ML22130A147
| ML22130A147 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Prairie Island  |
| Issue date: | 05/10/2022 |
| From: | Hanson H Northern States Power Company, Minnesota, Xcel Energy |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| L-Pl-22-023 | |
| Download: ML22130A147 (75) | |
Text
Xcel Energy C I 1717 Wakonade Drive Welch, MN 550B9 May 10, 2022 L-Pl-22-023 TS 5.6.2 ISFSI TS 5.2 ATTN: Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-282 and 50-306 Renewed Facility Operating License DPR-42 and DPR-60 Prairie Island Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Docket No. 72-10 Renewed Materials License No. SNM-2506 2021 Annual Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Report Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation, doing business as Xcel Energy (hereafter "NSPM", submits one copy of the Annual Radiological Environmental Program Report for the period January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021, as Enclosure 1.
Summary of Commitments This letter makes no new commitments and no revisions to existing commitments.
nson Jr.
Plant Manager, Prairie ar enerating Plant Northern States Power Company - innesota Enclosure cc: Regional Administrator, USNRC, Region Ill Project Manager, Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, USNRC, NRR NRC Resident Inspector, Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant Director of NMSS, USNRC Department of Health, State of Minnesota Pl Dakota Community Environmental Coordinator
ENCLOSURE 1 ANNUAL REPORT TO THE UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program January 1 to December 31, 2021 73 pages follow
~*, ATI Environmental, Inc.
~ /""\I Midwest Laboratory 700 Landwehr Road
- Northbrook, IL 60062-23 10 phone (847) 564-0700
- fax (847) 564-4517 XCEL ENERGY CORPORATION PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT ANNUAL REPORT to the UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program January 1 to December 31 , 2021 Docket No. 50-282 Renewed Operating License No. DPR-42 Docket No. 50-306 Renewed Operating License No. DPR-60 ISFSI Docket No. 72-1O Renewed License No. SNM-2506 Prepared under Contract by ATI ENVIRONMENTAL, Inc.
MIDWEST LABORATORY Project No. 801 O Approved:
Ashok Banavali , Ph.D.
Laboratory Manager
PREFACE The staff of Environmental, Inc., Midwest Laboratory was responsible for the acquisition of data presented in this report. Samples were collected by members of the staff of the Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, operated by Northern States Power Co. - Minnesota, for XCEL Energy Corporation.
The report was prepared by Environmental, Inc., Midwest Laboratory.
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Preface .................................................................................................................................................... ii List of Tables .......................................................................................................................................... iv List of Figures .......................................................................................................................................... v
1.0 INTRODUCTION
..................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0
SUMMARY
.............................................................................................................................................. 2 3.0 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM (REMP) ............................................ 3 3.1 Program Design and Data Interpretation ....................................................................................... 3 3.2 Program Description ...................................................................................................................... 4 3.3 Program Execution ........................................................................................................................ 5 3.4 Laboratory Procedures .................................................................................................................. 5 3.5 Program Modifications................................................................................................................... 5 3.6 Land Use Census .......................................................................................................................... 6 4.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ................................................................................................................ 7 4.1 Atmospheric Nuclear Detonations and Nuclear Accidents ............................................................ 7 4.2 Summary of Preoperational Data .................................................................................................. 7 4.3 Program Findings .......................................................................................................................... 8 5.0 FIGURES AND TABLES........................................................................................................................ 12
6.0 REFERENCES
CITED .......................................................................................................................... 24 APPENDICES A Interlaboratory Comparison Program Results....................................................................................... A-1 Attachment A, Acceptance Criteria for "Spiked" Samples................................................................ A-2 B Data Reporting Conventions................................................................................................................. B-1 C Annual Average Effluent Concentration Limits of Radioactivity in Air and Water Above Background in Unrestricted Areas.......................................................................................... C-1 D Sampling Location Maps..................................................................................................................... D-1 E Special Well and Surface Water Samples........................................................................................... E-1 iii
LIST OF TABLES No. Title Page 5.1 Sample Collection and Analysis Program ................................................................................................. 15 5.2 Sampling Locations ................................................................................................................................... 16 5.3 Missed Collections and Analyses .............................................................................................................. 19 5.4 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary ...................................................................... 20 In addition, the following tables can be found in the Appendices:
Appendix A A-1 Environmental Resources Associates, Crosscheck Program Results........................................................A-3 A-2 Program Results; (TLDs) .........................................................................................................................A-4 A-3 In-house "Spiked" Samples .................................................................................................................... A-6 A-4 In-house Blank Samples......................................................................................................................... A-8 A-5 In-house "Duplicate" Samples.........................................................................................................................A-10 A-6 Department of Energy MAPEP comparison results.................................................................................A-14 A-7 Environmental Resources Associates, Crosscheck Program Results (EML study replacement)............A-16 Appendix C C-1 Average Annual Effluent Concentration Limits of Radioactivity in Air and Water Above Natural Background in Unrestricted Areas ................................................................................. C-1 Appendix E E-4.1 Sample collection and analysis program ..................................................................................................E-5 E-4.2 Sampling locations ...................................................................................................................................E-6 E-4.3 REMP Summary ...................................................................................................................................... E-8 E-4.4 REMP Complete Data Tables ................................................................................................................. E-9 E-4.5 Supplementary Data Tables .................................................................................................................. E-14 iv
LIST OF FIGURES No. Title Page 5.1 Offsite Ambient Radiation (TLDs), average of inner and outer ring indicator locations versus control ............................................................................................................................... 13 5.2 Airborne Particulates; analysis for gross beta, average mean of all indicator locations (P-2,3,4,6,7) versus control location (P-1) .................................................................................... 14 MAPS Appendix D Title Page TLD locations within a one mile radius ..................................................................................................... D-2 TLD locations, Controls .............................................................................................................................. D-3 TLD locations, surrounding the ISFSI Area ................................................................................................ D-3 TLD locations within a five mile radius ..................................................................................................... D-4 REMP sampling points within a one mile radius ...................................................................................... D-5 REMP sampling points within a five mile radius ....................................................................................... D-6 REMP sampling points, Control locations ............................................................................................... D-7 Appendix E Groundwater Monitoring Well locations ..................................................................................................... E-15 v
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report summarizes and interprets results of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) conducted by Environmental, Inc., Midwest Laboratory at the Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Red Wing, Minnesota, during the period January - December, 2021.
This program monitors the levels of radioactivity in the air, terrestrial, and aquatic environments in order to assess the impact of the plant on its surroundings.
Tabulations of the individual analyses made during the year are not included in this report.
These data are included in a reference document (Environmental, Inc., Midwest Laboratory, 2021b) available at Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant.
Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant is located on the Mississippi River in Goodhue County, Minnesota, owned by Xcel Energy Corporation and operated by Northern States Power Co.- Minnesota. The plant has two 575 MWe pressurized water reactors. Unit 1 achieved initial criticality on 1 December 1973. Commercial operation at full power began on 16 December 1973. Unit 2 achieved initial criticality on 17 December 1974. Commercial operation at full power began on 21 December 1974.
1
2.0
SUMMARY
The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) required by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Offsite Dose Calculation Manual for the Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant and the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) is described.
Results for 2021 are summarized and discussed.
Program findings show background levels of radioactivity in the environmental samples collected in the vicinity of the Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant.
2
3.0 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM (REMP) 3.1 Program Design and Data Interpretation The purpose of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) at the Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant is to assess the impact of the plant on its environment. For this purpose, samples are collected from the air, terrestrial, and aquatic environments and analyzed for radioactive content. In addition, ambient gamma radiation levels are monitored by thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs).
Sources of environmental radiation include the following:
(1) Natural background radiation arising from cosmic rays and primordial radionuclides; (2) Fallout from atmospheric nuclear detonations; (3) Releases from nuclear power plants; (4) Industrial and medical radioactive waste; and (5) Fallout from nuclear accidents.
In interpreting the data, effects due to the plant must be distinguished from those due to other sources.
A major interpretive aid in assessment of these effects is the design of the monitoring program at the Prairie Island Plant which is based on the indicator-control concept. Most types of samples are collected both at indicator locations (nearby, downwind, or downstream) and at control locations (distant, upwind, or upstream). A plant effect would be indicated if the radiation level at an indicator location was significantly larger than that at the control location. The difference would have to be greater than could be accounted for by typical fluctuations in radiation levels arising from other sources.
An additional interpretive technique involves analyses for specific radionuclides present in the environmental samples collected from the plant site. The plants monitoring program includes analyses for tritium and iodine-131. Most samples are analyzed for gamma-emitting isotopes with results for the following groups quantified: zirconium-95, cesium-137, cerium-144, beryllium- 7, and potassium-40. The first three gamma-emitting isotopes were selected as radiological impact indicators because of the different characteristic proportions in which they appear in the fission product mix produced by a nuclear reactor and that produced by a nuclear detonation. Each of the three isotopes is produced in roughly equivalent amounts by a reactor: each constitutes about 10%
of the total activity of fission products 10 days after reactor shutdown. Alternatively, 10 days after a nuclear explosion, the contributions of zirconium-95, cerium-144, and cesium-137 to the activity of the resulting debris are in the approximate ratio 4:1:0.03 (Eisenbud, 1963). Beryllium-7 is of cosmogenic origin and potassium-40 is a naturally-occurring isotope. They were chosen as calibration monitors and should not be considered radiological impact indicators.
The other group quantified consists of niobium-95, ruthenium-103 and -106, cesium-134, barium-lanthanum-140, and cerium-141. These isotopes are released in small quantities by nuclear power plants, but to date their major source of injection into the general environment has been atmospheric nuclear testing. Nuclides of the final group, manganese-54, iron-59, cobalt-58 and - 60, and zinc-65, are activation products and arise from activation of corrosion products. They are typical components of a nuclear power plants effluents, but are not produced in significant quantities by nuclear detonations.
3
3.1 Program Design and Data Interpretation (continued)
Other means of distinguishing sources of environmental radiation are employed in interpreting the data. Current radiation levels are compared with previous levels, including those measured before the plant became operational. Results of the plants monitoring program can be related to those obtained in other parts of the world. Finally, results can be related to events known to cause elevated levels of radiation in the environment, e.g., atmospheric nuclear detonations.
3.2 Program Description The sampling and analysis schedule for the radiological environmental monitoring program at Prairie Island is summarized in Table 5.1 and briefly reviewed below. Table 5.2 defines the sampling location codes used in Table 5.1 and specifies for each location its type (indicator or control) and its distance, direction, and sector relative to the reactor site or ISFSI facility, as appropriate. To assure that sampling is carried out in a reproducible manner, detailed sampling procedures have been prescribed (Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, 2021). Maps of fixed sampling locations are included in Appendix D.
To monitor the airborne environment, air is sampled by continuous pumping at six stations, four site boundary indicators (P-2, P-3, P-4 and P-7), located in the highest calculated D/Q sectors, one community indicator (P-6), and one control (P-1). The particulates are collected on membrane filters; airborne iodine is trapped by activated charcoal canisters. Particulate filters are analyzed for gross beta activity and charcoal canisters for iodine-131. Quarterly composites of particulate filters from each location are analyzed for gamma-emitting isotopes.
Offsite ambient gamma radiation is monitored at thirty-four locations, using CaSO 4:Dy dosimeters with four sensitive areas at each location: ten in an inner ring in the general area of the site boundary, fifteen in the outer ring within a 4-5 mile radius, eight at special interest locations, and one control location, 11.1 miles distant from the plant. They are replaced and measured quarterly.
Ambient gamma radiation is monitored at the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI)
Facility by twenty CaSO4:Dy dosimeters. Twelve dosimeters are located inside of the earthen berm in direct line of sight from the storage casks and eight dosimeters are located outside of the earthen berm. They are replaced and measured quarterly.
To monitor the terrestrial environment, green leafy vegetables (cabbage) are collected annually from the highest D/Q garden and a control location (P-38), and analyzed for gamma-emitting isotopes, including iodine-131. Corn is collected annually only if fields are irrigated with river water and analyzed for gamma-emitting isotopes. Well water and ground water are collected quarterly from five locations near the plant and analyzed for tritium and gamma-emitting isotopes.
River water is collected weekly at two locations, one upstream of the plant (P-5) and one downstream (P-6, Lock and Dam No.3). Monthly composites are analyzed for gamma-emitting isotopes. Quarterly composites are analyzed for tritium.
Drinking water is collected weekly from the City of Red Wing well. Monthly composites are analyzed for gross beta, iodine-131, and gamma-emitting isotopes. Quarterly composites are analyzed for tritium.
4
3.2 Program Description (continued)
The aquatic environment is also monitored by semi-annual upstream and downstream collections of fish, periphyton or invertebrates, and bottom sediments. Shoreline sediment is collected semi-annually from one location. All samples are analyzed for gamma-emitting isotopes.
3.3 Program Execution The Program was executed as described in the preceding section in 2021 without exception.
3.4 Laboratory Procedures The iodine-131 analyses in drinking water were made using a sensitive radiochemical procedure which involves separation of the iodine using an ion-exchange method, solvent extraction and subsequent beta counting.
Gamma-spectroscopic analyses we re performed using high-purity germanium (HPGe) detectors. Levels of iodine-131 in cabbage and natural vegetation and concentrations of airborne iodine-131 in charcoal samples were determined by gamma spectroscopy.
Tritium concentrations were determined by liquid scintillation.
Analytical Procedures used by Environmental, Inc. are on file and are available for inspection.
Procedures are based on those prescribed by the Health and Safety Laboratory of the U.S.
Department of Energy, Edition 28, 1997, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for Measurement of Radioactivity in Drinking Water, 1980, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EERF, Radiochemical Procedures Manual, 1984.
Environmental, Inc., Midwest Laboratory has a comprehensive quality control/quality assurance program designed to assure the reliability of data obtained. Details of the QA Program are presented elsewhere (Environmental, Inc., Midwest Laboratory, 2018). The QA Program includes participation in Interlaboratory Comparison (crosscheck) Programs. Results obtained in the crosscheck programs are presented in Appendix A.
3.5 Program Modifications None.
5
3.6 Land Use Census In accordance with the Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant Offsite Dose Calculation Manual, H4, (ODCM) a land use census is conducted in order to identify the location of the nearest 2
residence, nearest milk animals, and the nearest garden of greater than 500 ft producing fresh leafy vegetables in each of the 16 meteorological sectors within a distance of 5 miles.
This census is conducted at least once per 12 months between the dates of May 1 and September 30. If new locations yield a calculated dose or dose equivalent (via the same exposure pathway) twenty percent greater than the required locations per the ODCM, then the new locations are added to the radiological environmental monitoring program within 30 days, and sampling locations having lower calculated doses or a lower dose commitment may be deleted from this monitoring program after September of the year in which the land use census was conducted.
This land use census insures the updating of the radiological environmental monitoring program should sampling locations change within the 5 mile radius from the plant.
The Land Use Census was conducted during August 2021. The ranking of the highest D/Q garden remained the same for 2021 as 2020, Suter (SSE at 0.6 miles). There are no dairy farms within a 5 mile radius of the plant therefore no samples were collected. The highest ranking D/Q residence remained the same for 2021 as for 2020, Sellers (WNW at 0.7 miles).
The Minnesota and Wisconsin Departments of Natural Resources were both consulted and both confirmed that no irrigation permits had been issued the past year for crop fields within the file mile Mississippi River area downstream of the Prairie Island Plant. Therefore, no crop sampling was performed.
There were no land use changes within five miles of the plant resulting in new special interest areas such as: new population centers, new residences, new schools or recreation centers.
No milk animals were identified within five miles of the plant therefore no samples were collected.
The last dairy within the five mile radius suspended operations in 2016.
6
4.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION All scheduled collections and analyses were made in 2021 without exception.
The results are summarized in Table 5.4 in a format recommended by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission in Regulatory Guide 4.8. For each type of analysis of each sampled medium, this table lists the mean and range for all indicator locations and for all control locations.
The locations with the highest mean and range are also shown.
4.1 Atmospheric Nuclear Detonations and Nuclear Accidents There were no reported accidents involving significant release to the environment at nuclear reactor facilities in 2021. The Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident occurred March 11, 2011.
There were no reported atmospheric nuclear tests in 2021. The last reported test was conducted on October 16, 1980 by the Peoples Republic of China.
