ML20140F052
| ML20140F052 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry  |
| Issue date: | 12/31/1996 |
| From: | CENTERIOR ENERGY |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20140F049 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9705020070 | |
| Download: ML20140F052 (112) | |
Text
.____ _. _ _ _ _ _ . _ _
1 0
...re..
l .g - . . - . , ._. - .
) ,_- - '.- '
f . , :
j
',. . 9
, s. . .
4 H Perry Nuclear. Power Plant 6 m L. .
j 4 . . , g-1
.. y, . . - -
j
{ .
v: . , .
5 f -
+' . g ,
. ',- ., . c .. # -
1 . .
~
1 .
. ,n .
m se 1996 i
i 3*
i E....J .
j 5
. Annual Environmental!
4 I
an.d. . . ..
l f X 7 y iEftlpe'nt Release ; ' '
~
j j LReport l i: j i t.
c .
, > - ..1 s. ,
.. ... q.; - _._,
[
.- p gggggw'ng j
i
- ' 1
.ra. . .. qmm;6# .,ypy ' ~*', ?
. .-..~
v
,,y+_ e l ,- ' y 1
~
y, f, (
j ;.
pgg[ %: ;W.-M D]
- i. .:. ; e l
. , kb
.'.5, ; g 9y ( 2-
$ ^l'y ;
9
- .no y . s.
_.; i n :
t.
7 i -
. . ab w '
1 .
-+ .- s .-
,s,. n i
g -- -
I
- - am f . , .. ; .
.. '. - k7 . . .\
. . , , 7p; ,..g g
, ,, ., p g.
,i
.. .n.\
[d f. (,
~:.v f ,2 C+ ,. ,,,Wk
- 'y
/ I
, , i
..s r tp; '* l g a
y, e s -
s: eyshi L'Jk + .A '
4 l
4 . - ;. ' . . :-[.g' ys ,,.;.
s .
'.:s ~, 5:;),j,t 9:. - - ;pm..
3' ;.e f x? ' r
> -y e.# 4
'; }
. - . i .
e 1
4 d i.m- , . - , . - . . - - - - - - . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .
l d
Perry. Nuclear Power Plant
~
' l 1
A s.
- #s, , ' '
1
. 1 M
1996 4
. Annual Environmental -
, and Efilpent Release
, ort ,
3 . . ,
g %, -
.i
. .: 2-. ,: n ..
yef _ -
y-W y%:
- rrr ~g >
r en Mqw' 4QWW;;cne ~
- . w '"
' ' ig i '
ls hir'.' i
, s ([..- ,
p.
? 4 b .%. .~1 3,
- ~~ **-
wg] 'Mif
.= ' A,,g .
.?$
.s p.\-s
- 3, _ ,
- p- j%?Q.
3.. g ,
Ot * $
l m;g gl'y ng
~q L ;
I 4
h 1
1 i
) .
ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL AND EFFLUENT
) RELEASE REPORT FOR PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT
)
) :
JANUARY 1,1996 To DECEMBER 31,1996 J
PREPARED BY: ,
l
) RADWASTE, ENVIRONMENTAL, AND CHEMISTRY SECTION i PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT l CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY PERRY, OHIO l
)
i l
APRIL 1996
)
O l
h
)
. . - . _ - - - - - - _ . . . -- = - . . - - ..
l l
l l
l 1996 Annu:1 Environmental And Emuent Release Report 0
SUMMARY
AND CONCLUSIONS . . . . . . !
ANNUAL EFFLUENT RELEASES.. . .............I g RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM. .._.................. I I LAND USE CENSUS. ........................... ..-. . . . -2 I l
CLAM / MUSSEL MONITORING ... ..~.........2 '
HERBICIDE USE - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . .3
~
r SPECIAL REPORTS. ......... . .3 l
INTRODUCTION . .. . . . .. ... . .. ... .. 4 9l RADIATION FUNDAMENTALS- .. . . 4 i RADIATION AND RADIOACTIVITY...... . . . . . . . . . .. 4 l i
- UNITS OF MEASURE
- . . . 5 LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION . -5 BACKGROUND RADIATION... ... . . . . . . . . . 6 g]
ANNUAL EFFLUENT RELEASES . . . . . . . ........ . . . .. .. . ....... . 7 INTRODUCTION . .........7 ,
RELEASE
SUMMARY
.-.............. . .............9 l METEOROLOGICAL DATA = . . .15 l
DOSE ASSESSMENT......... .... 15 g ABNORMAL RELEASES - .. .. . . . . . . . -17 PROGRAM CHANGES AND NONCOMPLIANCES..... 17 l
RAD 10 LOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM . .. . . .... 19 >
1 INTRODUCTION.. ... . ..... . . . . . . 19 !
SAMPLING LOCATIONS 19 gl SAMPLE ANALYSIS.. .. . . 21 l 1996 SAMPLING PROGRAM: . . :-25 INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM x . 32 CONCLUSION - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 LA ND US E CENSUS . . .. .. . . .. ... .~ . . .... ... ... .. ... 36 el INTRODUCTION.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -36 DISCUSSION AND RESULTS . 36 CLAM / MUSSEL MONITORING . .. . . .. ... . .. . ....... .... 39 INTRODUCTION. - . . . ....... 3 9 I CORB/CULA PROGRAM - . . . . . . . . . ... . . 3 9 $l DRE/SSENA PROGRAM . 40 1IERBICIDE US AG E .. . . ... . . ~ . . .... ~ .. . 42 l SPECI AL REPORTS . .. . . . .. ... . . . . . .. . ..... 43 1
NONCOMPLl ANCES .. .......... . ...... . 43 gl UNREVIEWED ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONS - . . .43 NONROUTINE REPORTS . ....... . 43 APPENDIX A: 1996 REMP DATA
SUMMARY
... . .. . ... .. .... 44
- 1 1
APPENDIX B: 1996 R EM P D ATA , ... .. ... .. ......... .. . ..... ... .. . .......... 4 5 l 1
(
l l Table of Contents $l
q J
1996 Annual Environmental And Emuent Release Report
SUMMARY
AND CONCLUSIONS 3
The Annual Environmental and Effluent Release Report details the results of environmental and effluent monitoring programs conducted at the Perry Nuclear Power Plant (PNPP) from January I through December 31,1996. This report meets all of the requirements in PNPP Technical Specifications, Appendix B of the PNPP Operating License (the Environmental Protection Plan, or
, EPP), and Regulatory Guide 1.21. Report topics include Annual Emuent Releases, Radiological J
Environmental Monitoring, Land Use Census, Clam / Mussel Monitoring, Herbicide Use, and Special Reports.
The results of the Environmental and Emuent Programs for 1996 indicate that the operation of the PNPP did not result in any significant environmental impact.
~'
ANNUAL EFFLUENT RELEASES During the normal operation of a nuclear power plant, small quantities of radioactivity are released to the environment in liquid and gaseous effluents. Radioactive materials are also released as solid waste.
PNPP maintains a comprehensive program to control and monitor the release of all radioactive
] materials from the site. All releases are strictly regulated by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).
The radioactivity released in the plant's liquid and gaseous emuents was well below applicable federal regulatory limits. The dose from plant effluents to the public was also below the applicable regulatory limits. The calculated hypothetical maximum individual dose potentially received by an individual O resulting from PNPP liquid emuents was 0.009 mrem (0.3% of the applicable limit). The hypothetical maximum individual dose potentially received by an individual resulting from PNPP gaseous effluents was 0.004 mrad (0.04% of the applicable limit). The summation of the hypothetical maximum individual dose from effluents in 1996 is equivalent to less than one percent of the dose that an individual living in the PNPP area receives from all sources of radiation.
D Shipments of solid waste consist of waste generated during water treatment, radioactive material generated during normal daily operations and maintenance, and irradiated components. PNPP complied with all regulations governing radioactive shipments in 1996, making 3 I shipments of solid radioactive waste to a licensed burial site.
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM O
The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) was established in 1981 to monitor the radiological conditions in the environment around PNPP. The REMP is conducted in accordance with PNPP Technical Specifications and the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) . This program includes the collection and analysis of environmental samples and evaluation of results.
) 8 The REMP was established at PNPP six years befere the plant became operational. This preoperational program was designed to provide data on background radiation and radioactivity l normally present in the area. PNPP has continued to monitor the environment during plant operation by collecting and analyzing samples of air, precipitation, milk, fish, produce, soil, grass, water and sediment as well as by measuring radiation directly.
3 Over 800 radiological environmental samples were collected in 1996 and over 1300 analyses for radioactivity were performed. The results of the REMP indicate the adequacy of the control of the release of radioectivity in effluents from PNPP. These results also demonstrate that PNPP complies r
I
) Summary and Conclusions Page 1
1996 Annual Environmental And Efiluent Release Report with all applicable federal regulations. Results are divided into four sections: atmospheric monitoring, terrestrial monitoring, aquatic monitoring and direct radiation monitoring.
o Samples of air are collected to monitor the radioactivity in the atmosphere. The 1996 results are
- similar to those observed in both preoperational and operational programs from prior years. Only background environmental radioactivity was detected end only at expected levels.
~
o Terrestrial monitoring includes analysis of milk, produce, vegetation, and soil samples. The results of the sample analyses indicate concentrations of radioactivity similar to that found in previous g, years. For example, the average concentration of cesium-137 in soil was 229.14 pCi/kg in 1996, which is at the low end of the range of 208.5 to 1104.05 pCi/kg observed during the past eleven years. Analyses of other terrestrial samples also detected concentrations of radioactivity similar to those observed in previous years, and indicate no build-up of radioactivity attributable to the operation of PNPP.
o Aquatic monitoring includes the collection and analysis of water, fish, and shoreline sediments.
The 1996 analyses results for water and fish sample results showed normal background concentrations of radionuclides. The results of sediment sample analyses indicated concentrations of radioactivity similar to previous years. The average concentration of cesium-137 in the sediment was 506.09 pCi/kg, which is well within the range of up to 864 pCi/kg established since 1981, o Direct radiation measurements showed no change from previous years. Indicator locations averaged 56.62 mrem / year and controllocations averaged 54.70 mrem / year. This shows that, in 1996, radiation in the area of PNPP was the same as radiation at locations greater than 10 miles away from the Plant.
Based on these results, the 1996 operation of PNPP resulted in no significant increase in the g concentrations of radionuclides in the environment.
LAND USE CENSUS in order to estimate radiation dose attributable to the operation of PNPP, the potential pathways through which public exposure can occur must be known. To identify these exposure pathways, an 4<
Annual Land Use Census is performed as part of the REMP. During the census, PNPP personnel travel every public road within a five mile radius of the plant to locate key radiological exposure pathways. These key pathways include the nearest resident, garden, and milk animal in each of the sixteen meteorological sectors. The information obtained from the census is entered into a computer program which is used to assess the hypothetical dose to members of the public.
O CLAM / MUSSEL MONITORING Clam and mussel shells can clog plant piping and components that use water from Lake Erie. For this reason, sampling for clams and mussels has been conducted in Lake Erie in the vicinity of PNPP since 1971, specifically for Corbicula (Asiatic clams) since their introduction into the Great Lakes in g 1981, and for Dreissena (zebra mussels) since their discovery in Lake Erie 1989.
r Since no Corbicula have ever been found at PNPP, routine Corbicula monitoring provides data to determine when and if this pest species will arrive in the vicinity of PNPP. The Dreissena program ~
includes both monitoring and control and is directed at minimizing the mussel's impact on plant operation. As in past years, this program has successfully prevented Dreissena from causing any gi operational problems at PNPP in 1996.
Summary and Conclusions Page 2 g; l
)
l 1996 Annual Environmental And Ernuent Release Report 1
l HERBICIDE USE l
) The use of herbicides on the PNPP site is monitored. This ensures compliance with Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (OEPA) requirements and protects the site's natural areas. Based on the results of surveillances of herbicide applications on site and weekly general site inspections, herbicide use has not had a negative impact on the environment around the plant.
SPECIAL REPORTS
)
Significant environmental events (for example, spills, releases), noncompliance with environmental regulations (for example, OEPA discharge limits), and changes in plant design or operation that affect i the environment are reported to regulatory agencies as they occur. These special reports are also
! summarized annually in this report. Two special reports were submitted in 1996.
)
I
)
l l
l I
l l
l l
l 4
i SummaryandConclusions Page 3 l l
- ~ . _ _ -. - - - . - .--- -
l Ol 1996 Annual Envirtnmental And Efiluent Release Report l
l INTRODUCTION I 9'
RADIATION FUNDAMENTALS
- Atoms are the basic building blocks of all matter. Simply described, atoms are made up of positively .
and negatively charged particles, and particles which are neutral. These particles are called protons, electrons, and neutrons, respectively. The relatively large protons and neutrons are packed together in the center of the atom called the nucleus. Orbiting around the nucleus are one or more 9l smaller electrons: one electron for each proton in the nucleus. Due to their dissimilar charges, the protons and electrons have a strong attraction for each other, which helps hold the atom together.
Atoms with the same number of protons in their nuclei make up an element. The number of neutrons in the nuclei of an element may vary. Atoms with the same number of protons but different numbers G' of neutrons are called isotopes. All isotopes of the same element have the same chemical properties and many are stable or nonradioactive. An unstable or radioactive isotope of an element is called a radioisotope or radionuclide. Radionuclides contain an excess amount of energy in the nucleus, which is usually due to an excess number of neutrons.
Radioactive atoms attempt to reach a stable, nonradioactive state through a process known as 9:
radioactive decay. Radioactive deuy is the release of energy from an atom's nucleus through the emission of radiation. Radionuclides vary greatly in the frequency with which their atoms release radiation. The length of time an atom remains radioactive is defined in terms of half life. Half life is the time required for a radioactive substance to lose halfits activity through the process of radioactive decay. Half-lives vary from milliontSs of a second to millions of years. The typical half-life ,
for radionuclides released from the plant is approximately five years. O; RADIATION AND RADIOACTIVITY ,
Radioactive decay is a process in v-hich the nucleus of an unstable atom becomes more stable by spontaneously emitting energy. Radiation refers to the energy that is released when decay within the g;'
nucleus occurs. This section includes a discussion on the three main forms ofradiation produced by radioactive decay: alpha particles, beta particles, and gamma rays.
Alpha Particles Alpha particles consist of two protons and two neutrons and have a positive charge. Because of their 9 charge and large size, alpha particles do not travel very far when released (one to eight centimeters in air). They are unable to penetrate any solid material, such as paper or skin, to any significant depth.
However, if alpha particles are released inside the body, they can damage the soft internal tissues because they deposit all their energy in a smali area.
Beta Particles S Beta particles are essentially electrons and usually carry a negative electrical charge. They are much smaller than alpha particles and travel at nearly the speed oflight, thus they can travel for longer
~
distances than alpha particles. Deta particles have a similar ionizing effect as alpha particles, but since they are smaller, faster and have less charge, they cause less concentrated damage when interacting with tissue. External beta radiation affects primarily the skin. Because of their electrical charge, beta
- g. -
particles can be stopped by paper, plastic or thin metals.
Introduction Page 4 g
- - ~ - - - . . - - - . . - . .. . .. ~ - . . - - - --- _ . - - - .
i 1996 Anmnl Environmtntti And Emuent Release Report 1
! 1 l
i Gamma Rays
. Gamma rays are bundles of electromagnetic energy called photons which behave as though they were l particles. They are similar to visible light, but of a much higher energy. Gamma rays can travel long i distances in air and are often released during radioactive decay along with alpha and beta particles.
- Potassium-40 is an example of a naturally occurring radionuclide found in all humans that decays by emitting a gamma ray.
l Interaction With Matter When radiation interacts with other materials, it affects the atoms of those materials principally by i knocking the negatively charged electrons out of orbit. This causes an atom to lose its electrical l neutrality and become positively charged. An atom that is charged, either positively or negatively, is l called an ion.
UNITS OF MEASURE l
Some of the units of measure used in this report require explanation.
i Activity l
l Activity is the number of atoms in a material that decay per unit of time. Each time an atom decays, ,
l radiation is emitted. The curie (Ci) is the unit used to describe the activity of a material and indicates i
! the rate at which the atoms are decaying. One curie of activity indicates the decay of 37 billion atorns i per second.
i l Smaller units of the curie are onen used in this report. Two common units are the microcurie (pCi),
[
one millionth of a curie, and the picoeurie (pCi), one trillionth of a curie. The mass, or weight, of radioactive material which would result in one curie of activity depends on the disintegration rate. For example, one gram of radium-226 is one curie of activity, but it would require about 1.5 million grams f of natural uranium to equal one curie since radium-226 decays more energetically than natural uranium.
1 Dose
) Biological damage due to alpha, beta, and gamma radiation may result from the ionization caused by these radiations. Some types of radiation, especially alpha particles, which can cause dense local ionization, can result in much more biological damage for the same energy imparted as do gamma or
[ X rays. Therefore, a quality factor must be applied to account for the different ionizing capabilities of
- various types ofionizing radiation. When the quality factor is multiplied by the absorbed dose, the l result is the dose equivalent, which is an estimate of the possible biological damage resulting from
) exposure to any type ofionizing radiation. The dose equivalent is measured in REM (Roentgen
, Equivalent Man). In terms of environmental radiation, the rem is a large unit. Therefore, a smaller unit, the millirem (mrem) is onen used. One millirem is equal to 1/1000 of a rem.
. LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION Sample results are onen reported as below the Lower Limit of Detection (LLD). The LLD is the smallest amount of radioactive material that will show a positive result for which there can be confidence that radioactivity is present. This statistical parameter is used as a measure of the i
j introduction Page 5 1
1
l 1996 Annual Environmental And Efnuent Rel:ase Report sensitivity of a sample analysis. When a measurement is reported as less than the LLD, it means that no radioactivity was detected and that had radioactivity been present at (or above) the stated LLD value, it statistically would have been detected. The NRC has established values for the LLDs for gi environmental and effluent sample analyses.
BACKGROUND RADIATION Background radiation includes the decay of radioactive elements in the earth's crust, a steady stream of high-energy particles from space called cosmic radiation, naturally occurring radioactive isotopes in 9l the human body like potassium 40, decay of radioisotopes used in medical procedures, man-made phosphate fertilizers (phosphates and uranium are often found together in nature), fallout from nuclear weapons testing, and even household items like smoke detectors. In the United States, a person's ;
average annual exposure from background radiation is 360 mrem, and is from sources shown in the Background Radlation Chart (Table 1) (Source: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements). O.
Table 1: Background Radiation Chart Natural Sources Man Made Sources Radon 55 % Medical /X-rays 11 %
Cosmic 8% Nuclear Medicine 4% :
Terrestrial 8% Consumer Products 3%
Internal 11 % Other(I) <l%
(I) - Other includes 0.3%from occupationalsources, <0.3%fromfall out, <0.1%from the nuclear fuel c>rle, and 0.1%from miscellaneous sources.
Many radionuclides are present in the environment due to sources such as cosmic radiation and fallout 8:
from nuclear weapons testing. 'Ihese radionuclides are expected to be present in many of the environmental samples collected in the vicinity of PNPP. Some of the radionuclides normally present ,
include:
o beryllium-7, present as a result of the interaction of cosmic radiation with the upper atmosphere, g) o potassium-40, a naturally occurring radionuclide normally found in humans and throughout the environment, and o fallout radionuclides from nuclear weapons testing, including tritium and cesium-137. These radionuclides may also be released in minute amounts from nuclear facilities.
Beryllium 7 and potassium-40 are especially common in REMP samples. Since they are naturally g occurring and are expected to be present, positive results for these radionuclides are not discussed in the section on 1996 Sampling Program results. However, the data on these radionuclides are included in Appendix B: 1996 REMP Data.
Si 9
Introduction Page 6 9
o I
1996 Annual Environmental And Emuent Release Report q
i O ANNUAL EFFLUENT RELEASES INTRODUCTION 3 iodines, noble gases and particulates), or neutron activa ,
example, cobalt and tritium, respectively). The majority of the fission products generated this fuel cladding, as well as the majority of the activat processing equipment. ,
ant D
released as liquids, gasses and solids. PNPP was design and monitors these emuent releases. Emuents are controlled to ensure radioactivity re environment is minimal and does not exceed regulatory limits. Emuent programs include operation ofmonitoring systems, in plant sampling and analysis, quality assurance, and de procedures covering all aspects of empent monitoring.
B
. Achievable (ALARA). The ALARA principle applies to redu reduction is based on sound operating practices and eco re PNPP minimizes health risks and possible environmental impact, and ensures that doses a maintained well below regulatory limits.
The liquid ard gaseous radioactive waste treatment systems at PNPP are designed to c process the wastes in order to remove most of the radioactivity. Monitoring systems are used provide continuous indication of the radioactivity present and are sensitive enough to i in the plant control room. The alarms are set to provide wa analyzed to identify and quantify radionuclides being relea measurements to calculate the composition and concentrations of radionuclides in emuents.
the public. In areas surrounding the plant, onmental devices maintain Monitoring Program constantly sample the air in the surrounding environment other environmental media are also taken to determine if any radioactive material dep occurred. This program is described in detail in the next section.
the amourt of material taken into the plant, .
c ve, and sorting material a a shredding and compacting waste once it is identified all help to lower the volume of r waste. Solid waste is shipped to a licensed burial site.
REGULATORY LIMITS PNPP Technical Specifications, and subsequently m into (O doses and dose rates due to radioactive emuents resulting from the operation of PN.
Annual Emuent Releases Page 7
1996 Annual Environmental And Ef0uent Release Report defined in several ways to limit the overall impact on persons living near the plant. The limits are described below. None of these limits were exceeded in 1995. O Gaseous Effluents I. Dose rate due to radioactive materials released in gaseous efnuents from the site to areas at and .
beyond the site boundary shall be limited to the following:
Noble gases:
Less than or equal to 500 mrem per year to the total body, and Less than or equal to 3000 mrem per year to any organ.
lodine-131, iodine 133, tritium, and for all radionuclides in particulate form with halflives greaterO than eight days:
Less than or equal to 1500 mrem per year to any organ.
- 11. Air dose due to noble gases to areas at and beyond the site boundary shall be limited to the following: e During any calendar quarter:
Less than or equal to 5 mrad for gamma radiation, and Less than or equal to 10 mrad for beta radiation.
I During any calendar year:
Less than or equal to 10 mrad for gamma radiation, and Less than or equal to 20 mrad for beta radiation.
III. Dose to a member of the public from iodine-131, iodine-133, tritium, and all radionuclidesOin particulate form with half lives greater than eight days in gaseous effluents released to area beyond the site boundary shall be limited to the following:
Less than or equal to 7.5 mrem to any organ per any calendar quarter, and Less than or equal to 15 mrem to any organ per any calendar year.
O The PNPP ODCM does not contain a concentration reference for gaseous effluents. For this reason, maximum permissible concentrations are not used to calculate maximum release rates for gaseous efauents.
Liquid Efiluents
- 1. The concentration of radioactive material released in liquid ef0uents to unrestricted areas *shall be limited to the concentrations specified in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10CFR), Part 20 (Standards for Protection Against Radiation), Appendix B, Table 11, Column 2 for radionucli other than dissolved or entrained noble gases, as required by the ODCM. For dissolved or entrained ~
noble gases, the concentration shall be limited to 2.0E-4 pCi/mi total activity. These values g are th maximum permissible concentrations.
1 I
Annual Ef0uent Releases Page 8 g
O 1996 AnnualEnvironment:1 And Emu:nt Release Report II. The dose or dose commitment to a member of the public from radioactive materials in liquid m
emuents released to unrestricted areas shall be limited to the following:
L)
, During any calendar quarter:
Less than or equal to 1.5 mrem to the total body, and
, Less than or equal to 5 mrem to any organ.
O During any calendar year:
Less than or equal to 3 mrem to the total body, and Less than or equal to 10 mrem to any organ.
RELEASE
SUMMARY
O Effluents are sampled and analyzed to identify both the type and quantity of radionuclides present.
This information is combined with emuent path flow measurements to determine the radioactive composition and concentration of effluents.
, Liquid Effluents The PNPP liquid radioactive waste system is designed to collect and treat all radioactive liquid waste produced in the plant. The treatment used for the liquid depends on its physical and chemical properties. It is designed to reduce the concentration of radioactive material in the liquid. Liquids are filtered to remove suspended solids, and demineralized to remove dissolved solids.
, Liquid emuent releases may be required after collecting water from small leaks within the plant or to reduce the volume of stored water in plant systems. In both cases, the water is first processed through a liquid radioactive waste treatment system. Dose calculations are performed prior to discharge of this processed water to the lake to ensure regulatory compliance and that ALARA is maintained.
Error is inherent in any analytical process. Error may be due to differences in analysis results of split q~ samples, or may be attributable to the precision limitations ofinstrumentation. An estimate of total error associated with different parameters is shown in Table 2.
Table 2: Error associated with liquid emuent processes Parameter % Error Gamma analysis 10 g Tritium analysis 8 Strontium 89/90 analysis 10 Iron-55 analysis 10 Gross alpha analysis 10 Dilution volume 31 Discharge volume 25 g Liquid waste volume 1 Liquid emuents are released intermittently and are considered " batch" releases. Table 3 provides information on the number and duration of these releases for 1996.
Table 4 provides information on the nuclide composition for the liquid releases. If a radionuclide was 9 not present at a level greater than the LLD, then the value is expressed as "less than (indicated by <),
LLD". In each case, LLDs met or were below the levels required by the Technical Specifications /ODCM.
g Annual Emuent Releases Page 9
1 1
1 1996 Annual Environmer.tal And Effluent Release Report 0! !
Table 3: Liquid batch releases item Value Number of batch releases 85 gi Total time period for batch releases (minutes) 17560 ,
Maximum time for a batch release (minutes) 246 Average time period for a batch release (minutes) 207 Minimum time for a batch release (minutes) ! ,
Average stream flow during periods of release of effluent into a flowing stream 1.78E+05 (liters / minute) $.'
Table 4: Summation of all liquid effluent releases Unit Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Est.
I 2 3 4 Total Error. O-
- /o A. Fission and activation products
- 1. Total releases (not Ci 2.42E-02 8.52E-03 1.97E-03 <LLD 1.00E+1 including tritium, gases, gi' alpha)
- 2. Average diluted pCi/mi 1.87E-08 9.22E-09 2.71E-09 <LLD concentration during period
- 3. Percent of applicabic limit % <<!% <<1% <<l% NA
- NA "- This stem ts Not Apphcable. The Technical SpectficationWODCM do not have a hmitforfission and acttvation y~.
products.
