ML20151J406

Informs That Maintenance Rule Baseline Insp at Farley Facility Scheduled for 970908-12.Insp Objective Will Be to Evaluate Effectiveness of Implementation of Requirements of 10CFR50.65.Description of Info Needed Outlined in Encl

ML20151J406
Person / Time
Site:	Farley
Issue date:	07/29/1997
From:	Holland W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:	Dennis Morey SOUTHERN NUCLEAR OPERATING CO.
References
50-348-97-09, 50-348-97-9, 50-364-97-09, 50-364-97-9, NUDOCS 9708050147
Download: ML20151J406 (6)

Text

.- _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _

, s

• July 29, 1997 Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.

ATTN: Mr. D. N. Morey Vice President P. O. Box 1295 Birmingham, AL 35201

SUBJECT:

MAINTENANCE RULE BASELINE TEAM INSPECTION NRC INSPECTION REPORT NO. 50-348,364/97-09

Dear Mr. Morey:

The purpose of this letter is to announce our Maintenance Rule Baseline inspection at your Farley facility. We have scheduled this inspection for September 8 - 12,1997. The designated b

inspection team leader, Billy Crowley, will make arrangements with your staff to telephonically discuss the inspection plans in more detail.

The inspection objective will be to evaluate the effectiveness of your implementation of the requirements of 10 CFR 50.65. The inspection will be conducted using Inspection Procedure 62706, " MAINTENANCE RULE," and will involve a team of at least four inspectors and two support staff members.

The team will require information about your program and its implementation for their in-office preparation for the inspection. A description of the information that is needed is outlined in the enclosure. This information will be needed by August 22,1997, in order to support the inspection effort.

Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions regarding this inspection, please contact Mr. Crowley at (404) 562-4603.

Sincerely Willia E. Holl nd, Chief Main}enance ranch Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos.: 50-348 and 50-364 License Nos.: NPF-2 and NPF-8

Enclosure:

As Stated (cc w/enci cont'd - See page 2) I 4

cy3 N>$ llllllllllllllllljlllljllll Illljlllllll 9700050147 970729 PDR ADOCK 05000348 0 PDR

-fE O)

h SCE&G 2 cc w/ encl:

M. J. Ajiuni, Licensing Services Manager, B-031 Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.

42 Inverness Center Parkway Birmingham, AL 35242 R. D. Hill, Jr.

General Manager, Farley Plant Southem Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.

P. O. Box 470 Ashford, AL 36312 J. D. Woodard Executive Vice President Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.

P. O. Box 1295 Birmingham, AL 35201 State Health Officer Alabama Department of Public Health 434 Monroe Street Montgomery, AL 36130-1701 M. Stanford Blanton Balch and Bingham Law Firm P. O. Box 306 1710 Sixth Avenue North Birmingham, AL 35201 Chairman Houston County Commission P. O. Box 6406 Dothan, AL 36302 Distribution w/ encl: (See page 3)

i I

i SCE&G 3 l

l l Distribution w/ encl:

1 J. Zimmerman, NRR l H. Christensen, Ril W. P. Kleinsorge, Ril l M. E. Ernstes, Ril PUBLIC NRC Resident inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 7388 N State Hwy 95 Columbia, AL 36319 l

tra;n vn pm,te nnriurnN rrv e fN vre. 30 0FFICE R11 DRS Ril DP.D @

S!CN AT'M NAME PCrM ee t i pr yr 49n p. $nnpr OAT [ 07 / / 07 07 / / 47 U/ / 07 07 ./ / 07 COPY? Vf5 No VFS N0 f hfSI NO YFS NO YES N') Vf5 NO OFFICIAE RECORD COPY DOCUMENT NAMEQ:\mr-far.ltr l

l l

i ENCLOSURE INFORMATION REQUESTED FOR MAINTENANCE RULE BASELINE TEAM INSPECTION l

1. Copy of Licensee Maintenance Rule Program

2. Copy of Procedures That Directly Relate to and Support the Maintenance Rule Program

3. Total Listing of Structures, Systems, and Components (SSCs) Considered

4. List of SSCs Determined to be Within the Scope of the Maintenance Rule

5. List of Risk Significant SSCs t

6. List of Non-Risk Significant Standby SSCs in Scope of Rule

7. Updated Risk Ranking of SSCs including the numericalimportance Measure (s) for Each System and the Criteria Utilized to Establish the Risk Significance of These SSCs for the Maintenance Rule

