|
---|
Category:CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS
MONTHYEARML20072U2211991-04-12012 April 1991 Forwards Response to NRC 901221 Request for Addl Info Re Ssar for Design Certification (CESSAR-DC) LD-91-014, Forwards Response to NRC Request for Addl Info Re Design Certification,CESSAR-DC,per1991-03-26026 March 1991 Forwards Response to NRC Request for Addl Info Re Design Certification,CESSAR-DC,per ML20029C1001991-03-15015 March 1991 Forwards Response to NRC 890626 Request for Addl Info Re C-E Std SAR - Design Certification (CESSAR-DC),including Revs to CESSAR-DC ML20029C0141991-03-15015 March 1991 Forwards Response to NRC 890119 Request for Addl Info to Enable NRC to Continue Review of Cessar - Design Certification (CESSAR-DC) LD-91-010, Responds to NRC 881223 Request for Addl Info Re CESSAR-DC. Forwards Proposed Revisions to CESSAR-DC1991-03-0404 March 1991 Responds to NRC 881223 Request for Addl Info Re CESSAR-DC. Forwards Proposed Revisions to CESSAR-DC ML20029B6491991-03-0404 March 1991 Forwards Amend 1 to Cessar - Design Certification (CESSAR-DC). LD-91-006, Forwards Summary of Amend I to Std SAR for Design Certification,For Info & Planning Purposes1991-01-30030 January 1991 Forwards Summary of Amend I to Std SAR for Design Certification,For Info & Planning Purposes LD-90-097, Forwards Response to 901106 Request for Discussion of Differences Between Certain Provisions of EPRI Advanced LWR Util Requirements Document & Sys 80+ Std Design1990-12-21021 December 1990 Forwards Response to 901106 Request for Discussion of Differences Between Certain Provisions of EPRI Advanced LWR Util Requirements Document & Sys 80+ Std Design LD-90-075, Forwards Amend H to CESSAR - Design Certification1990-10-0303 October 1990 Forwards Amend H to CESSAR - Design Certification LD-90-060, Forwards Proposed Changes to Sys 80+ Licensing Review Basis Document,Per1990-08-28028 August 1990 Forwards Proposed Changes to Sys 80+ Licensing Review Basis Document,Per LD-90-046, Forwards Addl Copies of Amend G to CESSAR-DC1990-07-12012 July 1990 Forwards Addl Copies of Amend G to CESSAR-DC ML20044A5531990-06-18018 June 1990 Advises That Licensee Will Submit Application for Final Design Approval & Design Certification of Process Inherent Ultimate Safety Reactor in FY92 & That Safe Integral Reactor Anticipated in FY93,in Addition to Sys 80+ Under Review ML20042E9001990-04-30030 April 1990 Forwards Amend G to CESSAR-design Certification,Per Draft Licensing Review Basis Document ML20011E2041990-01-25025 January 1990 Forwards Response to 881216 Request for Addl Info Re CESSAR-DC,Chapters 3,4,5 & 6 Re Turbine Missiles,Control Element Drive Structural Matls,Cleaning & Contamination Protection Procedures & Reactor Internals Matls ML20006A7201990-01-0505 January 1990 Requests That Consolidated Financial Statements Submitted to NRC by 891121 Ltr Re Indirect Transfer of C-E Licenses Be Treated as Confidential,Per 10CFR2.790.Supporting Affidavit Encl ML20011D5151989-12-22022 December 1989 Forwards Amend F to C-E Std SAR - Design Certification (CESSAR-DC). ML19324B6811989-10-30030 October 1989 Forwards Response to Request for Addl Info Re C-E QA Program & CESSAR-DC,Chapter 17,proposed Rev to CESSAR-DC & Rev 5 to CENPD-210, QA Program:Description of Nuclear Power Businesses QA Program. LD-89-107, Forwards Addl Info Re CESSAR-DC Chapter 71989-09-28028 September 1989 Forwards Addl Info Re CESSAR-DC Chapter 7 LD-89-092, Forwards Slides from 890616 Meeting Re CESSAR-DC Baseline PRA for Sys 80+ Std Design Described in SAR on Design Certification1989-08-17017 August 1989 Forwards Slides from 890616 Meeting Re CESSAR-DC Baseline PRA for Sys 80+ Std Design Described in SAR on Design Certification LD-89-091, Forwards Responses to 881020 Request for Addl Info Re CESSAR-DC,Chapter 10, Emergency Feedwater Sys1989-08-16016 August 1989 Forwards Responses to 881020 Request for Addl Info Re CESSAR-DC,Chapter 10, Emergency Feedwater Sys ML20246A2261989-04-28028 April 1989 Forwards Sser Re Steam Generator Tube Vibration for CESSAR Sys 80 Design.Concurs W/Licensee That Adequate Steam Generator Tube Integrity Can Be Assured at Each Plant Through Appropriate Program of Preventive Tube Plugging LD-89-035, Forwards Vols 1-17,consisting of Chapters 1-18,to CESSAR Design Certification, for Approval,Per 10CFR521989-03-30030 March 1989 Forwards Vols 1-17,consisting of Chapters 1-18,to CESSAR Design Certification, for Approval,Per 10CFR52 LD-89-033, Forwards Design Certification Licensing Review Basis, for Review & Concurrence1989-03-30030 March 1989 Forwards Design Certification Licensing Review Basis, for Review & Concurrence LD-89-029, Forwards Vol Viii to DOE/ID-10216, Mods for Development of MAAP-DOE Code:Vol Viii:Resolution of Outstanding Nuclear Fission Product Aerosol Transport & Deposition Issues Wbs 3.4.2, Per 881011 Request1989-03-17017 March 1989 Forwards Vol Viii to DOE/ID-10216, Mods for Development of MAAP-DOE Code:Vol Viii:Resolution of Outstanding Nuclear Fission Product Aerosol Transport & Deposition Issues Wbs 3.4.2, Per 881011 Request LD-89-028, Forwards Amend E to C-E Std SAR Group E2 Re Design Certification.Summary of Revs Also Encl1989-03-15015 March 1989 Forwards Amend E to C-E Std SAR Group E2 Re Design Certification.Summary of Revs Also Encl LD-88-132, Forwards Advanced Reactor Severe Accident Program Topic Paper Set 6, Development of Severe Accident Mgt Program, for Review1988-11-11011 November 1988 Forwards Advanced Reactor Severe Accident Program Topic Paper Set 6, Development of Severe Accident Mgt Program, for Review LD-88-128, Forwards QA Program in Response to NRC Request for Addl Info Re Chapter 17,CESSAR-DC QA1988-11-0404 November 1988 Forwards QA Program in Response to NRC Request for Addl Info Re Chapter 17,CESSAR-DC QA ML20195D2251988-11-0101 November 1988 Forwards Request for Addl Info Re Amend C of Chapters 5,6 & 10 of CESSAR-DC,Sys 80+.Info Requested within 90 Days of Ltr Receipt ML20205N4851988-10-28028 October 1988 Forwards Request for Addl Info Re Chapter 5,Amend C to CESSAR-DC,Sys 80+ on Steam Generators.Info Needed by 881230 ML20195B9011988-10-26026 October 1988 Forwards Request for Addl Info Re 880930 Submittal of Amend D to Chapters 4,5,6 & 10 of CESSAR-DC,Sys 80+.Info Requested within 90 Days from Receipt of Ltr LD-88-119, Responds to NRC Request for Addl Info on Chapter 17 of CESSAR-DC.NRC Question 260.2 Incorporated in CENPD-210,Rev 5 as Part of Sections III.1,III.3 & Table III-11988-10-21021 October 1988 Responds to NRC Request for Addl Info on Chapter 17 of CESSAR-DC.NRC Question 260.2 Incorporated in CENPD-210,Rev 5 as Part of Sections III.1,III.3 & Table III-1 LD-88-106, Forwards Amend D to CESSAR Fsar,Including Revs to Chapters 2-7 & 18.Technical Review Should Be Allowed to Proceed Unencumbered Pending Settlement of Dispute Re Fees1988-09-30030 September 1988 Forwards Amend D to CESSAR Fsar,Including Revs to Chapters 2-7 & 18.Technical Review Should Be Allowed to Proceed Unencumbered Pending Settlement of Dispute Re Fees LD-88-099, Responds to NRC Request for Addl Info Re Chapters 5 & 9 of CESSAR-DC Re Steam Generator Secondary Water Chemistry, Reactor Coolant Water Chemistry,Fire Protection Sys,Letdown Purification Line & Hydrogen Ignition1988-09-20020 September 1988 Responds to NRC Request for Addl Info Re Chapters 5 & 9 of CESSAR-DC Re Steam Generator Secondary Water Chemistry, Reactor Coolant Water Chemistry,Fire Protection Sys,Letdown Purification Line & Hydrogen Ignition LD-88-091, Forwards Summary of Sabotage Protection Considerations & Draft Requirements for Sabotage Design from EPRI Advanced LWR Requirements