4.2 Summary of Preoperational Data The following constitutes a summary of preoperational studies conducted at the Prairie Island Nuclear Power Plant during the years 1970 to 1973, to determine background levels expected in the environment, and provided, where applicable, as a means for comparison with present day levels. Strict comparisons, however, are difficult, since background levels of radiation were much higher in these years due to radioactive fallout from the atmosphere. Gross beta measurements 3 3 in fallout declined yearly from a level of 12,167 pCi/ m to 1,020 pCi/m , and these declining values are reflected throughout the various media tested.
In the air environment, ambient gamma radiation (TLDs) averaged 9.4 mR/4 weeks during pre-3 operational studies. Gross beta in air particulates declined from levels of 0.38 to 0.037 pCi/m .
3 Average present day levels have stabilized at around 0.025 pCi/m . Airborne radioiodine remained below detection levels.
In the terrestrial environment of 1970 to 1973, milk, agricultural crops, and soil were monitored.
In milk samples, low levels of Cs-137, I-131, and Sr-90 were detected. Cs-137 levels declined from 16.5 to 8.6 pCi/L. Present day measurements for both Cs-137 and I-131 are below detection levels. Agricultural crop measurements averaged 57.7 pCi/g for gross beta and 0.47 pCi/g for Cs-137. Gross beta measured in soil averaged 52 pCi/g.
The aqueous environment was monitored by testing of river, well and lake waters, bottom sediments, fish, aquatic vegetation and periphyton. Specific location comparison of drinking, river and well water concentrations for tritium and gross beta are not possible. However, tritium background levels, measured at eight separate locations, declined steadily from an average concentration of 1020 pCi/L to 490 pCi/L. Present day environmental levels of tritium measure below a detection limit of approximately 160 pCi/L. Values for gross beta, measured from 1970 to 1973, averaged 9.9 pCi/L in downstream Mississippi River water, 8.2 pCi/L for well water, and11.0 pCi/L for lake water. Gamma emitters were below the lower limit of detection (LLD).
In bottom sediments, gross beta background levels were determined at 51.0 pCi/g. Cs-137 activity during preoperational studies in 1973 measured 0.25 pCi/g upstream and 0.21 pCi/g downstream. The lower levels occasionally observed today can still be attributed to residual activity from atmospheric fallout. Gross beta in fish, measured in both flesh and skeletal samples, averaged 7.3 and 11.7 pCi/g, respectively. Gross beta background levels in aquatic vegetation, algae and periphyton samples measured 76.0 pCi/g, 46.0 pCi/g, and 13.6 pCi/g, respectively.
7
4.3 Program Findings Results obtained show background levels of radioactivity in the environmental samples collected in the vicinity of the Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant.
Ambient Radiation (TLDs)
Ambient radiation was measured in the general area of the site boundary, at the outer ring 4 - 5 mi. distant from the Plant, at special interest areas and at one control location. The means ranged from 16.1 mR/91 days at inner ring locations to 16.6 mR/91 days at outer ring locations. The mean at special interest locations was 15.7 mR/91 days and 15.9 mR/91 days at the control location. Dose rates measured at the inner and outer ring and the control locations were comparable to 2020 dose rates and consistent with results from previous years. The results are tabulated below. No plant effect on ambient gamma radiation measurements was indicated (Figure 5-1).
Average (Inner and Average (Inner and Year Outer Rings) Control Year Outer Rings) Control 2001 16.8 17.2 2012 16.5 16.5 2002 17.4 16.9 2013 15.1 16.0 2003 16.2 16.0 2014 15.3 16.2 2004 17.6 17.6 2015 16.0 17.4 2005 16.8 16.3 2016 16.7 17.4 2006 16.6 16.6 2017 16.1 16.3 2007 17.5 17.7 2018 16.6 17.4 2008 16.9 17.1 2019 15.8 15.3 2009 15.9 16.3 2020 15.4 14.2 2010 16.0 16.0 2021 16.4 15.9 2011 15.7 15.7 Ambient gamma radiation as measured by thermoluminescent dosimetry.
Average quarterly dose rates (mR/91 days).
ISFSI Facility Operations Monitoring Ambient radiation was measured inside the ISFSI earth berm, outside the ISFSI earth berm and at two special locations between the plant ISFSI and the Prairie Island Indian Community. The mean dose rates averaged 187.9 mR/91 days inside the ISFSI earth berm and 23.9 mR/91 days outside the ISFSI earth berm. No additional casks were placed on the ISFSI pad in 2021, a total of f or ty- s even loaded casks remain. The higher levels inside the earth berm are expected, due to the loaded spent fuel casks being in direct line-of-sight of the TLDs.
Ambient radiation levels measured outside the earth berm show a slight increase as compared to other offsite dose rates around the plant. The cumulative average of the two special Prairie Island Indian Community TLDs (Locations P-07S and P-08S) measured 15.4 and 14.5 mR/91 days.
Although the skyshine neutron dose rates are not directly measured, the neutron levels measured next to the casks are below the levels predicted in the ISFSI SAR Report, Table 7A-4, TN-40 Dose Rates at Short Distances. Therefore, the skyshine dose rates at farther distances from the casks should be at or below the calculated dose rates. No spent fuel storage effect on offsite ambient gamma radiation was indicated (Fig. 5-1).
8
Airborne Particulates Typically, the highest averages for gross beta occur during the months of January and December, and the first and fourth quarters, as in 1999 through 2006, and also in 2008 through 2019. The elevated activity observed in 2007 was attributed to construction activity in the area, an increase in dust and consequent heavier particulate filter loading.
3 Average annual gross beta concentrations in airborne particulates were 0.030 pCi/m for 3
indicator locations and 0.029 pCi/m for the control location and similar to levels observed from 1999 through 2006 and 2008 to 2020. The results are tabulated below.
Average of Year Indicators Control 3
Concentration (pCi/ m )
2001 0.023 0.023 2002 0.028 0.023 2003 0.027 0.025 2004 0.025 0.026 2005 0.027 0.025 2006 0.026 0.025 2007 0.037 0.031 2008 0.028 0.027 2009 0.029 0.029 2010 0.025 0.025 2011 0.026 0.027 2012 0.031 0.032 2013 0.027 0.028 2014 0.026 0.026 2015 0.029 0.029 2016 0.027 0.027 2017 0.026 0.025 2018 0.027 0.027 2019 0.023 0.023 2020 0.027 0.025 2021 0.030 0.029 Average annual gross beta concentrations in airborne particulates.
Gamma spectroscopic analysis of quarterly composites of air particulate filters yielded similar results for indicator and control locations. Beryllium-7, which is produced continuously in the upper atmosphere by cosmic radiation (Arnold and Al-Salih, 1955), was detected in all
- samples, 3 3 with an average activity of 0.088 pCi/m for indicator locations and 0.086 pCi/m at the control location. All other isotopes were below the lower limit of detection.
There was no indication of a plant effect.
Airborne Iodine Weekly levels of airborne iodine-131 were below the lower limit of detection (LLD) of 0.03 pCi/m 3 in all samples. There was no indication of a plant effect.
9
Drinking Water In drinking water from the City of Red Wing well, tritium activity measured below a detection limit of 160 pCi/L for all samples.
Gross beta concentrations averaged 9.2 pCi/L throughout the year, ranging from 7.1-11.7 pCi/L. These concentrations are consistent with the 2020 average of 8.6 pCi/L and with levels observed from 2000 through 2019. The most likely contribution is the relatively high levels of naturally-occurring radium. Gamma spectroscopy indicates the presence of lead and bismuth isotopes, which are daughters of the radium decay chain. There is no indication from the 2021 data of any effect of plant operation.
Year Gross Beta concentration (pCi/L) 2000 10.1 2001 8.3 2002 8.7 2003 9.9 2004 9.8 2005 11.5 2006 13.4 2007 11.6 2008 11.6 2009 11.4 2010 11.7 2011 12.4 2012 11.8 2013 12.2 2014 11.5 2015 11.4 2016 12.3 2017 10.1 2018 10.2 2019 9.7 2020 8.6 2021 9.2 Average annual gross beta concentrations in drinking water.
River Water Analyses for H-3 in river water was below an LLD of 160 pCi/L for all eight quarterly composites from both the upstream and downstream locations for 2021. Gamma-emitting isotopes were below detection limits in all samples. In summary, the data for 2021 show no radiological effects from the plant operation.
10
Well Water Water samples tested from the control well, P-43 (Peterson Farm) and from four indicator wells (P-8, Community Center, P-6, Lock and Dam No. 3, P-9, Plant Well No. 2 and P-24, Suter Farm) showed no tritium detected above a detection limit of 165 pCi/L. Gamma-emitting isotopes were below detection limits in all samples.
In summary, well water data for 2021 show no radiological effects of the plant operation.
Broadleaf Vegetation and Crops Three samples of broadleaf vegetation, cabbage leaves, were collected in August 2021 and analyzed for gamma-emitting isotopes, including iodine-131. The I-131 level was below 0.016 pCi/g wet weight in all samples. With exceptions for naturally-occurring beryllium-7 and potassium-40, all other gamma-emitting isotopes were below their respective detection limits. There was no indication of a plant effect.
Field sampling personnel conducted an annual land use survey and found no river water taken for irrigation into fields within five miles downstream from the Prairie Island Plant. The collection and analysis of corn samples was not required since the fields have not been irrigated.
Fish Fish were collected in May, September and October 2021 and analyzed for gamma-emitting isotopes. Only naturally-occurring potassium-40 was detected, and there was no significant difference between upstream and downstream results. There was no indication of a plant effect.
Aquatic Insects or Periphyton Aquatic insects (invertebrates) or periphyton were collected in June and September, 2021 and analyzed for gamma-emitting isotopes. All gamma-emitting isotopes measured below detection limits with the exception of naturally occurring potassium-40 which was detected in all four samples. There was no indication of any plant effect.
Bottom and Shoreline Sediments Upstream and downstream bottom sediments and downstream recreational area shoreline sediments were sampled in May, June and September, 2021. All gamma-emitting isotopes measured below detection limits with the exception of naturally occurring potassium-40 which was detected in all four bottom sediment samples and both shoreline sediment samples.
There was no indication of any plant effect.
11
5.0 FIGURES AND TABLES 12
Figure 5.1 Offsite Ambient Radiation (TLDs); average of inner and outer ring indicator locations versus control location.
Indicators I --
20 19 18 17 ... / ~
'\ /
J ~~ /
/
"' ~ / ~ V ~V ~ ,;
\ ...........,
16
-.........v
____.V V 15 mR/91 days 14 13 12 11 10 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 20
-- Control 19 18
___..., /
17
) r--... ~ , ; -~ ..)~
16
~ / '\
/ "\ ~ \
15
\ ... J
"\ I mR/91 days 14 13 12 11 10 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 13
Figure 5.2 Airborne Particulates; analysis for gross beta, average mean of all indicator locations versus control location.
Indicators (P-2,3,4,6,7)
_;.,, I 0.039 0.037
~Elevated due to construction activity I r--.... I I\
0.035 .....
0.033 I \
0.031 I \
I \ J i\ )t 0.029 0.027
.__ I V \ I \ / ~ /
I ~ / ---....., \ ___,,, ---.....,( ---....., V
\ I pCi/m3 0.025 0.023 I \V 0.021 0.019 0.017 0.015 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 0.039
-- Control (P-1) 0.037 0.035 0.033 J\
I \
0.031 I\
I \ I/ \ I I "'- I 0.029 pCi/m3 0.027 0.025
./ .....____ I \/ ""' "V \ V 0.023 I/ \/
0.021 0.019 0.017 0.015 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 14
Table 5.1. Sample collection and analysis program, Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant.
Collection Analysis Location Type and Type and a b c No. Codes (and Type) Frequency Frequency Medium Ambient radiation (TLD's) 54 P-01A - P-10A C/Q Ambient gamma P-01B - P-15B P-01S - P-08S P-01IA - P-08IA P-01IB - P-08IB P-01IX- P-04IX, P-01C Airborne Particulates 6 P-1(C), P-2, C/W GB, GS (QC of P-3, P-4, P-6, P-7 each location)
Airborne Iodine 6 P-1(C), P-2, P-3, P-4, P-6, P-7 C/W I-131 River water 2 P-5(C), P-6 G/W GS(MC), H-3(QC)
Drinking water 1 P-11 G/W GB(MC), I-131(MC)
Well water 5 P-6, P-8, P-9, P-24, G/Q H-3, GS P-43 (C)
Edible cultivated crops 1 P-30(C) G/A GS (I-131)
Leafy green vegetables 4 P-8, P-24, P-28, P-38(C) G/A GS (I-131)
Fish (three species, edible portion) 2 P-19(C), P-13 G/SA GS Periphyton or invertebrates 2 P-40(C), P-6 G/SA GS Bottom sediment 2 P-20(C), P-6 G/SA GS Shoreline sediment 1 P-12 G/SA GS a
Location codes are defined in Table 5.2. Control stations are indicated by (C). All other stations are indicators.
b Collection type is coded as follows: C/ = continuous, G/ = grab. Collection frequency is coded as follows:
W= weekly, M = monthly, Q = quarterly, SA = semiannually, A = annually.
c Analysis type is coded as follows: GB = gross beta, GS = gamma spectroscopy, H-3 = tritium, I-131 = iodine-131.
Analysis frequency is coded as follows: MC = monthly composite, QC = quarterly composite.
15
Table 5.2. Sampling locations, Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant.
Distance and Direction a b Code Type Collection Site Sample Type from Reactor o
P-1 C Air Station P-1 AP, AI 11.8 mi @ 316 /NNW P-2 Air Station P-2 AP, AI o
0.5 mi @ 294 /WNW P-3 Air Station P-3 AP, AI o
0.8 mi @ 313 /NW P-4 Air Station P-4 AP, AI 0.4 mi @ 359 /N o
o P-5 C Upstream of Plant RW 1.8 mi @ 11 /N P-6 o Lock and Dam #3 & Air Station P-6 AP, AI, RW 1.6 mi @ 129 /SE c
WW, BS, BO o
P-7 Air Station P-7 AP, AI 0.5 mi @ 271 /W o
P-8 Community Center WW 1.0 mi @ 321 /WNW o
P-9 Plant Well #2 WW 0.3 mi @ 306 /NW o
P-11 Red Wing Service Center DW 3.3 mi @ 158 /SSE o
P-12 Downstream of Plant SS 3.0 mi @ 116 /ESE P-13 Downstream of Plant c o 3.5 mi @ 113 /ESE F
P-19 C Upstream of Plant c o 1.3 mi @ 0 /N F
o P-20 C Upstream of Plant BS 0.9 mi @ 45 /NE o
P-24 Suter Residence WW 0.6 mi @ 158 /SSE o
P-28 Allyn Residence VE 1.0 mi @ 152 /SSE o
P-38 C Cain Residence VE 14.2 mi @ 359 /N c o P-40 C Upstream of Plant BO 0.4 mi @ 0 /N o
P-43 C Peterson Farm WW 13.9 mi. @ 355 /N General Area of the Site Boundary P-01A Property Line TLD 0.4 mi @ 359 /N o
o P-02A Property Line TLD 0.3 mi @ 10 /N o
P-03A Property Line TLD 0.5 mi @ 183 /S o
P-04A Property Line TLD 0.4 mi @ 204 /SSW o
P-05A Property Line TLD 0.4 mi @ 225 /SW o
P-06A Property Line TLD 0.4 mi @ 249 /WSW o
P-07A Property Line TLD 0.4 mi @ 268 /W o
P-08A Property Line TLD 0.4 mi @ 291 /WNW o
P-09A Property Line TLD 0.7 mi @ 317 /NW o
P-10A Property Line TLD 0.5 mi @ 333 /NNW 16
Table 5.2. Sampling locations, Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant (continued).
