ML20244D129

Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-317/88-25 & 50-318/88-25.Corrective Actions:Responses to 1986-1988 Insp Repts Reviewed to Verify Implementation & Formal Documentation of Continuous NRC Commitments

ML20244D129
Person / Time
Site:	Calvert Cliffs
Issue date:	02/10/1989
From:	Creel G BALTIMORE GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
Shared Package
ML20244D128	List: IR 05000317/1988025 ML20244D129
References
NUDOCS 8904210167
Download: ML20244D129 (2)

Text

_ _ _ _ _ - ,

I:

i f .,

\

BALTIMORE

. GADAND ELECTRIC CHARLES CENTER . P.O. BOX 1475 BALTIMORE. MARYLAND 21203 i

February 10, 1989 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission W shington, DC 20555 ATTENTION: Document Control Desk

SUBJECT:

Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Unit Nos. I & 2; Docket Nos. 50-317 & 50-318 Reolv to NRC Insoeetion Reoort Nos. 50-317/88-25: 50-318/88-25

REFERENCE:

(a) Letter from Mr. J. A. Tiernan (BG&E) to Mr. S. D. Ebneter (NRC),

dated October 14, 1986, Inspection Report 50-317/86-15; 50-318/86-15 Gentlemen:

~

The subject inspection report identified a deviation from a commitment provided in Reference (a). The circumstances which led to this deviation and our actions taken to prevent recurrence are provided in Enclosure (1).

Should you have any further questions regarding this matter, we will be pleased. to

. discuss them with you.

Very truly yours

//

N rge C. Cree sh Vice President - Nuc ar Energy .

GCC/JMO/dtm Enclosure cc: D. A. Brune, Esquire J. E. Silberg, Esquire R. A.Capra, NRC S. A.McNeil, NRC W. T. Russell, NRC V. L. Pritchett, NRC T. Magette, DNR 8904210167 890404 PDR ADOCK 05000337 G PNU

, . ENCLOSURE (1)

REPLY TO NRC INSPECTION REPORT

• i .- 50-317/88-25; 50-318/88-25 NRC Concern A previous NRC Inspectiun Report (50-318/86-15; 50-318/86-15) identified two devices with overdue . calibration dates which were used for surveillance testing. Our response to the inspection report, Reference (a), describes numerous corrective actions. Two of these are to assign an individual whose primary duty is Test Equipment Cage Attendant, and to lock the cage area when the attendant is not stationed. Contrary to these actions, the cage area was noted to be mniocked 2nd unattended during the subject inspection.

BG&E Response We have Teviewed the circumstances which led to' this deviation from our commitment. "

The controls described in our response to inspection Report 86-15 were implemented in .

1986. However, the . duties and responsibilities of the Test Equipment Cage Attendant were mot formally documented in administrative guidance. When we became aware of this deviation, these duties and responsibilities were immediately incorporated in draft guidance and implemented on the day of the inspection exit meeting (November 9,1988).

The formal guidance was approved on December 14, 1988, and is located in the Electrical and Control Section Guideline Number 30 Test Equipment Cage Rules of Operation. This guidance lists the Attendants' primary and collateral dutics, test equipment issue policies, access to the Test ' Equipment Csge and test equipment user responsibilities. .

j in addition to the ibove corrective actions, we will review the responses to 1986 through 1988 inspection reports to verify -implementation and formal documentation of continuous NRC commitments. Based on the results of this review, we will take additional action as necessary.

i e

+ _ ,

- __ _ . _ _ . . _ _ _ m._ ____-.-__,..__._________.-_.m_ _ _ . . - - _ - . _