Document,Per NRC .Basis for Program Listed1988-09-14014 September 1988 Forwards Summary of Sabotage Protection Considerations & Draft Requirements for Sabotage Design from EPRI Advanced LWR Requirements Document,Per NRC .Basis for Program Listed ML20154K0031988-09-12012 September 1988 Responds to Comments & Questions Re Regulatory Trends in Us & Republic of Korea.C-E Will Pursue Design Certification & Will Revise Sys 80 Std Design to Meet Requirements of NRC Severe Accident & Standardization Policy Statements ML20154K0211988-09-12012 September 1988 Submits Questions from South Korean Engineers Re Value of Design Certification Program for C-E Sys 80 & Sys 80 Plus Designs LD-88-089, Forwards Addl Info Re CESSAR-DC,Chapter 4,in Response to NRC 880628 Request1988-09-0909 September 1988 Forwards Addl Info Re CESSAR-DC,Chapter 4,in Response to NRC 880628 Request LD-88-088, Provides Proposed Resolution for Single Issue of Advanced Reactor Severe Accident Program Topic Paper Set 4, Essential Equipment Performance1988-09-0909 September 1988 Provides Proposed Resolution for Single Issue of Advanced Reactor Severe Accident Program Topic Paper Set 4, Essential Equipment Performance ML20151N3441988-08-0303 August 1988 Forwards Request for Addl Info Re Chapter 9, Auxiliary Sys, & Chapter 5, RCS, CESSAR-DC,Sys 80+ in Order to Continue Review of Amend B ML20151R0281988-08-0202 August 1988 Discusses QA for CESSAR-DC,Sys 80+ & Significant Points Made Listed ML20151Q8581988-08-0202 August 1988 Informs That Vendor Finalizing Review & Anticipates That Rev 5 to CENPD-210 Will Be Transmitted by Sept 1988.Road Map Will Also Be Submitted to Identify Remaining QA Questions LD-88-069, Informs of Finalizing Review of QA Program Description of Rev 5 to CESSAR Topical Rept CENPD-210 & Anticipates Transmitting Review to NRC by Third Quarter 1988.Submittal Will Address Remaining QA Questions in Road Map1988-08-0202 August 1988 Informs of Finalizing Review of QA Program Description of Rev 5 to CESSAR Topical Rept CENPD-210 & Anticipates Transmitting Review to NRC by Third Quarter 1988.Submittal Will Address Remaining QA Questions in Road Map LD-88-068, Forwards Response to Request for Addl Info Re CESSAR-DC Chapters 1 & 5 Re Sabotage Protection,Per1988-08-0101 August 1988 Forwards Response to Request for Addl Info Re CESSAR-DC Chapters 1 & 5 Re Sabotage Protection,Per LD-88-066, Forwards DOE Advanced Reactor Severe Accident Program Proposed Resolutions for Severe Accident Issues,Topic Set 3. Resolutions to Listed Items Will Be Adopted in Development of Sys 80+ Std Design1988-07-29029 July 1988 Forwards DOE Advanced Reactor Severe Accident Program Proposed Resolutions for Severe Accident Issues,Topic Set 3. Resolutions to Listed Items Will Be Adopted in Development of Sys 80+ Std Design LD-88-055, Forwards Revised Design Certification Licensing Review Bases1988-07-15015 July 1988 Forwards Revised Design Certification Licensing Review Bases ML20150E7261988-07-0101 July 1988 Forwards Flow Distribution & Tube Vibration:Evaluation of Sys 80 Steam Generator Tube Lane/Economizer Corner Region, in Support of C-E 870918 Request That Steam Generator Tube Vibration Issue Be Closed LD-88-047, Forwards Amend C to CESSAR-DC (Design Certification), Chapters 5,6 & 10.Summary of Significance of Revs Also Encl1988-06-30030 June 1988 Forwards Amend C to CESSAR-DC (Design Certification), Chapters 5,6 & 10.Summary of Significance of Revs Also Encl LD-88-046, Forwards Response to NRC 880315 Request for Addl Info Re CESSAR-DC,Chapter 10, Plant Sys Branch1988-06-30030 June 1988 Forwards Response to NRC 880315 Request for Addl Info Re CESSAR-DC,Chapter 10, Plant Sys Branch ML20153B1411988-06-28028 June 1988 Requests Addl Info Re Amend B of Chapters 5 & 9 of CESSAR-DC,Sys 80+ for Review Completion ML20153B1281988-06-28028 June 1988 Forwards Request for Addl Info Re Amend B of Chapters 4 & 5 of CESSAR-DC,Sys 80+,transmitted by .Receipt of Info within 90 Days of Ltr Date Requested 1991-04-12
[Table view] Category:INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE
MONTHYEARML20072U2211991-04-12012 April 1991 Forwards Response to NRC 901221 Request for Addl Info Re Ssar for Design Certification (CESSAR-DC) LD-91-014, Forwards Response to NRC Request for Addl Info Re Design Certification,CESSAR-DC,per1991-03-26026 March 1991 Forwards Response to NRC Request for Addl Info Re Design Certification,CESSAR-DC,per ML20029C1001991-03-15015 March 1991 Forwards Response to NRC 890626 Request for Addl Info Re C-E Std SAR - Design Certification (CESSAR-DC),including Revs to CESSAR-DC ML20029C0141991-03-15015 March 1991 Forwards Response to NRC 890119 Request for Addl Info to Enable NRC to Continue Review of Cessar - Design Certification (CESSAR-DC) LD-91-010, Responds to NRC 881223 Request for Addl Info Re CESSAR-DC. Forwards Proposed Revisions to CESSAR-DC1991-03-0404 March 1991 Responds to NRC 881223 Request for Addl Info Re CESSAR-DC. Forwards Proposed Revisions to CESSAR-DC ML20029B6491991-03-0404 March 1991 Forwards Amend 1 to Cessar - Design Certification (CESSAR-DC). LD-91-006, Forwards Summary of Amend I to Std SAR for Design Certification,For Info & Planning Purposes1991-01-30030 January 1991 Forwards Summary of Amend I to Std SAR for Design Certification,For Info & Planning Purposes LD-90-097, Forwards Response to 901106 Request for Discussion of Differences Between Certain Provisions of EPRI Advanced LWR Util Requirements Document & Sys 80+ Std Design1990-12-21021 December 1990 Forwards Response to 901106 Request for Discussion of Differences Between Certain Provisions of EPRI Advanced LWR Util Requirements Document & Sys 80+ Std Design LD-90-075, Forwards Amend H to CESSAR - Design Certification1990-10-0303 October 1990 Forwards Amend H to CESSAR - Design Certification LD-90-060, Forwards Proposed Changes to Sys 80+ Licensing Review Basis Document,Per1990-08-28028 August 1990 Forwards Proposed Changes to Sys 80+ Licensing Review Basis Document,Per LD-90-046, Forwards Addl Copies of Amend G to CESSAR-DC1990-07-12012 July 1990 Forwards Addl Copies of Amend G to CESSAR-DC ML20044A5531990-06-18018 June 1990 Advises That Licensee Will Submit Application for Final Design Approval & Design Certification of Process Inherent Ultimate Safety Reactor in FY92 & That Safe Integral Reactor Anticipated in FY93,in Addition to Sys 80+ Under Review ML20042E9001990-04-30030 April 1990 Forwards Amend G to CESSAR-design Certification,Per Draft Licensing Review Basis Document ML20011E2041990-01-25025 January 1990 Forwards Response to 881216 Request for Addl Info Re CESSAR-DC,Chapters 3,4,5 & 6 Re Turbine Missiles,Control Element Drive Structural Matls,Cleaning & Contamination Protection Procedures & Reactor Internals Matls ML20006A7201990-01-0505 January 1990 Requests That Consolidated Financial Statements Submitted to NRC by 891121 Ltr Re Indirect Transfer of C-E Licenses Be Treated as Confidential,Per 10CFR2.790.Supporting Affidavit Encl ML20011D5151989-12-22022 December 1989 Forwards Amend F to C-E Std SAR - Design Certification (CESSAR-DC). ML19324B6811989-10-30030 October 1989 Forwards Response to Request for Addl Info Re C-E QA Program & CESSAR-DC,Chapter 17,proposed Rev to CESSAR-DC & Rev 5 to CENPD-210, QA Program:Description of Nuclear Power Businesses QA Program. LD-89-107, Forwards Addl Info Re CESSAR-DC Chapter 71989-09-28028 September 1989 Forwards Addl Info Re CESSAR-DC Chapter 7 LD-89-092, Forwards Slides from 890616 Meeting Re CESSAR-DC Baseline PRA for Sys 80+ Std Design Described in SAR on Design Certification1989-08-17017 August 1989 Forwards Slides from 890616 Meeting Re CESSAR-DC Baseline