ML20126J344

Notice of Violation from Insp on 921025-1205.Violation Noted:Corrective Measures Implemented in Response to Westinghouse Technical Bulletin NSD-TB-89-06,inadequate

ML20126J344
Person / Time
Site:	Comanche Peak
Issue date:	12/31/1992
From:	NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20126J328	List: IR 05000445/1992051 ML20126J324 ML20126J344
References
50-445-92-51, NUDOCS 9301060123
Download: ML20126J344 (1)

Text

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . ._

APPENDIX A N01 ICE Of V101ATION Docket No. 50-445 License No. NPF-87 1U Electric Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station, Unit 1 Curing an NRC inspection conducted on October 25 through December 5, 1992, a violation of NRC requirements was identified. In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2.

Appendix C, the violation is listed below:

Criterion XVI of Appendix B to 10 CfR Part 50, as implemented by Section 16 of the TO Electric Quality Assurance Manual, requires that conditions adverse to quality are promptly identified and corrected, furthermore, for significant conditions adverse to quality, the measures shall assure that the cause of the condition is determined and that adequate corrective actions to preclude repetition are taken..

Contrary to the above, the corrective measures implemented in response to' Westinghouse Technical Bulletin NSD-TB-89-06 were inadequate in that multiple deficiencies of TERMI-POINT connection clips were subsequently identified on both train of the Unit 1 Solid State Protection System.

This is a Severity Level IV violation. (Supplement 1) (445/9251-01)

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CfR Part 2.201, TV Electric is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTH: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C. 20555, with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region IV, and a copy to the NRC Resident inspector at the facility that is the subject.of this Notice, within-30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation .

(Notice). This reply should be clearly marked as a " Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation: (1)_the reason _for the violation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation; (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the-results achieved; (3) the corrective steps that will be'taken to avoid further violations; and (4) the date when full compliance will be' achieved, if an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an-order or demand for-information may be' issued as to why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken. .Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending

-the response time.

Dated at ylington, Texas, this J /Sf day of b , 6 1992 9301060123 921231 DR- ADOCKOS00g5' l