ML19239A047
| ML19239A047 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry  |
| Issue date: | 08/23/2019 |
| From: | FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co |
| To: | NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB |
| DeMarshall J | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17215A921 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML19239A047 (1) | |
Text
ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: Perry Date of Examination: Feb. 2019 Item lnitials Task Description 6
a bL-.t c#
'flil' 81 ;,c
- b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with
,ilf n d o x Øc a R
I Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401N and whether all llA categories are appropriately sampled.
T c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics T 'lW (l E
N
- d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected l(A statements are appropriate.
4y/ XL e (
- a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number 2.
of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and S major transients. ,íW ç M
I
- b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and U
L mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at (:/ pa A
T least one new or sgnifcantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days. 4W lt o c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative and R quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D and in ,/,
Section D.5, "Specific lnstructions for the 'Simulator Operating Test,"'of ES-301 (including overlap).
'TT, K ç J. a. Verify that the systems walk{hrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:
(1) The outline(s) contains the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form.
A L
(2) Task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form.
K (3) No tasks are duplicated from the applicant's audit test(s).
T H
(4) The number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (il (5) The number of alternate-path, low-power, emergency, and radiologically controlled area "
R o tasks meets the criteria on the form. 4ft, ,YL U
G
- b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1 :
H (1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form , ,1, (2)
(3) at least one task is new or significantly modified no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations 4/,, k( #l
- c. Determine if there are enough dfferent outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days. 4llt' -y(^ -
- a. Assess wlrether plant-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment and individual plant
¿ltl,t K" fua 4.
examination insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.
G E
- b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41143 and 55.45 sampling s approprate 44,1' víi '!e N
E
- c. Ensure that l(A importance ratings (except for plantspecific priorities) are at least 2.5. ..{Vr -Wt A6-R d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections ,llh', ,.Y1, ç c
I
- e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. -Yt #-
- a. Author
- b. Facility Reviewer (*)
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) {-fÉ_
- d. NRC Supervisor I t/ lrt,,g
- Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines.
- The independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; the chief examiner's concurrence is required.
N ofe !.: (*) r,'t{ett yont ¿f'a/Lze ry^qta¿ (ry rft<t ES-201, Page 30 of 32