B. Tritium
- 1. Total release Ci 4.77E+0 2.02E+0 1.29E+0 <LLD 1.00+El
- 2. Average diluted pCi/mi 3.69E-06 2.19E-06 1.77E-6 <LLD concentration during g.
period
- 3. Percent of applicable limit % 1.23 E-1 7.29E 2 5.91E-2 NA _
C. Dissolved and entrained gases
- 1. Total release Ci 4.46E 3 7.30E-5 2.75E-05 <LLD 1.00E+1
- 2. Average diluted pCi/ml 3.45E 9 7.89E-11 3.78E-11 <LLD $!
concentration during period
- 3. Percent of applicable limit % 1.72E-3 3.95E-5 1.89E-5 NA D. Gross alpha radioactivity
- 1. Total release Ci 7.03E-05 2.10E-04 (LLD <LLD 1.00E+1 Ol E. Volume of waste released liters 5.40+06 2.70E+6 2.21E+6 0.00E00 1.00E+0 (prior to dilution)
F. Volume of dilution waier litets 1.29E+9 9.25E+8 7.28E+ 8 NA 2.80E+1 g used during period AnnualEffluent Releases Page 10 g; 1
i 199C Annual Environmental And Emuent Release Report The total number of curies of each nuclide present in liquid emuent releases for each quarter are
, shown in Table 5.
l Table 5: Nuclide composition ofliquid emuents Nuclides Released Unit Quarter l Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4
. tritium Ci 4.77E+00 2.02E+00 1.29E+00 <LLD chromium 51 Ci 3.30E-03 1.06E-03 <LLD <LLD manganese-54 Ci 6.00E-04 1.19E-04 1.76E-05 <LLD iron-55 Ci <LLD 5.30E-04 2.19E-04 <LLD cobalt-58 Ci 7.22 E-04 4.37E-05 <LLD <LLD cobalt-60 Ci 3.93 E-03 1.29E-03 3.26E-04 <LLD
- zinc-65 Ci 1.30E-02 4.60E-03 1.33E-03 <LLD j strontium 89 Ci 4.31E-05 2.87E-05 <LLD <LLD strontium-90 Ci <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD strontium-92 Ci <LLD 3.89E-05 <LLD <LLD
} molybdenum-99 Ci <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD technetium-99m Ci 3.30E-05 <LLD <LLD <LLD iodine-131 Ci 9.03E-05 <LLD <LLD <LLD iodine-133 Ci <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD xenon-133 Ci 3.57E-03 7.30E-05 <LLD <LLD xenon 133m Ci 1.16E-04 <LLD <LLD <LLD
) cesium-134 Ci <LLD 7.30E-06 <LLD <LLD xenon-135 Ci 7.68E-04 <LLD <LLD <LLD cesium-137 Ci <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD lanthanum-140 Ci 2.29E-03 6.53 E-04 7.96E-05 <LLD cerium-141 Ci 1.26E-04 1.83E-05 5.79E 06 <LLD Total for period Ci 4.79E+00 2.03 E+00 1.29E+00 <LLD Gaseous Effluents Gaseous effluents are made up of noble gases, iodines and particulates. The noble gas releases are primarily a result of containment purge operations, small steam leaks and off gassing during plant start
! up and shut down operations. The iodine and particulate releases are primarily a result of small steam
) leaks. Gaseous effluents from PNPP exit the plant from one of four effluent vents. Each of the four effluent vents contains radiation detectors that continuously monitor the air to ensure that radioactivity release levels are well below regulatory limits. Samples are also collected and analyzed on a routine I basis to ensure regulatory compliance and that ALARA is maintained. All gaseous effluent released ,
from PNPP are considered continuous and at ground level. l A small amount of error is inherent in t.ny analytical process. Error may be due to differences in h analysis results of split samples, or may be attributable to the precision limitations ofinstrumentation. l l An estimate of total error associated with different parameters is shown in Table 6. l Table 6: Error associated with gaseous efiluent processes I i Parameter % Error
! )
Noble gas analysis 11 Partir ateanalysis 9
. locine analysis 12 i Tritium analysis 8 Strontium-89/90 analysis 10 Gross alpha analysis 10
[ Sample flow rate 4
) Emuent flow rate 4
( \
l AnnualEmuent Releases Page 1I i
1996 Annual Environmental And Emuent Releae Report If a radionuclide was not present at a level greater than the LLD, then the value is expressed as "less than (indicated by <), LLD". In all cases, the LLDs met or were below the levels required by the Technical Specifications /ODCM. A summation of all gaseous releases is given in Table 7. The g nuclide composition of gas.ous efiluents is given in Table 8. ,
Table 7: Summation of all gaseous effluent releases Unit Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Est. ,
1 2 3 4 Total Error, g A. Fission and activation gases
- 1. Total release Ci 6.20E+1 3.13E+1 9.33 E+0 9.46E+0 1.00E+1
- 2. Average release rate for pCi/sec 7.89E+0 3.89E+0 1.17E+0 1.19E+0 period
- 3. Percent of Technical % NA NA NA NA O Specification limit "NA "- 1 hts trem is Not Apphcable. The TechnicalSpec$ cations /OKAf do not have a hmetforfission and activation products.
B. Iodines
- 1. Totallodine-131 Ci 3.14E-03 1.70E-03 1.76E-03 1.58E-03 1.00E+1 $
- 2. Average release rate for pCi/sec 4.00E 04 2.16E-04 2.22E-04 1.98E 04 period
- 3. Percent of Technical % NA NA NA NA Specification limit "NA "- 1 hts item is Not Apphcable. 1he TechnicalSpec$ cartons /0XAf do not have a hmisforfnssion and activation products Q C. Particulates
- 1. Particulates with half lives Ci 2.42E-03 6.41E-03 5.64E-03 5.80E-03 1.00E+1
>8 days
- 2. Average release rate for pCi/sec 3.08E-04 8.15E-04 7.09E-04 7.30E-04 period O
- 3. Percent of Technical % NA NA NA NA ,
Specification limit
- 4. Gross alpha radioactivity Ci <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD "NA " 1his item is Not Apphcable. 1he TechnicalSpec@ cations /OKAf do not have a hmitforfission and activation products.
O D. Tritium
- 1. Total release Ci <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD 1.00E+1
- 2. Average release rate for pCi/sec NA NA NA NA period
- 3. Percent of Technical % NA NA NA NA Specification limit O.
"NA " This item is Not Apphcable. The TechnicalSpec$ cations /0KAf do not have a hmitforjission and activation products.
9 Annual Efiluent Releases Page 12 g
O 1996 Annual Environmental And Efiluent Relrase Report l
Table 8: Nuclide composition of gaseous effluents - ground level release, continuous mode Nuclides Released Unit Quarter i Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4 0
. 1. Fission gases tritium Ci <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD argon-41 Ci <LLD 2.66E-03 <LLD <LLD krypton-85 Ci 4.89E-01 <LLD <LLD <LLD g krypton-85m Ci 1.29E-01 1.31 E-01 1.49E-01 V 2.68E-02 krypton-87 Ci 5.54E-03 2.72E-01 <LLD <LLD krypton-88 Ci 6.65E-02 2.47E-01 <LLD <LLD xenon-131m Ci <LLD <LLD 3.04E-01 <LLD xenon-133 Ci 3.46E+01 1.53E+01 3.60E+00 1.91E+00 xenon-133m Ci 7.63E-01 1.51E-01 1.34 E-01 5.45E-02 0 **" n 35 Ci 1.87E+0i 4.32E+00 2.80E+00 2.19E+00 xenon-135m Ci 7.03 E+00 8.56E+00 2.33 E+00 5.22E+00 xenon-137 Ci <LLD 9.75 E-01 <LLD <LLD xenon-138 Ci 2.31 E-01 1.33E+00 1.99E-02 6.08E-02 Total for period Ci 6.20E+01 3.13E+01 9.33 E+00 9.46E+00 0 2. lodines iodine-131 Ci 3.14 E-03 1.70E-03 1.76E-03 1.58E-03 iodine-132 Ci 2.86E-05 4.90E-04 6.04E-04 4.69E-04 iodine-133 Ci 1.32E-03 3.41 E-03 4.35 E-03 3.92E-03 iodine-134 Ci 1.57E-05 4.97E-04 5.31 E-04 4.13 E-04 iodine-135 Ci 3.04 E-04 2.59E-03 3.26E-03 3.10E-03 b_
Total for period Ci 4.81 E-03 8.68E-03 1.05E-02 9.48E-03
- 3. Particulates manganese-56 Ci <LLD <LLl> <LLD' ~ <LLD cobalt-56 Ci <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD g' cobalt-60 Ci 3.97E-06 6.52E-06 <LLD <LLD rubidium-88 Ci <LLD 8.86E-06 <LLD <LLD rubidium-89 Ci <LLD 1.83 E-04 <LLD <LLD strontium-89 Ci 5.84E-05 5.79E-05 5.33 E-05 9.37E-05 strontium-90 Ci 5.00E-07 <LLD <LLD 6.84E-08 strontium-91 Ci 8.64 E-b5 3.75E-04 2.73 E-04 1.83E-04 O yttrium-91m Ci <LLD <LLD 2.82E-05 <LLD strontium-92 Ci <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD molybdenum-99 Ci 1.49E-05 <LLD <LLD <LLD technetium-99m Ci <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD technetium 104 Ci <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD cesium-138 Ci 8.28E-04 1.34E-03 2.32E-03 2.54 E-03
/ barium-139 Ci 1.76E-03 3.46E-03 2.94E-03 2.97E-03 barium-140 Ci 7.02E-05 8.37E-04 <LLD <LLD lanthanum 140 Ci 1.00E-04 1.43 E-04 1.71 E-05 1.49E-05 Total for period Ci 2.42E-03 6.41 E-03
. 5.64E-03 5.80E-03 I
] Annual Effluent Releases Page 13
1996 Annual Environmental And Effluent Release Report Solid Waste Thirty one shipments of radioactive waste were transported from PNPP for disposal in 1996.
Shipments were delivered to the Barnwell, South Carolina and to Clive, Utah facilities. In addition, Ol PNPP waste was sent to the Barnwell disposal facility from Scientific Ecology Group in Oak Ridge, .
Tennessee, and from Alaron in Wampum, Pennsylvania as partial shipments in conjunction with other utilities. 'Ihe waste total in Table 9 below includes these shipments from Scientific Ecology Group and Alaron. No irradiated fuel was transported from PNPP in 1996. .
Table 9: Solid waste and irradiated fuel shipments 9:
- 1. Sol:d waste shipped off site for burial or disposal Type of Waste Unit Annual Value Est. Total Error. %
- a. Spent resins, filter sludges, evaporator bottoms, etc. m' 87.4 1 25 Ci 795.0 Ol
- b. Dry compressible waste, contaminated equipment, m' 59.9 25 ;
etc.
Ci 2.9
- c. Irradiated components, control rods, etc. m' 0 25 Ci 0
- d. Other (describe) Emergency Service Water Sediment m' 78.1 25 g Ci 7.0 E-5
- 2. Estimate of major nuclide composition (by type of waste)
Type of Waste Radionuclide % Est. Total Error, %
- a. Spent resins, filter sludges, evaporator bottoms, etc. Fe-55 12.4 9[
Co-60 26.3 Zn-65 51.1 25 :
Cs 137 2.7 i Mn 54 3.2 Cs-134 2.5
- b. Dry compressible waste, contaminated equipment, Co-60 32.2 0!
etc. Fe-55 58.2 Zn-65 6.7 25 !
Mn-54 1.5 <
- c. Irradiated components, control rods, etc. None O!
- d. Other (describe) Emergency Service Water Sediment Co-60 58.0 Zn-65 18.2 1 25 Cs-137 23.8
~
- 3. Solid waste disposition l
Number of Shipments (1) Mode of Transportation Destination 26 Truck Barnwell, South Carolina g'
l 5 Truck Clive, Utah (l} Addstional shipments utre made combined with unstefrom other utshnesfrom Scientific Ecology Group in Oak Rodge.
Tennessee and Alaron in Wampum. Pennsylvania.
! 4. Irradiated fuel shipments (Disposition)
Number of Shipments g;
Mode of Transportation Destination l 0 N/A N/A Annual Effluent Releases Page 14 g:
D 1996 Annual Environmental And Efilu:nt Release Report METEOROLOGICAL DATA
) -
The Meteorological Monitoring System at PNPP consists of a 60 meter tower equipped with two independent systems for measuring wind speed, wind direction, and temperature at both 10 meter and 60 meter heights. The tower also has instrumentation to measure dew point and barometric pressure.
Data is logged from the tower instrumentation into the Meteorological Data Processing System. This system compiles the data and calculates a variety of atmospheric parameters, communicates with the
) Meteorological Information Dose Assessment System, and sends data over communication links to the plant control room.
All meteorological data is maintained at PNPP and is available upon request.
DOSE ASSESSMENT
) The maximum concentration for any radioactive release is controlled by the limits set forth in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10 Part 20 (10CFR20). Compliance with these concentration limits is ensured by sampling, analyzing, processing, and monitoring the effluent stream. Dose limit compliance is verified through periodic dose assessment calculations. Some dose calculations are conservatively performed for a hypothetical individual who is assumed to reside on the site boundary
} at the highest potential dose location all year. This person, called the " maximum individual", would incur the maximum potential dose from direct exposure (air plus ground plus water), inhalation, and ingestion of water, milk, vegetation, and fish. Because no one actually meets these criteria, the actual dose received by a real member of the public is significantly less than what is calculated for this !
hypothetical individual.
i
} Dose calculations for this maximum individual at the site boundary are performed for two cases. First, they are performed using data for a 360* radius around the plant site (land and water based !
meteorological sectors), even though some of this area is over Lake Erie, which has no permanent residents. The second calculation is performed considering only the areas around the plant that are not over Lake Erie (land based meteorological sectors), in which people reside. Tables 10 and 11 provide the calculated hypothetical maximum site boundary dose values to either the total body or worst case
) organ considering all meteorological sectors. Table 12 provides the calculated hypothetical maximum site boundary dose values considering only the land based sectors.
If any radionuclide was not present at a level greater than the LLD, it was not used in dose calculations.
Table 10: 1996 Site boundary dose to maximum individual considering all sectors Efiluent Organ Estimated dose (mrem) Limit % oflimit Liquid Total body 9.07E-03 3.0E+0 3.00E-0i Liquid Liver 1.77E-02 1.0E+1 1.77E-01 Noble gas - gamma NA 4.29E-03 1.0E+1 4.29E-02 l Noble gas - beta NA 4.08E-03 2.0E+1 2.04E-02 Noble gas Total body 2.59E-03 5.0E+0 5.18E-02
, Noble gas Skin 5.40E-03 1.5E+1 3.60E-02 Iodine & particulates Thyroid 5.99E-02 1.5E+1 3.990E-01 Annual Effluent Releases Page 15
C 1996 Annual Environment:1 And Emuent Rele:se Report Table i1: 1996 Population dose considering all sectors Emuent Organ Estimated Population Dose (person-rem)
Liquid Total body 5.90E-01 M Liquid Thyroid 6.30E-02 .
Geseous Total body 1.80E-03 Gaseous Thyroid 2.00E-02 ~
Table 12: 1996 Site boundary dose to maximum individual considering sectors on land Organ Limit % oflimit I Emuent Estimated dose (mrem)
~ Liquid Total body 9.07E-03 3.0E+0 3.00E-01 Liquid Liver 1.77E-02 1.0E+1 1.77E-01 Noble gas - gamma NA 2.21E-03 1.0E+1 2.21E-02 Noble gas - beta NA 2.70E-03 2.0E+1 1.35E-02 Noble gas Total body 1.37E-03 5.0E+0 2.74E-02 g Noble gas Skin 3.25E-03 1.5E+ 1 2.17E-02 lodine & particulates Thyroid 5.60E-02 1.5 E+1 3.73E-01 Other dose calculations are performed for a hypothetical individual who is assumed to be on site for some specified amount of time. This person would receive the maximum dose during the time spent on site. Because no one actually meets the criteria established for these conservative calculations, the g actual dose received by a real member of the public is significantly less than what is calculated for this hypothetical individual. This dose is assessed relative to the offsite dose, and considers dilution, dispersion, and occupancy factors.
The highest hypothetical dose from liquid effluents to a member of the public on site is to a person who is fishing on Lake Erie from the shore on PNPP property. The calculations assume that this g person spends 60 hours6.944444e-4 days <br />0.0167 hours <br />9.920635e-5 weeks <br />2.283e-5 months <br /> per year fishing, and the dilution factor is 10. Ratioing this exposure pathway to doses calculated for offsite locations yields the dose values shown in Table 13, below.
Table 13: Maximum on site dose from liquid effluents Quarter / Annual Total Body Dose (mrem) Organ Dose (mrem)
First Quarter 4.57E-04 5.37E-04 g-Secor:d Quarter 8.32E-05 9.92E-05 Third Quarter 2.03E-05 2.36E-05 Fourth Quarter 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 Annual 5.59E-04 6.82E-04 Although several cases were evaluated to determine the highest hypothetical dose from gaseous $
emuents to members of the public on site (including traversing a public road within the site boundary, shoreline fishing, non-plant related training, car pooling, andjob interviews), the on site activity with the highest dose potential is also shoreline fishing (assuming 60 hours6.944444e-4 days <br />0.0167 hours <br />9.920635e-5 weeks <br />2.283e-5 months <br /> per year fishing). The calculations account for this and the difference between annual average dispersion values for the on site point of concern,6.6E-5 s/m3. The maximum on site dose values generated are shown in Table 14.
9.
Table 14: Maximum on site dose from gaseous emuents .
Quarter / Annual Total Body Dose (mrem) Organ Dose (mrem)
First Quarter 1.59E-04 5.59E-04 Second Quarter 7.67E-05 3.63 E-03 -
Third Quarter 3.43E-05 2.40E-03 Fourth Quarter 4.45E-05 4.51E-04 9 Annual 3.10E-04 7.02E-03 Annual Effluent Releases Page 16 $
O 1996 Annu11 Environment:1 And Emuent Release Report Average total body dose to individual members of the public is determined by combining the d O from gaseous effluents to the population that lives within 50 miles of PNPP (2,420,000 peo the dose from liquid effluents to the population that receives drinking water from intakes within 50 miles of PNPP (18,200,00 people). The results are shown in Table 15.
Table 15: Average individual total body dose (mrem)
Quarter / Annual From Gaseous Efiluents From Liquid Effluents First Quarter 3.35E-07
'O second quarter 2.53E-04 2.73E 07 5.38E-05
'Ihird Quarter 7.02E-08 1.65E-05 Fourth Quaner 6.61E-08 Annual 0.00E+00 7.44E-07 3.24E-04 4
ABNORMAL RELEASES '
There were no abnormal releases in 1996.
PROGRAM CHANGES AND NONCOMPLIANCES ,
3 Program Changes I The ODCM had three minor revisions made to it in 199J. The changes involved :
1.
incorporation of the revised 10 CFR 20 limits for maximum-permissible-ccacentrations,
- 2. incorporation of Technical Specification Position Statements as part of the l
implementation ofImproved Technical Specifications, and
- 3. removal of the radwaste low flow discharge header flow monitor as an ODCM control item by abandonment-in-place.
1 A minor change was made to the Radwaste System during 1996. A pin hole leak was discovered in a weld joint on the inlet pipe to detergent drain filter 0G50D005B. Because the detergent drain hiters are no longer required for radwaste operations, the filters were isolated and abandoned in-place.
Another notable change in 1996 was the implementation of"near-zero-release" at the Perry Plant. The i last liquid radwaste release for 1996 took place on August 25 ^, there were no subsequent batch releases ofliquid radwaste from the site for the remainder of 1996. {'
Noncomphances i There were three incidents when efiluent monitoring instruments were inoperable for greater than the 30 day limit:
1
- 1. The Unit 2 Vent Flow Monitor was inoperable from 3/5/96 until 6/21/96, a total of 108 days. A loose access cover on the ventilation ductwork resulted in an apparent flow mismatch between
, indicated flow and the Emergency Response Information System (ERIS) computer datapoint.
Once the access cover was replaced, the flow monitor was tested successfully and retamed to operability.
- 2. The liquid radwaste-to-Emergency Sersice Water (ESW) monitor was inoperable from 7/19/96 until 11/27/96, a total of 131 days. This monitor has a history of problems with build-up of internal contamination, producing high monitor background readings. After returning to operab!e j status, the monitor was not . xd due to the lack of batch radwaste releases.
l Annual Efiluent Releases Page 17
P I
O 1996 AnnualEnvironmental And Emuent Release Report
- 3. He radioactive waste low flow discharge header flow inonitor was inoperable for most of 1996, a total of 343 days (1/1/96 to 12/9/96 ). His monitor has never been used for a liquid radwaste release from the site. Removing it from operation was accomplished in 1996 by abandoning the g monitor in place in accordance with plant procedures. His change was also incorporated into the ,
ODCM.
Correctiens to 1995 Data G:
here were no corrections to the 1995 data.
O!
i 3:;
i t
e!i 1
i
$[ .
k ,
2 l
9i4
- i t
t ,
I . t 9'
Annual Emuent Releases Page 18 g;
O 1996 Annual Environmental And Effluent Release Report i
9 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING
- i. PROGRAM INTRODUCTION The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) was established at PNPP for several
' reasons. First, it verifies the adequacy of plant design and operation to control radioactive materials and limit effluent releases. Second, it assesses the radiological impact, if any, that the plant has had on the surrounding environment. Third, it ensures compliance with regulatory guidelines. The REMP is j conducted in accordance with the PNPP Operating License, Appendix B, Technical Specifications and the ODCM. REMP requirements were established by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).
A wide variety of samples is collected as part of the PNPP REMP. The selection of sample types, sampling locations, and sample collection frequency are based on many things. Potential pathways for l the transfer of radionuclides through the environment to humans, sample availability, local meteorology, p sputation characteristics, land use and NRC requirements are all considered.
l To ensure that the REMP data are meaningful and useful, detailed sampling methods and procedures <
are followed. His ensures that samples are collected in the same manner and from the same locations ;
each time. All samples are packaged on site, then shipped to an independent vendor laboratory for l i analysis. The vendor laboratory analyzes the samples and reports results to the PNPP Environmental l
Unit staff, the Lake County General Health District, and the State of Ohio Department of Health.
The REMP began in 1981 with 24 direct radiation monitoring locations, four sediment locations, and two fish sampling locations. In 1982, collections of air, water, milk, food products, and feed / silage were added. Precipitation and soil were added in 1985. Although these last two media were not i
required by the NRC, they were incorporated into the program to establish baseline data. In 1993, feed / silage sampling was dropped from the program based on the past ten years of data. For the same reason, strontium gnalyses were deleted from the program in 1994, gross beta and tritium were deleted from precipitation analyses in 1995, and precipitation sampling was deleted entirely in 1996. The i precipitation sample sites remain available if future samples are desired. Also in 1995, the frequency j for collecting soil samples was changed from quarterly to biannually, i SAMPLING LOCATIONS i REMP samples are collected at numerous locations, both on site and up to 22 miles away from the plant. Sampling locations are divided into two general categories: indicator and control. Indicator locations are those which would be most likely to display effects caused by plant operation. They are relatively close to the plant. Control locations are those which are considered to be unaffected by plant operation. Typically, they are a greater distance from the plant, ir, the least prevalent wind directions.
l Data obtained from the indicator locations are compared with data from the control locations. This comparison allows naturally occurring background radiation to be taken into account when evaluating
, any radiological impact PNPP may have had on the environment. Table 16 and Figures 1,2 and 3 identify the PNPP REMP sampling locations.
, Many REMP samples are collected in addition to those required by the PNPP Technical Specification /
ODCM. In some cases (soil, for example), the sample type is not required to be collected at all. In other cases (air sampling and direct radiation monitoring, for example), the PNPP REMP includes more locations than are required. The Technical Specifications /ODCM requirements for each sample type are discussed in more detail below. Sample types and locations that are required by the Technical Specification / ODCM are shown in BOLD in Table 16.
Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Page 19
O.
1996 Annual Environmental And Efflu:nt Release Report Table 16: REMP sampling locations
- Description Miles Direction Media (l)
Haines Rd. 3.4 ENE TLD, AIR 4 1
2 Site Boundary 0.7 E TLD ,
MeteorologicalTower 1.0 SE TLD, AIR, SOlL 3
Site Boundary 0.7 S TLD, AIR, SOIL 4
Quincy Substation 0.6 SW TLD, AIR -
5 11.0 SSW TLD, AIR, SOIL, VG 6 Concord Service Center TLD, AIR, SOIL, VG O
7 Site Boundary 0.6 NE 8 Site Boundary 0.8 E TLD ;
TLD, SOIL
! 9 Site Boundary 0.7 ESE 10 Parmly Rd. 0.8 SSE TLD 11 Parmly Rd. 0.6 SSW TLD 12 Site Boundary 0.6 WSW TLD, SOIL g:
13 Madison-on-the-Lake 4.7 ENE TLD 14 Hubbard Rd. 4.9 E TLD 15 Eagle Substation 5.1 ESE TLD 16 Dayton Rd. 5.0 SE TLD 17 Chadwick Rd. 5.2 SSE TLD ,
18 Blair Rd. 5.0 S TLD $[
19 Lane Rd. 5.3 SSW TLD 20 Nursery Rd. 5.3 SW TLD 21 Hardy Rd. 5.1 WSW TLD 22 Main St. 6.9 SW TLD 23 High St. 7.9 WSW TLD :
24 St. Clair Ave. 15.1 SW TLD 25 Offshore- PNPP discharge 0.6 NNW SEDIMENT, FISH 26 Offshore - Redbird 4.2 ENE SEDIMENT 27 Offshore - Fairport Harbor 7.9 WSW SEDIMENT 28 CEI Ashtabula Plant intake 22.0 ENE WATER 29 River Rd. 4.3 SSE TLD g7 30 Lane Rei. 4.8 SSW TLD 31 Wood and River Rd. 4.8 SE TLD 32 Offshore - Mentor 15.8 WSW SEDIMENT, FISH 33 River Rd. 4.5 S TLD 34 PNPP Intake 0.7 NW WATER ,
35 Site Boundary 0.6 E TLD, AIR, SOIL, VG $l 36 Lake County Water Plant 3.9 WSW TLD, WATER i 37 Gerlica Farm 1.5 ENE FOOD PRODUCTS 41 Clark Rd. 1.1 SW TLD 42 Parmly Rd. 0.8 S TLD, VG 43 Parmly Rd. 1.0 SSE TLD g~
$1 Rettger Milk Farm 9.6 S MILK 53 Neff Perkins 0.5 WSW TLD 54 Hale Rd. School 4.6 SW TLD ,
55 Center Rd. 2.5 S TLD l
56 Madison High School 4.0 ESE TLD g:
58 Antioch Rd. 0.8 ENE TLD 59 Lake Shoreline at Green Rd. 4.0 ENE WATER l Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Page 20 g
)
1996 Annual Environmental And Effluent Retrase Report
- Description Miles Direction Media (1) 60 Lake Shoreline at Perry Park 1.0 WSW WATER
) 61 Keller Milk Farm 7.4 SE MILK
. 62 Shreve Farm 1.2 ENE FOOD PRODUCTS 63 Minor Stream Mouth 0.08 NNE SEDIMENT 64 Northwest Drain Mouth 0.09 NW SEDIMENT 65 Major Stream Mouth 0.18 W SEDIMENT l 70 H&H Farm Stand 16.2 SSW FOOD PRODUCTS
)
71 Mosley Farm 7.9 SE MILK 77 Orosz Farm 1.2 E FOOD PRODUCTS l
(1) AIR = Air lodine and Particulate VG = Vegetation )
TLD = Thermoluminescent Dosimeters j
) l SAMPLE ANALYSIS i When environmental samples are analyzed for radioactivity, several types of measurements are performed to provide information about the types of radiation and radionuclides present. The major analyses that are performed are discussed below.
Gross beta analysis measures the total amount of beta emitting radioactivity present in a sample. Beta radiation may be released by many different radionuclides. Since beta decay results in a continuous energy spectrum rather than the discrete energy levels or " peaks" associated with gamma radiation, identification of specific beta emitting nuclides is much more difficult. Therefore, gross beta analysis only indicates whether the sample contains normal or abnormal concentrations of beta emitting radioactivity; it does not identify specific radionuclides. Gross beta analysis primarily acts as a tool to I identity samples that may require further analysis. I Gamma spectral analysis provides more specific information than does gross beta analysis. Gamma spectral analysis idemifies each radionuclide present in the sample that emits gamma radiation, and the amount of radioactivity associated with it. Each radionuclide has a very specific " fingerprint" that allows for accurate identification.
Jodine analysis measures the amount of radioactive iodine present in a sample. Some media (for example, air sample charcoal cartridges) are analyzed directly. With other media (for example, milk),
iodine is extracted by chemical separation.
Tritium analysis measures the amount of the radionuclide tritium (H-3) present in a sample. Tritium is an isotope of hydrogen that emits low energy beta particles. Tritium occurs naturally and is also man-made.
