ML20140E640

Notice of Violation from Insp on 970512-15.Violation Noted: No Fire Safety Insp Was Conducted During 1996 at Facility

ML20140E640
Person / Time
Site:	07001201
Issue date:	06/06/1997
From:	NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20140E621	List: ML20140E616 ML20140E640 ML20140E647
References
70-1201-97-04, 70-1201-97-4, NUDOCS 9706120166
Download: ML20140E640 (1)

Text

_ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ __ _- ___

i .

I NOTICE OF VIOLATION B&W Juel Company Docket No. 70-1201 Lynenburg, Virginia License No. SNM-1168 During an NRC inspection conducted on May 12 15, 1997, a violation of NRC requirements was identified. In accordance with the " General Statement of  ;

Policy and Procedures for NRC Enforcement Action," NUREG 1600, the violation  :

is listed below:

License Condition 2.7, Audits and Inspections, requires that,

" Independent auditors shall conduct semi annual fire safety inspections at the facility."

Contrary to the above, there were no fire safety inspection conducted during 1996 at the facility.

This is a Severity IV violation (Supplement VII).

, Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, B&W Fuel Company is hereby l required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555 with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region II, and a copy to the Chief, fuel Facilities Branch, Region II, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice). This reply should be clearly marked as a " Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation: (1) the reason for the violation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the l results achieved (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further i violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Your l response may reference or include previously docketed correspondence, if the i

correspondence adequately addresses the required res>onse. If an adecuate reply is not received within the time specified in t11s Notice, an orcer or a l Demand for Information may be issued as to why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as may be 3 roper should not be taken. Where good cause is shown, consideration will )e given to extending the response time.

Dated at Atlanta, Georgia this 6th day of June, 1997

Enclosure 1 1.

9706120166 970606 PDR ADOCK 07001201 C PDR i