ML20028G873

Forwards fitness-for-duty Program Performance Data for Jan-June 1990,per 10CFR26.71

ML20028G873
Person / Time
Site:	Beaver Valley
Issue date:	08/29/1990
From:	Sieber J DUQUESNE LIGHT CO.
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
NUDOCS 9009050254
Download: ML20028G873 (8)

Text

7 K g i g {

bea Whey hwet $taten

$Ngugott. 8% lbO77KKd

'V h nt Nder Gwi 44@ 3931.?te August 29, 1990 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission-Attn: nc.:ument Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Reference Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit No. 1 and No. 2 BV-1 Docket No. 50-334, License No. DPR-66 BV-2 Docket No. 50-412, License No. NPF-73 Fitness-For-Duty program Six Month Report Gentlement Fitness-For-Duty Program Performance Data is hereby submitted in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 26.

The attached report contains the information required by 10 CFR 26.71 (d) and encompassed the reporting period January - June 1990.

If there are any questions concerning this report, please contact Ms. Pat Casasanta, Manager of Human Resources (412) 393-5238.

Very truly yours, I (A g J.J D'.' Sieber Vice President Nuclear Group cc: Mr. J. Beall, Sr. Resident Inspector Mr. T. T. Martin, NRC Region I Administrator Mr. A. W. DeAgatio, Project Manager U. S. NRC Mail Drop P1-137 v -, ..

gA U)

Q9050254 900829 p ADOCK 05000334 PDC hhfl

'//

Fitness for Duty Progrmn

7. . Performance Data  ;

3 J ,

Personnel Subject to 10CFR 26 I i i

l Duquesne Light Company June 30,1990  !  !

W s in e. %

Beaver Valley Power Station Pat Casasanta 412-393-5238 caama e P m tinsumew eenem  !

Cutorts: ScreervCorvirmaton (nyml) 22 Appenotr A to 10CFR 26  :

Man luana / Amphetamines / /. l Cocaine / Phercycidine / /

i Opiates / Aloonal(% BAC) /

Long Te, n Short Term Testing Results Cortractor Cottractor Licensee Empeyees Personnet Personnel l Average Number wah gyagjgjggg Unescorted Acceis 1376 g g 227 291 8 .e ReferTod Access s a a #- ,

Categones Tested Poseve to EAP Ressored Tested Posneve Tested Poseve Pre empeymert Preacging 0 130 . 126 0 357 5 Perecc .

~-m _ ,  ;

For cause IAW'9Y l 0 * &4 1 0 l l

_ M 14 em%t EW3 55: e*$

Raroom 650 4 92 0 19- 1 FoMwo 5 0 Q

C'3d@YfsE#K F.sGlY yEKF 2 0

.,n- a w tww Other A 2 l^ T '

3h Total 788 5 3 L 219 0 552 6 A - One callout tested positive for Ethanol - no urine sent. One person tested here for site access to another nuclear facility - negative result.

Issue 1

> 0 m t :

{ 5 3 3 8 9 ' at C) at !\ = 4 c:

6 ' 50  ::

\\ ]iE t

[i -

5

• N a

$ i 33 3 2 !E

.i , -

n s e ii T

u y

u i aE e.

< \ p3 Je 'wy o m

. I 5 F i =

[ <

m m -

l a -

c l . 3 l 2 2 1

{ i 1

^

I

- M u s, m

. . . . i g ;

,iie i i i i i ii ! g l t 6 i i i eit iii 3

l

\

i i i t i i i ! ie i

'i i i i i i i i e i ii i I

i i e i i i i i e i i

__ ) i i i i e i e i e i* i g

( i i . e i i i i i i . ,

o I i i i i k I i i C

=

i. t !I I I i_ !l

• • i i i e i e ii lii l

l t m I i i i i i i ! i i i i i ! ! i i ti i

= 0.0 ' i '  !' ' '

t 0.8 M ' i

^ O' 3 d u

=

0.0 #i'i! ' i ii -

.C e 0*7 Mi u w a c'

a 1.2 W' i ' " "

I 0*6 '# I ' ~

E E'. iii i ii ! E g g ei iii i , t i '

3 i i i a

d eii '

6 i i O.

Q iii i 4 i -

i * , i . =

I i  !!

i t

"w i ' l i

, i i M

4 a

g ia  : -

3 =2 E

a  ! -

1 ur e C -

E, i g 4 h h I i

i i n

e i i 6 6 i ei i i i 1 e ii e i i i i e ii i e i i e i '

ii i i i e ! I i i ei 1

! i i i ! i ie i i i i i i i i i ei '

I i i i i ii i t i !

e i e i e i e i i e i i . t  ! ! ! ** i e i i l l l3 I I !

e i d

i i e i i i i i i i i i i i i i e i i i e i i i e iei i l_ i i e i i l i I I i i . . . i i i i i i j

(ssue I

d

r

\9

?

t i

.1 r l

y

?

EMPLOYEE ABSISTANCE PROGRAM. (EAPI RCSULTS FOR'MRO SIX-MONTH REPORT -!

t i

f i

1 From the inception of the Fitness for. Duty Program.in January, . .

1990, [

through-June, 1990, our records-Indicate that three (3) Duquesne' Light f Company employees were admitted to-the'EAPI two have since returned to .E

.?

i work.. Our records also indicate'that one (1)' contractor was admitted-to the EAP and has returned to work. f t

[

?

?