Gamma doses received by ThermoLuminescent Dosimeters (TLD) while in the field are determined by a special laboratory procedure. Thermoluminescence is a process by which ionizing radiation interacts with the sensitive phosphor material in the TLD. Energy is trapped in the TLD material and can be stored for months or years. This provides an excellent method to measure the dose received over long periods of time. The amount of energy that was stored in the TLD as a result ofinteraction with radiation is released by a controlled heating process and measured in a calibrated reading system. As
!. :he TLD is heated, the phosphor releases the stored energy as light. The amount oflight is directly l proportional to the amount of radiation to which the TLD was exposed. The reading process also
- zeroes the TLD and prepares it for reuse.
Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Page 21 i
Ol 1996 Annual Environmental And Emuent Release Report i
1 e'
NNW N NNE .
1 NE NW =
r -
sy y w gggh ,
pygga e
-wym ,
~y~m;.
o g@sp a;ggQg wwp;gw y"p ;w\&y @g y gMxp y q,w,dw 3 g . p&#xggggR
% w @; e g~
m7 w cg
- sy:-
A ?, QO 4 & j+h. . M.Q W M[
,V> v -; ljef '
Ft, ; . .x t:b l+W. -
c ,r Q L + w&mg . .k.. {,?! . x ef k.,gs?' G,;*jM c
?g y.zf, h ajp y;. m,,g c
,y , j ; ;f*.~n). h ff.f RQ.,gyh, y v J%ydN y,. n.p;a >-
.- n~
- 4 g; ~gQ 'n > wow.
8, ;n uv ipwr : . ,
b :n _.._p# h,ink r.% . j Q4 x.e L* w .,:s.y aSQ.Y& r,j. f?Q:)4 w, A f ~.i 2
- mla; M
.syyg, W/Ef!
a.
% 6j:pgG '$T'WDfWWiXl,nj y .qy & welMlY,sn:M:;.R*H O r
- p. o y a ~ ~ ;~ w. t,.~ w x.y a f-
.ww ~w
._,w.e ,La. Ap
, m., -
,. . ..; w,..
L$ v,id .
- - mm,,
Q , .L ?
.. e , , -~;r .
fp g. . :
n;p ,,~ s :4n.g o'C vb , * ; _ .
.c
- ) .y ,. ; a, s.z ,
w.
. y,.
.-,4 , ,
n .n 8 +- -
, ,n..-
~, . ,g',g4'^f
. $; ;l.. --
M W, e@ _ m a W Me aan.i' ENE WNW - m. M. ,y 2'ew
.J [', W W 'l#'4'h, w 25 n
af f n v. . .<,>f m d M.
, J' Lockwoo Rdli %
n\e
* ' . qq . sqr p us e37w 3
s3 snw g j N meet s me tes;N+ w 6 . 4'y
. ? ~ 6PERR ;N 58 1 '62 W N
'~
- 'E 7 f
' .W
- m. yw i . n+, wlW, R:PL jp e?
-e,
. T': 4 w- , nw g
a 4a 1 g yTic , , ; #n.1 nN m.1 41 LEA E W ! MI.LESg , c449)v
,;"_: -8 s2c w- .8
?
. p. .
~ ~
. -4 97 r ; , %y*., sg a y
_g , 4N- YA [5, kh'e w s . y , y[n g'grg og.bp;,#., Qp
]w' fif '
su j p 6 $d, gpfAW,g"@nyf ?%p-WSW /% *# . . G* W 7 ^^ F -
;et .
vz gm%n J :W i- mm. r ;.y ESE
+
a6-, - [4a h+i o .[ g.u. [s.* ~ J 3 k;
, , .. , $f/a@fi [.j :9 ['.yD,I%,.x ,
~
.(i e O
a 7.c-so
,%u M pc - :
e , W- :m-n u lds 4 % %x-& 4 m %v,d,N m mg.4ge%dSe i?:= ".. in,n 9- $-i
.g a.p~J..egm %= ~ &q wp- 1&.
. /;n, 'w v.
- .; a Oc
~ gr -
.e >
. ,a Je : :
4 qq y g V y9
+9 ." % (wAW w + x'-' :4 V: dk
- My'
+res, "V; a c.,:f: n u
f
'g c ".gj o d
, ,N y m W s' yg9,y;f
,e 9
. ' . s.4,- 7/$s.
- 3. ,.
m ,a
.,y w' t L
,. J , c e i, . > fw u ._.
. .V .4
"*g" j -
SW . TM . '
- I' M % f M SE (F SSW S SSE.
1 0 1 2 MILES M M - *. m M muuuuuuuuuums - ( I REMP sampling locations within two miles of the plant site. . I I Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Page 22 g~
4 _O. _ _ _O V O O O O , O O i NW NNW N NNE NE
, . '.f.[y'
;[ P
_I , '(
; hy ') . %.g , *. D
. af. g [*<y : yD y'4
<.s 3
'- 7s.
e-y Q-
'I ggcm' #[fi' ' y n$,1. 7+M'h_' ;
, - - 7.-
qg 94 e 4. 1 m-- .,, c u .
~
cgx~:- w v - wry.e
- , e
, w2 y .- -
- pgp. ' :%, ~ .* w c <- ~ ~
ac.w -
>;g w? :p
.g .,
y g g? *?
- ,m 1
y 73 N ,q83,1ILE' S;;.. gj;g p y s:~ o, - sg-'m
~
.,,7e- , m~sm.m ' ~. .w y ,.m
.m nr. . my-esne
.; s
* , l',k
;0 4
~
g'; % * # .l4's t ~
.w, , .n * ~ + .
, ' .% %p,~.
q ; t '_.,.g;x.
. g , -N'
- .. . *( - ; -
w n
. ,w .
< r.
; T.
~ ~m'm; H. w ~u;u/
% ,f-m ...g,% , c. ,
- z }.
sw n: ,
.. t w' :..
+ x . ,: , ..
w~ c
. . vv w. ..
; ~
g ,@ y :n . 5, m,g ' WQLX Lgg WNW _'r W; 4 - -- b i
~
n- u: ?
'y 7 -
g*
-vw, #:;. . $s..y\
43
.b.
- 4~
q
, cg5- +
f- M
.~~
i%- - tY % r , ENE - s" * . w m , s m 9&3- :., =, , u. 1 l
, 1 mm 3<. '
^ g,We 4 T
^ "
.E t g .. <
- 5. g 2 ; ;y/D - QL , ' ,
=-,r. ' = c h, : ;c, .
Ds'x -.m
,y
- # - .(. . 3( p*'.:s"t, c"k '
~.
m
% d2%. lkg isk
%i
~j: w .i x+* - ecy i y a
aa ; . a w . j. o 7j W q t - g- . s, -g e y - g -. E [ z- n : n+,g r Q.-c e g a i l - y
.;p 3
a o -l +'*" s. undW R' i- - p v.
- w. :' y' v. -
.- n, .
- .-x
.2 " ' >
= - ' ,,,, :' .-_-~. i
_- m .. p 27 - m 20 m g - e w,e ^ 2: '
~
90 o. m
- s. wc
- . .- / a l ;} [n N my "'62a.SC ]a ,
h - 4: 4y ,,d [ k t O WSW ' DI$
<w
, 7 ' 22 j L
-3. A' 48)
.= 17+. - ,)
' /
~-
, [h N'
n , ESE h y i 4
. a n. Ng .
1 *
;[ N
.L.A.K.E. C.O...o,-'
y 7 am '* vo.
..m -
+
g .i u -
. . . .U.# .w *-.; a ,
- s on 2 o
y
.c -
- ?:
sv . e e.
- 3. cue -
- c. .
~x, y #a.e .s e,%;
w.s
'8
- 2
'm
#. ' . .- :U ", [M. ,
*VI. 7A .g. ' OB1hD) . D ?' Y>;
a ,
, 7., s v .
c i j -a = . .n . amp i s':y "A m; g y i, . 4_ +
- r
; . n w - .
y n. ew' 2' ne SW SSW S SSE SE ' w 0 1 2 3 4 5 10 MILES REMP sampling locations between two and eight miles from the plant site. l t t
i NW NNW N NNE NE - q
- 9. n y
-. c c
n
,.e
; , . ;( ,
my. . y,, w ggg;;gy
.g 5,,4 ;sm+,;pn y
,k; Q py n.
, , .q g) ; Q z q.
l - ~ ~
- Q , s'qqs :, , ,
+ ,. g g Q , *$ fg y m}y ; w+ - uo g.a,.: y g. -Q .a f.;;~4 : )gw. a y u.
m;3n - t
> ., e. *4 ,* ~ n ~ . . , - ,
)s
' '~
v_: 4 s :f L p. tL
- 56Qgf'*mght ';
4
- A@. ,; 4@5 iffg% * .: f ^:
L *
'";?;?Q"xCs. C w_Qg WNW -
x u, L x; s nM a, x.c~ms u,m
' w'
?Mne 1 2 m? &e-- w ,- - mp: A n a c'w'
. 3 , ,
-~ CreO r* %.s
- 1 %R ME *N'97u WW-M W Md$3%!Nyy qipMBfF m -
t _ .-
., s - 4%0s.: 4c/- e .-
,'T Wv w&& 4- 12 ' "
- /
cn
. 3s .~> _ne,
, ,m . sh, tab a . g,
'* _ QQ , i
. ,. > r ,
s
'3 i
- n. ^ yf _x % t., .; <
, q
^
h k ' h, '
** f
,, s
.3 4, y g, ~ ;1 ; x-
.. y y ,
.,,-m--..
, s
2
. P ines- : (sij) g .
g f EU
' ., .Lenox l
- s. .
2 l
. .~~ ~~ -u s " n. .
a ; g m, 6
' ~ .vTamt .' girlak ,,. Ml - -s a% 79 c a lak *
, ?:gj '
s Q
', i, jggp g
~
~ ;; } ;,,[w,.
~
km s, l ":19ViUOWI/ , Og " -4 ^2 2
.. _c , ~ est 7.
E -WenV "
- N 1 5~ ,' 22' WSW 1 '
"' '*" 8 igV 70: H h
N EucU-i M "* .rtlan 4y 6 namp 7- - s? NE e Cheny 7 {${ k ' i 3_. 3 . m m ,e,y Valle,y
. Brat IU s. h,,. -
Aqui [" 1 --, - ' Williams gg @# ' f c Te Q S
"y ins;~ ,"*
s fr e . new __ -..GE GA - i . W- -
~
i.sd ; 2a SW SSW S SSE SE . M 5 0 5 10 15 20 MILES ! m"m's - ammmmm REMP sampling locations greater than eight miles from the plant site. l O S $ S S 4 9 9 6 4 S -
f-J 1996 Annual Environmental And Effluent Release Ikport Table 17 provides a list of the ana!yses performed on environmental samples collected for the PNPP REMP in 1996. O
, Table 17: Analyses performed on REMP samples.
Sample Type Frequency Analyses Performed Atmospheric Monitoring Airborne Particulates Weekly Gross Beta Quarterly Gamma Spectral Airborne Radiciodine Weekly Iodine-131 Terrestrial Monitoring Milk Bi/ Monthly Gamma Spectral, lodine 131 Food Products Monthly Gamma Spectral Vegetation Monthly Gamma Spectral q
~'
Soil Biannually Gamma Spectral Aquatic Monitoring Water MGth!y Gross Beta, Gamma Spectral Quarterly Tritium Fish Biannually Gamma Spectral Sediment Biannually Gamma Spectral ) Direct Radiation Monitoring TLD Quarterly Gamma Dose Annually Gamma Dose Sample results are often reported as below the Lower Limit of Detection (LLD). The LLD is the smallest amount of radioactive material that will show a positive result for which there can be E confidence that radioactivity is present. This statistical parameter is used as a measure of the sensitivity of a sample analysis. When a measurement is reported as less than the LLD, it means that no radioactivity was detected and that had radioactivity been present at (or above) the stated LLD value, it statistically would have been detected. The NRC has established the values for the LLDs for REMP sample analyses. The vendor laboratory was able to comply with those values in 1996. b 1996 SAMPLING PROGRAM The contribution of radionuclides to the environment resulting from the operation of PNPP is assessed by comparing results from the 1996 program with preoperational data (i.e., data from before 1986), g operational data from previous years, and control location data. The results for each sample type are discussed below and compared to historical data to determine if there are any observable trends. All results are expressed as concentrations. Refer to Appendix A: 1996 REMP Data Summary and Appendix B: 1996 REMP Data, for detailed results. The NRC requires special reporting if sample analysis results exceed set limits. No values exceeded these reporting levels in 1996. p Program Changes The following program change occurred in 1996.
. January The precipitation samples were removed from the REMP sampling program. These samples were not required. However, the precipitation sampling sites remain available if
) future samples are desired. > Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Page 25
1996 Annual Environment:1 And Efliurnt Release Report Missed Samples On occasion, samples cannot be collected. His can be due to a variety of events, including equipment 0~ malfunction, animal husbandry practices, lost shipments, or vandalism. Table 18 provides information . on samples missed in 1996. Table 18: Missed REMP samples,1996 . Media Location Date Reason Missed Food Products All Apr. - Aug. Veg: tables not ready for harvest Grass All Apr. Insufficient growth to harvest Grass 6 Oct. Insufficient growth to harvest Lake Water 59,60 Jan. Feb. Mar. Lake shareline covered with ice Milk 61 Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. Oct. Drying period for goats (1) Nov. Dec. ' TLD 9,54 ist qtr. Lost in the field (2) TLD 29 2nd qtr. Lost in the field (2) TLD 14 3rd qtr Lost in the field (2) TLD 24,42 Annual Lost in the field (2) (1) The dryingperiodfor goats is an annual occurrence. Goats, unlike cows, cannotproduce milk allyear. O; (2) Missing TLDs can be the result ofvandalism. At locations where vandalism has been identified as a recurringproblem, the TLD is relocated. Loss of the TLDs listedabove was unusual; they were not relocated as a result of this single event. . Events may also occur which prevent a sample from being collected in the normal way, or prevent a complete sample from being collected. The following is a discussion of these events for 1996. 9i Food There were no food products collected during the months of April through August because the local vegetable crop was not ready to harvest. r Water The weekly grab samples could not be collected from Locations 59 and 60 during January, February and March due to ice on the shoreline. 3; Grass ne grass for all of the sample locations could not be co!!ected during April due to lack of growth. In addition, a grass sample was not collected for Location 6 during October due to the lack of growth.
$i Atmospheric Monitoring i
l AIR l Air sampling is conducted to detect any increase in the concentration of airbome radionuclides. Five locations (four indicator and one control), are required by the PNPP Technical Specifications /ODCM. O Air sampling pumps are used to draw continuous samples at a rate of approximately one cubic foot per minute. The air is drawn through glass fiber filters, to collect particulates, and charcoal cartridges, to adsorb iodine. The samples are collected on a weekly basis,52 weeks a year, from each of seven air sampling stations. Six of the locations are within four miles of the plant site; the seventh is used as a control location and is eleven miles from PNPP. g Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Page 26 g
I 10 1996 Annual Environmental And Effluent Release Rrport Air samples are analyzed weekly for gross beta, iodine, and by gamma spectral analysis (quarterly) total of 364 of each type of air sample (particulate and iodine) was collected in 1996. O i i ! Gross beta activity was detected in all air samples and ranged up to 0.04 pCi/m3. The annual avera concentration of gross beta at both indicator and control locations was 0.02 pCi/m3. Historically, the concentration of gross beta in air has been essentially identical at indicator and control locations, as l
, shown in Figure 5. '
O Except for naturally occurring beryllium-7, no radionuclide was identified in the gamma spectral analysis above the LLD. Iodine-131 was not detected in any sample above the LLD of 0.05 pCi/m3. ' l 0.03 ' D 0.025 R E 0.02 - - 0.015 - -- - - - - - - - -- - -. - ) y 0.01 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.005 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 0 2 m a e3e 2a m 8 m%m Sm S 8 8" a9 m m .3 88 m Year Figure 5: Annual average concentration of gross beta in air. ) Terrestrial Monitoring Collecting and analyzing samples of milk, food products and vegetation provides data to assess the build-up of radionuclides that may be ingested by humans. The data from soil samples provides information on the deposition of radionuclides from the atmosphere. Neither vegetation nor soil samples are required by the PNPP Technical Specifications /ODCM. MILK Samples of milk are collected once each month from November through March, and twice each month from April through October. Sampling is increased during the summer because animals usually feed outside on pasture and not on stored feed. The PNPP REMP includes three milk locations (two within five miles of the plant, and one control). Since the milk sampling locations did not meet the requirements of the Technical Specifications /ODCM, food product sampling (discussed below) was performed. Milk was collected from the available locations even though they did not meet the l Technical Specifications /ODCM requirements. If new locatior.s that meet the Technical Specification
- / ODCM requL ements are identified in the future, they will be added to the program.
i. Milk samples are analyzed for iodine and by gamma spectral analysis. A total of 49 milk samples i were collected in 1996. Iodine was not detected above the LLD of 0.75 pCi/lin any of the samples. The concentrations of all radionuclides except naturally occurring potassium-40 were below LLDs in 4 l Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Page 27 l
1 Ol 1996 Annual Environmental And Emuent Release Report I all samples collected. The results for potassium-40 were similar at indicator and control locations, as expected. 4 FOOD PRODUCTS ~ Food products can provide a direct pathway to humans by ingestion. ney can absorb radionuclides from atmospheric deposition on soil or from irrigation water drawn from a lake or pond receiving airborne or liquid effluents. Also, radionuclides in the soil may be absorbed by the roots of the plants * ' and become incorporated into the edible portions. Because there is not a sufficient number of milk sampling locations, the PNPP REMP is required to include two food product indicator locations and p one control location. Food products are collected monthly during the growing season from three farms in the vicinity of PNPP. The control location for food products is 16.2 miles from PNPP. A total of 19 food product samples were collected in 1996 and analyzed by gamma spectral analysis. Seven food products were collected, including cabbage, broccoli, cauliflower, chinese cabbage, beet greens, red cabbage and tumip greens. Beryllium-7 and potassium-40, naturally occurring g= radionuclides, were found in several samples, as expected. No other radionuclides were detected above the LLDs. VEGETATION Vegetation (grass) was collected monthly during the growing season from four locations (three indicator and one control) in 1996. Grass is clipped from open areas using standard lawn trimming g. equipment. The control location for vegetation is eleven miles away. A total of 23 grass samples were collected in 1996 and analyzed by gamma spectral analysis. Two naturally occurring radionuclides were detected: beryllium 7 and potassium-40. No other radionuclides were detected above the LLDs. SOIL Soil samples are collected biannually from seven locations (six locations and one control). The control g: location is eleven miles away. Only the top inch of soil is sampled in an effort to identify possible trends in the local environmental radionuclide concentrations. Fourteen soil samples were collected in 1996 and analyzed by gamma spectral analysis. One naturally occurring radionuclide, potassium-40 was detected in the samples, as expected. Cesium-137 activity was detected in all samples and ranged from 54.89 - 356.95 pCi/kg. The annual average concentration gi of cesium 137 was 243.07pCi/kg at the indicator locations and 145.62 pCi/kg at the control location. For all sample sites, the annual average concentrations were similar to those measured in previous years (Figure 6). The downward trend apparent in the figure represents the decrease in cesium-137 deposition from atmospheric weapons testing in the 1960's and '70's. 6 l 9 4-i Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Page 28 g.
O 1996 Annual Environmental And Efauent Release Repon d 1200 N [ 1000 3 g 800 - - f _ _ Olndicator b BControl
! 400 _ _ _ _
200 - - - - - - - -
$ $ 2 8 8 E 9 R 3
- m m a a m 8 m m m m 8 $
m I Year Figure 6: Anr ual average concentration of cesium-137 in soil g The difference between indicator and control location results is not surprising since the presence of radionuclides in soil is so dependent on site-specific factors such as soil type and drainage, nese factors determine the ability of the soil to attract ions. For example, differences in soil types at the six indicator pCi/kg. locations in 1996 resulted in cesium-137 concentrations ranging from 54.89 pCi/kg to 365.95 Aquatic Monitoring Radionuclides may be present in Lake Erie from many sources (other than PNPP) including atmospheric deposition, run-off/ soil erosion, and releases of radioactivity in liquid effluents from hospitals, universities or other industrial facilities. These sources provide two forms of potential radiation exposure, extemal and internal. External exposure can occur from contact with water or I shoreline sediments. Internal exposure can occur from ingestion of radionuclides, either directly fr drinking the water, or as a result of the transfer of radionuclides through the aquatic food chain to the eventual consumption of aquatic organisms, such as fish. To monitor these pathways, PNPP samples water, shoreline sediments, and fish. WATER Water is sampled from five locations along Lake Eric in the vicinity of the PNPP as required by the PNPP Technical Specifications /ODCM. Samples from three locations are collected using composite sample pumps. He pumps are designed to collect water at regular intervals and composite it in a sample container. The containers are removed monthly and the samples shipped to the laboratory for analysis. Samples from two locations are collected weekly and combined. Each month the combined sample is shipped for analysis.
- Fifty-four water samples were collected and analyzed for gross beta activity and by gamma spectral analysis in 1996. From these, monthly samples were composited into quarterly samples and analyze for tritium. Gross beta activity was detected in all samples collected and ranged 1.56 from
- 4.40 pCi/1.
> The annual average concentration of gross beta was 2.56 pCill at the indicator locations and 2.49 p at the control location. For all sample locations, the annual average concentrations were similar to those measured in previous years (Figure 7). I Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Page 29
1996 Annual Environmental And Effluent Release Report The significant difference between pre-1988 data and post 1988 data has been attributed to a change in vendor laboratories in 1987/1988. A comprehensive explanation is provided in the 1988 Annual Environmental Operating Report. g 10 9 . 8 5 7 g S6 - - Olndicator h5
> 4 _
3 Control j 3 - - - - - 2- - - - - - - 3 M 2 3 2 8 13 2m 8 8a 5; m E yKm y8 m O g g m m m a g g Year Figure 7: Annual average concentration of gross beta in water g No radionuclides were detected by gamma spectral analysis above the LLD. Tritium tvas not detected in any of the 18 samples above the LLD. These results are well within the range of those measured in previous years which have ranged from below the lower limit of detection to 2,200 pCi/1. SEDIMENT Sampling lake bottom sediments can provide an indication of the accumulation of undissolved radionuclides which may lead to internal exposure to humans through the ingestion of fish, through 7 l resuspension into drinking water, or as an external radiation source from shoreline exposure to fishermen and swimmers. Although only one location is required by the PNPP Technical Specification
/ ODCM, sediment is sampled twice each year from seven locations, two of which are alm fish g sampling locations. Sediment samples from offshore aie collected using a hand dredge. Near shore samples are collected using a scoop. Fourteen rediment samples were co!!ected in 1996 end analyzed by gamma spectrometry. The predominant radionuclide detected by gamma spectral analysis was potassium-40, which is naturally occurring. Potassium-40 has been detected in all samples since the program began in 1981. Cesium 137 was detected in eight samples and ranged from 87.02 - 1,254.30 pCi/kg. The annual average concentration was 367.97 pCi/kg at the indicator locations and 920.46 g pCi/kg at the control location. These are within the range of concentrations measured in previous years (Figure 8).
