ML20135C392

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violations from Insp on 961006-1102.Violations Noted:No Licensee Sp Included Channel Check for Motor Driven Emergency Feedwater Pump Discharge Pressure Gauge
ML20135C392
Person / Time
Site: Crystal River Duke energy icon.png
Issue date: 11/27/1996
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20135C387 List:
References
50-302-96-15, NUDOCS 9612060290
Download: ML20135C392 (2)


Text

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _

NOTICE OF VIOLATION Florida Power Corporation _ Docket No. 50-302 Crystal River Unit 3 License No. DPR-72 During NRC ins)ections conducted on October 6 through November 2.1996, violations of 4RC requirements were identified. In accordance with the

" General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions." (60 FR 34381: June 30, 1995/NUREG 1600). the violations are listed below:

A. Crystal River Technical Specifications (TS) Surveillance Requirement  ;

3.3.18.1 requires that a monthly channel check shall be performed on each Remote Shutdown System Instrumentation Function Channel that is normally energized. The required Remote Shutdown System Functions are listed in TS Table 3.3.18-1  ;

Contrary to the above, on October 8,1996 no licensee surveillance procedure, including. Surveillance Procedure (SP) SP-338. Remote Shutdown and Post Accident Monitoring Channel Check, Revision 25, included a channel check for the Motor Driven Emergency Feedwater Pump Discharge l Pressure Gauge. EF-2-PI. which is listed in TS Table 3.3.18-1. '

This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement I).

B. 10 CFR 50.48(b) states, in part, that all nuclear power plants licensed to operate prior to January 1.1979 shall satisfy the applicable requirements of Appendix R to this part, including specifically the  ;

requirements of section III.O. Crystal River 3 received an operating l license on January 28, 1977. ,

1 10 CFR 50. Appendix R. Section III.0 states, in part, that the reactor coolant pump shall be equipped with an oil collection system. Such collection systems shall be capable of collecting lube oil from all potential pressurized and unpressurized leakage sites in the reactor coolant pump lube oil systems.

Contrary to the above, on October 10. 1996 the oil collection system for reactor coolant pum D was identified as not being capable of collecting the lube oil from a 1 potential leakage points, in that the lower portion of the oil collection system was not properly installed following the 1996 refueling outage. This resulted in oil leaking from  !

an improperly installed gasket seal on the bottom portion of the collection system and accumulating on the floor. The oil was not I drained into the closed tanks which were designed for this purpose.

This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement I). ,

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201. Florida Power Corporation is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ATTN: Document Control Desk. Washington. DC 20555, with a copy to the Regional Administrator. Region II, and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector, at the Crystal River facility, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice). This reply 9612060290 961127 4 DR ADOCK 050003 2 j

2 should be clearly marked as a " Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation: (1) the reason for the violation or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation. (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved. (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when fall com)11ance will be achieved. Your response may reference or include )revious docceted correspondence, if the correspondence adequately addresses t1e required response. If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order or demand for information may be issued as to why the license should not be modified, sus) ended, or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be tacen. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.

Dated at Atlanta, Georgia this 27thday of N W 1996 i

l l

I Enclosure 1