Distance and Direction a b Code Type Collection Site Sample Type from Reactor Approximately 4 to 5 miles Distant from the Plant o
P-01B Thomas Killian Residence TLD 4.7 mi @ 355 /N o
P-02B Roy Kinneman Residence TLD 4.8 mi @ 17 /NNE o
P-03B Wayne Anderson Farm TLD 4.9 mi @ 46 /NE o
P-04B Nelson Drive (Road) TLD 4.2 mi @ 61 /ENE o
P-05B County Road E and Coulee TLD 4.2 mi @ 102 /ESE o
P-06B William Hauschildt Residence TLD 4.4 mi @ 112 /ESE o
P-07B Red Wing Public Works TLD 4.7 mi @ 140 /SE o
P-08B David Wnuk Residence TLD 4.1 mi @ 165 /SSE o
P-09B Highway 19 South TLD 4.2 mi @ 187 /S o
P-10B Cannondale Farm TLD 4.9 mi @ 200 /SSW o
P-11B Wallace Weberg Farm TLD 4.5 mi @ 221 /SW o
P-12B Ray Gergen Farm TLD 4.6 mi @ 251 /WSW o
P-13B Thomas O'Rourke Farm TLD 4.4 mi @ 270 /W o
P-14B David J. Anderson Farm TLD 4.9 mi @ 306 /NW o
P-15B Holst Farms TLD 3.8 mi @ 345 /NNW Special Interest Locations o
P-01S Federal Lock & Dam #3 TLD 1.6 mi @ 129 /SE o
P-02S Charles Suter Residence TLD 0.5 mi @ 155 /SSE o
P-03S Carl Gustafson Farm TLD 2.2 mi @ 173 /S o
P-04S Richard Burt Residence TLD 2.0 mi @ 202 /SSW o
P-05S Kinney Store TLD 2.0 mi @ 270 /W o
P-06S Earl Flynn Farm TLD 2.5 mi @ 299 /WNW o
P-07S Indian Community TLD 0.7 mi @ 271 /W o
P-08S Indian Community TLD 0.7 mi @ 287 /WNW o
P-01C C Robert Kinneman Farm TLD 11.1 mi @ 331 /NNW 17
Table 5.2. Sampling locations, Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant (continued).
Distance and Direction a b Code Type Collection Site Sample Type from ISFSI Center.
ISFSI Area Inside Earth Berm P-01IA ISFSI Nuisance Fence TLD o 190' @ 45 /NE o
P-02IA ISFSI Nuisance Fence TLD 360' @ 82 /E o
P-03IA ISFSI Nuisance Fence TLD 370' @ 100 /E o
P-04IA ISFSI Nuisance Fence TLD 200' @ 134 /SE o
P-05IA ISFSI Nuisance Fence TLD 180' @ 219 /SW o
P-06IA ISFSI Nuisance Fence TLD 320' @ 258 /WSW o
P-07IA ISFSI Nuisance Fence TLD 320' @ 281 /WNW o
P-08IA ISFSI Nuisance Fence TLD 190' @ 318 /NW o
P-01IX ISFSI Nuisance Fence TLD 140' @ 180 /S o
P-02IX ISFSI Nuisance Fence TLD 310' @ 270 /W o
P-03IX ISFSI Nuisance Fence TLD 140' @ 0 /N o
P-04IX ISFSI Nuisance Fence TLD 360' @ 90 /E ISFSI Area Outside Earth Berm o
P-01IB ISFSI Berm Area TLD 340' @ 3 /N o
P-02IB ISFSI Berm Area TLD 380' @ 28 /NNE o
P-03IB ISFSI Berm Area TLD 560' @ 85 /E o
P-04IB ISFSI Berm Area TLD 590' @ 165 /SSE o
P-05IB ISFSI Berm Area TLD 690' @ 186 /S o
P-06IB ISFSI Berm Area TLD 720' @ 201 /SSW o
P-07IB ISFSI Berm Area TLD 610' @ 271 /W o
P-08IB ISFSI Berm Area TLD 360' @ 332 /NNW a
"C" type denotes control location. All other locations are indicators.
b Sample Codes:
AP Airborne particulates F Fish AI Airborne Iodine SS Shoreline Sediments BS Bottom (river) sediments SW Surface Water BO Bottom organisms VE Vegetation/vegetables (periphyton or macroinvertebrates) WW Well water DW Drinking water c
Distance and direction data for fish and bottom organisms are approximate since availability of sample specimen may vary at any one location.
18
Table 5.3. Missed collections and analyses at the Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant.
All required samples were collected and analyzed in 2021 as scheduled without exception:
Sample Analysis Location Collection Reason for not Plan for Type Date or Conducting REMP Preventing Period as Required Recurrence None 19
Table 5.4 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary Name of Facility Prairie Island Nuclear Power Station Docket No. 50-282, 50-306 Location of Facility Goodhue, Minnesota Reporting Period January-December, 2021
( County, State )
Indicator Location with Highest Control Number Sample Type and Locations Annual Mean Locations Non-b c c c Type Number of LLD Mean (F) Mean (F) Mean (F) Routine a c d c c e (Units) Analyses Range Location Range Range Results Direct Radiation TLD (Inner Ring, Gamma 40 3.0 16.1 (40/40) P-06A Property Line 17.5 (4/4) (See Control (13.6-19.3) 0.4 mi @ 249° /WSW (16.1-18.9) 0 Area at Site below.)
Boundary) mR/91 days)
TLD (Outer Ring, Gamma 60 3.0 16.6 (60/60) P-04B, Nelson Drive 19.6 (4/4) (See Control 0 4-5 mi. distant) (12.4-21.3) 4.2 mi @ 61o/ENE (17.1-21.3) below.)
mR/91 days)
TLD (Special Gamma 32 3.0 15.7 (32/32) P-04S, Richard Burt, 18.5 (4/4) (See Control 0 Interest Areas) (12.6-20.9) 2.0 mi @ 202° /SSW (16.0-20.9) below.)
mR/91 days)
TLD (Control) Gamma 4 3.0 None P-01C, Robert Kinneman 15.9 (4/4) 15.9 (4/4) 11.1 mi @ 331° /NNW (14.9-17.1) (14.9-17.1) 0 mR/91 days)
Airborne Pathway Airborne GB 312 0.005 0.030 (260/260) P-07, Air Station 0.031 (52 /52) 0.029 (52/52) 0 Particulates (0.008-0.070) 0.5 mi @ 271° /W (0.011-0.068) (0.007-0.067)
(pCi/m3)
GS 24 Be-7 0.015 0.088 (20/20) P-03, Air Station 0.091 (4/4) 0.086 (4/4) 0 (0.061-0.113) 0.8 mi @ 313° /NW (0.067-0.111) (0.059-0.103)
)
Mn-54 0.0009 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Co-58 0.0008 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Co-60 0.0007 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Zn-65 0.0012 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Zr-Nb-95 0.0011 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Ru-103 0.0010 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Ru-106 0.0062 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Cs-134 0.0008 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Cs-137 0.0007 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Ba-La-140 0.0030 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Ce-141 0.0016 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Ce-144 0.0045 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Airborne Iodine (pCi/m3) I-131 312 0.030 < LLD - - < LLD 0 20
Table 5.4 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary Name of Facility Prairie Island Nuclear Power Station Docket No. 50-282, 50-306 Location of Facility Goodhue, Minnesota Reporting Period January-December, 2021
( County, State )
Indicator Location with Highest Control Number Sample Type and Locations Annual Mean Locations Non-Type Number of b Mean (F) c c c a LLD Mean (F) Mean (F) Routine (Units) Analyses Range c d c c e Location Range Range Results Terrestrial Pathway Crops - Cabbage I-131 3 0.016 < LLD - - < LLD 0 (pCi/gwet)
Well Water H-3 20 165 < LLD - - < LLD 0 (pCi/L)
GS 20 Mn-54 10 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Fe-59 30 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Co-58 10 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Co-60 10 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Zn-65 30 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Zr-Nb-95 15 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Cs-134 10 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Cs-137 10 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Ba-La-140 15 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Ce-144 46 < LLD - - < LLD 0 21
Table 5.4 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary Name of Facility Prairie Island Nuclear Power Station Docket No. 50-282, 50-306 Location of Facility Goodhue, Minnesota Reporting Period January-December, 2021
( County, state )
Indicator Location with Highest Control Number Sample Type and Locations Number of Annual Mean Locations Non-Type Mean (F)c Analyses a LLDb Mean (F)c Mean (F)c Routine (Units) Rangec Locationd Rangec Rangec Resultse Waterborne Pathway Drinking Water GB 12 9.2 (12/12) P-11, Red Wing S.C. 9.2 (12/12) None 0 1.0 (7.1-11.7) 3.3 mi @ 158° /SSE (7.1-11.7)
(pCi/L)
I-131 12 1.0 < LLD - - None 0 H-3 4 160 < LLD - - None 0 GS 12 - -
Mn-54 10 < LLD - - None 0 Fe-59 30 < LLD - - None 0 Co-58 10 < LLD - - None 0 Co-60 10 < LLD - - None 0 Zn-65 30 < LLD - - None 0 Zr-Nb-95 15 < LLD - - None 0 Cs-134 10 < LLD - - None 0 Cs-137 10 < LLD - - None 0 Ba-La-140 15 < LLD - - None 0 Ce-144 41 < LLD - - None 0 H-3 -
River Water 8 160 < LLD - < LLD 0 (pCi/L)
GS 24 Mn-54 10 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Fe-59 30 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Co-58 10 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Co-60 10 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Zn-65 30 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Zr-Nb-95 15 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Cs-134 10 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Cs-137 10 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Ba-La-140 15 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Ce-144 46 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Fish GS 12 (pCi/g wet) K-40 0.10 3.20 (6/6) P-13, Downs t ream 3.20 (6/6) 3.17 (6/6) 0 (2.76-3.79) 3.5 mi @ 113° /ESE (2.76-3.79) (2.58-3.56)
Mn-54 0.026 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Fe-59 0.054 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Co-58 0.028 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Co-60 0.023 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Zn-65 0.043 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Zr-Nb-95 0.038 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Cs-134 0.023 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Cs-137 0.024 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Ba-La-140 0.091 < LLD - - < LLD 0 22
Table 5.4 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary Name of Facility Prairie Island Nuclear Power Station Docket No. 50-282, 50-306 Location of Facility Goodhue, Minnesota Reporting Period January-December, 2021
( County, State )
Indicator Location with Highest Control Number Sample Type and Locations Annual Mean Locations Non-b c c c Type Number of LLD Mean (F) Mean (F) Mean (F) Routine a c d c c e (Units) Analyses Range Location Range Range Results Waterborne Pathway Invertebrates GS 4 (pCi/g wet)
Be-7 0.23 < LLD - - < LLD 0 K-40 0.37 1.61 (2/2) P-6, Lock and Dam #3 1.61 (2/2) 1.27 (2/2) 0 (1.48-1.74) 1.6 mi @ 129° /SE (1.48-1.74) (0.72-1.81)
Mn-54 0.018 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Co-58 0.023 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Co-60 0.019 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Zn-65 0.036 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Zr-Nb-95 0.034 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Ru-103 0.030 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Ru-106 0.136 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Cs-134 0.017 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Cs-137 0.018 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Ba-La-140 0.117 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Ce-141 0.044 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Ce-144 0.100 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Bottom and GS 6 Shoreline 83(1/2)
Sediments Be-7 0.35 <<LLD lld - - < LLD 0 (pCi/g dry) K-40 7.57 (4/4) P-6,Lock and Dam #3 9.40 (2/2) 8.79 (2/2) 0 (5.07-9.51) 1.6 mi @ 129° /SE (9.30-9.51) (7.81-9.76)
Mn-54 0.024 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Co-58 0.025 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Co-60 0.018 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Zn-65 0.054 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Zr-Nb-95 0.036 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Ru-103 0.044 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Ru-106 0.184 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Cs-134 0.019 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Cs-137 0.020 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Ba-La-140 0.145 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Ce-141 0.102 < LLD - - < LLD 0 Ce-144 0.143 < LLD - - < LLD 0 a
GB = gross beta, GS = gamma scan.
b LLD = nominal lower limit of detection based on a 4.66 sigma counting error for background sample.
c Mean and range are based on detectable measurements only. Fraction of detectable measurements at specified locations is indicated in parentheses (F).
d Locations are specified: (1) by name, and/or station code and (2) by distance (miles) and direction relative to reactor site.
e Non-routine results are those which exceed ten times the control station value. If no control station value is available, the result is considered non-routine if it exceeds ten times the typical preoperational value for the medium or location.
23
6.0 REFERENCES
CITED Arnold, J. R. and H. A. Al-Salih. 1955. Beryllium-7 Produced by Cosmic Rays. Science 121: 451-453.
Eisenbud, M. 1963. Environmental Radioactivity, McGraw-Hill, New York, New York, pp. 213, 275 and 276.
Environmental, Inc., Midwest Laboratory.
2001a through 2020a. Radiation Environmental Monitoring for Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant, Complete Analysis Data Tables, January-December, 2000 through 2019.
2001b through 2020b. Radiation Environmental Monitoring for Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Complete Analysis Data Tables, January - December, 2000 through 2019.
1984a to 2000a. (formerly Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental Services, Midwest Laboratory)
Radiation Environmental Monitoring for Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant, Complete Analysis Data Tables, January - December, 1983 through 1999.
1984b to 2000b. (formerly Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental Services, Midwest Laboratory)
Radiation Environmental Monitoring for Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Complete Analysis Data Tables, January - December, 1983 through 1999.
1979a to 1983a. (formerly Hazleton Environmental Sciences Corporation) Radiation Environmental Monitoring for Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant, Complete Analysis Data Tables, January - December, 1978 through 1982.
1979b to 1983b. (formerly Hazleton Environmental Sciences Corporation) Radiation Environmental Monitoring for Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Complete Analysis Data Tables, January -
December, 1978 through 1982.
2022. Quality Manual, Rev. 7, 15 January 2022.
2012. Quality Assurance Program Manual, Rev. 3, 14 November 2012.
2020. Quality Control Procedures Manual, Rev. 4, 15 January 2020.
2009. Quality Control Program, Rev. 2, 12 November 2009.
Gold, S., H. W. Barkhau, B. Shlein, and B. Kahn, 1964. Measurement of Naturally Occurring Radionuclides in Air, in the Natural Environment, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, 369-382.
Northern States Power Company.
1972 through 1974. Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Environmental Monitoring and Ecological Studies Program, January 1, 1971 to December 31, 1971, 1972, 1973. Minneapolis, Minnesota.
1979 to 2008. Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Annual Radiation Environmental Monitoring Report to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, January 1 to December 31, 1978 through 2007. Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, 2013. Radiological Environmental Monitoring for Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Radiation Protection Implementing Procedures, 4700 series.
U.S. Dep't of Energy 1997 HASL-300, Edition 28, Procedures Manual, Environmental Measurements Laboratory, New York, NY.
24
Environmental Protection Agency .
1980. Prescribed Procedures for Measurement of Radioactivity in Drinking Water, Cincinnati, Ohio (EPA- 600/4-80-032).
1984. Eastern Environmental Radiation Facility, Radiochemistry Procedures Manual, Montgomery, Alabama (EPA-520/5-84-006).
2012. RadNet, formerly Environmental Radiation Ambient Monitoring System, Gross Beta in Air, Gross Beta in Drinking Water (MN) 1981- 2009.
Wilson, D. W., G. M. Ward and J. E. Johnson. 1969. In Environmental Contamination by Radioactive Materials, International Atomic Energy Agency. p.125.
Xcel Energy Corporation.
2009 to 2020. Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant, Annual Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, January 1 to December 31, 2008 through 2020.
Minneapolis, Minnesota.
2009 to 2020. Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Annual Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, January 1 to December 31, 2008 through 2020. Minneapolis, Minnesota.
25
~~, ATI Environmental, Inc.
"+1l /""\I Midwest Laboratory 700 Landwehr Road* Northbrook. IL 60062-2310 phone (847) 564-0700
- fax (847) 564-4517 APPENDIX A INTERLABORATORY AND INTRALABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM RESULTS NOTE: Appendix A is updated four times a year. The complete appendix is included in March, June, September and December monthly progress reports only.
January, 2021 through December, 2021
Appendix A Interlaboratory/ Intralaboratory Comparison Program Results Environmental, Inc., Midwest Laboratory has participated in interlaboratory comparison (crosscheck) programs since the formulation of its quality control program in December 1971. These programs are operated by agencies which supply environmental type samples containing concentrations of radionuclides known to the issuing agency but not to participant laboratories. The purpose of such a program is to provide an independent check on a laboratorys analytical procedures and to alert it of any possible problems.
Participant laboratories measure the concentration of specified radionuclides and report them to the issuing agency. Several months later, the agency reports the known values to the participant laboratories and specifies control limits. Results consistently higher or lower than the known values or outside the control limits indicate a need to check the instruments or procedures used.
Results in Table A-1 were obtained through participation in the RAD PT Study Proficiency Testing Program administered by Environmental Resource Associates, serving as a replacement for studies conducted previously by the U.S. EPA Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, Las Vegas, Nevada.