The changes in cesium-137 concentration from year to year may be related to the movement of sedimem on the lake bottom. Wave action and currents can cause significant sediment movement between sample collections. For this reason, it is unlikely the same bed of sediment is sampled at each g collection. This would contribute to inconsistent data, as Figure 8 demonstrates. , 9 i Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Page 30 g
) 1996 Annual Environmental And Effluent Rslene R: port f 1000 900 800 g 700 - - g 600 - - - Olndicator p 500 - - a Control
.g 400 --
300 - - { 200 - 1 . _ _ - _ _ _ . - _ _ _ _ _ _ E 2 0 3 E 8 b 2 $ m m m m a m m m a 8 m5 ma9m * $ 8 mm 8 Year b Figure 8: Annual average concentration of cesium-137 in sediment FISH Fish are analyzed primarily to quantify the dietary radionuclide intake by humans, and secondarily to serve as indicators of radicactivity in the aquatic ecosystem. Fish are collected from two locations, twice each year as required by the Technical Specifications /ODCM. Important sport and commercial species are targeted, and only the fillets are sent to the laboratory for analysis. A scienti:n collecting permit is obtained annually from the Ohio Department of Natural Resources for fish sampling. l Twenty-five fish samples were collected in 1996 and analyzed by gamma spectral analysis. Eleven species of fish were represented, including walleye, drum, smallmouth bass, carp, white sucker, white perch, yellow perch, redhorse sucker, white bass, catfish, and gizzard shad. As expected, naturally occurring potassium-40 wa.s found in all samples. No other radionuclides were detected above the LLD. Direct Radiation Monitoring 3 THERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETERS Environmental radiation is measured directly at twenty eight locations around the PNPP site, two of which are control locations. The locations are positioned in two rings around the plant as well as at the site boundary. The inner ring is within a one mile radius of the plant site; the outer ring is four to five Q miles from the plant. Control locations are over ten miles from the plant in the two least prevalent wind directions. Each location is equipped with three TLDs. Two are changed quarterly and one is changed annually. l A total of 246 TLDs were collected and analyzed in 1996. This includes 218 collected on a quarterly basis, and 28 collected annually. In 1996, the annual average dose for all indicator locations was 56.62 O mR, and 54.70 mR for all controllocations. The TLD results are higher prior to 1988 due to a change l . in vendor laboratory services. A comprehensive explanation of the difference is provided in the 1988 l Annual Environmental Operating Report. I e g Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Page 31
1996 Annual Environmental And Effluent Release Report 25 9' 20 l 15 - - - - - - - Olndicator E 10 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - s contml . E 5- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - O o l E m a 2a a2 m a3 m E 8 % m%o E $g M m 8 g8 * $ Year el Figure 9: Average dose per quarter INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM j The purpose of the Interlaboratory Cross-Check Comparison Program is to provide an independent check on the vendor laboratory's analytical procedures. Samples with a known concentration of specific radionuclides are provided to the vendor laboratory. The vendor laboratory measures and reports the concentration of specified radionuclides. The known values (EPA values) are then compared to the vendor results. Results consistently outside established acceptance criteria indicate a g-need to check instruments or procedures. In 1996, the vendor laboratory analyzed 32 samples of water for this program. All results were within the acceptable range. The results of this program are shown in Table 19. Results are expressed in pCi/l. 4 In addition to their participation in the EPA Interlaboratory Comparison Program, the vendor laboratory periodicsi:y conducts an internal cross-check program for dosimeters. No dosimeters were submitted for cross-check in 1996. The vendor laboratory routinely monitors the quality of their analyses by analyzing " spiked" samples (samples with a specific quantity of radioactive material present in them. The quantity is not known g. by the sample analyst). Table 20 shows the results of this program for 1996. No samples were outside the accep!able range. All results are expressed in pCi/l except air filter results, which are in pCi/ filter. Table 19: 1996 EPA Cross-Check Intercomparison Program results. Date Sample Annlysis Vendor Result EPA Value Acceptable Range Type g: Jan. Water Gross Alpha 19.6 1,5 12.1 5.0 3.4 -20 8 . Gross Beta 7.9 1.0.7 7.0 5.0 t t5.7 l Feb. Water I-131 70.7 1.5 67.0 7.0 54.9 i 79.1 Mar. Water H3 22,776.7 185.0 22,002.0 2,200 18,185.1 - 25,818 9 - A pr.. Water Gross Alpha 63.8 2.4 74.8 18.7 42.4 - 107.2 Ra-226 2.9 i 0.1 3.0 0.5 2.1 - 3.9 O Ra-228 4.6 0.2 5.0 1.3 2.7 - 7.3 Uranium 57.9 0.5 58.4 5.8 48.3 - 68.5 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Page 32 g l 1
1996 Annual Environmental And Emuent Release Rtpon Co-60 32.710.6 31.0 5.0 22.3 - 39.7 Cs 134 43.0 1.0 46.0 5.0 37.3 - 54.7 5 Cs-137 52.3 2.1 50.0 5.0 41.3 58.7
. Gross Beta 154.9 6.8 166.9 25.0 123.5 - 210.3 Sr-89 42.0 3.6 43.0 5.0 34.3 - 51.7 Sr-90 15.3 2.9 16.0 5.0 7.3 - 24.7
. Jun. Water Ba-133 745.0 1 19.5 745.0 75.0 614.9 - 875.1 Co-60 07.0 3.6 I Cs-134 99.0 I 5.0 90.3 - 107.7 72.3 1.2 79.0 5.0 70.3 - 87.7 Cs-137 201.3 2.3 197.0 10.0 179.7 -214.3 Zn-65 298.0 6.2 300.0 30.0 248.0 -352.0 Ra-226 4.8 0.I 4.9 0.7 3.7 - 6. I Ra-228 8.7 0.5 9.0 2.3 5.0 - 13.0 g Uranium 20.4 0.8 20.2 3.0 15.0 - 25.4 Jul. Water Sr-89 24.0 2.0 25.0 5.0 16.3 - 33.7 Sr-90 11.3 1.2 12.0 5.0 3.3 -20.7 Gross Alpha 20.1 2.0 24 4 6.1 13.8 - 35.0 Gross Beta 40.4 3.2 44.8 5.0 36.1 - 53.5 Sep. Water Ra-226 13.6 0.4 14.0 2.1 10.4 - 17.6
> Ra-228 5.4 0.4 4.7 1.2 2.6 - 6.8 Uranium 10.0 0.2 10.1 3.0 4.9 - 15.3 Oct. Water I 131 26.7 2.3 27.0 6.0 16.6 - 37.4 Gross Alpha 10.2 2.1 10.3 5.0 1.6 - 19.0 Bross Beta 32.0 1.6 34.6 5.0 25.9 -43.3 CONCLUSION No unusual radionuclide concentrations or exposure levels were detected during 1996. Atmospheric monitoring results were consistent with past results. The prevalent radionuclide in air was beryllium-7 which is naturally occurring. Naturally occurring potassium-40 was detected in all terrestrial samples, b
as expected. Cesium-137 was detected in soil and is the result of fallout from weapons testing. The concentrations were similar to those measured in previous years and are not related to plant operation. There was no significant change in radionuclide concentrations at indicator locations for aquatic samples in 1996. Cesium-137 was detected in sediment. Results were within the range of past data. Finally, direct radiation measurements are consistent with past data. f I Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Page 33 1
1996 Annual Environmtntal And Emuent Release Report O! Table 20: 1995 Vendor " spiked" sample results i Date Sample Analysis Result Known Value Acceptable Range i Feb. Charcoal Canister I131 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.2-0.4 9) Air Filter Cs 137 2.2 0.0 1.9 1.1 - 2.7 . Air Filter Gross Beta 6.8 0.0 8.0 0.0 - 18.0 Water 1 131 86.2 0.7 95.9 76.7 - 115.1 Water 1 131 96.2 4.7 95.9 57.5 - 105.9 . Water Gross Alpha 96.4 6.6 82.8 41.4 - 124.2 Water Gross Beta 83.7 3.3 85.7 75.7 - 95.7 O Water 11-3 18228.7 391.3 17833.0 14266.4 -21399.6 Water Co-60 231.0 14.5 239.3 215.4 -263.2 ~ l Water Cs-137 428.3 24.1 428.3 385.5 -471.1 Milk Cs-137 63.1 3.2 53.5 43.5 - 63.5 Milk 1 131 47.F 0.7 48.0 36.0 - 60.0 g' Milk 1-131 48.0 2.9 48.0 28.8 - 58.0 Vegetation I-131 0.8 0.0 0.8 0.5-1.1 Apr. Milk Cs-134 35.4 2.5 37.1 27.1-47.1 Milk Cs-137 117.2 5.4 106.6 95.9 - 117.3 Water C0-60 26.0 3.4 23.4 13.4 - 33.4 Water Cs 134 36.1 2.9 37.1 27.1-47.1 4: Water Cs-137 117.1 6.4 106.6 95.9 - 117.3 Water Gross Alpha 76.9 6.1 82.8 41.4 - 124.2 Water Gross Beta 132.3 5.0 136.8 123.1 - 150 i Water H3 17538.9 354.1 17937.0 14349.6 21524.4 Water I-129 15.7 1.4 14.9 2.9-26.9 Water Fe-55 1.2 0.5 1.1 0.0 -21.1 I Water Tc.99 70.5 7.9 66.0 46.2 - 85.8 i Water Am-241 77.4 0.4 82.8 49.7 - 115.9 Water , Cm-244 37.9 1.7 36.4 21.8-51.0 Water 'It-230 41.6 1.9 45.0 27.0 - 63.0 Water U-238 46.2 2.0 45.4 31.8- 59.0 g May Fish Cs-137 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 - 0.1 Water I-131 23.9 0.8 25.3 13.3 - 37.3 Milk 1-131 23.5 0.5 25.3 13.3 - 37.3 ! Jun. Milk Cs-134 28.1 2.6 31.3 21.3 -41.3 Milk Cs-137 47.0 3.7 42.5 32.5 - 52.5 Milk 1-131 39.4 3.6 40.4 24.2 - 50.4 $ Milk 1-131 35.7 0.6 40.3 28.3 - 52.3 Water Gross Alpha 70.0 3.6 82.7 41.4 - 124.1 Water Gross Beta 140.5 3.2 136.1 122.5 - 149.7 Jul. Air Filter Cs 137 2.2 0.0 1.9 1.1 - 2.7 Water Co-60 105.7 15.4 112.6 101.3 - 123.9 Wr.ter Cs-134 127.1 10.9 135.2 121.7 - 148.7 O.
~
Water Cs-137 220.2 20.2 211.9 190.7 - 233.1 Milk Cs-134 130.4 11.4 135.2 121.7 - 148.7 Mi'.k Cs-137 229.2 21.6 211.9 190.7 - 233.1 Water Fe-55 2.0 0.5 1.8 0.0 -21.8 fish Cs-137 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 - 0. I g-Air Filter Gross Beta 7.0 0.0 7.8 0.0 - 17.8 Aug. Water H-3 49589.0 589.5 51058.0 40846.4 - 61269.6 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Page 34 g-
P 1996 Annual Environmental And Emuent Release Report Date Sampic Oct. Milk 1-131 35.0 0.9 39.9 27.9-51.9 9 Milk Cs 134 19.5 2.4 21.4 11.4 -31.4
. Milk Cs-137 26.0 3.9 24.1 14.1 - 34.1 Milk I-131 117.316.4 114.1 68.5 - 125.5 Milk 1-131 64.5 14.4 79.9 63.9 - 95.8 Water 1 131 82.2 16.2 79.9 47.9 - 89.9 Milk I 131 235.5 2.8 199.7 159.8 -239.6 Water 1-131 190.9 14.1 199.7 119.8 - 219.7 Milk I-131 103.6 1.5 114.1 91.3 - 136.9 Air Filter Gross Beta 6.0 0.0 6.0 0.0 - i5.0 Soil Cs.134 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.1 - 0. 2 Soil Cs.I37 0.5 0.0 0.4 0.3 - 0.6 g Charcoal Canister 1-131 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.2 - 0.5 Charcoal Canister I-131 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.3-0.7 Air Filter Cs-137 2.1 0.0 1.9 1.1 - 2.7 Nov. Water Co-60 42.4 7.2 43.0 33.0 - $3.0 Water Cs-134 29.0 6.6 30.1 20.1-40.1 Water Cs-137 35.1 9.5 31.5 21.5 -41.5 E Water H-3 25383.5 433.5 25075.0 20060.0 - 30090.0 (1) (2) The raw data was reviewedandfoundto befree oferrors. The sample was repeated with similar results. An investigation was conducted to determine the cause ofthis deviation. No apparent cause wasfoundfor this discrepancy. It was determined the " spiked" sample was Y preparedimproperly. Another " spiked" sample waspreparedandanalped. Nofurther action isplanned.
b ) ) ) Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Page 35
("a ' 1996 Annual Environmental And Efflurnt Release R port LAND USE CENSUS tl INTRODUCTION . l Each year a land use census is conducted to identify the locations ofihe nearest milk animal, garden (of greater than 500 square feet), and residence in each of the meteorological sectors that is over land. The Land Use Census is required by the PNPP Off Site Dose Calculation Manual, Section 3/4.12.2. g The information gathered during the Land Use Census is used for off-site dose assessment and to update sampling locations for the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program. The Land Use Census is conducted by traveling all roads within a five-mile radius of the plant site, and recording and mapping the location of the nearest resident, milk animal, and vegetable garden in each of the meteorological sectors that is over land. The 1996 Census was conducted August 13 - 14. g The information has been tabulated below; garden, residence and milk animal locations are plotted on the map on page 38. Note that the W, WNW, NNW, NW N, and NNE sectors extend over Lake Erie, and therefore, were not included in the survey. DISCUSSION AND RESULTS 4' In general, the predominant land use within the census area continues to be rural / agricultural. 7here was one change in nearest residences within five miles of the plant in 1996. The new ENE sector residence is located at 4585 Lockwood Road at a distance of 1.0 miles from PNPP. Table 21 lists the nearest residence by sector. There were no changes to the nearest milk animal location in I 1996. Information on the milk animal is shown in Table 22. There were three changes to nearest gardens recorded during the 1996 census. The new ENE sector garden is located at 4630 Lockwood Road at a distance of 1.2 miles from PNPP, the new E sector garden is located at 2656 Antioch Road at a distance of 1.2 miles from PNPP, and the new SSE sector garden is located at 3119 Parmly Road at a distance of 0.9 miles from PNPP. Table 23 lists the nearest gardens that occupy at least 500 square feet. O Table 21: Nearest residence by sector Sector Location Address Miles from PNPP X/Q Value Map (Sec/m3) Locator # NE 4385 Lockwood 0.8 2.17E-6 ENE* 4585 Lockwood 1.0 1.13 E-6 2 1 g E 2684 Antioch 1.1 6.77E-7 3 ESE 2774 Antioch 1.2 4.44 E-7 4 SE 4495 N. Ridge 1.2 3.89E-7 5 SSE 3119 Parmly 0.9 1.89E-6 6 i S 3121 Center 0.9 2.25 E-6 7 g l SSW 3850 Clark 0.9 1.11 E-6 8 . l SW 3440 Clark 1.2 4.98E-7 9 WSW 2815 Perry Park 1.0 1.72 E-6 10 9 Land Use Census Page 36 g' l
)
1996 Annual Environmental And Effluent Release Report Table 22: Milk animal
) Sector Location Address Miles from PNPP Map . Locator #
l S 3588 River 4.8 18 l f Table 23: Nearest garden by sector l Sector Location Address Miles from D/Q Value per m2 Map PNPP Locator # NE 4398 Lockwood 0.8 1.09E-8 11 ENE* 4630 Lockwood 1.2 4.11 E-9 12 E* 2656 Antioch 1.2 4.56E-9 13 ESE 2774 Antioch 1.2 3.41 E-9 4 SE 4679 Middle Ridge 1.9 1.31 E-9 14 SSE* 3119 Parmly 0.9 2.30E-9 15 S 3121 Center 0.9 1.31 E-8 7
) SSW 3515 N. Ridge 1.7 1.19E-9 16 SW 3440 Clark 1.2 2.24 E-9 9 WSW 2975 Perry Park 1.2 2.31 E-9 17
* -Indicates a newlocationfor 1996.
] .
)
1
) ) ) ) Land Use Census Page 37
SE cygggg 3 p
~
n
' ' '6'c ~
y - y ~* % . : . Land Use sb_ $ ~ . x
^ L ~
g#'" %_ # - , 00
% [
8 ,
' ' y' ,.~
~
F .
' p .:
}f
, ' ~.
*g i
c, ,r, ,,
** 2 20 *' / _
' ~ h v - o# ' ,
2o s~
'4 ng 4
[f
" . f a
F
"'~~ f % "?%e *'
E.O -- s. R
' ~ co..
p
~ .'S\v ' ,g^'-
~
C 3, J va - n. -
~,
_ yopsp_ayr E
'~s p >
= 4 0Sc' - F g 8' IN ERR O' O -
~'s
- ag .,
S'f / ~ i c J N c ,, :se - c , * *%% j o n l
- e g4 3
D 5 e
~- ,
90
,.x.
, - 3
-me.-
g ' 8 gw 2 % 1 A' Land Use Census Map l O , O _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 6 9_ _ _ 6 O
- g .
i 1996 Annual Environmental And Efnuent Release Report CLAM / MUSSEL MONITORING ) INTRODUCTION Sampling for benthic macroinvertebrates (clams and mussels) has been conducted in Lake Erie in the vicinity of PNPP since 1971. The clam / mussel program currently focuses on two species: Corbicula ) fluminea (Aslatic clam) and Dreissenapolymorpha (zebra mussel). CORBICUIst PROGRAM Monitoring specifically for Corbicula was initiated in response to an NRC bulletin and concerns of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board. The current monitoring is part of the Environmental Protection ) Plan (Operating License, Appendix B). The program consists of periodic sampling of areas at both the PNPP and Eastlake Power Plants. Its purpose is to detect Corbicula, should it appear in the study area. No Corbicula have ever been found in any sample collected from PNPP or from Lake Erie in the vicinity of PNPP. Two Corbicula were found in a sample collected from the Eastlake plant in June, 1987. No Corbicula have been found in any other sample collected since that time. A more detailed ) program history can be found in the 1986 and 1987 PNPP Annual Environmental Operating Reports. Monitoring Samples were collected quarterly in 1996 from the service water and emergency service water pump } houses at PNPP, and semiannually from Lake Erie in the vicinity of the Eastlake Power Plant. Samp!e collection dates are listed in Table 24. Table 24: 1996 Corbicula sampling dates and locations Date Sample Location f 1/16 Service Water (SW) and Emergency Service Water (ESVh Forebays and trash baskets l ) 4/15 SW and ESW Forebays and trash baskets j 6/25 Lake Erie in the vicinity of the Eastlake Plant j 7/26 SW and ESW Forebays and trash baskets 9/5 Lake Erie in the vicinity of the Eastlake Plant l 10/23 SW and ESW Forebays and trash baskets ' Weekly Inspections of PNPP property shoreline, weather permittmg l All samples were collected by Ponar hand dredge, hand scoop, or scraper. They were examined for bivalve shells and fragments, which were then identified to the lowest possible species. In addition to sample collections, plant components that use raw water are inspected whenever opened for maintenance or repair. Internet environmental sites have been utilized specifically for the purpose ) of obtaining information on bivalves. Results l No Corbicula were found in any sample collected during the 1996 monitoring program. All bivalves
) collected are listed in Table 25.
Clam / Mussel Montioring Page 39
n 1996 Annual Environmental And Effluent Release Repoit Table 25: Bivalves collected during the 1996 Corb/cula monitoring program Species / Location PNPP Eastlake Ancylidoe X O' Dreissenapolymorpha X X , Dreissena bugensis X X Gastropod X X Limpets X X . Physacca X Physa sp. X X & Pisidium sp. X Pisidium adamst X Pisidium casertat.um X X Pisidium compressum , X X Pisidium equilaterale X q; Pisidiumferrugineum X Pisidium tilljeborgi X Pisidium nitidum .. X
^
Pisidium punctuation X Pisidium subtruncatum X Pisidium vanabile X Q. Sphaeridae X Sphaerium corneum X , _Sphaerium striatinum X l Sphaerium transversum X Valvatidae X X w q: Conclusions The collection in June 1987 was the only indication of Corbicula in the vicinity of PNPF However, it has not been demonstrated that the presence of these clams is creating any operational problems at the Eastlake Power Plant or at PNPP. 4; l DREISSENA PROGRAM Zebra mussels were first discovered at PNPP in September 1988. The initial collection of 19 mussels was made as part of the Corbicula monitoring program. The Dreissena program began in 1989 with monitoring and testing. The current control program was designed and implemented in 1990. g
- Monitoring 1
In addition to visually inspecting plant raw water systems when they are opened for maintenance or l repair, monitoring methods include the use of commercial divers, artificial substrates, sidestream g monitors, snd plankton nets. . Commercial divers monitor mussel infestation when they are inspecting forebays, basins, and the itaake and discharge stmetures. They have also been used to take underwater vidcotapes of the water . basins and intake tunnel. Artificial substrates include concrete blocks suspended by rope into the plant sers!ce watei bain. The substrate is removed weekly for inspection for settlement, rg. Clam / Mussel Montioring Page 40 4
= .__ _ _ _ -- _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _
I i Y 1996 Annu 1 Envirrnmental And Efflurnt Release Report Sidestream monitors are flow-through containers that receive water diverted from plant systems. l PNPP used them in three in-plant locations during the mussel season, May through October. %ey are ) fitted with slides and inspected weekly for veliger settlement. A plankton net is used to obtain weekly
, samples ofincoming service water that are subsequently examined for veligers.
Treatinent I Chemicals used for mussel control in 1996 included chlorine and a commercial molluscicide, ne ) system provides chlorine to plant service water, emergency service water, and circulating water systems. Sodium sulfite is added to plant discharge water to dechlorinate it before discharge to Lake Erie. l The use of ccomercial molluscicides requires approval of the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (OEPA). TL chemical selected for use at Perry Nuclear Power Plant in 1996 was didecyl dimethyl ammonium chloride. One treatment was applied near the end of the settlement period. The active ingredients were detoxified by adsorption onto bentonite clay prior to discharge into Lake Erie. 1 ! Results
- ne effectiveness of the intermittent chlorination treatment has been determined in several ways. First, visual inspections of raw water system components are conducted when systems are open during maintenance or repair. In addition, settlement monitors were inspected weekly for new settlement. No t
live settlement has been found in any plant component to date.
- The effectiveness of the application of the commercial molluscicide was measured by observing
) mortality of mussels placed in a flow-through container placed in plant service water and subjected to t the chemical treatment. Mortality observed in the flow-through container was 100%. To date, PNPP l has had no problems related to zebra mussels. Conclusions c Perry Nuclear Power Plant has taken the approach that the best method for avoiding problems with zebra mussels is preventive treatment of plant water systems. The current pro;, ram of monitoring and chemical treatments will be continued to minimize the possibility that PNPP will experience future problems due to zebra mussels. i. I I l l ( l Clam /MusselMontioring Page41 l-
O 1996 Annual Environmental And Emuent Release Report HERBICIDE USAGE , Herbicides are used sparingly on the PNPP site. An application must be made to the PNPP Enviromnental Unit prior to spraying to ensure that only approved chemicals are used, and only in approved areas. , Table 26 provides a compilation of herbicide usage at the PNPP for 1996. All usage was in g compliance with Ohio Environmental Protection Agency regulations. No adverse environmental Impacts as a result of this usage were noted during weekly site environmental inspections. Surflan AS and Round Up were used in equal portions to make up the total quantity except where noted. Table 26: Herbicide usage Date Applied Location Acres Gallons 5/14/96 Chem Cone. % $ Perimeter E Field 2.3 100 2 5/14/96 Warehouse 6 gravel area 1 30 2 7/10/96 Protected area perimeter 6 200 2 7/10/96 Warehouse 3 gravel area 3 100 2 9/17/96 Perimeter E Field 2.3 250 2 9 e 9 Herbicide Usage Page 42 0
l 1996 Annual Environmental And Efnu:nt Release Report l 1 i l SPECIAL REPORTS ) - l NONCOMPLIANCES
. NPDES Permit Noncompliances
) The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System, or NPDES permit, is issued by the Ohio i Environmental Protection Agency (OEPA). It establishes monitoring requirements and limits for discharges from the plant. It also specifies the locations from which the plant is allowed to discharge. There was one notification made to the OEPA in 1996. On October 14,1996, the September NPDES Repon was mailed to the OEPA as required by the ) NPDES Permit . This report was not received by the OEPA and a notification was mailed to PNPP. A l duplicate report was generated and mailed to the OEPA on November 15,1996. To prevent recurrence, subsequent NPDES Reports have been sent by Certified Mail. 2 EPP Noncompliances 1 The Environmerc.al Protection Plan, or EPP, is a part of the PNPP Operating License. It requires non-radiological environmental monitoring programs and reponing. There were no EPP noncompliances identided in 1996. UNREVIEWED ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONS All proposed changes in plant design or operation, as well as tests or experiments conducted during i 1996 were reviewed for potential environmental impact in accordance with the EPP and administrative ) quality assurance procedures. The reviews ensured that no changes were performed which could cause an adverse environmental impact. Therefore, there were no potentially significant unreviewed environmental questions in 1996. NONROUTINE REPORTS ) l There was one nonroutine report in 1996. l l i' l The founh quarter industrial waste permit, September 1996 data, identified analysis results for mercury at 2.1 ppb, which was above the limit of 2.0 ppb. A letter was mailed to the Lake County , Department of Utilities on January 14,1997 detailing the investigation conducted at PNPP. The ) investigation could not identify any mercury process at PNPP, coupled with a history free of mercury
. contamination, an error in the sampling or analysis was considered the most probable explanation.
l l Special Reports Page 43 1
O 1996 Annual Environmental And Emuent Release Report I APPENDIX A: 1996 REMP DATA
SUMMARY
D i l t 4i i l Of I
%)
i i i S:I 5 t GI: i l I
+
1 i i t Appendix A: 1996 REMP Data Summary Page 44 g{
6, &, , e c> g o o e a, ,o o Air Gamma Spectral Summary Report 1996 Radiologicd Environmental Monitoring Program Data Summary Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Lake County Ohio Docket no. : 50-440/50-44I Type and Mean of Results from Mean ofResults from Location with Hishest Annual Mean: Mean of Results fmm Number of Lower All Locations and . AllIndicatorlocations and Iscation # and Mean and All Control Locations and Sampic Type Analyses Limit ' Number Detected /NumberCollected Number Detecte4 Number Colleesed Distance and Number Detecte4 Number Collected Number Detected / Number Collected and Units Performed (LLD) and Ranac and Ranac Direction and Ranae and Ranae Air Be-7 N/A 0.07 0.07 5 0.08 0.08 28 28.00/28.00' 24.00/ 24.00 ' O.60 4 /4 4 / 4 0.05 - 0.11 0.05 - 0.11 SW 0.05 - 0.11 0.05 - 0.09 Air Co-58 N/A LLD - - - - 28
. Air Co-60 N/A LLD - - - -
28 Air Cs-134 0.04 LLD - - - - 28 Air Cs-137 0.05 LLD - - - - 28 } _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __m ________________.____,_-_e
- -- - _ . - v m- - __ _2-__ -
-_.-___.m_.__.__-. _ _
.__._______m -
_ _ __ - ._. - . ._..._ m --m Air Gross BetoSummary Report 1996 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Data Summary Perry Nuclear Power PIM .* de County Ohio Docket no. : 50-440/50-441 i' Type and Mean of Results from Mean of Results from Location with Hiahest Annual Mean: Mean of Results front Number of - Lower ' AIILocations and AllIndicator I.mcations and Location # and Mesa and All Connel Locations and Sample Type Analyses Limit Number Detected /NumberCollected Number Detected / Number Collected Distance and Number Detected / Number Collected Number Detected / Number Conected and Units Performed (Lt.D) and Ranae and Ranac Direction and Ranae andP - Air Gross Beta 0.01 0.02 0.02 5 0.02 0.02 pCi/m3 364 364 / 364 312 / 312 0.60 52 / 52 52 / 52 0.01 - 0.04 0.01 - 0.04 SW 0.01 - 0.05 0.01 - 0.03 t l l
# - - _ . _ .8 _ -. E_- - - . _ - _ #. - _ . _ . , _ k ~ . - . S . , _ _ E - . - .. - S -- _. - - - ._ -- _.- N - -- . . - --
Airlodine Summary Report 1996 Rzdiologicd Environmental Monitoring Program Data Summary Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Lake County Ohio Docket no. : 50-440/50-441
' Mean of Results from Mean of Results from Location with Histhest An;nsel Mean: Mean of Resuhs from Type and Imwer Alllocations and AllIndicatorlocations and I.mcation # and Mean and All Control Locations and Number of Limit Number Detected /NumberCollected Number Detected / Number Collected Distance and Number DetectedfNumber Collected Number DetectedfNumber Collected Sample Type Analyses - "
and Ranae Direction andP - and Range and Units Performed {LLD) and Range Air I-131 0.05 LLD - - - - 364 s l i F t w 5 l I i b 1 h r t P L t f r
L Fish Gamma Spectral Summary Report 1996 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Data Summary ' Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Lake County Ohio Docketno. : 50-440/50-441 e l ' Type and Mean of Results from Mean of Results from location with Hishest Annual Mean: Mean of Results from Number of lower AllImcations and AllIndicator1 mentions and I.ocation # and Mean and All Control Locations and ' Sample Type Analyses Limit Number Detected / Number Collected Number Detected / Number Collected Distance and Number Detected / Number Collected '. Number Deteceed/ Number Collected and Units Performed (LLD) and Ranae and Range Direction and Ranac and Range Fish Co-58 97.00 LLD - - - - , 25 l Fish Co-60 97.00 LLD - - - - l 25 : Fish Cs-134 97.00 LLD - - - - 25 Fish Cs-137 112.00 LLD - - - - 25 i Fish Fe-59 195.00 LLD - - - - 1 25 Fish K-40 N/A 2,198.26 2,322.50 25 2,766.70 1,319.70 ! 25 25.00 /25.00 11.00 / 11.00 0.60 2 / 11 11 / I4 1,319.70 - 2,955.40 1,693.80 - 2,955.40 NNW 1,693.80 - 2,955.40 1,319.70 - 2,692.70 Fish Mn-54 97.00 LLD - - - - 25 [ Fish Zn-65 195.00 LLD - - - - 25
- t 5
. . . i e.
-O e e -.
e . . ---__-___ ___ - _____ e __s - _ _ c y ..y . e. .
Food Products Gamma SpectrJ Summary Report 1996 Rr.:liologicci Environmentr.1 Monitoring Program Data Summary
, Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Lake County Ohio Docket no. : 50 440/50-441 T 3pe and Mean of Results from Mean of Results from Location with Hiahest Annual man- Mean of Results fran Number of Lower All I.scations and AllIndicator Locations and Location # and Mean and - AII Control Locations snd
- Sarnple Type Analyses Limit Number Detected / Number Collected Number Detected / Number Collected Distance and Number Detected / Number Collected Number Detected /NenberCollected and Units Performed (LLD) and Ranae R and__anee Direction and Ranac and Range Food Products Be-7 .N/A 555.11 555.11 37 774.07 LLD 19 4.00 /19.00 4.00/ 13.00 1.50 I /5 /
245.20 - 774.07 245.20 - 774.07 ENE 774.07 - 774.07 Food Products Co-58 N/A LLD - - - - 19 Food Products Co-60 N/A LLD - - - - 19 Food Products Cs-134 4S.00 LLD - - - - 19 Food Products Cs-137 60.00 LLD - - - - 19 Food Products 1-131 0.05 LLD - - - - 19 Food Products K-40 N/A 3,200.79 3,869.08 37 5,400.00 3,960.25
, 19 19.00/19.00 13.00 / 13.00 1.50 2 /5 14 / 6 1,4303 0 - 6,340.00 1,4303 0- 6,340.00 ENE 1,43030 - 6,340.00 1,650.90 - 4,628.10
Milk Gamma Spectral Summary Report 1996 R diological Environmental Monitoring Program Data Summary Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Lake County Ohio Docket no. : 50-440/50-441' Type md Mean of Results from Mean ofResults from 1.acation with Irishest Annual Mean: Mean ofResdts fican Number of lower All Locations and AllIndicatorlocations and . Location # and Mean and .
