ML17298C012

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
V. C. Summer, Unit 2, 05200027/2016301 Public Administrative Items (ADAMS-2C)- Delay Release 2 Yrs
ML17298C012
Person / Time
Site: Summer South Carolina Electric & Gas Company icon.png
Issue date: 10/25/2017
From:
NRC/RGN-II
To:
South Carolina Electric & Gas Co
References
Download: ML17298C012 (43)
v • d • e


Text

ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Facility: cgtrvec U,* Date of Examination: atOtt,,

Developed by: Written: Facility NRC El II Operating Facility NRC El

. . Chief Target Task Description (Reference) Examiners Date Initials

-180 1. Examination administration date confirmed (Cia; C.2.a and b)

-150 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e)

-150 3. Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c) J1J

-150 4. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d) .

[-120] 5. Reference material due (C.i.e; C.3.c; Attachment 3)

{-90} 6. Integrated examination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-1, ES-401-112, ES-401N-112, ES-401-3, ES-401N-3, ES-401-4, and ES-401N-4, as applicable (C.i.e and f; C.3.d)

{-85} 7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)

{-60} 8. Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPM5, and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, ES 301-5, E5-301-6, and ES-401-6, ES-401N-6, and any Form ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301-i, or ES-301-2 updates), and reference materials due (C.1.e, f, g and h; C.3.d)

-45 9. Written exam and operating test reviews completed. (C.3.f)

-30 10. Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398s) due (C.1.l; C.2.g; ES-202)

-21 11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review (C.2.h; C.3.f)

-21 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (Cli; C.2.f and h; C.3.g)

-14 13. Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (Cli; C.2.i; ES-2o2) y14

-14 14. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C.2.i; C.3.h)

-7 15. Facility licensee management queried regarding the licensees views on the examination. (C.2 j)

-7 16. Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if >10) applications audited to confirm qualifications / eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent (C.2.i; Attachment 5; ES-202, C.2.e; ES-204)

-7 17. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee (C.3.k)

-7 18. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i)

Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.

[Applies only] {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NRC.

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility:

V UN Date of Examination:

/ ? / Ii Initials Item Task Description

7. a. Verity that the outline(s) [it(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401 N.

R b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with Section 0.7 of ES-401 or ES-401N and whether all K/A categories are appropriately sampled. P 4t N

c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. c) ?tI
d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate.
2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component tailures, technical specifications, and major A(4 S transients. 5)

M b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and u mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule A

L without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the c,)

> Ill T applicants audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and ],,( , 1t4 quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301 -4 and described in Appendix D.
3. a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed W among the safety functions as specified on the form A (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form L (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants audit test(s)

K (4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on T the form.

H R b. Verifythatthe administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:

o (1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form c) 4lll U (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified I G (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations H

c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.
4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections. r ,1( E
b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate. 1(t( ft
c. Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. At1 U. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections, 1ctf [r$3 C a. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. Att/ 3
f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). df it j4

?rinted 5sf arp/Sinature pate O (rsj tV /

a. Author _>C.i1 t .tJ. / (,
b. Facility Reviewer (*) /gPE7 11, r(4&1s/.
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) / /14.1 .

U. NRCSupervisor .47X, Gu. i./

Note: # Independent NRC reviewer inltial items in Cotumn c; chief examiner concurrence required.

Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines.

ES-201 Page 26 of 28

/EI oc ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 CL Csi

1. Pre-Examination V u1 ce I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2. Post-Examination m To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during CI) the week(s) of 7 8 . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not 1 instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

-a Q)

Ca NOTE CD PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNURE(2) DATE 0 1. 5okc -c-- \J LA ii 2CJL -3,___

2. CA (l4uc.1J (1(5 L2c4 J. -i/-/S
3. F1j s ZiJc ,-:_..._-- 1°/ fl6
4. 6- JTii dc: /2.sfi /5-- icLf
5. C1.. ,q. (>

jC5 tAie1\ rc.54ir A ,q-LrzI /i/c ifr i2c ,w%4JIi,. I  :

6. tthIt6
7. Crr c, .

8o.ivrrzJt t-)M5ILi Q1p/Ji ur

9. 19q  %)Yl( O<

Ø&A Iw jo pect

,oIWt(,

7t - - fl/si/f q

13. ce<.r
14. Si J 3 4L
15. Ib4-t 1ty1R 2/7,//l I_ i(/

NOTES:

\ F 4?(.. CI-AD \-\\LL PEj-TECE.&tr,/)

Rg: Cc. t1f S LE L

F/Z.= S-& Th rv-& nA.

ft i

(çc C t) (2 &

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

_D

1. Pro-Examination vL I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of I 2 as of the date of my signature. I agree that will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth ooerator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not seleDt the training content cc provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical seccrity measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge. I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically nated

-U below and authorized by the NRC.

5)

Cr DATE CD PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY - SIGNATURE(1) DATE SIG TURE (2) NOTE M

to *!y-I L.____

0 1. S0 L rj.) 2. s -1

...Lt 1 c/_

4.!7-L. .---,

5.R,Jri A) -d -t -t d?h1f I cALlL4Ja-\ 5LbIw___

c:,i _L4 b /it(4-.

7. ;2\ S- k (JJ.i-_ Vis I

87,rnsts hSH .V.5 3RQ. iriSi 3/i Y/ib.

9. V; /4L

-It .J- -y-i. d-HL to f 3

lO.tA4.D Sh# i)3)&

11.I71vl) 61is- L1DT&

j_L/..)

12. A)wf/ vitAToç rtL
13. F)C. yiç1c__ - 9/JiJ tf,.

A9Flf./\j 14.