PRA for Sys 80+ Std Design Described in SAR on Design Certification LD-89-091, Forwards Responses to 881020 Request for Addl Info Re CESSAR-DC,Chapter 10, Emergency Feedwater Sys1989-08-16016 August 1989 Forwards Responses to 881020 Request for Addl Info Re CESSAR-DC,Chapter 10, Emergency Feedwater Sys LD-89-033, Forwards Design Certification Licensing Review Basis, for Review & Concurrence1989-03-30030 March 1989 Forwards Design Certification Licensing Review Basis, for Review & Concurrence LD-89-035, Forwards Vols 1-17,consisting of Chapters 1-18,to CESSAR Design Certification, for Approval,Per 10CFR521989-03-30030 March 1989 Forwards Vols 1-17,consisting of Chapters 1-18,to CESSAR Design Certification, for Approval,Per 10CFR52 LD-89-029, Forwards Vol Viii to DOE/ID-10216, Mods for Development of MAAP-DOE Code:Vol Viii:Resolution of Outstanding Nuclear Fission Product Aerosol Transport & Deposition Issues Wbs 3.4.2, Per 881011 Request1989-03-17017 March 1989 Forwards Vol Viii to DOE/ID-10216, Mods for Development of MAAP-DOE Code:Vol Viii:Resolution of Outstanding Nuclear Fission Product Aerosol Transport & Deposition Issues Wbs 3.4.2, Per 881011 Request LD-89-028, Forwards Amend E to C-E Std SAR Group E2 Re Design Certification.Summary of Revs Also Encl1989-03-15015 March 1989 Forwards Amend E to C-E Std SAR Group E2 Re Design Certification.Summary of Revs Also Encl LD-88-132, Forwards Advanced Reactor Severe Accident Program Topic Paper Set 6, Development of Severe Accident Mgt Program, for Review1988-11-11011 November 1988 Forwards Advanced Reactor Severe Accident Program Topic Paper Set 6, Development of Severe Accident Mgt Program, for Review LD-88-128, Forwards QA Program in Response to NRC Request for Addl Info Re Chapter 17,CESSAR-DC QA1988-11-0404 November 1988 Forwards QA Program in Response to NRC Request for Addl Info Re Chapter 17,CESSAR-DC QA LD-88-119, Responds to NRC Request for Addl Info on Chapter 17 of CESSAR-DC.NRC Question 260.2 Incorporated in CENPD-210,Rev 5 as Part of Sections III.1,III.3 & Table III-11988-10-21021 October 1988 Responds to NRC Request for Addl Info on Chapter 17 of CESSAR-DC.NRC Question 260.2 Incorporated in CENPD-210,Rev 5 as Part of Sections III.1,III.3 & Table III-1 LD-88-106, Forwards Amend D to CESSAR Fsar,Including Revs to Chapters 2-7 & 18.Technical Review Should Be Allowed to Proceed Unencumbered Pending Settlement of Dispute Re Fees1988-09-30030 September 1988 Forwards Amend D to CESSAR Fsar,Including Revs to Chapters 2-7 & 18.Technical Review Should Be Allowed to Proceed Unencumbered Pending Settlement of Dispute Re Fees LD-88-099, Responds to NRC Request for Addl Info Re Chapters 5 & 9 of CESSAR-DC Re Steam Generator Secondary Water Chemistry, Reactor Coolant Water Chemistry,Fire Protection Sys,Letdown Purification Line & Hydrogen Ignition1988-09-20020 September 1988 Responds to NRC Request for Addl Info Re Chapters 5 & 9 of CESSAR-DC Re Steam Generator Secondary Water Chemistry, Reactor Coolant Water Chemistry,Fire Protection Sys,Letdown Purification Line & Hydrogen Ignition LD-88-091, Forwards Summary of Sabotage Protection Considerations & Draft Requirements for Sabotage Design from EPRI Advanced LWR Requirements Document,Per NRC .Basis for Program Listed1988-09-14014 September 1988 Forwards Summary of Sabotage Protection Considerations & Draft Requirements for Sabotage Design from EPRI Advanced LWR Requirements Document,Per NRC .Basis for Program Listed ML20154K0211988-09-12012 September 1988 Submits Questions from South Korean Engineers Re Value of Design Certification Program for C-E Sys 80 & Sys 80 Plus Designs LD-88-089, Forwards Addl Info Re CESSAR-DC,Chapter 4,in Response to NRC 880628 Request1988-09-0909 September 1988 Forwards Addl Info Re CESSAR-DC,Chapter 4,in Response to NRC 880628 Request LD-88-088, Provides Proposed Resolution for Single Issue of Advanced Reactor Severe Accident Program Topic Paper Set 4, Essential Equipment Performance1988-09-0909 September 1988 Provides Proposed Resolution for Single Issue of Advanced Reactor Severe Accident Program Topic Paper Set 4, Essential Equipment Performance ML20151Q8581988-08-0202 August 1988 Informs That Vendor Finalizing Review & Anticipates That Rev 5 to CENPD-210 Will Be Transmitted by Sept 1988.Road Map Will Also Be Submitted to Identify Remaining QA Questions LD-88-069, Informs of Finalizing Review of QA Program Description of Rev 5 to CESSAR Topical Rept CENPD-210 & Anticipates Transmitting Review to NRC by Third Quarter 1988.Submittal Will Address Remaining QA Questions in Road Map1988-08-0202 August 1988 Informs of Finalizing Review of QA Program Description of Rev 5 to CESSAR Topical Rept CENPD-210 & Anticipates Transmitting Review to NRC by Third Quarter 1988.Submittal Will Address Remaining QA Questions in Road Map LD-88-068, Forwards Response to Request for Addl Info Re CESSAR-DC Chapters 1 & 5 Re Sabotage Protection,Per1988-08-0101 August 1988 Forwards Response to Request for Addl Info Re CESSAR-DC Chapters 1 & 5 Re Sabotage Protection,Per LD-88-066, Forwards DOE Advanced Reactor Severe Accident Program Proposed Resolutions for Severe Accident Issues,Topic Set 3. Resolutions to Listed Items Will Be Adopted in Development of Sys 80+ Std Design1988-07-29029 July 1988 Forwards DOE Advanced Reactor Severe Accident Program Proposed Resolutions for Severe Accident Issues,Topic Set 3. Resolutions to Listed Items Will Be Adopted in Development of Sys 80+ Std Design LD-88-055, Forwards Revised Design Certification Licensing Review Bases1988-07-15015 July 1988 Forwards Revised Design Certification Licensing Review Bases ML20150E7261988-07-0101 July 1988 Forwards Flow Distribution & Tube Vibration:Evaluation of Sys 80 Steam Generator Tube Lane/Economizer Corner Region, in Support of C-E 870918 Request That Steam Generator Tube Vibration Issue Be Closed LD-88-047, Forwards Amend C to CESSAR-DC (Design Certification), Chapters 5,6 & 10.Summary of Significance of Revs Also Encl1988-06-30030 June 1988 Forwards Amend C to CESSAR-DC (Design Certification), Chapters 5,6 & 10.Summary of Significance of Revs Also Encl LD-88-046, Forwards Response to NRC 880315 Request for Addl Info Re CESSAR-DC,Chapter 10, Plant Sys Branch1988-06-30030 June 1988 Forwards Response to NRC 880315 Request for Addl Info Re CESSAR-DC,Chapter 10, Plant Sys Branch LD-88-042, Provides Proposed Resolutions to Remaining Two Issues Committed to in Re Direct Containment Heating (Idcor Issue 8) & Debris Coolability (Idcor Issue 10).C-E Plans to Adopt 14 Resolutions Previously Submitted1988-06-17017 June 1988 Provides Proposed Resolutions to Remaining Two Issues Committed to in Re Direct Containment Heating (Idcor Issue 8) & Debris Coolability (Idcor Issue 10).C-E Plans to Adopt 14 Resolutions Previously Submitted LD-88-039, Forwards Addl Info Re Chapters 1 & 10 to CESSAR-DC,per NRC 880311 Request1988-06-0606 June 1988 Forwards Addl Info Re Chapters 1 & 10 to CESSAR-DC,per NRC 880311 Request LD-88-038, Provides Proposed Resolutions for Four of Six Issues Which Make Up Topic Paper Set 2,including in-vessel Hydrogen Generation,Core Melt Progression & Vessel Failure & Hydrogen Ignition & Burning.Remaining Issues Submitted in 30 Days1988-06-0606 June 1988 Provides Proposed Resolutions for Four of Six Issues Which Make Up Topic Paper Set 2,including in-vessel Hydrogen Generation,Core Melt Progression & Vessel Failure & Hydrogen Ignition & Burning.Remaining Issues Submitted in 30 Days LD-88-034, Provides Addl Info on CESSAR-DC Chapter 10 Re Secondary Water Chemistry,Per NRC 880225 request.CESSAR-DC Section 10.3.5.1 Revised to Make Clear That C-E