ML20137A104

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 850923-27
ML20137A104
Person / Time
Site: Fort Saint Vrain Xcel Energy icon.png
Issue date: 01/10/1986
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20137A097 List:
References
50-267-85-29, NUDOCS 8601140172
Download: ML20137A104 (2)


Text

.

APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Public Service Company of Colorado Docket: 50-267 Ft. St. Vrain Generating Station License: DPR-34 During an NRC inspection conducted on September 23-27, 1985, two violations of NRC requirements were identified. The violations involved the failure to provide adequate training and the failure to perform adequate audits of the emergency preparedness program. In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1985), the violations are listed below:

A. Failure to Provide Adequate Training 10 CFR 50.47(b)(15) states that " Radiological emergency response training is provided to those who may be called on to assist in an emergency."

Contrary to the above, on September 23-27, 1985, the NRC inspectors determined that licensee emergency training was inadequate as evidenced by the following:

(1) During emergency response scenario walkthroughs, initial notifications to the State and local authorities and to NRC were made in an improper sequence, and the controlling RERP procedure checklist was incorrect, (2) During emergency response scenario walkthroughs, on-shift health physics technicians were unable to determine the habitability of the control room and to determine the radioiodine content of a radioactive

. plume, (3) Training was not given to individuals according to their specific functional role during emergencies, and (4) PSC training program failed to establish emergency preparedness-training requirements for technical advisors and corporate personnel commensurate with their duties and responsibilities.

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement VIII).

B .- Failure to Perform Adequate Reviews of the Emergency Preparedness Program 10 CFR 50.54(t) states that the licensee "shall provide for the . ..

implementation and maintenance of its emergency preparedness program." The licensee "shall provide for a review of its emergency preparedness program at least every'12 months . . . ." The review "shall include an evaluation for adequacy of interfaces with State and local governments and of licensee drills, exercises, capabilities and procedures."

B601140172 860110 PDR ADOCK 05000267 G PM n

a Notice of Violation- 2 l.

Contrary 1.o the above, on September 23-27, 1985, the NRC inspectors determined that the licensee failed to perform adequate "eviews of the emergency preparedness program in that:

(1) PSC performed inadequate audits for the years 1984 and 1985 by limiting their effort to the observation of annual exercises and as a consequence, focused on verifying procedural adherence instead of procedural adequacy.

r I '

L  :(2) PSC performed inadequate audits of inteefaces with State and local

! governments for the years 1984 and 1985, by limiting their effort to the observation of their emergency operations centers during annual exercises.

(3) PSC failed to re olve a deficiency identified as Action Request CAR-080, dated August 17, 1984,. relating to PSC's ability to staff and activate-Fort St. Vrain Station emergency response centers in a timely manner.

_This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement VIII).

t

, Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Public Service Company of Colorado

! is hereby . required to submit to this of fice within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice, a_ written statement or explanation in reply, including for each violation: (1) the reason for the violations if admitted, (2) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations, and

(4);the date when full compliance will be achieved. Where good cause is shown,

' consideration will be given to' extending the response time.

t Dated at Arlington, Texas, j this 10 day of January,1986 l

e n