Semantic search

Jump to navigation Jump to search
 Start dateReporting criterionEvent description
05000301/LER-2012-00127 June 2012

On June 27, 2012 at 2046, a Point Beach Nuclear Plant (PBNP) Unit 2 manual reactor trip was actuated due to indications of a loss of load to the main turbine.

turbine first stage pressure and generator megawatts, indicative of a significant reduction in turbine load. Control rods were responding as designed by inserting into the reactor to reduce reactor power. Operations noted that the turbine speed indication on the EH control panel was reading high with the generator output breaker closed, indicating a control system failure. Based on these indications, the Shift Manager directed that the reactor be shutdown by manually actuating the reactor protection system. No automatic reactor protection setpoints were exceeded and an automatic shutdown was not actuated or required.

Based on troubleshooting, NextEra determined that the loss of turbine load was due to a failure of the speed channel card in the EH system. The speed channel card was replaced.

Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.73 (a)(2)(iv)(A), the event is reportable as an event or condition that resulted in manual actuation of the reactor protection system.

05000301/LER-2011-00127 February 201110 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(D), Loss of Safety Function - Mitigate the Consequences of an Accident

On February 27, 2011, at 2159 CST, during the testing of the A train safety injection (SI) system (BQ), it was discovered that the oiler for the Unit 2, B train SI pump, had rotated and the oil had drained out. The B train SI pump was declared inoperable. At the time of the event, the A train of SI was out of service for performance of a routine inservice test. Because both trains of SI were inoperable, LCO 3.0.3 was entered. Upon completion of the A train inservice test, Unit 2 exited LCO 3.0.3 at 2211 CST.

Immediate corrective actions taken included restoring the oiler to the vertical position, refilling it and performing a 5-minute pump run. The root cause of the event was determined to be a 1995 modification to the SI pump oiler which introduced a latent design/configuration flaw. Additional corrective actions will include a design change to the SI pumps and oiler assemblies for both units to reduce the possibility of accidental misalignments. The actions are being tracked to completion in the corrective action program.

An 8-hour ENS report was made in accordance with 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(D) on February 28, 2011 at 0345 CST.

