ML20065B166

Application to Amend License NPF-11,revising Radioactive Effluent Tech Specs Per NRC Approved Generic Changes & Qualification Requirements for Position of Operating Assistant Superintendent

ML20065B166
Person / Time
Site:	LaSalle
Issue date:	09/08/1982
From:	Schroeder C COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
To:	Schwencer A Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20064L016	List: ML20065B166 ML20065B176
References
4962N, NUDOCS 8209140276
Download: ML20065B166 (4)

Text

___ _

v1 p[c%+ CommonweaHh Edison o e ,,a .m ,.ec. om. <

\W /. A %., , wp , 'o Post 0" < .: wa 76 7 -

Wp ch t;p;o boc 00W) l Septembe r 8, 1982 Mr. A. Schwencer, Ch i e f Licensing Branch // 2 Division o f Licensing U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 Suoject: LaSalle County Station Unit 1 Proposed Amendmen t t o NPF-ll Appendix "A" Technical Specifications NRC Docket No. 50-373 Dea r Mr. Schwencer:

i The purpose o f this letter is to request the following changes in Technical Specifications fo r LaSalle Count y Station Uni t 1:

Change Request NPF-ll/82-14 Revise the radioactive e f fluent technical specifications in accordance with the generic changes approved by the NRC to incorpo-rate information that was reviewed and approved as part o f a prior action and, as such, is one example o f a Class II amendment.

Change Request NPF-ll/82-15 Revise the qualification requirements for the position o f Operating Assistant Superintendent. This change is purely admini-strative in nature and is being submitted as requested by the NRC staff. As such, this is one example o f a Class II amendment.

These proposed changes are addressed in tne Attachments.

These changes have received on-site and of f-site review and ,()O approval. At tachment B lists the status o f Technical Specification 1 Change Requests fo r LaSalle. L 1982 0 $

No tary Public Al 4962N J

, ,- e - -

o

• A T T AC HMEN T L ASALLE COUNTY STATION UNI T 1 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGE REQUEST NPF -l l/ 82 -14 Subjec t : Revise the Radioactive Ef fluen t Te chn ica l Specifications in Accordance with E IS Branch Approved Changes.

Re ference (a): Le tter C. A. Willis o f NRC t o S. Pandey o f Franklin Research Center dated 11/20/81, Recommending Changes to Radioactive Ef fluent Technical Specific,ation (RE TS) .

Background

Re ference (a) recommended five changes in the RETS as a result of NRC/AIF meetings and previous supportive data. These a re listed below:

1) Doses from C-14 may be dropped since NRC data shows no significant contribution to ef fluent doses.

2) Airborne releases of radiciodine and particulates may be limited to the inhalation pathway only. Thi s specification ensures compliance with the 20.106 limits which are based on inhalation doses.

3) Reporting requirements when of fsite doses exceeds one half an annual design objective in one quarter may be changed to require consideration o f doses during the remainder of the calendar year (rather than "the subsequent three calendar quarters"). This change is consistent with the requirements of appendix I which are based on the calendar year.

4) Add a statement to reduce reporting requirements to only those specified in the RETS. This is to reduce the number of valueless thirty day reports about inoperable instruments and like items.

5) Drop the requirement for monitoring liquid effluent for P-32 since an NRC sponsored study has shown that P-32 is not a major contributor to of fsite doses.

The NRC Ef fluent Treatment Branch recommends these changes be made to the Standard Technical Specifications.

4692N

3 NPF -14 Discussion The Radioactive Ef fleunt Technical Specifications for LSCS were negotiated with the NRC Staf f in approximately September, 1981. Shortly thereafter, the LSCS Tech Specs were " Frozen".

Following a meeting with the AIF working group, the NRC Sta f f accepted the above changes to the Radiological Ef fluent Technical Specifications. This change simply incorporates these changes into the LSCS Technical Specifications.

Conclusion Commonwealth Eoison Company finds no unreviewed safety questions involved. These changes have previously been approved by the NRC, as documented in Reference (a) .

4962N l

l i

(