15. (Ycftke.., ,,Jt. ..3JAL-r Ut-Z V

ci 7/1 . S t:i/

NOTES: jtZ ryAS Jc% CcA- tI7L 1ECfC-LE\Jfi tzS%-. (15L. E(-

3 f0(L i1-1 PFiz.- rz

3 o ES -2 0 1 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination t *1( C Lc.rsc \.o..LC I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about th NRC licensing examinati scheduled for the week(s) Zi Spt, of I z
  • tj 4 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information a out these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administratio n, except as specifically noted below and authorized the NRC by (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2. Post-Examination m To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons ny information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during N) the week(s) of From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not Q instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

CD (0

CD PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE NOTE N) 0

-I, 17io145 q. 4Jerr Si4ir P1AAjACTZ, N) 54. C cx 3. Li s..i1:;_ Sofa.I- &gi4a

4. C1j Piriti *SIfl2i SUPtA54 5.C1 Y 1LC, PI4i1 Opc.+

.$$J4j)

6. j1i Cct.t_ fZOd .scA.qfsø
7. CoLy 6.Gc nLAwJ1- Q-r S ffR S(
8. MIt HAL. s1,a1 AJLO (w pEvLo9M6FTr 9.5u rtc& ,(1L Do?,4+

1O.S+tp C2 11.% ,4ti ,fl-t?

lr-Lk &JP f15kucA-c(

13. :P cQc(d:t
14. 5r1fi1.V 1 5.

NOTES: 1nOft Prjz.

z. S(5A9vt.E5. 5Ifj -il I

P?GE qQ4C ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-20f-S

1. Pre-Examination t I acknowledge that have acquired specialized knowledge aboutthNRC licensing examinaigns scheduled forthe week(s) of I z 4 L- as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance teedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately repoftto facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2. Post-Examination m

Co To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during p.) the week(s) of From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted

-o below and authorized by the NRC.

(0 0 PRINTED NAME JOB TiTLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE N) 0 I Thci.s i-(. 4JeTp [:iti N) __:.EL-_ S..

3. (it4z...TZ & sI;-* &5fezz- SrI/Q cq-2o 4._HRS Pr .SIjPi suPVr5L
5. 0 .ALrth Plrr4

.1. Kif fif S 1J th Ji?i I o*

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

NOTES; (3C2T -t7

P/5L..

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of I Z, t Sq*s of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or prwide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures ani requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2. Post-Examination m

co To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during 3 the week(s) of From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not Q instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback

-A to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

CD CD CD PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE 3

-I 0

-I, t-4 Mjtwht64 io)ciIr r.) 2.AIWR GUTtEZ ((E-q16

(,-1A1 [UL?D& 2+/-1

4. Ry 5.f3icw,r ij 4Rrc-,z-/6 (c.- 4 tP.5 /E ) .

- iz -r iO:?/I,

.9

6. rr q/, a/i t __

fc/f/ic

7. ç J\)C.5\. Cr fc/JF&
8. /14*,7 (Ty) kEdY t.)/ 3//(,

rnAP, tYY cit(%t,C I 1OaE ILPk1 i /12 /1 11IER P-t5 C,4 hJ Chlo (i...

12. ,4S?&V C/4 -N I CMc) 1 1ifZ/I(., -

C

13. <tvr EStOT
14. DoSe r-&iVWt- ccL) t?f 15.

NOTES:

u(

2 c& PLV

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, provide or performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administratio n, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicato r is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not

. instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (j) DATE SIGNATURE(2) DATE NOTE 2.Sc.on- /4loEcJ ..4 6 t t O- !( I 3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

NOTES: j ti ECl( (&Z TEL(r

ES-301 Administrative JPM Outline Form ES-301-1 Facility: V.C. Summer NPS Date of Examination: Sept, 2016 Examination Level: RO/SRO Operating Test Number: 1301 Administrative Topic Type Describe activity to be performed (see Note) Code

  • Conduct of Operations M,R Assess EOP-F-0 Critical Safety function Status Trees Originally Vogtle 2016 Audit RO/SRO G2.1.21 Conduct of Operations DR Calculate a RCS Dilution in accordance with SOP-C VS Originally VCS 2015 Audit RO/SRO

. G2.2.10 Equipment Control DR . .

Determine isolation boundary components, positions and sequence to isolate a leak from a CCS pump discharge flange.

Originally Vogtle 2016 Audit RO/SRO SRO Only component to identify applicable LCO action statements, required actions and completion times

. G 2.3.4 Contingent upon approval of applicable HPP procedures for Unit 2/3 use.

Radiation Control MR .

Determine projected dose to add oil to a RNS pump and determine if the task can be completed without exceeding dose limits RO/SRO Emergency Plan N,R 12.4.34 Given an EAL declaration, complete the notification form for initial notifications SRO NOTE: All items (5 total) are required for SROs. RO applicants require only 4 items unless they are retakinq only the administrative topics, when all 5 are required.

Type Codes & Criteria: (C)ontrol Room, ($)imulator or Class(R)oorn 0/0/5 (D)jrect from bank (< 3 for ROs; < 4 for SROs and RO retakes) 2/2/0 (N)ew or (M)odified from bank (> 1) 1/2 (P)revious 2 exams (< 1; randomly selected) I

ES-301 Administrative JPM Outline Form ES-301-1

1. Assess EOP-F-0, Critical Safety Function Status Trees
  • G 2.1.7, Ability to evaluate plant performance and make operational judgments based on operating characteristics, reactor behavior. and instrument interpretation. (CfR: 41.5 /43.5 /45.12 /45.13) RO 4.4 SRO 4.7
  • RO/SRO
  • The candidate will be given an Ovation Critical Safety function screen (without color cues). The candidate must then evaluate this data against EOP-F-0 and determine any applicable F RPs
2. Calculate a RCS Dilution jaw SOP-CVS-00l, Attachment 3, Section 4.4
  • G 2.1.21, Ability to perform general and/or normal operating procedures during any plant condition. (CfR: 41.10 /