Secondary Water Chemistry Program Includes Immediate Shutdown Limits1988-05-25025 May 1988 Provides Addl Info on CESSAR-DC Chapter 10 Re Secondary Water Chemistry,Per NRC 880225 request.CESSAR-DC Section 10.3.5.1 Revised to Make Clear That C-E Secondary Water Chemistry Program Includes Immediate Shutdown Limits LD-88-033, Forwards Response to NRC 880226 Request for Addl Info on Chapter 17 to Rev 4 to Topical Rept CENPD-210A, QA Program, Including Revs to C-E 871130 & 880411 Responses1988-05-25025 May 1988 Forwards Response to NRC 880226 Request for Addl Info on Chapter 17 to Rev 4 to Topical Rept CENPD-210A, QA Program, Including Revs to C-E 871130 & 880411 Responses LD-88-026, Forwards Draft Revs to C-E Chapters 1,4,5 & 9 to C-E Std Sar.Meeting to Resolve Issues Re Schedule & Composition of Submittals as Part of Draft Licensing Review Bases & Related Issues,Requested1988-04-11011 April 1988 Forwards Draft Revs to C-E Chapters 1,4,5 & 9 to C-E Std Sar.Meeting to Resolve Issues Re Schedule & Composition of Submittals as Part of Draft Licensing Review Bases & Related Issues,Requested LD-88-021, Forwards Response to NRC 871208 Request for Addl Info Re Reg Guides That Appear in CESSAR-DC,QA.Suggest That Meeting W/Nrc Staff Be Scheduled to Allow Overview Program Changes1988-03-22022 March 1988 Forwards Response to NRC 871208 Request for Addl Info Re Reg Guides That Appear in CESSAR-DC,QA.Suggest That Meeting W/Nrc Staff Be Scheduled to Allow Overview Program Changes LD-88-019, Forwards Addl Info Re Chemical & Vol Control Sys for Sys 80+TM Std Design,Per 871217 Request.Proposed Rev to C-E Std SAR, Design Certification Also Encl1988-03-18018 March 1988 Forwards Addl Info Re Chemical & Vol Control Sys for Sys 80+TM Std Design,Per 871217 Request.Proposed Rev to C-E Std SAR, Design Certification Also Encl LD-88-020, Responds to NRC Request for Addl Info Re Chapter 1 Concerning Safeguards.Proposed Revision to C-E Engineering Std SAR & Responses to Specific Questions Also Encl1988-03-18018 March 1988 Responds to NRC Request for Addl Info Re Chapter 1 Concerning Safeguards.Proposed Revision to C-E Engineering Std SAR & Responses to Specific Questions Also Encl 1991-04-12
[Table view] Category:VENDOR/MANUFACTURER TO NRC
MONTHYEARLD-90-075, Forwards Amend H to CESSAR - Design Certification1990-10-0303 October 1990 Forwards Amend H to CESSAR - Design Certification LD-90-060, Forwards Proposed Changes to Sys 80+ Licensing Review Basis Document,Per1990-08-28028 August 1990 Forwards Proposed Changes to Sys 80+ Licensing Review Basis Document,Per LD-90-046, Forwards Addl Copies of Amend G to CESSAR-DC1990-07-12012 July 1990 Forwards Addl Copies of Amend G to CESSAR-DC ML20044A5531990-06-18018 June 1990 Advises That Licensee Will Submit Application for Final Design Approval & Design Certification of Process Inherent Ultimate Safety Reactor in FY92 & That Safe Integral Reactor Anticipated in FY93,in Addition to Sys 80+ Under Review ML20042E9001990-04-30030 April 1990 Forwards Amend G to CESSAR-design Certification,Per Draft Licensing Review Basis Document ML20006A7201990-01-0505 January 1990 Requests That Consolidated Financial Statements Submitted to NRC by 891121 Ltr Re Indirect Transfer of C-E Licenses Be Treated as Confidential,Per 10CFR2.790.Supporting Affidavit Encl ML20011D5151989-12-22022 December 1989 Forwards Amend F to C-E Std SAR - Design Certification (CESSAR-DC). ML19324B6811989-10-30030 October 1989 Forwards Response to Request for Addl Info Re C-E QA Program & CESSAR-DC,Chapter 17,proposed Rev to CESSAR-DC & Rev 5 to CENPD-210, QA Program:Description of Nuclear Power Businesses QA Program. LD-89-107, Forwards Addl Info Re CESSAR-DC Chapter 71989-09-28028 September 1989 Forwards Addl Info Re CESSAR-DC Chapter 7 LD-89-092, Forwards Slides from 890616 Meeting Re CESSAR-DC Baseline PRA for Sys 80+ Std Design Described in SAR on Design Certification1989-08-17017 August 1989 Forwards Slides from 890616 Meeting Re CESSAR-DC Baseline PRA for Sys 80+ Std Design Described in SAR on Design Certification LD-89-091, Forwards Responses to 881020 Request for Addl Info Re CESSAR-DC,Chapter 10, Emergency Feedwater Sys1989-08-16016 August 1989 Forwards Responses to 881020 Request for Addl Info Re CESSAR-DC,Chapter 10, Emergency Feedwater Sys LD-89-035, Forwards Vols 1-17,consisting of Chapters 1-18,to CESSAR Design Certification, for Approval,Per 10CFR521989-03-30030 March 1989 Forwards Vols 1-17,consisting of Chapters 1-18,to CESSAR Design Certification, for Approval,Per 10CFR52 LD-89-033, Forwards Design Certification Licensing Review Basis, for Review & Concurrence1989-03-30030 March 1989 Forwards Design Certification Licensing Review Basis, for Review & Concurrence LD-89-029, Forwards Vol Viii to DOE/ID-10216, Mods for Development of MAAP-DOE Code:Vol Viii:Resolution of Outstanding Nuclear Fission Product Aerosol Transport & Deposition Issues Wbs 3.4.2, Per 881011 Request1989-03-17017 March 1989 Forwards Vol Viii to DOE/ID-10216, Mods for Development of MAAP-DOE Code:Vol Viii:Resolution of Outstanding Nuclear Fission Product Aerosol Transport & Deposition Issues Wbs 3.4.2, Per 881011 Request LD-89-028, Forwards Amend E to C-E Std SAR Group E2 Re Design Certification.Summary of Revs Also Encl1989-03-15015 March 1989 Forwards Amend E to C-E Std SAR Group E2 Re Design Certification.Summary of Revs Also Encl LD-88-132, Forwards Advanced Reactor Severe Accident Program Topic Paper Set 6, Development of Severe Accident Mgt Program, for Review1988-11-11011 November 1988 Forwards Advanced Reactor Severe Accident Program Topic Paper Set 6, Development of Severe Accident Mgt Program, for Review LD-88-128, Forwards QA Program in Response to NRC Request for Addl Info Re Chapter 17,CESSAR-DC QA1988-11-0404 November 1988 Forwards QA Program in Response to NRC Request for Addl Info Re Chapter 17,CESSAR-DC QA LD-88-119, Responds to NRC Request for Addl Info on Chapter 17 of CESSAR-DC.NRC Question 260.2 Incorporated in CENPD-210,Rev 5 as Part of Sections III.1,III.3 & Table III-11988-10-21021 October 1988 Responds to NRC Request for Addl Info on Chapter 17 of CESSAR-DC.NRC Question 260.2 Incorporated in CENPD-210,Rev 5 as Part of Sections III.1,III.3 & Table III-1 LD-88-106, Forwards Amend D to CESSAR Fsar,Including Revs to Chapters 2-7 & 18.Technical Review Should Be Allowed to Proceed Unencumbered Pending Settlement of Dispute Re Fees1988-09-30030 September 1988 Forwards Amend D to CESSAR Fsar,Including Revs to Chapters 2-7 & 18.Technical Review Should Be Allowed to Proceed Unencumbered Pending Settlement of Dispute Re Fees LD-88-099, Responds to NRC Request for Addl Info Re Chapters 5 & 9 of CESSAR-DC Re Steam Generator Secondary Water Chemistry, Reactor Coolant Water Chemistry,Fire Protection Sys,Letdown Purification Line & Hydrogen Ignition1988-09-20020 September 1988 Responds to NRC Request for Addl Info Re Chapters 5 & 9 of CESSAR-DC Re Steam Generator Secondary Water Chemistry, Reactor Coolant Water Chemistry,Fire Protection Sys,Letdown Purification Line & Hydrogen Ignition LD-88-091, Forwards Summary of Sabotage Protection Considerations & Draft Requirements for Sabotage Design from EPRI Advanced LWR Requirements Document,Per NRC .Basis for Program Listed1988-09-14014 September 1988 Forwards Summary of Sabotage Protection Considerations & Draft Requirements for Sabotage Design from EPRI Advanced LWR Requirements Document,Per NRC .Basis for Program Listed LD-88-089, Forwards Addl Info Re CESSAR-DC,Chapter 4,in Response to NRC 880628 Request1988-09-0909 September 1988 Forwards Addl Info Re CESSAR-DC,Chapter 4,in Response to NRC 880628 Request LD-88-088, Provides