05000301/LER-1999-003, Forwards LER 99-003-00 for Point Beach Nuclear Plant,Unit 2. Rept Is Provided in Accordance with 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), as Any Operation or Condition Prohibited by Plant Tech Specs28 May 1999
05000301/LER-1999-002, Forwards LER 99-002-00 Re Discovery That Cable Necessary to Provide Plant Parameter Required to Be Monitored for App R Safe SD Location Was Not Routed Independent of Appropriate Fire Zone.Commitments in Rept Indicated in Italic16 April 1999
05000301/LER-1999-001, Forwards LER 99-001-00,re Loss of Safeguards Electrical Bus During Refueling Surveillance Testing Which Resulted in Temporary Unavailability of One Train of Decay Heat Removal. Commitments Made by Util Are Identified in Italics10 March 1999
05000301/LER-1998-004, Forwards LER 98-004-00,which Describes Operation of Unit W/Eight Hour Average Reactor Thermal Output in Excess of Licensed Limit.Commitments Made within Ltr Encl26 May 1998
05000301/LER-1998-003, Forwards LER 98-003-00,describing Discovery That Vent Valve from Reactor Coolant Drain Tank Which Had Been Placed on Increased Frequency Surveillance for Stroke Time Was Not Tested in Time Frame Required.New Commitments in Ital8 May 1998
05000301/LER-1998-002, Forwards LER 98-002-00 Re Serious Degradation of Reactor Coolant Pump Component Cooling Water Return Line Check Valve Which May Prevent Closure13 April 1998
05000301/LER-1998-001, Forwards LER 98-001-00,describing Mispositioning Event Which Resulted in SG Venting Steam Outside Containment During Plant Heatup.Commitments Are Encl in Rept in Italics4 March 1998
05000301/LER-1997-001, Forwards LER 97-001-00,re Containment Structure Where Internal Containment Structural Members Could Have Damaged Containment Liner During Safe Shutdown Earthquake6 February 1997
05000301/LER-1995-003, Forwards LER 95-003 Re Rt Due to Turbine Generator Eg Control Sys Oil Leak5 April 1995
05000301/LER-1995-001, Forwards LER 95-001 Re Inadvertent EDG Start.Rept Describes Situation That Caused Normal Power Supply Breaker for Unit 2 Train A,4160 Volt Safeguards Bus to Open27 March 1995
05000301/LER-1993-004, Forwards LER 93-004-00 for Pbnp Re Operability Concern for Containment Accident Fan Bearing6 December 1993
05000301/LER-1992-007, Forwards LER 92-007-00 for Point Beach Nuclear Plant Re Automatic Starting of Emergency DG G02 Following de-energization of 4,160 Volt Safeguards Bus23 November 1992
05000301/LER-1992-006, Forwards LER 92-006-00 for Point Beach Nuclear Plant,Unit 2, Re Inadvertent Actuation of non-safeguards Equipment Lockout19 November 1992
05000301/LER-1992-005, Forwards LER 92-005-00,per TS 15.4.2.A.7(a) After Each ISI, Number of Tube Plugged or Repaired in Each SG Shall Be Reported to Commission as Soon as Practical. Rept Also Reported Per TS Table 15.4.2-1 & TS 15.4.2.A.7(b)13 November 1992
05000301/LER-1992-001, Forwards LER 92-001-00.Rept Initially Submitted on 920317 as Improperly Numbered LER 92-003-00.Requests That LER 92-003-00 Be Withdrawn & Replaced W/Encl9 April 1992
05000301/LER-1991-004, Revises Commitment in LER 91-004-00 Re Failure of Containment Isolation Valve 2-CC-767 to Pass Seat Leakage Tests in 10CFR50,App J,Per 911108 Insp.Entire Valve Will Not Be Replaced,Based on Adequate Overall Performance16 April 1992
05000301/LER-1989-010, Forwards LER 89-010-00 Describing Generation of Containment High Pressure Signal During Leak Testing of Containment Penetrations for Facility11 October 1990
05000301/LER-1988-001, Provides Complete Copy of LER 88-001-00 Re Reactor Trip Due to Malfunction of Instrument Bus Power Supply Mechanical Interlock to Replace LER Forms Attached to . Certain Info Missing from Page 1 of Subj Forms17 May 1988
05000301/LER-1983-002, Forwards LER 83-002/01T-026 April 1983
05000301/LER-1983-001, Forwards LER 83-001/03L-06 April 1983
05000301/LER-1982-011, Forwards LER 82-011/03L-011 January 1983
05000301/LER-1982-010, Forwards LER 82-010/03L-015 December 1982
05000301/LER-1982-009, Forwards LER 82-009/01T-03 December 1982
05000301/LER-1982-007, Forwards LER 82-007/03L-025 October 1982
05000301/LER-1982-006, Forwards LER 82-006/03L-020 August 1982
05000301/LER-1982-005, Updated LER 82-005/01T-1:on 820727,discovered 2 of 3 Level Instruments on C Boric Acid Storage Tank Powered from Common Source.Cause Not Determined Due to Poor Early Maint of Documents.Wiring Corrected28 September 1982
05000301/LER-1982-004, Forwards LER 82-004/01T-015 June 1982
05000301/LER-1982-003, Forwards LER 82-003/03L-08 June 1982
05000301/LER-1981-002, Forwards Results of Metallographic Insp & Exam of Steam Generator Tube R15C73,as Committed to in LER 81-002/01T-01. Also Forwards Addl Rept on Evaluation of Apr 1981 Eddy Current Insp Results & Eddy Current Insp Maps27 May 1981
05000266/LER-2017-00330 October 2017
13 December 2017
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded

On October 30, 2017, with Unit 1 in MODE 3 for refueling activities, a boric acid indication downstream of 1CV-309B, 1P-1B Reactor Coolant Pump (RCP) Labyrinth Seal 1 DPT-124 Upper Root Valve was identified as a through-wall flaw. The flaw location on the root valve to differential pressure transmitter (DPT) instrument tubing welded joint was within the reactor coolant system (RCS) pressure boundary.

This event is being reported pursuant to 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A) for material defects in the primary coolant system that were not acceptable in accordance with ASME Section XI.