43.5/45.2/45.6) R04.3 SRO4.4

  • RO/SRO
  • The candidate will be given a desired Boron Concentration change and must then use the SOP calculation to determine the amount of demin water to be pumped to the RCS.
3. Determine isolation boundary components, positions and sequence to isolate a leak from a CCS pump discharge flange. SRO Only component to identify applicable LCO action statements, required actions and completion times
  • G 2.2.10, Knowledge of the process for controlling equipment configuration or status. (CFR: 41.10 / 43.3 / 45.13)

RO 3.9 SRO 4.3

  • APP-S WS-M6-OOl, SWS Mechanical Drawing
  • VCB-SAP-020 1, Equipment Tagging and Lockout-Tagout
  • The candidate must determine the applicable prints needed and iaw VCB-SAP-020l, properly align the system to isolate the leakage. The SRO must then determine any applicable TS/TRM impact.
4. Determine projected dose to add oil to a CVS makeup pump and determine if the task can be completed without exceeding dose limits. Modify to add SRO only component to process a dose limit extension.
  • G 2.3.4, Ability to comply with radiation work permit requirements during normal or abnormal conditions.

(CFR: 41.12 /45.lO)RO 3.5 SRO 3.6

  • RO/SRO
  • VCS-HPP-0l5 1.00 Use of the Radiation Work Permit
  • VCS-HPP-0 153.00 Administrative Exposure Limits
  • The candidate will be provided a survey map and RWP. The candidate must then determine the total dose involved in perfoming the task as whether administrative limits will be exceeded.
5. Given an EAL declaration, complete the notification form for initial notifications.
  • G 2.4.34, Knowledge of emergency communications systems and techniques. (CfR: 41.10 / 45.13) RO 3.2
  • EPP-002, Communication and Notification
  • The candidate will be given an approved EPP-002 communications form and complete the form.

ES 301-2 NRC CR JPMs ES-301 Control Room/In-Plant Systems Outline Form ES-301-2 Facility: VC Summer Units 2 and 3 Date of Examination: Sept, 2016 Exam Level: RO / SRO-I Operating Test No.: 1301 Control Room Systems 8 for RO; 7 for SRO-I; 2 or 3 for SRO-U Type Safety System / JPM Title Code* Function

a. Recover a dropped control rod (AOP-104) M,A,S 1
b. Lower accumulator B pressure (PXS-SOP). (RO Only) N,EN,S 2
c. Reduce RCS pressure using auxiliary spray (RCS-SOP) (Originally VCS 1201 D,S 3 Audit Exam)
d. Place RNS Train A into Shutdown Cooling (RNS-SOP) (Randomly selected P,S,L 4P from VCS 2015 NRC Exam)
e. Unload generator and trip turbine (GOP-102). Generator breaker fails to open.

P,A,S 4S (Randomly selected from VCS 2015 NRC Exam)

f. PCS Malfunction, vacuum reliefs fail to open to limit vacuum in containment N,S,EN 5 following inadvertent PCS actuation. (AOP-110).
g. Transfer ES-1 and 2 from UAT to RAT (ECS-SOP) M,S 6
h. RCP Locked Rotor ATWS (E-0/FR-S.1) D,A,L,S 7 In-Plant Systems* (3 for RO); (3 for SRO-I); (3 or 2 for SRO-U)
i. Evacuate Control Room (AOP-601) Enable RSR and alternate path to actuate N,A,E, 8 Safeguards
j. Align WGS Guard and Delay Beds for Nitrogen purge IAW WGS-SOP-001 N, R 9
k. Energize RNS-V023 to cool the IRWST as directed by E-0, Attachment 1 N, E 4P

@ All RO and SRO-I control room (and in-plant) systems must be different and serve different safety functions; all 5 SRO-U systems must serve different safety functions; in-plant systems and functions may overlap those tested in the control room.

Type Codes Criteria for RO / SRO-I / SRO-U Actual (A)lternate path 4-6/4-6/2-3 4 (C)ontrol room 0 (D)irect from bank < 9/< 8/<4 2 (E)mergency or abnormal in-plant > 1/> 1/>1 2 (EN)gineered safety feature >1 />1 />1 (control room system) 2 (L)ow-Power / Shutdown >1/>1/>1 2 (N)ew or (M)odified from bank including 1(A) > 2/> 2/>1 7 (P)revious 2 exams < 3/< 3/< 2 (randomly selected) 2 (R)CA >1/>1/>1 1 (S)imulator 8 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 1 of 4

ES 301-2 NRC CR JPMs a,c Control Room Systems:

Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 2 of 4

ES 301-2 NRC CR JPMs a,c Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 3 of 4

ES 301-2 NRC CR JPMs In-Plant Systems i) Evacuate Control Room: New, Alternate path, Emergency in plant x SF8 A-306, AA1.06. Ability to operate and/or monitor the following as thy apply to Evacuation of Control Room: Remote shutdown workstation controls RO 3.7 SRO 3.7 x AOP-601, Evacuation of Control Room x The operator evacuates to the Remote Shutdown Panel, enables control and determines that a Heat Sink can NOT be established and actuates Safeguards.

j) Align WGS Guard and Delay Beds for Nitrogen purge: New, RCA x SF9 WGS A4.01. Ability to manually operate and monitor in the control room: Place Gaseous Radwaste System in service 2.6 x SF9 WGS A4.02. Ability to manually operate and monitor in the control room:

Nitrogen purge 2.5 x WGS-SOP-001 x The operator will use plant drawing to identify the plant locations for components operated and demonstrate a path from the Main Control Room to this location. Then use a mockup to enter the RCA. Then identify the correct position of components through the use of pictures. Then exit the RCA.

k) Energize RNS-V023 to cool the IRWST: New, Engineered Safety Feature x SF4P RNS K1.06. Knowledge of the physical or control/protection logic relationship between the Normal Residual Heat Removal System and the following systems:

Passive Core Cooling System 3.8 x SF4P RNS A4.09. Ability to manually operate and monitor in the control room: In-containment refueling water storage tank cooling 3.6 x E-0, Attachment 1 x The operator will use plant drawing to identify the plant locations for components operated and demonstrate a path from the Main Control Room to this location. Then identify the correct position of components through the use of pictures.

Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 4 of 4

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility: V _- UN Date of Examination: i1 1 Operating Test Number: 12J /

. Initials

1. General Criteria a b c#
a. The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CER 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution).
b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during f)[)

this examination. kt

c. The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants audit test(s). (see Section D.1.a.) _

fflj

d. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits. ,C- elt(
e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated license level. i(t =
2. Walk-Through Criteria
a. Each 1PM includes the following, as applicable:

initial conditions

  • initiating cues
  • references and tools, including associated procedures
  • reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee
  • operationally important specific performance criteria that include: 1 flLS detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature kt1 fl system response and other examiner cues statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant criteria for successful completion of the task identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable
b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301-J and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance A( (1 criteria (e.g., item distribLition, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.
3. Simulator Criteria --

The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached. ) 4 Printed Name / Signatu1. Date a.

b.

Author Facility Reviewer(*) i C

C.

01

/(

/ CAk C /C

c. NRC Chief Examiner f#) MAi. A.E4r.s /i?Jó
d. NRC Supervisor (7/Ito NOTE: The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.
  1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required.

ES-301, Page 24 of 27

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: sf C U ?_ Date of Exam: I Scenario Numbers: 1J2..(Sf/1 dc Operating Test No.:

QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Imbals a b* c#

1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, ct, but it does not cue the operators into expected events. P 11
2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. ,CJ ltq jf3
3. Each event description consists of the the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated malfunction(s) or conditions that ate entered to initiate the event A, çj3

. the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew

. the expected operator actions (by shift position)

. the event termination point (if applicable)

4. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. fl11 JW3
5. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

Q P

) *

6. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. ()

Cues are given.

4

7. The simulator modeling is not altered. 4tl
8. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity fl,..7) is maintained while running the planned scenarios.
9. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301. .,bC, 1t 1 0. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301 -6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).

fl c.

j. Acf
11. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable rating factors. (Competency Rating factors as described on forms ES-303-l and ES-303-3.) (,..J 4
12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on j)

Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).

13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.

Lf Target QuantitatIve AttrIbutes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes -- -- --

1. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 9 23 T Yi .-1i 5 Att
2. Abnormal events (2-4) 3 ( / 3 1
3. Major transients (12) I 2... I .2.. 1. o1. j
4. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (12) 2..  ?....í 2.. 2..

2.

5. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) S C u *f cjf
6. EOP based Critical tasks f 23) I 2_ 2.... 1 . M.t NOTE: The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.
  1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required.

ES-301, Page 25 of 27

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: V C S i r 2... Date of Exam: 9 I -. ft Operating Test No.: I A E Scenarios 1 2 3 4 T M L N CREW CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION 0 I T POSmON T C S A B S A B S A B A B A S M A L R T 0 R 1 0 R 1 0 R T o u 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P M(*)

P E RU RO RX 1110 NOR SROI I/C S 442 SRO-U MAJ I 2 2 1 Li TS  ?

L 0 2 2 RO RX 0110 Li SRO-I NOR

-,tj C) iii I/C 442 SRO-U MA] f 2 2 1 Li TS g 022 RO RX 110 SROI NOR I/C ZZIiL 1 4 4 2 SRO-U MA] 2 2 1 Li TS 022 L1 NOR i/C iii 442 SRO-U MA] 2 2 1 Li TS 022 Instructions:

1 Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type: TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions. Instant SROs (SRO-i) must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (i/C) malfunctions and one major transient. in the ATC position. If an SRO-i additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. () Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a one-for-one basis.
3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns,
4. For licensees that use the ATC operator primarily for monitoring plant parameters, the chief examiner may place SRO-l applicants in either the ATC or BOP position to best evaluate the SRO-i in manipulating plant controls.

ES-301, Page 26 of 27

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES3O1-5 Facility: \j t Date of Exam: - L iC OperatingTestNo.:

A E Scenarios 1 2 3 4 T M L N CREW CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION 0 I T POSmON T C A S A B S A B S A B S A B M R T 0 R T 0 R 1 0 R r o L u 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P M(*)

T P E R IU RO RX 2.. i io NOR 1 1 1 SROI SRO-U MAJ 2 2 1 TS 022 RO RX 2.. ( 110 H

SRO-I NOR Gill I/C 9 14 42 SRO-U MA] I 2 2 1 H TS 0022 RO R.)( I 110 o

NOR 31 ii I/C 4 42 SRO-U MAJ 3 2 2 1 TS 0 22 NOR 111 O-I H

SRO-U I/c 4 42 MAJ 2 2 1 H TS 0 22 Instructions:

1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RD applicants. ROe must serve In both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions. Instant SROs (SRO-l) must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instwment or component (I1C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an SRO-I additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.
2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix 0. () Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a one-for-one basis,
3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.
4. For licensees that use the ATC operator primarily for monitoring plant parameters, the chief examiner may place SRO-l applicants in either the ATC or BOP position to best evaluate the SRO-l in manipulating plant controls.

ES-301, Page 26 of 27

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: J ( S ij

  • T L Date of Exam: . Operating Test No.: I 3c $

A E Scenarios 1 2 3 4 T M 0 I L N CREW CREWPOSITION CREWPOSITION CREWPOSITION I T POSmON T C A S A B S A B S A B S A B M A

R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T L u *)

0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P P

B R IU RO 1 110 RX NOR oi D I/C 1442 SRO-U MAJ L 2 2 1 D is 0 2 2 RO RX 110 D NOR 111 SRO-I I/C I L 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 2 2 1 D TS 022 RD RX I 110 oi NOR ZZLiiL ic 2_ 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ t. 2 2 1 TS 022 NOR 111 oi I/C 442 SRO-U MAJ 2 2 1 TS 022 Instructions:

1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RD applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions. Instant SROs (SRO-l) must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component fl/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an SRO-l additionally serves in the SOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.
2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C,2.a of Appendix D. () Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a one-for-one basis.
3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.
4. For licensees that use the ATC operator primarily for monitoring plant parameters, the chief examiner may place SRO-l applicants in either the ATC or BOP position to best evaluate the SRO-l in manipulating plant controls.

