ML20136E455

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards SALP Repts 50-254/85-01 & 50-265/85-01 for June 1984 - Sept 1985.Category 1 Assigned in Area of Emergency Preparedness.Comments Requested within 30 Days of 860110 Meeting
ML20136E455
Person / Time
Site: Quad Cities  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 01/03/1986
From: James Keppler
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Reed C
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
Shared Package
ML20136E459 List:
References
860913, NUDOCS 8601070024
Download: ML20136E455 (2)


See also: IR 05000254/1985001

Text

- ~

,

OcS/Aso G2105)

  • .

.

~

JAN 0 31986

Docket No. 50-254

Docket No. 50-265

Commonwealth Edison Company

ATTN: Mr. Cordell Reed

Vice President

Post Office Box 767

Chicago, IL 60690

Gentlemen:

Enclosed for your review, prior to our scheduled meeting of January 10, 1986,

is the SALP 5 Board Report for the Quad Cities Nuclear Generating Station,

covering the period June 1,1984 through September 30, 1985.

In accordance with NRC policy, I have reviewed the SALP Board assessment and

concur with their ratings. It is my view that Commonwealth Edison Company's

conduct of nuclear activities in connection with the Quad Cities station shows

an appropriate concern for nuclear safety. Specific areas.I would like to

highlight are:

1. Performance in the area of Plant Operations improved from a Category 3

rating to a Category 2 rating this period, while performance in

Surveillance and Inservice Testing declined from a Category 1 to a

Category 2 rating this period. While the other category ratings remained

the same we continue to see an improving trend in the overall regulatory

performance of the Quad Cities station. Today, I would rate the Quad

Cities regulatory performance the best of the larger reactor units

(800 MWe and above) in Region III.

2. Category I ratings were given in the areas of Emergency Preparedness,

Security, Refueling and Licensing Activities, and Category I performance

was identified in the radiation protection portion of the Radiological

controls. As a result of these findings, we plan to reduce our normal

inspection activities in these areas.

While you will have sufficient opportunity to present your comments at the

meeting on January 10, 1986, we also solicit written comments within 30 days

after the meeting to enable us to thoroughly evaluate your comments and provide

you with our conclusions relative to them.

In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2,

Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and the SALP

Report will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room.

RIII FIII RIII RIII RI I RIII RII RIII

a h t C ssotimos N ius pe ello is Ke er

'

( ft frk ( (U k il M \

l) N 1/3 PS

8601070024 960103 \

DR ADOCK0S%24

^

A.__._________________

.

. .-

^*

  • -

.

Commonwealth Edison Company 2 JAN 0 31986

No reply to this letter is required at this time; however, should you have

any questions concerning the SALP Report, we would be pleased to discuss them

with you.

Sincerely,

Oftglast gl$ced by

Asses 0. Koppior

James G. Keppler

Regional Administrator

Enclosure: SALP 5 Board Reports

No. 50-254/85-01;

No. 50-265/85-01

cc w/ enclosure:

D. L. Farrar, Director

of Nuclear Licensing

N. Kaltvianakis, Plant Manager

DCS/RSB (RIDS)

Licensing Fee Management Branch

Resident Inspector, RIII

Phyllis Dunton, Attorney

General's Office, Environmental

Control Division

J. M. Taylor, Director, IE

H. R. Denton, Director, NRR

Regional Administrators

RI, RII, RIV, RV

N. J. Palladino, Chairman

J. K. Asselstine, Commissioner

F. M. Bernthal, Commissioner

T. M. Roberts, Commissioner

.

L. W. Zech, Commissioner

NRR Project Manager

H. L. Thompson, NRR

J. Axelrad, IE

RIII PRR

RIII SGA

State Liaison Officer,

State of Illinois

INPO

I