05000266/LER-2017-00229 October 2017
13 December 2017
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications

On October 29, 2017, Unit 1 entered MODE 3 from MODE 4 without satisfying all of Technical Specification 3.7.5, Auxiliary Feedwater (AFW) Limiting Conditions for Operation (LCO) as required by LCO Applicability 3.0.4 for the Turbine Driven Auxiliary Feedwater (TDAFW) pump system.

LCO Applicability 3.0.4 does not permit entry into a MODE of applicability when an LCO is not met, unless the associated actions to be entered permit continued operation in the MODE for an unlimited time or after performance of an acceptable risk assessment and the appropriate risk management actions have been established. After entering MODE 3, it was discovered that components were not operable, contrary to LCO 3.0.4.

This event is being reported pursuant to 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), for an operation or condition prohibited by Technical Specifications.

05000266/LER-2017-00118 September 2017
16 November 2017
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(D), Loss of Safety Function - Mitigate the Consequences of an Accident
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability

At 1724 (CDT) on 9/18/17 Door-061, South Control Room Door (DR) was inadvertently disabled. The door became wedged open against its backstop during control room ventilation testing. Door-061 is a barrier that functions to maintain the control room envelope (NA). The barrier was subsequently disengaged from the backstop allowing it to close. The door was inspected and returned to operable status at 1750 (CDT). While the door was stuck open, the control room was in an unanalyzed condition, a condition that could have prevented fulfillment of a safety function, and a common cause inoperability of independent trains or channels.

This event is being reported pursuant to 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(D), and 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii) for a degraded barrier that affected the control room envelope.

05000266/LER-2016-0032 April 2016
1 June 2016
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications

On April 2, 2016, Unit 1 entered MODE 4 from MODE 5 without satisfying all of Technical Specification 3.6.6, Containment Spray and Cooling System Limiting Conditions for Operation (LCO) as required by LCO Applicability 3.0.4.

LCO Applicability 3.0.4 does not permit entry into a MODE of applicability when an LCO is not met, unless the associated actions to be entered permit continued operation in the MODE for an unlimited time or after performance of an acceptable risk assessment and the appropriate risk management actions have been established. After entering MODE 4, it was discovered that components were not operable, contrary to LCO 3.0.4.

This event is being reported pursuant to 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B) for operation or condition prohibited by technical specifications.

05000266/LER-2016-0021 April 2016
31 May 2016
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications

On April 1, 2016 the 345/13.8kV high voltage station auxiliary transformer (1X-03) tripped on a differential current relay (1-87A/X-03) actuation. Review of this event determined that there were three instances over the past three years when the required action completion time for not satisfying the Limiting Conditions For Operation of Technical Specification 3.8.1 (AC Sources - Operating) and 3.8.2 (AC Sources - Shutdown) would have been exceeded with the latent error present.

This event is being reported pursuant to 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B) for operation or condition prohibited by technical specifications.

05000266/LER-2016-00115 March 2016
12 May 2016
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded

At 0649 on March 15, 2016 with Unit 1 shut down in MODE 5 for refueling activities, a boric acid indication upstream of the valve seating surface on the inlet of the valve body of 1CV-200B, Letdown Orifice B Outlet Control Valve was identified as a through-wall flaw. The flaw location was within the reactor coolant system (RCS) pressure boundary as defined by 10 CFR 50.2, "Definitions." The valve body is original plant equipment.

This event is being reported pursuant to 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A) for material defects in the primary coolant system that were not acceptable in accordance with ASME Section Xl.

APPROVED BY OMB: NO. 3150.0104 EXPIRES: 01/31/2017 Reported lessons learned are incorporated into the licensing process and fed back to industry.

Send comments regarding burden estimate to the FOIA, Privacy and Information Collections Branch (T-5 F53), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Wa shing ton, DC 20555-0001, or by intemet e-mail to Infocollects.ResourceĀ©nrc.gov, and to the Desk Officer, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, NEOB-10202, (3150-0104), Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC 20503. If a means used to impose an information collection does not display a currently valid OMB control number, the NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, the information collection.

05000266/LER-2015-0044 June 201510 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications

On June 4, 2015 with both units at full power, it was identified that removal of the W-185A(B), G-03(04) Emergency Diesel Generator (EDG) Switchgear Room Exhaust Fan from service may result in the inability to maintain switchgear room temperatures below that required to maintain equipment operable.

