0CAN069408, Forwards Response to Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-313/94-16 & 50-368/94-16

Forwards Response to Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-313/94-16 & 50-368/94-16

ML20069L473
Person / Time
Site:	Arkansas Nuclear
Issue date:	06/11/1994
From:	Mims D ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
0CAN069408, CAN69408, NUDOCS 9406200027
Download: ML20069L473 (3)

Text

sh 1

Entergy ^"

Operations l

June 11,1994 l OCAN069408 i

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Mail Station Pl-137 Washington, DC 20555

Subject:

Arkansas Nuclear One - Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-313 and 50-368 License Nos. DPR-51 and NPF-6 Response To Inspection Report 50-313/94-16;50-368/94-16 Gentlemen:

Pursuant to the provisions of 10CFR2.201, attached is the response to the violations identified during inspection activities associated with the review of the physical security program.

Should you have any questions or comments, please call me at 501-964-8601.

Very truly yours, dh(C Wd Dwight C. Mims Director, Licensing n;

DCM/ mas f

Attachments N

1 406:00027 040611 i,

>CP .aDOCK 050003:0 1 PDR

U. S. NRC y o June 11,1994 4- U ,

PAGE 2 1 9 '"

• .i  !

cc: Mr. Leonard J. Callan l Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400 Arlington, TX 76011 8064 1

NRC Senior Resident inspector Arkansas Nuclear One - ANO-1 & 2 Number 1, Nuclear Plant Road Russellville, AR 7280i Mr. George Kalman NRR Project Manager Region IV/ANO-1 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NRR Mail Stop 13-11-3 One White Flint North 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852 Mr. Thomas W. Alexion NRR Project Manager, Region IV/ANO-2 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NRR Mail Stop 13-11-3 One White Flint North 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852

. .S iTION D'

~

I l

1 l

l @

x 5

SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION WARNING. This document contains Safeguards Information. Unauthorized disclosure is prohibited per section 147 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 and 10CFR73.21. Violations subject to civil and criminal sanctions.

Reviewed by:

Dwight C. Mims [brif C4f-(Name) (Signature)

_Jntergy Operations. Incoroorated June 11.1994 (Organization) (Date)

N GI);3 DR '. la Tiog i Tills P mLt.En

' 'Q .

Attachment to 8 1

OCAN069408 i Il' l NOTICE OF VIOLATION During an NRC inspection conducted on April 18-22,1994, three violations of NRC requirements were identified. In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C, the violations are listed below:

License Condition 2.D (Unit 1) and License Condition 2.c(4)(Unit 2) of the licensee's facility operating licenses require that the licensee fully implement and maintain the Commission approved Physical Security Plan, including amendments and changes made pursuant to the authority of 10 CFR 50.54(p).

A. Inadequate Access Control- Vehicles Paragraph 1.6 of the Physical Security Plan requires that alllicensee designated vehicles shall have the ignition locked and the key removed while unattended.

On April 21,1994, the inspector found an unattended licensee designated vehicle unsecured with the ignition keys in the vehicle.

This is a Severity Level IV violation (313/9416-01; 368/9416-01)

(Supplement Ill).

B. Inadequate Detection Aids - Protected Area Paragraph 1.4C of the Physical Security Plan requires that the protected area perimeter is protected by a single intrusion detection system. Paragraph 3 l.4 A4 requires that the perimeter intrusion alarm system generate an alarm upon detection of stimulus or a condition for which the system was designed to react.

Paragraph 3.1.4A5 states that the perimeter alarm system shall be located on the exterior side of the perimeter physical barrier.

Contrary to the above, on April 21,1994, the inspector determined that the design of the perimeter detection system failed to provide adequate detection to two sections of the protected area perimeter.

This is a Severity Level IV violation (313/9416-02; 368/9416-02)

(Supplement Ill).

- 'vr \[s;g T ! ATfm:

i~llls s a- s i ROLLED a

'i

. -.; g q Attachment to ,u OCAN069408 -

aM PAGE 2 0f 8 1 18 < ' -

• Idd C. Failure to Follow Safeguards Information Control Procedure Requirements 10 CFR 73.21(c) requires documents or other matter that contains safeguard information to be marked in a conspicuous manner. 10 CFR 73.21(d)(2) requires that knowledge oflock combinations protecting safeguards information be limited to a minimum number of personnel.

Paragraph 6.3.2 of Station Procedure 1000.044 requires that a label be attached to each safeguards storage container with the names of the individuals authorized uncontrolled access to the safeguards container and who have the combination to the locking device. Paragraph 6.9.1 of the same procedure requires that the covers of all documents containing safeguards information be marked on the front and back as safeguards information.

Contrary to the above, on April 21,1994, the inspector identified that one of the safeguards container labels did not have all the names of the individuals granted uncontrolled access to the container and the combination. Further, containers contained safeguards documents without required marking on the front and rear covers of the documents.

This is a Severity 1.evel IV violation (313/9416 03; 368/9416-03)

Supplement 111).

~ i l s,' ;

T.f A Tic pA W - .. iCN THIS

^ :CNTROLLED 3

dd

) , , - .

,1

__ _. _ , _ _