/sab l

.i t

I 0

-f

'I E

f t i i

o l 1 h

lh

. - _ - . ~ . . ,-. -- , . . - . . . .. -. . . - . . . . . . - . . . . . . . -

NUCLEAR GROUP l Nuclear Human Resources Department Medical Section August 24, 1990 MRO: 0019 MRO COMMENTS ON SIX-MONTH DATA

SUMMARY

From January 1, 1990 to June 30, 1990, one hundred eighty-one (101) days elapsed, representing 49.59% of the year ([181 t 365) x 100%).

My staff calculated the average number of badged individuals year '40 date for Duquesne Light Company (DLC) personnel, Security personnel, Contractor / Vendor personnel, and total badged personnel. This was done by cdding up the total number of badged individuals in each respective pool for each of the days elapsed this year, and dividing by 191.

By multiplying these pool numbers by 49.59%, 1 derived the actual number of random tests for each pool we should have tepted so far in order to reach our goal of testing approximately 100% of the work force by year's end (See TABLE 1).

TABLE 1: Estimated vs. Actual Random Tests DLC Security Contractors Total Should Have Tested 682 112 144 939 Actually Tested 92 193 935 l650 The top row reflects the calculated number of random tests for each pool that should have been tested by June 30, 1990 in order to equal 1 0 0*/. o f the work force by year's end. DLC, Security, and Contractors correspond respectively to Licensee Employees, Long-Term Contractors, and Short-Term Contractors on the Six-Month NRC Data Summary Report Sheet.

In order to be able to monitor actual vs. estimated number of tests on a daily basis, we will install a computer program to avoid an unsuspected noncompliance with 10-CFR-26 by year's end.

OM/mab

h NUCLEAR GROUP H Nuclear Human Resources Department Medical Section i

August 24, 1990  ;

MRO: 0020 MRO COMMENTS ON MANAGEMENT ACTIONS As required on Page 4 of the FFD Performance Data Form Explanation (TAB 6 of the FFD Manual), the following is a list of lessons learned and l corrective action taken from January 1, 1990 to June 30, 1990.

1. Eroblem Identified The random generating program in our computer was noted to be pulling lists with several repeat names from a previous list.

These names were not all repeated from the same date, but on any given day, a new list would have repeated several names, all of which had occurred on a single list from a previous date.

Solution Imolemented  :

A new computer program has been formulated. -It was being tested and independently evaluated by a computer specialist from Carnegie Mellon University. Union and management officials were alerted to the problems immediately after it was identified. -

Progress of the new computer prograto is being monitored.

Until the new program was on line, the old computer program generated our list of random employees to test. Prior to using this test, however, each list was compared to all previous lists since January 1, 1990. If a new list contained more than one (1) ,

name from the same day of a previous list, or more than three (3) names from different days' previous lists, the new list was ,

rejected as "non-random" and another list printed out. This has "

continued to the point where up to 12 new lists had to be generated on any given day before a new, valid random list became available. The new program was implemented on July 9, 1990.

2. Problem Identified i

There is currently no method in place to check on our day-to-day progress in attempting to reach a random test number equal to 100% of the badged work force by year's end.

o

• MRO COMMENTS ON MANAGEMENT ACTIONS Au' gust 24, 1990 MRO: 0020 Page 2 Solution Proposg3tL A program can be formulated for software in our medical facility personal computer. This software will help us track our daily progress. In addition, this software can help us monitor the progress of our blind proficiency tusting and our follow-up testing, to ensure its compliance with 10-CFR-26. We intend to implement the use of this software before January 1, 1991.

3. Problem Identifiud:

10-CFR-26 requires that the MRO contact the licensee within ten (10) days of a presumptive positive screening test by the laboratory. The proolem was that the MRO was required to adjudicate each positive and was not always able to do so within ten (10) days since the certified copy of the Chain of Custody form verifying the positive test wasn't always available.

Solution Imolemented:

The secured teletype terminal prints out the lab report for the MRO within one (1) day to two (2) days of the lab's test.

Arrangements were made to overnight express mail the certified copy of the Chain of Custody form to the MRO each day. We thus were able to circumvent both the U.S. Post Office and the company mail system, and their respective time delays.

Prior to the overnight express mail system, there were times when the Chain of Custody would be delayed for over 20 days. Our current turn-around time is four (4) to five (S) days.

4. Problem Identified:

The Fitness-For-Duty Program Manager was not always immediately available to attend to situations in which her input was mandated.

Solution Implemented:

A list was published of the Fitness-Fer-Duty Program Manager's designated representatives. These individuals, listed in decreasing order of authority, are all well versed in the Fiteess-For-Duty Program. One of these individuals is available st all times.

4

'Mkb COMMENTS ON MANAGEMENT ACTIONS Au* gust 24, 1990 MRO: 0020 Page 3

5. Problem Identified:

If a urine specimen is colder than 90.5 degrees Fahrenheit, this is reason to suspect it is adulterated. Our thermon.eter only registered down to 95 degrees Fahrenheit.

Solution Imolemented:

New thermometers which register down to 80.0 degrees Fahrenheit were purchased.

6. Problem Identified Two of our personnel were trained as instructors on the intoxilyzer instrument. During this training, deficiencies were noted in our routine maintenance and care of these instruments.

FolutL2n Implemented:

A monitored program was implemented to routinely rotate our intoxilyzers out of service for maintenance and cleaning. This is all documented in permanent log books.

7. Problem Identified:

An individual came to the Medical Facility to be tested. He insisted on recording the entire procedure on a tape recorder.

This was allowed.

Solution Implemen+ed:

Duquesne Light Company was notified of this incident after the fact. We determined that it is illegal to tape record someone without their permission by Pennsylvania State Law. The collection site is no longer to grant permission to tape record the collection procedure.

OM/mab