Subsequent engineering evaluation has determined that room temperature could have exceeded environmental conditions at which the components would be reasonably expected to function for their respective mission times with the G-03(04) EDG Switchgear Room Exhaust Fan(s) out of service. This condition resulted in a condition prohibited by Technical Specifications, Technical Specification 3.8.9. Distribution Systems- Operating. Additionally, Technical Specification 3.8.9 required action A.1 would have required immediate declaration of the associated supported required feature(s) inoperable.

No opposite train plant systems were affected by this condition.

This event is being reported pursuant to 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Operation or Condition Prohibited by Technical Sf.J~:dfi .... auuns, and 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause lnoperability of Independent Trains or Channels.

05000266/LER-2015-0039 March 201510 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications

At approximately 1730 on March 9, 2015 with both units at full power, it was discovered that the current limit feature of Battery Charger D-107 was not functioning as expected. Subsequent troubleshooting identified a defective crimp on a wire which was causing an intermittent open circuit that disabled the current limit function.

Evaluation determined that the capability to restore the battery charger to the DC electrical power subsystem to recover a discharged battery following a load shed of the charger may not have been able to be performed as designed. This condition may have resulted in an actual plant condition prohibited by Technical Specifications, Technical Specification 3.8.4. DC Sources-Operating.

No other plant systems were affected by this condition.

This event is being reported pursuant to 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Operation or Condition Prohibited by Technical Specifications.

05000266/LER-2015-0022 December 201410 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation

On December 2, 2014, operators commenced a rapid power reduction of Unit 1 due to noted degradation of Unit 1B Condensate Pump. At 2050 on December 2, 2014, with Unit 1 in Mode 1 at 62% power, operators initiated a manual reactor trip of Unit 1 following securing of the Unit 1B Condensate Pump due to imminent failure. The Auxiliary Feedwater Pumps started as expected on low steam generator level experienced due to the reduced steam demand from the turbine trip in response to the reactor trip. All other plant systems functioned as required.

After the reactor trip, feedwater pump suction pressure remained low. The decision was made to secure both Main Steam Generator Feedwater Pumps. The Main Steam Generator Feedwater Pump A was manually secured. Prior to securing the Main Steam Generator Feedwater Pump B, it automatically tripped. All control rods fully inserted in the core due to the manual trip. There was no Emergency Core Cooling System actuation. Offsite power was maintained throughout the event. The Main Steam Generator Feedwater Pumps were available to be restarted due to the recovered feedwater suction pressure from the running Condensate Pump A.

This event is being reported pursuant to 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A) for both the manual RPS actuation and also for the automatic initiation of Auxiliary Feedwater.

APPROVED BY OMB: NO. 3150-0104 EXPIRES: 01131/2017 Reported lessons learned are incorporated into the licensing process and fed back to industry.

Send comments regarding burden estimate to the FOIA, Privacy and Information Collections Branch (T-5 F53), U.S. NuclearRegulatory Commission, Was hington, DC 20555-0001,or byinternet e-mail to Infocollects.Resource@nrc.gov, and to the Desk Officer, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, NEOB-10202, (3150-0104), Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC 20503. If a means used to impose an information collection does not display a currently valid OMB control number, the NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, the information collection.

05000266/LER-2015-001, Inadequately Sealed Pipe Penetrations Result in Unanalyzed Condition for Internal Flooding19 November 14 JL10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat
05000266/LER-2015-00110 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed ConditionOn November 19, 2014, inadequately sealed piping penetrations were discovered in the Residual Heat Removal (RHR) (BP) piping and valve gallery walls that could have allowed a postulated flooding event to potentially impact both RHR pumps. The same configuration was identified on both Units. Following analysis of the postulated leakage sources and flow paths, it was discovered that there was a time when an unacceptable volume of flood water could have entered the pipe and valve gallery areas challenging operation of the RHR pumps. It was determined that this condition no longer existed as of December 16, 2014, when changes had been made to Operations flood mitigation strategies, and upon installation of seals in upstream pipeway trenches to eliminate certain leakage paths into the RHR pipe and valve gallery areas. Therefore, this item is being reported as a past unanalyzed condition.
05000266/LER-2013-00214 April 201310 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(D), Loss of Safety Function - Mitigate the Consequences of an Accident
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications

On April 13, 2013 at 23:39 PBNP Unit 1 entered Mode 4 during start up from a refueling outage. On April 14, 2013 at 0620, approximately 6 hours after entering into MODE 4, the Unit 1 sodium hydroxide tank outlet valve (1S1-831A) was found to be closed. This valve isolated the flow path for both trains of spray additive equipment and resulted in not meeting LCO 3.6.7, Spray Additive System. That mode change resulted in a violation of LCO 3.0.4.