Table A-2 lists results for thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs), via irradiation and evaluation by the University of Wisconsin-Madison Radiation Calibration Laboratory at the University of Wisconsin Medical Radiation Research Center.
Table A-3 lists results of the analyses on intralaboratory spiked samples for the past twelve months. All samples are prepared using NIST traceable sources. Data for previous years available upon request.
Table A-4 lists results of the analyses on intralaboratory blank samples for the past twelve months. Data for previous years available upon request.
Table A-5 lists analytical results from the intralaboratory duplicate program for the past twelve months. Acceptance is based on each result being within 25% of the mean of the two results or the two sigma uncertainties of each result overlap.
The results in Table A-6 were obtained through participation in the Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program.
Results in Table A-7 were obtained through participation in the MRAD PT Study Proficiency Testing Program administered by Environmental Resource Associates, serving as a replacement for studies conducted previously by the Environmental Measurement Laboratory Quality Assessment Program (EML).
Attachment A lists the laboratory acceptance criteria for various analyses.
Out-of-limit results are explained directly below the result.
A-1
Attachment A ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR INTRALABORATORY SPIKED SAMPLES Analysis Ratio of lab result to known value.
Gamma Emitters 0.8 to 1.2 Strontium-89, 0.8 to 1.2 Strontium-90 Potassium-40 0.8 to 1.2 Gross alpha 0.5 to 1.5 Gross beta 0.8 to 1.2 Tritium 0.8 to 1.2 Radium-226, 0.7 to 1.3 Radium-228 Plutonium 0.8 to 1.2 Iodine-129, 0.8 to 1.2 Iodine-131 Nickel-63, 0.7 to 1.3 Technetium-99, Uranium-238 Iron-55 0.8 to 1.2 Other Analyses 0.8 to 1.2 A-2
TABLE A-1. Interlaboratory Comparison Crosscheck program, Environmental Resource Associates (ERA) a.
RAD study Concentration (pCi/L)
Lab Code Date Analysis Laboratory ERA Control Result Result Limits Acceptance RAD-124 Study ERW-94 1/11/2021 Ba-133 24.1 +/- 3.5 23.8 18.4 - 27.4 Pass ERW-94 1/11/2021 Cs-134 46.1 +/- 3.1 42.8 34.2 - 47.1 Pass ERW-94 1/11/2021 Cs-137 154 +/- 6.0 148 133 - 165 Pass ERW-94 1/11/2021 Co-60 39.4 +/- 3.2 34.6 30.8 - 40.8 Pass ERW-94 1/11/2021 Zn-65 66.2 +/- 6.3 61.6 54.6 - 75.0 Pass ERDW-96 1/11/2021 Gr. Alpha 58.4 +/- 2.6 63.3 33.2 - 78.5 Pass ERDW-96 1/11/2021 Gr. Beta 38.1 +/- 1.3 39.8 26.4 - 47.3 Pass ERDW-98 1/11/2021 Ra-226 16.3 +/- 0.5 15.5 11.5 - 17.8 Pass ERDW-98 1/11/2021 Ra-228 12.3 +/- 1.2 12.9 8.54 - 15.8 Pass ERDW-98 1/11/2021 Uranium 33.2 +/- 1.8 30.1 24.4 - 33.4 Pass ERW-100 1/11/2021 H-3 2,100 +/- 160 2,120 1,750 - 2,350 Pass RAD-126 Study ERDW-2194 7/12/2021 Ba-133 44.1 +/- 4.0 45.5 37.2 - 50.6 Pass ERDW-2194 7/12/2021 Cs-134 85.2 +/- 3.9 87.5 71.8 - 96.2 Pass ERDW-2194 7/12/2021 Cs-137 218 +/-8 208 187 - 230 Pass ERDW-2194 7/12/2021 Co-60 91.7 +/- 4.0 87.1 78.4 - 98.1 Pass ERDW-2194 7/12/2021 Zn-65 114 +/-9 102 91.8 - 122.0 Pass ERDW-2196 7/12/2021 Gr. Alpha 61.5 +/- 2.9 49.1 25.6 - 61.7 Pass ERDW-2196 7/12/2021 Gr. Beta 31.7 +/- 1.3 31.5 20.3 - 39.2 Pass ERDW-2200 7/12/2021 Ra-226 16.5 +/- 0.5 13.4 10.0 - 15.4 Failb ERDW-2200 7/12/2021 Ra-228 8.7 +/- 1.0 7.6 4.81 - 9.7 Pass ERDW-2200 7/12/2021 Uranium 71.7 +/- 2.3 62.3 50.9 - 68.5 Failc ERDW-2202 7/12/2021 H-3 11,300 +/- 300 10,400 9,050 - 11,400 Pass ERDW-2198 7/12/2021 I-131 22.3 +/- 1.1 20.8 17.2 - 25.0 Pass a
Results obtained by Environmental, Inc., Midwest Laboratory as a participant in the crosscheck program for proficiency testing in drinking water conducted by Environmental Resource Associates (ERA).
b The radium-226 result did not meet ERA acceptance criteria.
c The uranium result did not meet ERA acceptance criteria.
A-3
TABLE A-2. Thermoluminescent Dosimetry, (TLD, CaSO4: Dy Cards).a mrem Lab Code Irradiation Delivered Reportedb Performancec Date Description Dose Dose Quotient (P)
Environmental, Inc. Group 1 2021-1 11/8/2021 Spike 1 167.0 171.4 0.03 2021-1 11/8/2021 Spike 2 167.0 159.4 -0.05 2021-1 11/8/2021 Spike 3 167.0 160.8 -0.04 2021-1 11/8/2021 Spike 4 167.0 164.5 -0.01 2021-1 11/8/2021 Spike 5 167.0 156.7 -0.06 2021-1 11/8/2021 Spike 6 167.0 152.3 -0.09 2021-1 11/8/2021 Spike 7 167.0 158.7 -0.05 2021-1 11/8/2021 Spike 8 167.0 161.6 -0.03 2021-1 11/8/2021 Spike 9 167.0 152.4 -0.09 2021-1 11/8/2021 Spike 10 167.0 155.7 -0.07 2021-1 11/8/2021 Spike 11 167.0 158.8 -0.05 2021-1 11/8/2021 Spike 12 167.0 163.1 -0.02 2021-1 11/8/2021 Spike 13 167.0 162.2 -0.03 2021-1 11/8/2021 Spike 14 167.0 158.8 -0.05 2021-1 11/8/2021 Spike 15 167.0 173.5 0.04 2021-1 11/8/2021 Spike 16 167.0 158.7 -0.05 2021-1 11/8/2021 Spike 17 167.0 162.9 -0.02 2021-1 11/8/2021 Spike 18 167.0 159.3 -0.05 2021-1 11/8/2021 Spike 19 167.0 158.2 -0.05 2021-1 11/8/2021 Spike 20 167.0 161.7 -0.03 Mean (Spike 1-20) 160.5 -0.04 Passd Standard Deviation (Spike 1-20) 5.2 0.03 Passd a TLD's were irradiated by the University of Wisconsin-Madison Radiation Calibration Laboratory following ANSI N13.37 protocol from a known air kerma rate. TLD's were read and the results were submitted by Environmental Inc. to the University of Wisconsin-Madison Radiation Calibration Laboratory for comparison to the delivered dose.
b Reported dose was converted from exposure (R) to Air Kerma (cGy) using a conversion of 0.876. Conversion from air kerma to ambient dose equivalent for Cs-137 at the reference dose point H*(10)K a = 1.20 . mrem/cGy = 1000.
c Performance Quotient (P) is calculated as ((reported dose - conventionally true value) ÷ conventionally true value) where the conventionally true value is the delivered dose.
d Acceptance is achieved when neither the absolute value of the mean of the P values, nor the standard deviation of the P values exceed 0.15.
A-4
TABLE A-2. Thermoluminescent Dosimetry, (TLD, CaSO4: Dy Cards).a mrem Lab Code Irradiation Delivered Reportedb Performancec Date Description Dose Dose Quotient (P)
Environmental, Inc. Group 2 2021-2 11/8/2021 Spike 21 102.0 98.3 -0.04 2021-2 11/8/2021 Spike 22 102.0 88.4 -0.13 2021-2 11/8/2021 Spike 23 102.0 96.7 -0.05 2021-2 11/8/2021 Spike 24 102.0 101.4 -0.01 2021-2 11/8/2021 Spike 25 102.0 98.5 -0.03 2021-2 11/8/2021 Spike 26 102.0 96.3 -0.06 2021-2 11/8/2021 Spike 27 102.0 95.8 -0.06 2021-2 11/8/2021 Spike 28 102.0 94.3 -0.08 2021-2 11/8/2021 Spike 29 102.0 93.5 -0.08 2021-2 11/8/2021 Spike 30 102.0 95.7 -0.06 2021-2 11/8/2021 Spike 31 102.0 101.7 0.00 2021-2 11/8/2021 Spike 32 102.0 98.5 -0.03 2021-2 11/8/2021 Spike 33 102.0 96.7 -0.05 2021-2 11/8/2021 Spike 34 102.0 87.2 -0.15 2021-2 11/8/2021 Spike 35 102.0 89.7 -0.12 2021-2 11/8/2021 Spike 36 102.0 88.5 -0.13 2021-2 11/8/2021 Spike 37 102.0 85.4 -0.16 2021-2 11/8/2021 Spike 38 102.0 90.0 -0.12 2021-2 11/8/2021 Spike 39 102.0 90.9 -0.11 2021-2 11/8/2021 Spike 40 102.0 92.6 -0.09 Mean (Spike 21-40) 94.0 -0.08 Passd Standard Deviation (Spike 21-40) 4.7 0.05 Passd a TLD's were irradiated by the University of Wisconsin-Madison Radiation Calibration Laboratory following ANSI N13.37 protocol from a known air kerma rate. TLD's were read and the results were submitted by Environmental Inc. to the University of Wisconsin-Madison Radiation Calibration Laboratory for comparison to the delivered dose.
b Reported dose was converted from exposure (R) to Air Kerma (cGy) using a conversion of 0.876. Conversion from air kerma to ambient dose equivalent for Cs-137 at the reference dose point H*(10)K a = 1.20 . mrem/cGy = 1000.
c Performance Quotient (P) is calculated as ((reported dose - conventionally true value) ÷ conventionally true value) where the conventionally true value is the delivered dose.
d Acceptance is achieved when neither the absolute value of the mean of the P values, nor the standard deviation of the P values exceed 0.15.
A-5
TABLE A-3. Intralaboratory "Spiked" Samples Concentrationa b
Lab Code Date Analysis Laboratory results Known Control Ratio 2s, n=1c Activity Limitsd Acceptance Lab/Known SPW-55 1/8/2021 H-3 1,889 +/- 150 2,110 1,688 - 2,532 Pass 0.90 SPDW-62 1/11/2021 Gr. Alpha 34.3 +/- 1.7 64.9 34.0 - 80.4 Pass 0.53 SPDW-62 1/11/2021 Gr. Beta 9.2 +/- 0.8 8.9 3.6 - 17.4 Pass 1.04 SPW-131 1/19/2021 Sr-90 18.0 +/- 1.1 17.9 14.3 - 21.5 Pass 1.00 SPW-133 1/19/2021 H-3 1,842 +/- 150 2,110 1,688 - 2,532 Pass 0.87 SPW-188 1/18/2021 Ra-228 14.2 +/- 1.7 14.9 10.4 - 19.3 Pass 0.96 SPW-236 1/26/2021 Ra-228 12.2 +/- 1.9 15.3 10.7 - 19.9 Pass 0.80 SPW-305 2/5/2021 H-3 1,785 +/- 147 2,110 1,688 - 2,532 Pass 0.85 SPW-372 2/12/2021 H-3 1,742 +/- 145 2,110 1,688 - 2,532 Pass 0.83 SPW-526 3/5/2021 H-3 1,899 +/- 150 2,110 1,688 - 2,532 Pass 0.90 SPW-692 3/19/2021 H-3 1,953 +/- 151 2,110 1,688 - 2,532 Pass 0.93 SPW-694 1/4/2021 Ra-226 9.7 +/- 0.4 12.3 8.6 - 16.0 Pass 0.79 SPW-800 3/30/2021 Ra-228 15.8 +/- 2.0 15.3 10.7 - 19.9 Pass 1.03 SPW-802 3/31/2021 H-3 1,878 +/- 150 2,110 1,688 - 2,532 Pass 0.89 SPW-810 3/19/2021 Ra-226 11.4 +/- 0.3 12.3 8.6 - 16.0 Pass 0.93 SPDW-30103 3/31/2021 Ra-226 13.5 +/- 0.4 12.3 8.6 - 16.0 Pass 1.10 SPW-812 4/1/2021 H-3 2,005 +/- 155 2,110 1,688 - 2,532 Pass 0.95 SPW-919 4/7/2021 H-3 1,877 +/- 149 2,110 1,688 - 2,532 Pass 0.89 SPW-944 4/9/2021 Gr. Alpha 56.7 +/- 2.5 58.4 29.2 - 87.6 Pass 0.97 SPW-944 4/9/2021 Gr. Beta 35.1 +/- 1.3 38.1 30.5 - 45.7 Pass 0.92 SPW-1048 4/15/2021 H-3 1,915 +/- 152 2,110 1,688 - 2,532 Pass 0.91 SPW-1250 4/30/2021 H-3 2,015 +/- 154 2,110 1,688 - 2,532 Pass 0.95 SPW-1373 5/11/2021 Gr. Alpha 63.5 +/- 2.9 58.4 29.2 - 87.6 Pass 1.09 SPW-1373 5/11/2021 Gr. Beta 38.5 +/- 1.3 38.1 30.5 - 45.7 Pass 1.01 SPW-1377 5/11/2021 Sr-90 17.4 +/- 1.2 17.9 14.3 - 21.5 Pass 0.97 SPDW-30108 5/28/2021 H-3 2,222 +/- 161 2,110 1,688 - 2,532 Pass 1.05 SPDW-30125 5/13/2021 Ra-226 10.9 +/- 0.3 12.3 8.6 - 16.0 Pass 0.89 SPDW-30118 6/4/2021 H-3 2,230 +/- 163 2,110 1,688 - 2,532 Pass 1.06 SPMI-1672 6/8/2021 Sr-90 14.2 +/- 0.9 13.6 10.9 - 16.3 Pass 1.04 SPDW-30160 6/11/2021 Ra-226 11.4 +/- 0.3 12.3 8.6 - 16.0 Pass 0.93 SPDW-30129 6/15/2021 H-3 2,238 +/- 162 2,110 1,688 - 2,532 Pass 1.06 SPDW-30134 6/18/2021 Gr. Alpha 17.9 +/- 1.4 23.5 11.8 - 35.3 Pass 0.76 SPDW-30134 6/18/2021 Gr. Beta 60.9 +/- 1.6 67.6 54.1 - 81.1 Pass 0.90 SPDW-30148 6/25/2021 Ra-228 15.1 +/- 2.9 15.3 10.7 - 19.9 Pass 0.98 SPDW-30206 7/8/2021 Ra-226 12.7 +/- 0.4 12.3 8.6 - 16.0 Pass 1.03 SPDW-3001 7/29/2021 Ra-226 11.6 +/- 0.3 12.3 8.6 - 16.0 Pass 0.95 a
Liquid sample results are reported in pCi/Liter, air filters ( pCi/m3), charcoal (pCi/charcoal canister), and solid samples (pCi/kg).
b Laboratory codes : W & SPW (Water), MI (milk), AP (air filter), SO (soil), VE (vegetation), CH (charcoal canister), F (fish), U (urine).
c Results are based on single determinations.
d Acceptance criteria are listed in Attachment A of this report.