ES-301, Page 26 of 27

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: V S Date of Exam: , 12. ), Operating Test No.: I 3c A E Scenarios 1 2 3 4 T M L N CREW CREWPOSITION CREWPOSITION CREWPOSITION I PoSmoN T C B S A B S A B S A B A M

S A R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T o L u 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P M(*)

I P E R lU RO RX 1110 NOR 1i I I/C )ç442 SRO-U MA] 2 2 1 TS ]022 RO RX . c 110 D

SRO-l NOR 0111 I/C 442 SRO-U MA] 2 2 1 LI TS ?0 22 RO RX 110 NOR liii oi ic 442 SRO-U MA] 22 1 LI TS 022 RO R)( 110 NOR 111 LI I/c 442 SRO-U MA] 2 2 1 LI TS 022 Instructions:

1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions, Instant SROs (SRO-l) must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (lIC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an SRO-l additionally serves in the SOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.
2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but

(*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional must be significant pet Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

instrument or component malfunctions on a one-for-one basis,

3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.
4. For licensees that use the ATC operator primarily for monitoring plant parameters, the chief examiner may place SRO-l applicants in either the ATC or SOP position to best evaluate the SRO-l in manipulating plant controls.

ES-301, Page 26 of 27

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES3O1-5 Facility: VS i t ç Date of Exam: G - 1( Operating Test No.:

A E Scenarios 2 3 4 T M L N CREW CREWPOSITION CREWPOSITION CREWPOSITION I POSmON T C B A S A B S A B S A B S A M A

R 1 0 R T 0 R T 0 R i L u 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P M(*)

P E R IU RO RX I 710 NOR oi Fi I/C 442 U 2_____

SRO-U 2... 2 MA] C 9 2 1 LI TS RO RX I j11O LI SRO-I NOR 0111 I/C 3442 LI SRO-U MAJ (9 2 2 2 1 LI TS I 022 LI L I/C 2 4 4 2 SRO-U MA] ( j ..

2 2 1 LI TS 022 RO RX 110 n -

NOR iii go-i LI SRO-U I/C 442 MA] 2 2 1 LI TS 022 Instructions:

1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for R0 applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions, Instant SROs fSRO-l) must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (IIC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an SRO-I additionally serves in the BOP position, one IC malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.
2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or contmlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a one-for-one basis.
3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide Insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.
4. For licensees that use the ATC operator primarily for monitoring plant parameters, the chief examiner may place SRO-l applicants in either the ATC or BOP position to best evaluate the SRO-l in manipulating plant controls.

ES-301, Page 26 of 27

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: V T 2...- Date of Exam: C - i IC Operating Test No.: I A E Scenarios 2 3 4 T M L N CREW CREWPOSITION CREWPOSITION CREWPOSITION I I T POSmON T C A S A B S A B S A B S A B M A T L R T 0 R T 0 R 1 0 R i 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P MC)

-r E R IU RO RX 1 110 NOR I/C -1 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 9 2. 2 2 1 IS 022 RO RX 1iO D

SRO-I NOR 0111 D

SRO-U MA] (,Cj

)442 2..

2 2 1 D i-RO p.x 110 o NOR Liii D

SRO-U

/C 442 MA] 2 2 1 D

NOR 111 oi D

SRO-U I/C 442 MA] 2 2 1 TS 022 Instructions: -

1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions. Instant SROs (SRO-l) must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an SRO-l additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.
2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. () Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a one-for-one basis.
3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included: only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.
4. For licensees that use the ATC operator primarily for monitoring plant parameters, the chief examiner may place SEQ-I applicants in either the ATC or BOP position to best evaluate the SEQ-I in manipulating plant controls.

ES-301, Page 26 of 27

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: V CS ti rL Date of Examination: I 2. - / Operating Test No.: Ci APPLICANTS RD El RD El RD El RD El SRD-I El SRD-l El SRO-l El SRDI El SRO-U El SRO-U El SRD-U El SRD-U El PS ATc -________

Competen des SCENAPJO_ SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARI Interpret/Diagnose Events and Conditions 3 Comply With and UseProcedures(1)

J . . [t 2,t, Z( 2) %1 Operate Control Boards(2) 9 I 13 I

i;i;ii

. 23 Communicate q -

i andinteract I-l i. t3 Demonstrate I I.

SupewisoryAbility(3) bN9I II Comply With and 3 3I 9 Use Tech. Specs. (3) = = = = = = = = =

Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RD.

(2) Optional for an SRD-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Check the applicants license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examineis to evaluate eveiy applicable competency for evety applicant. (This includes all rating factors breach competency.) (Competency Rating factors as described on forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.)

ES-301, Page 27 of 27

ES-301 Competences Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: V( 5 - Date of Examination: (, /2. )(, Operating Test No.:

APPLICANTS RO El RO El RO El RO El SRO-l El SRO-I El SRO-I LI SRO-l El SRO-U El SRO-U El SRO-U El SROU El (r? ATL Competencies SCENO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 53 4$ 3 4$6 341 234

. ., , 4-i 4 Cf ) L lnterpretlDiagnose I

-1 Events and Conditions 8-Comply With and l,) I1 UseProceduresfi) 1I 7_

Operate Control Boards (2) 5j 3 -

f, Communicate It I -f and Interact I,.3 IL Demonstrate

. . . ç-1c Supervisory Ability (3)

Corn ply With and Use Tech, Specs. (3) =

= = =

Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Check the applicants license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate eveiy applicable coinpetency for evety applicant. (This includes all rating factors foreach competency.) (Competency Rating factors as described on forms ES-303-i and ES-303-3.)

