
              .;            Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Su=ary                                         h , 7., , 7;
    ****             P'* WNT'     *$* p     W9         'WMe - W ge"      Se    ,.        ,--Wg_q ,,        %         W9* P #  P*"  " * '  '    " " '
  • 1
       -..- .~                   .-        . - - -                ~. -        .--c      - ~-        .
                                                                                                            ~ = .    = -

400 )' Franklin Rssench Ccnt:r NRC Contrcct N 2. NRC-03-79-118 P:g2 FRC Pr: Ject N2. CS257 A Dmson of The Frank!sn Insntuti FRC Task Assignment t ,.1}YM lb 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC No. - @7/ EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. W

SUMMARY

.OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: 1 Tne Licensee (has/haa avci provided a response to the SER concerns. The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions. The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. I The Licensee (has/haa ..v c ) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. g Justification for interim operation (nas,^:: .w t) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment-item. Corrective action specified by the Licensee: j Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level l, Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source l Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( ) The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. 1 The Licensee (Whas not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for acccmplishing the corrective action .) The Licensee states that ti.e equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. DESIGNATION CF RESULTANT NRO OCALIFICATICN EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

               - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY:                    (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a cualified _ II.c Qualified Life Deficiency Q Uo Modification l III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available L

                   - . g w, ;,                         _ . -           -,-w .           e .- e                . - , ., ._        -r.m

al Ar NRC Contract N 3. NRC-03-79-118 l!OO' d Franklin Research Canter FRC Project N2. C5257 P: 0 ~J A Dimon of The Franklin Insnaute 2 20th and Race Streets, Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Assignment FRC Task No. #I Np.1}7/ W/ r EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _N q EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM

  'O                                                                                                                    DESIGNATION:

X = DEFICIENCY

  'd                 NRC REQUIREMENTS r;                                                      ,
      ""             Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate
    t              Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established
Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately j Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)
    , y'              Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)
      ,-             Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate

    . Q.
   ,Q                      o Duration Adequate
  ,&                        o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately

([ o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate 1

 ;fjj                 Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied
  ' *r#               Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied lj?

[ Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied I v.; l I Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies l - N. (If Any) Satisfied X 7,$ Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied j.y Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied A Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) Cj;] h DESIGNATION:

  'r[t                                                                                                                     X = CATEGORY SI             NRC CUALIFICATION CATEGORY

!: B ,sp l I.a Equipment Qualified ly I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification X

    ,                 II.a         Equipmcnt Qualification Not Established F.],               II,b         Equipment Not Qttalified II.c         Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life 3, Mi                            or Replacement Schedule Justified f{.f                III.a        Fquipment Exempt From Qualification T                III.b        Equipment Not in the Scope of the Q:talification Review T                 IV          Documentation Not Made Available
 ,M L.

L J;5 [ Sb 4 n #"

 .s a
  -E'          a='*
  • y , _ _ _ - . . -

yr

                                                                   ,          _ ;  z g _, _    .

w__ __

        . ..            . _                ~..a.~.a.~..          ~         . ~ . , , u,      . . . . . . . -   - - ~ - - - -         -
   )
                 ~                                                            NRC Contr:ct N O. NRC-03-79-118 UO18 Funklin Risesreh C:,nt:r                                  FRC Project N2. C5257                          Pag]

1 A Dimon of The Frankhn Inst:tute FRC Assignment flp.13 3a 20th and Race St:eets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215)448-1000 FRC Task No. 777/Y@ EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M LICENSEE RE.SPONSE TO NRC SER

10. k'e had previously em:itted to replacing these trar.ssit'ters and have ordered 3arten trass itters for inside cont- est a-1 R:se: c. fc: outside : tai ==ect sp;11:sti::s. Oeliverf is antici;ated is suffi:1est ti:e f:r insta11stien duri:g cur =ex scheduled ref,;eling cutages; '.*:it i Cycle 5 a:d t; it 2 Cycle $. Se liLrto: q' ** * *icatics test progra= is scheculed for c =;1stics and issu~asce of final re; orts by !cve ber,1951.

Se utility spessored Rosesoust progran is seneduled for ce=;1stion by .v.my, 1982. As additio:a1 three =o=ths vill be secessary for our evaluatic:/ assessment asi subsequent acce;tance of the qual

  • ficatics of these devices. Sese vill be qualified to the Category I reTaire=en s.

e 4 0

l q..sz o ' NRC Contr:ct N3. NRC-03-79-118

       ....~

nklin Rise:rch Centu FRC Pr? Ject N3. C5257 PagJ A Dmsmn of The Fr:nkhn Institut:2 FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. N'7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. N EQUIPMSNT ITEM NO. 42 ELECTRICAL PENETRATION LOCATED IN CONTAINMENT (C230) AMPHENOL MODEL 205033 1 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: NOT STATED

M
 ,                       TER CHECKSHEET NO. 42
 ,W'                     LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 21 r               FUNCTION (PLANT ID): CONTAINMENT PENETRATION ASSEMBLY (1ZEA4, lZWA6, lZWA3,
          .-                                                 1ZEA7, lZWB7, lZWB2, lZWB1, lZEB6, lZEB3,1ZEB1, lZEC1, lZEC9, lZEC4, lZEC6, 12WC1, lZWC4, lZWC6) lu                        LICENSEE SUBMITTAL:               SCEW(S) [1, 12]: 96 THROUGH 112

' " il .,- FUNCTION (PLANT ID): CONTAINMENT PENETRATION ASSEMBLY (lZEE4, lZEE9, lZWE3,

     $,                                                      lZWE9)

LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S) [1, 12]: 50, 51, 52, 53 vii l FUNdfION (PLANT ID): CONTAINMENT PENETRATION ASSEMBLY (1ZEEl,1 ZEE 7, lZWEl,

      %1                                                     12WE7)
   ;.% d                 LICENSEE SUBMITTAL:              SCEW(S) [1, 12]:             46, 47, 48, 49 Ci sp?