A-6
TABLE A-3. Intralaboratory "Spiked" Samples Concentrationa b
Lab Code Date Analysis Laboratory results Known Control Ratio 2s, n=1c Activity Limitsd Acceptance Lab/Known SPDW-30224 8/2/2021 Gr. Alpha 38.6 +/- 2.1 49.1 24.6 - 73.7 Pass 0.79 SPDW-30224 8/2/2021 Gr. Beta 27.8 +/- 1.2 31.5 25.2 - 37.8 Pass 0.88 SPDW-30226 8/13/2021 H-3 2,074 +/- 157 2,110 1,688 - 2,532 Pass 0.98 SPDW-30231 8/18/2021 Ra-228 14.5 +/- 2.2 15.3 10.7 - 19.9 Pass 0.95 SPW-2783 9/3/2021 Sr-90 18.9 +/- 1.2 17.1 13.7 - 20.5 Pass 1.10 SPDW-2785 9/3/2021 H-3 2,135 +/- 158 2,110 1,688 - 2,532 Pass 1.01 SPDW-2891 9/10/2021 H-3 2,159 +/- 160 2,110 1,688 - 2,532 Pass 1.02 SPDW-3115 9/17/2021 Ra-226 11.3 +/- 0.3 12.3 8.6 - 16.0 Pass 0.92 SPDW-3036 9/23/2021 Ra-228 18.0 +/- 2.6 15.3 10.7 - 19.9 Pass 1.17 SPDW-3223 9/28/2021 Ra-228 16.6 +/- 2.5 15.3 10.7 - 19.9 Pass 1.08 SPDW-3288 9/29/2021 U-234 29.2 +/- 1.6 23.0 16.1 - 29.9 Pass 1.27 SPDW-3288 9/29/2021 U-238 28.2 +/- 1.6 23.2 16.3 - 30.2 Pass 1.21 SPDW-30276 9/29/2021 Ra-226 9.4 +/- 0.4 12.3 8.6 - 16.0 Pass 0.76 SPDW-3157 10/1/2021 H-3 2,111 +/- 158 2,110 1,688 - 2,532 Pass 1.00 SPDW-3290 10/12/2021 Gr. Alpha 34.6 +/- 2.1 49.1 24.6 - 73.7 Pass 0.70 SPDW-3290 10/12/2021 Gr. Beta 25.1 +/- 1.1 31.5 25.2 - 37.8 Pass 0.80 SPDW-3393 10/15/2021 H-3 2,184 +/- 161 2,110 1,688 - 2,532 Pass 1.04 SPDW-3604 10/28/2021 H-3 2,104 +/- 15 2,110 1,688 - 2,532 Pass 1.00 SPDW-30283 11/4/2021 Ra-226 11.7 +/- 0.3 12.3 8.6 - 16.0 Pass 0.95 SPDW-3769 11/10/2021 H-3 2,026 +/- 156 2,110 1,688 - 2,532 Pass 0.96 SPDW-3860 11/18/2021 H-3 2,161 +/- 161 2,110 1,688 - 2,532 Pass 1.02 SPDW-30290 11/22/2021 Ra-226 12.0 +/- 0.3 12.3 8.6 - 16.0 Pass 0.97 SPDW-3958 12/3/2021 H-3 2,126 +/- 160 2,110 1,688 - 2,532 Pass 1.01 SPW-3971 12/7/2021 Sr-90 19.0 +/- 1.2 17.1 13.7 - 20.5 Pass 1.11 SPDW-30287 12/9/2021 Ra-228 12.3 +/- 1.7 15.3 10.7 - 19.9 Pass 0.80 SPDW-30295 12/16/2021 H-3 2,265 +/- 163 2,110 1,688 - 2,532 Pass 1.07 SPDW-30301 12/30/2021 H-3 2,055 +/- 163 2,110 1,688 - 2,532 Pass 0.97 SPDW-30307 12/13/2021 Ra-226 11.7 +/- 0.4 12.3 8.6 - 16.0 Pass 0.95 a
Liquid sample results are reported in pCi/Liter, air filters ( pCi/m3), charcoal (pCi/charcoal canister), and solid samples (pCi/kg).
b Laboratory codes : W & SPW (Water), MI (milk), AP (air filter), SO (soil), VE (vegetation), CH (charcoal canister), F (fish), U (urine).
c Results are based on single determinations.
d Acceptance criteria are listed in Attachment A of this report.
A-7
TABLE A-4. Intralaboratory "Blank" Samples Concentrationa b c Lab Code Sample Date Analysis Laboratory results (4.66s) Acceptance Type LLD Activityd Criteria (4.66 s)
SPW-54 Water 1/8/2021 H-3 153 24 +/- 77 200 SPDW-61 Water 1/11/2021 Gr. Alpha 0.56 -0.32 +/- 0.37 2 SPDW-61 Water 1/11/2021 Gr. Beta 0.73 -0.11 +/- 0.49 4 SPW-130 Water 1/19/2021 Sr-89 0.66 -0.12 +/- 0.49 5 SPW-130 Water 1/19/2021 Sr-90 0.68 -0.02 +/- 0.31 1 SPW-132 Water 1/19/2021 H-3 165 38 +/- 79 200 SPW-4923 Water 1/26/2021 I-131 0.28 0.26 +/- 0.16 1 SPW-187 Water 1/18/2021 Ra-228 1.44 0.81 +/- 0.76 2 SPW-235 Water 1/26/2021 Ra-228 1.54 0.94 +/- 0.82 2 SPW-254 Water 2/2/2021 I-131 0.29 -0.06 +/- 0.13 1 SPW-304 Water 2/5/2021 H-3 159 6 +/- 74 200 SPW-371 Water 2/12/2021 H-3 154 -37 +/- 70 200 SPW-525 Water 3/5/2021 H-3 160 97 +/- 80 200 SPW-691 Water 3/19/2021 H-3 158 -38 +/- 71 200 SPW-693 Water 1/4/2021 Ra-226 0.03 -0.01 +/- 0.01 2 SPW-799 Water 3/30/2021 Ra-228 1.03 0.06 +/- 0.48 2 SPW-809 Water 3/19/2021 Ra-226 0.04 0.01 +/- 0.03 2 SPDW-30102 Water 3/31/2021 Ra-226 0.03 0.00 +/- 0.03 2 SPW-811 Water 4/1/2021 H-3 158 -29 +/- 77 200 SPW-918 Water 4/7/2021 H-3 156 93 +/- 79 200 SPW-943 Water 4/9/2021 Gr. Alpha 0.39 -0.08 +/- 0.27 2 SPW-943 Water 4/9/2021 Gr. Beta 0.73 0.04 +/- 0.51 4 SPW-1047 Water 4/15/2021 H-3 160 -51 +/- 74 200 SPW-1249 Water 4/30/2021 H-3 158 109 +/- 81 200 SPW-1372 Water 5/11/2021 Gr. Alpha 0.35 0.27 +/- 0.27 2 SPW-1372 Water 5/11/2021 Gr. Beta 0.68 0.27 +/- 0.49 4 SPW-1376 Water 5/11/2021 Sr-89 0.52 0.23 +/- 0.39 5 SPW-1376 Water 5/11/2021 Sr-90 0.51 -0.06 +/- 0.23 1 SPDW-30124 Water 5/13/2021 Ra-226 0.03 -0.02 +/- 0.03 2 SPDW-30104 Water 5/26/2021 Ra-228 1.30 -0.04 +/- 0.60 2 SPDW-30107 Water 5/28/2021 H-3 157 33 +/- 76 200 SPDW-30117 Water 6/4/2021 H-3 165 67 +/- 81 200 SPMI-1671 Milk 6/8/2021 Sr-89 0.46 0.23 +/- 0.42 5 SPMI-1671 Milk 6/8/2021 Sr-90 0.45 0.23 +/- 0.24 1 SPDW-30159 Water 6/11/2021 Ra-226 0.04 -0.02 +/- 0.04 2 SPDW-30128 Water 6/15/2021 H-3 161 17 +/- 76 200 SPDW-30133 Water 6/17/2021 I-131 0.20 0.06 +/- 0.12 1 SPDW-30134 Water 6/18/2021 Gr. Alpha 0.46 -0.11 +/- 0.32 2 SPDW-30134 Water 6/18/2021 Gr. Beta 0.70 -0.10 +/- 0.49 4 SPDW-30147 Water 6/25/2021 Ra-228 1.76 -0.15 +/- 0.80 2 a
Liquid sample results are reported in pCi/Liter, air filters ( pCi/m 3), charcoal (pCi/charcoal canister), and solid samples (pCi/g).
b Laboratory codes : W & SPW (Water), MI (milk), AP (air filter), SO (soil), VE (vegetation), CH (charcoal canister), F (fish), U (urine).
c I-131(G); iodine-131 as analyzed by gamma spectroscopy.
d Activity reported is a net activity result. A-8
TABLE A-4. Intralaboratory "Blank" Samples Concentrationa b c Lab Code Sample Date Analysis Laboratory results (4.66s) Acceptance Type LLD Activityd Criteria (4.66 s)
SPDW-30205 Water 7/8/2021 Ra-226 0.03 0.02 +/- 0.03 2 SPDW-3000 Water 7/29/2021 Ra-226 0.03 0.03 +/- 0.03 2 SPDW-30223 Water 8/2/2021 Gr. Alpha 0.46 -0.13 +/- 0.31 2 SPDW-30223 Water 8/2/2021 Gr. Beta 0.70 0.16 +/- 0.49 4 SPDW-30225 Water 8/13/2021 H-3 161 -2 +/- 75 200 SPDW-30230 Water 8/18/2021 Ra-228 1.02 0.47 +/- 0.53 2 SPW-2782 Water 9/3/2021 Sr-89 0.60 -0.16 +/- 0.48 5 SPW-2782 Water 9/3/2021 Sr-90 0.63 0.20 +/- 0.32 1 SPDW-2784 Water 9/3/2021 H-3 157 -50 +/- 69 200 SPDW-2890 Water 9/10/2021 H-3 163 -59 +/- 72 200 SPDW-2981 Water 9/17/2021 H-3 162 11 +/- 78 200 SPDW-3114 Water 9/17/2021 Ra-226 0.03 0.04 +/- 0.03 2 SPDW-3035 Water 9/23/2021 Ra-228 1.15 0.10 +/- 0.55 2 SPDW-3222 Water 9/28/2021 Ra-228 1.37 -0.30 +/- 0.60 2 SPDW-3287 Water 9/29/2021 U-234 0.22 0.19 +/- 0.23 1 SPDW-3287 Water 9/29/2021 U-238 0.38 -0.05 +/- 0.21 1 SPDW-30275 Water 9/29/2021 Ra-226 0.05 0.03 +/- 0.04 2 SPDW-3156 Water 10/1/2021 H-3 161 -11 +/- 75 200 SPDW-3289 Water 10/12/2021 Gr. Alpha 0.40 0.21 +/- 0.30 2 SPDW-3289 Water 10/12/2021 Gr. Beta 0.72 0.31 +/- 0.52 4 SPDW-3392 Water 10/15/2021 H-3 158 58 +/- 79 200 SPDW-3603 Water 10/28/2021 H-3 163 26 +/- 77 200 SPDW-30282 Water 11/4/2021 Ra-226 0.04 0.04 +/- 0.03 2 SPDW-3768 Water 11/10/2021 H-3 162 31 +/- 77 200 SPDW-3859 Water 11/18/2021 H-3 162 45 +/- 78 200 SPDW-30289 Water 11/22/2021 Ra-226 0.03 0.19 +/- 0.03 2 SPDW-3957 Water 12/3/2021 H-3 161 118 +/- 84 200 SPW-3970 Water 12/7/2021 Sr-89 0.54 -0.12 +/- 0.43 5 SPW-3970 Water 12/7/2021 Sr-90 0.54 0.08 +/- 0.26 1 SPDW-30286 Water 12/9/2021 Ra-228 0.91 -0.26 +/- 0.39 2 SPDW-30288 Water 12/10/2021 I-131 0.22 0.00 +/- 0.12 1 SPDW-30306 Water 12/13/2021 Ra-226 0.05 -0.05 +/- 0.04 2 SPDW-30294 Water 12/16/2021 H-3 162 -33 +/- 73 200 SPDW-30300 Water 12/30/2021 H-3 166 68 +/- 91 200 a
Liquid sample results are reported in pCi/Liter, air filters ( pCi/m 3), charcoal (pCi/charcoal canister), and solid samples (pCi/g).
b Laboratory codes : W & SPW (Water), MI (milk), AP (air filter), SO (soil), VE (vegetation), CH (charcoal canister), F (fish), U (urine).
c I-131(G); iodine-131 as analyzed by gamma spectroscopy.
d Activity reported is a net activity result.
