ML20137T191

Notice of Violation from Insp on 851007-1103

ML20137T191
Person / Time
Site:	North Anna
Issue date:	11/15/1985
From:	NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20137T187	List: ML20137T181 ML20137T191 ML20137T209
References
50-338-85-27, 50-339-85-27, NUDOCS 8512060407
Download: ML20137T191 (2)

Text

-. ._ - - _ _ _ . . - _ _ _

i ENCLOSURE 1 NOTICE OF VIOLATION 4

Virginia Electric and Power Company Docket Nos. 50-338 and 50-339 4

North Anna Units 1 and 2 License Nos. NPF-4 and NPF-7 4

The following violation was identified during an inspection conducted on October 7 - November 3, 1985. The Severity Level was assigned in accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy (10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C).

10 CFR Part 50, Appendix "B", Criterion XVII requires, in part, that suffi-cient records be maintained that provide information regarding the qualifi-cations of personnel performing the activities affecting quality.

Technical Specification 6.10.2.a requires records and drawing changes reflecting facility design modifications made to systems and equipment described in the Final Satety Analysis Report be retained for the duration of the facility operating license.

Amendment 4 of th' e Virginia Electric and Power Company (VEPCO) Topical Report, VEP-1, " Quality Assurance Program, Operations Phase", commits VEPC0 to collect, store, and maintain quality assurance (QA) records in accordance with NRC Regulatory Guide 1.88, Revision 2,1976, which endorses American

' National Standards Institute (ANSI) N45.2.9-1974.

Section 3.2 of ANSI,N45.2.9-1974, provides instructions on what constitutes a valid QA record.

Contrary to the above, the record retention and qualification traceability requirements are not being satisfied. Specifically, the practice described in section 5.2.2.1 of Administrative Procedure (ADM) 3.1, dated August 15, 1985, which allows a person other than .the one actually performing the action to sign for its comp!etion, combined with the destruction of the white working copy of design change procedures, which do contain the signa-tures of the person who performed the action, does not ensure that a valid record of activities affecting quality is maintained. Design change proce-dures DCP-82-148, DCP-83-24, and DCP-84-15 contain examples where a person ,

other than the one who actually performed the activity affecting quality, signed for that action in the master colored controlled copy (i.e., record copy) of the procedure.

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I) and applies to both units.

8512060407 852215 i

hDR ADOCK 05000338 PDR _

f I

. _ _ _ _ _ - . , _ , _ . _ . _ , _ _ . ~ -

=. _

4 Virginia Electric and Power Company 2 Docket Nos. 50-338 and 50-339 North Anna Units 1 and 2 License Nos. NPF-4 and NPF-7 Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.201, you are required to submit to this office within thirty days of the date of this Notice, a written statement cr explanation in reply, including: (1) admission or denial of the alleged violations; (2) the reasons for the violations if admitted; (3) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved; (4) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations; and (5) the date when full compliance will be achieved.

Security or safcguards information should be submitted as an enclosure to facilitate withholding it from public disclosure as required by 10 CFR 2.790(d) or 10 CFR 73.21.

Date:

i i

I l

. - _ . _ . - . . . - - - . - . ._ .. .