. All Control Locations and Sampic Type Analyses - Limit Number Detected / Number Collected Number Detected / Number Collected Distance and Number Detected / Number Collected Number Detected / Number Collected asuf Units Performed (LLD) and Range and Rantee Direction andP - and * -
Milk Ba-140 45.00- LLD - - - - 49 l Milk Cs-134 11.00 LLD - . - - 49 Milk Cs-137 13.00 LLD - - - . 49 Milk K-40 N/A 1,497.88 1,519.01 61 1,879.55 1,464.52 49 49.00/49.00 30.00/30.00- 7.40 11 / 11 19 / 19 1,157.60 - 2,128.80 1,157.60 - 2,128.80 SE 1,782.10 - 2,128.80 1,305.40 - 1,579.90 Milk La-140 11.00 LLD - - - - 49 O O O 9 9 O E % 5 & &
Milk fodine Summary Report !996 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Data Summary . Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Lake County Ohio Docketno. : 50-440/50-44I l 2 i
~
a Type and ' Mean of Results from Mean of Results from location with Hishest Annual Mean: Mean ofResults from f Number of lower All Locations and AllIndicator Imcations and . Imcation # and Mean and All Connel Locahons and ! Sample Type Analyses Limit Number Detected / Number Collected Number Detected / Number Collected Distance and Number Detected / Number Collected Number Detected / Number Collected . and Units Perf_ormed G_LD) and_ Range and Range Direction and Ranae and Ranae l Milk I-131 0.75 LLD - - - - 49 I l ! I
- 4 e
e
?
1 f [ i L I f
?
1 i t
.. - . __ - -, , , _ . . _ , . _ . , . _ . - , - , , . . -~..m.__ , , , . ,.,.__,,m_,,.._. - . -, - ,. . .
. . _ , . .. , , . _ , . , , . - . , - . . , _ . . ~ . . _ . _ ,
Sediment Gamma Spectral Summary Report 1996 Radiological Environmenti Monitoring Program Data Summary Perry Nuclear Power Plani, Lake County Ohio Docket no. : 50-440/50-44I Type and Mean of Results from Mean of Results from Location with flighest Annual Mean: Mean of Results fmm Number of Lower All Locations and AllIndicatorImcations and Location # and Mean and All Control tocations and Sample Type Analyses Limit Number DetectedNumber Collected Number Detected / Number Collected Distance and Number Detecte& Number Collected Number Detecte4 Number Collected and Units Performed (LLD) and Range and _ Range Direction and Range and Range Sediment Co-58 50.00 LLD - - - - 14 Sediment Co-60 40.00 LLD - - - - 14 Sediment Cs-134 112.00 LLD - - - - 14 Sediment Cs-137 135.00 506.09 367.97 32 920.46 920.46 14 8.00 /I4.00 6.00/ 12.00 15.80 2 /2 2 / 2 S7.02 - 1,2543 0 87.02 - 1,054.40 WSW - 586.62 - 1,254.30 Sediment K-40 N/A 14,291.79 13,009.58 32 21,985.00 21,985.00 14 14.00 / I4.00 12.00 / 12.00 15.80 2 /2 2 / 2 5,848.20 - 26,192.00 5,848.20 - 22,126.50 WSW - 17,778.00 - 26,192.00 O O O _ O - -- - _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ O E E E N b
Soit Gamma Spectral Summary Report 1996 Rdiologicd Environmentl Monitoring Program Dat; Summary Peny Nuclear Power Plant, Lake County Ohio Docket no. : 50-440/50-441 Type and Mean of Results from Mean of Results from location with flighest Annual Mean: Number of Lower All Locations and Mean of Results from AllIndicator Locations and imcation 8 and Mean and Sample Type Analyses Lim'i Number Detected / Number Collected Number Detected / Number Collected Distance and All Controllocatkwis and and Units Performed (L_LD) and Range Number Detecte& Number Collected Number Detecte4 Number Collected and Range Direction and Range and Range Soil { Co-58 300.00 LLD - - - 14 Soil Co-60 40.00 LLD - - - 14 Soil Cs-134 60.00 LLD - - 14 Soil Cs-137 30.00 229.14 243.07 9 353.46 14 145.62 14.00 /14.00 12.00/ 12.00 0.70 2 /2 54.89 - 356.95 2 / 2 54.89 - 356.95 ESE 349.97 - 356.95 139.41 - 151.82 Soil K-40 N/A I1,582.07 11,095.25 6 14,503.')0 14,503.00 14 14.00/ 14.00 12.00 / 12.00 11.00 2 /2 9,471.95 - 15,055.00 2 / 2 9,471.95 - 13,043.00 SSW - 13,951.00 - 15,055.00 l
e TLD Gamma Dose Summary Report 1996 Radiologicol Environmental Monitoring Program Data Summary Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Lake County Ohio Docketno. : 50-440/50-441 Type and Mean of Results from Mean of Results from laation with Highest Annual Mean: Mean of Results from Number of Lower All Locations and AIIIndicator Locations and Imcation # and Mean and All Control Locations and l Sampic Type Analyses Limit Number Detected / Number Collected Number Detected, Number Collected Distance and Number Detected / Number Collected Number Detecte4 Number Collected ! and_ Units Performed (LLD) and Range and Ranne Direct'en a_nd Ranze and Ranae i TLD TLD Direct 1.00 15.41 15.31 29 19.13 16.66 mrem /qtr 109 109 / 109 101 / 101 4.30 4/4 8/8 11.07 - 22.46 11.07 - 22.46 SSE 15.79 - 22.46 14.64 - 19.18 TLD TLB Direct 1.00 14.71 14.60 21 17.93 16.08 l mrem /qtr 109 109 / 109 101 / 101 5.10 4/4 8/8 i 9.94 - 19.43 9.94 - 19.43 WSW 16.86 - 19.28 14.73 - 17.83 l TLD i TLA Direct 1.00 56.48 56.62 29 72.70 54.70 l mrem /yr 28 28 / 28 26 / 26 4.30 1/I 2/2 46.42 - 72.70 46.42 - 72.70 SSE 72.70 - 72.70 51.00 - 58.41 j i
^ '
O M @ 9 9 O E 9 W y 9
v m w v v v v v v , ,v v Vegetatin Gamma Spectral Summary Report 1996 Radiologicd Environmental Monitoring Program Data Summary Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Laka County Ohio Docket no. : 50-440/50-441 Type and Mean of Results from Mean of Results from location with Highest Annual Mean: Mean of Resu!ts from Number of Lower AII Locations and AllIndicator Locations and location # and Mean and All Controllocations and Sample Type Analyses Limit Number Detected / Number Collected Number Detected, Number Collected Distance and Number Detected / Number Collected Number Detecte4 Number Collected Performed (LLD) and Range and Range Direction and Range and Range an_d Units Vegetation Be-7 N/A 2,908.92 2,868.56 7 3,174.50 3,054.20 23 23.00 /23.00 18.00/ 18.00 0.60 6 /6 5 / 5 650.00 - 7,621.30 650.00- 7,62130 NE 999.29 - 4,613.20 2,117.50 - 3,937.10 Vegetation Co-58 N/A LLD - - - - 23 Vegetation Co-60 N/A LLD - - - - 23 Vegetation Cs-134 0.05 LLD - - - - 23 Vegetation Cs-137 0.06 LLD - - - - 23 Vegetation 1-131 0.05 LLD - - - - 23 Vegetation K-40 N/A 5,247.40 5,194.22 35 6,069.58 5,438.84 23 23.00 /23.00 I8.00/ 18.00 0.60 6 /6 5 / 5 2,797.80 - 9,837.10 2,797.80- 9,837.10 E 3,039.10 - 9,837.10 3,206.50 - 7,228.00
- - - - - - - - _ - - - - - _ . _ _ _ _ _ , . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .____2 _ _ _ _ , _ .
1 Water Gamma Spectral Summary Report 1996 Radiological Environmentd Monitoring Program Data Summary Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Lake County Ohio Docket no. : 50 440/50-44I T3pe and Mean of Resulta from Mean of Results from Iscation with Hiahest Annual Mean: Mean of Results from Number of imwer All Locatie a and AllIndicatorImcations and location # and Mean and All ControlImcanons and Sampic Type Analyses Limit Number DetectedVumber Collected Number Detected, Number Collected Distance and Number Detected / Number Collected Number Detected / Number Collected (LLD) and Ranac Direction and Ranae and Range and Units Performed andimme Water Ba-140 45.00 LLD - - - . 54 l, Water Co-58 11.00 LLD - - - - 54 Water Co-60 11.00 LLD - - - - 54 Wcter Cs-134 11.00 LLD - - - - 54 Water Cs-137 13.00 LLD - - - - 54 l i Wxter Fe-59 22.00 LLD - - - - 54 Water La-140 11.00 LLD - - - . ; 54 , i n i f Water Mn-54 11.00 LLD - - - - [ 54 Water Nb-95 11.00 LLD - - - - 54 : s L 1 Water Zn-65 22.00 LLD - - - - 54 !
' ' a %
m_ E 5 E E E $ $
---_y-_--_------..-
~
- - - - - - - - - - - - - y - -- - - y - - ---- ------ g- , -- y--
-y. --
Water Gamma Spectral Summary Repott 1996 t Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Dato Summary , Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Lake County Ohio Docket no. : 50-440/50-441
- Type and Mean of Results from Mean of Results from location with Highest Annual Mean: Mean ofResults fmm Number of Imwer All Locations and AllIndicator Locations and location # and Mean and All Control Locations and
, Sarapic Type Analyses Limit Number Detected / Number Collected Number Detected / Number Collected Distance nd Number Detected / Number Collected Number Detected /NumberCollected and Units Performed (LLD) and Range and Range Direction and Ranae and Ranae Water Zr-95 22.00 LLD - - - - 54 P 1 t I j r f r f I
Water Gross Beta Summary Report 1996 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Data Summary Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Lake County Ohio . Docket no. : 50-440/50-441 Mean of Results frorn Mean of Results from Location with Hishest Annual Mean: Mean ofResuhs nom Type and All Locations and AllIndicator Locations and Location # and Merg and All ContreiIncat5ns and Number of Imrer .. Number hkO:_...... Collected Number Detected / Number Collected Distance and . Number Detected / Number Collected Number Detected /NumberCollected Limit Sample Type Analyses ' and Ranse Direction and Ranae and Ranae . and Units Perfonned (LLD) and_R._anse 3.00 2.54 2.56 60 3.00 2.49 Water Gross Beta 12 / 12 pCi/l 54 54 / 54 42 / 42 1.00 9/9
.1.56 - 4.40 1.93 - 4.40 WSW l.% - 4.40 1.56 - 3.05 i
' I-1 l t p I i i i 5
- I a t e e e
-O a -__ _ _ -'-m s - _
- e * '17- "
e l1m-w *v- -M9 -' t 5 w % 9 *7-r t'- e W W w'h ____ :n - 5
e = . , WeerTritium Summary Report 1996 Rrdiological Environmental Monitoring Program Data Summary Perry Nuclear Fower Plant, Lake County Ohio Docket no. : 50-440750-441 Type and Mean of Results from Mean of Results from Imcation with Hishest Annumi Mean: Mean ofResults Bom Number of Imwer AIIImcations and AllIndicator Locations and lacanon # and Mean and AII Conmot Locations and - Sample Type Analyses Limit Number Detected / Number Collected Number Detected / Number Collected Ihstance and Number Detected /Nanber Collected Number Detected / Number Collected and Units Performed (LLD) and_ Range and Ranae Deecnon and Ranee anda - Water T-3 1,300.00 -LLD - - . . 18 ) s i 9
._._ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ . _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ . _ _._m . . _ _ . _ _ ._ _ . _ - _ _ . . _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ . . _ . _ . . _ __ _ _ . _ _ _
1996 Annual Environmental And Emuent Release Report O: 1 APPENDIX B: 1996 REMP DATA e t e. 9 e e 4 6' e 9' Appendix B: 1996 REMP Data Page 45 g, 1 I
Air G:mno Spectral Det;il Report 1996 Radiologic:.1 Environmentd Monitoring Program Detail Data -t Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Laks County Ohio Docket no. : 50-440/50-44I . i Sample Frequency is: Quarterly Results in pCi/m3 +/- 2 Sigma Location Sample Type Collection Period End Be-7 Co-58 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 I Air 4/3/96 0.081 +/- 0.021 LLD LLD LLD LLD 1 I Air 7/3/96 0.070 +/- 0.005 LLD LLD LLD LLD , I r I - Air 10/2/96 0.063 +/- 0.008 LLD LLD LLD LLD , I Air 1/2/97 0.050 +/- 0.007 LLD LLD LLD LLD I i 3 Air 4/3S6 0.097 +/- 0.015 LLD ll D LLD LLD 3 Air 7/3/96 0.082 +/- 0.009 LLD LLD LLD LLD 3 Air 10/2/96 0 075 +/-0.007 LLD LLD LLD LLD l 3 Air 1/2/97 0.052 +/- 0.006 LLD LLD LLD LLD i 4 Air 4/3/96 0.103 +/- 0.012 LLD LLD LLD LLD i 4 Air 7/3/96 0.082 +/- 0.012 LLD LLD LLD LLD ; 4 Air 10/2/96 0.069 +/- 0.011 LLD LLD LLD LLD 4 Air 1/2/97 0.048 +/- 0.005 LLD LLD LLD LLD i
Air GIman Spectral Det;il Report 1996 e Radiologic:.1 Environmental Monitoring Program Detail Data Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Lake County Ohio Docket no. : 50-440/50-441 Sample Fiv.sy is: Quarterly Results in pCi/m3 +/- 2 Sigma Location Sample Type Collection Period End ' Be-7 Co-58 - Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 j
$ Air - 4/3/96 0.105 +/- 0.016 LLD LLD LLD LLD -
5 Air 7/3.96 0.087 +/- 0.008 LLD LLD LLD LLD t t 5 Air 10/2/96 0.076 +/- 0.008 LLD LLD LLD LLD a ; e 5 Air 1/2/97 0.047 +/- 0.006 LLD LLD LLD LLD ; s b 6 Air 4/3/96 0.094 +/- 0.013 LLD LLD LLD LLD t 4 f 6 Air 7/3/96 0.087 +/- 0.010 LLD' LLD LLD LLD l l I 6 Air 10/2/96 0.073 +/- 0.006 LLD LLD LLD LLD [r L i 6 Air 1/2/97 0.054 +/- 0.007 LLD LLD LLD LLD -
)
i 7 Air 4/3/96 0.092 +/- 0.018 LLD LLD LLD LLD - i 7 Air 7/3/96 0.076 +/-0.001 - LLD LLD LLD 11D i l l i 7 Air 10/2/96 0.063 +/- 0.008 LLD LLD LLD LLD 7 Air 1/2/97 0.054 +/-0.005 LLD LLD LLD LLD L e e
's__..._,_ e_
. . _. .e. - --_ .. . _ _ -e _ _e_ _. _. _._ .. .._e.. . _._-e...._.____________! ..
'e e
Air Gr.mma Spectral Detail Report 1996 Radiologicd Environmentd Monitoring Program Detail Data {' Peny Nuclear Power Plant, Lake County Ohio Docket no. : 50-440/50-441 Sample Frequency is: Quarterly Results in pCi/m3 +/- 2 Sigma Location Sample Type Collection Period End Be-7 Co-58 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 ; 35 Air 4/3/96 0.087 +/- 0.015 LLD LLD LLD LLD 35 Air 7/3/96 0.082 +/- 0.001 LLD LLD LLD LLD i 35 Air . 10/2/96 0.070 +/- 0.008 LLD LLD LLD LLD i LLD LLD ! 35 Air 1/2/97 0.054 +/- 0.006 LLD LLD. I i i [ t i i k _ _ _ - - - - _ _ _ _ _ , _ _ _ _ _ = _ . _ - - . _ - _ . _ _ _ - - . - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ . .----_--- _- _ -_. __ - ______ - ._ _ -
Air Gross Beta Detail Report 1996 Radiologic-1 Environmental Monitoring Program Data Summery Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Lake County Ohio Docket no. : 50-440/50-441 Sample Frequency is: Weekly Results in pCi/m3 +/- 2 Sigma Location 1 3 4 5 6 Collecticn Period Sample Type 7 35 I/386 to I/10/96 Air 0.033 +/-0.004 0.025 +/- 0.004 0.027 +/- 0.004 0.027 +/- 0.004 0.027 / 0.004 0.029 +/- 0.004 0.030 +/- 0.005 1/10S6 to 1/17/96 Air 0.036 +/- 0.005 0.035 +/- 0.005 0.034 +/- 0.004 0.032 +/- 0.004 0.030 +/- 0.004 0.035 +/- 0.004 0.032 +/- 0.005 I/17/96 to 1/24/96 Air 0.019 +/- 0.004 0.017 +/- 0.004 0.019 +/- 0.004 0.018 +/- 0.004 0.017 +/- 0.004 0.017 +/- 0.004 0.018 +/- 0.005 1/24/96 to I/31/96 Air 0.022 +/- 0.004 0.025 +/- 0.005 0.025 +/- 0.004 0.024 +/- 0.004 0.023 +/- 0.004 0.021 +/- 0.004 0.021 +/- 0.005 1/31/96 to 2/ 766 Air 0.026 +/- 0.004 0.030 +/- 0.004 0.026 +/- 0.004 0.03! +/- 0.004 0.030 +/- 0.004 0.030 +/- 0.004 0 030 +/- 0.005 2/ 7/96 to 2/14/96 Air 0.015 +/- 0.004 0.013 +/- 0.004 0.017 +/- 0.004 0.016 +/- 0.004 0.013 +/- 0.004 0.016 +/- 0.004 0.018 +/- 0.004 2/I4/96 to 2/21/96 Air 0.014 +/- 0.004 0.014 +/- 0.005 0.020 +/- 0.004 0.014 +/- 0.004 0.015 +/- 0.004 0.015 +/- 0.004 0.015 +/- 0.005 2/21/96 to 2/28/96 Air 0.010 +/- 0.004 0.010 +/- 0.004 0.015 +/- 0.004 0.010 +/- 0.004 0.008 +/- 0.004 0.009 +/- 0.004 0.012 +/- 0.004 2/28/96 to 3/ 6/96 Air 0.025 +/- 0.004 0.020 +/- 0.004 0.019 +/- 0.004 0.022 +/- 0.004 0.024 +/- 0.004 0.021 +/- 0.004 0.024 +/- 0.004 3/ 6/96 to 3/13/96 Air 0.020 +/- 0.004 0.020 +/- 0.005 0.018 +/- 0.004 0.019 +/- 0.004 0.017 +/- 0.004 0.018 +/- 0.004 0.019 +/- 0.005 3/13/96 to 3/20S6 Air 0.017 +/- 0.005 0.015 +/- 0.005 0.017 +/- 0.004 0.012 +/- 0.004 0.017 +/- 0.004 0.018 +/- 0.004 0.018 +/- 0.005 3/20/96 to 3/27/96 Air 0.020 +/- 0.005 0.020 +/- 0.005 0.019 +/- 0.004 0.018 +/- 0.004 0.014 +/- 0.004 0.0I8 +/- 0.004 0.017 +/- 0.005 3/27S6 to 4/ 3/96 Air 0.018 +/- 0.005 0.020 +/- 0.005 0.020 +/- 0.004 0.018 +/- 0.004 0.017 +/- 0.004 l 0.0I8 +/- 0.004 0.020 +/- 0.005 [ 4/3/96 to 4/10/96 Air 0.018 +/- 0.005 0.017 +/- 0.005 0.014 +/- 0.004 0.016 +/- 0.004 0.018 +/- 0.004 l 0.015 +/- 0.004 0.020 +/- 0.005 4/10/96 to 4/17/96 Air 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 O.014 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0 002 o * * * * * *
- ai *- - - - >
m_.-----_-_ ---_ y - - - - - - y-- - _ - - - y- -- - _-
,---_--- y -_------ -- ---_
Air Gross Beta Detzil Report 1996 Radi:fogical Environmental Monitoring Program Data Summary Perry Nuclear Power Plait, Lake County Ohio Docket no. : 50-440/50-44I Sample Frequency is: Weekly Results in pCi/m3 +/- 2 Sigma Location 1 3 4 5 6 Collection Period Sample Type 7 35 4/17/96 to 4/24/96 Air 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/-0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 4/24/96 to 5/1/96 Air 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 5/ I/96 to 5/ 8/96 Air 0.01I +/- 0.002 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 . 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 i 5/866 to 5/I566 Air 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.01I +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/-0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 5/15/96 to 5/22/96 Air 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.01I +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 5/22/96 to 5/29/96 Air 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.01I +/- 0.002 0.01 I +/- 0.002 0.01I +/- 0.002 5/29/96 to 6/ 5/96 Air 0 011 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.01 I +/- 0.002 0.01I +/- 0.002 6/5/96 to 6/12/96 Air 0.008 +/- 0.002 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.0I0 +/- 0.002 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.009 +/- 0.002 0.010 +/- 0.002 6/12/96 to 6/19/96 Air 0.017 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.020 +/- 0.002 0.017 +/- 0.002 0.019 +/- 0.002 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 6/19/96 to 6/26/96 Air 0.009 +/- 0.002 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/-0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.009 +/- 0.002 0.011 +/- 0.002 6/26/96 to 7/3/96 Air 0.020 +/- 0.002 0.020 +/- 0.002 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.021 +/- 0.002 0.022 +/- 0.002 0.019 +/- 0.002 0.019 +/- 0.002 7/3/96 to 7/10/96 Air 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.017 +/- 0.002 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 7/10/96 to 7/17/96 Air 0.014 +/- 0.004 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.017 +/- 0.003 0.014 +/- 0.003 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/-0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 7/17/96 to 7/24/96 Air 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 7/24/96 to 7/3I/96 Air 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002
l Air Cross Bets Det:ll Report 1996 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Data Summary Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Lake County Ohio Docket no. : 50-440/50-441 Sample Frequencyis: Weekly Resultsin pCi/m3 +/- 2 Sigma Location 1 3 4 5 6 Collection Period Sample Type 7 35 7/31/96 to 8/7/96 Air 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.019 +/- 0.002 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.017 +/- 0.002 8/7/96 to 8/l4/96 Air 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 . 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 8/I4/96 to 8/2I/96 Air 0.017 +/- 0.002 0.021 +/- 0.002 0.01 S +/- 0.002 0.020 +/- 0.002 0.020 +/- 0.002 0.017 +/- 0.002 0.018 +/- 0.002 8/21/96 to 8/28/96 Air 0.022 +/- 0.002 0.023 +/- 0.002 0.022 +/- 0.002 0.024 +/- 0 003 0.025 +/- 0.003 0.023 +/- 0.002 0.023 +/- 0.002 8/28/96 to 9/4/96 Air 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.022 +/- 0.002 0.022 +/- 0.002 0.023 +/-0.002 0.025 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 9/4/96 to 9/l1/96 Air 0.019 +/- 0.002 0.022 +/- 0.002 0.019 +/- 0.002 0.022 +/- 0.003 0.019 +/- 0.002 ( 0.022 +/- 0.002 0.019 +/- 0.002 f 9/II/96 to 9/I8/96 Air 0.009 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/-0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 9/18/96 to 9/25/96 Air 0.020 +/- 0.002 0.022 +/- 0.002 0.020 +/- 0.002 0.024 +/- 0.003 0.021 +/-0.002 0.021 +/- 0.002 0.023 +/- 0.002 9/25/96 to 10/ 2/96 Air 0.020 +/- 0.002 0.022 +/- 0.002 0.019 +/- 0.002 0.023 +/- 0.002 0.021 +/- 0.002 0.022 +/- 0.002 0.021 +/- 0.002 10/2/96 to 10/9/96 Air 0.017 +/- 0.002 0.017 +/- 0.002 0.017 +/- 0 002 0.019 +/- 0.002 0.021 +/- 0.003 O.019 +/- 0.003 0.019 +/- 0.002 10/9/96 to 10/16/96 Air 0.020 +/- 0.002 0.023 +/-0.002 0.020 +/- 0.002 0.024 +/- 0.002 0.021 +/- 0.002 0.020 +/- 0.002 0.019 +/- 0.002 i 10/16/96 to 10/23/96 Air 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.017 +/ 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 10/23/96 to 10/30/96 Air 0.022 +/- 0.002 0.021 +/- 0.002 0.023 +/- 0.002 0.023 +/-0.002 0.022 +/- 0.002 0.022 +/- 0.002 0.023 +/-0.002 10/30/96 to 1I/6/96 Air 0.022 +/- 0.002 0.022 +/- 0.002 0.022 +/- 0.002 0.021 +/- 0.002 0.024 +/- 0.002 0.022 +/- 0.002 0.020 +/- 0.002 II/6/96 to II/13/96 Air 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.011 +/- 0.002 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.017 +/- 0.004 0.011 +/- 0.002 , II/13/96 to 11/20/96 Air 0.020 +/- 0.002 0.021 +/- 0.002 0.023 +/- 0.002 0.021 +/- 0.002 0.024 +/- 0.002 0.022 +/- 0.002 0.022 +/- 0.002 O_ _ _ _ e_ _ '. . -
'e . . _ ._
e ~ - _4_ _ .. e 9_ _ e s_
~
'e _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ .
e
Air Gross Beta Detril Report 1996 , Radiologicd Environmentd Monitoring Program Data Summary Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Lake County Ohio Docket no. : 50-440/50-441 i Sample Frequency is: Weekly Results in pCi/m3 +/- 2 Sigma i
- Location 1 3 4 5 6
, Collection Period Sample Type 7 35 II/20/96 to iIi27/96 Air 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 O.015 +/ 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 11/27/96 to 12/4/96 Air 0.020 +/- 0.003 0.023 +/- 0.003 0.023 +/- 0.003 0.023 +/- 0.003 0.024 +/- 0.003 0.025 +/- 0.003 0.021 +/- 0.003 12/4/96 to 12/11/96 Air 0.02 +/- 0.002 0.022 +/- 0.002 0.022 +/- 0.002 0.020 +/- 0.002 0,023 +/- 0.003 4 0.023 +/- 0.003 0.022 +/- 0.002 12/11/96 to 12/19/96 Air 0.020 +/- 0.002 0.017 +/- 0.002 0.021 +/- 0.002 0.021 +/- 0.002 0.019 +/- 0.002 i 0.019 +/- 0.002 0.020 +/- 0.002 ; i 12/19t96 to 12/26/96 Air 0.027 +/- 0.002 0.028 +/- 0.002 0.027 +/- 0.002 0.028 +/- 0.002 0.026 +/- 0.003 : 0.027 +/- 0.003 0.028 +/- 0.003 i 12/26/96 to 1/2/97 Air 0.026 +/- 0.003 0.025 +/- 0.002 0.024 +/- 0.002 0.025 +/- 0.002 0.028 +/- 0.003 I-0.026 +/- 0.003 0.025 +/- 0.002 i : a a [ t
-i i
[ t f 1
Air Iodine Det'il R: port 1976 Radiologicd Environmentd Monitoring Program Det:il Data - Perry Nuclear Power P! ant, Lake County Ohio Docket no. . 50-440/50-441 ; Sample Frequency in Weekly ResultsinpCi/m3 +/- 2 Sigma Collection Date - I-131 i Location Sampic Type I hir il3/96 to 1/1066 LLD 1 Air 1/10/96 to 1/f 786 LLD 1 Air 1/17/96 to 4/24/96 LLD I Air 1/24/96 to !!31/96 LLD 1 Air 101/96 to 2/7/96 LLD I Air 2/7/96 to 2/!4/96 LLD
.I Air 2/14/96 to 24 I/96 LLD I Air 2/21/96 to ::!28/96 LLD '
1 Air 2/28/96 to 3/6/96 LLD 1 Air 3/ 6796 to 3/13/96 LLD 1 Air 3/13i96 to 3/2006 LLD 1 Air 3/20/96 to 3/27/96 LLD , 1 Air 3/27S 6 to 4/3/96 LLD , I Air 4/3/96 to 4/10S6 LLD I Air 4/10/96 to 4/17/96 LLD 1 Air 4/17/96 to 4/24/96 LLD 1 Air 4/24/96 to 5/ I/96 LLD ; I Air 5/1)96 to 5/8/96 L1,D 1 Air 3/8/96 to 5/15796 LLD i Air 5/15/96 to 5/22/96 LLD I Air 5/22 S 6 to 5/29/96 LLD I Air 5/29/96 to 6/5/96 LLD r i Air 6/5/96 to 6/12/96 LLD 1 Air 6/12/96 to 6/19/96 LLD ; 1 Air 6/19/96 to G26S6 LLD 1 Air 6/26/96 to 7/3/96 LLD I I Air '7/366 ts 7/10/96 LLD I Air 7/lff96 to 7/17/96 LLD t
! Air 7/17/96 to 7/24/96 LLD I Air 7/24/96 to 7/31/96 LLD e 1 Air 701/96 to 8/7/96 LLD ,
1 Air 8/7/96 to 8/14.96 LLD l t Air R/14/96 to 8/21/96 LLD y I Air 8/21/96 to 8/28/96 LLD 1 Air 8/28/96 to 9/4/96 LLD i Air 9/ 4/96 - to 9/11/96 LLD 1 Air 9/11/96 to 9/18/96 LLD 3 1 Air 9/18/96 to 9/25/96 LLD. [ t Air 9/25!96 to 10/2/96 LLD ' 1 Air 10/2/96 to 10/9/96 LLD 1 Air 10/9/96 to 10/16/96 LLD ; I Air 10/16/96 to 10/23/96. LLD 1 Air 10/23/96 so 10G0/96 LLD 1 Air 10/30/96 to 11/6/96 LLD-1 Air 111 6/96 to 11/13/96 LLD . , 1 Air 11/13/96 to 11/20/96 LLD ! I Air 11/20/96 to 11/27/96 LLD I Air 11127/96 to 12/ 4/96 LLD 1 Air 12/ t/96 to 12/11/96 LLD I Air 12/lL96 to 12/19/96 LLD 1 Air 12/193eC to 12/26,">6 LLD-
~ ~ '
O_ _ _ _- _ e = ._ _ _ _ ___ __' S_ e __ _ _ _ _ _ _ 4- _ _ _ _ _ _ . - - -. 9- . . S. .. S 9. '9 . 9 !