The incorrect valve position was discovered when a senior reactor operator identified a caution tag on the 1S1-831A valve. Operations investigated the unexpected condition then immediately placed the valve in its proper position to meet the Technical Specification requirements.

This event is being reported pursuant to 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(D) and 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B).

05000266/LER-2013-0016 February 201310 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vi)(A)

On February 6, 2013 at 1132 CST, an undervoltage condition occurred on Unit 1, 1A-05 and 1A-06 safety-related buses, which was caused by a loss of 1X-03 high voltage station auxiliary transformer (HVSAT). The four emergency diesel generators (EDGs) started. The GO1 and G03 EDGs loaded onto buses 1A-05 and 1A-06. Unit 2 maintained offsite power throughout the event.

Unexpected operation of the 1F89-112 circuit switcher resulted in de-energization of the 1X-03 transformer causing a low voltage condition, which started the standby EDGs. The opening of the circuit switcher did not cause a lockout of 1X-03. As a result, the automatic transfer to the redundant offsite power supply In the switchyard was not initiated, and G01 and G03 EDGs automatically loaded onto Unit 1 safety-related buses 1A-05 and 1A-06, once they had reached operating voltage and frequency.

This event is being reported pursuant to 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), any event or condition that resulted in a manual Dr automatic actuation of any of the systems listed in 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(B), including any event or condition that results in the actuation of the emergency AC electrical power system.

05000266/LER-2012-00414 August 2012

On August 14, 2012 at 2031, a Point Beach Nuclear Plant (PBNP) Unit 1 manual reactor trip was actuated due to indications of a loss of load to the main turbine.

turbine first stage pressure and generator megawatts, indicative of a reduction in turbine load.

Control rods were responding as designed by inserting into the reactor to reduce reactor power.

Based on these indications, the Shift Manager directed that the reactor be shutdown by manually actuating the reactor protection system. No automatic reactor protection setpoints were exceeded and an automatic shutdown was not actuated or required.

Based on troubleshooting, NextEra determined that the loss of turbine load was due to a failure of the main speed channel card in the electro-hydraulic (EH) system. The speed channel card was replaced.

Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.73 (a)(2)(iv)(A), the event is reportable as an event or condition that resulted in manual actuation of the reactor protection system.

05000266/LER-2012-0036 June 201110 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(D), Loss of Safety Function - Mitigate the Consequences of an Accident
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications

On June 6, 2011, while Unit 1 was in MODE 1 and Unit 2 was in MODE 4, the feeder breaker to safeguards 480V bus, 2B-04, opened on overcurrent.

The feeder breaker tripped on overload after energizing a pressurizer heater group. This trip resulted in de- energizing electrical bus 2B-04. No other breakers tripped during this event. The results of an investigation determined the overload trip was improperly set low.

A technical assessment for reportability was completed. Nextera Energy Point Beach, LLC (NextEra) determined that electrical bus 2B-04 was inoperable for specific time periods from March 23, 2011 through June 7, 2011 for Unit 1 and Unit 2. Technical Specification Limiting Conditions for Operation (LCOs) and associated Action Conditions (TSACs) for TS 3.8.9 Distribution System - Operating (TSAC 3.8.9 A and B), TS 3.8.10 Distribution Systems - Shutdown (TSAC 3.8.10 A), and TS 3.5.3 ECCS - Shutdown (TSAC 3.5.3 A and B) were not met during specific time periods. Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), the event is reportable as a condition prohibited by Technical Specifications. This event is also being reported pursuant to 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(D), any event or condition that could have prevented the fulfillment of the safety function of structures or systems that are needed to mitigate the consequences of an accident.

The feeder breaker overload trip setting was corrected.