A-9
TABLE A-5. Intralaboratory "Duplicate" Samples Concentrationa Averaged Lab Codeb Date Analysis First Result Second Result Result Acceptance S-20,21 1/5/2021 K-40 23.3 +/- 0.6 22.6 +/- 1.6 23.0 +/- 0.9 Pass XW-295,296 1/13/2021 H-3 245 +/- 87 288 +/- 89 267 +/- 62 Pass S-143,144 1/14/2021 K-40 7.47 +/- 0.76 8.38 +/- 0.22 7.93 +/- 0.40 Pass S-360,361 2/10/2021 K-40 9.23 +/- 0.54 9.00 +/- 0.68 9.12 +/- 0.43 Pass S-406,407 2/15/2021 K-40 2.92 +/- 0.28 2.94 +/- 0.94 2.93 +/- 0.49 Pass W-469,470 2/22/2021 Ra-226 0.75 +/- 0.21 0.87 +/- 0.22 0.81 +/- 0.15 Pass W-448,449 2/25/2021 Gr. Alpha 3.52 +/- 1.84 3.72 +/- 1.87 3.62 +/- 1.31 Pass W-448,449 2/25/2021 Gr. Beta 8.71 +/- 1.36 8.91 +/- 1.40 8.81 +/- 0.98 Pass W-448,449 2/25/2021 Ra-226 1.87 +/- 0.25 1.82 +/- 0.28 1.85 +/- 0.19 Pass W-448,449 2/25/2021 Ra-228 2.65 +/- 1.26 2.53 +/- 1.35 2.59 +/- 0.92 Pass P-511,512 3/2/2021 H-3 198 +/- 85 202 +/- 86 200 +/- 60 Pass WW-630,631 3/10/2021 H-3 144 +/- 82 148 +/- 82 146 +/- 58 Pass WW-743,744 3/16/2021 H-3 183 +/- 85 167 +/- 84 175 +/- 60 Pass S-785,786 3/25/2021 Pb-214 0.59 +/- 0.08 0.34 +/- 0.05 0.47 +/- 0.05 Pass S-785,786 3/25/2021 Ac-228 0.61 +/- 0.12 0.58 +/- 0.13 0.60 +/- 0.09 Pass AP-1052,1053 3/30/2021 Be-7 0.081 +/- 0.010 0.075 +/- 0.011 0.078 +/- 0.007 Pass AP-966,967 3/30/2021 Be-7 0.080 +/- 0.010 0.085 +/- 0.009 0.083 +/- 0.007 Pass SWU-835,836 3/30/2021 Gr. Beta 1.22 +/- 0.56 1.27 +/- 0.55 1.24 +/- 0.39 Pass AP-1204,1205 3/30/2021 Be-7 0.187 +/- 0.102 0.160 +/- 0.088 0.173 +/- 0.067 Pass AP-1029,1030 4/2/2021 Be-7 0.067 +/- 0.012 0.079 +/- 0.012 0.073 +/- 0.009 Pass SW-922,923 4/7/2021 H-3 440 +/- 99 307 +/- 93 373 +/- 68 Pass WW-987,988 4/12/2021 H-3 190 +/- 87 284 +/- 92 237 +/- 63 Pass F-1246,1247 4/22/2021 K-40 3.26 +/- 0.66 2.83 +/- 0.46 3.04 +/- 0.40 Pass SWT-1311,1312 4/27/2021 Gr. Beta 1.05 +/- 0.52 1.16 +/- 0.55 1.10 +/- 0.38 Pass WW-1401,1402 5/5/2021 Gr. Alpha 1.10 +/- 1.00 2.50 +/- 1.20 1.80 +/- 0.78 Pass WW-1401,1402 5/5/2021 K-40 126 +/- 15 105 +/- 30 115 +/- 17 Pass DW-30071.,30072 5/6/2021 Ra-226 0.98 +/- 0.15 0.67 +/- 0.13 0.83 +/- 0.10 Pass DW-30071.,30072 5/6/2021 Ra-228 0.83 +/- 0.51 1.21 +/- 0.54 1.02 +/- 0.37 Pass DW-30078,30079 5/10/2021 Gr. Alpha 4.90 +/- 0.92 5.92 +/- 0.99 5.41 +/- 0.68 Pass AP-051120A,B 5/11/2021 Gr. Beta 0.006 +/- 0.002 0.005 +/- 0.002 0.005 +/- 0.002 Pass DW-30083,30084 5/11/2021 Ra-226 0.34 +/- 0.13 0.19 +/- 0.20 0.27 +/- 0.12 Pass DW-30083,30084 5/11/2021 Ra-228 0.98 +/- 0.60 0.15 +/- 0.56 0.57 +/- 0.41 Pass S-1506,1507 5/18/2021 K-40 10.1 +/- 0.8 14.9 +/- 1.2 12.5 +/- 0.7 Pass DW-30092,30093 5/20/2021 Gr. Alpha 2.86 +/- 0.85 2.40 +/- 0.90 2.63 +/- 0.62 Pass DW-30095,30096 5/21/2021 Ra-226 1.18 +/- 0.16 0.73 +/- 0.15 0.96 +/- 0.11 Pass DW-30095,30096 5/21/2021 Ra-228 1.44 +/- 0.63 0.61 +/- 0.59 1.03 +/- 0.43 Pass AP-052521A,B 5/25/2021 Gr. Beta 0.021 +/- 0.003 0.022 +/- 0.003 0.021 +/- 0.002 Pass S-1589,1590 5/28/2021 Pb-214 1.16 +/- 0.08 1.06 +/- 0.09 1.11 +/- 0.06 Pass S-1589,1590 5/28/2021 Ac-228 1.17 +/- 0.18 1.08 +/- 0.14 1.13 +/- 0.11 Pass A-10
TABLE A-5. Intralaboratory "Duplicate" Samples Concentrationa Averaged Lab Codeb Date Analysis First Result Second Result Result Acceptance AP-060121A,B 6/1/2021 Gr. Beta 0.015 +/- 0.003 0.013 +/- 0.003 0.014 +/- 0.002 Pass DW-30113,30114 6/1/2021 Ra-226 2.00 +/- 0.34 2.64 +/- 0.26 2.32 +/- 0.21 Pass DW-30113,30114 6/1/2021 Ra-228 2.50 +/- 0.78 3.13 +/- 0.82 2.82 +/- 0.57 Pass PS-1631,1632 6/2/2021 K-40 21.1 +/- 0.8 20.4 +/- 0.8 20.7 +/- 0.6 Pass DW-30119,30120 6/3/2021 Gr. Alpha 1.18 +/- 0.75 0.66 +/- 0.64 0.92 +/- 0.49 Pass WW-1908,1909 6/4/2021 H-3 150 +/- 85 176 +/- 87 163 +/- 61 Pass VE-1717,1718 6/7/2021 Be-7 0.50 +/- 0.19 0.38 +/- 0.14 0.44 +/- 0.12 Pass VE-1717,1718 6/7/2021 K-40 5.26 +/- 0.47 5.45 +/- 0.44 5.35 +/- 0.32 Pass AP-060821A,B 6/8/2021 Gr. Beta 0.030 +/- 0.004 0.028 +/- 0.004 0.029 +/- 0.003 Pass AP-1822,1823 6/10/2021 Be-7 0.23 +/- 0.12 0.22 +/- 0.12 0.22 +/- 0.08 Pass CF-1844,1845 6/14/2021 K-40 8.37 +/- 0.44 8.33 +/- 0.35 8.35 +/- 0.28 Pass AP-061521A,B 6/15/2021 Gr. Beta 0.020 +/- 0.004 0.017 +/- 0.003 0.019 +/- 0.002 Pass DW-30131,30132 6/17/2021 Ra-226 0.41 +/- 0.21 0.34 +/- 0.23 0.38 +/- 0.16 Pass DW-30131,30132 6/17/2021 Ra-228 0.42 +/- 0.85 0.52 +/- 0.74 0.47 +/- 0.56 Pass DW-30138,30139 6/17/2021 Gr. Alpha 1.59 +/- 0.84 2.21 +/- 0.95 1.90 +/- 0.63 Pass S-1929,1930 6/22/2021 K-40 19.4 +/- 1.0 19.2 +/- 1.1 19.3 +/- 0.7 Pass AP-062221A,B 6/22/2021 Gr. Beta 0.014 +/- 0.003 0.012 +/- 0.028 0.013 +/- 0.014 Pass DW-30150,30151 6/28/2021 Ra-226 0.53 +/- 0.15 0.55 +/- 0.19 0.54 +/- 0.12 Pass DW-30150,30151 6/28/2021 Ra-228 0.76 +/- 0.54 0.52 +/- 0.52 0.64 +/- 0.37 Pass AP-2160,2161 6/28/2021 Be-7 0.11 +/- 0.01 0.11 +/- 0.01 0.11 +/- 0.01 Pass DW-30150,30151 6/28/2021 Ra-226 0.53 +/- 0.15 0.55 +/- 0.19 0.54 +/- 0.12 Pass DW-30150,30151 6/28/2021 Ra-228 0.76 +/- 0.54 0.52 +/- 0.52 0.64 +/- 0.37 Pass AP-2218,2119 6/29/2021 Be-7 0.11 +/- 0.01 0.12 +/- 0.01 0.11 +/- 0.01 Pass AP-2235,2236 6/30/2021 Be-7 0.10 +/- 0.01 0.11 +/- 0.01 0.10 +/- 0.01 Pass CF-2139,2140 7/12/2021 Be-7 0.49 +/- 0.12 0.65 +/- 0.20 0.57 +/- 0.12 Pass CF-2139,2140 7/12/2021 K-40 8.25 +/- 0.41 7.94 +/- 0.46 8.10 +/- 0.31 Pass VE-2214,2215 7/12/2021 K-40 3.26 +/- 0.11 3.41 +/- 0.25 3.34 +/- 0.14 Pass DW-30169,30170 7/12/2021 Gr. Alpha 2.61 +/- 0.87 2.09 +/- 0.84 2.35 +/- 0.60 Pass DW-30169,30170 7/12/2021 Gr. Beta 2.09 +/- 0.67 2.52 +/- 0.60 2.31 +/- 0.45 Pass DW-30169,30170 7/12/2021 Ra-226 0.84 +/- 0.24 0.82 +/- 0.20 0.83 +/- 0.16 Pass DW-30169,30170 7/12/2021 Ra-228 0.80 +/- 0.54 0.84 +/- 0.50 0.82 +/- 0.37 Pass AP-71320,71321 7/13/2021 Gr. Beta 0.015 +/- 0.003 0.010 +/- 0.003 0.013 +/- 0.002 Pass XW-2424,2425 7/16/2021 H-3 193 +/- 86 104 +/- 81 149 +/- 59 Pass DW-30183,30184 7/19/2021 Ra-226 1.37 +/- 0.18 1.21 +/- 0.27 1.29 +/- 0.16 Pass DW-30183,30185 7/19/2021 Ra-228 1.51 +/- 0.69 1.52 +/- 0.68 1.52 +/- 0.48 Pass AP-71920,71921 7/19/2021 Gr. Beta 0.021 +/- 0.004 0.020 +/- 0.003 0.021 +/- 0.002 Pass S-2277,2278 7/20/2021 K-40 13.6 +/- 0.9 12.3 +/- 0.9 12.9 +/- 0.6 Pass DW-30191,30192 7/20/2021 Gr. Alpha 3.88 +/- 0.94 3.66 +/- 94.00 3.77 +/- 47.00 Pass SG-2382,2383 7/23/2021 Pb-214 1.88 +/- 0.21 1.94 +/- 0.21 1.91 +/- 0.15 Pass SG-2382,2383 7/23/2021 Ac-228 1.69 +/- 0.28 1.96 +/- 0.33 1.83 +/- 0.22 Pass DW-30207,30208 7/26/2021 Gr. Alpha 5.47 +/- 1.29 5.20 +/- 1.24 5.34 +/- 0.89 Pass DW-30207,30208 7/26/2021 Gr. Beta 5.89 +/- 0.77 6.11 +/- 0.73 6.00 +/- 0.53 Pass A-11
TABLE A-5. Intralaboratory "Duplicate" Samples Concentrationa Averaged Lab Codeb Date Analysis First Result Second Result Result Acceptance DW-30210,30211 7/28/2021 Ra-226 0.48 +/- 0.13 0.62 +/- 0.11 0.55 +/- 0.09 Pass DW-30210,30211 7/28/2021 Ra-228 0.45 +/- 0.53 0.73 +/- 0.65 0.59 +/- 0.42 Pass S-2509,2510 8/1/2021 K-40 14.2 +/- 0.5 13.7 +/- 1.0 14.0 +/- 0.6 Pass S-2509,2510 8/1/2021 Be-7 7.27 +/- 0.29 7.97 +/- 0.69 7.62 +/- 0.37 Pass DW-30221,30222 8/6/2021 Gr. Alpha 2.19 +/- 1.55 2.08 +/- 1.54 2.14 +/- 1.09 Pass DW-30221,30222 8/6/2021 Gr. Beta 1.19 +/- 1.04 2.76 +/- 1.08 1.98 +/- 0.75 Pass DW-30221,30222 8/6/2021 Ra-226 2.00 +/- 0.22 1.58 +/- 0.26 1.79 +/- 0.17 Pass DW-30221,30222 8/6/2021 Ra-228 1.69 +/- 0.56 1.75 +/- 0.54 1.72 +/- 0.39 Pass VE-2551,2552 8/11/2021 K-40 2.68 +/- 0.20 2.61 +/- 0.27 2.64 +/- 0.17 Pass VE-2551,2552 8/11/2021 Be-7 0.16 +/- 0.08 0.18 +/- 0.08 0.17 +/- 0.05 Pass AP-2578,2579 8/12/2021 Be-7 0.18 +/- 0.09 0.20 +/- 0.11 0.19 +/- 0.07 Pass AP-082421A,B 8/24/2021 Gr. Beta 0.032 +/- 0.004 0.028 +/- 0.004 0.030 +/- 0.003 Pass AP-083121A,B 8/24/2021 Gr. Beta 0.027 +/- 0.004 0.029 +/- 0.004 0.028 +/- 0.003 Pass VE-2684,2685 8/25/2021 K-40 2.15 +/- 0.26 1.92 +/- 0.27 2.03 +/- 0.19 Pass VE-2684,2685 8/25/2021 Be-7 0.20 +/- 0.10 0.26 +/- 0.11 0.23 +/- 0.07 Pass VE-2728,2729 8/25/2021 K-40 2.34 +/- 0.41 2.27 +/- 0.40 2.31 +/- 0.29 Pass DW-30238,30239 8/25/2021 Gr. Alpha 3.94 +/- 0.91 2.43 +/- 0.86 3.185 +/- 0.63 Pass DW-30238,30239 8/25/2021 Ra-226 2.57 +/- 0.24 1.83 +/- 0.24 2.20 +/- 0.17 Pass DW-30238,30239 8/25/2021 Ra-228 2.86 +/- 0.83 2.52 +/- 0.66 2.69 +/- 0.53 Pass SW-2641,2642 8/31/2021 H-3 289 +/- 92 310 +/- 93 300 +/- 65 Pass VE-2858,2859 9/2/2021 K-40 8.36 +/- 0.41 8.02 +/- 0.47 8.19 +/- 0.31 Pass SG-2934,2935 9/13/2021 Pb-214 2.72 +/- 0.22 2.54 +/- 0.27 2.63 +/- 0.17 Pass SG-2934,2935 9/13/2021 Ac-228 3.16 +/- 0.39 3.22 +/- 0.58 3.19 +/- 0.35 Pass DW-30249,30250 9/17/2021 Ra-226 0.70 +/- 0.18 1.00 +/- 0.17 0.85 +/- 0.12 Pass S-3042,3043 9/22/2021 K-40 7.55 +/- 0.80 7.57 +/- 0.81 7.56 +/- 0.57 Pass DW-30249,30250 9/17/2021 Ra-226 0.70 +/- 0.18 1.00 +/- 0.17 0.85 +/- 0.12 Pass S-3042,3043 9/22/2021 K-40 7.55 +/- 0.80 7.57 +/- 0.81 7.56 +/- 0.57 Pass DW-30256,30257 10/8/2021 Gr. Alpha 2.35 +/- 0.79 2.71 +/- 0.92 2.53 +/- 0.61 Pass S-3279,3280 10/11/2021 K-40 10.08 +/- 0.58 9.18 +/- 0.53 9.63 +/- 0.39 Pass DW-30262,30263 10/14/2021 Ra-226 1.49 +/- 0.30 1.51 +/- 0.17 1.50 +/- 0.17 Pass DW-30262,30263 10/14/2021 Ra-228 1.16 +/- 0.79 2.08 +/- 0.82 1.62 +/- 0.57 Pass AP-102521A,B 10/25/2021 Gr. Beta 0.026 +/- 0.005 0.030 +/- 0.010 0.028 +/- 0.010 Pass XWW-3707,3708 10/27/2021 H-3 206 +/- 87 268 +/- 90 237 +/- 63 Pass AP-110121A,B 11/1/2021 Gr. Beta 0.017 +/- 0.004 0.016 +/- 0.00 0.016 +/- 0.003 Pass DW-30277,30278 11/5/2021 Gr. Alpha 10.11 +/- 1.19 9.72 +/- 1.11 9.92 +/- 0.81 Pass DW-30277,30278 11/5/2021 Gr .Beta 5.53 +/- 0.72 4.22 +/- 0.69 4.88 +/- 0.50 Pass DW-30277,30278 11/5/2021 Ra-226 6.27 +/- 0.32 6.34 +/- 0.37 6.31 +/- 0.25 Pass DW-30277,30278 11/5/2021 Ra-228 3.10 +/- 0.86 3.76 +/- 0.90 3.43 +/- 0.62 Pass AP-111521A,B 11/15/2021 Gr. Beta 0.022 +/- 0.004 0.026 +/- 0.005 0.024 +/- 0.003 Pass AP-112221A,B 11/22/2021 Gr. Beta 0.023 +/- 0.004 0.025 +/- 0.005 0.024 +/- 0.003 Pass AP-112921A,B 11/29/2021 Gr. Beta 0.038 +/- 0.005 0.035 +/- 0.005 0.037 +/- 0.004 Pass A-12
TABLE A-5. Intralaboratory "Duplicate" Samples Concentrationa Averaged Lab Codeb Date Analysis First Result Second Result Result Acceptance DW-30297,8 12/15/2021 Ra-226 1.71 +/- 0.15 1.21 +/- 0.13 1.46 +/- 0.10 Pass DW-30297,8 12/15/2021 Ra-228 2.44 +/- 0.98 1.96 +/- 0.97 2.20 +/- 0.69 Pass S-4182,4183 12/19/2021 Pb-214 1.19 +/- 0.06 1.07 +/- 0.08 1.13 +/- 0.05 Pass S-4182,4183 12/19/2021 Ac-228 1.08 +/- 0.11 1.15 +/- 0.14 1.12 +/- 0.09 Pass S-4182,4183 12/19/2021 K-40 1.75 +/- 0.74 1.80 +/- 0.84 1.78 +/- 0.56 Pass AP-122721A,B 12/27/2021 Gr. Beta 0.063 +/- 0.006 0.060 +/- 0.006 0.062 +/- 0.004 Pass AP-4350,4351 12/28/2021 Be-7 0.06 +/- 0.02 0.06 +/- 0.02 0.06 +/- 0.01 Pass AP-4845,4846 12/31/2021 Be-7 0.07 +/- 0.01 0.06 +/- 0.02 0.06 +/- 0.01 Pass Note: Duplicate analyses are performed on every twentieth sample received. Results are not listed for those analyses with activities that measure below the LLD.
a Results are reported in units of pCi/L, except for air filters (pCi/Filter or pCi/m3), food products, vegetation, soil and sediment (pCi/g).
b AP (Air Particulate), AV (Aquatic Vegetation), BS (Bottom Sediment), CF (Cattle Feed), CH (Charcoal Canister),
DW (Drinking Water), E (Egg), F (Fish), G (Grass), LW (Lake Water), MI (Milk), P (Precipitation), PM (Powdered Milk),
S (Solid), SG (Sludge), SO (Soil), SS (Shoreline Sediment), SW (Surface Water), SWT (Surface Water Treated),
SWU (Surface Water Untreated), VE (Vegetation), W (Water), WW (Well Water).
A-13
TABLE A-6. Department of Energy's Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP).