w - - - - - --u------ u ---y------ . Ur - --- - ,On-
, TJ ~
Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Detail Data Peny Nuclear Power Plant, Lake County Ohio Docket no. : 50-440/50-441 Sample Frequency is: Weekly Resuhs in pCi/m3.+/- 2 Sigma Location Sample Type =
- Collection Date I-131 1 Air 12/26/96 to 1/2/97 LLD
.3 Air 1/3/96 to 1/10/96 LLD 3 Air 1/lG96 to - 1/17/96 LLD 3 Air 1/17/96 to 1/24/96 LLD i 3 Air I/24/96 to 1/31/96 LLD 3 Air 1/31/96 to 2/7/96 LLD 3 Air 2/7/96 to 2/14/96 LLD l 3 Air 2/14/96 to 2/21/96 LLD 3 Air 2/21/96 to 2/28/96 LLD 3 Air 2/28/96 to 3/6/96 LLD 3 Air 3/6/96 to 3/13/96 LLD 3 Air 3/13/96 to 3/20/96 LLD 3 Air 3/20/96 to 3/27/96 LLD 3 Air 3/27/96 to 4/3/96 LLD 3 Air 4/3/96 to 4/10/96 LLD 3 Air 4/lG96 to 4/17/96 LLD 3 Air 4/17/96 to 4/24/96 LLD 3 Air 4/24/96 to 5/I/96 LLD 3 Air 5/ 1/96 to 5/8/96 LLD 3 Air 5/ 8/96 to 5/15!96 LLD i 3 Air 5/15/96 to 5/22/96 LLD 3 Air 5/22/96 to -5/29/96 LLD i 3 Air 5/29/96 to 6/5/96 LLD 3 Air 6/5/96 to 6/12/96 LLD 3 Air 6/12/96 to 6/19/96 LLD 3 Air 6/19/96 to 6/26/96 LLD 3 Air 6/26/96 to 7/3/96 LLD 3 Air 7/3/96 to 7/10/96 LLD 3 Air 7/10/96 to 7/17/96 LLD 3 Air 7/17/96 to 7/24/96 LLD 3 Air 7/24/96 to 7/31/96 LLD 3 Air 7/31/96 to - 8/7/96 LLD 3 Air 8/7/96 to 8/I4/96 LLD 3 Air 8/I4/96 to 8/21/96 LLD 3 Air 8/21/96 to 8/28/96 LLD 3 Air 8/28/96 to 9/4/96 LLD i 3 Air 9/4/96 to 9/11/96 LLD 3 Air 9/11/96 to 9/18/96 LLD 3 Air 9/18/96 to 9/25/96 LLD 3 Air 9/25/96 to 10/2/96 LLD 3 Air 10/2/96 to 10/9/96 LLD 3 Air 10/9/96 to 10/16/96 LLD 3 Air 10/16/96 to 10/23/96 LLD 3 Air 10/23/96 to 10/30/96 LLD 3 Air 10/30/96 to 11/6/96 LLD 3 Air 11/6/96 to 11/I3/96 LLD 3 Air 11/13/96 to 11/20/96 LLD 3 Air 11/20/96 to 1I/27/96 LLD 3 Air 11/27/96 to 12/4/96 Lt.D 3 Air 12/4/96 to 12/11/96 LLD 3- Air 12/11/96 to 12/19/96 LLD
Air Iodine Detail Report 1996 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Detail Data Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Lake County Ohio Docket no. : 50-440/50-441 Sample Frequency is- Weekly ResultsinpCi/m3 O/- 2 Sigma Location Sample Type Collection Date I-131 3 Air 12/1986 to 12/2666 LLD 3 Air 12/26/96 to 1/2/97 LLD i 4 Air 1/3/96 to 1/10/96 LLD 4 Air 1/10/96 to 1/17/96 LLD I 4 Air 1/17/96 to 1/2466 LLD 4 Air 1/24/96 to 1/3166 LLD 4 Air I/3166 to 2/ 7/96 LLD 4 Air 2/ 7/96 to 2/14/96 LLD 4 Air 2/14/96 to 2/2166 LLD l 4 Air 2/21/96 to 2/28 S 6 LLD l 4 Air 2/2866 to 3/ 6/96 LLD l 4 Air 3/6/96 to 3/13/96 LLD l 4 Air 3/13S6 to 3/20S6 LLD l 4 Air 3/20S6 to 3/27/96 LLD l 4 Air 3/27/96 to 4/3/96 LLD , 4 Air 1/3/96 to 4/10/96 LLD I 4 Air 4/10/96 to 4/17/96 LLD l 4 Air 4/17/96 to 4/24/96 LLD I 4 Air 4/24/96 to 5/ li)6 LLD 4 Air 5/IS6 to 5/ 8S6 LLD l 4 Air $/ 8/96 to 5/15/96 LLD l 4 Air 5/15/96 to 5/22/96 LLD l 4 Air 5/22/96 to 5/29/96 LLD l 4 Air 5/29/96 to 6/5/96 LLD 4 Air 6/5/96 to 6/1266 LLD 4 Air 6/12/96 to 6/1966 LLD l 4 Air 6/19/96 to 6/26/96 LLD 4 Air 6/26/96 to 7/ 3S6 LLD l 4 Air 7/3/96 to 7/10/96 LLD t i Air 7/10S6 to 7/17/96 LLD l 4 Air 7/17S6 to 7/24/96 LLD I 4 Air 7/24/96 to 7/3166 LLD 4 Air 7/31/96 to 8/ 7/96 LLD 4 Air 8/ 7/96 to 8/14/96 LLD 4 Air 8/14/96 to 8/21/96 LLD 4 Air 8/21/96 to 8/28S 6 LLD 4 Air 8/28S 6 to 9/4/96 LLD 4 Air 9/4/96 to 9/11/96 LLD 4 Air 9/11/96 to 9/18/96 LLD 4 Air 9/18/96 to 9/25 S 6 LLD 4 Air 9/25/96 to 10/2 S 6 LLD 4 Air 10/2S 6 to 10/966 LLD 4 Air 10/9/96 to 10/16/96 LLD 4 Air 10/16/96 to 10/23/96 LLD 4 Air 10/23/96 to 10/30/96 LLD 4 Air 10/30/96 to 11/ 6/96 LLD 4 Air 11/6/96 to 11/13/96 LLD 4 Air 1IIl3/96 to 1I/20S6 LLD 4 Air 11/20/96 to 11/27/96 LLD 4 Air 11/27/96 to 12/4/96 LLD 4 Air 12/4/96 to 12/11/96 LLD O e
'e e 4 e e e e
'e e
v v "
- v v .v (J ~ v v v, T U AirIodine DetailReport 1996
- Radio!ogical Environmental Monitoring Program Detail Data Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Lake County Ohio Docket no. : 50-440/50-441 Sample Frequency is: Weekly Results in pCi/m3 o/- 2 Sigma Location SampleType Collection Date I-131 4 Air 12/I!/96 to 12/19/96 LLD 4 Air 12/19/96 to 12/26/96 LLD 4 Air 12/26/96 to 1/2/97 LLD 5 Air 1/3/96 to 1/10/96 LLD
-5 Air 1/10/96 to 1/I7/96 LLD 5 Air 1/17/96 to 1/24/96 LLD 5 Air 1/24/96 to 1/31/96 LLD 5 Air 1/31/96 to 2/7/96 LLD 5 Air 2/ 7/96 to 2/14/96 LLD 5 Air 2/14/96 to 2/21/96 LLD 5 Air 2/21/96 to 2/28/96 LLD 5 Air 2/28 96 to 3/6/96 LLD 5 Air 3/6/96 to 3/13/96 LLD 5 Air 3/13/96 to 3/20/96 LLD
$ Air 3/20/96 to 3/27/96 LLD 5 Air 3/27/96 to 4/3/96 LLD 5 Air 4/3/96 to 4/10/96 LLD 5 Air 4/10/96 to 4/17/96 LLD 5 Air 4/17/96 to 4/24/96 LLD 5 Air 4/24/96 to 5/I/96 LLD 5 Air 5/1/96 to 5/8/96 LLD 5 Air 5/8/96 to 5/15/96 LLD 5 Air 5/15/96 to 5/22/96 LLD 5 Air 5/22/96 to 5/29/96 LLD 5 Air 5/29/96 to 6/5/96 LLD
$ Air 6/5/96 to 6/12/96 LLD 5 Air 6/12/96 to 6/19/96 LLD 5 Air 6/19/96 to 6/26/96 LLD 5 Air 6/26/96 to 7/3/96 LLD 5 Air 7/3/96 to 7/10/96 LLD 5 Air 7/10/96 to 7/I7/96 LLD 5 Air 7/17/96 to 7/24/96 LLD 5 Air 7/24/96 to 7/31/96 LLD 5 Air 7/31/96 te 8/7/96 LLD 5 Air 8/7/96 to 8/14/96 LLD 5 Air 8/14/96 to - 8/21/96 LLD 5 Air 8/21/96 to 2/28/96 LLD 5 Air 8/28/96 to 9/4/96 LLD 5 Air 9/4/96 to 9/11/96 LLD 5 Air 9/11/96 to 9/18/96 LLD 5 Air 9/18/96 to 9/25/96 LLD 5 Air 9/25/96 to 10/2/96 LLD 5 Air 10/2/96 to 10/9/96 LLD 5 Air 10/9/96 to 10/16/96 LLD 5 Air 10/16/96 to 10/23/96 LLD 5 Air 10/23/96 to 10/30/96 LLD 5 Air 10/30/96 to 11/6/96 LLD 5 Air 11/ 6/96 to 11/13/96 LLD 5 Air 11/13/96 to 1I/20/96 LLD 5 Air I1/20/96 to I1/27/96 LLD 5 Air 11/27/96 to 12/ 4/96 LLD ;
+_.
Air Iodine Detail Report 1996 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Detail Data Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Lake County Ohio Docket no. : 50-440/50-441 Sample Frequency is- Weekly Results in pCi/m3 +/- 2 Sigma Location Sample Type Collection Date I-131 5 Air 12/4/96 to 12/11/96 LLD 5 Air 12/11/96 to 12/19/96 LLD 5 Air 12/19S6 to 12/26/96 LLD 5 Air 12/26/96 to ~ 1/2/97 LLD 6 Air I/3/96 to 1/10/96 LLD 6 Air 1/10/96 to 1/17/96 LLD 6 Air III7/96 to 1/24/96 LLD 6 Air If24/96 to I/31/96 LLD 6 Air 1/31/96 to 2/7/96 LLD 6 Air 2/7/96 to 2/14/96 LLD 6 Air 2/14/96 to 2/21/96 LLD 6 Air 2/21/96 to 2/28/96 LLD 6 Air 2/28/96 to 3/6/96 LLD 6 Air 3/6/96 to 3/13/96 LLD 6 Air 3/13/96 to 3/20/96 LLD 6 Air 3/20/96 to 3/27/96 LLD 6 Air 3/27/96 to 4/3/96 LLD 6 Air 4/3/96 to 4/10/96 LLD 6 Air 4/10/96 to 4/17/96 LLD 6 Air 4/17/96 to 4/24/96 LLD 6 Air 4/24/96 to 5/I/96 LLD 6 Air 5/I/96 to 5/8/96 LLD 6 Air 5/8/96 to 5/15/96 LLD 6 Air 5/15/96 to 5/2266 LLD 6 Air 5/22/96 to 5/29/96 LLD 6 Air 5/29/96 to 6/5/96 LLD 6 Air 6/5/96 to 6/12/96 LLD 6 Air 6/12/96 to 6/19/96 LLD 6 Air 6/19/96 to 6/26/96 - LLD 6 Air 6/26/96 to 7/3/96 LLD 6 Air 7/3/96 to 7/10/96 LLD 6 Air 7/10/96 to 7/17/96 LLD 6 Air 7/17/96 to 7/24/96 LLD 6 Air 7/24/96 to 7/31/96 LLD 6 Air 7/31/96 to 8/7/96 LLD 6 Air 8/7/96 to 8/14S6 LLD 6 Air 8/14/96 to 8/21/96 LLD 6 Air 8/21/96 to 8/28/96 LLD 6 Air 8/28/96 to 9/4/96 LLD 6 Air 9/4/96 to 9/11/96 LLD 6 - Air 9/11/96 to 9/18/96 LLD 6 Air 9/18/96 to 9/25/96 LLD 6 Air f'25/96 to 10/2/96 LLD 6 Air 10/2/96 to 10/9/96 LLD 6 Air 10/966 to 10/16/96 LLD 6 Air 10/16/96 to 10/23/96 LLD 6 Air 10/23/96 to 10/30/96 LLD 6 Air 10/30/96 to 1II6/96 LLD 6 Air 11/ 6/96 to 11/13/96 LLD 6 Air 11/13/96 to 11/20/96 LLD 6 Air 11/20/96 to 11/27/96 LLD
^ ' '
G O O O O O O O O O O
U UT ~ 'O ---~ U i O UE
~ U~ ' 7 ~-
- Air Iodine Detan Report 1996 r
. Raiiological Environmental Monitanng Program Detail Data !
Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Lake County Ohio Docket no. : 50-440/50-441 Sample Frequency is: Weekly Results in pCi/m3 +/- 2 Signu I L Location Sample Type Collection Date I-131 : 6 Air 11/27/96 to 12/4/96 LLD ! 6 Air 12/ 4/96 to 12/11/96 LLD i 6 Air 12/11/96 to 12/19/96 LLD 6 Air 12/19/96 to 12/26/96 LLD '! 6 Air 12/26/96 to 1/2/97 LLD 7 Air 1/3/96 - to 1/l&96 I l LLD 7 Air 1/10/96 to 1/17/96 LLD 7 Air I/17/96 to 1/24/96 LLD 7 Air 1/24/96 to I/31/96 LLD 7 Air 1/31/96 to 2/ 7/96~. LLD 7 Air 2/7/96 to 2/14/96 LLD 7 Air 2/14/96 to 2/21/96 LLD 7 Air 2/21/96 to . 2/28/96 LLD 7 Air 2/28/96 to 3/6/96 LLD ! 7 Air 3/6/96 to 3/13/96 LLD I 7 Air 3/13/96 to 3/20/96 LLD ' 7 Air 3/20/96 to 3/27/96 LLD 7 Air 3/27/96 to -4/3/96 LLD 7 Air 4/3/96 to 4/1696 LLD 7 Air 4/10/96 to 4/17/96 LLD ! 7 Air 4/17/96 to 4/24/96 LLD 7 Air 4/24/96 to 5/I/96 LLD 7 Air 5/1/96 to 5/ 8/96 LLD ! 7 Air 5/8/96 to 5/15/96 LLD 7 Air 5/15/96 to 5/22/96 LLD 5 7 Air 5/22/96 to 5/29/96 . LLD 7 Air 5/29/96 to 6/5/96 LLD 7 Air 6/5/96 to 6/12/96 LLD : 7 Air 6/12/96 to 6/19/96 LLD , 7 Air 6/19/96 to 6/26/96 LLD r 7 Air 6/26/96 to 7/3/96 LLD 7 Air 7/3/96 to 7/10/96 LLD 7 Air 7/10/96 to 7/17/96 LLD i 7 Air 7/17/96 to 7/24/96 LLD 7 Air 7/24/96 to 7/31/96 LLD 7 Air 7/31/96 to 5/ 7/96 LLD 7 Air 8/7/96 to 8/14/96 LLD 7 Air 8/14/96 to 8/21/96 LLD 7 Air 8/21/96 to 8/28/96 LLD 7 Air 8/28/96 to 9/4/96 LLD 7 Air 9/4/96 to . 9/11/96 LLD 7 Air 9/11/96 to 9/18/96 LLD 7 Air 9/18/96 to 9/25/96 LLD 7 Air 9/25/96 to 10/2/96 LLD 7 Air 10/2/96 to 10/9/96 LLD' 7 Air 10/9/96 to 10/16/96 LLD 7 Air 10/16/96 to 10/23/96 LLD 7 Air 10/23/96 to 10/30/96 LLD l' 7 Air 10/30/96 to 11/6/96 LLD 7 Air 11/ 6/96 to 11/I3/96 LLD
- 7 Air 11/13/96 to 11/20/96 LLD t
Air Iodine Detail Report 1996 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Detail Data Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Lakt County Ohio Docket no. : 50-440/50-441 Sample Frequency is: Weekly Results in pCi/m3 +/- 2 Sigma Location Sample Type Collection Date I 131 7 Air iI/20S6 to I1/2766 LLD 7 Air 11/27 S 6 to 12/ 4/96 LLD 7 Air 12/ 4/96 to 12/1166 LLD 7 Air 12/1I/96 to 12/19/96 LLD 7 Air 12/19S 6 to 12/26/96 LLD 7 Air 12/26/96 to 1/2S7 LLD 35 Air I/3/96 to 1/10/96 LLD 35 Air 1/10S 6 to 1/1766 LLD 35 Air 1/17/96 to I/24/96 LLD 35 Air 1/24S 6 to 1/3166 LLD 35 Air 1/3166 to 2/766 LLD 35 Air 2/ 7/96 to 2/14S6 LLD 35 Air 2/14/96 to 2/21/96 LLD 35 Air 2/21/96 to 2/28/96 LLD 35 Air 2/28/96 to 3/6/96 LLD 35 Air 3/ 6/96 to 3/1366 LLD 35 Air 3/1366 to 3/20/96 LLD 35 Air 3/20/96 to 3/27S 6 LLD 35 Air 3/2766 to 4/3/96 LLD 35 Air 4/3/96 to 4/10/96 LLD 35 Air 4/10/96 to 4/17/96 LLD 35 Air 4/17/96 to 4/24/96 LLD 35 Air 4/24/96 to 5/I/96 LLD 35 Air 5/I/96 to 5/8/96 LLD 35 Air 5/ 8/96 to 5/15/96 LLD 35 Air 5/15/96 to 5/2296 LLD 35 Air 5/22/96 to 5/29S6 LLD 35 Air 5/29/96 to 6/5/96 LLD 35 Air 6/5/96 to 6/12S6 LLD 35 Air 6/12/96 to 6/1986 LLD 35 Air 6/19!96 to 6/26/96 LLD 35 Air 6/26/96 to 7/ 3S6 LLD 35 Air 7/ 3S6 to 7/10/96 LLD 35 Air 7/10/96 to 7/17/96 LLD 35 Air 7/17/96 to 7/24/96 LLD 35 Air 7/24/96 to 7/31/96 LLD 35 Air 7/3I/96 to 8/ 7/96 LLD 35 Air 8/7/96 to 8/l466 LLD 35 Air 8/14/96 to 8/2166 LLD 35 Air 8/21/96 to 8/28/96 LLD 35 Air 8/28/96 to 9/4/96 LLD 35 Air 9/4/96 to 9/1IS6 LLD ( 35 Air 9/1166 to 9/18S 6 LLD 35 Air 9/18/96 to 9/25/96 LLD l 35 Air 9/25/96 to 10/2/96 LLD 35 Air 10/2/96 to 10/9/96 LLD 35 Air 10/9/96 to 10/16/96 LLD 35 Air 10/16/96 to 10/23/96 LLD 35 Air 10/23/96 to 10/30/96 LLD 35 Air 10/30/96 to 11/ 6/96 LLD 35 Air 11/ 6/96 to 11/1366 LLD _ _ - _ -9 _ ----- _ *___ * * * * * * * - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -
- v. v -v v. v v v ,
v v. AirIodine Detail Report 1996
- Radiologica! Environmental Monitoring Program Detail Data Perry Nuclear Power Plant Lake County Ohio ' Docket no. : 50-440/50-441 Sample Frequency is: Weekly Results in pCi/m3 +/- 2 Sigma Location _ Sample Type Collection Date I-131 <
35 Air II/13/96 to 11/20/96 LLD 35 Air 11/20/96 to 11/27/96 LLD 35 Air 11/27/96 to 12/4/96 LLD 35 Air 12/4/96 to 12/11/96 LLD 35 Air 12/11/96 to 12/19/96 LLD 35 Air 12/19/96 to 12/26/96 LLD 35 Air 12/26/96 to 1/2/97 LLD l i 9
Fish C mma Spectral Det il Report 1996 Radiologic:.1 Environmental Monitoring Program Detail Data Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Lake County Ohio Docket no, : 50-440/50-441 Sample Frequency is: Bi-Annually Results in pCi/kg +/- 2 Sigma Location Sample Type Collection Period End Co-58 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 Fe-59 K-40 Mn-54 Zn-65 25 Carp 5/17 S 6 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD I,693.80 +/- 296.00 LLD LLD 25 Drum 5/17S 6 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2,097.70 +/- 319.00 LLD LLD 25 Redhorse 5/17 S 6 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2,488.40 +/- 263.00 LLD LLD l 25 Smatimouth bass 5/1786 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2,525.60 +/- 425.00 LLD LLD 1 1 l 25 Walleye 5/17/96 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD l 2,955.40 +/- 260.00 LLD LLD 1 25 White bass 5/17/96 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2,157.10 +/- 280.00 LLD LLD 23 White perch 5/17S 6 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2,371.70 +/- 363.00 LLD LLD 1 l 25 White sucker $/17S6 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2,284.70 +/- 290.00 LLD LLD 23 Yellow perch 5/17 S 6 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD I,809.90 +/- 407.00 LLD LLD l l 25 smallmouth bass 10/8S 6 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD l 2,585.20 +/- 383.00 LLD LLD l 23 walleye 10/8/96 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2,578.00 +/- 449.00 LLD LLD 32 Drum 5/1766 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1,867.70 +/- 225.00 LLD LLD O 4 t # O 4 4 4 4 4
- Fish Gcmana Spectral Detail Report 1996 Radiological Environment:1 Monitoring Program Detail D:ta Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Lake County Ohio Docket no. : 50-440/50-441 ,
Sample Frequency is: - Bi-Annually. Results in pCi/kg +/- 2 Sigma ! i i Location ' SampicType Collection Period End Co-58 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 Fe-59 K-40 . Mn-54 Zn-65 LLD LLD LLD ' 32 Smallmouth bass 5/17/96 LLD LLD 2,687.10 +/- 22832 LLD LLD ; i 32 Walleye 5/17/96 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD
~
2,692.70 +/- 371.00 LLD LLD 32 White bass 5/17/96 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD [ 2,561.70 +/- 264.00 LLD LLD ' 32 White perch 5/17/96 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2,045.40 +/- 275.00 LLD LLD ! t 32 White sucker 5/17/96 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD ' 2,047.20 +/- 374.00 LLD LLD 32 Yellow perch 5/17/96 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD i 2,656.10 +/- 561.00 LLD LLD ; 32 carp 10/8/96 LLD LLD LLD LID -LLD I,319.70 +/- 306.00 LLD LLD ; I 32 catfish 10/8/96 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2,208.20 +/- 246.00 LLD LLD ' 32 drum 10/8/96 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD I,483.60 +/-392.00 LLD LLD
'{
32 gizzard shad 10/8/96 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD [ I,906.80 +/- 296.II LLD LLD ; 32 redhorse 10/8/96 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD i 2,352.60 +/- 430.00 LLD LLD. ; 32 white bass 10/8/96 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2,264.20 +/- 472.00 LLD LLD ; f i t I
Fish Ccama Spectral Det:.it Report 1996 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Detail Data Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Lake County Ohio . Docket no. : 50-440/50-441 Sample Frequency is: Bi-Annually Results in pCi/kg +/- 2 Sigma Location Sampic Type Collection Period End Co-58 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 Fe-59 K-40 Mn-54 Zn-65 32 white sucker 10/8.96 LLD LLD 11D 11D LLD 2,303.40 +/- 366.00 LLD LLD l e
~
O e .' o . _ - . e _ - -._-. e .- e -. e- e' _e. _ _ __e__
Food Products G:maa Spectral Det;il Report 1996 Radiologicd Environmental Monitoring Program Detail Data Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Lake County Ohio Docket no. : 50-440/50-441 Sample Frequencyis: Monthly Results in pCi/kg wet +/- 2 Sigma Loc::: ion Sample Type Collection Period End Be-7 Co-58 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 1-131 K-40 37 BEET GREENS 9/11/96 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 4,460.00 +/- 310.00 37 CIID"ISE CABBA 9/11/96 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD I,54230 +/- 251.00 37 TURNIP GREENS 9/11/96 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 5,107.00 +/- 454.00 37 beet greens 10/15/96 774.07 +/- 131.00 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 6,340.00 +/- 371.00 37 chinese cabbage 10/15/96 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD I,43030 +/-278.00 62 BEET GREENS 9/11/96 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 5,022.70 +/- 345.00 62 BROCCOLI 9/11/96 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 3,924.90 +/- 267.00 62 CABBAGE 9/11/96 LIJ LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2,401.80 +/- 290.00 62 cabbage 10/15/96 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1,82435 +/- 17930 70 BROCCOLI 9/11/96 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 3,292.40 +/- 389.00 70 CABBAGE 9/I1/96 LLD LLD LLD LLD' LLD LLD I,887.80 +/-240.00 70 CAULIFLOWER 9/11/96 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2,82430 +/- 340.00
Food Products Gc man Spectral Detail Report 1996
. Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Detail Data Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Lake County Ohio Docket no. : 50-440/50-441 Sample Frequency is: Monthly Results in pCi,1g wet +/- 2 Sigma Loctrion Sample Type Collection Period End Be-7 Co-58 .CM4 Cs-134 Cs-137 I-131 K-40 70 broccoli 10/15/96 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 4,628.10 +/- 498.00 70 cabbage 10/15/96 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1,650.90 +/- 262.00 l 70 red cabbege 10/15/96 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2,582.90 +/- 341.00 77 BEET GREENS 9/11/96 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 5,090.60 +/- 306.00 77 TURNIP GREENS 9/1I/96 245.20 +/- 91.70 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2.81930 +/- 260.00 77 beet greens 10/15/96 555.75 +/- 162.00 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 4,855.20 +/- 341.00 77 turnip greens 10/15/96 645.42 +/- 148.00 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 5,479.60 +/- 392.00 e' .'e
~
e O . . __4 * - _ -
- e -. * -
Milk Gamm2 Spectral Detril Report 1996 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Det .il Data Perry Nucle:r Power Plant, Lake County Ohio Dock:t no. : 50-440/50-441 Sample Frequency is: Bi-Monthly Results in pCi/l +/ . 2 Sigrua Lcettion Sample Type Collection Period End Ba-140 Cs-134 Cs-137 K-40 La-140 51 Milk I/15/96 LLD LLD LLD I.332.6 +/- 144.0 LLD
$1 Milk 2/12/96 LLD LLD LLD I,421.1 +/- 104.0 LLD 51 Milk 3/11/96 LLD LLD LLD I,5303 +/- 162.0 LLD St Milk 4/8/96 LLD LLD LLD 1,557.9 +/- 132.0 LLD 51 Milk 4/22/96 LLD LLD LLD I,489.4 +/- 161.0 LLD
, 51 Milk 5/6/96 LLD LLD LLD I,549.7 +/- 122.0 LLD 51 Milk 5/20/96 LLD LI.D LLD I,579.9 +/- 178.0 LLD 51 Milk 6/10/96 LLD LLD LLD 1.392.0 +/- 149.0 LLD 51 Milk 6/24/96 LLD LLD LLD 1,4483 +/- 147.0 LLD 51 Milk 7/8/96 LLD LLD LLD 1,481.5 +/- 140.0 LLD 51 Milk 7/22/96 LLD LLD LLD 1,305.4 +/- 148.0 LLD i 51 Milk 8/5/96 LLD LLD LLD I,479.8 +/- 121.0 LLD i _ - - - _ . _ _ _ - _ - _ - _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ - . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ ~ - . - - - -- - .-.