05000266/LER-2012-00210 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications

On May 21, 2012 at 0054, the 1P-29 Turbine Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump (TDAFWP) was removed from service to perform quarterly testing. During the testing a degraded coupling condition was identified. At 0319 on May 21, 2012, the quarterly test was aborted and an investigation was started to determine the cause of the degraded coupling.

During the investigation a misalignment between the 1P-29 turbine and pump was discovered. NextEra concluded that the misalignment between the turbine and pump was the cause of the degraded coupling. The coupling was replaced and the turbine and pump were re-aligned.

A technical assessment for reportability was completed on June 21, 2012. NextEra determined that from the time surveillance was performed on the 1P-29 TDAFWP on March 13, 2012, until it was returned to service at 1900 on May 23, 2012, 1P-29 may not have been able to perform its design and licensing basis functions. Therefore, Technical Specification 3.7.5 was not met.

Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), the event is reportable as a condition prohibited by Technical Specifications.

05000266/LER-2011-00127 November 201110 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vi)(A)

On 11/27/2011 at 0226 CDT, an undervoltage condition occurred on Unit 1, 1A-05 and 1A-06 safety-related buses during the restoration of 1X-03 high voltage station auxiliary transformer (HVSAT). The four emergency diesels (EDGs) started. The G-01 and G-03 EDGs loaded onto buses 1A-05 and 1A-06. Offsite power remained available to Unit 2 throughout the event via an alternate path.

During switchyard realignment of the 1X03 HVSAT, the 1F89-112 circuit switcher failed. This resulted in a low voltage condition which started the standby EDGs. The fault did not cause a lockout of 1X03, the associated switchyard component. As a result, the automatic transfer to the redundant offsite power supply in the switchyard was not initiated, and GO1 and G03 automatically loaded onto Unit 1 safety system buses 1A05 and 1A06 once the diesels had reached operating voltage and frequency.

The safety significance of this event was low because at the time of the event Unit 1 was in MODE 5, and shutdown cooling capability was maintained via the steam generators. Following the event, station procedures were revised to check local circuit switcher indicators for proper configuration prior to and following operation.

This event is being reported pursuant to 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), any event or condition that resulted in a manual or automatic actuation of any of the systems listed in 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(B) including any event or condition that results in the actuation of the emergency AC electrical power system.

05000266/LER-2010-00527 August 201010 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor

During the spring of 2010, NextEra identified several past instances where high energy line break (HELB) barriers were not being properly controlled during maintenance and modification activities. Consequently, a HELB in certain areas coincident with the barriers being open could have adversely affected the equipment within the adjacent room.

A three-year review was conducted to determine the extent of condition of the potential barrier breaches. The results revealed additional instances where HELB barriers had been improperly controlled and the barrier had been rendered inoperable. A causal evaluation determined that the administrative procedure governing HELB barriers was not consistent with industry standards and did not contain applicable regulatory guidance. An analysis for safety significance is in progress.

This report supplements the 60-day licensee event report submitted on February 18, 2011, in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), as an unanalyzed condition and 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A) and (D) as a condition that could have prevented fulfillment of the safety function of systems that are needed to shutdown the reactor and maintain it in a safe shutdown condition or mitigate the consequences of an accident. The event constitutes a safety system functional failure.

05000266/LER-2008-00316 July 2008

This supplement provides the results of the detailed extent of condition evaluation completed in March 2009 and the risk significance evaluation completed on April 17, 2009. On July 16, 2008, plant staff concluded that an inadequate cable separation condition in the Auxiliary Feedwater (AFW) room could potentially compromise the plant's ability to meet Appendix R safe shutdown requirements. An 8-hour report was made via the emergency notification system (EN 44351), pursuant to 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii) (B). Immediate corrective actions included fire area rounds already being performed by plant personnel, implementation of transient combustible controls in the AFW area and performance of thermography for insipient fire detection in the AFW pump rooms.

An extent of condition evaluation completed in March 2009 confirmed the results of the August 2008 evaluation identifying six (6) areas where an inadequate cable separation condition could potentially result in a loss of significant equipment in areas beyond that postulated in the initiating fire area. The results of a risk significance evaluation completed on April 17, 2009, concluded that the risk significance of each of the inadequate cable separation conditions was less than the red finding threshold and may be resolved in accordance with the alternate methods established in NFPA-805.