ML20141D213

Forwards Safety Evaluation Granting Util Request for Relief from Certain Requirements of Section XI of ASME Code Re Inservice Insp for Second 10-yr Interval.Technical Evaluation Rept Also Encl

ML20141D213
Person / Time
Site:	Quad Cities
Issue date:	03/31/1986
From:	Zwolinski J Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Farrar D COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
Shared Package
ML20141D217	List: ML20141D213 ML20141D229 ML20141D243
References
TAC-52302, TAC-52303, NUDOCS 8604070447
Download: ML20141D213 (3)

Text

'

., March 31, 1986 Decket Nos. 50-254/265 DISTRIBUTION Docket File BGrimes i NRC POR JPartlow Local PDR nnetmns

, Mr. Dennis L. Farrar PD#1 Reading -J Po r i,i uw

-Director of Nuclear Licensing RRernero RBevan

, Comonwealth Edison Comoany OELD CJamerson Post Office Box 767 EJordan JZwolinski Chicago, Illinois 60690 ACRS (10) Quad Cities File RDigos Glainas Daar Mr. Farrar: 0Crutchfield ERossi GHolahan TRarnhart (4)

OPA

SUBJECT:

INSERVICE INSPECTION PROGRAM RELIEF REQUEST (TAC 52302,52303)

Re: Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2 The plan was reviewed and evaluated with technical assistance from our contractor, Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), who reviewed and evaluated your plan, and prepared a technical evaluation report (TERI on your request for relief from examination requirements that are impractical to perform at Guad cities Units 1 and 2. The NRC staff has prepared a safety evaluation (SE) on the conclusions and recomendations made by SAIC, based on the Commonwealth Edison reonests, supportino information, and proposed alternative examinations or tests. Our SE is enclosed with the TER as an attachment to the enclosed SE.

Relief has been qranted for those examination requirements found to be impractical to perform and, by granting relief, would not compromise the safety of the facility. Relief has been granted for certain examination requirements with a condition as described in the Relief Request Status column of a Table in our Safety Evaluation. In such cases, relief is granted subject to the stated condition.

Accordingly, relief from certain requirements of Section XI of the ASME Code is hereby granted, as described in the enclosed Safety Evaluation, for the second ten-year interval.

Sincerely, ogc,tgAL SIGNED BT B604070447 860331 PDR ADOCK 05000254 John A. Zwolinski, Director G PDR RWR Project Directorate #1 Division of RWR Licensing

Enclosure:

As stated *SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCE cc: See next page

• 0RL:PD#1

• DRL:PD#1 *0 ELD DRL:PD#1 CJamerson RRevan:jg RPirfo J7wolinski 3 /17 /86 3 / 17/86 3 / 24t86 3 / St/86 e

l l Docket Nos. 50-254/265 DISTRIRUTION l Docket File BGrimes NRC PDR JPartlow Local PDR BGrimes Mr. Dennis L. Farrar PD#1 Reading JPartlow l Director of Nuclear Licensing RBernero RBevan Comonwealth Ediso>i Company OELD CJamers n Post Office Box 767 EJordan JZwol ski l Chicaco, Illinois 60690 ACRS (10) Quad ities File

! RDiggs GL nas

Dear Mr. Farrar:

DCrutchfield E ssi GHolahan arnhart(4)

OPA

SUBJECT:

INSEIVICE INSPECTION PROGRAM RELIEF REQUEST (T C 5?302, 52303) l j Re: Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 nd 2 l

By letter dated February 17, 1983, January 9, 1985 and February 27, 1985, Commonwealth Edison Company submitted to the NRC ts Inservice Inspection (ISI) plan a id additional information for the s and ten-year term for Quad Cities Unitt 1 and 2. The plan included reque ts for relief from the requirements of Section XI, Rules for Inserv ,e Inspection of Nuclear Power Plant Compr.nents of the ASME Boiler and Pre ure Vessel Code.

Relief ha; been granted for those examin ion requirements found to be impractical to perform and, by grantino relief, would not compromise the safety r,f the facility. . Relief has be _n granted for certain examination requirements with a condition as des ibed in the Relief Request Status column of a Table in our Safety Eva uation. In such cases, relief is granted sub,iect to the stated con tion.

The plan was reviewed and evalt ted with technical assistance from our contractor, Science Applicati s International Corporation (SAICl, who l reviewed and evaluated your an, and prepared a technical evaluation report (TER) on your request for r. lief from examination requirements that are impractical to perform at uad Cities Units 1 and 9 The NPC staff has prepared a safety evalua ion (SE) on the conclusions and recommendations made by SAIC, based on he Commonwealth Edison requests, supporting information, and prop sed alternative examinations or tests. Our SE is enclosed with the ER as an attachment to the enclosed SE.

Sincerely, John A. Zwolinski. Director l RWR Pro.iect Directorate #1 l Division of BWR Licensing Enclos re:

As s ted cc See next page DRL:PD#1 DRL:PD(40m 0 DBL:PD#1 CJamerso RBevanWV l b JZwolinski 3/ 11/86 $/g/86' j k/86 / /86

i -

.g Mr. Dennis L. Farrar Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station Commonwealth Edison Company Units 1 and 2 CC:

Mr. B. C. O'Brien President Iowa-Illinois Gas and Electric Company -

206 East Second Avenue Davenport, Iowa 52801 Robert G. Fitzgibbons, Jr.

Ishan, Lincoln & Beale Three First National Plaza Suite 5200 Chicano, Illinois 60602 k

Mr. Nick Kalivianakis Plant Superintendent Ouad Cities Nuclear Power Station 22710 - 206th Avenue - North Cordova, Illinois 61?A?

Resident Insnector '

U. S. Nuclear Reculatory Comission 22717 206th Avenue North Cordova, Illinois 61242 Chaiman Rock Island County Board of Supervisors Rock Island County Court House Pock Island, Illinois 61201 Mr. Gary N. Wright Nuclear Facility Safety Illinois Departnent of Nuclear Safety 1035 Outer Park Drive, 5th Floor Springfield, Illinois 6?704 Regional Administrator, Region III U. S. Nuclear Pegulatory Comission 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 w