, Milk Grmaa Spectral Detail Report 1596 ! Radiological Environmentd Monitoring Program Detail Data Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Laks County Ohio Docket no. : 50-440/50-441 Sample Frequency is: Bi-Monthly Resultsin pCi/l +/- 2 Sigma , l Loccion Sample Type Collection Period Er:d Ba-140 Cs-134 Cs-137 ' K-40 La-140 b Milk 8/19/96 LLD LLD LLD 1,571.6 +/- 176.0 LLD 51 51 Milk 9/9/96 LLD LLD LLD I,4833 +/- 154.0 LLD Milk 9/24S 6 LLD LLD 11D I,3453 +/- 117.0 LLD 51 I 51 Milk 10/9/96 LLD LLD LLD 1,518.8 +/- 163.0 LLD . t I i 51 Milk 10/21/96 LLD LLD LLD 1,458.1 +/- 119.0 LLD l 51 Milk 11/11/96 LLD LLD LLD I,404.8 +/- 113.0 LLD 51 Milk 12/9/96 LLD LLD LLD 1,475.9 +/- 168.0 LLD 61 Milk 4/22/96 LLD LLD LLD 1,876.7 +/- 186.0 LLD 61 Milk 5/6/96 LLD LLD LLD I,880.7 +/- 140.0 LLD 61 Milk 5/20S6 LLD LLD LLD 1,782.1 +/- I80.0 LLD ! 61 Milk 6/10/96 LLD LLD LLD I,860.7 +/- 146.0 LLD 61 Milk 6/24/96 LLD LLD LLD 1,793.0 +/- 167.0 LLD i i 6 O .
- L. '* * -- -- _
9 __ - 9 _, 9 _e _ 9l . _ _je_ _ _e_ _
----v----- v , ,v v y 3 y W W ,
W W Milk Ccmma Spectral Det;_il Report 1996 Radiologicd Environmentd Monitoring Program Dettil D:la Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Lake County Ohio Docket no. : 50-440/50-441 Sample Frequency is: Bi-Monthly Results in pCi/l +/- 2 Sigma Location Sample Type Co!!cetion Period End Ba-140 Cs-134 Cs-137 K-40 La-140 61 Milk 7/8/96 LLD LLD LLD I,843.7 +/- 144.0 LLD 61 Milk 7/22/96 LLD LLD LLD 1,856.4 +/- 168.0 LLD 6i Mitk 8/5/96 LLD LLD LLD 1,862.1 +/- I 83.0 LLD 61 Milk 8/19/96 LLD LLD LLD 2,128.8 +/- 174.0 LLD 61 Milk 9/9/96 LLD LLD LLD I,883.9 +/- 193.0 LLD 61 Milk 9/24/96 LLD LLD LLD 1,906.9 +/- 132.0 LLD 71 Milk t/15/96 LLD LLD LLD I,284.7 +/- III.0 LLD i 71 Milk 2/12/96 LLD LLD LLD I,293.3 +/- 124.0 LLD 71 Milk 3/11/96 LLD LLD LLD I,259.5 +/- 107.0 LLD 71 Milk 4/8/96 LLD LLD LLD I,380.2 +/- 161.0 LLD 71 Milk 4/22/96 LLD LLD LLD 1,448.1 +/- 109.0 LLD 71 Milk 5/6/96 LLD LLD LLD 1,334.5 +/- 170.0 LLD i l
.~ . . _ _ . . - _ - _ _ . .. . - . . --
Milk G:mma Spectral Detil Report 1996 Radiologic:.I Environment:1 Monitoring Program Detil Data Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Lake County Ohio Docket no. : 50-440/50-441 Sample Frequency is: Bi-Momhly Resu!N in pCi/l +/- 2 Sigma Location Sample Type Collection Period End Ba-140 Cs-134 Cs-137 K-40 La-140 71 Milk 5/20/96 LLD LLD LLD I,394.0 +/- 121.0 LLD 71 Milk 6/10/96 LLD LLD LLD 1,261.3 +/- 108.0 LLD , L 71 Milk 6/24/96 LLD LLD LLD I,269.0 +/- 132.0 11D 71 Milk 7/8/96 LLD LLD LLD 1,157.6 +/- 138.0 LLD l 71 Milk 7/22/96 LLD 11D LLD 1.167.8 +/- 148.0 LLD , 71 Milk 8/5/96 LLD LLD LLD 1,279.0 +/- 159.0 LLD } 71 Milk 8/19/96 LLD LLD LLD 1,404.4 +/- 128.0 LLD , f 71 Milk 9/9/96 LLD LLD LLD !,285.5 +/- 167.0 LLD L r 71 Milk 9/24/96 LLD LLD LLD I,311.4 +/- 145.0 LLD 71 Milk 10/9/96 LLD LLD LLD 1.249.7 +/- 142.0 LLD 71 Milk 10/21/96 LLD LLD LLD I,296.1 +/- 121.0 LLD t 71 Milk i1/12/96 LLD LLD LLD 1,258.1 +/- 174.0 LLD i I
, 5 o e e e
't e e e e e e
m y , ,v_ v v. :v V V U . , U U Milk GIman Spectral Det-il Report 1996 Radiologic:.1 Environmental Monitoring Program Dettil Data Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Lalce County Ohio Docket no. : 50-440/50-44I '- Sample Frequency is: Bi-Monthly Results in pCi/I +/- 2 Sigma Location Sample Type Collection Period End Ba-140 Cs-134 . Cs-137 K-40 La-140 71 Milk 12/ 9/96 LLD LLD LLD 1,561.0 +/- 144.0 LLD 1
Milk Iodine Detril Report 1996 i Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Detail Data Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Lake County Ohio Docket no. : 50-440/50-441 - Sample Frequency is: Bi-Monthly Results in pCi/l +/- 2 Sigma i Location Sample Type Collection Period End I-131 51 Milk 1/15/96 LLD i' 51 Milk 2/12/96 LLD 51 Milk 3/I1/96 LLD r 5I Milk 4/8/96 LLD 51 Milk 4/22/96 LLD l 51 Milk 5/6/96 LLD 51 Milk 5/20/96 LLD [ 51 Milk 6/10,96 LLD 51 Milk 6/24/96 LLD 51 Milk 7/8/96 LLD t 51 Milk . 7/22/96 LLD - 51 Milk 8/5/96 LLD < 51 Milk 8/19/96 LLD : 1 51 Milk 9/9/96 LLD 51 Milk 9/24/96 LLD ' , 51 Milk 10/9/96 LLD
- 51 Milk 10/21/96 LLD 51 Milk i1/11/96 LLD 51 Milk 12/9/96 LLD 61 Milk 4/22/96 LLD '
61 Milk 5/6/96 LLD - 61 Milk 5/20/96 LLD ! 61 Milk 6/10/96 LLD 61 Milk 6/24/96 LLD r 61 Milk 7/ 8/96 LLD 61 Milk 7/22/96 LLD , 61 Milk 8/5/96 LLD ~! 61 Milk 8/19/96 LLD' I 61 Milk 9/9/96 LLD i 61 Milk 9/24/96 LLD i i 71 Milk 1/15!96 LLD 71 Milk 2/12/96 - LLD 71 Milk 3/11/96 -LLD 71 Milk 4/8/96 LLD 71 Milk 4/22/96 LLD l 71 Milk 5/6/96 LLD 71 Milk 5/20/96 LLD ! 71 Milk 6/10/96 LLD ! 71 Milk 6/24/96 LLD i 71 Milk 7/8/96 LLD ! 71 Milk 7/22/96 LLD ! 71 Milk 8/5/96 LLD , 71 Milk 8/19/96 LLD 71' Milk 9/9/96 LLD l 71 Milk 9/24/96 LLD ! 71 Milk 10/9/96 LLD i 71 Milk 10/21/96 LLD , 71 Milk 11/12/96 LLD l
^ 5 O - - . - - , .
S - . - . - .S .. -- 9- - -- 9 -. - -- 9 4 4 9 S O i
.--__- - -. - y -
Milk lodine Detril Report 1996 .
- Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Detail Data !
Peny Nuclear Power Plant, Lake County Ohio Docket no. : 50-440/50-441 Sample Frequency is- Bi-Monthly Results in pCi/l +/- 2 Sigma j Location Sample Type Collection Penod End I-131 71 Milk 12/9/96 LLD + i 6 S i I I i i i i a i L R
Sediment Gamen Spectral Detsil Report 1996 Radiological Environment:1 Monitoring Program Detail Data Perry Nucicar Power Plant, Lake County Ohio Docket no. : 50-440/50-441 Sample Frequency is: Bi-Annually Results in pCi/kg dry +/- 2 Sigma Location Sample Type Collection Period End Co-58 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 K-40 25 Sediment 5/16/96 LLD LLD LLD 186.59 +/- 40.40 15,914.00 +/- 989.00 I 25 Sediment IQf 7A4 LLD LLD LLD LLD 13,203.00 +/- 561.00 I 26 Sediment 5/16/96 LLD LLD LLD 178.86 +/- 35.60 15,718.00 +/-962.00 f 26 Sediment 10/7/96 LLD LLD LLD LID 13,501.00 +/- 615.00 i 27 Sediment 5/16/96 LLD LLD LLD 611.06 +/- 31.69 22,126.50 +/- 586.55 ; i v 27 Sedirnent 10/7/96 LLD LLD LLD 1,054.40 +/- 63.90 16,630.00 +/- 840.00 i r 32 Sediment 5/16/96 LLD LLD LLD 586.62 +/-6230 17,778.00 +/- 874.00 i 32 Sediment 10/7/96 LLD LLD' LLD I,25430 +/- 58.20 26,192.00 +/- 864.00 i I 63 Sediment 5/20/96 LLD LLD LLD LLD 8,85930 +/- 639.00 63 Sediment 10/10/96 LLD LLD LLD LLD 10,194.00 +/- 563.00 l 64 Sediment 5/20/96 LLD LLD LLD LLD 10,484.00 +/- 558.00 i l < l t t 64 Sediment 10/1496 LLD LLD LLD LLD 5,848.20 +/-409.00 l l e e _e., ' _O _
't _ 9_ .9 e_ _
e ,e _ e -
v v , ,U .U U U \J U U_ , v v Sediment G mms Spectral Detr:il Report 1996 Radislogicr.1 Environmental Monitoring Program Detril Dats Perry Nuclear Power Plant, L:ke County Ohio Docket no. : 50-440/50-441 Sample Frequency is: Bi-Annually Results in pCi/kg dry +/- 2 Sigma . Locuion Sample Type Collection Period End Co-58 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 K-40 i 65 Sediment 5/20/96 LLD LLD LLD LLD 11,027.00 +/- 629.00 [ c i 65 Sediment 10/10/96 LLD LLD LLD LLD 12,610.00 +/- 648.00 i L i I I 4 t I e I f i T w c- i-mw- er- * - mr --Mw4%es*W-Cw e-- g =a--r e'-- e =* w - * - - -t*'-
Soil Ccama Spectral Detril Report 1996 Radiologicd Environmental Monitoring Program Detail Data Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Lake County Ohio Docket no. : 50-440/50-441 Sample Frequency is: Quarterly Results in pCi!kg +/- 2 Sigma Location Sample Type Collection Period End Co-58 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 K-40 3 Soil 4/3/96 LLD LLD LLD 217.51 +/-21.00 10,719.00 +/-383.00 3 Soil 10/4/96 LLD LLD LLD 230.87 +/- 25.17 9,471.95 +/-433.57 4 Soil 4/3/96 LLD LLD LLD LLD 13,043.00 +/- 536.00 4 Soit 10/4/96 LLD LLD LLD LLD 12,820.00 +/- 535.00 6 Soit 4/ 3S6 LLD LLD LLD 151.82 +/- I8.70 15,055.00 +/- 505.00 6 Soit 10/4/96 LLD LLD LLD 139.41 +/-26.90 13,951.00 +/- 571.00 7 Soil 4/3/96 LLD LLD LLD 334.17 +/- 38.00 II,735.00 +/- 623.00 7 Soil 10/4/96 LLD LLD LLD 301.13 +/-25.40 1I,307.00 +/- 506.00 9 Soit 4/3/96 LLD LLD LLD 349.97 +/- 24.30 10.845.00 +/- 450.00 9 Soil 10/4/96 LLD LLD LLD 356.95 +/-27.70 10,470.00 +/- 510.00 12 Soil 4/3/96 LLD LLD LLD 331.22 +/- 25.10 11,248.00 +/- 466.00 12 Soit 10/4/96 LLD LLD LLD 326.01 +/-31.70 10,577.00 +/- 522.00 O s
'o e e e e e e' 'e e
._y_____--- -- - --
v -- -- v- u - -- ------y- --
- - u- - - -- -- u - -- - -- -- v -- - - v- -
Soil Gr maa Spectral Detail Report 1996 Radiologicd Environmental Monitoring Program Detail Data Perry Nuclear Power Plant Lake County Ohio Docket no. : 50-440/50-441 Sample Frequency is- Quarterly Results in pCi/kg dry +/- 2 Sigma Location Sample Type Collection Period End Co-58 CW Cs-134 Cs-137 K ! 35 Soil 4r 3/96 LLD LLD LLD I81.33 +/- 16.83 10,466.00 +/- 299.91 35 Soil iOf4/96 LLD LLD LLD I66.69 +/- 2I.80 10,441.00 +/- 484.00 i t
- ___-_____.__---_.-_------------------r - - - - - - - - ' = ~ ~ '- - -
TLD G:mma Dose Detail Report 1996 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Detail Data Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Lake County Ohio Ihcket no. : 50-440/50-441 , Sample Frequency is: Quarterly . Results in mrem /qtr +/- 2 Sigma [ f i Location Sample Type Collection Period Exposure ; 1 TLD ll5/96 to 4!4/96 11.07 ' +/- 0.40 [ t TLD 4/4/96 to 7'I/96 14.89 +/- 0.22 t I TLD 7/1/96 to 10/4/96 14.11 +/- 0.24 [ t TLD 10/4/96 to 1/ 6/97 14.05 +/- 0.21 [ i 3 TLD 1/5/96 to 4/4/96 13.21 +/- 0.21 ; 3 TLD 4/4/96 to 7/I/96 16.54 +/- 0.23 t 3 TLD 7/l/96 to 10/4/96 16.26 +/- 031 3 TLD 10/4/96 ' to II6/97 15.67 +/- 0.21 5 4 TLD I/5/96 to 4/4/96 13.57 +/- 0.25 [ 4 TLD 4/4/96 to 7/1/96 16.21 +/- 0.22 : 4 TLD 7/I/96 to 10/4/96 1738 +/- 0.20 4 TLD 10/4/96 to 1/6/97 15.69 +/- 0.21 ' 5 TLD 1/5/96 to 4/4/96 13.51 +/- 0.21 I 5 TLD 4/4/96 to 7/I/96 15.29 +/- 0.22 5 TLD 7/I/96 to 10/4/96 15.53 +/- 0.22 + 5 TLD 10/4/96 to II6/97 16.04 '/- 0.19 [ 6 TLD 1/8/96 to 4/4/96 15.48 +/- 033 ! 6 TLD 4/4/96 to 7/I/96 17.16 +/- 0.29 6 TLD 7/I/96 to 10/4/96 19.18 +/- 0.19 ! 6 TLD 10/4/96 to II6/97 16.44 +/- 0.21 : 7 TLD II5/96 to 4/4/96 13.55 +/- 0.20 1 4/4/96 to 7/1/96 ! 7 TLD 1539 +/- 0.21 7 TLD 7/I/96 to 10/4/96 16.41 +/- 0.27 - 7 TLD 10/4/96 to 1/6/97 14.85 +/- 0.20 ! i 8 TLD 1/5/96 to 4/4/96 11.41 +/- 0.23 ! 8 TLD 4/4/96 to 7/1/96 13.11 +/- 035 8 TLD 7/I/96 to 10/4/96 13.57 +/- 0.20 8 TLD 10/4/96 to 1/6/97 12.55 +/- 030 > 9 TLD 1/5/96 to 4/4/96 9 TLD 4/4/96 to -7/I/96 14.60 +/- 0.21 r 9 TLD 7/1/96 to 10/4/96 Il.84 +/- 031 9 TLD 10/4/96 to I/6/97 12.74 +/- 0.24 r 10 TLD I/5/96 to 4/4/96 16.74 +/- 0.20 10 TLD 4/4/96 - to 7/1/96 17.90 +/- 0.20 10 TLD 7/1/96 to 10/4/96 1933 +/- 0.23 l 10 TLD 10/4/96. to 1/6/97 17.04 +/- 033 ; f 11 TLD 1/5/96 to 4/4/96 13.50 +/- 0.22 :
; 11 TLD 4/4/96 to 7/1/96 13.57 +/- 0.21 11 TLD 7/I/96 to 10/4/96 16.46 +/- 0.23 .
' ^ ' !
O S S 9 . -_-. 9 . - 9- - .$ - . ._ 9 9 . O. - . _ _ _@ _-_
v v * ,
.
- v v v v v v .v ' , .
v v -- g TLD Gcama Dose Detail Report 1996 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Detail Data Perry Nuclear Power Plant. Lake County Ohio Docket no. : 50-440/50-441 Sample Frequency is: Quarterly Results in mrem /qtr +/- 2 Sigma Location Sample Type CoIIcction Period Exposure II TLD' 10/4/96 to 1/6/97 14.01 +/- 0.18 12 TLD 1/5/96 to 4/4/96 12.62 +/- 0.% . 12 TLD 4/4/96 to 7/I/96 16.47 +/- 0.23
-12 TLD 7/1/96 to 10/4/96 17.14 +/- 0.54 ,
12 TLD 10/4/96 to 1/ 6/97 14.94 +/- 0.21 13 TLD 1/5/96 to 4/4/96 13.50 +/- 0.22 13 TLD 4/4/96 to 7/I/96 15.22 +/- 0.21 13 TLD 7/ 1/96 to 10/4/96 16.76 +/- 035 13 TLD 10/4/96 to 1/6/97 14.89 +/- 0.21 14 TLD 1/5/96 to 4/4/96 13.50 +/- 0.25 1 14 TLD 4/4/96 to 7/I/96 14.87 +/- 0.23 14 TLD 7/1/96 to 10/4/96 14 TLD 10/4/96 to I/6/97 12.71 +/- 031
- TLD 1/5/96 to 4/4/96 1339 +/- 0.21 '
15 15 TLD 4/4/96 to 7/ I/96 13.43 +/- 034 15 TLD 7/1/96 to 10/4/96 15.% +/- 0.24 15 TLD 10/4/96 to 1/6/97 14.02 +/- 0.19 , i 21 TLD 1/7/96 to 4/4/96 15.48 +/- 0.39 21 TLD 4/4/96 to 7/l/96 17.59 +/- 0.29 21 TLD 7/1/96 to 10/4/96 19.76 +/- 0.23 21 TLD 10/4/96 to I/6/97 17.63 +/- 0.17 , 23 TLD 1/ 7/96 to 4/4/96 14.91 +/- 0.23 23 TLD 4/4/96 to 7/I/96 16.55 +/- 0.17 23 TLD 7/1/96 to 10/4/96 20.23 +/- 0.26 : 23 TLD 10/4/96 to 1/6/97 16.60 +/- 0.19 24 TLD 1/ 6/96 to 4/4/96 14.64 +/- 0.25 i 24 TLD 4/4/96 to 7/I/96 17.42 +/- 0.28 ' 24 TLD 7/I/96 to 10/4/96 17.75 +/- 0.24 24 TLD 10/4/96 to 1/6/97 15.20 +/- 0.20 29 '1LD 1/ 5/96 to 4/4/96 15.79 +/- 0.25 , 29 TLD 4/4/96 to 7/1/96 22.46 +/- 0.28 29 TLD 7/I/96 to 10/4/96 19.73 +/- 0.22 29 TLD 10/4/96 to 1/6/97 18.54 +/- 0.20 30 TLD 1/5/96 to 4/4/96 12.61 +/- 0.21 30 TLD 4/4/96 to 7/l/96 14.76 +/- 0.19 30 TLD 7/I/96 to 10/4/96 15.77 +/- 0.29 30 TLD 10/4/96 to 1/6/97 14.20 +/- 0.20 31 TLD I/5/96 to 4/4/96 14.82 +/- 0.23 31 TLD 4/4/96 to 7/1/96 16.82 +/- 032 31 TLD 7/ I/96 to 10/4/96 18.55 +/- 0.25
TLD G:mma Dose Detail Report 1996 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Detail Data .
. Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Lake County Ohio Docket no.: 50-440/50-441 !
Sample F equency is- Quarterly Results in mrem /qtr +/- 2 Sigma Location Sampic Type Collection Period Exposure 31 TLD 10/4/96 to I/6/97 16.97 +/- 0.21 33 TLD 1/5/96 to 4/4/96 15.16 +/- 0.29 33 TLD 4/4/96 to 7/I/96 18.08 +/- 0.41 33 TLD 7/ l>96 to 10/4/96 19.08 +/- 0.21 33 TLD 10/4/96 to 1/6/97 1839 +/- 0.19 35 TLD 1/5/96 to 4/4/96 1136 +/- 0.21 35 TLD 4/4/96 to 7/I/96 14.20 +/- 0.17 35 TLD 7/1/96 to 10/4/96 14.46 +/- 0.22 35 TLD 10/4/96 to 1/6/97 13.85 +/- 0.19 36 TLD 1/7/96 to 4/4/96 15.16 +/- 032 36 TLD 4/4/96 to 7/I/96 19.74 +/- 0.21 36 TLD 7/I/96 to 10/4/96 20.67 +/- 037 36 TLD 10/4/96 to Il6/97 19.53 +/- 0.20 . 53 TLD 1/5/96 to 4/4/96 13.57 + /- 0.25 , 53 TLD 4/4/96 to 7/I/96 15.86 +/- 0.27 - 53 TLD 7/I/96 to 10/4/96 16.28 +/- 0.29 - 53 TLD 10/4/96 to 1/6/97 16.85 +/- 0.21 54 TLP I/5/96 to 4/4/96 54 TLD 4/4/96 to 7/I/96 15.70 +/- 030 , 54 TLD 7/I/96 to 10/4/96 14.02 +/- 0.20 54 TLD 10/4/96 to 1/6/97 15.27 +/- 0.19 ;
$5 TLD I/7/96 to 4/4/96 1137 +/- 0.25 55 TLD 4/4/96 to 7/1/96 14.54 +/- 0.20 <
55 TLD 7/ I/96 to 10/4/96 15.47 +/- 0.21 l 55 TLD 10/4/96 to 1/6/97 14.14 +/- 0.20 56 TLD 1/5/96 to 4/4/96 1239 +/- 0.22 56 TLD 4/4/96 to 7/I/96 12.92 +/- 0.46 ' 56 TLD 7/I/96 to 10/4/96 15.01 +/- 0.24
$6 TLD 10/4/96 to 1/6/97 12.75 +/- 0.20 l l
58 TLD ll5/96 to 4/4/96 1236 +/- 0.20 58 TLD 4/4/96 to 7/I/96 12.98 +/- 038 : 58 TLD 7/l/96 to 10/4/96 15.58 +/- 031 58 TLD 10/4/96 to 1/6/97 12.51 +/- 0.29 !