Concentrationa Reference Known Control b
Lab Code Date Analysis Laboratory result Activity Limits c Acceptance MAAP-594 2/1/2021 Gross Alpha 1.30 +/- 0.08 1.77 0.53 - 3.01 Pass MAAP-594 2/1/2021 Gross Beta 0.81 +/- 0.04 0.649 0.325 - 0.974 Pass MADW-571 2/1/2021 Gross Alpha 0.73 +/- 0.06 0.87 0.26 - 1.48 Pass MADW-572 2/1/2021 Gross Beta 2.38 +/- 0.06 2.50 1.25 - 3.75 Pass MASO-591 2/1/2021 Cs-134 -2.57 +/- 2.21 0 NA c Pass MASO-591 2/1/2021 Cs-137 1700 +/- 20 1550 1085 - 2015 Pass MASO-591 2/1/2021 Co-57 977 +/-7 920 644 - 1196 Pass MASO-591 2/1/2021 Co-60 1360 +/- 10 1370 959 - 1781 Pass MASO-591 2/1/2021 Mn-54 0.91 +/- 2.85 0 NA c Pass MASO-591 2/1/2021 Zn-65 687 - 17 604 423 - 785 Pass MASO-591 2/1/2021 K-40 682 +/- 53 618 433 - 803 Pass MAW-569 2/1/2021 Cs-134 10.5 +/- 0.3 11.5 8.1 - 15.0 Pass MAW-569 2/1/2021 Cs-137 8.53 +/- 0.32 7.9 5.5 - 10.3 Pass MAW-569 2/1/2021 Co-57 12.2 +/- 0.3 11.4 8.0 - 14.8 Pass MAW-569 2/1/2021 Co-60 0.03 +/- 0.05 0 NA c Pass MAW-569 2/1/2021 Mn-54 16.5 +/- 0.4 15.5 10.9 - 20.2 Pass MAW-569 2/1/2021 Zn-65 11.5 +/- 0.5 10.5 7.40 - 13.7 Pass MAW-569 2/1/2021 K-40 9.93 +/- 1.42 0 NA c Fail d MAAP-592 2/1/2021 Cs-134 1.54 +/- 0.06 2.14 1.50 - 2.78 Pass MAAP-592 2/1/2021 Cs-137 -0.011 +/- 0.020 0 NA c Pass MAAP-592 2/1/2021 Co-57 0.636 +/- 0.042 0.69 0.480 - 0.892 Pass MAAP-592 2/1/2021 Co-60 -0.64 +/- 0.02 0 NA c Fail e MAAP-592 2/1/2021 Mn-54 0.312 +/- 0.058 0.312 0.218 - 0.406 Pass MAAP-592 2/1/2021 Zn-65 0.41 +/- 0.07 0.352 0.246 - 0.458 Pass MAVE-588 2/1/2021 Cs-134 3.73 +/- 0.09 3.60 2.50 - 4.70 Pass MAVE-588 2/1/2021 Cs-137 5.69 +/- 0.10 4.69 3.28 - 6.10 Pass MAVE-588 2/1/2021 Co-57 6.23 +/- 0.07 5.05 3.54 - 6.57 Pass MAVE-588 2/1/2021 Co-60 3.29 +/- 0.06 2.99 2.09 - 3.89 Pass MAVE-588 2/1/2021 Mn-54 6.17 +/- 0.16 5.25 3.68 - 6.83 Pass MAVE-588 2/1/2021 Zn-65 -0.04 +/- 0.08 0 NA c Pass MAAP-3007 8/1/2021 Gross Alpha 0.45 +/- 0.04 0.960 0.288 - 1.632 Pass MAAP-3007 8/1/2021 Gross Beta 0.71 +/- 0.04 0.553 0.277 - 0.830 Pass MADW-2688 8/1/2021 Gross Alpha 0.19 +/- 0.03 0.232 0.070 - 0.394 Pass MADW-2688 8/1/2021 Gross Beta 2.60 +/- 0.06 2.807 1.404 - 4.211 Pass A-14
TABLE A-6. Department of Energy's Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP).
Concentrationa Reference Known Control b
Lab Code Date Analysis Laboratory result Activity Limits c Acceptance MASO-3004 8/1/2021 Cs-134 1035 +/- 10 1170 819 - 1521 Pass MASO-3004 8/1/2021 Cs-137 628 +/- 11 572 400 - 744 Pass MASO-3004 8/1/2021 Co-57 -0.11 +/- 1.26 0 NA c Pass MASO-3004 8/1/2021 Co-60 720 +/- 7 722 714 - 1326 Pass MASO-3004 8/1/2021 Mn-54 456 +/- 11 410 287 - 533 Pass MASO-3004 8/1/2021 Zn-65 1002 +/- 22 907 635 - 1179 Pass MASO-3004 8/1/2021 K-40 663 +/- 50 607 425 - 789 Pass MADW-3003 8/1/2021 Ra-226 0.32 +/- 0.06 0.226 0.158 - 0.294 Failf MADW-3003 8/1/2021 Sr-90 3.63 +/- 0.16 3.9 2.70 - 5.02 Pass MADW-3003 8/1/2021 U-234 0.02 +/- 0.01 0.02 NA g Pass MADW-3003 8/1/2021 U-238 0.02 +/- 0.01 0.01 NA g Pass a
Results are reported in units of Bq/kg (soil), Bq/L (water) or Bq/total sample (filters, vegetation).
b Laboratory codes as follows: MAW (water), MADW (water), MAAP (air filter), MASO (soil) and MAVE (vegetation).
c MAPEP results are presented as the known values and expected laboratory precision (1 sigma, 1 determination) and control limits as defined by the MAPEP. A known value of "zero" indicates an analysis was included in the testing series as a "false positive". MAPEP does not provide control limits.
d The sample spectrum was reanalyzed utilizing the minimum data point background width method. The result was 1.59 +/- 1.77 Bq/L which satisfies MAPEP criteria for a false positive test.
e A decimal was misplaced in one of two cobalt-60 results while calculating a mean result causing MAPEP to fail the result as a statistically significant negative value at 3 standard deviations. The correct mean result (-0.0004 +/- 0.0186) is not a statistically significant negative value and would not have failed.
f Radium result did not meet MAPEP acceptance criteria.
g Provided in the series for "sensitivity evaluation". MAPEP does not provide control limits.
A-15
TABLE A-7. Interlaboratory Comparison Crosscheck Program, Environmental Resource Associates (ERA) a.
MRAD-30 Study Concentration a b
Lab Code Date Analysis Laboratory ERA Control Result Value c Limits d Acceptance ERAP-722 3/22/2021 Cs-134 898 1030 668 - 1260 Pass ERAP-722 3/22/2021 Cs-137 181 163 134 - 214 Pass ERAP-722 3/22/2021 Co-60 1270 1220 1040 - 1550 Pass ERAP-722 3/22/2021 Mn-54 < 4.3 < 50.0 0.00 - 50.0 Pass ERAP-722 3/22/2021 Zn-65 908 771 632 - 1180 Pass ERAP-722 3/22/2021 Sr-90 184 189 120 - 257 Pass ERAP-724 3/22/2021 Gross Alpha 88.4 96.1 50.2 - 158 Pass ERAP-724 3/22/2021 Gross Beta 74.1 62.6 38.0 - 94.6 Pass a
Results obtained by Environmental, Inc., Midwest Laboratory (EIML) as a participant in the crosscheck program for proficiency testing administered by Environmental Resource Associates, serving as a replacement for studies conducted previously by the Environmental Measurements Laboratory Quality Assessment Program (EML).
b Laboratory code ERAP (air filter). Results are reported in units of (pCi/Filter).
c The ERA Assigned values for the air filter standards are equal to 100% of the parameter present in the standard as determined by the gravimetric and/or volumetric measurements made during standard preparation as applicable.
d The acceptance limits are established per the guidelines contained in the Department of Energy (DOE) report EML-564, Analysis of Environmental Measurements Laboratory (EML) Quality Assessment Program (QAP)
Data Determination of Operational Criteria and Control Limits for Performance Evaluation Purposes or ERA's SOP for the generation of Performance Acceptance Limits.
A-16
~L. ATI Environmental, Inc.
,.~r\l Midwest Laboratory 700 Landwehr Road
- Northbrook. IL 60062-2310 phone (847) 564-0700
- fax (847) 564-4517 Appendix B Data Reporting Conventions
APPENDIX B. DATA REPORTING CONVENTIONS Data Reporting Conventions 1.0. All activities, except gross alpha and gross beta, are decay corrected to collection time or the end of the collection period.
2.0. Single Measurements Each single measurement is reported as follows: x+/-s where: x = value of the measurement; s = 2 counting uncertainty (corresponding to the 95% confidence level).
In cases where the activity is less than the lower limit of detection L, it is reported as: < L, where L = the lower limit of detection based on 4.66 uncertainty for a background sample.
3.0. Duplicate analyses If duplicate analyses are reported, the convention is as follows. :
3.1 Individual results: For two analysis results; x1 +/- s1 and x2 +/- s2 Reported result: x +/- s; where x = (1/2) (x1 + x2) and s = (1/2) s12 s 22 3.2. Individual results: < L1 , < L2 Reported result: < L, where L = lower of L1 and L2 3.3. Individual results: x +/- s, < L Reported result: x +/- s if x L; < L otherwise.
4.0. Computation of Averages and Standard Deviations 4.1 Averages and standard deviations listed in the tables are computed from all of the individual measurements over the period averaged; for example, an annual standard deviation would not be the average of quarterly standard deviations. The average x and standard deviation s of a set of n numbers x1, x2 . . . xn are defined as follows:
1 (x- x )2 x =n x s= n-1 4.2 Values below the highest lower limit of detection are not included in the average.
4.3 If all values in the averaging group are less than the highest LLD, the highest LLD is reported.
4.4 If all but one of the values are less than the highest LLD, the single value x and associated two sigma error is reported.
4.5 In rounding off, the following rules are followed:
4.5.1. If the number following those to be retained is less than 5, the number is dropped, and the retained numbers are kept unchanged. As an example, 11.443 is rounded off to 11.44.
4.5.2. If the number following those to be retained is equal to or greater than 5, the number is dropped and the last retained number is raised by 1. As an example, 11.445 is rounded off to 11.45.
B-1
~L. ATI Environmental, Inc.
,.~r\l Midwest Laboratory 700 Landwehr Road
- Northbrook. IL 60062-2310 phone (847) 564-0700
- fax (847) 564-4517 Appendix C Maximum permissible concentrations of radioactivity in air and water above natural background in unrestricted areas
APPENDIX C Table C-1. Maximum permissible concentrations of radioactivity in air and water above natural a
background in unrestricted areas .
3 Air (pCi/m ) Water (pCi/L)
-3 Gross alpha 1 x 10 Strontium-89 8,000 Gross beta 1 Strontium-90 500 b -1 Iodine-131 2.8 x 10 Cesium-137 1,000 Barium-140 8,000 Iodine-131 1,000 c
Potassium-40 4,000 Gross alpha 2 Gross beta 10 6
Tritium 1 x 10 a
Taken from Table 2 of Appendix B to Code of Federal Regulations Title 10, Part 20, and appropriate footnotes.
Concentrations may be averaged over a period not greater than one year.
b Value adjusted by a factor of 700 to reduce the dose resulting from the air-grass-cow-milk-child pathway.
c A natural radionuclide.
C-1
APPENDIX D Sample Collection and Analysis Program
TLO L.OCA H ONS ONE MILE RADIUS MONITORING LEGEND:
0 PRAIRIE ISLAND T, Lo*. POINTS D-2
TLO LOCATIONS CONTROL POINTS PRESCOTT, WISCONSIN r-134~
~
!n
' ..----7
___...,,-/ t. . RECEIVING
""=
t
.j : WAREHOUSED i
~ \ J
.,, /,
D DD
_,.,. /, , ,., ,.,, ,. . 0 i
041 Io ISF SI AREA TLO LOCATIONS MONITORING LEGEND:
0 PRAIRIE ISL AND TLD POINTS D-3
TLD LOCATIONS FIVE MILE RAOl US
!r--*7~
t..*~:
\ I I {
r \ ,,1?
' ~ .. ;ir-~
i +
\
. J J
- ~~~ *~. * t:*----4--'
Ct l'>
l / :028-___
~ *i .,..-,--, , *,, .~*---.__
r-~ . ~:.;,------ \\ $~JB r, /
\ ' 1 ~, ~-
"~' r "s-1~
~
"... _J_ * , 01~~(~./:
____slJ IF~ ~ r*+, ,.,
\\'<1:1\
\
~
I '
'-J 'I-
- !< --=+i_
'\ ~
/ ( 1 Jtt *~':,*
- I ' L f :f'.
... ~""'~ =,""="'~
r\ ~
.~ ._~.
- J-i;-~-.;q
( l....r .:1.
L~s-~R
.. . j //
,~.. ____, - *cc-
\
\
\\
- rREL'O'
- ~~ I
' '..}.~ - -
- n
-~~ .* ' . -----,..._,.,,,v1=1 ~.: ' __
-~*~ I ,"7'---"it,--.., x--.::,.__,_..,,,., ~-: ~"~\~:~
- 1-'+K ~~-1 ,- *----1,.,,.r~ .) ._*r7RiJ lf- : :.w t "I , 138 I i
. ,t i jl :1r~'...
_j - * ,...:
.f J \
...- ,I-J, ' \ * ;,,. fjl
%-\rt'
I \
t
~ -t,,'.;'
J ' *
' \
\
V,--- -
\
MONITORIN G LEGEND:
0 PRAIRIE ISL:ANO TLO Pb!NTS D-4
ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLING POINTS ONE MILE RADIUS PLANT AREA ENLARGED PLAN [1.00 MI L E RADIUS)
(NO SCAL E]
MONITORING LEGEND FISH SAMPLING POINT IO NUMBERS AIR SAMPLING POINT 10 NUMBERS P* \3, P- 19 P- 1, P-2, P*3, P*-4, P*G, P- 7 INVERTEBRATES POINT JO, NUMBERS WATER SAMPLING PO!NT IO NUMBERS P-6, P*40 P*5, P-6. P*8, P*'l, P*\l. P-24, P-43 S£01MENT SAMPLING POJNT IO NUMBERS VEGETATION I VEOE1ABLES ID NUMBERS P-28 . P- 38. P- 45 P*S, P*l2, P- 20 D-5
ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLING POINTS FIVE MILE RADIUS MONITORING LEGEND AIR SAMPUNG POJNT JD NUMBERS P-l. P-2. P-3, P-4. P-6, P-7 r8l FISH SAMPLING POINT ID NUMBERS P*l3. P*l'l 0 W,TER 5A'l'1PUNG POINT lO NUMBERS P-5, P-S. P-8, P-'l. P-ll. P-24 , P-43
!NVERTEBRMES POINT lD NUMBERS P-6. P -40 VEGE TATION / VEGET ABLES ID NUMBERS SEDIMENT SAMPLING POlNT JO NU~BERS P- 2 8, P* 38, P-45 P-6, P- 12, P-20 D-6
ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLING POINTS r,(*38 '\
( . , - - - - ~- ~ "'- rhM -t-0 P-43, Peterson Farm, W10322 St Rd 29, River Falls, WI 0 P-38, Caln Residence, N7395 950th SI, River Falls, WI CONTROL POINTS PRESCOTT, WISCONSIN MONITORING LEGEND AIR SAMPLING POINT 10 NUMBERS P-1, P-2, P-3, P-4, P-6, P-7 WATER SAMPLING POINT 10 NUMBERS P-6, P-6, P-8, P-9, P-11, P-43 VEGETATION I VEGETABLES 10 NUMBERS P-28, P-38, P-46 D-7
APPENDIX E Special Well and Surface Water Samples E-1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This appendix to the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Annual Report to the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission summarizes and interprets results of the special well and surface water samples taken at the Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Red Wing, Minnesota, during the period January - December, 2021. This supplemental special sampling program was established in December of 1989 when higher than expected levels of tritium were detected in a nearby residence well sample.
Tabulations of the special sampling program individual analyses made during the year are included in this appendix. A summary table of tritium analyses is also included in this appendix.
2.0
SUMMARY
This special sampling program was established following the detection of tritium in a residence well water sample south of the PINGP during 1989. This program is described and the results for 2021 are summarized and discussed.