8. Listing of Top 20 Non-Risk Significant SSCs Which Missed the Criteria for Being Risk Significant

9. Any Updated Material to the initial IPE Submittal

10. Definition of " Availability" at Site

11. List of SSCs Placed Within (a)(1) and (a)(2) Categories of the Maintenance Rule i

12. Copies of Equipment Status Documents (LCO Logs, Equipment Tagging Logs, etc.)

Which Provide an Understanding of What Equipment (BOP & Safety Related) Was Out of Serviced for the Last Six Months

13. Copies of SRO and RO Logs for the Last Six Months

14. List of Condition Adverse to Quality Reports and Work Requests Written on Each a(1) l System Within the Last Two Years. This List Should Specify the item Number, a Description of the Deficiency, and Whether the item is Currently Open or Closed.

15. Background Explanations for SSCs Currently Assigned to the (a)(1) Category

16. Current Performance Criteria and Goals for SSCs

! 17. Current Maintenance Rule Trending Data for SSCs i

1 i

l

. l l

! 2 i l

18. List of Maintenance Preventable Functional Failures for the Current Operating Cycle With any Repetitive Failures identified 1

19. List of SSCs Classified as " Inherently Reliable" l l

20. SSCs Classified for "Run to Failure" i l

21. Qualifications and Backgrounds of Expert Panet Members l

22. Minutes of Expert Panel Meetings l l

23. Listing of SSCs within the PRA but were Downgraded / Changed to Non-Risk Significant or Excluded from the Maintenance Rule by the Expert Panel and the Rational for the '

Change

24. Copy of any internal or External Maintenance Rule Program Assessments or Audits

25. Copies of Condition Adverse to Quality Reports (Includ:ng Corrective Actions and/or Proposed Corrective Actions) Associated with identification of Problems During Implementation of the Maintenance Rule, including PRA Aspects l

1

26. Current Organization Chart Depicting Key Personnel involved in the Maintenance Rule implementation and a List of Their Office Telephone Numbers I i

I

27. Specific Site Contacts for Logistics Information and Additional Correspondence Applicable to this inspection Activity

28. Listing of Spray Shields and Doors / Hatches Assumed Operationalin the PRA for l Internal Flooding l l

29. List of Acronyms and Alpha-Numeric Descriptions of Equipment within the Scope of the '

Maintenance Rule (Computer Printout or Computer Disk would be acceptab'e) l

30. Criteria used by the Expert Panel to determine Risk Significance of SSCs when the Plant was not in Mode 1 l

31. Listing of Reliability and Availability Basic Events in the PRA used for Risk Ranking compared to the Performance Criteria Established for those Systems under the Maintenance Rule

32. The Shutdown Safety Assessment Tool / Chart / Matrix showing which Systems were being used for maintaining DHR, RCS Inventory Control, Electric Power Availability, l Reactivity Control and Containment Integrity while Shutdown ENCLOSURE l

..m _ .. _ _

5 i

I 3

33. Fault Trees for Turbine Driven AFW and the EDGs i NOTE: IF available, a comprehensive list of SSCs containing items 3,4,5, and 6 above, and the basis for including the SSC in scope, i.e., safety related, non-safety related used in EOP, non-safety related causes trips, etc., is requested.

l i

! 4 5

1 I

a l

l l

l 1

i 1

i  !

I h I

! l 4

l'

' ENCLOSURE l t

l  !

l

__. _ _ _ . -_. -.- . . _ _ _ . _ - - .i