~
o- - - - _ s -
*v v y m *
, , v v u- v u , . U C TLD Gtmas Dose Detil Report 1996
- Radiologicd Environmental Monitoring Program Detail Data Perry N xlear Power Plant. Lake County Ohio Docket no. : 50-440/50-441 Sample Frequencyis: Quarterly Results in mrem /qtr +/- 2 Sigma Location Sample Type Collection Period Exposure I TLB 1/5/96 to 4/4/96 9.99 +/- 0.21 1 TLB 4/4/96 to 7/I/96 1539 +/- 0.20 1 TLB 7/1/96 to 10/4/96 11.49 +/- 0.26 i TLB 10/4/96 to I/6/97 15.17 +/- 0.17 3 TLB I/5/96 to 4/4/96 1239 +/- 0.21 3 TLB 4/4/96 ' to 7/ l/96 16.14 +/- 0.24 3 TLB 7/I/96 to 10/4/96 15.15 +/- 0.27 3 TLB 10/4/96 to 1/6/97 16.01 +/- 0.20 4 TLB I/5/96 to 4/4/96 12.70 +/- 0.21 4 TLB 4/4/96 to 7/I/96 15.52 +/- 031 4 TLB 7/1/96 to ' 10/4/96 17.04 +/- 0.20 4 TLB 10/4/96 to 1/6/97 17.85 +/- 0.18 5 TLB 1/5/96 to 4/4/96 13.00 +/- 0.21 5 TLB 4/4/06 to 7/I/96 14.91 +/- 0.24 "
5 TLB 7/1/96 to 10/4/96 15.74 +/- 034 5 TLB l'0/4/96 to 1/6/97 14.77 +/- 0.18 6 TLD 1/ 8/96 to 4/4/96 14.73 +/- 032 6 TLB- 4/4/96 to 7/I/96 16.08 +/- 0.29 TLB 7/I/96 to 10/4/96 6 17.15 +/- 0.21 6 TLB 10/4/96 to Il 6/97 15.54 +/- 0.21 7- TLB 1/5/96 to 4/4/96 12.97 +/- 0.22 7 T1-B 4/4/96 to 7/I/96 14.46 +/- 0.21 7 TLB 7/ !/96 to 10/4/96 15.91 +/- 035 7 TLB 10/4/96 to 11 6/97 1437 +/- 0.18 8 TLB 1/5/96 to 4/4/96 11.81 +/- 0.18 8 TLB 4/4/96 to 7/I/96 12.88 +/- 0.28 8 TLB 7/1/96 to 10/4/96 13.98 +/- 0.20 8 TLB 10/4/96 to 1/6/97 12.72 +/- 0.22 I 9 TLB 1/5/96 to 4/4/96 9 TLB 4/4/96 to 7/ I/96 12.84 +/- 0.25 9 TLB 7/1/96 to 10/4/96 12.73 +/- 0.22 9 TLB 10/4/96 to 1/6/97 12.73 +/- 0.18 i 10 TLB 1/ 5/96 to 4/4/96 12.19 +/- 0.18 10 TLB 4/4/96 to 7/I/96 17.40 +/- 0.53 10 TLB 7/I/96 to 10/4/96 15.46 +/- 0.25 10 TLB 10/4/96 to 1/6/97 16.82 +/- 0.47 11 TLB 1/5/96 to 4/4/96 12.50 +/- 0.17 11 TLB 4/ 4/96 ' to 7/1/96 13.74 +/- 0.18 II TLB- 7/ I/96 to 10/4/96 15.62 +/- 032 11 TLB 10/4/96 to I/ &97 13.50 +/- 0.18 _ ~ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _____ __ _
TLD Gomac Dese Detail Report 1996 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Detail Dsta - Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Laks County Ohio Docketno.: 50-440f50-441 SampicFrequencyis, Quarte-ly Results in mrem /qtr +/- 2 Sigma Location Sample Type Collection Period Exposure 12 TLB ll5/96 to 4/4/96 11.15 +/- 034 12 TLB 41 4/)6 to 7/I/96 15.05 +/- 0.19 12 TLB 7/2/96 to 10/4/96 15.24 +/- 0.22 12 TLB 1074/96 to 1/6/97 15.$3 +/- 0.20 13 TLB 1/5/96 to 4/466 10.16 +/- 0.27 13 TLB 4/4/96 to 7/I/96 14.14 +/- 0.27 13 TLB 7/I/96 to FD/ J/96 12.38 +/- 0.21 13 TLB 10/4/96 to 1/6/97 14.15 +/- G.18 14 TLB 1/5/96 to 4/4/96 9.94 +/- 0.M 14 TLB 4/4/96 to 7/I/96 13.72 +/- 0.19 14 TLB 7! !/96 to 10/4/96 12.82 +/- 0.22 , 14 TLB 10/4/96 to I/6/97 13.94 +/- 0.I9 f 15 TLB 1/5/96 to 4/4/96 e 38 +/- 035 ! 15 TLB 4/4/96 to 7/I/96 12.74 +/- 0.28 15 TLB 7/I/96 to IG/4/96 13.10 +/- 034 , , 15 TLB 10/4/96 to I/ 6/97 13.86 +/- 0.20 -! l 21 TLB 1/7/96 to 4/4/96 16,36 +/- 0.23 21 TLB 4/4/96 to 7/I/96 17.18 +/- 0.27 21 TLB 7/1-/96 to 10/4/96 19.28 +/- 0.22 ( 21 TLB 10/4/96 to 1/6/97 18.40 +/- 0.19 23 TLB 1/ ~7/96 to 4/4/96 14.96 +/- 031 23 TLB 4/4/96 to 7/1/96 15.70 +/- 0.19 23 TLB 7/1/96 to 10/4/96 18.02 +/- 0.22 23 TLB 10/4/96 to I/6/97 16.73 +/- G.27 24 TLB Il6/96 to 4/4/96 14.99 +/- e36 l 24 TLB 4/4/96 to 7/1/96 16.24 +/- 0.24 l 24 TLB 7/I/96 to 10/4/96 17.83 +/- 031 24 TLB 10/4/96 to 1/6/97 16.07 +/- 0,IS 29 TLB 1/5/96 to 4/4/96 15.07 +/- 0.23 29 TLB 4/ 4S6 'to 7/1/96 29 TLB 7/1/96 to 10/4/96 18.74 +/- 034 29 TLB 10/4/96 to 1/6/97 I835 +/- 0.20 30 TLB 115/96 to 4/4/96 12.58 +/- 0.21 30 TLB 4/4/96 to 7/1/96 13.91 +/- 0.26 30 TLB 7/ t/96 to 10/4/96 15.64 +/- 033 30 TLB 10/4/96 to I/6/97 13.92 +/- 0.18 31 TLB 1/5/96 to 4/4/96 14.66 +/- 0.40 31 TLB 4/4/96 to 7/1/96 15.98 +/- 017 31 TLB 7/ IS6 to 10/4/96 18.52 +/- 0 25 31 TLB 10/4/96 to 1/6/97 16.82 +/- 031
^
;e
^
o o
^
e e _ .e _ e. _ e e . o_ . e
7-y- - - -
--u - - - ;--- , - y- - ---- --- w -
TLD G:mm3 Dese DetaH Report 1996 Sadiologicai Farrironmental Monitoring Program Detail Data Perrv Wuclear Power Pla nt. Lake County Ohio Docket no. : 50-440/50-44I ' Sampic Frequency is: Quarterly Results in mrem /qtr +/- 2 Sigma ! Location Sample Type Collection Period Exposure , 33 TLB I/5/96 to 4/4/96 14.91 +/- 030 33 TLB 4/4/96 to 7/I/96 18.04 +/- 0.17 ' 33 TLB 7/1/96 to 10f4/96 I832 +/- 034 33 TLB 10/4/96 to 1/6/97 17.72 +/- 0.16 35 TLB 1/5/96 to 4/4/96 10.83 +/- 0.25 ? 35 TLB 4/4/96 to 7/1/96 13.47 +/- 0.17 I 35 TLB 7/1/96 to 10/4/96 13.60 +/- 0.19 ! 35 TLB 10/4/96 to 1/6/97 13.77 +/- 0.17 [ I 36 TLB 1/7/96 to 4/4/96 1432 +/- 0.24 36 TLB 4/4/96 to 7/I/96 19.14 +/- 0.19 36 TLB 7/I/96 to 10/4/96 18.17 +/- 0.23-36 TLB 10/4/96 to 1/6/97 19.43 +/- 0.20 53 TLB 1/5/96 to 4/4/96 11.71 +/- 0.17 r 53 TLB 4/4/96 to 7/1/96 14.42 +/- 0.22 ~ 53 TLB 7/I/96 to 10/4/96 15.62 +/- 0.28 " 53 TLB 10/4/96 to 1/6/97 1434 +/- 0.19 54 TLB 1/5/96 to 4/4/96 54 TLB 4/4/96 to 7/I/96 ' 15.41 +/- 0.27 54 TLB 7/1/96 to 10/4/96 17.11 +/- 0.24 ' 54 TLB 10/4/96 to 1/6/97 15.21 +/- 0.19 I 55 TLB 1/7/96 to 4/4/96 10.72 +/- 034 55 TLB 4/4/96 to 7/1/96 15.11 +/- 0.23 55 TLB 7/1/96 to 10/4/96 15.11 +/- 0.22 55 TLB 10/4/96 to 1/6/97 15.21 +/- 0.20 56 TLB 1/5/96 to 4/4/96 10.87 +/- 0.22 56 TLB 4/4/96 to 7/1/96 12.47 +/- 039 ! 56 TLB 7/1/96 to 10/4/96 1436 +/- 0.29 ' 56 TLB 10/4/96 to 1/6/97 12.72 +/- 0.20 58 TLD 1/5/96 to 4/4/96 11.90 +/- 0.17 58 TLB 4/4/96 to 7/I/96 13.62 +/- 0.20 , 58 TLB 7/I/96 to 10/4/96 15.08 +/- J.21 ! 58 TLB 10/4/96 ' to 1/6/97 14.19 +/- 0.19 . i
- e - - -- we u_ -
m ._ _.-_ _ _-__ ., . - _--e, --*-,- -- , --+__m---- - -,--- __ _ _
TLD Gemsma Dese Detall Report 1996 Radiological En.u .-..;.1 Monitoring Progran Detail Data Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Laks County Ohio Docket no.: 50 440/50 441 Sampic Frequency is: Annual Resultsin mrem /yr 41- 2 Sigma Location Sample Type Collection Pened Exposure 1 TLA I/5/96 to I/6/97 52.60 +/- 0.40 3 TLA 1/5/96 to 1/6/97 5431 +/- 0.16 4 TLA I/5/96 to 1/6/97 60.85 +/- 0.22 5 TLA I/5/96 to 1/6/97 5035 +/- 0.19 6 TLA I/8/96 to 1/6/97 58.41 +/- 0.15 7 TLA 1/5/96 to 1/ 6/97 55.46 +/- 0.21 8 TLA I/5/96 to 1/6/97 48.71 +/- 035 9 TLA 4/8/96 to 1/6/97 46.42 +/- 0.19 10 TLA 1/5/96 to 1/6/97 70.60 +/- 0.12 11 TLA I/5/96 to 116/97 50.62 +/- 0.14 l 12 TLA l/5/96 to 1/ 6/97 56.73 +/- 0.20 13 TLA I/5/96 to 1/6/97 54.73 +/- 0.13 14 TLA I/5/96 to 1/6/97 54.71 +/- 0.14 15 TLA l/5/96 to 1/6/97 52.20 +/- 0.12 21 TLA I/7/96 to 1/6/97 60.51 +/- 032 23 TLA I/7/96 to 1/6/97 57.97 +/- 0.09 24 TLA I/6/96 to 1/6/97 51.00 +/- 0.15 29 TLA I/5/96 to 1/6/97 72.70 +/- 032 t 30 TLA I/5/96 to 116/97 52.63 +/- 0.21 l 31 TLA I/5/96 to 1/6/97 64.67 +/- 039 l 33 TLA I/5/96 to 1/6/97 64.61 +/- 035 35 TLA I/5/96 to 1/6/97 50.65 +/- 0.16 36 TLA 1/7/96 to 1/6/97 68.82 +/- 0.21
~ ' ^ "
__0 . _ __ __ _ 9. - _ , _ _ _ _ t. _9_ . . _ , 9. _- _ . - _ .~9. _ _ _. . .-_ 9. -. .- _ _ _ __9_ . _ _. _9_ .._ . ._O . _ . . _ O . _ . .
o o *', , o- o- o o O o O l . 70 - - CC TLD Grusma Dose Detail Report 1996 Radiological Envwonmental Monitanng Program Detail Data ! Perry Nuclear Power Plant. Lake County Ohio Docket no. : 50-440/5Mi SampleFrequencyis- Annual Resultsin nrem/yr +/- 2 Sipna Location Sample Type Collection Period Exposure ; 53 TLA 1/5/96 to 1/6/97 55.09 +/- 0.I4 ' . 54 TLA 4/8/96 to 1/6/97 51.04 +/- 0.19 I '- TLA 55 I/7/96 to 1/6/97 63.64 +/- 0.20 56 TLA I/5/96 to 1/6/97 51.21 +/- 0.22 ;
$8 TLA I/5/96 to 1/6/97 50.27 +/- 0.16 I i
e i i i ; i i I i [ l [
. _ _ _ _ - - _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ .- . . . . _ _ - . . . . . - . - . - . - - ~ _ . . - _ - . . . . . - . - . - - . - . . . - . . . . - . . - . . . . _ . - . _ - . . J
-v_---- _ . . , _ _
Vegetation Gonnia SpectralDet;il Report 1996 Radiologicd Environmentti Monitoring Program Det il Data Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Lake County Ohio Docket no. : 50-440/50-441 Sample Frequency is: Monthly Results in pCi/kg wet +/- 2 Sigma Location Sample Type Collection Period End Be-7 Co-58 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 I-131 K-40 6 Vegetation 5/20/96 2,117.50 +/- 353.00 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 6,600.50 +/- 704.00 6 Vegetation 6/19/96 3,766.70 +/-329.00 LLD LLD L1D LLD LLD 5,575.40 +/- 507.00 6 Vegetation 7/18/96 3.061.60 +/-343 00 LLD LLD 11D LLD LLD 4.583.80 +/- 517.00 6 Vegetation 8/20/96 3,937.10 +/-419.00 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 7,228.00 +/- 685.00 6 Vegetation 9/20/96 2,388.10 +/- 245.00 LLD LLD L1D LLD LLD 3.206.50 +/- 341.00 7 Vegetation 5/20/96 4,613.20 +/- 424.00 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 6,586.20 +/- 681.00 7 Vegetation 6/19/96 3,620.80 +/- 310.00 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 4.753.40 +/- 484.00 7 Vegetation 7/18/96 2.721.20 +/- 382.00 LLD LLD LLD 11D LLD 5,385.40 +/- 559.00 7 Vegetation 8/20/96 999.29 +/- 166.00 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 5,978.70 +/- 450.00 7 Vegetation 9/20/96 2,830.80 +/-216.00 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 3,660.60 +/- 321.00 7 Vegetation 10/15/96 4,261.70 +/- 272.00 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 4,981.104/-380.00 35 Vegetation 5/20/96 3,122.00 +/- 404.00 LLD LLD L1D LLD LLD 5.945.90 +/- 72 1 _ _ _ . _ _ - _ = - .- - _ - - - - .- .-
Veget; tion Gcams Spectral Detail Report 1996 Radiologictl Environmental Monitoring Program Detai1 Data Peny Nuclear Power Plant, Lake County Ohio Docket no. : 50-440/50-441 Sample Frequency is: Monthly Results in pCiikg wet +/- 2 Sigma Location Sample Type Collection Period End Be-7 Co-58 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 1-131 K-40 i 35 Vegetation 6/19/96 2.88030 +/- 578.00 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 9,837.10 +/- 857.00 35 Vegetation 7/18/96 1,689.50 +/- 242.00 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 5,594.40 +/- 509.00 35 Vegetation 8/20/96 942.65 +/-271.00 L1D . LLD LLD LID LLD 5,516.50 +/- 702.00 35 Vegetation 9/20/96 2,400.60 +/- 198.00 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 3.039.10 +/- 256.00 35 Vegetation 10/1566 7,62130 +/- 288.00 LLD .LLD LLD LLD LLD 6,484.50 +/-373 00 42 Vegetation 5/20/96 1,751.50 +/- 239.00 LLD LLD LLD LLD 11D 5.09130 +/- 408.00 , 42 Vegetation 6/19/96 5,317.10 +/-237.62 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 4,923.20 +/-312.97 42 Vegetation 7/18/96 90621 +/-241.00 LLD LLD LLD 11D LLD 4,350.40 +/- 518.00 42 Vegmtion 8/20/96 650.00 +/- 263.00 LLD LLD L1D LLD LLD 4,908.20 +/- 527.00 42 Vegetation 9/20/96 2,000.60 4/-191.00 LLD LID LLD LLD 11D 2.797.80 +/- 310.00
- t 42 Vegetation 10/15/96 3,30530 +/-273.00 LLD LLD LLD 11D ,
LLD 3,662.20 +/- 401.00
~
_ ' '- 'O O - ._. ._ e. -_ ___- _e_ e _- _ 9.____-_-__-_-_o____. e
. _ - . _ - . . e.. - - '- -_ e . _ . e_
7 35 1 6 s n D D_ DD LL DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD CZ L l Ll LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL L1 L1 LL LL - 4 _ 3 5 0 1 st DD LL DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD LL LL LL LL LL LL CN LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL lLL I LL LL LL LL LL LL . 1 4 y 4-0 5
/ a 0
a44 gm - t a i D052 S l 0 4 i : a 6- 5 - 6t 9 e o /- on DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD 9Dn+ CM LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL 1 t LL LL LL t r .ki mel cC l o yop p e-sDn i RP s t ig l l ani u s e r oe . t DtoiR h ylarMty inO o 0 n 8 51 4 t: oy u DD DD _ m1 o a- DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD SnCh l CL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LI LL LL LL LL LL LL LL a e t LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL e _ mnmk a n o _ m rio L,M r_ vt Gnn: s yt; ca rElai el Py r c n _ Wiegwue l ooq ioPe rF r 0 da aee 4 95 DDD DDDLLL DDD DDD LLLDDD LLL DDD DDDLLL DDDLLL DDD DDD LLLDDD DDD 1 59 Rl c lp a e- r- ILL LLL LLL LLL LLL 1LL u m BFZ LLL LLL LLL LLL LLL LLL LLL LLL LLL LLL 1LL LLL Na yS w d T n E d o 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 i r 9 9 6 6 6 6 9 9 9 e 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 / / P
/
5
/
9
/
8 /6
/
0
/
7
/
5
/
9
/
6 1 /6 0 2 2 2 3 2 3 n / / / 2
/
3
/
2
/
2
/
2
/
2
/
/
0
/ /
o i 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 1 1 2 1 t c le l o C e p y _ T c ip r r r r r r r r r r r r m e t e te e e te e e e e te te a ta a a t a t a a t a t a t a t a a a S W W W W W W W W W W W W n i o t a 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 c 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 o _ L
7 _ 35 1 6 s n DD DD DD LL DD DD DD DD DD DD DD ED Dm e. CZ LL LL LL LL LL 1LL 1 IL LI LL LL LL LL LL LL L1 LL uu ULL 1u 1 lL e 4 3 59-1 sb DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD CN LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL uLL LL LL Lu L 1 . 4 4-0 e 5
/ a a40 t 4 g m
a i D052 S l 0 54 ia : 6- - o n DD DD DD DD DD DD 6te o /- DD DD DD DD DD DD 9 9Dn+ CM LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL L Lu 1 t el LL LL LL e.. t r mki / oracC g op poDn e r i RP t s - l g l i an i u s te r oe DtoiR h - l ao inOy e. r
;Mt 0
. n 8 51 4
. a uoy
,t l -
o a- DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD CL LL LL lL LL SnCh s e e n l t LL LL iL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL 1LL 1 LL LL Lu L - enmka o - mo
- i r L, M vt Gnn: s rElai e
id P y c e L c e eu r n Wig-- - o oq l ope r 0 ida aee rF 495 Rl c p l ae9 1- 5 BFZ r DDD LLL LLLDDD LLL DDD DDD LL DDDLLL LLu LLL DDDLLL DDD DDD DD LLL LLL LL DDD DDD DDD LLL LLL L u Nam LLL LLL LLL LLL LLL LLL LL LLL LLL LuL L - yS r r o-e d P E n - d - i o 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 r 9 6 6 6 6 6 9 e 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
/ / / / / / /
P 5 2 9 8 6
/
0
/
7
/
5
/
9
/
6 1 6 0 2 2 2 3 2 3 n o
/
1
/
2
/
3
/
4 8 5 2
/
6 2
/
7 2
/
8 2
/
/
0
/
1
/
2 i 9 1 1 1 t I Io c c e . C ' e p y T le e p r r r r r r r r m e e e e e r r r r a e e e e e e e a a t a t a t a a t a t a a t a t a t a S W W W W W W W W W W W W n io t _ a c 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 o 3 3 3 3 e L
llIllllj ll !' il 7 35 1 s n DD LL DD LL DD DD LL DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL CZ LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL m _ 4 3 59 1
- DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD CN sb LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL -
1 4 4-0 5
/ a 0
a44 ig m t a S D0 ia 52 l 0 4 6 6 t o n DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD 9 e o /- CM LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL 9Dn+ 1 t LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL uel / t r o mkicC p pop e cDn i i R "r s l g lt i
- ni u
s t e r oe DtoiR h aoinO l t crMtyn 8 51 - 0 4 eiu ptoy o a, DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD n CL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL S eCh l t LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL 3 e m nmk a no m ci o L,M r vt Gnn:s rElai el P y cca r cn t Wiegwue l o oq ioPr e r 0 a r.e F d 4 95 e DDD DDDLLL DDD DDD DDD LLLDDD LLLDDD LLL DDD LLL DDD DDDLLLDDD DDD 1 59 Rl c p l a er LLL LLL LLL LLL LLL LLL LLLLLL u m BFZ LLL LLL LLL LLL LLL LLL LLL LLL LLL LLL
- Na yS -
r r d e n P E d o 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 i r 6 6 6 6 6 9 9 9 P e 6 5 8 9 S 8 9
/
6 6 0 S 7
/
9 9
/
9
/
/
1
/
6 & 2 2 5 9 6 3 2 3 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 n / / / / / / ! / / / / / i o 1 2 3 4 5 6 ? 8 9 0 1 1 1 2 1 t c Ie
, Io C _
m ep _ y -
~ T lep r r r r r r r r r r r r m e e e e e e e e e e e a t a t a t a t a t t t t t te t S a a a ta a a a a W W W W W W W W W W W W n _
io t a 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 c 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 o _ v L ll illll'
I!! ti ! It" -[ [!!' I[ir [i( i l !!! L ! ' ! ', j, t - O 7 35 1 DD DD DD DD s n LL LL LL LL DD LL DD LL DD LL Do L DD DD DD DD . Lm 1LL L1 CZ LL LL LL LL LL LL LL 1 L1 L1 L1 LL LL S.. 4 3 5 e_- 9 1 sb
- - DD LL DD LL DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD CN LL LL L1 L1 LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL Lu L LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL 1
4 4-8 0 - 5
/ a t
0m a44 g a i D0 S 52 l 0 6 5 4 d :. o- n-6 t DD DD DD DD DD DD DD Do DD DD DD DD - 9 e o /- CM LL LL LL 9Dn+ t LL LL LL 1LL 1 LL LL LL LL LL LL L Lm LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL ._ 9 1 el l t r i. o-yopi. cCk i . - p e-sDn i - RP t s _ l g l _ i an i u s t e r oe oiR _ Dtih aonO l t rMtyn 8 0 4 9 - c 51 edu - o a- DD DD DD DD DD DD DD Do DD DD DD DD - pt oy SnCh l CL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL L Lm LL LL LL LL LL LL a e LL LL t e n - mnmka o i or L,M m 2i G nvt n :s rElai e Py 9 e dc r n t c Wiegwu ooq e l ope r 0 irF da aee 495 DDD LLL LL DDD DDD DDD DDD DDD DDD DoD DD 1 59 Rl c p l a -er - L1L LLL LLL LLL LLL DDD DDD DDD um BFZ LLL LLmLLL LLL LLL LLL LLL L LmLL LLLL LLL LLL LLL LLL LLL LLL Na S fS u d F n E d o 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 i r 6 6 9 9 6 6 6 e 9
/
9
/
9 9 9 9 / / 9 9 9 9 P 6 0
/
7
/
5
/
9 /6 1 6 G / 6 @
/
7 2 0 2 G n / 4 0 5 2
/
6 2
/
7 2
/ 2
/
0
/
1 2 / 2 S 2
/
iot 8 9 1 1 1 4 5 6 c le . lo O_ C '
- e p . y T
l e p e r r r r r r r r r r r r m te e te te e te e e e e e e a a t a a a t a a t a t a t a ta ta t a S W W . W W W W W W W W W W -. io t n a 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 0 0 0 c 5 5 5 o 5 $ 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 L e l
> ' ; r I! . t i! f:(iI + t i ! !h !: s ,
U 7 35 1 DD DD DD U s n DD DD DD CZ LL LL LL LL LL LL Lu L LL LL LL LL _ ~. _ ~ U - 4 _ 3 5 9 -- 1 sb- - DD DD DD DD DD DD CN LL LL LL LL LL LL Lu L LL LL LL LL m m
) 1 -
4 C .4-0 5
/ a a40 m g ta 4- iS D0 52 0 6- 4 l
i: a 5-6t 9 e o /- on DD DD DD DD DD DD CM O9Dn+ 1 ne/ t l LL LL LL LL LL LL Lu L LL LL LL LL t r o
.ki cC yop p
e eDn i R "r t s l g l i sn i u s e r oe t Dtih oiR _ Ol aonOy 0 trMtn c 8 4 51 - el au o a- DD DD DD D DD DD - pt oy SnClh CL LL LL LL LL LI LL Lw LL LL LL LL LL a e e n t mnmka o u o L,M ci vt r O GrElai e n nPy:s ccd r nce t m m Wiegwu looq ioPrFer 0 495 da aee 1 Rl c p l 59 a- -er- DDD DDD DDD DDD DDD DDD LLL LLL LLL L u m BFZ LLL LLL LLL LuLL LLL LLL LLL LLL m O Na yS _ r r d e n P E d . o i 6 6 6 6 6 6 _ r 9 9 9 9 9 9 e / / /
/
1
/
6
/
0 P 5 9 6 3 2 3 m 2 2 2 n / f R
/
/
0
/
1 2
/
o 7 9 1 1 1 it O le l c , A .
. o C
e p y O T le p r r r r r r m e te e e e e a i a a t a ta t a t a S W W W W W W n i o t a c 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 6 6 6 O o L
r Wcter Gross Bet: Det;il Report 1996 _ Radiologicd Environmental Monitoring Program Data Summary Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Lake County Ohio Docket no. : 50-440/50-441 Sample Frequencyis: Monthly Resuitsin pCi/l +/- 2 Sigma 1 Location 28 34 36 59 60 Collection Period Sample Type 12/28/95 to 1/25/96 Water LLD LLD LLD I/25/96 to 2/29/96 Water LLD LLD LLD 1 2/29/96 to 3/28/95 Water 3.04 +/-0.67 LLD LLD ! 3/28/96 ti 4/20'16 Water LLD LLD LLD 3.12 +/- 0.67 4.40 +/- 0.73 4/26/96 to 5/30/96 Water LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 5/30/96 to 6/27/96 Water LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 6/27/96 to 7/25/96 Water 3.05 +/- 0.66 LLD LLD LLD 3.31 +/- 0.67 , t 7/25/96 to 8/29/96 Water LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 8/29/96 to 9/26/96 Water LLD LLD LLD LLD Lt.D r 9/26/96 to 10/31/96 Water LLD LLD LLD 3.31 +/- 0.62 4.38 +/- 0.68 10/31/96 to I1/26/96 Water LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD i i I1/26/96 to 12/30/96 Water LLD LLD LLD 3.14 +/- 0.63 1.09 +/- 0.67 i I I O 4 e _ _ - _ _ - - _ - _ - _ _ - - _ - e e --_e---
.e . . - -
e -, . e. . ---s. .e .
-_.--_-____m---- - - _ _ . - _ - _ _ _
g _ , - - , - - . _ - - _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ WEter Tritiene Detz.il Report 1996 Radiological Environment] Monitoring Program Detail Data Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Lake County Ohio . Docket no. : 50-44Gr50-441 L Sample Frequency is: Quarterly Results in pCi/L +/- 2 Sigma e
= .
Location Sample Type Collection Period End H-3 ;
-L 28 Water 3/28/96 LLD l 28 Water 6/27/96 LLD r 28 Water 9/26/96 LLD !
28 Water . 12/30/96 LLD j 34 Water 3/28/96 LLD 34 Water 6/27/96 LLD t 34 Water 9/26/96 LLD I 34 Water 12/30/96 LLD 36 Water 3/28/96 LLD 36 Water 6/27/96 LLD 36 Water 9/26/96 LLD t 36 Water 12/30/96 LLD i 59 Water 6/27/96 LLD : 59 Water 9/26/96 LLD ! 59 Water 12/30/96 LLD j 60 Water 6/27/96 LLD i 60 Water 9/26/96 LLD I 60- Water 12/30/96 LLD ; i i t l i I f 1 L 1 s _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _m.____._ _ _ _ . --_ _. _ m _ _ _ - - , ,._,4.-. -- ..m .m..-.. - _ .._ __ _ _ . - _,__ _ ~ __ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ ___ ,.
.i V ,
6l
~
l> L ,
. e; 7
!- a h- . 1 I i . e: l. i. I; f e-I L Y i - e l v .- u
. .4 I.
- . e i
l. l - FOR MORE INFORMATION, WRITE OR CALL: ! e; l [ PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT i i' a: ENVIRONMENTAL UNIT 10 CENTER ROAD - P.O. BOX 97 PERRY, OHIO 44081 , I (216) 280-5601 .; l 1 e! I i}}