ES-301 Page 27 of 27

Final Written Sample Plan is a combination of Draft Approved Sample Plan and ES-401-4.

m C,,

C z

m CD CD C,

C 1

z a.

C (a CD CD CD C,

C; CD 0

a.

(ii 1

C 3

m C,,

C 2

ES-401N Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401N-6 Facility: VCS U )J 1 Date of Exam: 2 / t Exam Level: RD SRO

. Initial Item Description b c*#

1. Questions and answers are technically accurate and applicable totl,etality.
2. a. NRC K/As are referenced for all questions.
b. Facility learning objectives are referenced as available. ,C.] 4 [k.
3. 3RD questions are appropriate in accordance ath Section D.2.d of ES-401

,() Att 4 The sampling process was random and systematic (If more than four RD or two 3RD questions were repeated from the last two NRC licensing exams, consult the NRR/NRO DL program_office). C

5. Question duplication from the licensee screeningfaudit exam was controlled as indicated below (Check the item that applies) and appears appropriate

.. The audit exam was systematically and randomly developed: or the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or the examinations were developed independently; or

. the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or other (explain)

6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent from the Bank Modified New bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest new or 7.

sibuion(s)rtght RD / SRO-only question Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on the RD

/20 1 Memory

/

C/A c 9 I 72. x cD Atk exam are written at the comprehension? analysis level; the 3RD exam may exceed 60 percent if the randomly selected K/As support the higher cognitive levels; enter the actual RD / SRO question distribution(s) at right.

9 ..j / 55 / 7 Q) A

,O P1

8. References/handouts provided do not give away answers or aid in the elimination of fl,) )

distractors. ?Sk_J 4t

9. Question content conforms to specific K/A statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the tier to which they are assigned; deviations are justified. 1 tg -4V1Ø
10. Question psychometric quality and format meet the guidelines in ES Appendix B.

C)

11. The exam contains the required number of one.point, multiple choice items; the total is correct and agrees with the value on the cover sheet.

Q, I I 1tt,j C,.J Printed Name / Signature Date a Author cc C Ic /c4 q

b. Facility Reviewer (*) II36 C. i-IAt s / %1( C
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) 4A& IL rzrs/ iZZd
d. NRC Regional Supervisor L5L,$3.. M, kick.

) icJ,j.2 9 1P Note:

  • The facility reviewers initials or signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.
  1. Independent NRC reviewer initials items in Initial column c; chief examiner concurrence required.

ES-401 N, Page 47 of 51

Q 1. 2. 3. Psychomeric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 8. Explanation LOK LOD Stem Cues T/ Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back Q- SRO B, M, U, E, (F/H) (1-5) Focus F Dist Link Units ward K/A Only N S 1 H 2 M S CASK6.03 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

2 F 2 B S CNSG2.2.17 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

Q31 on May 2015 exam.

3 H 2 N S CVSA4.11 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

4 F 2 N S DASK4.01 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

5 H 2 B S ECSK6.09 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

6 H 2 B S IDSA3.01 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

7 H 2 M S IDSK1.03 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

8 F 2 M S MSSA3.05 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

Q41 on May 2015 exam.

9 F 2 M S PCSK4.03 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

1

Q 1. 2. 3. Psychomeric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 8. Explanation LOK LOD Stem Cues T/ Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back Q- SRO B, M, U, E, (F/H) (1-5) Focus F Dist Link Units ward K/A Only N S 10 F 2 B S PXSA4.03 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

11 H 2 B S RCPK3.01 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

12 H 2 B S RCSA3.03 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

13 H 2 B S RCSG2.4.7 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

14 H 2 B S ZOSK1.04 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

Q60 on May 2015 exam.

15 H 2 M S CDSA4.04 No material changes from what was agreed upon during development.

16 F 2 N S FPSK6.08 No material changes from what was agreed upon during development.

17 H 2 B S SFSK5.03 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

18 F 2 N S WLSK1.07 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

19 F 2 N S G2.1.18 2

Q 1. 2. 3. Psychomeric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 8. Explanation LOK LOD Stem Cues T/ Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back Q- SRO B, M, U, E, (F/H) (1-5) Focus F Dist Link Units ward K/A Only N S No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

20 F 2 N S G2.1.33 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

21 F 2 N S G2.3.4 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

22 H 2 B S G2.3.5 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

23 F 2 B S G2.3.6 Note: RO LOK was evaluated and determined to be sat. ROs must know under what plant conditions an SRO can give permission to enter a LHRA and under what plant conditions require HP approval to enter a LHRA. Determined to be information related to RO duties by both CE and licensee.

No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

24 H 2 B S A-313AA2.05 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

25 H 2 N S E-0EK3.10 No material changes from what was agreed upon during development.

26 H 2 N S ES-0.2EA1.07 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

27 H 2 N S ES-1.1EA2.03 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

28 H 2 N S ES-1.4EA2.04 3

Q 1. 2. 3. Psychomeric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 8. Explanation LOK LOD Stem Cues T/ Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back Q- SRO B, M, U, E, (F/H) (1-5) Focus F Dist Link Units ward K/A Only N S No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

29 F 2 N S FR-C.1G2.4.6 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

30 H 2 M S A-302AA2.01 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

31 H 2 N S A-306G2.4.4 Only minor changes made in rad level.

32 F 2 N S A-314AK3.03 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

33 F 2 N S A-318AA1.03 All previous comments incorporated.

34 F 2 N S ES-1.2EA1.09 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

35 F 2 N S CCSK5.01 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

36 F 2 N S CNSK4.05 Changes made to replace second half from question constructed during development.

37 H 2 M S ECSK5.04 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

38 H 2 N S PPCSA1.14 4

Q 1. 2. 3. Psychomeric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 8. Explanation LOK LOD Stem Cues T/ Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back Q- SRO B, M, U, E, (F/H) (1-5) Focus F Dist Link Units ward K/A Only N S No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