Program findings for 2021 detected low levels of tritium in nearby residence wells, ground water, surface samples, and storage tanks at or near the expected natural background levels with the exception of ground water sample well MW-8, parking lot runoff, D5/D6 tank vaults, and the septic system. The 2021 sample results (except for MW-8, parking lot runoff, D5/D6 tank vaults, and the septic system) ranged from <19 pCi/L to 183 pCi/L. Sample well MW-8 ranged from 127 pCi/L to 675 pCi/L. Parking lot runoff ranged from 51 to 390 pCi/L. D5 tank vault was 1314 pCi/L. D6 tank vault was 1537 pCi/L. The septic system ranged from 24 to 927 pCi/L. All tritium results are far below the Environmental Protection Agencys drinking water standard of 20,000 pCi/L and present no harm to any members of the public.
None of the water samples monitored for gamma-emitting isotopes showed any activity greater than the LLD.
E-2
3.0 Special Tritium Sampling Program 3.1 Program Design and Data Interpretation The purpose of this sampling program is to assess the impact of any tritium leaching into the environment (ground water system) from the PINGP. For this purpose, special water samples are collected and analyzed for tritium content.
3.2 Program Description The sampling and analysis schedule for the special water sampling program is summarized in Table E-4.1 and briefly reviewed below. Table E-4.2 defines the additional sample locations and codes for the special water sampling program.
Special well, tank, and surface water samples were collected quarterly (spring, summer, fall) at seven locations, quarterly at one location, monthly at six locations, semi-annually at six locations, and annually at thirty-eight locations. The Peterson (P-43) and Hanson (SW-1) farm wells are used as control locations for these special samples.
To detect low levels of tritium at or below natural background levels, analyses of the samples have been contracted to a laboratory (University of Waterloo Laboratories) capable of detecting tritium concentrations down to 19 pCi/L. Waterloo Laboratories report tritium analyses results in Tritium Units (1 TU = 3.2 pCi/L). The tritium results in this report are indicated in pCi/L.
3.3 Program Execution The special water sampling was executed as described in the preceding section.
3.4 Program Modifications Changes to the program in 2021 include:
Samples taken from monitoring wells P-10 and MW-8 were sent to Environmental Incorporated for hard-to-detect nuclide analysis in accordance with American Nuclear Insurers recommendation samples were taken from the D5/D6 Fuel Oil Storage Tank vaults because these areas were accessible in 2021 an extra sample of well MW-5 was taken in May an extra sample of well PZ-7 was taken in November well SW-6 was not available for sampling E-3
3.5 Results and Discussion Results show tritium in well water and ground water samples at or near expected natural background levels except the MW-8 ground water sample well. Table E-4.4 provides the complete data table of results for each period and sampling location.
The tritium level annual averages have shown a downward trend since the special sampling began in 1989.
Except for sample well MW-8, parking lot runoff, D5/D6 tank vaults, and the septic system, the 2021 sample results are within the range of expected background tritium levels in shallow ground water and surface water due to tritium concentrations measured in precipitation. Sampling points in North America have shown tritium concentrations in precipitation ranging from 5 pCi/L to 157 pCi/L (Environmental Isotope Data No. 10; World Survey of Isotope Concentration in Precipitation (1988-1991)).
The higher-level results at the Suter residence and Birch Lake in 1989 were possibly due to seepage from the PINGP discharge canal water into the ground water. This is thought to occur due to the elevation difference between the Vermillion River and the discharge canal. The Suter residence is located between the discharge canal and Birch Lake, which connects to the Vermillion River. The PINGP discharge canal piping was lengthened during 1991, so that liquid discharges from the plant are released near the end of the discharge canal, diffused and discharged to the Mississippi River. In 1992, the underground liquid discharge pipe from the plant to the discharge canal piping was replaced with a double walled leak detectable piping system. This years sample results continue to indicate that these modifications have eliminated the suspected radioactive effluent flow into the local ground water.
The elevated tritium levels in sample well MW-8 in 2021 may be due to prior leakage from the PINGP liquid radwaste discharge pipe, discharge of turbine building sump water into the landlocked area, or discharge of heating steam condensate from the main warehouse in 1978/1979. The liquid radwaste discharge pipe was replaced in 1992 and the discharge to the landlocked area has been terminated, the last discharge took place on 11/14/09. The main warehouse heating system was repaired in 1979. The heating steam system has not been used in the outer plant buildings since the 2011 - 2012 heating season. On 8/24/21, blank flanges were installed in the heating system piping to isolate steam and steam condensate from buildings located outside the Auxiliary Building, Turbine Building, and Radwaste Building.
The elevated tritium levels in the parking lot runoff and D5/D6 tank vaults are most likely due to tritium recaptured from effluent releases by precipitation. The levels found in the septic system have returned to background levels.
None of the water samples monitored for gamma-emitting isotopes showed any activity greater than the LLD.
E-4
Table E-4.1. Sample collection and analysis program for special well, storage tank, and surface water samples, Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, 2021.
Medium No. Location codes Collection type Analysis a b c and type and frequency type P-8 post-treat, P-8 pre-treat, REMP P-6, REMP P-11, PIIC-22, PIIC-26, PIIC-28, PIIC-29, P-7, P-9, Well water 25 P-11, PZ-1, PZ-2, PZ-4, PZ-5, PZ-7, G/A H-3 Annual MW-6, P-26, P-30, SW-3, SW-4, SW-5, SW-7, SW-8, SW-9 Well water 1 P-24D G/Q H-3 quarterly Well water P-2, P-3, P-5, P-6, 7 G/Q H-3 quarterly PZ-8, MW-4, MW-5 P-43(C), SW-1(C),
Well water monthly 5 G/M H-3 MW-7, MW-8, P-10 S-1, S-2, S-3, S-4, S-5, Surface water d H-3 8 S-6, S-7, P-31 G/A 11 CST, 21 CST, 22 CST, Storage Tank 5 G/S H-3 U1/2 Demin Hdr Storage Tank 2 D5 and D6 tank vaults G/A H-3 Storage Tank 1 Septic System G/M H-3 Snow 5 S-6, S-7, S-8, S-9, P-43(C) G/A H-3 a
Location codes are defined in table D-4.2. Control Stations are indicated by (C). All other stations are indicators.
b Collection type is codes as follows: G/ = grab. Collection frequency is coded as follows: M = monthly; Q = quarterly; Q = quarterly (spring, summer, and fall); S= semiannually; A = annually.
c Analysis type is coded as follows: H-3 = tritium.
d Location S-6 and S-7 are sampled semi-annually, P-31 is sampled three times a year E-5
Table E-4.2. Sampling locations for special well, storage tank, and surface water samples, Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, 2021.
Code Collection site Type of Distance and a
sample direction from reactor P-8 PI Community well post treat DW 1.0 mi. @ 321°/WNW P-8 PI Community well pre treat DW 1.0 mi. @ 321°/WNW REMP P-6 Lock & Dam #3 well DW 1.6 mi. @ 129°/SE REMP P-11 Red Wing Service Center DW 3.3 mi @ 158°/SSE PIIC-22 1773 Buffalo Slough Rd DW 1 mi. @ 315°/NW PIIC-26 1771 Buffalo Slough Rd DW 1 mi. @ 315°/NW PIIC-29 Buffalo Project DW 4.3 mi @ 302°/WNW P-24D Suter residence DW 0.6 mi. @ 158°/SSE P-43 Peterson Farm (Control) DW 13.9 mi. @ 355°/N SW-1 Hanson Farm (Control) DW 2.2 mi. @ 315°/NW P-2 Sample well WW See map P-3 Sample well WW See map P-5 Sample well WW See map P-6 Sample well WW See map P-7 Sample well WW See map P-10 Sample well WW See map P-11 Sample well WW See map PZ-1 Sample well WW See map PZ-2 Sample well WW See map PZ-4 Sample well WW See map PZ-5 Sample well WW See map PZ-7 Sample well WW See map PZ-8 Sample well WW See map MW-4 Sample well WW See map MW-5 Sample well WW See map MW-6 Sample well WW See map MW-7 Sample well WW See map MW-8 Sample well WW See map P-26 PITC well DW 0.4 mi. @ 258°/WSW P-30 Environ lab well DW 0.2 mi. @ 32°/NNE E-6
Table E-4.2. Sampling locations for special well, storage tank, and surface water samples, Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, 2021 (continued).
Code Collection site Type of Distance and a
sample direction from reactor SW-3 Cooling Tower pump WW See map SW-4 New Admin Bldg DW 0.05 mi. @ 315/NW SW-5 Plant Screenhouse well WW 0.05 mi. @ 0/N SW-6 SGR Building DW 0.2 mi @ 310/NW SW-7 Distribution Center DW 0.35 mi @ 271/W SW-8 Site Admin Building well WW 0.2 mi @ 310/NW SW-9 FLEX Building WW 0.2 mi @ 238°/WSW P-9 Plant well # 2 DW 0.3 mi. @ 306°/NW S-1 Upstream Miss. River SW See map S-2 Recirc/Intake canal SW See map S-3 Cooling water canal SW See map S-4 Discharge Canal (end) SW See map S-5 Mid Discharge Canal SW See map S-6 Roof Stormwater Runoff (also snow) SW 0.05 mi. @ 0/N S-7 Parking Lot Stormwater (also snow) SW 0.3 mi @ 306/NW S-8 P-10 area snow SW See map S-9 MW-7/8 area snow SW See map P-31 Birch Lake Seepage SW 0.69 mi. @ 172°/S 11 CST Storage Tank ST Turbine Building 21 CST Storage Tank ST Turbine Building 22 CST Storage Tank ST Turbine Building Unit 1/2 demin hdr Storage Tank ST Turbine Building Septic System Storage Tank ST Outside #1 Warehouse D5 Vault Concrete Vault ST Outside Turbine Bldg D6 Vault Concrete Vault ST Outside Turbine Bldg a
Sample codes: DW = Drinking Water: WW = Well Water; SW = Surface Water: ST = Storage Tank.
Table E-4.3 Radiation Environmental Monitoring Program Summary: Special well, storage tank, and surface water samples.
E-7
Table E-4.3 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary: Special well, storage tank, and surface water samples Name of Facility Prairie Island Nuclear Power Station Docket No. 50-282, 50-306 Location of Facility Goodhue, Minnesota Reporting Period January - December, 2021 (County, State)
Indicator Location with Highest Control Locations Annual Mean Locations Sample Type and Mean (F) c Location d Mean (F) c Mean (F) c Number Type Number of LLD b Range c Range c Range c Non-(Units) Analyses a Routine Results e Offsite Well H-3 13 19 29 (5/13) P-24D 32 (3/5) (See Control 0
Water (21-40) (26-40) Below)
(pCi/L)
Onsite H-3 76 19 138 (58/76) MW-8 400 (12/12) (See Control 7
Well Water (19-675) (127-675) Below)
(pCi/L)
Onsite H-3 16 19 92 (11/16) S-7 220 (2/3) (See Control Surface Water (20-390) (51-390) Below) 0 (pCi/L)
Onsite D-6 Fuel Oil H-3 24 19 257 (19/24) 1537 (1/1) (See Control Storage Tank Storage Tank (22-1537) (1537) Below) 3 (pCi/L) Vault Control (offsite H-3 24 19 none P-43 42 (4/12) 35 (6/24) well water) 0 (22-60) (20-60)
Control (offsite 64 (1/1) 64 (1/1)
H-3 1 19 none P-43 snow) (64) (64) 0 a
LLD = Nominal lower limit of detection based on 4.66 sigma error for background sample. Value shown is lowest for the period.
c Mean and range are based on detectable measurements only. Fraction of detectable measurements at specified locations is indicated in parentheses (F).
d Locations are specified by code.
e Non-routine results are those which exceed ten times the control station mean value.
E-8
Table E-4.4 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program , Complete Data Table, 2021.
SAMPLE DATES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 CODE SAMPLE LOCATIONS pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L OFFSITE WELLS
<19 P-8 Post-treat PI Comm. Well
<19 P-8 Pre-treat PI Comm. Well
<19 REMP P-6 Lock & Dam #3 well Red Wing Service <19 REMP P-11 Center
<19 PIIC-22 1773 Buffalo Slough Rd 21 PIIC-26 1771 Buffalo Slough Rd
<19 PIIC-28 1960 Larson Lane 28 PIIC-29 Buffalo Project 29 40 <19 <19 26 P-24D Suter residence 60/ 64*
28 57 <19 22 <19 <19 <19 <19 <19 <19 <19 P-43 Peterson Farm (Control *snow 24 20 <19 <19 <19 <19 <19 <19 <19 <19 <19 <19 SW-1 Hanson Farm (Control)
E-9
Table E-4.4 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program , Complete Data Table, 2021 (continued).
SAMPLE DATES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 CODE SAMPLE LOCATIONS pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L ONSITE WELLS P-2 Sample well 99 110 90 P-3 Sample well <19 59 <19 P-5 Sample well 50 71 81 P-6 Sample well 21 31 <19 P-7 Sample well 63 P-10 Sample well 132 67 160 142 81 77 95 50 28 79 54 50 P-11 Sample well 44 PZ-1 Sample well 39 PZ-2 Sample well <19 PZ-4 Sample well 34 PZ-5 Sample well 62 PZ-7 Sample well <19 <19 PZ-8 Sample well 56 61 27 MW-4 Sample well <19 22 <19 MW-5 Sample well 21 <19 19 44 MW-6 Sample well <19 MW-7 Sample well 110 84 29 <19 134 102 90 98 106 103 88 59 MW-8 Sample well 618 431 232 127 675 562 355 160 335 530 539 242 P-26 PITC well 23 P-30 Env. lab well <19 SW-3 CT pump <19 P-9 Plant well # 2 <19 SW-4 New Admin <19 SW-5 Plnt Scrnhs 35 SW-7 Dist Center <19 E-10
Table E-4.4 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program , Complete Data Table, 2021 (continued).
SAMPLE DATES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 CODE SAMPLE LOCATIONS pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L ONSITE WELLS SW-8 Site Admin Bldg <19 SW-9 FLEX Bldg <19 E-11
Table E-4.4 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program , Complete Data Table, 2021 (continued).
SAMPLE DATES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 CODE SAMPLE LOCATIONS pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L ONSITE SURFACE WATER
<19 S-1 Mississippi River upstream S-2 Recirculation/Intake canal 25 S-3 Cooling water canal <19 S-4 Discharge Canal (end) <19 S-5 Discharge Canal (midway) 29 S-6 Stormwater runoff 73* 45 67 S-7 Parking Lot runoff 51* <19 390 S-8 P-10 area snow 108*
S-9 MW-7/8 area snow 183*
P-31 Birch Lake Seepage <19 20 28
- snow samples E-12
Table E-4.4 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program , Complete Data Table, 2021 (continued).
SAMPLE DATES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 CODE SAMPLE LOCATIONS pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L ONSITE STORAGE TANKS 11 CST Storage tank 59 29 21 CST Storage tank <19 35 22 CST Storage tank <19 <19 U1/U2 Demin Storage tank <19/ 78 <19/ 22 Header Septic Storage tank 36 109 76 34 138 75 140 78 34 927 132 24 System D5 D5 Fuel Oil Storage Tank Vault 1314 D6 D6 Fuel Oil Storage Tank Vault 1537 E-13
Table E-4.5. Supplementary Data Tables, results of the analyses for Fe-55, Ni-63, Sr-90, Pu-238, Pu-239/240, Am-241, Cm-242 and Cm-243/244 on two samples.
Location P-10 MW-8 Collection Date 04-14-21 04-14-21 Lab Code PXW-1196 PXW-1197 Isotope Concentration (µCi/mL)
Fe-55 < 6.1 E-07 < 5.9 E-07 Ni-63 < 7.0 E-08 < 7.0 E-08 Sr-90 < 4.4 E-10 < 4.5 E-10 Pu-238 < 3.0 E-10 < 3.2 E-10 Pu-239/240 < 3.0 E-10 < 3.2 E-10 Am-241 < 3.0 E-10 < 1.7 E-10 Cm-242 < 1.3 E-10 < 2.1 E-10 Cm-243/244 < 1.3 E-10 < 1.2 E-10 Less than (<), value is based on a 4.66 sigma counting error for the background sample. Analytical results relate only to the samples submitted to the Laboratory for testing, in the condition received by the laboratory.
E-14
(.)
a..
PZ-8
- -----MW-8
- - - - - -MW-7
.... MW-5 Monday, December 17, 2007
\\fnpcsgo01 \home\clnkc02\data\word\project_filoa\p~we)evlwortdng-pl-litcmap2dwg Groundwater Monitoring Well Locations E-15