Proposed Resolution for Single Issue of Advanced Reactor Severe Accident Program Topic Paper Set 4, Essential Equipment Performance1988-09-0909 September 1988 Provides Proposed Resolution for Single Issue of Advanced Reactor Severe Accident Program Topic Paper Set 4, Essential Equipment Performance ML20151Q8581988-08-0202 August 1988 Informs That Vendor Finalizing Review & Anticipates That Rev 5 to CENPD-210 Will Be Transmitted by Sept 1988.Road Map Will Also Be Submitted to Identify Remaining QA Questions LD-88-069, Informs of Finalizing Review of QA Program Description of Rev 5 to CESSAR Topical Rept CENPD-210 & Anticipates Transmitting Review to NRC by Third Quarter 1988.Submittal Will Address Remaining QA Questions in Road Map1988-08-0202 August 1988 Informs of Finalizing Review of QA Program Description of Rev 5 to CESSAR Topical Rept CENPD-210 & Anticipates Transmitting Review to NRC by Third Quarter 1988.Submittal Will Address Remaining QA Questions in Road Map LD-88-068, Forwards Response to Request for Addl Info Re CESSAR-DC Chapters 1 & 5 Re Sabotage Protection,Per1988-08-0101 August 1988 Forwards Response to Request for Addl Info Re CESSAR-DC Chapters 1 & 5 Re Sabotage Protection,Per LD-88-066, Forwards DOE Advanced Reactor Severe Accident Program Proposed Resolutions for Severe Accident Issues,Topic Set 3. Resolutions to Listed Items Will Be Adopted in Development of Sys 80+ Std Design1988-07-29029 July 1988 Forwards DOE Advanced Reactor Severe Accident Program Proposed Resolutions for Severe Accident Issues,Topic Set 3. Resolutions to Listed Items Will Be Adopted in Development of Sys 80+ Std Design ML20150E7261988-07-0101 July 1988 Forwards Flow Distribution & Tube Vibration:Evaluation of Sys 80 Steam Generator Tube Lane/Economizer Corner Region, in Support of C-E 870918 Request That Steam Generator Tube Vibration Issue Be Closed LD-88-047, Forwards Amend C to CESSAR-DC (Design Certification), Chapters 5,6 & 10.Summary of Significance of Revs Also Encl1988-06-30030 June 1988 Forwards Amend C to CESSAR-DC (Design Certification), Chapters 5,6 & 10.Summary of Significance of Revs Also Encl LD-88-046, Forwards Response to NRC 880315 Request for Addl Info Re CESSAR-DC,Chapter 10, Plant Sys Branch1988-06-30030 June 1988 Forwards Response to NRC 880315 Request for Addl Info Re CESSAR-DC,Chapter 10, Plant Sys Branch LD-88-042, Provides Proposed Resolutions to Remaining Two Issues Committed to in Re Direct Containment Heating (Idcor Issue 8) & Debris Coolability (Idcor Issue 10).C-E Plans to Adopt 14 Resolutions Previously Submitted1988-06-17017 June 1988 Provides Proposed Resolutions to Remaining Two Issues Committed to in Re Direct Containment Heating (Idcor Issue 8) & Debris Coolability (Idcor Issue 10).C-E Plans to Adopt 14 Resolutions Previously Submitted LD-88-039, Forwards Addl Info Re Chapters 1 & 10 to CESSAR-DC,per NRC 880311 Request1988-06-0606 June 1988 Forwards Addl Info Re Chapters 1 & 10 to CESSAR-DC,per NRC 880311 Request LD-88-038, Provides Proposed Resolutions for Four of Six Issues Which Make Up Topic Paper Set 2,including in-vessel Hydrogen Generation,Core Melt Progression & Vessel Failure & Hydrogen Ignition & Burning.Remaining Issues Submitted in 30 Days1988-06-0606 June 1988 Provides Proposed Resolutions for Four of Six Issues Which Make Up Topic Paper Set 2,including in-vessel Hydrogen Generation,Core Melt Progression & Vessel Failure & Hydrogen Ignition & Burning.Remaining Issues Submitted in 30 Days LD-88-034, Provides Addl Info on CESSAR-DC Chapter 10 Re Secondary Water Chemistry,Per NRC 880225 request.CESSAR-DC Section 10.3.5.1 Revised to Make Clear That C-E Secondary Water Chemistry Program Includes Immediate Shutdown Limits1988-05-25025 May 1988 Provides Addl Info on CESSAR-DC Chapter 10 Re Secondary Water Chemistry,Per NRC 880225 request.CESSAR-DC Section 10.3.5.1 Revised to Make Clear That C-E Secondary Water Chemistry Program Includes Immediate Shutdown Limits LD-88-033, Forwards Response to NRC 880226 Request for Addl Info on Chapter 17 to Rev 4 to Topical Rept CENPD-210A, QA Program, Including Revs to C-E 871130 & 880411 Responses1988-05-25025 May 1988 Forwards Response to NRC 880226 Request for Addl Info on Chapter 17 to Rev 4 to Topical Rept CENPD-210A, QA Program, Including Revs to C-E 871130 & 880411 Responses LD-88-026, Forwards Draft Revs to C-E Chapters 1,4,5 & 9 to C-E Std Sar.Meeting to Resolve Issues Re Schedule & Composition of Submittals as Part of Draft Licensing Review Bases & Related Issues,Requested1988-04-11011 April 1988 Forwards Draft Revs to C-E Chapters 1,4,5 & 9 to C-E Std Sar.Meeting to Resolve Issues Re Schedule & Composition of Submittals as Part of Draft Licensing Review Bases & Related Issues,Requested LD-88-021, Forwards Response to NRC 871208 Request for Addl Info Re Reg Guides That Appear in CESSAR-DC,QA.Suggest That Meeting W/Nrc Staff Be Scheduled to Allow Overview Program Changes1988-03-22022 March 1988 Forwards Response to NRC 871208 Request for Addl Info Re Reg Guides That Appear in CESSAR-DC,QA.Suggest That Meeting W/Nrc Staff Be Scheduled to Allow Overview Program Changes LD-88-019, Forwards Addl Info Re Chemical & Vol Control Sys for Sys 80+TM Std Design,Per 871217 Request.Proposed Rev to C-E Std SAR, Design Certification Also Encl1988-03-18018 March 1988 Forwards Addl Info Re Chemical & Vol Control Sys for Sys 80+TM Std Design,Per 871217 Request.Proposed Rev to C-E Std SAR, Design Certification Also Encl LD-88-020, Responds to NRC Request for Addl Info Re Chapter 1 Concerning Safeguards.Proposed Revision to C-E Engineering Std SAR & Responses to Specific Questions Also Encl1988-03-18018 March 1988 Responds to NRC Request for Addl Info Re Chapter 1 Concerning Safeguards.Proposed Revision to C-E Engineering Std SAR & Responses to Specific Questions Also Encl ML20149M6171988-02-16016 February 1988 Forwards Proprietary & Nonproprietary Base Line Level 1 PRA for Sys 80R NSSS Design, Per NRC Request.Proprietary Rept Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790) LD-88-008, Forwards Proprietary Base Line Level 1 PRA for Sys 80r NSSS Design. Rept Presents Methodology & Results of Sys 80 PRA to Be Used for Evaluation of Design trade-offs for Sys 80+ Std Design1988-01-22022 January 1988 Forwards Proprietary Base Line Level 1 PRA for Sys 80r NSSS Design. Rept Presents Methodology & Results of Sys 80 PRA to Be Used for Evaluation of Design trade-offs for Sys 80+ Std Design ML20148D3241988-01-19019 January 1988 Forwards Input to Licensing Review Bases Document Being Developed for CESSAR - Design Certification Originally Transmitted on 870702.Encl C-E Sys 80+TM Std Design Design Certification Bases Addresses NRC 871207 Comments LD-87-068, Forwards Proposed Amend to CESSAR FSAR Describing Sys 80 Plus Design.Mods Comply W/Standardization & Severe Accident Policy Statements & Results in Upgrading of Final Design Approval FDA-2.Clarification of NRC Fees Requested1987-11-30030 November 1987 Forwards Proposed Amend to CESSAR FSAR Describing Sys 80 Plus Design.Mods Comply W/Standardization & Severe Accident Policy Statements & Results in Upgrading of Final Design Approval FDA-2.Clarification of NRC Fees Requested LD-87-053, Forwards Revised Steam Generator Tube Rupture Analysis for Fsar.Rev Incorporates Revised Analysis Using Reactor Coolant Gas Vent Sys for Depressurization Purposes1987-09-18018 September 1987 Forwards Revised Steam Generator Tube Rupture Analysis for Fsar.Rev Incorporates Revised Analysis Using Reactor Coolant Gas Vent Sys for Depressurization Purposes LD-87-050, Requests NRC Adoption of Proposed Docketing Process for Forthcoming Revs