YY

g
 ?flg f%3 m

h.h NdN D:N.9 DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM fS) ONLY: f (See Sectio.13 of this TER for Legend)

 'l$p
R, T, P, H, S, (R), I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, NW
   ) j., ;
     .                    Not stated, Not applicable i$$?           '

i {}j;!' LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

   . l'd l 'qtf                     Contents                                                                          Checksheet Pace No.
 ' 1W

,l2 t$

 ;g                       Equipment Item                                                                    la I,dd)                      Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER                                      lb IGE Q;                     Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms                               2 r.y ,o

( :,, Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, C, L, % I System Consideration Review 12, !b, !;, Id, !;, If Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Sa, 5b, Sc, 5d,.5e, 5f, q Sg , Sh, -Si, % Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation in, 5 5--

       ,{         l       Equipment Summary r;
        .c                Maintenance anc Replacement Schedule Summary                                     ?:, 'b,     c J . .!

'f'* __.o..-.-

1 du NRC Contract N D. NRC-03-79-118 libFr:nklin R:se:rch Ccnter FRC Project Nr. C5257 , FagJ A Dr. mon of Tha Frankitn Inst:run FRC Assignrn:nt N 9.13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Fa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. @ /@I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. Sad SUt4 MARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NKO SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: _j[,Tne Licensee (has/ha; .n) provided a response to the SER concerns. The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions. The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. I 4 The Licensee (hasih:2 := t ) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. [ Justification for interim operation (has/ hee-eet) been provid5d by the Licensee for this e.quipment item. j Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipaent Equipment modification

', Equipment relocation above submergence level e Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source ' Verify qualification by additional ~ (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress X Other ( MM , ? The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. [ The Licensee bet /has not) provided a schedule for the proposed

              ' corrective action. (Schedule for acccmplishing the corrective action                                                                              .)

The Licensee states that the equipment iter deer. not requiu qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY 9ASED ON REVIEW

    - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY:                   (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

E d I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency

 . I.b     Modifiestien                                           III.a Exempt

[II.a Qualification Not Establishedj III.b Not b Scope

   ~II.b Not Qualified                                             IV     Documentation Not Available i

O (- =...u n, . =- .-

                                                                                +--m                =:v 3w

e 6' NRC Contract N r. N RC-03-79-118 7 dd tanklin Research Center A oemion of The Frankhn Insnture FRC Project Nr. C5257 Pag 3 13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 4481xo FRC Assignrnent FRCTask No._ UE No.MVM 7 (N j) EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M ' l l l EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM i a'J . DESIGNATION: l

               ,j          NRC REQUIREMENTS                                                                           X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately                                                                   M' Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)                                         M Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation                                                        X Criteria Reoarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) i        Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposures o Peak Temperature Adequate                                                                     1 o Peak Pressure Adequate                                                                        1 o Duration Adequate                                                                                4 i

o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately [ o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate _ j- [ l Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Y '

 ',- tj                    Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied i'   -

Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied 1 { . [: $'N Criteria Regarding Test Sequenca Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies

                        )

j] ' (+ # . (If Any) Satisfied Y l 4 Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied b Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied f Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

 ; . .:p i           .

DESIGNATION: l - , NRC CUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY l - : '8 I.a Equipment Qualified li . I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification l1. H II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established X [N ' . (( II.b II.c Equipment Not Qualified Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Cualified Life

               #                        or Replacement Schedule Justified                                                               _
      ';.                   III.a       Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.c       Equipment Not in the Sccpe of the Qualification Review T p'. ,, .,,

IV Documentation Not Made Available i !.C [. 5 a ,m i a i ti.y. z ,@ , :q !$ . .h '

      .A b    Y   D,"?nP*he W. M.@M-*;* *gr- n- ~ # 7 SW *                         - T   7V.MT.,WWF M.-             +   m.,4;gm.r;4F.,;wcpw
                     - . ...                       ....-_.-...s                 ...... ....,. .. w -_.. ~ .. .. ...
                                                                                                                    -...-w NRC Contract Nr. NRC-03-79-118 A)hr:nkhn 00                   R: search C:nter                         FRC Project N;. C5257                           Pag 3 A Division of The Frankhn !nstitute                        FRC Assignment No.13 I                                                                                                                   3o 20th and Race Streets. Phala.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000    FRC Task No. VF7 / VM EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CUALIFICATION REVIEW OF ECUIPMENT ITEM NO. 4A LICENSEE RESPONSE 'IO NRC SER e
6. *ese ccaposents are withis the sco;e of our ; resent assessment /

evahatics activity. Cc=;1stics of the actitity with subsequest action ;1as is not assicipate1 until the eni of this year or first waarter of next. i O l 9 n . ,.; . . ... ...;__ ... ._w _;A.,._. ,, ,m. .

                                                                                     .._..,,#,.a___.____,:____  .

e NRC Contract NT. NRC-03-79-118 P g3 00l!!! Frank!!n R:se:rch Ccnt:r