39 H 2 M S PRHRK2.01 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

40 H 2 N S RNSA2.10 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

41 H 2 N S RTSK3.12 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

42 F 2 N S SGSK2.04 First half modified.

43 H 2 N S SGSK5.02 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

44 F 2 N S SWSK1.01 First half modified.

45 F 2 N S ZOSA1.01 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

46 F 2 N S FHSG2.1.27 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

47 F 2 N S VLSA2.02 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

48 F 2 N S IISK3.02 Stem condition changed first half answer.

5

Q 1. 2. 3. Psychomeric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 8. Explanation LOK LOD Stem Cues T/ Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back Q- SRO B, M, U, E, (F/H) (1-5) Focus F Dist Link Units ward K/A Only N S 49 F 2 N S PLCSK4.07 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

50 F 2 B S RMSA3.01 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

51 H 2 M S G2.1.40 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

52 H 2 N S G2.2.15 No material changes.

53 H 2 B S G2.2.30 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

54 F 2 N S G2.4.23 Expected changes made.

55 H 2 N S G2.4.37 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

56 F 2 N S VFSA1.07 H

Q should be H not F.

57 H 2 N S ESASA2.33 Q analysis updated.

58 H 2 N S FWSK6.11 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

59 F 2 N S SDP-5EK2.02 6

Q 1. 2. 3. Psychomeric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 8. Explanation LOK LOD Stem Cues T/ Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back Q- SRO B, M, U, E, (F/H) (1-5) Focus F Dist Link Units ward K/A Only N S No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

60 H 2 N S SDP-6EK2.01 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

61 H 2 N S ADS-G2.4.2 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

62 H 2 N S A-307AK1.03 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

63 H 2 N S A-317AK2.02 No material changes from what was agreed upon during development.

64 H 2 N S A-323AK2.02 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

65 H 2 N S A-329AK1.04 No material changes from what was agreed upon during development.

66 F 2 N S A-336AK3.03 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

67 H 2 N S A-337AA1.02 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

68 F 2 N S A-345G2.4.4 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

69 H 2 N S E-3G2.4.24 7

Q 1. 2. 3. Psychomeric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 8. Explanation LOK LOD Stem Cues T/ Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back Q- SRO B, M, U, E, (F/H) (1-5) Focus F Dist Link Units ward K/A Only N S No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

70 H 2 B S ECA-1.1EA1.03 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

71 H 2 N S FR-H.1EK2.05 No material changes from what was agreed upon during development.

72 F 2 N S SDP-1EK3.17 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

73 F 2 N S SDP-2EK1.17 No material changes from what was agreed upon during development.

74 F 2 N S FH-H.2G2.1.19 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

75 H 2 N S FR-I.1EK1.01 No material changes from what was agreed upon during development.

SRO EXAM 1 H 2 N S E-0EA2.03 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

2 F 2 B S ES-1.2G2.1.18 No material changes from what was agreed upon during development.

8

Q 1. 2. 3. Psychomeric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 8. Explanation LOK LOD Stem Cues T/ Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back Q- SRO B, M, U, E, (F/H) (1-5) Focus F Dist Link Units ward K/A Only N S 3 H 2 M S FR-C.3G2.4.14 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

4 H 2 M S MSSA2.07 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

5 H 2 B S RCSA2.30 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

Note: 2015 NRC exam Q8.

6 F 2 N S G2.2.11 No material changes from what was agreed upon during development.

7 H 2 B S G2.2.2 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

8 F 2 B S G2.3.2 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

9 H 2 B S G2.4.24 No material changes from what was agreed upon during development.

10 H 2 N S A337AA2.01 Second half of Q modified.

11 F 2 N S FR-S.1G2.4.7 No material changes from what was agreed upon during development.

12 H 2 N S SDP-1G2.4.36 9

Q 1. 2. 3. Psychomeric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 8. Explanation LOK LOD Stem Cues T/ Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back Q- SRO B, M, U, E, (F/H) (1-5) Focus F Dist Link Units ward K/A Only N S No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

13 H 2 N S RNSG2.4.39 No material changes from what was agreed upon during development.

14 F 2 N S DRCSA2.08 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

15 H 2 N S IISG2.4.7 Expected changes made.

16 H 2 N S SFSG2.1.28 Expected changes made.

17 H 2 N S G2.3.9 Half of Q replaced.

18 H 2 N S G2.1.2 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

19 H 2 N S ES-0.1G2.1.27 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

20 H 2 N S SDP-2EA2.05 No material changes from what was agreed upon during development.

21 F 2 N S A-328AA2.05 No material changes from what was agreed upon during development.

22 H 2 N S CASG2.2.17 10

Q 1. 2. 3. Psychomeric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 8. Explanation LOK LOD Stem Cues T/ Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back Q- SRO B, M, U, E, (F/H) (1-5) Focus F Dist Link Units ward K/A Only N S Expected changes made.