to C-E Std SAR1987-09-18018 September 1987 Requests NRC Adoption of Proposed Docketing Process for Forthcoming Revs to C-E Std SAR LD-87-052, Requests That Steam Generator Tube Vibration Issue Be Closed on C-E Std SAR - FSAR (CESSAR-F) Docket.Any Potential Design Improvements for Future Steam Generators Can Be Reviewed as Part of Review of Improved Design Sys 80+1987-09-18018 September 1987 Requests That Steam Generator Tube Vibration Issue Be Closed on C-E Std SAR - FSAR (CESSAR-F) Docket.Any Potential Design Improvements for Future Steam Generators Can Be Reviewed as Part of Review of Improved Design Sys 80+ LD-87-051, Provides Design Info to Support Conclusion That Sys 80R in Compliance W/Atws Rule.Requests Closure of Issuance on CESSAR - F Docket.Response to NRC Evaluation of CEN-315,Sys 80R Encl1987-09-18018 September 1987 Provides Design Info to Support Conclusion That Sys 80R in Compliance W/Atws Rule.Requests Closure of Issuance on CESSAR - F Docket.Response to NRC Evaluation of CEN-315,Sys 80R Encl LD-87-054, Forwards Amend 12 to CESSAR Fsar,Modifying Sys 80R Design. Enhanced & Expanded Sys 80 Design Will Be Called Sys 80 Tm1987-09-18018 September 1987 Forwards Amend 12 to CESSAR Fsar,Modifying Sys 80R Design. Enhanced & Expanded Sys 80 Design Will Be Called Sys 80 Tm LD-87-021, Provides Formal Description of C-E Efforts to Advance Sys 80R PWR Design & Advises That Sys 80 Design Including Consideration of EPRI Advanced LWR Design Requirements Document Revised1987-04-23023 April 1987 Provides Formal Description of C-E Efforts to Advance Sys 80R PWR Design & Advises That Sys 80 Design Including Consideration of EPRI Advanced LWR Design Requirements Document Revised LD-87-017, Responds to 870327 Questions Re Steam Generator Tube Vibration Observed at Palo Verde Units 1 & 2.Definition & Scope of Program to Review Phenomenon Will Be Available for Review W/Nrc in Approx 90 Days1987-04-10010 April 1987 Responds to 870327 Questions Re Steam Generator Tube Vibration Observed at Palo Verde Units 1 & 2.Definition & Scope of Program to Review Phenomenon Will Be Available for Review W/Nrc in Approx 90 Days 1990-08-28
[Table view] |
Text
_. . - - - _ _ - .
C-E P*w:r Syst!ms Tel 203/688-1911 Combustion Engineering. Inc Telex 99297 1000 Prospect Hill Road Windsor. Connecticut 06095 M POWER SYSTEMS Docket No. STN 50-470F May 10,1983 LD-83-042 Mr. Cecil 0. Thomas, Chief ,
Standardization and Special Projects Branch Division of Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555
Subject:
CESSAR-F SER Confirmatory Item 14, Responses to Questions
References:
(A) Letter, C. O. Thomas to A. E. Scherer, dated February 7,1983 (B ) Letter LD-83-027, A. E. Scherer to C. O. Thomas, dated March 29, 1983 (C) Letter LD-83-036, A. E. Scherer to C. 0. Thomas, dated April 26, 1983
Dear Mr. Thomas:
Reference (A) transmitted in its Enclosure (1) a set of questions on the small feedwater and small steam line break methodologies. Responses to questions one through four which address feedwater line break methodology (Confirmatory Item
- 15) were provided via Reference (B). A partial response to the question.s on small steam line break methodology was prepared and transmitted to the Staff earlier; Reference (C) transmitted responses to questions 6, 7, 8, 9 and 13.
The responses to tne remaining four questions (5,10,11 and 21) are enclosed.
We believe that the information provided in response to the thirteen questions addresses the Staff's concerns with small steam line break and feedwater line break methodologies and, thus, should resolve Confirmatory Items 14 and 15 of the CESSAR-F SER.
Due to the proprietary nature of the material contained in the enclosure, we request that it be withheld from public disclosure in accordance with the provisions of 10 CFR 2.790 and that this material be safeguarded. The reasons for the proprietary classification of this report are delineated in the enclosed affidavit.
[005 N'ec S4Nort-h Ohaa3(:N0'O lS Ilrs Nos Gop hof M'* Ql 8305120185 830510 PDR ADOCK 05000470 E PDR
Mr. Cecil 0. Thomas LD-83-042 May 10, 1983 Page 2 o .
If I can be of any further assistance in this matter, please contact me or Mr.
G. A. Davis of my staff at (203) 688-1911, extension 2803.
Very truly yours, COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC.
ft M A. . Scherer Director Nuclear Licensing AES:las F72006 cc: Gary Meyer (Project Manager / USNRC) w/o encl.
Enclosures:
1-P to LO-83-042, " Responses to Questions 440.5,10,11 and 12 on SLB Method", Proprietary Version, (copies 00001 - 00025) 1-NP to LD-83-042, " Responses to Questions 440.5, 10, 11 and 12 on SLB Method", Non-Proprietary Version, (15 copies)
Affidavit attesting to the proprietary nature of this report 1
I l
l l
l
AFFIDAVIT PURSUANT TO 10 CFR 2.790 Combustion Engineering, Inc. )
State of Connecticut )
County of Hartford ) SS.:
I, A. E. Scherer, depose and say that I am the Director, Nuclear Licensing, of Combustion Engineering, Inc., duly authorized to make this affidavit, and have reviewed or caused to have reviewed the information which is identified as proprietary and referenced in the paragraph immediately below. I am submitting this affidavit in conformance with the provisions of 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations for withholding this information.
The information for which proprietary treatment is sought is contained in the following document:
Enclosure 1-P to LD-83-042, Responses to Questions 440.5, 10, 11, and 12 on SLB Method, May 1983.
This document has been appropriately designated as proprietary.
I have personal knowledge of the criteria and procedures utilized by Combustion Engineering in designating information as a trade secret, privileged or as confidential commercial or financial information.
Pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (b) (4) of Section 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, the following is furnished for consideration by the Commission in determining whether the information sought to be withheld from public disclosure, included in the above referenced document, should be withheld.
. ~
1, The information sought to be withheld from public disclosure are the three-dimensional reactivity feedback credits which is owned and has been held in confidence by Combustion Engineering.
- 2. The information consists of test data or other similar data concerning a process, method or component, the application of which results in a substantial competitive advantage to Combustion Engineering.
- 3. The information is of a type customarily held in' confidence by I
Combustion Engineering and not customarily disclosed to the public. Combustion Engineering has a rational basis for determining the types of information customarily held in confidence by it and, in that connection, utilizes a system to determine when and whether to hold certain types of information in I
confidence. The details of the aforementioned system were provided to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission via letter DP-537 from F.M. Stern to Frank Schroeder dated December 2, 1974 This system was applied in determining that the subject document herein are proprietary.
- 4. The information is being transmitted to the Commission in confidence under the provisions of 10 CFR 2.790 with the understanding that it is to be received in confidence by the Commission.
- 5. The information, to the best of my knowledge and belief, is not available in public sources, and any disclosure to third parties has been made pursuant to regulatory provisions or proprietary agreements which provide for maintenance of the information in confidence.
- 6. Public disclosure of the information is likely to cause substantial harm to the competitive position of Combustion Engineering because:
- a. A similar product is manufactured and sold by major pressurized water reactor competitors of Combustion Engineering.
w-m,.m,=.-. ,w,-. ,_ .%-_ - -,- 4-.,.9v,,w-- --.. . . . -y - - --
w- ,--- - we .q-y-y y g 3-p 9
-wy w--., - - , y,- , n w yy-gy- ,, v m.--, ,--. 3
1
- b. Development of this information by C-E required thousands of manhours of effort and hundreds of thousands of dollars. To the best of my knowledgeand belief a competitor would have to undergo similar expense in generating equivalent information.
- c. In order to acquire such information, a competitor would also require considerable time and inconvenience related to the development of three-dimensional reactivity feedback credits.
- d. The information required significant effort and expense to obtain
- the licensing approvals necessary for application of the information.
Avoidance of this expense would decrease a competitor's cost in applying the information and marketing the product to which the information is applicable.
- e. The information consists of the three-dimensional reactivity feedback credits, the application of which provides a competitive economic advantage. The availability of such information to competitors would enable them to modify their product to better compete with Combustion Engineering, take marketing or other actions to improve their product's position or impair the position of Combustion Engineering's product, and avoid developing similar data and analyses in support of their processes, methods or apparatus,
- f. In pricing Combustion Engineering's products and services, significant research, development, engineering, analytical, manufacturing, licensing, quality assurance and other costs and expenses must be included.
The ability of Combustion Engineering's competitors 'to utilize such information without similar expenditure of resources may enable them to sell at prices reflecting significantly lower costs.
- g. Use of the information by competitors in the international marketplace would increase their ability to market nuclear steam supply systems by reducing the costs associated with their technology development. In addition, disclosure would have an adverse economic impact on Combustion Engineering's potential for obtaining or maintaining foreign licensees.
Further the deponent sayeth not.
b A. E g heter _
Director Nuclear Licensing Sworn to before me this /0 day of O hl.} b Mt> CGOJU Notary Public U i
~
. Enclosure 1-NP to LD-83-042 SYSTEM 80 CESSAR.FSAR DOCKETSTN55-470 RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS 440.5,10,11, and 12 ON SLB METHOD MAY, 1983 i
COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC.
NUCLEAR P.0WER SYSTEMS WINOSOR, CONNECTICUT 9
m
, - - - - - - - - . . ,,...y- -
~%,---.__ _, , , _ _ _ . . . , , , _ , - _ _ _ , . , ..m._.m.,
LEGAL NOTICE t
THIS REPORT WAS PREPARED AS AN ACCOUNT OF WORK SPONSORED BY COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC. NEITHER COMBUSTION ENGINEERING NOR ANY PERSON ACTING ON ITS BEHALF:
A. MAKES ANY WARRANTY OR REPRESENTATION, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED INCLUDING THE WARRANTIES OF FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR MERCHANTABILITY, WITH RESPECT TO THE ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS, OR USEFULNESS OF THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT, OR THAT THE USE OF ANY INFORMATION, APPARATUS, METHOD, OR PROCESS DISOLOSED IN THIS REPORT MAY NOT INFRINGE PRIVATELY OWNED RIGHTS;OR B. ASSUMES ANY LIABILITIES WITH RESPECT TO THE USE OF, OR FOR DAMAGES RESULTING FROM THE USE OF, ANY INFORMATION, APPARATUS, METHOD OR PROCESS DISCLOSED IN THIS REPORT.
l l
l .
, _ . . , , . . - _ . . - , . - - . _ . , , _ _ . , - , . _ - , . . . . _ , , _ . _ _ , - - - - , - ~ . .- ,_.--, -_ - - - _ - - . _ .
Question 440.5 Page 15C-2 states: '
.... corresponding to end-of-cycle operation were used for the steam line breaks appearing in Section 15.1.5 to maximize post-trip reactivity insertion.
Calculational uncertainty in the PDQ-X calculation was accounted for through
. the use of conservative multipliers on the CESEC reactivity functions .
The CESEC three-dimensional reactivity feedback option gives the capability of including three-dimensional reactivity feedback effects associated 'ith w core inlet plane temperature distribution, stuck CEA, and changes in core power distribution. The 3-0 reactivity contribution is based on HERMITE (described in subsection 4.3.3.1.1) calculations, and is parameterized in CESEC as a function of core inlet plant temperature tilt (difference between hot and cold edge temperatures), core flow, and core fission power. This option was not used for the steam ine breaks presented in Section 15.1.5..."
Since the three-dimensional reactivity feedback option was not used in the CESSAR analyses described in Appendix 15C, show results that demonstrate the conservatism of the approach used relative to the three-dimensional results.
Provide the three-dimensional feedback reactivity table used as input to CESEC.
] Response:
1 A typical plot of reactivities versus time for a steam line break (SLB)
, analysis for a non-System 80 NSSS for which three-dimensional reactivity t
feedback was credited is shown in Figure 440.5-1. The three-dimensional reactivity feedback is always negative. - Therefore the approach used in the CESSAR SLB analyses is conservative relative to an approach which uses three-dimensional results. If three-dimensional reactivity feedback had been 3 credited for the System 80 SLB analyses the total reactivity values would have been more negative than the values presented in CESSAR.
Table 440.5-1 is the three-dimensional feedback reactivity table used as input to CESEC for a typical non-System 80 NSSS.
i l
l
/
/
10
~
MODERATOR 6 -
A
/
s' ~~~,'
H %
5 ,' ~~
~~~~~..
3 !
E 2 - DOPPLER g '_.._.._.[.__._._._._._._.._._._..
.. ..[ SAFETY INJECTION
- a. ,-..
- - " ~ ~ . - -
u ..
-2
,,*~~ .. m .' * "-
g -
, 3-D REACTIVITY FEED 8ACK 2 ./.- TOTAL 4
w .i CEA .
E
,p- ____ - . _ ___
I I I I
-10 0 100 200 300 400 500 TIME, SECONDS FIGURE d40.5- 1 -
TYPICAL REACTIVITIES VS TIME FOR STEAM LINE BREAK FOR A NSSS FOR WHICH 3-D REACTIVITY IS CREDITED e
l
~
TABLE 440.5-1 . . . . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
__ . EXAMPLE 0FA__THREE DIMENSIONAL FEEDBACK REACTIVITY TABLE USED AS INPUT -
CESEC FOR NON-SYSTEM 80 NSSS
/
i i
1 1
m .
9 9
woo '
Question 440.10 Section 15C.3.3.2 (page 15C-6) of the CESSAR FSAR states:
...For System 80 this most adverse state has been found to be the maximum core power, most positive ASI, minimum core flowrate, maximum pressurizer water level, maximum core inlet coolant temperature, maximum reactor coolant system pressure, and maximum water level in the affected steam generator with the water level in the unaffected steam generator at the maximum value which can exist initially and still result in emergency feedwater actuation at the time of main steam isolation valve closure (i.e., the transient time of minimum level)..."
Parametric analyses have not been submitted to substantiate the limiting conditions outlined above.' Provide parameteric results of minimum DNBR versus these various parameters to demonstrate that the most adverse state has in fact been determined.
Response
Parametric analyses have been performed to determine the sensitivity of minimum post-trip CHFR (DNBR) to each of the initial conditions described in Section 15C.3.3.2 of the CESSAR FSAR. The results of this study are presented in Table 440.10-1 in terms of the rate of change of the minimum post-trip CHFR with change in the initial value of each parameter, xj, with all other parameters held constant.
The values in Table 440.10-1 represent results of variations from the initial conditions for the most limiting steam line break (SLB) of the CESSAR FSAR.
This is the large steam line break during full power operation with concurrent loss of offsite power (Case 1 of Section 15.1.5). The initial conditions for this case are listed in Table 15.1.5-6 of the CESSAR FSAR.