23 H 2 N S PCSG2.1.14 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

24 H 2 N S A-306AA2.03 Expected changes made.

25 F 2 N S G2.4.25 No changes from what was agreed upon during development.

11

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: V.C. Summer Date of Exam: 9/29/1 6 Exam Level: RO SRO X Item Description Initials a b c

1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading N/A
2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented N/A
3. Applicants scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations) N/A
4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail N/A
5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified N/A
6. Perlormance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of , N/A questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature Date
a. Grader Michael G. Donithan
b. Facility Reviewer(*) N/A
c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) Mark A. Bates /2%I 1 M/1//
d. NRC Supervisor (*) Eugene F. Guthrie 41/ i-/I (,

(*) The facility reviewers signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

7-FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Paul A. Mothena Manager, Nuclear Training 803.345.4642 SCE&a ASCANA COMPANY J u e 09 2016 Mr. Eugene F. Guthrie, Chief Operations Branch 2 Division of Reactor Safety U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II 245 Peachtree Center Ave. N.E., Suite 1200 Atlanta, GA 30303-1 257

Dear Mr. Guthrie:

Subject:

VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION UNIT 2 DOCKET NO.52-027 OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-93 REACTOR AND SENIOR REACTOR OPERATOR WRITTEN EXAMINATION AND SUPPORTING REFERENCE MATERIAL Based on the guidelines in NUREG-1 021, Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors, Revision 10, in particular ES-301, Preparing Initial Operating Tests, South Carolina Electric & Gas Company is providing the following information for your consideration:

  • Enclosure I ES-201-2, Examination Outline Quality Checklist
  • Enclosure 2 ES-201-3, Examination Security Agreement
  • Enclosure 3 ES-401-4, Record of Rejected K/As
  • Enclosure 4 ES-401 N-5, Sample Written Examination Question Worksheet
  • Enclosure 5 ES-401 N-6, Written Examination Quality Checklist
  • Enclosure 6 Written Exam Hard Copy with Supporting Documentation
  • Enclosure 7 Written Exam Electronic Files on DVD-ROM
  • Enclosure 8 Supporting Reference Documentation Files on DVD-ROM The enclosed examination materials have been independently reviewed by Mr. Albert C. Harris, NND Nuclear Operations Manager. In accordance with NUREG-1 021, this material must be withheld from public disclosure until the examinations are complete.

Should there be any questions, please contact Mr. Scott C. Dimeler at (803) 931-5409.

V truly yours, Paul A. Mothena KB/PAM/ts Enclosures C: (Without Enclosures unless noted)

G. J. McCoy RTS (CR-NND-16-00973)

M. A. Bates File (814.04, RR 1050)

S. C. Dimeler PRSF (RC-16-0090)

NRC Resident Inspector DCRM V. C. Summer Nuclear Station R 0. Box 88 ienkinsville, SC.29065. F (803) 941-9776

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Paul A. Mothena Manager, Nuclear Training E SCE&6 A SCANA COMPANY 803.345.4642 July 22, 2016 N ND-i 6-0285 Mr. Eugene F. Guthrie, Chief Operations Branch 2 Division of Reactor Safety U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II 245 Peachtree Center Ave. N.E., Suite 1200 Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

Subject:

VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION UNIT 2 DOCKET NO.52-027 OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-93 REACTOR AND SENIOR REACTOR OPERATIONAL EXAMINATION AND SUPPORTING REFERENCE MATERIAL

Dear Mr. Guthrie,

Based on the guidelines in NUREG-1 021, Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors, Revision 10, in particular ES-301, Preparing Initial Operating Tests, South Carolina Electric & Gas Company is providing the following information for your consideration:

  • Enclosure I ES-201-2, Examination Outline Quality Checklist
  • Enclosure 2 ES-201-3, Examination Security Agreement
  • Enclosure 3 ES-301-1, Administrative Topics Outline
  • Enclosure 4 ES-301-2, Control Room/In-Plant Systems Outline
  • Enclosure 5 ES-301-3, Operating Test Quality Checklist
  • Enclosure 6 ES-301-4, Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist
  • Enclosure 8 ES-301-6, Competencies Checklist
  • Enclosure 9 ES-D-1, Scenario Outline
  • Operational Exam Electronic Files (including ES-D-2) on DVD-ROM
  • Supporting Reference Documentation Files on DVD-ROM The enclosed examination materials have been independently reviewed by Mr. Albert C. Harris, NND Nuclear Operations Manager. In accordance with NUREG-1 021, this material must be withheld from public disclosure until the examinations are complete.

V. C. Summer Nuclear Station . P.O. Box 88. Jenkinsville, Sc. 29065. F (803) 941-9776

N ND-i 6-0285 Page 2 of 2 Should there be any questions, please contact Mr. Scott C. Dimeler at (803) 931-5409.

Very truly yours, LA Paul A. Mothena Manager, Nuclear Training KB/PAM/ts Enclosures c: (Without Enclosures unless noted)

G. J. McCoy M. A. Bates S. C. Dimeler NRC Resident Inspector DCRM CR-N ND-i 6-00973

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Paul A. Mothena Manager, Nuclear Training 803.345.4642 SCE&1 A SCANA COMPANY October 06, 2016 NND-1 6-0429 Mr. Eugene F. Guthrie, Chief Operations Branch 2 Division of Reactor Safety U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II 245 Peachtree Center Ave. N.E., Suite 1200 Atlanta, GA 30303-1 257

Subject:

Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station Unit 2 Docket No.52-027 Operating License No. NPF-93 Post Exam Submittal

Dear Mr. Guthrie,

The V. C. Summer Nuclear Station (VCSNS) Initial Operator License Examination was administered during the weeks of September 12, 2016 and September 19, 2016. The VCSNS Initial License Written Examination was administered on September 29, 2016. VCSNS is enclosing the following as requited by Revision 10, of NUREG 1021, Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors:

1. Graded written examinations;
2. Master examinations and answer keys;
3. Questions asked by and answers given to the applicants during the written examination;
4. Written examination seating chart;
5. Written examination performance analysis; and
6. Original Forms ES-201-3, Examination Security Agreement.

Should there be any questions, please contact Mr. Scott C. Dimeler at (803) 931-5409.

Respectfull Paul A. Mothena Manager, Nuclear Training KB/PAM/ts Enclosures c: (Without Enclosures unless noted)

C. Haney NRC Resident Inspector M. A. Bates DCRM S. C. Dimeler CR-NND-16-00973 V. C. Summer Nuclear Station. P.O. Box 88. ienkinsville, Sc. 29065. F (803) 941-9776

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML17298C012&oldid=2429508"