The signs on (BCHFR/3xq) for xj being initial reactor coolant system pressure, initial pressurizer water volume, and ASI are such that the extrema of these values used for the analyses presented in the CESSAR FSAR Section 15.1.5 do not produce a value of minimum CHFR which is quite as low as might have been calculated had other values of these parameters been used. However for these parameters is such that the had magnitude of the value the opposite extrema been used of (BCHFR/3xj)l for al of these parameters the resultant minimum CHFR would have been well within acceptable limits. In the case of the initial pressurizer water volume and initial reactor coolant system pressure, the extrema chosen for the analyses presented in Section 15.1 of the CESSAR FSAR were chosen to delay and impede safety injection flow. However, due to conservatisms in the choice of other parameters, safety injection (SI)
. boron does not reach the reactor core until after the time of minimum post-trip CHFR. As a result phenomena, which are of second order when SI boron is important to the reactivity balance at the time of minimum CHFR, cause the reversal of the sign of ( 3 CHFR/3xj).
n, , _
-* : .- _; ,
TABLE 440.10-1 RATE OF CHANGE OF MINIMUM POST-TRIP CHFR (DN8R) WITH CHANGE IN INITIAL CONDITIONS FOR LARGE SLB DURING FULL POWER OPERATION WITH CONCURRENT LOSS OF OFFSITE POWER i Initial Condition, Xj (a CHFR/3Xj)Xj, j = 1, 2,.. 8, j / i / Units l Core Power -0.20 /%
2 ASI +0.50 / ASI UNI 3 Core Flowrate +0 23
/%
4 Pressurizer Water Level +8.8 X 10-3 /%
5 Core Inlet Temperature -1.3 /*F 6 Reactor Coolant Pressure +3.7 X 10-3 / psia 7 Affected Steam Generator Water Mass -
3.3 X 10-4 /lbm 8 Unaffected Steam Generator Water Mass -1.6 X 10-5 /lbm 9
J
,w.- - - - - - - , . - , , - - - - -
Qu2stion 440.11 Section 15C.3.3.3 (Amendment 7 of the CESSAR FSAR) outlines several assumptions
. (a, thru j) utilized in conservatively predicting the consequences of a postulated steam line break. Provide the sensitivity of each parameter to minimum DNBR.
In addition, specifically referring to assumption g), "As the MSIVs close steam
. bicwdown from the unaffected steam generator terminates..." Steam line pressure equalization lines may exist in the balance of plant (BOP) design such that MSIV closure may not terminate steam blowdown from the unaffected steam generator. Include this possibility in the parametric study of assumption g).
Finally regarding assumption j), show the effect of various inlet mixing ratios and the effect of outlet mixing (upper plenum) on the inlet mixing models and the overall parametric effect on minimum DNBR versus time.
Response
Parametric analyses have been performed to determine the sensitivity of minimum post-trip CHFR (DNBR) to each of the parameters listed in Section 15C.3.3.3, Amendment 7, of the CESSAR FSAR (assumptions a through j), where applicable.
Except as noted below, the results of this study are presented in Table 440.11-1 in terms of the rate of change of the minimum post-trip CHFR with change in the initial value of each parameter, xj, with all other parameters held constant. The values in Table 440.11-1 represent the results of variations from the analysis assumptions used for the most limiting steam line break (SLB) of the CESSAR FSAR (i.e., Case 1 of Section 15.1.5: large SLB during full power operation with concurrent loss of offsite power).
Note that, with respect to the question referring to assumption (g), the System 80 80P interface requirements allow no steam flow paths upstream of the MSIVs which are not isolated on MSIS. See for example Item M.11 of Section 5.1.4 of the CESSAR FSAR.
The sensitivity of minimum post-trip CHFR to certain of the parameters in the list (a through j) of Section 15C.3.3.3 of the CESSAR FSAR are not included in Table 440.11-1 for the following reasons:
1 Assumption (c): Sensitivity to moisture carryover cannot be expressed in the t form presented in Table 440.11-1. The results presented in the FSAR assume no moisture carryover. For comparison the most limiting steam line break case of the CESSAR FSAR (Case 1 of Section 15.1.5) was repeated with a moisture l '
carryover function which yielded a blowdown quality of 1.0 (pure saturated
- vapor) at full power design steam flow rate and 0.5 at the maximum blowdown flow rate. The minimum post-trip CHFR for this case was more than 5 CHFR units greater than that for the comparable case in the FSAR (Case 1 of Section 15.1.5).
i l Assumption (f): The sensitivity of minimum post-trip CHFR to boron reactivity cannot be determined for the SLB cases of the FSAR. Due to the choice of conservatisms in the other parameters, safety injection (SI) boron does not reach the reactor core until after the time of minimum post-trip CHFR for the
- cases initiated from full power. For cases initiated from zero power the post-trip fission power is too small to yield meaningful CHFR calculations. However 1
the sensitivity of rr.aximum post-trip reactivity to boron reactivity can be calculated for cases initiated from zero power, since SI boron does reach the core prior to the time of maximum post-trip reactivity for these cases. The change in maximum post-trip reactivity per percent change in the slope of the boron reactivity versus boron concentration function is -0.00013 ao /% for the most limiting zero power SLB of the CESSAR FSAR (Case 4 of Section 15.1.5).
e p
l I
i l
9 l
l l
TABLE 440.11-1
^
RATE OF CHANGE OF MINIMUM POST-TRIP CHFR (DNBR) WITH CHANGE IN PARAMETRIC ASSUMPTIONS FOR LARGE SLB
, DURING FULL POWER OPERATION WITH CONCURRENT LOSS OF 0FFSITE POWER Assumption of Sectica 15C.3.3.3 i X
$ (a CHFR) , j = 1, 2,.. 8 Units aX4 Xj j/i a 1 CEA Worth +20 /%ac b, d 2 Moderator reactivity -1.2
- e 3 Doppler reactivity -0.18
h 5 Heat transfer area in the RV upper head +0.002 **
i i 6 Heat transfer area in the RCS, outside the +0.068 **
~
upper head j 7 Inlet mixing +0.16 ***
j 8 Outlet mixing +0.17 per percent increase in slope of function
- per percent increase in area l
per percent increase in mixing
Ouestion 440.12 Page 15.1-4 of Amendment 7 to the. CESSAR FSAR states that the consequences of all small steam line breaks (fraction of fuel rods predicted to experience DNBR) is the same as for the 1.0 square foot break analyzed. This is attributed to the core protection calculators. Provide greater details as to the reason for the insensitivity of minimum DNBR to break sizes in the small break regime.
Provide sensitivity analyses of minimum DNBR versus break size in the small steam line braak regime for the CESSAR NSSS design.
Since Appendix 15C is intended to be a documentation of C-E's steam line break methodology for generic application, provide a similar break spectrum sensitivity for typical C-E NSSS design without core protection calculators.
Response
Values of the minimum DNBR versus total steam line break (SLB) flow area (break area plus effective turbine ficw area) are presented in Figure 440.12-1. This figure includes curves of DNBR versus flow area both for System 80, with reactor trip on projected low DNBR as determined by the core protection calculators (CPCs), and for a typical C-E NSSS design without CPCs. For System 80 the minimum DNBR occurs at the maximum flow area. For the plants without CPCs, the minimum DNBR occurs at a flow area less than the maximum.
l l
i l
l l
l
i . . _ __-_.;g .. n . : __ _
r _ :- :- -
C' ..__
3 ._ _ . _ ~ . _ -. ---
-+ -
. _=-i___ . . . _x : . _. _ : .___._
. . .. .: r __
r: .. . : - . ::-- - : ; . _: i ____. a--- r :--- -- *--- - -+--- .___ - : - - - -
..T-'"___T'
, ~ _ .. . . _ _ ~ - - . ,* - ~ 7' l .. ; ;. . . . _ ,'" _. .4-
..{... _ , .. .
_ . . _ _ ...s._____
~ ~. *[- .'.'.#
..___.- Utf-trC9E.u w r-..:. y. ._. N otf- C Pc'-T Rsy MS$ s - _
._ ;. = :.c. --- ._--_
-. :x1
~U ~3 1- :_ ~ I . _ ._ g- g M .
5 W ea'rbt-tot 1t_
, . u.T_ . - .
wr. . ,
( . -
~
7~~
.)'AntAkEi~i_
- - g - -- :. cy- N_ .. ,_
j'.. ELaw:MMTR KTott :..--
m y ;, . .
-_=.. . - - --; .
jr" .
j/' .
7
- p. _ }- - ~ ~
M- _:: ~* f.
g 2_.
.au r .
I-GqrM 10 V MH 6
9 54T^2 Tbo mJ .:9mA s. .._.... : _:'._.:._.
C
,7 -
t oW DN B R(CPClTEiP t . r . _.
y -
, :1 .:. -_- n e , .. . .
g *W , - ---
, - - -- ; , , ; _
y -
____ .. 7___.,_.__.
.6 . . _ . - - . . _ .
~
. o.
O 1 1 3 4 T 6
.----_,-=:.-.._---_:._.-- :
- :- -= -- ---
=. -
--[gg ggw( p 2:3 l - _ - . . . - _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ . __- . - . - -
TOTAL Del AREA == be oe c Q fco e hM n e Cle,3 anc4 l FIGURE 440.1-2-1 1
1 COMPARISON.0F MINIMUM TRANSIENT Di:BR VS.
STEAMLINE BREAK FLOW AREA FOR SYSTEM 30 & NON-CPC TRIP NSSS l